Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Related to Fees for Use of BATS Exchange, Inc., 29139-29142 [2015-12147]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Notices
with respect to the meaning,
administration, or enforcement of an
existing rule.
(B) Clearing Agency’s Statement on
Burden on Competition
The proposed rule change will not
have any impact, or impose any burden,
on competition.
(C) Clearing Agency’s Statement on
Comments on the Proposed Rule
Change Received From Members,
Participants, or Others
Written comments relating to the
proposed rule change have not yet been
solicited or received. NSCC will notify
the Commission of any written
comments received by NSCC.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change, and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 9 of the Act and paragraph (f)
of Rule 19b–4 10 thereunder. At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NSCC–2015–002 on the subject line.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NSCC–2015–002. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of NSCC and on DTCC’s Web site
(https://dtcc.com/legal/sec-rulefilings.aspx). All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–NSCC–
2015–002 and should be submitted on
or before June 10, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–12145 Filed 5–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74968; File No. SR–BATS–
2015–38]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:50 May 19, 2015
The Exchange filed a proposal to
amend the fee schedule applicable to
Members 5 and non-members of the
Exchange pursuant to BATS Rules
15.1(a) and (c). Changes to the fee
schedule pursuant to this proposal are
effective upon filing.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at the Exchange’s Web site
at www.batstrading.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
May 14, 2015.
1. Purpose
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 6,
2015, BATS Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BATS’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
The Exchange proposes to modify the
‘‘Options Pricing’’ section of its fee
schedule, effective immediately, in
order to modify pricing charged by the
Exchange’s options platform (‘‘BATS
Options’’) including: (i) add a new
standard rate and a fee code NM
1 15
Jkt 235001
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
10 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f).
prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange has designated the proposed
rule change as one establishing or
changing a member due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange under
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 3 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,4 which
renders the proposed rule change
effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change Related to Fees for Use
of BATS Exchange, Inc.
11 17
9 15
29139
PO 00000
Frm 00211
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
5 The term ‘‘Member’’ is defined as ‘‘any
registered broker or dealer that has been admitted
to membership in the Exchange.’’ See Exchange
Rule 1.5(n).
4 17
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
20MYN1
29140
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Notices
associated with Market Maker 6 orders
that add liquidity in non-Penny Pilot
Securities; 7 (ii) add a new footnote 7
entitled ‘‘Market Maker Non-Penny Pilot
Add Volume Tiers’’; (iii) simplifying the
Exchange’s physical connection fees;
(iv) certain corresponding changes
associated with the new rebates
associated with Market Maker orders in
non-Penny Pilot Securities; and (v) a
non-substantive, clarifying change in
footnote 5.
Standard Rate in Market Maker Orders
in Non-Penny Pilot Securities
Currently, the Exchange offers a
rebate of $0.65 per contract for Market
Maker orders that add liquidity in nonPenny Pilot Securities. The Exchange is
proposing to create a new fee code NM
and to change the standard rate for
Market Maker orders that add liquidity
in non-Penny Pilot Securities to a rebate
of $0.42 per contract. Such orders will
be eligible for the enhanced rebates
available under the NBBO Setter Tiers,
the Quoting Incentive Program Tiers,
and the new Market Maker Non-Penny
Pilot Add Volume Tiers proposed
below. The Exchange is not proposing to
change pricing for Professional 8 or
Firm 9 orders or for any Market Maker
orders that do not add liquidity nonPenny Pilot Securities.
Market Maker Non-Penny Pilot Add
Volume Tiers
As described above, the Exchange
currently provides a rebate of $0.65 per
contract for Market Maker orders that
add liquidity in non-Penny Pilot
Securities, which it proposes to change
to $0.42 per contract. The Exchange is
also proposing to add new footnote 7 to
its fee schedule entitled ‘‘Market Maker
Non-Penny Pilot Add Volume Tiers’’ in
order to offer enhanced rebates for
Market Maker orders in non-Penny Pilot
Securities to Members that meet certain
thresholds. Specifically, the Exchange is
proposing to: (i) Provide a rebate of
$0.45 per contract where the Member
has an ADV 10 equal to or greater than
0.30% of average TCV; 11 and (ii)
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
6 ‘‘Market
Maker’’ applies to any transaction
identified by a Member for clearing in the Market
Maker range at the OCC.
7 ‘‘Penny Pilot Securities’’ are those issues quoted
pursuant to Exchange Rule 21.5, Interpretation and
Policy .01.
8 ‘‘Professional’’ applies to any transaction
identified by a Member as such pursuant to
Exchange Rule 16.1.
9 ‘‘Firm’’ applies to any transaction identified by
a Member for clearing in the Firm range at the OCC.
10 ‘‘ADV’’ means average daily volume calculated
as the number of contracts added or removed,
combined, per day.
11 ‘‘TCV’’ means total consolidated volume
calculated as the volume reported by all exchanges
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:50 May 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
provide a rebate of $0.52 where the
Member has an ADV equal to or greater
than 1.00% of average TCV. Where a
Member does not meet either of these
thresholds, they would receive the
standard rebate of $0.42 per contract, as
proposed above.
Physical Connection Fees
The Exchange currently maintains a
presence in two third-party data centers:
(i) The primary data center where the
Exchange’s business is primarily
conducted on a daily basis, and (ii) a
secondary data center, which is
predominantly maintained for business
continuity purposes. The Exchange
currently assesses fees to Members and
non-Members of $1,000 for any 1G
physical port connection at either data
center and of $2,500 for any 10G
physical port connection at either data
center. The Exchange also provides
market participants with the ability to
access the Exchange’s network through
another data center entry point, or Point
of Presence (‘‘PoP’’), at a data center
other than the Exchange’s primary or
secondary data center.12 The Exchange
currently charges $2,000 for any 1G
physical port to connect to the Exchange
in any data center where the Exchange
maintains a PoP other than the
Exchange’s primary or secondary data
center and $5,000 per month for each
single physical 10G port provided by
the Exchange to any Member or nonmember in any data center where the
Exchange maintains a PoP other than
the Exchange’s primary or secondary
data center.
The Exchange proposes to simplify its
pricing structure by imposing a uniform
rate for physical ports regardless of the
data center in which the port
connection is made. Specifically, the
Exchange proposes to charge $1,000 per
month for all 1G physical port
connections and $2,500 per month for
all 10G physical ports in any location
where the Exchange offers the ability to
connect to Exchange systems, including
the secondary data center and any PoP
location.
Corresponding Changes
In conjunction with the changes
proposed above, the Exchange is
proposing to make certain
corresponding changes, including: (i)
to the consolidated transaction reporting plan for
the month for which the fees apply, excluding
volume on any day that the Exchange experiences
an Exchange System Disruption and on any day
with a scheduled early market close.
12 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70199
(August 14, 2013), 78 FR 51250 (August 20, 2013)
(SR–BATS–2013–036) (Order Approving a
Proposed Rule Change to Introduce a Connectivity
Option Through Points of Presence).
PO 00000
Frm 00212
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Add fee code NM references in
footnotes 4 and 5; (ii) removing the
reference to ‘‘MM’’ (short for Market
Maker) from the description in fee code
NA; and (iii) remove the words ‘‘Market
Maker Add Volume’’ from both Market
Maker Add Volume Tier 1 and Tier 2 in
footnote 6.
Clarifying Change
The Exchange is proposing to add
references to the fee codes PA and PF
in footnote 5. While the Fee Codes and
Associated Fees table indicates that
footnote 5 applies to both fee codes PA
and PF, the fee codes are not included
in the footnote itself as fee codes to
which the footnote is applicable.
Effectiveness Date
As noted above, the Exchange
proposes to implement the amendments
to its fee schedule effective
immediately.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder that
are applicable to a national securities
exchange, and, in particular, with the
requirements of Section 6 of the Act.13
Specifically, the Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,14 in that
it provides for the equitable allocation
of reasonable dues, fees and other
charges among members and other
persons using any facility or system
which the Exchange operates or
controls. The Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee levels to be
excessive.
The Exchange believes the proposed
reduction of the standard rebate for
Market Maker orders in non-Penny Pilot
Securities that add liquidity is a
reasonable, fair and equitable allocation
of fees and rebates because it will
provide Members with a greater
incentive to increase their participation
on BATS Options in order to receive a
higher rebate by meeting any of the
enhanced rebate tiers for which the
orders are eligible, including the NBBO
Setter Tiers, the Quoting Incentive
Program Tiers, and the Market Maker
Non-Penny Pilot Add Volume Tiers
proposed herein. Finally, while
adjusting the standard rebate of $0.65
per contract to remove liquidity to $0.42
per share will obviously result in a
13 15
14 15
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f.
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
20MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
reduction in rebates paid per contract to
Members, the Exchange believes that
any potential negative impact of this
change will be outweighed by the
Exchange’s ability to apply the cost
savings to other areas of the business,
including enhanced rebates, reduced
fees, and improved technology on the
BATS Options. The Exchange also
believes that the proposed fee change is
non-discriminatory because it would
apply uniformly to all Members [sic].
Volume-based rebates and fees such
as the ones currently maintained on
BATS Options have been widely
adopted by equities and options
exchanges and are equitable because
they are open to all Members on an
equal basis and provide additional
benefits or discounts that are reasonably
related to the value to an exchange’s
market quality associated with higher
levels of market activity, such as higher
levels of liquidity provision and/or
growth patterns, and introduction of
higher volumes of orders into the price
and volume discovery processes. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
addition of Market Maker Non-Penny
Pilot Add Volume Tiers is a reasonable,
fair and equitable allocation of fees and
rebates because it will provide Members
with a greater incentive to increase their
participation on BATS Options in order
to receive a higher rebate, which will
result in enhanced market quality for all
Members.
The Exchange reiterates that it
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee levels to be
excessive.
Physical Connection Fees
The Exchange believes that providing
uniform rates for all 1G and 10G
physical connections to Exchange is
reasonable because such change
represents a reduction in fees for any
Member that connects to the Exchange
at a PoP location and no change to fees
for any Member located in the
Exchange’s primary or secondary data
center. The Exchange also believes that
the proposal is equitably allocated and
not unreasonably discriminatory
because, as proposed, market
participants will be able to access the
Exchange at uniform rates regardless of
whether such access is at the Exchange’s
primary or secondary data center
location or another location where the
Exchange offers access.
Corresponding and Clarifying Changes
Finally, the Exchange believes that
the corresponding and clarifying
changes discussed above are non-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:50 May 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
substantive and would contribute to the
protection of investors and the public
interest by helping to avoid confusion
with respect the Exchange fee schedule.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. With respect
to the proposed new rebates for Market
Maker orders that add liquidity in nonPenny Pilot Securities, particularly the
enhanced rebates available under the
Market Maker Non-Penny Pilot Add
Volume Tiers, the Exchange does not
believe that any such changes burden
competition, but instead, that they
enhance competition, as they are
intended to increase the
competitiveness of BATS Options. As
stated above, the Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if the deem fee structures to be
unreasonable or excessive.
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed change to physical port
fees represents a significant departure
from previous pricing offered by the
Exchange or pricing offered by the
Exchange’s competitors. Rather, as
described above, the Exchange is simply
normalizing its fees for physical access
to the Exchange regardless of the
location where a physical connection is
made. The offering is consistent with
the Exchange’s own economic
incentives to facilitate as many market
participants as possible in connecting to
its market. Accordingly, the Exchange
does not believe that the proposed
change will impair the ability of
Members or competing venues to
maintain their competitive standing in
the financial markets.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any written
comments from members or other
interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 15 and paragraph (f)(2) of Rule
15 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
Frm 00213
Fmt 4703
19b–4 thereunder.16 At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
BATS–2015–38 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BATS–2015–38. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
16 17
Sfmt 4703
29141
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
20MYN1
29142
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 97 / Wednesday, May 20, 2015 / Notices
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–BATS–
2015–38 and should be submitted on or
before June 10, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–12147 Filed 5–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74960; File No. SR–CBOE–
2015–029]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Order Granting Approval
of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Stock-Option Order Handling
May 14, 2015.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Introduction
On March 16, 2015, Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Incorporated
(‘‘CBOE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’ or
‘‘Exchange Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
amend its rules regarding the handling
and processing of stock-option orders on
the Exchange. The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the
Federal Register on April 1, 2015.3 The
Commission received no comments on
the proposal. This order grants approval
of the proposed rule change.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
rules regarding the handling and
processing of stock-option orders
represented in open outcry on the floor
of the Exchange. As described in more
detail below, the Exchange proposes to
amend CBOE Rule 6.48 to allow Trading
Permit Holders (‘‘TPHs’’) or PAR
Officials 4 to electronically route the
stock component of a stock-option order
represented in open outcry on the floor
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74590
(March 26, 2015), 80 FR 17528 (‘‘Notice’’).
4 See Notice, supra note 3 at 17529, defining
‘‘PAR Officials.’’
of the CBOE directly from a Public
Automated Routing (‘‘PAR’’)
workstation 5 to an Exchange-designated
broker-dealer for electronic execution
on a stock venue. In addition, the
Exchange proposes to amend
Interpretation .06 to Rule 6.53C to
require that the Clearing Trading Permit
Holder (‘‘CTPH’’) 6 identified as the
Designated Give Up by the executing
TPH in accordance with CBOE Rule
6.21 on a stock-option order enter into
a brokerage agreement with the nonaffiliated Exchange-designated brokerdealers before the TPH electronically
routes the stock component of the stockoption order to that Exchangedesignated broker-dealer for execution
on a stock venue.
Routing Stock Component of a StockOption Order via PAR. Currently, the
stock component of stock-option orders
handled and processed on the Exchange
in open outcry are manually transmitted
(e.g., via telephone) by the PAR user
(i.e., a floor broker or PAR Official) on
the floor to a broker on a stock trading
venue for execution. The Exchange
proposes to adopt subparagraph (d) to
Exchange Rule 6.48 (Contract Made on
Acceptance of Bid or Offer) to allow
TPHs or PAR Officials to electronically
route the stock component of such
stock-option orders to an Exchangedesignated broker-dealer not affiliated
with the Exchange for electronic
execution at a stock trading venue
directly from PAR.7 Proposed Rule
6.48(d) also provides that the stock
component of a stock-option order
represented in open outcry may be
routed to an Exchange-designated
broker-dealer not affiliated with the
Exchange for electronic execution at a
stock trading venue as single orders or
as paired orders (including with orders
transmitted from separate PAR
workstations), and that the stock-option
order must comply with the Qualified
Contingent Trade (‘‘QCT’’) Exemption of
Rule 611(a) of Regulation NMS.8
Finally, Rule 6.48(d) would require
TPHs who route the stock component of
a stock-option order represented in open
outcry through PAR to comply with
Rule 6.53C.06, which governs the
trading of complex orders, including
stock-option orders, on the CBOE
Hybrid System.9
The Exchange represents that for any
order whose stock component is routed
via PAR to an Exchange-designated
17 17
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:50 May 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
broker-dealer for execution at a stock
trading venue, the Exchange-designated
broker-dealer would be responsible for
the proper execution, trade reporting,
and submission to clearing of the stock
trade that is part of the stock-option
order.10 The Exchange also represents
that once the stock component of a
stock-option order is transmitted to the
Exchange-designated broker-dealer, the
Exchange-designated broker-dealers is
responsible for determining whether the
orders may be executed in accordance
with all of the rules applicable to the
execution of equity orders, including
compliance with applicable short sale,
trade-through, and reporting rules.11
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change will support more
efficient stock-option order execution,
streamline the steps required for openoutcry stock-option order trading, and
enhance the Exchange’s audit trail by
creating a more robust record of the
stock component of stock-option order
executions on the floor of the
Exchange.12 The Exchange also believes
that the proposed rule change will
promote liquidity on the national
market system by allowing TPHs to
more easily use stock-option orders and
more quickly send the stock component
of a stock-option order to a stock trading
venue.13
Brokerage Agreement between the
Clearing Trading Permit Holder and the
Exchange-designated Broker-Dealer.
Under current Interpretation and Policy
.06(a) to CBOE Rule 6.53C, the stock
component of a stock-option order
cannot be processed automatically
unless the executing TPH has entered
into a brokerage agreement with one or
more Exchange-designated brokerdealer(s) not affiliated with the
Exchange that can electronically execute
the equity order on a stock trading
venue.14 Under the proposed rule
change, Interpretation and Policy .06 to
CBOE Rule 6.53C would instead require
the CTPH that was previously identified
by the TPH as the ‘‘Designated Give Up’’
pursuant to CBOE Rule 6.21 to enter
into a brokerage agreement with the
non-affiliated Exchange-designated
broker-dealer(s) before the TPH
electronically routes the stock
component a of stock-option order to
the Exchange-designated broker-dealer
for execution at a stock-trading venue.15
The Exchange notes that it is the CTPH,
not the order entry TPH that guarantees
5 Id.,
10 See
6 Id.
11 Id.
defining ‘‘PAR workstations.’’
at footnote 5, discussing the obligations of
TPHs and CTPHs.
7 See Notice, supra note 3 at 17530.
8 Id.
9 See Proposed Rule 6.48(d).
PO 00000
Frm 00214
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice, supra note 3 at 17530.
12 Id.
13 See
14 Id.
Notice, supra note 3 at 17532.
at 17531.
15 Id.
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
20MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 97 (Wednesday, May 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29139-29142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12147]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-74968; File No. SR-BATS-2015-38]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Related to
Fees for Use of BATS Exchange, Inc.
May 14, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on May 6, 2015, BATS Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``BATS'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange has designated
the proposed rule change as one establishing or changing a member due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange under Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\
which renders the proposed rule change effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange filed a proposal to amend the fee schedule applicable
to Members \5\ and non-members of the Exchange pursuant to BATS Rules
15.1(a) and (c). Changes to the fee schedule pursuant to this proposal
are effective upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The term ``Member'' is defined as ``any registered broker or
dealer that has been admitted to membership in the Exchange.'' See
Exchange Rule 1.5(n).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
Web site at www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to modify the ``Options Pricing'' section of
its fee schedule, effective immediately, in order to modify pricing
charged by the Exchange's options platform (``BATS Options'')
including: (i) add a new standard rate and a fee code NM
[[Page 29140]]
associated with Market Maker \6\ orders that add liquidity in non-Penny
Pilot Securities; \7\ (ii) add a new footnote 7 entitled ``Market Maker
Non-Penny Pilot Add Volume Tiers''; (iii) simplifying the Exchange's
physical connection fees; (iv) certain corresponding changes associated
with the new rebates associated with Market Maker orders in non-Penny
Pilot Securities; and (v) a non-substantive, clarifying change in
footnote 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ ``Market Maker'' applies to any transaction identified by a
Member for clearing in the Market Maker range at the OCC.
\7\ ``Penny Pilot Securities'' are those issues quoted pursuant
to Exchange Rule 21.5, Interpretation and Policy .01.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard Rate in Market Maker Orders in Non-Penny Pilot Securities
Currently, the Exchange offers a rebate of $0.65 per contract for
Market Maker orders that add liquidity in non-Penny Pilot Securities.
The Exchange is proposing to create a new fee code NM and to change the
standard rate for Market Maker orders that add liquidity in non-Penny
Pilot Securities to a rebate of $0.42 per contract. Such orders will be
eligible for the enhanced rebates available under the NBBO Setter
Tiers, the Quoting Incentive Program Tiers, and the new Market Maker
Non-Penny Pilot Add Volume Tiers proposed below. The Exchange is not
proposing to change pricing for Professional \8\ or Firm \9\ orders or
for any Market Maker orders that do not add liquidity non-Penny Pilot
Securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ ``Professional'' applies to any transaction identified by a
Member as such pursuant to Exchange Rule 16.1.
\9\ ``Firm'' applies to any transaction identified by a Member
for clearing in the Firm range at the OCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Market Maker Non-Penny Pilot Add Volume Tiers
As described above, the Exchange currently provides a rebate of
$0.65 per contract for Market Maker orders that add liquidity in non-
Penny Pilot Securities, which it proposes to change to $0.42 per
contract. The Exchange is also proposing to add new footnote 7 to its
fee schedule entitled ``Market Maker Non-Penny Pilot Add Volume Tiers''
in order to offer enhanced rebates for Market Maker orders in non-Penny
Pilot Securities to Members that meet certain thresholds. Specifically,
the Exchange is proposing to: (i) Provide a rebate of $0.45 per
contract where the Member has an ADV \10\ equal to or greater than
0.30% of average TCV; \11\ and (ii) provide a rebate of $0.52 where the
Member has an ADV equal to or greater than 1.00% of average TCV. Where
a Member does not meet either of these thresholds, they would receive
the standard rebate of $0.42 per contract, as proposed above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ ``ADV'' means average daily volume calculated as the number
of contracts added or removed, combined, per day.
\11\ ``TCV'' means total consolidated volume calculated as the
volume reported by all exchanges to the consolidated transaction
reporting plan for the month for which the fees apply, excluding
volume on any day that the Exchange experiences an Exchange System
Disruption and on any day with a scheduled early market close.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Physical Connection Fees
The Exchange currently maintains a presence in two third-party data
centers: (i) The primary data center where the Exchange's business is
primarily conducted on a daily basis, and (ii) a secondary data center,
which is predominantly maintained for business continuity purposes. The
Exchange currently assesses fees to Members and non-Members of $1,000
for any 1G physical port connection at either data center and of $2,500
for any 10G physical port connection at either data center. The
Exchange also provides market participants with the ability to access
the Exchange's network through another data center entry point, or
Point of Presence (``PoP''), at a data center other than the Exchange's
primary or secondary data center.\12\ The Exchange currently charges
$2,000 for any 1G physical port to connect to the Exchange in any data
center where the Exchange maintains a PoP other than the Exchange's
primary or secondary data center and $5,000 per month for each single
physical 10G port provided by the Exchange to any Member or non-member
in any data center where the Exchange maintains a PoP other than the
Exchange's primary or secondary data center.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70199 (August 14,
2013), 78 FR 51250 (August 20, 2013) (SR-BATS-2013-036) (Order
Approving a Proposed Rule Change to Introduce a Connectivity Option
Through Points of Presence).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to simplify its pricing structure by imposing
a uniform rate for physical ports regardless of the data center in
which the port connection is made. Specifically, the Exchange proposes
to charge $1,000 per month for all 1G physical port connections and
$2,500 per month for all 10G physical ports in any location where the
Exchange offers the ability to connect to Exchange systems, including
the secondary data center and any PoP location.
Corresponding Changes
In conjunction with the changes proposed above, the Exchange is
proposing to make certain corresponding changes, including: (i) Add fee
code NM references in footnotes 4 and 5; (ii) removing the reference to
``MM'' (short for Market Maker) from the description in fee code NA;
and (iii) remove the words ``Market Maker Add Volume'' from both Market
Maker Add Volume Tier 1 and Tier 2 in footnote 6.
Clarifying Change
The Exchange is proposing to add references to the fee codes PA and
PF in footnote 5. While the Fee Codes and Associated Fees table
indicates that footnote 5 applies to both fee codes PA and PF, the fee
codes are not included in the footnote itself as fee codes to which the
footnote is applicable.
Effectiveness Date
As noted above, the Exchange proposes to implement the amendments
to its fee schedule effective immediately.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and,
in particular, with the requirements of Section 6 of the Act.\13\
Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\14\ in that it provides for
the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and other persons using any facility or system which the
Exchange operates or controls. The Exchange notes that it operates in a
highly competitive market in which market participants can readily
direct order flow to competing venues if they deem fee levels to be
excessive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed reduction of the standard rebate
for Market Maker orders in non-Penny Pilot Securities that add
liquidity is a reasonable, fair and equitable allocation of fees and
rebates because it will provide Members with a greater incentive to
increase their participation on BATS Options in order to receive a
higher rebate by meeting any of the enhanced rebate tiers for which the
orders are eligible, including the NBBO Setter Tiers, the Quoting
Incentive Program Tiers, and the Market Maker Non-Penny Pilot Add
Volume Tiers proposed herein. Finally, while adjusting the standard
rebate of $0.65 per contract to remove liquidity to $0.42 per share
will obviously result in a
[[Page 29141]]
reduction in rebates paid per contract to Members, the Exchange
believes that any potential negative impact of this change will be
outweighed by the Exchange's ability to apply the cost savings to other
areas of the business, including enhanced rebates, reduced fees, and
improved technology on the BATS Options. The Exchange also believes
that the proposed fee change is non-discriminatory because it would
apply uniformly to all Members [sic].
Volume-based rebates and fees such as the ones currently maintained
on BATS Options have been widely adopted by equities and options
exchanges and are equitable because they are open to all Members on an
equal basis and provide additional benefits or discounts that are
reasonably related to the value to an exchange's market quality
associated with higher levels of market activity, such as higher levels
of liquidity provision and/or growth patterns, and introduction of
higher volumes of orders into the price and volume discovery processes.
The Exchange believes that the proposed addition of Market Maker Non-
Penny Pilot Add Volume Tiers is a reasonable, fair and equitable
allocation of fees and rebates because it will provide Members with a
greater incentive to increase their participation on BATS Options in
order to receive a higher rebate, which will result in enhanced market
quality for all Members.
The Exchange reiterates that it operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels to be excessive.
Physical Connection Fees
The Exchange believes that providing uniform rates for all 1G and
10G physical connections to Exchange is reasonable because such change
represents a reduction in fees for any Member that connects to the
Exchange at a PoP location and no change to fees for any Member located
in the Exchange's primary or secondary data center. The Exchange also
believes that the proposal is equitably allocated and not unreasonably
discriminatory because, as proposed, market participants will be able
to access the Exchange at uniform rates regardless of whether such
access is at the Exchange's primary or secondary data center location
or another location where the Exchange offers access.
Corresponding and Clarifying Changes
Finally, the Exchange believes that the corresponding and
clarifying changes discussed above are non-substantive and would
contribute to the protection of investors and the public interest by
helping to avoid confusion with respect the Exchange fee schedule.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. With respect to the proposed
new rebates for Market Maker orders that add liquidity in non-Penny
Pilot Securities, particularly the enhanced rebates available under the
Market Maker Non-Penny Pilot Add Volume Tiers, the Exchange does not
believe that any such changes burden competition, but instead, that
they enhance competition, as they are intended to increase the
competitiveness of BATS Options. As stated above, the Exchange notes
that it operates in a highly competitive market in which market
participants can readily direct order flow to competing venues if the
deem fee structures to be unreasonable or excessive.
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed change to physical
port fees represents a significant departure from previous pricing
offered by the Exchange or pricing offered by the Exchange's
competitors. Rather, as described above, the Exchange is simply
normalizing its fees for physical access to the Exchange regardless of
the location where a physical connection is made. The offering is
consistent with the Exchange's own economic incentives to facilitate as
many market participants as possible in connecting to its market.
Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed change
will impair the ability of Members or competing venues to maintain
their competitive standing in the financial markets.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any written comments from members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \15\ and paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\16\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If
the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute
proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved
or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BATS-2015-38 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BATS-2015-38. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing will also be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change;
[[Page 29142]]
the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
BATS-2015-38 and should be submitted on or before June 10, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-12147 Filed 5-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P