In the Matter of Urban AG Corp.; Order of Suspension of Trading, 17807-17808 [2015-07672]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 63 / Thursday, April 2, 2015 / Notices
fair, reasonable, and not unreasonably
discriminatory fees and an equitable
allocation of fees among all Users. The
existence of alternatives to the BATS
One Feed, including the existing
underlying feeds, consolidated data, and
proprietary data from other sources,
ensures that the Exchange cannot set
unreasonable fees, or fees that are
unreasonably discriminatory, when
vendors and subscribers can elect these
alternatives or choose not to purchase a
specific proprietary data product if its
cost to purchase is not justified by the
returns any particular vendor or
subscriber would achieve through the
purchase.
Finally, although the BATS
Exchanges are the exclusive distributors
of the individual data feeds from which
certain data elements would be taken to
create the BATS One Feed, the
Exchange is not the exclusive
distributor of the aggregated and
consolidated information that would
compose the BATS One Feed. The
Exchange has taken into consideration
its affiliated relationship with EDGA,
BYX, and BZX in its design of the BATS
One Feed to assure that vendors would
be able to offer a similar product on the
same terms as the Exchange from a cost
perspective. While the BATS Exchanges
are the exclusive distributors of the
individual data feeds from which
certain data elements may be taken to
create the BATS One Feed, they are not
the exclusive distributors of the
aggregated and consolidated
information that comprises the BATS
One Feed. As discussed in in the BATS
One Fee Proposal,32 any entity may
separately purchase the individual
underlying products, and if they so
choose, perform a similar aggregation
and consolidation function that the
Exchange performs in creating the BATS
One Feed, and offer a data feed with the
same information included in the BATS
One Feed to sell and distribute it to its
clients with no greater cost than the
Exchange.
To enable such competition, the
amount of the proposed Digital Media
Enterprise license compared to the cost
of the individual data feeds from the
BATS Exchanges would enable a vendor
to receive the underlying data feeds and
offer a similar product on a competitive
basis and with no greater cost than the
Exchange. The amount of the proposed
Digital Media Enterprise license,
coupled with the Data Consolidation
Fee, is not lower than the cost to a
vendor of receiving the underlying data
feeds to create a competing product.
Therefore, the amount of the proposed
Digital Media Enterprise license the
Exchange would charge clients for the
BATS One Feed compared to the cost of
the individual data feeds from the BATS
Exchanges would enable a vendor to
receive the underlying data feeds and
offer a similar product on a competitive
basis and with no greater cost than the
Exchange.
Non-Substantive Change to the
Description of the BATS One Enterprise
Fee
The proposal to amend the
description of the Enterprise fee within
the fee schedule will not have any
impact on completion [sic]. The
proposed changes are designed to clarify
the fee schedule and avoid potential
investor confusion and do not amend
the amount or application of the BATS
One Enterprise fee.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 33 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 thereunder.34 At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
EDGX–2015–14 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
33 15
32 See
BATS One Fee Proposals, supra note 6.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Apr 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
34 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–EDGX–2015–14. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–EDGX–
2015–14, and should be submitted on or
before April 23, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.35
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–07522 Filed 4–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[File No. 500–1]
In the Matter of Urban AG Corp.; Order
of Suspension of Trading
March 31, 2015.
It appears to the Securities and
Exchange Commission that there is a
lack of current and accurate information
concerning the securities of Urban AG
Corporation (‘‘Urban AG’’) because it
has not filed a periodic report since it
filed its Form 10–Q for the period
ending September 30, 2013, filed on
35 17
Sfmt 4703
17807
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
02APN1
17808
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 63 / Thursday, April 2, 2015 / Notices
November 19, 2013. Urban AG’s
common stock (ticker ‘‘AQUM’’) is
quoted on OTC Link (previously ‘‘Pink
Sheets’’) operated by OTC Markets
Group, Inc.
The Commission is of the opinion that
the public interest and the protection of
investors require a suspension of trading
in the securities of Urban AG.
Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to
Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, that trading in the
securities of Urban AG is suspended for
the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on March
31, 2015, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on
April 14, 2015.
By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
BILLING CODE CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–74603; File No. SR–OCC–
2015–009]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Options Clearing Corporation; Notice
of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change
To Establish Procedures Regarding
the Monthly Resizing of its Clearing
Fund and the Addition of Financial
Resources
March 27, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 13,
2015, The Options Clearing Corporation
(‘‘OCC’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II and III below, which Items
have been prepared by OCC.3 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Terms of Substance of the Proposed
Rule Change
OCC proposes to establish procedures
regarding the monthly resizing of its
Clearing Fund and the addition of
financial resources through intra-day
margin calls and/or an intra-month
increase of the Clearing Fund to ensure
that it maintains adequate financial
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 On March 13, 2015, OCC formally withdrew the
proposed rule change filed as SR–OCC–2014–22, as
modified by Amendment No. 1 and Amendment
No. 2 thereto, the substance of which OCC has
refiled as SR–OCC–2015–009.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Apr 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
In its filing with the Commission,
OCC included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. OCC has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections (A), (B),
and (C) below, of the most significant
aspects of these statements.
1. Purpose
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
2 17
II. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the
Proposed Rule Change
(A) Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the
Proposed Rule Change
[FR Doc. 2015–07672 Filed 3–31–15; 4:15 pm]
1 15
resources in the event of a default of a
Clearing Member or group of affiliated
Clearing Members presenting the largest
exposure to OCC.
The proposed rule change is intended
to describe the situations in which OCC
would exercise authority under its Rules
to ensure that it maintains adequate
Financial Resources 4 in the event that
stress tests reveal a default of the
Clearing Member or Clearing Member
Group 5 presenting the largest exposure
would threaten the then-current
Financial Resources. This proposed rule
change would establish procedures
governing: (i) OCC’s resizing of the
Clearing Fund on a monthly basis
pursuant to Rule 1001(a) (the ‘‘Monthly
Clearing Fund Sizing Procedure’’); and
(ii) the addition of Financial Resources
through an intra-day margin call on one
or more Clearing Members under Rule
609 and, if necessary, an intra-month
increase of the Clearing Fund pursuant
to Rule 1001(a) (the ‘‘Financial Resource
Monitoring and Call Procedure’’).6 The
Monthly Clearing Fund Sizing
Procedure would permit OCC to
determine the size of the Clearing Fund
by relying on a broader range of sound
risk management practices than those
4 ‘‘Financial Resources’’ means, with respect to a
projected loss attributable to a particular Clearing
Member or Clearing Member Group, as defined
below, the sum of the margin deposits (less any
excess margin a Clearing Member or Clearing
Member Group may have on deposit at OCC) and
deposits in lieu of margin in respect of such
Clearing Members’ or Clearing Member Groups’
accounts, and the value of OCC’s Clearing Fund,
including both the Base Amount, as defined below,
and the prudential margin of safety, as discussed
below.
5 ‘‘Clearing Member Group’’ means a Clearing
Member and any affiliated entities that control, are
controlled by or are under common control with
such Clearing Member. See OCC By-Laws, Article
I, Sections 1.C.(15) and 1.M(11).
6 This proposed rule filing has also been filed as
an advance notice filing (SR–OCC–2014–811).
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
historically used under Rule 1001(a).7
The Financial Resource Monitoring and
Call Procedure would require OCC to
collect additional Financial Resources
in certain circumstances, establish how
OCC calculates and collects such
resources and provide the timing by
which such resources would be required
to be deposited by Clearing Members.
Background
OCC monitors the sufficiency of the
Clearing Fund on a daily basis but, prior
to emergency action taken on October
16, 2014,8 OCC had no express authority
to increase the size of the Clearing Fund
on an intra-month basis.9 During
ordinary course daily monitoring on
October 15, 2014, and as a result of
increased volatility in the financial
markets in October 2014, OCC
determined that the Financial Resources
needed to cover the potential loss
associated with a default of the Clearing
Member or Clearing Member Group
presenting the largest exposure could
have exceeded the Financial Resources
then available to apply to such a default.
To permit OCC to increase the size of
its Clearing Fund prior to the next
monthly resizing that was scheduled to
take place on the first business day of
November 2014, OCC’s Executive
Chairman, on October 16, 2014,
exercised certain emergency powers as
set forth in Article IX, Section 14 of
OCC’s By-Laws 10 to waive the
effectiveness of the second sentence of
Rule 1001(a), which states that OCC will
7 The procedures described herein would be in
effect until the development of a new standard
Clearing Fund sizing methodology. Following such
development, which will include a quantitative
approach to calculating the ‘‘prudential margin of
safety,’’ as discussed below, OCC will file a separate
rule change and advance notice with the
Commission that will include a description of the
new methodology as well as a revised Monthly
Clearing Fund Sizing Procedure.
8 On October 16, 2014, OCC filed an emergency
notice with the Commission to suspend the
effectiveness of the second sentence of Rule
1001(a). See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
73579 (November 12, 2014), 79 FR 68747
(November 18, 2014) (SR–OCC–2014–807). On
November 13, 2014, OCC filed SR–OCC–2014–21
with the Commission to delete the second sentence
of Rule 1001(a), preserving the suspended
effectiveness of that sentence until such time as the
Commission approves or disapproves SR–OCC–
2014–21. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
73685 (November 25, 2014) 79 FR 71479 (December
2, 2014) (SR–OCC–2014–21).
9 See Rule 1001(a).
10 OCC also has submitted an advance notice that
would provide greater detail concerning conditions
under which OCC would increase the size of the
Clearing Fund intra-month. The change would
permit an intra-month increase in the event that the
five-day rolling average of projected draws are
150% or more of the Clearing Fund’s then current
size. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72804
(August 11, 2014), 79 FR 48276 (August 15, 2014)
(SR–OCC–2014–804).
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 63 (Thursday, April 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17807-17808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07672]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[File No. 500-1]
In the Matter of Urban AG Corp.; Order of Suspension of Trading
March 31, 2015.
It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Urban AG Corporation (``Urban AG'') because it has not filed a periodic
report since it filed its Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2013, filed on
[[Page 17808]]
November 19, 2013. Urban AG's common stock (ticker ``AQUM'') is quoted
on OTC Link (previously ``Pink Sheets'') operated by OTC Markets Group,
Inc.
The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of Urban AG.
Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of
Urban AG is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on March 31,
2015, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 14, 2015.
By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-07672 Filed 3-31-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE CODE 8011-01-P