Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 20570-20571 [2015-08692]
Download as PDF
20570
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Notices
which are intended to facilitate both
recipient management and FTA
oversight by documenting the State’s
and designated recipient’s procedures
and policies for administering the
Section 5339 program. One commenter
expressed concern that FTA is
proposing a PMP for a program that
does not warrant this high level of
management. The commenter strongly
suggested the FTA reconsider the
requirement for a PMP. In response,
FTA notes that a PMP or SMP, for the
case of a State recipient, is required for
any program in which the recipient will
be managing subrecipients, as it
facilitates both recipient management
and FTA oversight by documenting the
designated recipient’s procedures and
policies for administering the Section
5339 program. The primary purpose of
the PMP/SMP is to serve as the basis for
FTA to perform recipient-level
management reviews of the program,
and to provide public information on
the recipient’s administration of the
Section 5339 program. It may also be
used internally by the recipient as a
program guide for local project
applicants.
One commenter sought clarification
regarding whether a PMP is required
from a single designated recipient
within a large Urbanized Area. If there
is only one designated recipient, then a
PMP is not required. However, if the
designated recipient is managing and
overseeing multiple subrecipients, then
a PMP is required.
H. Chapter VII—Other Provisions
This chapter describes cross-cutting
Federal requirements that apply to the
Section 5339 Program. The FTA did not
receive any substantive comments on
this chapter and did not make any
substantive edits.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Appendices
The appendices include instructions
for preparing a grant application and a
budget, an application checklist, and
several forms and representative
documents that recipients will need
when applying for Section 5339 funds.
One commenter recommended
including a sample sub-agreement
between designated recipients and
potential subrecipients. The FTA notes
that the designated recipient must still
manage the grant in TEAM. The FTA
has no role in the relationship between
subrecipients and designated recipients
other than determining if the
subrecipient is eligible for FTA funding.
Therefore, there is not a ‘‘one-size fits
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:48 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
all’’ sample agreement between
subrecipients and designated recipients.
Therese M. McMillan,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015–08773 Filed 4–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0015; Notice 1]
Continental Tire the Americas, LLC,
Receipt of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
Continental Tire the
Americas, LLC, (CTA), has determined
that certain Continental replacement
passenger car tires do not fully comply
with paragraph S5.5(f) of Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
139, New Pneumatic Radial Tires for
Light Vehicles. CTA has filed an
appropriate report dated January 7,
2015, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573,
Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports.
DATES: The closing date for comments
on the petition is May 18, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written data, views,
and arguments on this petition.
Comments must refer to the docket and
notice number cited at the beginning of
this notice and submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Mail: Send comments by mail
addressed to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Deliver: Deliver comments by
hand to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Section is open on weekdays from 10
a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays.
• Electronically: Submit comments
electronically by: Logging onto the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments may also be faxed to (202)
493–2251.
Comments must be written in the
English language, and be no greater than
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15 pages in length, although there is no
limit to the length of necessary
attachments to the comments. If
comments are submitted in hard copy
form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive
confirmation that your comments were
received, please enclose a stamped, selfaddressed postcard with the comments.
Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Documents submitted to a docket may
be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may
also be viewed on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by following the
online instructions for accessing the
dockets. DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000, (65 FR 19477–78).
The petition, supporting materials,
and all comments received before the
close of business on the closing date
indicated below will be filed and will be
considered. All comments and
supporting materials received after the
closing date will also be filed and will
be considered to the extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied,
notice of the decision will be published
in the Federal Register pursuant to the
authority indicated below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. CTA’s Petition: Pursuant to 49
U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) (see
implementing rule at 49 CFR part 556),
CTA submitted a petition for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of CTA’s
petition is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any agency decision or other exercise of
judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
II. Tires Involved: Affected are
approximately 116,500 Continental
ExtremeContact DWS size 225/45R17
91W, Continental ExtremeContact DW
size 225/45R17 91W and General G-Max
AS–03 size 225/45R17 91W passenger
car tires.
III. Noncompliance: CTA explains
that the noncompliance is that due to
mold labeling errors, the sidewall
markings on the subject tires do not
correctly describe the actual number of
plies in the tread area of the tires as
required by paragraph S5.5(f) of FMVSS
No. 139. Specifically, the Continental
ExtremeContact DWS size 225/45R17
91W tires were manufactured with
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Notices
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any
decision on this petition only applies to
the subject tires that CTA no longer
controlled at the time it determined that
the noncompliance existed. However,
any decision on this petition does not
relieve equipment distributors and
dealers of the prohibitions on the sale,
offer for sale, or introduction or delivery
for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant tires
under their control after CTA notified
them that the subject noncompliance
existed.
S5.5 Tire Markings. Except as specified in
paragraphs (a) through (i) of S5.5, each tire
must be marked on each sidewall with the
information specified in S5.5(a) through (d)
and on one sidewall with the information
specified in S5.5(e) through (i) according to
the phase-in schedule specified in S7 of this
standard . . .
(f) The actual number of plies in the
sidewall, and the actual number of plies in
the tread area, if different;
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
‘‘Tread 4 Plies: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel +
1 Polyamide.’’ The correct labeling and
stamping should have been ‘‘Tread 5
Plies: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel + 2
Polyamide.’’ The Continental
ExtremeContact DW size 225/45R17
91W tires were manufactured with
‘‘Tread 4 Plies: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel +
1 Polyamide.’’ The correct labeling and
stamping should have been ‘‘Tread 5
Plies: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel + 2
Polyamide.’’ The General G-Max AS–03
size 225/45R17 91W tires were
manufactured with ‘‘Plies: Tread: 1
Polyester + 2 Steel + 1 Polyamide.’’ The
correct labeling and stamping should
have been ‘‘Plies: Tread: 1 Polyester +
2 Steel + 2 Polyamide.’’
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S5.5 of
FMVSS No. 110 requires in pertinent
part:
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8).
V. Summary of CTA’s Analyses: CTA
stated its belief that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety for the following
reasons:
(A) CTA believes that the mislabeling
of the number of plies on the subject
tires has no impact on the operational
performance of the subject tires or on
the safety of vehicles on which these
tires are to be mounted. CTA states that
the subject tires also meet or exceed all
of the performance requirements
specified by FMVSS No. 139.
(B) CTA states that they are unaware
of any accidents or injuries that have
occurred as a result of this
noncompliance.
(C) CTA states that NHTSA has
previously granted similar petitions for
Inconsequential Noncompliance’s in the
past.
CTA has additionally informed
NHTSA that it has corrected the subject
noncompliance.
In summation, CTA believes that the
described noncompliance of the subject
tires is inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety, and that its petition, to exempt
CTA from providing recall notification
of noncompliance as required by 49
U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C.
30120 should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:48 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
Jeffrey Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compiance.
[FR Doc. 2015–08692 Filed 4–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0029; Notice 1]
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Receipt of
Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC,
(MBUSA) on behalf of itself and its
parent company Daimler AG (DAG),
collectively referred to as ‘‘Mercedes’’
has determined that certain model year
(MY) 2015 Mercedes-Benz C-Class (205
Platform) passenger vehicles do not
fully comply with paragraph S10.18.4 of
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 108, Lamps, Reflective
Devices, and Associated Equipment.
Mercedes has filed an appropriate report
dated February 9, 2015, pursuant to 49
CFR part 573, Defect and
Noncompliance Responsibility and
Reports.
DATES: The closing date for comments
on the petition is May 18, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written data, views,
and arguments on this petition.
Comments must refer to the docket and
notice number cited at the beginning of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20571
this notice and submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Mail: Send comments by mail
addressed to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Deliver: Deliver comments by
hand to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Section is open on weekdays from 10
a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays.
• Electronically: Submit comments
electronically by: logging onto the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments may also be faxed to (202)
493–2251.
Comments must be written in the
English language, and be no greater than
15 pages in length, although there is no
limit to the length of necessary
attachments to the comments. If
comments are submitted in hard copy
form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive
confirmation that your comments were
received, please enclose a stamped, selfaddressed postcard with the comments.
Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Documents submitted to the docket
may be viewed by anyone at the address
and times given above. The documents
may also be viewed on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by following
the online instructions for accessing the
dockets. DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000, (65 FR 19477–78).
The petition, supporting materials,
and all comments received before the
close of business on the closing date
indicated below will be filed and will be
considered. All comments and
supporting materials received after the
closing date will also be filed and will
be considered to the extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied,
notice of the decision will be published
in the Federal Register pursuant to the
authority indicated below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Mercedes’ Petition: Pursuant to 49
U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) (see
implementing rule at 49 CFR part 556),
Mercedes submitted a petition for an
exemption from the notification and
remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20570-20571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08692]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2015-0015; Notice 1]
Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Receipt of Petition for
Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, (CTA), has determined that
certain Continental replacement passenger car tires do not fully comply
with paragraph S5.5(f) of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS)
No. 139, New Pneumatic Radial Tires for Light Vehicles. CTA has filed
an appropriate report dated January 7, 2015, pursuant to 49 CFR part
573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is May 18, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited at the beginning of this notice and
submitted by any of the following methods:
Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to: U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Deliver: Deliver comments by hand to: U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. The
Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except
Federal Holidays.
Electronically: Submit comments electronically by: Logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that your comments were received, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the comments. Note that
all comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
Documents submitted to a docket may be viewed by anyone at the
address and times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by following the online
instructions for accessing the dockets. DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).
The petition, supporting materials, and all comments received
before the close of business on the closing date indicated below will
be filed and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the extent possible. When the petition is granted or
denied, notice of the decision will be published in the Federal
Register pursuant to the authority indicated below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. CTA's Petition: Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) (see
implementing rule at 49 CFR part 556), CTA submitted a petition for an
exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
This notice of receipt of CTA's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
II. Tires Involved: Affected are approximately 116,500 Continental
ExtremeContact DWS size 225/45R17 91W, Continental ExtremeContact DW
size 225/45R17 91W and General G-Max AS-03 size 225/45R17 91W passenger
car tires.
III. Noncompliance: CTA explains that the noncompliance is that due
to mold labeling errors, the sidewall markings on the subject tires do
not correctly describe the actual number of plies in the tread area of
the tires as required by paragraph S5.5(f) of FMVSS No. 139.
Specifically, the Continental ExtremeContact DWS size 225/45R17 91W
tires were manufactured with
[[Page 20571]]
``Tread 4 Plies: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel + 1 Polyamide.'' The correct
labeling and stamping should have been ``Tread 5 Plies: 1 Polyester + 2
Steel + 2 Polyamide.'' The Continental ExtremeContact DW size 225/45R17
91W tires were manufactured with ``Tread 4 Plies: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel
+ 1 Polyamide.'' The correct labeling and stamping should have been
``Tread 5 Plies: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel + 2 Polyamide.'' The General G-
Max AS-03 size 225/45R17 91W tires were manufactured with ``Plies:
Tread: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel + 1 Polyamide.'' The correct labeling and
stamping should have been ``Plies: Tread: 1 Polyester + 2 Steel + 2
Polyamide.''
IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S5.5 of FMVSS No. 110 requires in
pertinent part:
S5.5 Tire Markings. Except as specified in paragraphs (a)
through (i) of S5.5, each tire must be marked on each sidewall with
the information specified in S5.5(a) through (d) and on one sidewall
with the information specified in S5.5(e) through (i) according to
the phase-in schedule specified in S7 of this standard . . .
(f) The actual number of plies in the sidewall, and the actual
number of plies in the tread area, if different;
V. Summary of CTA's Analyses: CTA stated its belief that the
subject noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety for
the following reasons:
(A) CTA believes that the mislabeling of the number of plies on the
subject tires has no impact on the operational performance of the
subject tires or on the safety of vehicles on which these tires are to
be mounted. CTA states that the subject tires also meet or exceed all
of the performance requirements specified by FMVSS No. 139.
(B) CTA states that they are unaware of any accidents or injuries
that have occurred as a result of this noncompliance.
(C) CTA states that NHTSA has previously granted similar petitions
for Inconsequential Noncompliance's in the past.
CTA has additionally informed NHTSA that it has corrected the
subject noncompliance.
In summation, CTA believes that the described noncompliance of the
subject tires is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and that its
petition, to exempt CTA from providing recall notification of
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be granted.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on
this petition only applies to the subject tires that CTA no longer
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed.
However, any decision on this petition does not relieve equipment
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant tires under their control after CTA
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8).
Jeffrey Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compiance.
[FR Doc. 2015-08692 Filed 4-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P