Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; Maserati North America Inc., 20065-20066 [2015-08490]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Notices
a. Current Systems: GES and CDS threestage designs
b. Independence between CRSS and CISS
samples
5. The CISS Sample Design
a. Scope
b. Frame, Stratification, Formation and
Selection of each of the three stages (PSU, PJ
and PAR)
c. Sample Allocation
6. The CRSS Sample Design
a. Scope
b. Frame, Stratification, Formation and
Selection of each of the three stages (PSU, PJ
and PAR)
c. Sample Allocation
7. Improvements in CISS/CRSS
a. Scalability and Flexibility
b. Precision of Estimates
c. MOS aligned with Data Needs
8. Ongoing and Upcoming Activities in
Survey Modernization
a. Estimation Protocols
b. Calibration
c. Analytic Guidelines
9. Questions
The webinar will be open to the
public. NHTSA will present the new
sample designs starting at 1:30 p.m. The
presentation will be about one hour.
After the presentation NHTSA has
scheduled 30 minutes to answer
questions from the participants on the
sample designs.
Participants may access the Webinar
via the Internet and telephone. The
telephone access number and other
information on how to participate via
the Internet will be posted on the
NHTSA Web site at www.nhsta.gov one
week before the event. For questions,
contact Raj Subramanian at
raj.subramanian@dot.gov or 202–366–
3385.
Under authority delegated by 49 CFR
1.95.
Terry Shelton,
Associate Administrator, National Center for
Statistics and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2015–08477 Filed 4–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Petition for Exemption From the
Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard; Maserati North America Inc.
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
AGENCY:
This document grants in full
the Maserati North America Inc.’s,
(Maserati) petition for an exemption of
the Ghibli vehicle line in accordance
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Apr 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
with 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard. This
petition is granted because the agency
has determined that the antitheft device
to be placed on the line as standard
equipment is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the 49 CFR
part 541, Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard (Theft Prevention
Standard).
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with the
2016 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Carlita Ballard, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer
Programs, NHTSA, W43–439, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590. Ms. Ballard’s phone number is
(202) 366–5222. Her fax number is (202)
493–2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
petition dated February 5, 2015,
Maserati requested an exemption from
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard for the Ghibli
vehicle line beginning with MY 2016.
The petition requested an exemption
from parts-marking pursuant to 49 CFR
part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard, based on the
installation of an antitheft device as
standard equipment for an entire
vehicle line.
Under § 543.5(a), a manufacturer may
petition NHTSA to grant an exemption
for one vehicle line per model year. In
its petition, Maserati provided a
detailed description and diagram of the
identity, design, and location of the
components of the antitheft device for
the Ghibli vehicle line. Maserati stated
that all of its vehicles will be equipped
with a passive, Sentry Key Immobilizer
System (SKIS), a Vehicle Alarm System
(VTA) and a Keyless Ignition System as
standard equipment beginning with the
2016 model year. Key components of its
SKIS antitheft device will include an
Engine Power Control Module, Fuel
Delivery and a Starter Motor Circuit.
Maserati’s keyless ignition system will
consist of a Key Fob with Remote
Keyless Entry (RKE) Transmitter, RFHub
and Keyless Ignition Node (KIN). Key
components of Maserati’s VTA system
are a hood ajar switch, security
indicator, RFHub/Kin and FOBIK, an
intrusion and inclination sensor, door
ajar switches, an intrusion module and
a central body controller. Maserati also
stated that its VTA system will include
an audible and visual feature that will
provide perimeter protection that will
monitors the vehicle doors, ignition
switch and deck lid for unauthorized
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20065
tampering, and an ultrasonic intrusion
sensor, designed to detect motion
within the vehicle. Maserati further
stated that if unauthorized tampering
with any of these protected areas is
detected, the vehicle’s horn/siren will
sound and some of its exterior lamps
will flash.
Maserati stated that the immobilizer
device is automatically activated when
the ignition is changed from the run
position to the off position. Once
activated, only the use of a valid key can
disable immobilization and allow the
vehicle to run. Specifically, Maserati
stated that the device is deactivated by
performing an unlock actuation via the
RKE transmitter or by starting the
vehicle with a valid RFHub key.
Maserati stated that to start the vehicle,
the driver must press and hold the brake
pedal while pressing the START/STOP
button. The system takes over and
engages the starter causing the starter
motor to run and disengage
automatically when the engine is
running. Maserati stated that the RFHub
contains and controls the SKIS,
preventing the engine from running
more than 2 seconds unless a valid
FOBIK key is used to start the engine.
Maserati also stated that the vehicle’s
key fob with RKE transmitter, RFHub
and the KIN contains over 50,000
possible electronic key combinations
and allows the driver to operate the
ignition switch with the push of a
button as long as the RKE transmitter is
in the passenger compartment.
Maserati’s submission is considered a
complete petition as required by 49 CFR
543.7, in that it meets the general
requirements contained in § 543.5 and
the specific content requirements of
§ 543.6.
In addressing the specific content
requirements of 543.6, Maserati
provided information on the reliability
and durability of its proposed device.
To ensure reliability and durability of
the device, Maserati conducted tests
based on its own specified standards.
Maserati provided a detailed list of the
tests conducted (i.e., low and high
temperature exposure on system
components, resistance for humidity,
ice, water immersion, dust exposure,
and drop shock on surfaces). Maserati
also stated that the VTA, including the
immobilizer device and its related
components must meet design and
durability requirements for full vehicle
useful life (10 years/120k miles).
Maserati stated that it believes that its
device is reliable and durable because it
complied with specified requirements
for each test.
Maserati stated that based on MY
2010 theft data published by NHTSA, its
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
20066
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 71 / Tuesday, April 14, 2015 / Notices
antitheft and immobilizer-installed
vehicles have historically experienced
extremely low to zero theft rates.
Maserati informed the agency that its
immobilizer antitheft device has been
installed on its Quattroporte vehicles as
standard equipment since MY 2007 and
believes that its advanced. Maserati
compared its Quattroporte vehicle line
to its Ghibli vehicle line. Maserati stated
that its Ghibli vehicle line incorporates
identical vehicle/system architecture as
its Quattroporte vehicle line. Maserati
further stated that the vehicle
powertrain, electrical and other vehicle
systems are similar in construction and
design as the Ghibli vehicle line. Theft
rate data reported in Federal Register
notices published by the agency show
that the theft rate for the Quattroporte
vehicle line, using an average of three
MYs’ data (2010–2012) is 0.0000, which
is significantly lower than the median
theft rate established by the agency.
There is no available theft data for the
Ghibli vehicle line. Maserati believes
that the low theft rate experienced by
the immobilizer-installed Quattroporte
vehicle line demonstrates the
effectiveness of the proposed
immobilizer device to be installed on
the Ghibli vehicle line.
Based on the supporting evidence
submitted by Maserati on its device, the
agency believes that the antitheft device
for the Ghibli vehicle line is likely to be
as effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR 541).
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR
543.7 (b), the agency grants a petition
for exemption from the parts-marking
requirements of Part 541 either in whole
or in part, if it determines that, based
upon substantial evidence, the standard
equipment antitheft device is likely to
be as effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of Part
541. The agency finds that Maserati has
provided adequate reasons for its belief
that the antitheft device for the Maserati
Ghibli vehicle line is likely to be as
effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR part
541). This conclusion is based on the
information Maserati provided about its
device.
The agency concludes that the device
will provide the five types of
performance listed in § 543.6(a)(3):
Promoting activation; attract attention to
the efforts of an unauthorized person to
enter or move a vehicle by means other
than a key; preventing defeat or
circumvention of the device by
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:42 Apr 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency
hereby grants in full Maserati’s petition
for exemption for the Maserati Ghibli
vehicle line from the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR part 541. The
agency notes that 49 CFR part 541,
Appendix A–1, identifies those lines
that are exempted from the Theft
Prevention Standard for a given model
year. 49 CFR part 543.7(f) contains
publication requirements incident to the
disposition of all Part 543 petitions.
Advanced listing, including the release
of future product nameplates, the
beginning model year for which the
petition is granted and a general
description of the antitheft device is
necessary in order to notify law
enforcement agencies of new vehicle
lines exempted from the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard.
If Maserati decides not to use the
exemption for this line, it must formally
notify the agency. If such a decision is
made, the line must be fully marked
according to the requirements under 49
CFR parts 541.5 and 541.6 (marking of
major component parts and replacement
parts).
NHTSA notes that if Maserati wishes
in the future to modify the device on
which this exemption is based, the
company may have to submit a petition
to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d)
states that a Part 543 exemption applies
only to vehicles that belong to a line
exempted under this part and equipped
with the antitheft device on which the
line’s exemption is based. Further, Part
543.9(c)(2) provides for the submission
of petitions ‘‘to modify an exemption to
permit the use of an antitheft device
similar to but differing from the one
specified in that exemption.’’
The agency wishes to minimize the
administrative burden that Part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted
vehicle manufacturers and itself. The
agency did not intend in drafting Part
543 to require the submission of a
modification petition for every change
to the components or design of an
antitheft device. The significance of
many such changes could be de
minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests
that if the manufacturer contemplates
making any changes, the effects of
which might be characterized as de
minimis, it should consult the agency
before preparing and submitting a
petition to modify.
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Under authority delegated in 49 CFR Part
1.95.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2015–08490 Filed 4–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2015–0104; Notice No.
15–09]
Hazardous Materials: Explosive
Approvals—Applicant Contact
Information and Compliance With
Special Provision 347
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Proposed termination of
explosive approvals.
AGENCY:
PHMSA proposes to terminate
the explosive approvals listed herein.
PHMSA attempted to contact all of the
below listed approval holders during
the month of October 2014 via certified
mail utilizing the addresses on file. The
certified letters were returned by the
United States Postal Service (USPS) as
‘‘undeliverable.’’ With the failure of the
explosive approval holders to provide
PHMSA with a valid company name
and mailing address, the approvals
listed below will be terminated 30 days
after this notice is published in the
Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Ryan Paquet, Director, Approvals and
Permits Division, Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety, (202) 366–4512,
PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Introduction
In this notice, PHMSA’s Office of
Hazardous Materials Safety (OHMS) is
proposing to terminate the approvals
listed below for the approval holders’
failure to provide PHMSA with current
valid contact information and failure to
provide evidence that UN 6(d) testing
has been performed in accordance with
§ 172.102 and Special Provision 347.
II. Background
On January 19, 2011, PHMSA
published a final rule (76 FR 3308; HM–
215K) titled ‘‘Hazardous Materials:
Harmonization with the United Nations
Recommendations, International
Maritime Dangerous Goods Code, and
the International Civil Aviation
Organization Technical Instructions for
E:\FR\FM\14APN1.SGM
14APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 71 (Tuesday, April 14, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20065-20066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08490]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard; Maserati North America Inc.
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document grants in full the Maserati North America
Inc.'s, (Maserati) petition for an exemption of the Ghibli vehicle line
in accordance with 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard. This petition is granted because the agency has
determined that the antitheft device to be placed on the line as
standard equipment is likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of the 49 CFR part 541, Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard (Theft Prevention Standard).
DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
the 2016 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carlita Ballard, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, W43-
439, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard's
phone number is (202) 366-5222. Her fax number is (202) 493-2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated February 5, 2015,
Maserati requested an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of
the Theft Prevention Standard for the Ghibli vehicle line beginning
with MY 2016. The petition requested an exemption from parts-marking
pursuant to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard, based on the installation of an antitheft device as standard
equipment for an entire vehicle line.
Under Sec. 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to grant an
exemption for one vehicle line per model year. In its petition,
Maserati provided a detailed description and diagram of the identity,
design, and location of the components of the antitheft device for the
Ghibli vehicle line. Maserati stated that all of its vehicles will be
equipped with a passive, Sentry Key Immobilizer System (SKIS), a
Vehicle Alarm System (VTA) and a Keyless Ignition System as standard
equipment beginning with the 2016 model year. Key components of its
SKIS antitheft device will include an Engine Power Control Module, Fuel
Delivery and a Starter Motor Circuit. Maserati's keyless ignition
system will consist of a Key Fob with Remote Keyless Entry (RKE)
Transmitter, RFHub and Keyless Ignition Node (KIN). Key components of
Maserati's VTA system are a hood ajar switch, security indicator,
RFHub/Kin and FOBIK, an intrusion and inclination sensor, door ajar
switches, an intrusion module and a central body controller. Maserati
also stated that its VTA system will include an audible and visual
feature that will provide perimeter protection that will monitors the
vehicle doors, ignition switch and deck lid for unauthorized tampering,
and an ultrasonic intrusion sensor, designed to detect motion within
the vehicle. Maserati further stated that if unauthorized tampering
with any of these protected areas is detected, the vehicle's horn/siren
will sound and some of its exterior lamps will flash.
Maserati stated that the immobilizer device is automatically
activated when the ignition is changed from the run position to the off
position. Once activated, only the use of a valid key can disable
immobilization and allow the vehicle to run. Specifically, Maserati
stated that the device is deactivated by performing an unlock actuation
via the RKE transmitter or by starting the vehicle with a valid RFHub
key. Maserati stated that to start the vehicle, the driver must press
and hold the brake pedal while pressing the START/STOP button. The
system takes over and engages the starter causing the starter motor to
run and disengage automatically when the engine is running. Maserati
stated that the RFHub contains and controls the SKIS, preventing the
engine from running more than 2 seconds unless a valid FOBIK key is
used to start the engine. Maserati also stated that the vehicle's key
fob with RKE transmitter, RFHub and the KIN contains over 50,000
possible electronic key combinations and allows the driver to operate
the ignition switch with the push of a button as long as the RKE
transmitter is in the passenger compartment.
Maserati's submission is considered a complete petition as required
by 49 CFR 543.7, in that it meets the general requirements contained in
Sec. 543.5 and the specific content requirements of Sec. 543.6.
In addressing the specific content requirements of 543.6, Maserati
provided information on the reliability and durability of its proposed
device. To ensure reliability and durability of the device, Maserati
conducted tests based on its own specified standards. Maserati provided
a detailed list of the tests conducted (i.e., low and high temperature
exposure on system components, resistance for humidity, ice, water
immersion, dust exposure, and drop shock on surfaces). Maserati also
stated that the VTA, including the immobilizer device and its related
components must meet design and durability requirements for full
vehicle useful life (10 years/120k miles). Maserati stated that it
believes that its device is reliable and durable because it complied
with specified requirements for each test.
Maserati stated that based on MY 2010 theft data published by
NHTSA, its
[[Page 20066]]
antitheft and immobilizer-installed vehicles have historically
experienced extremely low to zero theft rates. Maserati informed the
agency that its immobilizer antitheft device has been installed on its
Quattroporte vehicles as standard equipment since MY 2007 and believes
that its advanced. Maserati compared its Quattroporte vehicle line to
its Ghibli vehicle line. Maserati stated that its Ghibli vehicle line
incorporates identical vehicle/system architecture as its Quattroporte
vehicle line. Maserati further stated that the vehicle powertrain,
electrical and other vehicle systems are similar in construction and
design as the Ghibli vehicle line. Theft rate data reported in Federal
Register notices published by the agency show that the theft rate for
the Quattroporte vehicle line, using an average of three MYs' data
(2010-2012) is 0.0000, which is significantly lower than the median
theft rate established by the agency. There is no available theft data
for the Ghibli vehicle line. Maserati believes that the low theft rate
experienced by the immobilizer-installed Quattroporte vehicle line
demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed immobilizer device to be
installed on the Ghibli vehicle line.
Based on the supporting evidence submitted by Maserati on its
device, the agency believes that the antitheft device for the Ghibli
vehicle line is likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking requirements
of the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR 541). Pursuant to 49 U.S.C.
33106 and 49 CFR 543.7 (b), the agency grants a petition for exemption
from the parts-marking requirements of Part 541 either in whole or in
part, if it determines that, based upon substantial evidence, the
standard equipment antitheft device is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements of Part 541. The agency finds that Maserati
has provided adequate reasons for its belief that the antitheft device
for the Maserati Ghibli vehicle line is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR
part 541). This conclusion is based on the information Maserati
provided about its device.
The agency concludes that the device will provide the five types of
performance listed in Sec. 543.6(a)(3): Promoting activation; attract
attention to the efforts of an unauthorized person to enter or move a
vehicle by means other than a key; preventing defeat or circumvention
of the device by unauthorized persons; preventing operation of the
vehicle by unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the reliability and
durability of the device.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full
Maserati's petition for exemption for the Maserati Ghibli vehicle line
from the parts-marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541. The agency
notes that 49 CFR part 541, Appendix A-1, identifies those lines that
are exempted from the Theft Prevention Standard for a given model year.
49 CFR part 543.7(f) contains publication requirements incident to the
disposition of all Part 543 petitions. Advanced listing, including the
release of future product nameplates, the beginning model year for
which the petition is granted and a general description of the
antitheft device is necessary in order to notify law enforcement
agencies of new vehicle lines exempted from the parts-marking
requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.
If Maserati decides not to use the exemption for this line, it must
formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the line must
be fully marked according to the requirements under 49 CFR parts 541.5
and 541.6 (marking of major component parts and replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if Maserati wishes in the future to modify the
device on which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit
a petition to modify the exemption. Part 543.7(d) states that a Part
543 exemption applies only to vehicles that belong to a line exempted
under this part and equipped with the antitheft device on which the
line's exemption is based. Further, Part 543.9(c)(2) provides for the
submission of petitions ``to modify an exemption to permit the use of
an antitheft device similar to but differing from the one specified in
that exemption.''
The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that Part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself.
The agency did not intend in drafting Part 543 to require the
submission of a modification petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft device. The significance of many
such changes could be de minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any changes, the effects of which
might be characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency
before preparing and submitting a petition to modify.
Under authority delegated in 49 CFR Part 1.95.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2015-08490 Filed 4-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P