Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; BMW of North America, LLC, 15051-15053 [2015-06384]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 54 / Friday, March 20, 2015 / Notices
was published on October 22, 1986 and
revised on March 16, 1988.
DATES: The deadline for comments is
Monday, April 13, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Smita Deshpande; 3347 Michelson
Drive, Suite 100; Irvine, CA 92612; (949)
724–2245; D12.NOP241.91@dot.ca.gov;
Chief, Division of Environmental
Analysis.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective
July 1, 2007, the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) assigned, and
the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans) assumed,
environmental responsibilities for this
project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327.
Caltrans as the assigned National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
agency, in cooperation with the United
States Fish and Wildlife Service and
United States Army Corps of Engineers,
will prepare a Supplemental Draft EIS
on a proposal for a median-to-median
connector between State Route 241 (SR–
241) and the State Route 91 (SR–91)
Express Lanes, project in Orange County
and Riverside County, California.
The proposed median-to-median
connector project encompasses 12–
ORA–241 (PM 36.1/39.1), 12–ORA–91
(PM 14.7/18.9), and 08–RIV–91 (PM 0.0/
1.5) for a length of approximately 8.7
miles. Anticipated federal approvals
include an FHWA Air Quality
Conformity Determination, Biological
Opinion Amendment and permits under
Section 404 and 401 of the Clean Water
Act.
Caltrans District 12, in cooperation
with the Foothill/Eastern Transportation
Corridor Agency (F/ETCA), proposes to
construct the median-to-median
connector from State Route 241 (SR–
241) to the State Route 91 (SR–91)
Express Lanes. The proposed median-tomedian connector is phase 2 of the
Eastern Transportation Corridor (ETC)
project previously approved in 1994. It
will provide improved access between
SR–241 and SR–91 and is proposed to
be a tolled facility. Caltrans will be the
lead agency for the project. The United
States Army Corps of Engineers and the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
were identified as cooperating agencies
in the corresponding 1991 ETC Draft EIS
and 1994 ETC Final EIS.
The SR–241/SR–91 Express Lane
Connector was originally evaluated as a
SR–241/SR–91 high-occupancy vehicle
(HOV) direct connector in the 1991 ETC
Draft EIS and 1994 ETC Final EIS (both
of which studied a broader project area
with improvements on SR–133, SR–241
and SR–261). The Systems Management
Concept (SMC) for the ETC project
proposed that the project would be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:14 Mar 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
staged, incorporating general purpose
traffic and eventually HOV lanes, to
meet the forecasted demand. Under the
SMC, ETC construction would be
completed in one stage with three or
more phases.
To implement Phase 2 of the ETC
project, a Supplemental Draft EIS is
being prepared to focus on the eastern
portion of the original project and to
address changes to environmental
conditions and regulatory requirements.
Various alternatives were studied in the
1991 ETC Draft EIS and 1994 ETC Final
EIS; however, the Supplemental Draft
EIS will include a No Build and one
Build Alternative for the median-tomedian connector only.
Letters describing the proposed action
and soliciting comments will be sent to
appropriate Federal, State, cooperating
agencies, participating agencies, local
agencies, and to private organizations
and citizens who have previously
expressed or are known to have interest
in this proposal. Environmental Review
of the project is anticipated to occur
from 2015 through 2017. A public
scoping meeting is not scheduled at this
time; should you be interested, please
let us know in writing. A public hearing
will be held in 2016. Public notice will
be given of the time and place of the
hearing. The Supplemental Draft EIS
will be available for public and agency
review and comment prior to the public
hearing.
To ensure that the full range of issues
related to this proposed action are
addressed and all significant issues
identified, comments, and suggestions
are invited from all interested parties.
Comments or questions concerning this
proposed action and the Supplemental
Draft EIS should be directed to Caltrans
at the address provided above.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Issued on: March 16, 2015.
Shawn Oliver,
Team Leader, Right of Way and Environment,
Federal Highway Administration,
Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2015–06415 Filed 3–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
PO 00000
Frm 00147
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15051
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard; BMW of North America, LLC
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
AGENCY:
This document grants in full
the BMW of North America, LLC (BMW)
petition for an exemption of the X1
multi-purpose vehicle line (MPV) in
accordance with 49 CFR part 543,
Exemption from the Theft Prevention
Standard. This petition is granted
because the agency has determined that
the antitheft device to be placed on the
line as standard equipment is likely to
be as effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
the parts-marking requirements of 49
CFR part 541, Federal Motor Vehicle
Theft Prevention Standard (Theft
Prevention Standard). BMW requested
confidential treatment for specific
information in its petition that the
agency will address by separate letter.
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with the
2016 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Carlita Ballard, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer
Programs, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building, Room W43–
439, Washington, DC 20590. Ms.
Ballard’s telephone number is (202)
366–5222. Her fax number is (202) 493–
2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
petition dated November 21, 2014,
BMW requested an exemption from the
parts-marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard for the X1 MPV
vehicle line beginning with MY 2016.
The petition requested an exemption
from parts-marking pursuant to 49 CFR
part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard, based on the
installation of an antitheft device as
standard equipment for the entire
vehicle line.
Under 49 CFR 543.5(a), a
manufacturer may petition NHTSA to
grant an exemption for one vehicle line
per model year. BMW stated that its X1
MPV line will be replacing its X1
passenger car line beginning with MY
2016. In its petition, BMW provided a
detailed description and diagram of the
identity, design, and location of the
components of the antitheft device for
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
15052
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 54 / Friday, March 20, 2015 / Notices
its X1 MPV line. BMW stated that the
X1 MPV line will be installed with an
engine immobilizer device as standard
equipment. Key features of the antitheft
device will include a key with a
transponder, loop antenna (coil), engine
control unit (DME/DDE) with encoded
start release input, an electronically
coded vehicle immobilizer/car access
system (EWS/CAS) control unit and a
passive immobilizer. BMW will not
offer an audible or visible alarm feature
on the proposed device.
BMW stated that the antitheft device
is a passive vehicle immobilizer system.
BMW further stated that the EWS
immobilizer device prevents the vehicle
from being driven away under its own
engine power. BMW further stated that
the EWS immobilizer device also fulfills
the requirements of the European
vehicle insurance companies.
BMW stated that activation of its
immobilizer device occurs
automatically when the engine is shut
off and the vehicle key is removed from
the ignition lock cylinder. Deactivation
of the device occurs when the Start/Stop
button is pressed and the vehicle
starting process begins. BMW stated that
deactivation cannot be carried out with
a mechanical key, but must occur
electronically. Specifically, BMW stated
that its transponder sends key data to
the EWS/CAS control unit. The correct
key data must be recognized by the
EWS/CAS control unit in order for the
vehicle to start. The transponder
contains a chip which is integrated in
the key and powered by a battery. The
transponder also consists of a
transmitter/receiver which
communicates with the EWS/CAS
control unit. The EWS/CAS control unit
provides the interface to the loop
antenna (coil), engine control unit and
starter. The ignition and fuel supply are
only released when a correct coded
release signal has been sent by the EWS/
CAS control unit to deactivate the
device and allow the vehicle to start.
When the EWS/CAS control unit has
sent a correct release signal, and after
the initial starting value, the release
signal becomes a rolling, ever-changing,
random code that is stored in the
DME/DDE and EWS/CAS control units.
The DME/DDE must identify the release
signal and only then will the ignition
signal and fuel supply be released.
BMW stated that the vehicle is also
equipped with a central-locking system
that can be operated to lock and unlock
all doors or to unlock only the driver’s
door, thereby preventing forced entry
into the vehicle through the passenger
doors. The vehicle can be further
secured by locking the doors and hood
using either the key lock cylinder on the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:14 Mar 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
driver’s door or the remote frequency
remote control. BMW stated that the
frequency for the remote control
constantly changes to prevent an
unauthorized person from opening the
vehicle by intercepting the signals of its
remote control.
BMW further stated that all of its
vehicles are currently equipped with
antitheft devices as standard equipment,
including the BMW X1 MPV line. BMW
compared the effectiveness of its
antitheft device with devices which
NHTSA has previously determined to be
as effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as would
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of Part 541. BMW stated
that the antitheft device that it intends
to install on its X1 MPV line for MY
2016 has been sufficient to grant
exemptions for other vehicle lines.
Specifically, BMW has installed its
antitheft device on its X1 (passenger
car), X3, X4 and X5 vehicle lines, as
well as its Carline 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, Z4,
and MINI vehicle lines, all which have
been granted parts-marking exemptions
by the agency. BMW asserts that theft
data have indicated a decline in theft
rates for vehicle lines that have been
equipped with antitheft devices similar
to that which it proposes to install on
the X1 MPV line. BMW also stated that
for MY/CY 2011, the agency’s data show
that theft rates for its lines are: 0.69 (1series), 0.62 (3-series), 0.63 (5-series),
1.08 (7-series), 0.26 (X3), 0.00 (X5), 0.00
(X6), 0.55 (Z4/M), and 0.35 (MINI).
Using an average of 3 MYs data (2010–
2012), NHTSA’s theft rates for BMW’s 1
series, 3 series, 5 series, 6 series, 7
series, X3, X5, X6, Z4/M and MINI
vehicle lines are 0.5503, 07177, 0.7314,
0.0000, 1.7952, 0.2055, 0.5501, 2.5840,
0.4696 and 0.3770 respectively. Theft
data for BMW’s X1 (passenger car), X4,
and Carline 4 is not available.
BMW’s submission is considered a
complete petition as required by 49 CFR
543.7, in that it meets the general
requirements contained in § 543.5 and
the specific content requirements of
§ 543.6.
In addressing the specific content
requirements of Part 543.6, BMW
provided information on the reliability
and durability of its device. To ensure
reliability and durability of the device,
BMW conducted tests and believes that
the device is reliable and durable
because it complied with its own
specific standards and the antitheft
device is installed on other vehicle lines
for which the agency has granted a
parts-marking exemption. Further
assuring the reliability and durability of
the X1 antitheft device, BMW notes that
the mechanical keys for the X1 MPV
PO 00000
Frm 00148
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
line are unique. Specifically, a special
key blank, a special key cutting machine
and the vehicle’s unique code are
needed to duplicate a key. BMW stated
that new keys will only be issued to
authorized persons, and the guide-ways
that are milled in the mechanical keys
make the locks almost impossible to
pick and the keys impossible to
duplicate on the open market.
BMW’s proposed device lacks an
audible or visible alarm, therefore, this
device cannot perform one of the
functions listed in 49 CFR 543.6(a)(3),
that is, to call attention to unauthorized
attempts to enter or move the vehicle.
However, in its November 2014 petition,
BMW asserted that in a previous
Federal Register notice published by
the agency (58 FR 44872, dated August
25, 1993), NHTSA’s review of the theft
data for 10 General Motors’ (GM)
vehicle lines that had been granted
partial exemptions concluded that the
lack of an audible and visible alarm had
not prevented the antitheft device from
being effective and that despite the
absence of an audible or visible alarm,
when placed on vehicle lines as
standard equipment, the GM antitheft
devices ‘‘continue to be as effective in
deterring and reducing motor vehicle
theft as compliance with parts-marking
requirements.’’ Therefore, BMW expects
that the X1’s antitheft device will be just
as effective as parts-marking.
Based on the supporting evidence
submitted by BMW, the agency believes
that the antitheft device for the BMW X1
MPV line is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541).
The agency concludes that the device
will provide four of the five types of
performance listed in § 543.6(a)(3):
promoting activation; preventing defeat
or circumvention of the device by
unauthorized persons; preventing
operation of the vehicle by
unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the
reliability and durability of the device.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49
CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants a
petition for exemption from the partsmarking requirements of Part 541, either
in whole or in part, if it determines that,
based upon supporting evidence, the
standard equipment antitheft device is
likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of Part 541. The agency
finds that BMW has provided adequate
reasons for its belief that the antitheft
device for the X1 MPV line is likely to
be as effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as compliance with
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 54 / Friday, March 20, 2015 / Notices
the parts-marking requirements of the
Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR part
541). This conclusion is based on the
information BMW provided about its
device.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency
hereby grants in full BMW’s petition for
exemption for the MY 2016 X1 MPV
line from the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR part 541. The
agency notes that 49 CFR part 541,
Appendix A–1, identifies those lines
that are exempted from the Theft
Prevention Standard for a given MY. 49
CFR 543.7(f) contains publication
requirements incident to the disposition
of all Part 543 petitions. Advanced
listing, including the release of future
product nameplates, the beginning
model year for which the petition is
granted and a general description of the
antitheft device is necessary in order to
notify law enforcement agencies of new
vehicle lines exempted from the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard.
If BMW decides not to use the
exemption for this line, it must formally
notify the agency. If such a decision is
made, the line must be fully marked as
required by 49 CFR 541.5 and 541.6
(marking of major component parts and
replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if BMW wishes in
the future to modify the device on
which this exemption is based, the
company may have to submit a petition
to modify the exemption.
Part 543.7(d) states that a Part 543
exemption applies only to vehicles that
belong to a line exempted under this
part and equipped with the anti-theft
device on which the line’s exemption is
based. Further, § 543.9(c)(2) provides for
the submission of petitions ‘‘to modify
an exemption to permit the use of an
antitheft device similar to but differing
from the one specified in that
exemption.’’
The agency wishes to minimize the
administrative burden that Part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted
vehicle manufacturers and itself. The
agency did not intend Part 543 to
require the submission of a modification
petition for every change to the
components or design of an antitheft
device. The significance of many such
changes could be de minimis. Therefore,
NHTSA suggests that if the
manufacturer contemplates making any
changes the effects of which might be
characterized as de minimis, it should
consult the agency before preparing and
submitting a petition to modify.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:14 Mar 19, 2015
Jkt 235001
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR Part 1.95.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2015–06384 Filed 3–19–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Funding Availability and
Solicitation of Applications for
Magnetic Levitation Projects
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of funding availability.
AGENCY:
This notice of funding
availability (NOFA or Notice) details the
grant application requirements and
submission procedures for obtaining up
to $27.8 million in Federal funding, as
authorized by sections 1101(a)(18) and
1307 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible,
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A
Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–LU, Public
Law 109–59 (August 10, 2005)), as
amended by section 102 of the
SAFETEA–LU Technical Corrections
Act of 2008, Public Law 110–244 (June
6, 2008), for existing magnetic levitation
(maglev) projects located east of the
Mississippi River. Pursuant to the Joint
Committee statement accompanying the
SAFETEA–LU Technical Corrections
Act, three projects are eligible for
funding under this Notice: The
‘‘Pittsburgh project’’, the ‘‘BaltimoreWashington project’’, and the ‘‘AtlantaChattanooga project’’. FRA previously
announced the availability of funds for
maglev projects located east of the
Mississippi River pursuant to a NOFA
issued on October 16, 2008, but one of
the selected applicants has decided not
to pursue the project for which the
funds were allocated resulting in the
availability of the funds for this Notice.
Funds awarded under this Notice can be
used for preconstruction planning
activities and capital costs of a viable
maglev project.
DATES: Applications for funding under
this NOFA are due no later than 5:00
p.m. EST, April 20, 2015. Applications
for funding received after 5:00 p.m. EST
on April 20, 2015, will not be
considered. See Section 4 of this Notice
for additional information regarding the
application process.
ADDRESSES: Applications must be
submitted via Grants.gov. For any
required or supporting application
materials that an applicant is unable to
submit via Grants.gov (such as oversized
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00149
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15053
engineering drawings), an applicant
may submit an original and two (2)
copies to Renee Cooper, Office of
Program Delivery, Federal Railroad
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Mail Stop 20, Washington,
DC 20590. However, due to delays
caused by enhanced screening of mail
delivered via the U.S. Postal Service,
applicants are advised to use other
means of conveyance (such as courier
service) to assure timely receipt of
materials.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information regarding this
Notice, please contact Renee Cooper,
Office of Program Delivery, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Mail Stop 20,
Washington, DC 20590; Email: FRAGrants@dot.gov; Phone: (202) 493–0491;
Fax: (202) 493–6333.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FRA
strongly suggests that applicants read
this Notice in its entirety prior to
preparing application materials. There
are programmatic prerequisites and
administrative requirements described
herein that applicants must comply
with in order to submit an application
and be considered for funding.
Table of Contents
1. Funding Opportunity Description
2. Award Information
3. Eligibility and Review Criteria
4. Application and Submission Information
5. Application Review Information
6. Award Administration Information
7. Agency Contact
Section 1: Funding Opportunity
Description
Section 102 of the SAFETEA–LU
Technical Corrections Act (Public Law
110–244, June 6, 2008) (the 2008 Act),
amended sections 1101(a)(18) and 1307
of SAFETEA–LU and provided $45
million in contract authority for maglev
projects located east of the Mississippi
River. Of the funding available for
projects east of the Mississippi River
($45 million), approximately $27.8
million in funding is available for award
under this NOFA.
In the Joint Explanatory Statement of
the House Transportation and
Infrastructure Committee and the Senate
Environmental and Public Works,
Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs,
and Commerce, Science and
Transportation Committees
accompanying the 2008 Act (the Joint
Explanatory Statement), Congress
explained that in amending SAFETEA–
LU to allow FRA discretion to award
funds to ‘‘projects’’ located east of the
Mississippi River, ‘‘the intent is to limit
the eligible projects to three existing
E:\FR\FM\20MRN1.SGM
20MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 54 (Friday, March 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15051-15053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06384]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Petition for Exemption From the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard; BMW of North America, LLC
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document grants in full the BMW of North America, LLC
(BMW) petition for an exemption of the X1 multi-purpose vehicle line
(MPV) in accordance with 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from the Theft
Prevention Standard. This petition is granted because the agency has
determined that the antitheft device to be placed on the line as
standard equipment is likely to be as effective in reducing and
deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the parts-marking
requirements of 49 CFR part 541, Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard (Theft Prevention Standard). BMW requested confidential
treatment for specific information in its petition that the agency will
address by separate letter.
DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with
the 2016 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carlita Ballard, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building, Room W43-439, Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard's telephone
number is (202) 366-5222. Her fax number is (202) 493-2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a petition dated November 21, 2014, BMW
requested an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard for the X1 MPV vehicle line beginning with MY 2016.
The petition requested an exemption from parts-marking pursuant to 49
CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard, based
on the installation of an antitheft device as standard equipment for
the entire vehicle line.
Under 49 CFR 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to grant
an exemption for one vehicle line per model year. BMW stated that its
X1 MPV line will be replacing its X1 passenger car line beginning with
MY 2016. In its petition, BMW provided a detailed description and
diagram of the identity, design, and location of the components of the
antitheft device for
[[Page 15052]]
its X1 MPV line. BMW stated that the X1 MPV line will be installed with
an engine immobilizer device as standard equipment. Key features of the
antitheft device will include a key with a transponder, loop antenna
(coil), engine control unit (DME/DDE) with encoded start release input,
an electronically coded vehicle immobilizer/car access system (EWS/CAS)
control unit and a passive immobilizer. BMW will not offer an audible
or visible alarm feature on the proposed device.
BMW stated that the antitheft device is a passive vehicle
immobilizer system. BMW further stated that the EWS immobilizer device
prevents the vehicle from being driven away under its own engine power.
BMW further stated that the EWS immobilizer device also fulfills the
requirements of the European vehicle insurance companies.
BMW stated that activation of its immobilizer device occurs
automatically when the engine is shut off and the vehicle key is
removed from the ignition lock cylinder. Deactivation of the device
occurs when the Start/Stop button is pressed and the vehicle starting
process begins. BMW stated that deactivation cannot be carried out with
a mechanical key, but must occur electronically. Specifically, BMW
stated that its transponder sends key data to the EWS/CAS control unit.
The correct key data must be recognized by the EWS/CAS control unit in
order for the vehicle to start. The transponder contains a chip which
is integrated in the key and powered by a battery. The transponder also
consists of a transmitter/receiver which communicates with the EWS/CAS
control unit. The EWS/CAS control unit provides the interface to the
loop antenna (coil), engine control unit and starter. The ignition and
fuel supply are only released when a correct coded release signal has
been sent by the EWS/CAS control unit to deactivate the device and
allow the vehicle to start. When the EWS/CAS control unit has sent a
correct release signal, and after the initial starting value, the
release signal becomes a rolling, ever-changing, random code that is
stored in the DME/DDE and EWS/CAS control units. The DME/DDE must
identify the release signal and only then will the ignition signal and
fuel supply be released.
BMW stated that the vehicle is also equipped with a central-locking
system that can be operated to lock and unlock all doors or to unlock
only the driver's door, thereby preventing forced entry into the
vehicle through the passenger doors. The vehicle can be further secured
by locking the doors and hood using either the key lock cylinder on the
driver's door or the remote frequency remote control. BMW stated that
the frequency for the remote control constantly changes to prevent an
unauthorized person from opening the vehicle by intercepting the
signals of its remote control.
BMW further stated that all of its vehicles are currently equipped
with antitheft devices as standard equipment, including the BMW X1 MPV
line. BMW compared the effectiveness of its antitheft device with
devices which NHTSA has previously determined to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as would compliance with the
parts-marking requirements of Part 541. BMW stated that the antitheft
device that it intends to install on its X1 MPV line for MY 2016 has
been sufficient to grant exemptions for other vehicle lines.
Specifically, BMW has installed its antitheft device on its X1
(passenger car), X3, X4 and X5 vehicle lines, as well as its Carline 1,
3, 4, 5, 6, 7, Z4, and MINI vehicle lines, all which have been granted
parts-marking exemptions by the agency. BMW asserts that theft data
have indicated a decline in theft rates for vehicle lines that have
been equipped with antitheft devices similar to that which it proposes
to install on the X1 MPV line. BMW also stated that for MY/CY 2011, the
agency's data show that theft rates for its lines are: 0.69 (1-series),
0.62 (3-series), 0.63 (5-series), 1.08 (7-series), 0.26 (X3), 0.00
(X5), 0.00 (X6), 0.55 (Z4/M), and 0.35 (MINI). Using an average of 3
MYs data (2010-2012), NHTSA's theft rates for BMW's 1 series, 3 series,
5 series, 6 series, 7 series, X3, X5, X6, Z4/M and MINI vehicle lines
are 0.5503, 07177, 0.7314, 0.0000, 1.7952, 0.2055, 0.5501, 2.5840,
0.4696 and 0.3770 respectively. Theft data for BMW's X1 (passenger
car), X4, and Carline 4 is not available.
BMW's submission is considered a complete petition as required by
49 CFR 543.7, in that it meets the general requirements contained in
Sec. 543.5 and the specific content requirements of Sec. 543.6.
In addressing the specific content requirements of Part 543.6, BMW
provided information on the reliability and durability of its device.
To ensure reliability and durability of the device, BMW conducted tests
and believes that the device is reliable and durable because it
complied with its own specific standards and the antitheft device is
installed on other vehicle lines for which the agency has granted a
parts-marking exemption. Further assuring the reliability and
durability of the X1 antitheft device, BMW notes that the mechanical
keys for the X1 MPV line are unique. Specifically, a special key blank,
a special key cutting machine and the vehicle's unique code are needed
to duplicate a key. BMW stated that new keys will only be issued to
authorized persons, and the guide-ways that are milled in the
mechanical keys make the locks almost impossible to pick and the keys
impossible to duplicate on the open market.
BMW's proposed device lacks an audible or visible alarm, therefore,
this device cannot perform one of the functions listed in 49 CFR
543.6(a)(3), that is, to call attention to unauthorized attempts to
enter or move the vehicle. However, in its November 2014 petition, BMW
asserted that in a previous Federal Register notice published by the
agency (58 FR 44872, dated August 25, 1993), NHTSA's review of the
theft data for 10 General Motors' (GM) vehicle lines that had been
granted partial exemptions concluded that the lack of an audible and
visible alarm had not prevented the antitheft device from being
effective and that despite the absence of an audible or visible alarm,
when placed on vehicle lines as standard equipment, the GM antitheft
devices ``continue to be as effective in deterring and reducing motor
vehicle theft as compliance with parts-marking requirements.''
Therefore, BMW expects that the X1's antitheft device will be just as
effective as parts-marking.
Based on the supporting evidence submitted by BMW, the agency
believes that the antitheft device for the BMW X1 MPV line is likely to
be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention
Standard (49 CFR part 541). The agency concludes that the device will
provide four of the five types of performance listed in Sec.
543.6(a)(3): promoting activation; preventing defeat or circumvention
of the device by unauthorized persons; preventing operation of the
vehicle by unauthorized entrants; and ensuring the reliability and
durability of the device.
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 33106 and 49 CFR 543.7(b), the agency grants
a petition for exemption from the parts-marking requirements of Part
541, either in whole or in part, if it determines that, based upon
supporting evidence, the standard equipment antitheft device is likely
to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as
compliance with the parts-marking requirements of Part 541. The agency
finds that BMW has provided adequate reasons for its belief that the
antitheft device for the X1 MPV line is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with
[[Page 15053]]
the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR
part 541). This conclusion is based on the information BMW provided
about its device.
For the foregoing reasons, the agency hereby grants in full BMW's
petition for exemption for the MY 2016 X1 MPV line from the parts-
marking requirements of 49 CFR part 541. The agency notes that 49 CFR
part 541, Appendix A-1, identifies those lines that are exempted from
the Theft Prevention Standard for a given MY. 49 CFR 543.7(f) contains
publication requirements incident to the disposition of all Part 543
petitions. Advanced listing, including the release of future product
nameplates, the beginning model year for which the petition is granted
and a general description of the antitheft device is necessary in order
to notify law enforcement agencies of new vehicle lines exempted from
the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard.
If BMW decides not to use the exemption for this line, it must
formally notify the agency. If such a decision is made, the line must
be fully marked as required by 49 CFR 541.5 and 541.6 (marking of major
component parts and replacement parts).
NHTSA notes that if BMW wishes in the future to modify the device
on which this exemption is based, the company may have to submit a
petition to modify the exemption.
Part 543.7(d) states that a Part 543 exemption applies only to
vehicles that belong to a line exempted under this part and equipped
with the anti-theft device on which the line's exemption is based.
Further, Sec. 543.9(c)(2) provides for the submission of petitions
``to modify an exemption to permit the use of an antitheft device
similar to but differing from the one specified in that exemption.''
The agency wishes to minimize the administrative burden that Part
543.9(c)(2) could place on exempted vehicle manufacturers and itself.
The agency did not intend Part 543 to require the submission of a
modification petition for every change to the components or design of
an antitheft device. The significance of many such changes could be de
minimis. Therefore, NHTSA suggests that if the manufacturer
contemplates making any changes the effects of which might be
characterized as de minimis, it should consult the agency before
preparing and submitting a petition to modify.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
Part 1.95.
Raymond R. Posten,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2015-06384 Filed 3-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P