Certain Incremental Dental Positioning Adjustment Appliances and Methods of Producing Same Termination of Investigation on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement, 27187-27188 [2015-11383]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 91 / Tuesday, May 12, 2015 / Notices Contact Christine Horton at 505–564– 7633 at least two business days before the meeting to reserve a line. Due to a limited number of available lines, the conference line is available on a firstcome first-served basis. All RAC meetings are open to the public. On Monday, June 15, 2015, at 3:30 p.m., members of the public will have the opportunity to make comments to the RAC, during a half-hour public comment period. Persons wishing to make comments during the public comment period should register in person with the BLM by 2:30 p.m. on June 15, 2015, at the meeting location. If you wish to make a comment during the comment period through the conference line, inform Christine Horton when you call to reserve the conference line. Depending on the number of commenters, the length of comments may be limited; this time may vary. The BLM appreciates any and all comments. James K. Stovall, Acting Deputy State Director, Lands and Resources. [FR Doc. 2015–11396 Filed 5–11–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–FB–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [15XL LLID100000–L10200000–PH0000 241A 4500075502] Notice of Public Meeting, Idaho Falls District Resource Advisory Council Meeting Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of public meetings. AGENCY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Idaho Falls District Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as indicated below. DATES: The Idaho Falls District RAC will meet in Pocatello, Idaho, June 16 and 17, 2015, for a two-day meeting at the BLM Pocatello Field Office, 4350 Cliffs Drive, Pocatello, Idaho 83204. The first day will begin at 9:00 a.m. and adjourn at 4:30 p.m. The second day will begin at 9:00 a.m. and adjourn at 2:00 p.m. Members of the public are invited to attend. A comment period will be held on June 16 following the introductions from 1:00–1:30 p.m. All meetings are open to the public. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:31 May 11, 2015 Jkt 235001 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Wheeler, RAC Coordinator, Idaho Falls District, 1405 Hollipark Dr., Idaho Falls, ID 83401. Telephone: (208) 524– 7550. Email: sawheeler@blm.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 16 the meeting will begin with new member orientation at 9:00 a.m. at the BLM Pocatello Field Office. At 1:00 p.m. the full RAC will convene and elect a new chairman, vice chairman and secretary. Topics on the agenda include the Twin Lakes Canal Company Bear River Dam proposal and climate change. On June 17 the RAC will depart the Pocatello Field Office at 9:00 a.m. for Soda Springs Hills to tour several fuels projects and discuss partnerships. At 11:30, the group will head to Bear River to discuss the Twin Lakes Canal Company Dam proposal and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission process. The meeting will adjourn at approximately 1:30 p.m. The 15-member Council advises the Secretary of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of planning and management issues associated with public land management in the BLM Idaho Falls District, which covers eastern Idaho. All meetings are open to the public. The public may present written comments to the Council. Each formal Council meeting will also have time allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation, tour transportation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact the BLM as indicated below. Dated: May 1, 2015. Sarah Wheeler, Idaho Falls District RAC Coordinator. [FR Doc. 2015–11397 Filed 5–11–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–GG–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–562 (Enforcement—Remand)] Certain Incremental Dental Positioning Adjustment Appliances and Methods of Producing Same Termination of Investigation on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 27187 Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 76) granting a joint motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement. The Commission has terminated the investigation. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2532. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted the underlying investigation in this matter on February 15, 2006, based on a complaint filed by Align Technology, Inc. (‘‘Align’’) of Santa Clara, California (now of San Jose, California). 71 FR 7995–96. The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain incremental dental positioning adjustment appliances by reason of infringement of certain patents. The complaint also alleged a violation of section 337 by reason of misappropriation of trade secrets. The Commission’s notice of investigation named OrthoClear, Inc. of San Francisco, California; OrthoClear Holdings, Inc. of Tortola, British Virgin Islands; and OrthoClear Pakistan Pvt, Ltd. of Lahore, Pakistan as respondents. On November 13, 2006, the Commission issued notice of its determination not to review the ALJ’s initial determination granting Align’s and the respondents’ joint motion to terminate the investigation based on a consent order. On March 1, 2012, Align filed a complaint for an enforcement SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM 12MYN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 27188 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 91 / Tuesday, May 12, 2015 / Notices proceeding under Commission Rule 210.75, and filed a corrected complaint on March 22, 2012. On April 25, 2012, the Commission determined that the criteria for institution of an enforcement proceeding were satisfied and instituted an enforcement proceeding, naming the following six respondents, which were alleged to be bound by the consent order: ClearCorrect Operating, LLC of Houston, Texas; ClearCorrect Pakistan (Private), Ltd. of Lahore, Pakistan; and Mudassar Rathore, Waqas Wahab, Nadeem Arif, and Asim Waheed (‘‘Enforcement Respondents’’). 77 Fed. Reg. 25747 (May 1, 2012). On November 28, 2012, the ALJ issued Order No. 57, and found that the accused digital datasets at issue in the enforcement proceeding fall within the scope of the term ‘‘articles’’ in the consent order. On January 4, 2013, the Commission determined to review and reverse Order No. 57. 78 FR 2282–83 (Jan. 10, 2013). The Commission terminated the enforcement proceeding with a finding of no violation of the consent order. Id. Upon Align’s appeal, the Federal Circuit held that Order No. 57 was not reviewable as an ID under the Commission’s rules. Align Tech., Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 771 F.3d 1317, 1324–25 (Fed. Cir. 2014). The Court vacated the Commission’s determination to review and reverse Order No. 57, and remanded the case to the Commission for further proceedings consistent with the Court’s opinion. Id. at 1326. On November 24, 2014, the Commission issued a notice to remand the investigation to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for assignment to a presiding ALJ to resume enforcement proceedings. On April 6, 2015, Align and the Enforcement Respondents filed a joint motion to terminate the enforcement proceeding on the basis of an agreement between the parties. The Commission investigative attorney filed a response in support of the motion. On April 8, 2015, the ALJ granted the motion as the subject ID (Order No. 76). The ID found that granting the motion is in the public interest. Order No. 76 at 1–2; see 19 CFR 210.50(b)(2). No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The Commission has terminated the investigation. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). Issued: May 6, 2015. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:31 May 11, 2015 Jkt 235001 By order of the Commission. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2015–11383 Filed 5–11–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–934] Certain Dental Implants: Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Joint Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 24) granting a joint motion of complainants Nobel Biocare Services AG of Switzerland and Nobel Biocare USA, LLC of Yorba Linda, California (collectively, ‘‘Nobel Biocare’’) and respondents Neodent USA, Inc., of Andover, Massachusetts ´ (‘‘Neodent USA’’) and JJGC Industria e ´ ´ Comercio de Materiais Dentarios S/A of Curitiba, Brazil (collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’) to amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation (‘‘NOI’’) to reflect the corporate name change of Neodent USA to Instradent USA, Inc. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2301. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 on October 27, 2014, based on a Complaint filed by Nobel Biocare, as supplemented. 79 FR. 63940–41 (Oct. 27, 2014). The Complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), in the sale for importation, importation, and sale within the United States after importation of certain dental implants by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,714,977 and 8,764,443. The Complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The Commission’s Notice of Investigation named Respondents and the Office of Unfair Import Investigations as parties to the investigation. On April 8, 2015, Nobel Biocare and Respondents filed a joint motion to amend the Complaint and NOI to reflect a corporate name change, effective August 15, 2014, of respondent Neodent USA to Instradent USA, Inc. The motion indicated that the Commission investigative attorney does not oppose the motion. On April 9, 2015, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting the joint motion to amend the Complaint and NOI. The ALJ found, pursuant to section 210.14(b)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.14(b)(1)), that good cause exists to amend the Complaint and NOI to conform to the name change. The ALJ also found that the amendment would not prejudice the public interest or the rights of the parties to the investigation. No petitions for review of the subject ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: May 6, 2015. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2015–11378 Filed 5–11–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM 12MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27187-27188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11383]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-562 (Enforcement--Remand)]


Certain Incremental Dental Positioning Adjustment Appliances and 
Methods of Producing Same Termination of Investigation on the Basis of 
a Settlement Agreement

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 76) 
granting a joint motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation 
on the basis of a settlement agreement. The Commission has terminated 
the investigation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2532. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted the underlying 
investigation in this matter on February 15, 2006, based on a complaint 
filed by Align Technology, Inc. (``Align'') of Santa Clara, California 
(now of San Jose, California). 71 FR 7995-96. The complaint alleged 
violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 
U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for 
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of 
certain incremental dental positioning adjustment appliances by reason 
of infringement of certain patents. The complaint also alleged a 
violation of section 337 by reason of misappropriation of trade 
secrets. The Commission's notice of investigation named OrthoClear, 
Inc. of San Francisco, California; OrthoClear Holdings, Inc. of 
Tortola, British Virgin Islands; and OrthoClear Pakistan Pvt, Ltd. of 
Lahore, Pakistan as respondents. On November 13, 2006, the Commission 
issued notice of its determination not to review the ALJ's initial 
determination granting Align's and the respondents' joint motion to 
terminate the investigation based on a consent order.
    On March 1, 2012, Align filed a complaint for an enforcement

[[Page 27188]]

proceeding under Commission Rule 210.75, and filed a corrected 
complaint on March 22, 2012. On April 25, 2012, the Commission 
determined that the criteria for institution of an enforcement 
proceeding were satisfied and instituted an enforcement proceeding, 
naming the following six respondents, which were alleged to be bound by 
the consent order: ClearCorrect Operating, LLC of Houston, Texas; 
ClearCorrect Pakistan (Private), Ltd. of Lahore, Pakistan; and Mudassar 
Rathore, Waqas Wahab, Nadeem Arif, and Asim Waheed (``Enforcement 
Respondents''). 77 Fed. Reg. 25747 (May 1, 2012).
    On November 28, 2012, the ALJ issued Order No. 57, and found that 
the accused digital datasets at issue in the enforcement proceeding 
fall within the scope of the term ``articles'' in the consent order. On 
January 4, 2013, the Commission determined to review and reverse Order 
No. 57. 78 FR 2282-83 (Jan. 10, 2013). The Commission terminated the 
enforcement proceeding with a finding of no violation of the consent 
order. Id. Upon Align's appeal, the Federal Circuit held that Order No. 
57 was not reviewable as an ID under the Commission's rules. Align 
Tech., Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 771 F.3d 1317, 1324-25 (Fed. Cir. 
2014). The Court vacated the Commission's determination to review and 
reverse Order No. 57, and remanded the case to the Commission for 
further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. Id. at 1326. 
On November 24, 2014, the Commission issued a notice to remand the 
investigation to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for assignment to a 
presiding ALJ to resume enforcement proceedings.
    On April 6, 2015, Align and the Enforcement Respondents filed a 
joint motion to terminate the enforcement proceeding on the basis of an 
agreement between the parties. The Commission investigative attorney 
filed a response in support of the motion. On April 8, 2015, the ALJ 
granted the motion as the subject ID (Order No. 76). The ID found that 
granting the motion is in the public interest. Order No. 76 at 1-2; see 
19 CFR 210.50(b)(2).
    No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined 
not to review the ID. The Commission has terminated the investigation.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

     Issued: May 6, 2015.

    By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-11383 Filed 5-11-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.