Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 25355-25356 [2015-10263]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 85 / Monday, May 4, 2015 / Notices
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
offices of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2015–046, and should be
submitted on or before May 26, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–10283 Filed 5–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0030; Notice 1]
Continental Tire the Americas, LLC,
Receipt of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of Petition.
AGENCY:
Continental Tire the
Americas, LLC, (CTA), has determined
that certain Continental Tire brand
TKC80 motorcycle replacement tires do
not fully comply with paragraph S6.5(c)
of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) No. 119, New
Pneumatic Radial Tires for motor
vehicles with a GVWR of more than
4,536 Kilograms (10,000 pounds) and
Motorcycles. CTA has filed an
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
17 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:40 May 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
appropriate report dated February 18,
2015, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573,
Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports.
DATES: The closing date for comments
on the petition is June 3, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written data, views,
and arguments on this petition.
Comments must refer to the docket and
notice number cited at the beginning of
this notice and submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Mail: Send comments by mail
addressed to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Deliver: Deliver comments by
hand to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Section is open on weekdays from 10
a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays.
• Electronically: Submit comments
electronically by: logging onto the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments may also be faxed to (202)
493–2251.
Comments must be written in the
English language, and be no greater than
15 pages in length, although there is no
limit to the length of necessary
attachments to the comments. If
comments are submitted in hard copy
form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive
confirmation that your comments were
received, please enclose a stamped, selfaddressed postcard with the comments.
Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Documents submitted to a docket may
be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may
also be viewed on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by following
the online instructions for accessing the
dockets. DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000, (65 FR 19477–78).
The petition, supporting materials,
and all comments received before the
close of business on the closing date
indicated below will be filed and will be
considered. All comments and
supporting materials received after the
closing date will also be filed and will
be considered to the extent possible.
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25355
When the petition is granted or denied,
notice of the decision will be published
in the Federal Register pursuant to the
authority indicated below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. CTA’s Petition
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) (see implementing rule at 49
CFR part 556), CTA submitted a petition
for an exemption from the notification
and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of CTA’s
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
II. Tires Involved
Affected are approximately 1,062
Continental TKC80 size 120/70–19 M/C
60Q diagonal (bias) motorcycle
replacement tires manufactured
between April 8, 2012 and January 31,
2015.
III. Noncompliance
CTA explains that the noncompliance
is that the tire size designation marking
on the sidewalls of the subject tires does
not contain the correct construction
code designator symbol from The Tire
and Rim Association yearbook.
Therefore, the tires do not fully comply
with paragraph S6.5(c) of FMVSS No.
119 because the tire size designation is
not as listed in the documents and
publications designated in S5.1.
Specifically, the tires were marked with
the construction code designator ‘‘B’’
indicating bias-belted construction and
should have been marked with the
designator ‘‘-’’ indicating diagonal (bias)
construction.
IV. Rule Text
Paragraph S6.5 of FMVSS No. 119
requires in pertinent part:
S6.5 Tire Markings. Except as
specified in paragraphs, each tire shall
be marked on each sidewall with the
information specified in paragraphs (a)
through (j) of this section. . .
(c) The tire size designation as listed
in the documents and publications
designated in S5.1.
V. Summary of CTA’s Analyses
CTA stated its belief that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety for the following
reasons:
(A) CTA notes that the only improper
marking on the sidewall of the subject tires
is the use of the letter character ‘‘B’’ in the
E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM
04MYN1
25356
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 85 / Monday, May 4, 2015 / Notices
tire size designation instead of a hyphen
character ‘‘-,’’ and that from its experience it
believes that most motorcycle tire consumers
do not understand the differences in tire
construction and therefore do not base tire
purchases on the tire construction type.
(B) CTA stated that the subject tires were
built as designed and that the performance
requirements and testing requirements
specified in FMVSS No. 119 are exactly the
same for both bias-belted and diagonal (bias)
tires.
(C) CTA believes that the subject
noncompliance has no impact on the safety
of vehicles on which the subject tires are
mounted and that the subject tires meet or
exceed all the performance requirement of
FMVSS No. 119.
(D) CTA also stated that it is not aware of
any crashes, injuries, customer complaints,
or field reports associated with the subject
noncompliance.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
CTA additionally informed NHTSA
that the molds at the manufacturing
plant have been corrected so that no
additional tires will be manufactured or
sold with the noncompliance.
In summation, CTA believes that the
described noncompliance of the subject
tires is inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety, and that its petition, to exempt
CTA from providing recall notification
of noncompliance as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C.
30120 should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any
decision on this petition only applies to
the subject tires that CTA no longer
controlled at the time it determined that
the noncompliance existed. However,
any decision on this petition does not
relieve equipment distributors and
dealers of the prohibitions on the sale,
offer for sale, or introduction or delivery
for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant tires
under their control after CTA notified
them that the subject noncompliance
existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8.
Jeffrey Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–10263 Filed 5–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:40 May 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0107, Notice 2]
Decision That Nonconforming Model
Year 2010 European Market Ferrari
California Passenger Cars Are Eligible
for Importation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition.
AGENCY:
This document announces a
decision by the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration that
certain Model Year (MY) 2010 Ferrari
California passenger cars (PCs) that were
not originally manufactured to comply
with all applicable Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) are
eligible for importation into the United
States because they are substantially
similar to vehicles originally
manufactured for importation into and
sale in the United States that were
certified by their manufacturer as
complying with the safety standards
(the U.S. certified version of the MY
2010 Ferrari California PC), and they are
capable of being readily altered to
conform to the standards.
DATES: This decision became effective
on April 28, 2015.
ADDRESSES: For further information
contact George Stevens, Office of
Vehicle Safety Compliance, NHTSA
(202–366–5308).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a
motor vehicle that was not originally
manufactured to conform to all
applicable FMVSS shall be refused
admission into the United States unless
NHTSA has decided that the motor
vehicle is substantially similar to a
motor vehicle originally manufactured
for importation into and sale in the
United States, certified as required
under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same
model year as the model of the motor
vehicle to be compared, and is capable
of being readily altered to conform to all
applicable FMVSS.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may
be submitted by either manufacturers or
importers who have registered with
NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR part 592. As
specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA
publishes notice in the Federal Register
of each petition that it receives, and
affords interested persons an
opportunity to comment on the petition.
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
At the close of the comment period,
NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has
received, whether the vehicle is eligible
for importation. The agency then
publishes this decision in the Federal
Register.
J.K. Technologies, LLC, of Baltimore,
Maryland (‘‘JK’’) (Registered Importer
#RI–90–006), petitioned NHTSA to
decide whether certain MY 2010 Ferrari
California PCs are eligible for
importation into the United States.
NHTSA published a notice of the
petition on March 21, 2014 (79 FR
15800) to afford an opportunity for
public comment. The reader is referred
to that notice for a thorough description
of the petition.
Comments
On April 21, 2014, NHTSA received
comments from Ferrari North America
(FNA), the vehicle’s original
manufacturer. In its comments, Ferrari
stated that while it agreed that the U.S.
and the non-U.S. versions of the vehicle
are ‘‘substantially similar’’ within the
meaning of section 30141(a)(1)(A)(i), it
strongly disputed JK’s assertions that
the non-U.S. version could be readily
altered to comply with all applicable
FMVSS. FNA elaborated by presenting
detailed reasons for its assertions with
respect to specific FMVSS.
On May 21, 2014, NHTSA forwarded
FNA’s comments to JK and asked that it
respond by June, 4, 2014. By letter dated
June 10, 2014, JK requested a 45 day
extension in order to gather engineering
data to adequately address the concerns
raised by FNA. NHTSA approved JK’s
request for this extension and JK
responded on August 15, 2014.
A summary of FNA’s comments, JK’s
responses, and the conclusions that
NHTSA has reached with regard to the
issues raised by the parties is set forth
below.
Review of Comments and Conclusions
NHTSA has reviewed the petition,
FNA’s comments and JK’s responses to
those comments, and has concluded
that the vehicles covered by the petition
are capable of being readily altered to
comply with all applicable FMVSS.
However, NHTSA has also decided that
an RI who imports or modifies one of
these vehicles must include in the
statement of conformity and associated
documents (referred to as a ‘‘conformity
package’’) it submits to NHTSA under
49 CFR 592.6(d) specific proof to
confirm that the vehicle was
manufactured to conform to, or was
successfully altered to conform to, each
of the following standards:
E:\FR\FM\04MYN1.SGM
04MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 85 (Monday, May 4, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25355-25356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10263]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2015-0030; Notice 1]
Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Receipt of Petition for
Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of Petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, (CTA), has determined that
certain Continental Tire brand TKC80 motorcycle replacement tires do
not fully comply with paragraph S6.5(c) of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standard (FMVSS) No. 119, New Pneumatic Radial Tires for motor vehicles
with a GVWR of more than 4,536 Kilograms (10,000 pounds) and
Motorcycles. CTA has filed an appropriate report dated February 18,
2015, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is June 3, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited at the beginning of this notice and
submitted by any of the following methods:
Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to: U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Deliver: Deliver comments by hand to: U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. The
Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except
Federal Holidays.
Electronically: Submit comments electronically by: logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that your comments were received, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the comments. Note that
all comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
Documents submitted to a docket may be viewed by anyone at the
address and times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by following the online
instructions for accessing the dockets. DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).
The petition, supporting materials, and all comments received
before the close of business on the closing date indicated below will
be filed and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the extent possible. When the petition is granted or
denied, notice of the decision will be published in the Federal
Register pursuant to the authority indicated below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. CTA's Petition
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) (see implementing rule
at 49 CFR part 556), CTA submitted a petition for an exemption from the
notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the
basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety.
This notice of receipt of CTA's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
II. Tires Involved
Affected are approximately 1,062 Continental TKC80 size 120/70-19
M/C 60Q diagonal (bias) motorcycle replacement tires manufactured
between April 8, 2012 and January 31, 2015.
III. Noncompliance
CTA explains that the noncompliance is that the tire size
designation marking on the sidewalls of the subject tires does not
contain the correct construction code designator symbol from The Tire
and Rim Association yearbook. Therefore, the tires do not fully comply
with paragraph S6.5(c) of FMVSS No. 119 because the tire size
designation is not as listed in the documents and publications
designated in S5.1. Specifically, the tires were marked with the
construction code designator ``B'' indicating bias-belted construction
and should have been marked with the designator ``-'' indicating
diagonal (bias) construction.
IV. Rule Text
Paragraph S6.5 of FMVSS No. 119 requires in pertinent part:
S6.5 Tire Markings. Except as specified in paragraphs, each tire
shall be marked on each sidewall with the information specified in
paragraphs (a) through (j) of this section. . .
(c) The tire size designation as listed in the documents and
publications designated in S5.1.
V. Summary of CTA's Analyses
CTA stated its belief that the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety for the following reasons:
(A) CTA notes that the only improper marking on the sidewall of
the subject tires is the use of the letter character ``B'' in the
[[Page 25356]]
tire size designation instead of a hyphen character ``-,'' and that
from its experience it believes that most motorcycle tire consumers
do not understand the differences in tire construction and therefore
do not base tire purchases on the tire construction type.
(B) CTA stated that the subject tires were built as designed and
that the performance requirements and testing requirements specified
in FMVSS No. 119 are exactly the same for both bias-belted and
diagonal (bias) tires.
(C) CTA believes that the subject noncompliance has no impact on
the safety of vehicles on which the subject tires are mounted and
that the subject tires meet or exceed all the performance
requirement of FMVSS No. 119.
(D) CTA also stated that it is not aware of any crashes,
injuries, customer complaints, or field reports associated with the
subject noncompliance.
CTA additionally informed NHTSA that the molds at the manufacturing
plant have been corrected so that no additional tires will be
manufactured or sold with the noncompliance.
In summation, CTA believes that the described noncompliance of the
subject tires is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and that its
petition, to exempt CTA from providing recall notification of
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on
this petition only applies to the subject tires that CTA no longer
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed.
However, any decision on this petition does not relieve equipment
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant tires under their control after CTA
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Jeffrey Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-10263 Filed 5-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P