Metlife Group, Inc., EI&A Service Management Group, Clarks Summit, Pennsylvania; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 23291-23292 [2015-09655]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 80 / Monday, April 27, 2015 / Notices Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES minimum of 120 days to process the full background. This does not include the time to transmit the form and any other administrative functions associated with the SF–86 process. In emergencies the information needs to be collected and processed quickly in order to facilitate the sharing of urgent and potentially time sensitive information. This collocation requires emergency approval because waiting an additional 90 days for comment period will further extend the risk of attack or other emergency where information needs to be shared and cannot due to the long process currently in place to clear uncleared personnel. Once approves, the FBI will have the capability to issue temporary clearances to individuals with the immediate need. Emergency approval is requested by May 15, 2015. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until June 26, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have additional comments, especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Jamie B. Benn, Management and Program Analyst, FBI, Security Division, Executive Staff Unit, 935 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20535 (facsimile: 202–651–4047). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; Evaluate whether and if so how the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected can be enhanced; and Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of this information collection: VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:41 Apr 24, 2015 Jkt 235001 (1) Type of Information Collection: Approval of a new collection. (2) Title of the Form/Collection: Request for Emergency or Term Access to National Security Information. (3) Agency form number: FD–1116. (4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: This form is utilized by the FBI to collect information in order to initiate a background investigation before granting access to classified and sensitive information to private sector people. (5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: It is estimated that 500 respondents will complete each form within approximately 10 minutes for an average respondent to respond: It is estimated that 500 respondents will complete each form within approximately 10 minutes. (6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: There are an estimated 83 total annual burden hours associated with this collection. If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 3E.405B, Washington, DC 20530. Dated: April 22, 2015. Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer, U.S. Department of Justice. [FR Doc. 2015–09675 Filed 4–24–15; 8:45 am] 23291 Assistance on January 15, 2015, applicable to workers of Turbomeca Manufacturing, LLC, a division of Safran, including on-site leased workers from Weiser Security Services, Inc., MSC Industrial Supply Co., and Cavalier, Monroe, North Carolina. The Department’s Notice of Determination was published in the Federal Register on February 18, 2015 (80 FR 8692). At the request of the company official, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The firm is engaged in activities related to the production of precision machine components for helicopter engines and aircraft. The company confirmed that workers from Labinal Power Systems worked on-site at Turbomeca Manufacturing, LLC and were affected by the same shift in production that was the basis for certification. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–85,712 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of Turbomeca Manufacturing, LLC, a division of Safran, including on-site leased workers from Weiser Security Services, Inc., MSC Industrial Supply Co., and Cavalier, Monroe, North Carolina (TA– W–85,712) and Labinal Power Systems working on-site at Turbomeca Manufacturing, LLC, Monroe, North Carolina (TA–W–85,712A) who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after December 10, 2013 through January 15, 2017, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Signed in Washington, DC, this 6th day of April, 2015. Michael W. Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. BILLING CODE 4410–02–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [FR Doc. 2015–09658 Filed 4–24–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P [TA–W–85,712; TA–W–85,712A] Turbomeca Manufacturing, LLC a Division of Safran Including On-Site Leased Workers From Weiser Security Services, Inc., MSC Industrial Supply Co., and Cavalier Monroe, North Carolina and Labinal Power Systems Working On-Site at Turbomeca Manufacturing, LLC Monroe, North Carolina; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance DEPARTMENT OF LABOR In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment By application dated January 28, 2015 a worker requested requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers’ eligibility to apply for worker PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–85,642] Metlife Group, Inc., EI&A Service Management Group, Clarks Summit, Pennsylvania; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM 27APN1 23292 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 80 / Monday, April 27, 2015 / Notices adjustment assistance applicable to workers and former workers of Metlife Group, Inc., EI&A Service Management Group, Clarks Summit, Pennsylvania. The determination was issued on December 22, 2014 and the Notice of Determination was published in the Federal Register on January 23, 2015 (80 FR 3655). Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances: (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was erroneous; (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the decision. The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the findings that subject firm does not produce an article within the meaning of Section 222(a) or Section 222(b) of the Trade Act of 1074, as amended. The request for reconsideration asserts that the subject worker group designed, built and maintained data models. The Department of Labor has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974. Conclusion After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor’s prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of March, 2015. Michael W. Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2015–09655 Filed 4–24–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221(a) of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than May 7, 2015. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than May 7, 2015. The petitions filed in this case are available for inspection at the Office of the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N–5428, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of April 2015. Michael W. Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. APPENDIX [30 TAA petitions instituted between 3/30/15 and 4/10/15] Date of institution Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES TA–W Subject firm (petitioners) Location 85908 ................ 85909 ................ 85910A .............. 85910 ................ 85911 ................ 85912 ................ 85913 ................ 85914 ................ 85915 ................ 85916 ................ 85917 ................ 85918 ................ 85919 ................ 85920 ................ 85921 ................ 85922 ................ 85923 ................ 85924 ................ 85925 ................ 85926 ................ 85927 ................ 85928 ................ 85929 ................ 85930 ................ 85931 ................ 85932 ................ Pemco Mutual Insurance Company (Workers) .................... Lear Corporation (State/One-Stop) ...................................... Leased Workers from Aerotek (State/One-Stop) ................. Federal Mogul Powertrain (State/One-Stop) ........................ Teleflex/Arrow International (Company) ............................... Ormco Corporation (State/One-Stop) ................................... Mic Group—Duncan (Workers) ............................................ Eureka Pellet Mills (Workers) ............................................... Pfizer Inc. (State/One-Stop) ................................................. Saint Louis Post Dispatch (State/One-Stop) ........................ CP Medical Inc. (State/One-Stop) ........................................ Interactive Data Corporation (Workers) ............................... Republic Steel (Union) ......................................................... US Steel (Union) .................................................................. Avaya (Union) ....................................................................... Chromalloy Gas Turbine—Los Angeles Facility (Company) Oerlikon Fairfield (Union) ..................................................... AstraZeneca LP (Company) ................................................. Bimbo Bakeries (State/One-Stop) ........................................ KIK Custom Products, Inc. (Company) ................................ Graham Packaging Plastic Co. LP (State/One-Stop) .......... Dover Norris Company (Workers) ........................................ IBM (State/One-Stop) ........................................................... Teva Pharmaceuticals (Workers) ......................................... Mage Solar USA (Workers) .................................................. Fab Industries Corp (Company) ........................................... Seattle, WA ........................... Rochester Hills, MI ................ Lake City, MN ....................... Lake City, MN ....................... Ramseur & Asheboro, NC .... Glendora, CA ........................ Duncan, OK .......................... Eureka, MT ........................... Groto, CT .............................. Saint Louis, MO .................... Portland, OR ......................... Bedford, MA .......................... Lorain, OH ............................. East Chicago, IN ................... Highlands Ranch, CO ........... Gardena, CA ......................... Lafayette, IN .......................... Westborough, MA ................. Fullerton, CA ......................... Memphis, TN ......................... Chicago, IL ............................ Tulsa, OK .............................. Endicott, NY .......................... Kulztown, PA ......................... Dublin, GA ............................. Lincolnton, NC ...................... VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:41 Apr 24, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\27APN1.SGM 27APN1 03/30/15 03/30/15 03/30/15 03/30/15 03/30/15 03/30/15 03/31/15 03/31/15 03/31/15 04/01/15 04/01/15 04/01/15 04/01/15 04/01/15 04/02/15 04/03/15 04/06/15 04/06/15 04/06/15 04/07/15 04/07/15 04/08/15 04/08/15 04/08/15 04/09/15 04/09/15 Date of petition 03/27/15 03/27/15 03/27/15 03/27/15 03/27/15 03/27/15 03/30/15 03/26/15 03/27/15 03/30/15 03/31/15 03/18/15 03/31/15 03/31/15 04/01/15 04/02/15 03/31/15 03/31/15 04/03/15 04/07/15 04/06/15 04/07/15 04/07/15 04/07/15 03/30/15 04/08/15

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 80 (Monday, April 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23291-23292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09655]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-85,642]


Metlife Group, Inc., EI&A Service Management Group, Clarks 
Summit, Pennsylvania; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding 
Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated January 28, 2015 a worker requested requested 
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding 
workers' eligibility to apply for worker

[[Page 23292]]

adjustment assistance applicable to workers and former workers of 
Metlife Group, Inc., EI&A Service Management Group, Clarks Summit, 
Pennsylvania. The determination was issued on December 22, 2014 and the 
Notice of Determination was published in the Federal Register on 
January 23, 2015 (80 FR 3655).
    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under 
the following circumstances:
    (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered 
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
    (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on 
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
    (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a 
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of 
the decision.
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the findings that subject firm does not produce an article 
within the meaning of Section 222(a) or Section 222(b) of the Trade Act 
of 1074, as amended.
    The request for reconsideration asserts that the subject worker 
group designed, built and maintained data models.
    The Department of Labor has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 26th day of March, 2015.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2015-09655 Filed 4-24-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P