Honey From the People's Republic of China: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 17717-17718 [2015-07599]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 63 / Thursday, April 2, 2015 / Notices
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED:
First, from the date of this Order until
October 28, 2023, Precision Image
Corporation, with a last known address
of 22424 76th Avenue Southeast,
Woodinville, WA 98072, and when
acting for or on its behalf, its successors,
assigns, directors, officers, employees,
agents, or representatives, (the ‘‘Denied
Person’’), may not, directly or indirectly,
participate in any way in any
transaction involving any commodity,
software or technology (hereinafter
collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’)
exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the
Regulations, including, but not limited
to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
Second, no person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Apr 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Third, after notice and opportunity for
comment as provided in Section 766.23
of the Regulations, any other person,
firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Precision Image
Corporation by ownership, control,
position of responsibility, affiliation, or
other connection in the conduct of trade
or business may also be made subject to
the provisions of this Order in order to
prevent evasion of this Order.
Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of
the Regulations, Precision Image
Corporation may file an appeal of this
Order with the Under Secretary of
Commerce for Industry and Security.
The appeal must be filed within 45 days
from the date of this Order and must
comply with the provisions of Part 756
of the Regulations.
Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be
delivered to the Precision Image
Corporation. This Order shall be
published in the Federal Register.
Sixth, this Order is effective
immediately and shall remain in effect
until October 28, 2023.
Issued this 26th day of March, 2015.
Thomas Andrukonis,
Acting Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2015–07640 Filed 4–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–863]
Honey From the People’s Republic of
China: Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2013–
2014
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) is rescinding the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on honey from
the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’)
for the period December 1, 2013 through
November 30, 2014.
DATES: Effective April 2, 2015.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17717
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alexis Polovina, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–3927.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 31, 2014, based on a
timely request for review 1 by the
American Honey Producers Association
and Sioux Honey Association
(collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’), the
Department published in the Federal
Register a notice of initiation of an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on honey from
the PRC covering the period December
1, 2013 through November 30, 2014.2
The review covers three companies.3 On
March 17, 2015, Petitioners withdrew
their request for an administrative
review on all the three companies listed
in the Initiation Notice.4 No other party
requested a review of these companies
or any other exporters of subject
merchandise.
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Department will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if the party that requested the
review withdraws its request within 90
days of the publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review. In
this case, Petitioners timely withdrew
their request by the 90-day deadline,
and no other party requested an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order. As a result,
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we
are rescinding, in its entirety, the
administrative review of honey from the
PRC for the period December 1, 2013
through November 30, 2014.
Assessment
The Department will instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. Because the
Department is rescinding this
administrative review in its entirety, the
1 See Letter from Petitioners, Honey from the
People’s Republic of China: Request for Thirteenth
Administrative Review, dated December 31, 2014.
2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR
6041, 6044 (February 4, 2015) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’).
3 The three companies are: Dongtai Peak Honey
Industry Co., Ltd.; Kunshan Xinlong Food Co., Ltd.;
and Lee Hoong Kee Ltd.
4 See Letter from Petitioners, Thirteenth
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Honey from the PRC: Petitioners’
Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,
dated March 17, 2015.
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
17718
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 63 / Thursday, April 2, 2015 / Notices
entries to which this administrative
review pertained shall be assessed
antidumping duties at rates equal to the
cash deposit of estimated antidumping
duties required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue appropriate assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register, if appropriate.
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Department’s presumption
that reimbursement of the antidumping
duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’)
of their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3),
which continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials, or conversion to
judicial protective order, is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and terms of an APO is a
violation which is subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: March 27, 2015.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2015–07599 Filed 4–1–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Order Denying Export Privileges
In the Matter of: Ivon Castaneda, Inmate
Number—99682–004, FCI Coleman Medium
Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box
1032, Coleman, FL 33521,
Washington, DC 20230
On December 18, 2012, in the U.S.
District Court, Southern District of
Florida, Ivon Castaneda (‘‘Castaneda’’),
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Apr 01, 2015
Jkt 235001
was convicted of violating Section 38 of
the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C.
2778 (2012)) (‘‘AECA’’). Specifically,
Castaneda conspired, knowingly and
willfully attempted to export defense
articles, that is AR–15/M–16 firearm
barrels, receivers, components, parts,
and accessories, from the United States
to Honduras without having first
obtained a license or written approval
from the U.S. Department of State.
Castaneda was sentenced 37 months of
imprisonment, two years of supervised
release and fined a $200 assessment.
Section 766.25 of the Export
Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or
‘‘Regulations’’) 1 provides, in pertinent
part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of the Office of
Exporter Services, in consultation with
the Director of the Office of Export
Enforcement, may deny the export
privileges of any person who has been
convicted of a violation of the Export
Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’), the EAR,
or any order, license or authorization
issued thereunder; any regulation,
license, or order issued under the
International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706); 18
U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of
the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50
U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms
Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).’’ 15
CFR 766.25(a); see also Section 11(h) of
the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. § 2410(h). The
denial of export privileges under this
provision may be for a period of up to
10 years from the date of the conviction.
15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C.
app. § 2410(h). In addition, Section
750.8 of the Regulations states that the
Bureau of Industry and Security’s Office
of Exporter Services may revoke any
Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’)
licenses previously issued in which the
person had an interest in at the time of
his conviction.
BIS has received notice of Castaneda’s
conviction for violating the AECA, and
has provided notice and an opportunity
for Castaneda to make a written
submission to BIS, as provided in
Section 766.25 of the Regulations. BIS
has not received a submission from
Castaneda.
1 The Regulations are currently codified in the
Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730–
774 (2014). The Regulations issued pursuant to the
Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401–
2420 (2000)) (‘‘EAA’’). Since August 21, 2001, the
EAA has been in lapse and the President, through
Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR,
2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended
by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent
being that of August 7, 2014 (79 FR 46959 (August
11, 2014)), has continued the Regulations in effect
under the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2006 & Supp.
IV 2010)).
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Based upon my review and
consultations with BIS’s Office of
Export Enforcement, including its
Director, and the facts available to BIS,
I have decided to deny Castaneda’s
export privileges under the Regulations
for a period of 10 years from the date of
Castaneda’s conviction. I have also
decided to revoke all licenses issued
pursuant to the Act or Regulations in
which Castaneda had an interest at the
time of her conviction.
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered:
First, from the date of this Order until
December 18, 2022, Ivon Castaneda,
with a last known address of Inmate
Number—99682–004, FCI Coleman
Medium, Federal Correctional
Institution, P.O. Box 1032, Coleman, FL
33521, and when acting for or on her
behalf, her successors, assigns,
employees, agents or representatives
(the ‘‘Denied Person’’), may not, directly
or indirectly, participate in any way in
any transaction involving any
commodity, software or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as
‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from
the United States that is subject to the
Regulations, including, but not limited
to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
Second, no person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 63 (Thursday, April 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17717-17718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07599]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-863]
Honey From the People's Republic of China: Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') is rescinding
the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on honey from
the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') for the period December 1,
2013 through November 30, 2014.
DATES: Effective April 2, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexis Polovina, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3927.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 31, 2014, based on a timely request for review \1\ by
the American Honey Producers Association and Sioux Honey Association
(collectively, ``Petitioners''), the Department published in the
Federal Register a notice of initiation of an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on honey from the PRC covering the period
December 1, 2013 through November 30, 2014.\2\ The review covers three
companies.\3\ On March 17, 2015, Petitioners withdrew their request for
an administrative review on all the three companies listed in the
Initiation Notice.\4\ No other party requested a review of these
companies or any other exporters of subject merchandise.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Letter from Petitioners, Honey from the People's
Republic of China: Request for Thirteenth Administrative Review,
dated December 31, 2014.
\2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 6041, 6044 (February 4, 2015)
(``Initiation Notice'').
\3\ The three companies are: Dongtai Peak Honey Industry Co.,
Ltd.; Kunshan Xinlong Food Co., Ltd.; and Lee Hoong Kee Ltd.
\4\ See Letter from Petitioners, Thirteenth Administrative
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Honey from the PRC:
Petitioners' Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review, dated
March 17, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested
the review withdraws its request within 90 days of the publication of
the notice of initiation of the requested review. In this case,
Petitioners timely withdrew their request by the 90-day deadline, and
no other party requested an administrative review of the antidumping
duty order. As a result, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we are
rescinding, in its entirety, the administrative review of honey from
the PRC for the period December 1, 2013 through November 30, 2014.
Assessment
The Department will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries. Because the Department is rescinding this
administrative review in its entirety, the
[[Page 17718]]
entries to which this administrative review pertained shall be assessed
antidumping duties at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated
antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i).
The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to
CBP 15 days after the publication of this notice in the Federal
Register, if appropriate.
Notifications
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and
terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: March 27, 2015.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2015-07599 Filed 4-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE 3510-DS-P