Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Review in Part; 2013-2014, 26224-26226 [2015-11087]

Download as PDF 26224 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 88 / Thursday, May 7, 2015 / Notices mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.22 We intend to instruct CBP to liquidate entries containing subject merchandise exported by the PRC-wide entity at the PRC-wide rate. The Department announced a refinement to its assessment practice in non-market economy (‘‘NME’’) cases.23 Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies individually examined during the administrative review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. Additionally, if the Department determines that an exporter had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter’s case number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.24 In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For any companies listed that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRCwide entity; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 23 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). 24 Id. Dated: April 30, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I—Companies Subject to the Administrative Review That Are Preliminarily Determined To Be Part of the PRC-Wide Entity Fastco (Shanghai) Trading Co., Ltd. Gem-Year Industrial Co., Ltd. Haiyan Dayu Fasteners Co., Ltd. Jiaxing Brother Standard Part Co., Ltd., IFI & Morgan Ltd. and RMB Fasteners Ltd. (collectively ‘‘RMB/IFI Group’’) Jiaxing Brother Standard Part. Midas Union Co., Ltd. New Pole Power System Co. Ltd. Shanghai P&J International Trading Co., Ltd. Zhejiang Morgan Brother Technology Co. Ltd. Appendix II—List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum: Summary 1. Background 2. Verification 3. Respondent Selection 4. Scope of the Order 5. Questionnaires 6. Non-Market Economy Country 7. PRC-Wide Entity 8. Separate Rates 9. Application of Facts Available and Use of Adverse Inference 10. Conclusion VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:07 May 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 International Trade Administration [A–549–821] This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. These preliminary results are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). [FR Doc. 2015–11082 Filed 5–6–15; 8:45 am] 22 See DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Review in Part; 2013–2014 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene retail carrier bags (PRCBs) from Thailand.1 This review covers 33 companies. The period of review (POR) is August 1, 2013, through July 31, 2014. We preliminarily find that subject merchandise has been sold at less than normal value by the one company subject to this review, Beyond Packaging Co., Ltd. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. AGENCY: DATES: Effective Date: May 7, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dmitry Vladimirov or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0665 and 202–482–1690, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the antidumping duty order is polyethylene retail carrier bags, which are currently classified under subheading 3923.21.0085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS number is provided for convenience and customs purposes. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.2 The written description is dispositive. 1 See Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand, 69 FR 48204 (August 9, 2004) (Order). 2 See memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of the 2013/2014 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Thailand’’ (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with this notice. E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM 07MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 88 / Thursday, May 7, 2015 / Notices Rescission of Review in Part Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party that requested the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. Except for Beyond Packaging Co., Ltd. (Beyond Packaging), the petitioners 3 withdrew their request for an administrative review of the remaining 32 companies identified in the Initiation Notice 4 within the 90-day period.5 The petitioners were the only party to request a review of these companies. Accordingly, we are rescinding this administrative review, in part, with respect to these companies in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Methodology In accordance with sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), we relied on facts available with an adverse inference with respect to Beyond Packaging, the sole company selected for individual examination and sole company in this review. Thus, we preliminarily assigned a rate of 122.88 percent as the weightedaverage dumping margin for Beyond Packaging. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the public via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ index.html. A list of topics included in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included in Appendix I attached to 3 Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bag Committee and its individual members, Hilex Poly Co., LLC, and Superbag Corporation (collectively, the petitioners). 4 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 58729 (September 30, 2014) (Initiation Notice). The Initiation Notice incorrectly lists one of the companies as 2PK Inetrplas Co., Ltd., instead of 2PK Interplas Co., Ltd. This error was corrected in Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 64565 (October 30, 2014). 5 See letter from King & Spalding LLP on behalf of the petitioners entitled ‘‘Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Thailand: Partial Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review’’ dated December 16, 2014. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:07 May 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 this notice. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Preliminary Results of Review As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that the following weighted-average dumping margin on PRCBs from Thailand exists for the period August 1, 2013, through July 31, 2014, at the following rate: Company Rate (percent) Beyond Packaging Co., Ltd ........ 122.88 Public Comment Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.6 Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.7 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.8 Requests should contain: (1) The party’s name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. When submitting a document to the Department via the Department’s electronic records system, ACCESS, the document must be received successfully in its entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the date on which it is due. The Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, unless extended, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon completion of the administrative review, the Department 6 See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). 8 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 7 See PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 26225 shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. For the final results, if we continue to rely on adverse facts available to establish Beyond Packaging’s weighted-average dumping margin, we will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 122.88 percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR which were produced and/or exported by Beyond Packaging. For the companies for which the review is rescinded, the antidumping duty shall be assessed at the rate equal to the cash deposit of the estimated antidumping duty required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(2). We will instruct CBP accordingly. We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of PRCBs from Thailand entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Beyond Packaging will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-fair-value investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of the merchandise; (4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer has its own rate, the cash deposit rate will be 4.69 percent.9 These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. 9 See Notice of Implementation of Determination Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Partial Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Order on Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand, 75 FR 48940 (August 12, 2010). E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM 07MYN1 26226 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 88 / Thursday, May 7, 2015 / Notices Notifications to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: May 1, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum A. Summary B. Background C. Scope of the Order D. Rescission of Review in Part E. Discussion of the Methodology 1. Use of Facts Otherwise Available a. Use of Facts Available b. Application of Facts Available With an Adverse Inference c. Selection and Corroboration of Information Used as Facts Available 2. Duty Absorption F. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015–11087 Filed 5–6–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–984] Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, Rescission in Part, and Intent To Rescind the Review in Part; 2012–2013 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on drawn stainless steel sinks (sinks) from the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The period of review (POR) is August 6, 2012, through December 31, 2013. We preliminarily find that Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd. (Dongyuan) received mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:07 May 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 countervailable subsidies during the POR. We are rescinding the review with respect to Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd. (Zhaoshun), Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd. (Superte), Zhongshan Newecan Enterprise Development Corporation Limited (Newecan), Zhongshan Silk Imp. & Exp. Group Co., Ltd. of Guangdong (Zhongshan Silk). Further, we preliminarily find that Shunde Native Produce Import and Export Co., Ltd. of Guangdong (Native Produce) did not have any reviewable entries during the POR. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective Date: May 7, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Meek or Joshua Morris, AD/ CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2778 and (202) 482–1779, respectively. Scope of the Order Drawn stainless steel sinks are sinks with single or multiple drawn bowls, with or without drain boards, whether finished or unfinished, regardless of type of finish, gauge, or grade of sinks. The products covered by this order are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under statistical reporting number 7324.10.0000. Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People’s Republic of China’’ dated concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is provided as Appendix I to this Notice. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at https:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Methodology The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each program found countervailable, we preliminarily determine that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.1 In making the preliminary findings, we relied, in part, on facts available and, because the Government of the PRC did not act to the best of its ability to respond to the Department’s requests for information, we applied an adverse inference in selecting from among the facts otherwise available.2 For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Partial Rescission As discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, the companies Zhaoshun, Superte, Newecan, and Zhongshan Silk timely withdrew their requests for administrative review of themselves.3 No other parties requested reviews of these companies. The Department, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), is therefore rescinding this administrative review with respect to Zhaoshun, Superte, Newecan, and Zhongshan Silk.4 Preliminary Determination of No Shipments and Intent To Rescind the Review in Part Based on our analysis of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) information and information provided by Native Produce, we preliminarily determine that Native Produce did not 1 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. 2 See sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. For further information, see ‘‘Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Adverse Inferences’’ in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 3 As noted in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, Native Produce also submitted a withdrawal of its request for review. It did so, however, after the 90-day deadline pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1) and was, therefore, untimely. 4 See Appendix II for the full list of companies for which this review is being rescinded. E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM 07MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 88 (Thursday, May 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26224-26226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11087]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-549-821]


Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From Thailand: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of 
Review in Part; 2013-2014

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene 
retail carrier bags (PRCBs) from Thailand.\1\ This review covers 33 
companies. The period of review (POR) is August 1, 2013, through July 
31, 2014. We preliminarily find that subject merchandise has been sold 
at less than normal value by the one company subject to this review, 
Beyond Packaging Co., Ltd. Interested parties are invited to comment on 
these preliminary results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags 
From Thailand, 69 FR 48204 (August 9, 2004) (Order).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: May 7, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dmitry Vladimirov or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0665 and 202-482-1690, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the antidumping duty order is 
polyethylene retail carrier bags, which are currently classified under 
subheading 3923.21.0085 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States (HTSUS). The HTSUS number is provided for convenience and 
customs purposes. A full description of the scope of the order is 
contained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\2\ The written 
description is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to 
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, 
``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of the 2013/2014 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Polyethylene Retail Carrier 
Bags from Thailand'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated 
concurrently with this notice.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 26225]]

Rescission of Review in Part

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an 
administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party that requested 
the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of 
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. Except 
for Beyond Packaging Co., Ltd. (Beyond Packaging), the petitioners \3\ 
withdrew their request for an administrative review of the remaining 32 
companies identified in the Initiation Notice \4\ within the 90-day 
period.\5\ The petitioners were the only party to request a review of 
these companies. Accordingly, we are rescinding this administrative 
review, in part, with respect to these companies in accordance with 19 
CFR 351.213(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bag Committee and its individual 
members, Hilex Poly Co., LLC, and Superbag Corporation 
(collectively, the petitioners).
    \4\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 
58729 (September 30, 2014) (Initiation Notice). The Initiation 
Notice incorrectly lists one of the companies as 2PK Inetrplas Co., 
Ltd., instead of 2PK Interplas Co., Ltd. This error was corrected in 
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 64565 (October 30, 
2014).
    \5\ See letter from King & Spalding LLP on behalf of the 
petitioners entitled ``Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from 
Thailand: Partial Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review'' 
dated December 16, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    In accordance with sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended (the Act), we relied on facts available with an 
adverse inference with respect to Beyond Packaging, the sole company 
selected for individual examination and sole company in this review. 
Thus, we preliminarily assigned a rate of 122.88 percent as the 
weighted-average dumping margin for Beyond Packaging. For a full 
description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 
a public document and is made available to the public via Enforcement 
and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized 
Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered 
users at https://access.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the 
Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce 
building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. A list of topics included in the 
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is included in Appendix I attached to 
this notice. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the 
electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are 
identical in content.

Preliminary Results of Review

    As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that the 
following weighted-average dumping margin on PRCBs from Thailand exists 
for the period August 1, 2013, through July 31, 2014, at the following 
rate:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Rate
                          Company                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beyond Packaging Co., Ltd..................................      122.88
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Public Comment

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case 
briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this 
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, 
may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case 
briefs.\6\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 
proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement 
of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of 
authorities.\7\
    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a 
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 
Compliance within 30 days after the date of publication of this 
notice.\8\ Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and 
telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of 
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to 
those raised in the respective case briefs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
    \7\ See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements).
    \8\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    When submitting a document to the Department via the Department's 
electronic records system, ACCESS, the document must be received 
successfully in its entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the date on 
which it is due.
    The Department intends to issue the final results of this 
administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the 
issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the 
date of publication of this notice, unless extended, pursuant to 
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.

Assessment Rates

    Upon completion of the administrative review, the Department shall 
determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. 
For the final results, if we continue to rely on adverse facts 
available to establish Beyond Packaging's weighted-average dumping 
margin, we will instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 
122.88 percent to all entries of subject merchandise during the POR 
which were produced and/or exported by Beyond Packaging.
    For the companies for which the review is rescinded, the 
antidumping duty shall be assessed at the rate equal to the cash 
deposit of the estimated antidumping duty required at the time of 
entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance 
with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(2). We will instruct CBP accordingly.
    We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after 
publication of the final results of review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for 
all shipments of PRCBs from Thailand entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as 
provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for 
Beyond Packaging will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin 
established in the final results of this review; (2) for merchandise 
exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but 
covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate 
will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most 
recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is 
not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-than-
fair-value investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate 
will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of 
this proceeding for the manufacturer of the merchandise; (4) if neither 
the exporter nor the manufacturer has its own rate, the cash deposit 
rate will be 4.69 percent.\9\ These deposit requirements, when imposed, 
shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Notice of Implementation of Determination Under Section 
129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Partial Revocation of 
the Antidumping Duty Order on Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From 
Thailand, 75 FR 48940 (August 12, 2010).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 26226]]

Notifications to Importers

    This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: May 1, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum

A. Summary
B. Background
C. Scope of the Order
D. Rescission of Review in Part
E. Discussion of the Methodology
    1. Use of Facts Otherwise Available
    a. Use of Facts Available
    b. Application of Facts Available With an Adverse Inference
    c. Selection and Corroboration of Information Used as Facts 
Available
    2. Duty Absorption
F. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2015-11087 Filed 5-6-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.