Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule Relating to Market Maker Posting Credit Tiers, 14187-14189 [2015-06125]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 52 / Wednesday, March 18, 2015 / Notices
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act,
because it applies to all Trading Permit
Holders. The Exchange believes this
proposal will not cause an unnecessary
burden on intermarket competition
because the electronic non-Penny Pilot
transaction fee and fee amount is similar
to fees assessed at other exchanges.13
Additionally, the proposal relating to
the FBW2 fee waivers only affect trading
on CBOE. To the extent that the
proposed changes make CBOE a more
attractive marketplace for market
participants at other exchanges, such
market participants are welcome to
become CBOE market participants.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 14 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 15 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2015–025. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2015–025 and should be submitted on
or before April 8, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–06109 Filed 3–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CBOE–2015–025 on the subject line.
13 See e.g., PHLX Pricing, Section II, Multiply
Listed Options Fees.
14 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:00 Mar 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74492 ; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2015–13]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Amending the NYSE Arca
Options Fee Schedule Relating to
Market Maker Posting Credit Tiers
March 12, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on March 2,
2015, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule (‘‘Fee
Schedule’’) relating to Market Maker
Posting Credit Tiers. The Exchange
proposes to implement the fee change
effective March 2, 2015. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com,
at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
1 15
U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
16 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14187
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
14188
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 52 / Wednesday, March 18, 2015 / Notices
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this filing is to create
an additional Market Maker Monthly
Posting Credit Super Tier (‘‘Super Tier
II’’) for Executions in Penny Pilot Issues
and SPY. The Exchange proposes to
implement the fee change effective
March 2, 2015.
Currently, the Exchange has a Base
Posting Credit rate, and two additional
tiers with higher credit rates for Market
Makers that meet certain volume
criteria, as outlined in the table below.
MARKET MAKER MONTHLY POSTING CREDIT SUPER TIER AND QUALIFICATIONS FOR EXECUTIONS IN PENNY PILOT ISSUES
AND SPY 8
Tier
Qualification basis (average electronic executions per day)
Base ..................
Select Tier ........
Super Tier .........
............................................
30,000 Contracts from Market Maker Posted Orders
in All Issues.
80,000 Contracts from Market Maker Posted Orders
in All Issues, or
Credit applied to posted
electronic market maker
executions in penny pilot
issues (except SPY)
Credit applied to posted
electronic market maker
executions in SPY
..................................................................
..................................................................
($0.28)
(0.32)
($0.28)
(0.32)
200,000 Contracts Combined from all orders in Penny Pilot Issues, all account
types, with at least 100,000 Contracts
from Posted Orders in Penny Pilot
Issues*.
(0.37)
(0.39)
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
* Includes transaction volume from the Market Maker’s affiliates.
The Exchange is proposing to add
another tier, Super Tier II, to provide an
incentive for increased Market Maker
activity on the Exchange.
As with the Super Tier, the proposed
Super Tier II qualification would be
200,000 contracts, but only contracts
traded for the account of a Market
Maker would count and at least 110,000
of those contracts would have to be from
Posted Orders or quotes from both
Penny Pilot and non-Penny Pilot issues.
Unlike Super Tier, contract volume
from a Market Maker’s affiliate would
not be counted for determining whether
a member qualified for fees in Super
Tier II. Market Makers who meet the
threshold for Super Tier II would
receive a credit of $0.42 applied to
Posted Electronic Market Maker
executions in Penny Pilot issues,
including SPY.
In addition, the Exchange proposes to
make a non-substantive change to the
title of the table to more accurately
reflect its contents, such that it reads:
‘‘MARKET MAKER MONTHLY
POSTING CREDIT TIERS AND
QUALIFICATIONS FOR EXECUTIONS
IN PENNY PILOT ISSUES AND SPY.’’
The Exchange is not proposing any
other modifications to the Market Maker
Posting Credits at this time.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,4 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Sections
4 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:00 Mar 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,5 in particular,
because it provides for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members,
issuers and other persons using its
facilities and does not unfairly
discriminate between customers,
issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed change is reasonable because
adding a new Super Tier II would
encourage Market Makers to post greater
volumes in all issues, including nonPenny Pilot issues, in order to qualify
for the Super Tier II credit of $0.42. The
proposed change is also reasonable
because it is designed to attract higher
volumes of Market Maker Posted Orders
to the Exchange, which would benefit
all market participants by offering
greater price discovery, increased
transparency and trading opportunities
on the Exchange. Encouraging Market
Makers to send higher volumes of orders
to the Exchange would also contribute
to the Exchange’s depth of book as well
as to the top of book liquidity.
The Exchange also believes that the
proposed credits are reasonable because
they are within a range of similar credits
available on other option exchanges.6
The Exchange believes that the
proposed change is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because it
5 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
e.g., BATS Options Exchange fee schedule,
available at, https://www.batsoptions.com/support/
fee_schedule/ (providing a ($0.42) credit for certain
market maker volume); NASDAQ Options Market
fee schedule, available at, https://www.nasdaq
trader.com/Micro.aspx?id=optionsPricing (same).
6 See,
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
would apply to all Market Makers on an
equal and non-discriminatory basis. The
Exchange further believes that the
proposed change is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because it is
reasonably related to the value to the
Exchange’s market quality associated
with higher volumes in Market Maker
Posted Orders, including both Penny
Pilot issues and non-Penny Pilot issues.
The Exchange believes the nonsubstantive change to the title of the
table would benefit all market
participants as it would add clarity to
the fee schedule.
For these reasons, the Exchange
believes that the proposal is consistent
with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act,7 the Exchange does not believe
that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Instead, the Exchange believes that the
proposed change would continue to
encourage competition, including by
attracting additional liquidity to the
Exchange, which would continue to
make the Exchange a more competitive
venue for, among other things, order
execution and price discovery. The
Exchange does not believe that the
proposed change will impair the ability
of Market Makers or competing order
execution venues to maintain their
7 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 52 / Wednesday, March 18, 2015 / Notices
competitive standing in the financial
markets.
The Exchange notes that it operates in
a highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily favor
competing venues. In such an
environment, the Exchange must
continually review, and consider
adjusting, its fees and credits to remain
competitive with other exchanges. For
the reasons described above, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule change reflects this competitive
environment.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 8 and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder,9 because it establishes a
due, fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act 10 to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEArca–2015–13 on the subject line.
8 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
10 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEArca–2015–13. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEArca–2015–13 and should be
submitted on or before April 8, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–06125 Filed 3–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. IA–4046/803–00224]
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. and T.
Rowe Price International Ltd; Notice of
Application
March 12, 2015.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of application for an
exemptive order under Section 206A of
AGENCY:
9 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:00 Mar 17, 2015
11 17
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14189
the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(the ‘‘Advisers Act’’) and Rule 206(4)–
5(e) thereunder.
Applicant: T. Rowe Price Associates,
Inc. (‘‘TRPA’’) and T. Rowe Price
International Ltd (‘‘TRPIL’’ and, together
with TRPA, the ‘‘Advisers’’ or the
‘‘Applicants’’).
Relevant Advisers Act Sections:
Exemption requested under Section
206A of the Advisers Act and Rule
206(4)–5(e) thereunder from Rule
206(4)–5(a)(1) under the Advisers Act.
Summary of Application: The
Applicants request that the Commission
issue an order under Section 206A of
the Advisers Act and Rule 206(4)–5(e)
thereunder exempting them from Rule
206(4)–5(a)(1) under the Advisers Act to
permit Applicants to receive
compensation from certain government
entities for investment advisory services
provided to the government entities
within the two-year period following a
contribution by a covered associate of
the Applicants to an official of the
government entities.
DATES: Filing Dates: The application was
filed on May 6, 2014, and an amended
and restated application was filed on
October 29, 2014.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An
order granting the application will be
issued unless the Commission orders a
hearing. Interested persons may request
a hearing by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary and serving
Applicants with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on April 6, 2015, and
should be accompanied by proof of
service on the Applicants, in the form
of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a
certificate of service. Pursuant to Rule
0–5 under the Advisers Act, hearing
requests should state the nature of the
writer’s interest, any facts bearing upon
the desirability of a hearing on the
matter, the reason for the request, and
the issues contested. Persons may
request notification of a hearing by
writing to the Commission’s Secretary.
ADDRESSES: Brent J. Fields, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090. Applicants, TRPA and
TRPIL, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.,
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore,
Maryland 21202.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle
R. Ahlgren, Senior Counsel, or Melissa
R. Harke, Branch Chief, at (202) 551–
6825 (Division of Investment
Management, Chief Counsel’s Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 52 (Wednesday, March 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14187-14189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06125]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-74492 ; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2015-13]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending the NYSE
Arca Options Fee Schedule Relating to Market Maker Posting Credit Tiers
March 12, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on March 2, 2015, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule
(``Fee Schedule'') relating to Market Maker Posting Credit Tiers. The
Exchange proposes to implement the fee change effective March 2, 2015.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
[[Page 14188]]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this filing is to create an additional Market Maker
Monthly Posting Credit Super Tier (``Super Tier II'') for Executions in
Penny Pilot Issues and SPY. The Exchange proposes to implement the fee
change effective March 2, 2015.
Currently, the Exchange has a Base Posting Credit rate, and two
additional tiers with higher credit rates for Market Makers that meet
certain volume criteria, as outlined in the table below.
Market Maker Monthly Posting Credit Super Tier and Qualifications for Executions in Penny Pilot Issues and SPY
\8\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tier Qualification basis (average Credit applied to Credit applied to
electronic executions per day) posted electronic posted electronic
market maker executions market maker executions
in penny pilot issues in SPY
(except SPY)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base........................ ............... ............... ($0.28) ($0.28)
Select Tier................. 30,000 ............... (0.32) (0.32)
Contracts from
Market Maker
Posted Orders
in All Issues.
Super Tier.................. 80,000 200,000 (0.37) (0.39)
Contracts from Contracts
Market Maker Combined from
Posted Orders all orders in
in All Issues, Penny Pilot
or Issues, all
account types,
with at least
100,000
Contracts from
Posted Orders
in Penny Pilot
Issues*.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Includes transaction volume from the Market Maker's affiliates.
The Exchange is proposing to add another tier, Super Tier II, to
provide an incentive for increased Market Maker activity on the
Exchange.
As with the Super Tier, the proposed Super Tier II qualification
would be 200,000 contracts, but only contracts traded for the account
of a Market Maker would count and at least 110,000 of those contracts
would have to be from Posted Orders or quotes from both Penny Pilot and
non-Penny Pilot issues. Unlike Super Tier, contract volume from a
Market Maker's affiliate would not be counted for determining whether a
member qualified for fees in Super Tier II. Market Makers who meet the
threshold for Super Tier II would receive a credit of $0.42 applied to
Posted Electronic Market Maker executions in Penny Pilot issues,
including SPY.
In addition, the Exchange proposes to make a non-substantive change
to the title of the table to more accurately reflect its contents, such
that it reads: ``MARKET MAKER MONTHLY POSTING CREDIT TIERS AND
QUALIFICATIONS FOR EXECUTIONS IN PENNY PILOT ISSUES AND SPY.''
The Exchange is not proposing any other modifications to the Market
Maker Posting Credits at this time.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\4\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\5\ in particular,
because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons
using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed change is reasonable
because adding a new Super Tier II would encourage Market Makers to
post greater volumes in all issues, including non-Penny Pilot issues,
in order to qualify for the Super Tier II credit of $0.42. The proposed
change is also reasonable because it is designed to attract higher
volumes of Market Maker Posted Orders to the Exchange, which would
benefit all market participants by offering greater price discovery,
increased transparency and trading opportunities on the Exchange.
Encouraging Market Makers to send higher volumes of orders to the
Exchange would also contribute to the Exchange's depth of book as well
as to the top of book liquidity.
The Exchange also believes that the proposed credits are reasonable
because they are within a range of similar credits available on other
option exchanges.\6\ The Exchange believes that the proposed change is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it would apply to all
Market Makers on an equal and non-discriminatory basis. The Exchange
further believes that the proposed change is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it is reasonably related to the value to the
Exchange's market quality associated with higher volumes in Market
Maker Posted Orders, including both Penny Pilot issues and non-Penny
Pilot issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See, e.g., BATS Options Exchange fee schedule, available at,
https://www.batsoptions.com/support/fee_schedule/ (providing a
($0.42) credit for certain market maker volume); NASDAQ Options
Market fee schedule, available at, https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Micro.aspx?id=optionsPricing (same).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the non-substantive change to the title of
the table would benefit all market participants as it would add clarity
to the fee schedule.
For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is
consistent with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\7\ the Exchange does
not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. Instead, the Exchange believes that the proposed
change would continue to encourage competition, including by attracting
additional liquidity to the Exchange, which would continue to make the
Exchange a more competitive venue for, among other things, order
execution and price discovery. The Exchange does not believe that the
proposed change will impair the ability of Market Makers or competing
order execution venues to maintain their
[[Page 14189]]
competitive standing in the financial markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can readily favor competing venues. In
such an environment, the Exchange must continually review, and consider
adjusting, its fees and credits to remain competitive with other
exchanges. For the reasons described above, the Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change reflects this competitive environment.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \8\ and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-
4 thereunder,\9\ because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge
imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \10\ to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2015-13 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2015-13. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2015-13 and should
be submitted on or before April 8, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-06125 Filed 3-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P