Application of Cargo Preference Requirements to the Federal Ship Financing Program, 22611-22613 [2015-09371]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 77 / Wednesday, April 22, 2015 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
natural quiet, as described in this notice
and in the response to the previous
comment. QT aircraft must adhere to the
current route structure defined for air
tour operations; no new areas of the
Grand Canyon will be opened to air
tours under this incentive. The agencies
do not anticipate a significant increase
in the number of air tours operated in
the winter months when tour demand is
low. The incentive should increase the
proportion of QT aircraft used for air
tours in the Dragon and Zuni Point
corridors and decrease the number of
louder non-QT aircraft. Air tour
operators that convert or have converted
to QT for the seasonal relief are
anticipated to continue to operate those
quieter fleets during the summer season.
Seasonal relief allows air tour operators
to save allocations that would have been
used in the first quarter of the year and
to use them during times of year when
air tour demand is higher; therefore,
there may be increases in the number of
air tour flights at other times of year
above the number that has been allowed
under the allocation system. If an
increase in the number of flights rises to
the level that results in a cumulative
increase in noise, the seasonal relief
incentive will be modified to reduce
noise or will be discontinued.
Comment: Commenters suggest
agencies mandate one ‘‘quiet day’’ per
month.
FAA and NPS Response: This
suggestion would presumably involve a
prohibition on air tours for one day each
month, which is outside the scope of
approved measures currently in place at
the park and is not a QT incentive.
Comment: One commenter called for
assurance that incentives will not
degrade substantial restoration of
natural quiet.
FAA and NPS Response: The agencies
will ensure that this incentive does not
diminish substantial restoration of
natural quiet as required by NPATMA.
Impact on air tour operations
Comment: Commenters representing
recreational and environmental interests
suggest this is an attempt to increase
number of operations by labeling them
as quieter. The air tour interests express
concern that operators who have already
converted to QT may not see a
permanent increase in their allocations.
Commenters representing recreational
and environmental interests noted that
they expected to see flights shift from
peak to off-peak as part of a QT
incentive. One commenter expressed
the view that the seasonal relief
incentive will result in vigorous
marketing of air tours in January
through March.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Apr 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
FAA and NPS Response: Currently,
air tour operators can use allocations at
any time throughout the year based on
the demand for air tours and individual
business decisions. This incentive does
not change that situation. The demand
for air tours is expected to remain
highest in the peak season.
Comment: Commenters representing
recreational and environmental interests
advocated a cap on operations.
FAA and NPS Response: Rather than
imposing a numerical cap, the statutory
noise conditions effectively provide a
limit.
Comment: Commenters asserted that
more frequent flights will produce more
air emissions.
FAA and NPS Response: FAA and
NPS air quality specialists do not expect
air tours to significantly affect air
quality in national parks.
V. Implementation Steps
The FAA and the NPS will use the
quarterly reports that are currently
required to be submitted by the
operators to determine the number of
QT flights flown during the first quarter
that will not count against their annual
allocations. The FAA will implement
the incentive by amending the
operations specifications of commercial
air tour operators holding allocations in
the Dragon and Zuni Point corridors to
allow them to conduct air tours with QT
aircraft without using an allocation for
such tours in the specified seasonal time
periods. The FAA and the NPS will
cooperatively ensure that the statutory
conditions protecting the park are met.
VI. Environmental Considerations
This action involving the FAA’s
amendment of operations specifications
is categorically excluded from more
detailed environmental review because
it would not have a significant effect on
the environment. The FAA and the NPS
have designed this incentive to ensure
compliance with the statutory
conditions that the cumulative impact
of QT operating without allocations
does not increase noise and that the
incentive does not diminish the
statutory mandate to achieve the
substantial restoration of natural quiet at
the park.
PO 00000
22611
Issued in Hawthorne, CA, on March 19,
2015.
Glen A. Martin,
Regional Administrator, Western-Pacific
Region, Federal Aviation Administration.
Issued in Lakewood, CO, on March 23,
2015.
Sue E. Masica,
Regional Director, Intermountain Region,
National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–09380 Filed 4–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
Sunshine Act Meetings; Unified Carrier
Registration Plan Board of Directors
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Unified Carrier
Registration Plan Board of Directors
Meeting.
AGENCY:
The meeting will be held
on May 7, 2015, from 12:00 Noon to
3:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time.
PLACE: This meeting will be open to the
public via conference call. Any
interested person may call 1–877–422–
1931, passcode 2855443940, to listen
and participate in this meeting.
STATUS: Open to the public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Unified
Carrier Registration Plan Board of
Directors (the Board) will continue its
work in developing and implementing
the Unified Carrier Registration Plan
and Agreement and to that end, may
consider matters properly before the
Board.
TIME AND DATE:
Mr.
Avelino Gutierrez, Chair, Unified
Carrier Registration Board of Directors at
(505) 827–4565.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Issued on: April 17, 2015.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–09462 Filed 4–20–15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
[Docket No. MARAD 2015–0049]
Application of Cargo Preference
Requirements to the Federal Ship
Financing Program
Maritime Administration,
MARAD, Department of Transportation.
AGENCY:
Frm 00139
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
22612
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 77 / Wednesday, April 22, 2015 / Notices
Notice of Proposed Policy
Clarification.
ACTION:
The Maritime Administration
(MARAD) is seeking comments on a
proposed policy clarification for the
application of the Cargo Preference Act
of 1954 (CPA 1954), 46 U.S.C. 55305, to
applications, commitments and
guarantees under MARAD’s Federal
Ship Financing Program (Title XI), 46
U.S.C. Chapter 537.
DATES: Comments may be submitted on
or before May 22, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by DOT Docket Number
MARAD–2015–0049 by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Search MARAD–
2015–0049 and follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Email: Rulemakings.MARAD@
dot.gov. Include MARAD–2015–0049 in
the subject line of the message.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building,
Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590.
To confirm that your comments reached
the facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building, Room W12–
140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Management Facility is open 9:00 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except on Federal holidays.
SUMMARY:
Note: If you fax, mail or hand deliver your
input, you should include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that you can be contacted if
there are questions regarding your
submission. If submitting inputs by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an unbound
format, no larger than 8 1⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic filing.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Owen J. Doherty, Associate
Administrator for Business and Finance
Development, Maritime Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366–9595,
owen.doherty@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: After
review of policies and practices
regarding the application of the CPA
1954 to applications, commitments and
guarantees under MARAD’s Title XI
program, it was determined that
applicants often lack a full
understanding of those policies and
practices, despite the issuance of an
earlier policy clarification document (76
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Apr 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
FR 37402) in 2011. In response to
applicant questions and input from
program participants, this proposed
policy clarification seeks to explain
MARAD practices to better inform those
seeking to benefit from Title XI.
Section 1: What is Cargo Preference?
The CPA 1954 mandates that shippers
use U.S.-flag vessels to transport a
portion of government-impelled, ocean
borne cargoes. Through statutory
amendments in 2008 to 46 U.S.C.
55305(b), the CPA 1954 was clarified to
state that the statute applies whenever
the U.S. Government provides financing
in any way with Federal funds for the
account of any person. MARAD, as the
agency charged with implementing and
overseeing compliance administration
of the CPA 1954, previously determined
that ‘‘financing in any way’’ includes
Federal loan guarantee programs, such
as Title XI.
Section 2: What are the Cargo
Preference requirements?
There are both transportation and
administrative requirements associated
with the CPA 1954:
Transportation: At least 50 percent of
the gross tons of the equipment or
materials which are transported by
ocean under a given Title XI
application, letter commitment and
guarantee of obligations must be
transported on privately-owned
commercial vessels of the United States,
to the extent those vessels are available
at fair and reasonable rates. MARAD
defines ‘‘gross ton’’ to mean a metric ton
or cubic meter of cargo, by whichever
measure the number is greater; that
number is the standard by which
compliance with the CPA 1954 will be
evaluated.
Administrative: For each covered
shipment, consistent with 46 CFR 381.3,
within thirty (30) days of the foreign
export loading, the shipper (Title XI
applicant or its representative) must
submit a legible copy of a rated onboard ocean master bill of lading to
MARAD. This requirement exists
whether the particular shipment was
transported aboard a U.S.-flag or a
foreign-flag vessel. The bills of lading
must be submitted to the Office of Cargo
and Commercial Sealift, Maritime
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590 or
via email to cargo.marad@dot.gov. The
bills of lading or the transmittal cover
must clearly state the Title XI
application or loan guarantee to which
they apply and must contain the
following information: (1) The name of
the vessel carrying the cargo(s); (2) The
carrying vessel’s International Maritime
PO 00000
Frm 00140
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Organization (IMO) number; (3) The
carrying vessel’s flag of registry; (4) The
date of cargo loading; (5) The port of
loading; (6) The port(s) of transshipment (if any); (7) The port of final
destination; (8) A description of the
cargo(s); (9) The gross weight of the
cargo(s) in kilograms and the volume of
the cargo(s) in cubic meters; and (10)
The total ocean freight revenue in U.S.
dollars.
Section 3: When do the Cargo
Preference requirements begin?
The cargo preference requirements
apply as soon as an application is
submitted for Title XI financing. The
requirements are therefore in place well
before a decision is made on a Title XI
application, a letter commitment is
issued or a guarantee closing takes
place. The CPA 1954 will generally
apply, particularly for constructionperiod financing, to all foreign
components that are transported by
ocean and included in the ‘‘Actual
Cost’’ of the project in accordance with
46 CFR 298.13(b). At the outset, all
applicants will be required to submit a
‘‘transportation plan’’ for review by
MARAD to ensure that sufficient
planning has occurred to meet the cargo
preference requirements. This
requirement will be discussed with each
applicant and potential applicant at the
earliest possible time. Additionally,
applicants and prospective applicants
should discuss their plans to pursue a
Title XI guarantee with shipyard
constructing the vessel at the earliest
possible time to ensure that the
shipyard is aware and will comply with
the associated cargo preference
requirements.
This programmatic administration is
necessary to ensure compliance with the
CPA 1954. Once MARAD issues a
guarantee under Title XI, the ‘‘financed’’
cargoes included in that guarantee are
within the meaning of the CPA 1954.
However, this can be far too late to
ensure compliance with the CPA 1954
requirements. This programmatic
administration is similar to the manner
in which Federal grants or contracts
generally work; that is, if a party seeks
reimbursement for an item obtained
prior to the execution of a Federal grant
or contract, that item still must be
compliant with applicable Federal laws,
such as the Buy American Act,
regardless of the fact that the item had
been procured before Federal financing
was approved or confirmed.
In the event that a Title XI application
is not approved, there are no
reimbursements for transportation costs
associated with CPA 1954 compliance.
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 77 / Wednesday, April 22, 2015 / Notices
Rather it will be a cost associated with
pursuing a Title XI loan guarantee.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Section 4: What if an available U.S.-flag
vessel cannot be found or the total
ocean freight rate appears too
expensive?
Only MARAD can issue a
determination that no qualified U.S.-flag
vessels are available at fair and
reasonable rates. If a Title XI applicant,
through diligent efforts, is unable to find
a U.S.-flag carrier, without prior
consultation with MARAD and a
determination of non-availability of
qualified U.S.-flag carriage, the
applicant’s due diligence alone will not
excuse that applicant from cargo
preference requirements. Title XI
applicants and prospective applicants
are encouraged to communicate with
U.S.-flag carriers at the earliest possible
time to ensure the greatest degree of
coordination and to obtain the best
rates. In the event that a Title XI
applicant or prospective applicant
experiences difficulty obtaining U.S.flag service, or if it can only find partial
U.S.-flag service, the applicant is
encouraged to contact MARAD as soon
as possible at cargo.marad@dot.gov or
(202) 366–4610. With proper planning,
U.S.-flag service can generally be
obtained at fair and reasonable rates.
Early planning and coordination are the
keys to meeting cargo preference
requirements in Title XI as in all other
Federal programs.
Section 5: What if non-compliance with
Cargo Preference requirements occurs?
At MARAD’s option, as the
administrator of the Title XI program,
non-compliant parties may be denied a
letter commitment or, consistent with
46 U.S.C. 55305(d)(2)(B), may required
to provide make-up cargoes for carriage
aboard U.S.-flag vessels to offset the lost
cargo carriage supporting work under
the Title XI financing application. In
extreme cases where knowing and
willful violations occur, consistent with
46 U.S.C. 55305(d)(2)(C), MARAD can
issue a civil penalty of not more than
$25,000 for each violation, with each
day of a continuing violation following
the date of shipment counting as a
separate violation. Additionally, cargo
preference requirements are
incorporated into Title XI letter
commitments; therefore, failure to
properly adhere to cargo preference
requirements could impact MARAD’s
ability to close on a Title XI guarantee
because the recipient has not met its
obligations under the letter
commitment. However, with early
planning and coordination with
MARAD, no cargo preference violations
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:00 Apr 21, 2015
Jkt 235001
need occur under any Title XI
application, letter commitment or
guarantee.
Section 6: What is the purpose of Cargo
Preference?
The CPA 1954 provides a revenue
base that helps to retain and encourages
a privately owned and operated U.S.flag merchant fleet. The U.S.-flag fleet is
a vital resource, providing essential
sealift capability to globally project and
sustain the U.S. Armed Forces or
support other national emergencies,
maintaining a cadre of skilled seafarers
available in time of national
emergencies, and helping to protect U.S.
economic interests. The U.S. maritime
industry also supports thousands of seagoing, shore-based, and secondary,
associated jobs, supporting the Nation’s
economic growth. It is imperative that
Federal programs, such as Title XI, and
Title XI applicants and beneficiary
shipyards, as members of the U.S.
maritime industry, support this national
priority through proper adherence to
cargo preference requirements.
Therefore, while the use of U.S.-flag
vessels to carry 50 percent of the gross
tons of ocean borne cargoes is the
statutory minimum, MARAD, as the
agency charged with administering both
Title XI and the CPA 1954, encourages
the use of U.S.-flag vessels more than
the minimum whenever possible.
Privacy Act
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c),
DOT solicits comments from the public
to better inform its rulemaking process.
DOT posts these comments, without
edit, to www.regulations.gov, as
described in the system of records
notice, DOT/ALL–14 FDMS, accessible
through www.dot.gov/privacy. In order
to facilitate comment tracking and
response, we encourage commenters to
provide their name, or the name of their
organization; however, submission of
names is completely optional. Whether
or not commenters identify themselves,
all timely comments will be fully
considered. If you wish to provide
comments containing proprietary or
confidential information, please contact
the agency for alternate submission
instructions.
(Authority: 46 U.S.C. 55305; 46 U.S.C.
Ch. 537)
*
*
*
*
*
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Dated: April 17, 2015.
Thomas M. Hudson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015–09371 Filed 4–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
PO 00000
Frm 00141
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22613
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[Docket No. MCF 21062]
Ace Express Coaches, LLC, et al.;
Acquisition and Control; Certain
Properties of Evergreen Trails, Inc.
d/b/a Horizon Coach Lines
AGENCY:
Surface Transportation Board,
DOT.
Notice tentatively approving
and authorizing finance transaction.
ACTION:
Ace Express Coaches, LLC
(Buyer), and its affiliated parties (All
Aboard America! Holdings, Inc. (AHI),
Celerity AHI Holdings SPV, LLC
(Celerity Holdings), Celerity Partners IV,
LLC (Celerity Partners), and Industrial
Bus Lines, Inc. (IBL)) (collectively,
Applicants) have filed an application
under 49 U.S.C. 14303 for the Buyer to
acquire certain assets of Evergreen
Trails, Inc. d/b/a Horizon Coach Lines
(Seller), and for the continuance in
control of the Buyer by AHI, Celerity
Holdings, and Celerity Partners once the
Buyer becomes a federally regulated
motor carrier of passengers. The Board
is tentatively approving and authorizing
the transaction, and, if no opposing
comments are timely filed, this notice
will be the final Board action. Persons
wishing to oppose the application must
follow the rules at 49 CFR 1182.5 and
1182.8.
DATES: Comments must be filed by June
8, 2015. Applicants may file a reply by
June 22, 2015. If no comments are filed
by June 8, 2015, this notice shall be
effective on June 9, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Send an original and 10
copies of any comments referring to
Docket No. MCF 21062 to: Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20423–0001. In
addition, send one copy of comments to
Applicants’ representative: Mark J.
Andrews, Strasburger & Price, LLP,
Suite 717, 1025 Connecticut Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20036.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew Bornstein: (202) 245–0385.
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) for the hearing impaired: 1–800–
877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Buyer
is a newly established limited liability
company under the laws of Delaware.1
SUMMARY:
1 Concurrently with their application, the parties
also filed a request for interim approval under 49
U.S.C. 14303(i). In a decision served on April 8,
2015, in related Docket No. MCF 21062 TA, interim
approval was granted, effective on the service date
of that decision.
E:\FR\FM\22APN1.SGM
22APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22611-22613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09371]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
[Docket No. MARAD 2015-0049]
Application of Cargo Preference Requirements to the Federal Ship
Financing Program
AGENCY: Maritime Administration, MARAD, Department of Transportation.
[[Page 22612]]
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Policy Clarification.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Maritime Administration (MARAD) is seeking comments on a
proposed policy clarification for the application of the Cargo
Preference Act of 1954 (CPA 1954), 46 U.S.C. 55305, to applications,
commitments and guarantees under MARAD's Federal Ship Financing Program
(Title XI), 46 U.S.C. Chapter 537.
DATES: Comments may be submitted on or before May 22, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT Docket Number
MARAD-2015-0049 by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Search MARAD-2015-0049 and follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
Email: Rulemakings.MARAD@dot.gov. Include MARAD-2015-0049
in the subject line of the message.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building, Room W12-
140, Washington, DC 20590. To confirm that your comments reached the
facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Management
Facility is open 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
on Federal holidays.
Note: If you fax, mail or hand deliver your input, you should
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that you can be
contacted if there are questions regarding your submission. If
submitting inputs by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8 \1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Owen J. Doherty, Associate
Administrator for Business and Finance Development, Maritime
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202)
366-9595, owen.doherty@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: After review of policies and practices
regarding the application of the CPA 1954 to applications, commitments
and guarantees under MARAD's Title XI program, it was determined that
applicants often lack a full understanding of those policies and
practices, despite the issuance of an earlier policy clarification
document (76 FR 37402) in 2011. In response to applicant questions and
input from program participants, this proposed policy clarification
seeks to explain MARAD practices to better inform those seeking to
benefit from Title XI.
Section 1: What is Cargo Preference?
The CPA 1954 mandates that shippers use U.S.-flag vessels to
transport a portion of government-impelled, ocean borne cargoes.
Through statutory amendments in 2008 to 46 U.S.C. 55305(b), the CPA
1954 was clarified to state that the statute applies whenever the U.S.
Government provides financing in any way with Federal funds for the
account of any person. MARAD, as the agency charged with implementing
and overseeing compliance administration of the CPA 1954, previously
determined that ``financing in any way'' includes Federal loan
guarantee programs, such as Title XI.
Section 2: What are the Cargo Preference requirements?
There are both transportation and administrative requirements
associated with the CPA 1954:
Transportation: At least 50 percent of the gross tons of the
equipment or materials which are transported by ocean under a given
Title XI application, letter commitment and guarantee of obligations
must be transported on privately-owned commercial vessels of the United
States, to the extent those vessels are available at fair and
reasonable rates. MARAD defines ``gross ton'' to mean a metric ton or
cubic meter of cargo, by whichever measure the number is greater; that
number is the standard by which compliance with the CPA 1954 will be
evaluated.
Administrative: For each covered shipment, consistent with 46 CFR
381.3, within thirty (30) days of the foreign export loading, the
shipper (Title XI applicant or its representative) must submit a
legible copy of a rated on-board ocean master bill of lading to MARAD.
This requirement exists whether the particular shipment was transported
aboard a U.S.-flag or a foreign-flag vessel. The bills of lading must
be submitted to the Office of Cargo and Commercial Sealift, Maritime
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590 or via
email to cargo.marad@dot.gov. The bills of lading or the transmittal
cover must clearly state the Title XI application or loan guarantee to
which they apply and must contain the following information: (1) The
name of the vessel carrying the cargo(s); (2) The carrying vessel's
International Maritime Organization (IMO) number; (3) The carrying
vessel's flag of registry; (4) The date of cargo loading; (5) The port
of loading; (6) The port(s) of trans-shipment (if any); (7) The port of
final destination; (8) A description of the cargo(s); (9) The gross
weight of the cargo(s) in kilograms and the volume of the cargo(s) in
cubic meters; and (10) The total ocean freight revenue in U.S. dollars.
Section 3: When do the Cargo Preference requirements begin?
The cargo preference requirements apply as soon as an application
is submitted for Title XI financing. The requirements are therefore in
place well before a decision is made on a Title XI application, a
letter commitment is issued or a guarantee closing takes place. The CPA
1954 will generally apply, particularly for construction-period
financing, to all foreign components that are transported by ocean and
included in the ``Actual Cost'' of the project in accordance with 46
CFR 298.13(b). At the outset, all applicants will be required to submit
a ``transportation plan'' for review by MARAD to ensure that sufficient
planning has occurred to meet the cargo preference requirements. This
requirement will be discussed with each applicant and potential
applicant at the earliest possible time. Additionally, applicants and
prospective applicants should discuss their plans to pursue a Title XI
guarantee with shipyard constructing the vessel at the earliest
possible time to ensure that the shipyard is aware and will comply with
the associated cargo preference requirements.
This programmatic administration is necessary to ensure compliance
with the CPA 1954. Once MARAD issues a guarantee under Title XI, the
``financed'' cargoes included in that guarantee are within the meaning
of the CPA 1954. However, this can be far too late to ensure compliance
with the CPA 1954 requirements. This programmatic administration is
similar to the manner in which Federal grants or contracts generally
work; that is, if a party seeks reimbursement for an item obtained
prior to the execution of a Federal grant or contract, that item still
must be compliant with applicable Federal laws, such as the Buy
American Act, regardless of the fact that the item had been procured
before Federal financing was approved or confirmed.
In the event that a Title XI application is not approved, there are
no reimbursements for transportation costs associated with CPA 1954
compliance.
[[Page 22613]]
Rather it will be a cost associated with pursuing a Title XI loan
guarantee.
Section 4: What if an available U.S.-flag vessel cannot be found or
the total ocean freight rate appears too expensive?
Only MARAD can issue a determination that no qualified U.S.-flag
vessels are available at fair and reasonable rates. If a Title XI
applicant, through diligent efforts, is unable to find a U.S.-flag
carrier, without prior consultation with MARAD and a determination of
non-availability of qualified U.S.-flag carriage, the applicant's due
diligence alone will not excuse that applicant from cargo preference
requirements. Title XI applicants and prospective applicants are
encouraged to communicate with U.S.-flag carriers at the earliest
possible time to ensure the greatest degree of coordination and to
obtain the best rates. In the event that a Title XI applicant or
prospective applicant experiences difficulty obtaining U.S.-flag
service, or if it can only find partial U.S.-flag service, the
applicant is encouraged to contact MARAD as soon as possible at
cargo.marad@dot.gov or (202) 366-4610. With proper planning, U.S.-flag
service can generally be obtained at fair and reasonable rates. Early
planning and coordination are the keys to meeting cargo preference
requirements in Title XI as in all other Federal programs.
Section 5: What if non-compliance with Cargo Preference requirements
occurs?
At MARAD's option, as the administrator of the Title XI program,
non-compliant parties may be denied a letter commitment or, consistent
with 46 U.S.C. 55305(d)(2)(B), may required to provide make-up cargoes
for carriage aboard U.S.-flag vessels to offset the lost cargo carriage
supporting work under the Title XI financing application. In extreme
cases where knowing and willful violations occur, consistent with 46
U.S.C. 55305(d)(2)(C), MARAD can issue a civil penalty of not more than
$25,000 for each violation, with each day of a continuing violation
following the date of shipment counting as a separate violation.
Additionally, cargo preference requirements are incorporated into Title
XI letter commitments; therefore, failure to properly adhere to cargo
preference requirements could impact MARAD's ability to close on a
Title XI guarantee because the recipient has not met its obligations
under the letter commitment. However, with early planning and
coordination with MARAD, no cargo preference violations need occur
under any Title XI application, letter commitment or guarantee.
Section 6: What is the purpose of Cargo Preference?
The CPA 1954 provides a revenue base that helps to retain and
encourages a privately owned and operated U.S.-flag merchant fleet. The
U.S.-flag fleet is a vital resource, providing essential sealift
capability to globally project and sustain the U.S. Armed Forces or
support other national emergencies, maintaining a cadre of skilled
seafarers available in time of national emergencies, and helping to
protect U.S. economic interests. The U.S. maritime industry also
supports thousands of sea-going, shore-based, and secondary, associated
jobs, supporting the Nation's economic growth. It is imperative that
Federal programs, such as Title XI, and Title XI applicants and
beneficiary shipyards, as members of the U.S. maritime industry,
support this national priority through proper adherence to cargo
preference requirements. Therefore, while the use of U.S.-flag vessels
to carry 50 percent of the gross tons of ocean borne cargoes is the
statutory minimum, MARAD, as the agency charged with administering both
Title XI and the CPA 1954, encourages the use of U.S.-flag vessels more
than the minimum whenever possible.
Privacy Act
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the
public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts these
comments, without edit, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice, DOT/ALL-14 FDMS, accessible through
www.dot.gov/privacy. In order to facilitate comment tracking and
response, we encourage commenters to provide their name, or the name of
their organization; however, submission of names is completely
optional. Whether or not commenters identify themselves, all timely
comments will be fully considered. If you wish to provide comments
containing proprietary or confidential information, please contact the
agency for alternate submission instructions.
(Authority: 46 U.S.C. 55305; 46 U.S.C. Ch. 537)
* * * * *
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Dated: April 17, 2015.
Thomas M. Hudson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-09371 Filed 4-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P