State Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program; State Supported Employment Services Program; Limitations on Use of Subminimum Wage, 21059-21146 [2015-05538]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
www.regulations.gov. Therefore,
commenters should be careful to
include in their comments only
information that they wish to make
publicly available.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Parts 361, 363, and 397
RIN 1820–AB70
[Docket ID ED–2015–OSERS–OOO1]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
State Vocational Rehabilitation
Services Program; State Supported
Employment Services Program;
Limitations on Use of Subminimum
Wage
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Secretary proposes to
amend the regulations governing the
State Vocational Rehabilitation Services
program and the State Supported
Employment Services program in order
to implement changes to the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended
by the Workforce Innovation and
Opportunity Act (WIOA) enacted on
July 22, 2014. The Secretary also
proposes to update, clarify, and improve
the current regulations.
Finally, the Secretary proposes to
issue new regulations regarding
limitations on the use of subminimum
wages that are added by WIOA and
under the purview of the Department.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before June 15, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
or via postal mail, commercial delivery,
or hand delivery. We will not accept
comments submitted by fax or by email
or those submitted after the comment
period. To ensure that we do not receive
duplicate copies, please submit your
comments only once. In addition, please
include the Docket ID at the top of your
comments.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov to submit your
comments electronically. Information
on using Regulations.gov, including
instructions for accessing agency
documents, submitting comments, and
viewing the docket, is available on the
site under ‘‘Are you new to the site?’’
• Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery,
or Hand Delivery: If you mail or deliver
your comments about these proposed
regulations, address them to Janet
LaBreck, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 5086,
Potomac Center Plaza (PCP),
Washington, DC 20202–2800.
Privacy Note: The Department’s
policy is to make all comments received
from members of the public available for
public viewing in their entirety on the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
Janet LaBreck, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Room 5086, PCP, Washington, DC
20202–2800. Telephone: (202) 245–7488
or by email: Janet.LaBreck@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Summary
Purpose of This Regulatory Action:
The Secretary proposes to amend the
regulations governing the State
Vocational Rehabilitation Services
program (VR program) (34 CFR part 361)
and State Supported Employment
Services program) (Supported
Employment program) (34 CFR part
363), administered by the Rehabilitation
Services Administration (RSA), to
implement changes to the Act made by
WIOA (P.L. 113–128), enacted on July
22, 2014. In so doing, the Secretary also
proposes to update and clarify current
regulations to improve program
function. Finally, the Secretary proposes
to promulgate regulations in 34 CFR
part 397 that implement the limitations
on the payment of subminimum wages
to individuals with disabilities in
section 511 of the Act that fall under the
purview of the Secretary.
For a more detailed description of the
purpose of these proposed regulatory
actions, see the Background section in
this notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
Summary of the Major Provisions of
This Regulatory Action: We summarize
here those proposed regulatory changes
needed to implement the amendments
to the Act made by WIOA. Under the
Proposed Changes section of this
NPRM, we provide a more complete
summary of these changes and a
detailed description of the substantive
proposed regulations for each part in the
order it appears in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR). We also describe in
detail under the Proposed Changes
section the amendments to each part to
update, clarify, and improve the
regulations.
The Secretary proposes to implement
the following changes to the VR
program and Supported Employment
program made by WIOA.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21059
State Vocational Rehabilitation
Services Program
People with disabilities represent a
vital and integral part of our society,
and we are committed to ensuring that
individuals with disabilities have
opportunities to compete for and enjoy
high quality employment in the 21st
century global economy. Some
individuals with disabilities face
particular barriers to high quality
employment. Giving workers with
disabilities the supports and the
opportunity to acquire the skills that
they need to pursue in-demand jobs and
careers is critical to growing our
economy, ensuring that everyone who
works hard is rewarded, and building a
strong middle class. To help achieve
this priority for individuals with
disabilities, the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended by WIOA, seeks to
empower individuals with disabilities
to maximize employment, economic
self-sufficiency, independence, and
inclusion and integration into society.
The VR program is authorized by title
I of the Act, as amended by WIOA (29
U.S.C. 720 et seq.), to provide support
to each State to assist in operating a
statewide comprehensive, coordinated,
effective, efficient, and accountable
State program as an integral part of a
statewide workforce development
system; and to assess, plan, and provide
vocational rehabilitation (VR) services
to individuals with disabilities so that
those individuals may prepare for and
engage in competitive integrated
employment consistent with their
unique strengths, priorities, concerns,
abilities, capabilities, interests, and
informed choice. The Department last
published regulations for this program
in part 361 on January 17, 2001 (66 FR
4382), to implement amendments made
by the Workforce Investment Act of
1998.
WIOA makes significant changes to
title I of the Act that affect the VR
program. First, WIOA strengthens the
alignment of the VR program with other
components of the workforce
development system by imposing
unified strategic planning requirements,
common performance accountability
measures, and requirements governing
the one-stop delivery system. This
alignment brings together entities
responsible for administering separate
workforce and employment,
educational, and other human resource
programs and funding streams to
collaborate in the creation of a seamless
custom-focused service delivery
network that integrates service delivery
across programs, enhances access to the
program’s services, and improves long-
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
21060
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
term employment outcomes for
individuals receiving assistance. In so
doing, WIOA places heightened
emphasis on coordination and
collaboration at the Federal, State, and
local levels to ensure a streamlined and
coordinated service delivery system for
job-seekers, including those with
disabilities, and employers. Therefore,
the Departments of Education and Labor
propose to issue a joint NPRM to
implement jointly administered
activities under title I of WIOA (e.g.,
those related to Unified or Combined
State Plans, performance accountability,
and the one-stop delivery system),
applicable to the workforce
development system’s core programs
(Adult, Dislocated Worker and Youth
programs; Adult Education and Literacy
programs; Wagner-Peyser Employment
Service program and the Vocational
Rehabilitation program). These joint
proposed regulations are set forth in a
separate NPRM published elsewhere in
this issue of the Federal Register.
WIOA also makes corresponding
changes to title I of the Act.
Consequently, we propose to make
conforming changes throughout part 361
and align the VR program-specific
regulations with the joint proposed
regulations to ensure consistency among
all core programs.
Second, WIOA places heightened
emphasis throughout the Act on the
achievement of competitive integrated
employment. The foundation of the VR
program is the principle that
individuals with disabilities, including
those with the most significant
disabilities, are capable of achieving
high quality, competitive integrated
employment when provided the
necessary skills and supports. To
increase the employment of individuals
with disabilities in the competitive
labor market, the workforce system must
provide the opportunity for such
individuals to participate in job-driven
training and pursue high-quality
employment outcomes. The
amendments to the Act—from the stated
purpose of the Act, to the expansion of
services designed to maximize the
potential of individuals with
disabilities, including those with the
most significant disabilities, to achieve
competitive integrated employment,
and, finally, to the inclusion of
limitations on the payment of
subminimum wages to individuals with
disabilities—reinforce the congressional
intent that individuals with disabilities,
with appropriate supports and services,
are able to achieve the same kinds of
competitive integrated employment as
non-disabled individuals.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
As a result, we propose to amend part
361 throughout to emphasize the key
role that the VR program plays in
employment outcomes and preparing
individuals with disabilities to achieve
competitive integrated employment in
the community. We propose, among
other things, to amend the definition of
‘‘employment outcome’’ to include only
those outcomes in competitive
integrated employment or supported
employment, thereby eliminating
uncompensated employment from the
scope of employment outcomes for
purposes of the VR program. We also
propose to amend numerous other
provisions throughout part 361 to
address the expansion of available
services, requirements related to the
development of the individualized plan
for employment, and order of selection
for services, all of which are intended to
maximize the potential for individuals
with disabilities to prepare for, obtain,
retain, and advance in the same highquality jobs, and high demand careers as
persons without disabilities.
Third, WIOA places heightened
emphasis on the provision of services to
students and youth with disabilities to
ensure that they have meaningful
opportunities to receive the training and
other services they need to achieve
employment outcomes in competitive
integrated employment. The Act, as
amended by WIOA, expands not only
the population of students with
disabilities who may receive services
but also the kinds of services that the
VR agencies may provide to youth and
students with disabilities who are
transitioning from school to
postsecondary education and
employment.
Most notably, the Act, as amended by
WIOA, requires States to reserve 15
percent of their VR allotment to provide
pre-employment transition services to
students with disabilities who are
eligible or potentially eligible for VR
services. These pre-employment
transition services are designed to
provide job exploration and other
services, such as counseling and selfadvocacy training, in the early stages of
the transition process.
With the addition of these early preemployment transition services, the VR
program can be characterized as
providing a continuum of VR services,
especially for students and youth with
disabilities. To that end, we propose to
amend numerous sections of part 361 to
implement new definitions for the terms
‘‘student with a disability’’ and ‘‘youth
with a disability’’ and new requirements
related to pre-employment transition
services and the provision of transition
services to students and youth with
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
disabilities. All of the proposed changes
demonstrate the continuum of services
available to students and youth with
disabilities under the VR program to
maximize their potential to transition
from school to postsecondary education
and employment.
Supported Employment Program
WIOA makes several significant
changes to title VI of the Act, which
governs the Supported Employment
program. All of the amendments to title
VI are consistent with those made
throughout the Act, namely to maximize
the potential of individuals with
disabilities, especially those with the
most significant disabilities, to achieve
competitive integrated employment and
to expand services for youth with the
most significant disabilities.
First, WIOA amends the definition of
‘‘supported employment’’ to make clear
that supported employment outcomes
must be in competitive integrated
employment or, if in an integrated
setting that is not competitive integrated
employment, then in an integrated
setting in which the individual is
working on a short-term basis toward
competitive integrated employment. By
adding a timeframe to this definition,
Congress reinforces its intention that
individuals with disabilities should not
be allowed to languish in subminimum
wage jobs under the Supported
Employment program. Thus, the
Secretary proposes to amend part 363 to
implement the revised definition of
‘‘supported employment.’’ The
Secretary proposes to define ‘‘short-term
basis’’ in this context to mean no longer
than six months. We believe this
proposed change is consistent with the
Act, as amended by WIOA, in its
entirety as well as the stated
congressional intent.
Second, WIOA requires States to
reserve at least 50 percent of their
supported employment program
allotment for the provision of supported
employment services to youth with the
most significant disabilities. With these
reserved funds, States may provide
extended services, for a period up to
four years, to youth with the most
significant disabilities. Prior to the
enactment of WIOA, extended services
were not permitted under either the VR
program or the Supported Employment
program. In addition, States must
provide a non-Federal share of 10
percent of the funds reserved for the
provision of supported employment
services to youth with the most
significant disabilities. By requiring that
States use half of their supported
employment program funds and provide
a match for these reserved funds,
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Congress reinforces the heightened
emphasis on the provision of services to
youth with disabilities. Congress makes
clear that youth with significant
disabilities must be given every
opportunity to receive the services
necessary to ensure the maximum
potential to achieve competitive
integrated employment. Accordingly,
the Secretary proposes to amend part
363 to implement new requirements
regarding the reservation of funds, and
the services to be provided with those
funds, to youth with the most
significant disabilities.
Limitations on the Payment of
Subminimum Wages
Section 511 of the Act, as added by
WIOA, imposes requirements on
employers who hold special wage
certificates under the Fair Labor
Standards Act (FLSA) that must be
satisfied before the employers may hire
youth with disabilities at subminimum
wage or continue to employ individuals
with disabilities of any age at the
subminimum wage level. Section 511
also establishes the roles and
responsibilities of the designated State
units (DSU) for the VR program and
State and local educational agencies in
assisting individuals with disabilities,
including youth with disabilities, to
maximize opportunities to achieve
competitive integrated employment
through services provided by VR and
the local educational agencies.
The addition of section 511 to the Act
is consistent with all other amendments
to the Act made by WIOA. Throughout
the Act, Congress makes clear that
individuals with disabilities, including
those with the most significant
disabilities, can achieve competitive
integrated employment if provided the
necessary supports and services. The
limitations imposed by section 511
reinforce this belief by requiring
individuals with disabilities, including
youth with disabilities, to satisfy certain
service-related requirements in order to
start or maintain, as applicable,
subminimum wage employment. To that
end, the Secretary proposes to develop
new regulations at part 397 that would
implement requirements of section 511
that fall under the purview of the
Department.
Costs and Benefits: The potential
costs associated with this regulatory
action are those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for
administering the Department’s
programs and activities. Further
information related to costs and benefits
may be found in the Regulatory Impact
Analysis section later in this NPRM.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
Invitation to Comment: We invite you
to submit comments regarding these
proposed regulations. To ensure that
your comments have maximum effect in
developing the final regulations, we
urge you to identify clearly the specific
section or sections of the proposed
regulations that each of your comments
addresses and to arrange your comments
in the same order as the proposed
regulations.
We invite you to assist us in
complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Orders 12866
and 13563 and their overall requirement
of reducing regulatory burden that
might result from these proposed
regulations. Please let us know of any
further ways we could reduce potential
costs or increase potential benefits
while preserving the effective and
efficient administration of the
Department’s programs and activities.
During and after the comment period,
you may inspect all public comments
about these proposed regulations by
accessing Regulations.gov. You may also
inspect the comments in person in room
5093, Potomac Center Plaza, 550 12th
Street SW., Washington, DC, between
8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Washington,
DC time, Monday through Friday of
each week except Federal holidays.
Please contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Assistance to Individuals with
Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request we will
provide an appropriate accommodation
or auxiliary aid to an individual with a
disability who needs assistance to
review the comments or other
documents in the public rulemaking
record for these proposed regulations. If
you want to schedule an appointment
for this type of accommodation or
auxiliary aid, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Background
The Workforce Innovation and
Opportunity Act (WIOA) (Pub L. 113–
128), enacted July 22, 2014, made
significant changes to the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973 (hereafter referred to as the
Act). As a result, the Secretary proposes
to amend parts 361 and 363 of title 34
of the CFR. These parts, respectively,
implement the:
• State Vocational Rehabilitation (VR)
Services program; and
• State Supported Employment
Services program.
In addition, WIOA added section 511
to title V of the Act. Section 511 limits
the payment of subminimum wages to
individuals with disabilities by
employers holding special wage
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21061
certificates under the FLSA. Although
the Department of Labor administers the
FLSA, some requirements of section 511
fall under the purview of the Secretary.
Therefore, the Secretary proposes to add
a new part 397 to title 34 of the CFR to
implement those particular provisions.
These proposed changes are further
described under the Summary of
Proposed Changes and Significant
Proposed Regulations sections of this
NPRM. WIOA also makes changes to
other programs authorized under title I
of the Act, including the Client
Assistance Program and the American
Indian Vocational Rehabilitation
Services (AIVRS) program, as well as
discretionary grant programs authorized
under title III, the Protection and
Advocacy of Individual Rights program
under title V, and the Independent
Living Services for Older Individuals
Who are Blind program under title VII.
The Secretary proposes regulatory
changes to implement the amendments
to these programs and projects made by
WIOA through a separate, but related,
NPRM published elsewhere in this issue
of the Federal Register.
Summary of Proposed Changes
The Secretary proposes to implement
the following changes to the VR
program and Supported Employment
program made by WIOA.
State Vocational Rehabilitation
Services Program
The VR program is authorized by title
I of the Act, as amended by WIOA (29
U.S.C. 720 through 731, and 733), to
provide support to each State to assist
in operating a statewide comprehensive,
coordinated, effective, efficient, and
accountable State VR program as an
integral part of a statewide workforce
development system; and to assess,
plan, and provide VR services to
individuals with disabilities so that
those individuals may prepare for and
engage in competitive integrated
employment consistent with their
unique strengths, priorities, concerns,
abilities, capabilities, interests, and
informed choice.
The Department last published
regulations for this program in part 361
on January 17, 2001 (66 FR 4382), to
implement amendments made by the
Workforce Investment Act of 1998
(WIA).
In implementing the amendments to
the VR program made by WIOA, the
numerous proposed regulatory changes
to part 361 improve employment
outcomes for individuals with
disabilities by: (1) Strengthening the
alignment of the VR program with other
components of the workforce
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
21062
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
development system through unified
strategic planning requirements,
common performance accountability
measures, and requirements governing
the one-stop delivery system; (2)
emphasizing the achievement of
competitive integrated employment by
individuals with disabilities, including
individuals with the most significant
disabilities; and (3) expanding services
to support the transition of students and
youth with disabilities to postsecondary
education and employment.
To implement jointly administered
activities under title I of WIOA (e.g.,
those related to Unified or Combined
State Plans, performance accountability
and the one-stop delivery system), the
U.S. Departments of Labor and
Education are proposing a set of joint
regulations applicable to the workforce
development system’s core programs,
including the VR program. Through
these proposed joint regulations, we lay
the foundation for establishing a
comprehensive, accessible, and high
quality workforce development system
that serves all individuals in need of
employment services, including
individuals with disabilities, and
employers in a manner that is customerfocused and that supports an integrated
service design and delivery model.
These joint proposed regulations are in
a separate NPRM published elsewhere
in this issue of the Federal Register.
WIOA makes corresponding changes
to title I of the Act regarding the
submission, approval, and disapproval
of the VR services portion of the Unified
or Combined State Plan; the standards
and indicators used to assess VR
program performance; and the
involvement of the VR program in the
one-stop delivery system. Consequently,
we propose to amend current § 361.10 to
require that all assurance and
descriptive information previously
submitted through the VR State plan
and supported employment supplement
be submitted through the VR services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan under sections 102 and 103
of the Act, respectively, of WIOA. We
also propose to implement changes
specific to the content of the VR services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan by amending current
§ 361.29(a) to require that the
comprehensive statewide needs
assessment include the results of the
needs of students and youth with
disabilities for VR services, including
pre-employment transition services.
Additionally, we propose to clarify in
current § 361.29 that States will report
to the Secretary updates to the statewide
needs assessment and goals and
priorities, estimates of the numbers of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
individuals with disabilities served
through the VR program and the costs
of serving them, and reports of progress
on goals and priorities at such time and
in such manner determined by the
Secretary, thereby resolving
inconsistencies in reporting
requirements within section 101(a) of
the Act. Finally, we clarify in proposed
§ 361.20 when designated State agencies
must conduct public hearings to obtain
comment on substantive changes to
policies and procedures governing the
VR program.
We propose to implement the changes
to section 106 of the Act made by WIOA
through proposed § 361.40, by replacing
the current standards and indicators
used to assess the performance of the
VR program under current § 361.80
through § 361.89 with a cross-reference
to the joint regulations for the common
performance accountability measures
for the core programs of the workforce
development system. Similarly, we
propose to provide a cross-reference in
current § 361.23, regarding the roles and
responsibilities of the VR program in the
one-stop delivery system, to the joint
regulations implementing requirements
for the one-stop delivery system.
WIOA makes extensive changes to
title I of the Act to improve the VR
services provided to, and the
employment outcomes achieved by,
individuals with disabilities, including
those with the most significant
disabilities. Embedded throughout the
provisions of WIOA and the
amendments to the Act is the principle
that individuals with disabilities,
including those with the most
significant disabilities, are capable of
achieving competitive integrated
employment when provided the
necessary skills and supports. As a
result, we propose to adopt a definition
of ‘‘competitive integrated employment’’
in § 361.5(c)(9) that combines, clarifies,
and enhances the two separate
definitions of ‘‘competitive
employment’’ and ‘‘integrated setting’’
for the purpose of employment in
current § 361.5(b)(11) and (b)(33)(ii).
We propose to incorporate this
principle throughout part 361, from the
statement of program purpose in
proposed § 361.1, to a requirement in
proposed § 361.46(a) that the
individualized plan for employment
include a specific employment goal
consistent with the general goal of
competitive integrated employment.
This principle is most evident in the
definition of ‘‘employment outcome’’ in
proposed § 361.5(c)(15), which
specifically identifies customized
employment as an employment outcome
under the VR program, and requires that
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
all employment outcomes achieved
through the VR program be in
competitive integrated employment or
supported employment, thereby
eliminating uncompensated outcomes,
such as homemakers and unpaid family
workers, from the scope of the
definition for purposes of the VR
program. We will provide guidance and
technical assistance to VR agencies to
assist them in implementing this
proposed change.
We propose additional regulatory
changes to ensure that individuals with
disabilities are provided a full
opportunity through the VR program to
participate in job-driven training and
pursue high-quality employment
outcomes. Proposed § 361.42(a)(1)(iii)
would clarify that an applicant meeting
all other eligibility criteria may be
determined eligible if he or she requires
services to advance in employment, not
just obtain or maintain employment. We
also propose to clarify in proposed
§§ 361.48(b)(6)and 361.49, that VR
services are available to assist
individuals with disabilities to obtain
graduate level education needed for this
purpose. We clarify in proposed
§ 361.42(c)(1) the prohibition against a
duration of residency requirement and
in § 361.42(c)(2) those factors that
cannot be considered when determining
the eligibility of VR program applicants.
We propose removing the option to use
extended evaluations, as a limited
exception to trial work experiences, to
explore an individual’s abilities,
capabilities, and capacity to perform in
work situations by deleting paragraph (f)
from current § 361.42. To enable
individuals with disabilities, including
students and youth with disabilities, to
receive VR services in a timely manner,
proposed § 361.45(e) would require the
individualized plan for employment of
each individual to be developed within
90 days following the determination of
eligibility. Finally, if a State VR agency
is operating under an order of selection
for services, it would have the option
under proposed § 361.36 to indicate in
its portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan that it will serve eligible
individuals with disabilities outside
that order who have an immediate need
for equipment or services to maintain
employment.
WIOA enhances the VR agency’s
focus on coordination and collaboration
with other entities by emphasizing
coordination with employers, noneducational agencies working with
youth, AIVRS programs, and other
agencies and programs providing
services to individuals with disabilities
to support the achievement of
competitive integrated employment.
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Proposed § 361.24 reflects the
enhancements. The collaboration with
employers is essential to the success of
VR program participants and proposed
§ 361.32 would describe the training
and technical assistance services that
can be provided to employers hiring, or
interested in hiring, individuals with
disabilities.
We propose to implement the
emphasis on serving students and youth
with disabilities contained in the
amendments to the Act made by WIOA
in many regulatory changes to part 361.
We propose new definitions of ‘‘student
with a disability’’ and ‘‘youth with a
disability’’ in § 361.5(c)(51) and (c)(59),
respectively. These definitions would
assist VR agencies to determine the
appropriate transition and other services
that may be provided to each group. We
propose in § 361.48(a) to implement the
requirements of new sections 110(d) and
113 of the Act requiring VR agencies to
reserve at least 15 percent of the Federal
allotment, to provide and arrange, in
coordination with local educational
agencies, for the provision of preemployment transition services to
students with disabilities. We propose
in § 361.49 to clarify the technical
assistance VR agencies can provide to
educational agencies and to permit the
provision of transition services for the
benefit of groups of students and youth
with disabilities. To enable VR agencies
and local educational agencies to better
determine their respective
responsibilities for the provision of
transition services, including preemployment transition services, through
greater interagency collaboration, we
propose in § 361.22(c) to clarify that
nothing in this part is to be construed
as reducing the responsibility of the
local educational agencies or any other
agencies under the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act to provide or
pay for transition services that are also
considered to be special education or
related services necessary for the
provision of a free appropriate public
education to students with disabilities.
So that VR agencies can recruit the
qualified personnel needed to provide
the services and engage in the activities
summarized here, we propose in
§ 361.18 changes to the requirements for
a comprehensive system of personnel
development. The proposed regulations
would establish minimum educational
requirements and experience and
eliminate the requirement to retrain staff
not meeting the VR agency’s personnel
standard for qualified staff.
Finally, we propose changes to part
361 to improve the fiscal administration
of the VR program. Proposed § 361.5(b)
would make applicable to the VR
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
program the definitions contained in 2
CFR part 200, Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles, and
Audit Requirements. We also propose to
make numerous conforming changes to
align with 2 CFR 200 to ensure
consistency.
We propose three changes to current
§ 361.65 regarding the allotment of VR
program funds. First, we propose adding
a new paragraph (a)(3) to § 361.65 that
would require the State to reserve not
less than 15 percent of its allotment for
the provision of pre-employment
transition services described in
proposed § 361.48(a). Second, we
propose to amend current § 361.65(b)(2)
to clarify that reallotment occurs in the
fiscal year the funds were appropriated;
however, the funds may be obligated or
expended during the period of
performance, provided that matching
requirements are met. Finally, we
propose to add a new paragraph (b)(3)
to § 361.65 that would describe the
Secretary’s authority to determine the
criteria to be used to reallot funds when
the amount requested exceeds the
amount of funds relinquished. We
provide a full discussion of these and
other changes to part 361 in the
Significant Proposed Regulations
section of this notice.
State Supported Employment Services
Program
Under the Supported Employment
program authorized under title VI of the
Act (29 U.S.C. 795g et seq.), the
Secretary provides grants to assist States
in developing and implementing
collaborative programs with appropriate
entities to provide supported
employment services for individuals
with the most significant disabilities,
including youth with the most
significant disabilities, to enable them to
achieve supported employment
outcomes in competitive integrated
employment. Grants made under the
Supported Employment program
supplement grants issued to States
under the VR program (34 CFR part
361).
The regulations in 34 CFR part 363,
governing the Supported Employment
program, were last updated February 18,
1993 (59 FR 8331). Therefore, the
changes proposed in part 363 would
incorporate statutory changes made by
WIOA, as well as update the regulations
to improve the program and ensure
consistency with changes proposed for
part 361 governing the VR program.
The changes made to the Supported
Employment program by WIOA are
intended to ensure that individuals with
the most significant disabilities,
especially youth with the most
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21063
significant disabilities, are afforded a
full opportunity to prepare for, obtain,
maintain, advance in, or re-enter
competitive integrated employment,
including supported or customized
employment. Proposed § 363.1 would
require that supported employment be
in competitive integrated employment
or, if not, in an integrated setting in
which the individual is working toward
competitive integrated employment on a
short-term basis not to exceed six
months. Proposed § 363.50(b)(1) would
extend the time from 18 months to 24
months for the provision of supported
employment services. Proposed § 363.22
would require a reservation of 50
percent of a State’s allotment under this
part for the provision of supported
employment services, including
extended services, to youth with the
most significant disabilities. Proposed
§ 363.23 would require not less than a
10 percent match for the amount of
funds reserved to serve youth with the
most significant disabilities. Proposed
§ 363.51 would reduce the amount of
funds that may be spent on
administrative costs.
Limitation on Use of Subminimum
Wages
The Secretary proposes to promulgate
new regulations in part 397 to
implement new requirements for
designated State units (DSUs) and
educational agencies under the purview
of the Department that are imposed by
section 511 of the Act, which was added
by WIOA. Section 511 imposes
limitations on employers who hold
special wage certificates, commonly
known as 14(c) certificates, under the
FLSA (29 U.S.C. 214(c)) that must be
satisfied before the employers may hire
youth with disabilities at subminimum
wage or continue to employ individuals
with disabilities of any age at the
subminimum wage level. The proposed
regulations in part 397 focus exclusively
on the related roles and responsibilities
of educational agencies and DSUs for
the VR program. The proposed
regulations in part 397 are consistent
with the changes proposed for parts 361
and 363, which govern the VR program
and Supported Employment program,
respectively.
Through amendments to the Act,
WIOA prioritizes, and places
heightened emphasis upon, the
provision of services that maximize
opportunities for competitive integrated
employment for individuals with
disabilities, including those with the
most significant disabilities, consistent
with their unique strengths, resources,
priorities, concerns, abilities,
capabilities, interests, and informed
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
21064
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
choice. WIOA also places heightened
emphasis on the provision of services
necessary to assist youth with
disabilities to achieve competitive
integrated employment in the
community, including supported or
customized employment. To that end,
amendments to the Act require DSUs to
reserve specified percentages of their VR
or supported employment allotments for
the provision of services to students or
youth with disabilities, as applicable.
These amendments, along with the
addition of section 511, demonstrate the
intent that individuals with disabilities,
especially youth with disabilities, must
be afforded a full opportunity to prepare
for, obtain, maintain, advance in, or reenter competitive integrated
employment.
Section 511 places limitations on the
payment of subminimum wages by
entities (e.g., employers) holding special
wage certificates under the FLSA. In
particular, such employers are
prohibited from hiring youth with
disabilities at a subminimum wage level
unless the youth are afforded
meaningful opportunities to access
services, including transition services
under the Act or IDEA, so they may
achieve competitive integrated
employment in the community. For the
purposes of these requirements, a
‘‘youth with a disability’’ is anyone who
is 24 years or younger. This age range
is consistent with the definition of a
‘‘youth with a disability’’ in section
7(42) of the Act. Additionally,
employers are prohibited from
continuing to employ individuals with
disabilities, regardless of age, at the
subminimum wage level unless other
requirements are satisfied. Specifically,
the individual with a disability, or the
individual’s parent or guardian if
applicable, must receive certain
information and career counselingrelated services from the DSU every six
months during the first year of such
employment and annually thereafter for
as long as the individual receives
compensation at the subminimum wage
level.
In addition to the requirements
imposed on employers holding special
wage certificates, section 511 of the Act
requires DSUs to provide certain career
counseling services. Further,
educational agencies and the DSUs must
develop a process, or use an existing
process, for the timely provision of
documentation necessary to
demonstrate completion of required
activities, as appropriate, to youth
seeking employment, at a subminimum
wage level. Finally, DSUs must provide
documentation of the provision of
career counseling and information and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
referral services to individuals with
disabilities, regardless of age, who are
currently employed at a subminimum
wage level.
The proposed regulations in this part
focus exclusively on those requirements
under the purview of the Department of
Education. To that end, we propose in
part 397: (1) Documentation
requirements that local educational
agencies and DSUs would be required to
satisfy; and (2) information and career
counseling-related services DSUs would
be required to provide. Requirements
imposed on employers are under the
purview of the Department of Labor,
which administers the FLSA.
Significant Proposed Regulations
The Secretary proposes to amend the
implementing regulations for the VR
program (part 361) and the Supported
Employment program (part 363). The
Secretary also proposes to issue new
regulations in part 397 to implement
limitations on the payment of
subminimum wages to individuals with
disabilities. We discuss substantive
issues within each subpart, by section or
subject.
Generally, we do not address
proposed changes that are technical or
otherwise minor in effect, such as
changes to the authority cited in the
Act.
Part 361—State Vocational
Rehabilitation Services Program
Organizational Changes
Although the proposed regulations
maintain the current structure of
subparts A, B, and C, we propose
organizational changes to other subparts
within this part. First, we propose to
reserve subparts within part 361 where
we plan to incorporate the three
subparts we are proposing in a separate,
but related, NPRM (the joint regulations
proposed by the Departments of
Education and Labor implementing
changes to title I of WIOA) published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register. Please see that NPRM for more
information about how these subparts
will be incorporated into part 361.
Second, we propose to remove §§ 361.80
through 361.89, since the VR-specific
standards and indicators are no longer
applicable given amendments made by
WIOA. Finally, we propose to eliminate
Appendix A to current part 361—
Questions and Responses. We will
consider issuing guidance after the
publication of the final regulations.
Purpose (§ 361.1)
Statute: Section 100(a)(1)(C) of the
Act, as amended by WIOA (29 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
720(a)(1)(C)), highlights competitive
integrated employment as the type of
employment that individuals with
disabilities, including individuals with
the most significant disabilities, are
capable of achieving if appropriate
supports and services are provided. This
section, as revised, also incorporates
economic self-sufficiency as a criterion
to consider when providing VR services
to an individual. The focus on
competitive integrated employment is
also reflected in changes made to
section 100(a)(3)(B) of the Act.
Current Regulations: Current
§ 361.1(b) refers only to gainful
employment, not competitive integrated
employment. It also does not include
economic self-sufficiency as a criterion
to consider when providing VR services.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend current § 361.1(b) by: (1)
Replacing the term ‘‘gainful
employment’’ with ‘‘competitive
integrated employment’’; and (2)
incorporating ‘‘economic selfsufficiency’’ as a new criterion that must
be considered to ensure that the VR
services provided are consistent with
the individual’s unique circumstances.
Reasons: The regulatory changes are
necessary to implement statutory
amendments to section 100 of the Act
that emphasize the ability of individuals
with disabilities, including individuals
with the most significant disabilities, to
achieve competitive integrated
employment, not ‘‘gainful
employment,’’ the term previously used
under the Act, as amended by WIA. We
believe this change is significant given
that section 7(5) of the Act, as amended
by WIOA, includes a new term,
‘‘competitive integrated employment,’’
that includes mandatory criteria related
to, among other things, compensation,
advancement, and the integrated nature
of the workplace. We also believe it is
significant that Congress added
economic self-sufficiency to the list of
areas that must be considered when
providing VR services to an individual
because it reinforces a key element of
‘‘competitive integrated employment,’’
namely requirements related to
compensation and benefits.
See the discussion of the term
‘‘competitive integrated employment’’
in this Significant Proposed Regulations
section of the notice for a full
explanation of this term for purposes of
the VR program.
Applicable Definitions (§ 361.5)
Definitions in 34 CFR 77.1
Statute: None.
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Current Regulations: Current
regulations highlight only a few terms
contained in 34 CFR 77.1.
Proposed Regulations: In paragraph
(a) of § 361.5, we propose to incorporate
by reference all definitions contained in
34 CFR 77.1.
Reasons: This change is necessary to
clarify that all definitions in 34 CFR
77.1 are applicable to part 361.
Adoption of 2 CFR Part 200
Statute: None.
Current Regulations: Current § 361.5,
which contains definitions relevant to
the VR program and was last updated in
2001, does not include definitions from
2 CFR part 200 since those regulations
were promulgated in 2014.
Proposed Regulations: We propose
redesignating current paragraph (b) as
paragraph (c) and adding a new
paragraph (b) that incorporates by
reference all definitions in 2 CFR part
200, subpart A (Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles, and
Audit Requirements). Proposed
substantive changes to paragraph (c)
will be discussed throughout this NPRM
in conjunction with the relevant topical
discussion.
Reasons: OMB issued the Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards on January 1, 2014. The
new regulations supersede and
streamline requirements from OMB
Circulars A–21, A–87, A–89, A–102, A–
110, A–122, and A–133, as well as the
guidance in Circular A–50 on Single
Audit Act follow-up. These regulations,
codified in 2 CFR part 200, have been
adopted by the Secretary in 2 CFR part
3474, which took effect on December 26,
2014. Consequently, terms and
definitions that previously were not
used in the VR program, such as
‘‘subaward’’ (2 CFR 200.92), will be
applicable given the Department’s
adoption of 2 CFR part 200.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Administrative Cost
Statute: Section 7(1) of the Act, which
defines ‘‘administrative costs,’’ remains
unchanged by WIOA.
Current Regulations: The current
definition in § 361.5(b)(2) mirrors the
statute and defines ‘‘administrative
costs’’ as including, among other things,
the costs of operating and maintaining
DSU facilities, equipment, and grounds.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend § 361.5(c)(2)(viii), as
redesignated by other changes made in
this part, by clarifying that operating
and maintenance expenses, for purposes
of the definition of ‘‘administrative
costs’’ for the VR program, do not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
include capital expenditures, as defined
in 2 CFR 200.13.
Reasons: The proposed change is
necessary to clarify the scope of
administrative costs, with regard to
operating and maintenance
expenditures, thereby ensuring
consistency with 2 CFR part 200. There
has been confusion among VR grantees
as to whether operating or maintenance
expenses, in the context of
administrative costs, include capital
expenditures. Operating or maintenance
expenses in the context of
administrative costs under the VR
program are those costs incurred to
maintain facilities, equipment, and
grounds in good working order;
whereas, capital expenditures, as
defined in 2 CFR 200.13, are those
expenditures that ‘‘materially increase
their value or useful life.’’ We want to
make clear that capital expenditures are
permitted under the VR program in
accordance with 2 CFR 200.439, but not
as an administrative cost.
Assessment for Determining Eligibility
and Vocational Rehabilitation Needs
Statute: Section 7(2)(B)(v) of the Act,
as amended by WIOA (29 U.S.C. 705(2)),
adds a new requirement that VR
agencies must, to the maximum extent
possible, rely on information from the
individual’s experiences obtained in an
integrated employment setting in the
community or in other integrated
community settings when using existing
information or conducting a
comprehensive assessment for
determining eligibility and the need for
VR services for an individual with a
disability.
Current Regulations: Current
§ 361.5(b)(6) defines ‘‘assessment for
determining eligibility and vocational
rehabilitation needs,’’ but does not
include the requirement related to
reliance on information about the
individual’s experiences in integrated
settings because this is a new statutory
requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend the current regulations to
conform to the statute in section 7(2)(B)
of the Act by adding language to the
definition of ‘‘assessment for
determining eligibility and vocational
rehabilitation needs’’ in proposed
§ 361.5(c)(5)(ii)(E) that would make
clear that a comprehensive assessment,
to the maximum extent possible, relies
on information obtained from the
eligible individual’s experiences in
integrated employment settings in the
community and other integrated settings
in the community.
Reasons: WIOA places a heightened
emphasis on the achievement of
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21065
competitive integrated employment by
individuals with disabilities. To that
end, amendments made by WIOA
require that assessments for determining
eligibility and VR needs of individuals
with disabilities must rely on
information about the individual’s
experiences in integrated employment
and in other integrated community
settings. The Act clearly places an
emphasis on integrated settings by
requiring that VR agencies rely on
information learned from the
individual’s experiences in these
settings, to the maximum extent
possible, when conducting an
assessment. Nonetheless a DSU is not
precluded from determining an
individual’s eligibility for VR services
based on other information obtained
through the assessment process when
the individual cannot participate in
integrated community-based work
experiences.
Assistive Technology Terms
Statute: Section 7(3) of the Act, as
amended by WIOA (29 U.S.C. 705(3)),
adds a new definition of ‘‘assistive
technology’’ and combines the previous
definitions of ‘‘assistive technology
device’’ and ‘‘assistive technology
service’’ under the heading ‘‘assistive
technology terms.’’
Current Regulations: Current
§ 361.5(b)(7) defines ‘‘assistive
technology device’’ and current
§ 361.5(b)(8) defines ‘‘assistive
technology service.’’ There is no
definition for ‘‘assistive technology’’
since this is a new statutory term.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
add the heading ‘‘assistive technology
terms’’ in proposed § 361.5(c)(6), under
which we would incorporate definitions
for the new term ‘‘assistive technology’’
and for the existing terms ‘‘assistive
technology device’’ and ‘‘assistive
technology service.’’ We also propose to
delete current § 361.5(b)(7) and (b)(8), as
these separate definitions would no
longer be necessary.
Reasons: The proposed changes are
necessary to implement the new
statutory definition in section 7(3) of the
Act, as amended by WIOA. The
proposed definition streamlines the
definitions of the various terms by
referencing the Assistive Technology
Act of 1998.
Competitive Integrated Employment
Statute: WIOA adds a new term,
‘‘competitive integrated employment,’’
in section 7(5) of the Act (29 U.S.C.
705(5)). Although this is a new statutory
term, the term and its definition
generally represent a consolidation of
two separate definitions and their terms
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
21066
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
in current regulations—‘‘competitive
employment’’ and ‘‘integrated setting.’’
In addition, the new statutory definition
incorporates a criterion related to
advancement in employment that is not
included in either of the two current
regulatory definitions.
Current Regulations: Current
§ 361.5(b)(11) defines ‘‘competitive
employment’’ and current § 361.5(b)(33)
defines ‘‘integrated setting.’’ Current
regulations do not define ‘‘competitive
integrated employment’’ since this is a
new statutory term.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
replace the term ‘‘competitive
employment’’ in current § 361.5(b)(11)
with the new term ‘‘competitive
integrated employment’’ in proposed
§ 361.5(c)(9). The proposed definition of
‘‘competitive integrated employment’’
would mirror the statutory definition in
section 7(5) of the Act, as amended by
WIOA, as well as provide two
clarifications with respect to the criteria
for integrated work locations.
First, proposed § 361.5(c)(9)(ii)(A)
would clarify that the employment
location must be in ‘‘a setting typically
found in the community.’’ Second,
proposed § 361.5(c)(9)(ii)(B) would
clarify that the employee with a
disability’s interaction with other
employees and others, as appropriate
(e.g., customers and vendors), who are
not persons with disabilities (other than
supervisors and service providers) must
be to the same extent that employees
without disabilities in similar positions
interact with these same persons. This
interaction must occur as part of the
individual’s performance of work duties
and must occur both in the particular
work unit and the entire work site, as
applicable. We further propose to
amend the definition of ‘‘integrated
setting’’ in proposed § 361.5(c)(32)(ii) to
conform to the clarifications provided in
the proposed definition of ‘‘competitive
integrated employment’’ in proposed
§ 361.5(c)(9)(ii) to ensure consistency
between the two terms.
Finally, we propose to replace the
terms ‘‘competitive employment’’ and
‘‘employment in an integrated setting,’’
as appropriate, with ‘‘competitive
integrated employment’’ throughout this
part.
Reasons: These proposed changes are
necessary to implement and to clarify
statutory amendments made by WIOA.
Because the proposed definition of
‘‘competitive integrated employment’’
reflects, for the most part, a
consolidation of two existing regulatory
definitions, the substance of this
proposed definition is familiar to DSUs
and does not represent a divergence
from current regulations, long-standing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
Department policy, practice, and the
heightened emphasis on competitive
integrated employment throughout the
Act, as amended by WIOA.
In implementing these proposed
regulations and determining whether an
individual with a disability has
achieved an employment outcome in
‘‘competitive integrated employment,’’ a
DSU must consider, on a case-by casebasis, each of the criteria described in
the proposed definition of ‘‘competitive
integrated employment.’’ While most of
the criteria are familiar and selfexplanatory, we believe additional
guidance is warranted here to explain
those few new criteria contained in the
statutory and proposed regulatory
definitions, especially with regard to the
criteria for an integrated employment
setting. As a result, we further explain
these criteria, highlighting those aspects
that historically have raised the most
questions from DSUs.
Competitive Earnings: The
compensation criteria of the proposed
definition of ‘‘competitive integrated
employment,’’ which mirror the
statutory definition, are consistent with
those found in the current regulatory
definition of ‘‘competitive employment’’
in § 361.5(b)(11). Proposed
§ 361.5(c)(9)(i)(A) would continue to
require that, to be considered
‘‘competitive integrated employment,’’
the individual must perform full- or
part-time work in which he or she earns
at least the higher of the minimum wage
rate established by Federal or applicable
State law. Because several jurisdictions
have established minimum wage rates
substantially higher than those provided
for under Federal or State law, the
statutory definition and proposed
§ 361.5(c)(9)(i)(A) would require that the
individual’s earnings be at least equal to
the legally established local minimum
wage rate if that rate is higher than both
the Federal and State rates. Also, as has
been the case under the current
definition of ‘‘competitive
employment,’’ section 7(5) of the Act
requires and proposed § 361.5(c)(9)(i)(D)
would require that the individual with
the disability must be eligible for the
same level of benefits provided to
employees without disabilities in
similar positions. In implementing the
statute, the proposed definition would
establish additional criteria with respect
to competitive earnings. First, proposed
§ 361.5(c)(9)(i)(B) would require that the
DSU take into account the training,
experience, and level of skills possessed
by the employees without disabilities in
similar positions. Second, the proposed
definition recognizes that individuals,
with or without disabilities, in selfemployment may not receive an income
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
from the business equal to or exceeding
applicable minimum wage rates,
particularly in the early stages of
operation. Hence, proposed
§ 361.5(c)(9)(i)(C) would clarify that selfemployed individuals with disabilities
can be considered to be receiving
competitive compensation if their
income is comparable to that of
individuals without disabilities in
similar occupations or performing
similar tasks who possess the same level
of training, experience, and skills.
Finally, to ensure consistency with the
American Indian Vocational
Rehabilitation Services program under
part 371, we interpret subsistence
employment as a form of selfemployment common to cultures of
many American Indian tribes.
Integrated Location: While the
integrated setting criteria of the
proposed definition of ‘‘competitive
integrated employment’’ are consistent
with the statutory definition in section
7(5)(B) of the Act, as amended by
WIOA, and the current definition of
‘‘integrated setting’’ in § 361.5(b)(33)(ii),
the proposed definition would provide
important clarifications that are
necessary to ensure consistency with
expressed congressional intent and
current Departmental guidance.
First, we propose to require that the
work location be in ‘‘a setting typically
found in the community’’ as required by
current § 361.5(b)(33)(ii), meaning that
an integrated setting must be one that is
typically found in the competitive labor
market. This particular criterion is
included in the current definition of
‘‘integrated setting’’ and, thus, its
incorporation in the proposed definition
of ‘‘competitive integrated employment’’
would ensure consistency between the
two terms. Furthermore, this longstanding Department interpretation is
consistent with the expressed
congressional intent throughout the Act,
as well as with past legislative history.
Specifically, integrated setting ‘‘. . . is
intended to mean a work setting in a
typical labor market site where people
with disabilities engage in typical daily
work patterns with co-workers who do
not have disabilities; and where workers
with disabilities are not congregated
. . .’’ (Senate Report 105–166, page 10,
March 2, 1998). Therefore, we continue
to maintain the long-standing
Department policy that settings
established by community rehabilitation
programs specifically for the purpose of
employing individuals with disabilities
(e.g., sheltered workshops) do not
constitute integrated settings because
these settings are not typically found in
the competitive labor market. We
believe this criterion of the integrated
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
setting component of the proposed
definition of competitive integrated
employment is the first of two
thresholds that must be satisfied.
Second, once the first threshold is
met, we believe it is essential, consistent
with the current definition of
‘‘integrated setting,’’ that individuals
with disabilities have the opportunity to
interact with non-disabled co-workers
during the course of performing their
work duties to the same extent that their
non-disabled co-workers have to
interact with each other when
performing the same work. To that end,
proposed § 361.5(c)(9)(ii)(B) would
clarify that ‘‘other persons’’ as used in
the statutory definition means other
employees without disabilities with
whom the employee with the disability
works within the specific work unit and
from across the entire work site. We
want to make clear that this proposed
clarification is contained, more
generally, in the current definition of
‘‘integrated setting.’’ Furthermore, we
believe this clarification is consistent
with congressional intent, past
legislative history, current Departmental
guidance, and current regulations.
Historically, this element regarding
integrated settings has raised many
questions; therefore, we provide specific
clarity with regard to certain job settings
in which employees primarily interact
with persons from outside the work
unit, such as vendors and customers,
rather than each other, while performing
their job duties. We believe the focus of
whether the setting is integrated should
be on the interaction between
employees with and without
disabilities, and not solely on the
interaction of employees with
disabilities with people outside of the
work unit. For example, the interaction
of individuals with disabilities
employed in a customer service center
with other persons over the telephone,
regardless of whether these persons
have disabilities, would be insufficient
by itself to satisfy the definition.
Instead, the interaction of primary
consideration should be that between
the employee with the disability and his
or her colleagues without disabilities in
similar positions.
Nonetheless, we recognize that
individuals who are self-employed or
who telecommute may interact more
frequently with persons such as vendors
and customers than with other
employees. Since these persons often
work alone from their own homes rather
than together in a single location, and
may have little contact with fellow
employees, we have long maintained
that self-employment and
telecommuting are considered to meet
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
the criteria for an integrated location, so
long as the employee with the disability
interacts with employees in similar
positions and other persons without
disabilities to the same extent that these
persons without disabilities interact
with others, though this interaction
need not be face-to-face.
The proposed definition of
‘‘competitive integrated employment’’
would further clarify, consistent with
the general principles contained in the
current definition of ‘‘integrated
setting,’’ that the DSU is to consider the
interaction between employees with
disabilities and those without
disabilities that is specific to the
performance of the employee’s job
duties, and not the casual,
conversational, and social interaction
that takes place in the workplace. As a
result, it would not be pertinent to its
determination of an integrated setting
for a DSU to consider interactions in the
lunchrooms and other common areas of
the work site in which employees with
disabilities and those without
disabilities are not engaged in
performing work responsibilities. This
determination, particularly with regard
to the level of interaction, would be
applicable regardless of whether the
individual with a disability is an
employee of the work site or a
community rehabilitation program hires
the individual with a disability under a
service contract for that work site.
Specifically, individuals with
disabilities hired by community
rehabilitation programs to perform work
under service contracts, either alone or
in groups (e.g., landscaping or janitorial
crews), whose interaction with persons
without disabilities (other than their
supervisors and service providers) is
with persons working in or visiting the
work locations (and not with employees
of the community rehabilitation
programs without disabilities in similar
positions) would not be performing
work in an integrated setting. In
summary, the DSU must determine, on
a case-by-case basis, that a work
location is in an integrated setting if it
both is typically found in the
community, and is one in which the
employee with the disability interacts
with employees and other persons, as
appropriate to the position, who do not
have disabilities to the same extent that
employees without disabilities interact
with these persons. Finally, the DSU is
to consider the interaction between the
employee with the disabilities and these
other persons that takes place for the
purpose of performing his or her job
duties, not mere casual and social
interaction.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21067
Opportunities for Advancement: To
ensure that the employment of persons
with disabilities is equivalent in all
respects to that of persons without
disabilities, section 7(5) of the Act, as
amended by WIOA, establishes a new
criterion not contained in current
regulations. Proposed § 361.5(c)(9)(iii)
mirrors the language in section 7(5) of
the Act and would require that the
employee with the disability have the
same opportunities for advancement as
employees without disabilities in
similar positions. We believe this new
criterion is consistent with current
definitions of ‘‘competitive
employment’’ and ‘‘integrated settings’’
and should pose no hardship on DSUs
to implement.
As explained here, the definition of
‘‘competitive integrated employment’’
in section 7(5) of the Act, as amended
by WIOA, and as proposed in
§ 361.5(c)(9) establishes three essential
criteria of employment—income
(earnings and benefits), integration, and
advancement—thereby ensuring that
individuals with disabilities are
provided through the VR program the
full opportunity to participate in the
same jobs available to persons without
disabilities in the public.
Again, we want to make clear that two
of the criteria—those related to
compensation and the integrated nature
of the worksite—are similar, if not
identical, to criteria contained in the
current definitions of ‘‘competitive
employment’’ and ‘‘integrated setting.’’
Thus, the substance of this definition is
familiar to the DSUs and should pose no
hardship to implement.
Customized Employment
Statute: Section 7(7) of the Act, as
amended by WIOA (29 U.S.C. 705 (7)),
adds and defines the term ‘‘customized
employment,’’ which means, in general,
competitive integrated employment
designed to meet both the specific
abilities of the individual with a
significant disability and the business
needs of an employer.
Current Regulations: None.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
add § 361.5(c)(11), to define
‘‘customized employment’’ to mirror the
statute.
Reasons: The proposed regulation is
necessary to implement the new
statutory term and definition because
the Act, as amended by WIOA, uses the
term in a variety of contexts, including
incorporating it into definitions of
employment outcome and supported
employment, and incorporating it into
the list of individualized services
permissible under the VR program.
Customized employment provides
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21068
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
flexibility in developing individualized
and customized strategies that are
specific to an individual with a
significant disability’s unique needs,
interests, and capabilities, through the
use of flexible strategies that meet the
needs of both the individual and the
employer.
Employment Outcome
Statute: Section 7(11) of the Act, as
amended by WIOA, revises the
definition of ‘‘employment outcome’’ to
include customized employment within
its scope.
Current Regulations: Current
§ 361.5(b)(16) defines ‘‘employment
outcome,’’ but does not include
customized employment since this is a
new statutory requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend the definition of ‘‘employment
outcome’’ in § 361.5(c)(15), as
redesignated by other changes made in
this part, to specifically identify
customized employment as an
employment outcome under the VR
program. We also propose to amend the
definition to require that all
employment outcomes achieved
through the VR program be in
competitive integrated employment or
supported employment, thereby
eliminating uncompensated outcomes
from the scope of the definition for
purposes of the VR program.
Furthermore, we propose to amend
current § 361.37(b) to expand the scope
of those circumstances when the DSU
must provide referrals to other programs
and service providers for individuals
who choose not to pursue an
employment outcome under the VR
program. Similarly, we propose to
amend current § 361.43(d) to expand the
requirement for the referral of
individuals found ineligible for VR
services or determined ineligible
subsequent to the receipt of services to
also include appropriate State, Federal,
and local programs, and community
service providers better suited to meet
their needs.
Reasons: The proposed changes are
necessary, in part, to implement
statutory changes to the definition of
‘‘employment outcome’’ that include
reference to ‘‘customized employment.’’
See the discussion of ‘‘customized
employment’’ earlier in this preamble
for further information regarding this
type of employment outcome.
The proposed change that would limit
the scope of employment outcomes
under the VR program to competitive
integrated employment or supported
employment is necessary to implement
the heightened emphasis of the Act on
the achievement of competitive
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
integrated employment. The Act, as
amended by WIOA, makes clear—from
the stated purpose of the Act, the
addition of new requirements governing
the development of individualized
plans for employment and the transition
of students and youth from school to
post-school activities, and new
limitations on the payment of
subminimum wages—that individuals
with disabilities, particularly those with
significant disabilities, are able to
achieve the same high-quality jobs in
the competitive integrated labor market
as persons without disabilities if they
are provided appropriate services and
supports. The amendments made by
WIOA are consistent with and further
other changes made over the past four
decades, with each reauthorization, that
have placed increasing emphasis on the
achievement of competitive
employment in an integrated setting
through the VR program. See the
discussion regarding ‘‘competitive
integrated employment’’ earlier in this
preamble.
It is in this context that we propose
to amend the definition of ‘‘employment
outcome,’’ for purposes of the VR
program, to include only those
outcomes that meet the requirements of
competitive integrated employment
(including customized employment,
self-employment, telecommuting or
business ownership), or supported
employment, thereby eliminating from
the scope of the definition, under the
VR program, uncompensated outcomes,
such as homemakers and unpaid family
workers. We believe this proposed
change is consistent with the statutory
definition of ‘‘employment outcome’’ in
section 7(11) of the Act, as well as the
pervasive emphasis in the Act on the
achievement of competitive integrated
employment by individuals with
disabilities, including those with the
most significant disabilities. Given this
emphasis, we believe the proposed
change, not to include, within the scope
of employment outcomes,
uncompensated outcomes, such as
homemakers and unpaid family
workers, is consistent with the
provisions of the Act.
We believe the proposed changes to
the definition, while essential to
fulfilling the expectation in the Act that
individuals with disabilities,
particularly individuals with significant
disabilities, are capable of pursuing
competitive integrated employment,
should not cause significant difficulty
for most State VR units in their
administration of the VR program.
Nationally, only a relatively small
number of individuals currently exit the
VR program as homemakers or unpaid
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
family workers. Over the past 35 years
the percentage of such outcomes has
steadily and significantly decreased. For
example, in FY 1980 homemaker
outcomes as a percentage of all
employment outcomes reported
nationally to the Department by VR
agencies through the VR program Case
Service Report for the years FY 1980
through FY 2013 approximated 15
percent. This percentage dropped to 5.2
percent in FY 1999, and to 3.4 percent
in FY 2004. By FY 2013, the most recent
year for which data is available, this
percentage had declined to 1.9 percent.
There has been a similar decline in
reported unpaid family workers.
According to data reported by VR
agencies through the VR program Case
Service Report, in FY 2000, 642
individuals were reported in the
category of unpaid family worker. By FY
2013, the most recent year for which we
have data, only 135 individuals were
reported to have obtained an unpaid
family worker outcome. National data
indicates that approximately 0.2 percent
or less of all the outcomes reported
annually by DSUs are unpaid family
worker outcomes.
While we recognize that some VR
agencies have a greater percentage of
homemaker and unpaid family worker
outcomes than others, particularly those
agencies serving individuals who are
blind and visually impaired, it is also
evident that the majority of DSUs have
been placing increased importance and
emphasis on competitive employment
outcomes, in their policies and
procedures, as the optimal employment
outcome and deemphasizing
uncompensated outcomes. This shift in
practice has been the product of the
DSUs responding to the intent of the Act
and translating that intent into their
administration of the VR program.
Nevertheless, we recognize that this
proposed change could represent a
significant shift in practice for a few VR
agencies, particularly those with high
percentages of individuals achieving
employment outcomes as homemakers
or unpaid family workers. These
agencies may be providing services to
assist individuals to obtain homemaker
and unpaid family worker outcomes at
the time the final regulations become
effective. To allow these agencies to
complete the VR process for these
individuals, we are considering a
transition period of six months
following the effective date of the final
regulations for the implementation of
this proposed change. We are interested
in receiving comments about providing
such a transition period.
Since FY 2004, through monitoring of
the VR program, we have reviewed the
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
attainment of homemaker outcomes and
have found that VR agencies sometimes
assist individuals to exit the program as
homemakers to provide an alternate
resource for the provision of
independent living services that are
otherwise available from the State
Independent Living Services, Centers
for Independent Living, and
Independent Living Services for Older
Individuals Who Are Blind programs.
To ensure that individuals who choose
to pursue homemaker and unpaid
family worker outcomes, or who are
determined ineligible for VR services
either at the time of application or
following the provision of services, are
able to access independent living and
other rehabilitation services, we propose
to expand the scope of §§ 361.37(b) and
361.43(d) so that these circumstances
would be among those when DSUs must
refer these individuals to public and
private agencies better suited to meet
their needs. These current regulatory
provisions are limited to those
individuals who choose to pursue
extended employment, which does not
constitute an employment outcome
under the VR program. As proposed,
§§ 361.37(b) and 361.43(d) would be
more broad, thus encompassing those
individuals who choose to pursue
uncompensated employment, such as
homemakers and unpaid family
workers, as well as those who choose to
pursue extended employment.
The resources available through the
independent living programs have
expanded exponentially since FY 1992.
Specifically, the number of Part Cfunded centers for independent living
has tripled since FY 1993, from 120 to
356 presently, including 20 new centers
for independent living established in FY
2010 through funding under the
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009. In addition, funding for the
Independent Living Services for Older
Individuals Who Are Blind program has
increased since FY 1992, from
$6,500,000 to approximately
$33,000,000 in FY 2014. While we
recognize that this proposed change
would place the responsibility for
making these referrals on DSUs, we
believe that any burden associated with
these requirements is outweighed by the
benefit that individuals with disabilities
would gain by having access to
programs and services that can more
appropriately meet their individualized
needs.
Extended Services
Statute: Section 604(b) of the Act, as
amended by WIOA, permits the
expenditure of supported employment
funds authorized under title VI, and the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
VR funds authorized under title I, on the
provision of extended services to youth
with the most significant disabilities for
a period not to exceed four years.
Current Regulation: Current
§ 361.5(b)(20) defines ‘‘extended
services,’’ but does not mention that
these services may be provided to youth
with the most significant disabilities
since this is a new statutory
requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend the definition in § 361.5(c)(19),
as redesignated by other changes made
in this part, to make clear that extended
services may be provided to youth with
the most significant disabilities for a
period not to exceed four years. The
changes proposed herein are consistent
with those proposed for the Supported
Employment program in part 363.
Reasons: The revisions are necessary
to implement statutory changes to the
Supported Employment program made
by WIOA that also relate to the VR
program since VR funds may be used to
pay for allowable supported
employment services. These proposed
changes are consistent with those
proposed in part 363 and discussed in
more detail later in this NPRM.
Indian; American Indian; Indian
American and Indian Tribe
Statute: Section 7(19) of the Act, as
amended by WIOA, revises the
definition of ‘‘Indian,’’ ‘‘American
Indian,’’ ‘‘Indian American,’’ and
‘‘Indian tribe’’ to further clarify those
terms.
Current Regulations: Current
§ 361.5(b)(3) defines ‘‘American Indian’’
to mean an individual who is a member
of an Indian tribe. Current § 361.5(b)(26)
defines ‘‘Indian tribe’’ to mean any
Federal or State Indian tribe, band,
rancheria, pueblo, colony, or
community, including any Alaskan
native village or regional village
corporation (as defined in or established
pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act).
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
combine the definitions of ‘‘American
Indian’’ and ‘‘Indian tribe’’ currently in
§ 361.5(b)(3) and (b)(26), respectively, to
be consistent with the definition in
section 7(19) of the Act, as amended by
WIOA. To that end, the proposed
definition in § 361.5(c)(25) would make
clear that the term ‘‘American Indian’’
includes a Native and a descendant of
a Native, as defined in the Alaska Native
Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1602),
and expands the term ‘‘Indian tribe’’ to
include a tribal organization, as defined
in the Indian Self-Determination and
Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C.
450(b)(1)).
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21069
Reasons: These changes are necessary
to implement the revised statutory
definition in section 7(19) of the Act.
These changes also are necessary to
ensure consistency with changes
proposed to part 371, implementing the
American Indian Vocational
Rehabilitation Services program,
contained in a separate, but related,
NPRM published elsewhere in this issue
of the Federal Register.
Local Workforce Development Board
and Other Workforce Development
Terms
Statute: Sections 7(25), 7(35), and
7(36) of the Act, as amended by WIOA,
define the terms ‘‘Local workforce
development board,’’ ‘‘State workforce
development board,’’ and ‘‘Statewide
workforce development system,’’
respectively.
Current Regulations: Current
§§ 361.5(b)(34), (b)(49), and (b)(50)
define ‘‘Local workforce investment
board,’’ ‘‘State workforce investment
board,’’ and ‘‘Statewide workforce
investment system,’’ respectively.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend part 361 throughout, including
the definitions for ‘‘Local workforce
development board’’ in § 361.5(c)(33),
‘‘State workforce development board’’ in
§ 361.5(c)(49), and ‘‘Statewide
workforce development system’’ in
§ 361.5(c)(50), to substitute the word
‘‘development’’ for ‘‘investment’’
wherever those terms appear.
Reasons: These changes are necessary
to implement revised terms used
throughout WIOA. The amendments are
technical in nature and do not represent
a substantive change to the definitions
themselves.
Supported Employment
Statute: Section 7(38) of the Act, as
amended by WIOA, revises the
definition of supported employment to,
among other things, reference
competitive integrated employment and
customized employment, and requires
that an individual who is employed in
an integrated setting, but not in
competitive integrated employment,
must be working toward such an
outcome on a short-term basis for such
work to qualify as supported
employment.
Current Regulation: Current
§ 361.5(b)(53) defines ‘‘supported
employment’’ as the term was defined
prior to the enactment of WIOA. There
is no reference to ‘‘competitive
integrated employment’’ or ‘‘customized
employment’’ since these are new
statutory requirements.
Proposed Regulation: We propose to
amend the definition in § 361.5(c)(53),
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21070
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
as redesignated by other changes made
in this part, to require that supported
employment means competitive
integrated employment, including
customized employment, or
employment in an integrated setting in
which the individual is working on a
short-term basis toward competitive
integrated employment. We also
propose, in this context, that an
individual be considered to be working
on a ‘‘short-term basis’’ toward
competitive integrated employment if
the individual reasonably expects
achieving a competitive integrated
employment outcome within six months
of achieving an employment outcome of
supported employment. These proposed
changes are consistent with those
proposed in part 363 for the Supported
Employment program, discussed later in
this NPRM.
Reasons: The revisions are necessary
to implement the new statutory
definition in section 7(38) of the Act, as
amended by WIOA, which reflects the
heightened emphasis on the
achievement of competitive integrated
employment.
We also propose to include a
definition of ‘‘short-term basis,’’ in the
context of supported employment, to
give meaning to the phrase and ensure
congressional intent. By limiting the
timeframe, we ensure that individuals
do not remain in subminimum wage
employment for the purpose of
achieving supported employment
outcomes. The proposed changes also
ensure consistency with the
amendments proposed in part 363,
implementing the Supported
Employment program, discussed later in
this NPRM.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Supported Employment Services
Statute: Section 7(39) of the Act, as
amended by WIOA, revises the
definition of ‘‘supported employment
services’’ to extend the allowable
timeframe for the provision of these
services from 18 months to 24 months.
The statute also makes other technical
changes to the definition.
Current Regulation: Current
§ 361.5(b)(54) defines ‘‘supported
employment services’’ to include a
timeframe of 18 months.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
revise the definition in § 361.5(c)(54), as
redesignated due to other changes made
in this part, to extend the allowable
timeframe for the delivery of these
services from 18 months to 24 months.
We also propose to make changes that
clarify the individualized and
customized nature of supported
employment services.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
Reasons: The revisions are necessary
to implement the new definition of
‘‘supported employment services’’ in
section 7(39) of the Act, as amended by
WIOA. Most importantly, the proposed
definition extends the allowable
timeframe for the provision of
supported employment services from 18
to 24 months. The proposed changes
also ensure consistency with revisions
proposed in part 363, implementing the
Supported Employment program,
discussed later in this NPRM.
Submission, Approval, and Disapproval
of the State Plan (§ 361.10)
Statute: Section 101(a)(1) of the Act,
as amended by WIOA, requires that, a
‘‘vocational rehabilitation services
portion’’ be included in a State’s
Unified State Plan in accordance with
section 102, or a Combined State Plan
in accordance with section 103, of
WIOA. The ‘‘vocational rehabilitation
services portion’’ must contain all State
plan requirements under section 101(a)
of the Act.
Section 101(b) of the Act, as amended
by WIOA, makes conforming changes
with regard to the submission, approval,
and modification process for the VR
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan.
Current Regulations: Current § 361.10
includes requirements for the
submission and approval process for the
VR State plan. Although current
§ 361.10(c) permits States to submit the
VR State plan as part of the Unified
State Plan, there is no requirement to do
so.
Proposed Regulations: First, we
propose to amend current § 361.10(a) to
require the State to submit a VR services
portion of a Unified or Combined State
Plan in accordance with sections 102 or
103, respectively, of WIOA to be eligible
to receive its VR allotment.
Second, we propose to clarify that the
VR services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan includes all
information required under section
101(a) of the Act.
Third, we propose to amend
§ 361.10(d) by providing a crossreference to subpart D of part 361,
which is reserved for the joint
regulations implementing requirements
for the Unified and Combined State Plan
proposed jointly by the Departments of
Education and Labor. The proposed
joint regulations that would implement
jointly-administered activities under
title I of WIOA are published elsewhere
in this issue of the Federal Register. We
also propose to remove current
paragraph (e) and redesignate current
paragraph (f)(3) as paragraph (e), and we
propose to remove the remainder of
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
current paragraph (f) and current
paragraph (g). We propose to
redesignate current paragraph (h) as
paragraph (f) and rename it ‘‘Due
Process.’’
Finally, we propose to make other
conforming changes throughout
§ 361.10.
Reasons: The proposed revisions to
§ 361.10 are necessary to: (1) Implement
the VR-specific amendments to sections
101(a)(1) and (b) of the Act made by
WIOA; and (2) align VR-specific
requirements with those contained in
the joint regulations, developed by the
Departments of Education and Labor,
regarding the submission, approval, and
modification of Unified or Combined
State Plans. Taken together, these
statutory amendments and proposed
regulatory changes recognize that the
VR services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan is to be an integral
part of the Unified or Combined State
Plan, and provide the foundation for the
seamless, effective, and efficient
delivery of services through the
collaboration and combined funding, to
the extent allowable under relevant
program requirements, of the workforce
development system that will enable
individuals with disabilities to obtain
the skills necessary to participate in the
high-demand jobs of today’s economy.
To further the integrated nature of the
VR services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan, we request that
comments to proposed revisions to
§ 361.10 be limited to VR-specific
requirements and that more general
comments about the Unified or
Combined State Plan be submitted in
response to the proposed joint
regulations published elsewhere in this
issue of this Federal Register.
Requirements for a State Rehabilitation
Council (§ 361.17)
Statute: Section 105(b)(1) of the Act,
as amended by WIOA, makes a
technical amendment to the
composition requirement of the State
Rehabilitation Council (SRC) related to
section 121 projects. WIOA also amends
section 105(b)(6) by requiring the SRC to
include programs authorized under the
Assistive Technology Act of 1998
among those agencies and organizations
with which it must coordinate.
Current Regulations: Current
§ 361.17(b)(1)(ix) requires that, in a State
with projects carried out under section
121 of the Act, a representative of the
directors of these projects must serve on
the SRC, but it does not use the new
statutory term ‘‘funded’’ in place of
‘‘carried out.’’ Current § 361.17(h)(6)
requires the SRC to collaborate with
various other entities, but does not
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
include programs authorized under the
Assistive Technology Act of 1998 since
this is a new statutory requirement.
Current § 361.17(h)(3) also requires the
SRC to partner with the VR agency in
establishing State goals and priorities
and to assist in the preparation of the
State plan.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend current § 361.17(b)(1)(ix) to
substitute ‘‘funded’’ for ‘‘carried out’’ in
the State to mirror the statute.
Additionally, we propose to amend
current § 361.17(h)(6) to include
programs established under the
Assistive Technology Act of 1998 in the
list of entities with which the SRC must
coordinate its activities. Finally, we
propose to clarify in § 361.17(h)(3) that
the SRC is only required to assist in the
preparation of the VR services portion of
the Unified or Combined State Plan, not
the entire Unified or Combined State
Plan.
Reasons: The proposed changes are
necessary to implement statutory
amendments to section 105 of the Act
made by WIOA. We believe the
proposed change in § 361.17(b)(1)(ix) is
more technical than substantive in the
context of the American Indian
Vocational Rehabilitation Services
program. Unlike most programs in
which funds are awarded to a State or
an entity in a State, the Department
awards section 121 grant funds to tribes,
whose reservations may cross State
lines. In that context, the distinctions
between ‘‘funded,’’ as used in WIOA,
and ‘‘carried out,’’ as had been used
previously, provides no substantive
differences in practical meaning. For
that reason, we believe this proposed
change is primarily technical in nature.
The proposed inclusion in
§ 361.17(h)(6) of the programs
authorized under the Assistive
Technology Act of 1998 among the
entities with which the SRC must
coordinate its activities would
underscore the integral role that
assistive technology plays in the ability
of individuals with disabilities to obtain
and maintain employment. Through the
coordination of SRC and assistive
technology program activities, SRC
members would be better informed of
the resources and services available in
the State for the provision of assistive
technology devices and training,
enabling the members to more
effectively advise the DSU in the State.
Finally, as discussed in proposed
§ 361.10, title I of WIOA requires the VR
program in each State to participate in
a Unified or Combined State Plan with
the other core programs or partner
programs within the workforce
development system. By replacing the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
term ‘‘State plan’’ with the ‘‘vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan,’’ we
believe that members of the SRC would
be responsible only for participating in
the development of the goals and
strategies contained in, and providing
input on, the VR services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan in
accordance with the mandated activities
of the SRC as set forth in proposed
§ 361.17(h).
Comprehensive System of Personnel
Development (§ 361.18)
Statute: Section 101(a)(7) of the Act,
as amended by WIOA, makes several
changes to the comprehensive system of
personnel development (CSPD) that
each DSU must establish to ensure its
personnel are adequately trained. In
particular, the amendments add specific
educational and experiential criteria
that must be met by VR personnel. The
statute also makes other technical
changes throughout this section.
Current Regulations: Current § 361.18
requires a DSU to establish a CSPD that
is based on either a national or State
licensing or certification standard.
Current regulations do not specify
specific educational or experiential
criteria since these are new statutory
requirements.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
revise § 361.18(c)(1)(ii) to mirror the
statute with regard to education and
experience requirements for VR
personnel. Accordingly, we would
ensure that personnel have a 21stcentury understanding of the evolving
labor force and needs of individuals
with disabilities. In addition, we
propose to add a new § 361.18(c)(2)(ii)
in which we would describe what we
mean by personnel having a 21stcentury understanding of the evolving
labor force and needs of individuals
with disabilities. We would provide
examples of the skills that would
demonstrate that personnel hired are
appropriately qualified.
Further, we propose to amend
§ 361.18(d)(1)(i) to require that the CSPD
include training implemented in
coordination with entities carrying out
State programs under section 4 of the
Assistive Technology Act of 1998.
Finally, we propose to delete those
provisions that are no longer applicable
given statutory changes, such as those
related to steps the State will take when
personnel do not meet the highest
standard in a State.
Reasons: The proposed changes are
necessary to implement statutory
changes made by WIOA. The changes
we propose in § 361.18(c)(1)(ii) would
ensure that DSU staff are well-qualified
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21071
to assist individuals with disabilities to
achieve competitive integrated
employment in today’s demanding labor
market. The proposed regulations would
describe education and experience, as
applicable, requirements at the
bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral level,
in fields related to rehabilitation that
prepare the individual to work with
individuals with disabilities and
employers. For individuals hired at the
bachelor’s level, there also would be a
requirement for at least one year of paid
or unpaid experience. These proposed
CSPD requirements would further the
heightened emphasis throughout the
Act on employer engagement and
affording individuals with disabilities
every opportunity to achieve
competitive integrated employment.
In order to further clarify what types
of skills we intend for personnel to
demonstrate, we propose some
illustrative examples in
§ 361.18(c)(2)(ii), which are by no means
all-inclusive but which are typically
required of rehabilitation professionals
hired by the DSU. Finally, in proposing
to amend current § 361.18(d)(1)(i) to
require that the CSPD include training
implemented in coordination with
entities carrying out State programs
under section 4 of the Assistive
Technology Act of 1998, we are
reflecting a new statutory requirement
that is consistent with the emphasis on
coordination throughout the Act.
Public Participation Requirements
(§ 361.20)
Statute: Section 101(a)(16)(A) of the
Act requires that the State plan provide
that the designated State agency, prior
to the adoption or amendment of any
policies or procedures governing the
provision of VR services under the State
plan, must conduct public meetings
throughout the State to provide the
public, including individuals with
disabilities, an opportunity to comment
on the policies or procedures, and
actively consult with agencies and
organizations involved in the vocational
rehabilitation of individuals with
disabilities. This requirement remains
unchanged by WIOA.
Current Regulations: Current § 361.20
implements section 101(a)(16)(A) of the
Act.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
clarify that the public participation
requirements under current § 361.20
pertain to the VR services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan. We
also propose to add paragraphs (a)(1)
and (a)(2) to clarify through descriptive
examples the distinction between
substantive changes that would require
the designated State agency to conduct
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21072
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
a public hearing, and administrative
changes for which a public hearing need
not be conducted. All other
requirements for public participation as
described in current § 361.20(b) through
(e), to the extent they are consistent
with public participation requirements
proposed in the joint regulations,
remain unchanged in the proposed
regulations, except for technical
modifications to the language required
by WIOA. Public participation
requirements related to Unified or
Combined State Plans generally are
addressed through the NPRM jointly
published by the Departments of Labor
and Education elsewhere in this issue of
the Federal Register.
Reasons: These proposed changes to
current § 361.20 are necessary to reflect
statutory changes that require what
previously was a stand-alone VR State
plan to be submitted as a VR services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan under WIOA. Additionally,
by clarifying what is meant by a
substantive change—that is, a change
that would have a direct impact on the
nature and scope of the VR services
provided to individuals with disabilities
or the manner in which these
individuals interact with the State VR
program, as opposed to a change that is
purely administrative or technical in
nature—State VR agencies would better
understand when they must conduct a
public hearing, specific to the VR
program. The ability to provide
comments and input at public hearings
is an important mechanism for
strengthening the voice of community
stakeholders and ensuring that any
changes to the implementation of the
VR services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan reflect concerns
and interests of those whom the
program serves.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Requirements Related to the Statewide
Workforce Development System
(§ 361.23)
Statute: Section 121(b)(1)(B)(iv) of
WIOA includes the VR program as a
core partner of the workforce
development system.
Current Regulations: Current § 361.23
outlines a VR program’s roles and
responsibilities in the workforce
investment system, as required under
WIA.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend current § 361.23(a) by crossreferencing to subpart F of part 361. We
also propose to remove the remainder of
this section because the substance of
these requirements is contained in joint
regulations developed by the
Departments of Education and Labor.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
Reasons: The changes are necessary to
implement amendments to title I of
WIOA and ensure consistency with joint
regulations proposed by the
Departments of Education and Labor,
which are published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register. We ask
that you submit any comments
regarding the VR program’s role in the
one-stop delivery system in conjunction
with related provisions contained in the
joint proposed regulations, rather than
in connection with this particular
section of the proposed VR programspecific regulations.
Cooperation and Coordination With
Other Entities (§ 361.24)
Statute: WIOA amends section
101(a)(11) of the Act by expanding the
scope of entities with which the DSU
must collaborate and coordinate its
activities under the VR program. The
new entities include, among others,
employers, non-educational agencies
serving out-of-school youth, programs
authorized under the Assistive
Technology Act of 1998, the State
agency administering the State
Medicaid plan, the agency responsible
for serving individuals with intellectual
and/or developmental disabilities,
agencies responsible for providing
mental health services, and other
agencies serving as employment
networks under the Ticket to Work and
Self-Sufficiency program.
Current Regulations: Current § 361.24
requires that the State plan include
assurances and descriptions, as
applicable, of the DSU’s interagency
cooperation with various entities, but
does not include the new entities
required by the WIOA amendments
since these are new statutory
requirements.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend § 361.24 to include the
additional agencies and entities with
which the DSU must coordinate its
activities under the VR program, as
required by section 101(a)(11) of the
Act, as amended by WIOA.
Reasons: The proposed changes are
necessary to implement new statutory
requirements regarding the DSU’s
coordination with other entities. The
changes are designed to ensure DSU
collaboration and coordination with
employers and State and Federal
agencies to increase access by
individuals with disabilities, especially
youth and individuals with the most
significant disabilities, to services and
supports to assist them in achieving
competitive integrated employment.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Third-Party Cooperative Arrangement
Requirements (§ 361.28)
Statute: None.
Current Regulations: Current § 361.28
includes requirements related to thirdparty cooperative arrangements, a
mechanism by which a DSU may work
with another public agency to provide
VR services.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend § 361.28(a) by removing the
words ‘‘administering’’ and
‘‘furnishing’’ and providing more
accurate descriptions of the cooperating
agency’s responsibilities. Proposed
§ 361.28(a) also would clarify that the
non-Federal share provided by the
cooperating agency must be consistent
with the requirements in proposed
§ 361.28(c). Proposed § 361.28(a)(4) and
361.28(b) change references to
‘‘cooperative programs’’ and
‘‘cooperative agreements’’ to
‘‘cooperative arrangements’’ to make the
language consistent throughout this
section. We propose to insert a new
paragraph (c) to clarify the manner in
which other public agencies may
contribute toward the non-Federal share
under a third-party cooperative
arrangement.
Reasons: With the exception of
§ 361.28(c), the changes to this section
are editorial and the minor clarifications
would ensure consistent language and
interpretation. Proposed § 361.28(c)
would list the manner in which a State
agency or a local public agency could
provide part or all of the non-Federal
share under a third-party cooperative
arrangement. Under the proposed
§ 361.28(c) the DSU could utilize cash
transfers or certified personnel
expenditures for the time cooperating
agency staff spent providing direct VR
services pursuant to a third-party
cooperative arrangement to meet part or
all of the non-Federal share. Given the
prohibition in § 361.60(b)(2) against
using third-party in-kind contributions
for match purposes under the VR
program, we have not included certified
expenditures for equipment and
supplies as an allowable source of
match under the VR program. In so
doing, we avoid potential third-party inkind contributions that could arise with
such certified expenditures.
Statewide Assessment; Estimates; State
Goals and Priorities; Strategies; and
Progress Reports (§ 361.29)
Statute: Section 101(a)(15) of the Act,
as amended by WIOA, makes several
technical and conforming changes, as
well as expands the scope of estimates
that the DSUs must report and the areas
of focus the States must consider in
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
conducting their triennial needs
assessment.
Section 101(a)(23) requires DSUs to
assure that the State will submit to the
Secretary reports required by section
101(a)(15) at such time and in such
manner as the Secretary may determine
to be appropriate. This statutory
requirement remains unchanged by
WIOA.
Current Regulations: Current § 361.29
implements the requirements of section
101(a)(15) of the Act, but does not
include the new statutory requirements.
The current regulations also require that
the State submit reports regarding goals,
strategies, and estimates annually.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend current § 361.29 by requiring
that reports and updates related to
assessment, estimates, goals and
priorities, and reports of progress, be
submitted to the Secretary, in such time
and such manner as determined by the
Secretary, rather than annually. We also
propose to amend the regulations to
require DSUs to report estimates of the
number of individuals not receiving
services because of the implementation
of an order of selection. We also propose
to make several technical and
conforming changes throughout. See
related discussion of this section in the
context of transition services later in
this NPRM, for proposed changes
related to students and youth in
transition.
Reasons: The proposed changes are
necessary, in part, to implement the
statutory amendments to section
101(a)(15) of the Act made by WIOA.
The proposed changes also would
ensure consistency in the reporting
requirements imposed throughout
section 101(a) of the Act, as well as in
title I of WIOA since the VR State plan
will be incorporated into the State’s
Unified or Combined State Plan as a
portion of that plan.
To date, we have collected the
required information through the annual
submission of the VR State plan (now
known as the VR services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan), rather
than through the submission of separate
reports. Because the VR services portion
will be submitted with all other
components of the Unified or Combined
State Plan every four years with
modifications submitted every two
years, there would be no vehicle for the
submission of these annual reports
without imposing additional reporting
requirements on the State separate from
the State plan.
By permitting the submission of the
required information at a time and in a
manner determined by the Secretary,
rather than annually, the Secretary
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
exercises the statutory flexibility to
establish reporting requirements
consistent with those for the VR services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan under section 101(a)(1) of the
Act, as amended by WIOA, and section
102(c) of WIOA, and avoid any
additional burden that would be
imposed on DSUs through the
submission of separate reports.
Provision of Training and Services for
Employers (§ 361.32)
Statute: Section 109 of the Act, as
amended by WIOA, expands the types
of training, technical assistance, and
other services DSUs may provide under
the VR program, to employers, who
have hired or are interested in hiring
individuals with disabilities. In
addition, WIOA repealed the Projects
with Industry program, previously
authorized at title VI, part A of the Act.
Current Regulations: Current § 361.32
implements requirements regarding
coordination between the VR program
and the Projects with Industry program.
There are no current regulations that
implement section 109 of the Act.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend § 361.32 in its entirety by
eliminating all requirements related to
the Projects with Industry program since
those requirements are no longer
applicable. In its place, we propose to
implement requirements regarding the
types of activities DSUs may engage in
with employers, pursuant to section 109
of the Act.
Reasons: The changes are necessary to
implement new statutory requirements
in section 109 of the Act, as amended
by WIOA, as well as remove
requirements that are no longer
applicable to the VR program due to the
repeal of the Projects with Industry
program. Section 109 of the Act, as
amended by WIOA, authorizes the DSU
to expend VR funds for training and
services for employers who are
interested in hiring individuals with
disabilities, thereby assisting those
individuals in achieving competitive
integrated employment. This training
could assist employers in providing
opportunities for work-based learning
experiences; training employees who
are individuals with disabilities; and
promoting awareness of disabilityrelated obstacles to continued
employment.
The amendments made throughout
WIOA place heightened emphasis on
the collaboration between DSUs and
employers to improve and maximize
opportunities for individuals with
disabilities, including those with the
most significant disabilities, to achieve
competitive integrated employment.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21073
Innovation and Expansion Activities
(§ 361.35)
Statute: Section 101(a)(18) of the Act
sets forth requirements regarding
innovation and expansion activities for
DSUs. This statutory provision remains
unchanged by WIOA.
Current Regulations: Current § 361.35
requires the State plan to assure that the
State will reserve and use a portion of
its VR funds to support, among other
things, the resource plans for the State
Rehabilitation Council and the
Statewide Independent Living Council.
Proposed Regulations: Proposed
§ 361.35 would clarify that the State
must reserve a portion of its VR program
funds to support the resource plan for
the Statewide Independent Living
Council, but it may choose not to use
these funds if the Statewide
Independent Living Council and the
State decide to use other available
resources to fund the resource plan for
the Statewide Independent Living
Council.
Reasons: This proposed change is
consistent with the Department’s
longstanding interpretation of section
101(a)(18) of the Act and current
§ 361.35. In the case of the State
Rehabilitation Council, there is no other
funding source available under the Act
to support its resource plan. The funds
for the State Rehabilitation Council
must come from this section. On the
other hand, the Statewide Independent
Living Council has multiple funding
sources that may be used to support the
resource plan, including independent
living funds under title VII, part B, of
the Act; State-appropriated independent
living funds; and other public and
private sources, to the extent allowable
by those sources. Therefore, our
interpretation of the requirement has
been that the State and the Statewide
Independent Living Council may decide
in the resource plan of the Statewide
Independent Living Council to use
funds under this section, but do not
have to use these funds. They can use
other sources of available funding to
fund the Statewide Independent Living
Council resource plan. This
interpretation would have minimal
impact on States since not all States use
innovation and expansion funds to
support the resource plan of the
Statewide Independent Living Council.
Ability To Serve All Eligible Individuals;
Order of Selection for Services (§ 361.36)
Statute: Section 101(a)(5) of the Act,
as amended by WIOA, permits DSUs to
serve eligible individuals who require
specific services or equipment to
maintain employment, regardless of
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
21074
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
whether they are currently receiving VR
services. The DSUs may serve these
individuals regardless of any order of
selection the State has established.
Current Regulations: Although current
§ 361.36(a)(3) sets forth criteria a State
must follow in establishing an order of
selection, there is no mention of this
particular discretionary exemption
because this is a new statutory
requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend current § 361.36(a)(3) by adding
a new paragraph (v) that would require
DSUs implementing an order of
selection to indicate in the VR services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan if they have elected to serve
eligible individuals in need of specific
services or equipment for the purpose of
maintaining employment, regardless of
their assignment to a priority category in
the State’s order of selection.
Reasons: This change is necessary to
implement the amendments to the Act.
Prior to the enactment of WIOA, DSUs
who were on an order of selection were
not permitted to serve eligible
individuals who did not meet the
criteria of that order, which was
designed to ensure that individuals with
the most significant disabilities received
a priority for services when resources
were limited. Section 101(a)(5) of the
Act, as amended by WIOA, allows
greater flexibility by permitting DSUs to
serve eligible individuals, regardless of
any order of selection that has been
established by the State, if those
individuals require specific services or
equipment to maintain employment
(e.g., because the individual’s disability
has progressed or the individual’s job
duties have changed).
This statutory change, as well as the
proposed regulatory change, is
significant because, in effect, it creates
an exemption from order of selection for
eligible individuals who need a specific
service or equipment in order to
maintain employment. Prior to the
passage of WIOA, these individuals
would have been placed in the order,
depending on the severity of their
disability, which could have resulted in
a placement on a waiting list. With the
proposed regulatory change, DSUs may,
at their discretion, elect to serve these
individuals outside of the order of
selection criteria that are otherwise in
place in order to serve these individuals
who could be at risk of losing
employment if such services or
equipment is not received. In this way,
DSUs could assist these individuals,
including those with significant
disabilities, to maintain economic selfsufficiency, thereby reducing their
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
potential need for publicly-funded
services or benefits.
We want to make four points clear.
First, proposed § 361.36(a)(3)(v) is
discretionary. DSUs would have the
ability to serve these individuals outside
of the established order and should
consider doing so if financial and staff
resources are sufficient. Second, if a
DSU elects to do so, it must, in
accordance with proposed
§ 361.36(a)(3)(v), its plans in the VR
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan before
implementing this authority. Third, the
services and equipment provided under
this authority must be consistent with
an individual’s individualized plan for
employment, in the same manner as any
other service or equipment provided
under the VR program. Finally,
proposed § 361.36(a)(3)(v) would apply
to those specific services or equipment
that the individual needs to maintain
employment, not to other services the
individual may need for other purposes.
Reports; Evaluation Standards and
Performance Indicators (§ 361.40)
Statute: Section 101(a)(10)(C) of the
Act, as amended by WIOA, expands the
data that DSUs must report to include
data about: Students with disabilities
who are receiving pre-employment
transition services; individuals with
open service records and the types of
services they are receiving; individuals
referred to the VR program by one-stop
operators; and individuals referred to
these one-stop operators by DSUs. In
addition, section 106 of the Act, as
amended by WIOA, requires the VR
program to be subject to the common
performance accountability measures,
established in section 116 of WIOA,
applicable to core programs of the
workforce development system.
Current Regulations: Current § 361.40
addresses the data that a DSU must
report, but does not include the new
data elements since these are new
statutory requirements. Current
§§ 361.81 through 361.89 implement
current evaluation standards and
performance indicators applicable to the
VR program. These standards and
indicators do not incorporate the
common performance measures since
these are new statutory requirements.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
reorganize current § 361.40 into two
paragraphs. Proposed paragraph (a)
would retain all existing provisions in
current § 361.40, as well as incorporate
requirements regarding new VR-specific
data related to individuals with open
service records and the types of services
they are receiving; students with
disabilities receiving pre-employment
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
transition services; and individuals
referred to the State VR program by onestop operators and those referred to
these one-stop operators by the State VR
program.
In proposed paragraph (b), we provide
a cross-reference to subpart E of this
part, which will include the joint
regulations implementing common
performance measures. In so doing, we
also propose to remove current
§§ 361.80 through 361.89, as the current
standards and indicators are no longer
applicable to the VR program.
Reasons: The proposed changes to
current § 361.40 are necessary to
implement amendments to the Act
made by WIOA. Specifically, we
include VR-specific data regarding,
among others, individuals with open
service records and the types of services
they are receiving, as well as students
with disabilities who are receiving preemployment transition services, to
ensure that the Secretary has the
information needed to assess the
performance of the VR program.
It is significant to note that the VR
program will no longer be subject to its
own set of performance standards and
indicators established by the
Department. Section 106 of the Act
requires that the VR program comply
with the common performance
accountability measures established
under section 116 of WIOA, which
apply to all core programs of the
workforce development system. To that
end, the Departments of Labor and
Education have developed proposed
joint regulations to implement these
requirements. The proposed joint
regulations regarding the performance
accountability system, which will be
incorporated in subpart E of this part,
will be presented in a separate NPRM
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register. Given this significant
statutory change in section 106 of the
Act, we have determined that most of
the provisions we had in current
§§ 361.80 through 361.89 are no longer
applicable and, therefore, we propose to
remove them. We ask that you provide
only comments specific to the VR
program with respect to this section.
Any comments regarding the common
performance measures or data
requirement, applicable to all core
programs, should be provided in
connection with the relevant provisions
of the joint proposed regulations.
Assessment for Determining Eligibility
and Priority for Services (§ 361.42)
Eligibility Criteria
Statute: Section 102(a)(1) of the Act,
as amended by WIOA, makes clear that
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
an individual with a disability, whose
physical or mental impairment
constitutes a substantial impediment to
employment, may be determined
eligible for VR services if he or she
requires services to advance in
employment.
Current Regulations: Current
§ 361.42(a)(1)(iii) specifies that the
applicant may be determined eligible if
he or she meets all other eligibility
criteria and requires VR services to
prepare for, secure, retain, or regain
employment. Current regulations do not
reference advancing in employment
since this is a new statutory
requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend current § 361.42(a)(1)(iii) to
clarify that an applicant, who meets all
other eligibility criteria, may be
determined eligible if he or she requires
VR services to advance in employment.
We also propose to clarify in current
§ 361.42(c)(2) that a DSU must not
consider an applicant’s employment
history, current employment status,
level of education or educational
credentials when determining eligibility
for services.
Reasons: The proposed changes are
necessary, in part, to implement
statutory amendments to section
102(a)(1) of the Act made by WIOA. The
proposed changes also would ensure
that individuals with disabilities are
able to obtain through the VR program
the skills necessary to engage in the
high demand jobs available in today’s
economy. It has been the Department’s
long-standing policy that the VR
program is not intended solely to place
individuals with disabilities in entrylevel jobs, but rather to assist them to
obtain employment that is appropriate
given their unique strengths, resources,
priorities, concerns, abilities,
capabilities, and informed choice. The
extent to which DSUs should assist
eligible individuals to advance in their
careers through the provision of VR
services depends upon whether the
individual has achieved employment
that is consistent with this standard.
Furthermore, the proposed additional
factors that a DSU must not consider
when determining an applicant’s
eligibility for VR services in proposed
§ 361.42(c)(2) would be consistent with
longstanding policy. By specifically
proposing the additional factors related
to employment and education history in
the regulation, we reinforce the
requirement in section 102(a)(1)(iii) of
the Act and proposed § 361.42(a)(1)(iii).
Residency
Statute: Section 101(a)(12) of the Act
requires that the State plan will include
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
an assurance that the State will not
impose a residence requirement that
excludes from services provided under
the plan any individual who is present
in the State. This provision remains
unchanged by WIOA.
Current Regulations: Current
§ 361.42(c)(1) requires that the State
plan must assure that the State unit will
not impose, as part of determining an
applicant’s eligibility for VR services, a
duration of residence requirement that
excludes from services any applicant
who is present in the State.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend current § 361.42(c)(1) to clarify
that a DSU must not require the
applicant to demonstrate a presence in
the State by the production of
documentation that would, under State
or local law, or practical circumstances,
result in a duration of residency.
Reasons: The proposed clarification
in § 361.42(c)(1) is consistent with our
long-standing interpretation of this
statutory requirement, as expressed in
monitoring reports and other guidance.
Many State VR agencies require
individuals applying for VR services to
provide documents that substantiate
that the individual is present in the
State and, hence, available to participate
in the eligibility determination process
and to receive VR services. Some forms
of documentation, however, such as a
driver’s license or voter registration
card, may require a significant amount
of time to obtain. Moreover, States or
local jurisdictions may impose
durational requirements prior to the
issuance of some forms of
documentation or identification. By
proposing these changes, we would
clarify that the requirement of such
forms of documentation to demonstrate
presence in the State constitutes a de
facto duration requirement, which is
prohibited by the Act. Although
documents that take time to obtain may
be accepted as proof of an applicant’s
presence in the State if available at the
time of application, the DSU must
permit the use of other documentation
that includes sufficient information to
demonstrate presence in the State, such
as documentation that includes a
residential address in the State.
Extended Evaluation
Statute: WIOA amends section
102(a)(2)(B) of the Act by removing the
limited exception to trial work
experiences, whereby VR agencies made
extended evaluations available to
applicants, prior to determining that an
individual is unable to benefit from VR
services due to the severity of the
individual’s disability and, thus, is
ineligible for VR services. Although the
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21075
term ‘‘extended evaluation’’ was not
referenced in the Act, this is the term
used in current regulation to describe
the process by which the DSUs assess
an individual’s ability to benefit from
VR services due to the severity of
disability, when the individual, under
limited circumstances, is unable to
participate in trial work experiences.
Current Regulations: Current
§ 361.42(f) permits, in limited
circumstances, the provision of
extended evaluations to individuals
with disabilities who cannot take
advantage of trial work experiences, or
for whom trial work experiences have
been exhausted.
Current § 361.41(b)(1)(ii) permits the
exploration of an individual’s abilities,
capabilities, and capacity to perform in
work situations in accordance with
§ 361.42(e) or, if appropriate, an
extended evaluation in accordance with
§ 361.42(f).
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
remove paragraph (f) from current
§ 361.42 and redesignate (g) as (f).
Proposed § 361.41(b)(1)(ii) would
remove reference to extended evaluation
and only permit an exploration of the
individual’s abilities, capabilities, and
capacity to perform in work situations
carried out in accordance with current
§ 361.42(e).
Reasons: These changes are necessary
to implement the amendments to
section 102(a)(2)(B) of the Act made by
WIOA. The proposed changes also
would ensure that before a DSU make
an ineligibility determination, it must
conduct a full assessment of the
capacity of the applicant to perform in
realistic work settings, without the
exception of extended evaluations.
Development of the Individualized Plan
for Employment (§ 361.45)
Timeframe for Completing the
Individualized Plan for Employment
Statute: Section 102(b)(3)(F) of the
Act, as amended by WIOA, mandates
that the individualized plan for
employment be developed as soon as
possible but no later than 90 days after
the date of determination of eligibility,
unless the DSU and the eligible
individual agree to an extension of that
timeframe.
Current Regulations: Current
§ 361.45(e) requires the DSU to establish
and implement standards for the prompt
development of individualized plans for
employment for eligible individuals;
however, the 90-day timeframe is not
included because this is a new statutory
requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend current § 361.45(e) to require
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21076
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
that the DSU develop the individualized
plan for employment for each eligible
individual as soon as possible, but no
later than 90 days following
determination of eligibility, unless the
DSU and the individual agree to a
specific extension of that timeframe.
Reasons: This change is necessary to
implement the statutory requirement
made by WIOA that VR agencies
develop the individualized plan for
employment within 90 days following
determination of eligibility. The intent
is to move all eligible individuals
through the VR process with minimal
delay in order to efficiently and
effectively serve these individuals,
resulting in the achievement of
employment outcomes in competitive
integrated employment. While the
majority of DSUs have already adopted
the 90-day timeframe, some DSUs have
adopted extended timeframes that
impede the efficient and effective
movement of individuals through the
VR process, therefore, resulting in the
delay of services, and ultimately
delaying the achievement of
employment outcomes. Additionally,
some DSUs have established interim
steps or plans prior to the development
of the individualized plan for
employment or have adopted longer
timeframes for transition-age youth or
other specific populations. The
establishment of a 90-day timeframe by
WIOA ensures consistency across the
VR program nationally and sets the
expectation that all eligible individuals
receive timely services through an
effective and efficient VR program with
an outcome of improved VR agency
performance and resulting in
employment outcomes for individuals
with disabilities.
Options for Developing the
Individualized Plan for Employment
Statute: WIOA amends section
102(b)(1)(A) of the Act by clarifying that
the DSU must provide eligible
individuals with information regarding
the availability of assistance in
developing all or part of the
individualized plan for employment
from disability advocacy organizations.
In addition, WIOA amends section
102(b) to require a DSU to provide to
eligible individuals entitled to Social
Security benefits under titles II or XVI
of the Social Security Act, general
information on additional supports,
such as assistance with benefits
planning.
Current Regulations: Current
§ 361.45(c)(1) requires that the DSU
provide eligible individuals information
regarding the options for developing the
individualized plan for employment,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
but does not reference disability
advocacy organizations since this is a
new statutory requirement. Current
§ 361.45(c)(2) requires the DSU to
provide additional information to
eligible individuals relevant to the
development of the individualized plan
for employment, but does not mention
benefits planning or other information
specific to Social Security beneficiaries
with disabilities since this is a new
statutory requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend current § 361.45(c)(1) by
requiring a DSU to provide eligible
individuals information about the
option of requesting assistance from a
disability advocacy organization when
developing the individualized plan for
employment. We also propose to amend
current § 361.45(c)(2) by adding a new
paragraph (v) that would require a DSU
to provide eligible individuals entitled
to Social Security benefits under titles II
or XVI of the Social Security Act
information on assistance and supports
available to individuals desiring to enter
the workforce, including benefits
planning.
Reasons: The proposed changes are
necessary to implement the
amendments to section 102(b) of the Act
made by WIOA. The inclusion of
disability advocacy groups as a specific
source of assistance, as appropriate, for
eligible individuals in the development
of the individualized plan for
employment supports, and
acknowledges the important role that
these groups may play in mentoring an
eligible individual through the VR
process and in designing the plan of
services that will successfully lead to an
employment outcome. In coordination
with the expertise of the qualified
rehabilitation counselor, the experience
of advocacy groups may lend a
perspective and understanding of the
disability-related needs, responsibilities,
and services that are required to achieve
the individual’s employment goal. The
inclusion of advocacy groups as a
resource also recognizes and
emphasizes the importance of selfdetermination, empowerment, and selfadvocacy as cornerstones in
rehabilitation.
By requiring that a DSU provide
eligible individuals entitled to Social
Security benefits under titles II or XVI
of the Social Security Act with
information on benefits planning, we
intend that the individuals understand
the implications of employment for
continued receipt of their benefits so
that they can make a fully informed
choice of an employment goal.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Content of the Individualized Plan for
Employment (§ 361.46)
Statute: WIOA amends section
102(b)(4) of the Act to require that the
description of the specific employment
goal chosen by the eligible individual,
required as a mandatory component of
the individualized plan for
employment, be consistent with the
general goal of competitive integrated
employment.
Current Regulations: Current
§ 361.46(a)(1) establishes the content
requirements for the individualized
plan for employment and requires that
the plan include a specific employment
goal based upon the unique strengths,
resources, priorities, concerns, abilities,
capabilities, interests, and informed
choice of the eligible individual. The
regulation does not contain the new
statutory requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend current § 361.46(a)(1) to require
that the vocational goal selected by the
individual in accordance with this
section be consistent with the general
goal of competitive integrated
employment.
Reasons: The proposed revision to
current § 361.46(a)(1) is necessary to
implement the statutory requirements
under WIOA, and is consistent with the
purpose of the VR program, which is to
assist individuals with disabilities,
including those with significant
disabilities, to prepare for and engage in
competitive integrated employment.
Transition of Students and Youth With
Disabilities
The Act, as amended by WIOA, places
heightened emphasis on the provision
of services to students and youth with
disabilities to ensure that they have
meaningful opportunities to receive the
training and other services they need to
achieve employment outcomes in
competitive integrated employment. To
that end, the Act expands not only the
population of students with disabilities
who may receive services but also the
kinds of services that the VR agencies
may provide to youth and students with
disabilities who are transitioning from
secondary school to postsecondary
education and employment.
Most notably, section 110(d) of the
Act, as amended by WIOA, requires
States to reserve 15 percent of their VR
allotment to provide pre-employment
transition services to students with
disabilities who are eligible or
potentially eligible for VR services.
Section 113 of the Act, as added by
WIOA, outlines the services that must
be provided with these reserved funds.
These services are designed to be an
early start at job exploration.
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
With the addition of these preemployment transition services, and
expansion of services to youth, the VR
program can be characterized as
providing a continuum of VR services,
especially for students and youth with
disabilities. Specifically, it can provide
pre-employment transition services to
any student with a disability who needs
these services, regardless of whether the
student has applied for or been
determined eligible for VR services. In
addition, section 103(b) of the Act
permits the VR agency to provide
transition services to groups of youth
with disabilities, regardless of whether
they have applied for or been
determined eligible for services. If either
a student or youth with a disability
requires more intensive services, he or
she would apply for VR services. Once
determined eligible, an individualized
plan for employment would be
developed, which would outline the
specific services that he or she may
need in order to achieve an employment
outcome. In sum, the VR program
provides a range of services, from most
basic to the most individualized and
intensive service, thereby meeting the
evolving needs of a student or a youth
with a disability who is transitioning
from school to post-school life.
This portion of the NPRM will
describe the key regulatory changes we
propose to implement statutory
amendments related to transition
services. The major substantive changes
relate to certain key definitions and the
provision of pre-employment transition
services and transition services to
groups of youth with disabilities.
Throughout this section of the NPRM,
we will provide additional guidance for
those areas that we expect will generate
significant comments. The proposed
changes are presented by relevant
section of the regulations.
Transition-Related Definitions
(§ 361.5(c))
Statute: Section 7 of the Act includes
several new definitions related to
transition services. In particular, section
7 adds new definitions for the terms:
‘‘pre-employment transition services’’ in
section 7(30); ‘‘student with a
disability’’ in section 7(37); and ‘‘youth
with a disability’’ in section 7(42).
WIOA also deleted the term, ‘‘transition
services,’’ which had been defined
previously in section 7(37).
Current Regulations: Current
§ 361.5(b) contains definitions for terms
relevant to the VR program, but does not
define ‘‘pre-employment transition
services,’’ student with a disability, or
youth with a disability since these are
new statutory terms.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
add new definitions to current
§ 361.5(c), as redesignated elsewhere in
this NPRM, for ‘‘pre-employment
transition services’’ in proposed
§ 361.5(c)(42); ‘‘student with a
disability’’ in proposed § 361.5(c)(51);
and ‘‘youth with a disability’’ in
proposed § 361.5(c)(59). We also
propose to retain the current definition
for ‘‘transition services’’ in
§ 361.5(c)(55), despite its removal from
the statute as a defined term, since it is
still used throughout the Act and the
regulations in part 361. In retaining this
definition, we propose to clarify that
this particular service is available to
both students and youth with
disabilities.
Reasons: These changes are necessary
to implement the amendments to the
Act. Given the heightened emphasis
throughout the Act on students and
youth with disabilities, especially with
regard to the provision of preemployment transition services and
other transition-related services, it is
essential that stakeholders understand
the definitions for these terms and how
they can be distinguished from other
terms commonly used.
For example, pre-employment
transition services are those specific
services specified in section 113 of the
Act and implemented in proposed
§ 361.48(a). These services, paid for
with a percentage of funds reserved
from the State’s VR allotment, are
available only to those individuals who
meet the definition of a student with a
disability. On the other hand, other
transition-related services, including
those that could be similar to preemployment transition services, may be
provided to students or youth with
disabilities and do not require a specific
reservation of funds (e.g., either as an
individualized VR service pursuant to
section 103(a) or as a service to groups
pursuant to section 103(b) of the Act).
It also is important to distinguish
between the terms ‘‘student with a
disability’’ and ‘‘youth with a
disability’’ because, as just described,
different services are available for
different populations. A student with a
disability is an individual with a
disability in school who is (1) 16 years
old, or younger, if determined
appropriate under the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (IDEA),
unless the State elects to provide preemployment transition services at a
younger age, and no older than 21,
unless the State provides transition
services under IDEA at an older age; and
(2) receiving transition services
pursuant to IDEA, or is a student who
is an individual with a disability for the
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21077
purposes of section 504 of the Act (29
U.S.C. 794). However, it is important to
note that we have interpreted a student
with a disability, given the plain
meaning of the statutory definition, as
not including an individual with a
disability in postsecondary education. A
youth with a disability, on the other
hand, is anyone who has a disability as
defined in section 7(20) of the Act and
is aged 14 to 24, regardless of whether
they are in school. The terms ‘‘student
with a disability’’ and ‘‘youth with a
disability’’ do not affect coverage under
section 504. All individuals with
disabilities regardless of whether they
meet the definition of ‘‘student with a
disability’’ and ‘‘youth with a
disability’’ continue to be covered under
section 504.
Therefore, all students with
disabilities would meet the definition of
a youth with a disability, but not all
youth with disabilities would satisfy the
definition of a student with a disability.
For example, an 18-year-old individual
with a disability who is in secondary
school and receiving services under
IDEA meets both the definition of a
student with a disability as well as the
definition of a youth with a disability.
However, an 18-year-old with a
disability who is not in school would
meet only the definition of a youth with
a disability.
The distinctions between these two
terms are critical for purposes of the
various authorities for providing
transition-related services. For example,
pre-employment transition services
provided under proposed § 361.48(a) are
only available to students with
disabilities; whereas transition services
provided for the benefit of a group of
individuals may be provided to both
students and youth with disabilities
under proposed § 361.49(a).
Despite the removal of the definition
of ‘‘transition services’’ from the Act, we
believe it is important to retain this
definition in part 361 given that the
term continues to be used throughout
the Act and these regulations. Therefore,
we propose to retain the definition of
‘‘transition services.’’ However, we
propose to clarify that this service is
available to both students and youth
with disabilities in order to be
consistent with proposed regulations in
§§ 361.48(b) and 361.49(a) governing the
provision of transition services.
Specific guidance about these terms
and how they relate to various
transition-related services will be
provided in this NPRM in conjunction
with the relevant proposed regulation.
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21078
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Coordination With Education Officials
(§ 361.22)
Statute: Section 101(a)(11)(D) of the
Act, as amended by WIOA, clarifies two
points: (1) Interagency coordination
between the DSUs and educational
agencies must include coordination
regarding the provision of preemployment transition services; and (2)
DSUs may provide consultation and
technical assistance to education
officials through alternative means, such
as conference calls and video
conferences. This section also includes
other technical changes.
In addition, WIOA adds a new section
101(c) to the Act that makes clear that
nothing in the Act is to be construed as
reducing the responsibility of the local
educational agencies or any other
agencies under IDEA to provide or pay
for any transition services that are also
considered to be special education or
related services necessary for providing
a free appropriate public education to
students with disabilities.
Finally, section 511 of the Act, as
amended by WIOA, imposes several
requirements, particularly related to
documentation of services for DSUs and
State and local educational agencies
with regard to youth with disabilities
seeking subminimum wage
employment. Unlike the rest of the Act,
which took effect upon enactment,
section 511 does not take effect until
July 22, 2016.
Current Regulations: Current § 361.22
requires VR agencies to develop policies
and procedures for coordinating with
education officials to facilitate the
transition of students with disabilities
from education services to the provision
of VR services. However, current
regulations do not reference preemployment transition services or the
option of providing consultation
services through alternative means since
these are new statutory requirements.
Current regulations also do not
reference the statutory construction
clause or the statutory requirements
contained in section 511, as these are
new statutory requirements.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend current § 361.22(a) to incorporate
reference to pre-employment transition
services as an area that must be
included during inter-agency
coordination of transition services.
We propose to amend current
§ 361.22(b)(1) to clarify that VR agencies
may use alternative means, such as
video conferences and conference calls,
for providing consultation and technical
assistance to education officials. We
also propose to amend current
§ 361.22(b) by adding new clauses (5)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
and (6) to incorporate, by reference,
certain requirements from section 511
into the formal interagency agreement
between the DSU and the State
educational agency.
Finally, we propose to add a new
paragraph (c) under § 361.22 to
incorporate the construction clause in
section 101(c) of the Act.
We also propose other technical or
conforming changes throughout this
section.
Reasons: The proposed changes to
current § 361.22 are necessary to
implement the amendments to the Act
made by WIOA. While most of the
proposed changes are self-explanatory,
we believe additional guidance is
necessary to clarify a few of the
proposed provisions.
First, section 511 of the Act, as added
by WIOA, imposes certain requirements
on DSUs and State and local
educational agencies with regard to
youth with disabilities seeking
subminimum wage employment.
Specifically, DSUs and local
educational agencies must provide these
youth with disabilities documentation
demonstrating that the youth completed
certain activities, such as receipt of
transition services under IDEA and preemployment transition services under
the VR program, as applicable. Section
511 also requires the DSU, in
consultation with the State educational
agency, to develop a process, or utilize
an existing process, to document
completion by youth with disabilities of
the required activities, as applicable,
under section 511. We believe the
formal interagency agreement that is
required by section 101(a)(11)(D) of the
Act, and current § 361.22(b) is the
appropriate mechanism for ensuring the
consultation necessary to develop and
implement the documentation process
required by section 511 and 34 CFR
397.10.
Second, section 511(b)(2) of the Act
prohibits a State or local educational
agency from entering into a contract or
other arrangement with an entity for
purposes of operating a program in
which youth with disabilities are
employed at subminimum wage. Again,
we believe the formal interagency
agreement, required by section
101(a)(11)(D) of the Act, and current
§ 361.22(b), between the State
educational agency and the DSU, is the
appropriate mechanism whereby State
and local educational agencies will
assure that they will comply with the
prohibition imposed by section
511(b)(2) of the Act and proposed 34
CFR 397.31. We believe that
incorporating both of these
requirements from section 511, and
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
proposed part 397, into an existing
formal interagency agreement will
reduce burden on the States so new
mechanisms for requirements are
unnecessary.
Third, we want to provide additional
clarification regarding proposed
§ 361.22(c) given questions that have
arisen over the years as to which entity,
the local educational agency or DSU, is
responsible for providing transition
services to students with disabilities
(who are also VR consumers) when such
services fall under the purview of both
entities. The following examples
illustrate the types of scenarios that
have been at the heart of questions
posed by DSUs in the past:
1. A VR-eligible student who is blind
is participating in a work-experience
placement after school hours as part of
her individualized education program.
Because that activity takes place in a
location outside of school, the student
needs travel training in order to travel
independently from school to work and
then home.
2. A VR-eligible student is enrolled in
an apprenticeship program in
construction trades as part of his
individualized education program
under IDEA. The program requires the
student to have special gloves, clothing,
equipment, and footwear to attend the
program.
3. A VR-eligible student is
participating in a work experience
activity during school hours as part of
her individualized education program.
The school has arranged for several
IDEA-eligible students to participate in
this same work activity and is providing
a school bus to transport the IDEAeligible students to and from the
worksite. The VR-eligible student needs
transportation to the worksite and a
uniform.
While neither the Act nor IDEA is
explicit as to which entity, the VR
agency or the local education agency, is
financially responsible for providing
transition services, which are not
considered solely special education or
related services under IDEA, both
proposed § 361.22(c) and current 34
CFR 300.324(c)(2)) make clear that
neither the local educational agency nor
the VR agency may shift the burden for
providing a service, for which it
otherwise would be responsible, to the
other entity. We want to make clear that
the Act and IDEA, along with their
implementing regulations in proposed
§ 361.22(c) and 34 CFR 300.324(c)(2),
are to be read in concert.
Therefore, we believe decisions
related to which entity will be
responsible for providing transition or
pre-employment transition services that
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
can be considered both a special
education and a VR service must be
made at the State and local level as part
of the collaboration between the VR
agencies, State educational agencies,
and local educational agencies. This
coordination and collaboration is
crucial to successful transition planning
and service delivery. Both the IDEA and
the Rehabilitation Act require State
educational agencies and VR agencies to
plan and coordinate transition services
for students with disabilities. This
occurs through an interagency
agreement or other mechanism for
interagency coordination, such as
described in section 612(a)(12) of IDEA
(20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(12))). Coordination,
including clearly articulated roles and
responsibilities for the provision of
transition services and for activities
under section 511 of the Act, as well as
mechanisms to resolve disputes
between the State educational agencies
and the VR agencies ensures a seamless
delivery of transition services that
enable eligible students with disabilities
to make a smooth transition from school
to post-school education and
employment. Moreover, under IDEA,
this interagency coordination may be
necessary to ensure the provision of
transition services that are necessary for
the provision of a free appropriate
public education to students with
disabilities (see section 612(a)(12) of
IDEA and 34 CFR 300.154). States have
the flexibility to include local
educational agencies as parties to the
State-level agreement.
Since the ultimate decisions related to
financial responsibility for the provision
of transition services must be
established at the State and local level
during the collaboration and
coordination of transition and preemployment transition services, a
State’s formal interagency agreement or
other mechanism for interagency
coordination can provide a foundation
for addressing these issues by including
criteria to be used by the VR agencies
and local educational agencies when
considering and assigning the financial
responsibility of each agency for the
provision of transition services to
students with disabilities on an
individualized basis. For example, the
criteria could include:
1. The purpose of the service—Is it
related more to an employment outcome
or education (i.e., is it considered a
special education or related service (e.g.,
rehabilitation counseling that is
necessary for the provision of a free
appropriate public education))?
2. Customary Services—Is the service
one that the school customarily
provides under IDEA part B? For
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
example, if the school ordinarily
provides job exploration counseling to
its eligible students with disabilities, the
mere fact that such a service is now
authorized under the Rehabilitation Act
as a pre-employment transition service
does not mean the school should cease
providing that service and refer those
students to the VR program.
3. Eligibility—Is the student with a
disability eligible for transition services
under IDEA? As stated earlier, the
definition of a ‘‘student with a
disability,’’ for purposes of the VR
program, is broader than that under
IDEA because the definition in the
Rehabilitation Act includes those
students who are individuals with a
disability under section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act. It is possible that
these students do not have an
individualized education program
under IDEA and, therefore, would not
be eligible for or receiving special
education and related services under
IDEA. As a result, VR agencies are
authorized to provide transition services
under the VR program to a broader
population than local educational
agencies are authorized to provide
under IDEA.
We believe that criteria such as these
could be beneficial as DSUs and local
educational agencies and State
educational agencies collaborate and
coordinate the provision of transition
services, including pre-employment
transition services to students with
disabilities, and resolve disputes related
to the provision of these services.
Cooperation and Coordination With
Other Entities (§ 361.24)
Statute: Section 101(a)(11) of the Act
makes several changes that highlight the
importance of transition and other
matters affecting students and youth
with disabilities with regard to the
coordination of services between the VR
program and other non-educational
programs.
Current Regulations: Current
regulations in § 361.24 address only the
cooperation and coordination between
the State VR agency and Federal, State
and local agencies that are not carrying
out activities through the workforce
development system. Current
regulations do not address the
coordination that must occur with the
section 121 projects in a State, if
applicable, with regard to the provision
of pre-employment transition services or
non-educational agencies serving out-ofschool youth because these are new
statutory requirements.
Proposed Regulations: Proposed
§ 361.24(a) would incorporate noneducational agencies serving out-of-
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21079
school youth as another entity with
which the VR agency must coordinate.
We also propose to amend current
§ 361.24(c) and (d), which govern
coordination between the DSUs and
employers and section 121 projects,
respectively, to include transition
services among the matters that must be
included in coordination efforts.
Reasons: These changes are necessary
to implement the amendments to the
Act made by WIOA, all of which are
designed to improve relationships and
coordination between the VR agencies,
employers, and all other agencies (e.g.,
workforce development, child welfare
and juvenile justice agencies) serving
individuals with disabilities, especially
youth with disabilities, to ensure they
have meaningful opportunities to
achieve employment outcomes in
competitive integrated employment.
While DSUs have been required to
coordinate with American Indian
Vocational Rehabilitation Services
projects in the State, if any, the
coordination now must also include
pre-employment transition services.
Statewide Assessment; Estimates; State
Goals and Priorities; Strategies; and
Progress Reports (§ 361.29)
Statute: Section 101(a)(15) of the Act,
as amended by WIOA, requires the
comprehensive needs assessments to
include: a review of the needs of youth
and students, especially with regard to
pre-employment transition services and
the coordination of services with
educational agencies; and the methods
used to improve the provision of VR
services, especially transition services.
Current Regulations: Current § 361.29
requires that the State plan include the
results of a statewide assessment, but
does not contain new statutory
requirements related to transition and
pre-employment transition services.
Proposed Regulations: Proposed
§ 361.29(a)(1)(i)(D) reflects the addition
of the new statutory requirement for the
statewide needs assessment to identify
the vocational rehabilitation needs of
youth and students with disabilities,
including their need for preemployment transition services as
defined under proposed § 361.5(c)(42)
or other transition services. Proposed
§ 361.29(a)(1)(i)(D)(2) would require that
the State plan include an assessment of
the needs for transition services and
pre-employment transition services and
the extent to which VR services are
coordinated with services provided
under IDEA in order to meet the needs
of individuals with disabilities. The
proposed § 361.29(d)(4) would require
that the State plan include strategies to
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21080
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
provide pre-employment transition
services.
Reasons: These proposed changes are
necessary to implement the
amendments to the Act made by WIOA.
These proposed changes reflect the
Act’s emphasis on transition-related
issues affecting students and youth with
disabilities.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Development of the Individualized Plan
for Employment (§ 361.45)
Statute: None.
Current Regulations: Current
§ 361.45(d)(9) requires that an
individualized plan for employment be
developed in consideration of a student
with a disability’s individualized
education program under IDEA. There is
no reference to 504 services in this
context.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend current § 361.45(d)(9)(i) to
incorporate consideration of a student’s
section 504 services.
Reasons: This proposed change is
necessary to implement the
amendments to the Act made by WIOA
with regard to the addition of a
definition of ‘‘student with a disability.’’
Because a student with a disability
could be an individual who is receiving
services under section 504 rather than
under an individualized education
program pursuant to IDEA, we believe
this proposed change is essential to
ensure consistent implementation of all
requirements affecting students with
disabilities.
Content of the Individualized Plan for
Employment (§ 361.46)
Statute: As amended by WIOA,
section 102(b)(4)(A) of the Act permits
an individualized plan for employment
to contain a specific post-school
employment outcome or a more general,
projected outcome. Section 102(b)(4)(B)
requires the individualized plan for
employment for a student with a
disability to include the specific
transition services needed by the
student for the achievement of the
employment goal.
Current Regulations: Current § 361.46
outlines the components of an
individualized plan for employment,
but does not contain specific
requirements related to transition since
these are new statutory requirements.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
revise current § 361.46(a)(1) to permit,
in lieu of a specific employment goal, a
description of an eligible student’s or
youth’s projected post-school
employment outcome.
Proposed § 361.46(a)(2)(ii) would
require that the description of the
specific VR services under proposed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
§ 361.48 include the specific transition
services and supports needed for an
eligible student with a disability or
youth with disability to achieve an
employment outcome or projected postschool employment outcome.
Reasons: These changes are necessary
to implement the amendments made to
the Act by WIOA. By permitting the
individualized plan for employment for
a student or youth with a disability to
include a projected, or generally
described, rather than a specific
employment goal, we recognize that
some students and youth with
disabilities, particularly those of a
younger age, may not have formulated a
specific employment goal when they
begin the VR process. As a result, VR
agencies may find it necessary to amend
the individualized plan for employment
to reflect career exploration consistent
with vocational growth and
development and the resulting
evolution in the student’s or youth’s
employment goal. However, VR
agencies should continue to work with
students and youth who have identified
a specific employment goal, especially
those who are older, to develop
individualized plans for employment
that contain a specific goal. For students
and youth who have yet to identify a
specific employment goal, this change
would remove the need for these
frequent amendments. However, the
inclusion of a projected employment
goal in the individualized plan for
employment would not eliminate the
responsibility of the VR counselor and
student to amend the individualized
plan for employment and the VR
services needed to achieve that goal as
the employment goal changes.
Scope of Vocational Rehabilitation
Services for Individuals With
Disabilities (§ 361.48)
Pre-Employment Transition Services
Statute: WIOA amends the Act by
including a new section 113 that
requires VR agencies to coordinate with
local educational agencies in providing,
or arranging for the provision of, preemployment transition services to
students with disabilities who are
eligible or potentially eligible for VR
services and in need of such services.
Section 110(d) requires States to reserve
15 percent of their VR allotment to
provide these services.
Current Regulations: None.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
add regulations implementing the
provision of pre-employment transition
services in a new paragraph in proposed
§ 361.48(a). The current regulations will
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
be moved to a new paragraph (b) in
§ 361.48.
Proposed § 361.48(a)(1) would permit
pre-employment transition services to
be provided to all students with
disabilities regardless of whether they
have applied for VR services and would
clarify that similar transition services
are available to youth with disabilities
under proposed § 361.48(b) when
specified in an individualized plan for
employment.
Proposed § 361.48(a)(2) would specify
the required pre-employment transition
services that are provided directly to
students with disabilities.
Proposed § 361.48(a)(3) would
describe the authorized activities that
the State may provide, if sufficient
funds are available, to improve the
transition of students with disabilities
from school to postsecondary education
or an employment outcome.
Proposed § 361.48(a)(4) would
describe the responsibilities for preemployment transition coordination to
be carried out by VR agencies.
Finally, proposed § 361.48(a)(5)
would support DSUs in providing preemployment transition services,
consulting with other Federal agencies,
and identifying best practices of the
States for the provision of transition
services to students with a variety of
disabilities.
Reasons: The proposed regulations in
§ 361.48(a) would implement the
requirements of section 113 of the Act,
which were added by WIOA. This new
section presents an innovative approach
to providing pre-employment transition
services to students with disabilities.
The services required by this section
are those that would be most beneficial
to an individual in the early stages of
employment exploration. These services
are designed to provide job exploration
and other services, such as counseling
and self-advocacy training, in the early
stages of the transition process. To that
end, we believe Congress intended these
services be provided to the broadest
population of students with disabilities
to ensure that as many students with
disabilities as possible are given the
opportunity to receive the services
necessary in order to achieve an
employment outcome. Therefore, the
proposed regulation clarifies that preemployment transition services would
be available to all students with
disabilities. However, it is important to
note that a student with a disability in
this instance does not mean an
individual with a disability in
postsecondary education. We believe
this interpretation is consistent with the
statutory language ‘‘all students with
disabilities who are eligible or
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
potentially eligible’’ for VR services and
intent, as well as the definition of a
‘‘student with a disability.’’ As an
individual with a disability, every
student with a disability satisfies at least
one of the eligibility criteria for VR
services in current § 361.42(a)(1).
In so doing, we would ensure that the
broadest possible group of students with
disabilities is able to receive the services
they need to better identify and prepare
for post-school activities, including
postsecondary education and
competitive integrated employment. We
do not believe that a student with a
disability would have to apply for, or be
determined eligible for, VR services
prior to receiving pre-employment
transition services under proposed
§ 361.48(a). However, if the student does
apply for VR services, he or she would
be subject to all relevant requirements
for eligibility and order of selection, as
applicable, for purposes of receiving
other VR services.
It is important to point out, in this
context, that the definition in proposed
§ 361.5(c)(51) of a ‘‘student with a
disability,’’ for purposes of the VR
program, is broader than the definition
used under IDEA. For that reason, the
VR agency may provide preemployment transition services under
this section to a broader group of
students than could receive such
services under IDEA since VR agencies
may provide these services to students
eligible for or receiving section 504
services, not all of whom may be
eligible for or receiving special
education or related services under
IDEA.
We are particularly interested in
receiving comments and alternative
suggestions about the interpretation of
‘‘potentially eligible’’ as used in section
113(a) of the Act to mean all students
with disabilities as defined under
proposed § 361.5(c)(51).
In providing pre-employment
transition services, a DSU may consider
providing these services to students
with disabilities in group settings or on
an individual basis. When provided in
group settings, these services are general
in nature and are not typically
customized to an individual student’s
disability-related or vocational needs.
For example, job exploration counseling
provided in group settings may include
the presentation of general local labor
market composition and information,
administration of vocational interest
inventories, and instruction regarding
self-advocacy and self-determination.
On the other hand, job exploration
counseling provided on an individual
basis might include discussion of the
student’s vocational interest inventory
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
results and discussion of local labor
market information that applies to those
interests.
The manner in which preemployment transition services are
delivered (e.g., either in a group setting
or on an individual basis) will most
likely depend on the amount of
information the DSU has available
regarding the student with a disability at
the time services are provided. As a
student progresses through the VR
process by applying, and being
determined eligible, for VR services, the
DSU would obtain the information
necessary to provide individually
tailored services that address the
student’s particular disability-related
and vocational needs. This aspect of
pre-employment transition services, the
fact that they can be either generalized
or individualized, further highlights the
continuum of services available under
the VR program.
We want to make clear that if a
student with a disability requires
services that are beyond the limited
scope of pre-employment transition
services, the student would have to
apply for and be determined eligible for
VR services and develop an
individualized plan for employment for
the receipt of those services as would be
true for any other applicant. To that
end, we encourage DSUs to work with
the local educational agencies and State
educational agencies to develop a
process whereby individuals expressing
interest in VR services are able to access
the program and apply for services in a
timely manner. VR agencies are
encouraged to develop a referral process
that is simple and engaging, especially
for students with disabilities and their
families who could become discouraged
or disinterested in VR services by
needlessly complex and prolonged
procedures. An individual may initiate
the application process by requesting
individualized pre-employment
transition services and other VR
services. Current § 361.41(b)(2) permits
a student or the student’s representative,
as appropriate, to apply for VR services
through a variety of means, including a
simple request for VR services, such as
submitting a form consenting to the
provision of VR services or even a
telephone call, so long as the request
contains the limited demographic and
other information necessary to begin an
assessment for the determination of
eligibility and the student is available to
participate in the assessment.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21081
Services for Individuals Who Have
Applied for or Been Determined Eligible
for VR Services (§ 361.48(b))
Statute: Section 103(a)(15) of the Act,
as amended by WIOA, adds preemployment transition services among
the scope of VR services that may be
provided in accordance with an
individual’s individualized plan for
employment.
Current Regulations: Current § 361.48
includes transition services among the
list of authorized activities. Preemployment transition services are not
specifically mentioned because this is a
result of statutory changes.
Proposed Regulations: As discussed
earlier, we propose to reorganize current
§ 361.48 so that all current provisions
are retained in proposed § 361.48(b). We
also propose to incorporate along with
those transition services already
provided for, pre-employment transition
services among the authorized list of
individualized services a VR agency
may provide under proposed
§ 361.48(b)(18).
Reasons: This change is necessary to
implement the amendments to the Act
made by WIOA. Under the VR program,
any allowable service may be provided
as a transition service to an individual
transitioning from secondary school to
postsecondary education or
employment, who has been determined
eligible and for whom an individualized
plan for employment has been
developed and approved. Services most
commonly provided as transition
services to students with disabilities
under an individualized plan for
employment include, but are not limited
to, assessments, counseling and
guidance, assistive technology, job
coaching, orientation and mobility
training, vocational counseling and
guidance, and vocational and other
training services, such as personal and
vocational adjustment training.
It is important to note that many of
the services described as preemployment transition services in
proposed § 361.48(a) were previously
provided as transition services, as
defined in proposed § 361.5(c)(55), or
other individualized services, including
community-based work experiences and
other career exploration services, even
though no specific category of preemployment transition services was
mentioned in the Act or current
§ 361.48.
Scope of Vocational Rehabilitation
Services for Groups of Individuals With
Disabilities (§ 361.49)
Statute: Section 103(b)(7) of the Act
expands the scope of allowable services
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
21082
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
for the benefit of groups of individuals
with disabilities to include transition
services for youth and students with
disabilities. Other technical changes
were made in section 103(b)(6).
Current Regulations: Current
§ 361.49(a) includes allowable services
for the benefit of groups of individuals
with disabilities, but does not include
transition services since this is a new
statutory requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend current § 361.49(a)(6) to clarify
that educational agencies referenced in
current regulations mean State or local
educational agencies.
We also propose to add a new
§ 361.49(a)(7) to incorporate transition
services to students and youth with
disabilities as a permissible service for
the benefit of groups of individuals with
disabilities. This service would be
provided in coordination with other
relevant agencies and providers.
Reasons: These changes are necessary
to implement the amendments to the
Act made by WIOA. Under this new
provision, VR agencies would be able to
engage in transition activities with some
entities that have not typically been
involved in transition planning. As a
service to groups, these transition
services would be provided in group
settings in a manner that benefits a
group of students or youth with
disabilities, rather than being
customized for any one individual.
Individualized transition services are
provided under proposed § 361.48(b).
Examples of group transition services
may include, but are not limited to,
class tours of universities and
vocational training programs, employer
or business site visits to learn about
career opportunities, career fairs
coordinated with workforce
development systems and employers
where students and youth participate in
resume writing classes and mock
interviews. Additionally, these services
are not limited to those individuals who
are still in school since section 103(b)(7)
of the Act includes youth with
disabilities between the ages of 14–24
who may or may not be enrolled in
secondary education.
DSUs will need to be mindful of the
authority they are using when providing
these services since requirements differ
for those transition services provided
under services to groups (see proposed
§ 361.49) or pursuant to an
individualized plan for employment
(see proposed § 361.48(b)) or as a preemployment transition service under
proposed § 361.48(a).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
Services for Individuals Who Have
Applied for and Been Determined
Eligible for Vocational Rehabilitation
Services (§ 361.48(b))
Scope of Vocational Rehabilitation
Services for Individuals With
Disabilities
Statute: WIOA amends section 103(a)
of the Act by adding customized
employment to the list of VR services
that may be provided to eligible
individuals under an individualized
plan for employment. The amendments
also encourage qualified individuals
who are eligible for VR services to
pursue advanced training in specified
fields.
Current Regulations: Current § 361.48
provides a non-exhaustive list of VR
services available to assist an individual
with a disability in preparing for,
securing, retaining, or regaining an
employment outcome. Neither
customized employment nor advanced
training is specified in this list because
these are new statutory requirements.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
reorganize current § 361.48. Proposed
§ 361.48(a) incorporates new regulations
governing pre-employment transition
services to students with disabilities,
which are required by section 113 of the
Act. Proposed § 361.48(b) contains all of
the services that are listed in current
§ 361.48 and that are available to an
eligible individual under an
individualized plan for employment.
Proposed § 361.48(b)(6) would specify
that advanced training in a field of
science, technology, engineering, or
mathematics (including computer
science), medicine, law, or business
may be provided to an eligible
individual receiving vocational and
other training services under an
individualized plan for employment.
Finally, we propose to include
customized employment as an available
VR service in proposed § 361.48(b)(20).
We also propose to make other
conforming changes throughout this
section.
Reasons: These changes are necessary
to implement amendments to section
103(a) of the Act made by WIOA. It has
been our long-standing policy that VR
services are available to individuals
with disabilities to enable them to
advance in employment and that
financial support for the graduate-level
degrees specified in proposed
§ 361.48(b)(6), may be provided to
eligible individuals when necessary to
achieve employment. The specific
mention of this service in section 103(a)
of the Act and the proposed regulation
underscores the importance of advanced
training when preparing individuals
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
with disabilities for high demand
careers in today’s economy.
Prior to enactment of WIOA,
customized employment was an
available service under the VR program
when necessary to assist the eligible
individual to achieve an employment
outcome. See the discussion of
customized employment in the
Applicable Definitions section for
further information.
Scope of Vocational Rehabilitation
Services for Groups of Individuals With
Disabilities (§ 361.49(a))
Statute: Section 103(b) of the Act
makes several changes with regard to
the services to groups that VR agencies
may provide, including those related to
technical assistance to businesses,
assistive technology, and advanced
training in specific fields of study.
Current Regulations: Current
§ 361.49(a) describes the services that
VR agencies may provide for the benefit
of groups, but they do not specifically
address services related to assistive
technology or advanced training, or
other changes made by WIOA.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend current § 361.49(a)(1), regarding
the establishment, development, or
improvement of a community
rehabilitation program, to clarify that
services provided under this authority
must be used to promote competitive
integrated employment, including
customized and supported employment.
We propose to amend current
§ 361.49(a)(4) to incorporate statutory
changes that expand a VR agency’s
authority to provide technical assistance
to all businesses who are considering
hiring individuals with disabilities.
We propose to add new § 361.49(a)(8)
and (9) regarding services related to
assistive technology and advanced
training, respectively, to reflect new
statutory authorities for these services.
We also propose to make other
conforming changes throughout this
section.
Reasons: These changes are necessary
to implement statutory changes, which
both expand the types of services that a
VR agency may provide for the benefit
of groups of individuals with
disabilities and provide clarification as
needed.
The proposed changes in
§ 361.49(a)(1) regarding the
establishment, development, or
improvement of a community
rehabilitation program are primarily for
clarification purposes. Services
provided under this authority have
always been for the purpose of
promoting integration into the
community with respect to
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
employment. However, the proposed
changes highlight the statute’s
heightened emphasis on competitive
integrated employment, supported
employment, and customized
employment.
Proposed changes to current
§ 361.49(a)(4) would permit VR agencies
to provide technical assistance to all
businesses who are considering hiring
individuals with disabilities. This
technical assistance could assist
businesses with recruitment, hiring,
employment, and retention, including
resources and tools to help with
accessing and use of assistive
technology, workplace accessibility, and
accommodations for individuals with
disabilities. VR agencies can work with
businesses to develop systems for the
matching and training of qualified
workers with job requirements.
Previously, a VR agency could provide
such services only to those businesses
that are not subject to title I of the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
This proposed change is also consistent
with the heightened emphasis
throughout WIOA on employer
engagement, especially with regard to
assisting individuals with disabilities to
enter competitive integrated
employment.
Proposed new § 361.49(a)(8) would
incorporate a new statutory authority for
VR agencies to provide assistive
technology-related services for the
benefit of groups of individuals with
disabilities. VR agencies may now
establish, develop, or improve assistive
technology programs. This new
authority would expand access to
assistive technology for individuals
with disabilities and employers in
recognition of the critical role it plays in
the vocational rehabilitation and
employment of individuals with
disabilities. However, we believe that
this authority should be implemented in
a manner that is consistent with the
authority to establish, develop, or
improve a community rehabilitation
program in proposed § 361.49(a)(1) in
that the services provided under this
authority should be limited to
applicants and eligible individuals
receiving VR services. In so doing, this
authority would be used in coordination
with, rather than to supplant, the
activities otherwise provided under the
Assistive Technology Act.
We also want to make clear that the
assistive technology services provided
under this authority would be
distinguished from those provided
under proposed § 361.48(b), which are
individualized and provided pursuant
to an individual’s plan for employment.
The assistive technology services
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
provided under proposed § 361.49(a)(8)
are for the benefit of a group of
individuals and are not tied to the
individualized plan for employment of
any one individual. For example, a DSU
may, in coordination with the State’s
assistive technology grant program, use
VR funds to support an assistive
technology lending library in proportion
to the benefit received by applicants and
eligible individuals. Once an eligible
individual needs a specific assistive
technology device to participate in VR
services or the employment outcome,
the DSU could provide the device as an
individualized service under an
individualized plan for employment
pursuant to proposed § 361.48(b).
Proposed § 361.49(a)(9) would
implement a new authority for VR
agencies to provide support for
advanced training in a manner that
benefits groups of eligible individuals.
Before WIOA was enacted, a DSU could
provide this service only on an
individualized basis, pursuant to an
individual’s individualized plan for
employment, in accordance with
proposed § 361.48(b), which remains
unchanged in this context. This new
authority is in addition to that provided
under proposed § 361.48(b) and is not
intended to replace such services as
being provided on an individualized
basis.
Under this new authority, VR
agencies may provide support services
to eligible individuals who meet
specific criteria and are pursuing
advanced training in specific fields, as
a service for the benefit of a group of
individuals with disabilities. Examples
of when a DSU may consider providing
such support services, not directly
related to an individualized plan for
employment, could include the
enrollment of multiple students
determined eligible for VR services in
the same training, or the development
and implementation of specific
programming for eligible individuals
with an institution of higher education
or community provider. Furthermore,
VR agencies could consider establishing
a scholarship fund for advanced training
in science, technology, engineering or
mathematics (STEM) or other fields as
described in section 103(b)(9) of the Act.
These funds may support the costs of
graduate level training not covered by
any other source for those services,
including support provided by the VR
program under proposed § 361.48(b). If
a DSU establishes such scholarships, it
should consider establishing criteria
governing the receipt of such support,
including merit and other competitive
criteria.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21083
We want to make clear that DSUs
should continue to provide any
individualized advanced training
support that an eligible individual
requires in order to achieve an
employment outcome in competitive
integrated employment, and that is
consistent with the individual’s plan for
employment, under proposed
§ 361.48(b), not under the services to
groups authority discussed here. For
that reason, we believe there would only
be limited circumstances in which it
would be appropriate for a DSU to
provide support for advanced training
under proposed § 361.49(a)(9). Given
that this service may be provided as
either an individualized service under
proposed §§ 361.48(b) or 361.49(a)(9),
DSUs would have to keep in mind the
distinctions between the two different
authorities to ensure proper
implementation and record-keeping for
reporting purposes.
Comparable Services and Benefits
(§ 361.53)
Statute: Section 101(a)(8) of the Act
clarifies that accommodations and
auxiliary aids and services are included
in the requirement to determine
whether comparable services and
benefits are available prior to the DSU
providing most VR services. In addition,
section 101(a)(8)(B) is amended to
clarify that interagency agreements for
coordination of services between the
DSU and other public entities in the
State, including institutions of higher
education, should specifically address
accommodations and auxiliary aids and
services among the services to be
coordinated.
Current Regulations: Current § 361.53
sets forth the requirements related to
comparable services and benefits, as
well as requirements related to
interagency agreements, without
specifically identifying accommodations
and auxiliary aids and services.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
add language to §§ 361.53(a) and
361.53(d)(1) and (3) that would include
accommodations and auxiliary aids and
services among the VR services that
would require the determination of the
availability of comparable services and
benefits prior to the provision of such
services to an eligible individual. The
proposed changes also would address
interagency coordination of the
provision of these services.
Reasons: The proposed changes
reflect the clarifications in section
101(a)(8) of the Act made by WIOA.
WIOA reinforces the Department’s
longstanding position that
accommodations and auxiliary aids and
services are considered to be part of the
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
21084
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
determination of the availability of
comparable services and benefits and
the services to be coordinated through
the required interagency agreements
with public entities should include
accommodations and auxiliary aids and
services. The changes to section
101(a)(8) of the Act and proposed
§ 361.53 make this interpretation
explicit.
The need for the DSU to coordinate
the provision of accommodations and
auxiliary aids and services often occurs
when serving eligible individuals
attending institutions of higher
education for postsecondary training
and education. Both DSUs and public
institutions of higher education must
adhere to the requirements of title II of
the Americans with Disabilities Act and
section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act to
ensure access to their services for
individuals with disabilities.
Additionally, private institutions of
higher education must adhere to
requirements of section 504 of the Act
to ensure access to their services for
individuals with disabilities.
Accordingly, the responsibilities of each
entity for the provision of
accommodations and auxiliary aids and
services to individuals served by each
must be determined at the State level.
Therefore, the interagency agreement
under proposed § 361.53(d) would
ensure interagency coordination and
describe the responsibilities of the DSU
and the institutions of higher education
for the provision of VR services,
including accommodations and
auxiliary aids and services, and would
provide a vehicle for resolving
interagency disputes. To that end,
Governors could assist the DSUs and
institutions of higher education, in
accordance with section 101(a)(8)(B) of
the Act, to develop these agreements to
ensure they are sufficient for ensuring
individuals with disabilities receive the
services they need, including
accommodations and auxiliary aids and
services, to enable them to achieve
competitive integrated employment.
The Rehabilitation Act requires DSUs to
enter into interagency agreements for
coordination of services (including each
agency’s financial responsibilities) with
institutions of higher education, as well
as other public entities. DSUs have
experienced difficulty engaging with
institutions of higher education, and
other public agencies, for the purpose of
developing the required interagency
agreements. In addition, DSUs and
institutions of higher education have
often executed interagency agreements
that do not clearly describe the manner
in which services will be coordinated,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
particularly the accommodations and
auxiliary aids and services that each
agency will be responsible to provide.
The lack of specificity in these
agreements, in turn, does not provide
adequate guidance to higher education
or VR personnel responsible for carrying
out their responsibilities to provide
such aids and devices to assist
individual students with disabilities.
Such guidance is crucial when a
particular service could be provided by
either the DSU or institution of higher
education in accordance with their
mutual obligations under the Americans
with Disabilities Act and section 504 of
the Act to ensure the ability of
individuals with disabilities to
participate in educational programs and
activities, and the timely delivery of VR
services.
We believe that the terms of the
interagency agreement should take into
account State laws and the resources of
each party. For example, an interagency
agreement could include a term that
could require institutions of higher
education to provide auxiliary aids and
services (e.g., interpreters) to VR eligible
individuals in the classroom and the
DSUs could provide these aids and
services during educational activities
outside the classroom. In States where
students who are deaf or blind and
attend a State university tuition-free, the
interagency agreement could specify
that the DSU provide auxiliary aids and
services, such as reader and interpreter
services, both in and out of the
classroom, since the school is
responsible for the full cost of tuition.
Greater specificity in the terms of the
interagency agreements at the State level
will promote consistency across the
State in the coordination of services and
in the provision of accommodations and
auxiliary aids and services to eligible
individuals attending institutions of
higher education.
Finally, we want to make clear that
accommodations and auxiliary aids and
services, for purposes of implementing
the requirements of section 101(a)(8)
and these proposed regulations, do not
include personally prescribed devices,
such as eye glasses, hearing aids,
wheelchairs, or other such individuallyprescribed devices and services.
Semi-Annual Review of Individuals in
Extended Employment and Other
Employment Under Special Certificate
Provisions of the Fair Labor Standards
Act (§ 361.55)
Statute: Section 101(a)(14) of the Act,
as amended by WIOA, increases the
frequency of reviews that the DSUs
must conduct when individuals with
disabilities, who have been served by
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
the VR program, obtain subminimum
wage employment or extended
employment.
Current Regulations: Current § 361.55
requires the DSU to conduct an annual
review and re-evaluation annually for
the first two years after an individual
obtains subminimum wage employment
or extended employment.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend § 361.55 to incorporate the new
statutory requirement that these reviews
be conducted semi-annually for the first
two years of the individual’s
employment and annually thereafter.
We also propose to make other technical
and conforming changes throughout.
Reasons: The proposed changes are
necessary to implement new statutory
requirements and ensure individuals
with disabilities do not languish in
subminimum wage employment or
extended employment. Prior to the
passage of WIOA, DSUs conducted
these reviews annually for two years.
With the amendments made by WIOA,
DSUs must conduct these reviews twice
a year for two years and then annually
thereafter for as long as the individual
remains employed at the subminimum
wage level or in extended employment.
These changes are consistent with the
heightened emphasis throughout WIOA
that individuals with disabilities,
including those with the most
significant disabilities, be given every
opportunity to achieve competitive
integrated employment.
Matching Requirements (§ 361.60)
Statute: Section 101(a)(3) of the Act
requires the State to pay a non-Federal
share in carrying out the VR program.
Section 7(14) of the Act defines
‘‘Federal share’’ as 78.7 percent. These
statutory provisions remain unchanged
by WIOA.
Current Regulations: Current
regulations in § 361.60(b) outline the
requirements for satisfying the nonFederal share requirement under the VR
program.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend current (b)(3) to clarify that nonFederal expenditures, for match
purposes under the VR program, from
private contributions must be made
from cash contributions that have been
deposited in the VR agency’s account
prior to their use for this purpose. We
also propose to make conforming
changes throughout current § 361.60 to
refer to 2 CFR part 200, as applicable
and to new terms, such as the
‘‘vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan’’ and ‘‘subaward.’’
Reasons: Proposed § 361.60(b)(3)
makes no substantive changes but
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
would clarify existing regulatory
requirements pertaining to expenditures
made from private contributions and
used for match purposes under the VR
program. Specifically, we would clarify
that contributions by private entities
must be in cash and that the funds must
be deposited into the State agency’s
account before they are used for match
purposes under the VR program. In so
doing, we make two points clear: (1)
Certified expenditures made by private
entities or individuals may not be used
by the VR agency for match purposes
under the VR program; and (2) a
contract, budgeted projection, or any
other promise by a private entity or
individual to make a contribution may
not be used, on its face, by the VR
agency for satisfying its match
requirement. The VR agency must
actually receive the cash contribution
before it may be used for match
purposes under the VR program. We
believe these clarifications are necessary
to ensure VR agencies have a better
understanding of, and comply with
these existing requirements. Finally,
other revisions proposed throughout
this section are necessary to conform to
other changes proposed throughout part
361.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Maintenance of Effort Requirements
(§ 361.62)
Statute: Section 111(a)(2)(B) of the
Act, as amended by WIOA, requires the
Secretary to reduce a grant in a fiscal
year for any prior fiscal year’s
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) shortfall.
Current Regulations: Current
§ 361.62(a) requires the Secretary to
reduce the grant in the fiscal year
immediately following the fiscal year
with the MOE deficit. In the event that
the MOE deficit is discovered after the
next fiscal year’s grant was awarded, the
Secretary is required to seek a remedy
for the MOE violation pursuant to the
disallowance process.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend current § 361.62(a) in four ways:
(1) By amending current § 361.62(a)(1)
to require the Secretary to reduce a grant
in any fiscal year by the amount of any
prior fiscal year’s MOE shortfall; (2) by
removing the example in current
§ 361.62(a)(1) as it is no longer
applicable, given statutory amendments;
(3) by removing current § 361.62(a)(2)
since it is no longer necessary given
new statutory requirements t; and (4) by
redesignating current § 361.62(a) to
reflect the removal of current
§ 361.62(a)(2).
We propose to amend current
§ 361.62(b) by removing the requirement
for the Secretary to recover the MOE
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
deficit through an audit disallowance
process.
We propose to amend the current
§ 361.62(d)(3) to clarify that a request for
a waiver or modification of the MOE
requirement must be submitted as soon
as the State has determined that it has
failed to satisfy the requirement due to
an exceptional or uncontrollable
circumstance. Finally, we propose to
make conforming changes throughout
current § 361.62 to reflect the
restructuring of paragraph (a).
Reasons: The proposed changes to
current § 361.62(a) are necessary to
implement the amendments to the Act
made by WIOA. Previously, the
Secretary could reduce the State’s VR
award to satisfy a MOE deficit only in
the fiscal year immediately following
the fiscal year in which the MOE deficit
occurred. In the event the MOE deficit
was discovered after the next fiscal
year’s grant was awarded, the Secretary
was required to seek recovery for the
MOE deficit pursuant to a disallowance
process, whereby, the State was
required to make payment for that
recovery action with non-Federal funds.
Under the proposed regulations the
Secretary would no longer be limited to
reducing only the next fiscal year’s
grant, but rather could reduce any
subsequent fiscal year’s grant to satisfy
the MOE deficit. Therefore, in the event
that a MOE shortfall is revealed after the
next fiscal year’s grant has been
awarded, the Secretary would reduce
the Federal grant in another subsequent
fiscal year. Consequently, it is no longer
necessary for the Secretary to seek
recovery through a disallowance process
and for a State to use non-Federal funds
to satisfy the deficit. The proposed
change to current § 361.62(b) is
necessary to ensure consistency with
paragraph (a) for purposes of satisfying
a MOE deficit.
The change in proposed § 361.62(d)(3)
is necessary for clarification purposes.
The proposed change would not
substantively revise the requirements
related to submitting a request for a
MOE waiver or modification, but rather
would add clarifying language to
existing requirements. Some States have
interpreted the existing regulation as
meaning that the request should be
submitted as soon as they anticipate that
they would be unable to satisfy the MOE
requirement, even if that was years in
advance. We have always interpreted
paragraph (d)(3) as meaning that the
request should be submitted as soon as
the State has determined it has not
satisfied the MOE requirement. The
proposed change provides further
clarification.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21085
Program Income (§ 361.63)
Statute: None.
Current Regulations: Current § 361.63
defines program income and lists
potential sources of program income
and uses for purposes of the VR
program.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend current § 361.63(a) to make the
definition of program income consistent
with 2 CFR 200.80.
We propose to amend current
§ 361.63(b) by providing additional
examples of common sources of
program income generated by the VR
program.
We propose to amend current
§ 361.63(c)(1) to clarify that program
income must be disbursed during the
period of performance of the award to
be consistent with 2 CFR 200.77, which
defines the period of performance of the
award as the time during which the
non-Federal entity may incur new
obligations to carry out the work
authorized under the Federal award.
We propose to amend current
§ 361.63(c)(2) to reflect statutory
restructuring of title VI of the Act.
Finally, we propose to amend current
§ 361.63(c)(3) to be consistent with 2
CFR 200.307(e)(1) and (2).
Reasons: The proposed changes to
current § 361.63 are necessary for
clarification purposes and to ensure
consistency with other relevant
requirements, especially those
contained in 2 CFR part 200.
Allotment and Payment of Federal
Funds for Vocational Rehabilitation
Services (§ 361.65)
Statute: Section 110(d) of the Act, as
amended by WIOA, requires VR
agencies to reserve not less than 15
percent of the State’s VR allotment for
the provision of pre-employment
transition services, in accordance with
section 113 of the Act. Section 110(d)(2)
of the Act prohibits a State from using
these reserved funds to pay for
administrative costs or any other VR
service.
Current Regulations: Current § 361.65
specifies the process the Secretary uses
to allot and reallot Federal funds, but
does not address the reservation by
States of funds for the provision of preemployment transition services since
this is a new statutory requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend current § 361.65(a) by adding a
new paragraph (3) to implement the
new statutory requirement for a State to
reserve not less than 15 percent of its
VR allotment for the provision of preemployment transition services. The
proposed provision would make clear
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21086
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
that such reserved funds must be used
only for services authorized in proposed
§ 361.48(a), and must not be used to pay
for administrative costs associated with
the provision of such services or for any
other VR service.
We propose to amend current
§ 361.65(b)(2) by revising the language
to clarify that reallotment would occur
in the fiscal year the funds were
appropriated; however, the funds may
be obligated or expended during the
period of performance, provided
matching requirements are met. We
propose to add a new paragraph (b)(3)
to current § 361.65 that would give the
Secretary the authority to determine the
criteria to be used to reallot funds when
the amount requested exceeds the
amount of funds relinquished.
Finally, we propose other technical
and conforming changes throughout this
section.
Reasons: The proposed changes to
current § 361.65(a) are necessary to
implement new statutory requirements
related to the reservation of Federal
funds for the provision of preemployment transition services. We
make clear that the funds to be reserved
are those awarded to the State pursuant
to section 110 of the Act and do not
refer to an allotment of State funds
awarded by the State.
None of the funds reserved for the
provision of pre-employment transition
services in accordance with section
110(d) may be used to pay for
administrative costs or any other VR
service. These funds must be used
solely for the provision of services
described in § 361.48(a) of this part. We
want to make clear that States must use
the entire amount reserved solely for the
provision of pre-employment transition
services in accordance with section 113
of the Act and § 361.48(a) of this part.
The proposed change to current
§ 361.65(b)(2) is necessary to ensure
consistency with 2 CFR 200.77.
The change in proposed § 361.65(b) is
necessary to inform grantees about the
reallotment process in the event there
are more requests for reallotment funds
than are available to satisfy those
requests.
Part 363—The State Supported
Employment Services Program
Proposed substantive changes to part
363 are presented in a format that
highlights topical areas in the order that
the relevant sections appear in this part.
Competitive Integrated Employment
(§ 363.1)
Statute: Section 7(38) of the Act, as
amended by WIOA, revises the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
definition of ‘‘supported employment’’
to mean, in pertinent part, employment
with supports in competitive integrated
employment or, if not in competitive
integrated employment, employment in
an integrated setting in which the
individual is working toward
competitive integrated employment on a
short-term basis, not to exceed six
months. Other key relevant statutory
provisions include section 7(5), which
defines competitive integrated
employment; section 602, which makes
clear the purpose of the Supported
Employment program is to enable
individuals with the most significant
disabilities, including youth with the
most significant disabilities, to achieve
supported employment in competitive
integrated employment; and section
604, which authorizes the services to be
provided under the Supported
Employment program to enable
individuals to achieve supported
employment in competitive integrated
employment. Title VI contains
references to this requirement
throughout.
Current Regulations: Current § 363.1
sets out the purpose of the Supported
Employment program, which is to assist
States in developing and implementing
collaborative programs with entities to
provide supported employment services
for individuals with the most severe
disabilities who require such services to
enter or retain competitive employment.
Current regulations do not reference
competitive integrated employment or
working towards competitive integrated
employment since these are new
statutory requirements.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend current § 363.1 to reflect the
revised statutory definition of
‘‘supported employment,’’ namely that
the employment be in competitive
integrated employment or, if it is not,
that the employment be in an integrated
setting in which the individual with a
most significant disability is working
toward competitive integrated
employment on a short-term basis.
As proposed, the regulations would
make clear that the purpose of the
Supported Employment program is to
enable individuals with the most
significant disabilities, with on-going
supports, to achieve competitive
integrated employment (i.e.,
employment in an integrated setting that
is compensated at or above the
minimum wage).
The proposed definition of
‘‘supported employment’’ would take
into account that under some
circumstances an individual’s
employment, which must always be in
an integrated setting, may not meet all
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
of the criteria for competitive integrated
employment initially. In those
circumstances, an individual with a
most significant disability would be
considered to have achieved an
employment outcome of supported
employment if he or she is working in
an integrated setting, on a short-term
basis, toward competitive integrated
employment. In the proposed definition,
we would interpret ‘‘short-term basis’’
in this context to mean within six
months of the individual entering
supported employment.
We also propose to amend current
§ 363.50(b)(3) and (b)(4) to state that the
collaborative agreements developed
with other relevant entities for
providing supported employment
services and extended services may
include efforts to increase opportunities
for competitive integrated employment
for individuals with the most significant
disabilities, including youth with the
most significant disabilities.
Finally, we propose to amend the
balance of current § 363.50 to reflect in
the States’ required collaborative
agreements the new scope and purpose
of supported employment, as well as the
new time limits for providing services
that are discussed in detail under the
sections ‘‘Services to Youth with the
Most Significant Disabilities’’ and
‘‘Extension of Time for the Provision of
Supported Employment Services.’’
Reasons: The proposed revisions are
necessary to implement in part 363 the
statutory changes made by WIOA. We
believe these proposed changes are
consistent with the purpose of the
Supported Employment program, as
expressed throughout title VI of the Act.
The proposed changes are also
consistent with proposed changes to
part 361, which governs the vocational
rehabilitation (VR) program, since the
supported employment program is
supplemental to that program. In
particular, we propose to establish a
specific time frame—e.g., six months—
for ‘‘short term basis’’ in the context of
‘‘supported employment,’’ because we
believe it is necessary to limit the time
allowed for individuals to work in noncompetitive employment in order to be
consistent with the clear intention of the
Act, as amended by WIOA, which
places heightened emphasis on
competitive integrated employment
throughout.
Services to Youth With the Most
Significant Disabilities (§§ 363.6 and
363.54)
Statute: Section 603(d) of the Act, as
amended by WIOA, requires each State
to reserve and use 50 percent of its
allotment under the Supported
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Employment program to provide
supported employment services,
including extended services, to youth
with the most significant disabilities.
Other relevant statutory provisions are
found in section 602, which highlights
services to youth with the most
significant disabilities in the purpose
section of title VI; section 604, which
authorizes services specifically for
youth with the most significant
disabilities; section 605, which
identifies youth with the most
significant disabilities as eligible for
supported employment services; and
section 606, which establishes certain
State plan requirements specific for
services to youth with the most
significant disabilities.
Current Regulations: None.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend multiple sections in part 363 to
incorporate these new requirements for
providing supported employment
services, including extended services, to
youth with the most significant
disabilities.
We propose to amend current § 363.1
to state that a purpose of the Supported
Employment program is to provide
individualized supported employment
services, including extended services in
an integrated setting, to youth with the
most significant disabilities in order to
assist them in achieving supported
employment in competitive integrated
employment.
We propose to amend current § 363.3
to clarify that youth with the most
significant disabilities are eligible to
receive supported employment services.
It is important to note that youth have
always been eligible to receive
supported employment services;
however, amendments made by WIOA
emphasize this population in the
context of the Supported Employment
program.
In proposed § 363.4(a) and (b), we
would implement new statutory
provisions permitting the expenditure of
supported employment program funds,
reserved for the provision of supported
employment services to youth with the
most significant disabilities on extended
services to youth with the most
significant disabilities for up to four
years following the transition from
support from the designated State unit
(DSU). We propose to amend current
§ 363.4(c) to clarify that nothing in this
part is to be construed as prohibiting the
VR program from providing extended
services to youth with the most
significant disabilities with funds
allotted under part 361.
In proposed § 363.4(d), we would set
out the statutory requirement that a
State must coordinate its supported
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
employment services with its VR
services provided under part 361 in
order to avoid duplication.
We propose to amend current § 363.11
to incorporate supported employment
services, including extended services,
for youth with the most significant
disabilities into the existing
requirements for the VR services portion
of the Unified or Combined State Plan
supplement.
We propose a new § 363.22, which
would implement the new statutory
requirement that a State must reserve
and use half of its allotment under the
supported employment program for the
provision of supported employment
services, including extended services, to
youth with the most significant
disabilities.
We propose changes throughout part
363 to conform to new statutory
nomenclature, such as referring to ‘‘the
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plans’’ in §§ 363.10 and 363.11,
instead of just ‘‘the State plan,’’ and
‘‘the most significant disabilities’’
instead of ‘‘severe disabilities.’’
Reasons: The proposed revisions are
necessary to implement in part 363
statutory changes made by WIOA. The
proposed changes are also consistent
with proposed changes to part 361,
which governs the VR program, since
the Supported Employment program is
supplemental to that program.
Specifically, the proposed changes are
consistent with the heightened
emphasis throughout the Act, as
amended by WIOA on the provision of
services to youth with disabilities,
especially those with the most
significant disabilities, to ensure they
receive the services and supports
necessary to achieve competitive
integrated employment. Accordingly,
the proposed changes would implement
the statutory requirement that States
must reserve half of their supported
employment allotment for the provision
of supported employment services,
including extended services, to youth
with the most significant disabilities.
This new statutory requirement reflects
the fact that this particular population
may need more intensive services for a
longer period of time in order to achieve
competitive integrated employment. It is
important to note that, prior to the
passage of WIOA, States were not
permitted to use supported employment
and/or VR program funds to provide
extended services under any
circumstance. States still are prohibited
from providing extended services to
individuals who are not youth with the
most significant disabilities.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21087
Extension of Time for the Provision of
Supported Employment Services
(§§ 363.6 and 363.54)
Statute: Section 7(39) of the Act, as
amended by WIOA, revises the
definition of ‘‘supported employment
services’’ to mean those on-going
supports provided for a period of time
not to exceed 24 months.
Current Regulations: Current § 363.6
defines ‘‘supported employment
services’’ as ongoing services provided
by the DSU for a limited period of time
to achieve job stabilization and assist an
individual with the most severe
disability before the transition to
extended services. The current
regulations do not reference the 24month time limit for the provision of
services since this is a new statutory
requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend the definition of ‘‘supported
employment services’’ in part 361,
which will be incorporated by reference
throughout part 363. The proposed
definition would extend the time
allowed for the provision of supported
employment services from 18 months to
24 months.
We also propose to update and
streamline current § 363.6 by removing
the current set of definitions and
inserting, instead, cross-references to
relevant definitions from other parts of
the Department’s regulations.
We propose to amend current § 363.53
to require that an individual must
transition to extended services within
24 months of starting to receive
supported employment services unless a
longer time period is agreed to in the
individualized plan for employment.
The proposed regulation would specify
conditions that must be met before a
DSU assists an individual in
transitioning to extended services, such
as ensuring the individual is engaged in
supported employment that is in
competitive integrated employment, or
in an integrated work setting in which
the individual is working on a shortterm basis toward competitive
integrated employment, and the
employment is customized for the
individual consistent with his or her
strengths, abilities, interests, and
informed choice. Administratively, the
State unit would also have to identify
the source of extended services and
meet all requirements for case closure.
Reasons: The proposed revisions are
necessary to implement in part 363
statutory changes made by WIOA. The
proposed changes are also consistent
with proposed changes to part 361,
which governs the VR program, since
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21088
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
the Supported Employment program is
supplemental to that program.
Match Requirements for Funds Reserved
for Serving Youth With the Most
Significant Disabilities (§ 363.23)
Statute: Section 606(b)(7)(I) of the
Act, as amended by WIOA, requires that
a State provide non-Federal
contributions in an amount not less than
10 percent of the costs of providing
supported employment services,
including extended services, to youth
with the most significant disabilities.
States are also authorized to leverage
public and private funds.
Current Regulations: None.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
add a new § 363.23 to implement these
new statutory requirements. In the event
that a designated State agency uses more
than 50 percent of its allotment to
provide supported employment services
to youth with the most significant
disabilities as required by § 363.22,
there is no requirement that a
designated State agency provide nonFederal expenditures to match the
excess Federal funds spent for this
purpose. In this proposed new section,
we would clarify, to ensure consistency
with part 361, that third-party in-kind
contributions are not permitted, but
contributions by private entities are
permitted, for match purposes under the
Supported Employment program.
We propose to amend § 363.4(a)(3) to
implement the new statutory provision
authorizing States to use funds reserved
for youth with the most significant
disabilities to leverage other public and
private funds to increase resources for
extended services and expand
supported employment opportunities
for youth with the most significant
disabilities.
We also propose to amend
§ 363.11(g)(9) to incorporate both the
new match requirement and the
description of the activities surrounding
how the State will leverage funds
reserved for youth with the most
significant disabilities into the
assurances that a State must submit as
part of its supported employment State
plan supplement.
Reasons: The proposed revisions are
necessary to implement in part 363
statutory changes made by WIOA. The
proposed changes are also consistent
with proposed changes to part 361
governing the VR program since the
Supported Employment program is
supplemental to that program. Given the
new statutory requirement that States
provide a 10 percent match on the funds
reserved for providing supported
employment services to youth with the
most significant disabilities, coupled
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
with the fact that States may use VR
funds to supplement the provision of
supported employment services, we
believe it is important to ensure the
match requirements under the
Supported Employment program are
consistent with those under the VR
program. To that end, we propose that
third-party in-kind contributions would
not be a permissible source of match
under the Supported Employment
program, since it is not permitted under
the VR program. In so doing, we reduce
the administrative burden on States
from having to distinguish whether a
match source is applicable to the
supported employment funds verses the
VR funds.
Program Income (§ 363.24)
Statute: Section 19 of the Act governs
the carryover of funds, including
program income, received by the
Supported Employment program. In
addition, section 108 of the Act permits
the VR program to transfer payments
received by the Social Security
Administration under part 361 to the
Supported Employment program. These
statutory provisions remained
substantively unchanged by WIOA.
Current Regulations: None.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
create a new § 363.24 that would define
program income, identify its uses, and
clarify that program income may be
treated as either an addition or
deduction to the award.
In addition, we propose including
requirements related to the carry-over of
program income in proposed § 363.25.
This provision would clarify that
program income may be carried over
into the succeeding fiscal year.
Reasons: These regulations are
necessary to govern the use and
treatment of program income, consistent
with sections 19 and 108 of the Act.
Although statutory requirements
governing program income have always
applied to the Supported Employment
program, we have found, through
monitoring, that confusion exists among
States as to how and when program
income should be reported under the
Supported Employment program as
opposed to under the VR program. We
believe this proposed change would
minimize such confusion and result in
more accurate reporting of program
income. Furthermore, these proposed
changes are consistent with those
proposed in part 361, which governs the
VR program, since the Supported
Employment program is supplemental
to that program.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Carryover (§ 363.25)
Statute: Section 19 of the Act permits
States to carry funds over to a
succeeding fiscal year to the extent the
State has satisfied any applicable match
requirements.
Current Regulations: None.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
add a new § 363.25 that mirrors the
carryover requirements under part 361,
which governs the VR program.
Although section 19 of the Act has
always applied to the Supported
Employment program, the amendments
made by WIOA change the effect of this
requirement since States, for the first
time, have a match requirement under
this program. Therefore, a State would
be permitted to carry over the 50
percent of the allotment reserved for
serving youth with the most significant
disabilities only if it has met the 10
percent match for those funds in the
fiscal year in which the funds were
awarded. A State would be able to
continue to carry over the other half of
the allotment, to serve all other
individuals, without having to satisfy a
match requirement since the statute
does not impose a match requirement
on that portion of the supported
employment allotment.
Reasons: The proposed revisions are
necessary to implement in part 363
statutory changes made by WIOA. The
proposed changes are also consistent
with proposed changes to part 361,
which governs the VR program, since
the Supported Employment program is
supplemental to that program.
Limitations on Administrative Costs
(§ 363.51)
Statute: Section 603(c) of the Act, as
amended by WIOA, reduces the limit
allowed for administrative costs from 5
percent of the allotment to 2.5 percent.
In addition, section 606(b)(7)(H)
requires the State to assure in its State
plan supplement for the Supported
Employment program within the VR
section of the Unified or Combined
State Plan, that it will not expend more
than 2.5 percent of the allotment for
administrative costs.
Current Regulations: Current
§ 363.51(b) contains a 5 percent limit.
The current regulations do not reference
the 2.5 percent limit since this is a new
statutory requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend § 363.51(b) to implement the
reduced administrative cost limit of 2.5
percent. We also propose to amend the
State plan requirements in § 363.11
accordingly.
Reasons: The proposed revisions are
necessary to implement in part 363
statutory changes made by WIOA.
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Miscellaneous Changes for Clarity
Statute: Section 603 of the Act, as
redesignated by WIOA, sets forth the
procedures for allotting and reallocating
funds under the Supported Employment
program. This statutory provision
remained substantively unchanged by
WIOA.
Current Regulations: Current
§§ 363.20 and 363.21 merely crossreference to statutory provisions
regarding procedures for allocating and
reallocating funds that are obsolete
given revisions made to title VI of the
Act by WIOA.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to
amend §§ 363.20 and 363.21 to mirror
the statutory text regarding procedures
for allocating and reallocating supported
employment funds.
Reasons: The proposed changes are
necessary to conform to statutory
amendments made by WIOA that
restructure title VI. The proposed
changes would also outline the
procedures for allocating and
reallocating funds, rather than merely
cross-referencing the Act, thereby
making the proposed sections more
user-friendly.
Limitation on Use of Subminimum
Wages (Proposed 34 Part 397)
Our discussion of part 397 is
presented by subject in the order in
which relevant sections appear in this
part.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Purpose and the Department’s
Jurisdiction
Statute: Section 511 of the Act, as
added by WIOA, imposes limitations on
employers who hold special wage
certificates under the Fair Labor
Standards Act (FLSA) that must be
satisfied before the employers may hire
youth with disabilities at subminimum
wage or continue to employ individuals
with disabilities of any age at
subminimum wage. Section 511 of the
Act also establishes the roles and
responsibilities of the designated State
units (DSU) for the vocational
rehabilitation (VR) program and State
and local educational agencies, in
assisting individuals with disabilities,
including youth with disabilities, who
are considering employment, or who are
already employed, at a subminimum
wage, to maximize opportunities to
achieve competitive integrated
employment through services provided
by VR and the local educational
agencies.
Current Regulations: None.
Proposed Regulations: Proposed
§ 397.1 establishes the purpose of the
regulations in this part, which is to set
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
21089
forth requirements the DSUs and State
and local educational agencies must
satisfy to ensure that individuals with
disabilities, especially youth with
disabilities, have a meaningful
opportunity to prepare for, obtain,
maintain, advance in, or regain
competitive integrated employment,
including supported or customized
employment.
This proposed section also states that
these regulations should be read in
concert with: Part 300, which
implements requirements under part B
of the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act; part 361, which
implements requirements for the VR
program; and part 363, which
implements the State Supported
Employment Services program. We
believe this clarification is necessary to
ensure all stakeholders understand that
nothing in this part is to be construed
as altering any requirement under parts
300, 361, or 363.
Other relevant proposed regulations
in this part include: § 397.2, regarding
the Department’s jurisdiction; § 397.3,
regarding rules of construction; § 397.4,
regarding other applicable regulations;
and § 397.5, regarding applicable
definitions.
Reasons: These proposed regulations
are necessary to ensure stakeholders
understand the purpose of section 511
of the Act, as added by WIOA, and the
Department’s authority and jurisdiction
under this section, as well as the interrelationship of these requirements with
those under the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act and the VR
program and Supported Employment
program.
including youth with disabilities,
receive documentation demonstrating
completion of the various activities
required by section 511 of the Act, such
as, to name a few, the receipt of
transition services by eligible children
with disabilities under the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act and preemployment transition services under
section 113 of the Act, as appropriate.
Proposed §§ 397.20 and 397.30 would
establish the documentation that the
DSUs and local educational agencies, as
appropriate, must provide to
demonstrate completion of the various
activities, required by section 511(a)(2)
of the Act, by a youth with a disability.
These would include completing preemployment transition services under
proposed § 361.48(a) and the
determination of eligibility or
ineligibility for VR services under
proposed § 361.42 and § 361.43.
Proposed § 397.40 would establish the
documentation that the DSUs must
provide to individuals with disabilities
of any age who are employed at a
subminimum wage upon the completion
of certain information and career
counseling-related services, as required
by section 511(c) of the Act.
Reasons: These proposed regulations
are necessary to implement new
statutory requirements. In so doing,
these proposed regulations would
inform DSUs, State, and local
educational agencies of their specific
responsibilities related to
documentation required under section
511 of the Act and would ensure that
individuals with disabilities have
sufficient information available to make
informed choices.
Coordinated Documentation Process
Statute: Section 511(d) of the Act, as
added by WIOA, requires the DSU and
the State educational agency to develop
a coordinated process, or use an existing
process, for providing youth with
disabilities documentation
demonstrating completion of the various
actions required by section 511 of the
Act. Other relevant statutory provisions
include section 511(a) of the Act,
regarding the actions that a youth must
complete prior to beginning
subminimum wage employment, and
section 511(c) of the Act, regarding the
actions that individuals with disabilities
of any age must complete in order to
continue employment at subminimum
wage.
Current Regulations: None.
Proposed Regulations: Proposed
§ 397.10 would require the DSU, in
consultation with the State educational
agency, to develop a process that
ensures individuals with disabilities,
Contracting Prohibition
Statute: Section 511(b)(2) of the Act,
as added by WIOA, prohibits a local or
State educational agency (as defined in
section 9101 of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20
U.S.C. 7801)) from entering into a
contract or other arrangement with an
entity, which holds a special wage
certificate under 14(c) of the FLSA for
the purpose of operating a program for
a youth under which work is
compensated at a subminimum wage.
Current Regulations: None.
Proposed Regulations: Proposed
§ 397.31 would prohibit a local
educational agency or a State
educational agency from entering into a
contract with an entity that employs
individuals at subminimum wage for
the purpose of operating a program
under which a youth with a disability
is engaged in subminimum wage
employment. Although section 511(b)(2)
of the Act refers to youth in general, the
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21090
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
proposed regulation is limited to youth
with disabilities in order to be
consistent with all other provisions of
section 511 of the Act.
Reasons: This proposed section is
necessary to implement new statutory
requirements. In so doing, this proposed
regulation is consistent with the
heightened emphasis in the Act, as
amended by WIOA, on ensuring that
individuals with disabilities, especially
youth with disabilities, are given the
opportunity to train for and obtain work
in competitive integrated employment.
While some State and local educational
agencies contract with employers who
hold special wage certificates under
FLSA, others contract with employers
who pay minimum wage, to create job
training and other work experiences for
students with disabilities. Through
these training and work experience
programs, students with disabilities gain
knowledge and skills that transfer into
eventual jobs similar to those in which
they receive their training, not only with
regard to the type of duties performed,
but also the wages earned. In the context
of this proposed regulation, State and
local educational agencies are not
employers, but rather partners that
facilitate entry of students with
disabilities into training programs that
are implemented by employers holding
special wage certificates under the
FLSA. We believe this statutory
prohibition, which is contained in the
proposed regulations, will result in
fewer students with disabilities,
participating in training programs at the
subminimum wage level. As a result, we
believe more students with disabilities,
especially those with the most
significant disabilities, will have the
opportunity to gain work experiences in
competitive integrated employment
settings which, in turn, will lead to
eventual employment outcomes in those
settings rather than at the subminimum
wage level. With regard to this proposed
provision, the Secretary specifically
seeks comments regarding the
Department’s role and jurisdiction with
respect to these provisions.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Review of Documentation Process
Statute: Section 511(e)(2)(B) of the
Act, as added by WIOA, permits DSUs,
along with the Department of Labor, to
review individual documentation held
by entities holding special wage
certificates under the FLSA to ensure
the required documentation for
individuals with disabilities, including
youth with disabilities, who are
employed at the subminimum wage
level, is maintained.
Current Regulations: None.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
Proposed Regulations: Proposed
§ 397.50 would authorize a DSU to
review individual documentation,
required by this part, for all individuals
with disabilities who are employed at
the subminimum wage level, that is
maintained by employers, who hold
special wage certificates under the
FSLA.
Reasons: This proposed provision is
necessary to implement new statutory
requirements. In this context, the DSU’s
role is one of review not enforcement.
The Department of Labor retains
enforcement authority with respect to
these employers under the FLSA.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Regulatory Impact Analysis
Under Executive Order 12866, the
Secretary must determine whether this
regulatory action is ‘‘significant’’ and,
therefore, subject to the requirements of
the Executive order and subject to
review by the OMB. Section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 defines a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as an
action likely to result in a rule that
may—
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, or
adversely affect a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities in a material way (also
referred to as an ‘‘economically
significant’’ rule);
(2) Create serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impacts of entitlement grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
stated in the Executive order.
This proposed regulatory action is a
significant regulatory action subject to
review by OMB under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866.
We have also reviewed these
regulations under Executive Order
13563, which supplements and
explicitly reaffirms the principles,
structures, and definitions governing
regulatory review established in
Executive Order 12866. To the extent
permitted by law, Executive Order
13563 requires that an agency—
(1) Propose or adopt regulations only
upon a reasoned determination that
their benefits justify their costs
(recognizing that some benefits and
costs are difficult to quantify);
(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the
least burden on society, consistent with
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
obtaining regulatory objectives and
taking into account—among other things
and to the extent practicable—the costs
of cumulative regulations;
(3) In choosing among alternative
regulatory approaches, select those
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity);
(4) To the extent feasible, specify
performance objectives, rather than the
behavior or manner of compliance a
regulated entity must adopt; and
(5) Identify and assess available
alternatives to direct regulation,
including economic incentives—such as
user fees or marketable permits—to
encourage the desired behavior, or
provide information that enables the
public to make choices.
Executive Order 13563 also requires
an agency ‘‘to use the best available
techniques to quantify anticipated
present and future benefits and costs as
accurately as possible.’’ The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs of
OMB has emphasized that these
techniques may include ‘‘identifying
changing future compliance costs that
might result from technological
innovation or anticipated behavioral
changes.’’
We also have determined that this
regulatory action would not unduly
interfere with State, local, and tribal
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
We have assessed the potential costs
and benefits of this regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with the
proposed regulations are those resulting
from statutory requirements and those
we have determined as necessary for
administering these programs effectively
and efficiently. Elsewhere in this
section under Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, we identify and explain
burdens specifically associated with
information collection requirements.
In assessing the potential costs and
benefits—both quantitative and
qualitative—of these proposed
regulations, we have determined that
the benefits would justify the costs.
Need for Regulatory Action
Executive Order 12866 emphasizes
that ‘‘Federal agencies should
promulgate only such regulations as are
required by law, are necessary to
interpret the law, or are made necessary
by compelling public need, such as
material failures of private markets to
protect or improve the health and safety
of the public, the environment, or the
well-being of the American people.’’
The Department’s goal in regulating is to
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
incorporate the provisions of the Act, as
amended by WIOA, into the
Department’s regulations governing the
VR program and Supported
Employment program at parts 361 and
363, respectively, as well as to clarify,
update and improve these regulations.
This regulatory action is also necessary
to establish a new part 397 to
implement specific the provisions of
section 511 of the Act, as added by
WIOA, which places limitations on the
use of subminimum wages for
individuals with disabilities.
to another that do not affect total
resources available to the VR program
and Supported Employment program.
However, in a number of service records
the Department is unable to quantify
these transfers due to limitations of the
data it currently collects. In estimating
costs, we used wage rates from the
Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Mean Hourly
Wage Rate for State employees.
Summary of Potential Costs and
Benefits
The Secretary believes that the
proposed changes would substantially
improve the programs covered in this
NPRM, and would yield substantial
benefits in terms of program
management, efficiency, and
effectiveness. The Secretary believes
that the proposed regulations represent
the least burdensome way to implement
the amendments to the Act made by
WIOA. Due to the number of proposed
regulatory changes, our analysis focuses
solely on new requirements imposed by
WIOA, organized in the following
manner. First, we discuss the potential
costs and benefits related to the VR
program under section A that
specifically address: competitive
integrated employment and
employment outcomes, pre-employment
transition services and transition
services, and additional VR program
provisions. Second, we discuss the
potential costs and benefits related to
the Supported Employment program
under section B. Finally, we discuss the
costs and benefits pertaining to the
establishment of proposed part 397
under section C.
Where possible The Department
derived estimates by comparing the
existing program regulations against the
benefits and costs associated with
implementation of provisions contained
in this WIOA-required NPRM. The
Department also made an effort, when
feasible, to quantify and monetize the
benefits and costs of the NPRM. When
we were unable to quantify them—for
example, due to data limitations—we
describe the benefits and costs
qualitatively. In accordance with the
regulatory analysis guidance contained
in OMB Circular A–4 and consistent
with the Department’s practices in
previous rulemakings, this regulatory
analysis focuses on the likely
consequences (benefits and costs that
accrue to individuals with disabilities)
of the WIOA-required NPRM. In this
analysis, the Department also considers
the transfer of benefits from one group
The Act, as amended by WIOA, places
heightened emphasis on the
achievement of competitive integrated
employment by individuals with
disabilities, including those with the
most significant disabilities. In so doing,
Congress added a new term and
accompanying definition to the Act—
‘‘competitive integrated employment.’’
While this is a new statutory term, it
represents, in general, a consolidation of
two existing regulatory definitions—
‘‘competitive employment’’ and
‘‘integrated setting.’’ As a result of the
statutory amendments, we propose to
replace the existing regulatory
definition of ‘‘competitive
employment,’’ with the new term
‘‘competitive integrated employment,’’
by mirroring the statute and
incorporating critical criteria from the
existing regulatory definition of
‘‘integrated setting.’’ Because this
proposed change is more technical than
substantive, and given that the
substance of the proposed definition
already exists in two separate
definitions, we believe this particular
change will have no significant impact
on the VR program.
In addition to proposing to implement
the new definition of ‘‘competitive
integrated employment,’’ we also
believe it is necessary to propose
changes to the current regulatory
definition of ‘‘employment outcome.’’
While the Act, as amended by WIOA,
made only technical changes to the
statutory definition of ‘‘employment
outcome,’’ we believe a regulatory
change is necessary in light of the
heightened emphasis throughout the
Act on the achievement of competitive
integrated employment under the VR
program and Supported Employment
program. To that end, we propose to
define ‘‘employment outcome’’ as an
outcome in competitive integrated
employment or supported employment,
thereby eliminating uncompensated
employment (e.g., homemakers and
unpaid family workers) from the scope
of employment outcomes for purposes
of the VR program.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
A. Vocational Rehabilitation Program
Competitive Integrated Employment
and Employment Outcomes
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21091
To date, the Department has exercised
the Secretary’s statutory discretion to
permit types of employment not
specified in the Act as ‘‘employment
outcomes’’ under the VR program. In so
doing, the Department has permitted
uncompensated employment, such as
work as homemakers and unpaid family
workers, to constitute as an employment
outcome under the VR program.
However, given the heightened
emphasis on competitive integrated
employment in the Act, as amended by
WIOA—from the purpose of the Act to
the addition of section 511, the
Secretary proposes to amend the current
regulatory definition of ‘‘employment
outcome’’ to include only compensated
employment within its scope for
purposes of the VR program. Thus, the
Secretary intends to ensure that VR
funds are no longer diverted for the
provision of services that can be
appropriately provided, in many cases,
by independent living and other
programs.
It is difficult to quantify the extent to
which the proposed change to the
definition of ‘‘employment outcome,’’
which has the effect of eliminating
homemakers and unpaid family workers
from its scope, will affect VR program
costs nationally due to a number of
highly variable factors. For example, it
is not known whether individuals who
previously achieved homemaker
outcomes will choose to pursue
competitive integrated employment
through the VR program in the future,
or seek out other resources, such as
those available from independent living
programs. Based on data reported by VR
agencies through the VR Case Service
Report (RSA–911) for the period
beginning in FY 1980 and ending in FY
2013, the percentage of individuals
exiting the VR program as homemakers
nationally declined significantly from
15 percent of all individuals achieving
an employment outcome in fiscal year
(FY) 1980 to 1.9 percent in FY 2013
(representing 3,467 of the 182,696 total
employment outcomes that year). While
the national percentage of homemaker
outcomes compared to all employment
outcomes is small, some designated
State units (DSU) have a greater
percentage of homemaker outcomes
than others, particularly those serving
only individuals who are blind and
visually impaired. In FY 2013, the 24
DSUs that only provided services to
individuals who are blind and visually
impaired reported that 10.5 percent of
the 6,121 employment outcomes in that
year were homemaker outcomes (or 645
outcomes). DSUs that serve individuals
with disabilities other than those with
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
21092
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
blindness and visual impairments
reported 656 homemaker outcomes in
that year, or 0.8 percent of the 84,238
employment outcomes. In addition, the
32 DSUs that serve individuals with all
disabilities reported 2,166 homemaker
outcomes in FY 2013, representing 2.3
percent of their total 92,337
employment outcomes.
The average cost per employment
outcome, including the average cost per
homemaker outcome, can be calculated
based on data reported by DSUs in the
RSA–911 on the cost of purchased
services for individuals exiting the VR
program with an employment outcome.
In FY 2013, the average cost per
homemaker outcome for the VR program
was $6,626, while the comparable
average cost per employment outcome
for all individuals exiting the VR
program with an employment outcome
that year was $5,672. It is possible that
this higher average cost is because
individuals obtaining a homemaker
outcome generally require more
intensive services or costly equipment
because the nature or severity of their
disabilities have prevented them from
pursuing competitive integrated
employment. However, there may be
other factors that drive up the average
cost of these outcomes. For example, it
may be that some of these individuals
originally had a goal of competitive
employment, but after receiving services
for an intensive or long period of time
without obtaining such an outcome,
they may have chosen to change their
goal. Further analysis is needed to
identify the factors that contribute to the
average higher cost of homemaker
closures.
Given current information reported to
the Department by DSUs, we are not
able to predict how many individuals
who would have possibly had a
homemaker outcome might now choose
to seek competitive employment.
However, for the purpose of providing
a gross estimate of these costs, we
assume that approximately one-fourth
(867) of the number of individuals who
exited the VR program with a
homemaker outcome will choose a goal
of competitive integrated employment
and continue to seek services through
the VR program. We also assume that
obtaining competitive integrated
employment for these individuals may
be more expensive than the current cost
for obtaining a homemaker outcome, but
also assume it is unlikely that the
average costs for providing services to
these individuals would exceed more
than 150 percent of their current costs
(or approximately 175 percent of the
average cost per employment outcome
for all agencies in FY 2013). As such, we
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
estimate the additional cost to DSUs to
provide VR services to those individuals
who previously would have exited the
program with a homemaker outcomes
would not exceed $3,313 per outcome,
or about $2,872,370 per year.
Alternatively, assuming that about 75
percent of the number of individuals
who would have otherwise attained a
homemaker outcome no longer seek
services from DSUs (2,600) at an average
cost of $6,626, there would be a net
savings of $17,227,600 to the VR
program. Based on these assumptions,
we estimate an overall savings to the VR
program of approximately $14,355,230.
We recognize that the proposed
change in the definition of employment
outcome could potentially increase the
demand for services from independent
living and other programs that can
provide services similar to those that
such individuals would have previously
sought from the VR program and that
some of these savings for the VR
program could result in a cost transfer
to other Federal, State, and local
programs. The Department plans to
provide guidance and technical
assistance to: (1) Facilitate the transition
to the new definition of employment
outcome; and (2) minimize the potential
disruption of services to current VR
program consumers who do not
currently have a competitive integrated
employment or supported employment
goal reflected in their individualized
plan for employment. The Department
also plans to provide guidance and
technical assistance to assist both VR
agencies and potential service providers
in the referral and acquisition of
services for individuals with disabilities
seeking services for outcomes other than
those covered under the proposed
revised definition of employment
outcome.
Finally the Department plans to work
with other Federal agencies, such as the
Administration for Community Living at
the Department of Health and Human
Services, in identifying any impact of
the proposed change on independent
living and other related programs and
developing strategies to address
potential problems.
Pre-Employment Transition Services
and Transition Services
The Act, as amended by WIOA, places
heightened emphasis on the provision
of pre-employment transition services
and other transition services to students
and youth with disabilities, as
applicable. As a result, the Secretary
proposes to make numerous
amendments to the VR program
regulations to implement new statutory
requirements. A few of those proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
changes are relevant to this regulatory
impact analysis discussion.
Foremost among these proposed
changes is the requirement that DSUs
reserve at least 15 percent of the State’s
VR allotment for the provision of preemployment transition services to
students with disabilities who are
eligible or potentially eligible for VR
services. Additionally, States may not
include administrative costs associated
with the provision of pre-employment
transition services in the calculation of
that 15 percent.
The proposed regulation would
require DSUs to dedicate resources to:
(1) Ensure that the 15 percent is
reserved from the State’s VR allotment;
(2) track the provision of preemployment transition services to
ensure funds were spent solely on
authorized services and not on
administrative costs; and (3) provide for
administrative costs related to preemployment transition services with
non-reserved VR funds.
Second, section 113 of the Act, as
added by WIOA, requires VR agencies to
provide pre-employment transition
services to students with disabilities
who are eligible or potentially eligible
for VR services. We propose to interpret
the term ‘‘potentially eligible’’ to mean
all students with disabilities, as defined
in proposed § 361.5(c)(51). Prior to the
enactment of WIOA, VR agencies were
only permitted to provide preemployment transition services or any
other transition services to individuals
who had been determined eligible for
the VR program and who had an
approved individualized plan for
employment. In developing the
proposed regulation, the Department
considered limiting the provision of preemployment transition services to those
students with disabilities who have
applied for VR services. However, this
alternative interpretation is not
proposed because we believe that
Congress intended these services to
reach a broader group of individuals
than those who are eligible under
current VR program regulations. The
Department’s proposed interpretation,
which is the broadest possible given the
plain meaning of the statute, is
consistent with Congressional intent
and the stated desires of some VR
agencies and other stakeholders.
Although pre-employment transition
services are a new category of services
identified in the Act, many of these
services historically were provided
under a more general category of
transition services. Therefore, the
provision of these services is not new to
VR agencies. However, until the
enactment of WIOA, all such services
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
were provided only to those students
with disabilities who had been
determined eligible for the VR program.
Consequently, providing preemployment transition services to all
students with disabilities could increase
staff time and resources spent on the
provision of these services.
We are unable to estimate the
potential increase in DSU
administrative costs that may arise from
implementation of new section 113 of
the Act or the required 15 percent
reservation of funds at this time.
However, we have attempted to estimate
the impact that this 15 percent
reservation could have on the VR
program as a whole.
Assuming that States are able to
match all of the funds provided for the
VR program in the FY 2015 VR
appropriation, $3,052,453,598, the total
aggregate amount of VR funds that
would be required to be reserved for
pre-employment transition services
from all 80 State VR agencies would be
$457,868,040. Because each State VR
agency must reserve a portion of its
allotment, it will now have fewer funds
available to use for all other authorized
activities, thereby reducing the available
resources for services other than preemployment transition services. The
extent of the impact of the reservation
on a particular State will depend largely
on the extent to which it has been
providing transition services to students
with disabilities that are now specified
under section 113 as pre-employment
transition services. States that currently
provide extensive transition services to
students with disabilities, including
services that would meet the definition
of pre-employment transition services,
are likely to see less transfer of benefits
among eligible individuals served by
their agency. For States that have not
provided such services or have only
provided such services to this
population to a small extent, there may
be more extensive transfers of services
and benefits of the VR program among
individuals (i.e., to students with
disabilities and away from other
individuals who otherwise would have
been served).
Ultimately, the total value of the
benefits transfer is equivalent to the
difference between the amount reserved
by States under this provision (we
assume here $457,868,040) and the cost
of providing pre-employment transition
services to students with disabilities
who have such services outlined in their
individualized plan for employment
(i.e., those who would receive such
services in the absence of the mandated
reservation).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
Based on data reported through the
RSA–911 for FY 2013, the service
records for 206,050 transition-age youth
(individuals ages 14 to 24 at the time of
application) were closed, of which
123,119 received services. A portion of
those served may qualify as students
with a disability that would be able to
receive pre-employment transition
services. In FY 2013, of the 123,119
transition-age individuals who received
services, 98,212 were aged 16 through
21, and most closely represent the
population of ‘‘students with a
disability’’ as defined under proposed
regulations. DSUs expended a total of
$503,208,438 on the purchase of VR
services for these individuals, for an
average cost of $5,124 per individual.
Recognizing that the 98,212 students
include only those who have applied for
VR services and that under proposed
regulations DSUs would provide preemployment transition services to
students with disabilities prior to their
application for VR services, we
anticipate that DSUs will be providing
these services to a potentially larger
number of students with disabilities
with the reserved funds.
We emphasize that this is an estimate
based on assumptions and that we
cannot more definitively project the
transfer of benefits across the VR
program related to the provision of preemployment transition services due to
both the unknown number of students
in each State and nationally who may
receive these services and the specific
services that will be provided.
Third, section 103(b)(7) of the Act, as
added by WIOA, permits VR agencies to
provide transition services to groups of
youth and students with disabilities. To
that end, we propose to add
§ 361.49(a)(7) to implement this
requirement. In so doing, DSUs would
be permitted to provide transition
services to groups of students and youth
with disabilities, who may not have
applied, or been determined eligible, for
VR services.
The proposed regulation benefits VR
agencies in two significant ways: (1) It
would give them the ability to serve
groups of youth and students with
disabilities simultaneously, who may
need only basic generalized services,
thereby reducing the amount of cost
expended per individual; and (2) it
would reduce administrative burden on
the VR agencies, as well as the burden
on students or youth with disabilities
and their families, by not having to
engage in processes for determining
eligibility, conducting assessments, and
developing individualized plans for
employment. However, we have not
attempted to quantify the impact of this
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21093
provision due to the variability in the
number of individuals that may seek out
these services nationally, the degree to
which individuals would require these
services within each State, and the
services that would be provided in each
State.
Additional Vocational Rehabilitation
Program Provisions
VR Services Portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan
WIOA requires the VR State plan,
which has been a stand-alone State
plan, to be submitted as a VR services
portion of a State’s Unified or Combined
State Plan for all six core programs of
the workforce development system.
Requirements related to the submission
of Unified or Combined State Plans do
not take effect until July 2016.
In preparing for the transition to the
submission of Unified or Combined
State Plans every four years, with
modifications submitted every two
years, we propose to amend regulations
governing the annual submissions of
certain reports and updates. In so doing,
we would no longer require the
submission of these particular reports
and updates annually, but rather, they
would be included in the VR services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan and would be submitted at
such time and in such manner as
determined by the Secretary. This
flexibility would allow for VR programspecific reporting to be done in a
manner consistent with those for the
Unified or Combined State Plan under
sections 102 or 103 of WIOA, thus
avoiding additional burden or costs to
DSUs through the submission of
separate reports annually or whenever
updates are made.
Section 101(a) of the Act, as amended
by WIOA, requires DSUs to include
additional descriptive information in
the VR services portion of the Unified
or Combined State Plan. Therefore, we
propose to amend part 361 by requiring
that DSUs describe in the VR services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan the results of the
comprehensive statewide needs
assessment with respect to the needs of
students and youth with disabilities for
pre-employment transition services and
other transition services, as appropriate;
to identify goals and priorities to
address these needs; and to describe
strategies for the achievement of these
goals. We also propose that the VR
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan include a
description of how the DSU will work
with employers to identify competitive
integrated employment opportunities
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21094
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
and career exploration opportunities, in
order to facilitate the provision of VR
services, and transition services for
youth with disabilities and students
with disabilities, such as preemployment transition services. We also
propose that the VR services portion of
the Unified or Combined State Plan
contain a description of collaboration
with the State agency responsible for
administering the State Medicaid plan
under title XIX of the Social Security
Act, the State agency responsible for
providing services for individuals with
developmental disabilities, and the
State agency responsible for providing
mental health services, to develop
opportunities for community-based
employment in integrated settings, to
the greatest extent practicable. As a
result, DSUs would be required to
expend additional effort in the
development of these descriptions
beyond the 25 hours currently estimated
for the development and submission of
the entire State plan, now the VR
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan. We estimate that
DSUs will require an additional five
hours for the development of these
descriptions, for a total of 30 hours per
agency. At an average hourly rate of
$39.78 (based on data obtained from the
Bureau of Labor Statistics for State
government management occupations),
a rate more consistent with State rates
of pay than the $22.00 per hour used to
calculate current costs, each DSU would
expend $1,193 in the development of
and submission of the VR services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan, resulting in a total of $95,472
for all 80 DSUs. Although these costs
are significantly higher than the current
estimate of $2,000 incurred by all 80
DSUs in the development and
submission of the State plan, we believe
that the additional burden is more
accurate and outweighed by the benefit
to the public through a more
comprehensive understanding of the
activities DSUs engage in to assist
individuals with disabilities to obtain
the skills necessary to achieve
competitive integrated employment in
job-driven careers.
Order of Selection
Section 101(a)(5) of the Act, as
amended by WIOA, permits DSUs, at
their discretion, to serve eligible
individuals who require specific
services or equipment to maintain
employment, regardless of whether they
are receiving VR services under an order
of selection or their assignment to a
priority category. Therefore, we propose
to amend part 361 to implement this
new statutory requirement. It is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
important to note that DSUs
implementing an order of selection are
not required to use this authority;
rather, they may choose to do so based
upon agency policy, or the availability
of financial and staff resources. DSUs
implementing an order of selection
would be required to state in the VR
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan whether they have
elected to exercise this discretion,
thereby signaling a decision to serve
eligible individuals who otherwise
might have been placed on a waiting list
under the State’s order of selection, and
who are at risk of losing their
employment. This proposed change
would increase flexibility for a State
managing its resources. If a State were
to implement this flexibility, it could
prevent an individual from losing
employment by avoiding a delay in
services. On the other hand, DSUs that
elect to implement this option would
potentially need to reallocate resources
to cover expenditures for services or
equipment for individuals who meet the
qualifications of this provision, and fall
outside the open priority category of a
DSU’s order of selection.
For FY 2015, the State Plans of 34 of
the 80 DSUs documented that the
agency had established an order of
selection, one agency more than in FY
2014. This total includes 8 percent of
the 24 DSUs serving only individuals
who are blind and visually impaired
and 57 percent of the 56 other DSUs.
Based on data reported through the
RSA–911 in FY 2013, 17 percent of the
individuals whose service records were
closed and who received services were
employed at application, with an
average cost of purchased services
$4,744. In addition, according to data
reported through the VR program
Cumulative Caseload (RSA–113) report,
33,856 individuals were on a waiting
list for VR services at the close of FY
2013 due to the implementation of an
order of selection. Assuming that 17
percent of the 33,856 individuals on the
waiting list could potentially benefit
from the provision of services and
equipment to maintain employment, a
possible 5,756 individuals could benefit
from the proposed regulatory change for
a total cost of $27,306,464. This figure
represents the potential reallocation of
resources to cover the cost of services
for individuals who, prior to enactment
of WIOA, may have not received them,
and away from eligible individuals who
would have received services based on
a VR agency’s order of selection policy.
However, the implementation of an
order of selection by individual DSUs
may differ from year to year, as well as
within a given fiscal year. In fact, not all
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
DSUs that indicate they have
established an order of selection as part
of their State Plan actually implement
that order or report that they had
individuals on a waiting list during the
year. In addition, we are unable to
predict which DSUs on an order of
selection would choose this option. The
degree to which individuals will be
referred for this service will also vary
widely, as will the level of services or
equipment that an individual could
need to maintain employment.
Reports, Standards, and Indicators
As a result of amendments to the Act
made by WIOA, we propose to revise
§ 361.40 to reflect changes to reporting
requirements in section 116(b) in title I
of WIOA and amendments to section
101(a)(10) of the Act. Section 361.40, as
proposed, does not list the actual data
to be reported, but rather requires the
collection and reporting of the
information specified in sections 13, 14,
and 101(a)(10) of the Act. New
requirements under section 101(a)(10)
include the reporting of data on the
number of: Individuals with open
service records and the types of services
these individuals are receiving
(including supported employment);
students with disabilities receiving preemployment transition services; and
individuals referred to State VR
programs by one-stop operators and
individuals referred to such one-stop
operators by State VR programs. The
RSA–911 would be revised as described
in the information collection published
for comment elsewhere in this issue of
the Federal Register, consistent with the
requirements in proposed § 361.40.
Proposed 361.40 also would require
States to report the data necessary to
assess VR agency performance on the
standards and indicators subject to the
performance accountability provisions
described in section 116 of WIOA. The
common performance accountability
measures apply to all core programs of
the workforce development system and
will be implemented in joint regulations
set forth in subpart E of part 361. The
impact analysis of these regulations are
addressed in the joint regulations.
We estimate that each DSU will need
an additional 15 minutes per VR
counselor to collect the new VR-specific
data required by Section 101(a)(10) of
the Act. Estimating an average of 125
counselors per DSU, the number of
hours per DSU would increase by 31.25
for a total increase of 2,500 hours for all
80 DSUs. The estimated cost per DSU,
using an hourly wage of $22.27 (based
on data from the Bureau of Labor
Statistics for State-employed VR
counselors), would result in an increase
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
of $695.94 per DSU and a total increase
of $55,675 for all 80 DSUs.
In addition, we estimate the burden
hours for submission of the entire RSA–
911 data file per DSU would increase
from 50 hours per agency to 100 hours
per agency, representing an increase of
50 hours due to the need to report all
open case data on a quarterly basis
(rather than only data for closed service
records on an annual basis). The total
number of hours needed for the
submission of the data file for 80
agencies would increase from 4,000 to
8,000 hours. Using an average hourly
wage rate of $33.63 (based on data from
the Bureau of Labor Statistics Stateemployed database administrators), the
estimated cost per DSU would be
$3,363, and the estimated cost for all 80
DSUs would be $269,040. The total
burden hours for both collection and
submission would be 131.25 hours per
DSU or a total of 10,500 hours for all 80
DSUs. The estimated total burden cost
for both collection and submission per
DSU would be $4,059, with a total
burden cost of $324,715 for all 80 DSUs.
Finally, DSUs will incur expenses
related to programming and
modifications of data retrieval systems
as a result of the revisions to the RSA–
911 and its instructions due to the new
VR-specific data required under section
101(a)(10) of the Act. The costs are onetime, first-year costs. The burden on the
DSUs related to the programming of
their case management systems as a
result of the redesigned RSA–911 will
vary widely because agencies
themselves range in size and the
sophistication of their information
technology systems. Roughly half of the
80 DSUs use case management and
reporting systems purchased from
software providers who are responsible
for maintaining and updating software.
We estimate those DSUs would
experience no or minimal increases in
cost burden. The remaining DSUs have
developed their own case management
systems for which changes will be made
by their information technology staff or
outside contractors. Approximately, half
of these DSUs would make the changes
internally and half would contract for
the changes to be made.
We estimate those 20 DSUs that own,
maintain, and update internal case
management and reporting systems will
expend an average of 240 hours at
$44.72 (based on data from the Bureau
of Labor Statistics for State-employed
computer and information systems
managers), for a total of $10,732.80 per
DSU. The estimated total burden hours
for all 20 DSUs would be 4,800 hours
and at a cost of $214,656. We estimate
that contractors who provide
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
maintenance and system updates to the
20 DSUs with internal case management
systems would need 500 hours per DSU
to accomplish the reprogramming of
these systems, for a total of 10,000
hours, as a result of the proposed
changes to the RSA–911 data file. Using
an average hourly wage rate of $39.21 ×
100 hours for private sector computer
programmers, and a wage rate $67.32 ×
400 hours for private sector computer
and information system managers
(based on Bureau Labor Statistics data
for 2013), we estimate these 20 DSUs
will incur expenses of $30,849.00 per
DSU, or a total cost of $616,980.00.
We believe that these costs are
outweighed by the benefits to the VR
program because the new information to
be reported and having access to more
timely information on individuals
currently participating in the VR
program will better enable the
Department and its partners to assess
the performance of the program and
monitor the implementation of WIOA,
particularly as it relates to key policy
changes, such as pre-employment
transition services and its integration in
the workforce development system.
Extended Evaluation
In implementing amendments to the
Act made by WIOA, we propose to
amend current §§ 361.41 and 361.42 by
removing requirements related to
extended evaluation. Instead, a DSU
would be required to use trial work
experiences when conducting an
exploration of an individual with a
significant disability’s abilities,
capabilities, and capacity to perform in
work situations. These proposed
revisions would streamline the
eligibility or ineligibility determination
process for all applicants whose ability
to benefit from VR services is in
question.
VR program data collected by the
Department do not distinguish between
individuals who had a trial work
experience and those that had an
extended evaluation. However, data
show that 5,205 individuals exited from
the VR program during or after trial
work experiences or extended
evaluations in FY 2013. DSUs expended
a total of $4,385,963 on the provision of
services to these individuals for an
average cost of $843 per individual.
Because we are unable to estimate how
many of the 5,205 individuals were in
extended evaluation, we cannot
quantify either the current or the
potential change in costs for this
specific group of individuals. Based on
the monitoring of VR agencies, it should
be noted that the use of these services
varies among DSUs, mainly due to
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21095
variations in opportunities for
individuals to participate in trial work
experiences, and the extent to which
DSUs historically utilized extended
evaluation. We believe that the benefits
of streamlining the eligibility
determination process for applicants
whose ability to benefit from VR
services is in question and ensuring that
ineligibility determinations are based on
a full assessment of the capacity of an
applicant to perform in realistic work
settings outweighs the costs of removing
the limited exception to trial work
experiences.
Timeframe for Completing the
Individualized Plan for Employment
Section 102(b) of the Act, as amended
by WIOA, requires DSUs to develop
individualized plans for employment
within 90 days of date of eligibility
determination. Consequently, we
propose to amend § 361.45 to
implement this 90-day requirement. Due
to variations in current DSU timelines
for the development of the
individualized plan for employment,
the establishment of a 90-day timeframe
by WIOA would ensure consistency
across the VR program nationally and
the timely delivery of services, thereby
improving DSU performance and
successful employment outcomes for
individuals with disabilities.
We are unable to quantify potential
additional costs to DSUs nationwide
due to the variance in timelines
currently in place. It is likely that States
with prolonged timelines beyond 90
days could experience an increase in
outlays. For example, an increase in
outlays could occur as a result of larger
numbers of individuals, with approved
individualized plans for employment,
beginning to receive VR services at an
earlier time than had historically been
the case. However, while the overall
cost per individual served are not likely
to be affected by this proposed
provision, the average time before some
DSUs incur expenses related to the
development of, and provision of
services under, individualized plans for
employment may be shortened,
resulting in a shift of VR program
outlays for services sooner than has
been experienced. Therefore, in any
given fiscal year outlays for these DSUs
could be higher. While costs over the
life of the service record should not be
affected, some VR agencies could find it
necessary to implement an order of
selection due to the shifting of cost that
would have been incurred in a
subsequent fiscal year to a prior fiscal
year as the result of a larger number of
individuals with individualized plans
for employment developed within 90
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21096
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
days. As always, DSUs are encouraged
to conduct planning that incorporates
programmatic and fiscal elements to
make projections and assessments of VR
program resources and the number of
individuals served, utilizing
management tools including order of
selection, as appropriate.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Services to Groups of Individuals With
Disabilities
Section 103(b)(8) of the Act, as added
by WIOA, permits a DSU to establish,
develop, or improve assistive
technology demonstration, loan,
reutilization, or financing programs
designed to promote access to assistive
technology. To that end, we propose to
amend § 361.49 to implement this new
authority. In so doing, we propose to
limit the population to be served to
individuals with disabilities who have
applied, or been determined eligible, for
VR services, thereby maintaining
consistency with the authority to
establish, develop, or improve a
community rehabilitation program. We
anticipate that this provision will
benefit individuals with disabilities and
employers through expanded access to
assistive technology, reflecting the
integral role assistive technology plays
in the vocational rehabilitation and
employment of individuals with
disabilities. However, by limiting the
use of this authority to services and
activities that benefit applicants and
eligible individuals, we ensure that this
authority is used in coordination with,
rather than to supplant, services and
activities provided under the Assistive
Technology Act. We have not attempted
to quantify additional costs associated
with this provision due to the variable
nature of the specific assistive
technology needs of VR program
participants, and the availability of
assistive technology demonstration,
loan, reutilization, or financing
programs within each State.
Maintenance of Effort Requirements
Section 111(a) of the Act, as amended
by WIOA, requires the Secretary to
reduce any subsequent fiscal year VR
award to satisfy a maintenance of effort
(MOE) deficit in a prior year. As a
result, we propose to amend § 361.62 to
implement this new requirement. Prior
to the enactment of WIOA, the Secretary
could only reduce the subsequent year’s
grant to satisfy an MOE deficit from the
preceding fiscal year. If a MOE deficit
was discovered after it was too late to
reduce the succeeding years grant, the
Secretary was required to seek recovery
through an audit disallowance, whereby
the State repaid the deficit amount with
non-Federal funds.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
Because the Secretary is now able to
reduce any subsequent year’s VR grant
for any prior year’s MOE deficit, DSUs
benefit as they are no longer required to
repay MOE shortfalls with non-Federal
funds, thereby increasing the
availability of non-Federal funds, in
those instances, for obligation as match
under the VR program. Since FY 2010,
two States were required to pay a total
of $791,342 in non-Federal funds
related to MOE penalties because their
MOE shortfall was not known at the
time the reduction in Federal funds
would have been authorized. As a
result, these funds were unavailable to
be used as matching funds for the VR
program in the year they were paid. On
the other hand, the new authority could
have resulted in the deduction of the
$791,342 MOE penalties from a future
Federal award.
B. The Supported Employment Program
Services To Youth With the Most
Significant Disabilities in Supported
Employment
Section 603(d) of the Act, as amended
by WIOA, requires DSUs to reserve 50
percent of their supported employment
State grant allotment to provide
supported employment services,
including extended services, to youth
with the most significant disabilities.
This new statutory requirement is
consistent with the heightened
emphasis throughout the Act on the
provision of services to youth with
disabilities, especially those with the
most significant disabilities. To that
end, we propose to amend part 363 to
implement this new requirement. The
proposed changes are consistent with
proposed changes to the VR program
regulations, since the Supported
Employment program is supplemental
to that program.
After setting aside funds to assist in
carrying out section 21 of the Act, the
FY 2015 Federal appropriation provides
$27,272,520 for distribution to DSUs
under the Supported Employment State
Grants. Assuming that States are able to
provide the required 10 percent nonFederal match for the available
Supported Employment formula grant
funds in FY 2015, the 50 percent
reservation would result in the
dedication of $13,636,260 for supported
employment services to youth with the
most significant disabilities. Conversely,
the reserved funds would not be
available for the provision of supported
employment services to individuals
who are not youth with the most
significant disabilities.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Match Requirements for Funds Reserved
for Serving Youth With the Most
Significant Disabilities in Supported
Employment
Section 606(b) of the Act, as amended
by WIOA, requires States to provide a
ten percent match for the 50 percent of
the supported employment allotment
reserved for providing supported
employment services, including
extended services, to youth with the
most significant disabilities. We propose
to implement this requirement in part
363. To date, the supported program has
not had a match requirement.
As stated above, $27,272,520 is
available for formula grants to States
under the Supported Employment
program for FY 2015. The 10 percent
match requirement would generate
$1,515,140 in non-Federal funds for
supported employment services that
will benefit youth with the most
significant disabilities. In addition, if
the appropriation increases in future
years, the match requirement would
result in additional supported
employment resources for youth with
the most significant disabilities.
However, States will have to identify
additional non-Federal resources in
order to match the Federal funds
reserved for this purpose.
Extended Services
Title VI of the Act, as amended by
WIOA, permits DSUs to provide
extended services to youth with the
most significant disabilities, using the
funds reserved for the provision of
supported employment services to this
population. These services may be
provided for a period up to four years.
To that end, we propose to amend part
363 to implement this requirement.
Prior to the enactment of WIOA, DSUs
were not permitted to provide extended
services to individuals of any age.
Under the Act, as amended by WIOA,
DSUs still may not provide extended
services to individuals with the most
significant disabilities who are not
youth with the most significant
disabilities. Since extended services
have not previously been an authorized
activity with the use of VR or supported
employment funds, this proposed
change could have significant impacts
on States.
Nonetheless, we want to make clear
that DSUs are not required to provide
extended services to youth with the
most significant disabilities, but rather
are permitted to do so, thereby creating
a funding source for the services that
previously was not available.
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Extension of Time for the Provision of
Supported Employment Services
Limitations on Supported Employment
Administrative Costs
We propose to amend the definition
of supported employment services in
§ 361.5(c)(54) to implement the statutory
change made by WIOA that extends the
provision of supported employment
services from 18 to 24 months. The
definition of supported employment
services applies to both the VR program
and Supported Employment program. In
addition, under both current and
proposed regulations, DSUs have the
authority to exceed this time period
under special circumstances if jointly
agreed to by the individual and the
rehabilitation counselor.
The statutory change implemented in
these proposed regulations would
benefit individuals with the most
significant disabilities who require
ongoing support services for a longer
period of time to achieve stability in the
employment setting, prior to full
transition to extended services. This
provision could result in DSUs using
more resources under both the VR
program and Supported Employment
program to provide ongoing services.
DSUs typically have not provided
ongoing support services for a full 18
months. In FY 2013, 15,458 individuals
achieved supported employment
outcomes within 21 months following
the development of the individualized
plans for employment, which period we
assume could include the provision of
supported employment services for a
full 18 months and a minimum period
of 90 days prior to case closure. Of these
individuals, 10,608, or approximately
69 percent, achieve supported
employment outcomes within 12
months. While we anticipate that most
individuals may not need supported
employment services for the full period
of 24 months, in FY 2013, 1,759
individuals achieved supported
employment outcomes within a period
ranging from 21 months to 27 months of
the development of the individualized
plan for employment. DSUs expended
$13,257, 816 on purchased services for
these individuals, or an average of
$7,537 per individual. Assuming this
period includes the provision of
supported employment services for a
full 24 months and a minimum period
of 90 days prior to case closure we
estimate that an approximate number of
individuals would benefit from the
provision of supported employment
services for an additional six months
and that DSUs would incur similar costs
for the provision of these services as a
result of the proposed regulatory
change.
We propose to amend part 363 to
implement a new requirement in the
Act, as amended by WIOA, that reduces
the maximum amount of a State’s grant
allotment under the Supported
Employment program that can be used
for administrative costs from 5 percent
of the State’s grant allotment to 2.5
percent. As a result, a larger portion of
Federal supported employment funds
must be spent on the provision of
supported employment services,
including extended services to youth
with the most significant disabilities,
rather than administrative costs.
However, any administrative costs
incurred beyond the 2.5 percent limit on
the use of Supported Employment funds
may be paid for with VR program funds.
Based upon the $27,272,520 available
for formula grants to States under the
Supported Employment program in FY
2015, the total allowable amount of
these Federal funds that can be used to
support administrative costs would be
reduced by half, from $1,363,626 to
$681,813. Thus, for those DSUs that
have typically used more than 2.5
percent of their allotment to cover
program administrative costs, the new
requirement would provide a small
increase in the amount of funds
available for the provision of services to
individuals with the most significant
disabilities pursuing a supported
employment outcome. DSUs will be
able to shift these excess costs to the VR
State grants program since it does not
have a cap on the amount of
administrative funds that can be spent
under that program.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
C. Limitations on the Use of
Subminimum Wage
The Act, as amended by WIOA,
imposes limitations on the payment of
subminimum wages by employers who
hold special wage certificates under the
Fair Labor Standards Act. The
requirements imposed by section 511
and thus proposed in part 397, do not
take effect until July 22, 2016.
Pursuant to statutory requirements
contained in section 511 of the Act, as
added by WIOA, we propose to create
a new § 397.10 that would require the
DSU, in consultation with the State
educational agency, to develop a
process, or utilize an existing process,
that ensures individuals with
disabilities, including youth with
disabilities, receive documentation
demonstrating completion of the various
activities required by section 511.
Proposed §§ 397.20 and 397.30 would
establish the documentation that the
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21097
DSUs and local educational agencies, as
appropriate, must provide to
demonstrate an individual’s completion
of the various activities required by
section 511(a)(2) of the Act. These
include completing pre-employment
transition services under proposed
§ 361.48(a) and the determination under
an application for VR services under
proposed §§ 361.42 and 361.43.
Proposed § 397.40 would establish the
documentation that the DSUs must
provide to individuals with disabilities
upon the completion of certain
information and career counselingrelated services, as required by section
511(c) of the Act. We have not
attempted to quantify the costs to the
DSUs related to the provision of this
required documentation because the
number of youth and other individuals
who potentially could receive services
under proposed part 397 will vary
widely from State to State. In addition,
there exists no reliable national data on
which to base a calculation of costs.
However, DSUs generate documentation
throughout the vocational rehabilitation
process that may meet the requirements
of §§ 397.20 and 397.30, including
written notification of a consumer’s
eligibility or ineligibility, copies of
individualized plans for employment
and subsequent amendments, and
written notification when the
consumer’s case record is closed. As a
result, the utilization of this
documentation to meet section 511
requirements should not result in
significant additional burden to DSUs.
Clarity of the Regulations
Executive Order 12866 and the
Presidential memorandum ‘‘Plain
Language in Government Writing’’
require each agency to write regulations
that are easy to understand. The
Secretary invites comments on how to
make these proposed regulations easier
to understand, including answers to
questions such as the following:
• Are the requirements in the
proposed regulations clearly stated?
• Do the proposed regulations contain
technical terms or other wording that
interferes with their clarity?
• Does the format of the proposed
regulations (grouping and order of
sections, use of headings, paragraphing,
etc.) aid or reduce their clarity?
• Would the proposed regulations be
easier to understand if we divided them
into more (but shorter) sections? (A
‘‘section’’ is preceded by the symbol
‘‘§ ’’ and a numbered heading: For
example, § 361.1 Purpose.)
• Could the description of the
proposed regulations in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21098
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
The Secretary certifies that these
proposed regulations would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The 80 entities that administer the VR
program and Supported Employment
program are State agencies, including
those in the 50 States, the District of
Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the United States Virgin Islands,
Guam, American Samoa, and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands. States and State agencies are
not defined as ‘‘small entities’’ in the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
the Department has submitted a copy of
these sections to OMB for its review.
A Federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless OMB approves the collection
under the PRA and the corresponding
information collection instrument
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, no person is required
to comply with, or is subject to penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection
of information if the collection
instrument does not display a currently
valid OMB control number. In the final
regulations, we will display the OMB
control numbers assigned by OMB to
any information collection requirement
proposed in this NPRM and adopted in
the final regulations, including: 1820–
0013 (Cumulative Case Report), 1820–
0017 (Annual Vocational Rehabilitation
Program/Cost Report), 1820–0500 (VR
State Plan), 1820–0508 (VR Case Service
Report), 1820–0563 (Annual Report of
Appeals), 1820–0693 (Program
Improvement Plan), and 1820–0694 (VR
Program Corrective Action Plan).
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
As part of its continuing effort to
reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, the Department provides the
general public and Federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on
proposed and continuing collections of
information in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
(44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This helps
ensure that: The public understands the
Department’s collection instructions,
respondents can provide the requested
data in the desired format, reporting
burden (time and financial resources) is
minimized, collection instruments are
clearly understood, and the Department
can properly assess the impact of
collection requirements on respondents.
The following sections contain
information collection requirements:
• Sections 361.10, 361.12, 361.13,
361.15, 361.16, 361.17, 361.18, 361.19,
361.20, 361.21, 361.22, 361.23, 361.24,
361.25, 361.26, 361.27, 361.29, 361.30,
361.31, 361.32, 361.34, 361.35, 361.36,
361.37, 361.40, 361.46, 361.51, 361.52,
361.53, and 361.55, as well as §§ 363.10
and 363.11, pertaining to the VR
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan and Supplement
for Supported Employment Services;
and
• Sections 361.40 and 363.52, related
to the VR program Case Service Report.
As a result of the amendments to the
Act made by WIOA, we propose
changes to some of these sections and
their corresponding information
collection requirements. Under the PRA
VR Services Portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan and Supplement
for Supported Employment Services
(1820–0500)
Section 101(a) of the Act, as amended
by WIOA, adds new content
requirements to the State plan, which is
now to be submitted as the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan under
section 102 or 103 of title I of WIOA. As
a result, proposed §§ 361.10, 361.18,
361.24, 361.29, and 361.36, along with
proposed §§ 363.10 and 363.11, would
cause substantive changes to the active
and OMB-approved data collection
under 1820–0500 (VR State Plan). In
addition, the VR State Plan form
includes previously approved
information collection requirements
related to a number of current
regulations that remain unchanged as a
result of the amendments to the Act.
There are also several proposed
regulations related to this data
collection that necessitate primarily
conforming or technical changes to the
form.
These current and proposed sections
that contain already approved
information collection requirements or
that do not cause substantive changes to
the form include: §§ 361.12, 361.13,
361.15, 361.16, 361.17, 361.19, 361.20,
361.21, 361.22, 361.23, 361.25, 361.26,
361.27, 361.30, 361.31, 361.34, 361.35,
361.37, 361.40, 361.46, 361.51, 361.52,
361.53, and 361.55. The proposed
regulations and other adjustments
described here would change the
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
this preamble be more helpful in
making the proposed regulations easier
to understand? If so, how?
• What else could we do to make the
proposed regulations easier to
understand?
To send any comments that concern
how the Department could make these
proposed regulations easier to
understand, see the instructions in the
ADDRESSES section.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
current OMB-approved annual aggregate
burden of 1,002,000 hours at $22.00 per
hour and estimated total annual costs of
$22,044,000.00 for all 80 respondents.
The currently OMB-approved
estimated annual burden of 1,002,000
hours for all 80 VR agencies includes a
total of 2,000 hours (25 hours per
agency) for the preparation and
submission of the VR State Plan and a
total of 1,000,000 hours (12,500 hours
per agency) for record keeping
associated with the case management of
the individuals who apply for and
receive services from the VR program,
and Supported Employment program.
However, we have determined that the
time associated with this record keeping
(1,000,000 hours annually for all 80
respondents) is part of the customary
and usual business practices carried out
by VR agencies, and thus, should not be
included in the estimated annual
burden for this form.
As previously stated there are a
number of proposed regulations in parts
361 and 363 that necessitate substantive
changes to the State plan. The most
significant of these changes is in
proposed § 361.10 and would require
VR agencies to submit the VR services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan to be eligible to receive
Federal VR program funds. Proposed
§ 361.18 would require the VR services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan to describe the procedures
and activities the State agency will take
to ensure it employs qualified
rehabilitation personnel, including the
minimum academic and experience
requirements as amended by WIOA.
Proposed § 361.24 would require VR
agencies to describe their coordination
with employers to increase awareness
and employment opportunities for
individuals with disabilities, as well as
coordination with non-educational
agencies serving out-of-school youth,
and the lead agency and implementing
entity for the coordination of activities
available under section 4 of the
Assistive Technology Act of 1998.
Proposed § 361.24 also would require
VR agencies to describe in the plan their
collaboration, to develop opportunities
for community-based employment in
integrated settings, to the greatest extent
practicable, with the State agency
responsible for administering the State
Medicaid plan under title XIX of the
Social Security Act, agencies providing
services and supports for individuals
with developmental disabilities, and the
State agency responsible for providing
mental health services. Proposed
§ 361.29 would require VR agencies to
include in the VR services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan the
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
results of the comprehensive statewide
assessment regarding the needs of
students and youth with disabilities for
pre-employment transition services and
other transition services. In addition,
proposed § 361.29 would require the
plan to include an estimate of the
number of eligible individuals who are
not receiving VR services due to the
implementation of an order of selection.
This proposed section also would
require the plan to contain strategies to
improve VR services for students and
youth with disabilities, to address their
needs as identified through the
statewide needs assessment, and to
provide pre-employment transition
services. Proposed § 361.36 would
require VR agencies implementing an
order of selection to indicate in the plan
if they elect to provide services or
equipment to individuals with
disabilities to enable them to maintain
employment, regardless of whether
these individuals are receiving services
under the order.
There are also proposed regulations in
part 363 governing the State Supported
Employment Services program that
necessitate changes to the VR State Plan
form. Proposed § 363.10 would require
the State to submit with the VR services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan a supplement that meets the
requirements of § 363.11 to receive a
grant under the State Supported
Employment Services program.
Proposed § 363.11 would require the VR
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan to describe the
quality, scope, and extent of supported
employment services to eligible
individuals (including youth with the
most significant disabilities), the State’s
goals and priorities with respect to the
distribution of funds received under this
section, the provision of extended
services for a period not to exceed four
years, and an assurance to expend no
more than 2.5 percent of the award
under this part for administrative costs.
The regulations proposed under these
sections of parts 361 and 363 would
increase the time needed by each VR
agency to prepare and submit the VR
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan and its supported
employment supplement from 25 to 30
hours annually.
In addition, the total cost of this data
collection may increase due to the
proposed adjustment to the average
hourly wage rate of State personnel used
to estimate the annual burden for this
data collection from $22.00 to $39.78, so
that wage rates are consistent with data
reported by the Bureau of Labor
Statistics.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
In summary, our new information
collection estimate for the VR State plan
reflects the removal of the burden
associated with the maintenance of case
management records for individuals
served through the VR program and
Supported Employment program,
adjustment of the average hourly wage
rate for State VR personnel responsible
for preparing the VR State plan form,
and the increase in the estimated
number of hours needed to prepare and
submit this data collection due to
proposed regulatory changes. As a result
of these changes, we estimate a total
annual burden of 2,400 hours (30 hours
for each of the 80 respondents), at
$39.78 per hour, for a total annual cost
of $95,472.00.
VR Case Service Report 1820–0508
The VR Case Service Report is used to
collect annual individual level data on
the individuals that have exited the VR
program, including individuals
receiving services with funds provided
under the Supported Employment
program. Sections 101(a)(10) and 606 of
the Act contain data reporting
requirements under the VR program and
Supported Employment program,
respectively. WIOA amends these
sections to require States to report
additional data describing the
individuals served and the services
provided through these programs. In
addition, WIOA amends section 106 of
the Act by eliminating the current VR
evaluation standards and indicators and
requiring that the standards and
indicators used to assess the
performance of the VR program be
consistent with the performance
accountability measures for the core
programs of the workforce development
system established under section 116 of
WIOA. Consequently, we propose
changes to §§ 361.40 and 363.52 that
would cause substantive changes to the
active and OMB-approved data
collection under 1820–0508—the VR
Case Service Report (RSA–911).
Specifically the proposed regulations
described here would change the
current OMB-approved annual aggregate
burden of 4,000 hours at $40.00 per
hour and estimated total annual costs of
$160,000.00 for all 80 respondents.
The most significant proposed change
to this data collection affects the time at
which data is collected as well as the
frequency with which data is collected.
Under the current approved form, VR
agencies annually report data on each
individual whose case file is closed after
exiting the VR program in that fiscal
year. However, new statutory
requirements would necessitate the
reporting of data for both current
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21099
program participants (open service
records), as well as individuals who
have exited the program (closed records)
on a quarterly basis. Specifically,
proposed § 361.40 would require a State
to ensure in the VR services portion of
the Unified or Combined State Plan that
it will submit reports, including reports
required under sections 13, 14, and
101(a)(10) of the Act. New reporting
requirements under section
101(a)(10)(C) of the Act include data on
the number of: Individuals currently
receiving services (open records) and
the types of services they are receiving,
students with disabilities receiving preemployment transition services, and
individuals referred to the State VR
program by one-stop operators and
those referred to such one-stop
operators by the State VR program. In
addition, proposed § 363.52 would
require States to report separately data
regarding eligible youth receiving
supported employment services under
parts 361 and 363.
Proposed § 361.40 also would require
States to report the data necessary to
assess VR agency performance on the
standards and indicators subject to the
performance accountability provisions
described in section 116 of WIOA. The
common performance accountability
measures established under section 116
of WIOA apply to all core programs of
the workforce development system and
will be implemented in joint regulations
set forth in subpart E of part 361.
Because these new requirements
would necessitate the reporting of data
for both current program participants
(open service records) as well as
individuals who have exited the
program (closed service records) on a
quarterly basis, estimated data
collection and reporting burden will
increase. However, we propose to
reduce the burden to respondents by
eliminating redundant elements and
reorganizing some existing elements of
the form. The regulations proposed
under this section will increase the total
annual burden for the 80 respondents by
4,000 hours. We estimate the total
annual reporting burden to be 8,000
hours at $33.63 per hour (a rate more
consistent with the rate reported
through the Bureau of Labor Statistics
for State-employed database
administrators), for a total annual cost of
$269,040.00.
Related OMB-Approved Data
Collections That Remain Unchanged
The regulations proposed through this
NPRM do not cause substantive changes
to the OMB-approved annual burden,
respondents, or costs for the following
OMB-approved data collections:
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21100
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
1820–0013 Cumulative Caseload
Report
In the Cumulative Caseload Report
State VR agencies report cumulative
aggregate data on individuals served in
the various stages of the VR process and
services provided. Proposed regulations
related to this data collection would not
cause substantive changes to the current
OMB-approved annual burden of 320
annual burden hours at $30.00 per hour
with 80 respondents reporting quarterly
for a total of 320 responses, and total
annual costs of $9,600.00.
1820–0017 Annual Vocational
Rehabilitation Program/Cost Report
Proposed regulations related to this
data collection would not cause
substantive changes to the current OMBapproved annual burden of 320 annual
burden hours at $30.00 per hour with 80
respondents and annual costs of
$9,600.00.
1820–0563 Annual Report of Appeals
In this report, State VR agencies
submit data on the number of
individuals who have requested appeals
for decisions made by the DSU
pertaining to the provision of services,
the types of dispute resolutions used to
resolve these appeals, and the outcomes
of these appeals. Proposed regulations
related to this data collection would not
cause substantive changes to the current
OMB-approved annual burden of 160
annual burden hours at $30.00 per hour
with 80 respondents and annual costs of
$4,800.00.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
1820–0693 Performance Improvement
Plan (PIP)
A Performance Improvement Plan is
developed when a VR agency has failed
to achieve the required performance
level for the evaluation standards and
indicators established under section 106
of the Act. Proposed regulations related
to this data collection would not cause
substantive changes to the current OMBapproved annual burden of 125 annual
burden hours at $30.00 per hour with 5
respondents reporting quarterly for a
total of 20 responses, and annual costs
of $3,750.00.
1820–0694 VR Program Corrective
Action Plan
A Corrective Action Plan is required
when a DSU is found to be out of
compliance with the Federal
requirements governing the
administration of the VR program
through monitoring activities engaged in
pursuant to section 107 of the Act.
Proposed regulations related to this data
collection would not cause substantive
changes to the current OMB-approved
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
annual burden of 975 annual burden
hours at $30.00 per hour with 15
respondents reporting quarterly for a
total of 60 responses, and annual costs
of $29,250.00.
Note that in accordance with the
Uniform Administrative Requirements,
Cost Principles, and Audit
Requirements for Federal Awards
published at 2 CFR 200, we require an
authorized certifying official for each
data collection to certify that the data is
true, accurate and complete to the best
of his or her knowledge or belief. This
requirement does not cause any change
to the estimated annual burden related
to the preparation and submission of the
data collections described in this
section of the NPRM.
We have prepared an Information
Collection Request (ICR) for these
collections. If you want to review and
comment on the ICR please follow the
instructions listed under the ADDRESSES
section of this notice. Please note the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OMB) and the Department
review all comments on an ICR that are
posted at www.regulations.gov. In
preparing your comments you may want
to review the ICR in
www.regulations.gov or in
www.reginfo.gov. The comment period
will run concurrently with the comment
period of the NPRM. When commenting
on the information collection
requirements, we consider your
comments on these collections of
information in—
• Deciding whether the collections
are necessary for the proper
performance of our functions, including
whether the information will have
practical use;
• Evaluating the accuracy of our
estimate of the burden of the
collections, including the validity of our
methodology and assumptions;
• Enhancing the quality, usefulness,
and clarity of the information we
collect; and
• Minimizing the burden on those
who must respond.
This includes exploring the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques.
OMB is required to make a decision
concerning the collections of
information contained in these
regulations between 30 and 60 days
after publication of this document in the
Federal Register. Therefore, to ensure
that OMB gives your comments full
consideration, it is important that OMB
receives your comments by May 18,
2015. This does not affect the deadline
for your comments to us on the
proposed regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Comments submitted in
response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov by selecting
Docket ID ED–2015–OSERS–0001 or via
postal mail commercial delivery, or
hand delivery. Please specify the Docket
ID number and indicate ‘‘Information
Collection Comments’’ on the top of
your comments if your comment relates
to the information collection for this
rule. Written requests for information or
comments submitted by postal mail or
delivery should be addressed to the
Director of the Information Collection
Clearance Division, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Mailstop L–OM–2–2E319LBJ, Room
2E115, Washington, DC 20202–4537.
Comments submitted by fax or email
and those submitted after the comment
period will not be accepted. FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Electronically mail ICDocketMgr@
ed.gov. Please do not send comments
here.
ADDRESSES:
Intergovernmental Review
These programs are subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of
the objectives of the Executive order is
to foster an intergovernmental
partnership and a strengthened
federalism. The Executive order relies
on processes developed by State and
local governments for coordination and
review of proposed Federal financial
assistance.
This document provides early
notification of our specific plans and
actions for these programs.
Assessment of Educational Impact
In accordance with section 411 of the
General Education Provisions Act, 20
U.S.C. 1221e–4, the Secretary
particularly requests comments on
whether these proposed regulations
would require transmission of
information that any other agency or
authority of the United States gathers or
makes available.
Federalism
Executive Order 13132 requires us to
ensure meaningful and timely input by
State and local elected officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have federalism implications.
‘‘Federalism implications’’ means
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. The proposed
regulations in §§ 361, 363, and 397 may
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
have federalism implications. We
encourage State and local elected
officials to review and provide
comments on these proposed
regulations.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department. (Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance Numbers: 84.126A
State Vocational Rehabilitation Services
program; and 84.187 State Supported
Employment Services program)
List of Subjects
34 CFR Part 361
Administrative practice and
procedure, Grant programs-education,
Grant programs-social programs,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Vocational rehabilitation.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
34 CFR Part 363
Grant programs-education, Grant
programs-social programs, Manpower
training programs, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, and
Vocational rehabilitation.
34 CFR Part 397
Individuals with disabilities,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Students, Vocational
rehabilitation, Youth.
Dated: March 6, 2015.
Arne Duncan,
Secretary of Education.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Secretary of Education
proposes to amend title 34 of the Code
of Federal Regulations as follows:
■ 1. Part 361 is revised to read as
follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
PART 361—STATE VOCATIONAL
REHABILITATION SERVICES
PROGRAM
Subpart A—General
Sec.
361.1
361.2
361.3
361.4
361.5
Purpose.
Eligibility for a grant.
Authorized activities.
Applicable regulations.
Applicable definitions.
Subpart B—State Plan and Other
Requirements for Vocational Rehabilitation
Services
361.10 Submission, approval, and
disapproval of the State plan.
361.11 Withholding of funds.
Administration
361.12 Methods of administration.
361.13 State agency for administration.
361.14 Substitute State agency.
361.15 Local administration.
361.16 Establishment of an independent
commission or a State Rehabilitation
Council.
361.17 Requirements for a State
Rehabilitation Council.
361.18 Comprehensive system of personnel
development.
361.19 Affirmative action for individuals
with disabilities.
361.20 Public participation requirements.
361.21 Consultations regarding the
administration of the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan.
361.22 Coordination with education
officials.
361.23 Requirements related to the
statewide workforce development
system.
361.24 Cooperation and coordination with
other entities.
361.25 Statewideness.
361.26 Waiver of statewideness.
361.27 Shared funding and administration
of joint programs.
361.28 Third-party cooperative
arrangements involving funds from other
public agencies.
361.29 Statewide assessment; annual
estimates; annual State goals and
priorities; strategies; and progress
reports.
361.30 Services to American Indians.
361.31 Cooperative agreements with
private nonprofit organizations.
361.32 Provision of training and services
for employers.
361.33 [Reserved]
361.34 Supported employment State plan
supplement.
361.35 Innovation and expansion
activities.
361.36 Ability to serve all eligible
individuals; order of selection for
services.
361.37 Information and referral programs.
361.38 Protection, use, and release of
personal information.
361.39 State-imposed requirements.
361.40 Reports; Evaluation standards and
performance indicators.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21101
Provision and Scope of Services
361.41 Processing referrals and
applications.
361.42 Assessment for determining
eligibility and priority for services.
361.43 Procedures for ineligibility
determination.
361.44 Closure without eligibility
determination.
361.45 Development of the individualized
plan for employment.
361.46 Content of the individualized plan
for employment.
361.47 Record of services.
361.48 Scope of vocational rehabilitation
services for individuals with disabilities.
361.49 Scope of vocational rehabilitation
services for groups of individuals with
disabilities.
361.50 Written policies governing the
provision of services for individuals with
disabilities.
361.51 Standards for facilities and
providers of services.
361.52 Informed choice.
361.53 Comparable services and benefits.
361.54 Participation of individuals in cost
of services based on financial need.
361.55 Annual review of individuals in
extended employment and other
employment under special certificate
provisions of the Fair Labor Standards
Act.
361.56 Requirements for closing the record
of services of an individual who has
achieved an employment outcome.
361.57 Review of determinations made by
designated State unit personnel.
Subpart C—Financing of State Vocational
Rehabilitation Programs
361.60 Matching requirements.
361.61 Limitation on use of funds for
construction expenditures.
361.62 Maintenance of effort requirements.
361.63 Program income.
361.64 Obligation of Federal funds.
361.65 Allotment and payment of Federal
funds for vocational rehabilitation
services.
Subpart D—[Reserved]
Subpart E—[Reserved]
Subpart F—[Reserved]
Authority: Section 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c), unless otherwise noted.
Subpart A—General
§ 361.1
Purpose.
Under the State Vocational
Rehabilitation Services Program, the
Secretary provides grants to assist States
in operating statewide comprehensive,
coordinated, effective, efficient, and
accountable vocational rehabilitation
programs, each of which is—
(a) An integral part of a statewide
workforce development system; and
(b) Designed to assess, plan, develop,
and provide vocational rehabilitation
services for individuals with
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21102
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
disabilities, consistent with their unique
strengths, resources, priorities,
concerns, abilities, capabilities,
interests, and informed choice so that
they may prepare for and engage in
competitive integrated employment and
achieve economic self-sufficiency.
(Authority: Section 100(a) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 720(a))
§ 361.2
Eligibility for a grant.
Any State that submits to the
Secretary a vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan that meets the
requirements of section 101(a) of the Act
and this part is eligible for a grant under
this program.
(Authority: Section 101(a) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 721(a))
§ 361.3
Authorized activities.
The Secretary makes payments to a
State to assist in—
(a) The costs of providing vocational
rehabilitation services under the
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan; and
(b) Administrative costs under the
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan.
(Authority: Section 111(a)(1) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 731(a)(1))
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 361.4
Applicable regulations.
The following regulations apply to
this program:
(a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) as
follows:
(1) 34 CFR part 76 (StateAdministered Programs).
(2) 34 CFR part 77 (Definitions that
Apply to Department Regulations).
(3) 34 CFR part 79 (Intergovernmental
Review of Department of Education
Programs and Activities).
(4) 34 CFR part 81 (General Education
Provisions Act—Enforcement).
(5) 34 CFR part 82 (New Restrictions
on Lobbying).
(b) The regulations in this part 361.
(c) 2 CFR part 190 (OMB Guidelines
to Agencies on Governmentwide
Debarment and Suspension
(Nonprocurement)) as adopted in 2 CFR
part 3485.
(d) 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards) as adopted in 2 CFR
part 3474.
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c))
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
§ 361.5
Applicable definitions.
The following definitions apply to
this part:
(a) Definitions in EDGAR 77.1.
(b) Definitions in 2 CFR part 200
subpart A.
(c) The following definitions:
(1) Act means the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 701 et
seq.).
(2) Administrative costs under the
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan means expenditures incurred
in the performance of administrative
functions under the vocational
rehabilitation program carried out under
this part, including expenses related to
program planning, development,
monitoring, and evaluation, including,
but not limited to, expenses for—
(i) Quality assurance;
(ii) Budgeting, accounting, financial
management, information systems, and
related data processing;
(iii) Providing information about the
program to the public;
(iv) Technical assistance and support
services to other State agencies, private
nonprofit organizations, and businesses
and industries, except for technical
assistance and support services
described in § 361.49(a)(4);
(v) The State Rehabilitation Council
and other advisory committees;
(vi) Professional organization
membership dues for designated State
unit employees;
(vii) The removal of architectural
barriers in State vocational
rehabilitation agency offices and Stateoperated rehabilitation facilities;
(viii) Operating and maintaining
designated State unit facilities,
equipment, and grounds, but not
including capital expenditures as
defined in 2 CFR 200.13;
(ix) Supplies;
(x) Administration of the
comprehensive system of personnel
development described in § 361.18,
including personnel administration,
administration of affirmative action
plans, and training and staff
development;
(xi) Administrative salaries, including
clerical and other support staff salaries,
in support of these administrative
functions;
(xii) Travel costs related to carrying
out the program, other than travel costs
related to the provision of services;
(xiii) Costs incurred in conducting
reviews of determinations made by
personnel of the designated State unit,
including costs associated with
mediation and impartial due process
hearings under § 361.57; and
(xiv) Legal expenses required in the
administration of the program.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(Authority: Sections 7(1) and 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(1) and 709(c))
(3) Applicant means an individual
who submits an application for
vocational rehabilitation services in
accordance with § 361.41(b)(2).
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c))
(4) Appropriate modes of
communication means specialized aids
and supports that enable an individual
with a disability to comprehend and
respond to information that is being
communicated. Appropriate modes of
communication include, but are not
limited to, the use of interpreters, open
and closed captioned videos,
specialized telecommunications
services and audio recordings, Brailled
and large print materials, materials in
electronic formats, augmentative
communication devices, graphic
presentations, and simple language
materials.
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c))
(5) Assessment for determining
eligibility and vocational rehabilitation
needs means, as appropriate in each
case—
(i)(A) A review of existing data—
(1) To determine if an individual is
eligible for vocational rehabilitation
services; and
(2) To assign priority for an order of
selection described in § 361.36 in the
States that use an order of selection; and
(B) To the extent necessary, the
provision of appropriate assessment
activities to obtain necessary additional
data to make the eligibility
determination and assignment;
(ii) To the extent additional data are
necessary to make a determination of
the employment outcomes and the
nature and scope of vocational
rehabilitation services to be included in
the individualized plan for employment
of an eligible individual, a
comprehensive assessment to determine
the unique strengths, resources,
priorities, concerns, abilities,
capabilities, interests, and informed
choice, including the need for
supported employment, of the eligible
individual. This comprehensive
assessment—
(A) Is limited to information that is
necessary to identify the rehabilitation
needs of the individual and to develop
the individualized plan of employment
of the eligible individual;
(B) Uses as a primary source of
information, to the maximum extent
possible and appropriate and in
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
accordance with confidentiality
requirements—
(1) Existing information obtained for
the purposes of determining the
eligibility of the individual and
assigning priority for an order of
selection described in § 361.36 for the
individual; and
(2) Information that can be provided
by the individual and, if appropriate, by
the family of the individual;
(C) May include, to the degree needed
to make such a determination, an
assessment of the personality, interests,
interpersonal skills, intelligence and
related functional capacities,
educational achievements, work
experience, vocational aptitudes,
personal and social adjustments, and
employment opportunities of the
individual and the medical, psychiatric,
psychological, and other pertinent
vocational, educational, cultural, social,
recreational, and environmental factors
that affect the employment and
rehabilitation needs of the individual;
(D) May include, to the degree
needed, an appraisal of the patterns of
work behavior of the individual and
services needed for the individual to
acquire occupational skills and to
develop work attitudes, work habits,
work tolerance, and social and behavior
patterns necessary for successful job
performance, including the use of work
in real job situations to assess and
develop the capacities of the individual
to perform adequately in a work
environment; and
(E) To the maximum extent possible,
relies on information obtained from
experiences in integrated employment
settings in the community and in other
integrated community settings;
(iii) Referral, for the provision of
rehabilitation technology services to the
individual, to assess and develop the
capacities of the individual to perform
in a work environment; and
(iv) An exploration of the individual’s
abilities, capabilities, and capacity to
perform in work situations, which must
be assessed periodically during trial
work experiences, including
experiences in which the individual is
provided appropriate supports and
training.
(Authority: Sections 7(2) and 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(2) and 709(c))
(6) Assistive technology terms.
(i) Assistive technology has the
meaning given such term in section 3 of
the Assistive Technology Act of 1998
(29 U.S.C. 3002).
(ii) Assistive technology device has
the meaning given such term in section
3 of the Assistive Technology Act of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
1998, except that the reference in such
section to the term individuals with
disabilities will be deemed to mean
more than one individual with a
disability as defined in paragraph
(20)(A) of the Act.
(iii) Assistive technology service has
the meaning given such term in section
3 of the Assistive Technology Act of
1998, except that the reference in such
section to the term—
(A) Individual with a disability will be
deemed to mean an individual with a
disability, as defined in paragraph
(20)(A) of the Act; and
(B) Individuals with disabilities will
be deemed to mean more than one such
individual.
(Authority: Sections 7(3) and 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(3) and 709(c))
(7) Community rehabilitation program
(i) Community rehabilitation program
means a program that provides directly
or facilitates the provision of one or
more of the following vocational
rehabilitation services to individuals
with disabilities to enable those
individuals to maximize their
opportunities for employment,
including career advancement:
(A) Medical, psychiatric,
psychological, social, and vocational
services that are provided under one
management.
(B) Testing, fitting, or training in the
use of prosthetic and orthotic devices.
(C) Recreational therapy.
(D) Physical and occupational
therapy.
(E) Speech, language, and hearing
therapy.
(F) Psychiatric, psychological, and
social services, including positive
behavior management.
(G) Assessment for determining
eligibility and vocational rehabilitation
needs.
(H) Rehabilitation technology.
(I) Job development, placement, and
retention services.
(J) Evaluation or control of specific
disabilities.
(K) Orientation and mobility services
for individuals who are blind.
(L) Extended employment.
(M) Psychosocial rehabilitation
services.
(N) Supported employment services
and extended services.
(O) Customized employment.
(P) Services to family members if
necessary to enable the applicant or
eligible individual to achieve an
employment outcome.
(Q) Personal assistance services.
(R) Services similar to the services
described in paragraphs (A) through (Q)
of this definition.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21103
(ii) For the purposes of this definition,
program means an agency, organization,
or institution, or unit of an agency,
organization, or institution, that
provides directly or facilitates the
provision of vocational rehabilitation
services as one of its major functions.
(Authority: Section 7(4) of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(4))
(8) Comparable services and benefits.
(i) Comparable services and benefits
means services and benefits, including
accommodations and auxiliary aids and
services, that are—
(A) Provided or paid for, in whole or
in part, by other Federal, State, or local
public agencies, by health insurance, or
by employee benefits;
(B) Available to the individual at the
time needed to ensure the progress of
the individual toward achieving the
employment outcome in the
individual’s individualized plan for
employment in accordance with
§ 361.53; and
(C) Commensurate to the services that
the individual would otherwise receive
from the designated State vocational
rehabilitation agency.
(ii) For the purposes of this definition,
comparable services and benefits do not
include awards and scholarships based
on merit.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(8) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a)(8))
(9) Competitive integrated
employment means work that—
(i) Is performed on a full-time or parttime basis (including self-employment)
and for which an individual is
compensated at a rate that—
(A) Is not less than the higher of the
rate specified in section 6(a)(1) of the
Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29
U.S.C. 206(a)(1)) or the rate required
under in the applicable State or local
minimum wage law;
(B) Is not less than the customary rate
paid by the employer for the same or
similar work performed by other
employees who are not individuals with
disabilities and who are similarly
situated in similar occupations by the
same employer and who have similar
training, experience, and skills; and
(C) In the case of an individual who
is self-employed, yields an income that
is comparable to the income received by
other individuals who are not
individuals with disabilities and who
are self-employed in similar
occupations or on similar tasks and who
have similar training, experience, and
skills; and
(D) Is eligible for the level of benefits
provided to other employees; and
(ii) Is at a location—
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21104
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(A) Typically found in the
community; and
(B) Where the employee with a
disability interacts for the purpose of
performing the duties of the position
with other employees within the
particular work unit and the entire work
site, and, as appropriate to the work
performed, other persons (e.g.,
customers and vendors), who are not
individuals with disabilities (not
including supervisory personnel or
individuals who are providing services
to such employee) to the same extent
that employees who are not individuals
with disabilities and who are in
comparable positions interact with these
persons; and
(iii) Presents, as appropriate,
opportunities for advancement that are
similar to those for other employees
who are not individuals with
disabilities and who have similar
positions.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(Authority: Sections 7(5) and 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(5) and 709(c))
(10) Construction of a facility for a
public or nonprofit community
rehabilitation program means—
(i) The acquisition of land in
connection with the construction of a
new building for a community
rehabilitation program;
(ii) The construction of new
buildings;
(iii) The acquisition of existing
buildings;
(iv) The expansion, remodeling,
alteration, or renovation of existing
buildings;
(v) Architect’s fees, site surveys, and
soil investigation, if necessary, in
connection with the acquisition of land
or existing buildings, or the and
construction, expansion, remodeling, or
alteration of community rehabilitation
facilities;
(vi) The acquisition of initial fixed or
movable equipment of any new, newly
acquired, newly expanded, newly
remodeled, newly altered, or newly
renovated buildings that are to be used
for community rehabilitation program
purposes; and
(vii) Other direct expenditures
appropriate to the construction project,
except costs of off-site improvements.
(Authority: Sections 7(6) and 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(6) and 709(c))
(11) Customized employment means
competitive integrated employment, for
an individual with a significant
disability, that is—
(i) Based on an individualized
determination of the unique strengths,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
needs, and interests of the individual
with a significant disability;
(ii) Designed to meet the specific
abilities of the individual with a
significant disability and the business
needs of the employer; and
(iii) Carried out through flexible
strategies, such as—
(A) Job exploration by the individual;
and
(B) Working with an employer to
facilitate placement, including—
(1) Customizing a job description
based on current employer needs or on
previously unidentified and unmet
employer needs;
(2) Developing a set of job duties, a
work schedule and job arrangement, and
specifics of supervision (including
performance evaluation and review),
and determining a job location;
(3) Using a professional representative
chosen by the individual, or if elected
self-representation, to work with an
employer to facilitate placement; and
(4) Providing services and supports at
the job location.
(Authority: Section 7(7) and 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(7) and 709(c))
(12) Designated State agency or State
agency means the sole State agency,
designated, in accordance with
§ 361.13(a), to administer, or supervise
the local administration of, the
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan. The term includes the State
agency for individuals who are blind, if
designated as the sole State agency with
respect to that part of the Unified or
Combined State Plan relating to the
vocational rehabilitation of individuals
who are blind.
(Authority: Sections 7(8)(A) and 101(a)(2)(A)
of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(8)(A) and
721(a)(2)(A))
(13) Designated State unit or State
unit means either—
(i) The State vocational rehabilitation
bureau, division, or other organizational
unit that is primarily concerned with
vocational rehabilitation or vocational
and other rehabilitation of individuals
with disabilities and that is responsible
for the administration of the vocational
rehabilitation program of the State
agency, as required under § 361.13(b); or
(ii) The State agency that is primarily
concerned with vocational
rehabilitation or vocational and other
rehabilitation of individuals with
disabilities.
(Authority: Sections 7(8)(B) and 101(a)(2)(B)
of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(8)(B) and
721(a)(2)(B))
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(14) Eligible individual means an
applicant for vocational rehabilitation
services who meets the eligibility
requirements of § 361.42(a).
(Authority: Sections 7(20)(A) and 102(a)(1) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 705(20)(A) and 722(a)(1))
(15) Employment outcome means,
with respect to an individual, entering,
advancing in, or retaining full-time or,
if appropriate, part-time competitive
integrated employment, as defined in
§ 361.5(c)(9) (including customized
employment, self-employment,
telecommuting, or business ownership),
or supported employment, that is
consistent with an individual’s unique
strengths, resources, priorities,
concerns, abilities, capabilities,
interests, and informed choice.
(Authority: Sections 7(11), 12(c), 100(a), and
102(b)(3)(A) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(11), 709(c),
720(a), and 722(b)(4)(A))
(16) Establishment, development, or
improvement of a public or nonprofit
community rehabilitation program
means—
(i) The establishment of a facility for
a public or nonprofit community
rehabilitation program, as defined in
paragraph (c)(17) of this section, to
provide vocational rehabilitation
services to applicants or eligible
individuals;
(ii) Staffing, if necessary to establish,
develop, or improve a public or
nonprofit community rehabilitation
program for the purpose of providing
vocational rehabilitation services to
applicants or eligible individuals, for a
maximum period of four years, with
Federal financial participation available
at the applicable matching rate for the
following levels of staffing costs:
(A) 100 percent of staffing costs for
the first year;
(B) 75 percent of staffing costs for the
second year;
(C) 60 percent of staffing costs for the
third year; and
(D) 45 percent of staffing costs for the
fourth year; and
(iii) Other expenditures and activities
related to the establishment,
development, or improvement of a
public or nonprofit community
rehabilitation program that are
necessary to make the program
functional or increase its effectiveness
in providing vocational rehabilitation
services to applicants or eligible
individuals, but are not ongoing
operating expenses of the program.
(Authority: Sections 7(12) and 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(12) and 709(c))
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(17) Establishment of a facility for a
public or nonprofit community
rehabilitation program means—
(i) The acquisition of an existing
building and, if necessary, the land in
connection with the acquisition, if the
building has been completed in all
respects for at least one year prior to the
date of acquisition and the Federal share
of the cost of acquisition is not more
than $300,000;
(ii) The remodeling or alteration of an
existing building, provided the
estimated cost of remodeling or
alteration does not exceed the appraised
value of the existing building;
(iii) The expansion of an existing
building, provided that—
(A) The existing building is complete
in all respects;
(B) The total size in square footage of
the expanded building, notwithstanding
the number of expansions, is not greater
than twice the size of the existing
building;
(C) The expansion is joined
structurally to the existing building and
does not constitute a separate building;
and
(D) The costs of the expansion do not
exceed the appraised value of the
existing building;
(iv) Architect’s fees, site survey, and
soil investigation, if necessary in
connection with the acquisition,
remodeling, alteration, or expansion of
an existing building; and
(v) The acquisition of fixed or
movable equipment, including the costs
of installation of the equipment, if
necessary to establish, develop, or
improve a community rehabilitation
program.
(Authority: Sections 7(12) and 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(12) and 709(c))
(18) Extended employment means
work in a non-integrated or sheltered
setting for a public or private nonprofit
agency or organization that provides
compensation in accordance with the
Fair Labor Standards Act.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c))
(19) Extended services means ongoing
support services and other appropriate
services that are—
(i) Needed to support and maintain an
individual with a most significant
disability including a youth with a most
significant disability, in supported
employment;
(ii) Organized or made available,
singly or in combination, in such a way
as to assist an eligible individual in
maintaining supported employment;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
(iii) Based on the needs of an eligible
individual, as specified in an
individualized plan for employment;
(iv) Provided by a State agency, a
private nonprofit organization,
employer, or any other appropriate
resource, after an individual has made
the transition from support from the
designated State unit; and
(v) Provided to youth with the most
significant disabilities by the designated
State unit in accordance with
requirements set forth in this part and
part 363 for a period not to exceed 4
years. The designated State unit may not
provide extended services to
individuals with the most significant
disabilities who are not youth with the
most significant disabilities.
(Authority: Sections 7(13), 12(c), and 604(b)
of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(13), 709(c) and 795i)
(20) Extreme medical risk means a
probability of substantially increasing
functional impairment or death if
medical services, including mental
health services, are not provided
expeditiously.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and
101(a)(8)(A)(i)(III) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and
721(a)(8)(A)(i)(III))
(21) Fair hearing board means a
committee, body, or group of persons
established by a State prior to January
1, 1985, that—
(i) Is authorized under State law to
review determinations made by
personnel of the designated State unit
that affect the provision of vocational
rehabilitation services; and
(ii) Carries out the responsibilities of
the impartial hearing officer in
accordance with the requirements in
§ 361.57(j).
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 102(c)(6) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 722(c)(6))
(22) Family member, for purposes of
receiving vocational rehabilitation
services in accordance with
§ 361.48(b)(9), means an individual—
(i) Who either—
(A) Is a relative or guardian of an
applicant or eligible individual; or
(B) Lives in the same household as an
applicant or eligible individual;
(ii) Who has a substantial interest in
the well-being of that individual; and
(iii) Whose receipt of vocational
rehabilitation services is necessary to
enable the applicant or eligible
individual to achieve an employment
outcome.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 103(a)(19) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 723(a)(19))
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21105
(23) Governor means a chief executive
officer of a State.
(Authority: Section 7(15) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(15))
(24) Impartial hearing officer. (i)
Impartial hearing officer means an
individual who—
(A) Is not an employee of a public
agency (other than an administrative
law judge, hearing examiner, or
employee of an institution of higher
education);
(B) Is not a member of the State
Rehabilitation Council for the
designated State unit;
(C) Has not been involved previously
in the vocational rehabilitation of the
applicant or eligible individual;
(D) Has knowledge of the delivery of
vocational rehabilitation services, the
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan, and the Federal and State
regulations governing the provision of
services;
(E) Has received training with respect
to the performance of official duties;
and
(F) Has no personal, professional, or
financial interest that could affect the
objectivity of the individual.
(ii) An individual is not considered to
be an employee of a public agency for
the purposes of this definition solely
because the individual is paid by the
agency to serve as a hearing officer.
(Authority: Section 7(16) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(16))
(25) Indian; American Indian; Indian
American; Indian Tribe.
(i) In general. The terms ‘‘Indian’’,
‘‘American Indian’’, and ‘‘Indian
American’’ mean an individual who is
a member of an Indian tribe and include
a Native and a descendant of a Native,
as such terms are defined in subsections
(b) and (c) of section 3 of the Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C.
1602).
(ii) Indian tribe. The term ‘‘Indian
tribe’’ means any Federal or State Indian
tribe, band, rancheria, pueblo, colony,
or community, including any Alaskan
native village or regional village
corporation (as defined in or established
pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act) and a tribal organization
(as defined in section 4(1) of the Indian
Self-Determination and Education
Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450(b)(1)).
(Authority: Section 7(19) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(19))
(26) Individual who is blind means a
person who is blind within the meaning
of applicable State law.
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21106
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c))
(27) Individual with a disability,
except as provided in paragraph
(c)(28)of this section, means an
individual—
(i) Who has a physical or mental
impairment;
(ii) Whose impairment constitutes or
results in a substantial impediment to
employment; and
(iii) Who can benefit in terms of an
employment outcome from the
provision of vocational rehabilitation
services.
(Authority: Section 7(20)(A) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(20)(A))
(28) Individual with a disability, for
purposes of §§ 361.5(c)(13), 361.13(a),
361.13(b)(1), 361.17(a), (b), (c), and (j),
361.18(b), 361.19, 361.20, 361.23(b)(2),
361.29(a) and (d)(8), and 361.51(b),
means an individual—
(i) Who has a physical or mental
impairment that substantially limits one
or more major life activities;
(ii) Who has a record of such an
impairment; or
(iii) Who is regarded as having such
an impairment.
(Authority: Section 7(20)(B) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(20)(B))
(29) Individual with a most significant
disability means an individual with a
significant disability who meets the
designated State unit’s criteria for an
individual with a most significant
disability. These criteria must be
consistent with the requirements in
§ 361.36(d)(1) and (2).
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(Authority: Sections 7(21)(E) and 101(a)(5)(C)
of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(21)(E) and
721(a)(5)(C))
(30) Individual with a significant
disability means an individual with a
disability—
(i) Who has a severe physical or
mental impairment that seriously limits
one or more functional capacities (such
as mobility, communication, self-care,
self-direction, interpersonal skills, work
tolerance, or work skills) in terms of an
employment outcome;
(ii) Whose vocational rehabilitation
can be expected to require multiple
vocational rehabilitation services over
an extended period of time; and
(iii) Who has one or more physical or
mental disabilities resulting from
amputation, arthritis, autism, blindness,
burn injury, cancer, cerebral palsy,
cystic fibrosis, deafness, head injury,
heart disease, hemiplegia, hemophilia,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
respiratory or pulmonary dysfunction,
mental illness, multiple sclerosis,
muscular dystrophy, musculo-skeletal
disorders, neurological disorders
(including stroke and epilepsy), spinal
cord conditions (including paraplegia
and quadriplegia), sickle cell anemia,
intellectual disability, specific learning
disability, end-stage renal disease, or
another disability or combination of
disabilities determined on the basis of
an assessment for determining eligibility
and vocational rehabilitation needs to
cause comparable substantial functional
limitation.
(Authority: Section 7(25) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(25))
(Authority: Section 7(21)(A) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(21)(A))
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 103(a)(7) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 723(a)(7))
(31) Individual’s representative means
any representative chosen by an
applicant or eligible individual, as
appropriate, including a parent,
guardian, other family member, or
advocate, unless a representative has
been appointed by a court to represent
the individual, in which case the courtappointed representative is the
individual’s representative.
(i)Examples: The following are
examples of expenses that would meet
the definition of maintenance. The
examples are illustrative, do not address
all possible circumstances, and are not
intended to substitute for individual
counselor judgment.
Example 1: The cost of a uniform or
other suitable clothing that is required
for an individual’s job placement or jobseeking activities.
Example 2: The cost of short-term
shelter that is required in order for an
individual to participate in assessment
activities or vocational training at a site
that is not within commuting distance
of an individual’s home.
Example 3: The initial one-time costs,
such as a security deposit or charges for
the initiation of utilities, that are
required in order for an individual to
relocate for a job placement.
(ii) [Reserved]
(35) Mediation means the act or
process of using an independent third
party to act as a mediator, intermediary,
or conciliator to assist persons or parties
in settling differences or disputes prior
to pursuing formal administrative or
other legal remedies. Mediation under
the program must be conducted in
accordance with the requirements in
§ 361.57(d) by a qualified and impartial
mediator as defined in § 361.5(c)(43).
(Authority: Sections 7(22) and 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(22) and 709(c))
(32) Integrated setting means—
(i) With respect to the provision of
services, a setting typically found in the
community in which applicants or
eligible individuals interact with nondisabled individuals other than nondisabled individuals who are providing
services to those applicants or eligible
individuals; and
(ii) With respect to an employment
outcome, means a setting—
(A) Typically found in the
community; and
(B) Where the employee with a
disability interacts, for the purpose of
performing the duties of the position,
with other employees within the
particular work unit and the entire work
site, and, as appropriate to the work
performed, other persons (e.g.,
customers and vendors) who are not
individuals with disabilities (not
including supervisory personnel or
individuals who are providing services
to such employee) to the same extent
that employees who are not individuals
with disabilities and who are in
comparable positions interact with these
persons.
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c))
(33) Local workforce development
board means a local board, as defined in
section 3 of the Workforce Innovation
and Opportunity Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(34) Maintenance means monetary
support provided to an individual for
expenses, such as food, shelter, and
clothing, that are in excess of the normal
expenses of the individual and that are
necessitated by the individual’s
participation in an assessment for
determining eligibility and vocational
rehabilitation needs or the individual’s
receipt of vocational rehabilitation
services under an individualized plan
for employment.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 102(c)(4) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 722(c)(4))
(36) Nonprofit, with respect to a
community rehabilitation program,
means a community rehabilitation
program carried out by a corporation or
association, no part of the net earnings
of which inures, or may lawfully inure,
to the benefit of any private shareholder
or individual and the income of which
is exempt from taxation under section
501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986.
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(Authority: Section 7(26) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(26))
(37) Ongoing support services, as used
in the definition of supported
employment, means services that—
(i) Are needed to support and
maintain an individual with a most
significant disability, including a youth
with a most significant disability, in
supported employment;
(ii) Are identified based on a
determination by the designated State
unit of the individual’s need as
specified in an individualized plan for
employment;
(iii) Are furnished by the designated
State unit from the time of job
placement until transition to extended
services, unless post-employment
services are provided following
transition, and thereafter by one or more
extended services providers throughout
the individual’s term of employment in
a particular job placement or multiple
placements if those placements are
being provided under a program of
transitional employment;
(iv) Include an assessment of
employment stability and provision of
specific services or the coordination of
services at or away from the worksite
that are needed to maintain stability
based on—
(A) At a minimum, twice-monthly
monitoring at the worksite of each
individual in supported employment; or
(B) If under specific circumstances,
especially at the request of the
individual, the individualized plan for
employment provides for off-site
monitoring, twice monthly meetings
with the individual;
(v) Consist of—
(A) Any particularized assessment
supplementary to the comprehensive
assessment of rehabilitation needs
described in paragraph (c)(5)(ii) of this
section;
(B) The provision of skilled job
trainers who accompany the individual
for intensive job skill training at the
work site;
(C) Job development and training;
(D) Social skills training;
(E) Regular observation or supervision
of the individual;
(F) Follow-up services including
regular contact with the employers, the
individuals, the parents, family
members, guardians, advocates or
authorized representatives of the
individuals, and other suitable
professional and informed advisors, in
order to reinforce and stabilize the job
placement;
(G) Facilitation of natural supports at
the worksite;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
(H) Any other service identified in the
scope of vocational rehabilitation
services for individuals, described in
§ 361.48; or
(I) Any service similar to the foregoing
services.
(Authority: Sections 7(27) and 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(27) and 709(c))
(38) Personal assistance services
means a range of services, including,
among other things, training in
managing, supervising, and directing
personal assistance services, provided
by one or more persons, that are—
(i) Designed to assist an individual
with a disability to perform daily living
activities on or off the job that the
individual would typically perform
without assistance if the individual did
not have a disability;
(ii) Designed to increase the
individual’s control in life and ability to
perform everyday activities on or off the
job;
(iii) Necessary to the achievement of
an employment outcome; and
(iv) Provided only while the
individual is receiving other vocational
rehabilitation services. The services may
include training in managing,
supervising, and directing personal
assistance services.
(Authority: Sections 7(28), 12(c),
102(b)(4)(B)(i)(I)(bb), and 103(a)(9) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(28), 709(c), 722(b)(4)(B)(i)(I)(bb),
and 723(a)(9))
(39) Physical and mental restoration
services means—
(i) Corrective surgery or therapeutic
treatment that is likely, within a
reasonable period of time, to correct or
modify substantially a stable or slowly
progressive physical or mental
impairment that constitutes a
substantial impediment to employment;
(ii) Diagnosis of and treatment for
mental or emotional disorders by
qualified personnel in accordance with
State licensure laws;
(iii) Dentistry;
(iv) Nursing services;
(v) Necessary hospitalization (either
inpatient or outpatient care) in
connection with surgery or treatment
and clinic services;
(vi) Drugs and supplies;
(vii) Prosthetic and orthotic devices;
(viii) Eyeglasses and visual services,
including visual training, and the
examination and services necessary for
the prescription and provision of
eyeglasses, contact lenses, microscopic
lenses, telescopic lenses, and other
special visual aids prescribed by
personnel who are qualified in
accordance with State licensure laws;
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21107
(ix) Podiatry;
(x) Physical therapy;
(xi) Occupational therapy;
(xii) Speech or hearing therapy;
(xiii) Mental health services;
(xiv) Treatment of either acute or
chronic medical complications and
emergencies that are associated with or
arise out of the provision of physical
and mental restoration services, or that
are inherent in the condition under
treatment;
(xv) Special services for the treatment
of individuals with end-stage renal
disease, including transplantation,
dialysis, artificial kidneys, and supplies;
and
(xvi) Other medical or medically
related rehabilitation services.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 103(a)(6) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 723(a)(6))
(40) Physical or mental impairment
means—
(i) Any physiological disorder or
condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or
anatomical loss affecting one or more of
the following body systems:
Neurological, musculo-skeletal, special
sense organs, respiratory (including
speech organs), cardiovascular,
reproductive, digestive, genitourinary,
hemic and lymphatic, skin, and
endocrine; or
(ii) Any mental or psychological
disorder such as intellectual disability,
organic brain syndrome, emotional or
mental illness, and specific learning
disabilities.
(Authority: Sections 7(20)(A) and 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(20)(A) and 709(c))
(41) Post-employment services means
one or more of the services identified in
§ 361.48 that are provided subsequent to
the achievement of an employment
outcome and that are necessary for an
individual to maintain, regain, or
advance in employment, consistent with
the individual’s unique strengths,
resources, priorities, concerns, abilities,
capabilities, interests, and informed
choice.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 103(a)(20) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 723(a)(20))
Note to paragraph(c)(41): Postemployment services are intended to
ensure that the employment outcome
remains consistent with the individual’s
unique strengths, resources, priorities,
concerns, abilities, capabilities,
interests, and informed choice. These
services are available to meet
rehabilitation needs that do not require
a complex and comprehensive provision
of services and, thus, should be limited
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21108
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
in scope and duration. If more
comprehensive services are required,
then a new rehabilitation effort should
be considered. Post-employment
services are to be provided under an
amended individualized plan for
employment; thus, a re-determination of
eligibility is not required. The provision
of post-employment services is subject
to the same requirements in this part as
the provision of any other vocational
rehabilitation service. Post-employment
services are available to assist an
individual to maintain employment,
e.g., the individual’s employment is
jeopardized because of conflicts with
supervisors or co-workers, and the
individual needs mental health services
and counseling to maintain the
employment, or the individual requires
assistive technology to maintain the
employment; to regain employment,
e.g., the individual’s job is eliminated
through reorganization and new
placement services are needed; and to
advance in employment, e.g., the
employment is no longer consistent
with the individual’s unique strengths,
resources, priorities, concerns, abilities,
capabilities, interests, and informed
choice.
(42) Pre-employment transition
services means the required activities
and authorized activities specified in
§ 361.48(a).
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(Authority: Sections 7(30) and 113 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 7(30) and 733)
(43) Qualified and impartial
mediator. (i) Qualified and impartial
mediator means an individual who—
(A) Is not an employee of a public
agency (other than an administrative
law judge, hearing examiner, employee
of a State office of mediators, or
employee of an institution of higher
education);
(B) Is not a member of the State
Rehabilitation Council for the
designated State unit;
(C) Has not been involved previously
in the vocational rehabilitation of the
applicant or eligible individual;
(D) Is knowledgeable of the vocational
rehabilitation program and the
applicable Federal and State laws,
regulations, and policies governing the
provision of vocational rehabilitation
services;
(E) Has been trained in effective
mediation techniques consistent with
any State-approved or -recognized
certification, licensing, registration, or
other requirements; and
(F) Has no personal, professional, or
financial interest that could affect the
individual’s objectivity during the
mediation proceedings.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
(ii) An individual is not considered to
be an employee of the designated State
agency or designated State unit for the
purposes of this definition solely
because the individual is paid by the
designated State agency or designated
State unit to serve as a mediator.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 102(c)(4) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 722(c)(4))
(44) Rehabilitation engineering means
the systematic application of
engineering sciences to design, develop,
adapt, test, evaluate, apply, and
distribute technological solutions to
problems confronted by individuals
with disabilities in functional areas,
such as mobility, communications,
hearing, vision, and cognition, and in
activities associated with employment,
independent living, education, and
integration into the community.
(Authority: Sections 7(32) and (12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(32) and 709(c))
(45) Rehabilitation technology means
the systematic application of
technologies, engineering
methodologies, or scientific principles
to meet the needs of, and address the
barriers confronted by, individuals with
disabilities in areas that include
education, rehabilitation, employment,
transportation, independent living, and
recreation. The term includes
rehabilitation engineering, assistive
technology devices, and assistive
technology services.
(Authority: Section 7(32) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(32))
(46) Reservation means a Federal or
State Indian reservation, a public
domain Indian allotment, a former
Indian reservation in Oklahoma, and
land held by incorporated Native
groups, regional corporations, and
village corporations under the
provisions of the Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.);
or a defined area of land recognized by
a State or the Federal Government
where there is a concentration of tribal
members and on which the tribal
government is providing structured
activities and services.
(Authority: Section 121(e) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 741(e))
(47) Sole local agency means a unit or
combination of units of general local
government or one or more Indian tribes
that has the sole responsibility under an
agreement with, and the supervision of,
the State agency to conduct a local or
tribal vocational rehabilitation program,
in accordance with the vocational
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan.
(Authority: Section 7(24) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(24))
(48) State means any of the 50 States,
the District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the
United States Virgin Islands, Guam,
American Samoa, and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands.
(Authority: Section 7(34) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(34))
(49) State workforce development
board means a State workforce
development board, as defined in
section 3 of the Workforce Innovation
and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3102).
(Authority: Section 7(35) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(35))
(50) Statewide workforce development
system means a workforce development
system, as defined in section 3 of the
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity
Act (29 U.S.C. 3102).
(Authority: Section 7(36) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(36))
(51) Student with a disability. (i)
Student with a disability means, in
general, an individual with a disability
who—
(A)(1) Is not younger than the earliest
age for the provision of transition
services under section
614(d)(1)(A)(i)(VIII) of the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act (20
U.S.C. 1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VIII)); or
(2) If the State involved elects to use
a lower minimum age for receipt of preemployment transition services under
this Act, is not younger than that
minimum age; and
(B)(1) Is not older than 21 years of age;
or
(2) If the State law for the State
provides for a higher maximum age for
receipt of services under the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act (20
U.S.C. 1400 et seq.), is not older than
that maximum age; and
(C)(1) Is eligible for, and receiving,
special education or related services
under Part B of the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C.
1411 et seq.); or
(2) Is a student who is an individual
with a disability, for purposes of section
504.
(ii) Students with disabilities means
more than one student with a disability.
(Authority: Section 7(37) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(37))
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(52) Substantial impediment to
employment means that a physical or
mental impairment (in light of attendant
medical, psychological, vocational,
educational, communication, and other
related factors) hinders an individual
from preparing for, entering into,
engaging in, advancing in, or retaining
employment consistent with the
individual’s abilities and capabilities.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(Authority: Sections 7(20)(A) and 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(20)(A) and 709(c))
(53) Supported employment. (i)
Supported employment means—
(A) Competitive integrated
employment, including customized
employment, or employment in an
integrated work setting in which an
individual with a most significant
disability, including a youth with a
most significant disability, is working
on a short-term basis toward
competitive integrated employment that
is individualized, consistent with the
unique strengths, abilities, interests, and
informed choice of the individual,
including with ongoing support services
for individuals with the most significant
disabilities—
(1) For whom competitive integrated
employment has not historically
occurred, or for whom competitive
integrated employment has been
interrupted or intermittent as a result of
a significant disability; and
(2) Who, because of the nature and
severity of their disability, need
intensive supported employment
services and extended services after the
transition from support provided by the
designated State unit, in order to
perform this work; or
(B) Transitional employment, as
defined in paragraph (c)(56) of this
section, for individuals with the most
significant disabilities due to mental
illness, including youth with the most
significant disabilities, constitutes
supported employment.
(ii) For purposes of this part, an
individual with the most significant
disabilities, whose supported
employment in an integrated setting
does not satisfy the criteria of
competitive integrated employment, as
defined in paragraph (c)(9) of this
section, is considered to be working on
a short-term basis toward competitive
integrated employment so long as the
individual can reasonably anticipate
achieving competitive integrated
employment within six months of
achieving an employment outcome of
supported employment.
(Authority: Sections 7(38), 12(c), and 602 of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 705(38), 709(c), and 795g)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
(54) Supported employment services
means ongoing support services,
including customized employment, and
other appropriate services needed to
support and maintain an individual
with a most significant disability,
including a youth with a most
significant disability, in supported
employment that are—
(i) Organized and made available,
singly or in combination, in such a way
as to assist an eligible individual to
achieve competitive integrated
employment;
(ii) Based on a determination of the
needs of an eligible individual, as
specified in an individualized plan for
employment;
(iii) Provided by the designated State
unit for a period of time not to exceed
24 months, unless under special
circumstances the eligible individual
and the rehabilitation counselor or
coordinator jointly agree to extend the
time to achieve the employment
outcome identified in the
individualized plan for employment;
and
(iv) Following transition, as postemployment services that are
unavailable from an extended services
provider and that are necessary to
maintain or regain the job placement or
advance in employment.
(Authority: Sections 7(39), 12(c), and
103(a)(16) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(39), 709(c), and
723(a)(16))
(55) Transition services means a
coordinated set of activities for a
student or youth with a disability—
(i) Designed within an outcomeoriented process that promotes
movement from school to post-school
activities, including postsecondary
education, vocational training,
integrated employment (including
supported employment), continuing and
adult education, adult services,
independent living, or community
participation;
(ii) Based upon the individual
student’s needs, taking into account the
student’s preferences and interests;
(iii) That includes instruction,
community experiences, the
development of employment and other
post-school adult living objectives, and,
if appropriate, acquisition of daily living
skills and functional vocational
evaluation; and
(iv) That promotes or facilitates the
achievement of the employment
outcome identified in the student’s
individualized plan for employment.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 103(a)(15) and
(b)(7) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 723(a)(15)
and (b)(7))
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21109
(56) Transitional employment, as used
in the definition of supported
employment, means a series of
temporary job placements in
competitive integrated employment
with ongoing support services for
individuals with the most significant
disabilities due to mental illness. In
transitional employment, the provision
of ongoing support services must
include continuing sequential job
placements until job permanency is
achieved.
(Authority: Sections 7(38)(B) and 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(38)(B) and 709(c))
(57) Transportation means travel and
related expenses that are necessary to
enable an applicant or eligible
individual to participate in a vocational
rehabilitation service, including
expenses for training in the use of
public transportation vehicles and
systems.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 103(a)(8) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 723(a)(8))
(i) Examples. The following are
examples of expenses that would meet
the definition of transportation. The
examples are purely illustrative, do not
address all possible circumstances, and
are not intended as substitutes for
individual counselor judgment.
Example 1: Travel and related
expenses for a personal care attendant
or aide if the services of that person are
necessary to enable the applicant or
eligible individual to travel to
participate in any vocational
rehabilitation service.
Example 2: The purchase and repair
of vehicles, including vans, but not the
modification of these vehicles, as
modification would be considered a
rehabilitation technology service.
Example 3: Relocation expenses
incurred by an eligible individual in
connection with a job placement that is
a significant distance from the eligible
individual’s current residence.
(ii) [Reserved]
(58) Vocational rehabilitation
services—
(i) If provided to an individual, means
those services listed in § 361.48; and
(ii) If provided for the benefit of
groups of individuals, means those
services listed in § 361.49.
(Authority: Sections 7(40) and 103 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(40) and 723)
(59) Youth with a disability. (i) Youth
with a disability means an individual
with a disability who is not—
(A) Younger than 14 years of age; and
(B) Older than 24 years of age.
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21110
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(ii) Youth with disabilities means
more than one youth with a disability.
(Authority: Section 7(42) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(42))
Subpart B—State Plan and Other
Requirements for Vocational
Rehabilitation Services
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 361.10 Submission, approval, and
disapproval of the State plan.
(a) Purpose. (1) To be eligible to
receive funds under this part for a fiscal
year, a State must submit, and have
approved, a vocational rehabilitation
services portion of a Unified or
Combined State Plan in accordance with
sections 102 or 103 of the Workforce
Innovation and Opportunity Act.
(2) The vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan must satisfy all
requirements set forth in this part.
(b) Separate part relating to the
vocational rehabilitation of individuals
who are blind. If a separate State agency
administers or supervises the
administration of a separate part of the
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan relating to the vocational
rehabilitation of individuals who are
blind, that part of the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan must
separately conform to all applicable
requirements under this part.
(c) Public participation. Prior to the
adoption of any substantive policies or
procedures specific to the provision of
vocational rehabilitation services under
the vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan, including making any
substantive amendment to those
policies and procedures, the designated
State agency must conduct public
meetings throughout the State, in
accordance with the requirements of
§ 361.20.
(d) Submission, approval,
disapproval, and duration. All
requirements regarding the submission,
approval, disapproval, and duration of
the vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan are governed by joint
regulations set forth in subpart D of this
part.
(e) Submission of policies and
procedures. The State is not required to
submit policies, procedures, or
descriptions required under this part
that have been previously submitted to
the Secretary and that demonstrate that
the State meets the requirements of this
part, including any policies, procedures,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
or descriptions submitted under this
part that are in effect on July 22, 2014.
(f) Due process. If the Secretary
disapproves the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan, the
Secretary will follow these procedures:
(1) Informal resolution. Prior to
disapproving the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan, the
Secretary attempts to resolve disputes
informally with State officials.
(2) Notice. If, after reasonable effort
has been made to resolve the dispute, no
resolution has been reached, the
Secretary provides notice to the State
agency of the intention to disapprove
the vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan and of the opportunity for a
hearing.
(3) State plan hearing. If the State
agency requests a hearing, the Secretary
designates one or more individuals,
either from the Department or
elsewhere, not responsible for or
connected with the administration of
this program, to conduct a hearing in
accordance with the provisions of 34
CFR part 81, subpart A.
(4) Initial decision. The hearing officer
issues an initial decision in accordance
with 34 CFR 81.41.
(5) Petition for review of an initial
decision. The State agency may seek the
Secretary’s review of the initial decision
in accordance with 34 CFR part 81.
(6) Review by the Secretary. The
Secretary reviews the initial decision in
accordance with 34 CFR 81.43.
(7) Final decision of the Department.
The final decision of the Department is
made in accordance with 34 CFR 81.44.
(8) Judicial review. A State may
appeal the Secretary’s decision to
disapprove the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan by filing a petition
for review with the United States Court
of Appeals for the circuit in which the
State is located, in accordance with
section 107(d) of the Act.
supported employment supplement, has
been so changed that it no longer
conforms with the requirements of this
part or part 363; or
(2) In the administration of the
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan there is a failure to comply
substantially with any provision of such
plan or with an evaluation standard or
performance indicator established under
section 106 of the Act.
(b) Informal resolution. Prior to
withholding or limiting payments in
accordance with this section, the
Secretary attempts to resolve disputed
issues informally with State officials.
(c) Notice. If, after reasonable effort
has been made to resolve the dispute, no
resolution has been reached, the
Secretary provides notice to the State
agency of the intention to withhold or
limit payments and of the opportunity
for a hearing.
(d) Withholding hearing. If the State
agency requests a hearing, the Secretary
designates one or more individuals,
either from the Department or
elsewhere, not responsible for or
connected with the administration of
this program, to conduct a hearing in
accordance with the provisions of 34
CFR part 81, subpart A.
(e) Initial decision. The hearing officer
issues an initial decision in accordance
with 34 CFR 81.41.
(f) Petition for review of an initial
decision. The State agency may seek the
Secretary’s review of the initial decision
in accordance with 34 CFR 81.42.
(g) Review by the Secretary. The
Secretary reviews the initial decision in
accordance with 34 CFR 81.43.
(h) Final decision of the Department.
The final decision of the Department is
made in accordance with 34 CFR 81.44.
(i) Judicial review. A State may appeal
the Secretary’s decision to withhold or
limit payments by filing a petition for
review with the United States Court of
Appeals for the circuit in which the
State is located, in accordance with
section 107(d) of the Act.
(Authority: Sections 101(a) and (b) and
107(d) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 20 U.S.C. 1231g(a); and 29 U.S.C.
721(a) and (b) and 727(d))
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 101(b), 107(c) and
(d) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c), 721(b), 727(c) and
(d))
§ 361.11
Administration
Withholding of funds.
(a) Basis for withholding. The
Secretary may withhold or limit
payments under section 111 or 603(a) of
the Act, as provided by section 107(c) of
the Act, if the Secretary determines
that—
(1) The vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan, including the
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
§ 361.12
Methods of administration.
The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must assure that the State
agency, and the designated State unit if
applicable, employs methods of
administration found necessary by the
Secretary for the proper and efficient
administration of the plan and for
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
carrying out all functions for which the
State is responsible under the plan and
this part. These methods must include
procedures to ensure accurate data
collection and financial accountability.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(6) and
(a)(10)(A) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a)(6)
and (a)(10)(A))
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 361.13
State agency for administration.
(a) Designation of State agency. The
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must designate a State agency
as the sole State agency to administer
the vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan, or to supervise its
administration in a political subdivision
of the State by a sole local agency, in
accordance with the following
requirements:
(1) General. Except as provided in
paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this
section, the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan must provide that
the designated State agency is one of the
following types of agencies:
(i) A State agency that is primarily
concerned with vocational
rehabilitation or vocational and other
rehabilitation of individuals with
disabilities; or
(ii) A State agency that includes a
vocational rehabilitation unit as
provided in paragraph (b) of this
section.
(2) American Samoa. In the case of
American Samoa, the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan must
designate the Governor.
(3) Designated State agency for
individuals who are blind. If a State
commission or other agency that
provides assistance or services to
individuals who are blind is authorized
under State law to provide vocational
rehabilitation services to individuals
who are blind, and this commission or
agency is primarily concerned with
vocational rehabilitation or includes a
vocational rehabilitation unit as
provided in paragraph (b) of this
section, the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan may designate that
agency as the sole State agency to
administer the part of the plan under
which vocational rehabilitation services
are provided for individuals who are
blind or to supervise its administration
in a political subdivision of the State by
a sole local agency.
(b) Designation of State unit. (1)
General. If the designated State agency
is not of the type specified in paragraph
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
(a)(1)(i) of this section or if the
designated State agency specified in
paragraph (a)(3) of this section is not
primarily concerned with vocational
rehabilitation or vocational and other
rehabilitation of individuals with
disabilities, the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan must assure that
the agency (or each agency if two
agencies are designated) includes a
vocational rehabilitation bureau,
division, or unit that—
(i) Is primarily concerned with
vocational rehabilitation or vocational
and other rehabilitation of individuals
with disabilities and is responsible for
the administration of the State agency’s
vocational rehabilitation program under
the vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan;
(ii) Has a full-time director who is
responsible for the day-to-day
operations of the vocational
rehabilitation program;
(iii) Has a staff, at least 90 percent of
whom are employed full time on the
rehabilitation work of the organizational
unit;
(iv) Is located at an organizational
level and has an organizational status
within the State agency comparable to
that of other major organizational units
of the agency; and
(v) Has the sole authority and
responsibility described within the
designated State agency in paragraph (a)
of this section to expend funds made
available under the Act in a manner that
is consistent with the purpose of the
Act.
(2) In the case of a State that has not
designated a separate State agency for
individuals who are blind, as provided
for in paragraph (a)(3) of this section,
the State may assign responsibility for
the part of the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan under which
vocational rehabilitation services are
provided to individuals who are blind
to one organizational unit of the
designated State agency and may assign
responsibility for the rest of the plan to
another organizational unit of the
designated State agency, with the
provisions of paragraph (b)(1) of this
section applying separately to each of
these units.
(c) Responsibility for administration.
(1) Required activities. At a minimum,
the following activities are the
responsibility of the designated State
unit or the sole local agency under the
supervision of the State unit:
(i) All decisions affecting eligibility
for vocational rehabilitation services,
the nature and scope of available
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21111
services, and the provision of these
services.
(ii) The determination to close the
record of services of an individual who
has achieved an employment outcome
in accordance with § 361.56.
(iii) Policy formulation and
implementation.
(iv) The allocation and expenditure of
vocational rehabilitation funds.
(v) Participation as a partner in the
one-stop service delivery system
established under title I of the
Workforce Investment Act of 1998, in
accordance with 20 CFR part 662.
(2) Non-delegable responsibility. The
responsibility for the functions
described in paragraph (c)(1) of this
section may not be delegated to any
other agency or individual.
(Authority: Section 101(a)(2) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 721(a)(2))
§ 361.14
Substitute State agency.
(a) General provisions. (1) If the
Secretary has withheld all funding from
a State under § 361.11, the State may
designate another agency to substitute
for the designated State agency in
carrying out the State’s program of
vocational rehabilitation services.
(2) Any public or nonprofit private
organization or agency within the State
or any political subdivision of the State
is eligible to be a substitute agency.
(3) The substitute agency must submit
a vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan that meets the requirements
of this part.
(4) The Secretary makes no grant to a
substitute agency until the Secretary
approves its plan.
(b) Substitute agency matching share.
The Secretary does not make any
payment to a substitute agency unless it
has provided assurances that it will
contribute the same matching share as
the State would have been required to
contribute if the State agency were
carrying out the vocational
rehabilitation program.
(Authority: Section 107(c)(3) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 727(c)(3))
§ 361.15
Local administration.
(a) If the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan provides for the
administration of the plan by a local
agency, the designated State agency
must—
(1) Ensure that each local agency is
under the supervision of the designated
State unit and is the sole local agency
as defined in § 361.5(c)(47) that is
responsible for the administration of the
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21112
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
program within the political subdivision
that it serves; and
(2) Develop methods that each local
agency will use to administer the
vocational rehabilitation program, in
accordance with the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan.
(b) A separate local agency serving
individuals who are blind may
administer that part of the plan relating
to vocational rehabilitation of
individuals who are blind, under the
supervision of the designated State unit
for individuals who are blind.
(Authority: Sections 7(24) and 101(a)(2)(A) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 705(24) and 721(a)(2)(A))
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 361.16 Establishment of an independent
commission or a State Rehabilitation
Council.
(a) General requirement. Except as
provided in paragraph (b) of this
section, the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan must contain one
of the following two assurances:
(1) An assurance that the designated
State agency is an independent State
commission that—
(i) Is responsible under State law for
operating, or overseeing the operation
of, the vocational rehabilitation program
in the State and is primarily concerned
with vocational rehabilitation or
vocational and other rehabilitation
services, in accordance with
§ 361.13(a)(1)(i);
(ii) Is consumer-controlled by persons
who—
(A) Are individuals with physical or
mental impairments that substantially
limit major life activities; and
(B) Represent individuals with a
broad range of disabilities, unless the
designated State unit under the
direction of the commission is the State
agency for individuals who are blind;
(iii) Includes family members,
advocates, or other representatives of
individuals with mental impairments;
and
(iv) Conducts the functions identified
in § 361.17(h)(4).
(2) An assurance that—
(i) The State has established a State
Rehabilitation Council (Council) that
meets the requirements of § 361.17;
(ii) The designated State unit, in
accordance with § 361.29, jointly
develops, agrees to, and reviews
annually State goals and priorities and
jointly submits to the Secretary annual
reports of progress with the Council;
(iii) The designated State unit
regularly consults with the Council
regarding the development,
implementation, and revision of State
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
policies and procedures of general
applicability pertaining to the provision
of vocational rehabilitation services;
(iv) The designated State unit
transmits to the Council—
(A) All plans, reports, and other
information required under this part to
be submitted to the Secretary;
(B) All policies and information on all
practices and procedures of general
applicability provided to or used by
rehabilitation personnel providing
vocational rehabilitation services under
this part; and
(C) Copies of due process hearing
decisions issued under this part and
transmitted in a manner to ensure that
the identity of the participants in the
hearings is kept confidential; and
(v) The vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan, and any revision
to the vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan, includes a summary of input
provided by the Council, including
recommendations from the annual
report of the Council, the review and
analysis of consumer satisfaction
described in § 361.17(h)(4), and other
reports prepared by the Council, and the
designated State unit’s response to the
input and recommendations, including
its reasons for rejecting any input or
recommendation of the Council.
(b) Exception for separate State
agency for individuals who are blind. In
the case of a State that designates a
separate State agency under
§ 361.13(a)(3) to administer the part of
the vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan under which vocational
rehabilitation services are provided to
individuals who are blind, the State
must either establish a separate State
Rehabilitation Council for each agency
that does not meet the requirements in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section or
establish one State Rehabilitation
Council for both agencies if neither
agency meets the requirements of
paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
(Authority: Sections 101(a)(21) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 721(a)(21))
§ 361.17 Requirements for a State
Rehabilitation Council.
If the State has established a Council
under § 361.16(a)(2) or (b), the Council
must meet the following requirements:
(a) Appointment. (1) The members of
the Council must be appointed by the
Governor or, in the case of a State that,
under State law, vests authority for the
administration of the activities carried
out under this part in an entity other
than the Governor (such as one or more
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
houses of the State legislature or an
independent board), the chief officer of
that entity.
(2) The appointing authority must
select members of the Council after
soliciting recommendations from
representatives of organizations
representing a broad range of
individuals with disabilities and
organizations interested in individuals
with disabilities. In selecting members,
the appointing authority must consider,
to the greatest extent practicable, the
extent to which minority populations
are represented on the Council.
(b) Composition. (1) General. Except
as provided in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section, the Council must be composed
of at least 15 members, including—
(i) At least one representative of the
Statewide Independent Living Council,
who must be the chairperson or other
designee of the Statewide Independent
Living Council;
(ii) At least one representative of a
parent training and information center
established pursuant to section 682(a) of
the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act;
(iii) At least one representative of the
Client Assistance Program established
under part 370 of this chapter, who
must be the director of or other
individual recommended by the Client
Assistance Program;
(iv) At least one qualified vocational
rehabilitation counselor with knowledge
of and experience with vocational
rehabilitation programs who serves as
an ex officio, nonvoting member of the
Council if employed by the designated
State agency;
(v) At least one representative of
community rehabilitation program
service providers;
(vi) Four representatives of business,
industry, and labor;
(vii) Representatives of disability
groups that include a cross section of—
(A) Individuals with physical,
cognitive, sensory, and mental
disabilities; and
(B) Representatives of individuals
with disabilities who have difficulty
representing themselves or are unable
due to their disabilities to represent
themselves;
(viii) Current or former applicants for,
or recipients of, vocational
rehabilitation services;
(ix) In a State in which one or more
projects are funded under section 121 of
the Act (American Indian Vocational
Rehabilitation Services), at least one
representative of the directors of the
projects in such State;
(x) At least one representative of the
State educational agency responsible for
the public education of students with
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
disabilities who are eligible to receive
services under this part and part B of
the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act;
(xi) At least one representative of the
State workforce development board; and
(xii) The director of the designated
State unit as an ex officio, nonvoting
member of the Council.
(2) Employees of the designated State
agency. Employees of the designated
State agency may serve only as
nonvoting members of the Council. This
provision does not apply to the
representative appointed pursuant to
paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section.
(3) Composition of a separate Council
for a separate State agency for
individuals who are blind. Except as
provided in paragraph (b)(4) of this
section, if the State establishes a
separate Council for a separate State
agency for individuals who are blind,
that Council must—
(i) Conform with all of the
composition requirements for a Council
under paragraph (b)(1) of this section,
except the requirements in paragraph
(b)(1)(vii), unless the exception in
paragraph (b)(4) of this section applies;
and
(ii) Include—
(A) At least one representative of a
disability advocacy group representing
individuals who are blind; and
(B) At least one representative of an
individual who is blind, has multiple
disabilities, and has difficulty
representing himself or herself or is
unable due to disabilities to represent
himself or herself.
(4) Exception. If State law in effect on
October 29, 1992 requires a separate
Council under paragraph (b)(3) of this
section to have fewer than 15 members,
the separate Council is in compliance
with the composition requirements in
paragraphs (b)(1)(vi) and (b)(1)(viii) of
this section if it includes at least one
representative who meets the
requirements for each of those
paragraphs.
(c) Majority. (1) A majority of the
Council members must be individuals
with disabilities who meet the
requirements of § 361.5(c)(28) and are
not employed by the designated State
unit.
(2) In the case of a separate Council
established under § 361.16(b), a majority
of the Council members must be
individuals who are blind and are not
employed by the designated State unit.
(d) Chairperson. (1) The chairperson
must be selected by the members of the
Council from among the voting
members of the Council, subject to the
veto power of the Governor; or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
(2) In States in which the Governor
does not have veto power pursuant to
State law, the appointing authority
described in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section must designate a member of the
Council to serve as the chairperson of
the Council or must require the Council
to designate a member to serve as
chairperson.
(e) Terms of appointment. (1) Each
member of the Council must be
appointed for a term of no more than
three years, and each member of the
Council, other than a representative
identified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) or (ix)
of this section, may serve for no more
than two consecutive full terms.
(2) A member appointed to fill a
vacancy occurring prior to the end of
the term for which the predecessor was
appointed must be appointed for the
remainder of the predecessor’s term.
(3) The terms of service of the
members initially appointed must be, as
specified by the appointing authority as
described in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section, for varied numbers of years to
ensure that terms expire on a staggered
basis.
(f) Vacancies. (1) A vacancy in the
membership of the Council must be
filled in the same manner as the original
appointment, except the appointing
authority as described in paragraph
(a)(1) of this section may delegate the
authority to fill that vacancy to the
remaining members of the Council after
making the original appointment.
(2) No vacancy affects the power of
the remaining members to execute the
duties of the Council.
(g) Conflict of interest. No member of
the Council may cast a vote on any
matter that would provide direct
financial benefit to the member or the
member’s organization or otherwise give
the appearance of a conflict of interest
under State law.
(h) Functions. The Council must, after
consulting with the State workforce
development board—
(1) Review, analyze, and advise the
designated State unit regarding the
performance of the State unit’s
responsibilities under this part,
particularly responsibilities related to—
(i) Eligibility, including order of
selection;
(ii) The extent, scope, and
effectiveness of services provided; and
(iii) Functions performed by State
agencies that affect or potentially affect
the ability of individuals with
disabilities in achieving employment
outcomes under this part;
(2) In partnership with the designated
State unit—
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21113
(i) Develop, agree to, and review State
goals and priorities in accordance with
§ 361.29(c); and
(ii) Evaluate the effectiveness of the
vocational rehabilitation program and
submit reports of progress to the
Secretary in accordance with
§ 361.29(e);
(3) Advise the designated State agency
and the designated State unit regarding
activities carried out under this part and
assist in the preparation of the
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan and amendments to the plan,
applications, reports, needs
assessments, and evaluations required
by this part;
(4) To the extent feasible, conduct a
review and analysis of the effectiveness
of, and consumer satisfaction with—
(i) The functions performed by the
designated State agency;
(ii) The vocational rehabilitation
services provided by State agencies and
other public and private entities
responsible for providing vocational
rehabilitation services to individuals
with disabilities under the Act; and
(iii) The employment outcomes
achieved by eligible individuals
receiving services under this part,
including the availability of health and
other employment benefits in
connection with those employment
outcomes;
(5) Prepare and submit to the
Governor and to the Secretary no later
than 90 days after the end of the Federal
fiscal year an annual report on the status
of vocational rehabilitation programs
operated within the State and make the
report available to the public through
appropriate modes of communication;
(6) To avoid duplication of efforts and
enhance the number of individuals
served, coordinate activities with the
activities of other councils within the
State, including the Statewide
Independent Living Council established
under chapter 1, title VII of the Act, the
advisory panel established under
section 612(a)(21) of the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act, the
State Developmental Disabilities
Planning Council described in section
124 of the Developmental Disabilities
Assistance and Bill of Rights Act, the
State mental health planning council
established under section 1914(a) of the
Public Health Service Act, and the State
workforce development board, and with
the activities of entities carrying out
programs under the Assistive
Technology Act of 1998;
(7) Provide for coordination and the
establishment of working relationships
between the designated State agency
and the Statewide Independent Living
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21114
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Council and centers for independent
living within the State; and
(8) Perform other comparable
functions, consistent with the purpose
of this part, as the Council determines
to be appropriate, that are comparable to
the other functions performed by the
Council.
(i) Resources. (1) The Council, in
conjunction with the designated State
unit, must prepare a plan for the
provision of resources, including staff
and other personnel, that may be
necessary and sufficient for the Council
to carry out its functions under this part.
(2) The resource plan must, to the
maximum extent possible, rely on the
use of resources in existence during the
period of implementation of the plan.
(3) Any disagreements between the
designated State unit and the Council
regarding the amount of resources
necessary to carry out the functions of
the Council must be resolved by the
Governor, consistent with paragraphs
(i)(1) and (2) of this section.
(4) The Council must, consistent with
State law, supervise and evaluate the
staff and personnel that are necessary to
carry out its functions.
(5) Those staff and personnel that are
assisting the Council in carrying out its
functions may not be assigned duties by
the designated State unit or any other
agency or office of the State that would
create a conflict of interest.
(j) Meetings. The Council must—
(1) Convene at least four meetings a
year in locations determined by the
Council to be necessary to conduct
Council business. The meetings must be
publicly announced, open, and
accessible to the general public,
including individuals with disabilities,
unless there is a valid reason for an
executive session; and
(2) Conduct forums or hearings, as
appropriate, that are publicly
announced, open, and accessible to the
public, including individuals with
disabilities.
(k) Compensation. Funds
appropriated under title I of the Act,
except funds to carry out sections 112
and 121 of the Act, may be used to
compensate and reimburse the expenses
of Council members in accordance with
section 105(g) of the Act.
(Authority: Section 105 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 725)
§ 361.18 Comprehensive system of
personnel development.
The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must describe the procedures
and activities the State agency will
undertake to establish and maintain a
comprehensive system of personnel
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
development designed to ensure an
adequate supply of qualified
rehabilitation personnel, including
professionals and paraprofessionals, for
the designated State unit. If the State
agency has a State Rehabilitation
Council, this description must, at a
minimum, specify that the Council has
an opportunity to review and comment
on the development of plans, policies,
and procedures necessary to meet the
requirements of paragraphs (b) through
(d) of this section. This description must
also conform with the following
requirements:
(a) Personnel and personnel
development data system. The
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must describe the
development and maintenance of a
system by the State agency for collecting
and analyzing on an annual basis data
on qualified personnel needs and
personnel development, in accordance
with the following requirements:
(1) Data on qualified personnel needs
must include—
(i) The number of personnel who are
employed by the State agency in the
provision of vocational rehabilitation
services in relation to the number of
individuals served, broken down by
personnel category;
(ii) The number of personnel
currently needed by the State agency to
provide vocational rehabilitation
services, broken down by personnel
category; and
(iii) Projections of the number of
personnel, broken down by personnel
category, who will be needed by the
State agency to provide vocational
rehabilitation services in the State in
five years based on projections of the
number of individuals to be served,
including individuals with significant
disabilities, the number of personnel
expected to retire or leave the field, and
other relevant factors.
(2) Data on personnel development
must include—
(i) A list of the institutions of higher
education in the State that are preparing
vocational rehabilitation professionals,
by type of program;
(ii) The number of students enrolled
at each of those institutions, broken
down by type of program; and
(iii) The number of students who
graduated during the prior year from
each of those institutions with
certification or licensure, or with the
credentials for certification or licensure,
broken down by the personnel category
for which they have received, or have
the credentials to receive, certification
or licensure.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(b) Plan for recruitment, preparation,
and retention of qualified personnel.
The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must describe the
development, updating, and
implementation of a plan to address the
current and projected needs for
personnel who are qualified in
accordance with paragraph (c) of this
section. The plan must identify the
personnel needs based on the data
collection and analysis system
described in paragraph (a) of this
section and must provide for the
coordination and facilitation of efforts
between the designated State unit and
institutions of higher education and
professional associations to recruit,
prepare, and retain personnel who are
qualified in accordance with paragraph
(c) of this section, including personnel
from minority backgrounds and
personnel who are individuals with
disabilities.
(c) Personnel standards. (1) The
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must include the State
agency’s policies and describe—
(i) Standards that are consistent with
any national or State-approved or
recognized certification, licensing, or
registration requirements, or, in the
absence of these requirements, other
comparable requirements (including
State personnel requirements) that
apply to the profession or discipline in
which that category of personnel is
providing vocational rehabilitation
services; and
(ii) The establishment and
maintenance of education and
experience requirements, to ensure that
the personnel have a 21st-century
understanding of the evolving labor
force and the needs of individuals with
disabilities, including requirements
for—
(A)(1) Attainment of a baccalaureate
degree in a field of study reasonably
related to vocational rehabilitation, to
indicate a level of competency and skill
demonstrating basic preparation in a
field of study such as vocational
rehabilitation counseling, social work,
psychology, disability studies, business
administration, human resources,
special education, supported
employment, customized employment,
economics, or another field that
reasonably prepares individuals to work
with consumers and employers; and
(2) Demonstrated paid or unpaid
experience, for not less than one year,
consisting of—
(i) Direct work with individuals with
disabilities in a setting such as an
independent living center;
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(ii) Direct service or advocacy
activities that provide such individual
with experience and skills in working
with individuals with disabilities; or
(iii) Direct experience in competitive
integrated employment environments as
an employer, as a small business owner
or operator, or in self-employment, or
other experience in human resources or
recruitment, or experience in
supervising employees, training, or
other activities; or
(B) Attainment of a master’s or
doctoral degree in a field of study such
as vocational rehabilitation counseling,
law, social work, psychology, disability
studies, business administration, human
resources, special education,
management, public administration, or
another field that reasonably provides
competence in the employment sector,
in a disability field, or in both businessrelated and rehabilitation-related fields;
and
(2) As used in this section—
(i) Profession or discipline means a
specific occupational category,
including any paraprofessional
occupational category, that—
(A) Provides rehabilitation services to
individuals with disabilities;
(B) Has been established or designated
by the State unit; and
(C) Has a specified scope of
responsibility.
(ii) Ensuring that personnel have a
21st-century understanding of the
evolving labor force and the needs of
individuals with disabilities means that
personnel have specialized training and
experience that enables them to work
effectively with individuals with
disabilities to assist them to achieve
competitive integrated employment and
with employers who hire such
individuals. Relevant personnel skills
include, but are not limited to—
(A) Understanding the medical and
psychosocial aspects of various
disabilities;
(B) Assessing an individual’s skills
and abilities to obtain and retain
competitive integrated employment and
establishing a plan to meet the
individual’s career goals;
(C) Counseling, case management, and
advocacy to modify environmental and
attitudinal barriers;
(D) Understanding the effective
utilization of rehabilitation technology;
(E) Developing effective relationships
with employers in the public and
private sectors and
(F) Delivering job development and
job placement services that respond to
today’s labor market.
(d) Staff development. (1) The
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
State Plan must include the State
agency’s policies and describe the
procedures and activities the State
agency will undertake to ensure that all
personnel employed by the State unit
receive appropriate and adequate
training, including a description of—
(i) A system of staff development for
rehabilitation professionals and
paraprofessionals within the State unit,
particularly with respect to assessment,
vocational counseling, job placement,
and rehabilitation technology, including
training implemented in coordination
with entities carrying out State
programs under section 4 of the
Assistive Technology Act of 1998 (29
U.S.C. 3003);
(ii) Procedures for acquiring and
disseminating to rehabilitation
professionals and paraprofessionals
within the designated State unit
significant knowledge from research and
other sources; and
(iii) Policies and procedures relating
to the establishment and maintenance of
standards to ensure that personnel,
including rehabilitation professionals
and paraprofessionals, needed within
the designated State unit to carry out
this part are appropriately and
adequately prepared and trained.
(2) The specific training areas for staff
development should be based on the
needs of each State unit and may
include, but are not limited to—
(i) Training regarding the Workforce
Innovation and Opportunity Act and the
amendments it made to the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973;
(ii) Training with respect to the
requirements of the Americans with
Disabilities Act, the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act, and Social
Security work incentive programs,
including programs under the Ticket to
Work and Work Incentives
Improvement Act of 1999, training to
facilitate informed choice under this
program, and training to improve the
provision of services to culturally
diverse populations; and
(iii) Activities related to—
(A) Recruitment and retention of
qualified rehabilitation personnel;
(B) Succession planning; and
(C) Leadership development and
capacity building.
(e) Personnel to address individual
communication needs. The vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan must
describe how the designated State unit
includes among its personnel, or obtains
the services of—
(1) Individuals able to communicate
in the native languages of applicants
and eligible individuals who have
limited English proficiency; and
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21115
(2) Individuals able to communicate
with applicants and eligible individuals
in appropriate modes of
communication.
(f) Coordination with personnel
development under the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act. The
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must describe the procedures
and activities the State agency will
undertake to coordinate its
comprehensive system of personnel
development under the Act with
personnel development under the
Individuals with Disabilities Education
Act.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(7) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a)(7))
§ 361.19 Affirmative action for individuals
with disabilities.
The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must assure that the State
agency takes affirmative action to
employ and advance in employment
qualified individuals with disabilities
covered under and on the same terms
and conditions as stated in section 503
of the Act.
(Authority: Section 101(a)(6)(B) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 721(a)(6)(B))
§ 361.20
Public participation requirements.
(a) Conduct of public meetings. (1)
The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must assure that prior to the
adoption of any substantive policies or
procedures governing the provision of
vocational rehabilitation services under
the Unified or Combined State Plan, the
designated State agency conducts public
meetings throughout the State to
provide the public, including
individuals with disabilities, an
opportunity to comment on the policies
or procedures.
(2) For purposes of this section,
substantive changes to the policies or
procedures governing the provision of
vocational rehabilitation services that
would require the conduct of public
meetings are those that directly impact
the nature and scope of the services
provided to individuals with
disabilities, or the manner in which
individuals interact with the designated
State agency or in matters related to the
delivery of vocational rehabilitation
services. Examples of substantive
changes include, but are not limited
to—
(i) Any changes to policies or
procedures that fundamentally alter the
rights and responsibilities of individuals
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
21116
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
with disabilities in the vocational
rehabilitation process;
(ii) Organizational changes to the
designated State agency or unit that
would likely affect the manner in which
services are delivered;
(iii) Any changes that affect the nature
and scope of vocational rehabilitation
services provided by the designated
State agency or unit;
(iv) Changes in formal or informal
dispute procedures;
(v) The adoption or amendment of
policies instituting an order of selection;
and
(vi) Changes to policies and
procedures regarding the financial
participation of eligible individuals.
(3) Non-substantive, e.g.,
administrative changes that would not
require the need for public hearings
include:
(i) Internal procedures that do not
directly affect individuals receiving
vocational rehabilitation services, such
as payment processing or personnel
procedures;
(ii) Changes to the case management
system that only affect vocational
rehabilitation personnel;
(iii) Changes in indirect cost
allocations, internal fiscal review
procedures, or routine reporting
requirements;
(iv) Minor revisions to vocational
rehabilitation procedures or policies to
correct production errors, such as
typographical and grammatical
mistakes; and
(v) Changes to contract procedures
that do not affect the delivery of
vocational rehabilitation services.
(b) Notice requirements. The
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must assure that the
designated State agency, prior to
conducting the public meetings,
provides appropriate and sufficient
notice throughout the State of the
meetings in accordance with—
(1) State law governing public
meetings; or
(2) In the absence of State law
governing public meetings, procedures
developed by the designated State
agency in consultation with the State
Rehabilitation Council.
(c) Summary of input of the State
Rehabilitation Council. The vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan must
provide a summary of the input of the
State Rehabilitation Council, if the State
agency has a Council, into the
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan and any amendment to that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
portion of the plan, in accordance with
§ 361.16(a)(2)(v).
(d) Special consultation requirements.
The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must assure that the State
agency actively consults with the
director of the Client Assistance
Program, the State Rehabilitation
Council, if the State agency has a
Council, and, as appropriate, Indian
tribes, tribal organizations, and native
Hawaiian organizations on its policies
and procedures governing the provision
of vocational rehabilitation services
under the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan.
(e) Appropriate modes of
communication. The State unit must
provide to the public, through
appropriate modes of communication,
notices of the public meetings, any
materials furnished prior to or during
the public meetings, and the policies
and procedures governing the provision
of vocational rehabilitation services
under the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 101(a)(16)(A) and
105(c)(3) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c), 721(a)(16)(A) and
725(c)(3))
§ 361.21 Consultations regarding the
administration of the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified
or Combined State plan.
The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must assure that, in
connection with matters of general
policy arising in the administration of
the vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan, the designated State agency
takes into account the views of—
(a) Individuals and groups of
individuals who are recipients of
vocational rehabilitation services or, as
appropriate, the individuals’
representatives;
(b) Personnel working in programs
that provide vocational rehabilitation
services to individuals with disabilities;
(c) Providers of vocational
rehabilitation services to individuals
with disabilities;
(d) The director of the Client
Assistance Program; and
(e) The State Rehabilitation Council, if
the State has a Council.
(Authority: Sections 101(a)(16)(B) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 721(a)(16)(B))
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
§ 361.22 Coordination with education
officials.
(a) Plans, policies, and procedures. (1)
The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must contain plans, policies,
and procedures for coordination
between the designated State agency
and education officials responsible for
the public education of students with
disabilities that are designed to facilitate
the transition of students with
disabilities from the receipt of
educational services, including preemployment transition services, in
school to the receipt of vocational
rehabilitation services under the
responsibility of the designated State
agency.
(2) These plans, policies, and
procedures in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section must provide for the
development and approval of an
individualized plan for employment in
accordance with § 361.45 as early as
possible during the transition planning
process and not later than the time a
student determined to be eligible for
vocational rehabilitation services leaves
the school setting or, if the designated
State unit is operating under an order of
selection, before each eligible student
able to be served under the order leaves
the school setting.
(b) Formal interagency agreement.
The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must include information on
a formal interagency agreement with the
State educational agency that, at a
minimum, provides for—
(1) Consultation and technical
assistance, which may be provided
using alternative means for meeting
participation (such as video conferences
and conference calls), to assist
educational agencies in planning for the
transition of students with disabilities
from school to post-school activities,
including vocational rehabilitation
services;
(2) Transition planning by personnel
of the designated State agency and
educational agency personnel for
students with disabilities that facilitates
the development and implementation of
their individualized education programs
(IEPs) under section 614(d) of the
Individuals with Disabilities Education
Act;
(3) The roles and responsibilities,
including financial responsibilities, of
each agency, including provisions for
determining State lead agencies and
qualified personnel responsible for
transition services;
(4) Procedures for outreach to and
identification of students with
disabilities who are in need of transition
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
services. Outreach to these students
should occur as early as possible during
the transition planning process and
must include, at a minimum, a
description of the purpose of the
vocational rehabilitation program,
eligibility requirements, application
procedures, and scope of services that
may be provided to eligible individuals;
(5) Coordination necessary to satisfy
documentation requirements set forth at
34 CFR part 397 with regard to students
and youth with disabilities who are
seeking subminimum wage
employment; and
(6) Assurance that, in accordance with
34 CFR 397.31, neither the State
educational agency nor the local
educational agency will enter into a
contract or other arrangement with an
entity, as defined in 34 CFR 397.5(d), for
the purpose of operating a program
under which a youth with a disability
is engaged in subminimum wage
employment.
(c) Construction. Nothing in this part
will be construed to reduce the
obligation under the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C.
1400 et seq.) of a local educational
agency or any other agency to provide
or pay for any transition services that
are also considered special education or
related services and that are necessary
for ensuring a free appropriate public
education to children with disabilities
within the State involved.
(Authority: Sections 101(a)(11)(D), 101(c),
and 511 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 721 (a)(11)(D), 721(c),
and 794g)
§ 361.23 Requirements related to the
statewide workforce development system.
As a required partner in the one-stop
service delivery system (which is part of
the statewide workforce development
system under title I of the Workforce
Innovation and Opportunity Act), the
designated State unit must satisfy all
requirements set forth in joint
regulations in subpart F of this part.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(Authority: Section 101(a)(11)(A) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 721(a)(11)(A); Section 121 (b)(1)(B)(iv)
of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity
Act; 29 U.S.C. 3151)
§ 361.24 Cooperation and coordination
with other entities.
(a) Interagency cooperation. The
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must describe the designated
State agency’s cooperation with and use
of the services and facilities of Federal,
State, and local agencies and programs,
including the State programs carried out
under section 4 of the Assistive
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
Technology Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C.
3003), programs carried out by the
Under Secretary for Rural Development
of the Department of Agriculture,
noneducational agencies serving out-ofschool youth, and State use contracting
programs, to the extent that such
Federal, State, and local agencies and
programs are not carrying out activities
through the statewide workforce
development system.
(b) Coordination with the Statewide
Independent Living Council and
independent living centers. The
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must assure that the
designated State unit, the Statewide
Independent Living Council established
under title VII, chapter 1, part B of the
Act, and the independent living centers
established under title VII, Chapter 1,
Part C of the Act have developed
working relationships and coordinate
their activities.
(c) Coordination with Employers. The
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must describe how the
designated State unit will work with
employers to identify competitive
integrated employment opportunities
and career exploration opportunities, in
order to facilitate the provision of—
(1) Vocational rehabilitation services;
and
(2) Transition services for youth with
disabilities and students with
disabilities, such as pre-employment
transition services.
(d) Cooperative agreement with
recipients of grants for services to
American Indians. (1) General. In
applicable cases, the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan must
assure that the designated State agency
has entered into a formal cooperative
agreement with each grant recipient in
the State that receives funds under part
C of the Act (American Indian
Vocational Rehabilitation Services).
(2) Contents of formal cooperative
agreement. The agreement required
under paragraph (d)(1) of this section
must describe strategies for
collaboration and coordination in
providing vocational rehabilitation
services to American Indians who are
individuals with disabilities,
including—
(i) Strategies for interagency referral
and information sharing that will assist
in eligibility determinations and the
development of individualized plans for
employment;
(ii) Procedures for ensuring that
American Indians who are individuals
with disabilities and are living on or
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21117
near a reservation or tribal service area
are provided vocational rehabilitation
services;
(iii) Strategies for the provision of
transition planning by personnel of the
designated State unit, the State
educational agency, and the recipient of
funds under part C of the Act, that will
facilitate the development and approval
of the individualized plan for
employment under § 361.45; and
(iv) Provisions for sharing resources
in cooperative studies and assessments,
joint training activities, and other
collaborative activities designed to
improve the provision of services to
American Indians who are individuals
with disabilities.
(e) Reciprocal referral services
between two designated State units in
the same State. If there is a separate
designated State unit for individuals
who are blind, the two designated State
units must establish reciprocal referral
services, use each other’s services and
facilities to the extent feasible, jointly
plan activities to improve services in the
State for individuals with multiple
impairments, including visual
impairments, and otherwise cooperate
to provide more effective services,
including, if appropriate, entering into a
written cooperative agreement.
(f) Cooperative agreement regarding
individuals eligible for home and
community-based waiver programs. The
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must include an assurance
that the designated State unit has
entered into a formal cooperative
agreement with the State agency
responsible for administering the State
Medicaid plan under title XIX of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et
seq.) and the State agency with primary
responsibility for providing services and
supports for individuals with
intellectual disabilities and individuals
with developmental disabilities, with
respect to the delivery of vocational
rehabilitation services, including
extended services, for individuals with
the most significant disabilities who
have been determined to be eligible for
home and community-based services
under a Medicaid waiver, Medicaid
State plan amendment, or other
authority related to a State Medicaid
program.
(g) Interagency cooperation. The
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan shall describe how the
designated State agency will collaborate
with the State agency responsible for
administering the State Medicaid plan
under title XIX of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.), the State
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21118
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
agency responsible for providing
services with developmental
disabilities, and the State agency
responsible for providing mental health
services, to develop opportunities for
community-based employment in
integrated settings, to the greatest extent
practicable.
(h) Coordination with assistive
technology programs. The vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan must
include an assurance that the designated
State unit, and the lead agency and
implementing entity (if any) designated
by the Governor of the State under
section 4 of the Assistive Technology
Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 3003), have
developed working relationships and
will enter into agreements for the
coordination of their activities,
including the referral of individuals
with disabilities to programs and
activities described in that section.
(i) Coordination with ticket to work
and self-sufficiency program. The
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must include an assurance
that the designated State unit will
coordinate activities with any other
State agency that is functioning as an
employment network under the Ticket
to Work and Self-Sufficiency Program
established under section 1148 of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–
19).
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(11) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a)(11))
§ 361.25
Statewideness.
The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must assure that services
provided under the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan will be
available in all political subdivisions of
the State, unless a waiver of
statewideness is requested and
approved in accordance with § 361.26.
(Authority: Section 101(a)(4) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 721(a)(4))
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 361.26
Waiver of statewideness.
(a) Availability. The State unit may
provide services in one or more political
subdivisions of the State that increase
services or expand the scope of services
that are available statewide under the
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan if—
(1) The non-Federal share of the cost
of these services is met from funds
provided by a local public agency,
including funds contributed to a local
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
public agency by a private agency,
organization, or individual;
(2) The services are likely to promote
the vocational rehabilitation of
substantially larger numbers of
individuals with disabilities or of
individuals with disabilities with
particular types of impairments; and
(3) For purposes other than those
specified in § 361.60(b)(3)(i) and
consistent with the requirements in
§ 361.60(b)(3)(ii), the State includes in
its vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan, and the Secretary approves,
a waiver of the statewideness
requirement, in accordance with the
requirements of paragraph (b) of this
section.
(b) Request for waiver. The request for
a waiver of statewideness must—
(1) Identify the types of services to be
provided;
(2) Contain a written assurance from
the local public agency that it will make
available to the State unit the nonFederal share of funds;
(3) Contain a written assurance that
State unit approval will be obtained for
each proposed service before it is put
into effect; and
(4) Contain a written assurance that
all other requirements of the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan,
including a State’s order of selection
requirements, will apply to all services
approved under the waiver.
(Authority: Section 101(a)(4) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 721(a)(4))
§ 361.27 Shared funding and
administration of joint programs.
(a) If the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan provides for the
designated State agency to share
funding and administrative
responsibility with another State agency
or local public agency to carry out a
joint program to provide services to
individuals with disabilities, the State
must submit to the Secretary for
approval a plan that describes its shared
funding and administrative
arrangement.
(b) The plan under paragraph (a) of
this section must include—
(1) A description of the nature and
scope of the joint program;
(2) The services to be provided under
the joint program;
(3) The respective roles of each
participating agency in the
administration and provision of
services; and
(4) The share of the costs to be
assumed by each agency.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(c) If a proposed joint program does
not comply with the statewideness
requirement in § 361.25, the State unit
must obtain a waiver of statewideness,
in accordance with § 361.26.
(Authority: Section 101(a)(2)(A) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 721(a)(2)(A))
§ 361.28 Third-party cooperative
arrangements involving funds from other
public agencies.
(a) The designated State unit may
enter into a third-party cooperative
arrangement for providing or
contracting for the provision of
vocational rehabilitation services with
another State agency or a local public
agency that is providing part or all of
the non-Federal share in accordance
with paragraph (c) of this section, if the
designated State unit ensures that—
(1) The services provided by the
cooperating agency are not the
customary or typical services provided
by that agency but are new services that
have a vocational rehabilitation focus or
existing services that have been
modified, adapted, expanded, or
reconfigured to have a vocational
rehabilitation focus;
(2) The services provided by the
cooperating agency are only available to
applicants for, or recipients of, services
from the designated State unit;
(3) Program expenditures and staff
providing services under the
cooperative arrangement are under the
administrative supervision of the
designated State unit; and
(4) All requirements of the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan,
including a State’s order of selection,
will apply to all services provided
under the cooperative arrangement.
(b) If a third party cooperative
arrangement does not comply with the
statewideness requirement in § 361.25,
the State unit must obtain a waiver of
statewideness, in accordance with
§ 361.26.
(c) The cooperating agency’s
contribution toward the non-Federal
share required under the arrangement,
as set forth in paragraph (a) of this
section, may be made through:
(1) Cash transfers to the designated
State unit; and
(2) Certified personnel expenditures
for the time cooperating agency staff
spent providing direct vocational
rehabilitation services pursuant to a
third-party cooperative arrangement that
meets the requirements of this section.
Certified personnel expenditures may
include the allocable portion of staff
salary and fringe benefits based upon
the amount of time cooperating agency
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
staff spent providing services under the
arrangement.
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c))
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 361.29 Statewide assessment; annual
estimates; annual State goals and priorities;
strategies; and progress reports.
(a) Comprehensive statewide
assessment. (1) The vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan must
include—
(i) The results of a comprehensive,
statewide assessment, jointly conducted
by the designated State unit and the
State Rehabilitation Council (if the State
unit has a Council) every three years.
Results of the assessment are to be
included in the vocational rehabilitation
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan, submitted in accordance
with the requirements of § 361.10(a) and
the joint regulations of this part. The
comprehensive needs assessment must
describe the rehabilitation needs of
individuals with disabilities residing
within the State, particularly the
vocational rehabilitation services needs
of—
(A) Individuals with the most
significant disabilities, including their
need for supported employment
services;
(B) Individuals with disabilities who
are minorities and individuals with
disabilities who have been unserved or
underserved by the vocational
rehabilitation program carried out under
this part;
(C) Individuals with disabilities
served through other components of the
statewide workforce development
system as identified by those
individuals and personnel assisting
those individuals through the
components of the system; and
(D) Youth with disabilities, and
students with disabilities, including
(1) Their need for pre-employment
transition services or other transition
services; and
(2) An assessment of the needs of
individuals with disabilities for
transition services and pre-employment
transition services, and the extent to
which such services provided under
this part are coordinated with transition
services provided under the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act (20
U.S.C. 1400 et seq.) in order to meet the
needs of individuals with disabilities.
(ii) An assessment of the need to
establish, develop, or improve
community rehabilitation programs
within the State.
(2) The vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
Combined State Plan must assure that
the State will submit to the Secretary a
report containing information regarding
updates to the assessments under
paragraph (a) of this section for any year
in which the State updates the
assessments at such time and in such
manner as the Secretary determines
appropriate.
(b) Annual estimates. The vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan must
include, and must assure that the State
will submit a report to the Secretary (at
such time and in such manner
determined appropriate by the
Secretary) that includes, State estimates
of—
(1) The number of individuals in the
State who are eligible for services under
this part;
(2) The number of eligible individuals
who will receive services provided with
funds provided under this part and
under part § 363, including, if the
designated State agency uses an order of
selection in accordance with § 361.36,
estimates of the number of individuals
to be served under each priority
category within the order;
(3) The number of individuals who
are eligible for services under paragraph
(b)(1) of this section, but are not
receiving such services due to an order
of selection; and
(4) The costs of the services described
in paragraph (b)(2) of this section,
including, if the designated State agency
uses an order of selection, the service
costs for each priority category within
the order.
(c) Goals and priorities. (1) In general.
The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must identify the goals and
priorities of the State in carrying out the
program.
(2) Council. The goals and priorities
must be jointly developed, agreed to,
reviewed annually, and, as necessary,
revised by the designated State unit and
the State Rehabilitation Council, if the
State unit has a Council.
(3) Submission. The vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan must
assure that the State will submit to the
Secretary a report containing
information regarding revisions in the
goals and priorities for any year in
which the State revises the goals and
priorities at such time and in such
manner as determined appropriate by
the Secretary.
(4) Basis for goals and priorities. The
State goals and priorities must be based
on an analysis of—
(i) The comprehensive statewide
assessment described in paragraph (a) of
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21119
this section, including any updates to
the assessment;
(ii) The performance of the State on
the standards and indicators established
under section 106 of the Act; and
(iii) Other available information on
the operation and the effectiveness of
the vocational rehabilitation program
carried out in the State, including any
reports received from the State
Rehabilitation Council under
§ 361.17(h) and the findings and
recommendations from monitoring
activities conducted under section 107
of the Act.
(5) Service and outcome goals for
categories in order of selection. If the
designated State agency uses an order of
selection in accordance with § 361.36,
the vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must identify the State’s
service and outcome goals and the time
within which these goals may be
achieved for individuals in each priority
category within the order.
(d) Strategies. The vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan must
describe the strategies the State will use
to address the needs identified in the
assessment conducted under paragraph
(a) of this section and achieve the goals
and priorities identified in paragraph (c)
of this section, including—
(1) The methods to be used to expand
and improve services to individuals
with disabilities, including how a broad
range of assistive technology services
and assistive technology devices will be
provided to those individuals at each
stage of the rehabilitation process and
how those services and devices will be
provided to individuals with disabilities
on a statewide basis;
(2) The methods to be used to
improve and expand vocational
rehabilitation services for students with
disabilities, including the coordination
of services designed to facilitate the
transition of such students from the
receipt of educational services in school
to postsecondary life, including the
receipt of vocational rehabilitation
services under the Act, postsecondary
education, employment, and preemployment transition services;
(3) Strategies developed and
implemented by the State to address the
needs of students and youth with
disabilities identified in the assessments
described in paragraph (a) of this
section and strategies to achieve the
goals and priorities identified by the
State to improve and expand vocational
rehabilitation services for students and
youth with disabilities on a statewide
basis;
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
21120
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(4) Strategies to provide preemployment transition services.
(5) Outreach procedures to identify
and serve individuals with disabilities
who are minorities and individuals with
disabilities who have been unserved or
underserved by the vocational
rehabilitation program;
(6) As applicable, the plan of the State
for establishing, developing, or
improving community rehabilitation
programs;
(7) Strategies to improve the
performance of the State with respect to
the evaluation standards and
performance indicators established
pursuant to section 106 of the Act and
section 116 of Workforce Innovation
and Opportunity Act; and
(8) Strategies for assisting other
components of the statewide workforce
development system in assisting
individuals with disabilities.
(e) Evaluation and reports of progress.
(1) The vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan must include—
(i) The results of an evaluation of the
effectiveness of the vocational
rehabilitation program; and
(ii) A joint report by the designated
State unit and the State Rehabilitation
Council, if the State unit has a Council,
to the Secretary on the progress made in
improving the effectiveness of the
program from the previous year. This
evaluation and joint report must
include—
(A) An evaluation of the extent to
which the goals and priorities identified
in paragraph (c) of this section were
achieved;
(B) A description of the strategies that
contributed to the achievement of the
goals and priorities;
(C) To the extent to which the goals
and priorities were not achieved, a
description of the factors that impeded
that achievement; and
(D) An assessment of the performance
of the State on the standards and
indicators established pursuant to
section 106 of the Act.
(2) The vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan must assure that
the designated State unit and the State
Rehabilitation Council, if the State unit
has a Council, will jointly submit to the
Secretary a report that contains the
information described in paragraph
(e)(1) of this section at such time and in
such manner the Secretary determines
appropriate.
(Authority: Section 101(a)(15) and (25) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 721(a)(15) and (25))
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
§ 361.30
Services to American Indians.
The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must assure that the
designated State agency provides
vocational rehabilitation services to
American Indians who are individuals
with disabilities residing in the State to
the same extent as the designated State
agency provides vocational
rehabilitation services to other
significant populations of individuals
with disabilities residing in the State.
(Authority: Sections 101(a)(13) and 121(b)(3)
of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 721(a)(13) and 741(b)(3))
§ 361.31 Cooperative agreements with
private nonprofit organizations.
The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must describe the manner in
which cooperative agreements with
private nonprofit vocational
rehabilitation service providers will be
established.
(Authority: Section 101(a)(24)(B) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 721(a)(24)(B))
§ 361.32 Provision of training and services
for employers.
The designated State unit may expend
payments received under this part to
educate and provide services to
employers who have hired or are
interested in hiring individuals with
disabilities under the vocational
rehabilitation program, including—
(a) Providing training and technical
assistance to employers regarding the
employment of individuals with
disabilities, including disability
awareness, and the requirements of the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
(42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) and other
employment-related laws;
(b) Working with employers to—
(1) Provide opportunities for workbased learning experiences (including
internships, short-term employment,
apprenticeships, and fellowships);
(2) Provide opportunities for preemployment transition services;
(3) Recruit qualified applicants who
are individuals with disabilities;
(4) Train employees who are
individuals with disabilities; and
(5) Promote awareness of disabilityrelated obstacles to continued
employment.
(c) Providing consultation, technical
assistance, and support to employers on
workplace accommodations, assistive
technology, and facilities and workplace
access through collaboration with
community partners and employers,
across States and nationally, to enable
the employers to recruit, job match,
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
hire, and retain qualified individuals
with disabilities who are recipients of
vocational rehabilitation services under
this part, or who are applicants for such
services; and
(d) Assisting employers with utilizing
available financial support for hiring or
accommodating individuals with
disabilities.
(Authority: Section 109 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 728A)
§ 361.33
[Reserved]
§ 361.34 Supported employment State plan
supplement.
(a) The vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan must assure that
the State has an acceptable plan under
part 363 of this chapter that provides for
the use of funds under that part to
supplement funds under this part for
the cost of services leading to supported
employment.
(b) The supported employment plan,
including any needed revisions, must be
submitted as a supplement to the
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan submitted under this part.
(Authority: Sections 101(a)(22) and 606 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 721(a)(22) and 795k)
§ 361.35 Innovation and expansion
activities.
(a) The vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan must assure that
the State will reserve and use a portion
of the funds allotted to the State under
section 110 of the Act—
(1) For the development and
implementation of innovative
approaches to expand and improve the
provision of vocational rehabilitation
services to individuals with disabilities,
particularly individuals with the most
significant disabilities, including
transition services for students and
youth with disabilities and preemployment transition services for
students with disabilities, consistent
with the findings of the comprehensive
statewide assessment of the
rehabilitation needs of individuals with
disabilities under § 361.29(a) and the
State’s goals and priorities under
§ 361.29(c);
(2) To support the funding of the State
Rehabilitation Council, if the State has
a Council, consistent with the resource
plan identified in § 361.17(i); and
(3) To support the Statewide
Independent Living Council, consistent
with the Statewide Independent Living
Council resource plan prepared under
title VII, chapter 1 of the Act. The State
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
and the Statewide Independent Living
Council may determine in the Statewide
Independent Living Council resource
plan that other sources of available
funding may be used instead of funding
under this section.
(b) The vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan must—
(1) Describe how the reserved funds
will be used; and
(2) Include a report describing how
the reserved funds were used.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(18) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a)(18))
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 361.36 Ability to serve all eligible
individuals; order of selection for services.
(a) General provisions. (1) The
designated State unit either must be able
to provide the full range of services
listed in section 103(a) of the Act and
§ 361.48, as appropriate, to all eligible
individuals or, in the event that
vocational rehabilitation services cannot
be provided to all eligible individuals in
the State who apply for the services,
include in the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan the order to be
followed in selecting eligible
individuals to be provided vocational
rehabilitation services.
(2) The ability of the designated State
unit to provide the full range of
vocational rehabilitation services to all
eligible individuals must be supported
by a determination that satisfies the
requirements of paragraph (b) or (c) of
this section and a determination that, on
the basis of the designated State unit’s
projected fiscal and personnel resources
and its assessment of the rehabilitation
needs of individuals with significant
disabilities within the State, it can—
(i) Continue to provide services to all
individuals currently receiving services;
(ii) Provide assessment services to all
individuals expected to apply for
services in the next fiscal year;
(iii) Provide services to all individuals
who are expected to be determined
eligible in the next fiscal year; and
(iv) Meet all program requirements.
(3) If the designated State unit is
unable to provide the full range of
vocational rehabilitation services to all
eligible individuals in the State who
apply for the services, the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan must—
(i) Show the order to be followed in
selecting eligible individuals to be
provided vocational rehabilitation
services;
(ii) Provide a justification for the
order of selection;
(iii) Identify service and outcome
goals and the time within which the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
goals may be achieved for individuals in
each priority category within the order,
as required under § 361.29(c)(5);
(iv) Assure that—
(A) In accordance with criteria
established by the State for the order of
selection, individuals with the most
significant disabilities will be selected
first for the provision of vocational
rehabilitation services; and
(B) Individuals who do not meet the
order of selection criteria will have
access to services provided through the
information and referral system
established under § 361.37; and
(v) State whether the designated State
unit will elect to serve, in its discretion,
eligible individuals (whether or not the
individuals are receiving vocational
rehabilitation services under the order
of selection) who require specific
services or equipment to maintain
employment, notwithstanding the
assurance provided pursuant to
paragraph (3)(iv)(A) of this section.
(b) Basis for assurance that services
can be provided to all eligible
individuals. (1) For a designated State
unit that determined, for the current
fiscal year and the preceding fiscal year,
that it is able to provide the full range
of services, as appropriate, to all eligible
individuals, the State unit, during the
current fiscal and preceding fiscal year,
must have in fact—
(i) Provided assessment services to all
applicants and the full range of services,
as appropriate, to all eligible
individuals;
(ii) Made referral forms widely
available throughout the State;
(iii) Conducted outreach efforts to
identify and serve individuals with
disabilities who have been unserved or
underserved by the vocational
rehabilitation system; and
(iv) Not delayed, through waiting lists
or other means, determinations of
eligibility, the development of
individualized plans for employment
for individuals determined eligible for
vocational rehabilitation services, or the
provision of services for eligible
individuals for whom individualized
plans for employment have been
developed.
(2) For a designated State unit that
was unable to provide the full range of
services to all eligible individuals
during the current or preceding fiscal
year or that has not met the
requirements in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section, the determination that the
designated State unit is able to provide
the full range of vocational
rehabilitation services to all eligible
individuals in the next fiscal year must
be based on—
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21121
(i) A demonstration that
circumstances have changed that will
allow the designated State unit to meet
the requirements of paragraph (a)(2) of
this section in the next fiscal year,
including—
(A) An estimate of the number of and
projected costs of serving, in the next
fiscal year, individuals with existing
individualized plans for employment;
(B) The projected number of
individuals with disabilities who will
apply for services and will be
determined eligible in the next fiscal
year and the projected costs of serving
those individuals;
(C) The projected costs of
administering the program in the next
fiscal year, including, but not limited to,
costs of staff salaries and benefits,
outreach activities, and required
statewide studies; and
(D) The projected revenues and
projected number of qualified personnel
for the program in the next fiscal year.
(ii) Comparable data, as relevant, for
the current or preceding fiscal year, or
for both years, of the costs listed in
paragraphs (b)(2)(i)(A) through (C) of
this section and the resources identified
in paragraph (b)(2)(i)(D) of this section
and an explanation of any projected
increases or decreases in these costs and
resources; and
(iii) A determination that the
projected revenues and the projected
number of qualified personnel for the
program in the next fiscal year are
adequate to cover the costs identified in
paragraphs (b)(2)(i)(A) through (C) of
this section to ensure the provision of
the full range of services, as appropriate,
to all eligible individuals.
(c) Determining need for establishing
and implementing an order of selection.
(1) The designated State unit must
determine, prior to the beginning of
each fiscal year, whether to establish
and implement an order of selection.
(2) If the designated State unit
determines that it does not need to
establish an order of selection, it must
reevaluate this determination whenever
changed circumstances during the
course of a fiscal year, such as a
decrease in its fiscal or personnel
resources or an increase in its program
costs, indicate that it may no longer be
able to provide the full range of services,
as appropriate, to all eligible
individuals, as described in paragraph
(a)(2) of this section.
(3) If a designated State unit
establishes an order of selection, but
determines that it does not need to
implement that order at the beginning of
the fiscal year, it must continue to meet
the requirements of paragraph (a)(2) of
this section, or it must implement the
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
21122
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
order of selection by closing one or
more priority categories.
(d) Establishing an order of selection.
(1) Basis for order of selection. An order
of selection must be based on a
refinement of the three criteria in the
definition of individual with a
significant disability in section 7(21)(A)
of the Act and § 361.5(c)(29).
(2) Factors that cannot be used in
determining order of selection of eligible
individuals. An order of selection may
not be based on any other factors,
including—
(i) Any duration of residency
requirement, provided the individual is
present in the State;
(ii) Type of disability;
(iii) Age, sex, race, color, or national
origin;
(iv) Source of referral;
(v) Type of expected employment
outcome;
(vi) The need for specific services or
anticipated cost of services required by
an individual; or
(vii) The income level of an
individual or an individual’s family.
(e) Administrative requirements. In
administering the order of selection, the
designated State unit must—
(1) Implement the order of selection
on a statewide basis;
(2) Notify all eligible individuals of
the priority categories in a State’s order
of selection, their assignment to a
particular category, and their right to
appeal their category assignment;
(3) Continue to provide all needed
services to any eligible individual who
has begun to receive services under an
individualized plan for employment
prior to the effective date of the order
of selection, irrespective of the severity
of the individual’s disability; and
(4) Ensure that its funding
arrangements for providing services
under the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan, including thirdparty arrangements and awards under
the establishment authority, are
consistent with the order of selection. If
any funding arrangements are
inconsistent with the order of selection,
the designated State unit must
renegotiate these funding arrangements
so that they are consistent with the
order of selection.
(f) State Rehabilitation Council. The
designated State unit must consult with
the State Rehabilitation Council, if the
State unit has a Council, regarding the—
(1) Need to establish an order of
selection, including any reevaluation of
the need under paragraph (c)(2) of this
section;
(2) Priority categories of the particular
order of selection;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
(3) Criteria for determining
individuals with the most significant
disabilities; and
(4) Administration of the order of
selection.
(Authority: Sections 12(d); 101(a)(5);
101(a)(12); 101(a)(15)(A), (B) and (C);
101(a)(21)(A)(ii); and 504(a) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(d), 721(a)(5), 721(a)(12),
721(a)(15)(A), (B) and (C); 721(a)(21)(A)(ii),
and 794(a))
§ 361.37 Information and referral
programs.
(a) General provisions. The vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan must
assure that—
(1) The designated State agency will
implement an information and referral
system adequate to ensure that
individuals with disabilities, including
eligible individuals who do not meet the
agency’s order of selection criteria for
receiving vocational rehabilitation
services if the agency is operating on an
order of selection, are provided accurate
vocational rehabilitation information
and guidance (which may include
counseling and referral for job
placement) using appropriate modes of
communication to assist them in
preparing for, securing, retaining,
advancing in, or regaining employment;
and
(2) The designated State agency will
refer individuals with disabilities to
other appropriate Federal and State
programs, including other components
of the statewide workforce development
system.
(b) The designated State unit must
refer to appropriate programs and
service providers best suited to address
the specific rehabilitation, independent
living and employment needs of an
individual with a disability who makes
an informed choice not to pursue an
employment outcome under the
vocational rehabilitation program, as
defined in § 361.5(c)(15). Before making
the referral required by this paragraph,
the State unit must—
(1) Consistent with § 361.42(a)(4)(i),
explain to the individual that the
purpose of the vocational rehabilitation
program is to assist individuals to
achieve an employment outcome as
defined in § 361.5(c)(15);
(2) Consistent with § 361.52, provide
the individual with information
concerning the availability of
employment options, and of vocational
rehabilitation services, to assist the
individual to achieve an appropriate
employment outcome;
(3) Inform the individual that services
under the vocational rehabilitation
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
program can be provided to eligible
individuals in an extended employment
setting if necessary for purposes of
training or otherwise preparing for
employment in an integrated setting;
(4) Inform the individual that, if he or
she initially chooses not to pursue an
employment outcome as defined in
§ 361.5(c)(15), he or she can seek
services from the designated State unit
at a later date if, at that time, he or she
chooses to pursue an employment
outcome; and
(5) Refer the individual, as
appropriate, to the Social Security
Administration in order to obtain
information concerning the ability of
individuals with disabilities to work
while receiving benefits from the Social
Security Administration.
(c) Criteria for appropriate referrals.
In making the referrals identified in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the
designated State unit must—
(1) Refer the individual to Federal or
State programs, including programs
carried out by other components of the
statewide workforce development
system, best suited to address the
specific employment needs of an
individual with a disability; and
(2) Provide the individual who is
being referred—
(i) A notice of the referral by the
designated State agency to the agency
carrying out the program;
(ii) Information identifying a specific
point of contact within the agency to
which the individual is being referred;
and
(iii) Information and advice regarding
the most suitable services to assist the
individual to prepare for, secure, retain,
or regain employment.
(d) Order of selection. In providing
the information and referral services
under this section to eligible individuals
who are not in the priority category or
categories to receive vocational
rehabilitation services under the State’s
order of selection, the State unit must
identify, as part of its reporting under
section 101(a)(10) of the Act and
§ 361.40, the number of eligible
individuals who did not meet the
agency’s order of selection criteria for
receiving vocational rehabilitation
services and did receive information
and referral services under this section.
(Authority: Sections 7(11), 12(c), 101(a)(5)(D),
101(a)(10)(C)(ii), and 101(a)(20) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c), 721(a)(5)(D), 721(a)(10)(C)(ii),
and 721(a)(20))
§ 361.38 Protection, use, and release of
personal information.
(a) General provisions. (1) The State
agency and the State unit must adopt
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
and implement written policies and
procedures to safeguard the
confidentiality of all personal
information, including photographs and
lists of names. These policies and
procedures must ensure that—
(i) Specific safeguards are established
to protect current and stored personal
information;
(ii) All applicants and eligible
individuals and, as appropriate, those
individuals’ representatives, service
providers, cooperating agencies, and
interested persons are informed through
appropriate modes of communication of
the confidentiality of personal
information and the conditions for
accessing and releasing this
information;
(iii) All applicants or their
representatives are informed about the
State unit’s need to collect personal
information and the policies governing
its use, including—
(A) Identification of the authority
under which information is collected;
(B) Explanation of the principal
purposes for which the State unit
intends to use or release the
information;
(C) Explanation of whether providing
requested information to the State unit
is mandatory or voluntary and the
effects of not providing requested
information;
(D) Identification of those situations
in which the State unit requires or does
not require informed written consent of
the individual before information may
be released; and
(E) Identification of other agencies to
which information is routinely released;
(iv) An explanation of State policies
and procedures affecting personal
information will be provided to each
individual in that individual’s native
language or through the appropriate
mode of communication; and
(v) These policies and procedures
provide no fewer protections for
individuals than State laws and
regulations.
(2) The State unit may establish
reasonable fees to cover extraordinary
costs of duplicating records or making
extensive searches and must establish
policies and procedures governing
access to records.
(b) State program use. All personal
information in the possession of the
State agency or the designated State unit
must be used only for the purposes
directly connected with the
administration of the vocational
rehabilitation program. Information
containing identifiable personal
information may not be shared with
advisory or other bodies that do not
have official responsibility for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
administration of the program. In the
administration of the program, the State
unit may obtain personal information
from service providers and cooperating
agencies under assurances that the
information may not be further
divulged, except as provided under
paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this
section.
(c) Release to applicants and eligible
individuals. (1) Except as provided in
paragraphs (c)(2) and (c)(3) of this
section, if requested in writing by an
applicant or eligible individual, the
State unit must make all requested
information in that individual’s record
of services accessible to and must
release the information to the individual
or the individual’s representative in a
timely manner.
(2) Medical, psychological, or other
information that the State unit
determines may be harmful to the
individual may not be released directly
to the individual, but must be provided
to the individual through a third party
chosen by the individual, which may
include, among others, an advocate, a
family member, or a qualified medical
or mental health professional, unless a
representative has been appointed by a
court to represent the individual, in
which case the information must be
released to the court-appointed
representative.
(3) If personal information has been
obtained from another agency or
organization, it may be released only by,
or under the conditions established by,
the other agency or organization.
(4) An applicant or eligible individual
who believes that information in the
individual’s record of services is
inaccurate or misleading may request
that the designated State unit amend the
information. If the information is not
amended, the request for an amendment
must be documented in the record of
services, consistent with § 361.47(a)(12).
(d) Release for audit, evaluation, and
research. Personal information may be
released to an organization, agency, or
individual engaged in audit, evaluation,
or research only for purposes directly
connected with the administration of
the vocational rehabilitation program or
for purposes that would significantly
improve the quality of life for applicants
and eligible individuals and only if the
organization, agency, or individual
assures that—
(1) The information will be used only
for the purposes for which it is being
provided;
(2) The information will be released
only to persons officially connected
with the audit, evaluation, or research;
(3) The information will not be
released to the involved individual;
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21123
(4) The information will be managed
in a manner to safeguard confidentiality;
and
(5) The final product will not reveal
any personal identifying information
without the informed written consent of
the involved individual or the
individual’s representative.
(e) Release to other programs or
authorities. (1) Upon receiving the
informed written consent of the
individual or, if appropriate, the
individual’s representative, the State
unit may release personal information to
another agency or organization for its
program purposes only to the extent that
the information may be released to the
involved individual or the individual’s
representative and only to the extent
that the other agency or organization
demonstrates that the information
requested is necessary for its program.
(2) Medical or psychological
information that the State unit
determines may be harmful to the
individual may be released if the other
agency or organization assures the State
unit that the information will be used
only for the purpose for which it is
being provided and will not be further
released to the individual.
(3) The State unit must release
personal information if required by
Federal law or regulations.
(4) The State unit must release
personal information in response to
investigations in connection with law
enforcement, fraud, or abuse, unless
expressly prohibited by Federal or State
laws or regulations, and in response to
an order issued by a judge, magistrate,
or other authorized judicial officer.
(5) The State unit also may release
personal information in order to protect
the individual or others if the individual
poses a threat to his or her safety or to
the safety of others.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(6)(A) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a)(6)(A))
§ 361.39
State-imposed requirements.
The designated State unit must, upon
request, identify those regulations and
policies relating to the administration or
operation of its vocational rehabilitation
program that are State-imposed,
including any regulations or policy
based on State interpretation of any
Federal law, regulation, or guideline.
(Authority: Section 17 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 714)
§ 361.40 Reports; Evaluation standards
and performance indicators.
(a) Reports. (1) The vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan must
assure that the designated State agency
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21124
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
for vocational rehabilitation services,
including applications made through
common intake procedures in one-stop
centers under section 121 of the
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity
Act, an eligibility determination must be
made within 60 days, unless—
(i) Exceptional and unforeseen
circumstances beyond the control of the
designated State unit preclude making
an eligibility determination within 60
days and the designated State unit and
the individual agree to a specific
extension of time; or
(ii) An exploration of the individual’s
abilities, capabilities, and capacity to
perform in work situations is carried out
in accordance with § 361.42(e).
(2) An individual is considered to
have submitted an application when the
individual or the individual’s
representative, as appropriate—
(i)(A) Has completed and signed an
agency application form;
(B) Has completed a common intake
application form in a one-stop center
requesting vocational rehabilitation
services; or
(C) Has otherwise requested services
from the designated State unit;
(ii) Has provided to the designated
State unit information necessary to
initiate an assessment to determine
eligibility and priority for services; and
(iii) Is available to complete the
assessment process.
(3) The designated State unit must
ensure that its application forms are
widely available throughout the State,
particularly in the one-stop centers
under section 121 of the Workforce
Innovation and Opportunity Act.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 101(a)(10)(A) and
(F), and 106 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c), 721(a)(10)(A)
and (F), and 726)
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 101(a)(6)(A) and
102(a)(6) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c), 721(a)(6)(A) and
722(a)(6))
Provision and Scope of Services
§ 361.42 Assessment for determining
eligibility and priority for services.
§ 361.41 Processing referrals and
applications.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
will submit reports, including reports
required under sections 13, 14, and
101(a)(10) of the Act—
(i) In the form and level of detail and
at the time required by the Secretary
regarding applicants for and eligible
individuals receiving services,
including students receiving preemployment transition services in
accordance with § 361.48(a); and
(ii) In a manner that provides a
complete count (other than the
information obtained through sampling
consistent with section 101(a)(10)(E) of
the Act) of the applicants and eligible
individuals to—
(A) Permit the greatest possible crossclassification of data; and
(B) Protect the confidentiality of the
identity of each individual.
(2) The designated State agency must
comply with any requirements
necessary to ensure the accuracy and
verification of those reports.
(b) Evaluation standards and
performance indicators.
(1) Standards and indicators. The
evaluation standards and performance
indicators for the vocational
rehabilitation program carried out under
this part are subject to the performance
accountability provisions described in
section 116(b) of the Workforce
Innovation and Opportunity Act and
implemented in joint regulations set
forth in subpart E of this part.
(2) Compliance. A State’s compliance
with common performance measures
and any necessary corrective actions
will be determined in accordance with
joint regulations set forth in subpart E
of this part.
In order to determine whether an
individual is eligible for vocational
rehabilitation services and the
individual’s priority under an order of
selection for services (if the State is
operating under an order of selection),
the designated State unit must conduct
an assessment for determining eligibility
and priority for services. The
assessment must be conducted in the
most integrated setting possible,
consistent with the individual’s needs
and informed choice, and in accordance
with the following provisions:
(a) Eligibility requirements. (1) Basic
requirements. The designated State
unit’s determination of an applicant’s
eligibility for vocational rehabilitation
services must be based only on the
following requirements:
(a) Referrals. The designated State
unit must establish and implement
standards for the prompt and equitable
handling of referrals of individuals for
vocational rehabilitation services,
including referrals of individuals made
through the one-stop service delivery
systems under section 121 of the
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity
Act. The standards must include
timelines for making good faith efforts
to inform these individuals of
application requirements and to gather
information necessary to initiate an
assessment for determining eligibility
and priority for services.
(b) Applications. (1) Once an
individual has submitted an application
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(i) A determination by qualified
personnel that the applicant has a
physical or mental impairment;
(ii) A determination by qualified
personnel that the applicant’s physical
or mental impairment constitutes or
results in a substantial impediment to
employment for the applicant; and
(iii) A determination by a qualified
vocational rehabilitation counselor
employed by the designated State unit
that the applicant requires vocational
rehabilitation services to prepare for,
secure, retain, advance in, or regain
employment that is consistent with the
individual’s unique strengths, resources,
priorities, concerns, abilities,
capabilities, interest, and informed
choice. For purposes of an assessment
for determining eligibility and
vocational rehabilitation needs under
this part, an individual is presumed to
have a goal of an employment outcome.
(2) Presumption of benefit. The
designated State unit must presume that
an applicant who meets the eligibility
requirements in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and
(ii) of this section can benefit in terms
of an employment outcome.
(3) Presumption of eligibility for
Social Security recipients and
beneficiaries. (i) Any applicant who has
been determined eligible for Social
Security benefits under title II or title
XVI of the Social Security Act is—
(A) Presumed eligible for vocational
rehabilitation services under paragraphs
(a)(1) and (2) of this section; and
(B) Considered an individual with a
significant disability as defined in
§ 361.5(c)(29).
(ii) If an applicant for vocational
rehabilitation services asserts that he or
she is eligible for Social Security
benefits under title II or title XVI of the
Social Security Act (and, therefore, is
presumed eligible for vocational
rehabilitation services under paragraph
(a)(3)(i)(A) of this section), but is unable
to provide appropriate evidence, such as
an award letter, to support that
assertion, the State unit must verify the
applicant’s eligibility under title II or
title XVI of the Social Security Act by
contacting the Social Security
Administration. This verification must
be made within a reasonable period of
time that enables the State unit to
determine the applicant’s eligibility for
vocational rehabilitation services within
60 days of the individual submitting an
application for services in accordance
with § 361.41(b)(2).
(4) Achievement of an employment
outcome. Any eligible individual,
including an individual whose
eligibility for vocational rehabilitation
services is based on the individual being
eligible for Social Security benefits
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
under title II or title XVI of the Social
Security Act, must intend to achieve an
employment outcome that is consistent
with the applicant’s unique strengths,
resources, priorities, concerns, abilities,
capabilities, interests, and informed
choice.
(i) The State unit is responsible for
informing individuals, through its
application process for vocational
rehabilitation services, that individuals
who receive services under the program
must intend to achieve an employment
outcome.
(ii) The applicant’s completion of the
application process for vocational
rehabilitation services is sufficient
evidence of the individual’s intent to
achieve an employment outcome, and
no additional demonstration on the part
of the applicant is required for purposes
of satisfying paragraph (a)(4) of this
section.
(5) Interpretation. Nothing in this
section, including paragraph (a)(3)(i), is
to be construed to create an entitlement
to any vocational rehabilitation service.
(b) Interim determination of eligibility.
(1) The designated State unit may
initiate the provision of vocational
rehabilitation services for an applicant
on the basis of an interim determination
of eligibility prior to the 60-day period
described in § 361.41(b)(2).
(2) If a State chooses to make interim
determinations of eligibility, the
designated State unit must—
(i) Establish criteria and conditions
for making those determinations;
(ii) Develop and implement
procedures for making the
determinations; and
(iii) Determine the scope of services
that may be provided pending the final
determination of eligibility.
(3) If a State elects to use an interim
eligibility determination, the designated
State unit must make a final
determination of eligibility within 60
days of the individual submitting an
application for services in accordance
with § 361.41(b)(2).
(c) Prohibited factors. (1) The
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must assure that the State
unit will not impose, as part of
determining eligibility under this
section, a duration of residence
requirement that excludes from services
any applicant who is present in the
State. The designated State unit may not
require the applicant to demonstrate a
presence in the State through the
production of any documentation that
under State or local law, or practical
circumstances, results in a duration of
residency.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
(2) In making a determination of
eligibility under this section, the
designated State unit also must ensure
that—
(i) No applicant or group of applicants
is excluded or found ineligible solely on
the basis of the type of disability; and
(ii) The eligibility requirements are
applied without regard to the—
(A) Age, sex, race, color, or national
origin of the applicant;
(B) Type of expected employment
outcome;
(C) Source of referral for vocational
rehabilitation services;
(D) Particular service needs or
anticipated cost of services required by
an applicant or the income level of an
applicant or applicant’s family;
(E) Applicants’ employment history or
current employment status; and
(F) Applicants’ educational status or
current educational credential.
(d) Review and assessment of data for
eligibility determination. Except as
provided in paragraph (e) of this
section, the designated State unit—
(1) Must base its determination of
each of the basic eligibility requirements
in paragraph (a) of this section on—
(i) A review and assessment of
existing data, including counselor
observations, education records,
information provided by the individual
or the individual’s family, particularly
information used by education officials,
and determinations made by officials of
other agencies; and
(ii) To the extent existing data do not
describe the current functioning of the
individual or are unavailable,
insufficient, or inappropriate to make an
eligibility determination, an assessment
of additional data resulting from the
provision of vocational rehabilitation
services, including trial work
experiences, assistive technology
devices and services, personal
assistance services, and any other
support services that are necessary to
determine whether an individual is
eligible; and
(2) Must base its presumption under
paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section that an
applicant who has been determined
eligible for Social Security benefits
under title II or title XVI of the Social
Security Act satisfies each of the basic
eligibility requirements in paragraph (a)
of this section on determinations made
by the Social Security Administration.
(e) Trial work experiences for
individuals with significant disabilities.
(1) Prior to any determination that an
individual with a disability is unable to
benefit from vocational rehabilitation
services in terms of an employment
outcome because of the severity of that
individual’s disability or that the
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21125
individual is ineligible for vocational
rehabilitation services, the designated
State unit must conduct an exploration
of the individual’s abilities, capabilities,
and capacity to perform in realistic
work situations.
(2)(i) The designated State unit must
develop a written plan to assess
periodically the individual’s abilities,
capabilities, and capacity to perform in
competitive integrated work situations
through the use of trial work
experiences, which must be provided in
competitive integrated employment
settings to the maximum extent
possible, consistent with the informed
choice and rehabilitation needs of the
individual.
(ii) Trial work experiences include
supported employment, on-the-job
training, and other experiences using
realistic integrated work settings.
(iii) Trial work experiences must be of
sufficient variety and over a sufficient
period of time for the designated State
unit to determine that there is sufficient
evidence to conclude that the individual
cannot benefit from the provision of
vocational rehabilitation services in
terms of a competitive integrated
employment outcome; and
(iv) The designated State unit must
provide appropriate supports, including
assistive technology devices and
services and personal assistance
services, to accommodate the
rehabilitation needs of the individual
during the trial work experiences.
(f) Data for determination of priority
for services under an order of selection.
If the designated State unit is operating
under an order of selection for services,
as provided in § 361.36, the State unit
must base its priority assignments on—
(1) A review of the data that was
developed under paragraphs (d) and (e)
of this section to make the eligibility
determination; and
(2) An assessment of additional data,
to the extent necessary.
(Authority: Sections 7(2), 12(c), 101(a)(12),
102(a), 103(a)(1), 103(a)(9), 103(a)(10) and
103(a)(14) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(2), 709(c),
721(a)(12), 722(a), 723(a)(1), 723(a)(9),
723(a)(10) and 723(a)(14))
Note to § 361.42: Clear and
convincing evidence means that the
designated State unit has a high degree
of certainty before it can conclude that
an individual is incapable of benefiting
from services in terms of an
employment outcome. The clear and
convincing standard constitutes the
highest standard used in our civil
system of law and is to be individually
applied on a case-by-case basis. The
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21126
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
achieving, an employment outcome as
defined in § 361.5(c)(15).
(e) Review within 12 months and
annually thereafter if requested by the
individual or, if appropriate, by the
individual’s representative any
ineligibility determination that is based
on a finding that the individual is
incapable of achieving an employment
outcome. This review need not be
conducted in situations in which the
individual has refused it, the individual
is no longer present in the State, the
individual’s whereabouts are unknown,
or the individual’s medical condition is
rapidly progressive or terminal.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 102(a)(5) and
(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 722(a)(5) and
(c))
§ 361.43 Procedures for ineligibility
determination.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
term clear means unequivocal. For
example, the use of an intelligence test
result alone would not constitute clear
and convincing evidence. Clear and
convincing evidence might include a
description of assessments, including
situational assessments and supported
employment assessments, from service
providers who have concluded that they
would be unable to meet the
individual’s needs due to the severity of
the individual’s disability. The
demonstration of ‘‘clear and convincing
evidence’’ must include, if appropriate,
a functional assessment of skill
development activities, with any
necessary supports (including assistive
technology), in real life settings. (S. Rep.
No. 357, 102d Cong., 2d. Sess. 37–38
(1992))
§ 361.44 Closure without eligibility
determination.
If the State unit determines that an
applicant is ineligible for vocational
rehabilitation services or determines
that an individual receiving services
under an individualized plan for
employment is no longer eligible for
services, the State unit must—
(a) Make the determination only after
providing an opportunity for full
consultation with the individual or, as
appropriate, with the individual’s
representative;
(b) Inform the individual in writing,
supplemented as necessary by other
appropriate modes of communication
consistent with the informed choice of
the individual, of the ineligibility
determination, including the reasons for
that determination, the requirements
under this section, and the means by
which the individual may express and
seek remedy for any dissatisfaction,
including the procedures for review of
State unit personnel determinations in
accordance with § 361.57;
(c) Provide the individual with a
description of services available from a
client assistance program established
under 34 CFR part 370 and information
on how to contact that program;
(d) Refer the individual—
(1) To other programs that are part of
the one-stop service delivery system
under the Workforce Investment Act
that can address the individual’s
training or employment-related needs;
or
(2) To Federal, State, or local
programs or service providers,
including, as appropriate, independent
living programs and extended
employment providers, best suited to
meet their rehabilitation needs, if the
ineligibility determination is based on a
finding that the individual has chosen
not to pursue, or is incapable of
The designated State unit may not
close an applicant’s record of services
prior to making an eligibility
determination unless the applicant
declines to participate in, or is
unavailable to complete, an assessment
for determining eligibility and priority
for services, and the State unit has made
a reasonable number of attempts to
contact the applicant or, if appropriate,
the applicant’s representative to
encourage the applicant’s participation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c))
§ 361.45 Development of the individualized
plan for employment.
(a) General requirements. The
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must assure that—
(1) An individualized plan for
employment meeting the requirements
of this section and § 361.46 is developed
and implemented in a timely manner for
each individual determined to be
eligible for vocational rehabilitation
services or, if the designated State unit
is operating under an order of selection
in accordance with § 361.36, for each
eligible individual to whom the State
unit is able to provide services; and
(2) Services will be provided in
accordance with the provisions of the
individualized plan for employment.
(b) Purpose. (1) The designated State
unit must conduct an assessment for
determining vocational rehabilitation
needs, if appropriate, for each eligible
individual or, if the State is operating
under an order of selection, for each
eligible individual to whom the State is
able to provide services. The purpose of
this assessment is to determine the
employment outcome, and the nature
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
and scope of vocational rehabilitation
services to be included in the
individualized plan for employment.
(2) The individualized plan for
employment must be designed to
achieve a specific employment outcome,
as defined in § 361.5(c)(15), that is
selected by the individual consistent
with the individual’s unique strengths,
resources, priorities, concerns, abilities,
capabilities, interests, and informed
choice.
(c) Required information. The State
unit must provide the following
information to each eligible individual
or, as appropriate, the individual’s
representative, in writing and, if
appropriate, in the native language or
mode of communication of the
individual or the individual’s
representative:
(1) Options for developing an
individualized plan for employment.
Information on the available options for
developing the individualized plan for
employment, including the option that
an eligible individual or, as appropriate,
the individual’s representative may
develop all or part of the individualized
plan for employment—
(i) Without assistance from the State
unit or other entity; or
(ii) With assistance from—
(A) A qualified vocational
rehabilitation counselor employed by
the State unit;
(B) A qualified vocational
rehabilitation counselor who is not
employed by the State unit;
(C) A disability advocacy
organization; or
(D) Resources other than those in
paragraph (c)(1)(ii)(A) through (C) of
this section.
(2) Additional information.
Additional information to assist the
eligible individual or, as appropriate,
the individual’s representative in
developing the individualized plan for
employment, including—
(i) Information describing the full
range of components that must be
included in an individualized plan for
employment;
(ii) As appropriate to each eligible
individual—
(A) An explanation of agency
guidelines and criteria for determining
an eligible individual’s financial
commitments under an individualized
plan for employment;
(B) Information on the availability of
assistance in completing State unit
forms required as part of the
individualized plan for employment;
and
(C) Additional information that the
eligible individual requests or the State
unit determines to be necessary to the
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
development of the individualized plan
for employment;
(iii) A description of the rights and
remedies available to the individual,
including, if appropriate, recourse to the
processes described in § 361.57; and
(iv) A description of the availability of
a client assistance program established
under part 370 of this chapter and
information on how to contact the client
assistance program.
(3) Individuals entitled to benefits
under title II or XVI of the Social
Security Act. For individuals entitled to
benefits under title II or XVI of the
Social Security Act on the basis of a
disability or blindness, the State unit
must provide to the individual general
information on additional supports and
assistance for individuals with
disabilities desiring to enter the
workforce, including assistance with
benefits planning.
(d) Mandatory procedures. The
designated State unit must ensure that—
(1) The individualized plan for
employment is a written document
prepared on forms provided by the State
unit;
(2) The individualized plan for
employment is developed and
implemented in a manner that gives
eligible individuals the opportunity to
exercise informed choice, consistent
with § 361.52, in selecting—
(i) The employment outcome,
including the employment setting;
(ii) The specific vocational
rehabilitation services needed to
achieve the employment outcome,
including the settings in which services
will be provided;
(iii) The entity or entities that will
provide the vocational rehabilitation
services; and
(iv) The methods available for
procuring the services;
(3) The individualized plan for
employment is—
(i) Agreed to and signed by the
eligible individual or, as appropriate,
the individual’s representative; and
(ii) Approved and signed by a
qualified vocational rehabilitation
counselor employed by the designated
State unit;
(4) A copy of the individualized plan
for employment and a copy of any
amendments to the individualized plan
for employment are provided to the
eligible individual or, as appropriate, to
the individual’s representative, in
writing and, if appropriate, in the native
language or mode of communication of
the individual or, as appropriate, the
individual’s representative;
(5) The individualized plan for
employment is reviewed at least
annually by a qualified vocational
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
rehabilitation counselor and the eligible
individual or, as appropriate, the
individual’s representative to assess the
eligible individual’s progress in
achieving the identified employment
outcome;
(6) The individualized plan for
employment is amended, as necessary,
by the individual or, as appropriate, the
individual’s representative, in
collaboration with a representative of
the State unit or a qualified vocational
rehabilitation counselor (to the extent
determined to be appropriate by the
individual), if there are substantive
changes in the employment outcome,
the vocational rehabilitation services to
be provided, or the providers of the
vocational rehabilitation services;
(7) Amendments to the individualized
plan for employment do not take effect
until agreed to and signed by the
eligible individual or, as appropriate,
the individual’s representative and by a
qualified vocational rehabilitation
counselor employed by the designated
State unit;
(8) The individualized plan for
employment is amended, as necessary,
to include the postemployment services
and service providers that are necessary
for the individual to maintain, advance
in or regain employment, consistent
with the individual’s unique strengths,
resources, priorities, concerns, abilities,
capabilities, interests, and informed
choice; and
(9) An individualized plan for
employment for a student with a
disability is developed—
(i) In consideration of the student’s
individualized education program or
504 services, as applicable; and
(ii) In accordance with the plans,
policies, procedures, and terms of the
interagency agreement required under
§ 361.22.
(e) Standards for developing the
individualized plan for employment.
The individualized plan for
employment must be developed as soon
as possible, but not later than 90 days
after the date of determination of
eligibility, unless the State unit and the
eligible individual agree to the
extension of that deadline to a specific
date by which the individualized plan
for employment must be completed.
(f) Data for preparing the
individualized plan for employment. (1)
Preparation without comprehensive
assessment. To the extent possible, the
employment outcome and the nature
and scope of rehabilitation services to
be included in the individual’s
individualized plan for employment
must be determined based on the data
used for the assessment of eligibility
and priority for services under § 361.42.
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21127
(2) Preparation based on
comprehensive assessment.
(i) If additional data are necessary to
determine the employment outcome and
the nature and scope of services to be
included in the individualized plan for
employment of an eligible individual,
the State unit must conduct a
comprehensive assessment of the
unique strengths, resources, priorities,
concerns, abilities, capabilities,
interests, and informed choice,
including the need for supported
employment services, of the eligible
individual, in the most integrated
setting possible, consistent with the
informed choice of the individual in
accordance with the provisions of
§ 361.5(c)(5)(ii).
(ii) In preparing the comprehensive
assessment, the State unit must use, to
the maximum extent possible and
appropriate and in accordance with
confidentiality requirements, existing
information that is current as of the date
of the development of the
individualized plan for employment,
including information—
(A) Available from other programs
and providers, particularly information
used by education officials and the
Social Security Administration;
(B) Provided by the individual and
the individual’s family; and
(C) Obtained under the assessment for
determining the individual’s eligibility
and vocational rehabilitation needs.
(Authority: Sections 7(2)(B), 101(a)(9), 102(b),
and 103(a)(1) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(2)(B),
721(a)(9), 722(b), and 723(a)(1))
§ 361.46 Content of the individualized plan
for employment.
(a) Mandatory components.
Regardless of the approach in
§ 361.45(c)(1) that an eligible individual
selects for purposes of developing the
individualized plan for employment,
each individualized plan for
employment must—
(1) Include a description of the
specific employment outcome, as
defined in § 361.5(c)(15), that is chosen
by the eligible individual and is
consistent with the individual’s unique
strengths, resources, priorities,
concerns, abilities, capabilities, career
interests, and informed choice
consistent with the general goal of
competitive integrated employment
(except that in the case of an eligible
individual who is a student or a youth
with a disability, the description may be
a description of the individual’s
projected post-school employment
outcome);
(2) Include a description under
§ 361.48 of—
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
21128
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(i) These specific rehabilitation
services needed to achieve the
employment outcome, including, as
appropriate, the provision of assistive
technology devices, assistive technology
services, and personal assistance
services, including training in the
management of those services; and
(ii) In the case of a plan for an eligible
individual that is a student or youth
with a disability, the specific transition
services and supports needed to achieve
the individual’s employment outcome
or projected post-school employment
outcome.
(3) Provide for services in the most
integrated setting that is appropriate for
the services involved and is consistent
with the informed choice of the eligible
individual;
(4) Include timelines for the
achievement of the employment
outcome and for the initiation of
services;
(5) Include a description of the entity
or entities chosen by the eligible
individual or, as appropriate, the
individual’s representative that will
provide the vocational rehabilitation
services and the methods used to
procure those services;
(6) Include a description of the
criteria that will be used to evaluate
progress toward achievement of the
employment outcome; and
(7) Include the terms and conditions
of the individualized plan for
employment, including, as appropriate,
information describing—
(i) The responsibilities of the
designated State unit;
(ii) The responsibilities of the eligible
individual, including—
(A) The responsibilities the individual
will assume in relation to achieving the
employment outcome;
(B) If applicable, the extent of the
individual’s participation in paying for
the cost of services; and
(C) The responsibility of the
individual with regard to applying for
and securing comparable services and
benefits as described in § 361.53; and
(iii) The responsibilities of other
entities as the result of arrangements
made pursuant to the comparable
services or benefits requirements in
§ 361.53.
(b) Supported employment
requirements. An individualized plan
for employment for an individual with
a most significant disability for whom
an employment outcome in a supported
employment setting has been
determined to be appropriate must—
(1) Specify the supported employment
services to be provided by the
designated State unit;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
(2) Specify the expected extended
services needed, which may include
natural supports;
(3) Identify the source of extended
services or, to the extent that it is not
possible to identify the source of
extended services at the time the
individualized plan for employment is
developed, include a description of the
basis for concluding that there is a
reasonable expectation that those
sources will become available;
(4) Provide for periodic monitoring to
ensure that the individual is making
satisfactory progress toward meeting the
weekly work requirement established in
the individualized plan for employment
by the time of transition to extended
services;
(5) Provide for the coordination of
services provided under an
individualized plan for employment
with services provided under other
individualized plans established under
other Federal or State programs;
(6) To the extent that job skills
training is provided, identify that the
training will be provided on site; and
(7) Include placement in an integrated
setting for the maximum number of
hours possible based on the unique
strengths, resources, priorities,
concerns, abilities, capabilities,
interests, and informed choice of
individuals with the most significant
disabilities.
(c) Post-employment services. The
individualized plan for employment for
each individual must contain, as
determined to be necessary, statements
concerning—
(1) The expected need for postemployment services prior to closing
the record of services of an individual
who has achieved an employment
outcome;
(2) A description of the terms and
conditions for the provision of any postemployment services; and
(3) If appropriate, a statement of how
post-employment services will be
provided or arranged through other
entities as the result of arrangements
made pursuant to the comparable
services or benefits requirements in
§ 361.53.
(d) Coordination of services for
students with disabilities. The
individualized plan for employment for
a student with a disability must be
coordinated with the individualized
education program or 504 services, as
applicable, for that individual in terms
of the goals, objectives, and services
identified in the education program.
(Authority: Sections 101(a)(8), 101(a)(9), and
102(b)(4) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 721(a)(8), 721(a)(9), and
722(b)(4))
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
§ 361.47
Record of services.
(a) The designated State unit must
maintain for each applicant and eligible
individual a record of services that
includes, to the extent pertinent, the
following documentation:
(1) If an applicant has been
determined to be an eligible individual,
documentation supporting that
determination in accordance with the
requirements under § 361.42.
(2) If an applicant or eligible
individual receiving services under an
individualized plan for employment has
been determined to be ineligible,
documentation supporting that
determination in accordance with the
requirements under § 361.43.
(3) Documentation that describes the
justification for closing an applicant’s or
eligible individual’s record of services if
that closure is based on reasons other
than ineligibility, including, as
appropriate, documentation indicating
that the State unit has satisfied the
requirements in § 361.44.
(4) If an individual has been
determined to be an individual with a
significant disability or an individual
with a most significant disability,
documentation supporting that
determination.
(5) If an individual with a significant
disability requires an exploration of
abilities, capabilities, and capacity to
perform in realistic work situations
through the use of trial work
experiences or, as appropriate, an
extended evaluation to determine
whether the individual is an eligible
individual, documentation supporting
the need for, and the plan relating to,
that exploration or, as appropriate,
extended evaluation and documentation
regarding the periodic assessments
carried out during the trial work
experiences or, as appropriate, the
extended evaluation, in accordance with
the requirements under § 361.42(e) and
(f).
(6) The individualized plan for
employment, and any amendments to
the individualized plan for
employment, consistent with the
requirements under § 361.46.
(7) Documentation describing the
extent to which the applicant or eligible
individual exercised informed choice
regarding the provision of assessment
services and the extent to which the
eligible individual exercised informed
choice in the development of the
individualized plan for employment
with respect to the selection of the
specific employment outcome, the
specific vocational rehabilitation
services needed to achieve the
employment outcome, the entity to
provide the services, the employment
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
setting, the settings in which the
services will be provided, and the
methods to procure the services.
(8) In the event that an individual’s
individualized plan for employment
provides for vocational rehabilitation
services in a non-integrated setting, a
justification to support the need for the
non-integrated setting.
(9) In the event that an individual
obtains competitive employment,
verification that the individual is
compensated at or above the minimum
wage and that the individual’s wage and
level of benefits are not less than that
customarily paid by the employer for
the same or similar work performed by
non-disabled individuals in accordance
with § 361.5(c)(9)(i).
(10) In the event an individual
achieves an employment outcome in
which the individual is compensated in
accordance with section 14(c) of the Fair
Labor Standards Act or the designated
State unit closes the record of services
of an individual in extended
employment on the basis that the
individual is unable to achieve an
employment outcome consistent with
§ 361.5(c)(15) or that an eligible
individual through informed choice
chooses to remain in extended
employment, documentation of the
results of the annual reviews required
under § 361.55, of the individual’s input
into those reviews, and of the
individual’s or, if appropriate, the
individual’s representative’s
acknowledgment that those reviews
were conducted.
(11) Documentation concerning any
action or decision resulting from a
request by an individual under § 361.57
for a review of determinations made by
designated State unit personnel.
(12) In the event that an applicant or
eligible individual requests under
§ 361.38(c)(4) that documentation in the
record of services be amended and the
documentation is not amended,
documentation of the request.
(13) In the event an individual is
referred to another program through the
State unit’s information and referral
system under § 361.37, including other
components of the statewide workforce
development system, documentation on
the nature and scope of services
provided by the designated State unit to
the individual and on the referral itself,
consistent with the requirements of
§ 361.37.
(14) In the event an individual’s
record of service is closed under
§ 361.56, documentation that
demonstrates the services provided
under the individual’s individualized
plan for employment contributed to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
achievement of the employment
outcome.
(15) In the event an individual’s
record of service is closed under
§ 361.56, documentation verifying that
the provisions of § 361.56 have been
satisfied.
(b) The State unit, in consultation
with the State Rehabilitation Council if
the State has a Council, must determine
the type of documentation that the State
unit must maintain for each applicant
and eligible individual in order to meet
the requirements in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 101(a)(6), (9), (14),
and (20) and 102(a), (b), and (d) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c), 721(a)(6), (9), (14), and (20)
and 722(a), (b), and (d))
§ 361.48 Scope of vocational rehabilitation
services for individuals with disabilities.
(a) Pre-employment transition
services. Each State must ensure that the
designated State unit, in collaboration
with the local educational agencies
involved, provide, or arrange for the
provision of, pre-employment transition
services for all students with
disabilities, as defined in § 361.5(c)(51),
in need of such services, without regard
to the type of disability, from funds
reserved in accordance with § 361.65
and any funds made available from
State, local, or private funding sources.
(1) Availability of services. Preemployment transition services may be
provided to all students with
disabilities, regardless of whether an
application for services has been
submitted.
(2) Required activities. The designated
State unit must provide the following
pre-employment transition services:
(i) Job exploration counseling;
(ii) Work-based learning experiences,
which may include in-school or after
school opportunities, or experience
outside the traditional school setting
(including internships), that is provided
in an integrated environment in the
community to the maximum extent
possible;
(iii) Counseling on opportunities for
enrollment in comprehensive transition
or postsecondary educational programs
at institutions of higher education;
(iv) Workplace readiness training to
develop social skills and independent
living; and
(v) Instruction in self-advocacy
(including instruction in personcentered planning), which may include
peer mentoring (including peer
mentoring from individuals with
disabilities working in competitive
integrated employment).
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21129
(3) Authorized activities. Funds
available and remaining after the
provision of the required activities
described in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section may be used to improve the
transition of students with disabilities
from school to postsecondary education
or an employment outcome by—
(i) Implementing effective strategies to
increase the likelihood of independent
living and inclusion in communities
and competitive integrated workplaces;
(ii) Developing and improving
strategies for individuals with
intellectual disabilities and individuals
with significant disabilities to live
independently; participate in
postsecondary education experiences;
and obtain, advance in and retain
competitive integrated employment;
(iii) Providing instruction to
vocational rehabilitation counselors,
school transition personnel, and other
persons supporting students with
disabilities;
(iv) Disseminating information about
innovative, effective, and efficient
approaches to achieve the goals of this
section;
(v) Coordinating activities with
transition services provided by local
educational agencies under the
Individuals with Disabilities Education
Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.);
(vi) Applying evidence-based findings
to improve policy, procedure, practice,
and the preparation of personnel, in
order to better achieve the goals of this
section;
(vii) Developing model transition
demonstration projects;
(viii) Establishing or supporting
multistate or regional partnerships
involving States, local educational
agencies, designated State units,
developmental disability agencies,
private businesses, or other participants
to achieve the goals of this section; and
(ix) Disseminating information and
strategies to improve the transition to
postsecondary activities of individuals
who are members of traditionally
unserved and underserved populations.
(4) Pre-employment transition
coordination. Each local office of a
designated State unit must carry out
responsibilities consisting of—
(i) Attending individualized
education program meetings for
students with disabilities, when invited;
(ii) Working with the local workforce
development boards, one-stop centers,
and employers to develop work
opportunities for students with
disabilities, including internships,
summer employment and other
employment opportunities available
throughout the school year, and
apprenticeships;
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
21130
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(iii) Working with schools, including
those carrying out activities under
section 614(d) of the IDEA, to
coordinate and ensure the provision of
pre-employment transition services
under this section;
(iv) When invited, attending personcentered planning meetings for
individuals receiving services under
title XIX of the Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. 1396 et seq.); and
(b) Services for individuals who have
applied for or been determined eligible
for vocational rehabilitation services. As
appropriate to the vocational
rehabilitation needs of each individual
and consistent with each individual’s
individualized plan for employment,
the designated State unit must ensure
that the following vocational
rehabilitation services are available to
assist the individual with a disability in
preparing for, securing, retaining,
advancing in or regaining an
employment outcome that is consistent
with the individual’s unique strengths,
resources, priorities, concerns, abilities,
capabilities, interests, and informed
choice:
(1) Assessment for determining
eligibility and priority for services by
qualified personnel, including, if
appropriate, an assessment by personnel
skilled in rehabilitation technology, in
accordance with § 361.42.
(2) Assessment for determining
vocational rehabilitation needs by
qualified personnel, including, if
appropriate, an assessment by personnel
skilled in rehabilitation technology, in
accordance with § 361.45.
(3) Vocational rehabilitation
counseling and guidance, including
information and support services to
assist an individual in exercising
informed choice in accordance with
§ 361.52.
(4) Referral and other services
necessary to assist applicants and
eligible individuals to secure needed
services from other agencies, including
other components of the statewide
workforce development system, in
accordance with §§ 361.23, 361.24, and
361.37, and to advise those individuals
about client assistance programs
established under 34 CFR part 370.
(5) In accordance with the definition
in § 361.5(c)(40), physical and mental
restoration services, to the extent that
financial support is not readily available
from a source other than the designated
State unit (such as through health
insurance or a comparable service or
benefit as defined in § 361.5(c)(10)).
(6) Vocational and other training
services, including personal and
vocational adjustment training,
advanced training in a field of science,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
technology, engineering, or mathematics
(including computer science), medicine,
law, or business; books, tools, and other
training materials, except that no
training or training services in an
institution of higher education
(universities, colleges, community or
junior colleges, vocational schools,
technical institutes, or hospital schools
of nursing or any other postsecondary
education institution) may be paid for
with funds under this part unless
maximum efforts have been made by the
State unit and the individual to secure
grant assistance in whole or in part from
other sources to pay for that training.
(7) Maintenance, in accordance with
the definition of that term in
§ 361.5(c)(35).
(8) Transportation in connection with
the provision of any vocational
rehabilitation service and in accordance
with the definition of that term in
§ 361.5(c)(57).
(9) Vocational rehabilitation services
to family members, as defined in
§ 361.5(c)(23), of an applicant or eligible
individual if necessary to enable the
applicant or eligible individual to
achieve an employment outcome.
(10) Interpreter services, including
sign language and oral interpreter
services, for individuals who are deaf or
hard of hearing and tactile interpreting
services for individuals who are deafblind provided by qualified personnel.
(11) Reader services, rehabilitation
teaching services, and orientation and
mobility services for individuals who
are blind.
(12) Job-related services, including job
search and placement assistance, job
retention services, follow-up services,
and follow-along services.
(13) Supported employment services
in accordance with the definition of that
term in § 361.5(c)(54).
(14) Personal assistance services in
accordance with the definition of that
term in § 361.5(c)(39).
(15) Post-employment services in
accordance with the definition of that
term in § 361.5(c)(42).
(16) Occupational licenses, tools,
equipment, initial stocks, and supplies.
(17) Rehabilitation technology in
accordance with the definition of that
term in § 361.5(c)(45), including
vehicular modification,
telecommunications, sensory, and other
technological aids and devices.
(18) Transition services for students
and youth with disabilities, that
facilitate the transition from school to
postsecondary life, such as achievement
of an employment outcome in
competitive integrated employment, or
pre-employment transition services for
students.
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(19) Technical assistance and other
consultation services to conduct market
analyses, develop business plans, and
otherwise provide resources, to the
extent those resources are authorized to
be provided through the statewide
workforce development system, to
eligible individuals who are pursuing
self-employment or telecommuting or
establishing a small business operation
as an employment outcome.
(20) Customized employment in
accordance with the definition of that
term in § 361.5(c)(11).
(21) Other goods and services
determined necessary for the individual
with a disability to achieve an
employment outcome.
(Authority: Sections 7(37), 103(a), and 113 of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 704(37), 723(a), and 733)
§ 361.49 Scope of vocational rehabilitation
services for groups of individuals with
disabilities.
(a) The designated State unit may
provide for the following vocational
rehabilitation services for the benefit of
groups of individuals with disabilities:
(1) The establishment, development,
or improvement of a public or other
nonprofit community rehabilitation
program that is used to provide
vocational rehabilitation services that
promote integration into the community
and prepare individuals with
disabilities for competitive integrated
employment, including supported
employment and customized
employment, and under special
circumstances, the construction of a
facility for a public or nonprofit
community rehabilitation program as
defined in §§ 361.5(c)(10), 361.5(c)(16)
and 361.5(c)(17). Examples of special
circumstances include the destruction
by natural disaster of the only available
center serving an area or a State
determination that construction is
necessary in a rural area because no
other public agencies or private
nonprofit organizations are currently
able to provide vocational rehabilitation
services to individuals.
(2) Telecommunications systems that
have the potential for substantially
improving vocational rehabilitation
service delivery methods and
developing appropriate programming to
meet the particular needs of individuals
with disabilities, including telephone,
television, video description services,
satellite, tactile-vibratory devices, and
similar systems, as appropriate.
(3) Special services to provide
nonvisual access to information for
individuals who are blind, including the
use of telecommunications, Braille,
sound recordings, or other appropriate
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
media; captioned television, films, or
video cassettes for individuals who are
deaf or hard of hearing; tactile materials
for individuals who are deaf-blind; and
other special services that provide
information through tactile, vibratory,
auditory, and visual media.
(4) Technical assistance to businesses
that are seeking to employ individuals
with disabilities.
(5) In the case of any small business
enterprise operated by individuals with
significant disabilities under the
supervision of the designated State unit,
including enterprises established under
the Randolph-Sheppard program,
management services and supervision
provided by the State unit along with
the acquisition by the State unit of
vending facilities or other equipment,
initial stocks and supplies, and initial
operating expenses, in accordance with
the following requirements:
(i) Management services and
supervision includes inspection, quality
control, consultation, accounting,
regulating, in-service training, and
related services provided on a
systematic basis to support and improve
small business enterprises operated by
individuals with significant disabilities.
Management services and supervision
may be provided throughout the
operation of the small business
enterprise.
(ii) Initial stocks and supplies
includes those items necessary to the
establishment of a new business
enterprise during the initial
establishment period, which may not
exceed six months.
(iii) Costs of establishing a small
business enterprise may include
operational costs during the initial
establishment period, which may not
exceed six months.
(iv) If the designated State unit
provides for these services, it must
ensure that only individuals with
significant disabilities will be selected
to participate in this supervised
program.
(v) If the designated State unit
provides for these services and chooses
to set aside funds from the proceeds of
the operation of the small business
enterprises, the State unit must
maintain a description of the methods
used in setting aside funds and the
purposes for which funds are set aside.
Funds may be used only for small
business enterprises purposes, and
benefits that are provided to operators
from set-aside funds must be provided
on an equitable basis.
(6) Consultation and technical
assistance services to assist State
educational agencies and local
educational agencies in planning for the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
transition of students and youth with
disabilities from school to
postsecondary life, including
employment.
(7) Transition services to youth with
disabilities and students with
disabilities who may not have yet
applied or been determined eligible for
vocational rehabilitation services, for
which a vocational rehabilitation
counselor works in concert with
educational agencies, providers of job
training programs, providers of services
under the Medicaid program under title
XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396 et seq.), entities designated by the
State to provide services for individuals
with developmental disabilities, centers
for independent living (as defined in
section 702 of the Act), housing and
transportation authorities, workforce
development systems, and businesses
and employers. These specific transition
services are to benefit a group of
students with disabilities or youth with
disabilities and are not individualized
services directly related to an
individualized plan for employment
goal. Services may include, but are not
limited to, group tours of universities
and vocational training programs,
employer or business site visits to learn
about career opportunities, career fairs
coordinated with workforce
development and employers to facilitate
mock interviews and resume writing,
and other general services applicable to
groups of students with disabilities and
youth with disabilities.
(8) The establishment, development,
or improvement of assistive technology
demonstration, loan, reutilization, or
financing programs in coordination with
activities authorized under the Assistive
Technology Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 3001
et seq.) to promote access to assistive
technology for individuals with
disabilities who are applicants of or
have been determined eligible for
vocational rehabilitation services and
employers.
(9) Support (including, as appropriate,
tuition) for advanced training in a field
of science, technology, engineering, or
mathematics (including computer
science), medicine, law, or business,
provided after an individual eligible to
receive services under this title
demonstrates—
(i) Such Eligibility;
(ii) Previous completion of a
bachelor’s degree program at an
institution of higher education or
scheduled completion of such a degree
program prior to matriculating in the
program for which the individual
proposes to use the support; and
(iii) Acceptance by a program at an
institution of higher education in the
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21131
United States that confers a master’s
degree in a field of science, technology,
engineering, or mathematics (including
computer science), a juris doctor degree,
a master of business administration
degree, or a doctor of medicine degree,
except that—
(A) No training provided at an
institution of higher education may be
paid for with funds under this program
unless maximum efforts have been
made by the designated State unit to
secure grant assistance, in whole or in
part, from other sources to pay for such
training; and
(B) Nothing in this paragraph prevents
any designated State unit from
providing similar support to individuals
with disabilities within the State who
are eligible to receive support under this
title and who are not served under this
section.
(b) If the designated State unit
provides for vocational rehabilitation
services for groups of individuals, it
must—
(1) Develop and maintain written
policies covering the nature and scope
of each of the vocational rehabilitation
services it provides and the criteria
under which each service is provided;
and
(2) Maintain information to ensure the
proper and efficient administration of
those services in the form and detail and
at the time required by the Secretary,
including the types of services
provided, the costs of those services,
and, to the extent feasible, estimates of
the numbers of individuals benefiting
from those services.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 101(a)(6)(A), and
103(b) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c), 721(a)(6), and
723(b))
§ 361.50 Written policies governing the
provision of services for individuals with
disabilities.
(a) Policies. The State unit must
develop and maintain written policies
covering the nature and scope of each of
the vocational rehabilitation services
specified in § 361.48 and the criteria
under which each service is provided.
The policies must ensure that the
provision of services is based on the
rehabilitation needs of each individual
as identified in that individual’s
individualized plan for employment
and is consistent with the individual’s
informed choice. The written policies
may not establish any arbitrary limits on
the nature and scope of vocational
rehabilitation services to be provided to
the individual to achieve an
employment outcome. The policies
must be developed in accordance with
the following provisions:
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21132
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(b) Out-of-State services. (1) The State
unit may establish a preference for inState services, provided that the
preference does not effectively deny an
individual a necessary service. If the
individual chooses an out-of-State
service at a higher cost than an in-State
service, if either service would meet the
individual’s rehabilitation needs, the
designated State unit is not responsible
for those costs in excess of the cost of
the in-State service.
(2) The State unit may not establish
policies that effectively prohibit the
provision of out-of-State services.
(c) Payment for services. (1) The State
unit must establish and maintain
written policies to govern the rates of
payment for all purchased vocational
rehabilitation services.
(2) The State unit may establish a fee
schedule designed to ensure a
reasonable cost to the program for each
service, if the schedule is—
(i) Not so low as to effectively deny
an individual a necessary service; and
(ii) Not absolute and permits
exceptions so that individual needs can
be addressed.
(3) The State unit may not place
absolute dollar limits on specific service
categories or on the total services
provided to an individual.
(d) Duration of services. (1) The State
unit may establish reasonable time
periods for the provision of services
provided that the time periods are—
(i) Not so short as to effectively deny
an individual a necessary service; and
(ii) Not absolute and permit
exceptions so that individual needs can
be addressed.
(2) The State unit may not establish
absolute time limits on the provision of
specific services or on the provision of
services to an individual. The duration
of each service needed by an individual
must be determined on an individual
basis and reflected in that individual’s
individualized plan for employment.
(e) Authorization of services. The
State unit must establish policies related
to the timely authorization of services,
including any conditions under which
verbal authorization can be given.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(6) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended
and 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a)(6))
§ 361.51 Standards for facilities and
providers of services.
(a) Accessibility of facilities. The
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must assure that any facility
used in connection with the delivery of
vocational rehabilitation services under
this part meets program accessibility
requirements consistent with the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
requirements, as applicable, of the
Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,
section 504 of the Act, and the
regulations implementing these laws.
(b) Affirmative action. The vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan must
assure that community rehabilitation
programs that receive assistance under
part B of title I of the Act take
affirmative action to employ and
advance in employment qualified
individuals with disabilities covered
under and on the same terms and
conditions as in section 503 of the Act.
(c) Special communication needs
personnel. The designated State unit
must ensure that providers of vocational
rehabilitation services are able to
communicate—
(1) In the native language of
applicants and eligible individuals who
have limited English proficiency; and
(2) By using appropriate modes of
communication used by applicants and
eligible individuals.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(6)(B)
and (C) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a)(6)(B)
and (C))
§ 361.52
Informed choice.
(a) General provision. The vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan must
assure that applicants and eligible
individuals or, as appropriate, their
representatives are provided
information and support services to
assist applicants and eligible
individuals in exercising informed
choice throughout the rehabilitation
process consistent with the provisions
of section 102(d) of the Act and the
requirements of this section.
(b) Written policies and procedures.
The designated State unit, in
consultation with its State
Rehabilitation Council, if it has a
Council, must develop and implement
written policies and procedures that
enable an applicant or eligible
individual to exercise informed choice
throughout the vocational rehabilitation
process. These policies and procedures
must provide for—
(1) Informing each applicant and
eligible individual (including students
with disabilities who are making the
transition from programs under the
responsibility of an educational agency
to programs under the responsibility of
the designated State unit and including
youth with disabilities), through
appropriate modes of communication,
about the availability of and
opportunities to exercise informed
choice, including the availability of
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
support services for individuals with
cognitive or other disabilities who
require assistance in exercising
informed choice throughout the
vocational rehabilitation process;
(2) Assisting applicants and eligible
individuals in exercising informed
choice in decisions related to the
provision of assessment services;
(3) Developing and implementing
flexible procurement policies and
methods that facilitate the provision of
vocational rehabilitation services and
that afford eligible individuals
meaningful choices among the methods
used to procure vocational
rehabilitation services;
(4) Assisting eligible individuals or, as
appropriate, the individuals’
representatives, in acquiring
information that enables them to
exercise informed choice in the
development of their individualized
plans for employment with respect to
the selection of the—
(i) Employment outcome;
(ii) Specific vocational rehabilitation
services needed to achieve the
employment outcome;
(iii) Entity that will provide the
services;
(iv) Employment setting and the
settings in which the services will be
provided; and
(v) Methods available for procuring
the services; and
(5) Ensuring that the availability and
scope of informed choice is consistent
with the obligations of the designated
State agency under this part.
(c) Information and assistance in the
selection of vocational rehabilitation
services and service providers. In
assisting an applicant and eligible
individual in exercising informed
choice during the assessment for
determining eligibility and vocational
rehabilitation needs and during
development of the individualized plan
for employment, the designated State
unit must provide the individual or the
individual’s representative, or assist the
individual or the individual’s
representative in acquiring, information
necessary to make an informed choice
about the specific vocational
rehabilitation services, including the
providers of those services, that are
needed to achieve the individual’s
employment outcome. This information
must include, at a minimum,
information relating to the—
(1) Cost, accessibility, and duration of
potential services;
(2) Consumer satisfaction with those
services to the extent that information
relating to consumer satisfaction is
available;
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(3) Qualifications of potential service
providers;
(4) Types of services offered by the
potential providers;
(5) Degree to which services are
provided in integrated settings; and
(6) Outcomes achieved by individuals
working with service providers, to the
extent that such information is
available.
(d) Methods or sources of information.
In providing or assisting the individual
or the individual’s representative in
acquiring the information required
under paragraph (c) of this section, the
State unit may use, but is not limited to,
the following methods or sources of
information:
(1) Lists of services and service
providers.
(2) Periodic consumer satisfaction
surveys and reports.
(3) Referrals to other consumers,
consumer groups, or disability advisory
councils qualified to discuss the
services or service providers.
(4) Relevant accreditation,
certification, or other information
relating to the qualifications of service
providers.
(5) Opportunities for individuals to
visit or experience various work and
service provider settings.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 101(a)(19);
102(b)(2)(B) and 102(d) of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c),
721(a)(19); 722(b)(2)(B) and 722(d))
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 361.53 Comparable services and
benefits.
(a) Determination of availability. The
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must assure that prior to
providing an accommodation or
auxiliary aid or service or any
vocational rehabilitation services,
except those services listed in paragraph
(b) of this section, to an eligible
individual or to members of the
individual’s family, the State unit must
determine whether comparable services
and benefits, as defined in § 361.5(c)(8),
exist under any other program and
whether those services and benefits are
available to the individual unless such
a determination would interrupt or
delay—
(1) The progress of the individual
toward achieving the employment
outcome identified in the
individualized plan for employment;
(2) An immediate job placement; or
(3) The provision of vocational
rehabilitation services to any individual
who is determined to be at extreme
medical risk, based on medical evidence
provided by an appropriate qualified
medical professional.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
(b) Exempt services. The following
vocational rehabilitation services
described in § 361.48(a) are exempt from
a determination of the availability of
comparable services and benefits under
paragraph (a) of this section:
(1) Assessment for determining
eligibility and vocational rehabilitation
needs.
(2) Counseling and guidance,
including information and support
services to assist an individual in
exercising informed choice.
(3) Referral and other services to
secure needed services from other
agencies, including other components of
the statewide workforce development
system, if those services are not
available under this part.
(4) Job-related services, including job
search and placement assistance, job
retention services, follow-up services,
and follow-along services.
(5) Rehabilitation technology,
including telecommunications, sensory,
and other technological aids and
devices.
(6) Post-employment services
consisting of the services listed under
paragraphs (b)(1) through (5) of this
section.
(c) Provision of services. (1) If
comparable services or benefits exist
under any other program and are
available to the individual at the time
needed to ensure the progress of the
individual toward achieving the
employment outcome in the
individual’s individualized plan for
employment, the designated State unit
must use those comparable services or
benefits to meet, in whole or part, the
costs of the vocational rehabilitation
services.
(2) If comparable services or benefits
exist under any other program, but are
not available to the individual at the
time needed to ensure the progress of
the individual toward achieving the
employment outcome specified in the
individualized plan for employment,
the designated State unit must provide
vocational rehabilitation services until
those comparable services and benefits
become available.
(d) Interagency coordination. (1) The
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must assure that the
Governor, in consultation with the
entity in the State responsible for the
vocational rehabilitation program and
other appropriate agencies, will ensure
that an interagency agreement or other
mechanism for interagency coordination
takes effect between the designated
State vocational rehabilitation unit and
any appropriate public entity, including
the State entity responsible for
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21133
administering the State Medicaid
program, a public institution of higher
education, and a component of the
statewide workforce development
system, to ensure the provision of
vocational rehabilitation services, and,
if appropriate, accommodations or
auxiliary aids and services, (other than
those services listed in paragraph (b) of
this section) that are included in the
individualized plan for employment of
an eligible individual, including the
provision of those vocational
rehabilitation services (including, if
appropriate, accommodations or
auxiliary aids and services) during the
pendency of any interagency dispute in
accordance with the provisions of
paragraph (d)(3)(iii) of this section.
(2) The Governor may meet the
requirements of paragraph (d)(1) of this
section through—
(i) A State statute or regulation;
(ii) A signed agreement between the
respective officials of the public entities
that clearly identifies the
responsibilities of each public entity for
the provision of the services; or
(iii) Another appropriate mechanism
as determined by the designated State
vocational rehabilitation unit.
(3) The interagency agreement or
other mechanism for interagency
coordination must include the
following:
(i) Agency financial responsibility. An
identification of, or description of a
method for defining, the financial
responsibility of the designated State
unit and other public entities for the
provision of vocational rehabilitation
services, and, if appropriate,
accommodations or auxiliary aids and
services other than those listed in
paragraph (b) of this section and a
provision stating the financial
responsibility of the public entity for
providing those services.
(ii) Conditions, terms, and procedures
of reimbursement. Information
specifying the conditions, terms, and
procedures under which the designated
State unit must be reimbursed by the
other public entities for providing
vocational rehabilitation services, and
accommodations or auxiliary aids and
services based on the terms of the
interagency agreement or other
mechanism for interagency
coordination.
(iii) Interagency disputes. Information
specifying procedures for resolving
interagency disputes under the
interagency agreement or other
mechanism for interagency
coordination, including procedures
under which the designated State unit
may initiate proceedings to secure
reimbursement from other public
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
21134
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
entities or otherwise implement the
provisions of the agreement or
mechanism.
(iv) Procedures for coordination of
services. Information specifying policies
and procedures for public entities to
determine and identify interagency
coordination responsibilities of each
public entity to promote the
coordination and timely delivery of
vocational rehabilitation services, and
accommodations or auxiliary aids and
services, other than those listed in
paragraph (b) of this section.
(e) Responsibilities under other law.
(1) If a public entity (other than the
designated State unit) is obligated under
Federal law (such as the Americans
with Disabilities Act, section 504 of the
Act, or section 188 of the Workforce
Innovation and Opportunity Act) or
State law, or assigned responsibility
under State policy or an interagency
agreement established under this
section, to provide or pay for any
services considered to be vocational
rehabilitation services (e.g., interpreter
services under § 361.48(j)), and, if
appropriate, accommodations or
auxiliary aids and services other than
those services listed in paragraph (b) of
this section, the public entity must
fulfill that obligation or responsibility
through—
(i) The terms of the interagency
agreement or other requirements of this
section;
(ii) Providing or paying for the service
directly or by contract; or
(iii) Other arrangement.
(2) If a public entity other than the
designated State unit fails to provide or
pay for vocational rehabilitation
services, and, if appropriate,
accommodations or auxiliary aids and
services for an eligible individual as
established under this section, the
designated State unit must provide or
pay for those services to the individual
and may claim reimbursement for the
services from the public entity that
failed to provide or pay for those
services. The public entity must
reimburse the designated State unit
pursuant to the terms of the interagency
agreement or other mechanism
described in paragraph (d) of this
section in accordance with the
procedures established in the agreement
or mechanism pursuant to paragraph
(d)(3)(ii) of this section.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(8) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a)(8))
§ 361.54 Participation of individuals in
cost of services based on financial need.
(a) No Federal requirement. There is
no Federal requirement that the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
financial need of individuals be
considered in the provision of
vocational rehabilitation services.
(b) State unit requirements. (1) The
State unit may choose to consider the
financial need of eligible individuals or
individuals who are receiving services
through trial work experiences under
§ 361.42(e) for purposes of determining
the extent of their participation in the
costs of vocational rehabilitation
services, other than those services
identified in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section.
(2) If the State unit chooses to
consider financial need—
(i) It must maintain written policies—
(A) Explaining the method for
determining the financial need of an
eligible individual; and
(B) Specifying the types of vocational
rehabilitation services for which the
unit has established a financial needs
test;
(ii) The policies must be applied
uniformly to all individuals in similar
circumstances;
(iii) The policies may require different
levels of need for different geographic
regions in the State, but must be applied
uniformly to all individuals within each
geographic region; and
(iv) The policies must ensure that the
level of an individual’s participation in
the cost of vocational rehabilitation
services is—
(A) Reasonable;
(B) Based on the individual’s financial
need, including consideration of any
disability-related expenses paid by the
individual; and
(C) Not so high as to effectively deny
the individual a necessary service.
(3) The designated State unit may not
apply a financial needs test, or require
the financial participation of the
individual—
(i) As a condition for furnishing the
following vocational rehabilitation
services:
(A) Assessment for determining
eligibility and priority for services
under § 361.48(b)(1), except those nonassessment services that are provided to
an individual with a significant
disability during either an exploration
of the individual’s abilities, capabilities,
and capacity to perform in work
situations through the use of trial work
experiences under § 361.42(e).
(B) Assessment for determining
vocational rehabilitation needs under
§ 361.48(b)(2).
(C) Vocational rehabilitation
counseling and guidance under
§ 361.48(b)(3).
(D) Referral and other services under
§ 361.48(b)(4).
(E) Job-related services under
§ 361.48(b)(12).
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(F) Personal assistance services under
§ 361.48(b)(14).
(G) Any auxiliary aid or service (e.g.,
interpreter services under
§ 361.48(b)(10), reader services under
§ 361.48(b)(11)) that an individual with
a disability requires under section 504
of the Act (29 U.S.C. 794) or the
Americans with Disabilities Act (42
U.S.C. 12101, et seq.), or regulations
implementing those laws, in order for
the individual to participate in the
vocational rehabilitation program as
authorized under this part; or
(ii) As a condition for furnishing any
vocational rehabilitation service if the
individual in need of the service has
been determined eligible for Social
Security benefits under titles II or XVI
of the Social Security Act.
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c))
§ 361.55 Semi-annual review of individuals
in extended employment and other
employment under special certificate
provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act.
(a) The vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan must assure that
the designated State unit conducts a
semi-annual review and reevaluation for
the first two years of such employment
and annually thereafter, in accordance
with the requirements in paragraph (b)
of this section for an individual with a
disability served under this part—
(1) Who has achieved an employment
outcome in which the individual is
compensated in accordance with section
14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act; or
(2) Whose record of services is closed
while the individual is in extended
employment on the basis that the
individual is unable to achieve an
employment outcome consistent with
§ 361.5(c)(15) or that the individual
made an informed choice to remain in
extended employment.
(b) For each individual with a
disability who meets the criteria in
paragraph (a) of this section, the
designated State unit must—
(1) Semi-annually review and
reevaluate the status of each individual
for two years after the individual’s
record of services is closed (and
annually thereafter) to determine the
interests, priorities, and needs of the
individual with respect to competitive
integrated employment or training for
competitive integrated employment;
(2) Enable the individual or, if
appropriate, the individual’s
representative to provide input into the
review and reevaluation and must
document that input in the record of
services, consistent with § 361.47(a)(10),
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
with the individual’s or, as appropriate,
the individual’s representative’s signed
acknowledgment that the review and
reevaluation have been conducted; and
(3) Make maximum efforts, including
identifying and providing vocational
rehabilitation services, reasonable
accommodations, and other necessary
support services, to assist the individual
in engaging in competitive integrated
employment as defined in § 361.5(c)(9).
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(14) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a)(14))
§ 361.56 Requirements for closing the
record of services of an individual who has
achieved an employment outcome.
The record of services of an
individual who has achieved an
employment outcome may be closed
only if all of the following requirements
are met:
(a) Employment outcome achieved.
The individual has achieved the
employment outcome that is described
in the individual’s individualized plan
for employment in accordance with
§ 361.46(a)(1) and is consistent with the
individual’s unique strengths, resources,
priorities, concerns, abilities,
capabilities, interests, and informed
choice.
(b) Employment outcome maintained.
The individual has maintained the
employment outcome for an appropriate
period of time, but not less than 90
days, necessary to ensure the stability of
the employment outcome, and the
individual no longer needs vocational
rehabilitation services.
(c) Satisfactory outcome. At the end of
the appropriate period under paragraph
(b) of this section, the individual and
the qualified rehabilitation counselor
employed by the designated State unit
consider the employment outcome to be
satisfactory and agree that the
individual is performing well in the
employment.
(d) Post-employment services. The
individual is informed through
appropriate modes of communication of
the availability of post-employment
services.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 101(a)(6), and
106(a)(2) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 711(c), 721(a)(6), and
726(a)(2))
§ 361.57 Review of determinations made
by designated State unit personnel.
(a) Procedures. The designated State
unit must develop and implement
procedures to ensure that an applicant
or eligible individual who is dissatisfied
with any determination made by
personnel of the designated State unit
that affects the provision of vocational
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
rehabilitation services may request, or,
if appropriate, may request through the
individual’s representative, a timely
review of that determination. The
procedures must be in accordance with
paragraphs (b) through (k) of this
section:
(b) General requirements. (1)
Notification. Procedures established by
the State unit under this section must
provide an applicant or eligible
individual or, as appropriate, the
individual’s representative notice of—
(i) The right to obtain review of State
unit determinations that affect the
provision of vocational rehabilitation
services through an impartial due
process hearing under paragraph (e) of
this section;
(ii) The right to pursue mediation
under paragraph (d) of this section with
respect to determinations made by
designated State unit personnel that
affect the provision of vocational
rehabilitation services to an applicant or
eligible individual;
(iii) The names and addresses of
individuals with whom requests for
mediation or due process hearings may
be filed;
(iv) The manner in which a mediator
or impartial hearing officer may be
selected consistent with the
requirements of paragraphs (d) and (f) of
this section; and
(v) The availability of the client
assistance program, established under
34 CFR part 370, to assist the applicant
or eligible individual during mediation
sessions or impartial due process
hearings.
(2) Timing. Notice described in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section must be
provided in writing—
(i) At the time the individual applies
for vocational rehabilitation services
under this part;
(ii) At the time the individual is
assigned to a category in the State’s
order of selection, if the State has
established an order of selection under
§ 361.36;
(iii) At the time the individualized
plan for employment is developed; and
(iv) Whenever vocational
rehabilitation services for an individual
are reduced, suspended, or terminated.
(3) Evidence and representation.
Procedures established under this
section must—
(i) Provide an applicant or eligible
individual or, as appropriate, the
individual’s representative with an
opportunity to submit during mediation
sessions or due process hearings
evidence and other information that
supports the applicant’s or eligible
individual’s position; and
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21135
(ii) Allow an applicant or eligible
individual to be represented during
mediation sessions or due process
hearings by counsel or other advocate
selected by the applicant or eligible
individual.
(4) Impact on provision of services.
The State unit may not institute a
suspension, reduction, or termination of
vocational rehabilitation services being
provided to an applicant or eligible
individual, including evaluation and
assessment services and individualized
plan for employment development,
pending a resolution through mediation,
pending a decision by a hearing officer
or reviewing official, or pending
informal resolution under this section
unless—
(i) The individual or, in appropriate
cases, the individual’s representative
requests a suspension, reduction, or
termination of services; or
(ii) The State agency has evidence that
the services have been obtained through
misrepresentation, fraud, collusion, or
criminal conduct on the part of the
individual or the individual’s
representative.
(5) Ineligibility. Applicants who are
found ineligible for vocational
rehabilitation services and previously
eligible individuals who are determined
to be no longer eligible for vocational
rehabilitation services pursuant to
§ 361.43 are permitted to challenge the
determinations of ineligibility under the
procedures described in this section.
(c) Informal dispute resolution. The
State unit may develop an informal
process for resolving a request for
review without conducting mediation or
a formal hearing. A State’s informal
process must not be used to deny the
right of an applicant or eligible
individual to a hearing under paragraph
(e) of this section or any other right
provided under this part, including the
right to pursue mediation under
paragraph (d) of this section. If informal
resolution under this paragraph or
mediation under paragraph (d) of this
section is not successful in resolving the
dispute within the time period
established under paragraph (e)(1) of
this section, a formal hearing must be
conducted within that same time
period, unless the parties agree to a
specific extension of time.
(d) Mediation. (1) The State must
establish and implement procedures, as
required under paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of
this section, to allow an applicant or
eligible individual and the State unit to
resolve disputes involving State unit
determinations that affect the provision
of vocational rehabilitation services
through a mediation process that must
be made available, at a minimum,
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
21136
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
whenever an applicant or eligible
individual or, as appropriate, the
individual’s representative requests an
impartial due process hearing under this
section.
(2) Mediation procedures established
by the State unit under paragraph (d) of
this section must ensure that—
(i) Participation in the mediation
process is voluntary on the part of the
applicant or eligible individual, as
appropriate, and on the part of the State
unit;
(ii) Use of the mediation process is
not used to deny or delay the
applicant’s or eligible individual’s right
to pursue resolution of the dispute
through an impartial hearing held
within the time period specified in
paragraph (e)(1) of this section or any
other rights provided under this part. At
any point during the mediation process,
either party or the mediator may elect to
terminate the mediation. In the event
mediation is terminated, either party
may pursue resolution through an
impartial hearing;
(iii) The mediation process is
conducted by a qualified and impartial
mediator, as defined in § 361.5(c)(43),
who must be selected from a list of
qualified and impartial mediators
maintained by the State—
(A) On a random basis;
(B) By agreement between the director
of the designated State unit and the
applicant or eligible individual or, as
appropriate, the individual’s
representative; or
(C) In accordance with a procedure
established in the State for assigning
mediators, provided this procedure
ensures the neutrality of the mediator
assigned; and
(iv) Mediation sessions are scheduled
and conducted in a timely manner and
are held in a location and manner that
is convenient to the parties to the
dispute.
(3) Discussions that occur during the
mediation process must be kept
confidential and may not be used as
evidence in any subsequent due process
hearings or civil proceedings, and the
parties to the mediation process may be
required to sign a confidentiality pledge
prior to the commencement of the
process.
(4) An agreement reached by the
parties to the dispute in the mediation
process must be described in a written
mediation agreement that is developed
by the parties with the assistance of the
qualified and impartial mediator and
signed by both parties. Copies of the
agreement must be sent to both parties.
(5) The costs of the mediation process
must be paid by the State. The State is
not required to pay for any costs related
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
to the representation of an applicant or
eligible individual authorized under
paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section.
(e) Impartial due process hearings.
The State unit must establish and
implement formal review procedures, as
required under paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this
section, that provide that—
(1) hearing conducted by an impartial
hearing officer, selected in accordance
with paragraph (f) of this section, must
be held within 60 days of an applicant’s
or eligible individual’s request for
review of a determination made by
personnel of the State unit that affects
the provision of vocational
rehabilitation services to the individual,
unless informal resolution or a
mediation agreement is achieved prior
to the 60th day or the parties agree to
a specific extension of time;
(2) In addition to the rights described
in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the
applicant or eligible individual or, if
appropriate, the individual’s
representative must be given the
opportunity to present witnesses during
the hearing and to examine all witnesses
and other relevant sources of
information and evidence;
(3) The impartial hearing officer
must—
(i) Make a decision based on the
provisions of the approved vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan, the
Act, Federal vocational rehabilitation
regulations, and State regulations and
policies that are consistent with Federal
requirements; and
(ii) Provide to the individual or, if
appropriate, the individual’s
representative and to the State unit a
full written report of the findings and
grounds for the decision within 30 days
of the completion of the hearing; and
(4) The hearing officer’s decision is
final, except that a party may request an
impartial review under paragraph (g)(1)
of this section if the State has
established procedures for that review,
and a party involved in a hearing may
bring a civil action under paragraph (i)
of this section.
(f) Selection of impartial hearing
officers. The impartial hearing officer
for a particular case must be selected—
(1) From a list of qualified impartial
hearing officers maintained by the State
unit. Impartial hearing officers included
on the list must be—
(i) Identified by the State unit if the
State unit is an independent
commission; or
(ii) Jointly identified by the State unit
and the State Rehabilitation Council if
the State has a Council; and
(2)(i) On a random basis; or
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(ii) By agreement between the director
of the designated State unit and the
applicant or eligible individual or, as
appropriate, the individual’s
representative.
(g) Administrative review of hearing
officer’s decision. The State may
establish procedures to enable a party
who is dissatisfied with the decision of
the impartial hearing officer to seek an
impartial administrative review of the
decision under paragraph (e)(3) of this
section in accordance with the
following requirements:
(1) A request for administrative
review under paragraph (g) of this
section must be made within 20 days of
the mailing of the impartial hearing
officer’s decision.
(2) Administrative review of the
hearing officer’s decision must be
conducted by—
(i) The chief official of the designated
State agency if the State has established
both a designated State agency and a
designated State unit under § 361.13(b);
or
(ii) An official from the office of the
Governor.
(3) The reviewing official described in
paragraph (g)(2)(i) of this section—
(i) Provides both parties with an
opportunity to submit additional
evidence and information relevant to a
final decision concerning the matter
under review;
(ii) May not overturn or modify the
hearing officer’s decision, or any part of
that decision, that supports the position
of the applicant or eligible individual
unless the reviewing official concludes,
based on clear and convincing evidence,
that the decision of the impartial
hearing officer is clearly erroneous on
the basis of being contrary to the
approved vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan, the Act, Federal
vocational rehabilitation regulations, or
State regulations and policies that are
consistent with Federal requirements;
(iii) Makes an independent, final
decision following a review of the entire
hearing record and provides the
decision in writing, including a full
report of the findings and the statutory,
regulatory, or policy grounds for the
decision, to the applicant or eligible
individual or, as appropriate, the
individual’s representative and to the
State unit within 30 days of the request
for administrative review under
paragraph (g)(1) of this section; and
(iv) May not delegate the
responsibility for making the final
decision under paragraph (g) of this
section to any officer or employee of the
designated State unit.
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(4) The reviewing official’s decision
under paragraph (g) of this section is
final unless either party brings a civil
action under paragraph (i) of this
section.
(h) Implementation of final decisions.
If a party brings a civil action under
paragraph (h) of this section to
challenge the final decision of a hearing
officer under paragraph (e) of this
section or to challenge the final decision
of a State reviewing official under
paragraph (g) of this section, the final
decision of the hearing officer or State
reviewing official must be implemented
pending review by the court.
(i) Civil action. (1) Any party who
disagrees with the findings and decision
of an impartial hearing officer under
paragraph (e) of this section in a State
that has not established administrative
review procedures under paragraph (g)
of this section and any party who
disagrees with the findings and decision
under paragraph (g)(3)(iii) of this section
have a right to bring a civil action with
respect to the matter in dispute. The
action may be brought in any State court
of competent jurisdiction or in a district
court of the United States of competent
jurisdiction without regard to the
amount in controversy.
(2) In any action brought under
paragraph (i) of this section, the court—
(i) Receives the records related to the
impartial due process hearing and the
records related to the administrative
review process, if applicable;
(ii) Hears additional evidence at the
request of a party; and
(iii) Basing its decision on the
preponderance of the evidence, grants
the relief that the court determines to be
appropriate.
(j) State fair hearing board. A fair
hearing board as defined in
§ 361.5(c)(21) is authorized to carry out
the responsibilities of the impartial
hearing officer under paragraph (e) of
this section in accordance with the
following criteria:
(1) The fair hearing board may
conduct due process hearings either
collectively or by assigning
responsibility for conducting the
hearing to one or more members of the
fair hearing board.
(2) The final decision issued by the
fair hearing board following a hearing
under paragraph (j)(1) of this section
must be made collectively by, or by a
majority vote of, the fair hearing board.
(3) The provisions of paragraphs
(b)(1), (2), and (3) of this section that
relate to due process hearings and of
paragraphs (e), (f), (g), and (h) of this
section do not apply to fair hearing
boards under this paragraph (j).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
(k) Data collection. (1) The director of
the designated State unit must collect
and submit, at a minimum, the
following data to the Secretary for
inclusion each year in the annual report
to Congress under section 13 of the Act:
(i) A copy of the standards used by
State reviewing officials for reviewing
decisions made by impartial hearing
officers under this section.
(ii) The number of mediations held,
including the number of mediation
agreements reached.
(iii) The number of hearings and
reviews sought from impartial hearing
officers and State reviewing officials,
including the type of complaints and
the issues involved.
(iv) The number of hearing officer
decisions that were not reviewed by
administrative reviewing officials.
(v) The number of hearing decisions
that were reviewed by State reviewing
officials and, based on these reviews,
the number of hearing decisions that
were—
(A) Sustained in favor of an applicant
or eligible individual;
(B) Sustained in favor of the
designated State unit;
(C) Reversed in whole or in part in
favor of the applicant or eligible
individual; and
(D) Reversed in whole or in part in
favor of the State unit.
(2) The State unit director also must
collect and submit to the Secretary
copies of all final decisions issued by
impartial hearing officers under
paragraph (e) of this section and by
State review officials under paragraph
(g) of this section.
(3) The confidentiality of records of
applicants and eligible individuals
maintained by the State unit may not
preclude the access of the Secretary to
those records for the purposes described
in this section.
(Authority: Section 102(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 722(c))
Subpart C—Financing of State
Vocational Rehabilitation Programs
§ 361.60
Matching requirements.
(a) Federal share. (1) General. Except
as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section, the Federal share for
expenditures made by the State under
the vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan, including expenditures for
the provision of vocational
rehabilitation services and the
administration of the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan, is 78.7
percent.
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21137
(2) Construction projects. The Federal
share for expenditures made for the
construction of a facility for community
rehabilitation program purposes may
not be more than 50 percent of the total
cost of the project.
(b) Non-Federal share. (1) General.
Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2)
and (b)(3) of this section, expenditures
made under the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan to meet
the non-Federal share under this section
must be consistent with the provisions
of 2 CFR 200.306(b).
(2) Third party in-kind contributions.
Third party in-kind contributions
specified in 2 CFR 200.306(b) may not
be used to meet the non-Federal share
under this section.
(3) Contributions by private entities.
Expenditures made from those cash
contributions provided by private
organizations, agencies, or individuals
and that are deposited in the State
agency’s account or, if applicable, sole
local agency’s account, in accordance
with State law prior to their expenditure
and that are earmarked, under a
condition imposed by the contributor,
may be used as part of the non-Federal
share under this section if the funds are
earmarked for—
(i) Meeting in whole or in part the
State’s share for establishing a
community rehabilitation program or
constructing a particular facility for
community rehabilitation program
purposes;
(ii) Particular geographic areas within
the State for any purpose under the
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan, other than those described in
paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section, in
accordance with the following criteria:
(A) Before funds that are earmarked
for a particular geographic area may be
used as part of the non-Federal share,
the State must notify the Secretary that
the State cannot provide the full nonFederal share without using these funds.
(B) Funds that are earmarked for a
particular geographic area may be used
as part of the non-Federal share without
requesting a waiver of statewideness
under § 361.26.
(C) Except as provided in paragraph
(b)(3)(i) of this section, all Federal funds
must be used on a statewide basis
consistent with § 361.25, unless a
waiver of statewideness is obtained
under § 361.26; and
(iii) Any other purpose under the
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan, provided the expenditures
do not benefit in any way the donor,
employee, officer, or agent, any member
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21138
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
of his or her immediate family, his or
her partner, an individual with whom
the donor has a close personal
relationship, or an individual, entity, or
organization with whom the donor
shares a financial or other interest. The
Secretary does not consider a donor’s
receipt from the State unit of a
subaward or contract with funds
allotted under this part to be a benefit
for the purposes of this paragraph if the
subaward or contract is awarded under
the State’s regular competitive
procedures.
(Authority: Sections 7(14), 101(a)(3),
101(a)(4) and 104 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(14),
721(a)(3), 721(a)(4) and 724)
Example for paragraph (b)(3):
Contributions may be earmarked in
accordance with § 361.60(b)(3)(iii) for
providing particular services (e.g.,
rehabilitation technology services);
serving individuals with certain types of
disabilities (e.g., individuals who are
blind), consistent with the State’s order
of selection, if applicable; providing
services to special groups that State or
Federal law permits to be targeted for
services (e.g., students with disabilities
who are receiving special education
services), consistent with the State’s
order of selection, if applicable; or
carrying out particular types of
administrative activities permissible
under State law. Contributions also may
be restricted to particular geographic
areas to increase services or expand the
scope of services that are available
statewide under the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan in
accordance with the requirements in
§ 361.60(b)(3)(ii).
§ 361.61 Limitation on use of funds for
construction expenditures.
No more than 10 percent of a State’s
allotment for any fiscal year under
section 110 of the Act may be spent on
the construction of facilities for
community rehabilitation program
purposes.
(Authority: Section 101(a)(17)(A) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 721(a)(17)(A))
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 361.62 Maintenance of effort
requirements.
(a) General requirements. The
Secretary reduces the amount otherwise
payable to a State for any fiscal year by
the amount by which the total
expenditures from non-Federal sources
under the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan for any previous
fiscal year were less than the total of
those expenditures for the fiscal year
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
two years prior to that previous fiscal
year.
(b) Specific requirements for
construction of facilities. If the State
provides for the construction of a
facility for community rehabilitation
program purposes, the amount of the
State’s share of expenditures for
vocational rehabilitation services under
the plan, other than for the construction
of a facility for community
rehabilitation program purposes or the
establishment of a facility for
community rehabilitation purposes,
must be at least equal to the
expenditures for those services for the
second prior fiscal year.
(c) Separate State agency for
vocational rehabilitation services for
individuals who are blind. If there is a
separate part of the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan
administered by a separate State agency
to provide vocational rehabilitation
services for individuals who are blind—
(1) Satisfaction of the maintenance of
effort requirements under paragraphs (a)
and (b) of this section is determined
based on the total amount of a State’s
non-Federal expenditures under both
parts of the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan; and
(2) If a State fails to meet any
maintenance of effort requirement, the
Secretary reduces the amount otherwise
payable to the State for any fiscal year
under each part of the plan in direct
proportion to the amount by which nonFederal expenditures under each part of
the plan in any previous fiscal year were
less than they were for that part of the
plan for the fiscal year 2 years prior to
that previous fiscal year.
(d) Waiver or modification. (1) The
Secretary may waive or modify the
maintenance of effort requirement in
paragraph (a) of this section if the
Secretary determines that a waiver or
modification is necessary to permit the
State to respond to exceptional or
uncontrollable circumstances, such as a
major natural disaster or a serious
economic downturn, that—
(i) Cause significant unanticipated
expenditures or reductions in revenue
that result in a general reduction of
programs within the State; or
(ii) Require the State to make
substantial expenditures in the
vocational rehabilitation program for
long-term purposes due to the one-time
costs associated with the construction of
a facility for community rehabilitation
program purposes, the establishment of
a facility for community rehabilitation
program purposes, or the acquisition of
equipment.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(2) The Secretary may waive or
modify the maintenance of effort
requirement in paragraph (b) of this
section or the 10 percent allotment
limitation in § 361.61 if the Secretary
determines that a waiver or
modification is necessary to permit the
State to respond to exceptional or
uncontrollable circumstances, such as a
major natural disaster, that result in
significant destruction of existing
facilities and require the State to make
substantial expenditures for the
construction of a facility for community
rehabilitation program purposes or the
establishment of a facility for
community rehabilitation program
purposes in order to provide vocational
rehabilitation services.
(3) A written request for waiver or
modification, including supporting
justification, must be submitted to the
Secretary for consideration as soon as
the State has determined that it has
failed to satisfy its maintenance of effort
requirement due to an exceptional or
uncontrollable circumstance, as
described in paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of
this section.
(Authority: Sections 101(a)(17) and 111(a)(2)
of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 721(a)(17) and 731(a)(2))
§ 361.63
Program income.
(a) Definition. For purposes of this
section, program income means gross
income received by the State that is
directly generated by a supported
activity under this part.
(b) Sources. Sources of program
income include, but are not limited to:
Payments from the Social Security
Administration for assisting Social
Security beneficiaries and recipients to
achieve employment outcomes;
payments received from workers’
compensation funds; payments received
by the State agency from insurers,
consumers, or others for services to
defray part or all of the costs of services
provided to particular individuals; and
income generated by a State-operated
community rehabilitation program for
activities authorized under this part.
(c) Use of program income. (1) Except
as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this
section, program income, whenever
earned, must be used for the provision
of vocational rehabilitation services and
the administration of the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan.
Program income—
(i) Is considered earned in the fiscal
year in which it is received; and
(ii) Must be disbursed during the
period of performance of the award,
prior to requesting additional cash
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
payments, in accordance with 2 CFR
200.305(b)(5).
(2) Payments provided to a State from
the Social Security Administration for
assisting Social Security beneficiaries
and recipients to achieve employment
outcomes may also be used to carry out
programs under part B of title I of the
Act (client assistance), title VI of the Act
(supported employment), and title VII of
the Act (independent living).
(3) The State is authorized to treat
program income using the deduction or
addition alternative in accordance with
2 CFR 200.307(e)(1) and (2).
(4) Program income cannot be used to
meet the non-Federal share requirement
under § 361.60.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 108 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c) and 728; 2 CFR part 200)
§ 361.64
Obligation of Federal funds.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, any Federal award
funds, including reallotted funds, that
are appropriated for a fiscal year to carry
out a program under this part that are
not obligated by the State by the
beginning of the succeeding fiscal year
remain available for obligation by the
State during that succeeding fiscal year.
(b) Federal funds appropriated for a
fiscal year remain available for
obligation in the succeeding fiscal year
only to the extent that the State met the
matching requirement for those Federal
funds by obligating, in accordance with
34 CFR 76.707, the non-Federal share in
the fiscal year for which the funds were
appropriated.
(Authority: Section 19 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 716)
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 361.65 Allotment and payment of Federal
funds for vocational rehabilitation services.
(a) Allotment. (1) The allotment of
Federal funds for vocational
rehabilitation services for each State is
computed in accordance with the
requirements of section 110 of the Act,
and payments are made to the State on
a quarterly basis, unless some other
period is established by the Secretary.
(2) If the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan designates one
State agency to administer, or supervise
the administration of, the part of the
plan under which vocational
rehabilitation services are provided for
individuals who are blind and another
State agency to administer the rest of the
plan, the division of the State’s
allotment is a matter for State
determination.
(3) Reservation for pre-employment
transition services. (i) Pursuant to
section 110(d) of the Act, the State must
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
reserve at least 15 percent of the State’s
allotment, received in accordance with
section 110(a) of the Act for the
provision of pre-employment transition
services, as described at § 361.48(a) of
this part.
(ii) The funds reserved in accordance
with paragraph (3)(i) of this section—
(A) Must only be used for preemployment transition services
authorized in § 361.48(a); and:
(B) Must not be used to pay for
administrative costs associated with the
provision of such services or any other
vocational rehabilitation services.
(b) Reallotment. (1) The Secretary
determines not later than 45 days before
the end of a fiscal year which States, if
any, will not use their full allotment.
(2) As soon as possible, but not later
than the end of the fiscal year, the
Secretary reallots these funds to other
States that can use those additional
funds during the period of performance
of the award, provided the State can
meet the matching requirement by
obligating the non-Federal share of any
reallotted funds in the fiscal year for
which the funds were appropriated.
(3) In the event more funds are
requested by agencies than are available,
the Secretary will determine the process
for allocating funds available for
reallotment.
(4) Funds reallotted to another State
are considered to be an increase in the
recipient State’s allotment for the fiscal
year for which the funds were
appropriated.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 110 and 111 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c), 730, and 731)
Subpart D—[Reserved]
Subpart E—[Reserved]
Subpart F—[Reserved]
2. Part 363 is revised to read as
follows:
■
PART 363—THE STATE SUPPORTED
EMPLOYMENT SERVICES PROGRAM
Subpart A—General
Sec.
363.1 What is the State Supported
Employment Services Program?
363.2 Who is eligible for an award?
363.3 Who is eligible for services?
363.4 What are the authorized activities
under the State Supported Employment
Services program?
363.5 What regulations apply?
363.6 What definitions apply?
Subpart B—How Does a State Apply for a
Grant?
363.10 What documents must a State
submit to receive a grant?
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21139
363.11 What are the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan
supplement requirements?
Subpart C—How Are State Supported
Employment Services Programs Financed?
363.20 How does the Secretary allocate
funds?
363.21 How does the Secretary reallocate
funds?
363.22 How are funds reserved for youth
with the most significant disabilities?
363.23 What are the matching
requirements?
363.24 What is program income and how
may it be used?
363.25 What is the period of availability of
funds?
Subpart D—[Reserved]
Subpart E—[Reserved]
Subpart F—What Post-Award Conditions
Must Be Met by a State?
363.50 What collaborative agreements must
the State develop?
363.51 What are the allowable
administrative costs?
363.52 What are the information collection
and reporting requirements?
363.53 What requirements must a State
meet before it provides for the transition
of an individual to extended services?
363.54 When will an individual be
considered to have achieved an
employment outcome in supported
employment?
363.55 What notice requirements apply to
this program?
Authority: Sections 602–608 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 795g–795m, unless otherwise noted.
Subpart A—General
§ 363.1 What is the State Supported
Employment Services Program?
(a) Under the State supported
employment services program, the
Secretary provides grants to assist States
in developing and implementing
collaborative programs with appropriate
entities to provide programs of
supported employment services for
individuals with the most significant
disabilities, including youth with the
most significant disabilities, to enable
them to achieve an employment
outcome of supported employment in
competitive integrated employment.
Grants made under the State supported
employment services program
supplement a State’s vocational
rehabilitation program grants under 34
CFR part 361.
(b) For purposes of this part,
‘‘supported employment’’ means
competitive integrated employment,
including customized employment, or
employment in an integrated work
setting in which individuals with the
most significant disabilities are working
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21140
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
on a short-term basis toward
competitive integrated employment,
that is individualized and customized
consistent with the unique strengths,
abilities, interests, and informed choice
of the individuals with ongoing support
services for individuals with the most
significant disabilities—
(1)(i) For whom competitive
integrated employment has not
historically occurred; or
(ii) For whom competitive integrated
employment has been interrupted or
intermittent as a result of a significant
disability; and
(2) Who, because of the nature and
severity of the disability, need intensive
supported employment services, and
extended services after the transition
from support provided by the
designated State unit in order to
perform the work.
(c) For purposes of this part, an
individual with the most significant
disabilities, whose supported
employment in an integrated setting
does not satisfy the criteria of
competitive integrated employment, as
defined at 34 CFR 361.5(c)(9), is
considered to be working on a shortterm basis toward competitive
integrated employment so long as the
individual can reasonably anticipate
achieving competitive integrated
employment within six months of the
individual entering supported
employment.
(Authority: Sections 7(38), 7(39), 12(c), and
602 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C., 705(38), 705(39), 709(c),
and 795g)
§ 363.2
Who is eligible for an award?
Any State that submits the
documentation required by § 363.10, as
part of the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan under 34 CFR part
361, is eligible for an award under this
part.
(Authority: Section 606(a) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 795k(a))
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 363.3
Who is eligible for services?
A State may provide services under
this part to any individual, including a
youth with a disability, if—
(a) The individual has been
determined to be—
(1) Eligible for vocational
rehabilitation services in accordance
with 34 CFR 361.42; and
(2) An individual with the most
significant disabilities;
(b) For purposes of activities carried
out under § 363.4(a)(2) of this part, the
individual is a youth with a disability,
as defined at 34 CFR 361.5(c)(59), who
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
satisfies the requirements of this
section; and
(c) Supported employment has been
identified as the appropriate
employment outcome for the individual
on the basis of a comprehensive
assessment of rehabilitation needs, as
defined at 34 CFR 361.5(c)(5), including
an evaluation of rehabilitation, career,
and job needs.
(Authority: Section 605 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 795j)
§ 363.4 What are the authorized activities
under the State Supported Employment
Services program?
(a) The State may use funds allotted
under this part to—
(1) Provide supported employment
services, as defined at 34 CFR
361.5(c)(54);
(2) Provide extended services, as
defined at 34 CFR 361.5(c)(19), to youth
with the most significant disabilities, in
accordance with § 363.11(f), for a period
of time not to exceed four years; and
(3) With funds reserved, in
accordance with § 363.22 for the
provision of supported employment
services to youth with the most
significant disabilities, leverage other
public and private funds to increase
resources for extended services and
expand supported employment
opportunities.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph
(a)(2) of this section, a State may not use
funds under this part to provide
extended services to individuals with
the most significant disabilities.
(c) Nothing in this part will be
construed to prohibit a State from
providing—
(1) Supported employment services in
accordance with the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan
submitted under 34 CFR part 361 by
using funds made available through a
State allotment under that part.
(2) Discrete postemployment services
in accordance with 34 CFR 361.48(b) by
using funds made available under 34
CFR part 361 to an individual who is
eligible under this part.
(d) A State must coordinate with the
entities described in § 363.50(a)
regarding the services provided to
individuals with the most significant
disabilities, including youth with the
most significant disabilities, under this
part and under 34 CFR part 361 to
ensure that the services are
complementary and not duplicative.
(Authority: Sections 7(39), 12(c), 604,
606(b)(6), and 608 of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(39),
709(c), 795i, 795k(b)(6), and 795m)
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
§ 363.5
What regulations apply?
The following regulations apply to the
State supported employment services
program:
(a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) as
follows:
(1) 34 CFR part 76 (StateAdministered Programs).
(2) 34 CFR part 77 (Definitions that
Apply to Department Regulations).
(3) 34 CFR part 79 (Intergovernmental
Review of Department of Education
Programs and Activities).
(4) 34 CFR part 81 (General Education
Provisions Act—Enforcement).
(5) 34 CFR part 82 (New Restrictions
on Lobbying).
(b) The regulations in this part 363.
(c) The following regulations in 34
CFR part 361 (The State Vocational
Rehabilitation Services Program):
§§ 361.5, 361.31, 361.32, 361.34, 361.35,
361.39, 361.40, 361.41, 361.42,
361.47(a), 361.48, 361.49, and 361.53.
(d) 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards), as adopted in 2 CFR
part 3474.
(e) 2 CFR part 180 (OMB Guidelines
to Agencies on Governmentwide
Debarment and Suspension
(Nonprocurement)), as adopted in 2 CFR
part 3485.
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c))
§ 363.6
What definitions apply?
The following definitions apply to
this part;
(a) Definitions in 34 CFR part 361.
(b) Definitions in 34 CFR part 77.
(c) Definitions in 2 CFR part 200,
subpart A.
(Authority: Sections 7 and 12(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705 and 709(c))
Subpart B—How Does a State Apply
for a Grant?
§ 363.10 What documents must a State
submit to receive a grant?
(a) To be eligible to receive a grant
under this part, a State must submit to
the Secretary, as part of the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan under
34 CFR part 361, a State plan
supplement that meets the requirements
of § 363.11.
(b) A State must submit revisions to
the vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan supplement submitted under
this part as may be necessary.
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(Authority: Section 606(a) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 795k(a))
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 363.11 What are the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified
or Combined State Plan supplement
requirements?
Each State plan supplement,
submitted in accordance with § 363.10,
must—
(a) Designate a designated State unit
or, as applicable, units, as defined in 34
CFR 361.5(c)(13), as the State agency or
agencies to administer the Supported
Employment program under this part;
(b) Summarize the results of the needs
assessment of individuals with most
significant disabilities, including youth
with the most significant disabilities,
conducted under 34 CFR 361.29(a), with
respect to the rehabilitation and career
needs of individuals with most
significant disabilities and their need for
supported employment services. The
results of the needs assessment must
also address needs relating to
coordination;
(c) Describe the quality, scope, and
extent of supported employment
services to be provided to eligible
individuals with the most significant
disabilities under this part, including
youth with the most significant
disabilities;
(d) Describe the State’s goals and
plans with respect to the distribution of
funds received under § 363.20;
(e) Demonstrate evidence of the
designated State unit’s efforts to identify
and make arrangements, including
entering into cooperative agreements,
with—
(1) Other State agencies and other
appropriate entities to assist in the
provision of supported employment
services; and
(2) Other public or non-profit agencies
or organizations within the State,
employers, natural supports, and other
entities with respect to the provision of
extended services;
(f) Describe the activities to be
conducted for youth with the most
significant disabilities with the funds
reserved in accordance with § 363.22,
including–
(1) The provision of extended services
to youth with the most significant
disabilities for a period not to exceed
four years, in accordance with
§ 363.4(a)(2); and
(2) How the State will use supported
employment funds reserved under
§ 363.22 to leverage other public and
private funds to increase resources for
extended services and expand
supported employment opportunities
for youth with the most significant
disabilities;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
(g) Assure that—
(1) Funds made available under this
part will only be used to provide
authorized supported employment
services to individuals who are eligible
under this part to receive such services;
(2) The comprehensive assessments of
individuals with significant disabilities,
including youth with the most
significant disabilities, conducted under
34 CFR part 361 will include
consideration of supported employment
as an appropriate employment outcome;
(3) An individualized plan for
employment, as described at 34 CFR
361.45 and 361.46, will be developed
and updated, using funds received
under 34 CFR part 361, in order to—
(i) Specify the supported employment
services to be provided, including, as
appropriate, transition services and preemployment transition services to be
provided for youth with the most
significant disabilities;
(ii) Specify the expected extended
services needed, including the extended
services that may be provided under
this part to youth with the most
significant disabilities in accordance
with an approved individualized plan
for employment for a period not to
exceed four years; and
(iii) Identify, as appropriate, the
source of extended services, which may
include natural supports, programs, or
other entities, or an indication that it is
not possible to identify the source of
extended services at the time the
individualized plan for employment is
developed;
(4) The State will use funds provided
under this part only to supplement, and
not supplant, the funds received under
34 CFR part 361, in providing supported
employment services specified in the
individualized plan for employment;
(5) Services provided under an
individualized plan for employment
will be coordinated with services
provided under other individualized
plans established under other Federal or
State programs;
(6) To the extent job skills training is
provided, the training will be provided
onsite;
(7) Supported employment services
will include placement in an integrated
setting based on the unique strengths,
resources, interests, concerns, abilities,
and capabilities of individuals with the
most significant disabilities, including
youth with the most significant
disabilities;
(8) The designated State agency or
agencies, as described in paragraph (a)
of this section, will expend no more
than 2.5 percent of the State’s allotment
under this part for administrative costs
of carrying out this program; and
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21141
(9) The designated State agency or
agencies will provide, directly or
indirectly through public or private
entities, non-Federal contributions in an
amount that is not less than 10 percent
of the costs of carrying out supported
employment services provided to youth
with the most significant disabilities
with the funds reserved for such
purpose under § 363.22; and
(h) Contain any other information and
be submitted in the form and in
accordance with the procedures that the
Secretary may require.
(Authority: Section 606 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 795k)
Subpart C—How Are State Supported
Employment Services Programs
Financed?
§ 363.20
funds?
How does the Secretary allocate
(a) States. The Secretary will allot the
sums appropriated for each fiscal year to
carry out the activities of this part
among the States on the basis of relative
population of each State, except that—
(1) No State will receive less than
$250,000, or 1/3 of 1 percent of the
sums appropriated for the fiscal year for
which the allotment is made, whichever
amount is greater; and
(2) If the sums appropriated to carry
out this part for the fiscal year exceed
the sums appropriated to carry out this
part (as in effect on September 30, 1992)
in fiscal year 1992 by $1,000,000 or
more, no State will receive less than
$300,000, or 1/3 of 1 percent of the
sums appropriated for the fiscal year for
which the allotment is made, whichever
amount is greater.
(b) Certain Territories. (1) For the
purposes of this part, Guam, American
Samoa, the United States Virgin Islands,
and the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands are not considered to be
States.
(2) Each jurisdiction described in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section will be
allotted not less than 1/8 of 1 percent of
the amounts appropriated for the fiscal
year for which the allotment is made.
(Authority: Section 603(a) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 795h(a))
§ 363.21 How does the Secretary
reallocate funds?
(a) Whenever the Secretary
determines that any amount of an
allotment to a State under § 363.20 for
any fiscal year will not be expended by
such State for carrying out the
provisions of this part, the Secretary
will make such amount available for
carrying out the provisions of this part
to one or more of the States that the
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21142
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Secretary determines will be able to use
additional amounts during such year for
carrying out such provisions.
(b) Any amount made available to a
State for any fiscal year in accordance
with paragraph (a) will be regarded as
an increase in the State’s allotment
under this part for such year.
(Authority: Section 603(b) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 795h(b))
§ 363.22 How are funds reserved for youth
with the most significant disabilities?
A State that receives an allotment
under this part must reserve and expend
50 percent of such allotment for the
provision of supported employment
services, including extended services, to
youth with the most significant
disabilities in order to assist those youth
in achieving an employment outcome in
supported employment.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 603(d) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c) and 795h(d))
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 363.23 What are the matching
requirements?
(a) Non-Federal Share. (1) For funds
allotted under § 363.20 and not reserved
under § 363.22 for the provision of
supported employment services to
youth with the most significant
disabilities, there is no non-Federal
share requirement.
(2)(i) For funds allotted under
§ 363.20 and reserved under § 363.22 for
the provision of supported employment
services to youth with the most
significant disabilities, a designated
State agency must provide non-Federal
expenditures in an amount that is not
less than 10 percent of the total
expenditures made with the reserved
funds for the provision of supported
employment services to youth with the
most significant disabilities, including
extended services.
(ii) In the event that a designated State
agency uses more than 50 percent of its
allotment under this part to provide
supported employment services to
youth with the most significant
disabilities as required by § 363.22,
there is no requirement that a
designated State agency provide nonFederal expenditures to match the
excess Federal funds spent for this
purpose.
(2) Except as provided under
paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section,
non-Federal expenditures made under
the vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan supplement to meet the nonFederal share requirement under this
section must be consistent with the
provision of 2 CFR 200.306.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
(b) Third-party in-kind contributions.
Third-party in-kind contributions, as
described in 2 CFR 200.306(b), may not
be used to meet the non-Federal share
under this section.
(c)(1) Contributions by private
entities. Expenditures made from
contributions by private organizations,
agencies, or individuals that are
deposited into the sole account of the
State agency, in accordance with State
law may be used as part of the nonFederal share under this section,
provided the expenditures under the
vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan supplement, as described in
§ 363.11, do not benefit in any way the
donor, an individual to whom the donor
is related by blood or marriage or with
whom the donor shares a financial
interest.
(2) The Secretary does not consider a
donor’s receipt from the State unit of a
contract or subaward with funds
allotted under this part to be a benefit
for the purpose of this paragraph if the
contract or subaward is awarded under
the State’s regular competitive
procedures.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 606(b)(7)(I) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 795k(b)(7)(I))
§ 363.24 What is program income and how
may it be used?
(a) Definition. (1) Program income
means gross income earned by the State
that is directly generated by authorized
activities supported under this part.
(2) Program income received through
the transfer of Social Security
Administration payments from the State
Vocational Rehabilitation Services
program, in accordance with 34 CFR
361.63(c)(2), will be treated as program
income received under this part.
(b) Use of program income. (1)
Program income must be used for the
provision of services authorized under
§ 363.4. Program income earned or
received during the fiscal year must be
disbursed during the period of
performance of the award, prior to
requesting additional cash payments in
accordance with 2 CFR 200.305(b)(5).
(2) States are authorized to treat
program income as—
(i) A deduction from total allowable
costs charged to a Federal grant, in
accordance with 2 CFR 200.307(e)(1); or
(ii) An addition to the grant funds to
be used for additional allowable
program expenditures, in accordance
with 2 CFR 200.307(e)(2).
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 108 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c) and 728)
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
§ 363.25 What is the period of availability
of funds?
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, any Federal award
funds, including reallotted funds, that
are appropriated for a fiscal year to carry
out a program under this part that are
not obligated by the State by the
beginning of the succeeding fiscal year,
and any program income received
during a fiscal year that is not obligated
or expended by the State prior to the
beginning of the succeeding fiscal year
in which the program income was
received, remain available for obligation
by the State during that succeeding
fiscal year.
(b) Federal funds appropriated for a
fiscal year and reserved for the
provision of supported employment
services to youth with the most
significant disabilities, in accordance
with § 363.22 of this part, remain
available for obligation in the
succeeding fiscal year only to the extent
that the State met the matching
requirement, as described at § 363.23,
for those Federal funds by obligating, in
accordance with 34 CFR 76.707, the
non-Federal share in the fiscal year for
which the funds were appropriated.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 19 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c) and 716)
Subpart D—[Reserved]
Subpart E—[Reserved]
Subpart F—What Post-Award
Conditions Must Be Met by a State?
§ 363.50 What collaborative agreements
must the State develop?
(a) A designated State unit must enter
into one or more written collaborative
agreements, memoranda of
understanding, or other appropriate
mechanisms with other public agencies,
private nonprofit organizations, and
other available funding sources,
including employers and other natural
supports, as appropriate, to assist with
the provision of supported employment
services and extended services to
individuals with the most significant
disabilities in the State, including youth
with the most significant disabilities, to
enable them to achieve an employment
outcome of supported employment in
competitive integrated employment.
(b) These agreements provide the
mechanism for collaboration at the State
level that is necessary to ensure the
smooth transition from supported
employment services to extended
services, the transition of which is
inherent to the definition of ‘‘supported
employment’’ in § 363.1(b). To that end,
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
the agreement may contain information
regarding the—
(1) Supported employment services to
be provided, for a period not to exceed
24 months, by the designated State unit
with funds received under this part.
(2) Extended services to be provided
to youth with the most significant
disabilities, for a period not to exceed
four years, by the designated State unit
with the funds reserved under § 363.22
of this part;
(3) Extended services to be provided
by other public agencies, private
nonprofit organizations, or other
sources, including employers and other
natural supports, following the
provision of authorized supported
employment services, or extended
services as appropriate for youth with
the most significant disabilities, under
this part; and
(4) Collaborative efforts that will be
undertaken by all relevant entities to
increase opportunities for competitive
integrated employment in the State for
individuals with the most significant
disabilities, especially youth with the
most significant disabilities.
(Authority: Sections 7(38), 7(39), 12(c), 602,
and 606(b) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(38), 705(39),
709(c), 795g, and 795k(b))
§ 363.51 What are the allowable
administrative costs?
(a) A State may use funds under this
part to pay for expenditures incurred in
the administration of activities carried
out under this part, consistent with the
definition of administrative costs in 34
CFR 361.5(c)(2).
(b) A designated State agency may not
expend more than 2.5 percent of a
State’s allotment under this part for
administrative costs for carrying out the
State supported employment program.
(Authority: Sections 7(1), 12(c), and 603(c) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 705(1), 709(c), and 795h(c))
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 363.52 What are the information
collection and reporting requirements?
Each State agency designated in
§ 363.11(a) of this part must collect and
report separately the information
required under 34 CFR 361.40 for—
(a) Eligible individuals receiving
supported employment services under
this part;
(b) Eligible individuals receiving
supported employment services under
34 CFR part 361;
(c) Eligible youth receiving supported
employment services and extended
services under this part; and
(d) Eligible youth receiving supported
employment services under 34 CFR part
361 and extended services.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
(Authority: Sections 13 and 607 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 710 and 795l)
§ 363.53 What requirements must a State
meet before it provides for the transition of
an individual to extended services?
A designated State unit must provide
for the transition of an individual with
the most significant disabilities,
including youth with the most
significant disabilities, to extended
services no later than 24 months after
the individual enters supported
employment, unless a longer period is
established in the individualized plan
for employment. Before assisting the
individual in transitioning from
supported employment services to
extended services, the designated State
unit must ensure—
(a) The supported employment is—
(1) In competitive integrated
employment, including customized
employment; or
(2) In an integrated work setting in
which individuals are working on a
short-term basis, as described in
§ 363.1(c), toward competitive
integrated employment;
(3) Individualized and customized
consistent with the strengths, abilities,
interests, and informed choice of the
individual; and
(b) The source of extended services
for the individual has been identified so
there will be no interruption of services.
(Authority: Sections 7(13), 7(38), 7(39), 12(c),
602, and 606(b) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(13),
705(38), 705(39), 709(c), 795g, and 795k(b))
§ 363.54 When will an individual be
considered to have achieved an
employment outcome in supported
employment?
An individual with the most
significant disabilities, including a
youth with the most significant
disabilities, who is receiving services
under this part will be determined to
have achieved an employment outcome
of supported employment if the
individual—
(a) Maintains supported employment
for at least 90 days after the individual
has—
(1) Completed all supported
employment services provided under
this part, as well as any other services
listed on the individualized plan for
employment and provided under 34
CFR part 361; and
(2) Begun extended services provided
by either the designated State unit, in
the case of a youth with a most
significant disabilities receiving services
with the funds reserved under § 363.22,
or another provider for all other
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21143
individuals with the most significant
disabilities;
(b) Satisfies requirements for case
closure, as set forth in 34 CFR 361.56;
and
(c) Satisfies the requirement at
§ 363.1(c) if the individual’s supported
employment is in an integrated setting,
but is not in competitive integrated
employment, as defined in 34 CFR
361.5(c)(9).
(Authority: Sections 7(38), 7(39), 12(c), and
602 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(38), 705(39), 709(c),
and 795g)
§ 363.55 What notice requirements apply
to this program?
Each grantee must advise applicants
for or recipients of services under this
part, or as appropriate, the parents,
family members, guardians, advocates,
or authorized representatives of those
individuals, including youth with the
most significant disabilities, of the
availability and purposes of the Client
Assistance Program, including
information on seeking assistance from
that program.
(Authority: Section 20 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 717)
■
3. Part 397 is added to read as follows:
PART 397—LIMITATIONS ON USE OF
SUBMINIMUM WAGE
Subpart A—General Provisions
Sec.
397.1 Purpose.
397.2 What is the Department of
Education’s jurisdiction under this part?
397.3 What rules of construction apply to
this part?
397.4 What regulations apply?
397.5 What definitions apply?
Subpart B—Coordinated Documentation
Procedures Related To Youth With
Disabilities
397.10 What documentation process must
the designated State unit develop?
Subpart C—Designated State Unit
Responsibilities Prior To Youth With
Disabilities Starting Subminimum Wage
Employment
397.20 What are the responsibilities of a
designated State unit to youth with
disabilities who are known to be
considering subminimum wage
employment?
Subpart D—Local Educational Agency
Responsibilities Prior To Youth With
Disabilities Starting Subminimum Wage
Employment
397.30 What are the responsibilities of a
local educational agency to youth with
disabilities who are known to be
considering subminimum wage
employment?
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21144
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
397.31 Are there any contracting
limitations on educational agencies
under this part?
Subpart E—Designated State Unit
Responsibilities To Individuals With
Disabilities During Subminimum Wage
Employment
397.40 What are the responsibilities of a
designated State unit for individuals
with disabilities, regardless of age, who
are employed at subminimum wage?
Subpart F—Review Of Documentation
Process
397.50 What is the role of the designated
State unit in the review of
documentation process under this part?
Authority: Section 511 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 794g, unless otherwise noted.
Subpart A—General Provisions
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 397.1
Purpose.
(a) The purpose of this part is to set
forth requirements the designated State
units and State and local educational
agencies must satisfy to ensure that
individuals with disabilities, especially
youth with disabilities, have a
meaningful opportunity to prepare for,
obtain, maintain, advance in, or regain
competitive integrated employment,
including supported or customized
employment.
(b) This part requires—
(1) A designated State unit to provide
youth with disabilities documentation
demonstrating that they have completed
certain requirements, as described in
this part, prior to starting subminimum
wage employment with entities holding
special wage certificates under section
14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of
1938 (29 U.S.C. 214(c)), as defined in
397.5(d);
(2) A designated State unit to provide,
at certain prescribed intervals, career
counseling and information and referral
services, designed to promote
opportunities for competitive integrated
employment, to individuals with
disabilities, regardless of age, who are
known to be employed at a
subminimum wage level for the
duration of such employment; and
(3) A designated State unit, in
consultation with the State educational
agency, to develop a, or utilize an
existing, process to document
completion of required activities under
this part by a youth with a disability.
(c) The provisions in this part
authorize a designated State unit, or a
representative of a designated State unit,
to engage in the review of individual
documentation required to be
maintained by these entities under this
part.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
(d) The provisions in this part work
in concert with requirements in 34 CFR
part 300, 361, and 363, and do not alter
any requirements under those parts.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 511 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c) and 794g)
§ 397.2 What is the Department of
Education’s jurisdiction under this part?
(a) The Department of Education has
jurisdiction under this part to
implement guidelines for—
(1) Documentation requirements
imposed on designated State units and
local educational agencies;
(2) Requirements related to the
services that designated State units must
provide to individuals regardless of age
who are employed at the subminimum
wage level; and
(3) Requirements under § 397.31 of
this part.
(b) Nothing in this part will be
construed to grant to the Department of
Education, or its grantees, jurisdiction
over requirements set forth in the Fair
Labor Standards Act, including those
imposed on entities holding special
wage certificates under section 14(c) of
that Act, which is administered by the
Department of Labor.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 511(b)(3), and
511(c) and (d) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c),
794g(b)(3), 794g(c), and 794g(d))
§ 397.3 What rules of construction apply to
this part?
Nothing in this part will be construed
to—
(a) Change the purpose of the
Rehabilitation Act, which is to empower
individuals with disabilities to
maximize opportunities for achieving
competitive integrated employment;
(b) Promote subminimum wage
employment as a vocational
rehabilitation strategy or employment
outcome, as defined in 34 CFR
361.5(c)(15); and
(c) Affect the provisions of the Fair
Labor Standards Act, as amended before
or after July 22, 2014.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 511(b) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c) and 794g(b))
§ 397.4
What regulations apply?
(a) The regulations in 34 CFR part 300
governing the definition of transition
services, and the Individualized
Education Program requirements related
to the development of postsecondary
goals and the transition services needed
to assist the eligible child in reaching
those goals (§§ 300.320(b), 300.321(b),
300.324(c), and 300.43).
(b) The regulations at 34 CFR part 361
governing the vocational rehabilitation
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
program, especially those regarding
eligibility determinations § 361.42;
individualized plans for employment
§ 361.45 and § 361.46; provision of
vocational rehabilitation services,
including pre-employment transition
services, transition services, and
supported employment services
§ 361.48; ineligibility determinations
§ 361.43; and case closures § 361.56.
(c) The regulations at 29 CFR part 525
governing the employment of
individuals with disabilities at
subminimum wage rates pursuant to a
certificate issued by the Secretary of the
Department of Labor.
(d) The regulations in this part 387.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 102(a) and (b),
103(a), and 113 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c), 722(a)
and (b), 723(a), and 733; sections 601(34) and
614(d)(1)(A)(i)(VIII) of the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C.
1401(34) and 1414(d)); and section 14(c) of
the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C.
214(c))
§ 397.5
What definitions apply?
(a) The following terms have the
meanings given to them in 34 CFR
§ 361.5(c):
(1) Act;
(2) Competitive integrated
employment;
(3) Customized employment;
(4) Designated State unit;
(5) Extended services;
(6) Individual with a disability;
(7) Individual with a most significant
disability;
(8) Individual’s representative;
(9) Individualized plan for
employment;
(10) Pre-employment transition
services;
(11) Student with a disability;
(12) Supported employment;
(13) Vocational rehabilitation
services; and
(14) Youth with a disability.
(b) The following terms have the
meanings given to them in 34 CFR part
300:
(1) Local educational agency
(§ 300.28);
(2) State educational agency
(§ 300.41); and
(3) Transition services (§ 300.43).
(c) The following terms have the
meaning given to them in 29 CFR 525.3
and section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor
Standards Act (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)):
(1) Federal minimum wage has the
meaning given to that term in section
6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act
(29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)); and
(2) Special wage certificate means a
certificate issued to an employer under
section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Act (29 U.S.C. 214(c)) and 29 CFR part
525 that authorizes payment of
subminimum wages, wages less than the
statutory minimum wage, to workers
with disabilities for the work being
performed.
(d) For purposes of this part, entity
means an employer, or a contractor or
subcontractor of that employer, that
holds a special wage certificate
described in section 14(c) of the Fair
Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. 214(c)).
(Authority: Sections 7, 12(c), and 511(a) and
(f) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705, 709(c), and 794g(a)
and (f); sections 601 and 614(d) of the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act,
20 U.S.C. 1401 and 1414(d); section 901 of
the Elementary and Secondary Education Act
of 1965, 20 U.S.C. 7801; and sections 6(a)(1)
and 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29
U.S.C. 206(a)(1) and 29 U.S.C. 214(c))
Subpart B—Coordinated
Documentation Procedures Related to
Youth With Disabilities
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 397.10 What documentation process
must the designated State unit develop?
(a) The designated State unit, in
consultation with the State educational
agency, must develop a new process, or
utilize an existing process, to document
the completion of the actions described
in § 397.20 and § 397.30 by a youth with
a disability.
(b) The documentation process must
ensure that—
(1) A designated State unit provides a
youth with a disability documentation
of completion of appropriate preemployment transition services, in
accordance with § 361.48(a) and as
required by § 397.20(a)(1);
(2) In the case of a student with a
disability, for actions described in
§ 397.30—
(i) The designated State unit will
receive from the appropriate school
official, responsible for the provision of
transition services, documentation of
completion of appropriate transition
services under the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act, including
those provided under section
614(d)(1)(A)(i)(VIII) (20 U.S.C.
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VIII));
(ii) The designated State unit must
provide documentation of completion of
the transition services, as documented
and provided by the appropriate school
official in accordance with paragraph
(b)(2) of this section, to the youth with
a disability.
(c) The designated State unit must
provide—
(1) Documentation required by this
part in a form and manner consistent
with this part and in an accessible
format for the youth; and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
(2) Documentation required by this
part to a youth as soon as possible upon
the completion of each of the required
actions, but no later than 90 days after
completion of each of the required
actions in § 397.20 and § 397.30.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 511(d) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c) and 794g(d))
Subpart C—Designated State Unit
Responsibilities Prior To Youth With
Disabilities Starting Subminimum
Wage Employment
§ 397.20 What are the responsibilities of a
designated State unit to youth with
disabilities who are known to be
considering subminimum wage
employment?
(a) A designated State unit must
provide youth with disabilities
documentation upon the completion of
the following actions:
(1) Pre-employment transition
services that are available to the
individual under § 34 CFR 361.48; and
(2) Application for vocational
rehabilitation services, in accordance
with 34 CFR § 361.41(b), with the result
that the individual was determined—
(i) Ineligible for vocational
rehabilitation services, in accordance
with 34 CFR § 361.43; or
(ii) Eligible for vocational
rehabilitation services, in accordance
with 34 CFR § 361.42; and
(A) The youth with a disability had an
approved individualized plan for
employment, in accordance with 34
CFR 361.46;
(B) The youth with a disability was
unable to achieve the employment
outcome specified in the individualized
plan for employment, as described in 34
CFR 361.5(c)(15) and 361.46, despite
working toward the employment
outcome with reasonable
accommodations and appropriate
supports and services, including
supported employment services and
customized employment services, for a
reasonable period of time; and
(C) The youth with a disability’s case
record, which meets all of the
requirements of 34 CFR 361.47, is
closed.
(3)(i) Regardless of the determination
made under paragraph (a)(2) of this
section, the youth with a disability has
received career counseling, and
information and referrals to Federal and
State programs and other resources in
the individual’s geographic area that
offer employment-related services and
supports designed to enable the
individual to explore, discover,
experience, and attain competitive
integrated employment.
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21145
(ii) The career counseling and
information and referral services
provided in accordance with paragraph
(a)(3)(i) of this section must—
(A) Be provided in a manner that
facilitates informed choice and
decision-making by the youth, or the
youth’s representative as appropriate;
and
(B) Not be for subminimum wage
employment by an entity defined in
§ 397.5(d), and such employmentrelated services are not compensated at
a subminimum wage and do not directly
result in employment compensated at a
subminimum wage provided by such an
entity.
(b) The following special
requirements apply—
(1) For purposes of this part, all
documentation provided by a
designated State unit must satisfy the
requirements for such documentation
under 34 CFR part 361.
(2) The individualized plan for
employment, required in paragraph
(a)(3)(i) of this section, must include a
specific employment goal consistent
with competitive integrated
employment, including supported or
customized employment.
(3)(i) For purposes of paragraph
(a)(2)(ii)(B) of this section, a
determination as to what constitutes
‘‘reasonable period of time’’ must be
consistent with the disability-related
and vocational needs of the individual,
as well as the anticipated length of time
required to complete the services
identified in the individualized plan for
employment.
(ii) For an individual whose specified
employment goal is in supported
employment, such reasonable period of
time is up to 24 months, unless under
special circumstances the individual
and the rehabilitation counselor jointly
agree to extend the time to achieve the
employment outcome identified in the
individualized plan for employment.
(Authority: Sections 7(5), 7(39), 12(c), 102(a)
and (b), 103(a), 113, and 511(a) and (d) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 705(5), 705(39), 709(c), 722(a) and (b),
723(a), 733, and 794g(a) and (d))
Subpart D—Local Educational Agency
Responsibilities Prior To Youth With
Disabilities Starting Subminimum
Wage Employment
§ 397.30 What are the responsibilities of a
local educational agency to youth with
disabilities who are known to be seeking
subminimum wage employment?
Of the documentation to demonstrate
a youth with a disability’s completion of
the actions described in § 397.20(a) of
this part, a local educational agency, as
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
21146
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 / Proposed Rules
defined in § 397.5(b)(1), can provide the
youth with documentation that the
youth has received transition services
under the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.),
such as transition services available to
the individual under section 614(d) of
that act (20 U.S.C. 1414(d)).
(Authority: Sections 511(a)(2)(A) and 511(d)
of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 794g(a)(2)(A) and (d))
§ 397.31 Are there any contracting
limitations on educational agencies under
this part?
Neither a local educational agency, as
defined in § 397.5(b)(1), nor a State
educational agency, as defined in
§ 397.5(b)(2), may enter into a contract
or other arrangement with an entity, as
defined in § 397.5(d), for the purpose of
operating a program under which a
youth with a disability is engaged in
subminimum wage employment.
(Authority: Section 511(b)(2) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 794g(b)(2))
Subpart E—Designated State Unit
Responsibilities to Individuals With
Disabilities During Subminimum Wage
Employment
§ 397.40 What are the responsibilities of a
designated State unit for individuals with
disabilities, regardless of age, who are
employed at a subminimum wage?
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(a) Counseling and information
services. (1) A designated State unit
must provide career counseling, and
information and referral services, as
described in § 397.20(a)(4) to
individuals with disabilities, regardless
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:53 Apr 15, 2015
Jkt 235001
of age, or the individual’s representative
as appropriate, who are known by the
designated State unit to be employed by
an entity, as defined in § 397.5(d), at a
subminimum wage level.
(2) A designated State unit may know
the identification of individuals with
disabilities described in this paragraph
through the vocational rehabilitation
process or by referral from the client
assistance program, another agency, or
an entity, as defined in § 397.5(d).
(3) The career counseling and
information and referral services must
be provided in a manner that–
(i) Is understandable to the individual
with a disability; and
(ii) Facilitates independent decisionmaking and informed choice as the
individual makes decisions regarding
opportunities for competitive integrated
employment and career advancement,
particularly with respect to supported
employment, including customized
employment.
(b) Other services. (1) Upon a referral
by an entity, as defined in 397.5(d), that
has fewer than 15 employees, of an
individual with a disability who is
employed at a subminimum wage by
that entity, a designated State unit must
also inform the individual of selfadvocacy, self-determination, and peer
mentoring training opportunities
available in the community.
(2) The services described in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section must be
provided by an entity that does not have
a financial interest in the individual’s
employment outcome.
(c) Required intervals. The services
required by this section must be carried
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
out once every six months for the first
year of the individual’s subminimum
wage employment and annually
thereafter for the duration of such
employment.
(d) Documentation. The designated
State unit must provide timely
documentation to the individual upon
completion of the activities required
under this section.
(e) Provision of services. Nothing in
this section will be construed as
requiring a designated State unit to
provide the services required by this
section directly. A designated State unit
may contract with other entities, i.e.,
other public and private service
providers, as appropriate, to fulfill the
requirements of this section.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 511(c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c) and 794g(c))
Subpart F–Review of Documentation
Process
§ 397.50 What is the role of the designated
State unit in the review of documentation
process under this part?
The designated State unit, or a
contractor working directly for the
designated State unit is authorized to
engage in the review of individual
documentation required under this part
that is maintained by entities, as defined
at 397.5(d), under this part.
(Authority: Section 511(e) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 794g(e))
[FR Doc. 2015–05538 Filed 4–2–15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
E:\FR\FM\16APP6.SGM
16APP6
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 73 (Thursday, April 16, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21059-21146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05538]
Federal Register / Vol. 80 , No. 73 / Thursday, April 16, 2015 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 21059]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Parts 361, 363, and 397
RIN 1820-AB70
[Docket ID ED-2015-OSERS-OOO1]
State Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program; State Supported
Employment Services Program; Limitations on Use of Subminimum Wage
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Secretary proposes to amend the regulations governing the
State Vocational Rehabilitation Services program and the State
Supported Employment Services program in order to implement changes to
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended by the Workforce Innovation
and Opportunity Act (WIOA) enacted on July 22, 2014. The Secretary also
proposes to update, clarify, and improve the current regulations.
Finally, the Secretary proposes to issue new regulations regarding
limitations on the use of subminimum wages that are added by WIOA and
under the purview of the Department.
DATES: We must receive your comments on or before June 15, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
or via postal mail, commercial delivery, or hand delivery. We will not
accept comments submitted by fax or by email or those submitted after
the comment period. To ensure that we do not receive duplicate copies,
please submit your comments only once. In addition, please include the
Docket ID at the top of your comments.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov to
submit your comments electronically. Information on using
Regulations.gov, including instructions for accessing agency documents,
submitting comments, and viewing the docket, is available on the site
under ``Are you new to the site?''
Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery, or Hand Delivery: If you
mail or deliver your comments about these proposed regulations, address
them to Janet LaBreck, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue SW., Room 5086, Potomac Center Plaza (PCP), Washington, DC
20202-2800.
Privacy Note: The Department's policy is to make all comments
received from members of the public available for public viewing in
their entirety on the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, commenters should be careful to include
in their comments only information that they wish to make publicly
available.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janet LaBreck, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 5086, PCP, Washington, DC
20202-2800. Telephone: (202) 245-7488 or by email:
Janet.LaBreck@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Summary
Purpose of This Regulatory Action: The Secretary proposes to amend
the regulations governing the State Vocational Rehabilitation Services
program (VR program) (34 CFR part 361) and State Supported Employment
Services program) (Supported Employment program) (34 CFR part 363),
administered by the Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA), to
implement changes to the Act made by WIOA (P.L. 113-128), enacted on
July 22, 2014. In so doing, the Secretary also proposes to update and
clarify current regulations to improve program function. Finally, the
Secretary proposes to promulgate regulations in 34 CFR part 397 that
implement the limitations on the payment of subminimum wages to
individuals with disabilities in section 511 of the Act that fall under
the purview of the Secretary.
For a more detailed description of the purpose of these proposed
regulatory actions, see the Background section in this notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Summary of the Major Provisions of This Regulatory Action: We
summarize here those proposed regulatory changes needed to implement
the amendments to the Act made by WIOA. Under the Proposed Changes
section of this NPRM, we provide a more complete summary of these
changes and a detailed description of the substantive proposed
regulations for each part in the order it appears in the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR). We also describe in detail under the
Proposed Changes section the amendments to each part to update,
clarify, and improve the regulations.
The Secretary proposes to implement the following changes to the VR
program and Supported Employment program made by WIOA.
State Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program
People with disabilities represent a vital and integral part of our
society, and we are committed to ensuring that individuals with
disabilities have opportunities to compete for and enjoy high quality
employment in the 21st century global economy. Some individuals with
disabilities face particular barriers to high quality employment.
Giving workers with disabilities the supports and the opportunity to
acquire the skills that they need to pursue in-demand jobs and careers
is critical to growing our economy, ensuring that everyone who works
hard is rewarded, and building a strong middle class. To help achieve
this priority for individuals with disabilities, the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended by WIOA, seeks to empower individuals with
disabilities to maximize employment, economic self-sufficiency,
independence, and inclusion and integration into society.
The VR program is authorized by title I of the Act, as amended by
WIOA (29 U.S.C. 720 et seq.), to provide support to each State to
assist in operating a statewide comprehensive, coordinated, effective,
efficient, and accountable State program as an integral part of a
statewide workforce development system; and to assess, plan, and
provide vocational rehabilitation (VR) services to individuals with
disabilities so that those individuals may prepare for and engage in
competitive integrated employment consistent with their unique
strengths, priorities, concerns, abilities, capabilities, interests,
and informed choice. The Department last published regulations for this
program in part 361 on January 17, 2001 (66 FR 4382), to implement
amendments made by the Workforce Investment Act of 1998.
WIOA makes significant changes to title I of the Act that affect
the VR program. First, WIOA strengthens the alignment of the VR program
with other components of the workforce development system by imposing
unified strategic planning requirements, common performance
accountability measures, and requirements governing the one-stop
delivery system. This alignment brings together entities responsible
for administering separate workforce and employment, educational, and
other human resource programs and funding streams to collaborate in the
creation of a seamless custom-focused service delivery network that
integrates service delivery across programs, enhances access to the
program's services, and improves long-
[[Page 21060]]
term employment outcomes for individuals receiving assistance. In so
doing, WIOA places heightened emphasis on coordination and
collaboration at the Federal, State, and local levels to ensure a
streamlined and coordinated service delivery system for job-seekers,
including those with disabilities, and employers. Therefore, the
Departments of Education and Labor propose to issue a joint NPRM to
implement jointly administered activities under title I of WIOA (e.g.,
those related to Unified or Combined State Plans, performance
accountability, and the one-stop delivery system), applicable to the
workforce development system's core programs (Adult, Dislocated Worker
and Youth programs; Adult Education and Literacy programs; Wagner-
Peyser Employment Service program and the Vocational Rehabilitation
program). These joint proposed regulations are set forth in a separate
NPRM published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.
WIOA also makes corresponding changes to title I of the Act.
Consequently, we propose to make conforming changes throughout part 361
and align the VR program-specific regulations with the joint proposed
regulations to ensure consistency among all core programs.
Second, WIOA places heightened emphasis throughout the Act on the
achievement of competitive integrated employment. The foundation of the
VR program is the principle that individuals with disabilities,
including those with the most significant disabilities, are capable of
achieving high quality, competitive integrated employment when provided
the necessary skills and supports. To increase the employment of
individuals with disabilities in the competitive labor market, the
workforce system must provide the opportunity for such individuals to
participate in job-driven training and pursue high-quality employment
outcomes. The amendments to the Act--from the stated purpose of the
Act, to the expansion of services designed to maximize the potential of
individuals with disabilities, including those with the most
significant disabilities, to achieve competitive integrated employment,
and, finally, to the inclusion of limitations on the payment of
subminimum wages to individuals with disabilities--reinforce the
congressional intent that individuals with disabilities, with
appropriate supports and services, are able to achieve the same kinds
of competitive integrated employment as non-disabled individuals.
As a result, we propose to amend part 361 throughout to emphasize
the key role that the VR program plays in employment outcomes and
preparing individuals with disabilities to achieve competitive
integrated employment in the community. We propose, among other things,
to amend the definition of ``employment outcome'' to include only those
outcomes in competitive integrated employment or supported employment,
thereby eliminating uncompensated employment from the scope of
employment outcomes for purposes of the VR program. We also propose to
amend numerous other provisions throughout part 361 to address the
expansion of available services, requirements related to the
development of the individualized plan for employment, and order of
selection for services, all of which are intended to maximize the
potential for individuals with disabilities to prepare for, obtain,
retain, and advance in the same high-quality jobs, and high demand
careers as persons without disabilities.
Third, WIOA places heightened emphasis on the provision of services
to students and youth with disabilities to ensure that they have
meaningful opportunities to receive the training and other services
they need to achieve employment outcomes in competitive integrated
employment. The Act, as amended by WIOA, expands not only the
population of students with disabilities who may receive services but
also the kinds of services that the VR agencies may provide to youth
and students with disabilities who are transitioning from school to
postsecondary education and employment.
Most notably, the Act, as amended by WIOA, requires States to
reserve 15 percent of their VR allotment to provide pre-employment
transition services to students with disabilities who are eligible or
potentially eligible for VR services. These pre-employment transition
services are designed to provide job exploration and other services,
such as counseling and self-advocacy training, in the early stages of
the transition process.
With the addition of these early pre-employment transition
services, the VR program can be characterized as providing a continuum
of VR services, especially for students and youth with disabilities. To
that end, we propose to amend numerous sections of part 361 to
implement new definitions for the terms ``student with a disability''
and ``youth with a disability'' and new requirements related to pre-
employment transition services and the provision of transition services
to students and youth with disabilities. All of the proposed changes
demonstrate the continuum of services available to students and youth
with disabilities under the VR program to maximize their potential to
transition from school to postsecondary education and employment.
Supported Employment Program
WIOA makes several significant changes to title VI of the Act,
which governs the Supported Employment program. All of the amendments
to title VI are consistent with those made throughout the Act, namely
to maximize the potential of individuals with disabilities, especially
those with the most significant disabilities, to achieve competitive
integrated employment and to expand services for youth with the most
significant disabilities.
First, WIOA amends the definition of ``supported employment'' to
make clear that supported employment outcomes must be in competitive
integrated employment or, if in an integrated setting that is not
competitive integrated employment, then in an integrated setting in
which the individual is working on a short-term basis toward
competitive integrated employment. By adding a timeframe to this
definition, Congress reinforces its intention that individuals with
disabilities should not be allowed to languish in subminimum wage jobs
under the Supported Employment program. Thus, the Secretary proposes to
amend part 363 to implement the revised definition of ``supported
employment.'' The Secretary proposes to define ``short-term basis'' in
this context to mean no longer than six months. We believe this
proposed change is consistent with the Act, as amended by WIOA, in its
entirety as well as the stated congressional intent.
Second, WIOA requires States to reserve at least 50 percent of
their supported employment program allotment for the provision of
supported employment services to youth with the most significant
disabilities. With these reserved funds, States may provide extended
services, for a period up to four years, to youth with the most
significant disabilities. Prior to the enactment of WIOA, extended
services were not permitted under either the VR program or the
Supported Employment program. In addition, States must provide a non-
Federal share of 10 percent of the funds reserved for the provision of
supported employment services to youth with the most significant
disabilities. By requiring that States use half of their supported
employment program funds and provide a match for these reserved funds,
[[Page 21061]]
Congress reinforces the heightened emphasis on the provision of
services to youth with disabilities. Congress makes clear that youth
with significant disabilities must be given every opportunity to
receive the services necessary to ensure the maximum potential to
achieve competitive integrated employment. Accordingly, the Secretary
proposes to amend part 363 to implement new requirements regarding the
reservation of funds, and the services to be provided with those funds,
to youth with the most significant disabilities.
Limitations on the Payment of Subminimum Wages
Section 511 of the Act, as added by WIOA, imposes requirements on
employers who hold special wage certificates under the Fair Labor
Standards Act (FLSA) that must be satisfied before the employers may
hire youth with disabilities at subminimum wage or continue to employ
individuals with disabilities of any age at the subminimum wage level.
Section 511 also establishes the roles and responsibilities of the
designated State units (DSU) for the VR program and State and local
educational agencies in assisting individuals with disabilities,
including youth with disabilities, to maximize opportunities to achieve
competitive integrated employment through services provided by VR and
the local educational agencies.
The addition of section 511 to the Act is consistent with all other
amendments to the Act made by WIOA. Throughout the Act, Congress makes
clear that individuals with disabilities, including those with the most
significant disabilities, can achieve competitive integrated employment
if provided the necessary supports and services. The limitations
imposed by section 511 reinforce this belief by requiring individuals
with disabilities, including youth with disabilities, to satisfy
certain service-related requirements in order to start or maintain, as
applicable, subminimum wage employment. To that end, the Secretary
proposes to develop new regulations at part 397 that would implement
requirements of section 511 that fall under the purview of the
Department.
Costs and Benefits: The potential costs associated with this
regulatory action are those resulting from statutory requirements and
those we have determined as necessary for administering the
Department's programs and activities. Further information related to
costs and benefits may be found in the Regulatory Impact Analysis
section later in this NPRM.
Invitation to Comment: We invite you to submit comments regarding
these proposed regulations. To ensure that your comments have maximum
effect in developing the final regulations, we urge you to identify
clearly the specific section or sections of the proposed regulations
that each of your comments addresses and to arrange your comments in
the same order as the proposed regulations.
We invite you to assist us in complying with the specific
requirements of Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 and their overall
requirement of reducing regulatory burden that might result from these
proposed regulations. Please let us know of any further ways we could
reduce potential costs or increase potential benefits while preserving
the effective and efficient administration of the Department's programs
and activities.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public
comments about these proposed regulations by accessing Regulations.gov.
You may also inspect the comments in person in room 5093, Potomac
Center Plaza, 550 12th Street SW., Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m.
and 4:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, Monday through Friday of each week
except Federal holidays. Please contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Assistance to Individuals with Disabilities in Reviewing the
Rulemaking Record: On request we will provide an appropriate
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability who
needs assistance to review the comments or other documents in the
public rulemaking record for these proposed regulations. If you want to
schedule an appointment for this type of accommodation or auxiliary
aid, please contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Background
The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) (Pub L. 113-
128), enacted July 22, 2014, made significant changes to the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (hereafter referred to as the Act). As a
result, the Secretary proposes to amend parts 361 and 363 of title 34
of the CFR. These parts, respectively, implement the:
State Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) Services program; and
State Supported Employment Services program.
In addition, WIOA added section 511 to title V of the Act. Section
511 limits the payment of subminimum wages to individuals with
disabilities by employers holding special wage certificates under the
FLSA. Although the Department of Labor administers the FLSA, some
requirements of section 511 fall under the purview of the Secretary.
Therefore, the Secretary proposes to add a new part 397 to title 34 of
the CFR to implement those particular provisions.
These proposed changes are further described under the Summary of
Proposed Changes and Significant Proposed Regulations sections of this
NPRM. WIOA also makes changes to other programs authorized under title
I of the Act, including the Client Assistance Program and the American
Indian Vocational Rehabilitation Services (AIVRS) program, as well as
discretionary grant programs authorized under title III, the Protection
and Advocacy of Individual Rights program under title V, and the
Independent Living Services for Older Individuals Who are Blind program
under title VII. The Secretary proposes regulatory changes to implement
the amendments to these programs and projects made by WIOA through a
separate, but related, NPRM published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register.
Summary of Proposed Changes
The Secretary proposes to implement the following changes to the VR
program and Supported Employment program made by WIOA.
State Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program
The VR program is authorized by title I of the Act, as amended by
WIOA (29 U.S.C. 720 through 731, and 733), to provide support to each
State to assist in operating a statewide comprehensive, coordinated,
effective, efficient, and accountable State VR program as an integral
part of a statewide workforce development system; and to assess, plan,
and provide VR services to individuals with disabilities so that those
individuals may prepare for and engage in competitive integrated
employment consistent with their unique strengths, priorities,
concerns, abilities, capabilities, interests, and informed choice.
The Department last published regulations for this program in part
361 on January 17, 2001 (66 FR 4382), to implement amendments made by
the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (WIA).
In implementing the amendments to the VR program made by WIOA, the
numerous proposed regulatory changes to part 361 improve employment
outcomes for individuals with disabilities by: (1) Strengthening the
alignment of the VR program with other components of the workforce
[[Page 21062]]
development system through unified strategic planning requirements,
common performance accountability measures, and requirements governing
the one-stop delivery system; (2) emphasizing the achievement of
competitive integrated employment by individuals with disabilities,
including individuals with the most significant disabilities; and (3)
expanding services to support the transition of students and youth with
disabilities to postsecondary education and employment.
To implement jointly administered activities under title I of WIOA
(e.g., those related to Unified or Combined State Plans, performance
accountability and the one-stop delivery system), the U.S. Departments
of Labor and Education are proposing a set of joint regulations
applicable to the workforce development system's core programs,
including the VR program. Through these proposed joint regulations, we
lay the foundation for establishing a comprehensive, accessible, and
high quality workforce development system that serves all individuals
in need of employment services, including individuals with
disabilities, and employers in a manner that is customer-focused and
that supports an integrated service design and delivery model. These
joint proposed regulations are in a separate NPRM published elsewhere
in this issue of the Federal Register.
WIOA makes corresponding changes to title I of the Act regarding
the submission, approval, and disapproval of the VR services portion of
the Unified or Combined State Plan; the standards and indicators used
to assess VR program performance; and the involvement of the VR program
in the one-stop delivery system. Consequently, we propose to amend
current Sec. 361.10 to require that all assurance and descriptive
information previously submitted through the VR State plan and
supported employment supplement be submitted through the VR services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan under sections 102 and
103 of the Act, respectively, of WIOA. We also propose to implement
changes specific to the content of the VR services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan by amending current Sec. 361.29(a) to
require that the comprehensive statewide needs assessment include the
results of the needs of students and youth with disabilities for VR
services, including pre-employment transition services. Additionally,
we propose to clarify in current Sec. 361.29 that States will report
to the Secretary updates to the statewide needs assessment and goals
and priorities, estimates of the numbers of individuals with
disabilities served through the VR program and the costs of serving
them, and reports of progress on goals and priorities at such time and
in such manner determined by the Secretary, thereby resolving
inconsistencies in reporting requirements within section 101(a) of the
Act. Finally, we clarify in proposed Sec. 361.20 when designated State
agencies must conduct public hearings to obtain comment on substantive
changes to policies and procedures governing the VR program.
We propose to implement the changes to section 106 of the Act made
by WIOA through proposed Sec. 361.40, by replacing the current
standards and indicators used to assess the performance of the VR
program under current Sec. 361.80 through Sec. 361.89 with a cross-
reference to the joint regulations for the common performance
accountability measures for the core programs of the workforce
development system. Similarly, we propose to provide a cross-reference
in current Sec. 361.23, regarding the roles and responsibilities of
the VR program in the one-stop delivery system, to the joint
regulations implementing requirements for the one-stop delivery system.
WIOA makes extensive changes to title I of the Act to improve the
VR services provided to, and the employment outcomes achieved by,
individuals with disabilities, including those with the most
significant disabilities. Embedded throughout the provisions of WIOA
and the amendments to the Act is the principle that individuals with
disabilities, including those with the most significant disabilities,
are capable of achieving competitive integrated employment when
provided the necessary skills and supports. As a result, we propose to
adopt a definition of ``competitive integrated employment'' in Sec.
361.5(c)(9) that combines, clarifies, and enhances the two separate
definitions of ``competitive employment'' and ``integrated setting''
for the purpose of employment in current Sec. 361.5(b)(11) and
(b)(33)(ii).
We propose to incorporate this principle throughout part 361, from
the statement of program purpose in proposed Sec. 361.1, to a
requirement in proposed Sec. 361.46(a) that the individualized plan
for employment include a specific employment goal consistent with the
general goal of competitive integrated employment. This principle is
most evident in the definition of ``employment outcome'' in proposed
Sec. 361.5(c)(15), which specifically identifies customized employment
as an employment outcome under the VR program, and requires that all
employment outcomes achieved through the VR program be in competitive
integrated employment or supported employment, thereby eliminating
uncompensated outcomes, such as homemakers and unpaid family workers,
from the scope of the definition for purposes of the VR program. We
will provide guidance and technical assistance to VR agencies to assist
them in implementing this proposed change.
We propose additional regulatory changes to ensure that individuals
with disabilities are provided a full opportunity through the VR
program to participate in job-driven training and pursue high-quality
employment outcomes. Proposed Sec. 361.42(a)(1)(iii) would clarify
that an applicant meeting all other eligibility criteria may be
determined eligible if he or she requires services to advance in
employment, not just obtain or maintain employment. We also propose to
clarify in proposed Sec. Sec. 361.48(b)(6)and 361.49, that VR services
are available to assist individuals with disabilities to obtain
graduate level education needed for this purpose. We clarify in
proposed Sec. 361.42(c)(1) the prohibition against a duration of
residency requirement and in Sec. 361.42(c)(2) those factors that
cannot be considered when determining the eligibility of VR program
applicants. We propose removing the option to use extended evaluations,
as a limited exception to trial work experiences, to explore an
individual's abilities, capabilities, and capacity to perform in work
situations by deleting paragraph (f) from current Sec. 361.42. To
enable individuals with disabilities, including students and youth with
disabilities, to receive VR services in a timely manner, proposed Sec.
361.45(e) would require the individualized plan for employment of each
individual to be developed within 90 days following the determination
of eligibility. Finally, if a State VR agency is operating under an
order of selection for services, it would have the option under
proposed Sec. 361.36 to indicate in its portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan that it will serve eligible individuals with
disabilities outside that order who have an immediate need for
equipment or services to maintain employment.
WIOA enhances the VR agency's focus on coordination and
collaboration with other entities by emphasizing coordination with
employers, non-educational agencies working with youth, AIVRS programs,
and other agencies and programs providing services to individuals with
disabilities to support the achievement of competitive integrated
employment.
[[Page 21063]]
Proposed Sec. 361.24 reflects the enhancements. The collaboration with
employers is essential to the success of VR program participants and
proposed Sec. 361.32 would describe the training and technical
assistance services that can be provided to employers hiring, or
interested in hiring, individuals with disabilities.
We propose to implement the emphasis on serving students and youth
with disabilities contained in the amendments to the Act made by WIOA
in many regulatory changes to part 361. We propose new definitions of
``student with a disability'' and ``youth with a disability'' in Sec.
361.5(c)(51) and (c)(59), respectively. These definitions would assist
VR agencies to determine the appropriate transition and other services
that may be provided to each group. We propose in Sec. 361.48(a) to
implement the requirements of new sections 110(d) and 113 of the Act
requiring VR agencies to reserve at least 15 percent of the Federal
allotment, to provide and arrange, in coordination with local
educational agencies, for the provision of pre-employment transition
services to students with disabilities. We propose in Sec. 361.49 to
clarify the technical assistance VR agencies can provide to educational
agencies and to permit the provision of transition services for the
benefit of groups of students and youth with disabilities. To enable VR
agencies and local educational agencies to better determine their
respective responsibilities for the provision of transition services,
including pre-employment transition services, through greater
interagency collaboration, we propose in Sec. 361.22(c) to clarify
that nothing in this part is to be construed as reducing the
responsibility of the local educational agencies or any other agencies
under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to provide or pay
for transition services that are also considered to be special
education or related services necessary for the provision of a free
appropriate public education to students with disabilities.
So that VR agencies can recruit the qualified personnel needed to
provide the services and engage in the activities summarized here, we
propose in Sec. 361.18 changes to the requirements for a comprehensive
system of personnel development. The proposed regulations would
establish minimum educational requirements and experience and eliminate
the requirement to retrain staff not meeting the VR agency's personnel
standard for qualified staff.
Finally, we propose changes to part 361 to improve the fiscal
administration of the VR program. Proposed Sec. 361.5(b) would make
applicable to the VR program the definitions contained in 2 CFR part
200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit
Requirements. We also propose to make numerous conforming changes to
align with 2 CFR 200 to ensure consistency.
We propose three changes to current Sec. 361.65 regarding the
allotment of VR program funds. First, we propose adding a new paragraph
(a)(3) to Sec. 361.65 that would require the State to reserve not less
than 15 percent of its allotment for the provision of pre-employment
transition services described in proposed Sec. 361.48(a). Second, we
propose to amend current Sec. 361.65(b)(2) to clarify that reallotment
occurs in the fiscal year the funds were appropriated; however, the
funds may be obligated or expended during the period of performance,
provided that matching requirements are met. Finally, we propose to add
a new paragraph (b)(3) to Sec. 361.65 that would describe the
Secretary's authority to determine the criteria to be used to reallot
funds when the amount requested exceeds the amount of funds
relinquished. We provide a full discussion of these and other changes
to part 361 in the Significant Proposed Regulations section of this
notice.
State Supported Employment Services Program
Under the Supported Employment program authorized under title VI of
the Act (29 U.S.C. 795g et seq.), the Secretary provides grants to
assist States in developing and implementing collaborative programs
with appropriate entities to provide supported employment services for
individuals with the most significant disabilities, including youth
with the most significant disabilities, to enable them to achieve
supported employment outcomes in competitive integrated employment.
Grants made under the Supported Employment program supplement grants
issued to States under the VR program (34 CFR part 361).
The regulations in 34 CFR part 363, governing the Supported
Employment program, were last updated February 18, 1993 (59 FR 8331).
Therefore, the changes proposed in part 363 would incorporate statutory
changes made by WIOA, as well as update the regulations to improve the
program and ensure consistency with changes proposed for part 361
governing the VR program.
The changes made to the Supported Employment program by WIOA are
intended to ensure that individuals with the most significant
disabilities, especially youth with the most significant disabilities,
are afforded a full opportunity to prepare for, obtain, maintain,
advance in, or re-enter competitive integrated employment, including
supported or customized employment. Proposed Sec. 363.1 would require
that supported employment be in competitive integrated employment or,
if not, in an integrated setting in which the individual is working
toward competitive integrated employment on a short-term basis not to
exceed six months. Proposed Sec. 363.50(b)(1) would extend the time
from 18 months to 24 months for the provision of supported employment
services. Proposed Sec. 363.22 would require a reservation of 50
percent of a State's allotment under this part for the provision of
supported employment services, including extended services, to youth
with the most significant disabilities. Proposed Sec. 363.23 would
require not less than a 10 percent match for the amount of funds
reserved to serve youth with the most significant disabilities.
Proposed Sec. 363.51 would reduce the amount of funds that may be
spent on administrative costs.
Limitation on Use of Subminimum Wages
The Secretary proposes to promulgate new regulations in part 397 to
implement new requirements for designated State units (DSUs) and
educational agencies under the purview of the Department that are
imposed by section 511 of the Act, which was added by WIOA. Section 511
imposes limitations on employers who hold special wage certificates,
commonly known as 14(c) certificates, under the FLSA (29 U.S.C. 214(c))
that must be satisfied before the employers may hire youth with
disabilities at subminimum wage or continue to employ individuals with
disabilities of any age at the subminimum wage level. The proposed
regulations in part 397 focus exclusively on the related roles and
responsibilities of educational agencies and DSUs for the VR program.
The proposed regulations in part 397 are consistent with the changes
proposed for parts 361 and 363, which govern the VR program and
Supported Employment program, respectively.
Through amendments to the Act, WIOA prioritizes, and places
heightened emphasis upon, the provision of services that maximize
opportunities for competitive integrated employment for individuals
with disabilities, including those with the most significant
disabilities, consistent with their unique strengths, resources,
priorities, concerns, abilities, capabilities, interests, and informed
[[Page 21064]]
choice. WIOA also places heightened emphasis on the provision of
services necessary to assist youth with disabilities to achieve
competitive integrated employment in the community, including supported
or customized employment. To that end, amendments to the Act require
DSUs to reserve specified percentages of their VR or supported
employment allotments for the provision of services to students or
youth with disabilities, as applicable. These amendments, along with
the addition of section 511, demonstrate the intent that individuals
with disabilities, especially youth with disabilities, must be afforded
a full opportunity to prepare for, obtain, maintain, advance in, or re-
enter competitive integrated employment.
Section 511 places limitations on the payment of subminimum wages
by entities (e.g., employers) holding special wage certificates under
the FLSA. In particular, such employers are prohibited from hiring
youth with disabilities at a subminimum wage level unless the youth are
afforded meaningful opportunities to access services, including
transition services under the Act or IDEA, so they may achieve
competitive integrated employment in the community. For the purposes of
these requirements, a ``youth with a disability'' is anyone who is 24
years or younger. This age range is consistent with the definition of a
``youth with a disability'' in section 7(42) of the Act. Additionally,
employers are prohibited from continuing to employ individuals with
disabilities, regardless of age, at the subminimum wage level unless
other requirements are satisfied. Specifically, the individual with a
disability, or the individual's parent or guardian if applicable, must
receive certain information and career counseling-related services from
the DSU every six months during the first year of such employment and
annually thereafter for as long as the individual receives compensation
at the subminimum wage level.
In addition to the requirements imposed on employers holding
special wage certificates, section 511 of the Act requires DSUs to
provide certain career counseling services. Further, educational
agencies and the DSUs must develop a process, or use an existing
process, for the timely provision of documentation necessary to
demonstrate completion of required activities, as appropriate, to youth
seeking employment, at a subminimum wage level. Finally, DSUs must
provide documentation of the provision of career counseling and
information and referral services to individuals with disabilities,
regardless of age, who are currently employed at a subminimum wage
level.
The proposed regulations in this part focus exclusively on those
requirements under the purview of the Department of Education. To that
end, we propose in part 397: (1) Documentation requirements that local
educational agencies and DSUs would be required to satisfy; and (2)
information and career counseling-related services DSUs would be
required to provide. Requirements imposed on employers are under the
purview of the Department of Labor, which administers the FLSA.
Significant Proposed Regulations
The Secretary proposes to amend the implementing regulations for
the VR program (part 361) and the Supported Employment program (part
363). The Secretary also proposes to issue new regulations in part 397
to implement limitations on the payment of subminimum wages to
individuals with disabilities. We discuss substantive issues within
each subpart, by section or subject.
Generally, we do not address proposed changes that are technical or
otherwise minor in effect, such as changes to the authority cited in
the Act.
Part 361--State Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program
Organizational Changes
Although the proposed regulations maintain the current structure of
subparts A, B, and C, we propose organizational changes to other
subparts within this part. First, we propose to reserve subparts within
part 361 where we plan to incorporate the three subparts we are
proposing in a separate, but related, NPRM (the joint regulations
proposed by the Departments of Education and Labor implementing changes
to title I of WIOA) published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register. Please see that NPRM for more information about how these
subparts will be incorporated into part 361. Second, we propose to
remove Sec. Sec. 361.80 through 361.89, since the VR-specific
standards and indicators are no longer applicable given amendments made
by WIOA. Finally, we propose to eliminate Appendix A to current part
361--Questions and Responses. We will consider issuing guidance after
the publication of the final regulations.
Purpose (Sec. 361.1)
Statute: Section 100(a)(1)(C) of the Act, as amended by WIOA (29
U.S.C. 720(a)(1)(C)), highlights competitive integrated employment as
the type of employment that individuals with disabilities, including
individuals with the most significant disabilities, are capable of
achieving if appropriate supports and services are provided. This
section, as revised, also incorporates economic self-sufficiency as a
criterion to consider when providing VR services to an individual. The
focus on competitive integrated employment is also reflected in changes
made to section 100(a)(3)(B) of the Act.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.1(b) refers only to gainful
employment, not competitive integrated employment. It also does not
include economic self-sufficiency as a criterion to consider when
providing VR services.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend current Sec. 361.1(b)
by: (1) Replacing the term ``gainful employment'' with ``competitive
integrated employment''; and (2) incorporating ``economic self-
sufficiency'' as a new criterion that must be considered to ensure that
the VR services provided are consistent with the individual's unique
circumstances.
Reasons: The regulatory changes are necessary to implement
statutory amendments to section 100 of the Act that emphasize the
ability of individuals with disabilities, including individuals with
the most significant disabilities, to achieve competitive integrated
employment, not ``gainful employment,'' the term previously used under
the Act, as amended by WIA. We believe this change is significant given
that section 7(5) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, includes a new term,
``competitive integrated employment,'' that includes mandatory criteria
related to, among other things, compensation, advancement, and the
integrated nature of the workplace. We also believe it is significant
that Congress added economic self-sufficiency to the list of areas that
must be considered when providing VR services to an individual because
it reinforces a key element of ``competitive integrated employment,''
namely requirements related to compensation and benefits.
See the discussion of the term ``competitive integrated
employment'' in this Significant Proposed Regulations section of the
notice for a full explanation of this term for purposes of the VR
program.
Applicable Definitions (Sec. 361.5)
Definitions in 34 CFR 77.1
Statute: None.
[[Page 21065]]
Current Regulations: Current regulations highlight only a few terms
contained in 34 CFR 77.1.
Proposed Regulations: In paragraph (a) of Sec. 361.5, we propose
to incorporate by reference all definitions contained in 34 CFR 77.1.
Reasons: This change is necessary to clarify that all definitions
in 34 CFR 77.1 are applicable to part 361.
Adoption of 2 CFR Part 200
Statute: None.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.5, which contains
definitions relevant to the VR program and was last updated in 2001,
does not include definitions from 2 CFR part 200 since those
regulations were promulgated in 2014.
Proposed Regulations: We propose redesignating current paragraph
(b) as paragraph (c) and adding a new paragraph (b) that incorporates
by reference all definitions in 2 CFR part 200, subpart A (Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements).
Proposed substantive changes to paragraph (c) will be discussed
throughout this NPRM in conjunction with the relevant topical
discussion.
Reasons: OMB issued the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards on January 1,
2014. The new regulations supersede and streamline requirements from
OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-89, A-102, A-110, A-122, and A-133, as well
as the guidance in Circular A-50 on Single Audit Act follow-up. These
regulations, codified in 2 CFR part 200, have been adopted by the
Secretary in 2 CFR part 3474, which took effect on December 26, 2014.
Consequently, terms and definitions that previously were not used in
the VR program, such as ``subaward'' (2 CFR 200.92), will be applicable
given the Department's adoption of 2 CFR part 200.
Administrative Cost
Statute: Section 7(1) of the Act, which defines ``administrative
costs,'' remains unchanged by WIOA.
Current Regulations: The current definition in Sec. 361.5(b)(2)
mirrors the statute and defines ``administrative costs'' as including,
among other things, the costs of operating and maintaining DSU
facilities, equipment, and grounds.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend Sec. 361.5(c)(2)(viii),
as redesignated by other changes made in this part, by clarifying that
operating and maintenance expenses, for purposes of the definition of
``administrative costs'' for the VR program, do not include capital
expenditures, as defined in 2 CFR 200.13.
Reasons: The proposed change is necessary to clarify the scope of
administrative costs, with regard to operating and maintenance
expenditures, thereby ensuring consistency with 2 CFR part 200. There
has been confusion among VR grantees as to whether operating or
maintenance expenses, in the context of administrative costs, include
capital expenditures. Operating or maintenance expenses in the context
of administrative costs under the VR program are those costs incurred
to maintain facilities, equipment, and grounds in good working order;
whereas, capital expenditures, as defined in 2 CFR 200.13, are those
expenditures that ``materially increase their value or useful life.''
We want to make clear that capital expenditures are permitted under the
VR program in accordance with 2 CFR 200.439, but not as an
administrative cost.
Assessment for Determining Eligibility and Vocational Rehabilitation
Needs
Statute: Section 7(2)(B)(v) of the Act, as amended by WIOA (29
U.S.C. 705(2)), adds a new requirement that VR agencies must, to the
maximum extent possible, rely on information from the individual's
experiences obtained in an integrated employment setting in the
community or in other integrated community settings when using existing
information or conducting a comprehensive assessment for determining
eligibility and the need for VR services for an individual with a
disability.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.5(b)(6) defines ``assessment
for determining eligibility and vocational rehabilitation needs,'' but
does not include the requirement related to reliance on information
about the individual's experiences in integrated settings because this
is a new statutory requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend the current regulations
to conform to the statute in section 7(2)(B) of the Act by adding
language to the definition of ``assessment for determining eligibility
and vocational rehabilitation needs'' in proposed Sec.
361.5(c)(5)(ii)(E) that would make clear that a comprehensive
assessment, to the maximum extent possible, relies on information
obtained from the eligible individual's experiences in integrated
employment settings in the community and other integrated settings in
the community.
Reasons: WIOA places a heightened emphasis on the achievement of
competitive integrated employment by individuals with disabilities. To
that end, amendments made by WIOA require that assessments for
determining eligibility and VR needs of individuals with disabilities
must rely on information about the individual's experiences in
integrated employment and in other integrated community settings. The
Act clearly places an emphasis on integrated settings by requiring that
VR agencies rely on information learned from the individual's
experiences in these settings, to the maximum extent possible, when
conducting an assessment. Nonetheless a DSU is not precluded from
determining an individual's eligibility for VR services based on other
information obtained through the assessment process when the individual
cannot participate in integrated community-based work experiences.
Assistive Technology Terms
Statute: Section 7(3) of the Act, as amended by WIOA (29 U.S.C.
705(3)), adds a new definition of ``assistive technology'' and combines
the previous definitions of ``assistive technology device'' and
``assistive technology service'' under the heading ``assistive
technology terms.''
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.5(b)(7) defines ``assistive
technology device'' and current Sec. 361.5(b)(8) defines ``assistive
technology service.'' There is no definition for ``assistive
technology'' since this is a new statutory term.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to add the heading ``assistive
technology terms'' in proposed Sec. 361.5(c)(6), under which we would
incorporate definitions for the new term ``assistive technology'' and
for the existing terms ``assistive technology device'' and ``assistive
technology service.'' We also propose to delete current Sec.
361.5(b)(7) and (b)(8), as these separate definitions would no longer
be necessary.
Reasons: The proposed changes are necessary to implement the new
statutory definition in section 7(3) of the Act, as amended by WIOA.
The proposed definition streamlines the definitions of the various
terms by referencing the Assistive Technology Act of 1998.
Competitive Integrated Employment
Statute: WIOA adds a new term, ``competitive integrated
employment,'' in section 7(5) of the Act (29 U.S.C. 705(5)). Although
this is a new statutory term, the term and its definition generally
represent a consolidation of two separate definitions and their terms
[[Page 21066]]
in current regulations--``competitive employment'' and ``integrated
setting.'' In addition, the new statutory definition incorporates a
criterion related to advancement in employment that is not included in
either of the two current regulatory definitions.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.5(b)(11) defines
``competitive employment'' and current Sec. 361.5(b)(33) defines
``integrated setting.'' Current regulations do not define ``competitive
integrated employment'' since this is a new statutory term.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to replace the term ``competitive
employment'' in current Sec. 361.5(b)(11) with the new term
``competitive integrated employment'' in proposed Sec. 361.5(c)(9).
The proposed definition of ``competitive integrated employment'' would
mirror the statutory definition in section 7(5) of the Act, as amended
by WIOA, as well as provide two clarifications with respect to the
criteria for integrated work locations.
First, proposed Sec. 361.5(c)(9)(ii)(A) would clarify that the
employment location must be in ``a setting typically found in the
community.'' Second, proposed Sec. 361.5(c)(9)(ii)(B) would clarify
that the employee with a disability's interaction with other employees
and others, as appropriate (e.g., customers and vendors), who are not
persons with disabilities (other than supervisors and service
providers) must be to the same extent that employees without
disabilities in similar positions interact with these same persons.
This interaction must occur as part of the individual's performance of
work duties and must occur both in the particular work unit and the
entire work site, as applicable. We further propose to amend the
definition of ``integrated setting'' in proposed Sec. 361.5(c)(32)(ii)
to conform to the clarifications provided in the proposed definition of
``competitive integrated employment'' in proposed Sec. 361.5(c)(9)(ii)
to ensure consistency between the two terms.
Finally, we propose to replace the terms ``competitive employment''
and ``employment in an integrated setting,'' as appropriate, with
``competitive integrated employment'' throughout this part.
Reasons: These proposed changes are necessary to implement and to
clarify statutory amendments made by WIOA. Because the proposed
definition of ``competitive integrated employment'' reflects, for the
most part, a consolidation of two existing regulatory definitions, the
substance of this proposed definition is familiar to DSUs and does not
represent a divergence from current regulations, long-standing
Department policy, practice, and the heightened emphasis on competitive
integrated employment throughout the Act, as amended by WIOA.
In implementing these proposed regulations and determining whether
an individual with a disability has achieved an employment outcome in
``competitive integrated employment,'' a DSU must consider, on a case-
by case-basis, each of the criteria described in the proposed
definition of ``competitive integrated employment.'' While most of the
criteria are familiar and self-explanatory, we believe additional
guidance is warranted here to explain those few new criteria contained
in the statutory and proposed regulatory definitions, especially with
regard to the criteria for an integrated employment setting. As a
result, we further explain these criteria, highlighting those aspects
that historically have raised the most questions from DSUs.
Competitive Earnings: The compensation criteria of the proposed
definition of ``competitive integrated employment,'' which mirror the
statutory definition, are consistent with those found in the current
regulatory definition of ``competitive employment'' in Sec.
361.5(b)(11). Proposed Sec. 361.5(c)(9)(i)(A) would continue to
require that, to be considered ``competitive integrated employment,''
the individual must perform full- or part-time work in which he or she
earns at least the higher of the minimum wage rate established by
Federal or applicable State law. Because several jurisdictions have
established minimum wage rates substantially higher than those provided
for under Federal or State law, the statutory definition and proposed
Sec. 361.5(c)(9)(i)(A) would require that the individual's earnings be
at least equal to the legally established local minimum wage rate if
that rate is higher than both the Federal and State rates. Also, as has
been the case under the current definition of ``competitive
employment,'' section 7(5) of the Act requires and proposed Sec.
361.5(c)(9)(i)(D) would require that the individual with the disability
must be eligible for the same level of benefits provided to employees
without disabilities in similar positions. In implementing the statute,
the proposed definition would establish additional criteria with
respect to competitive earnings. First, proposed Sec.
361.5(c)(9)(i)(B) would require that the DSU take into account the
training, experience, and level of skills possessed by the employees
without disabilities in similar positions. Second, the proposed
definition recognizes that individuals, with or without disabilities,
in self-employment may not receive an income from the business equal to
or exceeding applicable minimum wage rates, particularly in the early
stages of operation. Hence, proposed Sec. 361.5(c)(9)(i)(C) would
clarify that self-employed individuals with disabilities can be
considered to be receiving competitive compensation if their income is
comparable to that of individuals without disabilities in similar
occupations or performing similar tasks who possess the same level of
training, experience, and skills. Finally, to ensure consistency with
the American Indian Vocational Rehabilitation Services program under
part 371, we interpret subsistence employment as a form of self-
employment common to cultures of many American Indian tribes.
Integrated Location: While the integrated setting criteria of the
proposed definition of ``competitive integrated employment'' are
consistent with the statutory definition in section 7(5)(B) of the Act,
as amended by WIOA, and the current definition of ``integrated
setting'' in Sec. 361.5(b)(33)(ii), the proposed definition would
provide important clarifications that are necessary to ensure
consistency with expressed congressional intent and current
Departmental guidance.
First, we propose to require that the work location be in ``a
setting typically found in the community'' as required by current Sec.
361.5(b)(33)(ii), meaning that an integrated setting must be one that
is typically found in the competitive labor market. This particular
criterion is included in the current definition of ``integrated
setting'' and, thus, its incorporation in the proposed definition of
``competitive integrated employment'' would ensure consistency between
the two terms. Furthermore, this long-standing Department
interpretation is consistent with the expressed congressional intent
throughout the Act, as well as with past legislative history.
Specifically, integrated setting ``. . . is intended to mean a work
setting in a typical labor market site where people with disabilities
engage in typical daily work patterns with co-workers who do not have
disabilities; and where workers with disabilities are not congregated .
. .'' (Senate Report 105-166, page 10, March 2, 1998). Therefore, we
continue to maintain the long-standing Department policy that settings
established by community rehabilitation programs specifically for the
purpose of employing individuals with disabilities (e.g., sheltered
workshops) do not constitute integrated settings because these settings
are not typically found in the competitive labor market. We believe
this criterion of the integrated
[[Page 21067]]
setting component of the proposed definition of competitive integrated
employment is the first of two thresholds that must be satisfied.
Second, once the first threshold is met, we believe it is
essential, consistent with the current definition of ``integrated
setting,'' that individuals with disabilities have the opportunity to
interact with non-disabled co-workers during the course of performing
their work duties to the same extent that their non-disabled co-workers
have to interact with each other when performing the same work. To that
end, proposed Sec. 361.5(c)(9)(ii)(B) would clarify that ``other
persons'' as used in the statutory definition means other employees
without disabilities with whom the employee with the disability works
within the specific work unit and from across the entire work site. We
want to make clear that this proposed clarification is contained, more
generally, in the current definition of ``integrated setting.''
Furthermore, we believe this clarification is consistent with
congressional intent, past legislative history, current Departmental
guidance, and current regulations.
Historically, this element regarding integrated settings has raised
many questions; therefore, we provide specific clarity with regard to
certain job settings in which employees primarily interact with persons
from outside the work unit, such as vendors and customers, rather than
each other, while performing their job duties. We believe the focus of
whether the setting is integrated should be on the interaction between
employees with and without disabilities, and not solely on the
interaction of employees with disabilities with people outside of the
work unit. For example, the interaction of individuals with
disabilities employed in a customer service center with other persons
over the telephone, regardless of whether these persons have
disabilities, would be insufficient by itself to satisfy the
definition. Instead, the interaction of primary consideration should be
that between the employee with the disability and his or her colleagues
without disabilities in similar positions.
Nonetheless, we recognize that individuals who are self-employed or
who telecommute may interact more frequently with persons such as
vendors and customers than with other employees. Since these persons
often work alone from their own homes rather than together in a single
location, and may have little contact with fellow employees, we have
long maintained that self-employment and telecommuting are considered
to meet the criteria for an integrated location, so long as the
employee with the disability interacts with employees in similar
positions and other persons without disabilities to the same extent
that these persons without disabilities interact with others, though
this interaction need not be face-to-face.
The proposed definition of ``competitive integrated employment''
would further clarify, consistent with the general principles contained
in the current definition of ``integrated setting,'' that the DSU is to
consider the interaction between employees with disabilities and those
without disabilities that is specific to the performance of the
employee's job duties, and not the casual, conversational, and social
interaction that takes place in the workplace. As a result, it would
not be pertinent to its determination of an integrated setting for a
DSU to consider interactions in the lunchrooms and other common areas
of the work site in which employees with disabilities and those without
disabilities are not engaged in performing work responsibilities. This
determination, particularly with regard to the level of interaction,
would be applicable regardless of whether the individual with a
disability is an employee of the work site or a community
rehabilitation program hires the individual with a disability under a
service contract for that work site. Specifically, individuals with
disabilities hired by community rehabilitation programs to perform work
under service contracts, either alone or in groups (e.g., landscaping
or janitorial crews), whose interaction with persons without
disabilities (other than their supervisors and service providers) is
with persons working in or visiting the work locations (and not with
employees of the community rehabilitation programs without disabilities
in similar positions) would not be performing work in an integrated
setting. In summary, the DSU must determine, on a case-by-case basis,
that a work location is in an integrated setting if it both is
typically found in the community, and is one in which the employee with
the disability interacts with employees and other persons, as
appropriate to the position, who do not have disabilities to the same
extent that employees without disabilities interact with these persons.
Finally, the DSU is to consider the interaction between the employee
with the disabilities and these other persons that takes place for the
purpose of performing his or her job duties, not mere casual and social
interaction.
Opportunities for Advancement: To ensure that the employment of
persons with disabilities is equivalent in all respects to that of
persons without disabilities, section 7(5) of the Act, as amended by
WIOA, establishes a new criterion not contained in current regulations.
Proposed Sec. 361.5(c)(9)(iii) mirrors the language in section 7(5) of
the Act and would require that the employee with the disability have
the same opportunities for advancement as employees without
disabilities in similar positions. We believe this new criterion is
consistent with current definitions of ``competitive employment'' and
``integrated settings'' and should pose no hardship on DSUs to
implement.
As explained here, the definition of ``competitive integrated
employment'' in section 7(5) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, and as
proposed in Sec. 361.5(c)(9) establishes three essential criteria of
employment--income (earnings and benefits), integration, and
advancement--thereby ensuring that individuals with disabilities are
provided through the VR program the full opportunity to participate in
the same jobs available to persons without disabilities in the public.
Again, we want to make clear that two of the criteria--those
related to compensation and the integrated nature of the worksite--are
similar, if not identical, to criteria contained in the current
definitions of ``competitive employment'' and ``integrated setting.''
Thus, the substance of this definition is familiar to the DSUs and
should pose no hardship to implement.
Customized Employment
Statute: Section 7(7) of the Act, as amended by WIOA (29 U.S.C. 705
(7)), adds and defines the term ``customized employment,'' which means,
in general, competitive integrated employment designed to meet both the
specific abilities of the individual with a significant disability and
the business needs of an employer.
Current Regulations: None.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to add Sec. 361.5(c)(11), to
define ``customized employment'' to mirror the statute.
Reasons: The proposed regulation is necessary to implement the new
statutory term and definition because the Act, as amended by WIOA, uses
the term in a variety of contexts, including incorporating it into
definitions of employment outcome and supported employment, and
incorporating it into the list of individualized services permissible
under the VR program. Customized employment provides
[[Page 21068]]
flexibility in developing individualized and customized strategies that
are specific to an individual with a significant disability's unique
needs, interests, and capabilities, through the use of flexible
strategies that meet the needs of both the individual and the employer.
Employment Outcome
Statute: Section 7(11) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, revises the
definition of ``employment outcome'' to include customized employment
within its scope.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.5(b)(16) defines
``employment outcome,'' but does not include customized employment
since this is a new statutory requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend the definition of
``employment outcome'' in Sec. 361.5(c)(15), as redesignated by other
changes made in this part, to specifically identify customized
employment as an employment outcome under the VR program. We also
propose to amend the definition to require that all employment outcomes
achieved through the VR program be in competitive integrated employment
or supported employment, thereby eliminating uncompensated outcomes
from the scope of the definition for purposes of the VR program.
Furthermore, we propose to amend current Sec. 361.37(b) to expand
the scope of those circumstances when the DSU must provide referrals to
other programs and service providers for individuals who choose not to
pursue an employment outcome under the VR program. Similarly, we
propose to amend current Sec. 361.43(d) to expand the requirement for
the referral of individuals found ineligible for VR services or
determined ineligible subsequent to the receipt of services to also
include appropriate State, Federal, and local programs, and community
service providers better suited to meet their needs.
Reasons: The proposed changes are necessary, in part, to implement
statutory changes to the definition of ``employment outcome'' that
include reference to ``customized employment.'' See the discussion of
``customized employment'' earlier in this preamble for further
information regarding this type of employment outcome.
The proposed change that would limit the scope of employment
outcomes under the VR program to competitive integrated employment or
supported employment is necessary to implement the heightened emphasis
of the Act on the achievement of competitive integrated employment. The
Act, as amended by WIOA, makes clear--from the stated purpose of the
Act, the addition of new requirements governing the development of
individualized plans for employment and the transition of students and
youth from school to post-school activities, and new limitations on the
payment of subminimum wages--that individuals with disabilities,
particularly those with significant disabilities, are able to achieve
the same high-quality jobs in the competitive integrated labor market
as persons without disabilities if they are provided appropriate
services and supports. The amendments made by WIOA are consistent with
and further other changes made over the past four decades, with each
reauthorization, that have placed increasing emphasis on the
achievement of competitive employment in an integrated setting through
the VR program. See the discussion regarding ``competitive integrated
employment'' earlier in this preamble.
It is in this context that we propose to amend the definition of
``employment outcome,'' for purposes of the VR program, to include only
those outcomes that meet the requirements of competitive integrated
employment (including customized employment, self-employment,
telecommuting or business ownership), or supported employment, thereby
eliminating from the scope of the definition, under the VR program,
uncompensated outcomes, such as homemakers and unpaid family workers.
We believe this proposed change is consistent with the statutory
definition of ``employment outcome'' in section 7(11) of the Act, as
well as the pervasive emphasis in the Act on the achievement of
competitive integrated employment by individuals with disabilities,
including those with the most significant disabilities. Given this
emphasis, we believe the proposed change, not to include, within the
scope of employment outcomes, uncompensated outcomes, such as
homemakers and unpaid family workers, is consistent with the provisions
of the Act.
We believe the proposed changes to the definition, while essential
to fulfilling the expectation in the Act that individuals with
disabilities, particularly individuals with significant disabilities,
are capable of pursuing competitive integrated employment, should not
cause significant difficulty for most State VR units in their
administration of the VR program. Nationally, only a relatively small
number of individuals currently exit the VR program as homemakers or
unpaid family workers. Over the past 35 years the percentage of such
outcomes has steadily and significantly decreased. For example, in FY
1980 homemaker outcomes as a percentage of all employment outcomes
reported nationally to the Department by VR agencies through the VR
program Case Service Report for the years FY 1980 through FY 2013
approximated 15 percent. This percentage dropped to 5.2 percent in FY
1999, and to 3.4 percent in FY 2004. By FY 2013, the most recent year
for which data is available, this percentage had declined to 1.9
percent. There has been a similar decline in reported unpaid family
workers. According to data reported by VR agencies through the VR
program Case Service Report, in FY 2000, 642 individuals were reported
in the category of unpaid family worker. By FY 2013, the most recent
year for which we have data, only 135 individuals were reported to have
obtained an unpaid family worker outcome. National data indicates that
approximately 0.2 percent or less of all the outcomes reported annually
by DSUs are unpaid family worker outcomes.
While we recognize that some VR agencies have a greater percentage
of homemaker and unpaid family worker outcomes than others,
particularly those agencies serving individuals who are blind and
visually impaired, it is also evident that the majority of DSUs have
been placing increased importance and emphasis on competitive
employment outcomes, in their policies and procedures, as the optimal
employment outcome and deemphasizing uncompensated outcomes. This shift
in practice has been the product of the DSUs responding to the intent
of the Act and translating that intent into their administration of the
VR program. Nevertheless, we recognize that this proposed change could
represent a significant shift in practice for a few VR agencies,
particularly those with high percentages of individuals achieving
employment outcomes as homemakers or unpaid family workers. These
agencies may be providing services to assist individuals to obtain
homemaker and unpaid family worker outcomes at the time the final
regulations become effective. To allow these agencies to complete the
VR process for these individuals, we are considering a transition
period of six months following the effective date of the final
regulations for the implementation of this proposed change. We are
interested in receiving comments about providing such a transition
period.
Since FY 2004, through monitoring of the VR program, we have
reviewed the
[[Page 21069]]
attainment of homemaker outcomes and have found that VR agencies
sometimes assist individuals to exit the program as homemakers to
provide an alternate resource for the provision of independent living
services that are otherwise available from the State Independent Living
Services, Centers for Independent Living, and Independent Living
Services for Older Individuals Who Are Blind programs. To ensure that
individuals who choose to pursue homemaker and unpaid family worker
outcomes, or who are determined ineligible for VR services either at
the time of application or following the provision of services, are
able to access independent living and other rehabilitation services, we
propose to expand the scope of Sec. Sec. 361.37(b) and 361.43(d) so
that these circumstances would be among those when DSUs must refer
these individuals to public and private agencies better suited to meet
their needs. These current regulatory provisions are limited to those
individuals who choose to pursue extended employment, which does not
constitute an employment outcome under the VR program. As proposed,
Sec. Sec. 361.37(b) and 361.43(d) would be more broad, thus
encompassing those individuals who choose to pursue uncompensated
employment, such as homemakers and unpaid family workers, as well as
those who choose to pursue extended employment.
The resources available through the independent living programs
have expanded exponentially since FY 1992. Specifically, the number of
Part C-funded centers for independent living has tripled since FY 1993,
from 120 to 356 presently, including 20 new centers for independent
living established in FY 2010 through funding under the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. In addition, funding for the
Independent Living Services for Older Individuals Who Are Blind program
has increased since FY 1992, from $6,500,000 to approximately
$33,000,000 in FY 2014. While we recognize that this proposed change
would place the responsibility for making these referrals on DSUs, we
believe that any burden associated with these requirements is
outweighed by the benefit that individuals with disabilities would gain
by having access to programs and services that can more appropriately
meet their individualized needs.
Extended Services
Statute: Section 604(b) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, permits the
expenditure of supported employment funds authorized under title VI,
and the VR funds authorized under title I, on the provision of extended
services to youth with the most significant disabilities for a period
not to exceed four years.
Current Regulation: Current Sec. 361.5(b)(20) defines ``extended
services,'' but does not mention that these services may be provided to
youth with the most significant disabilities since this is a new
statutory requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend the definition in Sec.
361.5(c)(19), as redesignated by other changes made in this part, to
make clear that extended services may be provided to youth with the
most significant disabilities for a period not to exceed four years.
The changes proposed herein are consistent with those proposed for the
Supported Employment program in part 363.
Reasons: The revisions are necessary to implement statutory changes
to the Supported Employment program made by WIOA that also relate to
the VR program since VR funds may be used to pay for allowable
supported employment services. These proposed changes are consistent
with those proposed in part 363 and discussed in more detail later in
this NPRM.
Indian; American Indian; Indian American and Indian Tribe
Statute: Section 7(19) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, revises the
definition of ``Indian,'' ``American Indian,'' ``Indian American,'' and
``Indian tribe'' to further clarify those terms.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.5(b)(3) defines ``American
Indian'' to mean an individual who is a member of an Indian tribe.
Current Sec. 361.5(b)(26) defines ``Indian tribe'' to mean any Federal
or State Indian tribe, band, rancheria, pueblo, colony, or community,
including any Alaskan native village or regional village corporation
(as defined in or established pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act).
Proposed Regulations: We propose to combine the definitions of
``American Indian'' and ``Indian tribe'' currently in Sec. 361.5(b)(3)
and (b)(26), respectively, to be consistent with the definition in
section 7(19) of the Act, as amended by WIOA. To that end, the proposed
definition in Sec. 361.5(c)(25) would make clear that the term
``American Indian'' includes a Native and a descendant of a Native, as
defined in the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1602),
and expands the term ``Indian tribe'' to include a tribal organization,
as defined in the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance
Act (25 U.S.C. 450(b)(1)).
Reasons: These changes are necessary to implement the revised
statutory definition in section 7(19) of the Act. These changes also
are necessary to ensure consistency with changes proposed to part 371,
implementing the American Indian Vocational Rehabilitation Services
program, contained in a separate, but related, NPRM published elsewhere
in this issue of the Federal Register.
Local Workforce Development Board and Other Workforce Development Terms
Statute: Sections 7(25), 7(35), and 7(36) of the Act, as amended by
WIOA, define the terms ``Local workforce development board,'' ``State
workforce development board,'' and ``Statewide workforce development
system,'' respectively.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. Sec. 361.5(b)(34), (b)(49), and
(b)(50) define ``Local workforce investment board,'' ``State workforce
investment board,'' and ``Statewide workforce investment system,''
respectively.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend part 361 throughout,
including the definitions for ``Local workforce development board'' in
Sec. 361.5(c)(33), ``State workforce development board'' in Sec.
361.5(c)(49), and ``Statewide workforce development system'' in Sec.
361.5(c)(50), to substitute the word ``development'' for ``investment''
wherever those terms appear.
Reasons: These changes are necessary to implement revised terms
used throughout WIOA. The amendments are technical in nature and do not
represent a substantive change to the definitions themselves.
Supported Employment
Statute: Section 7(38) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, revises the
definition of supported employment to, among other things, reference
competitive integrated employment and customized employment, and
requires that an individual who is employed in an integrated setting,
but not in competitive integrated employment, must be working toward
such an outcome on a short-term basis for such work to qualify as
supported employment.
Current Regulation: Current Sec. 361.5(b)(53) defines ``supported
employment'' as the term was defined prior to the enactment of WIOA.
There is no reference to ``competitive integrated employment'' or
``customized employment'' since these are new statutory requirements.
Proposed Regulation: We propose to amend the definition in Sec.
361.5(c)(53),
[[Page 21070]]
as redesignated by other changes made in this part, to require that
supported employment means competitive integrated employment, including
customized employment, or employment in an integrated setting in which
the individual is working on a short-term basis toward competitive
integrated employment. We also propose, in this context, that an
individual be considered to be working on a ``short-term basis'' toward
competitive integrated employment if the individual reasonably expects
achieving a competitive integrated employment outcome within six months
of achieving an employment outcome of supported employment. These
proposed changes are consistent with those proposed in part 363 for the
Supported Employment program, discussed later in this NPRM.
Reasons: The revisions are necessary to implement the new statutory
definition in section 7(38) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, which
reflects the heightened emphasis on the achievement of competitive
integrated employment.
We also propose to include a definition of ``short-term basis,'' in
the context of supported employment, to give meaning to the phrase and
ensure congressional intent. By limiting the timeframe, we ensure that
individuals do not remain in subminimum wage employment for the purpose
of achieving supported employment outcomes. The proposed changes also
ensure consistency with the amendments proposed in part 363,
implementing the Supported Employment program, discussed later in this
NPRM.
Supported Employment Services
Statute: Section 7(39) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, revises the
definition of ``supported employment services'' to extend the allowable
timeframe for the provision of these services from 18 months to 24
months. The statute also makes other technical changes to the
definition.
Current Regulation: Current Sec. 361.5(b)(54) defines ``supported
employment services'' to include a timeframe of 18 months.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to revise the definition in Sec.
361.5(c)(54), as redesignated due to other changes made in this part,
to extend the allowable timeframe for the delivery of these services
from 18 months to 24 months. We also propose to make changes that
clarify the individualized and customized nature of supported
employment services.
Reasons: The revisions are necessary to implement the new
definition of ``supported employment services'' in section 7(39) of the
Act, as amended by WIOA. Most importantly, the proposed definition
extends the allowable timeframe for the provision of supported
employment services from 18 to 24 months. The proposed changes also
ensure consistency with revisions proposed in part 363, implementing
the Supported Employment program, discussed later in this NPRM.
Submission, Approval, and Disapproval of the State Plan (Sec. 361.10)
Statute: Section 101(a)(1) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, requires
that, a ``vocational rehabilitation services portion'' be included in a
State's Unified State Plan in accordance with section 102, or a
Combined State Plan in accordance with section 103, of WIOA. The
``vocational rehabilitation services portion'' must contain all State
plan requirements under section 101(a) of the Act.
Section 101(b) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, makes conforming
changes with regard to the submission, approval, and modification
process for the VR services portion of the Unified or Combined State
Plan.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.10 includes requirements for
the submission and approval process for the VR State plan. Although
current Sec. 361.10(c) permits States to submit the VR State plan as
part of the Unified State Plan, there is no requirement to do so.
Proposed Regulations: First, we propose to amend current Sec.
361.10(a) to require the State to submit a VR services portion of a
Unified or Combined State Plan in accordance with sections 102 or 103,
respectively, of WIOA to be eligible to receive its VR allotment.
Second, we propose to clarify that the VR services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan includes all information required under
section 101(a) of the Act.
Third, we propose to amend Sec. 361.10(d) by providing a cross-
reference to subpart D of part 361, which is reserved for the joint
regulations implementing requirements for the Unified and Combined
State Plan proposed jointly by the Departments of Education and Labor.
The proposed joint regulations that would implement jointly-
administered activities under title I of WIOA are published elsewhere
in this issue of the Federal Register. We also propose to remove
current paragraph (e) and redesignate current paragraph (f)(3) as
paragraph (e), and we propose to remove the remainder of current
paragraph (f) and current paragraph (g). We propose to redesignate
current paragraph (h) as paragraph (f) and rename it ``Due Process.''
Finally, we propose to make other conforming changes throughout
Sec. 361.10.
Reasons: The proposed revisions to Sec. 361.10 are necessary to:
(1) Implement the VR-specific amendments to sections 101(a)(1) and (b)
of the Act made by WIOA; and (2) align VR-specific requirements with
those contained in the joint regulations, developed by the Departments
of Education and Labor, regarding the submission, approval, and
modification of Unified or Combined State Plans. Taken together, these
statutory amendments and proposed regulatory changes recognize that the
VR services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan is to be an
integral part of the Unified or Combined State Plan, and provide the
foundation for the seamless, effective, and efficient delivery of
services through the collaboration and combined funding, to the extent
allowable under relevant program requirements, of the workforce
development system that will enable individuals with disabilities to
obtain the skills necessary to participate in the high-demand jobs of
today's economy. To further the integrated nature of the VR services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan, we request that comments
to proposed revisions to Sec. 361.10 be limited to VR-specific
requirements and that more general comments about the Unified or
Combined State Plan be submitted in response to the proposed joint
regulations published elsewhere in this issue of this Federal Register.
Requirements for a State Rehabilitation Council (Sec. 361.17)
Statute: Section 105(b)(1) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, makes a
technical amendment to the composition requirement of the State
Rehabilitation Council (SRC) related to section 121 projects. WIOA also
amends section 105(b)(6) by requiring the SRC to include programs
authorized under the Assistive Technology Act of 1998 among those
agencies and organizations with which it must coordinate.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.17(b)(1)(ix) requires that,
in a State with projects carried out under section 121 of the Act, a
representative of the directors of these projects must serve on the
SRC, but it does not use the new statutory term ``funded'' in place of
``carried out.'' Current Sec. 361.17(h)(6) requires the SRC to
collaborate with various other entities, but does not
[[Page 21071]]
include programs authorized under the Assistive Technology Act of 1998
since this is a new statutory requirement. Current Sec. 361.17(h)(3)
also requires the SRC to partner with the VR agency in establishing
State goals and priorities and to assist in the preparation of the
State plan.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend current Sec.
361.17(b)(1)(ix) to substitute ``funded'' for ``carried out'' in the
State to mirror the statute. Additionally, we propose to amend current
Sec. 361.17(h)(6) to include programs established under the Assistive
Technology Act of 1998 in the list of entities with which the SRC must
coordinate its activities. Finally, we propose to clarify in Sec.
361.17(h)(3) that the SRC is only required to assist in the preparation
of the VR services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan, not
the entire Unified or Combined State Plan.
Reasons: The proposed changes are necessary to implement statutory
amendments to section 105 of the Act made by WIOA. We believe the
proposed change in Sec. 361.17(b)(1)(ix) is more technical than
substantive in the context of the American Indian Vocational
Rehabilitation Services program. Unlike most programs in which funds
are awarded to a State or an entity in a State, the Department awards
section 121 grant funds to tribes, whose reservations may cross State
lines. In that context, the distinctions between ``funded,'' as used in
WIOA, and ``carried out,'' as had been used previously, provides no
substantive differences in practical meaning. For that reason, we
believe this proposed change is primarily technical in nature.
The proposed inclusion in Sec. 361.17(h)(6) of the programs
authorized under the Assistive Technology Act of 1998 among the
entities with which the SRC must coordinate its activities would
underscore the integral role that assistive technology plays in the
ability of individuals with disabilities to obtain and maintain
employment. Through the coordination of SRC and assistive technology
program activities, SRC members would be better informed of the
resources and services available in the State for the provision of
assistive technology devices and training, enabling the members to more
effectively advise the DSU in the State.
Finally, as discussed in proposed Sec. 361.10, title I of WIOA
requires the VR program in each State to participate in a Unified or
Combined State Plan with the other core programs or partner programs
within the workforce development system. By replacing the term ``State
plan'' with the ``vocational rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan,'' we believe that members of the SRC
would be responsible only for participating in the development of the
goals and strategies contained in, and providing input on, the VR
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan in accordance
with the mandated activities of the SRC as set forth in proposed Sec.
361.17(h).
Comprehensive System of Personnel Development (Sec. 361.18)
Statute: Section 101(a)(7) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, makes
several changes to the comprehensive system of personnel development
(CSPD) that each DSU must establish to ensure its personnel are
adequately trained. In particular, the amendments add specific
educational and experiential criteria that must be met by VR personnel.
The statute also makes other technical changes throughout this section.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.18 requires a DSU to
establish a CSPD that is based on either a national or State licensing
or certification standard. Current regulations do not specify specific
educational or experiential criteria since these are new statutory
requirements.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to revise Sec. 361.18(c)(1)(ii)
to mirror the statute with regard to education and experience
requirements for VR personnel. Accordingly, we would ensure that
personnel have a 21st-century understanding of the evolving labor force
and needs of individuals with disabilities. In addition, we propose to
add a new Sec. 361.18(c)(2)(ii) in which we would describe what we
mean by personnel having a 21st-century understanding of the evolving
labor force and needs of individuals with disabilities. We would
provide examples of the skills that would demonstrate that personnel
hired are appropriately qualified.
Further, we propose to amend Sec. 361.18(d)(1)(i) to require that
the CSPD include training implemented in coordination with entities
carrying out State programs under section 4 of the Assistive Technology
Act of 1998. Finally, we propose to delete those provisions that are no
longer applicable given statutory changes, such as those related to
steps the State will take when personnel do not meet the highest
standard in a State.
Reasons: The proposed changes are necessary to implement statutory
changes made by WIOA. The changes we propose in Sec. 361.18(c)(1)(ii)
would ensure that DSU staff are well-qualified to assist individuals
with disabilities to achieve competitive integrated employment in
today's demanding labor market. The proposed regulations would describe
education and experience, as applicable, requirements at the
bachelor's, master's, and doctoral level, in fields related to
rehabilitation that prepare the individual to work with individuals
with disabilities and employers. For individuals hired at the
bachelor's level, there also would be a requirement for at least one
year of paid or unpaid experience. These proposed CSPD requirements
would further the heightened emphasis throughout the Act on employer
engagement and affording individuals with disabilities every
opportunity to achieve competitive integrated employment.
In order to further clarify what types of skills we intend for
personnel to demonstrate, we propose some illustrative examples in
Sec. 361.18(c)(2)(ii), which are by no means all-inclusive but which
are typically required of rehabilitation professionals hired by the
DSU. Finally, in proposing to amend current Sec. 361.18(d)(1)(i) to
require that the CSPD include training implemented in coordination with
entities carrying out State programs under section 4 of the Assistive
Technology Act of 1998, we are reflecting a new statutory requirement
that is consistent with the emphasis on coordination throughout the
Act.
Public Participation Requirements (Sec. 361.20)
Statute: Section 101(a)(16)(A) of the Act requires that the State
plan provide that the designated State agency, prior to the adoption or
amendment of any policies or procedures governing the provision of VR
services under the State plan, must conduct public meetings throughout
the State to provide the public, including individuals with
disabilities, an opportunity to comment on the policies or procedures,
and actively consult with agencies and organizations involved in the
vocational rehabilitation of individuals with disabilities. This
requirement remains unchanged by WIOA.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.20 implements section
101(a)(16)(A) of the Act.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to clarify that the public
participation requirements under current Sec. 361.20 pertain to the VR
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan. We also propose
to add paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) to clarify through descriptive
examples the distinction between substantive changes that would require
the designated State agency to conduct
[[Page 21072]]
a public hearing, and administrative changes for which a public hearing
need not be conducted. All other requirements for public participation
as described in current Sec. 361.20(b) through (e), to the extent they
are consistent with public participation requirements proposed in the
joint regulations, remain unchanged in the proposed regulations, except
for technical modifications to the language required by WIOA. Public
participation requirements related to Unified or Combined State Plans
generally are addressed through the NPRM jointly published by the
Departments of Labor and Education elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register.
Reasons: These proposed changes to current Sec. 361.20 are
necessary to reflect statutory changes that require what previously was
a stand-alone VR State plan to be submitted as a VR services portion of
the Unified or Combined State Plan under WIOA. Additionally, by
clarifying what is meant by a substantive change--that is, a change
that would have a direct impact on the nature and scope of the VR
services provided to individuals with disabilities or the manner in
which these individuals interact with the State VR program, as opposed
to a change that is purely administrative or technical in nature--State
VR agencies would better understand when they must conduct a public
hearing, specific to the VR program. The ability to provide comments
and input at public hearings is an important mechanism for
strengthening the voice of community stakeholders and ensuring that any
changes to the implementation of the VR services portion of the Unified
or Combined State Plan reflect concerns and interests of those whom the
program serves.
Requirements Related to the Statewide Workforce Development System
(Sec. 361.23)
Statute: Section 121(b)(1)(B)(iv) of WIOA includes the VR program
as a core partner of the workforce development system.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.23 outlines a VR program's
roles and responsibilities in the workforce investment system, as
required under WIA.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend current Sec. 361.23(a)
by cross-referencing to subpart F of part 361. We also propose to
remove the remainder of this section because the substance of these
requirements is contained in joint regulations developed by the
Departments of Education and Labor.
Reasons: The changes are necessary to implement amendments to title
I of WIOA and ensure consistency with joint regulations proposed by the
Departments of Education and Labor, which are published elsewhere in
this issue of the Federal Register. We ask that you submit any comments
regarding the VR program's role in the one-stop delivery system in
conjunction with related provisions contained in the joint proposed
regulations, rather than in connection with this particular section of
the proposed VR program-specific regulations.
Cooperation and Coordination With Other Entities (Sec. 361.24)
Statute: WIOA amends section 101(a)(11) of the Act by expanding the
scope of entities with which the DSU must collaborate and coordinate
its activities under the VR program. The new entities include, among
others, employers, non-educational agencies serving out-of-school
youth, programs authorized under the Assistive Technology Act of 1998,
the State agency administering the State Medicaid plan, the agency
responsible for serving individuals with intellectual and/or
developmental disabilities, agencies responsible for providing mental
health services, and other agencies serving as employment networks
under the Ticket to Work and Self-Sufficiency program.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.24 requires that the State
plan include assurances and descriptions, as applicable, of the DSU's
interagency cooperation with various entities, but does not include the
new entities required by the WIOA amendments since these are new
statutory requirements.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend Sec. 361.24 to include
the additional agencies and entities with which the DSU must coordinate
its activities under the VR program, as required by section 101(a)(11)
of the Act, as amended by WIOA.
Reasons: The proposed changes are necessary to implement new
statutory requirements regarding the DSU's coordination with other
entities. The changes are designed to ensure DSU collaboration and
coordination with employers and State and Federal agencies to increase
access by individuals with disabilities, especially youth and
individuals with the most significant disabilities, to services and
supports to assist them in achieving competitive integrated employment.
Third-Party Cooperative Arrangement Requirements (Sec. 361.28)
Statute: None.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.28 includes requirements
related to third-party cooperative arrangements, a mechanism by which a
DSU may work with another public agency to provide VR services.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend Sec. 361.28(a) by
removing the words ``administering'' and ``furnishing'' and providing
more accurate descriptions of the cooperating agency's
responsibilities. Proposed Sec. 361.28(a) also would clarify that the
non-Federal share provided by the cooperating agency must be consistent
with the requirements in proposed Sec. 361.28(c). Proposed Sec.
361.28(a)(4) and 361.28(b) change references to ``cooperative
programs'' and ``cooperative agreements'' to ``cooperative
arrangements'' to make the language consistent throughout this section.
We propose to insert a new paragraph (c) to clarify the manner in which
other public agencies may contribute toward the non-Federal share under
a third-party cooperative arrangement.
Reasons: With the exception of Sec. 361.28(c), the changes to this
section are editorial and the minor clarifications would ensure
consistent language and interpretation. Proposed Sec. 361.28(c) would
list the manner in which a State agency or a local public agency could
provide part or all of the non-Federal share under a third-party
cooperative arrangement. Under the proposed Sec. 361.28(c) the DSU
could utilize cash transfers or certified personnel expenditures for
the time cooperating agency staff spent providing direct VR services
pursuant to a third-party cooperative arrangement to meet part or all
of the non-Federal share. Given the prohibition in Sec. 361.60(b)(2)
against using third-party in-kind contributions for match purposes
under the VR program, we have not included certified expenditures for
equipment and supplies as an allowable source of match under the VR
program. In so doing, we avoid potential third-party in-kind
contributions that could arise with such certified expenditures.
Statewide Assessment; Estimates; State Goals and Priorities;
Strategies; and Progress Reports (Sec. 361.29)
Statute: Section 101(a)(15) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, makes
several technical and conforming changes, as well as expands the scope
of estimates that the DSUs must report and the areas of focus the
States must consider in
[[Page 21073]]
conducting their triennial needs assessment.
Section 101(a)(23) requires DSUs to assure that the State will
submit to the Secretary reports required by section 101(a)(15) at such
time and in such manner as the Secretary may determine to be
appropriate. This statutory requirement remains unchanged by WIOA.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.29 implements the
requirements of section 101(a)(15) of the Act, but does not include the
new statutory requirements. The current regulations also require that
the State submit reports regarding goals, strategies, and estimates
annually.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend current Sec. 361.29 by
requiring that reports and updates related to assessment, estimates,
goals and priorities, and reports of progress, be submitted to the
Secretary, in such time and such manner as determined by the Secretary,
rather than annually. We also propose to amend the regulations to
require DSUs to report estimates of the number of individuals not
receiving services because of the implementation of an order of
selection. We also propose to make several technical and conforming
changes throughout. See related discussion of this section in the
context of transition services later in this NPRM, for proposed changes
related to students and youth in transition.
Reasons: The proposed changes are necessary, in part, to implement
the statutory amendments to section 101(a)(15) of the Act made by WIOA.
The proposed changes also would ensure consistency in the reporting
requirements imposed throughout section 101(a) of the Act, as well as
in title I of WIOA since the VR State plan will be incorporated into
the State's Unified or Combined State Plan as a portion of that plan.
To date, we have collected the required information through the
annual submission of the VR State plan (now known as the VR services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan), rather than through the
submission of separate reports. Because the VR services portion will be
submitted with all other components of the Unified or Combined State
Plan every four years with modifications submitted every two years,
there would be no vehicle for the submission of these annual reports
without imposing additional reporting requirements on the State
separate from the State plan.
By permitting the submission of the required information at a time
and in a manner determined by the Secretary, rather than annually, the
Secretary exercises the statutory flexibility to establish reporting
requirements consistent with those for the VR services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan under section 101(a)(1) of the Act, as
amended by WIOA, and section 102(c) of WIOA, and avoid any additional
burden that would be imposed on DSUs through the submission of separate
reports.
Provision of Training and Services for Employers (Sec. 361.32)
Statute: Section 109 of the Act, as amended by WIOA, expands the
types of training, technical assistance, and other services DSUs may
provide under the VR program, to employers, who have hired or are
interested in hiring individuals with disabilities. In addition, WIOA
repealed the Projects with Industry program, previously authorized at
title VI, part A of the Act.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.32 implements requirements
regarding coordination between the VR program and the Projects with
Industry program. There are no current regulations that implement
section 109 of the Act.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend Sec. 361.32 in its
entirety by eliminating all requirements related to the Projects with
Industry program since those requirements are no longer applicable. In
its place, we propose to implement requirements regarding the types of
activities DSUs may engage in with employers, pursuant to section 109
of the Act.
Reasons: The changes are necessary to implement new statutory
requirements in section 109 of the Act, as amended by WIOA, as well as
remove requirements that are no longer applicable to the VR program due
to the repeal of the Projects with Industry program. Section 109 of the
Act, as amended by WIOA, authorizes the DSU to expend VR funds for
training and services for employers who are interested in hiring
individuals with disabilities, thereby assisting those individuals in
achieving competitive integrated employment. This training could assist
employers in providing opportunities for work-based learning
experiences; training employees who are individuals with disabilities;
and promoting awareness of disability-related obstacles to continued
employment.
The amendments made throughout WIOA place heightened emphasis on
the collaboration between DSUs and employers to improve and maximize
opportunities for individuals with disabilities, including those with
the most significant disabilities, to achieve competitive integrated
employment.
Innovation and Expansion Activities (Sec. 361.35)
Statute: Section 101(a)(18) of the Act sets forth requirements
regarding innovation and expansion activities for DSUs. This statutory
provision remains unchanged by WIOA.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.35 requires the State plan
to assure that the State will reserve and use a portion of its VR funds
to support, among other things, the resource plans for the State
Rehabilitation Council and the Statewide Independent Living Council.
Proposed Regulations: Proposed Sec. 361.35 would clarify that the
State must reserve a portion of its VR program funds to support the
resource plan for the Statewide Independent Living Council, but it may
choose not to use these funds if the Statewide Independent Living
Council and the State decide to use other available resources to fund
the resource plan for the Statewide Independent Living Council.
Reasons: This proposed change is consistent with the Department's
longstanding interpretation of section 101(a)(18) of the Act and
current Sec. 361.35. In the case of the State Rehabilitation Council,
there is no other funding source available under the Act to support its
resource plan. The funds for the State Rehabilitation Council must come
from this section. On the other hand, the Statewide Independent Living
Council has multiple funding sources that may be used to support the
resource plan, including independent living funds under title VII, part
B, of the Act; State-appropriated independent living funds; and other
public and private sources, to the extent allowable by those sources.
Therefore, our interpretation of the requirement has been that the
State and the Statewide Independent Living Council may decide in the
resource plan of the Statewide Independent Living Council to use funds
under this section, but do not have to use these funds. They can use
other sources of available funding to fund the Statewide Independent
Living Council resource plan. This interpretation would have minimal
impact on States since not all States use innovation and expansion
funds to support the resource plan of the Statewide Independent Living
Council.
Ability To Serve All Eligible Individuals; Order of Selection for
Services (Sec. 361.36)
Statute: Section 101(a)(5) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, permits
DSUs to serve eligible individuals who require specific services or
equipment to maintain employment, regardless of
[[Page 21074]]
whether they are currently receiving VR services. The DSUs may serve
these individuals regardless of any order of selection the State has
established.
Current Regulations: Although current Sec. 361.36(a)(3) sets forth
criteria a State must follow in establishing an order of selection,
there is no mention of this particular discretionary exemption because
this is a new statutory requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend current Sec.
361.36(a)(3) by adding a new paragraph (v) that would require DSUs
implementing an order of selection to indicate in the VR services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan if they have elected to
serve eligible individuals in need of specific services or equipment
for the purpose of maintaining employment, regardless of their
assignment to a priority category in the State's order of selection.
Reasons: This change is necessary to implement the amendments to
the Act. Prior to the enactment of WIOA, DSUs who were on an order of
selection were not permitted to serve eligible individuals who did not
meet the criteria of that order, which was designed to ensure that
individuals with the most significant disabilities received a priority
for services when resources were limited. Section 101(a)(5) of the Act,
as amended by WIOA, allows greater flexibility by permitting DSUs to
serve eligible individuals, regardless of any order of selection that
has been established by the State, if those individuals require
specific services or equipment to maintain employment (e.g., because
the individual's disability has progressed or the individual's job
duties have changed).
This statutory change, as well as the proposed regulatory change,
is significant because, in effect, it creates an exemption from order
of selection for eligible individuals who need a specific service or
equipment in order to maintain employment. Prior to the passage of
WIOA, these individuals would have been placed in the order, depending
on the severity of their disability, which could have resulted in a
placement on a waiting list. With the proposed regulatory change, DSUs
may, at their discretion, elect to serve these individuals outside of
the order of selection criteria that are otherwise in place in order to
serve these individuals who could be at risk of losing employment if
such services or equipment is not received. In this way, DSUs could
assist these individuals, including those with significant
disabilities, to maintain economic self-sufficiency, thereby reducing
their potential need for publicly-funded services or benefits.
We want to make four points clear. First, proposed Sec.
361.36(a)(3)(v) is discretionary. DSUs would have the ability to serve
these individuals outside of the established order and should consider
doing so if financial and staff resources are sufficient. Second, if a
DSU elects to do so, it must, in accordance with proposed Sec.
361.36(a)(3)(v), its plans in the VR services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan before implementing this authority. Third, the
services and equipment provided under this authority must be consistent
with an individual's individualized plan for employment, in the same
manner as any other service or equipment provided under the VR program.
Finally, proposed Sec. 361.36(a)(3)(v) would apply to those specific
services or equipment that the individual needs to maintain employment,
not to other services the individual may need for other purposes.
Reports; Evaluation Standards and Performance Indicators (Sec. 361.40)
Statute: Section 101(a)(10)(C) of the Act, as amended by WIOA,
expands the data that DSUs must report to include data about: Students
with disabilities who are receiving pre-employment transition services;
individuals with open service records and the types of services they
are receiving; individuals referred to the VR program by one-stop
operators; and individuals referred to these one-stop operators by
DSUs. In addition, section 106 of the Act, as amended by WIOA, requires
the VR program to be subject to the common performance accountability
measures, established in section 116 of WIOA, applicable to core
programs of the workforce development system.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.40 addresses the data that a
DSU must report, but does not include the new data elements since these
are new statutory requirements. Current Sec. Sec. 361.81 through
361.89 implement current evaluation standards and performance
indicators applicable to the VR program. These standards and indicators
do not incorporate the common performance measures since these are new
statutory requirements.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to reorganize current Sec. 361.40
into two paragraphs. Proposed paragraph (a) would retain all existing
provisions in current Sec. 361.40, as well as incorporate requirements
regarding new VR-specific data related to individuals with open service
records and the types of services they are receiving; students with
disabilities receiving pre-employment transition services; and
individuals referred to the State VR program by one-stop operators and
those referred to these one-stop operators by the State VR program.
In proposed paragraph (b), we provide a cross-reference to subpart
E of this part, which will include the joint regulations implementing
common performance measures. In so doing, we also propose to remove
current Sec. Sec. 361.80 through 361.89, as the current standards and
indicators are no longer applicable to the VR program.
Reasons: The proposed changes to current Sec. 361.40 are necessary
to implement amendments to the Act made by WIOA. Specifically, we
include VR-specific data regarding, among others, individuals with open
service records and the types of services they are receiving, as well
as students with disabilities who are receiving pre-employment
transition services, to ensure that the Secretary has the information
needed to assess the performance of the VR program.
It is significant to note that the VR program will no longer be
subject to its own set of performance standards and indicators
established by the Department. Section 106 of the Act requires that the
VR program comply with the common performance accountability measures
established under section 116 of WIOA, which apply to all core programs
of the workforce development system. To that end, the Departments of
Labor and Education have developed proposed joint regulations to
implement these requirements. The proposed joint regulations regarding
the performance accountability system, which will be incorporated in
subpart E of this part, will be presented in a separate NPRM published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. Given this significant
statutory change in section 106 of the Act, we have determined that
most of the provisions we had in current Sec. Sec. 361.80 through
361.89 are no longer applicable and, therefore, we propose to remove
them. We ask that you provide only comments specific to the VR program
with respect to this section. Any comments regarding the common
performance measures or data requirement, applicable to all core
programs, should be provided in connection with the relevant provisions
of the joint proposed regulations.
Assessment for Determining Eligibility and Priority for Services (Sec.
361.42)
Eligibility Criteria
Statute: Section 102(a)(1) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, makes
clear that
[[Page 21075]]
an individual with a disability, whose physical or mental impairment
constitutes a substantial impediment to employment, may be determined
eligible for VR services if he or she requires services to advance in
employment.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.42(a)(1)(iii) specifies that
the applicant may be determined eligible if he or she meets all other
eligibility criteria and requires VR services to prepare for, secure,
retain, or regain employment. Current regulations do not reference
advancing in employment since this is a new statutory requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend current Sec.
361.42(a)(1)(iii) to clarify that an applicant, who meets all other
eligibility criteria, may be determined eligible if he or she requires
VR services to advance in employment.
We also propose to clarify in current Sec. 361.42(c)(2) that a DSU
must not consider an applicant's employment history, current employment
status, level of education or educational credentials when determining
eligibility for services.
Reasons: The proposed changes are necessary, in part, to implement
statutory amendments to section 102(a)(1) of the Act made by WIOA. The
proposed changes also would ensure that individuals with disabilities
are able to obtain through the VR program the skills necessary to
engage in the high demand jobs available in today's economy. It has
been the Department's long-standing policy that the VR program is not
intended solely to place individuals with disabilities in entry-level
jobs, but rather to assist them to obtain employment that is
appropriate given their unique strengths, resources, priorities,
concerns, abilities, capabilities, and informed choice. The extent to
which DSUs should assist eligible individuals to advance in their
careers through the provision of VR services depends upon whether the
individual has achieved employment that is consistent with this
standard.
Furthermore, the proposed additional factors that a DSU must not
consider when determining an applicant's eligibility for VR services in
proposed Sec. 361.42(c)(2) would be consistent with longstanding
policy. By specifically proposing the additional factors related to
employment and education history in the regulation, we reinforce the
requirement in section 102(a)(1)(iii) of the Act and proposed Sec.
361.42(a)(1)(iii).
Residency
Statute: Section 101(a)(12) of the Act requires that the State plan
will include an assurance that the State will not impose a residence
requirement that excludes from services provided under the plan any
individual who is present in the State. This provision remains
unchanged by WIOA.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.42(c)(1) requires that the
State plan must assure that the State unit will not impose, as part of
determining an applicant's eligibility for VR services, a duration of
residence requirement that excludes from services any applicant who is
present in the State.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend current Sec.
361.42(c)(1) to clarify that a DSU must not require the applicant to
demonstrate a presence in the State by the production of documentation
that would, under State or local law, or practical circumstances,
result in a duration of residency.
Reasons: The proposed clarification in Sec. 361.42(c)(1) is
consistent with our long-standing interpretation of this statutory
requirement, as expressed in monitoring reports and other guidance.
Many State VR agencies require individuals applying for VR services to
provide documents that substantiate that the individual is present in
the State and, hence, available to participate in the eligibility
determination process and to receive VR services. Some forms of
documentation, however, such as a driver's license or voter
registration card, may require a significant amount of time to obtain.
Moreover, States or local jurisdictions may impose durational
requirements prior to the issuance of some forms of documentation or
identification. By proposing these changes, we would clarify that the
requirement of such forms of documentation to demonstrate presence in
the State constitutes a de facto duration requirement, which is
prohibited by the Act. Although documents that take time to obtain may
be accepted as proof of an applicant's presence in the State if
available at the time of application, the DSU must permit the use of
other documentation that includes sufficient information to demonstrate
presence in the State, such as documentation that includes a
residential address in the State.
Extended Evaluation
Statute: WIOA amends section 102(a)(2)(B) of the Act by removing
the limited exception to trial work experiences, whereby VR agencies
made extended evaluations available to applicants, prior to determining
that an individual is unable to benefit from VR services due to the
severity of the individual's disability and, thus, is ineligible for VR
services. Although the term ``extended evaluation'' was not referenced
in the Act, this is the term used in current regulation to describe the
process by which the DSUs assess an individual's ability to benefit
from VR services due to the severity of disability, when the
individual, under limited circumstances, is unable to participate in
trial work experiences.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.42(f) permits, in limited
circumstances, the provision of extended evaluations to individuals
with disabilities who cannot take advantage of trial work experiences,
or for whom trial work experiences have been exhausted.
Current Sec. 361.41(b)(1)(ii) permits the exploration of an
individual's abilities, capabilities, and capacity to perform in work
situations in accordance with Sec. 361.42(e) or, if appropriate, an
extended evaluation in accordance with Sec. 361.42(f).
Proposed Regulations: We propose to remove paragraph (f) from
current Sec. 361.42 and redesignate (g) as (f).
Proposed Sec. 361.41(b)(1)(ii) would remove reference to extended
evaluation and only permit an exploration of the individual's
abilities, capabilities, and capacity to perform in work situations
carried out in accordance with current Sec. 361.42(e).
Reasons: These changes are necessary to implement the amendments to
section 102(a)(2)(B) of the Act made by WIOA. The proposed changes also
would ensure that before a DSU make an ineligibility determination, it
must conduct a full assessment of the capacity of the applicant to
perform in realistic work settings, without the exception of extended
evaluations.
Development of the Individualized Plan for Employment (Sec. 361.45)
Timeframe for Completing the Individualized Plan for Employment
Statute: Section 102(b)(3)(F) of the Act, as amended by WIOA,
mandates that the individualized plan for employment be developed as
soon as possible but no later than 90 days after the date of
determination of eligibility, unless the DSU and the eligible
individual agree to an extension of that timeframe.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.45(e) requires the DSU to
establish and implement standards for the prompt development of
individualized plans for employment for eligible individuals; however,
the 90-day timeframe is not included because this is a new statutory
requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend current Sec. 361.45(e)
to require
[[Page 21076]]
that the DSU develop the individualized plan for employment for each
eligible individual as soon as possible, but no later than 90 days
following determination of eligibility, unless the DSU and the
individual agree to a specific extension of that timeframe.
Reasons: This change is necessary to implement the statutory
requirement made by WIOA that VR agencies develop the individualized
plan for employment within 90 days following determination of
eligibility. The intent is to move all eligible individuals through the
VR process with minimal delay in order to efficiently and effectively
serve these individuals, resulting in the achievement of employment
outcomes in competitive integrated employment. While the majority of
DSUs have already adopted the 90-day timeframe, some DSUs have adopted
extended timeframes that impede the efficient and effective movement of
individuals through the VR process, therefore, resulting in the delay
of services, and ultimately delaying the achievement of employment
outcomes. Additionally, some DSUs have established interim steps or
plans prior to the development of the individualized plan for
employment or have adopted longer timeframes for transition-age youth
or other specific populations. The establishment of a 90-day timeframe
by WIOA ensures consistency across the VR program nationally and sets
the expectation that all eligible individuals receive timely services
through an effective and efficient VR program with an outcome of
improved VR agency performance and resulting in employment outcomes for
individuals with disabilities.
Options for Developing the Individualized Plan for Employment
Statute: WIOA amends section 102(b)(1)(A) of the Act by clarifying
that the DSU must provide eligible individuals with information
regarding the availability of assistance in developing all or part of
the individualized plan for employment from disability advocacy
organizations. In addition, WIOA amends section 102(b) to require a DSU
to provide to eligible individuals entitled to Social Security benefits
under titles II or XVI of the Social Security Act, general information
on additional supports, such as assistance with benefits planning.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.45(c)(1) requires that the
DSU provide eligible individuals information regarding the options for
developing the individualized plan for employment, but does not
reference disability advocacy organizations since this is a new
statutory requirement. Current Sec. 361.45(c)(2) requires the DSU to
provide additional information to eligible individuals relevant to the
development of the individualized plan for employment, but does not
mention benefits planning or other information specific to Social
Security beneficiaries with disabilities since this is a new statutory
requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend current Sec.
361.45(c)(1) by requiring a DSU to provide eligible individuals
information about the option of requesting assistance from a disability
advocacy organization when developing the individualized plan for
employment. We also propose to amend current Sec. 361.45(c)(2) by
adding a new paragraph (v) that would require a DSU to provide eligible
individuals entitled to Social Security benefits under titles II or XVI
of the Social Security Act information on assistance and supports
available to individuals desiring to enter the workforce, including
benefits planning.
Reasons: The proposed changes are necessary to implement the
amendments to section 102(b) of the Act made by WIOA. The inclusion of
disability advocacy groups as a specific source of assistance, as
appropriate, for eligible individuals in the development of the
individualized plan for employment supports, and acknowledges the
important role that these groups may play in mentoring an eligible
individual through the VR process and in designing the plan of services
that will successfully lead to an employment outcome. In coordination
with the expertise of the qualified rehabilitation counselor, the
experience of advocacy groups may lend a perspective and understanding
of the disability-related needs, responsibilities, and services that
are required to achieve the individual's employment goal. The inclusion
of advocacy groups as a resource also recognizes and emphasizes the
importance of self-determination, empowerment, and self-advocacy as
cornerstones in rehabilitation.
By requiring that a DSU provide eligible individuals entitled to
Social Security benefits under titles II or XVI of the Social Security
Act with information on benefits planning, we intend that the
individuals understand the implications of employment for continued
receipt of their benefits so that they can make a fully informed choice
of an employment goal.
Content of the Individualized Plan for Employment (Sec. 361.46)
Statute: WIOA amends section 102(b)(4) of the Act to require that
the description of the specific employment goal chosen by the eligible
individual, required as a mandatory component of the individualized
plan for employment, be consistent with the general goal of competitive
integrated employment.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.46(a)(1) establishes the
content requirements for the individualized plan for employment and
requires that the plan include a specific employment goal based upon
the unique strengths, resources, priorities, concerns, abilities,
capabilities, interests, and informed choice of the eligible
individual. The regulation does not contain the new statutory
requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend current Sec.
361.46(a)(1) to require that the vocational goal selected by the
individual in accordance with this section be consistent with the
general goal of competitive integrated employment.
Reasons: The proposed revision to current Sec. 361.46(a)(1) is
necessary to implement the statutory requirements under WIOA, and is
consistent with the purpose of the VR program, which is to assist
individuals with disabilities, including those with significant
disabilities, to prepare for and engage in competitive integrated
employment.
Transition of Students and Youth With Disabilities
The Act, as amended by WIOA, places heightened emphasis on the
provision of services to students and youth with disabilities to ensure
that they have meaningful opportunities to receive the training and
other services they need to achieve employment outcomes in competitive
integrated employment. To that end, the Act expands not only the
population of students with disabilities who may receive services but
also the kinds of services that the VR agencies may provide to youth
and students with disabilities who are transitioning from secondary
school to postsecondary education and employment.
Most notably, section 110(d) of the Act, as amended by WIOA,
requires States to reserve 15 percent of their VR allotment to provide
pre-employment transition services to students with disabilities who
are eligible or potentially eligible for VR services. Section 113 of
the Act, as added by WIOA, outlines the services that must be provided
with these reserved funds. These services are designed to be an early
start at job exploration.
[[Page 21077]]
With the addition of these pre-employment transition services, and
expansion of services to youth, the VR program can be characterized as
providing a continuum of VR services, especially for students and youth
with disabilities. Specifically, it can provide pre-employment
transition services to any student with a disability who needs these
services, regardless of whether the student has applied for or been
determined eligible for VR services. In addition, section 103(b) of the
Act permits the VR agency to provide transition services to groups of
youth with disabilities, regardless of whether they have applied for or
been determined eligible for services. If either a student or youth
with a disability requires more intensive services, he or she would
apply for VR services. Once determined eligible, an individualized plan
for employment would be developed, which would outline the specific
services that he or she may need in order to achieve an employment
outcome. In sum, the VR program provides a range of services, from most
basic to the most individualized and intensive service, thereby meeting
the evolving needs of a student or a youth with a disability who is
transitioning from school to post-school life.
This portion of the NPRM will describe the key regulatory changes
we propose to implement statutory amendments related to transition
services. The major substantive changes relate to certain key
definitions and the provision of pre-employment transition services and
transition services to groups of youth with disabilities. Throughout
this section of the NPRM, we will provide additional guidance for those
areas that we expect will generate significant comments. The proposed
changes are presented by relevant section of the regulations.
Transition-Related Definitions (Sec. 361.5(c))
Statute: Section 7 of the Act includes several new definitions
related to transition services. In particular, section 7 adds new
definitions for the terms: ``pre-employment transition services'' in
section 7(30); ``student with a disability'' in section 7(37); and
``youth with a disability'' in section 7(42). WIOA also deleted the
term, ``transition services,'' which had been defined previously in
section 7(37).
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.5(b) contains definitions
for terms relevant to the VR program, but does not define ``pre-
employment transition services,'' student with a disability, or youth
with a disability since these are new statutory terms.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to add new definitions to current
Sec. 361.5(c), as redesignated elsewhere in this NPRM, for ``pre-
employment transition services'' in proposed Sec. 361.5(c)(42);
``student with a disability'' in proposed Sec. 361.5(c)(51); and
``youth with a disability'' in proposed Sec. 361.5(c)(59). We also
propose to retain the current definition for ``transition services'' in
Sec. 361.5(c)(55), despite its removal from the statute as a defined
term, since it is still used throughout the Act and the regulations in
part 361. In retaining this definition, we propose to clarify that this
particular service is available to both students and youth with
disabilities.
Reasons: These changes are necessary to implement the amendments to
the Act. Given the heightened emphasis throughout the Act on students
and youth with disabilities, especially with regard to the provision of
pre-employment transition services and other transition-related
services, it is essential that stakeholders understand the definitions
for these terms and how they can be distinguished from other terms
commonly used.
For example, pre-employment transition services are those specific
services specified in section 113 of the Act and implemented in
proposed Sec. 361.48(a). These services, paid for with a percentage of
funds reserved from the State's VR allotment, are available only to
those individuals who meet the definition of a student with a
disability. On the other hand, other transition-related services,
including those that could be similar to pre-employment transition
services, may be provided to students or youth with disabilities and do
not require a specific reservation of funds (e.g., either as an
individualized VR service pursuant to section 103(a) or as a service to
groups pursuant to section 103(b) of the Act).
It also is important to distinguish between the terms ``student
with a disability'' and ``youth with a disability'' because, as just
described, different services are available for different populations.
A student with a disability is an individual with a disability in
school who is (1) 16 years old, or younger, if determined appropriate
under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), unless
the State elects to provide pre-employment transition services at a
younger age, and no older than 21, unless the State provides transition
services under IDEA at an older age; and (2) receiving transition
services pursuant to IDEA, or is a student who is an individual with a
disability for the purposes of section 504 of the Act (29 U.S.C. 794).
However, it is important to note that we have interpreted a student
with a disability, given the plain meaning of the statutory definition,
as not including an individual with a disability in postsecondary
education. A youth with a disability, on the other hand, is anyone who
has a disability as defined in section 7(20) of the Act and is aged 14
to 24, regardless of whether they are in school. The terms ``student
with a disability'' and ``youth with a disability'' do not affect
coverage under section 504. All individuals with disabilities
regardless of whether they meet the definition of ``student with a
disability'' and ``youth with a disability'' continue to be covered
under section 504.
Therefore, all students with disabilities would meet the definition
of a youth with a disability, but not all youth with disabilities would
satisfy the definition of a student with a disability. For example, an
18-year-old individual with a disability who is in secondary school and
receiving services under IDEA meets both the definition of a student
with a disability as well as the definition of a youth with a
disability. However, an 18-year-old with a disability who is not in
school would meet only the definition of a youth with a disability.
The distinctions between these two terms are critical for purposes
of the various authorities for providing transition-related services.
For example, pre-employment transition services provided under proposed
Sec. 361.48(a) are only available to students with disabilities;
whereas transition services provided for the benefit of a group of
individuals may be provided to both students and youth with
disabilities under proposed Sec. 361.49(a).
Despite the removal of the definition of ``transition services''
from the Act, we believe it is important to retain this definition in
part 361 given that the term continues to be used throughout the Act
and these regulations. Therefore, we propose to retain the definition
of ``transition services.'' However, we propose to clarify that this
service is available to both students and youth with disabilities in
order to be consistent with proposed regulations in Sec. Sec.
361.48(b) and 361.49(a) governing the provision of transition services.
Specific guidance about these terms and how they relate to various
transition-related services will be provided in this NPRM in
conjunction with the relevant proposed regulation.
[[Page 21078]]
Coordination With Education Officials (Sec. 361.22)
Statute: Section 101(a)(11)(D) of the Act, as amended by WIOA,
clarifies two points: (1) Interagency coordination between the DSUs and
educational agencies must include coordination regarding the provision
of pre-employment transition services; and (2) DSUs may provide
consultation and technical assistance to education officials through
alternative means, such as conference calls and video conferences. This
section also includes other technical changes.
In addition, WIOA adds a new section 101(c) to the Act that makes
clear that nothing in the Act is to be construed as reducing the
responsibility of the local educational agencies or any other agencies
under IDEA to provide or pay for any transition services that are also
considered to be special education or related services necessary for
providing a free appropriate public education to students with
disabilities.
Finally, section 511 of the Act, as amended by WIOA, imposes
several requirements, particularly related to documentation of services
for DSUs and State and local educational agencies with regard to youth
with disabilities seeking subminimum wage employment. Unlike the rest
of the Act, which took effect upon enactment, section 511 does not take
effect until July 22, 2016.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.22 requires VR agencies to
develop policies and procedures for coordinating with education
officials to facilitate the transition of students with disabilities
from education services to the provision of VR services. However,
current regulations do not reference pre-employment transition services
or the option of providing consultation services through alternative
means since these are new statutory requirements. Current regulations
also do not reference the statutory construction clause or the
statutory requirements contained in section 511, as these are new
statutory requirements.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend current Sec. 361.22(a)
to incorporate reference to pre-employment transition services as an
area that must be included during inter-agency coordination of
transition services.
We propose to amend current Sec. 361.22(b)(1) to clarify that VR
agencies may use alternative means, such as video conferences and
conference calls, for providing consultation and technical assistance
to education officials. We also propose to amend current Sec.
361.22(b) by adding new clauses (5) and (6) to incorporate, by
reference, certain requirements from section 511 into the formal
interagency agreement between the DSU and the State educational agency.
Finally, we propose to add a new paragraph (c) under Sec. 361.22
to incorporate the construction clause in section 101(c) of the Act.
We also propose other technical or conforming changes throughout
this section.
Reasons: The proposed changes to current Sec. 361.22 are necessary
to implement the amendments to the Act made by WIOA. While most of the
proposed changes are self-explanatory, we believe additional guidance
is necessary to clarify a few of the proposed provisions.
First, section 511 of the Act, as added by WIOA, imposes certain
requirements on DSUs and State and local educational agencies with
regard to youth with disabilities seeking subminimum wage employment.
Specifically, DSUs and local educational agencies must provide these
youth with disabilities documentation demonstrating that the youth
completed certain activities, such as receipt of transition services
under IDEA and pre-employment transition services under the VR program,
as applicable. Section 511 also requires the DSU, in consultation with
the State educational agency, to develop a process, or utilize an
existing process, to document completion by youth with disabilities of
the required activities, as applicable, under section 511. We believe
the formal interagency agreement that is required by section
101(a)(11)(D) of the Act, and current Sec. 361.22(b) is the
appropriate mechanism for ensuring the consultation necessary to
develop and implement the documentation process required by section 511
and 34 CFR 397.10.
Second, section 511(b)(2) of the Act prohibits a State or local
educational agency from entering into a contract or other arrangement
with an entity for purposes of operating a program in which youth with
disabilities are employed at subminimum wage. Again, we believe the
formal interagency agreement, required by section 101(a)(11)(D) of the
Act, and current Sec. 361.22(b), between the State educational agency
and the DSU, is the appropriate mechanism whereby State and local
educational agencies will assure that they will comply with the
prohibition imposed by section 511(b)(2) of the Act and proposed 34 CFR
397.31. We believe that incorporating both of these requirements from
section 511, and proposed part 397, into an existing formal interagency
agreement will reduce burden on the States so new mechanisms for
requirements are unnecessary.
Third, we want to provide additional clarification regarding
proposed Sec. 361.22(c) given questions that have arisen over the
years as to which entity, the local educational agency or DSU, is
responsible for providing transition services to students with
disabilities (who are also VR consumers) when such services fall under
the purview of both entities. The following examples illustrate the
types of scenarios that have been at the heart of questions posed by
DSUs in the past:
1. A VR-eligible student who is blind is participating in a work-
experience placement after school hours as part of her individualized
education program. Because that activity takes place in a location
outside of school, the student needs travel training in order to travel
independently from school to work and then home.
2. A VR-eligible student is enrolled in an apprenticeship program
in construction trades as part of his individualized education program
under IDEA. The program requires the student to have special gloves,
clothing, equipment, and footwear to attend the program.
3. A VR-eligible student is participating in a work experience
activity during school hours as part of her individualized education
program. The school has arranged for several IDEA-eligible students to
participate in this same work activity and is providing a school bus to
transport the IDEA-eligible students to and from the worksite. The VR-
eligible student needs transportation to the worksite and a uniform.
While neither the Act nor IDEA is explicit as to which entity, the
VR agency or the local education agency, is financially responsible for
providing transition services, which are not considered solely special
education or related services under IDEA, both proposed Sec. 361.22(c)
and current 34 CFR 300.324(c)(2)) make clear that neither the local
educational agency nor the VR agency may shift the burden for providing
a service, for which it otherwise would be responsible, to the other
entity. We want to make clear that the Act and IDEA, along with their
implementing regulations in proposed Sec. 361.22(c) and 34 CFR
300.324(c)(2), are to be read in concert.
Therefore, we believe decisions related to which entity will be
responsible for providing transition or pre-employment transition
services that
[[Page 21079]]
can be considered both a special education and a VR service must be
made at the State and local level as part of the collaboration between
the VR agencies, State educational agencies, and local educational
agencies. This coordination and collaboration is crucial to successful
transition planning and service delivery. Both the IDEA and the
Rehabilitation Act require State educational agencies and VR agencies
to plan and coordinate transition services for students with
disabilities. This occurs through an interagency agreement or other
mechanism for interagency coordination, such as described in section
612(a)(12) of IDEA (20 U.S.C. 1412(a)(12))). Coordination, including
clearly articulated roles and responsibilities for the provision of
transition services and for activities under section 511 of the Act, as
well as mechanisms to resolve disputes between the State educational
agencies and the VR agencies ensures a seamless delivery of transition
services that enable eligible students with disabilities to make a
smooth transition from school to post-school education and employment.
Moreover, under IDEA, this interagency coordination may be necessary to
ensure the provision of transition services that are necessary for the
provision of a free appropriate public education to students with
disabilities (see section 612(a)(12) of IDEA and 34 CFR 300.154).
States have the flexibility to include local educational agencies as
parties to the State-level agreement.
Since the ultimate decisions related to financial responsibility
for the provision of transition services must be established at the
State and local level during the collaboration and coordination of
transition and pre-employment transition services, a State's formal
interagency agreement or other mechanism for interagency coordination
can provide a foundation for addressing these issues by including
criteria to be used by the VR agencies and local educational agencies
when considering and assigning the financial responsibility of each
agency for the provision of transition services to students with
disabilities on an individualized basis. For example, the criteria
could include:
1. The purpose of the service--Is it related more to an employment
outcome or education (i.e., is it considered a special education or
related service (e.g., rehabilitation counseling that is necessary for
the provision of a free appropriate public education))?
2. Customary Services--Is the service one that the school
customarily provides under IDEA part B? For example, if the school
ordinarily provides job exploration counseling to its eligible students
with disabilities, the mere fact that such a service is now authorized
under the Rehabilitation Act as a pre-employment transition service
does not mean the school should cease providing that service and refer
those students to the VR program.
3. Eligibility--Is the student with a disability eligible for
transition services under IDEA? As stated earlier, the definition of a
``student with a disability,'' for purposes of the VR program, is
broader than that under IDEA because the definition in the
Rehabilitation Act includes those students who are individuals with a
disability under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. It is possible
that these students do not have an individualized education program
under IDEA and, therefore, would not be eligible for or receiving
special education and related services under IDEA. As a result, VR
agencies are authorized to provide transition services under the VR
program to a broader population than local educational agencies are
authorized to provide under IDEA.
We believe that criteria such as these could be beneficial as DSUs
and local educational agencies and State educational agencies
collaborate and coordinate the provision of transition services,
including pre-employment transition services to students with
disabilities, and resolve disputes related to the provision of these
services.
Cooperation and Coordination With Other Entities (Sec. 361.24)
Statute: Section 101(a)(11) of the Act makes several changes that
highlight the importance of transition and other matters affecting
students and youth with disabilities with regard to the coordination of
services between the VR program and other non-educational programs.
Current Regulations: Current regulations in Sec. 361.24 address
only the cooperation and coordination between the State VR agency and
Federal, State and local agencies that are not carrying out activities
through the workforce development system. Current regulations do not
address the coordination that must occur with the section 121 projects
in a State, if applicable, with regard to the provision of pre-
employment transition services or non-educational agencies serving out-
of-school youth because these are new statutory requirements.
Proposed Regulations: Proposed Sec. 361.24(a) would incorporate
non-educational agencies serving out-of-school youth as another entity
with which the VR agency must coordinate.
We also propose to amend current Sec. 361.24(c) and (d), which
govern coordination between the DSUs and employers and section 121
projects, respectively, to include transition services among the
matters that must be included in coordination efforts.
Reasons: These changes are necessary to implement the amendments to
the Act made by WIOA, all of which are designed to improve
relationships and coordination between the VR agencies, employers, and
all other agencies (e.g., workforce development, child welfare and
juvenile justice agencies) serving individuals with disabilities,
especially youth with disabilities, to ensure they have meaningful
opportunities to achieve employment outcomes in competitive integrated
employment. While DSUs have been required to coordinate with American
Indian Vocational Rehabilitation Services projects in the State, if
any, the coordination now must also include pre-employment transition
services.
Statewide Assessment; Estimates; State Goals and Priorities;
Strategies; and Progress Reports (Sec. 361.29)
Statute: Section 101(a)(15) of the Act, as amended by WIOA,
requires the comprehensive needs assessments to include: a review of
the needs of youth and students, especially with regard to pre-
employment transition services and the coordination of services with
educational agencies; and the methods used to improve the provision of
VR services, especially transition services.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.29 requires that the State
plan include the results of a statewide assessment, but does not
contain new statutory requirements related to transition and pre-
employment transition services.
Proposed Regulations: Proposed Sec. 361.29(a)(1)(i)(D) reflects
the addition of the new statutory requirement for the statewide needs
assessment to identify the vocational rehabilitation needs of youth and
students with disabilities, including their need for pre-employment
transition services as defined under proposed Sec. 361.5(c)(42) or
other transition services. Proposed Sec. 361.29(a)(1)(i)(D)(2) would
require that the State plan include an assessment of the needs for
transition services and pre-employment transition services and the
extent to which VR services are coordinated with services provided
under IDEA in order to meet the needs of individuals with disabilities.
The proposed Sec. 361.29(d)(4) would require that the State plan
include strategies to
[[Page 21080]]
provide pre-employment transition services.
Reasons: These proposed changes are necessary to implement the
amendments to the Act made by WIOA. These proposed changes reflect the
Act's emphasis on transition-related issues affecting students and
youth with disabilities.
Development of the Individualized Plan for Employment (Sec. 361.45)
Statute: None.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.45(d)(9) requires that an
individualized plan for employment be developed in consideration of a
student with a disability's individualized education program under
IDEA. There is no reference to 504 services in this context.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend current Sec.
361.45(d)(9)(i) to incorporate consideration of a student's section 504
services.
Reasons: This proposed change is necessary to implement the
amendments to the Act made by WIOA with regard to the addition of a
definition of ``student with a disability.'' Because a student with a
disability could be an individual who is receiving services under
section 504 rather than under an individualized education program
pursuant to IDEA, we believe this proposed change is essential to
ensure consistent implementation of all requirements affecting students
with disabilities.
Content of the Individualized Plan for Employment (Sec. 361.46)
Statute: As amended by WIOA, section 102(b)(4)(A) of the Act
permits an individualized plan for employment to contain a specific
post-school employment outcome or a more general, projected outcome.
Section 102(b)(4)(B) requires the individualized plan for employment
for a student with a disability to include the specific transition
services needed by the student for the achievement of the employment
goal.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.46 outlines the components
of an individualized plan for employment, but does not contain specific
requirements related to transition since these are new statutory
requirements.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to revise current Sec.
361.46(a)(1) to permit, in lieu of a specific employment goal, a
description of an eligible student's or youth's projected post-school
employment outcome.
Proposed Sec. 361.46(a)(2)(ii) would require that the description
of the specific VR services under proposed Sec. 361.48 include the
specific transition services and supports needed for an eligible
student with a disability or youth with disability to achieve an
employment outcome or projected post-school employment outcome.
Reasons: These changes are necessary to implement the amendments
made to the Act by WIOA. By permitting the individualized plan for
employment for a student or youth with a disability to include a
projected, or generally described, rather than a specific employment
goal, we recognize that some students and youth with disabilities,
particularly those of a younger age, may not have formulated a specific
employment goal when they begin the VR process. As a result, VR
agencies may find it necessary to amend the individualized plan for
employment to reflect career exploration consistent with vocational
growth and development and the resulting evolution in the student's or
youth's employment goal. However, VR agencies should continue to work
with students and youth who have identified a specific employment goal,
especially those who are older, to develop individualized plans for
employment that contain a specific goal. For students and youth who
have yet to identify a specific employment goal, this change would
remove the need for these frequent amendments. However, the inclusion
of a projected employment goal in the individualized plan for
employment would not eliminate the responsibility of the VR counselor
and student to amend the individualized plan for employment and the VR
services needed to achieve that goal as the employment goal changes.
Scope of Vocational Rehabilitation Services for Individuals With
Disabilities (Sec. 361.48)
Pre-Employment Transition Services
Statute: WIOA amends the Act by including a new section 113 that
requires VR agencies to coordinate with local educational agencies in
providing, or arranging for the provision of, pre-employment transition
services to students with disabilities who are eligible or potentially
eligible for VR services and in need of such services. Section 110(d)
requires States to reserve 15 percent of their VR allotment to provide
these services.
Current Regulations: None.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to add regulations implementing
the provision of pre-employment transition services in a new paragraph
in proposed Sec. 361.48(a). The current regulations will be moved to a
new paragraph (b) in Sec. 361.48.
Proposed Sec. 361.48(a)(1) would permit pre-employment transition
services to be provided to all students with disabilities regardless of
whether they have applied for VR services and would clarify that
similar transition services are available to youth with disabilities
under proposed Sec. 361.48(b) when specified in an individualized plan
for employment.
Proposed Sec. 361.48(a)(2) would specify the required pre-
employment transition services that are provided directly to students
with disabilities.
Proposed Sec. 361.48(a)(3) would describe the authorized
activities that the State may provide, if sufficient funds are
available, to improve the transition of students with disabilities from
school to postsecondary education or an employment outcome.
Proposed Sec. 361.48(a)(4) would describe the responsibilities for
pre-employment transition coordination to be carried out by VR
agencies.
Finally, proposed Sec. 361.48(a)(5) would support DSUs in
providing pre-employment transition services, consulting with other
Federal agencies, and identifying best practices of the States for the
provision of transition services to students with a variety of
disabilities.
Reasons: The proposed regulations in Sec. 361.48(a) would
implement the requirements of section 113 of the Act, which were added
by WIOA. This new section presents an innovative approach to providing
pre-employment transition services to students with disabilities.
The services required by this section are those that would be most
beneficial to an individual in the early stages of employment
exploration. These services are designed to provide job exploration and
other services, such as counseling and self-advocacy training, in the
early stages of the transition process. To that end, we believe
Congress intended these services be provided to the broadest population
of students with disabilities to ensure that as many students with
disabilities as possible are given the opportunity to receive the
services necessary in order to achieve an employment outcome.
Therefore, the proposed regulation clarifies that pre-employment
transition services would be available to all students with
disabilities. However, it is important to note that a student with a
disability in this instance does not mean an individual with a
disability in postsecondary education. We believe this interpretation
is consistent with the statutory language ``all students with
disabilities who are eligible or
[[Page 21081]]
potentially eligible'' for VR services and intent, as well as the
definition of a ``student with a disability.'' As an individual with a
disability, every student with a disability satisfies at least one of
the eligibility criteria for VR services in current Sec. 361.42(a)(1).
In so doing, we would ensure that the broadest possible group of
students with disabilities is able to receive the services they need to
better identify and prepare for post-school activities, including
postsecondary education and competitive integrated employment. We do
not believe that a student with a disability would have to apply for,
or be determined eligible for, VR services prior to receiving pre-
employment transition services under proposed Sec. 361.48(a). However,
if the student does apply for VR services, he or she would be subject
to all relevant requirements for eligibility and order of selection, as
applicable, for purposes of receiving other VR services.
It is important to point out, in this context, that the definition
in proposed Sec. 361.5(c)(51) of a ``student with a disability,'' for
purposes of the VR program, is broader than the definition used under
IDEA. For that reason, the VR agency may provide pre-employment
transition services under this section to a broader group of students
than could receive such services under IDEA since VR agencies may
provide these services to students eligible for or receiving section
504 services, not all of whom may be eligible for or receiving special
education or related services under IDEA.
We are particularly interested in receiving comments and
alternative suggestions about the interpretation of ``potentially
eligible'' as used in section 113(a) of the Act to mean all students
with disabilities as defined under proposed Sec. 361.5(c)(51).
In providing pre-employment transition services, a DSU may consider
providing these services to students with disabilities in group
settings or on an individual basis. When provided in group settings,
these services are general in nature and are not typically customized
to an individual student's disability-related or vocational needs. For
example, job exploration counseling provided in group settings may
include the presentation of general local labor market composition and
information, administration of vocational interest inventories, and
instruction regarding self-advocacy and self-determination. On the
other hand, job exploration counseling provided on an individual basis
might include discussion of the student's vocational interest inventory
results and discussion of local labor market information that applies
to those interests.
The manner in which pre-employment transition services are
delivered (e.g., either in a group setting or on an individual basis)
will most likely depend on the amount of information the DSU has
available regarding the student with a disability at the time services
are provided. As a student progresses through the VR process by
applying, and being determined eligible, for VR services, the DSU would
obtain the information necessary to provide individually tailored
services that address the student's particular disability-related and
vocational needs. This aspect of pre-employment transition services,
the fact that they can be either generalized or individualized, further
highlights the continuum of services available under the VR program.
We want to make clear that if a student with a disability requires
services that are beyond the limited scope of pre-employment transition
services, the student would have to apply for and be determined
eligible for VR services and develop an individualized plan for
employment for the receipt of those services as would be true for any
other applicant. To that end, we encourage DSUs to work with the local
educational agencies and State educational agencies to develop a
process whereby individuals expressing interest in VR services are able
to access the program and apply for services in a timely manner. VR
agencies are encouraged to develop a referral process that is simple
and engaging, especially for students with disabilities and their
families who could become discouraged or disinterested in VR services
by needlessly complex and prolonged procedures. An individual may
initiate the application process by requesting individualized pre-
employment transition services and other VR services. Current Sec.
361.41(b)(2) permits a student or the student's representative, as
appropriate, to apply for VR services through a variety of means,
including a simple request for VR services, such as submitting a form
consenting to the provision of VR services or even a telephone call, so
long as the request contains the limited demographic and other
information necessary to begin an assessment for the determination of
eligibility and the student is available to participate in the
assessment.
Services for Individuals Who Have Applied for or Been Determined
Eligible for VR Services (Sec. 361.48(b))
Statute: Section 103(a)(15) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, adds
pre-employment transition services among the scope of VR services that
may be provided in accordance with an individual's individualized plan
for employment.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.48 includes transition
services among the list of authorized activities. Pre-employment
transition services are not specifically mentioned because this is a
result of statutory changes.
Proposed Regulations: As discussed earlier, we propose to
reorganize current Sec. 361.48 so that all current provisions are
retained in proposed Sec. 361.48(b). We also propose to incorporate
along with those transition services already provided for, pre-
employment transition services among the authorized list of
individualized services a VR agency may provide under proposed Sec.
361.48(b)(18).
Reasons: This change is necessary to implement the amendments to
the Act made by WIOA. Under the VR program, any allowable service may
be provided as a transition service to an individual transitioning from
secondary school to postsecondary education or employment, who has been
determined eligible and for whom an individualized plan for employment
has been developed and approved. Services most commonly provided as
transition services to students with disabilities under an
individualized plan for employment include, but are not limited to,
assessments, counseling and guidance, assistive technology, job
coaching, orientation and mobility training, vocational counseling and
guidance, and vocational and other training services, such as personal
and vocational adjustment training.
It is important to note that many of the services described as pre-
employment transition services in proposed Sec. 361.48(a) were
previously provided as transition services, as defined in proposed
Sec. 361.5(c)(55), or other individualized services, including
community-based work experiences and other career exploration services,
even though no specific category of pre-employment transition services
was mentioned in the Act or current Sec. 361.48.
Scope of Vocational Rehabilitation Services for Groups of Individuals
With Disabilities (Sec. 361.49)
Statute: Section 103(b)(7) of the Act expands the scope of
allowable services
[[Page 21082]]
for the benefit of groups of individuals with disabilities to include
transition services for youth and students with disabilities. Other
technical changes were made in section 103(b)(6).
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.49(a) includes allowable
services for the benefit of groups of individuals with disabilities,
but does not include transition services since this is a new statutory
requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend current Sec.
361.49(a)(6) to clarify that educational agencies referenced in current
regulations mean State or local educational agencies.
We also propose to add a new Sec. 361.49(a)(7) to incorporate
transition services to students and youth with disabilities as a
permissible service for the benefit of groups of individuals with
disabilities. This service would be provided in coordination with other
relevant agencies and providers.
Reasons: These changes are necessary to implement the amendments to
the Act made by WIOA. Under this new provision, VR agencies would be
able to engage in transition activities with some entities that have
not typically been involved in transition planning. As a service to
groups, these transition services would be provided in group settings
in a manner that benefits a group of students or youth with
disabilities, rather than being customized for any one individual.
Individualized transition services are provided under proposed Sec.
361.48(b).
Examples of group transition services may include, but are not
limited to, class tours of universities and vocational training
programs, employer or business site visits to learn about career
opportunities, career fairs coordinated with workforce development
systems and employers where students and youth participate in resume
writing classes and mock interviews. Additionally, these services are
not limited to those individuals who are still in school since section
103(b)(7) of the Act includes youth with disabilities between the ages
of 14-24 who may or may not be enrolled in secondary education.
DSUs will need to be mindful of the authority they are using when
providing these services since requirements differ for those transition
services provided under services to groups (see proposed Sec. 361.49)
or pursuant to an individualized plan for employment (see proposed
Sec. 361.48(b)) or as a pre-employment transition service under
proposed Sec. 361.48(a).
Services for Individuals Who Have Applied for and Been Determined
Eligible for Vocational Rehabilitation Services (Sec. 361.48(b))
Scope of Vocational Rehabilitation Services for Individuals With
Disabilities
Statute: WIOA amends section 103(a) of the Act by adding customized
employment to the list of VR services that may be provided to eligible
individuals under an individualized plan for employment. The amendments
also encourage qualified individuals who are eligible for VR services
to pursue advanced training in specified fields.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.48 provides a non-exhaustive
list of VR services available to assist an individual with a disability
in preparing for, securing, retaining, or regaining an employment
outcome. Neither customized employment nor advanced training is
specified in this list because these are new statutory requirements.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to reorganize current Sec.
361.48. Proposed Sec. 361.48(a) incorporates new regulations governing
pre-employment transition services to students with disabilities, which
are required by section 113 of the Act. Proposed Sec. 361.48(b)
contains all of the services that are listed in current Sec. 361.48
and that are available to an eligible individual under an
individualized plan for employment.
Proposed Sec. 361.48(b)(6) would specify that advanced training in
a field of science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (including
computer science), medicine, law, or business may be provided to an
eligible individual receiving vocational and other training services
under an individualized plan for employment.
Finally, we propose to include customized employment as an
available VR service in proposed Sec. 361.48(b)(20).
We also propose to make other conforming changes throughout this
section.
Reasons: These changes are necessary to implement amendments to
section 103(a) of the Act made by WIOA. It has been our long-standing
policy that VR services are available to individuals with disabilities
to enable them to advance in employment and that financial support for
the graduate-level degrees specified in proposed Sec. 361.48(b)(6),
may be provided to eligible individuals when necessary to achieve
employment. The specific mention of this service in section 103(a) of
the Act and the proposed regulation underscores the importance of
advanced training when preparing individuals with disabilities for high
demand careers in today's economy.
Prior to enactment of WIOA, customized employment was an available
service under the VR program when necessary to assist the eligible
individual to achieve an employment outcome. See the discussion of
customized employment in the Applicable Definitions section for further
information.
Scope of Vocational Rehabilitation Services for Groups of Individuals
With Disabilities (Sec. 361.49(a))
Statute: Section 103(b) of the Act makes several changes with
regard to the services to groups that VR agencies may provide,
including those related to technical assistance to businesses,
assistive technology, and advanced training in specific fields of
study.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.49(a) describes the services
that VR agencies may provide for the benefit of groups, but they do not
specifically address services related to assistive technology or
advanced training, or other changes made by WIOA.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend current Sec.
361.49(a)(1), regarding the establishment, development, or improvement
of a community rehabilitation program, to clarify that services
provided under this authority must be used to promote competitive
integrated employment, including customized and supported employment.
We propose to amend current Sec. 361.49(a)(4) to incorporate
statutory changes that expand a VR agency's authority to provide
technical assistance to all businesses who are considering hiring
individuals with disabilities.
We propose to add new Sec. 361.49(a)(8) and (9) regarding services
related to assistive technology and advanced training, respectively, to
reflect new statutory authorities for these services.
We also propose to make other conforming changes throughout this
section.
Reasons: These changes are necessary to implement statutory
changes, which both expand the types of services that a VR agency may
provide for the benefit of groups of individuals with disabilities and
provide clarification as needed.
The proposed changes in Sec. 361.49(a)(1) regarding the
establishment, development, or improvement of a community
rehabilitation program are primarily for clarification purposes.
Services provided under this authority have always been for the purpose
of promoting integration into the community with respect to
[[Page 21083]]
employment. However, the proposed changes highlight the statute's
heightened emphasis on competitive integrated employment, supported
employment, and customized employment.
Proposed changes to current Sec. 361.49(a)(4) would permit VR
agencies to provide technical assistance to all businesses who are
considering hiring individuals with disabilities. This technical
assistance could assist businesses with recruitment, hiring,
employment, and retention, including resources and tools to help with
accessing and use of assistive technology, workplace accessibility, and
accommodations for individuals with disabilities. VR agencies can work
with businesses to develop systems for the matching and training of
qualified workers with job requirements. Previously, a VR agency could
provide such services only to those businesses that are not subject to
title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. This proposed
change is also consistent with the heightened emphasis throughout WIOA
on employer engagement, especially with regard to assisting individuals
with disabilities to enter competitive integrated employment.
Proposed new Sec. 361.49(a)(8) would incorporate a new statutory
authority for VR agencies to provide assistive technology-related
services for the benefit of groups of individuals with disabilities. VR
agencies may now establish, develop, or improve assistive technology
programs. This new authority would expand access to assistive
technology for individuals with disabilities and employers in
recognition of the critical role it plays in the vocational
rehabilitation and employment of individuals with disabilities.
However, we believe that this authority should be implemented in a
manner that is consistent with the authority to establish, develop, or
improve a community rehabilitation program in proposed Sec.
361.49(a)(1) in that the services provided under this authority should
be limited to applicants and eligible individuals receiving VR
services. In so doing, this authority would be used in coordination
with, rather than to supplant, the activities otherwise provided under
the Assistive Technology Act.
We also want to make clear that the assistive technology services
provided under this authority would be distinguished from those
provided under proposed Sec. 361.48(b), which are individualized and
provided pursuant to an individual's plan for employment. The assistive
technology services provided under proposed Sec. 361.49(a)(8) are for
the benefit of a group of individuals and are not tied to the
individualized plan for employment of any one individual. For example,
a DSU may, in coordination with the State's assistive technology grant
program, use VR funds to support an assistive technology lending
library in proportion to the benefit received by applicants and
eligible individuals. Once an eligible individual needs a specific
assistive technology device to participate in VR services or the
employment outcome, the DSU could provide the device as an
individualized service under an individualized plan for employment
pursuant to proposed Sec. 361.48(b).
Proposed Sec. 361.49(a)(9) would implement a new authority for VR
agencies to provide support for advanced training in a manner that
benefits groups of eligible individuals. Before WIOA was enacted, a DSU
could provide this service only on an individualized basis, pursuant to
an individual's individualized plan for employment, in accordance with
proposed Sec. 361.48(b), which remains unchanged in this context. This
new authority is in addition to that provided under proposed Sec.
361.48(b) and is not intended to replace such services as being
provided on an individualized basis.
Under this new authority, VR agencies may provide support services
to eligible individuals who meet specific criteria and are pursuing
advanced training in specific fields, as a service for the benefit of a
group of individuals with disabilities. Examples of when a DSU may
consider providing such support services, not directly related to an
individualized plan for employment, could include the enrollment of
multiple students determined eligible for VR services in the same
training, or the development and implementation of specific programming
for eligible individuals with an institution of higher education or
community provider. Furthermore, VR agencies could consider
establishing a scholarship fund for advanced training in science,
technology, engineering or mathematics (STEM) or other fields as
described in section 103(b)(9) of the Act. These funds may support the
costs of graduate level training not covered by any other source for
those services, including support provided by the VR program under
proposed Sec. 361.48(b). If a DSU establishes such scholarships, it
should consider establishing criteria governing the receipt of such
support, including merit and other competitive criteria.
We want to make clear that DSUs should continue to provide any
individualized advanced training support that an eligible individual
requires in order to achieve an employment outcome in competitive
integrated employment, and that is consistent with the individual's
plan for employment, under proposed Sec. 361.48(b), not under the
services to groups authority discussed here. For that reason, we
believe there would only be limited circumstances in which it would be
appropriate for a DSU to provide support for advanced training under
proposed Sec. 361.49(a)(9). Given that this service may be provided as
either an individualized service under proposed Sec. Sec. 361.48(b) or
361.49(a)(9), DSUs would have to keep in mind the distinctions between
the two different authorities to ensure proper implementation and
record-keeping for reporting purposes.
Comparable Services and Benefits (Sec. 361.53)
Statute: Section 101(a)(8) of the Act clarifies that accommodations
and auxiliary aids and services are included in the requirement to
determine whether comparable services and benefits are available prior
to the DSU providing most VR services. In addition, section
101(a)(8)(B) is amended to clarify that interagency agreements for
coordination of services between the DSU and other public entities in
the State, including institutions of higher education, should
specifically address accommodations and auxiliary aids and services
among the services to be coordinated.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.53 sets forth the
requirements related to comparable services and benefits, as well as
requirements related to interagency agreements, without specifically
identifying accommodations and auxiliary aids and services.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to add language to Sec. Sec.
361.53(a) and 361.53(d)(1) and (3) that would include accommodations
and auxiliary aids and services among the VR services that would
require the determination of the availability of comparable services
and benefits prior to the provision of such services to an eligible
individual. The proposed changes also would address interagency
coordination of the provision of these services.
Reasons: The proposed changes reflect the clarifications in section
101(a)(8) of the Act made by WIOA. WIOA reinforces the Department's
longstanding position that accommodations and auxiliary aids and
services are considered to be part of the
[[Page 21084]]
determination of the availability of comparable services and benefits
and the services to be coordinated through the required interagency
agreements with public entities should include accommodations and
auxiliary aids and services. The changes to section 101(a)(8) of the
Act and proposed Sec. 361.53 make this interpretation explicit.
The need for the DSU to coordinate the provision of accommodations
and auxiliary aids and services often occurs when serving eligible
individuals attending institutions of higher education for
postsecondary training and education. Both DSUs and public institutions
of higher education must adhere to the requirements of title II of the
Americans with Disabilities Act and section 504 of the Rehabilitation
Act to ensure access to their services for individuals with
disabilities. Additionally, private institutions of higher education
must adhere to requirements of section 504 of the Act to ensure access
to their services for individuals with disabilities. Accordingly, the
responsibilities of each entity for the provision of accommodations and
auxiliary aids and services to individuals served by each must be
determined at the State level. Therefore, the interagency agreement
under proposed Sec. 361.53(d) would ensure interagency coordination
and describe the responsibilities of the DSU and the institutions of
higher education for the provision of VR services, including
accommodations and auxiliary aids and services, and would provide a
vehicle for resolving interagency disputes. To that end, Governors
could assist the DSUs and institutions of higher education, in
accordance with section 101(a)(8)(B) of the Act, to develop these
agreements to ensure they are sufficient for ensuring individuals with
disabilities receive the services they need, including accommodations
and auxiliary aids and services, to enable them to achieve competitive
integrated employment. The Rehabilitation Act requires DSUs to enter
into interagency agreements for coordination of services (including
each agency's financial responsibilities) with institutions of higher
education, as well as other public entities. DSUs have experienced
difficulty engaging with institutions of higher education, and other
public agencies, for the purpose of developing the required interagency
agreements. In addition, DSUs and institutions of higher education have
often executed interagency agreements that do not clearly describe the
manner in which services will be coordinated, particularly the
accommodations and auxiliary aids and services that each agency will be
responsible to provide. The lack of specificity in these agreements, in
turn, does not provide adequate guidance to higher education or VR
personnel responsible for carrying out their responsibilities to
provide such aids and devices to assist individual students with
disabilities. Such guidance is crucial when a particular service could
be provided by either the DSU or institution of higher education in
accordance with their mutual obligations under the Americans with
Disabilities Act and section 504 of the Act to ensure the ability of
individuals with disabilities to participate in educational programs
and activities, and the timely delivery of VR services.
We believe that the terms of the interagency agreement should take
into account State laws and the resources of each party. For example,
an interagency agreement could include a term that could require
institutions of higher education to provide auxiliary aids and services
(e.g., interpreters) to VR eligible individuals in the classroom and
the DSUs could provide these aids and services during educational
activities outside the classroom. In States where students who are deaf
or blind and attend a State university tuition-free, the interagency
agreement could specify that the DSU provide auxiliary aids and
services, such as reader and interpreter services, both in and out of
the classroom, since the school is responsible for the full cost of
tuition. Greater specificity in the terms of the interagency agreements
at the State level will promote consistency across the State in the
coordination of services and in the provision of accommodations and
auxiliary aids and services to eligible individuals attending
institutions of higher education.
Finally, we want to make clear that accommodations and auxiliary
aids and services, for purposes of implementing the requirements of
section 101(a)(8) and these proposed regulations, do not include
personally prescribed devices, such as eye glasses, hearing aids,
wheelchairs, or other such individually-prescribed devices and
services.
Semi-Annual Review of Individuals in Extended Employment and Other
Employment Under Special Certificate Provisions of the Fair Labor
Standards Act (Sec. 361.55)
Statute: Section 101(a)(14) of the Act, as amended by WIOA,
increases the frequency of reviews that the DSUs must conduct when
individuals with disabilities, who have been served by the VR program,
obtain subminimum wage employment or extended employment.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.55 requires the DSU to
conduct an annual review and re-evaluation annually for the first two
years after an individual obtains subminimum wage employment or
extended employment.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend Sec. 361.55 to
incorporate the new statutory requirement that these reviews be
conducted semi-annually for the first two years of the individual's
employment and annually thereafter. We also propose to make other
technical and conforming changes throughout.
Reasons: The proposed changes are necessary to implement new
statutory requirements and ensure individuals with disabilities do not
languish in subminimum wage employment or extended employment. Prior to
the passage of WIOA, DSUs conducted these reviews annually for two
years. With the amendments made by WIOA, DSUs must conduct these
reviews twice a year for two years and then annually thereafter for as
long as the individual remains employed at the subminimum wage level or
in extended employment. These changes are consistent with the
heightened emphasis throughout WIOA that individuals with disabilities,
including those with the most significant disabilities, be given every
opportunity to achieve competitive integrated employment.
Matching Requirements (Sec. 361.60)
Statute: Section 101(a)(3) of the Act requires the State to pay a
non-Federal share in carrying out the VR program. Section 7(14) of the
Act defines ``Federal share'' as 78.7 percent. These statutory
provisions remain unchanged by WIOA.
Current Regulations: Current regulations in Sec. 361.60(b) outline
the requirements for satisfying the non-Federal share requirement under
the VR program.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend current (b)(3) to clarify
that non-Federal expenditures, for match purposes under the VR program,
from private contributions must be made from cash contributions that
have been deposited in the VR agency's account prior to their use for
this purpose. We also propose to make conforming changes throughout
current Sec. 361.60 to refer to 2 CFR part 200, as applicable and to
new terms, such as the ``vocational rehabilitation services portion of
the Unified or Combined State Plan'' and ``subaward.''
Reasons: Proposed Sec. 361.60(b)(3) makes no substantive changes
but
[[Page 21085]]
would clarify existing regulatory requirements pertaining to
expenditures made from private contributions and used for match
purposes under the VR program. Specifically, we would clarify that
contributions by private entities must be in cash and that the funds
must be deposited into the State agency's account before they are used
for match purposes under the VR program. In so doing, we make two
points clear: (1) Certified expenditures made by private entities or
individuals may not be used by the VR agency for match purposes under
the VR program; and (2) a contract, budgeted projection, or any other
promise by a private entity or individual to make a contribution may
not be used, on its face, by the VR agency for satisfying its match
requirement. The VR agency must actually receive the cash contribution
before it may be used for match purposes under the VR program. We
believe these clarifications are necessary to ensure VR agencies have a
better understanding of, and comply with these existing requirements.
Finally, other revisions proposed throughout this section are necessary
to conform to other changes proposed throughout part 361.
Maintenance of Effort Requirements (Sec. 361.62)
Statute: Section 111(a)(2)(B) of the Act, as amended by WIOA,
requires the Secretary to reduce a grant in a fiscal year for any prior
fiscal year's Maintenance of Effort (MOE) shortfall.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.62(a) requires the Secretary
to reduce the grant in the fiscal year immediately following the fiscal
year with the MOE deficit. In the event that the MOE deficit is
discovered after the next fiscal year's grant was awarded, the
Secretary is required to seek a remedy for the MOE violation pursuant
to the disallowance process.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend current Sec. 361.62(a)
in four ways: (1) By amending current Sec. 361.62(a)(1) to require the
Secretary to reduce a grant in any fiscal year by the amount of any
prior fiscal year's MOE shortfall; (2) by removing the example in
current Sec. 361.62(a)(1) as it is no longer applicable, given
statutory amendments; (3) by removing current Sec. 361.62(a)(2) since
it is no longer necessary given new statutory requirements t; and (4)
by redesignating current Sec. 361.62(a) to reflect the removal of
current Sec. 361.62(a)(2).
We propose to amend current Sec. 361.62(b) by removing the
requirement for the Secretary to recover the MOE deficit through an
audit disallowance process.
We propose to amend the current Sec. 361.62(d)(3) to clarify that
a request for a waiver or modification of the MOE requirement must be
submitted as soon as the State has determined that it has failed to
satisfy the requirement due to an exceptional or uncontrollable
circumstance. Finally, we propose to make conforming changes throughout
current Sec. 361.62 to reflect the restructuring of paragraph (a).
Reasons: The proposed changes to current Sec. 361.62(a) are
necessary to implement the amendments to the Act made by WIOA.
Previously, the Secretary could reduce the State's VR award to satisfy
a MOE deficit only in the fiscal year immediately following the fiscal
year in which the MOE deficit occurred. In the event the MOE deficit
was discovered after the next fiscal year's grant was awarded, the
Secretary was required to seek recovery for the MOE deficit pursuant to
a disallowance process, whereby, the State was required to make payment
for that recovery action with non-Federal funds. Under the proposed
regulations the Secretary would no longer be limited to reducing only
the next fiscal year's grant, but rather could reduce any subsequent
fiscal year's grant to satisfy the MOE deficit. Therefore, in the event
that a MOE shortfall is revealed after the next fiscal year's grant has
been awarded, the Secretary would reduce the Federal grant in another
subsequent fiscal year. Consequently, it is no longer necessary for the
Secretary to seek recovery through a disallowance process and for a
State to use non-Federal funds to satisfy the deficit. The proposed
change to current Sec. 361.62(b) is necessary to ensure consistency
with paragraph (a) for purposes of satisfying a MOE deficit.
The change in proposed Sec. 361.62(d)(3) is necessary for
clarification purposes. The proposed change would not substantively
revise the requirements related to submitting a request for a MOE
waiver or modification, but rather would add clarifying language to
existing requirements. Some States have interpreted the existing
regulation as meaning that the request should be submitted as soon as
they anticipate that they would be unable to satisfy the MOE
requirement, even if that was years in advance. We have always
interpreted paragraph (d)(3) as meaning that the request should be
submitted as soon as the State has determined it has not satisfied the
MOE requirement. The proposed change provides further clarification.
Program Income (Sec. 361.63)
Statute: None.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.63 defines program income
and lists potential sources of program income and uses for purposes of
the VR program.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend current Sec. 361.63(a)
to make the definition of program income consistent with 2 CFR 200.80.
We propose to amend current Sec. 361.63(b) by providing additional
examples of common sources of program income generated by the VR
program.
We propose to amend current Sec. 361.63(c)(1) to clarify that
program income must be disbursed during the period of performance of
the award to be consistent with 2 CFR 200.77, which defines the period
of performance of the award as the time during which the non-Federal
entity may incur new obligations to carry out the work authorized under
the Federal award.
We propose to amend current Sec. 361.63(c)(2) to reflect statutory
restructuring of title VI of the Act.
Finally, we propose to amend current Sec. 361.63(c)(3) to be
consistent with 2 CFR 200.307(e)(1) and (2).
Reasons: The proposed changes to current Sec. 361.63 are necessary
for clarification purposes and to ensure consistency with other
relevant requirements, especially those contained in 2 CFR part 200.
Allotment and Payment of Federal Funds for Vocational Rehabilitation
Services (Sec. 361.65)
Statute: Section 110(d) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, requires VR
agencies to reserve not less than 15 percent of the State's VR
allotment for the provision of pre-employment transition services, in
accordance with section 113 of the Act. Section 110(d)(2) of the Act
prohibits a State from using these reserved funds to pay for
administrative costs or any other VR service.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 361.65 specifies the process the
Secretary uses to allot and reallot Federal funds, but does not address
the reservation by States of funds for the provision of pre-employment
transition services since this is a new statutory requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend current Sec. 361.65(a)
by adding a new paragraph (3) to implement the new statutory
requirement for a State to reserve not less than 15 percent of its VR
allotment for the provision of pre-employment transition services. The
proposed provision would make clear
[[Page 21086]]
that such reserved funds must be used only for services authorized in
proposed Sec. 361.48(a), and must not be used to pay for
administrative costs associated with the provision of such services or
for any other VR service.
We propose to amend current Sec. 361.65(b)(2) by revising the
language to clarify that reallotment would occur in the fiscal year the
funds were appropriated; however, the funds may be obligated or
expended during the period of performance, provided matching
requirements are met. We propose to add a new paragraph (b)(3) to
current Sec. 361.65 that would give the Secretary the authority to
determine the criteria to be used to reallot funds when the amount
requested exceeds the amount of funds relinquished.
Finally, we propose other technical and conforming changes
throughout this section.
Reasons: The proposed changes to current Sec. 361.65(a) are
necessary to implement new statutory requirements related to the
reservation of Federal funds for the provision of pre-employment
transition services. We make clear that the funds to be reserved are
those awarded to the State pursuant to section 110 of the Act and do
not refer to an allotment of State funds awarded by the State.
None of the funds reserved for the provision of pre-employment
transition services in accordance with section 110(d) may be used to
pay for administrative costs or any other VR service. These funds must
be used solely for the provision of services described in Sec.
361.48(a) of this part. We want to make clear that States must use the
entire amount reserved solely for the provision of pre-employment
transition services in accordance with section 113 of the Act and Sec.
361.48(a) of this part.
The proposed change to current Sec. 361.65(b)(2) is necessary to
ensure consistency with 2 CFR 200.77.
The change in proposed Sec. 361.65(b) is necessary to inform
grantees about the reallotment process in the event there are more
requests for reallotment funds than are available to satisfy those
requests.
Part 363--The State Supported Employment Services Program
Proposed substantive changes to part 363 are presented in a format
that highlights topical areas in the order that the relevant sections
appear in this part.
Competitive Integrated Employment (Sec. 363.1)
Statute: Section 7(38) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, revises the
definition of ``supported employment'' to mean, in pertinent part,
employment with supports in competitive integrated employment or, if
not in competitive integrated employment, employment in an integrated
setting in which the individual is working toward competitive
integrated employment on a short-term basis, not to exceed six months.
Other key relevant statutory provisions include section 7(5), which
defines competitive integrated employment; section 602, which makes
clear the purpose of the Supported Employment program is to enable
individuals with the most significant disabilities, including youth
with the most significant disabilities, to achieve supported employment
in competitive integrated employment; and section 604, which authorizes
the services to be provided under the Supported Employment program to
enable individuals to achieve supported employment in competitive
integrated employment. Title VI contains references to this requirement
throughout.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 363.1 sets out the purpose of
the Supported Employment program, which is to assist States in
developing and implementing collaborative programs with entities to
provide supported employment services for individuals with the most
severe disabilities who require such services to enter or retain
competitive employment. Current regulations do not reference
competitive integrated employment or working towards competitive
integrated employment since these are new statutory requirements.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend current Sec. 363.1 to
reflect the revised statutory definition of ``supported employment,''
namely that the employment be in competitive integrated employment or,
if it is not, that the employment be in an integrated setting in which
the individual with a most significant disability is working toward
competitive integrated employment on a short-term basis.
As proposed, the regulations would make clear that the purpose of
the Supported Employment program is to enable individuals with the most
significant disabilities, with on-going supports, to achieve
competitive integrated employment (i.e., employment in an integrated
setting that is compensated at or above the minimum wage).
The proposed definition of ``supported employment'' would take into
account that under some circumstances an individual's employment, which
must always be in an integrated setting, may not meet all of the
criteria for competitive integrated employment initially. In those
circumstances, an individual with a most significant disability would
be considered to have achieved an employment outcome of supported
employment if he or she is working in an integrated setting, on a
short-term basis, toward competitive integrated employment. In the
proposed definition, we would interpret ``short-term basis'' in this
context to mean within six months of the individual entering supported
employment.
We also propose to amend current Sec. 363.50(b)(3) and (b)(4) to
state that the collaborative agreements developed with other relevant
entities for providing supported employment services and extended
services may include efforts to increase opportunities for competitive
integrated employment for individuals with the most significant
disabilities, including youth with the most significant disabilities.
Finally, we propose to amend the balance of current Sec. 363.50 to
reflect in the States' required collaborative agreements the new scope
and purpose of supported employment, as well as the new time limits for
providing services that are discussed in detail under the sections
``Services to Youth with the Most Significant Disabilities'' and
``Extension of Time for the Provision of Supported Employment
Services.''
Reasons: The proposed revisions are necessary to implement in part
363 the statutory changes made by WIOA. We believe these proposed
changes are consistent with the purpose of the Supported Employment
program, as expressed throughout title VI of the Act. The proposed
changes are also consistent with proposed changes to part 361, which
governs the vocational rehabilitation (VR) program, since the supported
employment program is supplemental to that program. In particular, we
propose to establish a specific time frame--e.g., six months--for
``short term basis'' in the context of ``supported employment,''
because we believe it is necessary to limit the time allowed for
individuals to work in non-competitive employment in order to be
consistent with the clear intention of the Act, as amended by WIOA,
which places heightened emphasis on competitive integrated employment
throughout.
Services to Youth With the Most Significant Disabilities (Sec. Sec.
363.6 and 363.54)
Statute: Section 603(d) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, requires
each State to reserve and use 50 percent of its allotment under the
Supported
[[Page 21087]]
Employment program to provide supported employment services, including
extended services, to youth with the most significant disabilities.
Other relevant statutory provisions are found in section 602, which
highlights services to youth with the most significant disabilities in
the purpose section of title VI; section 604, which authorizes services
specifically for youth with the most significant disabilities; section
605, which identifies youth with the most significant disabilities as
eligible for supported employment services; and section 606, which
establishes certain State plan requirements specific for services to
youth with the most significant disabilities.
Current Regulations: None.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend multiple sections in part
363 to incorporate these new requirements for providing supported
employment services, including extended services, to youth with the
most significant disabilities.
We propose to amend current Sec. 363.1 to state that a purpose of
the Supported Employment program is to provide individualized supported
employment services, including extended services in an integrated
setting, to youth with the most significant disabilities in order to
assist them in achieving supported employment in competitive integrated
employment.
We propose to amend current Sec. 363.3 to clarify that youth with
the most significant disabilities are eligible to receive supported
employment services. It is important to note that youth have always
been eligible to receive supported employment services; however,
amendments made by WIOA emphasize this population in the context of the
Supported Employment program.
In proposed Sec. 363.4(a) and (b), we would implement new
statutory provisions permitting the expenditure of supported employment
program funds, reserved for the provision of supported employment
services to youth with the most significant disabilities on extended
services to youth with the most significant disabilities for up to four
years following the transition from support from the designated State
unit (DSU). We propose to amend current Sec. 363.4(c) to clarify that
nothing in this part is to be construed as prohibiting the VR program
from providing extended services to youth with the most significant
disabilities with funds allotted under part 361.
In proposed Sec. 363.4(d), we would set out the statutory
requirement that a State must coordinate its supported employment
services with its VR services provided under part 361 in order to avoid
duplication.
We propose to amend current Sec. 363.11 to incorporate supported
employment services, including extended services, for youth with the
most significant disabilities into the existing requirements for the VR
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan supplement.
We propose a new Sec. 363.22, which would implement the new
statutory requirement that a State must reserve and use half of its
allotment under the supported employment program for the provision of
supported employment services, including extended services, to youth
with the most significant disabilities.
We propose changes throughout part 363 to conform to new statutory
nomenclature, such as referring to ``the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plans'' in Sec. Sec.
363.10 and 363.11, instead of just ``the State plan,'' and ``the most
significant disabilities'' instead of ``severe disabilities.''
Reasons: The proposed revisions are necessary to implement in part
363 statutory changes made by WIOA. The proposed changes are also
consistent with proposed changes to part 361, which governs the VR
program, since the Supported Employment program is supplemental to that
program. Specifically, the proposed changes are consistent with the
heightened emphasis throughout the Act, as amended by WIOA on the
provision of services to youth with disabilities, especially those with
the most significant disabilities, to ensure they receive the services
and supports necessary to achieve competitive integrated employment.
Accordingly, the proposed changes would implement the statutory
requirement that States must reserve half of their supported employment
allotment for the provision of supported employment services, including
extended services, to youth with the most significant disabilities.
This new statutory requirement reflects the fact that this particular
population may need more intensive services for a longer period of time
in order to achieve competitive integrated employment. It is important
to note that, prior to the passage of WIOA, States were not permitted
to use supported employment and/or VR program funds to provide extended
services under any circumstance. States still are prohibited from
providing extended services to individuals who are not youth with the
most significant disabilities.
Extension of Time for the Provision of Supported Employment Services
(Sec. Sec. 363.6 and 363.54)
Statute: Section 7(39) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, revises the
definition of ``supported employment services'' to mean those on-going
supports provided for a period of time not to exceed 24 months.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 363.6 defines ``supported
employment services'' as ongoing services provided by the DSU for a
limited period of time to achieve job stabilization and assist an
individual with the most severe disability before the transition to
extended services. The current regulations do not reference the 24-
month time limit for the provision of services since this is a new
statutory requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend the definition of
``supported employment services'' in part 361, which will be
incorporated by reference throughout part 363. The proposed definition
would extend the time allowed for the provision of supported employment
services from 18 months to 24 months.
We also propose to update and streamline current Sec. 363.6 by
removing the current set of definitions and inserting, instead, cross-
references to relevant definitions from other parts of the Department's
regulations.
We propose to amend current Sec. 363.53 to require that an
individual must transition to extended services within 24 months of
starting to receive supported employment services unless a longer time
period is agreed to in the individualized plan for employment. The
proposed regulation would specify conditions that must be met before a
DSU assists an individual in transitioning to extended services, such
as ensuring the individual is engaged in supported employment that is
in competitive integrated employment, or in an integrated work setting
in which the individual is working on a short-term basis toward
competitive integrated employment, and the employment is customized for
the individual consistent with his or her strengths, abilities,
interests, and informed choice. Administratively, the State unit would
also have to identify the source of extended services and meet all
requirements for case closure.
Reasons: The proposed revisions are necessary to implement in part
363 statutory changes made by WIOA. The proposed changes are also
consistent with proposed changes to part 361, which governs the VR
program, since
[[Page 21088]]
the Supported Employment program is supplemental to that program.
Match Requirements for Funds Reserved for Serving Youth With the Most
Significant Disabilities (Sec. 363.23)
Statute: Section 606(b)(7)(I) of the Act, as amended by WIOA,
requires that a State provide non-Federal contributions in an amount
not less than 10 percent of the costs of providing supported employment
services, including extended services, to youth with the most
significant disabilities. States are also authorized to leverage public
and private funds.
Current Regulations: None.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to add a new Sec. 363.23 to
implement these new statutory requirements. In the event that a
designated State agency uses more than 50 percent of its allotment to
provide supported employment services to youth with the most
significant disabilities as required by Sec. 363.22, there is no
requirement that a designated State agency provide non-Federal
expenditures to match the excess Federal funds spent for this purpose.
In this proposed new section, we would clarify, to ensure consistency
with part 361, that third-party in-kind contributions are not
permitted, but contributions by private entities are permitted, for
match purposes under the Supported Employment program.
We propose to amend Sec. 363.4(a)(3) to implement the new
statutory provision authorizing States to use funds reserved for youth
with the most significant disabilities to leverage other public and
private funds to increase resources for extended services and expand
supported employment opportunities for youth with the most significant
disabilities.
We also propose to amend Sec. 363.11(g)(9) to incorporate both the
new match requirement and the description of the activities surrounding
how the State will leverage funds reserved for youth with the most
significant disabilities into the assurances that a State must submit
as part of its supported employment State plan supplement.
Reasons: The proposed revisions are necessary to implement in part
363 statutory changes made by WIOA. The proposed changes are also
consistent with proposed changes to part 361 governing the VR program
since the Supported Employment program is supplemental to that program.
Given the new statutory requirement that States provide a 10 percent
match on the funds reserved for providing supported employment services
to youth with the most significant disabilities, coupled with the fact
that States may use VR funds to supplement the provision of supported
employment services, we believe it is important to ensure the match
requirements under the Supported Employment program are consistent with
those under the VR program. To that end, we propose that third-party
in-kind contributions would not be a permissible source of match under
the Supported Employment program, since it is not permitted under the
VR program. In so doing, we reduce the administrative burden on States
from having to distinguish whether a match source is applicable to the
supported employment funds verses the VR funds.
Program Income (Sec. 363.24)
Statute: Section 19 of the Act governs the carryover of funds,
including program income, received by the Supported Employment program.
In addition, section 108 of the Act permits the VR program to transfer
payments received by the Social Security Administration under part 361
to the Supported Employment program. These statutory provisions
remained substantively unchanged by WIOA.
Current Regulations: None.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to create a new Sec. 363.24 that
would define program income, identify its uses, and clarify that
program income may be treated as either an addition or deduction to the
award.
In addition, we propose including requirements related to the
carry-over of program income in proposed Sec. 363.25. This provision
would clarify that program income may be carried over into the
succeeding fiscal year.
Reasons: These regulations are necessary to govern the use and
treatment of program income, consistent with sections 19 and 108 of the
Act. Although statutory requirements governing program income have
always applied to the Supported Employment program, we have found,
through monitoring, that confusion exists among States as to how and
when program income should be reported under the Supported Employment
program as opposed to under the VR program. We believe this proposed
change would minimize such confusion and result in more accurate
reporting of program income. Furthermore, these proposed changes are
consistent with those proposed in part 361, which governs the VR
program, since the Supported Employment program is supplemental to that
program.
Carryover (Sec. 363.25)
Statute: Section 19 of the Act permits States to carry funds over
to a succeeding fiscal year to the extent the State has satisfied any
applicable match requirements.
Current Regulations: None.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to add a new Sec. 363.25 that
mirrors the carryover requirements under part 361, which governs the VR
program. Although section 19 of the Act has always applied to the
Supported Employment program, the amendments made by WIOA change the
effect of this requirement since States, for the first time, have a
match requirement under this program. Therefore, a State would be
permitted to carry over the 50 percent of the allotment reserved for
serving youth with the most significant disabilities only if it has met
the 10 percent match for those funds in the fiscal year in which the
funds were awarded. A State would be able to continue to carry over the
other half of the allotment, to serve all other individuals, without
having to satisfy a match requirement since the statute does not impose
a match requirement on that portion of the supported employment
allotment.
Reasons: The proposed revisions are necessary to implement in part
363 statutory changes made by WIOA. The proposed changes are also
consistent with proposed changes to part 361, which governs the VR
program, since the Supported Employment program is supplemental to that
program.
Limitations on Administrative Costs (Sec. 363.51)
Statute: Section 603(c) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, reduces the
limit allowed for administrative costs from 5 percent of the allotment
to 2.5 percent. In addition, section 606(b)(7)(H) requires the State to
assure in its State plan supplement for the Supported Employment
program within the VR section of the Unified or Combined State Plan,
that it will not expend more than 2.5 percent of the allotment for
administrative costs.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. 363.51(b) contains a 5 percent
limit. The current regulations do not reference the 2.5 percent limit
since this is a new statutory requirement.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend Sec. 363.51(b) to
implement the reduced administrative cost limit of 2.5 percent. We also
propose to amend the State plan requirements in Sec. 363.11
accordingly.
Reasons: The proposed revisions are necessary to implement in part
363 statutory changes made by WIOA.
[[Page 21089]]
Miscellaneous Changes for Clarity
Statute: Section 603 of the Act, as redesignated by WIOA, sets
forth the procedures for allotting and reallocating funds under the
Supported Employment program. This statutory provision remained
substantively unchanged by WIOA.
Current Regulations: Current Sec. Sec. 363.20 and 363.21 merely
cross-reference to statutory provisions regarding procedures for
allocating and reallocating funds that are obsolete given revisions
made to title VI of the Act by WIOA.
Proposed Regulations: We propose to amend Sec. Sec. 363.20 and
363.21 to mirror the statutory text regarding procedures for allocating
and reallocating supported employment funds.
Reasons: The proposed changes are necessary to conform to statutory
amendments made by WIOA that restructure title VI. The proposed changes
would also outline the procedures for allocating and reallocating
funds, rather than merely cross-referencing the Act, thereby making the
proposed sections more user-friendly.
Limitation on Use of Subminimum Wages (Proposed 34 Part 397)
Our discussion of part 397 is presented by subject in the order in
which relevant sections appear in this part.
Purpose and the Department's Jurisdiction
Statute: Section 511 of the Act, as added by WIOA, imposes
limitations on employers who hold special wage certificates under the
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) that must be satisfied before the
employers may hire youth with disabilities at subminimum wage or
continue to employ individuals with disabilities of any age at
subminimum wage. Section 511 of the Act also establishes the roles and
responsibilities of the designated State units (DSU) for the vocational
rehabilitation (VR) program and State and local educational agencies,
in assisting individuals with disabilities, including youth with
disabilities, who are considering employment, or who are already
employed, at a subminimum wage, to maximize opportunities to achieve
competitive integrated employment through services provided by VR and
the local educational agencies.
Current Regulations: None.
Proposed Regulations: Proposed Sec. 397.1 establishes the purpose
of the regulations in this part, which is to set forth requirements the
DSUs and State and local educational agencies must satisfy to ensure
that individuals with disabilities, especially youth with disabilities,
have a meaningful opportunity to prepare for, obtain, maintain, advance
in, or regain competitive integrated employment, including supported or
customized employment.
This proposed section also states that these regulations should be
read in concert with: Part 300, which implements requirements under
part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act; part 361,
which implements requirements for the VR program; and part 363, which
implements the State Supported Employment Services program. We believe
this clarification is necessary to ensure all stakeholders understand
that nothing in this part is to be construed as altering any
requirement under parts 300, 361, or 363.
Other relevant proposed regulations in this part include: Sec.
397.2, regarding the Department's jurisdiction; Sec. 397.3, regarding
rules of construction; Sec. 397.4, regarding other applicable
regulations; and Sec. 397.5, regarding applicable definitions.
Reasons: These proposed regulations are necessary to ensure
stakeholders understand the purpose of section 511 of the Act, as added
by WIOA, and the Department's authority and jurisdiction under this
section, as well as the inter-relationship of these requirements with
those under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and the VR
program and Supported Employment program.
Coordinated Documentation Process
Statute: Section 511(d) of the Act, as added by WIOA, requires the
DSU and the State educational agency to develop a coordinated process,
or use an existing process, for providing youth with disabilities
documentation demonstrating completion of the various actions required
by section 511 of the Act. Other relevant statutory provisions include
section 511(a) of the Act, regarding the actions that a youth must
complete prior to beginning subminimum wage employment, and section
511(c) of the Act, regarding the actions that individuals with
disabilities of any age must complete in order to continue employment
at subminimum wage.
Current Regulations: None.
Proposed Regulations: Proposed Sec. 397.10 would require the DSU,
in consultation with the State educational agency, to develop a process
that ensures individuals with disabilities, including youth with
disabilities, receive documentation demonstrating completion of the
various activities required by section 511 of the Act, such as, to name
a few, the receipt of transition services by eligible children with
disabilities under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and
pre-employment transition services under section 113 of the Act, as
appropriate.
Proposed Sec. Sec. 397.20 and 397.30 would establish the
documentation that the DSUs and local educational agencies, as
appropriate, must provide to demonstrate completion of the various
activities, required by section 511(a)(2) of the Act, by a youth with a
disability. These would include completing pre-employment transition
services under proposed Sec. 361.48(a) and the determination of
eligibility or ineligibility for VR services under proposed Sec.
361.42 and Sec. 361.43.
Proposed Sec. 397.40 would establish the documentation that the
DSUs must provide to individuals with disabilities of any age who are
employed at a subminimum wage upon the completion of certain
information and career counseling-related services, as required by
section 511(c) of the Act.
Reasons: These proposed regulations are necessary to implement new
statutory requirements. In so doing, these proposed regulations would
inform DSUs, State, and local educational agencies of their specific
responsibilities related to documentation required under section 511 of
the Act and would ensure that individuals with disabilities have
sufficient information available to make informed choices.
Contracting Prohibition
Statute: Section 511(b)(2) of the Act, as added by WIOA, prohibits
a local or State educational agency (as defined in section 9101 of the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801)) from
entering into a contract or other arrangement with an entity, which
holds a special wage certificate under 14(c) of the FLSA for the
purpose of operating a program for a youth under which work is
compensated at a subminimum wage.
Current Regulations: None.
Proposed Regulations: Proposed Sec. 397.31 would prohibit a local
educational agency or a State educational agency from entering into a
contract with an entity that employs individuals at subminimum wage for
the purpose of operating a program under which a youth with a
disability is engaged in subminimum wage employment. Although section
511(b)(2) of the Act refers to youth in general, the
[[Page 21090]]
proposed regulation is limited to youth with disabilities in order to
be consistent with all other provisions of section 511 of the Act.
Reasons: This proposed section is necessary to implement new
statutory requirements. In so doing, this proposed regulation is
consistent with the heightened emphasis in the Act, as amended by WIOA,
on ensuring that individuals with disabilities, especially youth with
disabilities, are given the opportunity to train for and obtain work in
competitive integrated employment. While some State and local
educational agencies contract with employers who hold special wage
certificates under FLSA, others contract with employers who pay minimum
wage, to create job training and other work experiences for students
with disabilities. Through these training and work experience programs,
students with disabilities gain knowledge and skills that transfer into
eventual jobs similar to those in which they receive their training,
not only with regard to the type of duties performed, but also the
wages earned. In the context of this proposed regulation, State and
local educational agencies are not employers, but rather partners that
facilitate entry of students with disabilities into training programs
that are implemented by employers holding special wage certificates
under the FLSA. We believe this statutory prohibition, which is
contained in the proposed regulations, will result in fewer students
with disabilities, participating in training programs at the subminimum
wage level. As a result, we believe more students with disabilities,
especially those with the most significant disabilities, will have the
opportunity to gain work experiences in competitive integrated
employment settings which, in turn, will lead to eventual employment
outcomes in those settings rather than at the subminimum wage level.
With regard to this proposed provision, the Secretary specifically
seeks comments regarding the Department's role and jurisdiction with
respect to these provisions.
Review of Documentation Process
Statute: Section 511(e)(2)(B) of the Act, as added by WIOA, permits
DSUs, along with the Department of Labor, to review individual
documentation held by entities holding special wage certificates under
the FLSA to ensure the required documentation for individuals with
disabilities, including youth with disabilities, who are employed at
the subminimum wage level, is maintained.
Current Regulations: None.
Proposed Regulations: Proposed Sec. 397.50 would authorize a DSU
to review individual documentation, required by this part, for all
individuals with disabilities who are employed at the subminimum wage
level, that is maintained by employers, who hold special wage
certificates under the FSLA.
Reasons: This proposed provision is necessary to implement new
statutory requirements. In this context, the DSU's role is one of
review not enforcement. The Department of Labor retains enforcement
authority with respect to these employers under the FLSA.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Regulatory Impact Analysis
Under Executive Order 12866, the Secretary must determine whether
this regulatory action is ``significant'' and, therefore, subject to
the requirements of the Executive order and subject to review by the
OMB. Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 defines a ``significant
regulatory action'' as an action likely to result in a rule that may--
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more,
or adversely affect a sector of the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or
tribal governments or communities in a material way (also referred to
as an ``economically significant'' rule);
(2) Create serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impacts of entitlement grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles stated in the
Executive order.
This proposed regulatory action is a significant regulatory action
subject to review by OMB under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
We have also reviewed these regulations under Executive Order
13563, which supplements and explicitly reaffirms the principles,
structures, and definitions governing regulatory review established in
Executive Order 12866. To the extent permitted by law, Executive Order
13563 requires that an agency--
(1) Propose or adopt regulations only upon a reasoned determination
that their benefits justify their costs (recognizing that some benefits
and costs are difficult to quantify);
(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the least burden on society,
consistent with obtaining regulatory objectives and taking into
account--among other things and to the extent practicable--the costs of
cumulative regulations;
(3) In choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, select
those approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity);
(4) To the extent feasible, specify performance objectives, rather
than the behavior or manner of compliance a regulated entity must
adopt; and
(5) Identify and assess available alternatives to direct
regulation, including economic incentives--such as user fees or
marketable permits--to encourage the desired behavior, or provide
information that enables the public to make choices.
Executive Order 13563 also requires an agency ``to use the best
available techniques to quantify anticipated present and future
benefits and costs as accurately as possible.'' The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB has emphasized that these
techniques may include ``identifying changing future compliance costs
that might result from technological innovation or anticipated
behavioral changes.''
We also have determined that this regulatory action would not
unduly interfere with State, local, and tribal governments in the
exercise of their governmental functions.
We have assessed the potential costs and benefits of this
regulatory action. The potential costs associated with the proposed
regulations are those resulting from statutory requirements and those
we have determined as necessary for administering these programs
effectively and efficiently. Elsewhere in this section under Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, we identify and explain burdens specifically
associated with information collection requirements.
In assessing the potential costs and benefits--both quantitative
and qualitative--of these proposed regulations, we have determined that
the benefits would justify the costs.
Need for Regulatory Action
Executive Order 12866 emphasizes that ``Federal agencies should
promulgate only such regulations as are required by law, are necessary
to interpret the law, or are made necessary by compelling public need,
such as material failures of private markets to protect or improve the
health and safety of the public, the environment, or the well-being of
the American people.'' The Department's goal in regulating is to
[[Page 21091]]
incorporate the provisions of the Act, as amended by WIOA, into the
Department's regulations governing the VR program and Supported
Employment program at parts 361 and 363, respectively, as well as to
clarify, update and improve these regulations. This regulatory action
is also necessary to establish a new part 397 to implement specific the
provisions of section 511 of the Act, as added by WIOA, which places
limitations on the use of subminimum wages for individuals with
disabilities.
Summary of Potential Costs and Benefits
The Secretary believes that the proposed changes would
substantially improve the programs covered in this NPRM, and would
yield substantial benefits in terms of program management, efficiency,
and effectiveness. The Secretary believes that the proposed regulations
represent the least burdensome way to implement the amendments to the
Act made by WIOA. Due to the number of proposed regulatory changes, our
analysis focuses solely on new requirements imposed by WIOA, organized
in the following manner. First, we discuss the potential costs and
benefits related to the VR program under section A that specifically
address: competitive integrated employment and employment outcomes,
pre-employment transition services and transition services, and
additional VR program provisions. Second, we discuss the potential
costs and benefits related to the Supported Employment program under
section B. Finally, we discuss the costs and benefits pertaining to the
establishment of proposed part 397 under section C.
Where possible The Department derived estimates by comparing the
existing program regulations against the benefits and costs associated
with implementation of provisions contained in this WIOA-required NPRM.
The Department also made an effort, when feasible, to quantify and
monetize the benefits and costs of the NPRM. When we were unable to
quantify them--for example, due to data limitations--we describe the
benefits and costs qualitatively. In accordance with the regulatory
analysis guidance contained in OMB Circular A-4 and consistent with the
Department's practices in previous rulemakings, this regulatory
analysis focuses on the likely consequences (benefits and costs that
accrue to individuals with disabilities) of the WIOA-required NPRM. In
this analysis, the Department also considers the transfer of benefits
from one group to another that do not affect total resources available
to the VR program and Supported Employment program. However, in a
number of service records the Department is unable to quantify these
transfers due to limitations of the data it currently collects. In
estimating costs, we used wage rates from the Bureau of Labor
Statistics' Mean Hourly Wage Rate for State employees.
A. Vocational Rehabilitation Program Competitive Integrated Employment
and Employment Outcomes
The Act, as amended by WIOA, places heightened emphasis on the
achievement of competitive integrated employment by individuals with
disabilities, including those with the most significant disabilities.
In so doing, Congress added a new term and accompanying definition to
the Act--``competitive integrated employment.'' While this is a new
statutory term, it represents, in general, a consolidation of two
existing regulatory definitions--``competitive employment'' and
``integrated setting.'' As a result of the statutory amendments, we
propose to replace the existing regulatory definition of ``competitive
employment,'' with the new term ``competitive integrated employment,''
by mirroring the statute and incorporating critical criteria from the
existing regulatory definition of ``integrated setting.'' Because this
proposed change is more technical than substantive, and given that the
substance of the proposed definition already exists in two separate
definitions, we believe this particular change will have no significant
impact on the VR program.
In addition to proposing to implement the new definition of
``competitive integrated employment,'' we also believe it is necessary
to propose changes to the current regulatory definition of ``employment
outcome.'' While the Act, as amended by WIOA, made only technical
changes to the statutory definition of ``employment outcome,'' we
believe a regulatory change is necessary in light of the heightened
emphasis throughout the Act on the achievement of competitive
integrated employment under the VR program and Supported Employment
program. To that end, we propose to define ``employment outcome'' as an
outcome in competitive integrated employment or supported employment,
thereby eliminating uncompensated employment (e.g., homemakers and
unpaid family workers) from the scope of employment outcomes for
purposes of the VR program.
To date, the Department has exercised the Secretary's statutory
discretion to permit types of employment not specified in the Act as
``employment outcomes'' under the VR program. In so doing, the
Department has permitted uncompensated employment, such as work as
homemakers and unpaid family workers, to constitute as an employment
outcome under the VR program. However, given the heightened emphasis on
competitive integrated employment in the Act, as amended by WIOA--from
the purpose of the Act to the addition of section 511, the Secretary
proposes to amend the current regulatory definition of ``employment
outcome'' to include only compensated employment within its scope for
purposes of the VR program. Thus, the Secretary intends to ensure that
VR funds are no longer diverted for the provision of services that can
be appropriately provided, in many cases, by independent living and
other programs.
It is difficult to quantify the extent to which the proposed change
to the definition of ``employment outcome,'' which has the effect of
eliminating homemakers and unpaid family workers from its scope, will
affect VR program costs nationally due to a number of highly variable
factors. For example, it is not known whether individuals who
previously achieved homemaker outcomes will choose to pursue
competitive integrated employment through the VR program in the future,
or seek out other resources, such as those available from independent
living programs. Based on data reported by VR agencies through the VR
Case Service Report (RSA-911) for the period beginning in FY 1980 and
ending in FY 2013, the percentage of individuals exiting the VR program
as homemakers nationally declined significantly from 15 percent of all
individuals achieving an employment outcome in fiscal year (FY) 1980 to
1.9 percent in FY 2013 (representing 3,467 of the 182,696 total
employment outcomes that year). While the national percentage of
homemaker outcomes compared to all employment outcomes is small, some
designated State units (DSU) have a greater percentage of homemaker
outcomes than others, particularly those serving only individuals who
are blind and visually impaired. In FY 2013, the 24 DSUs that only
provided services to individuals who are blind and visually impaired
reported that 10.5 percent of the 6,121 employment outcomes in that
year were homemaker outcomes (or 645 outcomes). DSUs that serve
individuals with disabilities other than those with
[[Page 21092]]
blindness and visual impairments reported 656 homemaker outcomes in
that year, or 0.8 percent of the 84,238 employment outcomes. In
addition, the 32 DSUs that serve individuals with all disabilities
reported 2,166 homemaker outcomes in FY 2013, representing 2.3 percent
of their total 92,337 employment outcomes.
The average cost per employment outcome, including the average cost
per homemaker outcome, can be calculated based on data reported by DSUs
in the RSA-911 on the cost of purchased services for individuals
exiting the VR program with an employment outcome. In FY 2013, the
average cost per homemaker outcome for the VR program was $6,626, while
the comparable average cost per employment outcome for all individuals
exiting the VR program with an employment outcome that year was $5,672.
It is possible that this higher average cost is because individuals
obtaining a homemaker outcome generally require more intensive services
or costly equipment because the nature or severity of their
disabilities have prevented them from pursuing competitive integrated
employment. However, there may be other factors that drive up the
average cost of these outcomes. For example, it may be that some of
these individuals originally had a goal of competitive employment, but
after receiving services for an intensive or long period of time
without obtaining such an outcome, they may have chosen to change their
goal. Further analysis is needed to identify the factors that
contribute to the average higher cost of homemaker closures.
Given current information reported to the Department by DSUs, we
are not able to predict how many individuals who would have possibly
had a homemaker outcome might now choose to seek competitive
employment. However, for the purpose of providing a gross estimate of
these costs, we assume that approximately one-fourth (867) of the
number of individuals who exited the VR program with a homemaker
outcome will choose a goal of competitive integrated employment and
continue to seek services through the VR program. We also assume that
obtaining competitive integrated employment for these individuals may
be more expensive than the current cost for obtaining a homemaker
outcome, but also assume it is unlikely that the average costs for
providing services to these individuals would exceed more than 150
percent of their current costs (or approximately 175 percent of the
average cost per employment outcome for all agencies in FY 2013). As
such, we estimate the additional cost to DSUs to provide VR services to
those individuals who previously would have exited the program with a
homemaker outcomes would not exceed $3,313 per outcome, or about
$2,872,370 per year. Alternatively, assuming that about 75 percent of
the number of individuals who would have otherwise attained a homemaker
outcome no longer seek services from DSUs (2,600) at an average cost of
$6,626, there would be a net savings of $17,227,600 to the VR program.
Based on these assumptions, we estimate an overall savings to the VR
program of approximately $14,355,230.
We recognize that the proposed change in the definition of
employment outcome could potentially increase the demand for services
from independent living and other programs that can provide services
similar to those that such individuals would have previously sought
from the VR program and that some of these savings for the VR program
could result in a cost transfer to other Federal, State, and local
programs. The Department plans to provide guidance and technical
assistance to: (1) Facilitate the transition to the new definition of
employment outcome; and (2) minimize the potential disruption of
services to current VR program consumers who do not currently have a
competitive integrated employment or supported employment goal
reflected in their individualized plan for employment. The Department
also plans to provide guidance and technical assistance to assist both
VR agencies and potential service providers in the referral and
acquisition of services for individuals with disabilities seeking
services for outcomes other than those covered under the proposed
revised definition of employment outcome.
Finally the Department plans to work with other Federal agencies,
such as the Administration for Community Living at the Department of
Health and Human Services, in identifying any impact of the proposed
change on independent living and other related programs and developing
strategies to address potential problems.
Pre-Employment Transition Services and Transition Services
The Act, as amended by WIOA, places heightened emphasis on the
provision of pre-employment transition services and other transition
services to students and youth with disabilities, as applicable. As a
result, the Secretary proposes to make numerous amendments to the VR
program regulations to implement new statutory requirements. A few of
those proposed changes are relevant to this regulatory impact analysis
discussion.
Foremost among these proposed changes is the requirement that DSUs
reserve at least 15 percent of the State's VR allotment for the
provision of pre-employment transition services to students with
disabilities who are eligible or potentially eligible for VR services.
Additionally, States may not include administrative costs associated
with the provision of pre-employment transition services in the
calculation of that 15 percent.
The proposed regulation would require DSUs to dedicate resources
to: (1) Ensure that the 15 percent is reserved from the State's VR
allotment; (2) track the provision of pre-employment transition
services to ensure funds were spent solely on authorized services and
not on administrative costs; and (3) provide for administrative costs
related to pre-employment transition services with non-reserved VR
funds.
Second, section 113 of the Act, as added by WIOA, requires VR
agencies to provide pre-employment transition services to students with
disabilities who are eligible or potentially eligible for VR services.
We propose to interpret the term ``potentially eligible'' to mean all
students with disabilities, as defined in proposed Sec. 361.5(c)(51).
Prior to the enactment of WIOA, VR agencies were only permitted to
provide pre-employment transition services or any other transition
services to individuals who had been determined eligible for the VR
program and who had an approved individualized plan for employment. In
developing the proposed regulation, the Department considered limiting
the provision of pre-employment transition services to those students
with disabilities who have applied for VR services. However, this
alternative interpretation is not proposed because we believe that
Congress intended these services to reach a broader group of
individuals than those who are eligible under current VR program
regulations. The Department's proposed interpretation, which is the
broadest possible given the plain meaning of the statute, is consistent
with Congressional intent and the stated desires of some VR agencies
and other stakeholders.
Although pre-employment transition services are a new category of
services identified in the Act, many of these services historically
were provided under a more general category of transition services.
Therefore, the provision of these services is not new to VR agencies.
However, until the enactment of WIOA, all such services
[[Page 21093]]
were provided only to those students with disabilities who had been
determined eligible for the VR program. Consequently, providing pre-
employment transition services to all students with disabilities could
increase staff time and resources spent on the provision of these
services.
We are unable to estimate the potential increase in DSU
administrative costs that may arise from implementation of new section
113 of the Act or the required 15 percent reservation of funds at this
time. However, we have attempted to estimate the impact that this 15
percent reservation could have on the VR program as a whole.
Assuming that States are able to match all of the funds provided
for the VR program in the FY 2015 VR appropriation, $3,052,453,598, the
total aggregate amount of VR funds that would be required to be
reserved for pre-employment transition services from all 80 State VR
agencies would be $457,868,040. Because each State VR agency must
reserve a portion of its allotment, it will now have fewer funds
available to use for all other authorized activities, thereby reducing
the available resources for services other than pre-employment
transition services. The extent of the impact of the reservation on a
particular State will depend largely on the extent to which it has been
providing transition services to students with disabilities that are
now specified under section 113 as pre-employment transition services.
States that currently provide extensive transition services to students
with disabilities, including services that would meet the definition of
pre-employment transition services, are likely to see less transfer of
benefits among eligible individuals served by their agency. For States
that have not provided such services or have only provided such
services to this population to a small extent, there may be more
extensive transfers of services and benefits of the VR program among
individuals (i.e., to students with disabilities and away from other
individuals who otherwise would have been served).
Ultimately, the total value of the benefits transfer is equivalent
to the difference between the amount reserved by States under this
provision (we assume here $457,868,040) and the cost of providing pre-
employment transition services to students with disabilities who have
such services outlined in their individualized plan for employment
(i.e., those who would receive such services in the absence of the
mandated reservation).
Based on data reported through the RSA-911 for FY 2013, the service
records for 206,050 transition-age youth (individuals ages 14 to 24 at
the time of application) were closed, of which 123,119 received
services. A portion of those served may qualify as students with a
disability that would be able to receive pre-employment transition
services. In FY 2013, of the 123,119 transition-age individuals who
received services, 98,212 were aged 16 through 21, and most closely
represent the population of ``students with a disability'' as defined
under proposed regulations. DSUs expended a total of $503,208,438 on
the purchase of VR services for these individuals, for an average cost
of $5,124 per individual. Recognizing that the 98,212 students include
only those who have applied for VR services and that under proposed
regulations DSUs would provide pre-employment transition services to
students with disabilities prior to their application for VR services,
we anticipate that DSUs will be providing these services to a
potentially larger number of students with disabilities with the
reserved funds.
We emphasize that this is an estimate based on assumptions and that
we cannot more definitively project the transfer of benefits across the
VR program related to the provision of pre-employment transition
services due to both the unknown number of students in each State and
nationally who may receive these services and the specific services
that will be provided.
Third, section 103(b)(7) of the Act, as added by WIOA, permits VR
agencies to provide transition services to groups of youth and students
with disabilities. To that end, we propose to add Sec. 361.49(a)(7) to
implement this requirement. In so doing, DSUs would be permitted to
provide transition services to groups of students and youth with
disabilities, who may not have applied, or been determined eligible,
for VR services.
The proposed regulation benefits VR agencies in two significant
ways: (1) It would give them the ability to serve groups of youth and
students with disabilities simultaneously, who may need only basic
generalized services, thereby reducing the amount of cost expended per
individual; and (2) it would reduce administrative burden on the VR
agencies, as well as the burden on students or youth with disabilities
and their families, by not having to engage in processes for
determining eligibility, conducting assessments, and developing
individualized plans for employment. However, we have not attempted to
quantify the impact of this provision due to the variability in the
number of individuals that may seek out these services nationally, the
degree to which individuals would require these services within each
State, and the services that would be provided in each State.
Additional Vocational Rehabilitation Program Provisions
VR Services Portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan
WIOA requires the VR State plan, which has been a stand-alone State
plan, to be submitted as a VR services portion of a State's Unified or
Combined State Plan for all six core programs of the workforce
development system. Requirements related to the submission of Unified
or Combined State Plans do not take effect until July 2016.
In preparing for the transition to the submission of Unified or
Combined State Plans every four years, with modifications submitted
every two years, we propose to amend regulations governing the annual
submissions of certain reports and updates. In so doing, we would no
longer require the submission of these particular reports and updates
annually, but rather, they would be included in the VR services portion
of the Unified or Combined State Plan and would be submitted at such
time and in such manner as determined by the Secretary. This
flexibility would allow for VR program-specific reporting to be done in
a manner consistent with those for the Unified or Combined State Plan
under sections 102 or 103 of WIOA, thus avoiding additional burden or
costs to DSUs through the submission of separate reports annually or
whenever updates are made.
Section 101(a) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, requires DSUs to
include additional descriptive information in the VR services portion
of the Unified or Combined State Plan. Therefore, we propose to amend
part 361 by requiring that DSUs describe in the VR services portion of
the Unified or Combined State Plan the results of the comprehensive
statewide needs assessment with respect to the needs of students and
youth with disabilities for pre-employment transition services and
other transition services, as appropriate; to identify goals and
priorities to address these needs; and to describe strategies for the
achievement of these goals. We also propose that the VR services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan include a description of
how the DSU will work with employers to identify competitive integrated
employment opportunities
[[Page 21094]]
and career exploration opportunities, in order to facilitate the
provision of VR services, and transition services for youth with
disabilities and students with disabilities, such as pre-employment
transition services. We also propose that the VR services portion of
the Unified or Combined State Plan contain a description of
collaboration with the State agency responsible for administering the
State Medicaid plan under title XIX of the Social Security Act, the
State agency responsible for providing services for individuals with
developmental disabilities, and the State agency responsible for
providing mental health services, to develop opportunities for
community-based employment in integrated settings, to the greatest
extent practicable. As a result, DSUs would be required to expend
additional effort in the development of these descriptions beyond the
25 hours currently estimated for the development and submission of the
entire State plan, now the VR services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan. We estimate that DSUs will require an additional
five hours for the development of these descriptions, for a total of 30
hours per agency. At an average hourly rate of $39.78 (based on data
obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for State government
management occupations), a rate more consistent with State rates of pay
than the $22.00 per hour used to calculate current costs, each DSU
would expend $1,193 in the development of and submission of the VR
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan, resulting in a
total of $95,472 for all 80 DSUs. Although these costs are
significantly higher than the current estimate of $2,000 incurred by
all 80 DSUs in the development and submission of the State plan, we
believe that the additional burden is more accurate and outweighed by
the benefit to the public through a more comprehensive understanding of
the activities DSUs engage in to assist individuals with disabilities
to obtain the skills necessary to achieve competitive integrated
employment in job-driven careers.
Order of Selection
Section 101(a)(5) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, permits DSUs, at
their discretion, to serve eligible individuals who require specific
services or equipment to maintain employment, regardless of whether
they are receiving VR services under an order of selection or their
assignment to a priority category. Therefore, we propose to amend part
361 to implement this new statutory requirement. It is important to
note that DSUs implementing an order of selection are not required to
use this authority; rather, they may choose to do so based upon agency
policy, or the availability of financial and staff resources. DSUs
implementing an order of selection would be required to state in the VR
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan whether they
have elected to exercise this discretion, thereby signaling a decision
to serve eligible individuals who otherwise might have been placed on a
waiting list under the State's order of selection, and who are at risk
of losing their employment. This proposed change would increase
flexibility for a State managing its resources. If a State were to
implement this flexibility, it could prevent an individual from losing
employment by avoiding a delay in services. On the other hand, DSUs
that elect to implement this option would potentially need to
reallocate resources to cover expenditures for services or equipment
for individuals who meet the qualifications of this provision, and fall
outside the open priority category of a DSU's order of selection.
For FY 2015, the State Plans of 34 of the 80 DSUs documented that
the agency had established an order of selection, one agency more than
in FY 2014. This total includes 8 percent of the 24 DSUs serving only
individuals who are blind and visually impaired and 57 percent of the
56 other DSUs. Based on data reported through the RSA-911 in FY 2013,
17 percent of the individuals whose service records were closed and who
received services were employed at application, with an average cost of
purchased services $4,744. In addition, according to data reported
through the VR program Cumulative Caseload (RSA-113) report, 33,856
individuals were on a waiting list for VR services at the close of FY
2013 due to the implementation of an order of selection. Assuming that
17 percent of the 33,856 individuals on the waiting list could
potentially benefit from the provision of services and equipment to
maintain employment, a possible 5,756 individuals could benefit from
the proposed regulatory change for a total cost of $27,306,464. This
figure represents the potential reallocation of resources to cover the
cost of services for individuals who, prior to enactment of WIOA, may
have not received them, and away from eligible individuals who would
have received services based on a VR agency's order of selection
policy.
However, the implementation of an order of selection by individual
DSUs may differ from year to year, as well as within a given fiscal
year. In fact, not all DSUs that indicate they have established an
order of selection as part of their State Plan actually implement that
order or report that they had individuals on a waiting list during the
year. In addition, we are unable to predict which DSUs on an order of
selection would choose this option. The degree to which individuals
will be referred for this service will also vary widely, as will the
level of services or equipment that an individual could need to
maintain employment.
Reports, Standards, and Indicators
As a result of amendments to the Act made by WIOA, we propose to
revise Sec. 361.40 to reflect changes to reporting requirements in
section 116(b) in title I of WIOA and amendments to section 101(a)(10)
of the Act. Section 361.40, as proposed, does not list the actual data
to be reported, but rather requires the collection and reporting of the
information specified in sections 13, 14, and 101(a)(10) of the Act.
New requirements under section 101(a)(10) include the reporting of data
on the number of: Individuals with open service records and the types
of services these individuals are receiving (including supported
employment); students with disabilities receiving pre-employment
transition services; and individuals referred to State VR programs by
one-stop operators and individuals referred to such one-stop operators
by State VR programs. The RSA-911 would be revised as described in the
information collection published for comment elsewhere in this issue of
the Federal Register, consistent with the requirements in proposed
Sec. 361.40.
Proposed 361.40 also would require States to report the data
necessary to assess VR agency performance on the standards and
indicators subject to the performance accountability provisions
described in section 116 of WIOA. The common performance accountability
measures apply to all core programs of the workforce development system
and will be implemented in joint regulations set forth in subpart E of
part 361. The impact analysis of these regulations are addressed in the
joint regulations.
We estimate that each DSU will need an additional 15 minutes per VR
counselor to collect the new VR-specific data required by Section
101(a)(10) of the Act. Estimating an average of 125 counselors per DSU,
the number of hours per DSU would increase by 31.25 for a total
increase of 2,500 hours for all 80 DSUs. The estimated cost per DSU,
using an hourly wage of $22.27 (based on data from the Bureau of Labor
Statistics for State-employed VR counselors), would result in an
increase
[[Page 21095]]
of $695.94 per DSU and a total increase of $55,675 for all 80 DSUs.
In addition, we estimate the burden hours for submission of the
entire RSA-911 data file per DSU would increase from 50 hours per
agency to 100 hours per agency, representing an increase of 50 hours
due to the need to report all open case data on a quarterly basis
(rather than only data for closed service records on an annual basis).
The total number of hours needed for the submission of the data file
for 80 agencies would increase from 4,000 to 8,000 hours. Using an
average hourly wage rate of $33.63 (based on data from the Bureau of
Labor Statistics State-employed database administrators), the estimated
cost per DSU would be $3,363, and the estimated cost for all 80 DSUs
would be $269,040. The total burden hours for both collection and
submission would be 131.25 hours per DSU or a total of 10,500 hours for
all 80 DSUs. The estimated total burden cost for both collection and
submission per DSU would be $4,059, with a total burden cost of
$324,715 for all 80 DSUs.
Finally, DSUs will incur expenses related to programming and
modifications of data retrieval systems as a result of the revisions to
the RSA-911 and its instructions due to the new VR-specific data
required under section 101(a)(10) of the Act. The costs are one-time,
first-year costs. The burden on the DSUs related to the programming of
their case management systems as a result of the redesigned RSA-911
will vary widely because agencies themselves range in size and the
sophistication of their information technology systems. Roughly half of
the 80 DSUs use case management and reporting systems purchased from
software providers who are responsible for maintaining and updating
software. We estimate those DSUs would experience no or minimal
increases in cost burden. The remaining DSUs have developed their own
case management systems for which changes will be made by their
information technology staff or outside contractors. Approximately,
half of these DSUs would make the changes internally and half would
contract for the changes to be made.
We estimate those 20 DSUs that own, maintain, and update internal
case management and reporting systems will expend an average of 240
hours at $44.72 (based on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for
State-employed computer and information systems managers), for a total
of $10,732.80 per DSU. The estimated total burden hours for all 20 DSUs
would be 4,800 hours and at a cost of $214,656. We estimate that
contractors who provide maintenance and system updates to the 20 DSUs
with internal case management systems would need 500 hours per DSU to
accomplish the reprogramming of these systems, for a total of 10,000
hours, as a result of the proposed changes to the RSA-911 data file.
Using an average hourly wage rate of $39.21 x 100 hours for private
sector computer programmers, and a wage rate $67.32 x 400 hours for
private sector computer and information system managers (based on
Bureau Labor Statistics data for 2013), we estimate these 20 DSUs will
incur expenses of $30,849.00 per DSU, or a total cost of $616,980.00.
We believe that these costs are outweighed by the benefits to the
VR program because the new information to be reported and having access
to more timely information on individuals currently participating in
the VR program will better enable the Department and its partners to
assess the performance of the program and monitor the implementation of
WIOA, particularly as it relates to key policy changes, such as pre-
employment transition services and its integration in the workforce
development system.
Extended Evaluation
In implementing amendments to the Act made by WIOA, we propose to
amend current Sec. Sec. 361.41 and 361.42 by removing requirements
related to extended evaluation. Instead, a DSU would be required to use
trial work experiences when conducting an exploration of an individual
with a significant disability's abilities, capabilities, and capacity
to perform in work situations. These proposed revisions would
streamline the eligibility or ineligibility determination process for
all applicants whose ability to benefit from VR services is in
question.
VR program data collected by the Department do not distinguish
between individuals who had a trial work experience and those that had
an extended evaluation. However, data show that 5,205 individuals
exited from the VR program during or after trial work experiences or
extended evaluations in FY 2013. DSUs expended a total of $4,385,963 on
the provision of services to these individuals for an average cost of
$843 per individual. Because we are unable to estimate how many of the
5,205 individuals were in extended evaluation, we cannot quantify
either the current or the potential change in costs for this specific
group of individuals. Based on the monitoring of VR agencies, it should
be noted that the use of these services varies among DSUs, mainly due
to variations in opportunities for individuals to participate in trial
work experiences, and the extent to which DSUs historically utilized
extended evaluation. We believe that the benefits of streamlining the
eligibility determination process for applicants whose ability to
benefit from VR services is in question and ensuring that ineligibility
determinations are based on a full assessment of the capacity of an
applicant to perform in realistic work settings outweighs the costs of
removing the limited exception to trial work experiences.
Timeframe for Completing the Individualized Plan for Employment
Section 102(b) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, requires DSUs to
develop individualized plans for employment within 90 days of date of
eligibility determination. Consequently, we propose to amend Sec.
361.45 to implement this 90-day requirement. Due to variations in
current DSU timelines for the development of the individualized plan
for employment, the establishment of a 90-day timeframe by WIOA would
ensure consistency across the VR program nationally and the timely
delivery of services, thereby improving DSU performance and successful
employment outcomes for individuals with disabilities.
We are unable to quantify potential additional costs to DSUs
nationwide due to the variance in timelines currently in place. It is
likely that States with prolonged timelines beyond 90 days could
experience an increase in outlays. For example, an increase in outlays
could occur as a result of larger numbers of individuals, with approved
individualized plans for employment, beginning to receive VR services
at an earlier time than had historically been the case. However, while
the overall cost per individual served are not likely to be affected by
this proposed provision, the average time before some DSUs incur
expenses related to the development of, and provision of services
under, individualized plans for employment may be shortened, resulting
in a shift of VR program outlays for services sooner than has been
experienced. Therefore, in any given fiscal year outlays for these DSUs
could be higher. While costs over the life of the service record should
not be affected, some VR agencies could find it necessary to implement
an order of selection due to the shifting of cost that would have been
incurred in a subsequent fiscal year to a prior fiscal year as the
result of a larger number of individuals with individualized plans for
employment developed within 90
[[Page 21096]]
days. As always, DSUs are encouraged to conduct planning that
incorporates programmatic and fiscal elements to make projections and
assessments of VR program resources and the number of individuals
served, utilizing management tools including order of selection, as
appropriate.
Services to Groups of Individuals With Disabilities
Section 103(b)(8) of the Act, as added by WIOA, permits a DSU to
establish, develop, or improve assistive technology demonstration,
loan, reutilization, or financing programs designed to promote access
to assistive technology. To that end, we propose to amend Sec. 361.49
to implement this new authority. In so doing, we propose to limit the
population to be served to individuals with disabilities who have
applied, or been determined eligible, for VR services, thereby
maintaining consistency with the authority to establish, develop, or
improve a community rehabilitation program. We anticipate that this
provision will benefit individuals with disabilities and employers
through expanded access to assistive technology, reflecting the
integral role assistive technology plays in the vocational
rehabilitation and employment of individuals with disabilities.
However, by limiting the use of this authority to services and
activities that benefit applicants and eligible individuals, we ensure
that this authority is used in coordination with, rather than to
supplant, services and activities provided under the Assistive
Technology Act. We have not attempted to quantify additional costs
associated with this provision due to the variable nature of the
specific assistive technology needs of VR program participants, and the
availability of assistive technology demonstration, loan,
reutilization, or financing programs within each State.
Maintenance of Effort Requirements
Section 111(a) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, requires the
Secretary to reduce any subsequent fiscal year VR award to satisfy a
maintenance of effort (MOE) deficit in a prior year. As a result, we
propose to amend Sec. 361.62 to implement this new requirement. Prior
to the enactment of WIOA, the Secretary could only reduce the
subsequent year's grant to satisfy an MOE deficit from the preceding
fiscal year. If a MOE deficit was discovered after it was too late to
reduce the succeeding years grant, the Secretary was required to seek
recovery through an audit disallowance, whereby the State repaid the
deficit amount with non-Federal funds.
Because the Secretary is now able to reduce any subsequent year's
VR grant for any prior year's MOE deficit, DSUs benefit as they are no
longer required to repay MOE shortfalls with non-Federal funds, thereby
increasing the availability of non-Federal funds, in those instances,
for obligation as match under the VR program. Since FY 2010, two States
were required to pay a total of $791,342 in non-Federal funds related
to MOE penalties because their MOE shortfall was not known at the time
the reduction in Federal funds would have been authorized. As a result,
these funds were unavailable to be used as matching funds for the VR
program in the year they were paid. On the other hand, the new
authority could have resulted in the deduction of the $791,342 MOE
penalties from a future Federal award.
B. The Supported Employment Program Services To Youth With the Most
Significant Disabilities in Supported Employment
Section 603(d) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, requires DSUs to
reserve 50 percent of their supported employment State grant allotment
to provide supported employment services, including extended services,
to youth with the most significant disabilities. This new statutory
requirement is consistent with the heightened emphasis throughout the
Act on the provision of services to youth with disabilities, especially
those with the most significant disabilities. To that end, we propose
to amend part 363 to implement this new requirement. The proposed
changes are consistent with proposed changes to the VR program
regulations, since the Supported Employment program is supplemental to
that program.
After setting aside funds to assist in carrying out section 21 of
the Act, the FY 2015 Federal appropriation provides $27,272,520 for
distribution to DSUs under the Supported Employment State Grants.
Assuming that States are able to provide the required 10 percent non-
Federal match for the available Supported Employment formula grant
funds in FY 2015, the 50 percent reservation would result in the
dedication of $13,636,260 for supported employment services to youth
with the most significant disabilities. Conversely, the reserved funds
would not be available for the provision of supported employment
services to individuals who are not youth with the most significant
disabilities.
Match Requirements for Funds Reserved for Serving Youth With the Most
Significant Disabilities in Supported Employment
Section 606(b) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, requires States to
provide a ten percent match for the 50 percent of the supported
employment allotment reserved for providing supported employment
services, including extended services, to youth with the most
significant disabilities. We propose to implement this requirement in
part 363. To date, the supported program has not had a match
requirement.
As stated above, $27,272,520 is available for formula grants to
States under the Supported Employment program for FY 2015. The 10
percent match requirement would generate $1,515,140 in non-Federal
funds for supported employment services that will benefit youth with
the most significant disabilities. In addition, if the appropriation
increases in future years, the match requirement would result in
additional supported employment resources for youth with the most
significant disabilities. However, States will have to identify
additional non-Federal resources in order to match the Federal funds
reserved for this purpose.
Extended Services
Title VI of the Act, as amended by WIOA, permits DSUs to provide
extended services to youth with the most significant disabilities,
using the funds reserved for the provision of supported employment
services to this population. These services may be provided for a
period up to four years. To that end, we propose to amend part 363 to
implement this requirement. Prior to the enactment of WIOA, DSUs were
not permitted to provide extended services to individuals of any age.
Under the Act, as amended by WIOA, DSUs still may not provide extended
services to individuals with the most significant disabilities who are
not youth with the most significant disabilities. Since extended
services have not previously been an authorized activity with the use
of VR or supported employment funds, this proposed change could have
significant impacts on States.
Nonetheless, we want to make clear that DSUs are not required to
provide extended services to youth with the most significant
disabilities, but rather are permitted to do so, thereby creating a
funding source for the services that previously was not available.
[[Page 21097]]
Extension of Time for the Provision of Supported Employment Services
We propose to amend the definition of supported employment services
in Sec. 361.5(c)(54) to implement the statutory change made by WIOA
that extends the provision of supported employment services from 18 to
24 months. The definition of supported employment services applies to
both the VR program and Supported Employment program. In addition,
under both current and proposed regulations, DSUs have the authority to
exceed this time period under special circumstances if jointly agreed
to by the individual and the rehabilitation counselor.
The statutory change implemented in these proposed regulations
would benefit individuals with the most significant disabilities who
require ongoing support services for a longer period of time to achieve
stability in the employment setting, prior to full transition to
extended services. This provision could result in DSUs using more
resources under both the VR program and Supported Employment program to
provide ongoing services.
DSUs typically have not provided ongoing support services for a
full 18 months. In FY 2013, 15,458 individuals achieved supported
employment outcomes within 21 months following the development of the
individualized plans for employment, which period we assume could
include the provision of supported employment services for a full 18
months and a minimum period of 90 days prior to case closure. Of these
individuals, 10,608, or approximately 69 percent, achieve supported
employment outcomes within 12 months. While we anticipate that most
individuals may not need supported employment services for the full
period of 24 months, in FY 2013, 1,759 individuals achieved supported
employment outcomes within a period ranging from 21 months to 27 months
of the development of the individualized plan for employment. DSUs
expended $13,257, 816 on purchased services for these individuals, or
an average of $7,537 per individual. Assuming this period includes the
provision of supported employment services for a full 24 months and a
minimum period of 90 days prior to case closure we estimate that an
approximate number of individuals would benefit from the provision of
supported employment services for an additional six months and that
DSUs would incur similar costs for the provision of these services as a
result of the proposed regulatory change.
Limitations on Supported Employment Administrative Costs
We propose to amend part 363 to implement a new requirement in the
Act, as amended by WIOA, that reduces the maximum amount of a State's
grant allotment under the Supported Employment program that can be used
for administrative costs from 5 percent of the State's grant allotment
to 2.5 percent. As a result, a larger portion of Federal supported
employment funds must be spent on the provision of supported employment
services, including extended services to youth with the most
significant disabilities, rather than administrative costs. However,
any administrative costs incurred beyond the 2.5 percent limit on the
use of Supported Employment funds may be paid for with VR program
funds.
Based upon the $27,272,520 available for formula grants to States
under the Supported Employment program in FY 2015, the total allowable
amount of these Federal funds that can be used to support
administrative costs would be reduced by half, from $1,363,626 to
$681,813. Thus, for those DSUs that have typically used more than 2.5
percent of their allotment to cover program administrative costs, the
new requirement would provide a small increase in the amount of funds
available for the provision of services to individuals with the most
significant disabilities pursuing a supported employment outcome. DSUs
will be able to shift these excess costs to the VR State grants program
since it does not have a cap on the amount of administrative funds that
can be spent under that program.
C. Limitations on the Use of Subminimum Wage
The Act, as amended by WIOA, imposes limitations on the payment of
subminimum wages by employers who hold special wage certificates under
the Fair Labor Standards Act. The requirements imposed by section 511
and thus proposed in part 397, do not take effect until July 22, 2016.
Pursuant to statutory requirements contained in section 511 of the
Act, as added by WIOA, we propose to create a new Sec. 397.10 that
would require the DSU, in consultation with the State educational
agency, to develop a process, or utilize an existing process, that
ensures individuals with disabilities, including youth with
disabilities, receive documentation demonstrating completion of the
various activities required by section 511. Proposed Sec. Sec. 397.20
and 397.30 would establish the documentation that the DSUs and local
educational agencies, as appropriate, must provide to demonstrate an
individual's completion of the various activities required by section
511(a)(2) of the Act. These include completing pre-employment
transition services under proposed Sec. 361.48(a) and the
determination under an application for VR services under proposed
Sec. Sec. 361.42 and 361.43. Proposed Sec. 397.40 would establish the
documentation that the DSUs must provide to individuals with
disabilities upon the completion of certain information and career
counseling-related services, as required by section 511(c) of the Act.
We have not attempted to quantify the costs to the DSUs related to the
provision of this required documentation because the number of youth
and other individuals who potentially could receive services under
proposed part 397 will vary widely from State to State. In addition,
there exists no reliable national data on which to base a calculation
of costs. However, DSUs generate documentation throughout the
vocational rehabilitation process that may meet the requirements of
Sec. Sec. 397.20 and 397.30, including written notification of a
consumer's eligibility or ineligibility, copies of individualized plans
for employment and subsequent amendments, and written notification when
the consumer's case record is closed. As a result, the utilization of
this documentation to meet section 511 requirements should not result
in significant additional burden to DSUs.
Clarity of the Regulations
Executive Order 12866 and the Presidential memorandum ``Plain
Language in Government Writing'' require each agency to write
regulations that are easy to understand. The Secretary invites comments
on how to make these proposed regulations easier to understand,
including answers to questions such as the following:
Are the requirements in the proposed regulations clearly
stated?
Do the proposed regulations contain technical terms or
other wording that interferes with their clarity?
Does the format of the proposed regulations (grouping and
order of sections, use of headings, paragraphing, etc.) aid or reduce
their clarity?
Would the proposed regulations be easier to understand if
we divided them into more (but shorter) sections? (A ``section'' is
preceded by the symbol ``Sec. '' and a numbered heading: For example,
Sec. 361.1 Purpose.)
Could the description of the proposed regulations in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
[[Page 21098]]
this preamble be more helpful in making the proposed regulations easier
to understand? If so, how?
What else could we do to make the proposed regulations
easier to understand?
To send any comments that concern how the Department could make
these proposed regulations easier to understand, see the instructions
in the ADDRESSES section.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
The Secretary certifies that these proposed regulations would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The 80 entities that administer the VR program and Supported
Employment program are State agencies, including those in the 50
States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the
United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. States and State agencies
are not defined as ``small entities'' in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, the Department provides the general public and Federal agencies
with an opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing collections
of information in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This helps ensure that: The public
understands the Department's collection instructions, respondents can
provide the requested data in the desired format, reporting burden
(time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are
clearly understood, and the Department can properly assess the impact
of collection requirements on respondents.
The following sections contain information collection requirements:
Sections 361.10, 361.12, 361.13, 361.15, 361.16, 361.17,
361.18, 361.19, 361.20, 361.21, 361.22, 361.23, 361.24, 361.25, 361.26,
361.27, 361.29, 361.30, 361.31, 361.32, 361.34, 361.35, 361.36, 361.37,
361.40, 361.46, 361.51, 361.52, 361.53, and 361.55, as well as
Sec. Sec. 363.10 and 363.11, pertaining to the VR services portion of
the Unified or Combined State Plan and Supplement for Supported
Employment Services; and
Sections 361.40 and 363.52, related to the VR program Case
Service Report.
As a result of the amendments to the Act made by WIOA, we propose
changes to some of these sections and their corresponding information
collection requirements. Under the PRA the Department has submitted a
copy of these sections to OMB for its review.
A Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless OMB approves the collection under the PRA and the
corresponding information collection instrument displays a currently
valid OMB control number. Notwithstanding any other provision of law,
no person is required to comply with, or is subject to penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information if the collection
instrument does not display a currently valid OMB control number. In
the final regulations, we will display the OMB control numbers assigned
by OMB to any information collection requirement proposed in this NPRM
and adopted in the final regulations, including: 1820-0013 (Cumulative
Case Report), 1820-0017 (Annual Vocational Rehabilitation Program/Cost
Report), 1820-0500 (VR State Plan), 1820-0508 (VR Case Service Report),
1820-0563 (Annual Report of Appeals), 1820-0693 (Program Improvement
Plan), and 1820-0694 (VR Program Corrective Action Plan).
VR Services Portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan and
Supplement for Supported Employment Services (1820-0500)
Section 101(a) of the Act, as amended by WIOA, adds new content
requirements to the State plan, which is now to be submitted as the
vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan under section 102 or 103 of title I of WIOA. As a result,
proposed Sec. Sec. 361.10, 361.18, 361.24, 361.29, and 361.36, along
with proposed Sec. Sec. 363.10 and 363.11, would cause substantive
changes to the active and OMB-approved data collection under 1820-0500
(VR State Plan). In addition, the VR State Plan form includes
previously approved information collection requirements related to a
number of current regulations that remain unchanged as a result of the
amendments to the Act. There are also several proposed regulations
related to this data collection that necessitate primarily conforming
or technical changes to the form.
These current and proposed sections that contain already approved
information collection requirements or that do not cause substantive
changes to the form include: Sec. Sec. 361.12, 361.13, 361.15, 361.16,
361.17, 361.19, 361.20, 361.21, 361.22, 361.23, 361.25, 361.26, 361.27,
361.30, 361.31, 361.34, 361.35, 361.37, 361.40, 361.46, 361.51, 361.52,
361.53, and 361.55. The proposed regulations and other adjustments
described here would change the current OMB-approved annual aggregate
burden of 1,002,000 hours at $22.00 per hour and estimated total annual
costs of $22,044,000.00 for all 80 respondents.
The currently OMB-approved estimated annual burden of 1,002,000
hours for all 80 VR agencies includes a total of 2,000 hours (25 hours
per agency) for the preparation and submission of the VR State Plan and
a total of 1,000,000 hours (12,500 hours per agency) for record keeping
associated with the case management of the individuals who apply for
and receive services from the VR program, and Supported Employment
program. However, we have determined that the time associated with this
record keeping (1,000,000 hours annually for all 80 respondents) is
part of the customary and usual business practices carried out by VR
agencies, and thus, should not be included in the estimated annual
burden for this form.
As previously stated there are a number of proposed regulations in
parts 361 and 363 that necessitate substantive changes to the State
plan. The most significant of these changes is in proposed Sec. 361.10
and would require VR agencies to submit the VR services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan to be eligible to receive Federal VR
program funds. Proposed Sec. 361.18 would require the VR services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan to describe the
procedures and activities the State agency will take to ensure it
employs qualified rehabilitation personnel, including the minimum
academic and experience requirements as amended by WIOA. Proposed Sec.
361.24 would require VR agencies to describe their coordination with
employers to increase awareness and employment opportunities for
individuals with disabilities, as well as coordination with non-
educational agencies serving out-of-school youth, and the lead agency
and implementing entity for the coordination of activities available
under section 4 of the Assistive Technology Act of 1998. Proposed Sec.
361.24 also would require VR agencies to describe in the plan their
collaboration, to develop opportunities for community-based employment
in integrated settings, to the greatest extent practicable, with the
State agency responsible for administering the State Medicaid plan
under title XIX of the Social Security Act, agencies providing services
and supports for individuals with developmental disabilities, and the
State agency responsible for providing mental health services. Proposed
Sec. 361.29 would require VR agencies to include in the VR services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan the
[[Page 21099]]
results of the comprehensive statewide assessment regarding the needs
of students and youth with disabilities for pre-employment transition
services and other transition services. In addition, proposed Sec.
361.29 would require the plan to include an estimate of the number of
eligible individuals who are not receiving VR services due to the
implementation of an order of selection. This proposed section also
would require the plan to contain strategies to improve VR services for
students and youth with disabilities, to address their needs as
identified through the statewide needs assessment, and to provide pre-
employment transition services. Proposed Sec. 361.36 would require VR
agencies implementing an order of selection to indicate in the plan if
they elect to provide services or equipment to individuals with
disabilities to enable them to maintain employment, regardless of
whether these individuals are receiving services under the order.
There are also proposed regulations in part 363 governing the State
Supported Employment Services program that necessitate changes to the
VR State Plan form. Proposed Sec. 363.10 would require the State to
submit with the VR services portion of the Unified or Combined State
Plan a supplement that meets the requirements of Sec. 363.11 to
receive a grant under the State Supported Employment Services program.
Proposed Sec. 363.11 would require the VR services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan to describe the quality, scope, and
extent of supported employment services to eligible individuals
(including youth with the most significant disabilities), the State's
goals and priorities with respect to the distribution of funds received
under this section, the provision of extended services for a period not
to exceed four years, and an assurance to expend no more than 2.5
percent of the award under this part for administrative costs.
The regulations proposed under these sections of parts 361 and 363
would increase the time needed by each VR agency to prepare and submit
the VR services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan and its
supported employment supplement from 25 to 30 hours annually.
In addition, the total cost of this data collection may increase
due to the proposed adjustment to the average hourly wage rate of State
personnel used to estimate the annual burden for this data collection
from $22.00 to $39.78, so that wage rates are consistent with data
reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
In summary, our new information collection estimate for the VR
State plan reflects the removal of the burden associated with the
maintenance of case management records for individuals served through
the VR program and Supported Employment program, adjustment of the
average hourly wage rate for State VR personnel responsible for
preparing the VR State plan form, and the increase in the estimated
number of hours needed to prepare and submit this data collection due
to proposed regulatory changes. As a result of these changes, we
estimate a total annual burden of 2,400 hours (30 hours for each of the
80 respondents), at $39.78 per hour, for a total annual cost of
$95,472.00.
VR Case Service Report 1820-0508
The VR Case Service Report is used to collect annual individual
level data on the individuals that have exited the VR program,
including individuals receiving services with funds provided under the
Supported Employment program. Sections 101(a)(10) and 606 of the Act
contain data reporting requirements under the VR program and Supported
Employment program, respectively. WIOA amends these sections to require
States to report additional data describing the individuals served and
the services provided through these programs. In addition, WIOA amends
section 106 of the Act by eliminating the current VR evaluation
standards and indicators and requiring that the standards and
indicators used to assess the performance of the VR program be
consistent with the performance accountability measures for the core
programs of the workforce development system established under section
116 of WIOA. Consequently, we propose changes to Sec. Sec. 361.40 and
363.52 that would cause substantive changes to the active and OMB-
approved data collection under 1820-0508--the VR Case Service Report
(RSA-911). Specifically the proposed regulations described here would
change the current OMB-approved annual aggregate burden of 4,000 hours
at $40.00 per hour and estimated total annual costs of $160,000.00 for
all 80 respondents.
The most significant proposed change to this data collection
affects the time at which data is collected as well as the frequency
with which data is collected. Under the current approved form, VR
agencies annually report data on each individual whose case file is
closed after exiting the VR program in that fiscal year. However, new
statutory requirements would necessitate the reporting of data for both
current program participants (open service records), as well as
individuals who have exited the program (closed records) on a quarterly
basis. Specifically, proposed Sec. 361.40 would require a State to
ensure in the VR services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan
that it will submit reports, including reports required under sections
13, 14, and 101(a)(10) of the Act. New reporting requirements under
section 101(a)(10)(C) of the Act include data on the number of:
Individuals currently receiving services (open records) and the types
of services they are receiving, students with disabilities receiving
pre-employment transition services, and individuals referred to the
State VR program by one-stop operators and those referred to such one-
stop operators by the State VR program. In addition, proposed Sec.
363.52 would require States to report separately data regarding
eligible youth receiving supported employment services under parts 361
and 363.
Proposed Sec. 361.40 also would require States to report the data
necessary to assess VR agency performance on the standards and
indicators subject to the performance accountability provisions
described in section 116 of WIOA. The common performance accountability
measures established under section 116 of WIOA apply to all core
programs of the workforce development system and will be implemented in
joint regulations set forth in subpart E of part 361.
Because these new requirements would necessitate the reporting of
data for both current program participants (open service records) as
well as individuals who have exited the program (closed service
records) on a quarterly basis, estimated data collection and reporting
burden will increase. However, we propose to reduce the burden to
respondents by eliminating redundant elements and reorganizing some
existing elements of the form. The regulations proposed under this
section will increase the total annual burden for the 80 respondents by
4,000 hours. We estimate the total annual reporting burden to be 8,000
hours at $33.63 per hour (a rate more consistent with the rate reported
through the Bureau of Labor Statistics for State-employed database
administrators), for a total annual cost of $269,040.00.
Related OMB-Approved Data Collections That Remain Unchanged
The regulations proposed through this NPRM do not cause substantive
changes to the OMB-approved annual burden, respondents, or costs for
the following OMB-approved data collections:
[[Page 21100]]
1820-0013 Cumulative Caseload Report
In the Cumulative Caseload Report State VR agencies report
cumulative aggregate data on individuals served in the various stages
of the VR process and services provided. Proposed regulations related
to this data collection would not cause substantive changes to the
current OMB-approved annual burden of 320 annual burden hours at $30.00
per hour with 80 respondents reporting quarterly for a total of 320
responses, and total annual costs of $9,600.00.
1820-0017 Annual Vocational Rehabilitation Program/Cost Report
Proposed regulations related to this data collection would not
cause substantive changes to the current OMB-approved annual burden of
320 annual burden hours at $30.00 per hour with 80 respondents and
annual costs of $9,600.00.
1820-0563 Annual Report of Appeals
In this report, State VR agencies submit data on the number of
individuals who have requested appeals for decisions made by the DSU
pertaining to the provision of services, the types of dispute
resolutions used to resolve these appeals, and the outcomes of these
appeals. Proposed regulations related to this data collection would not
cause substantive changes to the current OMB-approved annual burden of
160 annual burden hours at $30.00 per hour with 80 respondents and
annual costs of $4,800.00.
1820-0693 Performance Improvement Plan (PIP)
A Performance Improvement Plan is developed when a VR agency has
failed to achieve the required performance level for the evaluation
standards and indicators established under section 106 of the Act.
Proposed regulations related to this data collection would not cause
substantive changes to the current OMB-approved annual burden of 125
annual burden hours at $30.00 per hour with 5 respondents reporting
quarterly for a total of 20 responses, and annual costs of $3,750.00.
1820-0694 VR Program Corrective Action Plan
A Corrective Action Plan is required when a DSU is found to be out
of compliance with the Federal requirements governing the
administration of the VR program through monitoring activities engaged
in pursuant to section 107 of the Act. Proposed regulations related to
this data collection would not cause substantive changes to the current
OMB-approved annual burden of 975 annual burden hours at $30.00 per
hour with 15 respondents reporting quarterly for a total of 60
responses, and annual costs of $29,250.00.
Note that in accordance with the Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal
Awards published at 2 CFR 200, we require an authorized certifying
official for each data collection to certify that the data is true,
accurate and complete to the best of his or her knowledge or belief.
This requirement does not cause any change to the estimated annual
burden related to the preparation and submission of the data
collections described in this section of the NPRM.
We have prepared an Information Collection Request (ICR) for these
collections. If you want to review and comment on the ICR please follow
the instructions listed under the ADDRESSES section of this notice.
Please note the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OMB) and
the Department review all comments on an ICR that are posted at
www.regulations.gov. In preparing your comments you may want to review
the ICR in www.regulations.gov or in www.reginfo.gov. The comment
period will run concurrently with the comment period of the NPRM. When
commenting on the information collection requirements, we consider your
comments on these collections of information in--
Deciding whether the collections are necessary for the
proper performance of our functions, including whether the information
will have practical use;
Evaluating the accuracy of our estimate of the burden of
the collections, including the validity of our methodology and
assumptions;
Enhancing the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the
information we collect; and
Minimizing the burden on those who must respond.
This includes exploring the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques.
OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collections of
information contained in these regulations between 30 and 60 days after
publication of this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, to
ensure that OMB gives your comments full consideration, it is important
that OMB receives your comments by May 18, 2015. This does not affect
the deadline for your comments to us on the proposed regulations.
ADDRESSES: Comments submitted in response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov by selecting Docket ID ED-2015-OSERS-0001 or via
postal mail commercial delivery, or hand delivery. Please specify the
Docket ID number and indicate ``Information Collection Comments'' on
the top of your comments if your comment relates to the information
collection for this rule. Written requests for information or comments
submitted by postal mail or delivery should be addressed to the
Director of the Information Collection Clearance Division, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Mailstop L-OM-2-
2E319LBJ, Room 2E115, Washington, DC 20202-4537. Comments submitted by
fax or email and those submitted after the comment period will not be
accepted. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Electronically mail
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Please do not send comments here.
Intergovernmental Review
These programs are subject to Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the Executive
order is to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened
federalism. The Executive order relies on processes developed by State
and local governments for coordination and review of proposed Federal
financial assistance.
This document provides early notification of our specific plans and
actions for these programs.
Assessment of Educational Impact
In accordance with section 411 of the General Education Provisions
Act, 20 U.S.C. 1221e-4, the Secretary particularly requests comments on
whether these proposed regulations would require transmission of
information that any other agency or authority of the United States
gathers or makes available.
Federalism
Executive Order 13132 requires us to ensure meaningful and timely
input by State and local elected officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have federalism implications. ``Federalism
implications'' means substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. The proposed regulations in Sec. Sec. 361, 363, and 397
may
[[Page 21101]]
have federalism implications. We encourage State and local elected
officials to review and provide comments on these proposed regulations.
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or compact disc) on request to the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well
as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF
you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the
site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers:
84.126A State Vocational Rehabilitation Services program; and 84.187
State Supported Employment Services program)
List of Subjects
34 CFR Part 361
Administrative practice and procedure, Grant programs-education,
Grant programs-social programs, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Vocational rehabilitation.
34 CFR Part 363
Grant programs-education, Grant programs-social programs, Manpower
training programs, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, and
Vocational rehabilitation.
34 CFR Part 397
Individuals with disabilities, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Students, Vocational rehabilitation, Youth.
Dated: March 6, 2015.
Arne Duncan,
Secretary of Education.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Secretary of
Education proposes to amend title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations
as follows:
0
1. Part 361 is revised to read as follows:
PART 361--STATE VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION SERVICES PROGRAM
Subpart A--General
Sec.
361.1 Purpose.
361.2 Eligibility for a grant.
361.3 Authorized activities.
361.4 Applicable regulations.
361.5 Applicable definitions.
Subpart B--State Plan and Other Requirements for Vocational
Rehabilitation Services
361.10 Submission, approval, and disapproval of the State plan.
361.11 Withholding of funds.
Administration
361.12 Methods of administration.
361.13 State agency for administration.
361.14 Substitute State agency.
361.15 Local administration.
361.16 Establishment of an independent commission or a State
Rehabilitation Council.
361.17 Requirements for a State Rehabilitation Council.
361.18 Comprehensive system of personnel development.
361.19 Affirmative action for individuals with disabilities.
361.20 Public participation requirements.
361.21 Consultations regarding the administration of the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State
Plan.
361.22 Coordination with education officials.
361.23 Requirements related to the statewide workforce development
system.
361.24 Cooperation and coordination with other entities.
361.25 Statewideness.
361.26 Waiver of statewideness.
361.27 Shared funding and administration of joint programs.
361.28 Third-party cooperative arrangements involving funds from
other public agencies.
361.29 Statewide assessment; annual estimates; annual State goals
and priorities; strategies; and progress reports.
361.30 Services to American Indians.
361.31 Cooperative agreements with private nonprofit organizations.
361.32 Provision of training and services for employers.
361.33 [Reserved]
361.34 Supported employment State plan supplement.
361.35 Innovation and expansion activities.
361.36 Ability to serve all eligible individuals; order of selection
for services.
361.37 Information and referral programs.
361.38 Protection, use, and release of personal information.
361.39 State-imposed requirements.
361.40 Reports; Evaluation standards and performance indicators.
Provision and Scope of Services
361.41 Processing referrals and applications.
361.42 Assessment for determining eligibility and priority for
services.
361.43 Procedures for ineligibility determination.
361.44 Closure without eligibility determination.
361.45 Development of the individualized plan for employment.
361.46 Content of the individualized plan for employment.
361.47 Record of services.
361.48 Scope of vocational rehabilitation services for individuals
with disabilities.
361.49 Scope of vocational rehabilitation services for groups of
individuals with disabilities.
361.50 Written policies governing the provision of services for
individuals with disabilities.
361.51 Standards for facilities and providers of services.
361.52 Informed choice.
361.53 Comparable services and benefits.
361.54 Participation of individuals in cost of services based on
financial need.
361.55 Annual review of individuals in extended employment and other
employment under special certificate provisions of the Fair Labor
Standards Act.
361.56 Requirements for closing the record of services of an
individual who has achieved an employment outcome.
361.57 Review of determinations made by designated State unit
personnel.
Subpart C--Financing of State Vocational Rehabilitation Programs
361.60 Matching requirements.
361.61 Limitation on use of funds for construction expenditures.
361.62 Maintenance of effort requirements.
361.63 Program income.
361.64 Obligation of Federal funds.
361.65 Allotment and payment of Federal funds for vocational
rehabilitation services.
Subpart D--[Reserved]
Subpart E--[Reserved]
Subpart F--[Reserved]
Authority: Section 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c), unless otherwise noted.
Subpart A--General
Sec. 361.1 Purpose.
Under the State Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program, the
Secretary provides grants to assist States in operating statewide
comprehensive, coordinated, effective, efficient, and accountable
vocational rehabilitation programs, each of which is--
(a) An integral part of a statewide workforce development system;
and
(b) Designed to assess, plan, develop, and provide vocational
rehabilitation services for individuals with
[[Page 21102]]
disabilities, consistent with their unique strengths, resources,
priorities, concerns, abilities, capabilities, interests, and informed
choice so that they may prepare for and engage in competitive
integrated employment and achieve economic self-sufficiency.
(Authority: Section 100(a) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 720(a))
Sec. 361.2 Eligibility for a grant.
Any State that submits to the Secretary a vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan that meets the
requirements of section 101(a) of the Act and this part is eligible for
a grant under this program.
(Authority: Section 101(a) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 721(a))
Sec. 361.3 Authorized activities.
The Secretary makes payments to a State to assist in--
(a) The costs of providing vocational rehabilitation services under
the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan; and
(b) Administrative costs under the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan.
(Authority: Section 111(a)(1) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 731(a)(1))
Sec. 361.4 Applicable regulations.
The following regulations apply to this program:
(a) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations
(EDGAR) as follows:
(1) 34 CFR part 76 (State-Administered Programs).
(2) 34 CFR part 77 (Definitions that Apply to Department
Regulations).
(3) 34 CFR part 79 (Intergovernmental Review of Department of
Education Programs and Activities).
(4) 34 CFR part 81 (General Education Provisions Act--Enforcement).
(5) 34 CFR part 82 (New Restrictions on Lobbying).
(b) The regulations in this part 361.
(c) 2 CFR part 190 (OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide
Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement)) as adopted in 2 CFR part
3485.
(d) 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards) as adopted in 2
CFR part 3474.
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c))
Sec. 361.5 Applicable definitions.
The following definitions apply to this part:
(a) Definitions in EDGAR 77.1.
(b) Definitions in 2 CFR part 200 subpart A.
(c) The following definitions:
(1) Act means the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C.
701 et seq.).
(2) Administrative costs under the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan means
expenditures incurred in the performance of administrative functions
under the vocational rehabilitation program carried out under this
part, including expenses related to program planning, development,
monitoring, and evaluation, including, but not limited to, expenses
for--
(i) Quality assurance;
(ii) Budgeting, accounting, financial management, information
systems, and related data processing;
(iii) Providing information about the program to the public;
(iv) Technical assistance and support services to other State
agencies, private nonprofit organizations, and businesses and
industries, except for technical assistance and support services
described in Sec. 361.49(a)(4);
(v) The State Rehabilitation Council and other advisory committees;
(vi) Professional organization membership dues for designated State
unit employees;
(vii) The removal of architectural barriers in State vocational
rehabilitation agency offices and State-operated rehabilitation
facilities;
(viii) Operating and maintaining designated State unit facilities,
equipment, and grounds, but not including capital expenditures as
defined in 2 CFR 200.13;
(ix) Supplies;
(x) Administration of the comprehensive system of personnel
development described in Sec. 361.18, including personnel
administration, administration of affirmative action plans, and
training and staff development;
(xi) Administrative salaries, including clerical and other support
staff salaries, in support of these administrative functions;
(xii) Travel costs related to carrying out the program, other than
travel costs related to the provision of services;
(xiii) Costs incurred in conducting reviews of determinations made
by personnel of the designated State unit, including costs associated
with mediation and impartial due process hearings under Sec. 361.57;
and
(xiv) Legal expenses required in the administration of the program.
(Authority: Sections 7(1) and 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(1) and 709(c))
(3) Applicant means an individual who submits an application for
vocational rehabilitation services in accordance with Sec.
361.41(b)(2).
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c))
(4) Appropriate modes of communication means specialized aids and
supports that enable an individual with a disability to comprehend and
respond to information that is being communicated. Appropriate modes of
communication include, but are not limited to, the use of interpreters,
open and closed captioned videos, specialized telecommunications
services and audio recordings, Brailled and large print materials,
materials in electronic formats, augmentative communication devices,
graphic presentations, and simple language materials.
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c))
(5) Assessment for determining eligibility and vocational
rehabilitation needs means, as appropriate in each case--
(i)(A) A review of existing data--
(1) To determine if an individual is eligible for vocational
rehabilitation services; and
(2) To assign priority for an order of selection described in Sec.
361.36 in the States that use an order of selection; and
(B) To the extent necessary, the provision of appropriate
assessment activities to obtain necessary additional data to make the
eligibility determination and assignment;
(ii) To the extent additional data are necessary to make a
determination of the employment outcomes and the nature and scope of
vocational rehabilitation services to be included in the individualized
plan for employment of an eligible individual, a comprehensive
assessment to determine the unique strengths, resources, priorities,
concerns, abilities, capabilities, interests, and informed choice,
including the need for supported employment, of the eligible
individual. This comprehensive assessment--
(A) Is limited to information that is necessary to identify the
rehabilitation needs of the individual and to develop the
individualized plan of employment of the eligible individual;
(B) Uses as a primary source of information, to the maximum extent
possible and appropriate and in
[[Page 21103]]
accordance with confidentiality requirements--
(1) Existing information obtained for the purposes of determining
the eligibility of the individual and assigning priority for an order
of selection described in Sec. 361.36 for the individual; and
(2) Information that can be provided by the individual and, if
appropriate, by the family of the individual;
(C) May include, to the degree needed to make such a determination,
an assessment of the personality, interests, interpersonal skills,
intelligence and related functional capacities, educational
achievements, work experience, vocational aptitudes, personal and
social adjustments, and employment opportunities of the individual and
the medical, psychiatric, psychological, and other pertinent
vocational, educational, cultural, social, recreational, and
environmental factors that affect the employment and rehabilitation
needs of the individual;
(D) May include, to the degree needed, an appraisal of the patterns
of work behavior of the individual and services needed for the
individual to acquire occupational skills and to develop work
attitudes, work habits, work tolerance, and social and behavior
patterns necessary for successful job performance, including the use of
work in real job situations to assess and develop the capacities of the
individual to perform adequately in a work environment; and
(E) To the maximum extent possible, relies on information obtained
from experiences in integrated employment settings in the community and
in other integrated community settings;
(iii) Referral, for the provision of rehabilitation technology
services to the individual, to assess and develop the capacities of the
individual to perform in a work environment; and
(iv) An exploration of the individual's abilities, capabilities,
and capacity to perform in work situations, which must be assessed
periodically during trial work experiences, including experiences in
which the individual is provided appropriate supports and training.
(Authority: Sections 7(2) and 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(2) and 709(c))
(6) Assistive technology terms.
(i) Assistive technology has the meaning given such term in section
3 of the Assistive Technology Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 3002).
(ii) Assistive technology device has the meaning given such term in
section 3 of the Assistive Technology Act of 1998, except that the
reference in such section to the term individuals with disabilities
will be deemed to mean more than one individual with a disability as
defined in paragraph (20)(A) of the Act.
(iii) Assistive technology service has the meaning given such term
in section 3 of the Assistive Technology Act of 1998, except that the
reference in such section to the term--
(A) Individual with a disability will be deemed to mean an
individual with a disability, as defined in paragraph (20)(A) of the
Act; and
(B) Individuals with disabilities will be deemed to mean more than
one such individual.
(Authority: Sections 7(3) and 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(3) and 709(c))
(7) Community rehabilitation program (i) Community rehabilitation
program means a program that provides directly or facilitates the
provision of one or more of the following vocational rehabilitation
services to individuals with disabilities to enable those individuals
to maximize their opportunities for employment, including career
advancement:
(A) Medical, psychiatric, psychological, social, and vocational
services that are provided under one management.
(B) Testing, fitting, or training in the use of prosthetic and
orthotic devices.
(C) Recreational therapy.
(D) Physical and occupational therapy.
(E) Speech, language, and hearing therapy.
(F) Psychiatric, psychological, and social services, including
positive behavior management.
(G) Assessment for determining eligibility and vocational
rehabilitation needs.
(H) Rehabilitation technology.
(I) Job development, placement, and retention services.
(J) Evaluation or control of specific disabilities.
(K) Orientation and mobility services for individuals who are
blind.
(L) Extended employment.
(M) Psychosocial rehabilitation services.
(N) Supported employment services and extended services.
(O) Customized employment.
(P) Services to family members if necessary to enable the applicant
or eligible individual to achieve an employment outcome.
(Q) Personal assistance services.
(R) Services similar to the services described in paragraphs (A)
through (Q) of this definition.
(ii) For the purposes of this definition, program means an agency,
organization, or institution, or unit of an agency, organization, or
institution, that provides directly or facilitates the provision of
vocational rehabilitation services as one of its major functions.
(Authority: Section 7(4) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(4))
(8) Comparable services and benefits. (i) Comparable services and
benefits means services and benefits, including accommodations and
auxiliary aids and services, that are--
(A) Provided or paid for, in whole or in part, by other Federal,
State, or local public agencies, by health insurance, or by employee
benefits;
(B) Available to the individual at the time needed to ensure the
progress of the individual toward achieving the employment outcome in
the individual's individualized plan for employment in accordance with
Sec. 361.53; and
(C) Commensurate to the services that the individual would
otherwise receive from the designated State vocational rehabilitation
agency.
(ii) For the purposes of this definition, comparable services and
benefits do not include awards and scholarships based on merit.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(8) of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a)(8))
(9) Competitive integrated employment means work that--
(i) Is performed on a full-time or part-time basis (including self-
employment) and for which an individual is compensated at a rate that--
(A) Is not less than the higher of the rate specified in section
6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1))
or the rate required under in the applicable State or local minimum
wage law;
(B) Is not less than the customary rate paid by the employer for
the same or similar work performed by other employees who are not
individuals with disabilities and who are similarly situated in similar
occupations by the same employer and who have similar training,
experience, and skills; and
(C) In the case of an individual who is self-employed, yields an
income that is comparable to the income received by other individuals
who are not individuals with disabilities and who are self-employed in
similar occupations or on similar tasks and who have similar training,
experience, and skills; and
(D) Is eligible for the level of benefits provided to other
employees; and
(ii) Is at a location--
[[Page 21104]]
(A) Typically found in the community; and
(B) Where the employee with a disability interacts for the purpose
of performing the duties of the position with other employees within
the particular work unit and the entire work site, and, as appropriate
to the work performed, other persons (e.g., customers and vendors), who
are not individuals with disabilities (not including supervisory
personnel or individuals who are providing services to such employee)
to the same extent that employees who are not individuals with
disabilities and who are in comparable positions interact with these
persons; and
(iii) Presents, as appropriate, opportunities for advancement that
are similar to those for other employees who are not individuals with
disabilities and who have similar positions.
(Authority: Sections 7(5) and 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(5) and 709(c))
(10) Construction of a facility for a public or nonprofit community
rehabilitation program means--
(i) The acquisition of land in connection with the construction of
a new building for a community rehabilitation program;
(ii) The construction of new buildings;
(iii) The acquisition of existing buildings;
(iv) The expansion, remodeling, alteration, or renovation of
existing buildings;
(v) Architect's fees, site surveys, and soil investigation, if
necessary, in connection with the acquisition of land or existing
buildings, or the and construction, expansion, remodeling, or
alteration of community rehabilitation facilities;
(vi) The acquisition of initial fixed or movable equipment of any
new, newly acquired, newly expanded, newly remodeled, newly altered, or
newly renovated buildings that are to be used for community
rehabilitation program purposes; and
(vii) Other direct expenditures appropriate to the construction
project, except costs of off-site improvements.
(Authority: Sections 7(6) and 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(6) and 709(c))
(11) Customized employment means competitive integrated employment,
for an individual with a significant disability, that is--
(i) Based on an individualized determination of the unique
strengths, needs, and interests of the individual with a significant
disability;
(ii) Designed to meet the specific abilities of the individual with
a significant disability and the business needs of the employer; and
(iii) Carried out through flexible strategies, such as--
(A) Job exploration by the individual; and
(B) Working with an employer to facilitate placement, including--
(1) Customizing a job description based on current employer needs
or on previously unidentified and unmet employer needs;
(2) Developing a set of job duties, a work schedule and job
arrangement, and specifics of supervision (including performance
evaluation and review), and determining a job location;
(3) Using a professional representative chosen by the individual,
or if elected self-representation, to work with an employer to
facilitate placement; and
(4) Providing services and supports at the job location.
(Authority: Section 7(7) and 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(7) and 709(c))
(12) Designated State agency or State agency means the sole State
agency, designated, in accordance with Sec. 361.13(a), to administer,
or supervise the local administration of, the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan. The term
includes the State agency for individuals who are blind, if designated
as the sole State agency with respect to that part of the Unified or
Combined State Plan relating to the vocational rehabilitation of
individuals who are blind.
(Authority: Sections 7(8)(A) and 101(a)(2)(A) of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(8)(A) and 721(a)(2)(A))
(13) Designated State unit or State unit means either--
(i) The State vocational rehabilitation bureau, division, or other
organizational unit that is primarily concerned with vocational
rehabilitation or vocational and other rehabilitation of individuals
with disabilities and that is responsible for the administration of the
vocational rehabilitation program of the State agency, as required
under Sec. 361.13(b); or
(ii) The State agency that is primarily concerned with vocational
rehabilitation or vocational and other rehabilitation of individuals
with disabilities.
(Authority: Sections 7(8)(B) and 101(a)(2)(B) of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(8)(B) and 721(a)(2)(B))
(14) Eligible individual means an applicant for vocational
rehabilitation services who meets the eligibility requirements of Sec.
361.42(a).
(Authority: Sections 7(20)(A) and 102(a)(1) of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(20)(A) and 722(a)(1))
(15) Employment outcome means, with respect to an individual,
entering, advancing in, or retaining full-time or, if appropriate,
part-time competitive integrated employment, as defined in Sec.
361.5(c)(9) (including customized employment, self-employment,
telecommuting, or business ownership), or supported employment, that is
consistent with an individual's unique strengths, resources,
priorities, concerns, abilities, capabilities, interests, and informed
choice.
(Authority: Sections 7(11), 12(c), 100(a), and 102(b)(3)(A) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(11), 709(c),
720(a), and 722(b)(4)(A))
(16) Establishment, development, or improvement of a public or
nonprofit community rehabilitation program means--
(i) The establishment of a facility for a public or nonprofit
community rehabilitation program, as defined in paragraph (c)(17) of
this section, to provide vocational rehabilitation services to
applicants or eligible individuals;
(ii) Staffing, if necessary to establish, develop, or improve a
public or nonprofit community rehabilitation program for the purpose of
providing vocational rehabilitation services to applicants or eligible
individuals, for a maximum period of four years, with Federal financial
participation available at the applicable matching rate for the
following levels of staffing costs:
(A) 100 percent of staffing costs for the first year;
(B) 75 percent of staffing costs for the second year;
(C) 60 percent of staffing costs for the third year; and
(D) 45 percent of staffing costs for the fourth year; and
(iii) Other expenditures and activities related to the
establishment, development, or improvement of a public or nonprofit
community rehabilitation program that are necessary to make the program
functional or increase its effectiveness in providing vocational
rehabilitation services to applicants or eligible individuals, but are
not ongoing operating expenses of the program.
(Authority: Sections 7(12) and 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(12) and 709(c))
[[Page 21105]]
(17) Establishment of a facility for a public or nonprofit
community rehabilitation program means--
(i) The acquisition of an existing building and, if necessary, the
land in connection with the acquisition, if the building has been
completed in all respects for at least one year prior to the date of
acquisition and the Federal share of the cost of acquisition is not
more than $300,000;
(ii) The remodeling or alteration of an existing building, provided
the estimated cost of remodeling or alteration does not exceed the
appraised value of the existing building;
(iii) The expansion of an existing building, provided that--
(A) The existing building is complete in all respects;
(B) The total size in square footage of the expanded building,
notwithstanding the number of expansions, is not greater than twice the
size of the existing building;
(C) The expansion is joined structurally to the existing building
and does not constitute a separate building; and
(D) The costs of the expansion do not exceed the appraised value of
the existing building;
(iv) Architect's fees, site survey, and soil investigation, if
necessary in connection with the acquisition, remodeling, alteration,
or expansion of an existing building; and
(v) The acquisition of fixed or movable equipment, including the
costs of installation of the equipment, if necessary to establish,
develop, or improve a community rehabilitation program.
(Authority: Sections 7(12) and 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(12) and 709(c))
(18) Extended employment means work in a non-integrated or
sheltered setting for a public or private nonprofit agency or
organization that provides compensation in accordance with the Fair
Labor Standards Act.
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c))
(19) Extended services means ongoing support services and other
appropriate services that are--
(i) Needed to support and maintain an individual with a most
significant disability including a youth with a most significant
disability, in supported employment;
(ii) Organized or made available, singly or in combination, in such
a way as to assist an eligible individual in maintaining supported
employment;
(iii) Based on the needs of an eligible individual, as specified in
an individualized plan for employment;
(iv) Provided by a State agency, a private nonprofit organization,
employer, or any other appropriate resource, after an individual has
made the transition from support from the designated State unit; and
(v) Provided to youth with the most significant disabilities by the
designated State unit in accordance with requirements set forth in this
part and part 363 for a period not to exceed 4 years. The designated
State unit may not provide extended services to individuals with the
most significant disabilities who are not youth with the most
significant disabilities.
(Authority: Sections 7(13), 12(c), and 604(b) of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(13), 709(c) and 795i)
(20) Extreme medical risk means a probability of substantially
increasing functional impairment or death if medical services,
including mental health services, are not provided expeditiously.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(8)(A)(i)(III) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and
721(a)(8)(A)(i)(III))
(21) Fair hearing board means a committee, body, or group of
persons established by a State prior to January 1, 1985, that--
(i) Is authorized under State law to review determinations made by
personnel of the designated State unit that affect the provision of
vocational rehabilitation services; and
(ii) Carries out the responsibilities of the impartial hearing
officer in accordance with the requirements in Sec. 361.57(j).
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 102(c)(6) of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 722(c)(6))
(22) Family member, for purposes of receiving vocational
rehabilitation services in accordance with Sec. 361.48(b)(9), means an
individual--
(i) Who either--
(A) Is a relative or guardian of an applicant or eligible
individual; or
(B) Lives in the same household as an applicant or eligible
individual;
(ii) Who has a substantial interest in the well-being of that
individual; and
(iii) Whose receipt of vocational rehabilitation services is
necessary to enable the applicant or eligible individual to achieve an
employment outcome.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 103(a)(19) of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 723(a)(19))
(23) Governor means a chief executive officer of a State.
(Authority: Section 7(15) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(15))
(24) Impartial hearing officer. (i) Impartial hearing officer means
an individual who--
(A) Is not an employee of a public agency (other than an
administrative law judge, hearing examiner, or employee of an
institution of higher education);
(B) Is not a member of the State Rehabilitation Council for the
designated State unit;
(C) Has not been involved previously in the vocational
rehabilitation of the applicant or eligible individual;
(D) Has knowledge of the delivery of vocational rehabilitation
services, the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified
or Combined State Plan, and the Federal and State regulations governing
the provision of services;
(E) Has received training with respect to the performance of
official duties; and
(F) Has no personal, professional, or financial interest that could
affect the objectivity of the individual.
(ii) An individual is not considered to be an employee of a public
agency for the purposes of this definition solely because the
individual is paid by the agency to serve as a hearing officer.
(Authority: Section 7(16) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(16))
(25) Indian; American Indian; Indian American; Indian Tribe.
(i) In general. The terms ``Indian'', ``American Indian'', and
``Indian American'' mean an individual who is a member of an Indian
tribe and include a Native and a descendant of a Native, as such terms
are defined in subsections (b) and (c) of section 3 of the Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1602).
(ii) Indian tribe. The term ``Indian tribe'' means any Federal or
State Indian tribe, band, rancheria, pueblo, colony, or community,
including any Alaskan native village or regional village corporation
(as defined in or established pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act) and a tribal organization (as defined in section 4(1)
of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25
U.S.C. 450(b)(1)).
(Authority: Section 7(19) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(19))
(26) Individual who is blind means a person who is blind within the
meaning of applicable State law.
[[Page 21106]]
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c))
(27) Individual with a disability, except as provided in paragraph
(c)(28)of this section, means an individual--
(i) Who has a physical or mental impairment;
(ii) Whose impairment constitutes or results in a substantial
impediment to employment; and
(iii) Who can benefit in terms of an employment outcome from the
provision of vocational rehabilitation services.
(Authority: Section 7(20)(A) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(20)(A))
(28) Individual with a disability, for purposes of Sec. Sec.
361.5(c)(13), 361.13(a), 361.13(b)(1), 361.17(a), (b), (c), and (j),
361.18(b), 361.19, 361.20, 361.23(b)(2), 361.29(a) and (d)(8), and
361.51(b), means an individual--
(i) Who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially
limits one or more major life activities;
(ii) Who has a record of such an impairment; or
(iii) Who is regarded as having such an impairment.
(Authority: Section 7(20)(B) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(20)(B))
(29) Individual with a most significant disability means an
individual with a significant disability who meets the designated State
unit's criteria for an individual with a most significant disability.
These criteria must be consistent with the requirements in Sec.
361.36(d)(1) and (2).
(Authority: Sections 7(21)(E) and 101(a)(5)(C) of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(21)(E) and 721(a)(5)(C))
(30) Individual with a significant disability means an individual
with a disability--
(i) Who has a severe physical or mental impairment that seriously
limits one or more functional capacities (such as mobility,
communication, self-care, self-direction, interpersonal skills, work
tolerance, or work skills) in terms of an employment outcome;
(ii) Whose vocational rehabilitation can be expected to require
multiple vocational rehabilitation services over an extended period of
time; and
(iii) Who has one or more physical or mental disabilities resulting
from amputation, arthritis, autism, blindness, burn injury, cancer,
cerebral palsy, cystic fibrosis, deafness, head injury, heart disease,
hemiplegia, hemophilia, respiratory or pulmonary dysfunction, mental
illness, multiple sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, musculo-skeletal
disorders, neurological disorders (including stroke and epilepsy),
spinal cord conditions (including paraplegia and quadriplegia), sickle
cell anemia, intellectual disability, specific learning disability,
end-stage renal disease, or another disability or combination of
disabilities determined on the basis of an assessment for determining
eligibility and vocational rehabilitation needs to cause comparable
substantial functional limitation.
(Authority: Section 7(21)(A) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(21)(A))
(31) Individual's representative means any representative chosen by
an applicant or eligible individual, as appropriate, including a
parent, guardian, other family member, or advocate, unless a
representative has been appointed by a court to represent the
individual, in which case the court-appointed representative is the
individual's representative.
(Authority: Sections 7(22) and 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(22) and 709(c))
(32) Integrated setting means--
(i) With respect to the provision of services, a setting typically
found in the community in which applicants or eligible individuals
interact with non-disabled individuals other than non-disabled
individuals who are providing services to those applicants or eligible
individuals; and
(ii) With respect to an employment outcome, means a setting--
(A) Typically found in the community; and
(B) Where the employee with a disability interacts, for the purpose
of performing the duties of the position, with other employees within
the particular work unit and the entire work site, and, as appropriate
to the work performed, other persons (e.g., customers and vendors) who
are not individuals with disabilities (not including supervisory
personnel or individuals who are providing services to such employee)
to the same extent that employees who are not individuals with
disabilities and who are in comparable positions interact with these
persons.
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c))
(33) Local workforce development board means a local board, as
defined in section 3 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act.
(Authority: Section 7(25) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(25))
(34) Maintenance means monetary support provided to an individual
for expenses, such as food, shelter, and clothing, that are in excess
of the normal expenses of the individual and that are necessitated by
the individual's participation in an assessment for determining
eligibility and vocational rehabilitation needs or the individual's
receipt of vocational rehabilitation services under an individualized
plan for employment.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 103(a)(7) of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 723(a)(7))
(i)Examples: The following are examples of expenses that would meet
the definition of maintenance. The examples are illustrative, do not
address all possible circumstances, and are not intended to substitute
for individual counselor judgment.
Example 1: The cost of a uniform or other suitable clothing that is
required for an individual's job placement or job-seeking activities.
Example 2: The cost of short-term shelter that is required in order
for an individual to participate in assessment activities or vocational
training at a site that is not within commuting distance of an
individual's home.
Example 3: The initial one-time costs, such as a security deposit
or charges for the initiation of utilities, that are required in order
for an individual to relocate for a job placement.
(ii) [Reserved]
(35) Mediation means the act or process of using an independent
third party to act as a mediator, intermediary, or conciliator to
assist persons or parties in settling differences or disputes prior to
pursuing formal administrative or other legal remedies. Mediation under
the program must be conducted in accordance with the requirements in
Sec. 361.57(d) by a qualified and impartial mediator as defined in
Sec. 361.5(c)(43).
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 102(c)(4) of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 722(c)(4))
(36) Nonprofit, with respect to a community rehabilitation program,
means a community rehabilitation program carried out by a corporation
or association, no part of the net earnings of which inures, or may
lawfully inure, to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual
and the income of which is exempt from taxation under section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
[[Page 21107]]
(Authority: Section 7(26) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(26))
(37) Ongoing support services, as used in the definition of
supported employment, means services that--
(i) Are needed to support and maintain an individual with a most
significant disability, including a youth with a most significant
disability, in supported employment;
(ii) Are identified based on a determination by the designated
State unit of the individual's need as specified in an individualized
plan for employment;
(iii) Are furnished by the designated State unit from the time of
job placement until transition to extended services, unless post-
employment services are provided following transition, and thereafter
by one or more extended services providers throughout the individual's
term of employment in a particular job placement or multiple placements
if those placements are being provided under a program of transitional
employment;
(iv) Include an assessment of employment stability and provision of
specific services or the coordination of services at or away from the
worksite that are needed to maintain stability based on--
(A) At a minimum, twice-monthly monitoring at the worksite of each
individual in supported employment; or
(B) If under specific circumstances, especially at the request of
the individual, the individualized plan for employment provides for
off-site monitoring, twice monthly meetings with the individual;
(v) Consist of--
(A) Any particularized assessment supplementary to the
comprehensive assessment of rehabilitation needs described in paragraph
(c)(5)(ii) of this section;
(B) The provision of skilled job trainers who accompany the
individual for intensive job skill training at the work site;
(C) Job development and training;
(D) Social skills training;
(E) Regular observation or supervision of the individual;
(F) Follow-up services including regular contact with the
employers, the individuals, the parents, family members, guardians,
advocates or authorized representatives of the individuals, and other
suitable professional and informed advisors, in order to reinforce and
stabilize the job placement;
(G) Facilitation of natural supports at the worksite;
(H) Any other service identified in the scope of vocational
rehabilitation services for individuals, described in Sec. 361.48; or
(I) Any service similar to the foregoing services.
(Authority: Sections 7(27) and 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(27) and 709(c))
(38) Personal assistance services means a range of services,
including, among other things, training in managing, supervising, and
directing personal assistance services, provided by one or more
persons, that are--
(i) Designed to assist an individual with a disability to perform
daily living activities on or off the job that the individual would
typically perform without assistance if the individual did not have a
disability;
(ii) Designed to increase the individual's control in life and
ability to perform everyday activities on or off the job;
(iii) Necessary to the achievement of an employment outcome; and
(iv) Provided only while the individual is receiving other
vocational rehabilitation services. The services may include training
in managing, supervising, and directing personal assistance services.
(Authority: Sections 7(28), 12(c), 102(b)(4)(B)(i)(I)(bb), and
103(a)(9) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C.
705(28), 709(c), 722(b)(4)(B)(i)(I)(bb), and 723(a)(9))
(39) Physical and mental restoration services means--
(i) Corrective surgery or therapeutic treatment that is likely,
within a reasonable period of time, to correct or modify substantially
a stable or slowly progressive physical or mental impairment that
constitutes a substantial impediment to employment;
(ii) Diagnosis of and treatment for mental or emotional disorders
by qualified personnel in accordance with State licensure laws;
(iii) Dentistry;
(iv) Nursing services;
(v) Necessary hospitalization (either inpatient or outpatient care)
in connection with surgery or treatment and clinic services;
(vi) Drugs and supplies;
(vii) Prosthetic and orthotic devices;
(viii) Eyeglasses and visual services, including visual training,
and the examination and services necessary for the prescription and
provision of eyeglasses, contact lenses, microscopic lenses, telescopic
lenses, and other special visual aids prescribed by personnel who are
qualified in accordance with State licensure laws;
(ix) Podiatry;
(x) Physical therapy;
(xi) Occupational therapy;
(xii) Speech or hearing therapy;
(xiii) Mental health services;
(xiv) Treatment of either acute or chronic medical complications
and emergencies that are associated with or arise out of the provision
of physical and mental restoration services, or that are inherent in
the condition under treatment;
(xv) Special services for the treatment of individuals with end-
stage renal disease, including transplantation, dialysis, artificial
kidneys, and supplies; and
(xvi) Other medical or medically related rehabilitation services.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 103(a)(6) of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 723(a)(6))
(40) Physical or mental impairment means--
(i) Any physiological disorder or condition, cosmetic
disfigurement, or anatomical loss affecting one or more of the
following body systems: Neurological, musculo-skeletal, special sense
organs, respiratory (including speech organs), cardiovascular,
reproductive, digestive, genitourinary, hemic and lymphatic, skin, and
endocrine; or
(ii) Any mental or psychological disorder such as intellectual
disability, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, and
specific learning disabilities.
(Authority: Sections 7(20)(A) and 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(20)(A) and 709(c))
(41) Post-employment services means one or more of the services
identified in Sec. 361.48 that are provided subsequent to the
achievement of an employment outcome and that are necessary for an
individual to maintain, regain, or advance in employment, consistent
with the individual's unique strengths, resources, priorities,
concerns, abilities, capabilities, interests, and informed choice.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 103(a)(20) of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 723(a)(20))
Note to paragraph(c)(41): Post-employment services are intended to
ensure that the employment outcome remains consistent with the
individual's unique strengths, resources, priorities, concerns,
abilities, capabilities, interests, and informed choice. These services
are available to meet rehabilitation needs that do not require a
complex and comprehensive provision of services and, thus, should be
limited
[[Page 21108]]
in scope and duration. If more comprehensive services are required,
then a new rehabilitation effort should be considered. Post-employment
services are to be provided under an amended individualized plan for
employment; thus, a re-determination of eligibility is not required.
The provision of post-employment services is subject to the same
requirements in this part as the provision of any other vocational
rehabilitation service. Post-employment services are available to
assist an individual to maintain employment, e.g., the individual's
employment is jeopardized because of conflicts with supervisors or co-
workers, and the individual needs mental health services and counseling
to maintain the employment, or the individual requires assistive
technology to maintain the employment; to regain employment, e.g., the
individual's job is eliminated through reorganization and new placement
services are needed; and to advance in employment, e.g., the employment
is no longer consistent with the individual's unique strengths,
resources, priorities, concerns, abilities, capabilities, interests,
and informed choice.
(42) Pre-employment transition services means the required
activities and authorized activities specified in Sec. 361.48(a).
(Authority: Sections 7(30) and 113 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 7(30) and 733)
(43) Qualified and impartial mediator. (i) Qualified and impartial
mediator means an individual who--
(A) Is not an employee of a public agency (other than an
administrative law judge, hearing examiner, employee of a State office
of mediators, or employee of an institution of higher education);
(B) Is not a member of the State Rehabilitation Council for the
designated State unit;
(C) Has not been involved previously in the vocational
rehabilitation of the applicant or eligible individual;
(D) Is knowledgeable of the vocational rehabilitation program and
the applicable Federal and State laws, regulations, and policies
governing the provision of vocational rehabilitation services;
(E) Has been trained in effective mediation techniques consistent
with any State-approved or -recognized certification, licensing,
registration, or other requirements; and
(F) Has no personal, professional, or financial interest that could
affect the individual's objectivity during the mediation proceedings.
(ii) An individual is not considered to be an employee of the
designated State agency or designated State unit for the purposes of
this definition solely because the individual is paid by the designated
State agency or designated State unit to serve as a mediator.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 102(c)(4) of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 722(c)(4))
(44) Rehabilitation engineering means the systematic application of
engineering sciences to design, develop, adapt, test, evaluate, apply,
and distribute technological solutions to problems confronted by
individuals with disabilities in functional areas, such as mobility,
communications, hearing, vision, and cognition, and in activities
associated with employment, independent living, education, and
integration into the community.
(Authority: Sections 7(32) and (12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(32) and 709(c))
(45) Rehabilitation technology means the systematic application of
technologies, engineering methodologies, or scientific principles to
meet the needs of, and address the barriers confronted by, individuals
with disabilities in areas that include education, rehabilitation,
employment, transportation, independent living, and recreation. The
term includes rehabilitation engineering, assistive technology devices,
and assistive technology services.
(Authority: Section 7(32) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(32))
(46) Reservation means a Federal or State Indian reservation, a
public domain Indian allotment, a former Indian reservation in
Oklahoma, and land held by incorporated Native groups, regional
corporations, and village corporations under the provisions of the
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.); or a
defined area of land recognized by a State or the Federal Government
where there is a concentration of tribal members and on which the
tribal government is providing structured activities and services.
(Authority: Section 121(e) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 741(e))
(47) Sole local agency means a unit or combination of units of
general local government or one or more Indian tribes that has the sole
responsibility under an agreement with, and the supervision of, the
State agency to conduct a local or tribal vocational rehabilitation
program, in accordance with the vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan.
(Authority: Section 7(24) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(24))
(48) State means any of the 50 States, the District of Columbia,
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands,
Guam, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands.
(Authority: Section 7(34) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(34))
(49) State workforce development board means a State workforce
development board, as defined in section 3 of the Workforce Innovation
and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3102).
(Authority: Section 7(35) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(35))
(50) Statewide workforce development system means a workforce
development system, as defined in section 3 of the Workforce Innovation
and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3102).
(Authority: Section 7(36) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(36))
(51) Student with a disability. (i) Student with a disability
means, in general, an individual with a disability who--
(A)(1) Is not younger than the earliest age for the provision of
transition services under section 614(d)(1)(A)(i)(VIII) of the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C.
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VIII)); or
(2) If the State involved elects to use a lower minimum age for
receipt of pre-employment transition services under this Act, is not
younger than that minimum age; and
(B)(1) Is not older than 21 years of age; or
(2) If the State law for the State provides for a higher maximum
age for receipt of services under the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.), is not older than that maximum
age; and
(C)(1) Is eligible for, and receiving, special education or related
services under Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education
Act (20 U.S.C. 1411 et seq.); or
(2) Is a student who is an individual with a disability, for
purposes of section 504.
(ii) Students with disabilities means more than one student with a
disability.
(Authority: Section 7(37) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(37))
[[Page 21109]]
(52) Substantial impediment to employment means that a physical or
mental impairment (in light of attendant medical, psychological,
vocational, educational, communication, and other related factors)
hinders an individual from preparing for, entering into, engaging in,
advancing in, or retaining employment consistent with the individual's
abilities and capabilities.
(Authority: Sections 7(20)(A) and 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(20)(A) and 709(c))
(53) Supported employment. (i) Supported employment means--
(A) Competitive integrated employment, including customized
employment, or employment in an integrated work setting in which an
individual with a most significant disability, including a youth with a
most significant disability, is working on a short-term basis toward
competitive integrated employment that is individualized, consistent
with the unique strengths, abilities, interests, and informed choice of
the individual, including with ongoing support services for individuals
with the most significant disabilities--
(1) For whom competitive integrated employment has not historically
occurred, or for whom competitive integrated employment has been
interrupted or intermittent as a result of a significant disability;
and
(2) Who, because of the nature and severity of their disability,
need intensive supported employment services and extended services
after the transition from support provided by the designated State
unit, in order to perform this work; or
(B) Transitional employment, as defined in paragraph (c)(56) of
this section, for individuals with the most significant disabilities
due to mental illness, including youth with the most significant
disabilities, constitutes supported employment.
(ii) For purposes of this part, an individual with the most
significant disabilities, whose supported employment in an integrated
setting does not satisfy the criteria of competitive integrated
employment, as defined in paragraph (c)(9) of this section, is
considered to be working on a short-term basis toward competitive
integrated employment so long as the individual can reasonably
anticipate achieving competitive integrated employment within six
months of achieving an employment outcome of supported employment.
(Authority: Sections 7(38), 12(c), and 602 of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(38), 709(c), and 795g)
(54) Supported employment services means ongoing support services,
including customized employment, and other appropriate services needed
to support and maintain an individual with a most significant
disability, including a youth with a most significant disability, in
supported employment that are--
(i) Organized and made available, singly or in combination, in such
a way as to assist an eligible individual to achieve competitive
integrated employment;
(ii) Based on a determination of the needs of an eligible
individual, as specified in an individualized plan for employment;
(iii) Provided by the designated State unit for a period of time
not to exceed 24 months, unless under special circumstances the
eligible individual and the rehabilitation counselor or coordinator
jointly agree to extend the time to achieve the employment outcome
identified in the individualized plan for employment; and
(iv) Following transition, as post-employment services that are
unavailable from an extended services provider and that are necessary
to maintain or regain the job placement or advance in employment.
(Authority: Sections 7(39), 12(c), and 103(a)(16) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(39), 709(c),
and 723(a)(16))
(55) Transition services means a coordinated set of activities for
a student or youth with a disability--
(i) Designed within an outcome-oriented process that promotes
movement from school to post-school activities, including postsecondary
education, vocational training, integrated employment (including
supported employment), continuing and adult education, adult services,
independent living, or community participation;
(ii) Based upon the individual student's needs, taking into account
the student's preferences and interests;
(iii) That includes instruction, community experiences, the
development of employment and other post-school adult living
objectives, and, if appropriate, acquisition of daily living skills and
functional vocational evaluation; and
(iv) That promotes or facilitates the achievement of the employment
outcome identified in the student's individualized plan for employment.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 103(a)(15) and (b)(7) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and
723(a)(15) and (b)(7))
(56) Transitional employment, as used in the definition of
supported employment, means a series of temporary job placements in
competitive integrated employment with ongoing support services for
individuals with the most significant disabilities due to mental
illness. In transitional employment, the provision of ongoing support
services must include continuing sequential job placements until job
permanency is achieved.
(Authority: Sections 7(38)(B) and 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(38)(B) and 709(c))
(57) Transportation means travel and related expenses that are
necessary to enable an applicant or eligible individual to participate
in a vocational rehabilitation service, including expenses for training
in the use of public transportation vehicles and systems.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 103(a)(8) of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 723(a)(8))
(i) Examples. The following are examples of expenses that would
meet the definition of transportation. The examples are purely
illustrative, do not address all possible circumstances, and are not
intended as substitutes for individual counselor judgment.
Example 1: Travel and related expenses for a personal care
attendant or aide if the services of that person are necessary to
enable the applicant or eligible individual to travel to participate in
any vocational rehabilitation service.
Example 2: The purchase and repair of vehicles, including vans, but
not the modification of these vehicles, as modification would be
considered a rehabilitation technology service.
Example 3: Relocation expenses incurred by an eligible individual
in connection with a job placement that is a significant distance from
the eligible individual's current residence.
(ii) [Reserved]
(58) Vocational rehabilitation services--
(i) If provided to an individual, means those services listed in
Sec. 361.48; and
(ii) If provided for the benefit of groups of individuals, means
those services listed in Sec. 361.49.
(Authority: Sections 7(40) and 103 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(40) and 723)
(59) Youth with a disability. (i) Youth with a disability means an
individual with a disability who is not--
(A) Younger than 14 years of age; and
(B) Older than 24 years of age.
[[Page 21110]]
(ii) Youth with disabilities means more than one youth with a
disability.
(Authority: Section 7(42) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(42))
Subpart B--State Plan and Other Requirements for Vocational
Rehabilitation Services
Sec. 361.10 Submission, approval, and disapproval of the State plan.
(a) Purpose. (1) To be eligible to receive funds under this part
for a fiscal year, a State must submit, and have approved, a vocational
rehabilitation services portion of a Unified or Combined State Plan in
accordance with sections 102 or 103 of the Workforce Innovation and
Opportunity Act.
(2) The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified
or Combined State Plan must satisfy all requirements set forth in this
part.
(b) Separate part relating to the vocational rehabilitation of
individuals who are blind. If a separate State agency administers or
supervises the administration of a separate part of the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan
relating to the vocational rehabilitation of individuals who are blind,
that part of the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan must separately conform to all
applicable requirements under this part.
(c) Public participation. Prior to the adoption of any substantive
policies or procedures specific to the provision of vocational
rehabilitation services under the vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan, including making any
substantive amendment to those policies and procedures, the designated
State agency must conduct public meetings throughout the State, in
accordance with the requirements of Sec. 361.20.
(d) Submission, approval, disapproval, and duration. All
requirements regarding the submission, approval, disapproval, and
duration of the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan are governed by joint regulations set
forth in subpart D of this part.
(e) Submission of policies and procedures. The State is not
required to submit policies, procedures, or descriptions required under
this part that have been previously submitted to the Secretary and that
demonstrate that the State meets the requirements of this part,
including any policies, procedures, or descriptions submitted under
this part that are in effect on July 22, 2014.
(f) Due process. If the Secretary disapproves the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan,
the Secretary will follow these procedures:
(1) Informal resolution. Prior to disapproving the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan,
the Secretary attempts to resolve disputes informally with State
officials.
(2) Notice. If, after reasonable effort has been made to resolve
the dispute, no resolution has been reached, the Secretary provides
notice to the State agency of the intention to disapprove the
vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan and of the opportunity for a hearing.
(3) State plan hearing. If the State agency requests a hearing, the
Secretary designates one or more individuals, either from the
Department or elsewhere, not responsible for or connected with the
administration of this program, to conduct a hearing in accordance with
the provisions of 34 CFR part 81, subpart A.
(4) Initial decision. The hearing officer issues an initial
decision in accordance with 34 CFR 81.41.
(5) Petition for review of an initial decision. The State agency
may seek the Secretary's review of the initial decision in accordance
with 34 CFR part 81.
(6) Review by the Secretary. The Secretary reviews the initial
decision in accordance with 34 CFR 81.43.
(7) Final decision of the Department. The final decision of the
Department is made in accordance with 34 CFR 81.44.
(8) Judicial review. A State may appeal the Secretary's decision to
disapprove the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan by filing a petition for review with the
United States Court of Appeals for the circuit in which the State is
located, in accordance with section 107(d) of the Act.
(Authority: Sections 101(a) and (b) and 107(d) of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 20 U.S.C. 1231g(a); and 29 U.S.C. 721(a)
and (b) and 727(d))
Sec. 361.11 Withholding of funds.
(a) Basis for withholding. The Secretary may withhold or limit
payments under section 111 or 603(a) of the Act, as provided by section
107(c) of the Act, if the Secretary determines that--
(1) The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified
or Combined State Plan, including the supported employment supplement,
has been so changed that it no longer conforms with the requirements of
this part or part 363; or
(2) In the administration of the vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan there is a failure to
comply substantially with any provision of such plan or with an
evaluation standard or performance indicator established under section
106 of the Act.
(b) Informal resolution. Prior to withholding or limiting payments
in accordance with this section, the Secretary attempts to resolve
disputed issues informally with State officials.
(c) Notice. If, after reasonable effort has been made to resolve
the dispute, no resolution has been reached, the Secretary provides
notice to the State agency of the intention to withhold or limit
payments and of the opportunity for a hearing.
(d) Withholding hearing. If the State agency requests a hearing,
the Secretary designates one or more individuals, either from the
Department or elsewhere, not responsible for or connected with the
administration of this program, to conduct a hearing in accordance with
the provisions of 34 CFR part 81, subpart A.
(e) Initial decision. The hearing officer issues an initial
decision in accordance with 34 CFR 81.41.
(f) Petition for review of an initial decision. The State agency
may seek the Secretary's review of the initial decision in accordance
with 34 CFR 81.42.
(g) Review by the Secretary. The Secretary reviews the initial
decision in accordance with 34 CFR 81.43.
(h) Final decision of the Department. The final decision of the
Department is made in accordance with 34 CFR 81.44.
(i) Judicial review. A State may appeal the Secretary's decision to
withhold or limit payments by filing a petition for review with the
United States Court of Appeals for the circuit in which the State is
located, in accordance with section 107(d) of the Act.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 101(b), 107(c) and (d) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c), 721(b),
727(c) and (d))
Administration
Sec. 361.12 Methods of administration.
The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan must assure that the State agency, and the
designated State unit if applicable, employs methods of administration
found necessary by the Secretary for the proper and efficient
administration of the plan and for
[[Page 21111]]
carrying out all functions for which the State is responsible under the
plan and this part. These methods must include procedures to ensure
accurate data collection and financial accountability.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(6) and (a)(10)(A) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and
721(a)(6) and (a)(10)(A))
Sec. 361.13 State agency for administration.
(a) Designation of State agency. The vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must designate a
State agency as the sole State agency to administer the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan,
or to supervise its administration in a political subdivision of the
State by a sole local agency, in accordance with the following
requirements:
(1) General. Except as provided in paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of
this section, the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan must provide that the designated State
agency is one of the following types of agencies:
(i) A State agency that is primarily concerned with vocational
rehabilitation or vocational and other rehabilitation of individuals
with disabilities; or
(ii) A State agency that includes a vocational rehabilitation unit
as provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) American Samoa. In the case of American Samoa, the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan
must designate the Governor.
(3) Designated State agency for individuals who are blind. If a
State commission or other agency that provides assistance or services
to individuals who are blind is authorized under State law to provide
vocational rehabilitation services to individuals who are blind, and
this commission or agency is primarily concerned with vocational
rehabilitation or includes a vocational rehabilitation unit as provided
in paragraph (b) of this section, the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan may designate
that agency as the sole State agency to administer the part of the plan
under which vocational rehabilitation services are provided for
individuals who are blind or to supervise its administration in a
political subdivision of the State by a sole local agency.
(b) Designation of State unit. (1) General. If the designated State
agency is not of the type specified in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this
section or if the designated State agency specified in paragraph (a)(3)
of this section is not primarily concerned with vocational
rehabilitation or vocational and other rehabilitation of individuals
with disabilities, the vocational rehabilitation services portion of
the Unified or Combined State Plan must assure that the agency (or each
agency if two agencies are designated) includes a vocational
rehabilitation bureau, division, or unit that--
(i) Is primarily concerned with vocational rehabilitation or
vocational and other rehabilitation of individuals with disabilities
and is responsible for the administration of the State agency's
vocational rehabilitation program under the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan;
(ii) Has a full-time director who is responsible for the day-to-day
operations of the vocational rehabilitation program;
(iii) Has a staff, at least 90 percent of whom are employed full
time on the rehabilitation work of the organizational unit;
(iv) Is located at an organizational level and has an
organizational status within the State agency comparable to that of
other major organizational units of the agency; and
(v) Has the sole authority and responsibility described within the
designated State agency in paragraph (a) of this section to expend
funds made available under the Act in a manner that is consistent with
the purpose of the Act.
(2) In the case of a State that has not designated a separate State
agency for individuals who are blind, as provided for in paragraph
(a)(3) of this section, the State may assign responsibility for the
part of the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified
or Combined State Plan under which vocational rehabilitation services
are provided to individuals who are blind to one organizational unit of
the designated State agency and may assign responsibility for the rest
of the plan to another organizational unit of the designated State
agency, with the provisions of paragraph (b)(1) of this section
applying separately to each of these units.
(c) Responsibility for administration. (1) Required activities. At
a minimum, the following activities are the responsibility of the
designated State unit or the sole local agency under the supervision of
the State unit:
(i) All decisions affecting eligibility for vocational
rehabilitation services, the nature and scope of available services,
and the provision of these services.
(ii) The determination to close the record of services of an
individual who has achieved an employment outcome in accordance with
Sec. 361.56.
(iii) Policy formulation and implementation.
(iv) The allocation and expenditure of vocational rehabilitation
funds.
(v) Participation as a partner in the one-stop service delivery
system established under title I of the Workforce Investment Act of
1998, in accordance with 20 CFR part 662.
(2) Non-delegable responsibility. The responsibility for the
functions described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section may not be
delegated to any other agency or individual.
(Authority: Section 101(a)(2) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 721(a)(2))
Sec. 361.14 Substitute State agency.
(a) General provisions. (1) If the Secretary has withheld all
funding from a State under Sec. 361.11, the State may designate
another agency to substitute for the designated State agency in
carrying out the State's program of vocational rehabilitation services.
(2) Any public or nonprofit private organization or agency within
the State or any political subdivision of the State is eligible to be a
substitute agency.
(3) The substitute agency must submit a vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan that meets the
requirements of this part.
(4) The Secretary makes no grant to a substitute agency until the
Secretary approves its plan.
(b) Substitute agency matching share. The Secretary does not make
any payment to a substitute agency unless it has provided assurances
that it will contribute the same matching share as the State would have
been required to contribute if the State agency were carrying out the
vocational rehabilitation program.
(Authority: Section 107(c)(3) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 727(c)(3))
Sec. 361.15 Local administration.
(a) If the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan provides for the administration of the
plan by a local agency, the designated State agency must--
(1) Ensure that each local agency is under the supervision of the
designated State unit and is the sole local agency as defined in Sec.
361.5(c)(47) that is responsible for the administration of the
[[Page 21112]]
program within the political subdivision that it serves; and
(2) Develop methods that each local agency will use to administer
the vocational rehabilitation program, in accordance with the
vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan.
(b) A separate local agency serving individuals who are blind may
administer that part of the plan relating to vocational rehabilitation
of individuals who are blind, under the supervision of the designated
State unit for individuals who are blind.
(Authority: Sections 7(24) and 101(a)(2)(A) of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(24) and 721(a)(2)(A))
Sec. 361.16 Establishment of an independent commission or a State
Rehabilitation Council.
(a) General requirement. Except as provided in paragraph (b) of
this section, the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan must contain one of the following two
assurances:
(1) An assurance that the designated State agency is an independent
State commission that--
(i) Is responsible under State law for operating, or overseeing the
operation of, the vocational rehabilitation program in the State and is
primarily concerned with vocational rehabilitation or vocational and
other rehabilitation services, in accordance with Sec.
361.13(a)(1)(i);
(ii) Is consumer-controlled by persons who--
(A) Are individuals with physical or mental impairments that
substantially limit major life activities; and
(B) Represent individuals with a broad range of disabilities,
unless the designated State unit under the direction of the commission
is the State agency for individuals who are blind;
(iii) Includes family members, advocates, or other representatives
of individuals with mental impairments; and
(iv) Conducts the functions identified in Sec. 361.17(h)(4).
(2) An assurance that--
(i) The State has established a State Rehabilitation Council
(Council) that meets the requirements of Sec. 361.17;
(ii) The designated State unit, in accordance with Sec. 361.29,
jointly develops, agrees to, and reviews annually State goals and
priorities and jointly submits to the Secretary annual reports of
progress with the Council;
(iii) The designated State unit regularly consults with the Council
regarding the development, implementation, and revision of State
policies and procedures of general applicability pertaining to the
provision of vocational rehabilitation services;
(iv) The designated State unit transmits to the Council--
(A) All plans, reports, and other information required under this
part to be submitted to the Secretary;
(B) All policies and information on all practices and procedures of
general applicability provided to or used by rehabilitation personnel
providing vocational rehabilitation services under this part; and
(C) Copies of due process hearing decisions issued under this part
and transmitted in a manner to ensure that the identity of the
participants in the hearings is kept confidential; and
(v) The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified
or Combined State Plan, and any revision to the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan,
includes a summary of input provided by the Council, including
recommendations from the annual report of the Council, the review and
analysis of consumer satisfaction described in Sec. 361.17(h)(4), and
other reports prepared by the Council, and the designated State unit's
response to the input and recommendations, including its reasons for
rejecting any input or recommendation of the Council.
(b) Exception for separate State agency for individuals who are
blind. In the case of a State that designates a separate State agency
under Sec. 361.13(a)(3) to administer the part of the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan
under which vocational rehabilitation services are provided to
individuals who are blind, the State must either establish a separate
State Rehabilitation Council for each agency that does not meet the
requirements in paragraph (a)(1) of this section or establish one State
Rehabilitation Council for both agencies if neither agency meets the
requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
(Authority: Sections 101(a)(21) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
as amended; 29 U.S.C. 721(a)(21))
Sec. 361.17 Requirements for a State Rehabilitation Council.
If the State has established a Council under Sec. 361.16(a)(2) or
(b), the Council must meet the following requirements:
(a) Appointment. (1) The members of the Council must be appointed
by the Governor or, in the case of a State that, under State law, vests
authority for the administration of the activities carried out under
this part in an entity other than the Governor (such as one or more
houses of the State legislature or an independent board), the chief
officer of that entity.
(2) The appointing authority must select members of the Council
after soliciting recommendations from representatives of organizations
representing a broad range of individuals with disabilities and
organizations interested in individuals with disabilities. In selecting
members, the appointing authority must consider, to the greatest extent
practicable, the extent to which minority populations are represented
on the Council.
(b) Composition. (1) General. Except as provided in paragraph
(b)(3) of this section, the Council must be composed of at least 15
members, including--
(i) At least one representative of the Statewide Independent Living
Council, who must be the chairperson or other designee of the Statewide
Independent Living Council;
(ii) At least one representative of a parent training and
information center established pursuant to section 682(a) of the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act;
(iii) At least one representative of the Client Assistance Program
established under part 370 of this chapter, who must be the director of
or other individual recommended by the Client Assistance Program;
(iv) At least one qualified vocational rehabilitation counselor
with knowledge of and experience with vocational rehabilitation
programs who serves as an ex officio, nonvoting member of the Council
if employed by the designated State agency;
(v) At least one representative of community rehabilitation program
service providers;
(vi) Four representatives of business, industry, and labor;
(vii) Representatives of disability groups that include a cross
section of--
(A) Individuals with physical, cognitive, sensory, and mental
disabilities; and
(B) Representatives of individuals with disabilities who have
difficulty representing themselves or are unable due to their
disabilities to represent themselves;
(viii) Current or former applicants for, or recipients of,
vocational rehabilitation services;
(ix) In a State in which one or more projects are funded under
section 121 of the Act (American Indian Vocational Rehabilitation
Services), at least one representative of the directors of the projects
in such State;
(x) At least one representative of the State educational agency
responsible for the public education of students with
[[Page 21113]]
disabilities who are eligible to receive services under this part and
part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act;
(xi) At least one representative of the State workforce development
board; and
(xii) The director of the designated State unit as an ex officio,
nonvoting member of the Council.
(2) Employees of the designated State agency. Employees of the
designated State agency may serve only as nonvoting members of the
Council. This provision does not apply to the representative appointed
pursuant to paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section.
(3) Composition of a separate Council for a separate State agency
for individuals who are blind. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(4)
of this section, if the State establishes a separate Council for a
separate State agency for individuals who are blind, that Council
must--
(i) Conform with all of the composition requirements for a Council
under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, except the requirements in
paragraph (b)(1)(vii), unless the exception in paragraph (b)(4) of this
section applies; and
(ii) Include--
(A) At least one representative of a disability advocacy group
representing individuals who are blind; and
(B) At least one representative of an individual who is blind, has
multiple disabilities, and has difficulty representing himself or
herself or is unable due to disabilities to represent himself or
herself.
(4) Exception. If State law in effect on October 29, 1992 requires
a separate Council under paragraph (b)(3) of this section to have fewer
than 15 members, the separate Council is in compliance with the
composition requirements in paragraphs (b)(1)(vi) and (b)(1)(viii) of
this section if it includes at least one representative who meets the
requirements for each of those paragraphs.
(c) Majority. (1) A majority of the Council members must be
individuals with disabilities who meet the requirements of Sec.
361.5(c)(28) and are not employed by the designated State unit.
(2) In the case of a separate Council established under Sec.
361.16(b), a majority of the Council members must be individuals who
are blind and are not employed by the designated State unit.
(d) Chairperson. (1) The chairperson must be selected by the
members of the Council from among the voting members of the Council,
subject to the veto power of the Governor; or
(2) In States in which the Governor does not have veto power
pursuant to State law, the appointing authority described in paragraph
(a)(1) of this section must designate a member of the Council to serve
as the chairperson of the Council or must require the Council to
designate a member to serve as chairperson.
(e) Terms of appointment. (1) Each member of the Council must be
appointed for a term of no more than three years, and each member of
the Council, other than a representative identified in paragraph
(b)(1)(iii) or (ix) of this section, may serve for no more than two
consecutive full terms.
(2) A member appointed to fill a vacancy occurring prior to the end
of the term for which the predecessor was appointed must be appointed
for the remainder of the predecessor's term.
(3) The terms of service of the members initially appointed must
be, as specified by the appointing authority as described in paragraph
(a)(1) of this section, for varied numbers of years to ensure that
terms expire on a staggered basis.
(f) Vacancies. (1) A vacancy in the membership of the Council must
be filled in the same manner as the original appointment, except the
appointing authority as described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section
may delegate the authority to fill that vacancy to the remaining
members of the Council after making the original appointment.
(2) No vacancy affects the power of the remaining members to
execute the duties of the Council.
(g) Conflict of interest. No member of the Council may cast a vote
on any matter that would provide direct financial benefit to the member
or the member's organization or otherwise give the appearance of a
conflict of interest under State law.
(h) Functions. The Council must, after consulting with the State
workforce development board--
(1) Review, analyze, and advise the designated State unit regarding
the performance of the State unit's responsibilities under this part,
particularly responsibilities related to--
(i) Eligibility, including order of selection;
(ii) The extent, scope, and effectiveness of services provided; and
(iii) Functions performed by State agencies that affect or
potentially affect the ability of individuals with disabilities in
achieving employment outcomes under this part;
(2) In partnership with the designated State unit--
(i) Develop, agree to, and review State goals and priorities in
accordance with Sec. 361.29(c); and
(ii) Evaluate the effectiveness of the vocational rehabilitation
program and submit reports of progress to the Secretary in accordance
with Sec. 361.29(e);
(3) Advise the designated State agency and the designated State
unit regarding activities carried out under this part and assist in the
preparation of the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan and amendments to the plan,
applications, reports, needs assessments, and evaluations required by
this part;
(4) To the extent feasible, conduct a review and analysis of the
effectiveness of, and consumer satisfaction with--
(i) The functions performed by the designated State agency;
(ii) The vocational rehabilitation services provided by State
agencies and other public and private entities responsible for
providing vocational rehabilitation services to individuals with
disabilities under the Act; and
(iii) The employment outcomes achieved by eligible individuals
receiving services under this part, including the availability of
health and other employment benefits in connection with those
employment outcomes;
(5) Prepare and submit to the Governor and to the Secretary no
later than 90 days after the end of the Federal fiscal year an annual
report on the status of vocational rehabilitation programs operated
within the State and make the report available to the public through
appropriate modes of communication;
(6) To avoid duplication of efforts and enhance the number of
individuals served, coordinate activities with the activities of other
councils within the State, including the Statewide Independent Living
Council established under chapter 1, title VII of the Act, the advisory
panel established under section 612(a)(21) of the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act, the State Developmental Disabilities
Planning Council described in section 124 of the Developmental
Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act, the State mental health
planning council established under section 1914(a) of the Public Health
Service Act, and the State workforce development board, and with the
activities of entities carrying out programs under the Assistive
Technology Act of 1998;
(7) Provide for coordination and the establishment of working
relationships between the designated State agency and the Statewide
Independent Living
[[Page 21114]]
Council and centers for independent living within the State; and
(8) Perform other comparable functions, consistent with the purpose
of this part, as the Council determines to be appropriate, that are
comparable to the other functions performed by the Council.
(i) Resources. (1) The Council, in conjunction with the designated
State unit, must prepare a plan for the provision of resources,
including staff and other personnel, that may be necessary and
sufficient for the Council to carry out its functions under this part.
(2) The resource plan must, to the maximum extent possible, rely on
the use of resources in existence during the period of implementation
of the plan.
(3) Any disagreements between the designated State unit and the
Council regarding the amount of resources necessary to carry out the
functions of the Council must be resolved by the Governor, consistent
with paragraphs (i)(1) and (2) of this section.
(4) The Council must, consistent with State law, supervise and
evaluate the staff and personnel that are necessary to carry out its
functions.
(5) Those staff and personnel that are assisting the Council in
carrying out its functions may not be assigned duties by the designated
State unit or any other agency or office of the State that would create
a conflict of interest.
(j) Meetings. The Council must--
(1) Convene at least four meetings a year in locations determined
by the Council to be necessary to conduct Council business. The
meetings must be publicly announced, open, and accessible to the
general public, including individuals with disabilities, unless there
is a valid reason for an executive session; and
(2) Conduct forums or hearings, as appropriate, that are publicly
announced, open, and accessible to the public, including individuals
with disabilities.
(k) Compensation. Funds appropriated under title I of the Act,
except funds to carry out sections 112 and 121 of the Act, may be used
to compensate and reimburse the expenses of Council members in
accordance with section 105(g) of the Act.
(Authority: Section 105 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 725)
Sec. 361.18 Comprehensive system of personnel development.
The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan must describe the procedures and activities the
State agency will undertake to establish and maintain a comprehensive
system of personnel development designed to ensure an adequate supply
of qualified rehabilitation personnel, including professionals and
paraprofessionals, for the designated State unit. If the State agency
has a State Rehabilitation Council, this description must, at a
minimum, specify that the Council has an opportunity to review and
comment on the development of plans, policies, and procedures necessary
to meet the requirements of paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section.
This description must also conform with the following requirements:
(a) Personnel and personnel development data system. The vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan
must describe the development and maintenance of a system by the State
agency for collecting and analyzing on an annual basis data on
qualified personnel needs and personnel development, in accordance with
the following requirements:
(1) Data on qualified personnel needs must include--
(i) The number of personnel who are employed by the State agency in
the provision of vocational rehabilitation services in relation to the
number of individuals served, broken down by personnel category;
(ii) The number of personnel currently needed by the State agency
to provide vocational rehabilitation services, broken down by personnel
category; and
(iii) Projections of the number of personnel, broken down by
personnel category, who will be needed by the State agency to provide
vocational rehabilitation services in the State in five years based on
projections of the number of individuals to be served, including
individuals with significant disabilities, the number of personnel
expected to retire or leave the field, and other relevant factors.
(2) Data on personnel development must include--
(i) A list of the institutions of higher education in the State
that are preparing vocational rehabilitation professionals, by type of
program;
(ii) The number of students enrolled at each of those institutions,
broken down by type of program; and
(iii) The number of students who graduated during the prior year
from each of those institutions with certification or licensure, or
with the credentials for certification or licensure, broken down by the
personnel category for which they have received, or have the
credentials to receive, certification or licensure.
(b) Plan for recruitment, preparation, and retention of qualified
personnel. The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan must describe the development, updating,
and implementation of a plan to address the current and projected needs
for personnel who are qualified in accordance with paragraph (c) of
this section. The plan must identify the personnel needs based on the
data collection and analysis system described in paragraph (a) of this
section and must provide for the coordination and facilitation of
efforts between the designated State unit and institutions of higher
education and professional associations to recruit, prepare, and retain
personnel who are qualified in accordance with paragraph (c) of this
section, including personnel from minority backgrounds and personnel
who are individuals with disabilities.
(c) Personnel standards. (1) The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must include the State
agency's policies and describe--
(i) Standards that are consistent with any national or State-
approved or recognized certification, licensing, or registration
requirements, or, in the absence of these requirements, other
comparable requirements (including State personnel requirements) that
apply to the profession or discipline in which that category of
personnel is providing vocational rehabilitation services; and
(ii) The establishment and maintenance of education and experience
requirements, to ensure that the personnel have a 21st-century
understanding of the evolving labor force and the needs of individuals
with disabilities, including requirements for--
(A)(1) Attainment of a baccalaureate degree in a field of study
reasonably related to vocational rehabilitation, to indicate a level of
competency and skill demonstrating basic preparation in a field of
study such as vocational rehabilitation counseling, social work,
psychology, disability studies, business administration, human
resources, special education, supported employment, customized
employment, economics, or another field that reasonably prepares
individuals to work with consumers and employers; and
(2) Demonstrated paid or unpaid experience, for not less than one
year, consisting of--
(i) Direct work with individuals with disabilities in a setting
such as an independent living center;
[[Page 21115]]
(ii) Direct service or advocacy activities that provide such
individual with experience and skills in working with individuals with
disabilities; or
(iii) Direct experience in competitive integrated employment
environments as an employer, as a small business owner or operator, or
in self-employment, or other experience in human resources or
recruitment, or experience in supervising employees, training, or other
activities; or
(B) Attainment of a master's or doctoral degree in a field of study
such as vocational rehabilitation counseling, law, social work,
psychology, disability studies, business administration, human
resources, special education, management, public administration, or
another field that reasonably provides competence in the employment
sector, in a disability field, or in both business-related and
rehabilitation-related fields; and
(2) As used in this section--
(i) Profession or discipline means a specific occupational
category, including any paraprofessional occupational category, that--
(A) Provides rehabilitation services to individuals with
disabilities;
(B) Has been established or designated by the State unit; and
(C) Has a specified scope of responsibility.
(ii) Ensuring that personnel have a 21st-century understanding of
the evolving labor force and the needs of individuals with disabilities
means that personnel have specialized training and experience that
enables them to work effectively with individuals with disabilities to
assist them to achieve competitive integrated employment and with
employers who hire such individuals. Relevant personnel skills include,
but are not limited to--
(A) Understanding the medical and psychosocial aspects of various
disabilities;
(B) Assessing an individual's skills and abilities to obtain and
retain competitive integrated employment and establishing a plan to
meet the individual's career goals;
(C) Counseling, case management, and advocacy to modify
environmental and attitudinal barriers;
(D) Understanding the effective utilization of rehabilitation
technology;
(E) Developing effective relationships with employers in the public
and private sectors and
(F) Delivering job development and job placement services that
respond to today's labor market.
(d) Staff development. (1) The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must include the State
agency's policies and describe the procedures and activities the State
agency will undertake to ensure that all personnel employed by the
State unit receive appropriate and adequate training, including a
description of--
(i) A system of staff development for rehabilitation professionals
and paraprofessionals within the State unit, particularly with respect
to assessment, vocational counseling, job placement, and rehabilitation
technology, including training implemented in coordination with
entities carrying out State programs under section 4 of the Assistive
Technology Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 3003);
(ii) Procedures for acquiring and disseminating to rehabilitation
professionals and paraprofessionals within the designated State unit
significant knowledge from research and other sources; and
(iii) Policies and procedures relating to the establishment and
maintenance of standards to ensure that personnel, including
rehabilitation professionals and paraprofessionals, needed within the
designated State unit to carry out this part are appropriately and
adequately prepared and trained.
(2) The specific training areas for staff development should be
based on the needs of each State unit and may include, but are not
limited to--
(i) Training regarding the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act
and the amendments it made to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973;
(ii) Training with respect to the requirements of the Americans
with Disabilities Act, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act,
and Social Security work incentive programs, including programs under
the Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999,
training to facilitate informed choice under this program, and training
to improve the provision of services to culturally diverse populations;
and
(iii) Activities related to--
(A) Recruitment and retention of qualified rehabilitation
personnel;
(B) Succession planning; and
(C) Leadership development and capacity building.
(e) Personnel to address individual communication needs. The
vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must describe how the designated State unit includes among
its personnel, or obtains the services of--
(1) Individuals able to communicate in the native languages of
applicants and eligible individuals who have limited English
proficiency; and
(2) Individuals able to communicate with applicants and eligible
individuals in appropriate modes of communication.
(f) Coordination with personnel development under the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act. The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must describe the
procedures and activities the State agency will undertake to coordinate
its comprehensive system of personnel development under the Act with
personnel development under the Individuals with Disabilities Education
Act.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(7) of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a)(7))
Sec. 361.19 Affirmative action for individuals with disabilities.
The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan must assure that the State agency takes affirmative
action to employ and advance in employment qualified individuals with
disabilities covered under and on the same terms and conditions as
stated in section 503 of the Act.
(Authority: Section 101(a)(6)(B) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
as amended; 29 U.S.C. 721(a)(6)(B))
Sec. 361.20 Public participation requirements.
(a) Conduct of public meetings. (1) The vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must assure that
prior to the adoption of any substantive policies or procedures
governing the provision of vocational rehabilitation services under the
Unified or Combined State Plan, the designated State agency conducts
public meetings throughout the State to provide the public, including
individuals with disabilities, an opportunity to comment on the
policies or procedures.
(2) For purposes of this section, substantive changes to the
policies or procedures governing the provision of vocational
rehabilitation services that would require the conduct of public
meetings are those that directly impact the nature and scope of the
services provided to individuals with disabilities, or the manner in
which individuals interact with the designated State agency or in
matters related to the delivery of vocational rehabilitation services.
Examples of substantive changes include, but are not limited to--
(i) Any changes to policies or procedures that fundamentally alter
the rights and responsibilities of individuals
[[Page 21116]]
with disabilities in the vocational rehabilitation process;
(ii) Organizational changes to the designated State agency or unit
that would likely affect the manner in which services are delivered;
(iii) Any changes that affect the nature and scope of vocational
rehabilitation services provided by the designated State agency or
unit;
(iv) Changes in formal or informal dispute procedures;
(v) The adoption or amendment of policies instituting an order of
selection; and
(vi) Changes to policies and procedures regarding the financial
participation of eligible individuals.
(3) Non-substantive, e.g., administrative changes that would not
require the need for public hearings include:
(i) Internal procedures that do not directly affect individuals
receiving vocational rehabilitation services, such as payment
processing or personnel procedures;
(ii) Changes to the case management system that only affect
vocational rehabilitation personnel;
(iii) Changes in indirect cost allocations, internal fiscal review
procedures, or routine reporting requirements;
(iv) Minor revisions to vocational rehabilitation procedures or
policies to correct production errors, such as typographical and
grammatical mistakes; and
(v) Changes to contract procedures that do not affect the delivery
of vocational rehabilitation services.
(b) Notice requirements. The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must assure that the
designated State agency, prior to conducting the public meetings,
provides appropriate and sufficient notice throughout the State of the
meetings in accordance with--
(1) State law governing public meetings; or
(2) In the absence of State law governing public meetings,
procedures developed by the designated State agency in consultation
with the State Rehabilitation Council.
(c) Summary of input of the State Rehabilitation Council. The
vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan must provide a summary of the input of the State
Rehabilitation Council, if the State agency has a Council, into the
vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan and any amendment to that portion of the plan, in accordance
with Sec. 361.16(a)(2)(v).
(d) Special consultation requirements. The vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan
must assure that the State agency actively consults with the director
of the Client Assistance Program, the State Rehabilitation Council, if
the State agency has a Council, and, as appropriate, Indian tribes,
tribal organizations, and native Hawaiian organizations on its policies
and procedures governing the provision of vocational rehabilitation
services under the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan.
(e) Appropriate modes of communication. The State unit must provide
to the public, through appropriate modes of communication, notices of
the public meetings, any materials furnished prior to or during the
public meetings, and the policies and procedures governing the
provision of vocational rehabilitation services under the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 101(a)(16)(A) and 105(c)(3) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c),
721(a)(16)(A) and 725(c)(3))
Sec. 361.21 Consultations regarding the administration of the
vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined
State plan.
The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan must assure that, in connection with matters of
general policy arising in the administration of the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan,
the designated State agency takes into account the views of--
(a) Individuals and groups of individuals who are recipients of
vocational rehabilitation services or, as appropriate, the individuals'
representatives;
(b) Personnel working in programs that provide vocational
rehabilitation services to individuals with disabilities;
(c) Providers of vocational rehabilitation services to individuals
with disabilities;
(d) The director of the Client Assistance Program; and
(e) The State Rehabilitation Council, if the State has a Council.
(Authority: Sections 101(a)(16)(B) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 721(a)(16)(B))
Sec. 361.22 Coordination with education officials.
(a) Plans, policies, and procedures. (1) The vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan
must contain plans, policies, and procedures for coordination between
the designated State agency and education officials responsible for the
public education of students with disabilities that are designed to
facilitate the transition of students with disabilities from the
receipt of educational services, including pre-employment transition
services, in school to the receipt of vocational rehabilitation
services under the responsibility of the designated State agency.
(2) These plans, policies, and procedures in paragraph (a)(1) of
this section must provide for the development and approval of an
individualized plan for employment in accordance with Sec. 361.45 as
early as possible during the transition planning process and not later
than the time a student determined to be eligible for vocational
rehabilitation services leaves the school setting or, if the designated
State unit is operating under an order of selection, before each
eligible student able to be served under the order leaves the school
setting.
(b) Formal interagency agreement. The vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must include
information on a formal interagency agreement with the State
educational agency that, at a minimum, provides for--
(1) Consultation and technical assistance, which may be provided
using alternative means for meeting participation (such as video
conferences and conference calls), to assist educational agencies in
planning for the transition of students with disabilities from school
to post-school activities, including vocational rehabilitation
services;
(2) Transition planning by personnel of the designated State agency
and educational agency personnel for students with disabilities that
facilitates the development and implementation of their individualized
education programs (IEPs) under section 614(d) of the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act;
(3) The roles and responsibilities, including financial
responsibilities, of each agency, including provisions for determining
State lead agencies and qualified personnel responsible for transition
services;
(4) Procedures for outreach to and identification of students with
disabilities who are in need of transition
[[Page 21117]]
services. Outreach to these students should occur as early as possible
during the transition planning process and must include, at a minimum,
a description of the purpose of the vocational rehabilitation program,
eligibility requirements, application procedures, and scope of services
that may be provided to eligible individuals;
(5) Coordination necessary to satisfy documentation requirements
set forth at 34 CFR part 397 with regard to students and youth with
disabilities who are seeking subminimum wage employment; and
(6) Assurance that, in accordance with 34 CFR 397.31, neither the
State educational agency nor the local educational agency will enter
into a contract or other arrangement with an entity, as defined in 34
CFR 397.5(d), for the purpose of operating a program under which a
youth with a disability is engaged in subminimum wage employment.
(c) Construction. Nothing in this part will be construed to reduce
the obligation under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
(20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.) of a local educational agency or any other
agency to provide or pay for any transition services that are also
considered special education or related services and that are necessary
for ensuring a free appropriate public education to children with
disabilities within the State involved.
(Authority: Sections 101(a)(11)(D), 101(c), and 511 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 721 (a)(11)(D),
721(c), and 794g)
Sec. 361.23 Requirements related to the statewide workforce
development system.
As a required partner in the one-stop service delivery system
(which is part of the statewide workforce development system under
title I of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act), the
designated State unit must satisfy all requirements set forth in joint
regulations in subpart F of this part.
(Authority: Section 101(a)(11)(A) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
as amended; 29 U.S.C. 721(a)(11)(A); Section 121 (b)(1)(B)(iv) of
the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act; 29 U.S.C. 3151)
Sec. 361.24 Cooperation and coordination with other entities.
(a) Interagency cooperation. The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must describe the
designated State agency's cooperation with and use of the services and
facilities of Federal, State, and local agencies and programs,
including the State programs carried out under section 4 of the
Assistive Technology Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 3003), programs carried out
by the Under Secretary for Rural Development of the Department of
Agriculture, noneducational agencies serving out-of-school youth, and
State use contracting programs, to the extent that such Federal, State,
and local agencies and programs are not carrying out activities through
the statewide workforce development system.
(b) Coordination with the Statewide Independent Living Council and
independent living centers. The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must assure that the
designated State unit, the Statewide Independent Living Council
established under title VII, chapter 1, part B of the Act, and the
independent living centers established under title VII, Chapter 1, Part
C of the Act have developed working relationships and coordinate their
activities.
(c) Coordination with Employers. The vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must describe
how the designated State unit will work with employers to identify
competitive integrated employment opportunities and career exploration
opportunities, in order to facilitate the provision of--
(1) Vocational rehabilitation services; and
(2) Transition services for youth with disabilities and students
with disabilities, such as pre-employment transition services.
(d) Cooperative agreement with recipients of grants for services to
American Indians. (1) General. In applicable cases, the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan
must assure that the designated State agency has entered into a formal
cooperative agreement with each grant recipient in the State that
receives funds under part C of the Act (American Indian Vocational
Rehabilitation Services).
(2) Contents of formal cooperative agreement. The agreement
required under paragraph (d)(1) of this section must describe
strategies for collaboration and coordination in providing vocational
rehabilitation services to American Indians who are individuals with
disabilities, including--
(i) Strategies for interagency referral and information sharing
that will assist in eligibility determinations and the development of
individualized plans for employment;
(ii) Procedures for ensuring that American Indians who are
individuals with disabilities and are living on or near a reservation
or tribal service area are provided vocational rehabilitation services;
(iii) Strategies for the provision of transition planning by
personnel of the designated State unit, the State educational agency,
and the recipient of funds under part C of the Act, that will
facilitate the development and approval of the individualized plan for
employment under Sec. 361.45; and
(iv) Provisions for sharing resources in cooperative studies and
assessments, joint training activities, and other collaborative
activities designed to improve the provision of services to American
Indians who are individuals with disabilities.
(e) Reciprocal referral services between two designated State units
in the same State. If there is a separate designated State unit for
individuals who are blind, the two designated State units must
establish reciprocal referral services, use each other's services and
facilities to the extent feasible, jointly plan activities to improve
services in the State for individuals with multiple impairments,
including visual impairments, and otherwise cooperate to provide more
effective services, including, if appropriate, entering into a written
cooperative agreement.
(f) Cooperative agreement regarding individuals eligible for home
and community-based waiver programs. The vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must include an
assurance that the designated State unit has entered into a formal
cooperative agreement with the State agency responsible for
administering the State Medicaid plan under title XIX of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.) and the State agency with primary
responsibility for providing services and supports for individuals with
intellectual disabilities and individuals with developmental
disabilities, with respect to the delivery of vocational rehabilitation
services, including extended services, for individuals with the most
significant disabilities who have been determined to be eligible for
home and community-based services under a Medicaid waiver, Medicaid
State plan amendment, or other authority related to a State Medicaid
program.
(g) Interagency cooperation. The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan shall describe how the
designated State agency will collaborate with the State agency
responsible for administering the State Medicaid plan under title XIX
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.), the State
[[Page 21118]]
agency responsible for providing services with developmental
disabilities, and the State agency responsible for providing mental
health services, to develop opportunities for community-based
employment in integrated settings, to the greatest extent practicable.
(h) Coordination with assistive technology programs. The vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan
must include an assurance that the designated State unit, and the lead
agency and implementing entity (if any) designated by the Governor of
the State under section 4 of the Assistive Technology Act of 1998 (29
U.S.C. 3003), have developed working relationships and will enter into
agreements for the coordination of their activities, including the
referral of individuals with disabilities to programs and activities
described in that section.
(i) Coordination with ticket to work and self-sufficiency program.
The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan must include an assurance that the designated State
unit will coordinate activities with any other State agency that is
functioning as an employment network under the Ticket to Work and Self-
Sufficiency Program established under section 1148 of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b-19).
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(11) of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a)(11))
Sec. 361.25 Statewideness.
The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan must assure that services provided under the
vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan will be available in all political subdivisions of the
State, unless a waiver of statewideness is requested and approved in
accordance with Sec. 361.26.
(Authority: Section 101(a)(4) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 721(a)(4))
Sec. 361.26 Waiver of statewideness.
(a) Availability. The State unit may provide services in one or
more political subdivisions of the State that increase services or
expand the scope of services that are available statewide under the
vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan if--
(1) The non-Federal share of the cost of these services is met from
funds provided by a local public agency, including funds contributed to
a local public agency by a private agency, organization, or individual;
(2) The services are likely to promote the vocational
rehabilitation of substantially larger numbers of individuals with
disabilities or of individuals with disabilities with particular types
of impairments; and
(3) For purposes other than those specified in Sec.
361.60(b)(3)(i) and consistent with the requirements in Sec.
361.60(b)(3)(ii), the State includes in its vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan, and the
Secretary approves, a waiver of the statewideness requirement, in
accordance with the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) Request for waiver. The request for a waiver of statewideness
must--
(1) Identify the types of services to be provided;
(2) Contain a written assurance from the local public agency that
it will make available to the State unit the non-Federal share of
funds;
(3) Contain a written assurance that State unit approval will be
obtained for each proposed service before it is put into effect; and
(4) Contain a written assurance that all other requirements of the
vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan, including a State's order of selection requirements, will
apply to all services approved under the waiver.
(Authority: Section 101(a)(4) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 721(a)(4))
Sec. 361.27 Shared funding and administration of joint programs.
(a) If the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan provides for the designated State agency
to share funding and administrative responsibility with another State
agency or local public agency to carry out a joint program to provide
services to individuals with disabilities, the State must submit to the
Secretary for approval a plan that describes its shared funding and
administrative arrangement.
(b) The plan under paragraph (a) of this section must include--
(1) A description of the nature and scope of the joint program;
(2) The services to be provided under the joint program;
(3) The respective roles of each participating agency in the
administration and provision of services; and
(4) The share of the costs to be assumed by each agency.
(c) If a proposed joint program does not comply with the
statewideness requirement in Sec. 361.25, the State unit must obtain a
waiver of statewideness, in accordance with Sec. 361.26.
(Authority: Section 101(a)(2)(A) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
as amended; 29 U.S.C. 721(a)(2)(A))
Sec. 361.28 Third-party cooperative arrangements involving funds from
other public agencies.
(a) The designated State unit may enter into a third-party
cooperative arrangement for providing or contracting for the provision
of vocational rehabilitation services with another State agency or a
local public agency that is providing part or all of the non-Federal
share in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, if the
designated State unit ensures that--
(1) The services provided by the cooperating agency are not the
customary or typical services provided by that agency but are new
services that have a vocational rehabilitation focus or existing
services that have been modified, adapted, expanded, or reconfigured to
have a vocational rehabilitation focus;
(2) The services provided by the cooperating agency are only
available to applicants for, or recipients of, services from the
designated State unit;
(3) Program expenditures and staff providing services under the
cooperative arrangement are under the administrative supervision of the
designated State unit; and
(4) All requirements of the vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan, including a State's
order of selection, will apply to all services provided under the
cooperative arrangement.
(b) If a third party cooperative arrangement does not comply with
the statewideness requirement in Sec. 361.25, the State unit must
obtain a waiver of statewideness, in accordance with Sec. 361.26.
(c) The cooperating agency's contribution toward the non-Federal
share required under the arrangement, as set forth in paragraph (a) of
this section, may be made through:
(1) Cash transfers to the designated State unit; and
(2) Certified personnel expenditures for the time cooperating
agency staff spent providing direct vocational rehabilitation services
pursuant to a third-party cooperative arrangement that meets the
requirements of this section. Certified personnel expenditures may
include the allocable portion of staff salary and fringe benefits based
upon the amount of time cooperating agency
[[Page 21119]]
staff spent providing services under the arrangement.
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c))
Sec. 361.29 Statewide assessment; annual estimates; annual State
goals and priorities; strategies; and progress reports.
(a) Comprehensive statewide assessment. (1) The vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan
must include--
(i) The results of a comprehensive, statewide assessment, jointly
conducted by the designated State unit and the State Rehabilitation
Council (if the State unit has a Council) every three years. Results of
the assessment are to be included in the vocational rehabilitation
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan, submitted in accordance
with the requirements of Sec. 361.10(a) and the joint regulations of
this part. The comprehensive needs assessment must describe the
rehabilitation needs of individuals with disabilities residing within
the State, particularly the vocational rehabilitation services needs
of--
(A) Individuals with the most significant disabilities, including
their need for supported employment services;
(B) Individuals with disabilities who are minorities and
individuals with disabilities who have been unserved or underserved by
the vocational rehabilitation program carried out under this part;
(C) Individuals with disabilities served through other components
of the statewide workforce development system as identified by those
individuals and personnel assisting those individuals through the
components of the system; and
(D) Youth with disabilities, and students with disabilities,
including
(1) Their need for pre-employment transition services or other
transition services; and
(2) An assessment of the needs of individuals with disabilities for
transition services and pre-employment transition services, and the
extent to which such services provided under this part are coordinated
with transition services provided under the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.) in order to meet
the needs of individuals with disabilities.
(ii) An assessment of the need to establish, develop, or improve
community rehabilitation programs within the State.
(2) The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified
or Combined State Plan must assure that the State will submit to the
Secretary a report containing information regarding updates to the
assessments under paragraph (a) of this section for any year in which
the State updates the assessments at such time and in such manner as
the Secretary determines appropriate.
(b) Annual estimates. The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must include, and must
assure that the State will submit a report to the Secretary (at such
time and in such manner determined appropriate by the Secretary) that
includes, State estimates of--
(1) The number of individuals in the State who are eligible for
services under this part;
(2) The number of eligible individuals who will receive services
provided with funds provided under this part and under part Sec. 363,
including, if the designated State agency uses an order of selection in
accordance with Sec. 361.36, estimates of the number of individuals to
be served under each priority category within the order;
(3) The number of individuals who are eligible for services under
paragraph (b)(1) of this section, but are not receiving such services
due to an order of selection; and
(4) The costs of the services described in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section, including, if the designated State agency uses an order of
selection, the service costs for each priority category within the
order.
(c) Goals and priorities. (1) In general. The vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan
must identify the goals and priorities of the State in carrying out the
program.
(2) Council. The goals and priorities must be jointly developed,
agreed to, reviewed annually, and, as necessary, revised by the
designated State unit and the State Rehabilitation Council, if the
State unit has a Council.
(3) Submission. The vocational rehabilitation services portion of
the Unified or Combined State Plan must assure that the State will
submit to the Secretary a report containing information regarding
revisions in the goals and priorities for any year in which the State
revises the goals and priorities at such time and in such manner as
determined appropriate by the Secretary.
(4) Basis for goals and priorities. The State goals and priorities
must be based on an analysis of--
(i) The comprehensive statewide assessment described in paragraph
(a) of this section, including any updates to the assessment;
(ii) The performance of the State on the standards and indicators
established under section 106 of the Act; and
(iii) Other available information on the operation and the
effectiveness of the vocational rehabilitation program carried out in
the State, including any reports received from the State Rehabilitation
Council under Sec. 361.17(h) and the findings and recommendations from
monitoring activities conducted under section 107 of the Act.
(5) Service and outcome goals for categories in order of selection.
If the designated State agency uses an order of selection in accordance
with Sec. 361.36, the vocational rehabilitation services portion of
the Unified or Combined State Plan must identify the State's service
and outcome goals and the time within which these goals may be achieved
for individuals in each priority category within the order.
(d) Strategies. The vocational rehabilitation services portion of
the Unified or Combined State Plan must describe the strategies the
State will use to address the needs identified in the assessment
conducted under paragraph (a) of this section and achieve the goals and
priorities identified in paragraph (c) of this section, including--
(1) The methods to be used to expand and improve services to
individuals with disabilities, including how a broad range of assistive
technology services and assistive technology devices will be provided
to those individuals at each stage of the rehabilitation process and
how those services and devices will be provided to individuals with
disabilities on a statewide basis;
(2) The methods to be used to improve and expand vocational
rehabilitation services for students with disabilities, including the
coordination of services designed to facilitate the transition of such
students from the receipt of educational services in school to
postsecondary life, including the receipt of vocational rehabilitation
services under the Act, postsecondary education, employment, and pre-
employment transition services;
(3) Strategies developed and implemented by the State to address
the needs of students and youth with disabilities identified in the
assessments described in paragraph (a) of this section and strategies
to achieve the goals and priorities identified by the State to improve
and expand vocational rehabilitation services for students and youth
with disabilities on a statewide basis;
[[Page 21120]]
(4) Strategies to provide pre-employment transition services.
(5) Outreach procedures to identify and serve individuals with
disabilities who are minorities and individuals with disabilities who
have been unserved or underserved by the vocational rehabilitation
program;
(6) As applicable, the plan of the State for establishing,
developing, or improving community rehabilitation programs;
(7) Strategies to improve the performance of the State with respect
to the evaluation standards and performance indicators established
pursuant to section 106 of the Act and section 116 of Workforce
Innovation and Opportunity Act; and
(8) Strategies for assisting other components of the statewide
workforce development system in assisting individuals with
disabilities.
(e) Evaluation and reports of progress. (1) The vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan
must include--
(i) The results of an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
vocational rehabilitation program; and
(ii) A joint report by the designated State unit and the State
Rehabilitation Council, if the State unit has a Council, to the
Secretary on the progress made in improving the effectiveness of the
program from the previous year. This evaluation and joint report must
include--
(A) An evaluation of the extent to which the goals and priorities
identified in paragraph (c) of this section were achieved;
(B) A description of the strategies that contributed to the
achievement of the goals and priorities;
(C) To the extent to which the goals and priorities were not
achieved, a description of the factors that impeded that achievement;
and
(D) An assessment of the performance of the State on the standards
and indicators established pursuant to section 106 of the Act.
(2) The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified
or Combined State Plan must assure that the designated State unit and
the State Rehabilitation Council, if the State unit has a Council, will
jointly submit to the Secretary a report that contains the information
described in paragraph (e)(1) of this section at such time and in such
manner the Secretary determines appropriate.
(Authority: Section 101(a)(15) and (25) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 721(a)(15) and (25))
Sec. 361.30 Services to American Indians.
The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan must assure that the designated State agency
provides vocational rehabilitation services to American Indians who are
individuals with disabilities residing in the State to the same extent
as the designated State agency provides vocational rehabilitation
services to other significant populations of individuals with
disabilities residing in the State.
(Authority: Sections 101(a)(13) and 121(b)(3) of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 721(a)(13) and 741(b)(3))
Sec. 361.31 Cooperative agreements with private nonprofit
organizations.
The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan must describe the manner in which cooperative
agreements with private nonprofit vocational rehabilitation service
providers will be established.
(Authority: Section 101(a)(24)(B) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
as amended; 29 U.S.C. 721(a)(24)(B))
Sec. 361.32 Provision of training and services for employers.
The designated State unit may expend payments received under this
part to educate and provide services to employers who have hired or are
interested in hiring individuals with disabilities under the vocational
rehabilitation program, including--
(a) Providing training and technical assistance to employers
regarding the employment of individuals with disabilities, including
disability awareness, and the requirements of the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) and other
employment-related laws;
(b) Working with employers to--
(1) Provide opportunities for work-based learning experiences
(including internships, short-term employment, apprenticeships, and
fellowships);
(2) Provide opportunities for pre-employment transition services;
(3) Recruit qualified applicants who are individuals with
disabilities;
(4) Train employees who are individuals with disabilities; and
(5) Promote awareness of disability-related obstacles to continued
employment.
(c) Providing consultation, technical assistance, and support to
employers on workplace accommodations, assistive technology, and
facilities and workplace access through collaboration with community
partners and employers, across States and nationally, to enable the
employers to recruit, job match, hire, and retain qualified individuals
with disabilities who are recipients of vocational rehabilitation
services under this part, or who are applicants for such services; and
(d) Assisting employers with utilizing available financial support
for hiring or accommodating individuals with disabilities.
(Authority: Section 109 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 728A)
Sec. 361.33 [Reserved]
Sec. 361.34 Supported employment State plan supplement.
(a) The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified
or Combined State Plan must assure that the State has an acceptable
plan under part 363 of this chapter that provides for the use of funds
under that part to supplement funds under this part for the cost of
services leading to supported employment.
(b) The supported employment plan, including any needed revisions,
must be submitted as a supplement to the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan submitted under
this part.
(Authority: Sections 101(a)(22) and 606 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 721(a)(22) and 795k)
Sec. 361.35 Innovation and expansion activities.
(a) The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified
or Combined State Plan must assure that the State will reserve and use
a portion of the funds allotted to the State under section 110 of the
Act--
(1) For the development and implementation of innovative approaches
to expand and improve the provision of vocational rehabilitation
services to individuals with disabilities, particularly individuals
with the most significant disabilities, including transition services
for students and youth with disabilities and pre-employment transition
services for students with disabilities, consistent with the findings
of the comprehensive statewide assessment of the rehabilitation needs
of individuals with disabilities under Sec. 361.29(a) and the State's
goals and priorities under Sec. 361.29(c);
(2) To support the funding of the State Rehabilitation Council, if
the State has a Council, consistent with the resource plan identified
in Sec. 361.17(i); and
(3) To support the Statewide Independent Living Council, consistent
with the Statewide Independent Living Council resource plan prepared
under title VII, chapter 1 of the Act. The State
[[Page 21121]]
and the Statewide Independent Living Council may determine in the
Statewide Independent Living Council resource plan that other sources
of available funding may be used instead of funding under this section.
(b) The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified
or Combined State Plan must--
(1) Describe how the reserved funds will be used; and
(2) Include a report describing how the reserved funds were used.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(18) of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a)(18))
Sec. 361.36 Ability to serve all eligible individuals; order of
selection for services.
(a) General provisions. (1) The designated State unit either must
be able to provide the full range of services listed in section 103(a)
of the Act and Sec. 361.48, as appropriate, to all eligible
individuals or, in the event that vocational rehabilitation services
cannot be provided to all eligible individuals in the State who apply
for the services, include in the vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan the order to be followed
in selecting eligible individuals to be provided vocational
rehabilitation services.
(2) The ability of the designated State unit to provide the full
range of vocational rehabilitation services to all eligible individuals
must be supported by a determination that satisfies the requirements of
paragraph (b) or (c) of this section and a determination that, on the
basis of the designated State unit's projected fiscal and personnel
resources and its assessment of the rehabilitation needs of individuals
with significant disabilities within the State, it can--
(i) Continue to provide services to all individuals currently
receiving services;
(ii) Provide assessment services to all individuals expected to
apply for services in the next fiscal year;
(iii) Provide services to all individuals who are expected to be
determined eligible in the next fiscal year; and
(iv) Meet all program requirements.
(3) If the designated State unit is unable to provide the full
range of vocational rehabilitation services to all eligible individuals
in the State who apply for the services, the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must--
(i) Show the order to be followed in selecting eligible individuals
to be provided vocational rehabilitation services;
(ii) Provide a justification for the order of selection;
(iii) Identify service and outcome goals and the time within which
the goals may be achieved for individuals in each priority category
within the order, as required under Sec. 361.29(c)(5);
(iv) Assure that--
(A) In accordance with criteria established by the State for the
order of selection, individuals with the most significant disabilities
will be selected first for the provision of vocational rehabilitation
services; and
(B) Individuals who do not meet the order of selection criteria
will have access to services provided through the information and
referral system established under Sec. 361.37; and
(v) State whether the designated State unit will elect to serve, in
its discretion, eligible individuals (whether or not the individuals
are receiving vocational rehabilitation services under the order of
selection) who require specific services or equipment to maintain
employment, notwithstanding the assurance provided pursuant to
paragraph (3)(iv)(A) of this section.
(b) Basis for assurance that services can be provided to all
eligible individuals. (1) For a designated State unit that determined,
for the current fiscal year and the preceding fiscal year, that it is
able to provide the full range of services, as appropriate, to all
eligible individuals, the State unit, during the current fiscal and
preceding fiscal year, must have in fact--
(i) Provided assessment services to all applicants and the full
range of services, as appropriate, to all eligible individuals;
(ii) Made referral forms widely available throughout the State;
(iii) Conducted outreach efforts to identify and serve individuals
with disabilities who have been unserved or underserved by the
vocational rehabilitation system; and
(iv) Not delayed, through waiting lists or other means,
determinations of eligibility, the development of individualized plans
for employment for individuals determined eligible for vocational
rehabilitation services, or the provision of services for eligible
individuals for whom individualized plans for employment have been
developed.
(2) For a designated State unit that was unable to provide the full
range of services to all eligible individuals during the current or
preceding fiscal year or that has not met the requirements in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section, the determination that the designated State
unit is able to provide the full range of vocational rehabilitation
services to all eligible individuals in the next fiscal year must be
based on--
(i) A demonstration that circumstances have changed that will allow
the designated State unit to meet the requirements of paragraph (a)(2)
of this section in the next fiscal year, including--
(A) An estimate of the number of and projected costs of serving, in
the next fiscal year, individuals with existing individualized plans
for employment;
(B) The projected number of individuals with disabilities who will
apply for services and will be determined eligible in the next fiscal
year and the projected costs of serving those individuals;
(C) The projected costs of administering the program in the next
fiscal year, including, but not limited to, costs of staff salaries and
benefits, outreach activities, and required statewide studies; and
(D) The projected revenues and projected number of qualified
personnel for the program in the next fiscal year.
(ii) Comparable data, as relevant, for the current or preceding
fiscal year, or for both years, of the costs listed in paragraphs
(b)(2)(i)(A) through (C) of this section and the resources identified
in paragraph (b)(2)(i)(D) of this section and an explanation of any
projected increases or decreases in these costs and resources; and
(iii) A determination that the projected revenues and the projected
number of qualified personnel for the program in the next fiscal year
are adequate to cover the costs identified in paragraphs (b)(2)(i)(A)
through (C) of this section to ensure the provision of the full range
of services, as appropriate, to all eligible individuals.
(c) Determining need for establishing and implementing an order of
selection. (1) The designated State unit must determine, prior to the
beginning of each fiscal year, whether to establish and implement an
order of selection.
(2) If the designated State unit determines that it does not need
to establish an order of selection, it must reevaluate this
determination whenever changed circumstances during the course of a
fiscal year, such as a decrease in its fiscal or personnel resources or
an increase in its program costs, indicate that it may no longer be
able to provide the full range of services, as appropriate, to all
eligible individuals, as described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(3) If a designated State unit establishes an order of selection,
but determines that it does not need to implement that order at the
beginning of the fiscal year, it must continue to meet the requirements
of paragraph (a)(2) of this section, or it must implement the
[[Page 21122]]
order of selection by closing one or more priority categories.
(d) Establishing an order of selection. (1) Basis for order of
selection. An order of selection must be based on a refinement of the
three criteria in the definition of individual with a significant
disability in section 7(21)(A) of the Act and Sec. 361.5(c)(29).
(2) Factors that cannot be used in determining order of selection
of eligible individuals. An order of selection may not be based on any
other factors, including--
(i) Any duration of residency requirement, provided the individual
is present in the State;
(ii) Type of disability;
(iii) Age, sex, race, color, or national origin;
(iv) Source of referral;
(v) Type of expected employment outcome;
(vi) The need for specific services or anticipated cost of services
required by an individual; or
(vii) The income level of an individual or an individual's family.
(e) Administrative requirements. In administering the order of
selection, the designated State unit must--
(1) Implement the order of selection on a statewide basis;
(2) Notify all eligible individuals of the priority categories in a
State's order of selection, their assignment to a particular category,
and their right to appeal their category assignment;
(3) Continue to provide all needed services to any eligible
individual who has begun to receive services under an individualized
plan for employment prior to the effective date of the order of
selection, irrespective of the severity of the individual's disability;
and
(4) Ensure that its funding arrangements for providing services
under the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan, including third-party arrangements and awards
under the establishment authority, are consistent with the order of
selection. If any funding arrangements are inconsistent with the order
of selection, the designated State unit must renegotiate these funding
arrangements so that they are consistent with the order of selection.
(f) State Rehabilitation Council. The designated State unit must
consult with the State Rehabilitation Council, if the State unit has a
Council, regarding the--
(1) Need to establish an order of selection, including any
reevaluation of the need under paragraph (c)(2) of this section;
(2) Priority categories of the particular order of selection;
(3) Criteria for determining individuals with the most significant
disabilities; and
(4) Administration of the order of selection.
(Authority: Sections 12(d); 101(a)(5); 101(a)(12); 101(a)(15)(A),
(B) and (C); 101(a)(21)(A)(ii); and 504(a) of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(d), 721(a)(5), 721(a)(12),
721(a)(15)(A), (B) and (C); 721(a)(21)(A)(ii), and 794(a))
Sec. 361.37 Information and referral programs.
(a) General provisions. The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must assure that--
(1) The designated State agency will implement an information and
referral system adequate to ensure that individuals with disabilities,
including eligible individuals who do not meet the agency's order of
selection criteria for receiving vocational rehabilitation services if
the agency is operating on an order of selection, are provided accurate
vocational rehabilitation information and guidance (which may include
counseling and referral for job placement) using appropriate modes of
communication to assist them in preparing for, securing, retaining,
advancing in, or regaining employment; and
(2) The designated State agency will refer individuals with
disabilities to other appropriate Federal and State programs, including
other components of the statewide workforce development system.
(b) The designated State unit must refer to appropriate programs
and service providers best suited to address the specific
rehabilitation, independent living and employment needs of an
individual with a disability who makes an informed choice not to pursue
an employment outcome under the vocational rehabilitation program, as
defined in Sec. 361.5(c)(15). Before making the referral required by
this paragraph, the State unit must--
(1) Consistent with Sec. 361.42(a)(4)(i), explain to the
individual that the purpose of the vocational rehabilitation program is
to assist individuals to achieve an employment outcome as defined in
Sec. 361.5(c)(15);
(2) Consistent with Sec. 361.52, provide the individual with
information concerning the availability of employment options, and of
vocational rehabilitation services, to assist the individual to achieve
an appropriate employment outcome;
(3) Inform the individual that services under the vocational
rehabilitation program can be provided to eligible individuals in an
extended employment setting if necessary for purposes of training or
otherwise preparing for employment in an integrated setting;
(4) Inform the individual that, if he or she initially chooses not
to pursue an employment outcome as defined in Sec. 361.5(c)(15), he or
she can seek services from the designated State unit at a later date
if, at that time, he or she chooses to pursue an employment outcome;
and
(5) Refer the individual, as appropriate, to the Social Security
Administration in order to obtain information concerning the ability of
individuals with disabilities to work while receiving benefits from the
Social Security Administration.
(c) Criteria for appropriate referrals. In making the referrals
identified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the designated State
unit must--
(1) Refer the individual to Federal or State programs, including
programs carried out by other components of the statewide workforce
development system, best suited to address the specific employment
needs of an individual with a disability; and
(2) Provide the individual who is being referred--
(i) A notice of the referral by the designated State agency to the
agency carrying out the program;
(ii) Information identifying a specific point of contact within the
agency to which the individual is being referred; and
(iii) Information and advice regarding the most suitable services
to assist the individual to prepare for, secure, retain, or regain
employment.
(d) Order of selection. In providing the information and referral
services under this section to eligible individuals who are not in the
priority category or categories to receive vocational rehabilitation
services under the State's order of selection, the State unit must
identify, as part of its reporting under section 101(a)(10) of the Act
and Sec. 361.40, the number of eligible individuals who did not meet
the agency's order of selection criteria for receiving vocational
rehabilitation services and did receive information and referral
services under this section.
(Authority: Sections 7(11), 12(c), 101(a)(5)(D), 101(a)(10)(C)(ii),
and 101(a)(20) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29
U.S.C. 709(c), 721(a)(5)(D), 721(a)(10)(C)(ii), and 721(a)(20))
Sec. 361.38 Protection, use, and release of personal information.
(a) General provisions. (1) The State agency and the State unit
must adopt
[[Page 21123]]
and implement written policies and procedures to safeguard the
confidentiality of all personal information, including photographs and
lists of names. These policies and procedures must ensure that--
(i) Specific safeguards are established to protect current and
stored personal information;
(ii) All applicants and eligible individuals and, as appropriate,
those individuals' representatives, service providers, cooperating
agencies, and interested persons are informed through appropriate modes
of communication of the confidentiality of personal information and the
conditions for accessing and releasing this information;
(iii) All applicants or their representatives are informed about
the State unit's need to collect personal information and the policies
governing its use, including--
(A) Identification of the authority under which information is
collected;
(B) Explanation of the principal purposes for which the State unit
intends to use or release the information;
(C) Explanation of whether providing requested information to the
State unit is mandatory or voluntary and the effects of not providing
requested information;
(D) Identification of those situations in which the State unit
requires or does not require informed written consent of the individual
before information may be released; and
(E) Identification of other agencies to which information is
routinely released;
(iv) An explanation of State policies and procedures affecting
personal information will be provided to each individual in that
individual's native language or through the appropriate mode of
communication; and
(v) These policies and procedures provide no fewer protections for
individuals than State laws and regulations.
(2) The State unit may establish reasonable fees to cover
extraordinary costs of duplicating records or making extensive searches
and must establish policies and procedures governing access to records.
(b) State program use. All personal information in the possession
of the State agency or the designated State unit must be used only for
the purposes directly connected with the administration of the
vocational rehabilitation program. Information containing identifiable
personal information may not be shared with advisory or other bodies
that do not have official responsibility for administration of the
program. In the administration of the program, the State unit may
obtain personal information from service providers and cooperating
agencies under assurances that the information may not be further
divulged, except as provided under paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of this
section.
(c) Release to applicants and eligible individuals. (1) Except as
provided in paragraphs (c)(2) and (c)(3) of this section, if requested
in writing by an applicant or eligible individual, the State unit must
make all requested information in that individual's record of services
accessible to and must release the information to the individual or the
individual's representative in a timely manner.
(2) Medical, psychological, or other information that the State
unit determines may be harmful to the individual may not be released
directly to the individual, but must be provided to the individual
through a third party chosen by the individual, which may include,
among others, an advocate, a family member, or a qualified medical or
mental health professional, unless a representative has been appointed
by a court to represent the individual, in which case the information
must be released to the court-appointed representative.
(3) If personal information has been obtained from another agency
or organization, it may be released only by, or under the conditions
established by, the other agency or organization.
(4) An applicant or eligible individual who believes that
information in the individual's record of services is inaccurate or
misleading may request that the designated State unit amend the
information. If the information is not amended, the request for an
amendment must be documented in the record of services, consistent with
Sec. 361.47(a)(12).
(d) Release for audit, evaluation, and research. Personal
information may be released to an organization, agency, or individual
engaged in audit, evaluation, or research only for purposes directly
connected with the administration of the vocational rehabilitation
program or for purposes that would significantly improve the quality of
life for applicants and eligible individuals and only if the
organization, agency, or individual assures that--
(1) The information will be used only for the purposes for which it
is being provided;
(2) The information will be released only to persons officially
connected with the audit, evaluation, or research;
(3) The information will not be released to the involved
individual;
(4) The information will be managed in a manner to safeguard
confidentiality; and
(5) The final product will not reveal any personal identifying
information without the informed written consent of the involved
individual or the individual's representative.
(e) Release to other programs or authorities. (1) Upon receiving
the informed written consent of the individual or, if appropriate, the
individual's representative, the State unit may release personal
information to another agency or organization for its program purposes
only to the extent that the information may be released to the involved
individual or the individual's representative and only to the extent
that the other agency or organization demonstrates that the information
requested is necessary for its program.
(2) Medical or psychological information that the State unit
determines may be harmful to the individual may be released if the
other agency or organization assures the State unit that the
information will be used only for the purpose for which it is being
provided and will not be further released to the individual.
(3) The State unit must release personal information if required by
Federal law or regulations.
(4) The State unit must release personal information in response to
investigations in connection with law enforcement, fraud, or abuse,
unless expressly prohibited by Federal or State laws or regulations,
and in response to an order issued by a judge, magistrate, or other
authorized judicial officer.
(5) The State unit also may release personal information in order
to protect the individual or others if the individual poses a threat to
his or her safety or to the safety of others.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(6)(A) of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a)(6)(A))
Sec. 361.39 State-imposed requirements.
The designated State unit must, upon request, identify those
regulations and policies relating to the administration or operation of
its vocational rehabilitation program that are State-imposed, including
any regulations or policy based on State interpretation of any Federal
law, regulation, or guideline.
(Authority: Section 17 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 714)
Sec. 361.40 Reports; Evaluation standards and performance indicators.
(a) Reports. (1) The vocational rehabilitation services portion of
the Unified or Combined State Plan must assure that the designated
State agency
[[Page 21124]]
will submit reports, including reports required under sections 13, 14,
and 101(a)(10) of the Act--
(i) In the form and level of detail and at the time required by the
Secretary regarding applicants for and eligible individuals receiving
services, including students receiving pre-employment transition
services in accordance with Sec. 361.48(a); and
(ii) In a manner that provides a complete count (other than the
information obtained through sampling consistent with section
101(a)(10)(E) of the Act) of the applicants and eligible individuals
to--
(A) Permit the greatest possible cross-classification of data; and
(B) Protect the confidentiality of the identity of each individual.
(2) The designated State agency must comply with any requirements
necessary to ensure the accuracy and verification of those reports.
(b) Evaluation standards and performance indicators.
(1) Standards and indicators. The evaluation standards and
performance indicators for the vocational rehabilitation program
carried out under this part are subject to the performance
accountability provisions described in section 116(b) of the Workforce
Innovation and Opportunity Act and implemented in joint regulations set
forth in subpart E of this part.
(2) Compliance. A State's compliance with common performance
measures and any necessary corrective actions will be determined in
accordance with joint regulations set forth in subpart E of this part.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 101(a)(10)(A) and (F), and 106 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c),
721(a)(10)(A) and (F), and 726)
Provision and Scope of Services
Sec. 361.41 Processing referrals and applications.
(a) Referrals. The designated State unit must establish and
implement standards for the prompt and equitable handling of referrals
of individuals for vocational rehabilitation services, including
referrals of individuals made through the one-stop service delivery
systems under section 121 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity
Act. The standards must include timelines for making good faith efforts
to inform these individuals of application requirements and to gather
information necessary to initiate an assessment for determining
eligibility and priority for services.
(b) Applications. (1) Once an individual has submitted an
application for vocational rehabilitation services, including
applications made through common intake procedures in one-stop centers
under section 121 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, an
eligibility determination must be made within 60 days, unless--
(i) Exceptional and unforeseen circumstances beyond the control of
the designated State unit preclude making an eligibility determination
within 60 days and the designated State unit and the individual agree
to a specific extension of time; or
(ii) An exploration of the individual's abilities, capabilities,
and capacity to perform in work situations is carried out in accordance
with Sec. 361.42(e).
(2) An individual is considered to have submitted an application
when the individual or the individual's representative, as
appropriate--
(i)(A) Has completed and signed an agency application form;
(B) Has completed a common intake application form in a one-stop
center requesting vocational rehabilitation services; or
(C) Has otherwise requested services from the designated State
unit;
(ii) Has provided to the designated State unit information
necessary to initiate an assessment to determine eligibility and
priority for services; and
(iii) Is available to complete the assessment process.
(3) The designated State unit must ensure that its application
forms are widely available throughout the State, particularly in the
one-stop centers under section 121 of the Workforce Innovation and
Opportunity Act.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 101(a)(6)(A) and 102(a)(6) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c),
721(a)(6)(A) and 722(a)(6))
Sec. 361.42 Assessment for determining eligibility and priority for
services.
In order to determine whether an individual is eligible for
vocational rehabilitation services and the individual's priority under
an order of selection for services (if the State is operating under an
order of selection), the designated State unit must conduct an
assessment for determining eligibility and priority for services. The
assessment must be conducted in the most integrated setting possible,
consistent with the individual's needs and informed choice, and in
accordance with the following provisions:
(a) Eligibility requirements. (1) Basic requirements. The
designated State unit's determination of an applicant's eligibility for
vocational rehabilitation services must be based only on the following
requirements:
(i) A determination by qualified personnel that the applicant has a
physical or mental impairment;
(ii) A determination by qualified personnel that the applicant's
physical or mental impairment constitutes or results in a substantial
impediment to employment for the applicant; and
(iii) A determination by a qualified vocational rehabilitation
counselor employed by the designated State unit that the applicant
requires vocational rehabilitation services to prepare for, secure,
retain, advance in, or regain employment that is consistent with the
individual's unique strengths, resources, priorities, concerns,
abilities, capabilities, interest, and informed choice. For purposes of
an assessment for determining eligibility and vocational rehabilitation
needs under this part, an individual is presumed to have a goal of an
employment outcome.
(2) Presumption of benefit. The designated State unit must presume
that an applicant who meets the eligibility requirements in paragraphs
(a)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section can benefit in terms of an
employment outcome.
(3) Presumption of eligibility for Social Security recipients and
beneficiaries. (i) Any applicant who has been determined eligible for
Social Security benefits under title II or title XVI of the Social
Security Act is--
(A) Presumed eligible for vocational rehabilitation services under
paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section; and
(B) Considered an individual with a significant disability as
defined in Sec. 361.5(c)(29).
(ii) If an applicant for vocational rehabilitation services asserts
that he or she is eligible for Social Security benefits under title II
or title XVI of the Social Security Act (and, therefore, is presumed
eligible for vocational rehabilitation services under paragraph
(a)(3)(i)(A) of this section), but is unable to provide appropriate
evidence, such as an award letter, to support that assertion, the State
unit must verify the applicant's eligibility under title II or title
XVI of the Social Security Act by contacting the Social Security
Administration. This verification must be made within a reasonable
period of time that enables the State unit to determine the applicant's
eligibility for vocational rehabilitation services within 60 days of
the individual submitting an application for services in accordance
with Sec. 361.41(b)(2).
(4) Achievement of an employment outcome. Any eligible individual,
including an individual whose eligibility for vocational rehabilitation
services is based on the individual being eligible for Social Security
benefits
[[Page 21125]]
under title II or title XVI of the Social Security Act, must intend to
achieve an employment outcome that is consistent with the applicant's
unique strengths, resources, priorities, concerns, abilities,
capabilities, interests, and informed choice.
(i) The State unit is responsible for informing individuals,
through its application process for vocational rehabilitation services,
that individuals who receive services under the program must intend to
achieve an employment outcome.
(ii) The applicant's completion of the application process for
vocational rehabilitation services is sufficient evidence of the
individual's intent to achieve an employment outcome, and no additional
demonstration on the part of the applicant is required for purposes of
satisfying paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
(5) Interpretation. Nothing in this section, including paragraph
(a)(3)(i), is to be construed to create an entitlement to any
vocational rehabilitation service.
(b) Interim determination of eligibility. (1) The designated State
unit may initiate the provision of vocational rehabilitation services
for an applicant on the basis of an interim determination of
eligibility prior to the 60-day period described in Sec. 361.41(b)(2).
(2) If a State chooses to make interim determinations of
eligibility, the designated State unit must--
(i) Establish criteria and conditions for making those
determinations;
(ii) Develop and implement procedures for making the
determinations; and
(iii) Determine the scope of services that may be provided pending
the final determination of eligibility.
(3) If a State elects to use an interim eligibility determination,
the designated State unit must make a final determination of
eligibility within 60 days of the individual submitting an application
for services in accordance with Sec. 361.41(b)(2).
(c) Prohibited factors. (1) The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must assure that the
State unit will not impose, as part of determining eligibility under
this section, a duration of residence requirement that excludes from
services any applicant who is present in the State. The designated
State unit may not require the applicant to demonstrate a presence in
the State through the production of any documentation that under State
or local law, or practical circumstances, results in a duration of
residency.
(2) In making a determination of eligibility under this section,
the designated State unit also must ensure that--
(i) No applicant or group of applicants is excluded or found
ineligible solely on the basis of the type of disability; and
(ii) The eligibility requirements are applied without regard to
the--
(A) Age, sex, race, color, or national origin of the applicant;
(B) Type of expected employment outcome;
(C) Source of referral for vocational rehabilitation services;
(D) Particular service needs or anticipated cost of services
required by an applicant or the income level of an applicant or
applicant's family;
(E) Applicants' employment history or current employment status;
and
(F) Applicants' educational status or current educational
credential.
(d) Review and assessment of data for eligibility determination.
Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, the designated
State unit--
(1) Must base its determination of each of the basic eligibility
requirements in paragraph (a) of this section on--
(i) A review and assessment of existing data, including counselor
observations, education records, information provided by the individual
or the individual's family, particularly information used by education
officials, and determinations made by officials of other agencies; and
(ii) To the extent existing data do not describe the current
functioning of the individual or are unavailable, insufficient, or
inappropriate to make an eligibility determination, an assessment of
additional data resulting from the provision of vocational
rehabilitation services, including trial work experiences, assistive
technology devices and services, personal assistance services, and any
other support services that are necessary to determine whether an
individual is eligible; and
(2) Must base its presumption under paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this
section that an applicant who has been determined eligible for Social
Security benefits under title II or title XVI of the Social Security
Act satisfies each of the basic eligibility requirements in paragraph
(a) of this section on determinations made by the Social Security
Administration.
(e) Trial work experiences for individuals with significant
disabilities. (1) Prior to any determination that an individual with a
disability is unable to benefit from vocational rehabilitation services
in terms of an employment outcome because of the severity of that
individual's disability or that the individual is ineligible for
vocational rehabilitation services, the designated State unit must
conduct an exploration of the individual's abilities, capabilities, and
capacity to perform in realistic work situations.
(2)(i) The designated State unit must develop a written plan to
assess periodically the individual's abilities, capabilities, and
capacity to perform in competitive integrated work situations through
the use of trial work experiences, which must be provided in
competitive integrated employment settings to the maximum extent
possible, consistent with the informed choice and rehabilitation needs
of the individual.
(ii) Trial work experiences include supported employment, on-the-
job training, and other experiences using realistic integrated work
settings.
(iii) Trial work experiences must be of sufficient variety and over
a sufficient period of time for the designated State unit to determine
that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the individual
cannot benefit from the provision of vocational rehabilitation services
in terms of a competitive integrated employment outcome; and
(iv) The designated State unit must provide appropriate supports,
including assistive technology devices and services and personal
assistance services, to accommodate the rehabilitation needs of the
individual during the trial work experiences.
(f) Data for determination of priority for services under an order
of selection. If the designated State unit is operating under an order
of selection for services, as provided in Sec. 361.36, the State unit
must base its priority assignments on--
(1) A review of the data that was developed under paragraphs (d)
and (e) of this section to make the eligibility determination; and
(2) An assessment of additional data, to the extent necessary.
(Authority: Sections 7(2), 12(c), 101(a)(12), 102(a), 103(a)(1),
103(a)(9), 103(a)(10) and 103(a)(14) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(2), 709(c), 721(a)(12), 722(a),
723(a)(1), 723(a)(9), 723(a)(10) and 723(a)(14))
Note to Sec. 361.42: Clear and convincing evidence means that the
designated State unit has a high degree of certainty before it can
conclude that an individual is incapable of benefiting from services in
terms of an employment outcome. The clear and convincing standard
constitutes the highest standard used in our civil system of law and is
to be individually applied on a case-by-case basis. The
[[Page 21126]]
term clear means unequivocal. For example, the use of an intelligence
test result alone would not constitute clear and convincing evidence.
Clear and convincing evidence might include a description of
assessments, including situational assessments and supported employment
assessments, from service providers who have concluded that they would
be unable to meet the individual's needs due to the severity of the
individual's disability. The demonstration of ``clear and convincing
evidence'' must include, if appropriate, a functional assessment of
skill development activities, with any necessary supports (including
assistive technology), in real life settings. (S. Rep. No. 357, 102d
Cong., 2d. Sess. 37-38 (1992))
Sec. 361.43 Procedures for ineligibility determination.
If the State unit determines that an applicant is ineligible for
vocational rehabilitation services or determines that an individual
receiving services under an individualized plan for employment is no
longer eligible for services, the State unit must--
(a) Make the determination only after providing an opportunity for
full consultation with the individual or, as appropriate, with the
individual's representative;
(b) Inform the individual in writing, supplemented as necessary by
other appropriate modes of communication consistent with the informed
choice of the individual, of the ineligibility determination, including
the reasons for that determination, the requirements under this
section, and the means by which the individual may express and seek
remedy for any dissatisfaction, including the procedures for review of
State unit personnel determinations in accordance with Sec. 361.57;
(c) Provide the individual with a description of services available
from a client assistance program established under 34 CFR part 370 and
information on how to contact that program;
(d) Refer the individual--
(1) To other programs that are part of the one-stop service
delivery system under the Workforce Investment Act that can address the
individual's training or employment-related needs; or
(2) To Federal, State, or local programs or service providers,
including, as appropriate, independent living programs and extended
employment providers, best suited to meet their rehabilitation needs,
if the ineligibility determination is based on a finding that the
individual has chosen not to pursue, or is incapable of achieving, an
employment outcome as defined in Sec. 361.5(c)(15).
(e) Review within 12 months and annually thereafter if requested by
the individual or, if appropriate, by the individual's representative
any ineligibility determination that is based on a finding that the
individual is incapable of achieving an employment outcome. This review
need not be conducted in situations in which the individual has refused
it, the individual is no longer present in the State, the individual's
whereabouts are unknown, or the individual's medical condition is
rapidly progressive or terminal.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 102(a)(5) and (c) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and
722(a)(5) and (c))
Sec. 361.44 Closure without eligibility determination.
The designated State unit may not close an applicant's record of
services prior to making an eligibility determination unless the
applicant declines to participate in, or is unavailable to complete, an
assessment for determining eligibility and priority for services, and
the State unit has made a reasonable number of attempts to contact the
applicant or, if appropriate, the applicant's representative to
encourage the applicant's participation.
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c))
Sec. 361.45 Development of the individualized plan for employment.
(a) General requirements. The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must assure that--
(1) An individualized plan for employment meeting the requirements
of this section and Sec. 361.46 is developed and implemented in a
timely manner for each individual determined to be eligible for
vocational rehabilitation services or, if the designated State unit is
operating under an order of selection in accordance with Sec. 361.36,
for each eligible individual to whom the State unit is able to provide
services; and
(2) Services will be provided in accordance with the provisions of
the individualized plan for employment.
(b) Purpose. (1) The designated State unit must conduct an
assessment for determining vocational rehabilitation needs, if
appropriate, for each eligible individual or, if the State is operating
under an order of selection, for each eligible individual to whom the
State is able to provide services. The purpose of this assessment is to
determine the employment outcome, and the nature and scope of
vocational rehabilitation services to be included in the individualized
plan for employment.
(2) The individualized plan for employment must be designed to
achieve a specific employment outcome, as defined in Sec.
361.5(c)(15), that is selected by the individual consistent with the
individual's unique strengths, resources, priorities, concerns,
abilities, capabilities, interests, and informed choice.
(c) Required information. The State unit must provide the following
information to each eligible individual or, as appropriate, the
individual's representative, in writing and, if appropriate, in the
native language or mode of communication of the individual or the
individual's representative:
(1) Options for developing an individualized plan for employment.
Information on the available options for developing the individualized
plan for employment, including the option that an eligible individual
or, as appropriate, the individual's representative may develop all or
part of the individualized plan for employment--
(i) Without assistance from the State unit or other entity; or
(ii) With assistance from--
(A) A qualified vocational rehabilitation counselor employed by the
State unit;
(B) A qualified vocational rehabilitation counselor who is not
employed by the State unit;
(C) A disability advocacy organization; or
(D) Resources other than those in paragraph (c)(1)(ii)(A) through
(C) of this section.
(2) Additional information. Additional information to assist the
eligible individual or, as appropriate, the individual's representative
in developing the individualized plan for employment, including--
(i) Information describing the full range of components that must
be included in an individualized plan for employment;
(ii) As appropriate to each eligible individual--
(A) An explanation of agency guidelines and criteria for
determining an eligible individual's financial commitments under an
individualized plan for employment;
(B) Information on the availability of assistance in completing
State unit forms required as part of the individualized plan for
employment; and
(C) Additional information that the eligible individual requests or
the State unit determines to be necessary to the
[[Page 21127]]
development of the individualized plan for employment;
(iii) A description of the rights and remedies available to the
individual, including, if appropriate, recourse to the processes
described in Sec. 361.57; and
(iv) A description of the availability of a client assistance
program established under part 370 of this chapter and information on
how to contact the client assistance program.
(3) Individuals entitled to benefits under title II or XVI of the
Social Security Act. For individuals entitled to benefits under title
II or XVI of the Social Security Act on the basis of a disability or
blindness, the State unit must provide to the individual general
information on additional supports and assistance for individuals with
disabilities desiring to enter the workforce, including assistance with
benefits planning.
(d) Mandatory procedures. The designated State unit must ensure
that--
(1) The individualized plan for employment is a written document
prepared on forms provided by the State unit;
(2) The individualized plan for employment is developed and
implemented in a manner that gives eligible individuals the opportunity
to exercise informed choice, consistent with Sec. 361.52, in
selecting--
(i) The employment outcome, including the employment setting;
(ii) The specific vocational rehabilitation services needed to
achieve the employment outcome, including the settings in which
services will be provided;
(iii) The entity or entities that will provide the vocational
rehabilitation services; and
(iv) The methods available for procuring the services;
(3) The individualized plan for employment is--
(i) Agreed to and signed by the eligible individual or, as
appropriate, the individual's representative; and
(ii) Approved and signed by a qualified vocational rehabilitation
counselor employed by the designated State unit;
(4) A copy of the individualized plan for employment and a copy of
any amendments to the individualized plan for employment are provided
to the eligible individual or, as appropriate, to the individual's
representative, in writing and, if appropriate, in the native language
or mode of communication of the individual or, as appropriate, the
individual's representative;
(5) The individualized plan for employment is reviewed at least
annually by a qualified vocational rehabilitation counselor and the
eligible individual or, as appropriate, the individual's representative
to assess the eligible individual's progress in achieving the
identified employment outcome;
(6) The individualized plan for employment is amended, as
necessary, by the individual or, as appropriate, the individual's
representative, in collaboration with a representative of the State
unit or a qualified vocational rehabilitation counselor (to the extent
determined to be appropriate by the individual), if there are
substantive changes in the employment outcome, the vocational
rehabilitation services to be provided, or the providers of the
vocational rehabilitation services;
(7) Amendments to the individualized plan for employment do not
take effect until agreed to and signed by the eligible individual or,
as appropriate, the individual's representative and by a qualified
vocational rehabilitation counselor employed by the designated State
unit;
(8) The individualized plan for employment is amended, as
necessary, to include the postemployment services and service providers
that are necessary for the individual to maintain, advance in or regain
employment, consistent with the individual's unique strengths,
resources, priorities, concerns, abilities, capabilities, interests,
and informed choice; and
(9) An individualized plan for employment for a student with a
disability is developed--
(i) In consideration of the student's individualized education
program or 504 services, as applicable; and
(ii) In accordance with the plans, policies, procedures, and terms
of the interagency agreement required under Sec. 361.22.
(e) Standards for developing the individualized plan for
employment. The individualized plan for employment must be developed as
soon as possible, but not later than 90 days after the date of
determination of eligibility, unless the State unit and the eligible
individual agree to the extension of that deadline to a specific date
by which the individualized plan for employment must be completed.
(f) Data for preparing the individualized plan for employment. (1)
Preparation without comprehensive assessment. To the extent possible,
the employment outcome and the nature and scope of rehabilitation
services to be included in the individual's individualized plan for
employment must be determined based on the data used for the assessment
of eligibility and priority for services under Sec. 361.42.
(2) Preparation based on comprehensive assessment.
(i) If additional data are necessary to determine the employment
outcome and the nature and scope of services to be included in the
individualized plan for employment of an eligible individual, the State
unit must conduct a comprehensive assessment of the unique strengths,
resources, priorities, concerns, abilities, capabilities, interests,
and informed choice, including the need for supported employment
services, of the eligible individual, in the most integrated setting
possible, consistent with the informed choice of the individual in
accordance with the provisions of Sec. 361.5(c)(5)(ii).
(ii) In preparing the comprehensive assessment, the State unit must
use, to the maximum extent possible and appropriate and in accordance
with confidentiality requirements, existing information that is current
as of the date of the development of the individualized plan for
employment, including information--
(A) Available from other programs and providers, particularly
information used by education officials and the Social Security
Administration;
(B) Provided by the individual and the individual's family; and
(C) Obtained under the assessment for determining the individual's
eligibility and vocational rehabilitation needs.
(Authority: Sections 7(2)(B), 101(a)(9), 102(b), and 103(a)(1) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(2)(B),
721(a)(9), 722(b), and 723(a)(1))
Sec. 361.46 Content of the individualized plan for employment.
(a) Mandatory components. Regardless of the approach in Sec.
361.45(c)(1) that an eligible individual selects for purposes of
developing the individualized plan for employment, each individualized
plan for employment must--
(1) Include a description of the specific employment outcome, as
defined in Sec. 361.5(c)(15), that is chosen by the eligible
individual and is consistent with the individual's unique strengths,
resources, priorities, concerns, abilities, capabilities, career
interests, and informed choice consistent with the general goal of
competitive integrated employment (except that in the case of an
eligible individual who is a student or a youth with a disability, the
description may be a description of the individual's projected post-
school employment outcome);
(2) Include a description under Sec. 361.48 of--
[[Page 21128]]
(i) These specific rehabilitation services needed to achieve the
employment outcome, including, as appropriate, the provision of
assistive technology devices, assistive technology services, and
personal assistance services, including training in the management of
those services; and
(ii) In the case of a plan for an eligible individual that is a
student or youth with a disability, the specific transition services
and supports needed to achieve the individual's employment outcome or
projected post-school employment outcome.
(3) Provide for services in the most integrated setting that is
appropriate for the services involved and is consistent with the
informed choice of the eligible individual;
(4) Include timelines for the achievement of the employment outcome
and for the initiation of services;
(5) Include a description of the entity or entities chosen by the
eligible individual or, as appropriate, the individual's representative
that will provide the vocational rehabilitation services and the
methods used to procure those services;
(6) Include a description of the criteria that will be used to
evaluate progress toward achievement of the employment outcome; and
(7) Include the terms and conditions of the individualized plan for
employment, including, as appropriate, information describing--
(i) The responsibilities of the designated State unit;
(ii) The responsibilities of the eligible individual, including--
(A) The responsibilities the individual will assume in relation to
achieving the employment outcome;
(B) If applicable, the extent of the individual's participation in
paying for the cost of services; and
(C) The responsibility of the individual with regard to applying
for and securing comparable services and benefits as described in Sec.
361.53; and
(iii) The responsibilities of other entities as the result of
arrangements made pursuant to the comparable services or benefits
requirements in Sec. 361.53.
(b) Supported employment requirements. An individualized plan for
employment for an individual with a most significant disability for
whom an employment outcome in a supported employment setting has been
determined to be appropriate must--
(1) Specify the supported employment services to be provided by the
designated State unit;
(2) Specify the expected extended services needed, which may
include natural supports;
(3) Identify the source of extended services or, to the extent that
it is not possible to identify the source of extended services at the
time the individualized plan for employment is developed, include a
description of the basis for concluding that there is a reasonable
expectation that those sources will become available;
(4) Provide for periodic monitoring to ensure that the individual
is making satisfactory progress toward meeting the weekly work
requirement established in the individualized plan for employment by
the time of transition to extended services;
(5) Provide for the coordination of services provided under an
individualized plan for employment with services provided under other
individualized plans established under other Federal or State programs;
(6) To the extent that job skills training is provided, identify
that the training will be provided on site; and
(7) Include placement in an integrated setting for the maximum
number of hours possible based on the unique strengths, resources,
priorities, concerns, abilities, capabilities, interests, and informed
choice of individuals with the most significant disabilities.
(c) Post-employment services. The individualized plan for
employment for each individual must contain, as determined to be
necessary, statements concerning--
(1) The expected need for post-employment services prior to closing
the record of services of an individual who has achieved an employment
outcome;
(2) A description of the terms and conditions for the provision of
any post-employment services; and
(3) If appropriate, a statement of how post-employment services
will be provided or arranged through other entities as the result of
arrangements made pursuant to the comparable services or benefits
requirements in Sec. 361.53.
(d) Coordination of services for students with disabilities. The
individualized plan for employment for a student with a disability must
be coordinated with the individualized education program or 504
services, as applicable, for that individual in terms of the goals,
objectives, and services identified in the education program.
(Authority: Sections 101(a)(8), 101(a)(9), and 102(b)(4) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 721(a)(8),
721(a)(9), and 722(b)(4))
Sec. 361.47 Record of services.
(a) The designated State unit must maintain for each applicant and
eligible individual a record of services that includes, to the extent
pertinent, the following documentation:
(1) If an applicant has been determined to be an eligible
individual, documentation supporting that determination in accordance
with the requirements under Sec. 361.42.
(2) If an applicant or eligible individual receiving services under
an individualized plan for employment has been determined to be
ineligible, documentation supporting that determination in accordance
with the requirements under Sec. 361.43.
(3) Documentation that describes the justification for closing an
applicant's or eligible individual's record of services if that closure
is based on reasons other than ineligibility, including, as
appropriate, documentation indicating that the State unit has satisfied
the requirements in Sec. 361.44.
(4) If an individual has been determined to be an individual with a
significant disability or an individual with a most significant
disability, documentation supporting that determination.
(5) If an individual with a significant disability requires an
exploration of abilities, capabilities, and capacity to perform in
realistic work situations through the use of trial work experiences or,
as appropriate, an extended evaluation to determine whether the
individual is an eligible individual, documentation supporting the need
for, and the plan relating to, that exploration or, as appropriate,
extended evaluation and documentation regarding the periodic
assessments carried out during the trial work experiences or, as
appropriate, the extended evaluation, in accordance with the
requirements under Sec. 361.42(e) and (f).
(6) The individualized plan for employment, and any amendments to
the individualized plan for employment, consistent with the
requirements under Sec. 361.46.
(7) Documentation describing the extent to which the applicant or
eligible individual exercised informed choice regarding the provision
of assessment services and the extent to which the eligible individual
exercised informed choice in the development of the individualized plan
for employment with respect to the selection of the specific employment
outcome, the specific vocational rehabilitation services needed to
achieve the employment outcome, the entity to provide the services, the
employment
[[Page 21129]]
setting, the settings in which the services will be provided, and the
methods to procure the services.
(8) In the event that an individual's individualized plan for
employment provides for vocational rehabilitation services in a non-
integrated setting, a justification to support the need for the non-
integrated setting.
(9) In the event that an individual obtains competitive employment,
verification that the individual is compensated at or above the minimum
wage and that the individual's wage and level of benefits are not less
than that customarily paid by the employer for the same or similar work
performed by non-disabled individuals in accordance with Sec.
361.5(c)(9)(i).
(10) In the event an individual achieves an employment outcome in
which the individual is compensated in accordance with section 14(c) of
the Fair Labor Standards Act or the designated State unit closes the
record of services of an individual in extended employment on the basis
that the individual is unable to achieve an employment outcome
consistent with Sec. 361.5(c)(15) or that an eligible individual
through informed choice chooses to remain in extended employment,
documentation of the results of the annual reviews required under Sec.
361.55, of the individual's input into those reviews, and of the
individual's or, if appropriate, the individual's representative's
acknowledgment that those reviews were conducted.
(11) Documentation concerning any action or decision resulting from
a request by an individual under Sec. 361.57 for a review of
determinations made by designated State unit personnel.
(12) In the event that an applicant or eligible individual requests
under Sec. 361.38(c)(4) that documentation in the record of services
be amended and the documentation is not amended, documentation of the
request.
(13) In the event an individual is referred to another program
through the State unit's information and referral system under Sec.
361.37, including other components of the statewide workforce
development system, documentation on the nature and scope of services
provided by the designated State unit to the individual and on the
referral itself, consistent with the requirements of Sec. 361.37.
(14) In the event an individual's record of service is closed under
Sec. 361.56, documentation that demonstrates the services provided
under the individual's individualized plan for employment contributed
to the achievement of the employment outcome.
(15) In the event an individual's record of service is closed under
Sec. 361.56, documentation verifying that the provisions of Sec.
361.56 have been satisfied.
(b) The State unit, in consultation with the State Rehabilitation
Council if the State has a Council, must determine the type of
documentation that the State unit must maintain for each applicant and
eligible individual in order to meet the requirements in paragraph (a)
of this section.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 101(a)(6), (9), (14), and (20) and
102(a), (b), and (d) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended;
29 U.S.C. 709(c), 721(a)(6), (9), (14), and (20) and 722(a), (b),
and (d))
Sec. 361.48 Scope of vocational rehabilitation services for
individuals with disabilities.
(a) Pre-employment transition services. Each State must ensure that
the designated State unit, in collaboration with the local educational
agencies involved, provide, or arrange for the provision of, pre-
employment transition services for all students with disabilities, as
defined in Sec. 361.5(c)(51), in need of such services, without regard
to the type of disability, from funds reserved in accordance with Sec.
361.65 and any funds made available from State, local, or private
funding sources.
(1) Availability of services. Pre-employment transition services
may be provided to all students with disabilities, regardless of
whether an application for services has been submitted.
(2) Required activities. The designated State unit must provide the
following pre-employment transition services:
(i) Job exploration counseling;
(ii) Work-based learning experiences, which may include in-school
or after school opportunities, or experience outside the traditional
school setting (including internships), that is provided in an
integrated environment in the community to the maximum extent possible;
(iii) Counseling on opportunities for enrollment in comprehensive
transition or postsecondary educational programs at institutions of
higher education;
(iv) Workplace readiness training to develop social skills and
independent living; and
(v) Instruction in self-advocacy (including instruction in person-
centered planning), which may include peer mentoring (including peer
mentoring from individuals with disabilities working in competitive
integrated employment).
(3) Authorized activities. Funds available and remaining after the
provision of the required activities described in paragraph (a)(2) of
this section may be used to improve the transition of students with
disabilities from school to postsecondary education or an employment
outcome by--
(i) Implementing effective strategies to increase the likelihood of
independent living and inclusion in communities and competitive
integrated workplaces;
(ii) Developing and improving strategies for individuals with
intellectual disabilities and individuals with significant disabilities
to live independently; participate in postsecondary education
experiences; and obtain, advance in and retain competitive integrated
employment;
(iii) Providing instruction to vocational rehabilitation
counselors, school transition personnel, and other persons supporting
students with disabilities;
(iv) Disseminating information about innovative, effective, and
efficient approaches to achieve the goals of this section;
(v) Coordinating activities with transition services provided by
local educational agencies under the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.);
(vi) Applying evidence-based findings to improve policy, procedure,
practice, and the preparation of personnel, in order to better achieve
the goals of this section;
(vii) Developing model transition demonstration projects;
(viii) Establishing or supporting multistate or regional
partnerships involving States, local educational agencies, designated
State units, developmental disability agencies, private businesses, or
other participants to achieve the goals of this section; and
(ix) Disseminating information and strategies to improve the
transition to postsecondary activities of individuals who are members
of traditionally unserved and underserved populations.
(4) Pre-employment transition coordination. Each local office of a
designated State unit must carry out responsibilities consisting of--
(i) Attending individualized education program meetings for
students with disabilities, when invited;
(ii) Working with the local workforce development boards, one-stop
centers, and employers to develop work opportunities for students with
disabilities, including internships, summer employment and other
employment opportunities available throughout the school year, and
apprenticeships;
[[Page 21130]]
(iii) Working with schools, including those carrying out activities
under section 614(d) of the IDEA, to coordinate and ensure the
provision of pre-employment transition services under this section;
(iv) When invited, attending person-centered planning meetings for
individuals receiving services under title XIX of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.); and
(b) Services for individuals who have applied for or been
determined eligible for vocational rehabilitation services. As
appropriate to the vocational rehabilitation needs of each individual
and consistent with each individual's individualized plan for
employment, the designated State unit must ensure that the following
vocational rehabilitation services are available to assist the
individual with a disability in preparing for, securing, retaining,
advancing in or regaining an employment outcome that is consistent with
the individual's unique strengths, resources, priorities, concerns,
abilities, capabilities, interests, and informed choice:
(1) Assessment for determining eligibility and priority for
services by qualified personnel, including, if appropriate, an
assessment by personnel skilled in rehabilitation technology, in
accordance with Sec. 361.42.
(2) Assessment for determining vocational rehabilitation needs by
qualified personnel, including, if appropriate, an assessment by
personnel skilled in rehabilitation technology, in accordance with
Sec. 361.45.
(3) Vocational rehabilitation counseling and guidance, including
information and support services to assist an individual in exercising
informed choice in accordance with Sec. 361.52.
(4) Referral and other services necessary to assist applicants and
eligible individuals to secure needed services from other agencies,
including other components of the statewide workforce development
system, in accordance with Sec. Sec. 361.23, 361.24, and 361.37, and
to advise those individuals about client assistance programs
established under 34 CFR part 370.
(5) In accordance with the definition in Sec. 361.5(c)(40),
physical and mental restoration services, to the extent that financial
support is not readily available from a source other than the
designated State unit (such as through health insurance or a comparable
service or benefit as defined in Sec. 361.5(c)(10)).
(6) Vocational and other training services, including personal and
vocational adjustment training, advanced training in a field of
science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (including computer
science), medicine, law, or business; books, tools, and other training
materials, except that no training or training services in an
institution of higher education (universities, colleges, community or
junior colleges, vocational schools, technical institutes, or hospital
schools of nursing or any other postsecondary education institution)
may be paid for with funds under this part unless maximum efforts have
been made by the State unit and the individual to secure grant
assistance in whole or in part from other sources to pay for that
training.
(7) Maintenance, in accordance with the definition of that term in
Sec. 361.5(c)(35).
(8) Transportation in connection with the provision of any
vocational rehabilitation service and in accordance with the definition
of that term in Sec. 361.5(c)(57).
(9) Vocational rehabilitation services to family members, as
defined in Sec. 361.5(c)(23), of an applicant or eligible individual
if necessary to enable the applicant or eligible individual to achieve
an employment outcome.
(10) Interpreter services, including sign language and oral
interpreter services, for individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing
and tactile interpreting services for individuals who are deaf-blind
provided by qualified personnel.
(11) Reader services, rehabilitation teaching services, and
orientation and mobility services for individuals who are blind.
(12) Job-related services, including job search and placement
assistance, job retention services, follow-up services, and follow-
along services.
(13) Supported employment services in accordance with the
definition of that term in Sec. 361.5(c)(54).
(14) Personal assistance services in accordance with the definition
of that term in Sec. 361.5(c)(39).
(15) Post-employment services in accordance with the definition of
that term in Sec. 361.5(c)(42).
(16) Occupational licenses, tools, equipment, initial stocks, and
supplies.
(17) Rehabilitation technology in accordance with the definition of
that term in Sec. 361.5(c)(45), including vehicular modification,
telecommunications, sensory, and other technological aids and devices.
(18) Transition services for students and youth with disabilities,
that facilitate the transition from school to postsecondary life, such
as achievement of an employment outcome in competitive integrated
employment, or pre-employment transition services for students.
(19) Technical assistance and other consultation services to
conduct market analyses, develop business plans, and otherwise provide
resources, to the extent those resources are authorized to be provided
through the statewide workforce development system, to eligible
individuals who are pursuing self-employment or telecommuting or
establishing a small business operation as an employment outcome.
(20) Customized employment in accordance with the definition of
that term in Sec. 361.5(c)(11).
(21) Other goods and services determined necessary for the
individual with a disability to achieve an employment outcome.
(Authority: Sections 7(37), 103(a), and 113 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 704(37), 723(a), and 733)
Sec. 361.49 Scope of vocational rehabilitation services for groups of
individuals with disabilities.
(a) The designated State unit may provide for the following
vocational rehabilitation services for the benefit of groups of
individuals with disabilities:
(1) The establishment, development, or improvement of a public or
other nonprofit community rehabilitation program that is used to
provide vocational rehabilitation services that promote integration
into the community and prepare individuals with disabilities for
competitive integrated employment, including supported employment and
customized employment, and under special circumstances, the
construction of a facility for a public or nonprofit community
rehabilitation program as defined in Sec. Sec. 361.5(c)(10),
361.5(c)(16) and 361.5(c)(17). Examples of special circumstances
include the destruction by natural disaster of the only available
center serving an area or a State determination that construction is
necessary in a rural area because no other public agencies or private
nonprofit organizations are currently able to provide vocational
rehabilitation services to individuals.
(2) Telecommunications systems that have the potential for
substantially improving vocational rehabilitation service delivery
methods and developing appropriate programming to meet the particular
needs of individuals with disabilities, including telephone,
television, video description services, satellite, tactile-vibratory
devices, and similar systems, as appropriate.
(3) Special services to provide nonvisual access to information for
individuals who are blind, including the use of telecommunications,
Braille, sound recordings, or other appropriate
[[Page 21131]]
media; captioned television, films, or video cassettes for individuals
who are deaf or hard of hearing; tactile materials for individuals who
are deaf-blind; and other special services that provide information
through tactile, vibratory, auditory, and visual media.
(4) Technical assistance to businesses that are seeking to employ
individuals with disabilities.
(5) In the case of any small business enterprise operated by
individuals with significant disabilities under the supervision of the
designated State unit, including enterprises established under the
Randolph-Sheppard program, management services and supervision provided
by the State unit along with the acquisition by the State unit of
vending facilities or other equipment, initial stocks and supplies, and
initial operating expenses, in accordance with the following
requirements:
(i) Management services and supervision includes inspection,
quality control, consultation, accounting, regulating, in-service
training, and related services provided on a systematic basis to
support and improve small business enterprises operated by individuals
with significant disabilities. Management services and supervision may
be provided throughout the operation of the small business enterprise.
(ii) Initial stocks and supplies includes those items necessary to
the establishment of a new business enterprise during the initial
establishment period, which may not exceed six months.
(iii) Costs of establishing a small business enterprise may include
operational costs during the initial establishment period, which may
not exceed six months.
(iv) If the designated State unit provides for these services, it
must ensure that only individuals with significant disabilities will be
selected to participate in this supervised program.
(v) If the designated State unit provides for these services and
chooses to set aside funds from the proceeds of the operation of the
small business enterprises, the State unit must maintain a description
of the methods used in setting aside funds and the purposes for which
funds are set aside. Funds may be used only for small business
enterprises purposes, and benefits that are provided to operators from
set-aside funds must be provided on an equitable basis.
(6) Consultation and technical assistance services to assist State
educational agencies and local educational agencies in planning for the
transition of students and youth with disabilities from school to
postsecondary life, including employment.
(7) Transition services to youth with disabilities and students
with disabilities who may not have yet applied or been determined
eligible for vocational rehabilitation services, for which a vocational
rehabilitation counselor works in concert with educational agencies,
providers of job training programs, providers of services under the
Medicaid program under title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1396 et seq.), entities designated by the State to provide services for
individuals with developmental disabilities, centers for independent
living (as defined in section 702 of the Act), housing and
transportation authorities, workforce development systems, and
businesses and employers. These specific transition services are to
benefit a group of students with disabilities or youth with
disabilities and are not individualized services directly related to an
individualized plan for employment goal. Services may include, but are
not limited to, group tours of universities and vocational training
programs, employer or business site visits to learn about career
opportunities, career fairs coordinated with workforce development and
employers to facilitate mock interviews and resume writing, and other
general services applicable to groups of students with disabilities and
youth with disabilities.
(8) The establishment, development, or improvement of assistive
technology demonstration, loan, reutilization, or financing programs in
coordination with activities authorized under the Assistive Technology
Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.) to promote access to assistive
technology for individuals with disabilities who are applicants of or
have been determined eligible for vocational rehabilitation services
and employers.
(9) Support (including, as appropriate, tuition) for advanced
training in a field of science, technology, engineering, or mathematics
(including computer science), medicine, law, or business, provided
after an individual eligible to receive services under this title
demonstrates--
(i) Such Eligibility;
(ii) Previous completion of a bachelor's degree program at an
institution of higher education or scheduled completion of such a
degree program prior to matriculating in the program for which the
individual proposes to use the support; and
(iii) Acceptance by a program at an institution of higher education
in the United States that confers a master's degree in a field of
science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (including computer
science), a juris doctor degree, a master of business administration
degree, or a doctor of medicine degree, except that--
(A) No training provided at an institution of higher education may
be paid for with funds under this program unless maximum efforts have
been made by the designated State unit to secure grant assistance, in
whole or in part, from other sources to pay for such training; and
(B) Nothing in this paragraph prevents any designated State unit
from providing similar support to individuals with disabilities within
the State who are eligible to receive support under this title and who
are not served under this section.
(b) If the designated State unit provides for vocational
rehabilitation services for groups of individuals, it must--
(1) Develop and maintain written policies covering the nature and
scope of each of the vocational rehabilitation services it provides and
the criteria under which each service is provided; and
(2) Maintain information to ensure the proper and efficient
administration of those services in the form and detail and at the time
required by the Secretary, including the types of services provided,
the costs of those services, and, to the extent feasible, estimates of
the numbers of individuals benefiting from those services.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 101(a)(6)(A), and 103(b) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c), 721(a)(6),
and 723(b))
Sec. 361.50 Written policies governing the provision of services for
individuals with disabilities.
(a) Policies. The State unit must develop and maintain written
policies covering the nature and scope of each of the vocational
rehabilitation services specified in Sec. 361.48 and the criteria
under which each service is provided. The policies must ensure that the
provision of services is based on the rehabilitation needs of each
individual as identified in that individual's individualized plan for
employment and is consistent with the individual's informed choice. The
written policies may not establish any arbitrary limits on the nature
and scope of vocational rehabilitation services to be provided to the
individual to achieve an employment outcome. The policies must be
developed in accordance with the following provisions:
[[Page 21132]]
(b) Out-of-State services. (1) The State unit may establish a
preference for in-State services, provided that the preference does not
effectively deny an individual a necessary service. If the individual
chooses an out-of-State service at a higher cost than an in-State
service, if either service would meet the individual's rehabilitation
needs, the designated State unit is not responsible for those costs in
excess of the cost of the in-State service.
(2) The State unit may not establish policies that effectively
prohibit the provision of out-of-State services.
(c) Payment for services. (1) The State unit must establish and
maintain written policies to govern the rates of payment for all
purchased vocational rehabilitation services.
(2) The State unit may establish a fee schedule designed to ensure
a reasonable cost to the program for each service, if the schedule is--
(i) Not so low as to effectively deny an individual a necessary
service; and
(ii) Not absolute and permits exceptions so that individual needs
can be addressed.
(3) The State unit may not place absolute dollar limits on specific
service categories or on the total services provided to an individual.
(d) Duration of services. (1) The State unit may establish
reasonable time periods for the provision of services provided that the
time periods are--
(i) Not so short as to effectively deny an individual a necessary
service; and
(ii) Not absolute and permit exceptions so that individual needs
can be addressed.
(2) The State unit may not establish absolute time limits on the
provision of specific services or on the provision of services to an
individual. The duration of each service needed by an individual must
be determined on an individual basis and reflected in that individual's
individualized plan for employment.
(e) Authorization of services. The State unit must establish
policies related to the timely authorization of services, including any
conditions under which verbal authorization can be given.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(6) of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended and 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a)(6))
Sec. 361.51 Standards for facilities and providers of services.
(a) Accessibility of facilities. The vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must assure that
any facility used in connection with the delivery of vocational
rehabilitation services under this part meets program accessibility
requirements consistent with the requirements, as applicable, of the
Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, the Americans with Disabilities Act
of 1990, section 504 of the Act, and the regulations implementing these
laws.
(b) Affirmative action. The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must assure that
community rehabilitation programs that receive assistance under part B
of title I of the Act take affirmative action to employ and advance in
employment qualified individuals with disabilities covered under and on
the same terms and conditions as in section 503 of the Act.
(c) Special communication needs personnel. The designated State
unit must ensure that providers of vocational rehabilitation services
are able to communicate--
(1) In the native language of applicants and eligible individuals
who have limited English proficiency; and
(2) By using appropriate modes of communication used by applicants
and eligible individuals.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(6)(B) and (C) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and
721(a)(6)(B) and (C))
Sec. 361.52 Informed choice.
(a) General provision. The vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must assure that
applicants and eligible individuals or, as appropriate, their
representatives are provided information and support services to assist
applicants and eligible individuals in exercising informed choice
throughout the rehabilitation process consistent with the provisions of
section 102(d) of the Act and the requirements of this section.
(b) Written policies and procedures. The designated State unit, in
consultation with its State Rehabilitation Council, if it has a
Council, must develop and implement written policies and procedures
that enable an applicant or eligible individual to exercise informed
choice throughout the vocational rehabilitation process. These policies
and procedures must provide for--
(1) Informing each applicant and eligible individual (including
students with disabilities who are making the transition from programs
under the responsibility of an educational agency to programs under the
responsibility of the designated State unit and including youth with
disabilities), through appropriate modes of communication, about the
availability of and opportunities to exercise informed choice,
including the availability of support services for individuals with
cognitive or other disabilities who require assistance in exercising
informed choice throughout the vocational rehabilitation process;
(2) Assisting applicants and eligible individuals in exercising
informed choice in decisions related to the provision of assessment
services;
(3) Developing and implementing flexible procurement policies and
methods that facilitate the provision of vocational rehabilitation
services and that afford eligible individuals meaningful choices among
the methods used to procure vocational rehabilitation services;
(4) Assisting eligible individuals or, as appropriate, the
individuals' representatives, in acquiring information that enables
them to exercise informed choice in the development of their
individualized plans for employment with respect to the selection of
the--
(i) Employment outcome;
(ii) Specific vocational rehabilitation services needed to achieve
the employment outcome;
(iii) Entity that will provide the services;
(iv) Employment setting and the settings in which the services will
be provided; and
(v) Methods available for procuring the services; and
(5) Ensuring that the availability and scope of informed choice is
consistent with the obligations of the designated State agency under
this part.
(c) Information and assistance in the selection of vocational
rehabilitation services and service providers. In assisting an
applicant and eligible individual in exercising informed choice during
the assessment for determining eligibility and vocational
rehabilitation needs and during development of the individualized plan
for employment, the designated State unit must provide the individual
or the individual's representative, or assist the individual or the
individual's representative in acquiring, information necessary to make
an informed choice about the specific vocational rehabilitation
services, including the providers of those services, that are needed to
achieve the individual's employment outcome. This information must
include, at a minimum, information relating to the--
(1) Cost, accessibility, and duration of potential services;
(2) Consumer satisfaction with those services to the extent that
information relating to consumer satisfaction is available;
[[Page 21133]]
(3) Qualifications of potential service providers;
(4) Types of services offered by the potential providers;
(5) Degree to which services are provided in integrated settings;
and
(6) Outcomes achieved by individuals working with service
providers, to the extent that such information is available.
(d) Methods or sources of information. In providing or assisting
the individual or the individual's representative in acquiring the
information required under paragraph (c) of this section, the State
unit may use, but is not limited to, the following methods or sources
of information:
(1) Lists of services and service providers.
(2) Periodic consumer satisfaction surveys and reports.
(3) Referrals to other consumers, consumer groups, or disability
advisory councils qualified to discuss the services or service
providers.
(4) Relevant accreditation, certification, or other information
relating to the qualifications of service providers.
(5) Opportunities for individuals to visit or experience various
work and service provider settings.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 101(a)(19); 102(b)(2)(B) and 102(d) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c),
721(a)(19); 722(b)(2)(B) and 722(d))
Sec. 361.53 Comparable services and benefits.
(a) Determination of availability. The vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must assure that
prior to providing an accommodation or auxiliary aid or service or any
vocational rehabilitation services, except those services listed in
paragraph (b) of this section, to an eligible individual or to members
of the individual's family, the State unit must determine whether
comparable services and benefits, as defined in Sec. 361.5(c)(8),
exist under any other program and whether those services and benefits
are available to the individual unless such a determination would
interrupt or delay--
(1) The progress of the individual toward achieving the employment
outcome identified in the individualized plan for employment;
(2) An immediate job placement; or
(3) The provision of vocational rehabilitation services to any
individual who is determined to be at extreme medical risk, based on
medical evidence provided by an appropriate qualified medical
professional.
(b) Exempt services. The following vocational rehabilitation
services described in Sec. 361.48(a) are exempt from a determination
of the availability of comparable services and benefits under paragraph
(a) of this section:
(1) Assessment for determining eligibility and vocational
rehabilitation needs.
(2) Counseling and guidance, including information and support
services to assist an individual in exercising informed choice.
(3) Referral and other services to secure needed services from
other agencies, including other components of the statewide workforce
development system, if those services are not available under this
part.
(4) Job-related services, including job search and placement
assistance, job retention services, follow-up services, and follow-
along services.
(5) Rehabilitation technology, including telecommunications,
sensory, and other technological aids and devices.
(6) Post-employment services consisting of the services listed
under paragraphs (b)(1) through (5) of this section.
(c) Provision of services. (1) If comparable services or benefits
exist under any other program and are available to the individual at
the time needed to ensure the progress of the individual toward
achieving the employment outcome in the individual's individualized
plan for employment, the designated State unit must use those
comparable services or benefits to meet, in whole or part, the costs of
the vocational rehabilitation services.
(2) If comparable services or benefits exist under any other
program, but are not available to the individual at the time needed to
ensure the progress of the individual toward achieving the employment
outcome specified in the individualized plan for employment, the
designated State unit must provide vocational rehabilitation services
until those comparable services and benefits become available.
(d) Interagency coordination. (1) The vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan must assure that
the Governor, in consultation with the entity in the State responsible
for the vocational rehabilitation program and other appropriate
agencies, will ensure that an interagency agreement or other mechanism
for interagency coordination takes effect between the designated State
vocational rehabilitation unit and any appropriate public entity,
including the State entity responsible for administering the State
Medicaid program, a public institution of higher education, and a
component of the statewide workforce development system, to ensure the
provision of vocational rehabilitation services, and, if appropriate,
accommodations or auxiliary aids and services, (other than those
services listed in paragraph (b) of this section) that are included in
the individualized plan for employment of an eligible individual,
including the provision of those vocational rehabilitation services
(including, if appropriate, accommodations or auxiliary aids and
services) during the pendency of any interagency dispute in accordance
with the provisions of paragraph (d)(3)(iii) of this section.
(2) The Governor may meet the requirements of paragraph (d)(1) of
this section through--
(i) A State statute or regulation;
(ii) A signed agreement between the respective officials of the
public entities that clearly identifies the responsibilities of each
public entity for the provision of the services; or
(iii) Another appropriate mechanism as determined by the designated
State vocational rehabilitation unit.
(3) The interagency agreement or other mechanism for interagency
coordination must include the following:
(i) Agency financial responsibility. An identification of, or
description of a method for defining, the financial responsibility of
the designated State unit and other public entities for the provision
of vocational rehabilitation services, and, if appropriate,
accommodations or auxiliary aids and services other than those listed
in paragraph (b) of this section and a provision stating the financial
responsibility of the public entity for providing those services.
(ii) Conditions, terms, and procedures of reimbursement.
Information specifying the conditions, terms, and procedures under
which the designated State unit must be reimbursed by the other public
entities for providing vocational rehabilitation services, and
accommodations or auxiliary aids and services based on the terms of the
interagency agreement or other mechanism for interagency coordination.
(iii) Interagency disputes. Information specifying procedures for
resolving interagency disputes under the interagency agreement or other
mechanism for interagency coordination, including procedures under
which the designated State unit may initiate proceedings to secure
reimbursement from other public
[[Page 21134]]
entities or otherwise implement the provisions of the agreement or
mechanism.
(iv) Procedures for coordination of services. Information
specifying policies and procedures for public entities to determine and
identify interagency coordination responsibilities of each public
entity to promote the coordination and timely delivery of vocational
rehabilitation services, and accommodations or auxiliary aids and
services, other than those listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
(e) Responsibilities under other law. (1) If a public entity (other
than the designated State unit) is obligated under Federal law (such as
the Americans with Disabilities Act, section 504 of the Act, or section
188 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act) or State law, or
assigned responsibility under State policy or an interagency agreement
established under this section, to provide or pay for any services
considered to be vocational rehabilitation services (e.g., interpreter
services under Sec. 361.48(j)), and, if appropriate, accommodations or
auxiliary aids and services other than those services listed in
paragraph (b) of this section, the public entity must fulfill that
obligation or responsibility through--
(i) The terms of the interagency agreement or other requirements of
this section;
(ii) Providing or paying for the service directly or by contract;
or
(iii) Other arrangement.
(2) If a public entity other than the designated State unit fails
to provide or pay for vocational rehabilitation services, and, if
appropriate, accommodations or auxiliary aids and services for an
eligible individual as established under this section, the designated
State unit must provide or pay for those services to the individual and
may claim reimbursement for the services from the public entity that
failed to provide or pay for those services. The public entity must
reimburse the designated State unit pursuant to the terms of the
interagency agreement or other mechanism described in paragraph (d) of
this section in accordance with the procedures established in the
agreement or mechanism pursuant to paragraph (d)(3)(ii) of this
section.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(8) of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a)(8))
Sec. 361.54 Participation of individuals in cost of services based on
financial need.
(a) No Federal requirement. There is no Federal requirement that
the financial need of individuals be considered in the provision of
vocational rehabilitation services.
(b) State unit requirements. (1) The State unit may choose to
consider the financial need of eligible individuals or individuals who
are receiving services through trial work experiences under Sec.
361.42(e) for purposes of determining the extent of their participation
in the costs of vocational rehabilitation services, other than those
services identified in paragraph (b)(3) of this section.
(2) If the State unit chooses to consider financial need--
(i) It must maintain written policies--
(A) Explaining the method for determining the financial need of an
eligible individual; and
(B) Specifying the types of vocational rehabilitation services for
which the unit has established a financial needs test;
(ii) The policies must be applied uniformly to all individuals in
similar circumstances;
(iii) The policies may require different levels of need for
different geographic regions in the State, but must be applied
uniformly to all individuals within each geographic region; and
(iv) The policies must ensure that the level of an individual's
participation in the cost of vocational rehabilitation services is--
(A) Reasonable;
(B) Based on the individual's financial need, including
consideration of any disability-related expenses paid by the
individual; and
(C) Not so high as to effectively deny the individual a necessary
service.
(3) The designated State unit may not apply a financial needs test,
or require the financial participation of the individual--
(i) As a condition for furnishing the following vocational
rehabilitation services:
(A) Assessment for determining eligibility and priority for
services under Sec. 361.48(b)(1), except those non-assessment services
that are provided to an individual with a significant disability during
either an exploration of the individual's abilities, capabilities, and
capacity to perform in work situations through the use of trial work
experiences under Sec. 361.42(e).
(B) Assessment for determining vocational rehabilitation needs
under Sec. 361.48(b)(2).
(C) Vocational rehabilitation counseling and guidance under Sec.
361.48(b)(3).
(D) Referral and other services under Sec. 361.48(b)(4).
(E) Job-related services under Sec. 361.48(b)(12).
(F) Personal assistance services under Sec. 361.48(b)(14).
(G) Any auxiliary aid or service (e.g., interpreter services under
Sec. 361.48(b)(10), reader services under Sec. 361.48(b)(11)) that an
individual with a disability requires under section 504 of the Act (29
U.S.C. 794) or the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12101, et
seq.), or regulations implementing those laws, in order for the
individual to participate in the vocational rehabilitation program as
authorized under this part; or
(ii) As a condition for furnishing any vocational rehabilitation
service if the individual in need of the service has been determined
eligible for Social Security benefits under titles II or XVI of the
Social Security Act.
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c))
Sec. 361.55 Semi-annual review of individuals in extended employment
and other employment under special certificate provisions of the Fair
Labor Standards Act.
(a) The vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified
or Combined State Plan must assure that the designated State unit
conducts a semi-annual review and reevaluation for the first two years
of such employment and annually thereafter, in accordance with the
requirements in paragraph (b) of this section for an individual with a
disability served under this part--
(1) Who has achieved an employment outcome in which the individual
is compensated in accordance with section 14(c) of the Fair Labor
Standards Act; or
(2) Whose record of services is closed while the individual is in
extended employment on the basis that the individual is unable to
achieve an employment outcome consistent with Sec. 361.5(c)(15) or
that the individual made an informed choice to remain in extended
employment.
(b) For each individual with a disability who meets the criteria in
paragraph (a) of this section, the designated State unit must--
(1) Semi-annually review and reevaluate the status of each
individual for two years after the individual's record of services is
closed (and annually thereafter) to determine the interests,
priorities, and needs of the individual with respect to competitive
integrated employment or training for competitive integrated
employment;
(2) Enable the individual or, if appropriate, the individual's
representative to provide input into the review and reevaluation and
must document that input in the record of services, consistent with
Sec. 361.47(a)(10),
[[Page 21135]]
with the individual's or, as appropriate, the individual's
representative's signed acknowledgment that the review and reevaluation
have been conducted; and
(3) Make maximum efforts, including identifying and providing
vocational rehabilitation services, reasonable accommodations, and
other necessary support services, to assist the individual in engaging
in competitive integrated employment as defined in Sec. 361.5(c)(9).
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 101(a)(14) of the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 721(a)(14))
Sec. 361.56 Requirements for closing the record of services of an
individual who has achieved an employment outcome.
The record of services of an individual who has achieved an
employment outcome may be closed only if all of the following
requirements are met:
(a) Employment outcome achieved. The individual has achieved the
employment outcome that is described in the individual's individualized
plan for employment in accordance with Sec. 361.46(a)(1) and is
consistent with the individual's unique strengths, resources,
priorities, concerns, abilities, capabilities, interests, and informed
choice.
(b) Employment outcome maintained. The individual has maintained
the employment outcome for an appropriate period of time, but not less
than 90 days, necessary to ensure the stability of the employment
outcome, and the individual no longer needs vocational rehabilitation
services.
(c) Satisfactory outcome. At the end of the appropriate period
under paragraph (b) of this section, the individual and the qualified
rehabilitation counselor employed by the designated State unit consider
the employment outcome to be satisfactory and agree that the individual
is performing well in the employment.
(d) Post-employment services. The individual is informed through
appropriate modes of communication of the availability of post-
employment services.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 101(a)(6), and 106(a)(2) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 711(c), 721(a)(6),
and 726(a)(2))
Sec. 361.57 Review of determinations made by designated State unit
personnel.
(a) Procedures. The designated State unit must develop and
implement procedures to ensure that an applicant or eligible individual
who is dissatisfied with any determination made by personnel of the
designated State unit that affects the provision of vocational
rehabilitation services may request, or, if appropriate, may request
through the individual's representative, a timely review of that
determination. The procedures must be in accordance with paragraphs (b)
through (k) of this section:
(b) General requirements. (1) Notification. Procedures established
by the State unit under this section must provide an applicant or
eligible individual or, as appropriate, the individual's representative
notice of--
(i) The right to obtain review of State unit determinations that
affect the provision of vocational rehabilitation services through an
impartial due process hearing under paragraph (e) of this section;
(ii) The right to pursue mediation under paragraph (d) of this
section with respect to determinations made by designated State unit
personnel that affect the provision of vocational rehabilitation
services to an applicant or eligible individual;
(iii) The names and addresses of individuals with whom requests for
mediation or due process hearings may be filed;
(iv) The manner in which a mediator or impartial hearing officer
may be selected consistent with the requirements of paragraphs (d) and
(f) of this section; and
(v) The availability of the client assistance program, established
under 34 CFR part 370, to assist the applicant or eligible individual
during mediation sessions or impartial due process hearings.
(2) Timing. Notice described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section
must be provided in writing--
(i) At the time the individual applies for vocational
rehabilitation services under this part;
(ii) At the time the individual is assigned to a category in the
State's order of selection, if the State has established an order of
selection under Sec. 361.36;
(iii) At the time the individualized plan for employment is
developed; and
(iv) Whenever vocational rehabilitation services for an individual
are reduced, suspended, or terminated.
(3) Evidence and representation. Procedures established under this
section must--
(i) Provide an applicant or eligible individual or, as appropriate,
the individual's representative with an opportunity to submit during
mediation sessions or due process hearings evidence and other
information that supports the applicant's or eligible individual's
position; and
(ii) Allow an applicant or eligible individual to be represented
during mediation sessions or due process hearings by counsel or other
advocate selected by the applicant or eligible individual.
(4) Impact on provision of services. The State unit may not
institute a suspension, reduction, or termination of vocational
rehabilitation services being provided to an applicant or eligible
individual, including evaluation and assessment services and
individualized plan for employment development, pending a resolution
through mediation, pending a decision by a hearing officer or reviewing
official, or pending informal resolution under this section unless--
(i) The individual or, in appropriate cases, the individual's
representative requests a suspension, reduction, or termination of
services; or
(ii) The State agency has evidence that the services have been
obtained through misrepresentation, fraud, collusion, or criminal
conduct on the part of the individual or the individual's
representative.
(5) Ineligibility. Applicants who are found ineligible for
vocational rehabilitation services and previously eligible individuals
who are determined to be no longer eligible for vocational
rehabilitation services pursuant to Sec. 361.43 are permitted to
challenge the determinations of ineligibility under the procedures
described in this section.
(c) Informal dispute resolution. The State unit may develop an
informal process for resolving a request for review without conducting
mediation or a formal hearing. A State's informal process must not be
used to deny the right of an applicant or eligible individual to a
hearing under paragraph (e) of this section or any other right provided
under this part, including the right to pursue mediation under
paragraph (d) of this section. If informal resolution under this
paragraph or mediation under paragraph (d) of this section is not
successful in resolving the dispute within the time period established
under paragraph (e)(1) of this section, a formal hearing must be
conducted within that same time period, unless the parties agree to a
specific extension of time.
(d) Mediation. (1) The State must establish and implement
procedures, as required under paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, to
allow an applicant or eligible individual and the State unit to resolve
disputes involving State unit determinations that affect the provision
of vocational rehabilitation services through a mediation process that
must be made available, at a minimum,
[[Page 21136]]
whenever an applicant or eligible individual or, as appropriate, the
individual's representative requests an impartial due process hearing
under this section.
(2) Mediation procedures established by the State unit under
paragraph (d) of this section must ensure that--
(i) Participation in the mediation process is voluntary on the part
of the applicant or eligible individual, as appropriate, and on the
part of the State unit;
(ii) Use of the mediation process is not used to deny or delay the
applicant's or eligible individual's right to pursue resolution of the
dispute through an impartial hearing held within the time period
specified in paragraph (e)(1) of this section or any other rights
provided under this part. At any point during the mediation process,
either party or the mediator may elect to terminate the mediation. In
the event mediation is terminated, either party may pursue resolution
through an impartial hearing;
(iii) The mediation process is conducted by a qualified and
impartial mediator, as defined in Sec. 361.5(c)(43), who must be
selected from a list of qualified and impartial mediators maintained by
the State--
(A) On a random basis;
(B) By agreement between the director of the designated State unit
and the applicant or eligible individual or, as appropriate, the
individual's representative; or
(C) In accordance with a procedure established in the State for
assigning mediators, provided this procedure ensures the neutrality of
the mediator assigned; and
(iv) Mediation sessions are scheduled and conducted in a timely
manner and are held in a location and manner that is convenient to the
parties to the dispute.
(3) Discussions that occur during the mediation process must be
kept confidential and may not be used as evidence in any subsequent due
process hearings or civil proceedings, and the parties to the mediation
process may be required to sign a confidentiality pledge prior to the
commencement of the process.
(4) An agreement reached by the parties to the dispute in the
mediation process must be described in a written mediation agreement
that is developed by the parties with the assistance of the qualified
and impartial mediator and signed by both parties. Copies of the
agreement must be sent to both parties.
(5) The costs of the mediation process must be paid by the State.
The State is not required to pay for any costs related to the
representation of an applicant or eligible individual authorized under
paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section.
(e) Impartial due process hearings. The State unit must establish
and implement formal review procedures, as required under paragraph
(b)(1)(i) of this section, that provide that--
(1) hearing conducted by an impartial hearing officer, selected in
accordance with paragraph (f) of this section, must be held within 60
days of an applicant's or eligible individual's request for review of a
determination made by personnel of the State unit that affects the
provision of vocational rehabilitation services to the individual,
unless informal resolution or a mediation agreement is achieved prior
to the 60th day or the parties agree to a specific extension of time;
(2) In addition to the rights described in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section, the applicant or eligible individual or, if appropriate, the
individual's representative must be given the opportunity to present
witnesses during the hearing and to examine all witnesses and other
relevant sources of information and evidence;
(3) The impartial hearing officer must--
(i) Make a decision based on the provisions of the approved
vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan, the Act, Federal vocational rehabilitation regulations, and
State regulations and policies that are consistent with Federal
requirements; and
(ii) Provide to the individual or, if appropriate, the individual's
representative and to the State unit a full written report of the
findings and grounds for the decision within 30 days of the completion
of the hearing; and
(4) The hearing officer's decision is final, except that a party
may request an impartial review under paragraph (g)(1) of this section
if the State has established procedures for that review, and a party
involved in a hearing may bring a civil action under paragraph (i) of
this section.
(f) Selection of impartial hearing officers. The impartial hearing
officer for a particular case must be selected--
(1) From a list of qualified impartial hearing officers maintained
by the State unit. Impartial hearing officers included on the list must
be--
(i) Identified by the State unit if the State unit is an
independent commission; or
(ii) Jointly identified by the State unit and the State
Rehabilitation Council if the State has a Council; and
(2)(i) On a random basis; or
(ii) By agreement between the director of the designated State unit
and the applicant or eligible individual or, as appropriate, the
individual's representative.
(g) Administrative review of hearing officer's decision. The State
may establish procedures to enable a party who is dissatisfied with the
decision of the impartial hearing officer to seek an impartial
administrative review of the decision under paragraph (e)(3) of this
section in accordance with the following requirements:
(1) A request for administrative review under paragraph (g) of this
section must be made within 20 days of the mailing of the impartial
hearing officer's decision.
(2) Administrative review of the hearing officer's decision must be
conducted by--
(i) The chief official of the designated State agency if the State
has established both a designated State agency and a designated State
unit under Sec. 361.13(b); or
(ii) An official from the office of the Governor.
(3) The reviewing official described in paragraph (g)(2)(i) of this
section--
(i) Provides both parties with an opportunity to submit additional
evidence and information relevant to a final decision concerning the
matter under review;
(ii) May not overturn or modify the hearing officer's decision, or
any part of that decision, that supports the position of the applicant
or eligible individual unless the reviewing official concludes, based
on clear and convincing evidence, that the decision of the impartial
hearing officer is clearly erroneous on the basis of being contrary to
the approved vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified
or Combined State Plan, the Act, Federal vocational rehabilitation
regulations, or State regulations and policies that are consistent with
Federal requirements;
(iii) Makes an independent, final decision following a review of
the entire hearing record and provides the decision in writing,
including a full report of the findings and the statutory, regulatory,
or policy grounds for the decision, to the applicant or eligible
individual or, as appropriate, the individual's representative and to
the State unit within 30 days of the request for administrative review
under paragraph (g)(1) of this section; and
(iv) May not delegate the responsibility for making the final
decision under paragraph (g) of this section to any officer or employee
of the designated State unit.
[[Page 21137]]
(4) The reviewing official's decision under paragraph (g) of this
section is final unless either party brings a civil action under
paragraph (i) of this section.
(h) Implementation of final decisions. If a party brings a civil
action under paragraph (h) of this section to challenge the final
decision of a hearing officer under paragraph (e) of this section or to
challenge the final decision of a State reviewing official under
paragraph (g) of this section, the final decision of the hearing
officer or State reviewing official must be implemented pending review
by the court.
(i) Civil action. (1) Any party who disagrees with the findings and
decision of an impartial hearing officer under paragraph (e) of this
section in a State that has not established administrative review
procedures under paragraph (g) of this section and any party who
disagrees with the findings and decision under paragraph (g)(3)(iii) of
this section have a right to bring a civil action with respect to the
matter in dispute. The action may be brought in any State court of
competent jurisdiction or in a district court of the United States of
competent jurisdiction without regard to the amount in controversy.
(2) In any action brought under paragraph (i) of this section, the
court--
(i) Receives the records related to the impartial due process
hearing and the records related to the administrative review process,
if applicable;
(ii) Hears additional evidence at the request of a party; and
(iii) Basing its decision on the preponderance of the evidence,
grants the relief that the court determines to be appropriate.
(j) State fair hearing board. A fair hearing board as defined in
Sec. 361.5(c)(21) is authorized to carry out the responsibilities of
the impartial hearing officer under paragraph (e) of this section in
accordance with the following criteria:
(1) The fair hearing board may conduct due process hearings either
collectively or by assigning responsibility for conducting the hearing
to one or more members of the fair hearing board.
(2) The final decision issued by the fair hearing board following a
hearing under paragraph (j)(1) of this section must be made
collectively by, or by a majority vote of, the fair hearing board.
(3) The provisions of paragraphs (b)(1), (2), and (3) of this
section that relate to due process hearings and of paragraphs (e), (f),
(g), and (h) of this section do not apply to fair hearing boards under
this paragraph (j).
(k) Data collection. (1) The director of the designated State unit
must collect and submit, at a minimum, the following data to the
Secretary for inclusion each year in the annual report to Congress
under section 13 of the Act:
(i) A copy of the standards used by State reviewing officials for
reviewing decisions made by impartial hearing officers under this
section.
(ii) The number of mediations held, including the number of
mediation agreements reached.
(iii) The number of hearings and reviews sought from impartial
hearing officers and State reviewing officials, including the type of
complaints and the issues involved.
(iv) The number of hearing officer decisions that were not reviewed
by administrative reviewing officials.
(v) The number of hearing decisions that were reviewed by State
reviewing officials and, based on these reviews, the number of hearing
decisions that were--
(A) Sustained in favor of an applicant or eligible individual;
(B) Sustained in favor of the designated State unit;
(C) Reversed in whole or in part in favor of the applicant or
eligible individual; and
(D) Reversed in whole or in part in favor of the State unit.
(2) The State unit director also must collect and submit to the
Secretary copies of all final decisions issued by impartial hearing
officers under paragraph (e) of this section and by State review
officials under paragraph (g) of this section.
(3) The confidentiality of records of applicants and eligible
individuals maintained by the State unit may not preclude the access of
the Secretary to those records for the purposes described in this
section.
(Authority: Section 102(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 722(c))
Subpart C--Financing of State Vocational Rehabilitation Programs
Sec. 361.60 Matching requirements.
(a) Federal share. (1) General. Except as provided in paragraph
(a)(2) of this section, the Federal share for expenditures made by the
State under the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan, including expenditures for the
provision of vocational rehabilitation services and the administration
of the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan, is 78.7 percent.
(2) Construction projects. The Federal share for expenditures made
for the construction of a facility for community rehabilitation program
purposes may not be more than 50 percent of the total cost of the
project.
(b) Non-Federal share. (1) General. Except as provided in paragraph
(b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section, expenditures made under the
vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan to meet the non-Federal share under this section must be
consistent with the provisions of 2 CFR 200.306(b).
(2) Third party in-kind contributions. Third party in-kind
contributions specified in 2 CFR 200.306(b) may not be used to meet the
non-Federal share under this section.
(3) Contributions by private entities. Expenditures made from those
cash contributions provided by private organizations, agencies, or
individuals and that are deposited in the State agency's account or, if
applicable, sole local agency's account, in accordance with State law
prior to their expenditure and that are earmarked, under a condition
imposed by the contributor, may be used as part of the non-Federal
share under this section if the funds are earmarked for--
(i) Meeting in whole or in part the State's share for establishing
a community rehabilitation program or constructing a particular
facility for community rehabilitation program purposes;
(ii) Particular geographic areas within the State for any purpose
under the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or
Combined State Plan, other than those described in paragraph (b)(3)(i)
of this section, in accordance with the following criteria:
(A) Before funds that are earmarked for a particular geographic
area may be used as part of the non-Federal share, the State must
notify the Secretary that the State cannot provide the full non-Federal
share without using these funds.
(B) Funds that are earmarked for a particular geographic area may
be used as part of the non-Federal share without requesting a waiver of
statewideness under Sec. 361.26.
(C) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section, all
Federal funds must be used on a statewide basis consistent with Sec.
361.25, unless a waiver of statewideness is obtained under Sec.
361.26; and
(iii) Any other purpose under the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan, provided the
expenditures do not benefit in any way the donor, employee, officer, or
agent, any member
[[Page 21138]]
of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, an individual with
whom the donor has a close personal relationship, or an individual,
entity, or organization with whom the donor shares a financial or other
interest. The Secretary does not consider a donor's receipt from the
State unit of a subaward or contract with funds allotted under this
part to be a benefit for the purposes of this paragraph if the subaward
or contract is awarded under the State's regular competitive
procedures.
(Authority: Sections 7(14), 101(a)(3), 101(a)(4) and 104 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(14),
721(a)(3), 721(a)(4) and 724)
Example for paragraph (b)(3): Contributions may be earmarked in
accordance with Sec. 361.60(b)(3)(iii) for providing particular
services (e.g., rehabilitation technology services); serving
individuals with certain types of disabilities (e.g., individuals who
are blind), consistent with the State's order of selection, if
applicable; providing services to special groups that State or Federal
law permits to be targeted for services (e.g., students with
disabilities who are receiving special education services), consistent
with the State's order of selection, if applicable; or carrying out
particular types of administrative activities permissible under State
law. Contributions also may be restricted to particular geographic
areas to increase services or expand the scope of services that are
available statewide under the vocational rehabilitation services
portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan in accordance with the
requirements in Sec. 361.60(b)(3)(ii).
Sec. 361.61 Limitation on use of funds for construction expenditures.
No more than 10 percent of a State's allotment for any fiscal year
under section 110 of the Act may be spent on the construction of
facilities for community rehabilitation program purposes.
(Authority: Section 101(a)(17)(A) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
as amended; 29 U.S.C. 721(a)(17)(A))
Sec. 361.62 Maintenance of effort requirements.
(a) General requirements. The Secretary reduces the amount
otherwise payable to a State for any fiscal year by the amount by which
the total expenditures from non-Federal sources under the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan
for any previous fiscal year were less than the total of those
expenditures for the fiscal year two years prior to that previous
fiscal year.
(b) Specific requirements for construction of facilities. If the
State provides for the construction of a facility for community
rehabilitation program purposes, the amount of the State's share of
expenditures for vocational rehabilitation services under the plan,
other than for the construction of a facility for community
rehabilitation program purposes or the establishment of a facility for
community rehabilitation purposes, must be at least equal to the
expenditures for those services for the second prior fiscal year.
(c) Separate State agency for vocational rehabilitation services
for individuals who are blind. If there is a separate part of the
vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan administered by a separate State agency to provide
vocational rehabilitation services for individuals who are blind--
(1) Satisfaction of the maintenance of effort requirements under
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section is determined based on the total
amount of a State's non-Federal expenditures under both parts of the
vocational rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined
State Plan; and
(2) If a State fails to meet any maintenance of effort requirement,
the Secretary reduces the amount otherwise payable to the State for any
fiscal year under each part of the plan in direct proportion to the
amount by which non-Federal expenditures under each part of the plan in
any previous fiscal year were less than they were for that part of the
plan for the fiscal year 2 years prior to that previous fiscal year.
(d) Waiver or modification. (1) The Secretary may waive or modify
the maintenance of effort requirement in paragraph (a) of this section
if the Secretary determines that a waiver or modification is necessary
to permit the State to respond to exceptional or uncontrollable
circumstances, such as a major natural disaster or a serious economic
downturn, that--
(i) Cause significant unanticipated expenditures or reductions in
revenue that result in a general reduction of programs within the
State; or
(ii) Require the State to make substantial expenditures in the
vocational rehabilitation program for long-term purposes due to the
one-time costs associated with the construction of a facility for
community rehabilitation program purposes, the establishment of a
facility for community rehabilitation program purposes, or the
acquisition of equipment.
(2) The Secretary may waive or modify the maintenance of effort
requirement in paragraph (b) of this section or the 10 percent
allotment limitation in Sec. 361.61 if the Secretary determines that a
waiver or modification is necessary to permit the State to respond to
exceptional or uncontrollable circumstances, such as a major natural
disaster, that result in significant destruction of existing facilities
and require the State to make substantial expenditures for the
construction of a facility for community rehabilitation program
purposes or the establishment of a facility for community
rehabilitation program purposes in order to provide vocational
rehabilitation services.
(3) A written request for waiver or modification, including
supporting justification, must be submitted to the Secretary for
consideration as soon as the State has determined that it has failed to
satisfy its maintenance of effort requirement due to an exceptional or
uncontrollable circumstance, as described in paragraphs (d)(1) and (2)
of this section.
(Authority: Sections 101(a)(17) and 111(a)(2) of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 721(a)(17) and 731(a)(2))
Sec. 361.63 Program income.
(a) Definition. For purposes of this section, program income means
gross income received by the State that is directly generated by a
supported activity under this part.
(b) Sources. Sources of program income include, but are not limited
to: Payments from the Social Security Administration for assisting
Social Security beneficiaries and recipients to achieve employment
outcomes; payments received from workers' compensation funds; payments
received by the State agency from insurers, consumers, or others for
services to defray part or all of the costs of services provided to
particular individuals; and income generated by a State-operated
community rehabilitation program for activities authorized under this
part.
(c) Use of program income. (1) Except as provided in paragraph
(c)(2) of this section, program income, whenever earned, must be used
for the provision of vocational rehabilitation services and the
administration of the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan. Program income--
(i) Is considered earned in the fiscal year in which it is
received; and
(ii) Must be disbursed during the period of performance of the
award, prior to requesting additional cash
[[Page 21139]]
payments, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.305(b)(5).
(2) Payments provided to a State from the Social Security
Administration for assisting Social Security beneficiaries and
recipients to achieve employment outcomes may also be used to carry out
programs under part B of title I of the Act (client assistance), title
VI of the Act (supported employment), and title VII of the Act
(independent living).
(3) The State is authorized to treat program income using the
deduction or addition alternative in accordance with 2 CFR
200.307(e)(1) and (2).
(4) Program income cannot be used to meet the non-Federal share
requirement under Sec. 361.60.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 108 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 728; 2 CFR part 200)
Sec. 361.64 Obligation of Federal funds.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, any
Federal award funds, including reallotted funds, that are appropriated
for a fiscal year to carry out a program under this part that are not
obligated by the State by the beginning of the succeeding fiscal year
remain available for obligation by the State during that succeeding
fiscal year.
(b) Federal funds appropriated for a fiscal year remain available
for obligation in the succeeding fiscal year only to the extent that
the State met the matching requirement for those Federal funds by
obligating, in accordance with 34 CFR 76.707, the non-Federal share in
the fiscal year for which the funds were appropriated.
(Authority: Section 19 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 716)
Sec. 361.65 Allotment and payment of Federal funds for vocational
rehabilitation services.
(a) Allotment. (1) The allotment of Federal funds for vocational
rehabilitation services for each State is computed in accordance with
the requirements of section 110 of the Act, and payments are made to
the State on a quarterly basis, unless some other period is established
by the Secretary.
(2) If the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan designates one State agency to
administer, or supervise the administration of, the part of the plan
under which vocational rehabilitation services are provided for
individuals who are blind and another State agency to administer the
rest of the plan, the division of the State's allotment is a matter for
State determination.
(3) Reservation for pre-employment transition services. (i)
Pursuant to section 110(d) of the Act, the State must reserve at least
15 percent of the State's allotment, received in accordance with
section 110(a) of the Act for the provision of pre-employment
transition services, as described at Sec. 361.48(a) of this part.
(ii) The funds reserved in accordance with paragraph (3)(i) of this
section--
(A) Must only be used for pre-employment transition services
authorized in Sec. 361.48(a); and:
(B) Must not be used to pay for administrative costs associated
with the provision of such services or any other vocational
rehabilitation services.
(b) Reallotment. (1) The Secretary determines not later than 45
days before the end of a fiscal year which States, if any, will not use
their full allotment.
(2) As soon as possible, but not later than the end of the fiscal
year, the Secretary reallots these funds to other States that can use
those additional funds during the period of performance of the award,
provided the State can meet the matching requirement by obligating the
non-Federal share of any reallotted funds in the fiscal year for which
the funds were appropriated.
(3) In the event more funds are requested by agencies than are
available, the Secretary will determine the process for allocating
funds available for reallotment.
(4) Funds reallotted to another State are considered to be an
increase in the recipient State's allotment for the fiscal year for
which the funds were appropriated.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 110 and 111 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c), 730, and 731)
Subpart D--[Reserved]
Subpart E--[Reserved]
Subpart F--[Reserved]
0
2. Part 363 is revised to read as follows:
PART 363--THE STATE SUPPORTED EMPLOYMENT SERVICES PROGRAM
Subpart A--General
Sec.
363.1 What is the State Supported Employment Services Program?
363.2 Who is eligible for an award?
363.3 Who is eligible for services?
363.4 What are the authorized activities under the State Supported
Employment Services program?
363.5 What regulations apply?
363.6 What definitions apply?
Subpart B--How Does a State Apply for a Grant?
363.10 What documents must a State submit to receive a grant?
363.11 What are the vocational rehabilitation services portion of
the Unified or Combined State Plan supplement requirements?
Subpart C--How Are State Supported Employment Services Programs
Financed?
363.20 How does the Secretary allocate funds?
363.21 How does the Secretary reallocate funds?
363.22 How are funds reserved for youth with the most significant
disabilities?
363.23 What are the matching requirements?
363.24 What is program income and how may it be used?
363.25 What is the period of availability of funds?
Subpart D--[Reserved]
Subpart E--[Reserved]
Subpart F--What Post-Award Conditions Must Be Met by a State?
363.50 What collaborative agreements must the State develop?
363.51 What are the allowable administrative costs?
363.52 What are the information collection and reporting
requirements?
363.53 What requirements must a State meet before it provides for
the transition of an individual to extended services?
363.54 When will an individual be considered to have achieved an
employment outcome in supported employment?
363.55 What notice requirements apply to this program?
Authority: Sections 602-608 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
as amended; 29 U.S.C. 795g-795m, unless otherwise noted.
Subpart A--General
Sec. 363.1 What is the State Supported Employment Services Program?
(a) Under the State supported employment services program, the
Secretary provides grants to assist States in developing and
implementing collaborative programs with appropriate entities to
provide programs of supported employment services for individuals with
the most significant disabilities, including youth with the most
significant disabilities, to enable them to achieve an employment
outcome of supported employment in competitive integrated employment.
Grants made under the State supported employment services program
supplement a State's vocational rehabilitation program grants under 34
CFR part 361.
(b) For purposes of this part, ``supported employment'' means
competitive integrated employment, including customized employment, or
employment in an integrated work setting in which individuals with the
most significant disabilities are working
[[Page 21140]]
on a short-term basis toward competitive integrated employment, that is
individualized and customized consistent with the unique strengths,
abilities, interests, and informed choice of the individuals with
ongoing support services for individuals with the most significant
disabilities--
(1)(i) For whom competitive integrated employment has not
historically occurred; or
(ii) For whom competitive integrated employment has been
interrupted or intermittent as a result of a significant disability;
and
(2) Who, because of the nature and severity of the disability, need
intensive supported employment services, and extended services after
the transition from support provided by the designated State unit in
order to perform the work.
(c) For purposes of this part, an individual with the most
significant disabilities, whose supported employment in an integrated
setting does not satisfy the criteria of competitive integrated
employment, as defined at 34 CFR 361.5(c)(9), is considered to be
working on a short-term basis toward competitive integrated employment
so long as the individual can reasonably anticipate achieving
competitive integrated employment within six months of the individual
entering supported employment.
(Authority: Sections 7(38), 7(39), 12(c), and 602 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C., 705(38), 705(39),
709(c), and 795g)
Sec. 363.2 Who is eligible for an award?
Any State that submits the documentation required by Sec. 363.10,
as part of the vocational rehabilitation services portion of the
Unified or Combined State Plan under 34 CFR part 361, is eligible for
an award under this part.
(Authority: Section 606(a) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 795k(a))
Sec. 363.3 Who is eligible for services?
A State may provide services under this part to any individual,
including a youth with a disability, if--
(a) The individual has been determined to be--
(1) Eligible for vocational rehabilitation services in accordance
with 34 CFR 361.42; and
(2) An individual with the most significant disabilities;
(b) For purposes of activities carried out under Sec. 363.4(a)(2)
of this part, the individual is a youth with a disability, as defined
at 34 CFR 361.5(c)(59), who satisfies the requirements of this section;
and
(c) Supported employment has been identified as the appropriate
employment outcome for the individual on the basis of a comprehensive
assessment of rehabilitation needs, as defined at 34 CFR 361.5(c)(5),
including an evaluation of rehabilitation, career, and job needs.
(Authority: Section 605 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 795j)
Sec. 363.4 What are the authorized activities under the State
Supported Employment Services program?
(a) The State may use funds allotted under this part to--
(1) Provide supported employment services, as defined at 34 CFR
361.5(c)(54);
(2) Provide extended services, as defined at 34 CFR 361.5(c)(19),
to youth with the most significant disabilities, in accordance with
Sec. 363.11(f), for a period of time not to exceed four years; and
(3) With funds reserved, in accordance with Sec. 363.22 for the
provision of supported employment services to youth with the most
significant disabilities, leverage other public and private funds to
increase resources for extended services and expand supported
employment opportunities.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, a State
may not use funds under this part to provide extended services to
individuals with the most significant disabilities.
(c) Nothing in this part will be construed to prohibit a State from
providing--
(1) Supported employment services in accordance with the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan
submitted under 34 CFR part 361 by using funds made available through a
State allotment under that part.
(2) Discrete postemployment services in accordance with 34 CFR
361.48(b) by using funds made available under 34 CFR part 361 to an
individual who is eligible under this part.
(d) A State must coordinate with the entities described in Sec.
363.50(a) regarding the services provided to individuals with the most
significant disabilities, including youth with the most significant
disabilities, under this part and under 34 CFR part 361 to ensure that
the services are complementary and not duplicative.
(Authority: Sections 7(39), 12(c), 604, 606(b)(6), and 608 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(39), 709(c),
795i, 795k(b)(6), and 795m)
Sec. 363.5 What regulations apply?
The following regulations apply to the State supported employment
services program:
(a) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations
(EDGAR) as follows:
(1) 34 CFR part 76 (State-Administered Programs).
(2) 34 CFR part 77 (Definitions that Apply to Department
Regulations).
(3) 34 CFR part 79 (Intergovernmental Review of Department of
Education Programs and Activities).
(4) 34 CFR part 81 (General Education Provisions Act--Enforcement).
(5) 34 CFR part 82 (New Restrictions on Lobbying).
(b) The regulations in this part 363.
(c) The following regulations in 34 CFR part 361 (The State
Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program): Sec. Sec. 361.5, 361.31,
361.32, 361.34, 361.35, 361.39, 361.40, 361.41, 361.42, 361.47(a),
361.48, 361.49, and 361.53.
(d) 2 CFR part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards), as adopted in 2
CFR part 3474.
(e) 2 CFR part 180 (OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide
Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement)), as adopted in 2 CFR part
3485.
(Authority: Section 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c))
Sec. 363.6 What definitions apply?
The following definitions apply to this part;
(a) Definitions in 34 CFR part 361.
(b) Definitions in 34 CFR part 77.
(c) Definitions in 2 CFR part 200, subpart A.
(Authority: Sections 7 and 12(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705 and 709(c))
Subpart B--How Does a State Apply for a Grant?
Sec. 363.10 What documents must a State submit to receive a grant?
(a) To be eligible to receive a grant under this part, a State must
submit to the Secretary, as part of the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan under 34 CFR
part 361, a State plan supplement that meets the requirements of Sec.
363.11.
(b) A State must submit revisions to the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan supplement
submitted under this part as may be necessary.
[[Page 21141]]
(Authority: Section 606(a) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 795k(a))
Sec. 363.11 What are the vocational rehabilitation services portion
of the Unified or Combined State Plan supplement requirements?
Each State plan supplement, submitted in accordance with Sec.
363.10, must--
(a) Designate a designated State unit or, as applicable, units, as
defined in 34 CFR 361.5(c)(13), as the State agency or agencies to
administer the Supported Employment program under this part;
(b) Summarize the results of the needs assessment of individuals
with most significant disabilities, including youth with the most
significant disabilities, conducted under 34 CFR 361.29(a), with
respect to the rehabilitation and career needs of individuals with most
significant disabilities and their need for supported employment
services. The results of the needs assessment must also address needs
relating to coordination;
(c) Describe the quality, scope, and extent of supported employment
services to be provided to eligible individuals with the most
significant disabilities under this part, including youth with the most
significant disabilities;
(d) Describe the State's goals and plans with respect to the
distribution of funds received under Sec. 363.20;
(e) Demonstrate evidence of the designated State unit's efforts to
identify and make arrangements, including entering into cooperative
agreements, with--
(1) Other State agencies and other appropriate entities to assist
in the provision of supported employment services; and
(2) Other public or non-profit agencies or organizations within the
State, employers, natural supports, and other entities with respect to
the provision of extended services;
(f) Describe the activities to be conducted for youth with the most
significant disabilities with the funds reserved in accordance with
Sec. 363.22, including-
(1) The provision of extended services to youth with the most
significant disabilities for a period not to exceed four years, in
accordance with Sec. 363.4(a)(2); and
(2) How the State will use supported employment funds reserved
under Sec. 363.22 to leverage other public and private funds to
increase resources for extended services and expand supported
employment opportunities for youth with the most significant
disabilities;
(g) Assure that--
(1) Funds made available under this part will only be used to
provide authorized supported employment services to individuals who are
eligible under this part to receive such services;
(2) The comprehensive assessments of individuals with significant
disabilities, including youth with the most significant disabilities,
conducted under 34 CFR part 361 will include consideration of supported
employment as an appropriate employment outcome;
(3) An individualized plan for employment, as described at 34 CFR
361.45 and 361.46, will be developed and updated, using funds received
under 34 CFR part 361, in order to--
(i) Specify the supported employment services to be provided,
including, as appropriate, transition services and pre-employment
transition services to be provided for youth with the most significant
disabilities;
(ii) Specify the expected extended services needed, including the
extended services that may be provided under this part to youth with
the most significant disabilities in accordance with an approved
individualized plan for employment for a period not to exceed four
years; and
(iii) Identify, as appropriate, the source of extended services,
which may include natural supports, programs, or other entities, or an
indication that it is not possible to identify the source of extended
services at the time the individualized plan for employment is
developed;
(4) The State will use funds provided under this part only to
supplement, and not supplant, the funds received under 34 CFR part 361,
in providing supported employment services specified in the
individualized plan for employment;
(5) Services provided under an individualized plan for employment
will be coordinated with services provided under other individualized
plans established under other Federal or State programs;
(6) To the extent job skills training is provided, the training
will be provided onsite;
(7) Supported employment services will include placement in an
integrated setting based on the unique strengths, resources, interests,
concerns, abilities, and capabilities of individuals with the most
significant disabilities, including youth with the most significant
disabilities;
(8) The designated State agency or agencies, as described in
paragraph (a) of this section, will expend no more than 2.5 percent of
the State's allotment under this part for administrative costs of
carrying out this program; and
(9) The designated State agency or agencies will provide, directly
or indirectly through public or private entities, non-Federal
contributions in an amount that is not less than 10 percent of the
costs of carrying out supported employment services provided to youth
with the most significant disabilities with the funds reserved for such
purpose under Sec. 363.22; and
(h) Contain any other information and be submitted in the form and
in accordance with the procedures that the Secretary may require.
(Authority: Section 606 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 795k)
Subpart C--How Are State Supported Employment Services Programs
Financed?
Sec. 363.20 How does the Secretary allocate funds?
(a) States. The Secretary will allot the sums appropriated for each
fiscal year to carry out the activities of this part among the States
on the basis of relative population of each State, except that--
(1) No State will receive less than $250,000, or 1/3 of 1 percent
of the sums appropriated for the fiscal year for which the allotment is
made, whichever amount is greater; and
(2) If the sums appropriated to carry out this part for the fiscal
year exceed the sums appropriated to carry out this part (as in effect
on September 30, 1992) in fiscal year 1992 by $1,000,000 or more, no
State will receive less than $300,000, or 1/3 of 1 percent of the sums
appropriated for the fiscal year for which the allotment is made,
whichever amount is greater.
(b) Certain Territories. (1) For the purposes of this part, Guam,
American Samoa, the United States Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands are not considered to be States.
(2) Each jurisdiction described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section
will be allotted not less than 1/8 of 1 percent of the amounts
appropriated for the fiscal year for which the allotment is made.
(Authority: Section 603(a) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 795h(a))
Sec. 363.21 How does the Secretary reallocate funds?
(a) Whenever the Secretary determines that any amount of an
allotment to a State under Sec. 363.20 for any fiscal year will not be
expended by such State for carrying out the provisions of this part,
the Secretary will make such amount available for carrying out the
provisions of this part to one or more of the States that the
[[Page 21142]]
Secretary determines will be able to use additional amounts during such
year for carrying out such provisions.
(b) Any amount made available to a State for any fiscal year in
accordance with paragraph (a) will be regarded as an increase in the
State's allotment under this part for such year.
(Authority: Section 603(b) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 795h(b))
Sec. 363.22 How are funds reserved for youth with the most
significant disabilities?
A State that receives an allotment under this part must reserve and
expend 50 percent of such allotment for the provision of supported
employment services, including extended services, to youth with the
most significant disabilities in order to assist those youth in
achieving an employment outcome in supported employment.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 603(d) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 795h(d))
Sec. 363.23 What are the matching requirements?
(a) Non-Federal Share. (1) For funds allotted under Sec. 363.20
and not reserved under Sec. 363.22 for the provision of supported
employment services to youth with the most significant disabilities,
there is no non-Federal share requirement.
(2)(i) For funds allotted under Sec. 363.20 and reserved under
Sec. 363.22 for the provision of supported employment services to
youth with the most significant disabilities, a designated State agency
must provide non-Federal expenditures in an amount that is not less
than 10 percent of the total expenditures made with the reserved funds
for the provision of supported employment services to youth with the
most significant disabilities, including extended services.
(ii) In the event that a designated State agency uses more than 50
percent of its allotment under this part to provide supported
employment services to youth with the most significant disabilities as
required by Sec. 363.22, there is no requirement that a designated
State agency provide non-Federal expenditures to match the excess
Federal funds spent for this purpose.
(2) Except as provided under paragraphs (b) and (c) of this
section, non-Federal expenditures made under the vocational
rehabilitation services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan
supplement to meet the non-Federal share requirement under this section
must be consistent with the provision of 2 CFR 200.306.
(b) Third-party in-kind contributions. Third-party in-kind
contributions, as described in 2 CFR 200.306(b), may not be used to
meet the non-Federal share under this section.
(c)(1) Contributions by private entities. Expenditures made from
contributions by private organizations, agencies, or individuals that
are deposited into the sole account of the State agency, in accordance
with State law may be used as part of the non-Federal share under this
section, provided the expenditures under the vocational rehabilitation
services portion of the Unified or Combined State Plan supplement, as
described in Sec. 363.11, do not benefit in any way the donor, an
individual to whom the donor is related by blood or marriage or with
whom the donor shares a financial interest.
(2) The Secretary does not consider a donor's receipt from the
State unit of a contract or subaward with funds allotted under this
part to be a benefit for the purpose of this paragraph if the contract
or subaward is awarded under the State's regular competitive
procedures.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 606(b)(7)(I) of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 795k(b)(7)(I))
Sec. 363.24 What is program income and how may it be used?
(a) Definition. (1) Program income means gross income earned by the
State that is directly generated by authorized activities supported
under this part.
(2) Program income received through the transfer of Social Security
Administration payments from the State Vocational Rehabilitation
Services program, in accordance with 34 CFR 361.63(c)(2), will be
treated as program income received under this part.
(b) Use of program income. (1) Program income must be used for the
provision of services authorized under Sec. 363.4. Program income
earned or received during the fiscal year must be disbursed during the
period of performance of the award, prior to requesting additional cash
payments in accordance with 2 CFR 200.305(b)(5).
(2) States are authorized to treat program income as--
(i) A deduction from total allowable costs charged to a Federal
grant, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.307(e)(1); or
(ii) An addition to the grant funds to be used for additional
allowable program expenditures, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.307(e)(2).
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 108 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 728)
Sec. 363.25 What is the period of availability of funds?
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, any
Federal award funds, including reallotted funds, that are appropriated
for a fiscal year to carry out a program under this part that are not
obligated by the State by the beginning of the succeeding fiscal year,
and any program income received during a fiscal year that is not
obligated or expended by the State prior to the beginning of the
succeeding fiscal year in which the program income was received, remain
available for obligation by the State during that succeeding fiscal
year.
(b) Federal funds appropriated for a fiscal year and reserved for
the provision of supported employment services to youth with the most
significant disabilities, in accordance with Sec. 363.22 of this part,
remain available for obligation in the succeeding fiscal year only to
the extent that the State met the matching requirement, as described at
Sec. 363.23, for those Federal funds by obligating, in accordance with
34 CFR 76.707, the non-Federal share in the fiscal year for which the
funds were appropriated.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 19 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 716)
Subpart D--[Reserved]
Subpart E--[Reserved]
Subpart F--What Post-Award Conditions Must Be Met by a State?
Sec. 363.50 What collaborative agreements must the State develop?
(a) A designated State unit must enter into one or more written
collaborative agreements, memoranda of understanding, or other
appropriate mechanisms with other public agencies, private nonprofit
organizations, and other available funding sources, including employers
and other natural supports, as appropriate, to assist with the
provision of supported employment services and extended services to
individuals with the most significant disabilities in the State,
including youth with the most significant disabilities, to enable them
to achieve an employment outcome of supported employment in competitive
integrated employment.
(b) These agreements provide the mechanism for collaboration at the
State level that is necessary to ensure the smooth transition from
supported employment services to extended services, the transition of
which is inherent to the definition of ``supported employment'' in
Sec. 363.1(b). To that end,
[[Page 21143]]
the agreement may contain information regarding the--
(1) Supported employment services to be provided, for a period not
to exceed 24 months, by the designated State unit with funds received
under this part.
(2) Extended services to be provided to youth with the most
significant disabilities, for a period not to exceed four years, by the
designated State unit with the funds reserved under Sec. 363.22 of
this part;
(3) Extended services to be provided by other public agencies,
private nonprofit organizations, or other sources, including employers
and other natural supports, following the provision of authorized
supported employment services, or extended services as appropriate for
youth with the most significant disabilities, under this part; and
(4) Collaborative efforts that will be undertaken by all relevant
entities to increase opportunities for competitive integrated
employment in the State for individuals with the most significant
disabilities, especially youth with the most significant disabilities.
(Authority: Sections 7(38), 7(39), 12(c), 602, and 606(b) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(38), 705(39),
709(c), 795g, and 795k(b))
Sec. 363.51 What are the allowable administrative costs?
(a) A State may use funds under this part to pay for expenditures
incurred in the administration of activities carried out under this
part, consistent with the definition of administrative costs in 34 CFR
361.5(c)(2).
(b) A designated State agency may not expend more than 2.5 percent
of a State's allotment under this part for administrative costs for
carrying out the State supported employment program.
(Authority: Sections 7(1), 12(c), and 603(c) of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(1), 709(c), and 795h(c))
Sec. 363.52 What are the information collection and reporting
requirements?
Each State agency designated in Sec. 363.11(a) of this part must
collect and report separately the information required under 34 CFR
361.40 for--
(a) Eligible individuals receiving supported employment services
under this part;
(b) Eligible individuals receiving supported employment services
under 34 CFR part 361;
(c) Eligible youth receiving supported employment services and
extended services under this part; and
(d) Eligible youth receiving supported employment services under 34
CFR part 361 and extended services.
(Authority: Sections 13 and 607 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
as amended; 29 U.S.C. 710 and 795l)
Sec. 363.53 What requirements must a State meet before it provides
for the transition of an individual to extended services?
A designated State unit must provide for the transition of an
individual with the most significant disabilities, including youth with
the most significant disabilities, to extended services no later than
24 months after the individual enters supported employment, unless a
longer period is established in the individualized plan for employment.
Before assisting the individual in transitioning from supported
employment services to extended services, the designated State unit
must ensure--
(a) The supported employment is--
(1) In competitive integrated employment, including customized
employment; or
(2) In an integrated work setting in which individuals are working
on a short-term basis, as described in Sec. 363.1(c), toward
competitive integrated employment;
(3) Individualized and customized consistent with the strengths,
abilities, interests, and informed choice of the individual; and
(b) The source of extended services for the individual has been
identified so there will be no interruption of services.
(Authority: Sections 7(13), 7(38), 7(39), 12(c), 602, and 606(b) of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(13),
705(38), 705(39), 709(c), 795g, and 795k(b))
Sec. 363.54 When will an individual be considered to have achieved an
employment outcome in supported employment?
An individual with the most significant disabilities, including a
youth with the most significant disabilities, who is receiving services
under this part will be determined to have achieved an employment
outcome of supported employment if the individual--
(a) Maintains supported employment for at least 90 days after the
individual has--
(1) Completed all supported employment services provided under this
part, as well as any other services listed on the individualized plan
for employment and provided under 34 CFR part 361; and
(2) Begun extended services provided by either the designated State
unit, in the case of a youth with a most significant disabilities
receiving services with the funds reserved under Sec. 363.22, or
another provider for all other individuals with the most significant
disabilities;
(b) Satisfies requirements for case closure, as set forth in 34 CFR
361.56; and
(c) Satisfies the requirement at Sec. 363.1(c) if the individual's
supported employment is in an integrated setting, but is not in
competitive integrated employment, as defined in 34 CFR 361.5(c)(9).
(Authority: Sections 7(38), 7(39), 12(c), and 602 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(38), 705(39),
709(c), and 795g)
Sec. 363.55 What notice requirements apply to this program?
Each grantee must advise applicants for or recipients of services
under this part, or as appropriate, the parents, family members,
guardians, advocates, or authorized representatives of those
individuals, including youth with the most significant disabilities, of
the availability and purposes of the Client Assistance Program,
including information on seeking assistance from that program.
(Authority: Section 20 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 717)
0
3. Part 397 is added to read as follows:
PART 397--LIMITATIONS ON USE OF SUBMINIMUM WAGE
Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec.
397.1 Purpose.
397.2 What is the Department of Education's jurisdiction under this
part?
397.3 What rules of construction apply to this part?
397.4 What regulations apply?
397.5 What definitions apply?
Subpart B--Coordinated Documentation Procedures Related To Youth With
Disabilities
397.10 What documentation process must the designated State unit
develop?
Subpart C--Designated State Unit Responsibilities Prior To Youth With
Disabilities Starting Subminimum Wage Employment
397.20 What are the responsibilities of a designated State unit to
youth with disabilities who are known to be considering subminimum
wage employment?
Subpart D--Local Educational Agency Responsibilities Prior To Youth
With Disabilities Starting Subminimum Wage Employment
397.30 What are the responsibilities of a local educational agency
to youth with disabilities who are known to be considering
subminimum wage employment?
[[Page 21144]]
397.31 Are there any contracting limitations on educational agencies
under this part?
Subpart E--Designated State Unit Responsibilities To Individuals With
Disabilities During Subminimum Wage Employment
397.40 What are the responsibilities of a designated State unit for
individuals with disabilities, regardless of age, who are employed
at subminimum wage?
Subpart F--Review Of Documentation Process
397.50 What is the role of the designated State unit in the review
of documentation process under this part?
Authority: Section 511 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 794g, unless otherwise noted.
Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec. 397.1 Purpose.
(a) The purpose of this part is to set forth requirements the
designated State units and State and local educational agencies must
satisfy to ensure that individuals with disabilities, especially youth
with disabilities, have a meaningful opportunity to prepare for,
obtain, maintain, advance in, or regain competitive integrated
employment, including supported or customized employment.
(b) This part requires--
(1) A designated State unit to provide youth with disabilities
documentation demonstrating that they have completed certain
requirements, as described in this part, prior to starting subminimum
wage employment with entities holding special wage certificates under
section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C.
214(c)), as defined in 397.5(d);
(2) A designated State unit to provide, at certain prescribed
intervals, career counseling and information and referral services,
designed to promote opportunities for competitive integrated
employment, to individuals with disabilities, regardless of age, who
are known to be employed at a subminimum wage level for the duration of
such employment; and
(3) A designated State unit, in consultation with the State
educational agency, to develop a, or utilize an existing, process to
document completion of required activities under this part by a youth
with a disability.
(c) The provisions in this part authorize a designated State unit,
or a representative of a designated State unit, to engage in the review
of individual documentation required to be maintained by these entities
under this part.
(d) The provisions in this part work in concert with requirements
in 34 CFR part 300, 361, and 363, and do not alter any requirements
under those parts.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 511 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 794g)
Sec. 397.2 What is the Department of Education's jurisdiction under
this part?
(a) The Department of Education has jurisdiction under this part to
implement guidelines for--
(1) Documentation requirements imposed on designated State units
and local educational agencies;
(2) Requirements related to the services that designated State
units must provide to individuals regardless of age who are employed at
the subminimum wage level; and
(3) Requirements under Sec. 397.31 of this part.
(b) Nothing in this part will be construed to grant to the
Department of Education, or its grantees, jurisdiction over
requirements set forth in the Fair Labor Standards Act, including those
imposed on entities holding special wage certificates under section
14(c) of that Act, which is administered by the Department of Labor.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 511(b)(3), and 511(c) and (d) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c),
794g(b)(3), 794g(c), and 794g(d))
Sec. 397.3 What rules of construction apply to this part?
Nothing in this part will be construed to--
(a) Change the purpose of the Rehabilitation Act, which is to
empower individuals with disabilities to maximize opportunities for
achieving competitive integrated employment;
(b) Promote subminimum wage employment as a vocational
rehabilitation strategy or employment outcome, as defined in 34 CFR
361.5(c)(15); and
(c) Affect the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, as
amended before or after July 22, 2014.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 511(b) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 794g(b))
Sec. 397.4 What regulations apply?
(a) The regulations in 34 CFR part 300 governing the definition of
transition services, and the Individualized Education Program
requirements related to the development of postsecondary goals and the
transition services needed to assist the eligible child in reaching
those goals (Sec. Sec. 300.320(b), 300.321(b), 300.324(c), and
300.43).
(b) The regulations at 34 CFR part 361 governing the vocational
rehabilitation program, especially those regarding eligibility
determinations Sec. 361.42; individualized plans for employment Sec.
361.45 and Sec. 361.46; provision of vocational rehabilitation
services, including pre-employment transition services, transition
services, and supported employment services Sec. 361.48; ineligibility
determinations Sec. 361.43; and case closures Sec. 361.56.
(c) The regulations at 29 CFR part 525 governing the employment of
individuals with disabilities at subminimum wage rates pursuant to a
certificate issued by the Secretary of the Department of Labor.
(d) The regulations in this part 387.
(Authority: Sections 12(c), 102(a) and (b), 103(a), and 113 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c), 722(a) and
(b), 723(a), and 733; sections 601(34) and 614(d)(1)(A)(i)(VIII) of
the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1401(34)
and 1414(d)); and section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (29
U.S.C. 214(c))
Sec. 397.5 What definitions apply?
(a) The following terms have the meanings given to them in 34 CFR
Sec. 361.5(c):
(1) Act;
(2) Competitive integrated employment;
(3) Customized employment;
(4) Designated State unit;
(5) Extended services;
(6) Individual with a disability;
(7) Individual with a most significant disability;
(8) Individual's representative;
(9) Individualized plan for employment;
(10) Pre-employment transition services;
(11) Student with a disability;
(12) Supported employment;
(13) Vocational rehabilitation services; and
(14) Youth with a disability.
(b) The following terms have the meanings given to them in 34 CFR
part 300:
(1) Local educational agency (Sec. 300.28);
(2) State educational agency (Sec. 300.41); and
(3) Transition services (Sec. 300.43).
(c) The following terms have the meaning given to them in 29 CFR
525.3 and section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C.
206(a)(1)):
(1) Federal minimum wage has the meaning given to that term in
section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1));
and
(2) Special wage certificate means a certificate issued to an
employer under section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards
[[Page 21145]]
Act (29 U.S.C. 214(c)) and 29 CFR part 525 that authorizes payment of
subminimum wages, wages less than the statutory minimum wage, to
workers with disabilities for the work being performed.
(d) For purposes of this part, entity means an employer, or a
contractor or subcontractor of that employer, that holds a special wage
certificate described in section 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act
(29 U.S.C. 214(c)).
(Authority: Sections 7, 12(c), and 511(a) and (f) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 705, 709(c), and
794g(a) and (f); sections 601 and 614(d) of the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. 1401 and 1414(d); section 901
of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C.
7801; and sections 6(a)(1) and 14(c) of the Fair Labor Standards
Act, 29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1) and 29 U.S.C. 214(c))
Subpart B--Coordinated Documentation Procedures Related to Youth
With Disabilities
Sec. 397.10 What documentation process must the designated State unit
develop?
(a) The designated State unit, in consultation with the State
educational agency, must develop a new process, or utilize an existing
process, to document the completion of the actions described in Sec.
397.20 and Sec. 397.30 by a youth with a disability.
(b) The documentation process must ensure that--
(1) A designated State unit provides a youth with a disability
documentation of completion of appropriate pre-employment transition
services, in accordance with Sec. 361.48(a) and as required by Sec.
397.20(a)(1);
(2) In the case of a student with a disability, for actions
described in Sec. 397.30--
(i) The designated State unit will receive from the appropriate
school official, responsible for the provision of transition services,
documentation of completion of appropriate transition services under
the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, including those
provided under section 614(d)(1)(A)(i)(VIII) (20 U.S.C.
1414(d)(1)(A)(i)(VIII));
(ii) The designated State unit must provide documentation of
completion of the transition services, as documented and provided by
the appropriate school official in accordance with paragraph (b)(2) of
this section, to the youth with a disability.
(c) The designated State unit must provide--
(1) Documentation required by this part in a form and manner
consistent with this part and in an accessible format for the youth;
and
(2) Documentation required by this part to a youth as soon as
possible upon the completion of each of the required actions, but no
later than 90 days after completion of each of the required actions in
Sec. 397.20 and Sec. 397.30.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 511(d) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 794g(d))
Subpart C--Designated State Unit Responsibilities Prior To Youth
With Disabilities Starting Subminimum Wage Employment
Sec. 397.20 What are the responsibilities of a designated State unit
to youth with disabilities who are known to be considering subminimum
wage employment?
(a) A designated State unit must provide youth with disabilities
documentation upon the completion of the following actions:
(1) Pre-employment transition services that are available to the
individual under Sec. 34 CFR 361.48; and
(2) Application for vocational rehabilitation services, in
accordance with 34 CFR Sec. 361.41(b), with the result that the
individual was determined--
(i) Ineligible for vocational rehabilitation services, in
accordance with 34 CFR Sec. 361.43; or
(ii) Eligible for vocational rehabilitation services, in accordance
with 34 CFR Sec. 361.42; and
(A) The youth with a disability had an approved individualized plan
for employment, in accordance with 34 CFR 361.46;
(B) The youth with a disability was unable to achieve the
employment outcome specified in the individualized plan for employment,
as described in 34 CFR 361.5(c)(15) and 361.46, despite working toward
the employment outcome with reasonable accommodations and appropriate
supports and services, including supported employment services and
customized employment services, for a reasonable period of time; and
(C) The youth with a disability's case record, which meets all of
the requirements of 34 CFR 361.47, is closed.
(3)(i) Regardless of the determination made under paragraph (a)(2)
of this section, the youth with a disability has received career
counseling, and information and referrals to Federal and State programs
and other resources in the individual's geographic area that offer
employment-related services and supports designed to enable the
individual to explore, discover, experience, and attain competitive
integrated employment.
(ii) The career counseling and information and referral services
provided in accordance with paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section must--
(A) Be provided in a manner that facilitates informed choice and
decision-making by the youth, or the youth's representative as
appropriate; and
(B) Not be for subminimum wage employment by an entity defined in
Sec. 397.5(d), and such employment-related services are not
compensated at a subminimum wage and do not directly result in
employment compensated at a subminimum wage provided by such an entity.
(b) The following special requirements apply--
(1) For purposes of this part, all documentation provided by a
designated State unit must satisfy the requirements for such
documentation under 34 CFR part 361.
(2) The individualized plan for employment, required in paragraph
(a)(3)(i) of this section, must include a specific employment goal
consistent with competitive integrated employment, including supported
or customized employment.
(3)(i) For purposes of paragraph (a)(2)(ii)(B) of this section, a
determination as to what constitutes ``reasonable period of time'' must
be consistent with the disability-related and vocational needs of the
individual, as well as the anticipated length of time required to
complete the services identified in the individualized plan for
employment.
(ii) For an individual whose specified employment goal is in
supported employment, such reasonable period of time is up to 24
months, unless under special circumstances the individual and the
rehabilitation counselor jointly agree to extend the time to achieve
the employment outcome identified in the individualized plan for
employment.
(Authority: Sections 7(5), 7(39), 12(c), 102(a) and (b), 103(a),
113, and 511(a) and (d) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 705(5), 705(39), 709(c), 722(a) and (b), 723(a),
733, and 794g(a) and (d))
Subpart D--Local Educational Agency Responsibilities Prior To Youth
With Disabilities Starting Subminimum Wage Employment
Sec. 397.30 What are the responsibilities of a local educational
agency to youth with disabilities who are known to be seeking
subminimum wage employment?
Of the documentation to demonstrate a youth with a disability's
completion of the actions described in Sec. 397.20(a) of this part, a
local educational agency, as
[[Page 21146]]
defined in Sec. 397.5(b)(1), can provide the youth with documentation
that the youth has received transition services under the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.), such as
transition services available to the individual under section 614(d) of
that act (20 U.S.C. 1414(d)).
(Authority: Sections 511(a)(2)(A) and 511(d) of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 794g(a)(2)(A) and (d))
Sec. 397.31 Are there any contracting limitations on educational
agencies under this part?
Neither a local educational agency, as defined in Sec.
397.5(b)(1), nor a State educational agency, as defined in Sec.
397.5(b)(2), may enter into a contract or other arrangement with an
entity, as defined in Sec. 397.5(d), for the purpose of operating a
program under which a youth with a disability is engaged in subminimum
wage employment.
(Authority: Section 511(b)(2) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 794g(b)(2))
Subpart E--Designated State Unit Responsibilities to Individuals
With Disabilities During Subminimum Wage Employment
Sec. 397.40 What are the responsibilities of a designated State unit
for individuals with disabilities, regardless of age, who are employed
at a subminimum wage?
(a) Counseling and information services. (1) A designated State
unit must provide career counseling, and information and referral
services, as described in Sec. 397.20(a)(4) to individuals with
disabilities, regardless of age, or the individual's representative as
appropriate, who are known by the designated State unit to be employed
by an entity, as defined in Sec. 397.5(d), at a subminimum wage level.
(2) A designated State unit may know the identification of
individuals with disabilities described in this paragraph through the
vocational rehabilitation process or by referral from the client
assistance program, another agency, or an entity, as defined in Sec.
397.5(d).
(3) The career counseling and information and referral services
must be provided in a manner that-
(i) Is understandable to the individual with a disability; and
(ii) Facilitates independent decision-making and informed choice as
the individual makes decisions regarding opportunities for competitive
integrated employment and career advancement, particularly with respect
to supported employment, including customized employment.
(b) Other services. (1) Upon a referral by an entity, as defined in
397.5(d), that has fewer than 15 employees, of an individual with a
disability who is employed at a subminimum wage by that entity, a
designated State unit must also inform the individual of self-advocacy,
self-determination, and peer mentoring training opportunities available
in the community.
(2) The services described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section must
be provided by an entity that does not have a financial interest in the
individual's employment outcome.
(c) Required intervals. The services required by this section must
be carried out once every six months for the first year of the
individual's subminimum wage employment and annually thereafter for the
duration of such employment.
(d) Documentation. The designated State unit must provide timely
documentation to the individual upon completion of the activities
required under this section.
(e) Provision of services. Nothing in this section will be
construed as requiring a designated State unit to provide the services
required by this section directly. A designated State unit may contract
with other entities, i.e., other public and private service providers,
as appropriate, to fulfill the requirements of this section.
(Authority: Sections 12(c) and 511(c) of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 709(c) and 794g(c))
Subpart F-Review of Documentation Process
Sec. 397.50 What is the role of the designated State unit in the
review of documentation process under this part?
The designated State unit, or a contractor working directly for the
designated State unit is authorized to engage in the review of
individual documentation required under this part that is maintained by
entities, as defined at 397.5(d), under this part.
(Authority: Section 511(e) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; 29 U.S.C. 794g(e))
[FR Doc. 2015-05538 Filed 4-2-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P