Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 19633-19635 [2015-08430]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices and encourage foreign commerce, and for other purposes,’’ and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of entry; Whereas, the Board’s regulations (15 CFR part 400) provide for the establishment of subzones for specific uses; Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zone of Southeast Texas, Inc., grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 116, has made application to the Board to expand Subzone 116B on behalf of Total Petrochemicals & Refining USA, Inc., to include as Site 5 a pipeline that extends from the subzone’s Site 4 in Nederland to Site 1 in Port Arthur, Texas (FTZ Docket B–85–2014, docketed 11–25– 2014); Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the Federal Register (79 FR 71831, 12–02–2014) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations; and, Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner’s memorandum, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations are satisfied; Now, therefore, the Board hereby approves the expansion of Subzone 116B on behalf of Total Petrochemicals & Refining USA, Inc., as described in the application and Federal Register notice, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.13. Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of April 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. ATTEST: Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 CFR 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of zones; Whereas, the Port Authority of Greater Oklahoma City, grantee of ForeignTrade Zone 106, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket B– 57–2014, docketed 08–12–2014) for authority to expand the zone under the ASF to include a new magnet site (proposed Site 18) in Shawnee, Oklahoma, adjacent to the Oklahoma City Customs and Border Protection port of entry; Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal Register (79 FR 48117, 08–15–2014) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations; and, Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendation of the examiner’s report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations are satisfied; Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders: The application to expand FTZ 106 under the ASF is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including section 400.13, to the Board’s standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the zone, and to an ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that would terminate authority for Site 18 if not activated within the initial seven years from the month of approval. establishment or reorganization of zones; Whereas, Tucson Regional Economic Opportunities, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 174, has applied to the Board (FTZ Docket B–35–2011, docketed 05/23/ 2011, amended 05/21/2014) for authority to expand FTZ 174 under the ASF to include additional magnet sites, adjacent to the Tucson, Arizona U.S. Customs and Border Protection port of entry; Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal Register (76 FR 30907, 05/27/2011 and 79 FR 31297, 06/02/2014) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations; and, Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendation of the examiner’s report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations are satisfied, in part; Now, Therefore, the Board hereby orders: The application to reorganize FTZ 174 under the ASF is approved as it pertains to the Red Rock Industrial Park (designated as Site 8) and the Sunshine Industrial Park (designated as Site 9), subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including section 400.13, to the Board’s standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the zone, and to an ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that would terminate authority for Site 8 and Site 9 if not activated within five years from the month of approval. Signed at Washington, DC this 3rd day of April 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. ATTEST: Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. Signed at Washington, DC this 3rd day of April 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. [FR Doc. 2015–08444 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P [FR Doc. 2015–08457 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE [FR Doc. 2015–08456 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 19633 International Trade Administration [A–201–805] Foreign-Trade Zones Board DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE [Order No. 1968] Foreign-Trade Zones Board Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 174 Under Alternative Site Framework, Tucson, Arizona mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES [Order No. 1975] Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 106 Under Alternative Site Framework Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:02 Apr 10, 2015 Jkt 235001 Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order: Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 CFR 400.2(c)) as an option for the PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On December 9, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain circular welded non-alloy steel pipe AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM 13APN1 19634 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices from Mexico.1 The Department issued post-preliminary results of this administrative review on January 30, 2015 (Post-Preliminary Results).2 Also, as a result of our partial rescission of this review, as discussed in the Preliminary Results, Productos Laminados, S.A. de C.V. (Productos Laminados) is the sole remaining respondent.3 4 The period of review (POR) is November 1, 2012, through October 31, 2013. Only one party submitted a case brief. No interested party submitted rebuttal briefs. Based on our analysis of the comment received, we made no changes to the margin calculations. Therefore, the final results of review do not differ from the Post-Preliminary Results. The final dumping margin is listed in the section below entitled, ‘‘Final Results of Review.’’ DATES: Effective Date: April 13, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Davina Friedmann or Robert James, AD/ CVD Operations, Office VI, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0698 and (202) 482–0649, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES On December 9, 2014, the Department published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain circular welded non-alloy steel pipe from Mexico for the period November 1, 2012, through October 31, 2013.5 During this administrative review, the Department also conducted a concurrent scope review. As indicated in the final scope ruling, the Department found that 1 See Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From Mexico: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 73034 (December 9, 2014) (Preliminary Results). 2 See ‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Mexico: Post-Preliminary Results Decision Memorandum,’’ dated January 30, 2015. 3 See Preliminary Results. 4 The Department initiated an administrative review of both Productos Laminados and Prolamsa, Inc. separately. However, record information indicates that Prolamsa, Inc. is a wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary of Productos Laminados, and is an importer, not a producer, of subject merchandise. Also, during the course of this review, Productos Laminados submitted consolidated responses on behalf of itself and Prolamsa, Inc. For purposes of this Federal Register notice, references to Prolamsa pertain to Productos Laminados and Prolamsa, Inc. collectively. Otherwise, the two entities are referenced separately, where appropriate. 5 See Preliminary Results. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:02 Apr 10, 2015 Jkt 235001 certain black, circular tubing produced to ASTM A–513 by Productos Laminados meets the exclusion language for mechanical tubing in the scope of this antidumping duty order. Pursuant to the final scope ruling, the Department instructed Productos Laminados to submit a revised U.S. sales database incorporating the factors set forth in the scope ruling. Productos Laminados submitted its revised U.S. sales database on January 5, 2014. Consequently, on January 30, 2015, the Department issued the Post-Preliminary Results. The Department also placed on the record of this review the following memorandum: ‘‘Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A. de C.V. and Prolamsa, Inc.—Analysis Memorandum for the Post-Preliminary Results of the 2012/2013 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Mexico’’, dated January 30, 2015 (PostPreliminary Analysis Memo). Together, these memoranda explain the changes made to the Preliminary Results, yielding the revised margin for the postpreliminary results of review. In response to the Department’s invitation to comment on the preliminary and post-preliminary results of this review, one party, Prolamsa, filed a case brief on February 9, 2015. No rebuttal briefs were submitted to the Department. Scope of the Order The products covered by the order are circular welded non-alloy steel pipes and tubes. The merchandise covered by the order and subject to this review is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) at subheadings: 7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, and 7306.30.5090. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of this proceeding is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Circular Welded NonAlloy Steel Pipe from Mexico; 2012– 2013’’ (Issues and Decision Memorandum), which is hereby adopted by this notice and incorporated herein by reference. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).6 ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov and available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised by interested parties in this administrative review are listed as an attachment to this notice. We have analyzed all interested party comments. Based on our analysis of the comments received, the margin in the final results is unchanged from that presented in the Post-Preliminary Results. Final Results of Review We determine the following weightedaverage margin exists for the period November 1, 2012, through October 31, 2013: Manufacturer/Exporter Weightedaverage margin (percent) Productos Laminados ............... 7.33 Assessment The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 356.8(a), the Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 41 days after the date of publication of these final results of review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of these final results for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the 6 On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘IA Access’’) changed to AD and CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). The Web site location also changed from http://iaaccess.rade.gov to http:// access.trade.gov. The Final Rule changing the references to the Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014). E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM 13APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES publication date of these final results of administrative review, consistent with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act): (1) The cash deposit rate for Productos Laminados will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this review, which is listed above; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not participating in this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate established from a completed segment of this proceeding for the most recent review period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 32.62 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.7 These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Interested Parties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APOs) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 7 See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From Mexico, 57 FR 42953 (September 17, 1992). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:02 Apr 10, 2015 Jkt 235001 Dated: April 8, 2015. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Summary Background Scope of the Order Discussion of the Issue Comment: The Department Should Grant a CEP Offset Adjustment to Normal Value Recommendation [FR Doc. 2015–08430 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–583–844] Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On October 7, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the Preliminary Results of the third administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on narrow woven ribbons with woven selvedge (NWR) from Taiwan.1 The review covers two producers/ exporters of the subject merchandise: King Young Enterprise Co., Ltd. and its affiliates, Ethel Enterprise Co., Ltd. and Glory Young Enterprise Co., Ltd., (collectively, King Young); and Hen Hao Trading Co. Ltd. a.k.a. Taiwan Tulip Ribbons and Braids Co. Ltd. (Hen Hao). The period of review (POR) is September 1, 2012, through August 31, 2013. We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results and, based upon our analysis of the comments, we continue to find that sales of subject merchandise to the United States have been made at prices below normal value (NV). The final dumping margins for the reviewed companies are listed below in the section entitled ‘‘Final Results of the Review.’’ DATES: Effective date: April 13, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Crespo or Alice Maldonado, AD/ CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; AGENCY: 1 See Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012– 2013, 79 FR 60449 (October 7, 2014) (Preliminary Results). PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 19635 telephone: (202) 482–3693 and (202) 482–4682, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On October 7, 2014, the Department published the Preliminary Results in the Federal Register. The Department conducted a sales verification of King Young at its offices in Taiwan from September 29 through October 3, 2014, and a cost verification from November 12 through 16, 2014. In January 2015, we received case briefs from Berwick Offray LLC and its wholly-owned subsidiary Lion Ribbon Company, Inc. (the petitioner), King Young, and Morex Ribbon Corp. and Papillon Ribbon & Bow Inc., importers of subject merchandise. Also in January 2015, we received rebuttal briefs from the petitioner and King Young. On January 15, 2015, the Department postponed the final results by 60 days.2 The Department has conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to this order 3 covers narrow woven ribbons with woven selvedge. The merchandise subject to this order is classifiable under the harmonized tariff schedule of the United States (HTSUS) statistical categories 5806.32.1020; 5806.32.1030; 5806.32.1050 and 5806.32.1060. Subject merchandise also may enter under subheadings 5806.31.00; 5806.32.20; 5806.39.20; 5806.39.30; 5808.90.00; 5810.91.00; 5810.99.90; 5903.90.10; 5903.90.25; 5907.00.60; and 5907.00.80 and under statistical categories 5806.32.1080; 5810.92.9080; 5903.90.3090; and 6307.90.9889. The HTSUS statistical categories and subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written description of the merchandise covered by this order is dispositive.4 2 See the January 15, 2015, memorandum to Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations through Irene Darzenta Tzafolias, Acting Director, Office II from David Crespo, Senior International Trade Compliance Analyst, entitled ‘‘Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge from Taiwan: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review.’’ 3 See Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China: Amended Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 56982 (Sept. 17, 2010) (Order). 4 For a complete description of the scope of the order, see the memorandum from James P. Maeder, Senior Director, Office I, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM Continued 13APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 70 (Monday, April 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19633-19635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08430]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-201-805]


Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From Mexico: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On December 9, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on certain circular welded non-
alloy steel pipe

[[Page 19634]]

from Mexico.\1\ The Department issued post-preliminary results of this 
administrative review on January 30, 2015 (Post-Preliminary 
Results).\2\ Also, as a result of our partial rescission of this 
review, as discussed in the Preliminary Results, Productos Laminados, 
S.A. de C.V. (Productos Laminados) is the sole remaining respondent.\3\ 
\4\ The period of review (POR) is November 1, 2012, through October 31, 
2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From 
Mexico: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 73034 (December 9, 
2014) (Preliminary Results).
    \2\ See ``Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Circular 
Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Mexico: Post-Preliminary Results 
Decision Memorandum,'' dated January 30, 2015.
    \3\ See Preliminary Results.
    \4\ The Department initiated an administrative review of both 
Productos Laminados and Prolamsa, Inc. separately. However, record 
information indicates that Prolamsa, Inc. is a wholly-owned U.S. 
subsidiary of Productos Laminados, and is an importer, not a 
producer, of subject merchandise. Also, during the course of this 
review, Productos Laminados submitted consolidated responses on 
behalf of itself and Prolamsa, Inc. For purposes of this Federal 
Register notice, references to Prolamsa pertain to Productos 
Laminados and Prolamsa, Inc. collectively. Otherwise, the two 
entities are referenced separately, where appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Only one party submitted a case brief. No interested party 
submitted rebuttal briefs. Based on our analysis of the comment 
received, we made no changes to the margin calculations. Therefore, the 
final results of review do not differ from the Post-Preliminary 
Results. The final dumping margin is listed in the section below 
entitled, ``Final Results of Review.''

DATES: Effective Date: April 13, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Davina Friedmann or Robert James, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VI, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0698 and (202) 482-0649, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 9, 2014, the Department published in the Federal 
Register the preliminary results of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on certain circular welded non-alloy steel pipe 
from Mexico for the period November 1, 2012, through October 31, 
2013.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    During this administrative review, the Department also conducted a 
concurrent scope review. As indicated in the final scope ruling, the 
Department found that certain black, circular tubing produced to ASTM 
A-513 by Productos Laminados meets the exclusion language for 
mechanical tubing in the scope of this antidumping duty order. Pursuant 
to the final scope ruling, the Department instructed Productos 
Laminados to submit a revised U.S. sales database incorporating the 
factors set forth in the scope ruling. Productos Laminados submitted 
its revised U.S. sales database on January 5, 2014. Consequently, on 
January 30, 2015, the Department issued the Post-Preliminary Results. 
The Department also placed on the record of this review the following 
memorandum: ``Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A. de C.V. and 
Prolamsa, Inc.--Analysis Memorandum for the Post-Preliminary Results of 
the 2012/2013 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Circular Welded 
Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Mexico'', dated January 30, 2015 (Post-
Preliminary Analysis Memo). Together, these memoranda explain the 
changes made to the Preliminary Results, yielding the revised margin 
for the post-preliminary results of review.
    In response to the Department's invitation to comment on the 
preliminary and post-preliminary results of this review, one party, 
Prolamsa, filed a case brief on February 9, 2015. No rebuttal briefs 
were submitted to the Department.

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the order are circular welded non-alloy 
steel pipes and tubes. The merchandise covered by the order and subject 
to this review is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) at subheadings: 7306.30.1000, 
7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, 
and 7306.30.5090. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for 
convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope 
of this proceeding is dispositive. A full description of the scope of 
the order is contained in the memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy 
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 
to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 
Compliance, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of 
the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Circular Welded 
Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from Mexico; 2012-2013'' (Issues and Decision 
Memorandum), which is hereby adopted by this notice and incorporated 
herein by reference. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public 
document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS).\6\ ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and available to all parties in the Central Records 
Unit, Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In 
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can 
be accessed directly on the internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and electronic versions 
of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and Compliance's AD and 
CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (``IA Access'') changed to 
AD and CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). The 
Web site location also changed from http://iaaccess.rade.gov to 
http://access.trade.gov. The Final Rule changing the references to 
the Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised by interested parties in this administrative 
review are listed as an attachment to this notice. We have analyzed all 
interested party comments. Based on our analysis of the comments 
received, the margin in the final results is unchanged from that 
presented in the Post-Preliminary Results.

Final Results of Review

    We determine the following weighted-average margin exists for the 
period November 1, 2012, through October 31, 2013:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Weighted-
                                                               average
                   Manufacturer/Exporter                       margin
                                                              (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Productos Laminados.......................................         7.33
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of 
this review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 356.8(a), the Department intends to 
issue assessment instructions to CBP 41 days after the date of 
publication of these final results of review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of these final results for all shipments of the subject 
merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or 
after the

[[Page 19635]]

publication date of these final results of administrative review, 
consistent with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 
(the Act): (1) The cash deposit rate for Productos Laminados will be 
equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final 
results of this review, which is listed above; (2) for previously 
reviewed or investigated companies not participating in this review, 
the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate 
established from a completed segment of this proceeding for the most 
recent review period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this 
review, a prior review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 
investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be 
the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of 
the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 
manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 32.62 percent, the all-
others rate established in the LTFV investigation.\7\ These deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: 
Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe From Mexico, 57 FR 42953 
(September 17, 1992).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APOs) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern 
business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. 
Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO 
materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
APO is a sanctionable violation.
    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: April 8, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion of the Issue
    Comment: The Department Should Grant a CEP Offset Adjustment to 
Normal Value Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2015-08430 Filed 4-10-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P