Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Related to Fees for Use of BATS Exchange, Inc., 14191-14193 [2015-06124]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 52 / Wednesday, March 18, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
As noted above, however, the
Contributor did not disclose the
Contribution to the Applicants and the
Applicants had no knowledge of the
Contribution when the Contributor
received approval for the May 31, 2012
contribution for the recall general
election.
Applicant’s Legal Analysis
1. Rule 206(4)–5(a)(1) under the
Advisers Act prohibits a registered
investment adviser from providing
investment advisory services for
compensation to a government entity
within two years after a contribution to
an official of the government entity is
made by the investment adviser or any
covered associate of the investment
adviser. Each Client is a ‘‘government
entity,’’ as defined in rule 206(4)–5(f)(5),
the Contributor is a ‘‘covered associate’’
as defined in rule 206(4)–5(f)(2), and the
Official is an ‘‘official’’ as defined in
rule 206(4)–5(f)(6). Rule 206(4)–5(c)
provides that when a government entity
invests in a covered investment pool,
the investment adviser to that covered
investment pool is treated as providing
advisory services directly to the
government entity. The RICs and the
Funds are ‘‘covered investment pools,’’
as defined in rule 206(4)–5(f)(3).
2. Section 206A of the Advisers Act
grants the Commission the authority to
‘‘conditionally or unconditionally
exempt any person or transaction . . .
from any provision or provisions of [the
Advisers Act] or of any rule or
regulation thereunder, if and to the
extent that such exemption is necessary
or appropriate in the public interest and
consistent with the protection of
investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of
[the Advisers Act].’’
3. Rule 206(4)–5(e) provides that the
Commission may exempt an investment
adviser from the prohibition under Rule
206(4)–5(a)(1) upon consideration of the
factors listed below, among others:
(1) Whether the exemption is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest and consistent with the
protection of investors and the purposes
fairly intended by the policy and
provisions of the Advisers Act;
(2) Whether the investment adviser:
(i) Before the contribution resulting in
the prohibition was made, adopted and
implemented policies and procedures
reasonably designed to prevent
violations of the rule; and (ii) prior to or
at the time the contribution which
resulted in such prohibition was made,
had no actual knowledge of the
contribution; and (iii) after learning of
the contribution: (A) Has taken all
available steps to cause the contributor
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:00 Mar 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
involved in making the contribution
which resulted in such prohibition to
obtain a return of the contribution; and
(B) has taken such other remedial or
preventive measures as may be
appropriate under the circumstances;
(3) Whether, at the time of the
contribution, the contributor was a
covered associate or otherwise an
employee of the investment adviser, or
was seeking such employment;
(4) The timing and amount of the
contribution which resulted in the
prohibition;
(5) The nature of the election (e.g.,
federal, state or local); and
(6) The contributor’s apparent intent
or motive in making the contribution
which resulted in the prohibition, as
evidenced by the facts and
circumstances surrounding such
contribution.
4. The Applicants request an order
pursuant to section 206A and rule
206(4)–5(e), exempting them from the
two-year prohibition on compensation
imposed by rule 206(4)–5(a)(1) with
respect to investment advisory services
provided to the Clients within the twoyear period following the Contribution.
5. The Applicants submit that the
exemption is necessary and appropriate
in the public interest and consistent
with the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policy
and provisions of the Act. The
Applicants further submit that the other
factors set forth in Rule 206(4)–5
similarly weigh in favor of granting an
exemption to the Applicants to avoid
consequences disproportionate to the
violation. The Applicants note that
causing the Advisers to serve without
compensation for a two-year period
could result in a financial loss that is
approximately 24,000 times the amount
of the Contribution.
6. The Applicants represent that
neither the Advisers nor the Contributor
sought to interfere with the Clients’
merit-based selection process for
advisory services, nor did they seek to
negotiate higher fees or greater ancillary
benefits than would be achieved in
arms’-length transactions. The
Applicants note that the Advisers’
relationship with the Clients pre-date
the Contribution, and that one Client
divested its investment in the Fund
shortly after the Contribution. The
Applicants represent that they have no
reason to believe that the Contribution
undermined the integrity of the market
for advisory services or resulted in a
violation of the public trust in the
process for awarding contracts.
7. The Applicants note that the
Advisers adopted and implemented
pay-to-play policies and procedures on
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14191
the Rule’s effective date, March 14, 2011
that are fully compliant with the Rule’s
requirements. The Applicants further
note that the Advisers began developing
compliance testing that includes
random searches of public campaign
databases for contributions by
employees. The Applicants represent
that at no time did any employees of the
Advisers other than the Contributor
have any actual knowledge that the
Contribution had been made prior to its
discovery by the Advisers in March
2014. The Applicants further represent
that the Advisers and the Contributor
obtained the Official’s agreement to
return the Contribution, which was
subsequently returned, and the Advisers
established an escrow account for all
fees attributable to the Clients’
relationships with the Advisers accrued
between February 5, 2012 and February
26, 2014.
8. The Applicants state that the
Contributor’s apparent intent in making
the Contribution was not to influence
the selection or retention of the
Advisers, and that the Contribution was
consistent with prior political donations
made by the Contributor in support of
other candidates who share the political
views of the Official.
9. The Applicants represent that the
Contributor has had no direct contact or
involvement with any of the Clients,
and that the Contributor’s only indirect
involvement with one of the Clients was
through a single meeting at which a
research analyst who reported to the
Contributor met with the Client.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–06110 Filed 3–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74484; File No. SR–BATS–
2015–20]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change Related to Fees for Use
of BATS Exchange, Inc.
March 12, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 2,
2015, BATS Exchange, Inc. (the
1 15
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
14192
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 52 / Wednesday, March 18, 2015 / Notices
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BATS’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II and III
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Exchange has
designated the proposed rule change as
one establishing or changing a member
due, fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2)
thereunder,4 which renders the
proposed rule change effective upon
filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange filed a proposal to
amend the fee schedule applicable to
Members 5 and non-members of the
Exchange pursuant to BATS Rules
15.1(a) and (c). Changes to the fee
schedule pursuant to this proposal are
effective upon filing.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at the Exchange’s Web site
at www.batstrading.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to modify the
‘‘Options Pricing’’ section of its fee
schedule effective immediately, in order
to modify pricing charged by the
Exchange’s options platform (‘‘BATS
3 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
5 The term ‘‘Member’’ is defined as ‘‘any
registered broker or dealer that has been admitted
to membership in the Exchange.’’ See Exchange
Rule 1.5(n).
4 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:00 Mar 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
Options’’) including adjusting the
rebates associated with Customer Penny
Pilot Add Volume Tier 1 and
Professional and Firm Penny Pilot Add
Volume Tiers 1 and 2, as further
described below.
The Exchange proposes to adjust the
rebate for Customer 6 orders in Penny
Pilot Securities 7 that add liquidity and
meet Customer Add Volume Tier 1 from
$0.45 per contract to $0.40 per contract.
Currently, the Exchange offers a $0.45
rebate for Customer orders that add
liquidity and meet Customer Add
Volume Tier 1, which requires that the
Member has an ADV 8 equal to or greater
than 0.05% of average TCV.9 The
Exchange notes that such change will be
reflected in both the Standard Rates
table and the Customer Penny Pilot Add
Tiers under footnote 1 of the fee
schedule.
The Exchange also proposes to adjust
the rebate for Professional 10 and Firm 11
orders in Penny Pilot Securities that add
liquidity and meet Professional/Firm
Step-up Add Volume Tier 1 and Tier 2
from $0.44 per contract to $0.42 per
contract. The Exchange currently offers
a $0.44 rebate for Professional and Firm
orders that add liquidity and meet
Professional/Firm Step-Up Add Volume
Tier 1 or Tier 2. Meeting Professional/
Firm Step-up Add Volume Tier 1
requires that a Member has an Options
Step-up Add TCV 12 from June 2014
baseline that is equal to or greater than
0.50%. Meeting Professional/Firm Stepup Add Volume Tier 2 requires that a
Member has an Options Step-up Add
TCV from September 2014 baseline
equal to or greater than 0.30% and an
ADV equal to or greater than 0.40% of
average TCV. The Exchange is not
proposing to amend the requirements
6 ‘‘Customer’’ applies to any transaction identified
by a Member for clearing in the Customer range at
the Options Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’),
excluding any transaction for a ‘‘Professional’’ as
defined in Exchange Rule 16.1.
7 ‘‘Penny Pilot Securities’’ are those issues quoted
pursuant to Exchange Rule 21.5, Interpretation and
Policy .01.
8 ‘‘ADV’’ means average daily volume calculated
as the number of contracts added or removed,
combined, per day.
9 ‘‘TCV’’ means total consolidated volume
calculated as the volume reported by all exchanges
to the consolidated transaction reporting plan for
the month for which the fees apply, excluding
volume on any day that the Exchange experiences
an Exchange System Disruption and on any day
with a scheduled early market close.
10 ‘‘Professional’’ applies to any transaction
identified by a Member as such pursuant to
Exchange Rule 16.1.
11 ‘‘Firm’’ applies to any transaction identified by
a Member for clearing in the Firm range at the OCC.
12 ‘‘Options Step-up Add TCV’’ means ADAV as
a percentage of TCV in the relevant baseline month
subtracted from current ADAV as a percentage of
TCV.
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for meeting Professional/Firm Step-up
Add Volume Tier 1 or Tier 2. The
Exchange notes that such changes will
be reflected in both the Standard Rates
table and the Professional and Firm
Penny Pilot Add Volume Tiers under
footnote 2 of the fee schedule.
The Exchange proposes to implement
the amendments to its fee schedule
effective immediately.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder that
are applicable to a national securities
exchange, and, in particular, with the
requirements of Section 6 of the Act.13
Specifically, the Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,14 in that
it provides for the equitable allocation
of reasonable dues, fees and other
charges among members and other
persons using any facility or system
which the Exchange operates or
controls. The Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee levels to be
excessive.
Volume-based rebates and fees such
as the ones currently maintained on
BATS Options have been widely
adopted by equities and options
exchanges and are equitable because
they are open to all Members on an
equal basis and provide additional
benefits or discounts that are reasonably
related to the value to an exchange’s
market quality associated with higher
levels of market activity, such as higher
levels of liquidity provision and/or
growth patterns, and introduction of
higher volumes of orders into the price
and volume discovery processes. The
Exchange believes the proposed
reduction of the rebate for orders that
add liquidity for Customers that meet
Customer Add Volume Tier 1 is a
reasonable, fair and equitable, and not
unfairly discriminatory allocation of
fees and rebates because it will provide
Members with a greater incentive to
increase their participation on BATS
Options in order to receive a higher
rebate by meeting a higher Customer
Add Volume Tier. Currently, the
difference between the rebate received
for orders that qualify for Customer Add
Volume Tier 1 and those that qualify for
Customer Add Volume Tier 2 is only
$0.03 per contract, but as proposed, the
difference would be $0.08 per contract.
13 15
14 15
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78f.
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
18MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 52 / Wednesday, March 18, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
As such, the Exchange believes that
increasing the difference in the rebates
between the tiers will act to incentivize
Members to increase their ADV as a
percentage of TCV to 0.30% in order to
qualify for Customer Add Volume Tier
2 and receive a rebate of $0.48 per
contract. Such increased participation
on BATS Options will result in higher
levels of liquidity provision and
introduction of higher volumes of orders
into the price and volume discovery
processes, which will benefit all
participants on BATS Options.
The Exchange also believes that the
proposed reduction of the rebates for
Professional/Firm Step-up Add Volume
Tier 1 and Tier 2 is a reasonable, fair
and equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory allocation of fees and
rebates because, as stated above, the
Exchange’s tiered pricing structure is
designed such that fees and rebates are
related to the value of market quality
associated with higher levels of market
activity, such as higher levels of
liquidity provision and/or growth
patterns, and introduction of higher
volumes of orders into the price and
volume discovery processes. As such,
the Exchange believes that it is
reasonable, fair, and equitable to lower
the rebates associated with Professional/
Firm Step-up Add Volume Tier 1 and
Tier 2. In this same light, the Exchange
notes that the proposed amendments
would bring the rebate for Professional/
Firm Step-up Add Volume Tier 1 and
Tier 2 in line with that of the Market
Maker Add Volume Tier. The Exchange
also notes that Professional and Firm
orders can continue to receive further
enhanced rebates through the NBBO
Setter Tiers and that any order that
qualifies for either Professional/Firm
Step-Up Add Volume Tier 1 or Tier 2
will also qualify for NBBO Setter Tier 1
where the order sets the national best
bid or offer.
The Exchange reiterates that it
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee levels to be
excessive.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. With respect
to the proposed new rebates in
Customer Add Volume Tier 1 and
Professional/Firm Step-Up Tier 1 and
Tier 2, the Exchange does not believe
that any such changes burden
competition, but instead, that they
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:00 Mar 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
enhance competition, as they are
intended to increase the
competitiveness of and draw additional
volume to BATS Options. As stated
above, the Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if the deem fee structures to be
unreasonable or excessive.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any written
comments from members or other
interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 15 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 thereunder.16 At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
BATS–2015–20 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BATS–2015–20. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–BATS–
2015–20 and should be submitted on or
before April 8, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–06124 Filed 3–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74487; File No. SR–CHX–
2015–02]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of a Proposed Rule Change
Concerning the CHX Routing Services
March 12, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 2 thereunder,
notice is hereby given that on March 4,
2015, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘CHX’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
17 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
15 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
16 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f).
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
1 15
Sfmt 4703
14193
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 52 (Wednesday, March 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14191-14193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06124]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-74484; File No. SR-BATS-2015-20]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Related to
Fees for Use of BATS Exchange, Inc.
March 12, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on March 2, 2015, BATS Exchange, Inc. (the
[[Page 14192]]
``Exchange'' or ``BATS'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as one
establishing or changing a member due, fee, or other charge imposed by
the Exchange under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposed rule change effective
upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange filed a proposal to amend the fee schedule applicable
to Members \5\ and non-members of the Exchange pursuant to BATS Rules
15.1(a) and (c). Changes to the fee schedule pursuant to this proposal
are effective upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The term ``Member'' is defined as ``any registered broker or
dealer that has been admitted to membership in the Exchange.'' See
Exchange Rule 1.5(n).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
Web site at www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to modify the ``Options Pricing'' section of
its fee schedule effective immediately, in order to modify pricing
charged by the Exchange's options platform (``BATS Options'') including
adjusting the rebates associated with Customer Penny Pilot Add Volume
Tier 1 and Professional and Firm Penny Pilot Add Volume Tiers 1 and 2,
as further described below.
The Exchange proposes to adjust the rebate for Customer \6\ orders
in Penny Pilot Securities \7\ that add liquidity and meet Customer Add
Volume Tier 1 from $0.45 per contract to $0.40 per contract. Currently,
the Exchange offers a $0.45 rebate for Customer orders that add
liquidity and meet Customer Add Volume Tier 1, which requires that the
Member has an ADV \8\ equal to or greater than 0.05% of average TCV.\9\
The Exchange notes that such change will be reflected in both the
Standard Rates table and the Customer Penny Pilot Add Tiers under
footnote 1 of the fee schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ ``Customer'' applies to any transaction identified by a
Member for clearing in the Customer range at the Options Clearing
Corporation (``OCC''), excluding any transaction for a
``Professional'' as defined in Exchange Rule 16.1.
\7\ ``Penny Pilot Securities'' are those issues quoted pursuant
to Exchange Rule 21.5, Interpretation and Policy .01.
\8\ ``ADV'' means average daily volume calculated as the number
of contracts added or removed, combined, per day.
\9\ ``TCV'' means total consolidated volume calculated as the
volume reported by all exchanges to the consolidated transaction
reporting plan for the month for which the fees apply, excluding
volume on any day that the Exchange experiences an Exchange System
Disruption and on any day with a scheduled early market close.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also proposes to adjust the rebate for Professional
\10\ and Firm \11\ orders in Penny Pilot Securities that add liquidity
and meet Professional/Firm Step-up Add Volume Tier 1 and Tier 2 from
$0.44 per contract to $0.42 per contract. The Exchange currently offers
a $0.44 rebate for Professional and Firm orders that add liquidity and
meet Professional/Firm Step-Up Add Volume Tier 1 or Tier 2. Meeting
Professional/Firm Step-up Add Volume Tier 1 requires that a Member has
an Options Step-up Add TCV \12\ from June 2014 baseline that is equal
to or greater than 0.50%. Meeting Professional/Firm Step-up Add Volume
Tier 2 requires that a Member has an Options Step-up Add TCV from
September 2014 baseline equal to or greater than 0.30% and an ADV equal
to or greater than 0.40% of average TCV. The Exchange is not proposing
to amend the requirements for meeting Professional/Firm Step-up Add
Volume Tier 1 or Tier 2. The Exchange notes that such changes will be
reflected in both the Standard Rates table and the Professional and
Firm Penny Pilot Add Volume Tiers under footnote 2 of the fee schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ ``Professional'' applies to any transaction identified by a
Member as such pursuant to Exchange Rule 16.1.
\11\ ``Firm'' applies to any transaction identified by a Member
for clearing in the Firm range at the OCC.
\12\ ``Options Step-up Add TCV'' means ADAV as a percentage of
TCV in the relevant baseline month subtracted from current ADAV as a
percentage of TCV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to implement the amendments to its fee
schedule effective immediately.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and,
in particular, with the requirements of Section 6 of the Act.\13\
Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\14\ in that it provides for
the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and other persons using any facility or system which the
Exchange operates or controls. The Exchange notes that it operates in a
highly competitive market in which market participants can readily
direct order flow to competing venues if they deem fee levels to be
excessive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Volume-based rebates and fees such as the ones currently maintained
on BATS Options have been widely adopted by equities and options
exchanges and are equitable because they are open to all Members on an
equal basis and provide additional benefits or discounts that are
reasonably related to the value to an exchange's market quality
associated with higher levels of market activity, such as higher levels
of liquidity provision and/or growth patterns, and introduction of
higher volumes of orders into the price and volume discovery processes.
The Exchange believes the proposed reduction of the rebate for orders
that add liquidity for Customers that meet Customer Add Volume Tier 1
is a reasonable, fair and equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory
allocation of fees and rebates because it will provide Members with a
greater incentive to increase their participation on BATS Options in
order to receive a higher rebate by meeting a higher Customer Add
Volume Tier. Currently, the difference between the rebate received for
orders that qualify for Customer Add Volume Tier 1 and those that
qualify for Customer Add Volume Tier 2 is only $0.03 per contract, but
as proposed, the difference would be $0.08 per contract.
[[Page 14193]]
As such, the Exchange believes that increasing the difference in the
rebates between the tiers will act to incentivize Members to increase
their ADV as a percentage of TCV to 0.30% in order to qualify for
Customer Add Volume Tier 2 and receive a rebate of $0.48 per contract.
Such increased participation on BATS Options will result in higher
levels of liquidity provision and introduction of higher volumes of
orders into the price and volume discovery processes, which will
benefit all participants on BATS Options.
The Exchange also believes that the proposed reduction of the
rebates for Professional/Firm Step-up Add Volume Tier 1 and Tier 2 is a
reasonable, fair and equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory
allocation of fees and rebates because, as stated above, the Exchange's
tiered pricing structure is designed such that fees and rebates are
related to the value of market quality associated with higher levels of
market activity, such as higher levels of liquidity provision and/or
growth patterns, and introduction of higher volumes of orders into the
price and volume discovery processes. As such, the Exchange believes
that it is reasonable, fair, and equitable to lower the rebates
associated with Professional/Firm Step-up Add Volume Tier 1 and Tier 2.
In this same light, the Exchange notes that the proposed amendments
would bring the rebate for Professional/Firm Step-up Add Volume Tier 1
and Tier 2 in line with that of the Market Maker Add Volume Tier. The
Exchange also notes that Professional and Firm orders can continue to
receive further enhanced rebates through the NBBO Setter Tiers and that
any order that qualifies for either Professional/Firm Step-Up Add
Volume Tier 1 or Tier 2 will also qualify for NBBO Setter Tier 1 where
the order sets the national best bid or offer.
The Exchange reiterates that it operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels to be excessive.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. With respect to the proposed
new rebates in Customer Add Volume Tier 1 and Professional/Firm Step-Up
Tier 1 and Tier 2, the Exchange does not believe that any such changes
burden competition, but instead, that they enhance competition, as they
are intended to increase the competitiveness of and draw additional
volume to BATS Options. As stated above, the Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants
can readily direct order flow to competing venues if the deem fee
structures to be unreasonable or excessive.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any written comments from members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \15\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\16\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BATS-2015-20 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BATS-2015-20. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BATS-2015-20 and should be
submitted on or before April 8, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-06124 Filed 3-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P