Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Establish Rules Governing the Trading of Options on the EDGX Options Exchange, 28745-28757 [2015-12022]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 19, 2015 / Notices
rate from $0.0030 per share to $0.0029
per share will also assist in increasing
competition in that its proposed rebate
is lower than the standard fees for
removing liquidity offered by Nasdaq
(removal rate of $0.0030 per share) and
NYSE Arca (removal rate of $0.0030 per
share for Tape A and Tape C
securities).21
The Exchange believes that its
internalization rates for securities priced
$1.00 and above will also not burden
intermarket or intramarket competition
as the proposed rates are no more
favorable than Members achieving the
maker/taker spreads between the
standard add and remove rates on the
Exchange.
Non-Substantive Changes
The Exchange believes that the
proposed non-substantive clarifying
changes to the Fee Schedule will not
affect intermarket nor intramarket
competition because these changes are
not designed to amend any fee or alter
the manner in which the Exchange
assesses fees or calculates rebates.
(C) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any
unsolicited written comments from
Members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 22 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 thereunder.23 At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
supra note 19.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
23 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f).
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
EDGX–2015–22 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–EDGX–2015–22. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–EDGX–
2015–22 and should be submitted on or
before June 9, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.24
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–12027 Filed 5–18–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74949; File No. SR–EDGX–
2015–18]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change To Establish
Rules Governing the Trading of
Options on the EDGX Options
Exchange
May 13, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that, on April 30,
2015, EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange filed a proposal to
adopt rules to govern the trading of
options on the Exchange (referred to
herein as ‘‘EDGX Options Exchange’’ or
‘‘EDGX Options’’). As described more
fully below, the EDGX Options
Exchange will operate a fully
automated, Customer priority/pro rata
allocation model. The fundamental
premise of the proposal is that the
Exchange will operate its options
market in a similar manner to the
options exchange operated by the
Exchange’s affiliate, BATS Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘BZX Options’’), with the
exception of the proposed priority
model and certain other limited
differences.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at the Exchange’s Web site
at www.batstrading.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
21 See
22 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 May 18, 2015
1 15
24 17
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00167
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28745
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
28746
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 19, 2015 / Notices
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to adopt a
series of rules in connection with EDGX
Options, which will be a facility of the
Exchange. EDGX Options will operate
an electronic trading system developed
to trade options (‘‘System’’) that will
provide for the electronic display and
execution of orders, as described below.
All Exchange Members will be eligible
to participate in EDGX Options
provided that the Exchange specifically
authorizes them to trade in the System.
The System will provide a routing
service for orders when trading interest
is not present on EDGX Options, and
will comply with the obligations of the
Options Order Protection and Locked/
Crossed Market Plan.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
EDGX Options Members
The Exchange will authorize any
Exchange Member who meets certain
enumerated qualification requirements
to obtain access to EDGX Options (any
such Member, an ‘‘Options Member’’).
There will be two basic types of
Options Members, Options Order Entry
Firms (‘‘OEFs’’) and Options Market
Makers. Options Market Makers, in turn,
will be eligible to participate as Directed
Market Makers, Primary Market Makers
and Market Makers. OEFs will be those
Options Members representing orders as
agent on EDGX Options and non-market
maker participants conducting
proprietary trading as principal. Options
Market Makers are Options Members
registered with the Exchange as Options
Market Makers.
To become an Options Market Maker,
an Options Member is required to
register by filing a written application
with the Exchange, and then must
register to make markets in individual
series of options. Pursuant to proposed
Rule 22.2, the Exchange may appoint
one Primary Market Maker per option
class. Market Makers may select from
among any option issues traded on the
Exchange to request appointment as a
Primary Market Maker, subject to the
approval of the Exchange. In
considering the approval of the
appointment of a Primary Market Maker
in each security, the Exchange will
consider: the Market Maker’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 May 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
preference; the financial resources
available to the Market Maker; the
Market Maker’s experience, expertise
and past performance in making
markets, including the Market Maker’s
performance in other securities; the
Market Makers [sic] operational
capability; and the maintenance and
enhancement of competition among
Market Makers in each security in
which they are registered, including
pursuant to the performance standards
set forth in proposed Rule 22.2(i).3
An unlimited number of Market
Makers may be registered in each class
unless the number of Market Makers
registered to make a market in a
particular option class should be limited
whenever, in the Exchange’s judgment,
quotation system capacity in an option
class or classes is not sufficient to
support additional Market Makers in
such class or classes. The Exchange will
not restrict access in any particular
option class until such time as the
Exchange has submitted objective
standards for restricting access to the
SEC for its review and approval.
EDGX Options Market Makers will be
required to electronically engage in a
course of dealing to enhance liquidity
available on EDGX Options and to assist
in the maintenance of fair and orderly
markets. Among other things, an
Options Market Maker would have to
satisfy the following responsibilities and
duties during trading: (1) On a daily
basis maintain a two-sided market on a
continuous basis in at least 75% of the
individual options series in which it is
registered; (2) engage, to a reasonable
degree under the existing
circumstances, in dealings for their own
accounts when there exists, or it is
reasonably anticipated that there will
exist, a lack of price continuity, a
temporary disparity between the supply
of (or demand for) a particular option
contract, or a temporary distortion of the
price relationships between option
contracts of the same class; (3) compete
with other Market Makers in all series
in which the Market Maker is registered
to trade; and (4) maintain minimum net
capital in accordance with Commission
and the Exchange rules. The Exchange
proposes to specify numerically the
meaning of ‘‘continuous’’ with respect
to Market Makers’ obligation to
maintain continuous, two-sided quotes.
For the purposes of Rule 22.6, the
Exchange will consider the continuous
quoting requirement fulfilled if a Market
Maker provides two-sided quotes for
3 The Exchange notes that proposed Rule 22.2 is
based in part on BZX Options Rule 22.2 (paragraphs
(a) and (b)) and in part on Amex Rule 923NY
(paragraphs (c) through (i)).
PO 00000
Frm 00168
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
90% of the time the Market Maker is
required to provide quotes in an
appointed options series on a given
trading day, or such higher percentage
as the Exchange may announce in
advance. Substantial or continued
failure by an Options Market Maker to
meet any of its obligations and duties,
will subject the Options Market Maker
to disciplinary action, suspension, or
revocation of the Options Market
Maker’s registration in one or more
options series.
Options Market Makers receive
certain benefits for carrying out their
duties. For example, a Market Maker
may be designated by the Exchange as
a Primary Market Maker or may have
orders directed to it in its capacity as a
Directed Market Maker, in each case
receiving a priority advantage over other
non-Customer orders to the extent
applicable priority overlays have been
implemented, as described below. In
addition, a lender may extend credit to
a broker-dealer without regard to the
restrictions in Regulation T of the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System if the credit is to be used to
finance the broker-dealer’s activities as
a specialist or market maker on a
national securities exchange. Thus, an
Options Market Maker has a
corresponding obligation to hold itself
out as willing to buy and sell options for
its own account on a regular or
continuous basis to justify this favorable
treatment. The Exchange believes that
the proposed 90% continuous quoting
requirement for all Market Makers is
consistent with that typically required
of Primary Market Makers and market
makers of similar status.
Every Options Member shall at all
times maintain membership in another
registered options exchange that is not
registered solely under Section 6(g) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or
in FINRA. OEF’s that transact business
with customers must at all times be
members of FINRA. Pursuant to
proposed EDGX Rule 17.2(g), every
Options Member will be required to
have at least one registered Options
Principal who satisfies the criteria of
that Rule, including the satisfaction of a
proper qualification examination. An
OEF may only transact business with
Public Customers if such Options
Member also is an Options Member of
another registered national securities
exchange or association with which the
Exchange has entered into an agreement
under Rule 17d-2 under the Exchange
Act pursuant to which such other
exchange or association shall be the
designated options examining authority
for the OEF.
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 19, 2015 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
As provided in EDGX Rule 16.2,
existing Exchange Rules applicable to
the EDGX equity market contained in
Chapters I through XV of the Exchange
Rules will apply to Options Members
unless a specific Exchange Rule
applicable to the options market
(Chapters XVI through XXIX of the
Exchange Rules) governs or unless the
context otherwise requires. Options
Members can therefore provide
sponsored access to the EDGX Options
Exchange to a nonmember (‘‘Sponsored
Participant’’) pursuant to Rule 11.3 of
the Exchange Rules.
Execution System
The Exchange’s options trading
system will leverage the Exchange’s
current state of the art technology,
including its customer connectivity,
messaging protocols, quotation and
execution engine, order router, data
feeds, and network infrastructure. This
approach minimizes the technical effort
required for existing Exchange Members
to begin trading options on the EDGX
Options Exchange. The EDGX Options
Exchange will closely resemble the
Exchange’s affiliate, BZX Options, but
will differ in that EDGX Options will
maintain a pro rata allocation model
with execution priority dependent on
the capacity of an order (e.g., Customer
or non-Customer) as well as status as a
Primary Market Maker or Directed
Market Maker, as applicable. The
proposed model for EDGX Options is
similar to other options exchanges such
as NYSE Amex Options (‘‘Amex’’), the
MIAX Options Exchange (‘‘MIAX’’), and
other exchanges, which are sometimes
referred to as ‘‘classic’’ exchanges.
Like the Exchange system for equities,
all trading interest entered into the
System will be automatically
executable. Orders entered into the
System will be displayed either with
attribution or anonymously. The
Exchange will become an exchange
member of the Options Clearing
Corporation (‘‘OCC’’). The System will
be linked to OCC for the Exchange to
transmit locked-in trades for clearance
and settlement.
Hours of Operation. The Exchange
will begin accepting orders at 8:00 a.m.
Eastern Time, as described below. The
options trading system will operate
between the hours of 9:30 a.m. Eastern
Time and 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time, with
all orders being available for execution
during that timeframe.
Minimum Quotation and Trading
Increments. The Exchange is proposing
to apply the following quotation
increments: (1) If the options series is
trading at less than $3.00, five (5) cents;
(2) if the options series is trading at
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 May 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
$3.00 or higher, ten (10) cents; and (3)
if the options series is trading pursuant
to the Penny Pilot program one (1) cent
if the options series is trading at less
than $3.00, five (5) cents if the options
series is trading at $3.00 or higher,
except for QQQQ, SPY, or IWM where
the minimum quoting increment will be
one cent for all series. In addition, the
Exchange is proposing that the
minimum trading increment for options
contracts traded on EDGX Options will
be one (1) cent for all series. The
Exchange also proposes to offer trading
of Mini Options, and that the minimum
trading increment for Mini Options
shall be the same as the minimum
trading increment permitted for
standard options on the same
underlying security.
Penny Pilot Program. Upon initial
operation of EDGX Options the
Exchange proposes to commence
trading, pursuant to the Penny Pilot
Program (the ‘‘Penny Pilot’’), all classes
that are, on that date, traded by other
options exchanges pursuant to the
Penny Pilot, which is currently
scheduled to expire on June 30, 2015,
unless extended.
The Exchange represents that it has
the necessary system capacity to
support any additional series listed as
part of the Penny Pilot.
The Exchange agrees to submit semiannual reports to the Commission that
will include sample data and written
analysis of information collected from
April 1 through September 30, and from
October 1 through March 31, for each
year, for the ten most active and twenty
least active option classes added to the
Penny Pilot. In addition, for comparison
purposes, the reports include data from
a control group consisting of the ten
least active option classes from the
initial group of 63 option classes in the
program. This report will include, but is
not limited to: (1) Data and written
analysis on the number of quotations
generated for options included in the
report; (2) an assessment of the
quotation spreads for the options
included in the report; (3) an assessment
of the impact of the Penny Pilot on the
capacity of the Exchange’s automated
systems; (4) data reflecting the size and
depth of markets; and (5) any capacity
problems or other problems that arose
related to the operation of the Penny
Pilot and how the Exchange addressed
them.
Additionally, the Exchange proposes
that any Penny Pilot issues that have
been delisted may be replaced on a
semi-annual basis by the next most
actively traded multiply listed options
classes that are not yet included in the
Penny Pilot, based on trading activity in
PO 00000
Frm 00169
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28747
the previous six months. The
replacement issues, as applicable,
would be added to the Penny Pilot
Program on the second trading day
following January 1 and July 1 of each
year. The Exchange will employ the
same parameters to prospective
replacement issues as approved and
applicable under the Penny Pilot
Program, including excluding highpriced underlying securities. The
replacement issues will be announced
in Information Circulars distributed to
Members.
Order Types. The proposed System
will make available to Options Members
the following order types: Limit Orders,
Minimum Quantity Orders, Market
Orders, Price Improving Orders, Book
Only Orders, Post Only Orders, and
Intermarket Sweep Orders, with
characteristics and functionality similar
to what is currently approved for use on
BZX Options. Each of the proposed
rules regarding the order types and
order type modifiers described below is
substantively identical to the applicable
rule for a corresponding order type or
order type modifier offered by BZX
Options with the exception of the Post
Only Order, to which the Exchange has
proposed some substantive
modification. The Exchange has also
proposed minor corrections and
improvements to the descriptions of the
IOC and FOK time-in-force and Price
Improving Orders, as compared to the
corresponding BZX Options Rules. The
Exchange notes that it has not proposed
initially to adopt all of the order types
and order type modifiers currently
offered by BZX Options.4 The Exchange
has not proposed to adopt any new
order types or order type modifiers that
are not currently offered by BZX
Options.
‘‘Limit Orders’’ are orders to buy or
sell an option at a specified price or
better. A limit order is marketable when,
for a limit order to buy, at the time it
is entered into the System, the order is
priced at the current inside offer or
higher, or for a limit order to sell, at the
time it is entered into the System, the
order is priced at the inside bid or
lower.
‘‘Minimum Quantity Orders’’ are
orders that require that a specified
minimum quantity of contracts be
obtained, or the order is cancelled.
Minimum Quantity Orders will only
execute against multiple, aggregated
orders if such execution would occur
simultaneously. The Exchange will only
4 The Exchange has not proposed to adopt stop
orders or stop limit orders, reserve orders, partial
post only at limit orders or the WAIT time-in-force,
each of which is offered by BZX Options.
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
28748
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 19, 2015 / Notices
honor a specified minimum quantity on
a Book Only Order entered with a timein-force designation of Immediate or
Cancel and will disregard a minimum
quantity on any other order.
‘‘Market Orders’’ are orders to buy or
sell at the best price available at the time
of execution. Market Orders to buy or
sell an option traded on EDGX Options
will be rejected if they are received
when the underlying security is subject
to a ‘‘Limit State’’ or ‘‘Straddle State’’ as
defined in the Plan to Address
Extraordinary Market Volatility
Pursuant to Rule 608 of Regulation NMS
under the Act (the ‘‘Limit Up-Limit
Down Plan’’).5 Any portion of a Market
Order that would execute at a price
more than $0.50 or 5 percent worse than
the national best bid and offer
(‘‘NBBO’’) at the time the order initially
reaches EDGX Options, whichever is
greater, will be cancelled.
‘‘Price Improving Orders’’ are orders
to buy or sell an option at a specified
price at an increment smaller than the
minimum price variation in the
security. Price Improving Orders may be
entered in increments as small as (1)
one cent. Price Improving Orders shall
be displayed at the minimum price
variation in that security and shall be
rounded up for sell orders and rounded
down for buy orders. Unless a User 6 has
entered instructions not to do so, Price
Improving Orders will be subject to the
‘‘display-price sliding process,’’ as
described below. The display-price
sliding process is contained in proposed
Rule 21.1(h).
‘‘Book Only Orders’’ are orders that
are to be ranked and executed on the
Exchange pursuant to Rule 21.8 (Order
Display and Book Processing) or
cancelled, as appropriate, without
routing away to another options
exchange. A Book Only Order will be
subject to the display-price sliding
process unless a User has entered
instructions not to use the display-price
sliding process.
‘‘Post Only Orders’’ are orders that are
to be ranked and executed on the
Exchange pursuant to proposed Rule
21.8 or cancelled, as appropriate,
without routing away to another options
exchange except that the order will not
remove liquidity from the EDGX
Options Book. A Post Only Order
cannot be designated with instructions
to use the display-price sliding process,
and any such order will be rejected. A
5 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091 (May
31, 2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012) (order
approving the Plan on a pilot basis).
6 As proposed in Rule 16.1(a)(63), the term
‘‘User’’ means any Options Member or Sponsored
Participant who is authorized to obtain access to the
System pursuant to Rule 11.3 (Access).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 May 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
Post Only Order that is not subject to
the Price Adjust process, as described
below, that would lock or cross a
Protected Quotation of another options
exchange or the Exchange will be
cancelled. The Exchange notes that Post
Only Orders on BZX Options are
permitted to remove liquidity under
certain circumstances and can be
designated for the display-price sliding
process under BZX Options Rules. The
Exchange has not proposed to adopt
these features.
‘‘Intermarket Sweep Orders’’ or
‘‘ISOs’’ are orders that shall have the
meaning provided in proposed Rule
27.1, which relates to intermarket
trading. Such orders may be executed at
one or multiple price levels in the
System without regard to Protected
Quotations at other options exchanges
(i.e., may trade through such
quotations). The Exchange relies on the
marking of an order by a User as an ISO
order when handling such order, and
thus, it is the entering Options
Member’s responsibility, not the
Exchange’s responsibility, to comply
with the requirements relating to ISOs.
ISOs are not eligible for routing
pursuant to Rule 21.9.
Time in Force Designations. Options
Members entering orders into the
System may designate such orders to
remain in force and available for display
and/or potential execution for varying
periods of time. Unless cancelled
earlier, once these time periods expire,
the order (or the unexecuted portion
thereof) is returned to the entering
party.
‘‘Good Til Day’’ or ‘‘GTD’’ shall mean,
for orders so designated, that if after
entry into the System, the order is not
fully executed, the order (or the
unexecuted portion thereof) shall
remain available for potential display
and/or execution for the amount of time
during such trading day specified by the
entering User unless canceled by the
entering party.
‘‘Immediate Or Cancel’’ or ‘‘IOC’’
shall mean, for an order so designated,
a limit order that is to be executed in
whole or in part as soon as such order
is received. The portion not so executed
immediately on the Exchange or another
options exchange is cancelled and is not
posted to the EDGX Options Book. IOC
limit orders that are not designated as
Book Only Orders and that cannot be
executed in accordance with Rule 21.8
on the System when reaching the
Exchange will be eligible for routing
away pursuant to Rule 21.9.
‘‘DAY’’ shall mean, for an order so
designated, a limit order to buy or sell
which, if not executed expires at market
close.
PO 00000
Frm 00170
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
‘‘Fill-or-Kill’’ or ‘‘FOK’’ shall mean,
for an order so designated, a limit order
that is to be executed in its entirety as
soon as it is received and, if not so
executed, cancelled. A limit order
designated as FOK is not eligible for
routing away pursuant to Rule 21.9.
One Second Exposure Period.
Proposed Rule 22.12 would prohibit
Options Members from executing as
principal on EDGX Options orders they
represent as agent unless (i) agency
orders are first exposed on EDGX
Options for at least one (1) second or (ii)
the Options Member has been bidding
or offering on EDGX Options for at least
one (1) second prior to receiving an
agency order that is executable against
such bid or offer. As noted above,
proposed Rule 22.12 would require
Options Members to expose their
customers’ orders on the Exchange for at
least one second under certain
circumstances. During this one second
exposure period, other Options
Members will be able to enter orders to
trade against the exposed order. In
adopting a one-second order exposure
period, the Exchange is proposing a
requirement that is consistent with the
Rules of other options exchanges,
including BZX Options.7 Thus, the
exposure period will allow Options
Members that are members of other
options exchanges to comply with Rule
22.12 without programming separate
time parameters into their systems for
order entry or compliance purposes.
The Exchange believes that market
participants are sufficiently automated
that a one second exposure period
allows an adequate time for market
participants to electronically respond to
an order. Also, it is possible that market
participants might wait until the end of
the exposure period, no matter how
long, before responding. Thus, the
Exchange believes that any longer than
one second would not further the
protection of investors or market
participants, but rather, would
potentially increase market risk to
investors and other market participants
by creating a longer period of time for
the exposed order to be subject to
market risk.
The technology for the Exchange’s
trading system for EDGX Options will
be comparable to the technology used
for the trading system currently used for
equities trading on the Exchange today.
The Exchange has had ample experience
with that trading system to believe that
one second is an adequate exposure
7 See, e.g., Chicago Board Options Exchange
(‘‘CBOE’’) Rules 6.45A, 6.45B, 6.74A and 6.74B;
International Securities Exchange (‘‘ISE’’) Rule
717(d); NOM Chapter VII, Sec. 12.
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 19, 2015 / Notices
period. Further, the Exchange believes
that many of its current Members will
be Options Members and that such
current Members have demonstrated an
ability to respond to orders in a timely
fashion.
Match Trade Prevention Modifiers. As
is true for BZX Options, the Exchange
will allow Options Members to use
Match Trade Prevention (‘‘MTP’’)
Modifiers. Any incoming order
designated with an MTP modifier will
be prevented from executing against a
resting opposite side order also
designated with an MTP modifier and
originating from the same market
participant identifier (‘‘MPID’’),
Exchange Member identifier, trading
group identifier, or Exchange Sponsored
Participant identifier.
Re-Pricing Mechanisms. The
Exchange, like BZX Options, proposes
to offer two re-pricing mechanisms for
Users of EDGX Options, the displayprice sliding process and the Price
Adjust process. In turn, under each type
of price sliding, Users will be able to
select between either single price
sliding or multiple price sliding. The
Exchange will offer display-price sliding
(including multiple display-price
sliding) and Price Adjust (including
multiple Price Adjust) to ensure
compliance with locked and crossed
market rules relevant to participation on
EDGX Options. The proposed displayprice sliding functionality for EDGX
Options is identical to functionality for
BZX Options, with the exception of
language related to Post Only Order
functionality, which is not applicable.
Specifically, as noted above, the
Exchange omitted language regarding
Post Only Orders contained in the BZX
Options description of display-price
sliding because the Exchange has
proposed to reject orders that are
designated as Post Only Orders and
subject to display-price sliding.
Similarly, because the Exchange has not
proposed to adopt functionality that
results in executions of Post Only
Orders against resting liquidity under
certain circumstances, the Exchange has
omitted from the Exchange’s proposed
Price Adjust rule certain language
contained in the corresponding BZX
Options rule regarding such
circumstances.
Market Opening Procedures. The
System shall open options, other than
index options, for trading after 9:30 a.m.
Eastern Time as described below. With
respect to index options, the System
shall open such options for trading at
9:30 a.m. Eastern Time.
As proposed, the Exchange will
accept market and limit orders and
quotes for inclusion in the opening
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 May 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
process (the ‘‘Opening Process’’)
beginning at 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time or
immediately upon trading being halted
in an option series due to the primary
listing market for the applicable
underlying security declaring a
regulatory trading halt, suspension, or
pause with respect to such security (a
‘‘Regulatory Halt’’) and will continue to
accept market and limit orders and
quotes until such time as the Opening
Process is initiated in that option series
(the ‘‘Order Entry Period’’), other than
index options. The Exchange will not
accept IOC or FOK orders for queuing
prior to the completion of the Opening
Process. The Exchange will convert all
ISOs entered for queuing prior to the
completion of the Opening Process into
non-ISOs.
After the first transaction on the
primary listing market after 9:30 a.m.
Eastern Time in the securities
underlying the options as reported on
the first print disseminated pursuant to
an effective national market system plan
(‘‘First Listing Market Transaction’’) or
the Regulatory Halt has been lifted, the
related option series will be opened
automatically as described below. The
System will determine a single price at
which a particular option series will be
opened (the ‘‘Opening Price’’) as
calculated by the System within 30
seconds of the First Listing Market
Transaction or the Regulatory Halt being
lifted. Where there are no contracts in
a particular series that would execute at
any price, the System shall open such
options for trading without determining
an Opening Price. After establishing an
Opening Price that is also a Valid Price,8
orders and quotes in the System that are
priced equal to or more aggressively
than the Opening Price will be matched
based on the Exchange’s proposed
priority rule, Rule 21.8. Matches will
occur until there is no remaining
volume or there is an imbalance of
orders. All orders and quotes or portions
thereof that are matched pursuant to the
Opening Process will be executed at the
Opening Price. An imbalance of orders
on the buy side or sell side may result
in orders that are not executed in whole
or in part. Such orders will be handled
in time sequence, beginning with the
order with the oldest time stamp and
may, in whole or in part, be placed on
the EDGX Options Book, cancelled,
executed, or routed in accordance with
proposed Rule 21.9.
Order Display/Matching System.
Other than the differences with respect
to the market model described below,
the System will be based upon
8 Valid Price is defined in proposed Rule
21.7(a)(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00171
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28749
technology and functionality currently
approved for use in the Exchange’s
equities trading system and the
Exchange’s affiliate, BZX Options.
Specifically, the System will allow
Options Members to enter market orders
and priced limit orders to buy and sell
options listed on EDGX Options. The
orders will be designated for display
(price and size) in the order display
service of the System.
Book Processing/Priority. After the
opening, trades on the Exchange will
occur when a buy order/quote and a sell
order/quote match on the Exchange’s
order book. The System shall execute
trading interest within the System in
price priority, meaning it will execute
all trading interest at the best price level
within the System before executing
trading interest at the next best price.
Pursuant to proposed Rule 21.8(c), after
considering price priority, all orders are
matched according to pro-rata priority.
In addition, Customer, Primary Market
Maker and/or Directed Market Maker
priority overlays are also available at the
Exchange’s discretion on a class-byclass basis pursuant to proposed Rule
21.8(d). For example, (i) the Customer
Overlay provides Customers with
priority over all non-Customer interest
at the same price; (ii) the Directed
Market Maker overlay (which may only
be in effect if the Customer Overlay is
also in effect) provides the Directed
Market Maker with priority over other
Market Makers for a certain percentage
of contracts allocated at the same price
(60% or 40% depending upon the
number of other Market Makers at the
NBBO) and for small size orders; and
(iii) the Primary Market Maker overlay
(which may only be in effect if the
Customer Overlay is also in effect)
provides Primary Market Makers with
priority over other Market Makers for a
certain percentage of contracts allocated
at the same price (60% or 40%
depending upon the number of other
Market Makers at the NBBO) and for
small size orders.
After executions resulting from the
Priority Overlays described above,
Orders and Quotes within the System
for the accounts of non-Customers,
including Professional Customers, have
next priority. If there is more than one
highest bid or more than one lowest
offer in the Consolidated Book for the
account of a non-Customer, then such
bids or offers will be afforded priority
on a ‘‘size pro rata’’ basis.
In allocating the participation
entitlements set forth in proposed Rule
21.8 to the Directed Market Maker and
the Primary Market Maker, the
following shall apply. In a class of
options where both the Primary Market
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
28750
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 19, 2015 / Notices
Maker and the Directed Market Maker
participation entitlements are in effect
and an Options Member has directed an
order to a Directed Market Maker: (a) if
the Directed Market Maker’s priority
quote is at the NBBO, the Directed
Market Maker’s participation
entitlement will supersede the Primary
Market Maker’s participation
entitlements for an order directed to
such Directed Market Maker; (b) if the
Directed Market Maker’s priority quote
is not at the NBBO, the Primary Market
Maker’s participation entitlement will
apply to that order, provided the
Primary Market Maker’s priority quote
is at the NBBO: and (c) if neither the
Directed Market Maker’s nor the
Primary Market Maker’s priority quote
is at the NBBO then executed contracts
will be allocated in accordance with the
pro-rata allocation methodology as
described in paragraphs (c) and (e)
above without regard to any
participation entitlement. If an
incoming order has not been directed to
a Directed Market Maker by an Options
Member, however, then the Primary
Market Maker’s participation
entitlement will apply to that order,
provided the Primary Market Maker’s
priority quote is at the NBBO.
As proposed and as noted above, the
participation entitlements of proposed
Rule 21.8 shall not be in effect unless
the Customer Overlay is also in effect
and the participation entitlements shall
only apply to any remaining balance
after Customer orders have been
satisfied.
Neither the Primary Market Maker nor
the Directed Market Maker may be
allocated a total quantity greater than
the quantity they are quoting at the
execution price. If the Primary Market
Maker’s or the Directed Market Maker’s
allocation of an order pursuant to its
participation entitlement is greater than
its pro-rata share of priority quotes at
the best price at the time that the
participation entitlement is granted,
neither the Primary Market Maker nor
the Directed Market Maker shall receive
any further allocation of that order.
In establishing the counterparties to a
particular trade, the participation
entitlements must first be counted
against the Primary Market Maker’s
highest priority bids and offers or the
Directed Market Maker’s highest priority
bids or offers.
The proposed participation
entitlements only apply to the allocation
of executions among competing Market
Maker priority quotes existing on the
EDGX Options Book at the time the
order is received by the Exchange. No
market participant is allocated any
portion of an execution unless it has an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 May 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
existing interest at the execution price.
Moreover, no market participant can
execute a greater number of contracts
than is associated with its interest at a
given price. Accordingly, the Primary
Market Maker and the Directed Market
Maker participation entitlements
contained in the proposed Rule are not
guarantees.
The Exchange believes that proposed
Rule 21.8 governing priority on the
Exchange is consistent with other
options exchanges that have similar
market models, including Amex and
MIAX.9
Routing. The EDGX Options Exchange
will support orders that are designated
to be routed to the NBBO as well as
orders that will execute only within
EDGX Options. Orders that are
designated to execute at the NBBO will
be routed to other options markets to be
executed when the Exchange is not at
the NBBO consistent with the Options
Order Protection and Locked/Crossed
Market Plan. Subject to the exceptions
contained in proposed Rule 27.2(b), the
System will ensure that an order will
not be executed at a price that trades
through another options exchange. An
order that is designated by an Options
Member as routable will be routed in
compliance with applicable TradeThrough restrictions. Any order entered
with a price that would lock or cross a
Protected Quotation that is not eligible
for either routing, or the display-price
sliding process or the Price Adjust
process will be cancelled.
EDGX Options shall route orders in
options via BATS Trading, Inc. (‘‘BATS
Trading’’), which serves as the
Outbound Router of the Exchange, as
defined in current Rule 2.11. The
function of the Outbound Router will be
to route orders in options listed and
open for trading on EDGX Options to
other options exchanges pursuant to
EDGX Options rules solely on behalf of
EDGX Options. The Outbound Router is
subject to regulation as a facility of the
Exchange, including the requirement to
file proposed rule changes under
Section 19 of the Act. Use of BATS
Trading or Routing Services (as
described below) to route orders to other
market centers is optional. Parties that
do not desire to use BATS Trading or
other Routing Services provided by the
Exchange must designate orders as not
available for routing.
In the event the Exchange is not able
to provide order routing services
through its affiliated broker-dealer, the
Exchange will route orders to other
options exchanges in conjunction with
one or more routing brokers that are not
9 See,
PO 00000
e.g., Amex Rule 964NY; MIAX Rule 514.
Frm 00172
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
affiliated with the Exchange (‘‘Routing
Services’’).
EDGX Options will offer a variety of
routing options that will be identical to
the routing options offered by BZX
Options. Routing options may be
combined with all available order types
and times-in-force, with the exception
of order types and times-in-force whose
terms are inconsistent with the terms of
a particular routing option. The System
will consider the quotations only of
accessible markets. The term ‘‘System
routing table’’ refers to the proprietary
process for determining the specific
options exchanges to which the System
routes orders and the order in which it
routes them. The Exchange reserves the
right to maintain a different System
routing table for different routing
options and to modify the System
routing table at any time without notice.
The proposed System routing options
are Parallel D, Parallel 2D, Destination
Specific and Directed ISO. The
Exchange notes that Destination
Specific and Directed ISO are both
offered by BZX Options but that such
options are currently listed in both the
routing section and the order
description section. The Exchange
believes that these options are more
appropriately listed as routing
strategies, and thus has proposed to
include them in Rule 21.9.
The Exchange also proposes to offer
two optional Re-Route instructions,
Aggressive Re-Route and Super
Aggressive Re-Route, either of which
can be assigned to routable orders.
Pursuant to the Aggressive Re-Route
instruction, to the extent the unfilled
balance of a routable order has been
posted to the EDGX Options Book,
should the order subsequently be
crossed by another accessible options
exchange, the System shall route the
order to the crossing options exchange.
Pursuant to the Super Aggressive ReRoute instruction, to the extent the
unfilled balance of a routable order has
been posted to the EDGX Options Book,
should the order subsequently be locked
or crossed by another accessible options
exchange, the System shall route the
order to the locking or crossing options
Exchange.
Data Feed; Anonymity. The System
will include a proprietary data feed,
Multicast PITCH, which will display
depth of book quotations and execution
information based on orders received by
EDGX Options using the minimum price
variation applicable to that security. The
Exchange will make available to all
market participants through the Options
Price Reporting Authority (‘‘OPRA’’) an
indication that there is Customer
interest included in the best bid and
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 19, 2015 / Notices
offer disseminated by the Exchange. The
Exchange will also identify Customer
orders and trades as such on messages
disseminated by the Exchange through
its Multicast PITCH data feed. To the
extent a User has submitted an
Attributable Order, which is the default
property for all orders entered into the
System, the Multicast PITCH data feed
will indicate the User’s MPID along
with the price and size of their order or
quote.
The intra-day transaction reports
produced by the System will indicate
the details of the transactions, and will
not reveal contra party identities.
However, the Exchange does anticipate
generating daily, weekly and/or
monthly reports containing aggregate
information regarding Market Maker
and Customer executions, and thus, has
proposed to make clear in Rule 21.10
that such identifying information will
be made available. The Exchange
believes that this practice is common on
other options exchanges that operate
market models similar to that proposed
by the Exchange.
Risk Monitor Mechanism. The
Exchange also proposes to offer to all
Users of EDGX Options the ability to
establish certain risk control parameters
via the Exchange’s Risk Monitor
Mechanism. The proposed Risk Monitor
Mechanism is identical to that offered
by BZX Options pursuant to Rule 21.16.
The Risk Monitor Mechanism provides
protection from the risk of multiple
executions across multiple series of an
option or across multiple options. The
risk to Users is not limited to a single
series in an option or even to all series
of an option; Users that quote in
multiple series of multiple options have
significant exposure, requiring them to
offset or hedge their overall positions.
In particular, the Risk Monitor
Mechanism will be useful for EDGX
Options Market Makers, who are
required to continuously quote in
assigned options. Quoting across many
series in an option creates the
possibility of ‘‘rapid fire’’ executions
that can create large, unintended
principal positions that expose the
Market Maker to unnecessary market
risk. The Risk Monitor Mechanism is
intended to assist such Users in
managing their market risk.
Though the Risk Monitor Mechanism
will be most useful to Market Makers,
the Exchange proposes to offer the
functionality to all participant types.
There may be other firms that trade on
a proprietary basis and provide liquidity
to the Exchange; these firms could
potentially benefit, similarly to Market
Makers, from the Risk Monitor
Mechanism. The Exchange believes that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 May 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
the Risk Monitor Mechanism should
help liquidity providers generally,
market makers and other participants
alike, in managing risk and providing
deep and liquid markets to investors.
Options Order Protection and Locked/
Crossed Market Plan Rules
The Exchange will participate in the
approved Options Order Protection and
Locked/Crossed Market Plan (‘‘Plan’’),
and therefore will be required to comply
with the obligations of Participants
under the Plan. The Exchange proposes
to adopt rules relating to the Plan that
are substantially similar to the rules in
place on all of the options exchanges
that are Participants to the Plan.
The Plan replaced the Plan for the
Purpose of Creating and Operating an
Intermarket Option Linkage (‘‘Old
Plan’’). The Old Plan required its
participant exchanges to operate a
stand-alone system or ‘‘Linkage’’ for
sending order-flow between exchanges
to limit trade-throughs, and the Linkage
was operated by the Options Clearing
Corporation (‘‘OCC’’). The Plan
essentially applies the Regulation NMS
price-protection provisions to the
options markets. Similar to Regulation
NMS, the Plan requires the Plan
Participants to adopt rules ‘‘reasonably
designed to prevent Trade-Throughs,’’
while exempting Intermarket Sweep
Orders (‘‘ISOs’’) from that prohibition.
The Plan’s definition of an ISO is
essentially the same as under Regulation
NMS. The remaining exceptions to the
trade-through prohibition, discussed
more specifically below, either track
those under Regulation NMS or
correspond to unique aspects of the
options market, or both.
The Rules in proposed Chapter XXVII
conform to the requirements of the Plan.
Rule 27.1 sets forth the defined terms
for use under the Plan. Rule 27.2
prohibits trade-throughs and exempts
ISOs from that prohibition. Rule 27.2
also contains additional exceptions to
the trade-through prohibition that track
the exceptions under Regulation NMS
or correspond to unique aspects of the
EDGX Options Exchange, or both.
Proposed Rule 27.3 sets forth the
general prohibition against locking/
crossing other eligible exchanges as well
as several exceptions that permit locked
markets in limited circumstances; such
exceptions have been approved by the
Commission for inclusion in the rules of
other options exchanges. Specifically,
the exceptions to the general prohibition
on locking and crossing occur when (1)
the locking or crossing quotation was
displayed at a time when the Exchange
was experiencing a failure, material
delay, or malfunction of its systems or
PO 00000
Frm 00173
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28751
equipment; (2) the locking or crossing
quotation was displayed at a time when
there is a Crossed Market; or (3) the
Member simultaneously routed an ISO
to execute against the full displayed size
of any locked or crossed Protected Bid
or Protected Offer.
Securities Traded on EDGX Options
General Listing Standards. The
Exchange proposes to adopt listing
standards for Options traded on EDGX
Options (Chapter XIX) as well as for
Index Options (Chapter XXIX) that are
identical to the approved rules of BZX
Options.10 The Exchange will join the
Options Listings Procedures Plan and
will list and trade options already listed
on other options exchanges. The
Exchange will gradually phase-in its
trading of options, beginning with a
selection of actively traded options. At
least initially, the Exchange does not
plan to develop new options products or
listing standards.
$1 Strike Program. Pursuant to
proposed Rule 19.6, Supplementary
Material .02, the interval between strike
prices of series of options on individual
stocks may be $1.00 or greater (‘‘$1
Strike Prices’’) provided the strike price
is $50 or less, but not less than $1. The
listing of $1 strike prices shall be
limited to option classes overlying no
more than one hundred fifty (150)
individual stocks (the ‘‘$1 Strike Price
Program’’) as specifically designated by
EDGX Options. As proposed, EDGX
Options may list $1 Strike Prices on any
other option classes if those classes are
specifically designated by other national
securities exchanges that employ a
similar $1 Strike Price Program under
their respective rules.
To be eligible for inclusion into the $1
Strike Price Program, an underlying
security must close below $50 in the
primary market on the previous trading
day. After a security is added to the $1
Strike Price Program, EDGX Options
may list $1 Strike Prices from $1 to $50
that are no more than $5 from the
closing price of the underlying on the
preceding day. For example, if the
underlying security closes at $13, EDGX
Options may list strike prices from $8 to
$18. EDGX Options may not list series
with $1 intervals within $0.50 of an
existing strike price in the same series,
except that strike prices of $2, $3, $4, $5
and $6 shall be permitted within $0.50
of an existing strike price for classes
also selected to participate in the $0.50
Strike Program. Additionally, for an
option class selected for the $1 Strike
Price Program, EDGX Options may not
10 See Rules of BZX Options, Chapters XIX and
XXIX.
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
28752
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 19, 2015 / Notices
list $1 Strike Prices on any series having
greater than nine (9) months until
expiration. A security shall remain in
the $1 Strike Price Program until
otherwise designated by EDGX Options.
For options classes selected to
participate in the $1 Strike Program, the
Exchange will, on a monthly basis,
review series that were originally listed
under the $1 Strike Program with strike
prices that are more than $5 from the
current value of an options class and
delist those series with no open interest
in both the put and the call series
having a: (1) strike higher than the
highest strike price with open interest in
the put and/or call series for a given
expiration month; and (2) strike lower
than the lowest strike price with open
interest in the put and/or call series for
a given expiration month. If the
Exchange identifies series for delisting
pursuant to this policy, the Exchange
shall notify other options exchanges
with similar delisting policies regarding
the eligible series for delisting, and shall
work jointly with such other exchanges
to develop a uniform list of series to be
delisted so as to ensure uniform series
delisting of multiply listed options
classes.
Notwithstanding the above delisting
policy, the Exchange may grant member
requests to add strikes and/or maintain
strikes in series of options classes traded
pursuant to the $1 Strike Program that
are eligible for delisting.
In addition to $1 strikes as proposed
above, the Exchange proposes to offer
options trading on series of options with
$0.50, $2.50 and $5.00 strike price
intervals, consistent with other options
exchanges, including BZX Options.
With regard to the impact on system
capacity, the Exchange has analyzed its
capacity and represents that it and the
Options Price Reporting Authority have
the necessary systems capacity to
handle the additional traffic associated
with the listing and trading of option
series that may be listed and traded in
the strike price intervals described
above, including $0.50, $1, $2.50 and
$5.00 strikes.
Mini Options. After an option class on
a stock, Exchange-Traded Fund Share,
Trust Issued Receipt, Exchange Traded
Note, and other Index Linked Security
with a 100 share deliverable has been
approved for listing and trading on the
Exchange, the Exchange proposes to
permit listing of series of option
contracts with a 10 share deliverable on
that stock, Exchange-Traded Fund
Share, Trust Issued Receipt, Exchange
Traded Note, and other Index Linked
Security for all expirations opened for
trading on the Exchange. Pursuant to
proposed Interpretation and Policy .07
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 May 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
to Rule 19.6, Mini Option contracts
could be listed on SPDR S&P 500
(‘‘SPY’’), Apple Inc. (‘‘AAPL’’), SPDR
Gold Trust (‘‘GLD’’), Google Inc.
(‘‘GOOG’’), and Amazon.com Inc.
(‘‘AMZN’’). Strike prices for Mini
Options shall be set at the same level as
for regular options. For example, a call
series strike price to deliver 10 shares of
stock at $125 per share has a total
deliverable value of $1250 and the strike
price will be set at 125. No additional
series of Mini Options may be added if
the underlying security is trading at $90
or less. The underlying security must
trade above $90 for five consecutive
days prior to listing Mini Options
contracts in an additional expiration
month.
Quarterly Options Series Program.
Pursuant to proposed Rule 19.6,
Interpretation and Policy .04 and
proposed Rule 29.11(g) the Exchange
may list and trade options series that
expire at the close of business on the
last business day of a calendar quarter
(‘‘Quarterly Options Series’’). As
proposed, the Exchange may list
Quarterly Options Series for up to five
(5) currently listed options classes that
are either options on exchange traded
funds (‘‘ETF’’) or index options. In
addition, the Exchange may also list
Quarterly Options Series on any options
classes that are selected by other
securities exchanges that employ a
similar program under their respective
rules.
The Exchange may list series that
expire at the end of the next consecutive
four (4) calendar quarters, as well as the
fourth quarter of the next calendar year.
For example, if the Exchange is trading
Quarterly Options Series in the month
of May 2016, it may list series that
expire at the end of the second, third,
and fourth quarters of 2016, as well as
the first and fourth quarters of 2017.
Following the second quarter 2016
expiration, the Exchange could add
series that expire at the end of the
second quarter of 2017.
For each class of ETF options selected
for the Quarterly Options Series
program, the Exchange may list strike
prices within $5 from the previous day’s
closing price of the underlying security
at the time of initial listing.
Subsequently, the Exchange may list up
to 60 additional strike prices that are
within thirty percent (30%) of the
previous day’s close, or more than 30%
away from the previous day’s close
provided demonstrated customer
interest exists for such series.
The Exchange has also proposed a
delisting policy with respect to
Quarterly Options Series in ETF
options. On a monthly basis, the
PO 00000
Frm 00174
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Exchange will review series that are
outside of a range of five (5) strikes
above and five (5) strikes below the
current price of the ETF, and delist
series with no open interest in both the
call and the put series having a (1) strike
higher than the highest price with open
interest in the put and/or call series for
a given expiration month; and (2) strike
lower than the lowest strike price with
open interest in the put and/or the call
series for a given expiration month.
Notwithstanding the delisting policy,
customer requests to add strikes and/or
maintain strikes in Quarterly Options
Series eligible for delisting shall be
granted.
The Exchange also may list Quarterly
Option Series based on an underlying
index pursuant to similar provisions in
Rule 29.11. There are two noteworthy
distinctions between the rules for listing
Quarterly Options Series based on an
ETF versus Quarterly Options Series
based on an index. First, whereas the
initial listing of Quarterly Options
Series based on an underlying ETF is
restricted to strike prices within $5 from
the previous day’s closing price of the
underlying security, the initial listing of
strikes for Quarterly Options Series
based on an underlying index is
restricted to: (i) a price that is within
thirty percent (30%) of the current
index value, and (ii) no more than five
strikes above and five strikes below the
value of the underlying index. Second,
whereas the Exchange may list up to 60
additional strike prices for each
Quarterly Options Series based on an
ETF, there is no firm cap on the
additional listing of strikes for Quarterly
Options Series based on an underlying
index; rather, additional strike prices
may be listed provided the new listings
do not result in more than five strike
prices on the same side of the
underlying index value as the new
listings.
The interval between strike prices on
Quarterly Options Series shall be the
same as the interval for strike prices for
series in that same options class that
expire in accordance with the normal
monthly expiration cycle.
With regard to the impact on system
capacity, the Exchange has analyzed its
capacity and represents that it and the
Options Price Reporting Authority have
the necessary systems capacity to
handle the additional traffic associated
with the listing and trading of options
series pursuant to the above-described
Quarterly Options Series program.
Short Term Option Series Program.
The Exchange plans to operate a ShortTerm Options Series Program similar to
other Short Term Options Programs,
including that of BZX Options. Pursuant
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 19, 2015 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
to proposed Rule 19.6, Interpretation
and Policy .05 for equity options and
Rule 29.11(h) for index options in, the
Exchange intends to open for trading on
any Thursday or Friday that is a
business day (‘‘Short Term Option
Opening Date’’) series of options on that
class that expire on each of the next five
(5) Fridays that are business days and
are not Fridays in which monthly
options series or Quarterly Options
Series expire (‘‘Short Term Option
Expiration Dates’’). As proposed, the
Exchange may have no more than a total
of five Short Term Option Expiration
Dates. If EDGX Options is not open for
business on the respective Thursday or
Friday, the Short Term Option Opening
Date will be the first business day
immediately prior to that respective
Thursday or Friday. Similarly, if EDGX
Options is not open for business on the
Friday that the options are set to expire,
the Short Term Option Expiration Date
will be the first business day
immediately prior to that Friday.
As proposed, the Exchange may select
up to fifty (50) option classes in which
Short Term Option Series may be
traded. In addition to those fifty option
classes the Exchange may also list Short
Term Option Series on any option
classes that are selected by other
securities exchanges that employ a
similar program. For each option class
eligible for participation in the Short
Term Option Series Program, the
Exchange may open up to thirty (30)
Short Term Option Series for each
expiration date in that class. The
Exchange may also open Short Term
Option Series that are opened by other
securities exchanges in option classes
selected by such exchanges under their
respective short term option rules.
As noted above, the remaining
parameters of the proposed Short Term
Options Program are identical to those
of BZX Options and similar to those
operated by other options exchanges.
With regard to the impact on system
capacity, the Exchange has analyzed its
capacity and represents that it and the
Options Price Reporting Authority have
the necessary systems capacity to
handle the additional traffic associated
with the listing and trading of option
series pursuant to the Short Term
Option Series Program.
Conduct and Operational Rules for
Options Members
EDGX proposes to adopt rules that are
nearly identical to the approved rules of
other options exchanges, including BZX
Options. Thus, EDGX proposes to adopt
rules that are based on the rules of BZX
Options regarding: Business Conduct
Rules (Chapter XVIII); exercises and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 May 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
deliveries (Chapter XXIII); records,
reports and audits (Chapter XXIV);
minor rule violations (Chapter XXV);
doing business with the public (Chapter
XXVI); and margin (Chapter XXVIII).
The Exchange notes that certain
requirements that will be applicable to
Options Members are contained in other
sections of the Exchange’s existing
Rules. For example, the Exchange has
included applicable rules requiring
options principal registration into
proposed EDGX Rule 17.2(g) but also
proposes to include reference to
applicable registration requirements that
are already contained in EDGX Rule 2.5.
The Exchange also proposes to expand
EDGX Rule 2.5 to clearly include
options principal registration. The
Exchange intends to require Authorized
Traders of Options Members to comply
with existing Exchange registration
requirements applicable to all
Authorized Traders.11 Accordingly, the
Exchange has not proposed specific
rules applicable to registration of
representatives other than options
principals.
As is true for BZX Options, with
respect to Position Limits (Rule 18.7)
and Exercise Limits (Rule 18.9), the
Exchange is proposing to apply the
limits established pursuant to the rules
of the CBOE, although the Exchange
will establish such limits for products
not traded on the CBOE. By expressly
incorporating an already-approved
limit, the Exchange will ensure that an
appropriate limit is in place at all times
without the need to continually adjust
its rule manually or to disrupt the
operations of its Members.
National Market System
The EDGX Options Exchange will
operate as a full and equal participant
in the national market system for
options trading established under
Section 11A of the Exchange Act, just as
its equities market participates today.
The EDGX Options Exchange will
become a member of OPRA, the Options
Linkage Authority (‘‘OLA’’), the Options
Regulatory Surveillance Authority
(‘‘ORSA’’), and the Options Listing
Procedures Plan (‘‘OLPP’’).
The Exchange expects to participate
in those plans on the same terms
currently applicable to current members
of those plans, and it expects little or no
plan impact due to the fact that the
Exchange’s market will operate in a
manner similar to several other existing
options exchanges.
11 See Exchange Rule 2.5, Interpretation and
Policy .01 and Exchange Rule 11.4.
PO 00000
Frm 00175
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28753
Regulation
The Exchange will leverage many of
the structures it established to operate a
national securities exchange in
compliance with Section 6 of the
Exchange Act. As described in more
detail below, there will be three
elements of that regulation: (1) the
Exchange will join the existing options
industry agreements pursuant to Section
17(d) of the Exchange Act, as it has with
respect to its equities market, (2) the
Exchange’s Regulatory Services
Agreement (‘‘RSA’’) with FINRA will
govern many aspects of the regulation
and discipline of Members that
participate in options trading, just as it
does for equities market regulation, and
(3) the Exchange will perform options
listing regulation, as well as authorize
Options Members to trade on EDGX
Options, and conduct surveillance of
options trading as it does today for
equities.
Section 17(d) of the Exchange Act and
the related Exchange Act rules permit
SROs to allocate certain regulatory
responsibilities to avoid duplicative
oversight and regulation. Under
Exchange Act Rule 17d–1, the SEC
designates one SRO to be the Designated
Examining Authority, or DEA, for each
broker-dealer that is a member of more
than one SRO. The DEA is responsible
for the financial aspects of that brokerdealer’s regulatory oversight. Because
EDGX Options Members also must be
members of at least one other SRO, the
Exchange would generally not be
designated as the DEA for any of its
members.
Rule 17d–2 under the Act permits
SROs to file with the Commission plans
under which the SROs allocate among
each other the responsibility to receive
regulatory reports from, and examine
and enforce compliance with specified
provisions of the Act and rules
thereunder and SRO rules by, firms that
are members of more than one SRO
(‘‘common members’’). If such a plan is
declared effective by the Commission,
an SRO that is a party to the plan is
relieved of regulatory responsibility as
to any common member for whom
responsibility is allocated under the
plan to another SRO.
All of the options exchanges and
FINRA have entered into the Options
Sales Practices Agreement, a Rule 17d–
2 agreement. Under this Agreement, the
examining SROs will examine firms that
are common members of the Exchange
and the particular examining SRO for
compliance with certain provisions of
the Act, certain of the rules and
regulations adopted thereunder, certain
examining SRO rules, and certain EDGX
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
28754
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 19, 2015 / Notices
Options Rules. In addition, EDGX
Options Rules contemplate participation
in this Agreement by requiring that any
Options Member also be a member of at
least one of the examining SROs.
For those regulatory responsibilities
that fall outside the scope of any Rule
17d–2 agreements, the Exchange will
retain full regulatory responsibility
under the Exchange Act. However, as
noted above, the Exchange has entered
into an RSA with FINRA, pursuant to
which FINRA personnel operate as
agents for the Exchange in performing
certain of these functions. As is the case
with the EDGX equities market, the
Exchange will supervise FINRA and
continue to bear ultimate regulatory
responsibility for the EDGX Options
Exchange. The Exchange intends to
amend the existing RSA in order to
capture certain aspects of regulation
specifically applicable to EDGX Options
and the regulation and discipline of
Options Members.
As a member of the Intermarket
Surveillance Group, the Exchange will
comply with the specifications of the
Consolidated Options Audit Trail
System (‘‘COATS’’) in submitting data
for purposes of creating a consolidated
audit trail. The Exchange will also
receive COATS data for purposes of its
surveillance operations.
Consistent with the Exchange’s
existing regulatory structure, the
Exchange’s Chief Regulatory Officer
shall have general supervision of the
regulatory operations of EDGX Options,
including responsibility for overseeing
the surveillance, examination, and
enforcement functions and for
administering all regulatory services
agreements applicable to EDGX Options.
Similarly, the Exchange’s existing
Regulatory Oversight Committee will be
responsible for overseeing the adequacy
and effectiveness of Exchange’s
regulatory and self-regulatory
organization responsibilities, including
those applicable to EDGX Options.
Finally, as is true with respect to
equities, the Exchange, and FINRA
pursuant to the RSA referenced above,
will perform automated surveillance of
trading on EDGX Options for the
purpose of maintaining a fair and
orderly market at all times. Specifically,
EDGX Options will be monitored to
identify unusual trading patterns and
determine whether particular trading
activity requires further regulatory
investigation by FINRA.
In addition, the Exchange will oversee
the process for determining and
implementing trade halts, identifying
and responding to unusual market
conditions, and administering the
Exchange’s process for identifying and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 May 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
remediating ‘‘obvious errors’’ by and
among its Options Members. EDGX
proposed rules (Chapter XX) regarding
halts, unusual market conditions,
extraordinary market volatility, obvious
errors, and audit trail are identical to the
approved rules of BZX Options.12
The Exchange notes that the obvious
error rule of BZX Options was recently
approved 13 and that other options
exchanges are in the process of
implementing similar rules. The
Exchange has not proposed any changes
as compared to the recently approved
obvious error rule of BZX Options.
Thus, in addition to the general
provisions for reviewing and handling
transactions that potentially qualify for
adjustment or nullification as Obvious
Errors or Catastrophic Errors, the
Exchange proposes to adopt
Interpretation and Policy .01 to provide
for how the Exchange will treat Obvious
and Catastrophic Errors in response to
the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan, which is
applicable to all NMS stocks, as defined
in Regulation NMS Rule 600(b)(47).14
As proposed, during a pilot period to
coincide with the pilot period for the
Plan, including any extensions to the
pilot period for the Plan, an execution
will not be subject to review as an
Obvious Error or Catastrophic Error
pursuant to paragraph (c) or (d) of the
Proposed Rule if it occurred while the
underlying security was in a ‘‘Limit
State’’ or ‘‘Straddle State,’’ as defined in
the Plan. During a Limit or Straddle
State, options prices may deviate
substantially from those available
immediately prior to or following such
States. Thus, determining a Theoretical
Price in such situations would often be
very subjective, creating unnecessary
uncertainty and confusion for investors.
Because of this uncertainty, the
Exchange is proposing to provide in
Rule 20.6 that the Exchange will not
review transactions as Obvious Errors or
Catastrophic Errors when the
underlying security is in a Limit or
Straddle State.
The Exchange represents that it will
conduct its own analysis concerning the
elimination of the Obvious Error and
Catastrophic Error provisions during
Limit and Straddle States and agrees to
provide the Commission with relevant
data to assess the impact of this
proposed rule change. As part of its
analysis, the Exchange will evaluate (1)
the options market quality during Limit
and Straddle States, (2) assess the
12 See BZX Options Rules Chapter XX; see also
Rules of NOM, Chapter V, and BOX, Chapter V.
13 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74556
(March 20, 2015), 80 FR 16031 (March 26, 2015)
(SR–BATS–2014–067).
14 17 CFR 242.600(b)(47).
PO 00000
Frm 00176
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
character of incoming order flow and
transactions during Limit and Straddle
States, and (3) review any complaints
from Members and their customers
concerning executions during Limit and
Straddle States. The Exchange also
agrees to provide to the Commission
data requested to evaluate the impact of
the inapplicability of the Obvious Error
and Catastrophic Error provisions,
including data relevant to assessing the
various analyses noted above.
In connection with this proposal, the
Exchange will provide to the
Commission and the public a dataset
containing the data for each Straddle
State and Limit State in NMS Stocks
underlying options traded on the
Exchange beginning in the month
during which the proposal is approved,
limited to those option classes that have
at least one (1) trade on the Exchange
during a Straddle State or Limit State.
For each of those option classes
affected, each data record will contain
the following information:
• Stock symbol, option symbol, time at the
start of the Straddle or Limit State, an
indicator for whether it is a Straddle or Limit
State.
Æ For activity on the Exchange:
Æ Executed volume, time-weighted quoted
bid-ask spread, time-weighted average quoted
depth at the bid, time-weighted average
quoted depth at the offer;
Æ high execution price, low execution
price;
Æ number of trades for which a request for
review for error was received during Straddle
and Limit States;
Æ an indicator variable for whether those
options outlined above have a price change
exceeding 30% during the underlying stock’s
Limit or Straddle State compared to the last
available option price as reported by OPRA
before the start of the Limit or Straddle State
(1 if observe 30% and 0 otherwise). Another
indicator variable for whether the option
price within five minutes of the underlying
stock leaving the Limit or Straddle state (or
halt if applicable) is 30% away from the price
before the start of the Limit or Straddle State.
In addition, the Exchange shall
provide to the Commission and the
public assessments relating to the
impact of the operation of the Obvious
Error rules during Limit and Straddle
States as follows: (1) Evaluate the
statistical and economic impact of Limit
and Straddle States on liquidity and
market quality in the options markets;
and (2) Assess whether the lack of
Obvious Error rules in effect during the
Straddle and Limit States are
problematic. The timing of this
submission would coordinate with
Participants’ proposed time frame to
submit to the Commission assessments
as required under Appendix B of the
Plan. The Exchange notes that the pilot
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 19, 2015 / Notices
program is intended to run concurrent
with the pilot period of the Plan, which
currently expires to October 23, 2015.
The Exchange proposes to reflect this
date in the Proposed Rule.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Minor Rule Violation Plan
The Exchange’s disciplinary rules,
including Exchange Rules applicable to
‘‘minor rule violations,’’ are set forth in
Chapter VIII of the Exchange’s current
Rules. Such disciplinary rules will
apply to Options Members and their
associated persons.
The Commission approved the EDGX
Exchange’s Minor Rule Violation Plan
(‘‘MRVP’’) in 2010.15 The Exchange’s
MRVP specifies those uncontested
minor rule violations with sanctions not
exceeding $2,500 that would not be
subject to the provisions of Rule 19d–
1(c)(1) under the Act 16 requiring that an
SRO promptly file notice with the
Commission of any final disciplinary
action taken with respect to any person
or organization.17 The Exchange’s
MRVP includes the policies and
procedures included in Exchange Rule
8.15 (Imposition of Fines for Minor
Violation(s) of Rules) and in Rule 8.15,
Interpretation and Policy .01.
The Exchange proposes to amend its
MRVP and Rule 8.15, Interpretation and
Policy .01 to include proposed Rule 25.3
(Penalty for Minor Rule Violations).18
The rules included in proposed Rule
25.3 as appropriate for disposition
under the Exchange’s MRVP are:
violations of applicable Position Limit
and Exercise Limit rules; order entry
violations regarding restrictions on
orders entered by Market Makers;
violations of Market Maker continuous
bid and offer rules; violations of rules
applicable to expiring exercise
declarations; and violations of Exchange
requirements to provide trade data. The
15 See Release No. 34–62036 (May 5, 2010), 75 FR
26822 (May 12, 2010) (File No. 4–594) (‘‘MRVP
Order’’).
16 17 CFR 240.19d–1(c)(1).
17 The Commission adopted amendments to
paragraph (c) of Rule 19d-1 to allow SROs to submit
for Commission approval plans for the abbreviated
reporting of minor disciplinary infractions. See
Release No. 34–21013 (June 1, 1984), 49 FR 23828
(June 8, 1984). Any disciplinary action taken by an
SRO against any person for violation of a rule of the
SRO which has been designated as a minor rule
violation pursuant to such a plan filed with and
declared effective by the Commission will not be
considered ‘‘final’’ for purposes of Section 19(d)(1)
of the Act if the sanction imposed consists of a fine
not exceeding $2,500 and the sanctioned person has
not sought an adjudication, including a hearing, or
otherwise exhausted his administrative remedies.
18 In the MRVP Order, the Commission noted that
the Exchange proposed that any amendments to
Rule 8.15.01 made pursuant to a rule filing
submitted under Rule 19b–4 of the Act would
automatically be deemed a request by the Exchange
for Commission approval of a modification to its
MRVP. See MRVP Order, supra note 15, at note 5.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 May 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
rules included in Rule 25.3 are the same
as the rules included in the MRVPs of
BZX Options and other options
exchanges.19
Upon implementation of this
proposal, the Exchange will include the
enumerated options trading rule
violations in the Exchange’s standard
quarterly report of actions taken on
minor rule violations under the MRVP.
The quarterly report includes: the
Exchange’s internal file number for the
case, the name of the individual and/or
organization, the nature of the violation,
the specific rule provision violated, the
sanction imposed, the number of times
the rule violation has occurred, and the
date of disposition.
Although the Exchange has not
proposed fees for EDGX Options in
connection with this proposal, the
Exchange does anticipate filing a
separate proposal prior to the launch of
EDGX Options to establish applicable
fees. The Exchange notes that pursuant
to both the Act and existing Exchange
Rule 15.1, the Exchange has the
authority to prescribe dues, fees,
assessments and other charges
(collectively, ‘‘Fees’’) so long as such
Fees are equitably allocated, reasonable
and not unreasonably discriminatory.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of the Act,20 in general
and with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,21 in
particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest; and are not designed to
permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
As described above, the fundamental
premise of the proposal is that the
Exchange will operate its options
market in a similar manner to its
affiliated options exchange, BZX
Options, with the exception of the
priority model and certain other limited
differences. The Exchange believes that
EDGX Options will benefit individual
investors, options trading firms, and the
options market generally. The entry of
19 See BZX Options Rule 25.3; see also, NOM,
Chapter X, Section 7, and BOX, Chapter X, Section
2.
20 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.
21 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00177
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28755
an innovative, low-cost competitor such
as EDGX Options will promote
competition, spurring existing markets
to improve their own execution systems
and reduce trading costs.
The basis for the majority of the rules
of EDGX Options are [sic] the approved
rules of BZX Options, which have
already been found to be consistent with
the Act. For instance, the Exchange does
not believe that any of the proposed
order types or order type functionality
raise any new or novel issues that have
not previously been considered. Thus,
the Exchange further believes that the
functionality that it proposes to offer is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,22 because the System is designed to
be efficient and its operation
transparent, thereby facilitating
transactions in securities, removing
impediments to and perfecting the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system. As noted
above, the Exchange will participate in
the approved Options Order Protection
and Locked/Crossed Market Plan, and
therefore will be required to comply
with the obligations of Participants
under the Plan.
Similarly, the Exchange proposes to
adopt initial and continued listing
standards for equity and index options
that are substantially similar to the
listing standards adopted by BZX
Options and other options exchanges.
The Exchange has also proposed to
adopt rules that are substantially similar
to those of BZX Options with respect to
the Penny Pilot Program and various
other strike price programs, including
the program regarding the listing of
$0.50, $1, $2.50 and $5.00 strikes, the
Quarterly Options Series Program and
the Short Term Options Series program.
The Exchange believes that general
consistency amongst options exchanges
with respect to the series of options
available for listings and trading is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,23 in particular, in that it is designed
to promote just and equitable principles
of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest by avoiding unnecessary
confusion.
The Exchange believes that the rules
of EDGX Options as well as the
proposed method of monitoring for
22 15
23 15
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
19MYN1
28756
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 19, 2015 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
compliance with and enforcing such
rules is also consistent with the Act,
particularly Sections 6(b)(1), 6(b)(5) and
6(b)(6) of the Act, which require, in part,
that an exchange have the capacity to
enforce compliance with, and provide
appropriate discipline for, violations of
the rules of the Commission and of the
exchange.24 The Exchange has proposed
to adopt rules necessary to regulation
Options Members that are nearly
identical to the approved Rules of BZX
Options as well as numerous other
options exchanges. The Exchange
proposes to regulate activity on EDGX
Options in the same way it regulates
activity on its equities market,
specifically through various Exchange
specific functions, an RSA with FINRA,
as well as participation in industry
plans, including plans pursuant to Rule
17d–2 under the Exchange Act.
More specifically, the Exchange’s
MRVP, as proposed to be amended, is
also consistent with Sections 6(b)(1),
6(b)(5) and 6(b)(6) of the Act, which
require, in part, that an exchange have
the capacity to enforce compliance with,
and provide appropriate discipline for,
violations of the rules of the
Commission and of the exchange.25 In
addition, because amended Rule 8.15
will offer procedural rights to a person
sanctioned for a violation listed in
proposed Rule 25.3, the Exchange will
provide a fair procedure for the
disciplining of members and associated
persons, consistent with Section 6(b)(7)
of the Act.26 The proposal to include the
rules listed in proposed Rule 25.3 in the
Exchange’s MRVP is also consistent
with the public interest, the protection
of investors, or otherwise in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act, as required
by Rule 19d–1(c)(2) under the Act,27
because it should strengthen the
Exchange’s ability to carry out its
oversight and enforcement
responsibilities as an SRO in cases
where full disciplinary proceedings are
unsuitable in view of the minor nature
of the particular violation.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange operates in an intensely
competitive global marketplace for
transaction services. Relying on its array
of services and benefits, the Exchange
24 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(1), 78f(b)(5) and 78f(b)(6).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(1), 78f(b)(5) and 78f(b)(6).
26 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(7).
27 17 CFR 240.19d–1(c)(2).
25 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 May 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
competes for the privilege of providing
market services to broker-dealers. The
Exchange’s ability to compete in this
environment is based in large part on
the quality of its trading systems, the
overall quality of its market and its
attractiveness to the largest number of
investors, as measured by speed,
likelihood and cost of executions, as
well as spreads, fairness, and
transparency.
The Exchange notes that most U.S.
options exchanges are owned and
operated by companies that operate
more than one options exchange.28 The
primary reason to operate multiple
options exchanges, as is true with
respect to the proposed launch of EDGX
Options, is that it allows an exchange
operator to offer multiple market
models, including a price-time market
and a pro rata market, often with
Customer priority as a critical
component of the latter. Accordingly,
the proposed rule change is intended to
enhance competition by allowing the
Exchange to compete with existing
options exchanges that operate models
based on Customer priority and pro rata
allocations.
The proposed rule change will reduce
overall trading costs and increase price
competition, both pro-competitive
developments, and will promote further
initiative and innovation among market
centers and market participants.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period
up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which
the Exchange consents, the Commission
will: (a) By order approve or disapprove
such proposed rule change, or (b)
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
28 The IntercontinentalExchange Group, Inc.
(‘‘ICE’’) operates two options exchanges, Amex and
Arca; NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. operates three
options exchanges, NOM, Phlx and NASDAQ OMX
BX; International Securities Exchange Holding, Inc.
operates two options exchanges, ISE and ISE
Gemini; and CBOE Holdings operates two options
exchanges, CBOE and C2 Options Exchange.
PO 00000
Frm 00178
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
EDGX–2015–18 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–EDGX–2015–18. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–EDGX–
2015–18 and should be submitted on or
before June 9, 2015.
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 19, 2015 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.29
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–12022 Filed 5–18–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
[Release No. 34–74946; File No. SR–
NASDAQ–2015–052]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Modify
NASDAQ Rule 7018 Governing Fees
and Credits Assessed For Execution
and Routing
May 13, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 7,
2015, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify
NASDAQ Rule 7018(a)(1), (2), and (3),
governing fees and credits assessed for
execution and routing securities listed
on NASDAQ (subsection 1), the New
York Stock Exchange (‘‘NYSE’’)
(subsection 2) and on exchanges other
than NASDAQ and NYSE (subsection
3). NASDAQ will implement the
proposed fees on May 1, 2015.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
29 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 May 18, 2015
Jkt 235001
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1. Purpose
NASDAQ is proposing to amend
NASDAQ Rule 7018(1), (2) and (3) to
modify fees assessed for execution and
routing securities listed on NASDAQ
(‘‘Tape C’’), NYSE (‘‘Tape A’’) and on
exchanges other than NASDAQ and the
NYSE (‘‘Tape B’’), respectively,
(together, the ‘‘Tapes’’). The Exchange is
proposing two categories of changes to
credits paid regarding midpoint
liquidity: (1) Changes to the calculation
of Equity and Options-linked volume
when the Exchange pays rebates to
members that provide liquidity via
midpoint orders that are executed; and
(2) adding a tier of credits for midpoint
liquidity provided via non-displayed
orders that are executed. These changes
are described in greater detail below.
Equity and Options-Linked Volume.
With respect to credits paid for
members adding liquidity via midpoint
orders, the Exchange currently pays a
credit of $0.0030 per share executed for
members (i) with shares of liquidity
provided in all securities during the
month representing at least 0.40% of
Consolidated Volume during the month,
through one or more of its Nasdaq
Market Center MPIDs, and (ii) that
qualifies for the Nasdaq Options Market
Customer and Professional Rebate to
add Liquidity in Penny Pilot Options
Tier 8 under Chapter XV, Section 2 of
the Nasdaq Options Market rules during
the month through one or more of its
Nasdaq Options Market MPIDs. The Tier
8 program requires that a ‘‘Participant
adds Customer, Professional, Firm, NonNOM Market Maker and/or BrokerDealer liquidity in Penny Pilot Options
and/or Non-Penny Pilot Options of
0.75% or more of total industry
customer equity and ETF option ADV
contracts per day in a month.’’ The Tier
8 credit is designed to reward members
that add liquidity broadly across
NASDAQ’s equity and options trading
platform whether for trading NASDAQ,
NYSE or Amex or other exchange-listed
securities.
NASDAQ is proposing to retain the
credit rate of $0.0030 for this activity
PO 00000
Frm 00179
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28757
tier and to modify the volume
calculations for both equity and options
volume for securities on all three Tapes.
First, the Exchange is increasing the
required percentage of Consolidated
Volume of equities executed from 0.40
percent to 0.60 percent per member for
one or more of that member’s MPIDs.
Second, NASDAQ is retaining the
existing link between equities and
options trading, but it is modifying the
measure of options volume.
Specifically, the Exchange is modifying
the rule to incorporate language from
the Liquidity in Penny Pilot Options
Tier 8 under Chapter XV, Section 2 of
the Nasdaq Options Market.
Additionally, the Exchange plans to
credit members that add liquidity of
1.25 percent or more of average daily
volume (‘‘ADV’’) for the industry in the
customer clearing range 3 in Equity and
ETF Options 4 based upon volume
added by that member in the Customer,5
Professional,6 Firm,7 Non-NOM Market
Maker 8 and Broker-Dealer 9
classifications as those classifications
are defined in NOM rules.
Non-Displayed Volume. Currently,
NASDAQ Rule 7018 provides for credits
for the execution of non-displayed
liquidity (other than via Supplemental
3 The term ‘‘customer clearing range’’ refers to a
clearing designation determined by the Options
Clearing Corporation that applies throughout the
options industry.
4 This proposed rule change applies to the same
categories of options (Penny Pilot, Non-Penny Pilot,
Equity and ETF options) and the same participant
liquidity (Customer, Professional, Firm, Non-NOM
Market Maker and Broker-Dealer) that are identified
in Chapter XV, Section 2 of the Nasdaq Options
Market Rules, Tier 8.
5 As defined in Chapter XV of the Nasdaq Options
Market Rules, the term ‘‘Customer’’ or (‘‘C’’) applies
to any transaction that is identified by a Participant
for clearing in the Customer range at The Options
Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) which is not for the
account of broker or dealer or for the account of a
‘‘Professional’’ (as that term is defined in Chapter
I, Section 1(a)(48)).
6 As defined in Chapter XV of the Nasdaq Options
Market Rules, the term ‘‘Professional’’ or (‘‘P’’)
means any person or entity that (i) is not a broker
or dealer in securities, and (ii) places more than 390
orders in listed options per day on average during
a calendar month for its own beneficial account(s)
pursuant to Chapter I, Section 1(a)(48). All
Professional orders shall be appropriately marked
by Participants.
7 As defined in Chapter XV of the Nasdaq Options
Market Rules, the term ‘‘Firm’’ or (‘‘F’’) applies to
any transaction that is identified by a Participant for
clearing in the Firm range at OCC.
8 As defined in Chapter XV of the Nasdaq Options
Market Rules, the term ‘‘Non-NOM Market Maker’’
or (‘‘O’’) is a registered market maker on another
options exchange that is not a NOM Market Maker.
A Non-NOM Market Maker must append the proper
Non-NOM Market Maker designation to orders
routed to NOM.
9 As defined in Chapter XV of the Nasdaq Options
Market Rules, the term ‘‘Broker-Dealer’’ or (‘‘B’’)
applies to any transaction which is not subject to
any of the other transaction fees applicable within
a particular category.
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 96 (Tuesday, May 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28745-28757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12022]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-74949; File No. SR-EDGX-2015-18]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Establish Rules Governing the Trading
of Options on the EDGX Options Exchange
May 13, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on April 30, 2015, EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange filed a proposal to adopt rules to govern the trading
of options on the Exchange (referred to herein as ``EDGX Options
Exchange'' or ``EDGX Options''). As described more fully below, the
EDGX Options Exchange will operate a fully automated, Customer
priority/pro rata allocation model. The fundamental premise of the
proposal is that the Exchange will operate its options market in a
similar manner to the options exchange operated by the Exchange's
affiliate, BATS Exchange, Inc. (``BZX Options''), with the exception of
the proposed priority model and certain other limited differences.
The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
Web site at www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these
[[Page 28746]]
statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C
below, of the most significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to adopt a series of rules in connection
with EDGX Options, which will be a facility of the Exchange. EDGX
Options will operate an electronic trading system developed to trade
options (``System'') that will provide for the electronic display and
execution of orders, as described below. All Exchange Members will be
eligible to participate in EDGX Options provided that the Exchange
specifically authorizes them to trade in the System. The System will
provide a routing service for orders when trading interest is not
present on EDGX Options, and will comply with the obligations of the
Options Order Protection and Locked/Crossed Market Plan.
EDGX Options Members
The Exchange will authorize any Exchange Member who meets certain
enumerated qualification requirements to obtain access to EDGX Options
(any such Member, an ``Options Member'').
There will be two basic types of Options Members, Options Order
Entry Firms (``OEFs'') and Options Market Makers. Options Market
Makers, in turn, will be eligible to participate as Directed Market
Makers, Primary Market Makers and Market Makers. OEFs will be those
Options Members representing orders as agent on EDGX Options and non-
market maker participants conducting proprietary trading as principal.
Options Market Makers are Options Members registered with the Exchange
as Options Market Makers.
To become an Options Market Maker, an Options Member is required to
register by filing a written application with the Exchange, and then
must register to make markets in individual series of options. Pursuant
to proposed Rule 22.2, the Exchange may appoint one Primary Market
Maker per option class. Market Makers may select from among any option
issues traded on the Exchange to request appointment as a Primary
Market Maker, subject to the approval of the Exchange. In considering
the approval of the appointment of a Primary Market Maker in each
security, the Exchange will consider: the Market Maker's preference;
the financial resources available to the Market Maker; the Market
Maker's experience, expertise and past performance in making markets,
including the Market Maker's performance in other securities; the
Market Makers [sic] operational capability; and the maintenance and
enhancement of competition among Market Makers in each security in
which they are registered, including pursuant to the performance
standards set forth in proposed Rule 22.2(i).\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Exchange notes that proposed Rule 22.2 is based in part
on BZX Options Rule 22.2 (paragraphs (a) and (b)) and in part on
Amex Rule 923NY (paragraphs (c) through (i)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An unlimited number of Market Makers may be registered in each
class unless the number of Market Makers registered to make a market in
a particular option class should be limited whenever, in the Exchange's
judgment, quotation system capacity in an option class or classes is
not sufficient to support additional Market Makers in such class or
classes. The Exchange will not restrict access in any particular option
class until such time as the Exchange has submitted objective standards
for restricting access to the SEC for its review and approval.
EDGX Options Market Makers will be required to electronically
engage in a course of dealing to enhance liquidity available on EDGX
Options and to assist in the maintenance of fair and orderly markets.
Among other things, an Options Market Maker would have to satisfy the
following responsibilities and duties during trading: (1) On a daily
basis maintain a two-sided market on a continuous basis in at least 75%
of the individual options series in which it is registered; (2) engage,
to a reasonable degree under the existing circumstances, in dealings
for their own accounts when there exists, or it is reasonably
anticipated that there will exist, a lack of price continuity, a
temporary disparity between the supply of (or demand for) a particular
option contract, or a temporary distortion of the price relationships
between option contracts of the same class; (3) compete with other
Market Makers in all series in which the Market Maker is registered to
trade; and (4) maintain minimum net capital in accordance with
Commission and the Exchange rules. The Exchange proposes to specify
numerically the meaning of ``continuous'' with respect to Market
Makers' obligation to maintain continuous, two-sided quotes. For the
purposes of Rule 22.6, the Exchange will consider the continuous
quoting requirement fulfilled if a Market Maker provides two-sided
quotes for 90% of the time the Market Maker is required to provide
quotes in an appointed options series on a given trading day, or such
higher percentage as the Exchange may announce in advance. Substantial
or continued failure by an Options Market Maker to meet any of its
obligations and duties, will subject the Options Market Maker to
disciplinary action, suspension, or revocation of the Options Market
Maker's registration in one or more options series.
Options Market Makers receive certain benefits for carrying out
their duties. For example, a Market Maker may be designated by the
Exchange as a Primary Market Maker or may have orders directed to it in
its capacity as a Directed Market Maker, in each case receiving a
priority advantage over other non-Customer orders to the extent
applicable priority overlays have been implemented, as described below.
In addition, a lender may extend credit to a broker-dealer without
regard to the restrictions in Regulation T of the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System if the credit is to be used to finance the
broker-dealer's activities as a specialist or market maker on a
national securities exchange. Thus, an Options Market Maker has a
corresponding obligation to hold itself out as willing to buy and sell
options for its own account on a regular or continuous basis to justify
this favorable treatment. The Exchange believes that the proposed 90%
continuous quoting requirement for all Market Makers is consistent with
that typically required of Primary Market Makers and market makers of
similar status.
Every Options Member shall at all times maintain membership in
another registered options exchange that is not registered solely under
Section 6(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or in FINRA. OEF's
that transact business with customers must at all times be members of
FINRA. Pursuant to proposed EDGX Rule 17.2(g), every Options Member
will be required to have at least one registered Options Principal who
satisfies the criteria of that Rule, including the satisfaction of a
proper qualification examination. An OEF may only transact business
with Public Customers if such Options Member also is an Options Member
of another registered national securities exchange or association with
which the Exchange has entered into an agreement under Rule 17d-2 under
the Exchange Act pursuant to which such other exchange or association
shall be the designated options examining authority for the OEF.
[[Page 28747]]
As provided in EDGX Rule 16.2, existing Exchange Rules applicable
to the EDGX equity market contained in Chapters I through XV of the
Exchange Rules will apply to Options Members unless a specific Exchange
Rule applicable to the options market (Chapters XVI through XXIX of the
Exchange Rules) governs or unless the context otherwise requires.
Options Members can therefore provide sponsored access to the EDGX
Options Exchange to a nonmember (``Sponsored Participant'') pursuant to
Rule 11.3 of the Exchange Rules.
Execution System
The Exchange's options trading system will leverage the Exchange's
current state of the art technology, including its customer
connectivity, messaging protocols, quotation and execution engine,
order router, data feeds, and network infrastructure. This approach
minimizes the technical effort required for existing Exchange Members
to begin trading options on the EDGX Options Exchange. The EDGX Options
Exchange will closely resemble the Exchange's affiliate, BZX Options,
but will differ in that EDGX Options will maintain a pro rata
allocation model with execution priority dependent on the capacity of
an order (e.g., Customer or non-Customer) as well as status as a
Primary Market Maker or Directed Market Maker, as applicable. The
proposed model for EDGX Options is similar to other options exchanges
such as NYSE Amex Options (``Amex''), the MIAX Options Exchange
(``MIAX''), and other exchanges, which are sometimes referred to as
``classic'' exchanges.
Like the Exchange system for equities, all trading interest entered
into the System will be automatically executable. Orders entered into
the System will be displayed either with attribution or anonymously.
The Exchange will become an exchange member of the Options Clearing
Corporation (``OCC''). The System will be linked to OCC for the
Exchange to transmit locked-in trades for clearance and settlement.
Hours of Operation. The Exchange will begin accepting orders at
8:00 a.m. Eastern Time, as described below. The options trading system
will operate between the hours of 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time and 4:00 p.m.
Eastern Time, with all orders being available for execution during that
timeframe.
Minimum Quotation and Trading Increments. The Exchange is proposing
to apply the following quotation increments: (1) If the options series
is trading at less than $3.00, five (5) cents; (2) if the options
series is trading at $3.00 or higher, ten (10) cents; and (3) if the
options series is trading pursuant to the Penny Pilot program one (1)
cent if the options series is trading at less than $3.00, five (5)
cents if the options series is trading at $3.00 or higher, except for
QQQQ, SPY, or IWM where the minimum quoting increment will be one cent
for all series. In addition, the Exchange is proposing that the minimum
trading increment for options contracts traded on EDGX Options will be
one (1) cent for all series. The Exchange also proposes to offer
trading of Mini Options, and that the minimum trading increment for
Mini Options shall be the same as the minimum trading increment
permitted for standard options on the same underlying security.
Penny Pilot Program. Upon initial operation of EDGX Options the
Exchange proposes to commence trading, pursuant to the Penny Pilot
Program (the ``Penny Pilot''), all classes that are, on that date,
traded by other options exchanges pursuant to the Penny Pilot, which is
currently scheduled to expire on June 30, 2015, unless extended.
The Exchange represents that it has the necessary system capacity
to support any additional series listed as part of the Penny Pilot.
The Exchange agrees to submit semi-annual reports to the Commission
that will include sample data and written analysis of information
collected from April 1 through September 30, and from October 1 through
March 31, for each year, for the ten most active and twenty least
active option classes added to the Penny Pilot. In addition, for
comparison purposes, the reports include data from a control group
consisting of the ten least active option classes from the initial
group of 63 option classes in the program. This report will include,
but is not limited to: (1) Data and written analysis on the number of
quotations generated for options included in the report; (2) an
assessment of the quotation spreads for the options included in the
report; (3) an assessment of the impact of the Penny Pilot on the
capacity of the Exchange's automated systems; (4) data reflecting the
size and depth of markets; and (5) any capacity problems or other
problems that arose related to the operation of the Penny Pilot and how
the Exchange addressed them.
Additionally, the Exchange proposes that any Penny Pilot issues
that have been delisted may be replaced on a semi-annual basis by the
next most actively traded multiply listed options classes that are not
yet included in the Penny Pilot, based on trading activity in the
previous six months. The replacement issues, as applicable, would be
added to the Penny Pilot Program on the second trading day following
January 1 and July 1 of each year. The Exchange will employ the same
parameters to prospective replacement issues as approved and applicable
under the Penny Pilot Program, including excluding high-priced
underlying securities. The replacement issues will be announced in
Information Circulars distributed to Members.
Order Types. The proposed System will make available to Options
Members the following order types: Limit Orders, Minimum Quantity
Orders, Market Orders, Price Improving Orders, Book Only Orders, Post
Only Orders, and Intermarket Sweep Orders, with characteristics and
functionality similar to what is currently approved for use on BZX
Options. Each of the proposed rules regarding the order types and order
type modifiers described below is substantively identical to the
applicable rule for a corresponding order type or order type modifier
offered by BZX Options with the exception of the Post Only Order, to
which the Exchange has proposed some substantive modification. The
Exchange has also proposed minor corrections and improvements to the
descriptions of the IOC and FOK time-in-force and Price Improving
Orders, as compared to the corresponding BZX Options Rules. The
Exchange notes that it has not proposed initially to adopt all of the
order types and order type modifiers currently offered by BZX
Options.\4\ The Exchange has not proposed to adopt any new order types
or order type modifiers that are not currently offered by BZX Options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Exchange has not proposed to adopt stop orders or stop
limit orders, reserve orders, partial post only at limit orders or
the WAIT time-in-force, each of which is offered by BZX Options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
``Limit Orders'' are orders to buy or sell an option at a specified
price or better. A limit order is marketable when, for a limit order to
buy, at the time it is entered into the System, the order is priced at
the current inside offer or higher, or for a limit order to sell, at
the time it is entered into the System, the order is priced at the
inside bid or lower.
``Minimum Quantity Orders'' are orders that require that a
specified minimum quantity of contracts be obtained, or the order is
cancelled. Minimum Quantity Orders will only execute against multiple,
aggregated orders if such execution would occur simultaneously. The
Exchange will only
[[Page 28748]]
honor a specified minimum quantity on a Book Only Order entered with a
time-in-force designation of Immediate or Cancel and will disregard a
minimum quantity on any other order.
``Market Orders'' are orders to buy or sell at the best price
available at the time of execution. Market Orders to buy or sell an
option traded on EDGX Options will be rejected if they are received
when the underlying security is subject to a ``Limit State'' or
``Straddle State'' as defined in the Plan to Address Extraordinary
Market Volatility Pursuant to Rule 608 of Regulation NMS under the Act
(the ``Limit Up-Limit Down Plan'').\5\ Any portion of a Market Order
that would execute at a price more than $0.50 or 5 percent worse than
the national best bid and offer (``NBBO'') at the time the order
initially reaches EDGX Options, whichever is greater, will be
cancelled.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091 (May 31, 2012), 77
FR 33498 (June 6, 2012) (order approving the Plan on a pilot basis).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
``Price Improving Orders'' are orders to buy or sell an option at a
specified price at an increment smaller than the minimum price
variation in the security. Price Improving Orders may be entered in
increments as small as (1) one cent. Price Improving Orders shall be
displayed at the minimum price variation in that security and shall be
rounded up for sell orders and rounded down for buy orders. Unless a
User \6\ has entered instructions not to do so, Price Improving Orders
will be subject to the ``display-price sliding process,'' as described
below. The display-price sliding process is contained in proposed Rule
21.1(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ As proposed in Rule 16.1(a)(63), the term ``User'' means any
Options Member or Sponsored Participant who is authorized to obtain
access to the System pursuant to Rule 11.3 (Access).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
``Book Only Orders'' are orders that are to be ranked and executed
on the Exchange pursuant to Rule 21.8 (Order Display and Book
Processing) or cancelled, as appropriate, without routing away to
another options exchange. A Book Only Order will be subject to the
display-price sliding process unless a User has entered instructions
not to use the display-price sliding process.
``Post Only Orders'' are orders that are to be ranked and executed
on the Exchange pursuant to proposed Rule 21.8 or cancelled, as
appropriate, without routing away to another options exchange except
that the order will not remove liquidity from the EDGX Options Book. A
Post Only Order cannot be designated with instructions to use the
display-price sliding process, and any such order will be rejected. A
Post Only Order that is not subject to the Price Adjust process, as
described below, that would lock or cross a Protected Quotation of
another options exchange or the Exchange will be cancelled. The
Exchange notes that Post Only Orders on BZX Options are permitted to
remove liquidity under certain circumstances and can be designated for
the display-price sliding process under BZX Options Rules. The Exchange
has not proposed to adopt these features.
``Intermarket Sweep Orders'' or ``ISOs'' are orders that shall have
the meaning provided in proposed Rule 27.1, which relates to
intermarket trading. Such orders may be executed at one or multiple
price levels in the System without regard to Protected Quotations at
other options exchanges (i.e., may trade through such quotations). The
Exchange relies on the marking of an order by a User as an ISO order
when handling such order, and thus, it is the entering Options Member's
responsibility, not the Exchange's responsibility, to comply with the
requirements relating to ISOs. ISOs are not eligible for routing
pursuant to Rule 21.9.
Time in Force Designations. Options Members entering orders into
the System may designate such orders to remain in force and available
for display and/or potential execution for varying periods of time.
Unless cancelled earlier, once these time periods expire, the order (or
the unexecuted portion thereof) is returned to the entering party.
``Good Til Day'' or ``GTD'' shall mean, for orders so designated,
that if after entry into the System, the order is not fully executed,
the order (or the unexecuted portion thereof) shall remain available
for potential display and/or execution for the amount of time during
such trading day specified by the entering User unless canceled by the
entering party.
``Immediate Or Cancel'' or ``IOC'' shall mean, for an order so
designated, a limit order that is to be executed in whole or in part as
soon as such order is received. The portion not so executed immediately
on the Exchange or another options exchange is cancelled and is not
posted to the EDGX Options Book. IOC limit orders that are not
designated as Book Only Orders and that cannot be executed in
accordance with Rule 21.8 on the System when reaching the Exchange will
be eligible for routing away pursuant to Rule 21.9.
``DAY'' shall mean, for an order so designated, a limit order to
buy or sell which, if not executed expires at market close.
``Fill-or-Kill'' or ``FOK'' shall mean, for an order so designated,
a limit order that is to be executed in its entirety as soon as it is
received and, if not so executed, cancelled. A limit order designated
as FOK is not eligible for routing away pursuant to Rule 21.9.
One Second Exposure Period. Proposed Rule 22.12 would prohibit
Options Members from executing as principal on EDGX Options orders they
represent as agent unless (i) agency orders are first exposed on EDGX
Options for at least one (1) second or (ii) the Options Member has been
bidding or offering on EDGX Options for at least one (1) second prior
to receiving an agency order that is executable against such bid or
offer. As noted above, proposed Rule 22.12 would require Options
Members to expose their customers' orders on the Exchange for at least
one second under certain circumstances. During this one second exposure
period, other Options Members will be able to enter orders to trade
against the exposed order. In adopting a one-second order exposure
period, the Exchange is proposing a requirement that is consistent with
the Rules of other options exchanges, including BZX Options.\7\ Thus,
the exposure period will allow Options Members that are members of
other options exchanges to comply with Rule 22.12 without programming
separate time parameters into their systems for order entry or
compliance purposes. The Exchange believes that market participants are
sufficiently automated that a one second exposure period allows an
adequate time for market participants to electronically respond to an
order. Also, it is possible that market participants might wait until
the end of the exposure period, no matter how long, before responding.
Thus, the Exchange believes that any longer than one second would not
further the protection of investors or market participants, but rather,
would potentially increase market risk to investors and other market
participants by creating a longer period of time for the exposed order
to be subject to market risk.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See, e.g., Chicago Board Options Exchange (``CBOE'') Rules
6.45A, 6.45B, 6.74A and 6.74B; International Securities Exchange
(``ISE'') Rule 717(d); NOM Chapter VII, Sec. 12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The technology for the Exchange's trading system for EDGX Options
will be comparable to the technology used for the trading system
currently used for equities trading on the Exchange today. The Exchange
has had ample experience with that trading system to believe that one
second is an adequate exposure
[[Page 28749]]
period. Further, the Exchange believes that many of its current Members
will be Options Members and that such current Members have demonstrated
an ability to respond to orders in a timely fashion.
Match Trade Prevention Modifiers. As is true for BZX Options, the
Exchange will allow Options Members to use Match Trade Prevention
(``MTP'') Modifiers. Any incoming order designated with an MTP modifier
will be prevented from executing against a resting opposite side order
also designated with an MTP modifier and originating from the same
market participant identifier (``MPID''), Exchange Member identifier,
trading group identifier, or Exchange Sponsored Participant identifier.
Re-Pricing Mechanisms. The Exchange, like BZX Options, proposes to
offer two re-pricing mechanisms for Users of EDGX Options, the display-
price sliding process and the Price Adjust process. In turn, under each
type of price sliding, Users will be able to select between either
single price sliding or multiple price sliding. The Exchange will offer
display-price sliding (including multiple display-price sliding) and
Price Adjust (including multiple Price Adjust) to ensure compliance
with locked and crossed market rules relevant to participation on EDGX
Options. The proposed display-price sliding functionality for EDGX
Options is identical to functionality for BZX Options, with the
exception of language related to Post Only Order functionality, which
is not applicable. Specifically, as noted above, the Exchange omitted
language regarding Post Only Orders contained in the BZX Options
description of display-price sliding because the Exchange has proposed
to reject orders that are designated as Post Only Orders and subject to
display-price sliding. Similarly, because the Exchange has not proposed
to adopt functionality that results in executions of Post Only Orders
against resting liquidity under certain circumstances, the Exchange has
omitted from the Exchange's proposed Price Adjust rule certain language
contained in the corresponding BZX Options rule regarding such
circumstances.
Market Opening Procedures. The System shall open options, other
than index options, for trading after 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time as
described below. With respect to index options, the System shall open
such options for trading at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time.
As proposed, the Exchange will accept market and limit orders and
quotes for inclusion in the opening process (the ``Opening Process'')
beginning at 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time or immediately upon trading being
halted in an option series due to the primary listing market for the
applicable underlying security declaring a regulatory trading halt,
suspension, or pause with respect to such security (a ``Regulatory
Halt'') and will continue to accept market and limit orders and quotes
until such time as the Opening Process is initiated in that option
series (the ``Order Entry Period''), other than index options. The
Exchange will not accept IOC or FOK orders for queuing prior to the
completion of the Opening Process. The Exchange will convert all ISOs
entered for queuing prior to the completion of the Opening Process into
non-ISOs.
After the first transaction on the primary listing market after
9:30 a.m. Eastern Time in the securities underlying the options as
reported on the first print disseminated pursuant to an effective
national market system plan (``First Listing Market Transaction'') or
the Regulatory Halt has been lifted, the related option series will be
opened automatically as described below. The System will determine a
single price at which a particular option series will be opened (the
``Opening Price'') as calculated by the System within 30 seconds of the
First Listing Market Transaction or the Regulatory Halt being lifted.
Where there are no contracts in a particular series that would execute
at any price, the System shall open such options for trading without
determining an Opening Price. After establishing an Opening Price that
is also a Valid Price,\8\ orders and quotes in the System that are
priced equal to or more aggressively than the Opening Price will be
matched based on the Exchange's proposed priority rule, Rule 21.8.
Matches will occur until there is no remaining volume or there is an
imbalance of orders. All orders and quotes or portions thereof that are
matched pursuant to the Opening Process will be executed at the Opening
Price. An imbalance of orders on the buy side or sell side may result
in orders that are not executed in whole or in part. Such orders will
be handled in time sequence, beginning with the order with the oldest
time stamp and may, in whole or in part, be placed on the EDGX Options
Book, cancelled, executed, or routed in accordance with proposed Rule
21.9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Valid Price is defined in proposed Rule 21.7(a)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order Display/Matching System. Other than the differences with
respect to the market model described below, the System will be based
upon technology and functionality currently approved for use in the
Exchange's equities trading system and the Exchange's affiliate, BZX
Options. Specifically, the System will allow Options Members to enter
market orders and priced limit orders to buy and sell options listed on
EDGX Options. The orders will be designated for display (price and
size) in the order display service of the System.
Book Processing/Priority. After the opening, trades on the Exchange
will occur when a buy order/quote and a sell order/quote match on the
Exchange's order book. The System shall execute trading interest within
the System in price priority, meaning it will execute all trading
interest at the best price level within the System before executing
trading interest at the next best price. Pursuant to proposed Rule
21.8(c), after considering price priority, all orders are matched
according to pro-rata priority. In addition, Customer, Primary Market
Maker and/or Directed Market Maker priority overlays are also available
at the Exchange's discretion on a class-by-class basis pursuant to
proposed Rule 21.8(d). For example, (i) the Customer Overlay provides
Customers with priority over all non-Customer interest at the same
price; (ii) the Directed Market Maker overlay (which may only be in
effect if the Customer Overlay is also in effect) provides the Directed
Market Maker with priority over other Market Makers for a certain
percentage of contracts allocated at the same price (60% or 40%
depending upon the number of other Market Makers at the NBBO) and for
small size orders; and (iii) the Primary Market Maker overlay (which
may only be in effect if the Customer Overlay is also in effect)
provides Primary Market Makers with priority over other Market Makers
for a certain percentage of contracts allocated at the same price (60%
or 40% depending upon the number of other Market Makers at the NBBO)
and for small size orders.
After executions resulting from the Priority Overlays described
above, Orders and Quotes within the System for the accounts of non-
Customers, including Professional Customers, have next priority. If
there is more than one highest bid or more than one lowest offer in the
Consolidated Book for the account of a non-Customer, then such bids or
offers will be afforded priority on a ``size pro rata'' basis.
In allocating the participation entitlements set forth in proposed
Rule 21.8 to the Directed Market Maker and the Primary Market Maker,
the following shall apply. In a class of options where both the Primary
Market
[[Page 28750]]
Maker and the Directed Market Maker participation entitlements are in
effect and an Options Member has directed an order to a Directed Market
Maker: (a) if the Directed Market Maker's priority quote is at the
NBBO, the Directed Market Maker's participation entitlement will
supersede the Primary Market Maker's participation entitlements for an
order directed to such Directed Market Maker; (b) if the Directed
Market Maker's priority quote is not at the NBBO, the Primary Market
Maker's participation entitlement will apply to that order, provided
the Primary Market Maker's priority quote is at the NBBO: and (c) if
neither the Directed Market Maker's nor the Primary Market Maker's
priority quote is at the NBBO then executed contracts will be allocated
in accordance with the pro-rata allocation methodology as described in
paragraphs (c) and (e) above without regard to any participation
entitlement. If an incoming order has not been directed to a Directed
Market Maker by an Options Member, however, then the Primary Market
Maker's participation entitlement will apply to that order, provided
the Primary Market Maker's priority quote is at the NBBO.
As proposed and as noted above, the participation entitlements of
proposed Rule 21.8 shall not be in effect unless the Customer Overlay
is also in effect and the participation entitlements shall only apply
to any remaining balance after Customer orders have been satisfied.
Neither the Primary Market Maker nor the Directed Market Maker may
be allocated a total quantity greater than the quantity they are
quoting at the execution price. If the Primary Market Maker's or the
Directed Market Maker's allocation of an order pursuant to its
participation entitlement is greater than its pro-rata share of
priority quotes at the best price at the time that the participation
entitlement is granted, neither the Primary Market Maker nor the
Directed Market Maker shall receive any further allocation of that
order.
In establishing the counterparties to a particular trade, the
participation entitlements must first be counted against the Primary
Market Maker's highest priority bids and offers or the Directed Market
Maker's highest priority bids or offers.
The proposed participation entitlements only apply to the
allocation of executions among competing Market Maker priority quotes
existing on the EDGX Options Book at the time the order is received by
the Exchange. No market participant is allocated any portion of an
execution unless it has an existing interest at the execution price.
Moreover, no market participant can execute a greater number of
contracts than is associated with its interest at a given price.
Accordingly, the Primary Market Maker and the Directed Market Maker
participation entitlements contained in the proposed Rule are not
guarantees.
The Exchange believes that proposed Rule 21.8 governing priority on
the Exchange is consistent with other options exchanges that have
similar market models, including Amex and MIAX.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See, e.g., Amex Rule 964NY; MIAX Rule 514.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Routing. The EDGX Options Exchange will support orders that are
designated to be routed to the NBBO as well as orders that will execute
only within EDGX Options. Orders that are designated to execute at the
NBBO will be routed to other options markets to be executed when the
Exchange is not at the NBBO consistent with the Options Order
Protection and Locked/Crossed Market Plan. Subject to the exceptions
contained in proposed Rule 27.2(b), the System will ensure that an
order will not be executed at a price that trades through another
options exchange. An order that is designated by an Options Member as
routable will be routed in compliance with applicable Trade-Through
restrictions. Any order entered with a price that would lock or cross a
Protected Quotation that is not eligible for either routing, or the
display-price sliding process or the Price Adjust process will be
cancelled.
EDGX Options shall route orders in options via BATS Trading, Inc.
(``BATS Trading''), which serves as the Outbound Router of the
Exchange, as defined in current Rule 2.11. The function of the Outbound
Router will be to route orders in options listed and open for trading
on EDGX Options to other options exchanges pursuant to EDGX Options
rules solely on behalf of EDGX Options. The Outbound Router is subject
to regulation as a facility of the Exchange, including the requirement
to file proposed rule changes under Section 19 of the Act. Use of BATS
Trading or Routing Services (as described below) to route orders to
other market centers is optional. Parties that do not desire to use
BATS Trading or other Routing Services provided by the Exchange must
designate orders as not available for routing.
In the event the Exchange is not able to provide order routing
services through its affiliated broker-dealer, the Exchange will route
orders to other options exchanges in conjunction with one or more
routing brokers that are not affiliated with the Exchange (``Routing
Services'').
EDGX Options will offer a variety of routing options that will be
identical to the routing options offered by BZX Options. Routing
options may be combined with all available order types and times-in-
force, with the exception of order types and times-in-force whose terms
are inconsistent with the terms of a particular routing option. The
System will consider the quotations only of accessible markets. The
term ``System routing table'' refers to the proprietary process for
determining the specific options exchanges to which the System routes
orders and the order in which it routes them. The Exchange reserves the
right to maintain a different System routing table for different
routing options and to modify the System routing table at any time
without notice. The proposed System routing options are Parallel D,
Parallel 2D, Destination Specific and Directed ISO. The Exchange notes
that Destination Specific and Directed ISO are both offered by BZX
Options but that such options are currently listed in both the routing
section and the order description section. The Exchange believes that
these options are more appropriately listed as routing strategies, and
thus has proposed to include them in Rule 21.9.
The Exchange also proposes to offer two optional Re-Route
instructions, Aggressive Re-Route and Super Aggressive Re-Route, either
of which can be assigned to routable orders. Pursuant to the Aggressive
Re-Route instruction, to the extent the unfilled balance of a routable
order has been posted to the EDGX Options Book, should the order
subsequently be crossed by another accessible options exchange, the
System shall route the order to the crossing options exchange. Pursuant
to the Super Aggressive Re-Route instruction, to the extent the
unfilled balance of a routable order has been posted to the EDGX
Options Book, should the order subsequently be locked or crossed by
another accessible options exchange, the System shall route the order
to the locking or crossing options Exchange.
Data Feed; Anonymity. The System will include a proprietary data
feed, Multicast PITCH, which will display depth of book quotations and
execution information based on orders received by EDGX Options using
the minimum price variation applicable to that security. The Exchange
will make available to all market participants through the Options
Price Reporting Authority (``OPRA'') an indication that there is
Customer interest included in the best bid and
[[Page 28751]]
offer disseminated by the Exchange. The Exchange will also identify
Customer orders and trades as such on messages disseminated by the
Exchange through its Multicast PITCH data feed. To the extent a User
has submitted an Attributable Order, which is the default property for
all orders entered into the System, the Multicast PITCH data feed will
indicate the User's MPID along with the price and size of their order
or quote.
The intra-day transaction reports produced by the System will
indicate the details of the transactions, and will not reveal contra
party identities. However, the Exchange does anticipate generating
daily, weekly and/or monthly reports containing aggregate information
regarding Market Maker and Customer executions, and thus, has proposed
to make clear in Rule 21.10 that such identifying information will be
made available. The Exchange believes that this practice is common on
other options exchanges that operate market models similar to that
proposed by the Exchange.
Risk Monitor Mechanism. The Exchange also proposes to offer to all
Users of EDGX Options the ability to establish certain risk control
parameters via the Exchange's Risk Monitor Mechanism. The proposed Risk
Monitor Mechanism is identical to that offered by BZX Options pursuant
to Rule 21.16. The Risk Monitor Mechanism provides protection from the
risk of multiple executions across multiple series of an option or
across multiple options. The risk to Users is not limited to a single
series in an option or even to all series of an option; Users that
quote in multiple series of multiple options have significant exposure,
requiring them to offset or hedge their overall positions.
In particular, the Risk Monitor Mechanism will be useful for EDGX
Options Market Makers, who are required to continuously quote in
assigned options. Quoting across many series in an option creates the
possibility of ``rapid fire'' executions that can create large,
unintended principal positions that expose the Market Maker to
unnecessary market risk. The Risk Monitor Mechanism is intended to
assist such Users in managing their market risk.
Though the Risk Monitor Mechanism will be most useful to Market
Makers, the Exchange proposes to offer the functionality to all
participant types. There may be other firms that trade on a proprietary
basis and provide liquidity to the Exchange; these firms could
potentially benefit, similarly to Market Makers, from the Risk Monitor
Mechanism. The Exchange believes that the Risk Monitor Mechanism should
help liquidity providers generally, market makers and other
participants alike, in managing risk and providing deep and liquid
markets to investors.
Options Order Protection and Locked/Crossed Market Plan Rules
The Exchange will participate in the approved Options Order
Protection and Locked/Crossed Market Plan (``Plan''), and therefore
will be required to comply with the obligations of Participants under
the Plan. The Exchange proposes to adopt rules relating to the Plan
that are substantially similar to the rules in place on all of the
options exchanges that are Participants to the Plan.
The Plan replaced the Plan for the Purpose of Creating and
Operating an Intermarket Option Linkage (``Old Plan''). The Old Plan
required its participant exchanges to operate a stand-alone system or
``Linkage'' for sending order-flow between exchanges to limit trade-
throughs, and the Linkage was operated by the Options Clearing
Corporation (``OCC''). The Plan essentially applies the Regulation NMS
price-protection provisions to the options markets. Similar to
Regulation NMS, the Plan requires the Plan Participants to adopt rules
``reasonably designed to prevent Trade-Throughs,'' while exempting
Intermarket Sweep Orders (``ISOs'') from that prohibition. The Plan's
definition of an ISO is essentially the same as under Regulation NMS.
The remaining exceptions to the trade-through prohibition, discussed
more specifically below, either track those under Regulation NMS or
correspond to unique aspects of the options market, or both.
The Rules in proposed Chapter XXVII conform to the requirements of
the Plan. Rule 27.1 sets forth the defined terms for use under the
Plan. Rule 27.2 prohibits trade-throughs and exempts ISOs from that
prohibition. Rule 27.2 also contains additional exceptions to the
trade-through prohibition that track the exceptions under Regulation
NMS or correspond to unique aspects of the EDGX Options Exchange, or
both.
Proposed Rule 27.3 sets forth the general prohibition against
locking/crossing other eligible exchanges as well as several exceptions
that permit locked markets in limited circumstances; such exceptions
have been approved by the Commission for inclusion in the rules of
other options exchanges. Specifically, the exceptions to the general
prohibition on locking and crossing occur when (1) the locking or
crossing quotation was displayed at a time when the Exchange was
experiencing a failure, material delay, or malfunction of its systems
or equipment; (2) the locking or crossing quotation was displayed at a
time when there is a Crossed Market; or (3) the Member simultaneously
routed an ISO to execute against the full displayed size of any locked
or crossed Protected Bid or Protected Offer.
Securities Traded on EDGX Options
General Listing Standards. The Exchange proposes to adopt listing
standards for Options traded on EDGX Options (Chapter XIX) as well as
for Index Options (Chapter XXIX) that are identical to the approved
rules of BZX Options.\10\ The Exchange will join the Options Listings
Procedures Plan and will list and trade options already listed on other
options exchanges. The Exchange will gradually phase-in its trading of
options, beginning with a selection of actively traded options. At
least initially, the Exchange does not plan to develop new options
products or listing standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Rules of BZX Options, Chapters XIX and XXIX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1 Strike Program. Pursuant to proposed Rule 19.6, Supplementary
Material .02, the interval between strike prices of series of options
on individual stocks may be $1.00 or greater (``$1 Strike Prices'')
provided the strike price is $50 or less, but not less than $1. The
listing of $1 strike prices shall be limited to option classes
overlying no more than one hundred fifty (150) individual stocks (the
``$1 Strike Price Program'') as specifically designated by EDGX
Options. As proposed, EDGX Options may list $1 Strike Prices on any
other option classes if those classes are specifically designated by
other national securities exchanges that employ a similar $1 Strike
Price Program under their respective rules.
To be eligible for inclusion into the $1 Strike Price Program, an
underlying security must close below $50 in the primary market on the
previous trading day. After a security is added to the $1 Strike Price
Program, EDGX Options may list $1 Strike Prices from $1 to $50 that are
no more than $5 from the closing price of the underlying on the
preceding day. For example, if the underlying security closes at $13,
EDGX Options may list strike prices from $8 to $18. EDGX Options may
not list series with $1 intervals within $0.50 of an existing strike
price in the same series, except that strike prices of $2, $3, $4, $5
and $6 shall be permitted within $0.50 of an existing strike price for
classes also selected to participate in the $0.50 Strike Program.
Additionally, for an option class selected for the $1 Strike Price
Program, EDGX Options may not
[[Page 28752]]
list $1 Strike Prices on any series having greater than nine (9) months
until expiration. A security shall remain in the $1 Strike Price
Program until otherwise designated by EDGX Options.
For options classes selected to participate in the $1 Strike
Program, the Exchange will, on a monthly basis, review series that were
originally listed under the $1 Strike Program with strike prices that
are more than $5 from the current value of an options class and delist
those series with no open interest in both the put and the call series
having a: (1) strike higher than the highest strike price with open
interest in the put and/or call series for a given expiration month;
and (2) strike lower than the lowest strike price with open interest in
the put and/or call series for a given expiration month. If the
Exchange identifies series for delisting pursuant to this policy, the
Exchange shall notify other options exchanges with similar delisting
policies regarding the eligible series for delisting, and shall work
jointly with such other exchanges to develop a uniform list of series
to be delisted so as to ensure uniform series delisting of multiply
listed options classes.
Notwithstanding the above delisting policy, the Exchange may grant
member requests to add strikes and/or maintain strikes in series of
options classes traded pursuant to the $1 Strike Program that are
eligible for delisting.
In addition to $1 strikes as proposed above, the Exchange proposes
to offer options trading on series of options with $0.50, $2.50 and
$5.00 strike price intervals, consistent with other options exchanges,
including BZX Options.
With regard to the impact on system capacity, the Exchange has
analyzed its capacity and represents that it and the Options Price
Reporting Authority have the necessary systems capacity to handle the
additional traffic associated with the listing and trading of option
series that may be listed and traded in the strike price intervals
described above, including $0.50, $1, $2.50 and $5.00 strikes.
Mini Options. After an option class on a stock, Exchange-Traded
Fund Share, Trust Issued Receipt, Exchange Traded Note, and other Index
Linked Security with a 100 share deliverable has been approved for
listing and trading on the Exchange, the Exchange proposes to permit
listing of series of option contracts with a 10 share deliverable on
that stock, Exchange-Traded Fund Share, Trust Issued Receipt, Exchange
Traded Note, and other Index Linked Security for all expirations opened
for trading on the Exchange. Pursuant to proposed Interpretation and
Policy .07 to Rule 19.6, Mini Option contracts could be listed on SPDR
S&P 500 (``SPY''), Apple Inc. (``AAPL''), SPDR Gold Trust (``GLD''),
Google Inc. (``GOOG''), and Amazon.com Inc. (``AMZN''). Strike prices
for Mini Options shall be set at the same level as for regular options.
For example, a call series strike price to deliver 10 shares of stock
at $125 per share has a total deliverable value of $1250 and the strike
price will be set at 125. No additional series of Mini Options may be
added if the underlying security is trading at $90 or less. The
underlying security must trade above $90 for five consecutive days
prior to listing Mini Options contracts in an additional expiration
month.
Quarterly Options Series Program. Pursuant to proposed Rule 19.6,
Interpretation and Policy .04 and proposed Rule 29.11(g) the Exchange
may list and trade options series that expire at the close of business
on the last business day of a calendar quarter (``Quarterly Options
Series''). As proposed, the Exchange may list Quarterly Options Series
for up to five (5) currently listed options classes that are either
options on exchange traded funds (``ETF'') or index options. In
addition, the Exchange may also list Quarterly Options Series on any
options classes that are selected by other securities exchanges that
employ a similar program under their respective rules.
The Exchange may list series that expire at the end of the next
consecutive four (4) calendar quarters, as well as the fourth quarter
of the next calendar year. For example, if the Exchange is trading
Quarterly Options Series in the month of May 2016, it may list series
that expire at the end of the second, third, and fourth quarters of
2016, as well as the first and fourth quarters of 2017. Following the
second quarter 2016 expiration, the Exchange could add series that
expire at the end of the second quarter of 2017.
For each class of ETF options selected for the Quarterly Options
Series program, the Exchange may list strike prices within $5 from the
previous day's closing price of the underlying security at the time of
initial listing. Subsequently, the Exchange may list up to 60
additional strike prices that are within thirty percent (30%) of the
previous day's close, or more than 30% away from the previous day's
close provided demonstrated customer interest exists for such series.
The Exchange has also proposed a delisting policy with respect to
Quarterly Options Series in ETF options. On a monthly basis, the
Exchange will review series that are outside of a range of five (5)
strikes above and five (5) strikes below the current price of the ETF,
and delist series with no open interest in both the call and the put
series having a (1) strike higher than the highest price with open
interest in the put and/or call series for a given expiration month;
and (2) strike lower than the lowest strike price with open interest in
the put and/or the call series for a given expiration month.
Notwithstanding the delisting policy, customer requests to add strikes
and/or maintain strikes in Quarterly Options Series eligible for
delisting shall be granted.
The Exchange also may list Quarterly Option Series based on an
underlying index pursuant to similar provisions in Rule 29.11. There
are two noteworthy distinctions between the rules for listing Quarterly
Options Series based on an ETF versus Quarterly Options Series based on
an index. First, whereas the initial listing of Quarterly Options
Series based on an underlying ETF is restricted to strike prices within
$5 from the previous day's closing price of the underlying security,
the initial listing of strikes for Quarterly Options Series based on an
underlying index is restricted to: (i) a price that is within thirty
percent (30%) of the current index value, and (ii) no more than five
strikes above and five strikes below the value of the underlying index.
Second, whereas the Exchange may list up to 60 additional strike prices
for each Quarterly Options Series based on an ETF, there is no firm cap
on the additional listing of strikes for Quarterly Options Series based
on an underlying index; rather, additional strike prices may be listed
provided the new listings do not result in more than five strike prices
on the same side of the underlying index value as the new listings.
The interval between strike prices on Quarterly Options Series
shall be the same as the interval for strike prices for series in that
same options class that expire in accordance with the normal monthly
expiration cycle.
With regard to the impact on system capacity, the Exchange has
analyzed its capacity and represents that it and the Options Price
Reporting Authority have the necessary systems capacity to handle the
additional traffic associated with the listing and trading of options
series pursuant to the above-described Quarterly Options Series
program.
Short Term Option Series Program. The Exchange plans to operate a
Short-Term Options Series Program similar to other Short Term Options
Programs, including that of BZX Options. Pursuant
[[Page 28753]]
to proposed Rule 19.6, Interpretation and Policy .05 for equity options
and Rule 29.11(h) for index options in, the Exchange intends to open
for trading on any Thursday or Friday that is a business day (``Short
Term Option Opening Date'') series of options on that class that expire
on each of the next five (5) Fridays that are business days and are not
Fridays in which monthly options series or Quarterly Options Series
expire (``Short Term Option Expiration Dates''). As proposed, the
Exchange may have no more than a total of five Short Term Option
Expiration Dates. If EDGX Options is not open for business on the
respective Thursday or Friday, the Short Term Option Opening Date will
be the first business day immediately prior to that respective Thursday
or Friday. Similarly, if EDGX Options is not open for business on the
Friday that the options are set to expire, the Short Term Option
Expiration Date will be the first business day immediately prior to
that Friday.
As proposed, the Exchange may select up to fifty (50) option
classes in which Short Term Option Series may be traded. In addition to
those fifty option classes the Exchange may also list Short Term Option
Series on any option classes that are selected by other securities
exchanges that employ a similar program. For each option class eligible
for participation in the Short Term Option Series Program, the Exchange
may open up to thirty (30) Short Term Option Series for each expiration
date in that class. The Exchange may also open Short Term Option Series
that are opened by other securities exchanges in option classes
selected by such exchanges under their respective short term option
rules.
As noted above, the remaining parameters of the proposed Short Term
Options Program are identical to those of BZX Options and similar to
those operated by other options exchanges.
With regard to the impact on system capacity, the Exchange has
analyzed its capacity and represents that it and the Options Price
Reporting Authority have the necessary systems capacity to handle the
additional traffic associated with the listing and trading of option
series pursuant to the Short Term Option Series Program.
Conduct and Operational Rules for Options Members
EDGX proposes to adopt rules that are nearly identical to the
approved rules of other options exchanges, including BZX Options. Thus,
EDGX proposes to adopt rules that are based on the rules of BZX Options
regarding: Business Conduct Rules (Chapter XVIII); exercises and
deliveries (Chapter XXIII); records, reports and audits (Chapter XXIV);
minor rule violations (Chapter XXV); doing business with the public
(Chapter XXVI); and margin (Chapter XXVIII).
The Exchange notes that certain requirements that will be
applicable to Options Members are contained in other sections of the
Exchange's existing Rules. For example, the Exchange has included
applicable rules requiring options principal registration into proposed
EDGX Rule 17.2(g) but also proposes to include reference to applicable
registration requirements that are already contained in EDGX Rule 2.5.
The Exchange also proposes to expand EDGX Rule 2.5 to clearly include
options principal registration. The Exchange intends to require
Authorized Traders of Options Members to comply with existing Exchange
registration requirements applicable to all Authorized Traders.\11\
Accordingly, the Exchange has not proposed specific rules applicable to
registration of representatives other than options principals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Exchange Rule 2.5, Interpretation and Policy .01 and
Exchange Rule 11.4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As is true for BZX Options, with respect to Position Limits (Rule
18.7) and Exercise Limits (Rule 18.9), the Exchange is proposing to
apply the limits established pursuant to the rules of the CBOE,
although the Exchange will establish such limits for products not
traded on the CBOE. By expressly incorporating an already-approved
limit, the Exchange will ensure that an appropriate limit is in place
at all times without the need to continually adjust its rule manually
or to disrupt the operations of its Members.
National Market System
The EDGX Options Exchange will operate as a full and equal
participant in the national market system for options trading
established under Section 11A of the Exchange Act, just as its equities
market participates today. The EDGX Options Exchange will become a
member of OPRA, the Options Linkage Authority (``OLA''), the Options
Regulatory Surveillance Authority (``ORSA''), and the Options Listing
Procedures Plan (``OLPP'').
The Exchange expects to participate in those plans on the same
terms currently applicable to current members of those plans, and it
expects little or no plan impact due to the fact that the Exchange's
market will operate in a manner similar to several other existing
options exchanges.
Regulation
The Exchange will leverage many of the structures it established to
operate a national securities exchange in compliance with Section 6 of
the Exchange Act. As described in more detail below, there will be
three elements of that regulation: (1) the Exchange will join the
existing options industry agreements pursuant to Section 17(d) of the
Exchange Act, as it has with respect to its equities market, (2) the
Exchange's Regulatory Services Agreement (``RSA'') with FINRA will
govern many aspects of the regulation and discipline of Members that
participate in options trading, just as it does for equities market
regulation, and (3) the Exchange will perform options listing
regulation, as well as authorize Options Members to trade on EDGX
Options, and conduct surveillance of options trading as it does today
for equities.
Section 17(d) of the Exchange Act and the related Exchange Act
rules permit SROs to allocate certain regulatory responsibilities to
avoid duplicative oversight and regulation. Under Exchange Act Rule
17d-1, the SEC designates one SRO to be the Designated Examining
Authority, or DEA, for each broker-dealer that is a member of more than
one SRO. The DEA is responsible for the financial aspects of that
broker-dealer's regulatory oversight. Because EDGX Options Members also
must be members of at least one other SRO, the Exchange would generally
not be designated as the DEA for any of its members.
Rule 17d-2 under the Act permits SROs to file with the Commission
plans under which the SROs allocate among each other the responsibility
to receive regulatory reports from, and examine and enforce compliance
with specified provisions of the Act and rules thereunder and SRO rules
by, firms that are members of more than one SRO (``common members'').
If such a plan is declared effective by the Commission, an SRO that is
a party to the plan is relieved of regulatory responsibility as to any
common member for whom responsibility is allocated under the plan to
another SRO.
All of the options exchanges and FINRA have entered into the
Options Sales Practices Agreement, a Rule 17d-2 agreement. Under this
Agreement, the examining SROs will examine firms that are common
members of the Exchange and the particular examining SRO for compliance
with certain provisions of the Act, certain of the rules and
regulations adopted thereunder, certain examining SRO rules, and
certain EDGX
[[Page 28754]]
Options Rules. In addition, EDGX Options Rules contemplate
participation in this Agreement by requiring that any Options Member
also be a member of at least one of the examining SROs.
For those regulatory responsibilities that fall outside the scope
of any Rule 17d-2 agreements, the Exchange will retain full regulatory
responsibility under the Exchange Act. However, as noted above, the
Exchange has entered into an RSA with FINRA, pursuant to which FINRA
personnel operate as agents for the Exchange in performing certain of
these functions. As is the case with the EDGX equities market, the
Exchange will supervise FINRA and continue to bear ultimate regulatory
responsibility for the EDGX Options Exchange. The Exchange intends to
amend the existing RSA in order to capture certain aspects of
regulation specifically applicable to EDGX Options and the regulation
and discipline of Options Members.
As a member of the Intermarket Surveillance Group, the Exchange
will comply with the specifications of the Consolidated Options Audit
Trail System (``COATS'') in submitting data for purposes of creating a
consolidated audit trail. The Exchange will also receive COATS data for
purposes of its surveillance operations.
Consistent with the Exchange's existing regulatory structure, the
Exchange's Chief Regulatory Officer shall have general supervision of
the regulatory operations of EDGX Options, including responsibility for
overseeing the surveillance, examination, and enforcement functions and
for administering all regulatory services agreements applicable to EDGX
Options. Similarly, the Exchange's existing Regulatory Oversight
Committee will be responsible for overseeing the adequacy and
effectiveness of Exchange's regulatory and self-regulatory organization
responsibilities, including those applicable to EDGX Options.
Finally, as is true with respect to equities, the Exchange, and
FINRA pursuant to the RSA referenced above, will perform automated
surveillance of trading on EDGX Options for the purpose of maintaining
a fair and orderly market at all times. Specifically, EDGX Options will
be monitored to identify unusual trading patterns and determine whether
particular trading activity requires further regulatory investigation
by FINRA.
In addition, the Exchange will oversee the process for determining
and implementing trade halts, identifying and responding to unusual
market conditions, and administering the Exchange's process for
identifying and remediating ``obvious errors'' by and among its Options
Members. EDGX proposed rules (Chapter XX) regarding halts, unusual
market conditions, extraordinary market volatility, obvious errors, and
audit trail are identical to the approved rules of BZX Options.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See BZX Options Rules Chapter XX; see also Rules of NOM,
Chapter V, and BOX, Chapter V.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange notes that the obvious error rule of BZX Options was
recently approved \13\ and that other options exchanges are in the
process of implementing similar rules. The Exchange has not proposed
any changes as compared to the recently approved obvious error rule of
BZX Options. Thus, in addition to the general provisions for reviewing
and handling transactions that potentially qualify for adjustment or
nullification as Obvious Errors or Catastrophic Errors, the Exchange
proposes to adopt Interpretation and Policy .01 to provide for how the
Exchange will treat Obvious and Catastrophic Errors in response to the
Limit Up-Limit Down Plan, which is applicable to all NMS stocks, as
defined in Regulation NMS Rule 600(b)(47).\14\ As proposed, during a
pilot period to coincide with the pilot period for the Plan, including
any extensions to the pilot period for the Plan, an execution will not
be subject to review as an Obvious Error or Catastrophic Error pursuant
to paragraph (c) or (d) of the Proposed Rule if it occurred while the
underlying security was in a ``Limit State'' or ``Straddle State,'' as
defined in the Plan. During a Limit or Straddle State, options prices
may deviate substantially from those available immediately prior to or
following such States. Thus, determining a Theoretical Price in such
situations would often be very subjective, creating unnecessary
uncertainty and confusion for investors. Because of this uncertainty,
the Exchange is proposing to provide in Rule 20.6 that the Exchange
will not review transactions as Obvious Errors or Catastrophic Errors
when the underlying security is in a Limit or Straddle State.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74556 (March 20,
2015), 80 FR 16031 (March 26, 2015) (SR-BATS-2014-067).
\14\ 17 CFR 242.600(b)(47).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange represents that it will conduct its own analysis
concerning the elimination of the Obvious Error and Catastrophic Error
provisions during Limit and Straddle States and agrees to provide the
Commission with relevant data to assess the impact of this proposed
rule change. As part of its analysis, the Exchange will evaluate (1)
the options market quality during Limit and Straddle States, (2) assess
the character of incoming order flow and transactions during Limit and
Straddle States, and (3) review any complaints from Members and their
customers concerning executions during Limit and Straddle States. The
Exchange also agrees to provide to the Commission data requested to
evaluate the impact of the inapplicability of the Obvious Error and
Catastrophic Error provisions, including data relevant to assessing the
various analyses noted above.
In connection with this proposal, the Exchange will provide to the
Commission and the public a dataset containing the data for each
Straddle State and Limit State in NMS Stocks underlying options traded
on the Exchange beginning in the month during which the proposal is
approved, limited to those option classes that have at least one (1)
trade on the Exchange during a Straddle State or Limit State. For each
of those option classes affected, each data record will contain the
following information:
Stock symbol, option symbol, time at the start of the
Straddle or Limit State, an indicator for whether it is a Straddle
or Limit State.
[cir] For activity on the Exchange:
[cir] Executed volume, time-weighted quoted bid-ask spread,
time-weighted average quoted depth at the bid, time-weighted average
quoted depth at the offer;
[cir] high execution price, low execution price;
[cir] number of trades for which a request for review for error
was received during Straddle and Limit States;
[cir] an indicator variable for whether those options outlined
above have a price change exceeding 30% during the underlying
stock's Limit or Straddle State compared to the last available
option price as reported by OPRA before the start of the Limit or
Straddle State (1 if observe 30% and 0 otherwise). Another indicator
variable for whether the option price within five minutes of the
underlying stock leaving the Limit or Straddle state (or halt if
applicable) is 30% away from the price before the start of the Limit
or Straddle State.
In addition, the Exchange shall provide to the Commission and the
public assessments relating to the impact of the operation of the
Obvious Error rules during Limit and Straddle States as follows: (1)
Evaluate the statistical and economic impact of Limit and Straddle
States on liquidity and market quality in the options markets; and (2)
Assess whether the lack of Obvious Error rules in effect during the
Straddle and Limit States are problematic. The timing of this
submission would coordinate with Participants' proposed time frame to
submit to the Commission assessments as required under Appendix B of
the Plan. The Exchange notes that the pilot
[[Page 28755]]
program is intended to run concurrent with the pilot period of the
Plan, which currently expires to October 23, 2015. The Exchange
proposes to reflect this date in the Proposed Rule.
Minor Rule Violation Plan
The Exchange's disciplinary rules, including Exchange Rules
applicable to ``minor rule violations,'' are set forth in Chapter VIII
of the Exchange's current Rules. Such disciplinary rules will apply to
Options Members and their associated persons.
The Commission approved the EDGX Exchange's Minor Rule Violation
Plan (``MRVP'') in 2010.\15\ The Exchange's MRVP specifies those
uncontested minor rule violations with sanctions not exceeding $2,500
that would not be subject to the provisions of Rule 19d-1(c)(1) under
the Act \16\ requiring that an SRO promptly file notice with the
Commission of any final disciplinary action taken with respect to any
person or organization.\17\ The Exchange's MRVP includes the policies
and procedures included in Exchange Rule 8.15 (Imposition of Fines for
Minor Violation(s) of Rules) and in Rule 8.15, Interpretation and
Policy .01.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See Release No. 34-62036 (May 5, 2010), 75 FR 26822 (May
12, 2010) (File No. 4-594) (``MRVP Order'').
\16\ 17 CFR 240.19d-1(c)(1).
\17\ The Commission adopted amendments to paragraph (c) of Rule
19d-1 to allow SROs to submit for Commission approval plans for the
abbreviated reporting of minor disciplinary infractions. See Release
No. 34-21013 (June 1, 1984), 49 FR 23828 (June 8, 1984). Any
disciplinary action taken by an SRO against any person for violation
of a rule of the SRO which has been designated as a minor rule
violation pursuant to such a plan filed with and declared effective
by the Commission will not be considered ``final'' for purposes of
Section 19(d)(1) of the Act if the sanction imposed consists of a
fine not exceeding $2,500 and the sanctioned person has not sought
an adjudication, including a hearing, or otherwise exhausted his
administrative remedies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to amend its MRVP and Rule 8.15,
Interpretation and Policy .01 to include proposed Rule 25.3 (Penalty
for Minor Rule Violations).\18\ The rules included in proposed Rule
25.3 as appropriate for disposition under the Exchange's MRVP are:
violations of applicable Position Limit and Exercise Limit rules; order
entry violations regarding restrictions on orders entered by Market
Makers; violations of Market Maker continuous bid and offer rules;
violations of rules applicable to expiring exercise declarations; and
violations of Exchange requirements to provide trade data. The rules
included in Rule 25.3 are the same as the rules included in the MRVPs
of BZX Options and other options exchanges.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ In the MRVP Order, the Commission noted that the Exchange
proposed that any amendments to Rule 8.15.01 made pursuant to a rule
filing submitted under Rule 19b-4 of the Act would automatically be
deemed a request by the Exchange for Commission approval of a
modification to its MRVP. See MRVP Order, supra note 15, at note 5.
\19\ See BZX Options Rule 25.3; see also, NOM, Chapter X,
Section 7, and BOX, Chapter X, Section 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upon implementation of this proposal, the Exchange will include the
enumerated options trading rule violations in the Exchange's standard
quarterly report of actions taken on minor rule violations under the
MRVP. The quarterly report includes: the Exchange's internal file
number for the case, the name of the individual and/or organization,
the nature of the violation, the specific rule provision violated, the
sanction imposed, the number of times the rule violation has occurred,
and the date of disposition.
Although the Exchange has not proposed fees for EDGX Options in
connection with this proposal, the Exchange does anticipate filing a
separate proposal prior to the launch of EDGX Options to establish
applicable fees. The Exchange notes that pursuant to both the Act and
existing Exchange Rule 15.1, the Exchange has the authority to
prescribe dues, fees, assessments and other charges (collectively,
``Fees'') so long as such Fees are equitably allocated, reasonable and
not unreasonably discriminatory.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of the Act,\20\ in general and with Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act,\21\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions
in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest; and are not designed to
permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As described above, the fundamental premise of the proposal is that
the Exchange will operate its options market in a similar manner to its
affiliated options exchange, BZX Options, with the exception of the
priority model and certain other limited differences. The Exchange
believes that EDGX Options will benefit individual investors, options
trading firms, and the options market generally. The entry of an
innovative, low-cost competitor such as EDGX Options will promote
competition, spurring existing markets to improve their own execution
systems and reduce trading costs.
The basis for the majority of the rules of EDGX Options are [sic]
the approved rules of BZX Options, which have already been found to be
consistent with the Act. For instance, the Exchange does not believe
that any of the proposed order types or order type functionality raise
any new or novel issues that have not previously been considered. Thus,
the Exchange further believes that the functionality that it proposes
to offer is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\22\ because the
System is designed to be efficient and its operation transparent,
thereby facilitating transactions in securities, removing impediments
to and perfecting the mechanism of a free and open market and a
national market system. As noted above, the Exchange will participate
in the approved Options Order Protection and Locked/Crossed Market
Plan, and therefore will be required to comply with the obligations of
Participants under the Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Similarly, the Exchange proposes to adopt initial and continued
listing standards for equity and index options that are substantially
similar to the listing standards adopted by BZX Options and other
options exchanges. The Exchange has also proposed to adopt rules that
are substantially similar to those of BZX Options with respect to the
Penny Pilot Program and various other strike price programs, including
the program regarding the listing of $0.50, $1, $2.50 and $5.00
strikes, the Quarterly Options Series Program and the Short Term
Options Series program. The Exchange believes that general consistency
amongst options exchanges with respect to the series of options
available for listings and trading is consistent with Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act,\23\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions
in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest by avoiding unnecessary
confusion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the rules of EDGX Options as well as the
proposed method of monitoring for
[[Page 28756]]
compliance with and enforcing such rules is also consistent with the
Act, particularly Sections 6(b)(1), 6(b)(5) and 6(b)(6) of the Act,
which require, in part, that an exchange have the capacity to enforce
compliance with, and provide appropriate discipline for, violations of
the rules of the Commission and of the exchange.\24\ The Exchange has
proposed to adopt rules necessary to regulation Options Members that
are nearly identical to the approved Rules of BZX Options as well as
numerous other options exchanges. The Exchange proposes to regulate
activity on EDGX Options in the same way it regulates activity on its
equities market, specifically through various Exchange specific
functions, an RSA with FINRA, as well as participation in industry
plans, including plans pursuant to Rule 17d-2 under the Exchange Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1), 78f(b)(5) and 78f(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
More specifically, the Exchange's MRVP, as proposed to be amended,
is also consistent with Sections 6(b)(1), 6(b)(5) and 6(b)(6) of the
Act, which require, in part, that an exchange have the capacity to
enforce compliance with, and provide appropriate discipline for,
violations of the rules of the Commission and of the exchange.\25\ In
addition, because amended Rule 8.15 will offer procedural rights to a
person sanctioned for a violation listed in proposed Rule 25.3, the
Exchange will provide a fair procedure for the disciplining of members
and associated persons, consistent with Section 6(b)(7) of the Act.\26\
The proposal to include the rules listed in proposed Rule 25.3 in the
Exchange's MRVP is also consistent with the public interest, the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act, as required by Rule 19d-1(c)(2) under the Act,\27\ because it
should strengthen the Exchange's ability to carry out its oversight and
enforcement responsibilities as an SRO in cases where full disciplinary
proceedings are unsuitable in view of the minor nature of the
particular violation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1), 78f(b)(5) and 78f(b)(6).
\26\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(7).
\27\ 17 CFR 240.19d-1(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange
operates in an intensely competitive global marketplace for transaction
services. Relying on its array of services and benefits, the Exchange
competes for the privilege of providing market services to broker-
dealers. The Exchange's ability to compete in this environment is based
in large part on the quality of its trading systems, the overall
quality of its market and its attractiveness to the largest number of
investors, as measured by speed, likelihood and cost of executions, as
well as spreads, fairness, and transparency.
The Exchange notes that most U.S. options exchanges are owned and
operated by companies that operate more than one options exchange.\28\
The primary reason to operate multiple options exchanges, as is true
with respect to the proposed launch of EDGX Options, is that it allows
an exchange operator to offer multiple market models, including a
price-time market and a pro rata market, often with Customer priority
as a critical component of the latter. Accordingly, the proposed rule
change is intended to enhance competition by allowing the Exchange to
compete with existing options exchanges that operate models based on
Customer priority and pro rata allocations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ The IntercontinentalExchange Group, Inc. (``ICE'') operates
two options exchanges, Amex and Arca; NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc.
operates three options exchanges, NOM, Phlx and NASDAQ OMX BX;
International Securities Exchange Holding, Inc. operates two options
exchanges, ISE and ISE Gemini; and CBOE Holdings operates two
options exchanges, CBOE and C2 Options Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change will reduce overall trading costs and
increase price competition, both pro-competitive developments, and will
promote further initiative and innovation among market centers and
market participants.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will: (a) By order approve
or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-EDGX-2015-18 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2015-18. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2015-18 and should be
submitted on or before June 9, 2015.
[[Page 28757]]
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-12022 Filed 5-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P