Jones Apparel US LLC, Lawrenceburg, Tennessee; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 23297 [2015-09659]
Download as PDF
23297
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 80 / Monday, April 27, 2015 / Notices
APPENDIX—Continued
[16 TAA petitions instituted between 3/23/15 and 3/27/15]
Subject firm
(Petitioners)
Location
Minntac (State/One-Stop) ........................................................
American Cotton Growers LLC (State/One-Stop) ...................
Siemens Energy Inc. (Union) ...................................................
Smiths Connectors (State/One-Stop) ......................................
Fort Dearborn Company (Company) .......................................
United States Steel—Granite City Works (State/One-Stop) ....
Surgical Specialties of Puerto Rico (State/One-Stop) .............
Verizon Communications Inc. (Workers) .................................
Maverick Tube Corporation b/b/a Tenaris Texas Arai (State/
One-Stop).
Hampton Products International Corporation (Workers) .........
Finisar Corporation (Company) ................................................
Mt. Iron, MN ............................
Littlefield, TX ...........................
Mount Vernon, OH ..................
Costa Mesa & Irvine, CA ........
Bowling Green, KY .................
Granite City, IL ........................
Aguadilla, PR ..........................
Richardson, TX .......................
Houston, TX ............................
03/24/15
03/24/15
03/25/15
03/25/15
03/26/15
03/26/15
03/26/15
03/26/15
03/26/15
03/23/15
03/23/15
03/19/15
03/24/15
03/25/15
03/25/15
03/25/15
03/25/15
03/25/15
Shell Lake, WI ........................
Horsham, PA ..........................
03/26/15
03/27/15
03/16/15
03/26/15
TA–W
85896
85897
85898
85899
85900
85901
85902
85903
85904
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
85905 ...........
85906 ...........
[FR Doc. 2015–09651 Filed 4–24–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–85,808]
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Jones Apparel US LLC, Lawrenceburg,
Tennessee; Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application dated March 10, 2015,
workers requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s negative determination
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, applicable to
workers and former workers of Jones
Apparel US LLC, Lawrenceburg,
Tennessee. The denial notice was
signed on February 12, 2015, and the
Notice of Determination was published
in the Federal Register on March 18,
2015 (80 FR 14166).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of
the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The negative determination of the
TAA petition filed on behalf of workers
at Jones Apparel US LLC,
Lawrenceburg, Tennessee was based on
the firm not producing an article within
the meaning of Section 222(a) or Section
222(b) of the Act. In order to be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:41 Apr 24, 2015
Jkt 235001
considered eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Section 223
of the Trade Act of 1974, the worker
group seeking certification (or on whose
behalf certification is being sought)
must work for a ‘‘firm’’ or appropriate
subdivision that produces an article.
The definition of a firm includes an
individual proprietorship, partnership,
joint venture, association, corporation
(including a development corporation),
business trust, cooperative, trustee in
bankruptcy, and receiver under decree
of any court.
In the request for reconsideration the
petitioner, the petitioner did not supply
facts not previously considered; nor
provide additional documentation
indicating that there was either (1) a
mistake in the determination of facts not
previously considered or (2) a
misinterpretation of facts or of the law
justifying reconsideration of the initial
determination. Based on these findings,
the Department determines that 29 CFR
90.18(c) has not been met.
The original investigation confirmed
that the workers’ firm did not produce
an article. Rather, the workers’ firm
supplied services related to the supply
of warehousing, distribution, quality
control, and retail services. The
investigation confirmed that production
of the firm’s apparel product lines
occurs outside of the United States.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application
and investigative findings, I conclude
that there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Date of
institution
Date of
petition
Signed in Washington, DC, this 14th day of
April, 2015.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2015–09659 Filed 4–24–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2011–0858]
Permit-Required Confined Spaces;
Extension of the Office of Management
and Budget’s (OMB) Approval of
Collection of Information (Paperwork)
Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Request for public comments.
AGENCY:
OSHA solicits public
comments concerning its proposal to
extend the Office of Management and
Budget’s (OMB) approval of the
collection of information requirements
contained in the Standard on PermitRequired Confined Spaces (29 CFR
1910.146).
DATES: Comments must be submitted
(postmarked, sent, or received) by June
26, 2015.
ADDRESSES:
Electronically: You may submit
comments and attachments
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, which is the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the
instructions online for submitting
comments.
Facsimile: If your comments,
including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages you may fax them to the
OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648.
Mail, hand delivery, express mail,
messenger, or courier service: When
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM
27APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 80 (Monday, April 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 23297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09659]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-85,808]
Jones Apparel US LLC, Lawrenceburg, Tennessee; Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application dated March 10, 2015, workers requested
administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's negative
determination regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment
assistance, applicable to workers and former workers of Jones Apparel
US LLC, Lawrenceburg, Tennessee. The denial notice was signed on
February 12, 2015, and the Notice of Determination was published in the
Federal Register on March 18, 2015 (80 FR 14166).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The negative determination of the TAA petition filed on behalf of
workers at Jones Apparel US LLC, Lawrenceburg, Tennessee was based on
the firm not producing an article within the meaning of Section 222(a)
or Section 222(b) of the Act. In order to be considered eligible to
apply for adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of
1974, the worker group seeking certification (or on whose behalf
certification is being sought) must work for a ``firm'' or appropriate
subdivision that produces an article. The definition of a firm includes
an individual proprietorship, partnership, joint venture, association,
corporation (including a development corporation), business trust,
cooperative, trustee in bankruptcy, and receiver under decree of any
court.
In the request for reconsideration the petitioner, the petitioner
did not supply facts not previously considered; nor provide additional
documentation indicating that there was either (1) a mistake in the
determination of facts not previously considered or (2) a
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justifying reconsideration of
the initial determination. Based on these findings, the Department
determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not been met.
The original investigation confirmed that the workers' firm did not
produce an article. Rather, the workers' firm supplied services related
to the supply of warehousing, distribution, quality control, and retail
services. The investigation confirmed that production of the firm's
apparel product lines occurs outside of the United States.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application and investigative findings,
I conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 14th day of April, 2015.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2015-09659 Filed 4-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P