Certain Hemostatic Products and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion To Terminate the Investigation on the Basis of Settlement; Termination of the Investigation, 24967-24968 [2015-10198]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Notices
of the existing Navajo Mine lease, which
is located adjacent to the FCPP on
Navajo tribal trust lands. Surface mining
operations would occur on an
approximately 2,744-acre portion of the
proposed Pinabete Permit area, with a
total disturbance footprint, including
staging areas, of approximately 4,100
acres. The proposed Pinabete Permit
area would, in conjunction with the
mining of any reserves remaining within
the existing Navajo Mine Permit area
(Federal SMCRA Permit NM0003F),
supply low-sulfur coal to the FCPP at a
rate of approximately 5.8 million tons
per year. Development of the Pinabete
Permit area and associated coal reserves
would use surface mining methods, and
based on current projected customer
needs, would supply coal to FCPP for
up to 25 years beginning in 2016. The
proposed Pinabete Permit area would
include previously permitted but
undeveloped coal reserves within Area
IV North of the Navajo Mine Lease, and
unpermitted and undeveloped coal
reserves in a portion of Area IV South
of the existing Navajo Mine Lease.
Approval of the proposed Pinabete
Permit would require several federal
actions, including:
• OSMRE approval of the new
SMCRA permit.
• BLM approval of a revised Mine
Plan developed for the proposed
maximum economic recovery of coal
reserves.
• USACE approval of a Section 404
Individual Permit for impacts to waters
of the United States from proposed
mining activities.
• USEPA approval of a new source
Section 402 National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Industrial Permit associated with the
mining and reclamation operations and
coal preparation facilities.
• BIA approval of a proposed
realignment for approximately 2.8 miles
of BIA 3005/Navajo Road N–5082
(Burnham Road) in Area IV South to
avoid proposed mining areas. This
realignment would not be needed until
2022; however, the potential impacts of
this realignment are analyzed in the
FEIS.
• BIA approval or grant of permits or
rights-of-way for access and haul roads,
power supply for operations, and
related facilities.
In addition, in 2014, OSMRE
administratively delayed its decision on
NTEC’s renewal application for its
existing Navajo Mine SMCRA Permit
No. NM00003F. The EIS, therefore, also
addresses alternatives and direct,
indirect, and cumulative impacts of the
2014 renewal application action.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Apr 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
IV. Alternatives
Alternatives considered in the FEIS
include three different mine plan
configurations at Navajo Mine;
implementing highwall or longwall
mining techniques at the Navajo Mine;
two different ash disposal facility
configurations at FCPP; conversion of
FCPP to a renewable energy plant;
implementing carbon capture and
storage at FCPP; and use of an off-site
coal supply option for FCPP.
V. Revisions to the Draft EIS
In accordance with the CEQ’s
regulations for implementing NEPA and
the DOI’s NEPA regulations, OSMRE
solicited public comments on the Draft
EIS. OSMRE responses to comments are
included in Appendix F of the FEIS.
Comments on the Draft EIS received
from the public were considered and
incorporated as appropriate into the
FEIS. Public comments resulted in the
addition of clarifying text, but did not
change any of the impact analyses or
significance determinations.
In addition, the FEIS includes updates
based on evolving regulatory guidance
and completion of the Section 106 and
Section 7 consultation processes.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10.
Dated: April 16, 2015 .
Joseph G. Pizarchik,
Director, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Control.
[FR Doc. 2015–10020 Filed 4–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–913]
Certain Hemostatic Products and
Components Thereof; Commission
Determination Not To Review an Initial
Determination Granting a Motion To
Terminate the Investigation on the
Basis of Settlement; Termination of the
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’)
(Order No. 51) issued by the presiding
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on
April 2, 2015, granting complainants’
motion to terminate the above-identified
investigation on the basis of settlement.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cathy Chen, Office of the General
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24967
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–2392. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on April 7, 2014, based on a complaint
filed on February 28, 2014, and
supplemented on March 19, 2014, on
behalf of Baxter International Inc. of
Deerfield, Illinois; Baxter Healthcare
Corporation of Deerfield, Illinois; and
Baxter Healthcare SA of Switzerland
(collectively, ‘‘Baxter’’). 79 FR 19124
(Apr. 7, 2014). The complaint alleged
violations of Section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, in the sale for importation, and
sale within the United States after
importation of certain hemostatic
products and components thereof by
reason of infringement of certain claims
of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,303,981; 8,512,729;
6,066,325; 8,357,378; and 8,603,511.
The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337. The Commission’s notice of
investigation named as respondents
Johnson & Johnson (‘‘J&J’’) of
Brunswick, New Jersey; Ethicon, Inc.
(‘‘Ethicon’’) of Somerville, New Jersey;
Ferrosan Medical Devices A/S
(‘‘Ferrosan’’) of Denmark; and Packaging
Coordinators, Inc. (‘‘PCI’’) of
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 79 FR
19125. The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations was named as a party to
the investigation. Id. Subsequently, the
investigation was terminated with
respect to J&J and PCI. See Notice of
Commission Determination Not to
Review an Initial Determination
Partially Terminating the Investigation
Based on a Withdrawal of the Complaint
(July 14, 2014).
On March 31, 2015, Baxter moved to
terminate the investigation as to
respondents Ethicon and Ferrosan based
E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM
01MYN1
24968
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Notices
upon a settlement agreement between
them. The parties asserted that there are
no other agreements, written or oral,
express or implied between them
concerning the subject matter of this
investigation. The Commission’s
Investigative Attorney filed a response
in support of the motion.
On April 2, 2015, the ALJ issued an
ID (Order No. 51), granting the motion
to terminate the investigation as to
respondents Ethicon and Ferrosan. The
ALJ found that the settlement agreement
appears to resolve the dispute between
the parties, and that granting the motion
would not adversely affect the public
interest factors. No petitions for review
were filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in
section 210 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 27, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–10198 Filed 4–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1047 (Second
Review)]
Ironing Tables and Certain Parts
Thereof From China; Institution of a
Five-Year Review
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice that it has instituted a review
pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the
Act) to determine whether revocation of
the antidumping duty order on ironing
tables and certain parts thereof from
China would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury. Pursuant to the Act, interested
parties are requested to respond to this
notice by submitting the information
specified below to the Commission; 1 to
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
1 No response to this request for information is
required if a currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) number is not displayed; the
OMB number is 3117–0016/USITC No. 15–5–332,
expiration date June 30, 2017. Public reporting
burden for the request is estimated to average 15
hours per response. Please send comments
regarding the accuracy of this burden estimate to
the Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Apr 30, 2015
Jkt 235001
be assured of consideration, the
deadline for responses is June 1, 2015.
Comments on the adequacy of responses
may be filed with the Commission by
July 14, 2015.
DATES:
Effective Date: May 1, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Messer (202–205–3193), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this proceeding may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On August 6, 2004, the
Department of Commerce issued an
antidumping duty order on imports of
ironing tables and certain parts thereof
from China (69 FR 47868). Following
the first five-year reviews by Commerce
and the Commission, effective June 28,
2010, Commerce issued a continuation
of the antidumping duty order on
imports of ironing tables and certain
parts thereof from China (75 FR 36629).
The Commission is now conducting a
second review pursuant to section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) to
determine whether revocation of the
order would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to the domestic industry within
a reasonably foreseeable time.
Provisions concerning the conduct of
this proceeding may be found in the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure at 19 CFR parts 201, subparts
A and B and 19 CFR part 207, subparts
A and F. The Commission will assess
the adequacy of interested party
responses to this notice of institution to
determine whether to conduct a full
review or an expedited review. The
Commission’s determination in any
expedited review will be based on the
facts available, which may include
information provided in response to this
notice.
Definitions.—The following
definitions apply to this review:
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC
20436.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or
kind of merchandise that is within the
scope of the five-year review, as defined
by the Department of Commerce.
(2) The Subject Country in this review
is China.
(3) The Domestic Like Product is the
domestically produced product or
products which are like, or in the
absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the
Subject Merchandise. In its original
determination and full first five-year
review, the Commission found one
Domestic Like Product consisting of
ironing tables and certain parts thereof,
coextensive with Commerce’s scope.
(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S.
producers as a whole of the Domestic
Like Product, or those producers whose
collective output of the Domestic Like
Product constitutes a major proportion
of the total domestic production of the
product. In its original determination
and full first five-year review
determination, the Commission defined
the Domestic Industry as U.S. producers
of the Domestic Like Product.
(5) An Importer is any person or firm
engaged, either directly or through a
parent company or subsidiary, in
importing the Subject Merchandise into
the United States from a foreign
manufacturer or through its selling
agent.
Participation in the proceeding and
public service list.—Persons, including
industrial users of the Subject
Merchandise and, if the merchandise is
sold at the retail level, representative
consumer organizations, wishing to
participate in the proceeding as parties
must file an entry of appearance with
the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11(b)(4) of the
Commission’s rules, no later than 21
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. The Secretary will
maintain a public service list containing
the names and addresses of all persons,
or their representatives, who are parties
to the proceeding.
Former Commission employees who
are seeking to appear in Commission
five-year reviews are advised that they
may appear in a review even if they
participated personally and
substantially in the corresponding
underlying original investigation or an
earlier review of the same underlying
investigation. The Commission’s
designated agency ethics official has
advised that a five-year review is not the
same particular matter as the underlying
original investigation, and a five-year
review is not the same particular matter
as an earlier review of the same
underlying investigation for purposes of
18 U.S.C. 207, the post employment
E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM
01MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 84 (Friday, May 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24967-24968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10198]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-913]
Certain Hemostatic Products and Components Thereof; Commission
Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion
To Terminate the Investigation on the Basis of Settlement; Termination
of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination
(``ID'') (Order No. 51) issued by the presiding administrative law
judge (``ALJ'') on April 2, 2015, granting complainants' motion to
terminate the above-identified investigation on the basis of
settlement.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2392. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on April 7, 2014, based on a complaint filed on February 28, 2014, and
supplemented on March 19, 2014, on behalf of Baxter International Inc.
of Deerfield, Illinois; Baxter Healthcare Corporation of Deerfield,
Illinois; and Baxter Healthcare SA of Switzerland (collectively,
``Baxter''). 79 FR 19124 (Apr. 7, 2014). The complaint alleged
violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, in the sale for importation, and sale within the United
States after importation of certain hemostatic products and components
thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos.
8,303,981; 8,512,729; 6,066,325; 8,357,378; and 8,603,511. The
complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists
as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The Commission's
notice of investigation named as respondents Johnson & Johnson
(``J&J'') of Brunswick, New Jersey; Ethicon, Inc. (``Ethicon'') of
Somerville, New Jersey; Ferrosan Medical Devices A/S (``Ferrosan'') of
Denmark; and Packaging Coordinators, Inc. (``PCI'') of Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania. 79 FR 19125. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations
was named as a party to the investigation. Id. Subsequently, the
investigation was terminated with respect to J&J and PCI. See Notice of
Commission Determination Not to Review an Initial Determination
Partially Terminating the Investigation Based on a Withdrawal of the
Complaint (July 14, 2014).
On March 31, 2015, Baxter moved to terminate the investigation as
to respondents Ethicon and Ferrosan based
[[Page 24968]]
upon a settlement agreement between them. The parties asserted that
there are no other agreements, written or oral, express or implied
between them concerning the subject matter of this investigation. The
Commission's Investigative Attorney filed a response in support of the
motion.
On April 2, 2015, the ALJ issued an ID (Order No. 51), granting the
motion to terminate the investigation as to respondents Ethicon and
Ferrosan. The ALJ found that the settlement agreement appears to
resolve the dispute between the parties, and that granting the motion
would not adversely affect the public interest factors. No petitions
for review were filed.
The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in section 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 27, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-10198 Filed 4-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
