Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Exchange's Arbitration Forum, 19713-19715 [2015-08336]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices
(1) Will request and evaluate, and the
Fund’s Adviser will furnish, such
information as may be reasonably
necessary to make an informed
determination of whether the
Distribution Policy should be continued
or continued after amendment;
(2) will determine whether
continuation, or continuation after
amendment, of the Distribution Policy is
consistent with the Fund’s investment
objective(s) and policies and is in the
best interests of the Fund and its
stockholders, after considering the
information in condition 5(b)(i)(1)
above; including, without limitation:
(A) Whether the Distribution Policy is
accomplishing its purpose(s);
(B) the reasonably foreseeable
material effects of the Distribution
Policy on the Fund’s long-term total
return in relation to the market price
and NAV of the Fund’s common stock;
and
(C) the Fund’s current distribution
rate, as described in condition 5(b)
above, compared with the Fund’s
average annual taxable income or total
return over the 2-year period, as
described in condition 5(b), or such
longer period as the Board deems
appropriate; and
(3) based upon that determination,
will approve or disapprove the
continuation, or continuation after
amendment, of the Distribution Policy;
and
(ii) The Board will record the
information considered by it, including
its consideration of the factors listed in
condition 5(b)(i)(2) above, and the basis
for its approval or disapproval of the
continuation, or continuation after
amendment, of the Distribution Policy
in its meeting minutes, which must be
made and preserved for a period of not
less than six years from the date of such
meeting, the first two years in an easily
accessible place.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
6. Public Offerings
The Fund will not make a public
offering of the Fund’s common stock
other than:
(a) A rights offering below NAV to
holders of the Fund’s common stock;
(b) an offering in connection with a
dividend reinvestment plan, merger,
consolidation, acquisition, spin-off or
reorganization of the Fund; or
(c) an offering other than an offering
described in conditions 6(a) and 6(b)
above, provided that, with respect to
such other offering:
(i) The Fund’s annualized distribution
rate for the six months ending on the
last day of the month ended
immediately prior to the most recent
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
distribution record date,6 expressed as a
percentage of NAV as of such date, is no
more than 1 percentage point greater
than the Fund’s average annual total
return for the 5-year period ending on
such date; 7 and
(ii) the transmittal letter
accompanying any registration
statement filed with the Commission in
connection with such offering discloses
that the Fund has received an order
under section 19(b) to permit it to make
periodic distributions of long-term
capital gains with respect to its shares
of common stock as frequently as twelve
times each year, and as frequently as
distributions are specified by or
determined in accordance with the
terms of any outstanding shares of
preferred stock as such Fund may issue.
7. Amendments to Rule 19b–1
The requested order will expire on the
effective date of any amendment to rule
19b–1 that provides relief permitting
certain closed-end investment
companies to make periodic
distributions of long-term capital gains
with respect to their outstanding
common stock as frequently as twelve
times each year.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–08338 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74665; File No. SR–CBOE–
2015–037]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change Relating to the
Exchange’s Arbitration Forum
April 7, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 1,
2015, Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘CBOE’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
6 If the Fund has been in operation fewer than six
months, the measured period will begin
immediately following the Fund’s first public
offering.
7 If the Fund has been in operation fewer than five
years, the measured period will begin immediately
following the Fund’s first public offering.
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19713
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been substantially prepared by the
Exchange. The Exchange filed the
proposal as a ‘‘non-controversial’’
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 3 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.4 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to adopt new
Rule 18.1A relating to arbitration. The
text of the proposed rule change is
available at the Exchange’s Office of the
Secretary, on the Exchange’s Web site at
https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/
CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to adopt new
Rule 18.1A. Specifically, the Exchange
proposes to adopt new Rule 18.1A
which would govern all arbitration
claims submitted to the Exchange after
the proposed rule change becomes
operative (‘‘Effective Date’’). By way of
background, the Exchange currently
offers an arbitration facility for any of its
Trading Permit Holders (‘‘TPHs’’),
associated persons, or their customers to
arbitrate disputes, claims, or
controversies arising out of Exchange
business. The Exchange’s arbitration
program is governed by Chapter XVIII of
the CBOE Rules.
The Exchange recently entered into a
Regulatory Services Agreement (‘‘RSA’’)
3 15
4 17
E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
13APN1
19714
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
with the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’), pursuant to
which FINRA, among other things, will
provide certain services pertaining to
dispute resolution. As such, CBOE
would cease to administer an arbitration
program for all claims after the Effective
Date. More specifically, all arbitration
claims filed on and after the Effective
Date would be administered by FINRA
pursuant to the RSA and the Exchange
would continue to administer its
arbitration program for all claims filed
prior to the Effective Date.
Additionally, the Exchange notes that
the rules governing the administration
of any particular arbitration would
depend on the date the case was filed.
This would help ensure that any person
that filed an arbitration claim under a
particular set of arbitration rules would
continue to have the case administered
pursuant to those rules through the
case’s conclusion. Particularly, CBOE
Rules 18.1–18.37, with the exception of
proposed CBOE Rule 18.1A, would
continue to apply to CBOE arbitration
cases pending prior to the Effective
Date.5 Thereafter, claims involving
TPHs, associated persons of TPHs, and/
or customers would be arbitrated under
the FINRA Code of Arbitration
Procedure for Customer Disputes, the
FINRA Code of Arbitration Procedure
for Industry Disputes (together, ‘‘FINRA
Codes of Arbitration’’), and proposed
new Rule 18.1A.
Proposed CBOE Rule 18.1A provides
detailed guidance concerning claims
involving TPHs, associated persons,
and/or customers that are asserted on or
after the Effective Date. First, disputes,
claims, or controversies between or
among CBOE TPHs and non-CBOE
TPHs to resolve TPH-to-TPH, TPH-toassociated person, TPH-to-non-CBOE
TPH, associated person-to-associated
person, and associated person-to-nonCBOE TPH disputes arising out of or in
connection with Exchange business
would be arbitrated pursuant to the
FINRA Codes of Arbitration. Proposed
subparagraph (b) of CBOE Rule 18.1A
provides that a dispute, claim, or
controversy alleging employment
discrimination (including a sexual
harassment claim) in violation of a
statute, however, may only be arbitrated
if the parties have agreed to arbitrate it
after the dispute arose.6 Any type of
dispute, claim, or controversy that is not
permitted to be arbitrated under the
FINRA Codes of Arbitration, such as
class action claims, would also not be
eligible for arbitration. Proposed CBOE
Rule 18.1A would also apply to former
CBOE TPHs and former associated
persons of CBOE TPHs.
Additionally, proposed CBOE Rule
18.1A(d) would explicitly retain the
Exchange’s enforcement authority
related to arbitration. In appropriate
cases, arbitrators refer to the Exchange
potential violations of the Exchange’s
Rules or the federal securities laws that
come to their attention during and in
connection with a proceeding. Proposed
CBOE Rule 18.1A would specify that the
Exchange would retain the ability to
take action based on such referrals that
may come from arbitrators in cases
being arbitrated at FINRA.
Proposed CBOE Rule 18.1A(e) would
also retain the substance of current
CBOE Rule 18.37, regarding the
obligation to honor arbitration awards. It
would provide that any TPH, or
associated person of any TPH, that fails
to honor an award of arbitrators
rendered under proposed CBOE Rule
18.1A would be subject to disciplinary
proceedings in accordance with Chapter
17 of the CBOE Rules. Proposed CBOE
Rule 18.1A(f) would also specify that
the submission of any matter to
arbitration as provided for under the
Rule would in no way limit or preclude
any right, action, or determination by
the Exchange that it would otherwise be
authorized to adopt, administer, or
enforce. Proposed CBOE Rule 18.1A(c)
would also provide that the
requirements of FINRA Rule 2268
(Requirements When Using Predispute
Arbitration Agreements for Customer
Accounts) would apply to predispute
arbitration agreements between TPHs
and their customers.
Finally, the Exchange proposed
adding Interpretation and Policy .04 to
existing CBOE Rule 18.1, to clarify that
the current CBOE arbitration rules
(Rules 18.1 through 18.37), would apply
only to arbitrations commenced prior to
the Effective Date and would be
otherwise of no force or effect. Proposed
new Interpretation and Policy .04 would
also clarify that all arbitrations filed
prior to the Effective Date would, until
concluded, continue to be administered
by the Exchange.
5 The Exchange notes that there are three cases
currently pending.
6 The Exchange notes that FINRA rules currently
provide that any claim alleging employment
discrimination, including any sexual harassment
claims, in violation of a statute, is eligible for
arbitration pursuant to either a pre-dispute or a
post-dispute agreement to arbitrate. In contrast,
proposed Rule 18.1A(b) would permit claims to be
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.7 Specifically,
the Exchange believes that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) requirements that the
rules of an exchange be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with
respect to, and facilitating transactions
in securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.8
Additionally, the Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change is consistent
with the Section 6(b)(5) requirement
that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.9
In particular, the Exchange believes
that the proposed rule change would
facilitate the transition of the
Exchange’s arbitration forum to FINRA’s
pursuant to the RSA the Exchange
recently entered into with FINRA.
Additionally, the Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change would
streamline the arbitration process and
provide for a unified and efficient
arbitration forum with one set of
arbitration rules and administrative
procedures for all cases filed after the
Effective Date. The Exchange also
believes that the proposal would
provide a clear framework to handle
arbitrations in a manner that is designed
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, and to promote the
protection of investors and the public
interest. Further, the Exchange believes
that the proposed rule change would
provide greater harmonization between
Exchange Rules and the rules of similar
substance and purpose of FINRA,
resulting in less burdensome and more
efficient regulatory compliance for
members of both the Exchange and
FINRA (‘‘Dual Members’’), removing
impediments to and perfecting the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system.
Finally, the Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change would
promote the protection of investors and
the public interest by continuing to
provide market participants with a
simple and inexpensive procedure for
resolution of their controversies.
7 15
arbitrated only when the parties have agreed to
arbitrate the claim after it has arisen.
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
9 Id.
E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM
13APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 70 / Monday, April 13, 2015 / Notices
Specifically, the Exchange notes that
while CBOE would cease to administer
an arbitration program, TPHs, associated
persons, and their customers would still
have an effective forum in which to
arbitrate their disputes, claims, or
controversies (i.e., TPHs, associated
persons, and their customers would still
have the availability of an arbitration
program; it would just be FINRA’s
program in lieu of CBOE’s). The
Exchange believes that FINRA
maintains a robust dispute resolution
system that provides a clear framework
to handle arbitrations in a manner that
is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices and
promotes the protection of investors and
the public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the
proposed rule change would impose any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. CBOE
believes that the proposed rule change
is not designed to address any
competitive issues. Rather, CBOE
believes that the proposed rule change
is designed to facilitate the transition of
the Exchange’s arbitration forum to
FINRA’s pursuant to the RSA and
streamline the arbitration process and
provide for a unified and efficient
arbitration forum with one set of
arbitration rules and administrative
procedures for all cases filed after the
Effective Date. Additionally, CBOE
believes that the proposed rule change
would provide greater harmonization
between the Exchange Rules and FINRA
Rules of similar purpose, resulting in
less burdensome and more efficient
regulatory compliance for Dual
Members.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change
does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:28 Apr 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 10 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) 11 thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act 12 to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
19715
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2015–037 and should be submitted on
or before May 4, 2015.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
Electronic Comments
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml ); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CBOE–2015–037 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2015–037. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site at https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml. Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
10 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the
Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
12 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
11 17
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2015–08336 Filed 4–10–15; 8:45 am]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74664; File No. SR–EDGX–
2015–15]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Rules 11.8,
11.9, 11.10, 11.11, and 11.16 Regarding
the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan
April 7, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 26,
2015, EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange filed a proposal to
amend Rules 11.8, 11.9, 11.10, 11.11,
and 11.16, in order to conform Exchange
Rules to the rules of BATS Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘BZX’’) and BATS Y-Exchange,
13 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM
13APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 70 (Monday, April 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19713-19715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08336]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-74665; File No. SR-CBOE-2015-037]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Exchange's Arbitration Forum
April 7, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on April 1, 2015, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been substantially
prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-
controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to adopt new Rule 18.1A relating to
arbitration. The text of the proposed rule change is available at the
Exchange's Office of the Secretary, on the Exchange's Web site at
https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to adopt new Rule 18.1A. Specifically, the
Exchange proposes to adopt new Rule 18.1A which would govern all
arbitration claims submitted to the Exchange after the proposed rule
change becomes operative (``Effective Date''). By way of background,
the Exchange currently offers an arbitration facility for any of its
Trading Permit Holders (``TPHs''), associated persons, or their
customers to arbitrate disputes, claims, or controversies arising out
of Exchange business. The Exchange's arbitration program is governed by
Chapter XVIII of the CBOE Rules.
The Exchange recently entered into a Regulatory Services Agreement
(``RSA'')
[[Page 19714]]
with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA''),
pursuant to which FINRA, among other things, will provide certain
services pertaining to dispute resolution. As such, CBOE would cease to
administer an arbitration program for all claims after the Effective
Date. More specifically, all arbitration claims filed on and after the
Effective Date would be administered by FINRA pursuant to the RSA and
the Exchange would continue to administer its arbitration program for
all claims filed prior to the Effective Date.
Additionally, the Exchange notes that the rules governing the
administration of any particular arbitration would depend on the date
the case was filed. This would help ensure that any person that filed
an arbitration claim under a particular set of arbitration rules would
continue to have the case administered pursuant to those rules through
the case's conclusion. Particularly, CBOE Rules 18.1-18.37, with the
exception of proposed CBOE Rule 18.1A, would continue to apply to CBOE
arbitration cases pending prior to the Effective Date.\5\ Thereafter,
claims involving TPHs, associated persons of TPHs, and/or customers
would be arbitrated under the FINRA Code of Arbitration Procedure for
Customer Disputes, the FINRA Code of Arbitration Procedure for Industry
Disputes (together, ``FINRA Codes of Arbitration''), and proposed new
Rule 18.1A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Exchange notes that there are three cases currently
pending.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed CBOE Rule 18.1A provides detailed guidance concerning
claims involving TPHs, associated persons, and/or customers that are
asserted on or after the Effective Date. First, disputes, claims, or
controversies between or among CBOE TPHs and non-CBOE TPHs to resolve
TPH-to-TPH, TPH-to-associated person, TPH-to-non-CBOE TPH, associated
person-to-associated person, and associated person-to-non-CBOE TPH
disputes arising out of or in connection with Exchange business would
be arbitrated pursuant to the FINRA Codes of Arbitration. Proposed
subparagraph (b) of CBOE Rule 18.1A provides that a dispute, claim, or
controversy alleging employment discrimination (including a sexual
harassment claim) in violation of a statute, however, may only be
arbitrated if the parties have agreed to arbitrate it after the dispute
arose.\6\ Any type of dispute, claim, or controversy that is not
permitted to be arbitrated under the FINRA Codes of Arbitration, such
as class action claims, would also not be eligible for arbitration.
Proposed CBOE Rule 18.1A would also apply to former CBOE TPHs and
former associated persons of CBOE TPHs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The Exchange notes that FINRA rules currently provide that
any claim alleging employment discrimination, including any sexual
harassment claims, in violation of a statute, is eligible for
arbitration pursuant to either a pre-dispute or a post-dispute
agreement to arbitrate. In contrast, proposed Rule 18.1A(b) would
permit claims to be arbitrated only when the parties have agreed to
arbitrate the claim after it has arisen.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, proposed CBOE Rule 18.1A(d) would explicitly retain
the Exchange's enforcement authority related to arbitration. In
appropriate cases, arbitrators refer to the Exchange potential
violations of the Exchange's Rules or the federal securities laws that
come to their attention during and in connection with a proceeding.
Proposed CBOE Rule 18.1A would specify that the Exchange would retain
the ability to take action based on such referrals that may come from
arbitrators in cases being arbitrated at FINRA.
Proposed CBOE Rule 18.1A(e) would also retain the substance of
current CBOE Rule 18.37, regarding the obligation to honor arbitration
awards. It would provide that any TPH, or associated person of any TPH,
that fails to honor an award of arbitrators rendered under proposed
CBOE Rule 18.1A would be subject to disciplinary proceedings in
accordance with Chapter 17 of the CBOE Rules. Proposed CBOE Rule
18.1A(f) would also specify that the submission of any matter to
arbitration as provided for under the Rule would in no way limit or
preclude any right, action, or determination by the Exchange that it
would otherwise be authorized to adopt, administer, or enforce.
Proposed CBOE Rule 18.1A(c) would also provide that the requirements of
FINRA Rule 2268 (Requirements When Using Predispute Arbitration
Agreements for Customer Accounts) would apply to predispute arbitration
agreements between TPHs and their customers.
Finally, the Exchange proposed adding Interpretation and Policy .04
to existing CBOE Rule 18.1, to clarify that the current CBOE
arbitration rules (Rules 18.1 through 18.37), would apply only to
arbitrations commenced prior to the Effective Date and would be
otherwise of no force or effect. Proposed new Interpretation and Policy
.04 would also clarify that all arbitrations filed prior to the
Effective Date would, until concluded, continue to be administered by
the Exchange.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.\7\ Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) requirements that the
rules of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade,
to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest.\8\ Additionally, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) requirement that the
rules of an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination
between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change
would facilitate the transition of the Exchange's arbitration forum to
FINRA's pursuant to the RSA the Exchange recently entered into with
FINRA. Additionally, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule
change would streamline the arbitration process and provide for a
unified and efficient arbitration forum with one set of arbitration
rules and administrative procedures for all cases filed after the
Effective Date. The Exchange also believes that the proposal would
provide a clear framework to handle arbitrations in a manner that is
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, and
to promote the protection of investors and the public interest.
Further, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would
provide greater harmonization between Exchange Rules and the rules of
similar substance and purpose of FINRA, resulting in less burdensome
and more efficient regulatory compliance for members of both the
Exchange and FINRA (``Dual Members''), removing impediments to and
perfecting the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system.
Finally, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would
promote the protection of investors and the public interest by
continuing to provide market participants with a simple and inexpensive
procedure for resolution of their controversies.
[[Page 19715]]
Specifically, the Exchange notes that while CBOE would cease to
administer an arbitration program, TPHs, associated persons, and their
customers would still have an effective forum in which to arbitrate
their disputes, claims, or controversies (i.e., TPHs, associated
persons, and their customers would still have the availability of an
arbitration program; it would just be FINRA's program in lieu of
CBOE's). The Exchange believes that FINRA maintains a robust dispute
resolution system that provides a clear framework to handle
arbitrations in a manner that is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices and promotes the protection of
investors and the public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change would impose
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. CBOE believes that the proposed
rule change is not designed to address any competitive issues. Rather,
CBOE believes that the proposed rule change is designed to facilitate
the transition of the Exchange's arbitration forum to FINRA's pursuant
to the RSA and streamline the arbitration process and provide for a
unified and efficient arbitration forum with one set of arbitration
rules and administrative procedures for all cases filed after the
Effective Date. Additionally, CBOE believes that the proposed rule
change would provide greater harmonization between the Exchange Rules
and FINRA Rules of similar purpose, resulting in less burdensome and
more efficient regulatory compliance for Dual Members.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \11\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). Rule 19b-4(f)(6) requires a self-
regulatory organization to give the Commission written notice of its
intent to file the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has
satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \12\ to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml ); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2015-037 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2015-037. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site at https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090 on official business days between the hours
of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2015-037 and should be
submitted on or before May 4, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-08336 Filed 4-10-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P