Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 13522-13524 [2015-05959]
Download as PDF
13522
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 50 / Monday, March 16, 2015 / Notices
the meeting. Parties wishing to submit
written comments for consideration by
the Committee in advance of this
meeting must send them to the Office of
Supply Chain, Professional & Business
Services, 1401 Constitution Ave NW.,
Room 11014, Washington, DC 20230, or
email to richard.boll@trade.gov.
For consideration during the
meetings, and to ensure transmission to
the Committee prior to the meetings,
comments must be received no later
than 5:00 p.m. EST on April 8, 2015.
Comments received after April 8, 2015,
will be distributed to the Committee,
but may not be considered at the
meetings. The minutes of the meetings
will be posted on the Committee Web
site within 60 days of the meeting.
Dated: March 9, 2015.
David Long,
Director, Office of Supply Chain, Professional
& Business Services.
[FR Doc. 2015–05883 Filed 3–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Manufacturing
Extension Partnership (MEP)
Management Information Reporting
National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before May 15, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at jjessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Deirdre McMahon, National
Institute of Standards and Technology—
Manufacturing Extension Partnership,
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 4800, 301–975–
8328 (phone). In addition, written
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:09 Mar 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
comments may be sent via email to
Deirdre.mcmahon@nist.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
I. Abstract
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Sponsored by NIST, the
Manufacturing Extension Partnership
(MEP) is a national network of locallybased manufacturing extension centers
working with small manufacturers to
assist them improve their productivity,
improve profitability and enhance their
economic competitiveness. The
information collected will provide the
MEP with information regarding MEP
Center performance regarding the
delivery of technology, and business
solutions to U.S.-based manufacturers.
The collected information will assist in
determining the performance of the
MEP Centers at both local and national
levels, provide information critical to
monitoring and reporting on MEP
programmatic performance, and assist
management in policy decisions.
Responses to the collection of
information are mandatory per the
regulations governing the operation of
the MEP Program (15 CFR parts 290,
291, 292, and H.R. 1274—section 2).
The information collected will include
center inputs and activities including
services delivered, clients served, center
staff, quarterly expenses and revenues,
partners, strategic plan, operation plans,
and client success stories. No
confidentiality for information
submitted is promised or provided.
In order to reflect new initiatives and
new data needs, NIST MEP has
identified a need to revise its existing
reporting processes by modifying
existing reporting elements that will
enable NIST MEP to better monitor and
assess the extent to which the Centers
are meeting program goals and
milestones.
II. Method of Collection
The information will be collected
from the MEP Centers through the MEP
Enterprise Information System (MEIS),
https://meis.nist.gov.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0693–0032.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission
(revision of a currently approved
information collection).
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
60.
Estimated Time per Response: 160
hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 9,600.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV. Request for Comments
Dated: March 11, 2015.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015–05890 Filed 3–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–849]
Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel
Plate From the People’s Republic of
China: Final Results of Administrative
Review; 2012–2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 21, 2014, the
Department of Commerce (the
‘‘Department’’) published the
preliminary results and partial
rescission of the 2012–2013
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain cutto-length carbon steel plate (‘‘CTL
plate’’) from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’), in accordance with
section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’).1 The
period of review (‘‘POR’’) is November
1, 2012, through October 31, 2013. This
review covers two PRC companies:
AGENCY:
1 See Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate
From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Administrative Review;
2012–2013, 79 FR 69425 (November 21, 2014)
(‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 50 / Monday, March 16, 2015 / Notices
Hunan Valin Xiangtan Iron & Steel Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘Hunan Valin’’), and Zhengzhou
Shangdao Iron & Steel Co. (‘‘Zhengzhou
Shangdao’’). The Department invited
interested parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. No parties
commented. Accordingly, our final
results remain unchanged from the
Preliminary Results.
DATES: Effective Date: March 16, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick O’Connor, AD/CVD Operations,
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–0989.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 21, 2014, the
Department published the Preliminary
Results. We invited interested parties to
submit comments on the Preliminary
Results, but no comments were
received.
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the order is
certain cut-to-length carbon steel plate
from the PRC. Included in this
description is hot-rolled iron and nonalloy steel universal mill plates (i.e.,
flat-rolled products rolled on four faces
or in a closed box pass, of a width
exceeding 150 millimeters (‘‘mm’’) but
not exceeding 1250 mm and of a
thickness of not less than 4 mm, not in
coils and without patterns of relief), of
rectangular shape, neither clad, plated
nor coated with metal, whether or not
painted, varnished, or coated with
plastics or other nonmetallic substances;
and certain iron and non-alloy steel flatrolled products not in coils, of
rectangular shape, hot-rolled, neither
clad, plated nor coated with metal,
whether or not painted, varnished, or
covered with plastics or other
nonmetallic substances, 4.75 mm or
more in thickness and of a width which
exceeds 150mm and measures at least
twice the thickness. Included as subject
merchandise in this order are flat-rolled
products of nonrectangular cross-section
where such cross-section is achieved
subsequent to the rolling process (i.e.,
products which have been ‘‘worked
after rolling’’)—for example, products
which have been beveled or rounded at
the edges. This merchandise is currently
classified in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’) under item numbers
7208.40.3030, 7208.40.3060,
7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045,
7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:09 Mar 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
7208.53.0000, 7208.90.0000,
7210.70.3000, 7212.40.5000, and
7212.50.0000. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of the
order is dispositive. Specifically
excluded from subject merchandise
within the scope of the order is grade X–
70 steel plate.
Final Determination of No Shipments
In the Preliminary Results, we
determined that Hunan Valin did not
have any reviewable transactions during
the POR because Hunan Valin
submitted a timely-filed certification
that it had no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR and U.S.
import data did not show any POR
entries of Hunan Valin’s subject
merchandise.2 We did not receive
information from U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) indicating
that there were reviewable transactions
for Hunan Valin during the POR.
Consistent with the Department’s
assessment practice in non-market
economy (‘‘NME’’) cases, we stated in
the Preliminary Results that the
Department would not rescind the
review in these circumstances but,
rather, would complete the review with
respect to Hunan Valin and issue
appropriate instructions to CBP based
on the final results of the review.3 As
stated above, we did not receive any
comments on our Preliminary Results.
In these final results, we continue to
determine that Hunan Valin had no
reviewable transactions of subject
merchandise during the POR.
Treatment of Zhengzhou Shangdao
In the Preliminary Results, we
determined that because Zhengzhou
Shangdao did not respond to the
questionnaire and did not provide
separate rate information, it did not
establish its eligibility for separate rate
status and is part of the PRC-wide
entity.4 The Department then
preliminarily determined that it had to
rely on facts otherwise available to
assign a dumping margin to the PRCwide entity in accordance with sections
776(a)(1), 776(a)(2)(A), and 776(a)(2)(C)
of the Act, because necessary
information was not on the record, the
PRC-wide entity (Zhengzhou Shangdao)
2 See Preliminary Results, and accompanying
Decision Memorandum, at 3.
3 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (‘‘Assessment Practice
Refinement’’); see also the ‘‘Assessment’’ section of
this notice, below.
4 See Preliminary Results, and accompanying
Decision Memorandum, at 3–4.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13523
had withheld information that was
requested of it, and, by not providing
requested information, the entity had
significantly impeded the proceeding.
We further preliminarily found that
Zhengzhou Shangdao’s failure to
provide the requested information
constituted circumstances under which
the company and, hence, the PRC-wide
entity, had not acted to the best of its
ability to comply with the Department’s
request for information. We therefore
preliminarily determined, pursuant to
section 776(b) of the Act, that the PRCwide entity failed to cooperate by not
acting to the best of its ability and that,
accordingly, when selecting from among
the facts otherwise available, an adverse
inference was warranted with respect to
the PRC-wide entity.
Therefore, for these final results, the
Department finds that Zhengzhou
Shangdao is part of the PRC-wide entity
and that the use of adverse facts
available is warranted with respect to
the PRC-wide entity.
Final Results of Review
The Department determines that the
following weighted-average dumping
margin exists for the period November
1, 2012, through October 31, 2013:
Exporter
PRC-wide entity 5 ..................
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
128.59
Assessment
The Department will determine, and
CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on
all appropriate entries covered by this
review.6 The Department intends to
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15
days after the date of publication of
these final results of review. The
Department intends to instruct CBP to
liquidate entries of subject merchandise
from Zhengzhou Shangdao at the PRCwide rate of 128.59 percent.
Additionally, consistent with the
Department’s assessment practice
refinement in NME cases, because the
Department determined that Hunan
Valin had no reviewable transactions of
subject merchandise during the POR,
any suspended entries that entered
under Hunan Valin’s antidumping duty
case number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate)
will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.7
5 The PRC-wide entity includes Zhengzhou
Shangdao Iron & Steel Co.
6 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
7 See Assessment Practice Refinement.
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
13524
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 50 / Monday, March 16, 2015 / Notices
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise from the PRC
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Hunan
Valin, which claimed no shipments, the
cash deposit rate will remain unchanged
from the rate assigned to this company
in the most recently completed review
of the company; (2) for previously
investigated or reviewed PRC and nonPRC exporters which are not under
review in this segment of the proceeding
but which have separate rates, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
exporter-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) for all PRC
exporters of subject merchandise that
have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, including Zhengzhou
Shangdao, the cash deposit rate will be
the PRC-wide rate of 128.59 percent;
and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of
subject merchandise which have not
received their own rate, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate applicable to the
PRC exporter(s) that supplied that nonPRC exporter. These deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers Regarding the
Reimbursement of Duties
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Department’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
has occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to the administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
notification of the destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these
results and this notice in accordance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:09 Mar 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the
Act.
Dated: March 9, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–05959 Filed 3–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulation
System
[Docket Number 2015–0007]
Information Collection Requirement;
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; DFARS Part
245, Government Property
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments regarding a proposed
extension of an approved information
collection requirement.
AGENCY:
In compliance with Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), DoD announces the
proposed extension of a public
information collection requirement and
seeks public comment on the provisions
thereof. DoD invites comments on
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of DoD,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways
to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and to minimize the burden
of the information collection on
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has approved this information
collection under Control Number 0704–
0246 for use through December 31,
2014. DoD is proposing that OMB
extend its approval for use for three
additional years.
DATES: DoD will consider all comments
received by May 15, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by OMB Control Number
0704–0246, using any of the following
methods:
Æ Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Æ Email: osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include
OMB Control Number 0704–0246 in the
subject line of the message.
Æ Fax: (571) 372–6094.
Æ Mail: Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Attn: Mr. Mark
Gomersall, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS),
Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Mark Gomersall, at (571) 372–6099. The
information collection requirements
addressed in this notice are available on
the World Wide Web at: https://
www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfarspgi/
current/index.htm. Paper copies are
available from Mr. Mark Gomersall,
OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS), Room
3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title, Associated Forms, and OMB
Number: Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) part
245, Government Property, and the
following related clauses and forms:
DFARS 252.245–7003, Contractor
Property Management System
Administration; 252.245–7004,
Reporting, Reutilization, and Disposal;
DD Form 1348–1A, DoD Single Line
item Release/Receipt Document; DD
Form 1639, Disposal Determination/
Approval; OMB Control Number 0704–
0246.
Needs and Uses: This requirement
provides for the collection of
information related to providing
Government property to contractors;
contractor use and management of
Government property; and reporting,
redistribution, and disposal of property.
a. DFARS 245.302(1)(i): DFARS
245.302 concerns contracts with foreign
governments or international
organizations. Paragraph (1)(i) requires
contractors to request and obtain
contracting officer approval before using
Government property on work for
foreign governments and international
organizations.
b. DFARS 245.604–3(b) and (d):
DFARS 245.604–3 concerns the sale of
surplus Government property. Under
paragraph (b), a contractor may be
directed by the plant clearance officer to
issue informal invitations for bids.
Under paragraph (d), a contractor may
be authorized by the plant clearance
officer to purchase or retain Government
property at less than cost if the plant
clearance officer determines this
method is essential for expeditious
plant clearance.
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 50 (Monday, March 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13522-13524]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05959]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-849]
Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From the People's
Republic of China: Final Results of Administrative Review; 2012-2013
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 21, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the
``Department'') published the preliminary results and partial
rescission of the 2012-2013 administrative review of the antidumping
duty order on certain cut-to-length carbon steel plate (``CTL plate'')
from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''), in accordance with
section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the
Act'').\1\ The period of review (``POR'') is November 1, 2012, through
October 31, 2013. This review covers two PRC companies:
[[Page 13523]]
Hunan Valin Xiangtan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (``Hunan Valin''), and
Zhengzhou Shangdao Iron & Steel Co. (``Zhengzhou Shangdao''). The
Department invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary
Results. No parties commented. Accordingly, our final results remain
unchanged from the Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From the
People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 69425 (November 21, 2014)
(``Preliminary Results'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: March 16, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick O'Connor, AD/CVD Operations,
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0989.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 21, 2014, the Department published the Preliminary
Results. We invited interested parties to submit comments on the
Preliminary Results, but no comments were received.
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the order is certain cut-to-length carbon
steel plate from the PRC. Included in this description is hot-rolled
iron and non-alloy steel universal mill plates (i.e., flat-rolled
products rolled on four faces or in a closed box pass, of a width
exceeding 150 millimeters (``mm'') but not exceeding 1250 mm and of a
thickness of not less than 4 mm, not in coils and without patterns of
relief), of rectangular shape, neither clad, plated nor coated with
metal, whether or not painted, varnished, or coated with plastics or
other nonmetallic substances; and certain iron and non-alloy steel
flat-rolled products not in coils, of rectangular shape, hot-rolled,
neither clad, plated nor coated with metal, whether or not painted,
varnished, or covered with plastics or other nonmetallic substances,
4.75 mm or more in thickness and of a width which exceeds 150mm and
measures at least twice the thickness. Included as subject merchandise
in this order are flat-rolled products of nonrectangular cross-section
where such cross-section is achieved subsequent to the rolling process
(i.e., products which have been ``worked after rolling'')--for example,
products which have been beveled or rounded at the edges. This
merchandise is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (``HTSUS'') under item numbers 7208.40.3030,
7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000,
7208.53.0000, 7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000, 7212.40.5000, and
7212.50.0000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope
of the order is dispositive. Specifically excluded from subject
merchandise within the scope of the order is grade X-70 steel plate.
Final Determination of No Shipments
In the Preliminary Results, we determined that Hunan Valin did not
have any reviewable transactions during the POR because Hunan Valin
submitted a timely-filed certification that it had no shipments of
subject merchandise during the POR and U.S. import data did not show
any POR entries of Hunan Valin's subject merchandise.\2\ We did not
receive information from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'')
indicating that there were reviewable transactions for Hunan Valin
during the POR. Consistent with the Department's assessment practice in
non-market economy (``NME'') cases, we stated in the Preliminary
Results that the Department would not rescind the review in these
circumstances but, rather, would complete the review with respect to
Hunan Valin and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the
final results of the review.\3\ As stated above, we did not receive any
comments on our Preliminary Results. In these final results, we
continue to determine that Hunan Valin had no reviewable transactions
of subject merchandise during the POR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Preliminary Results, and accompanying Decision
Memorandum, at 3.
\3\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (``Assessment
Practice Refinement''); see also the ``Assessment'' section of this
notice, below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Treatment of Zhengzhou Shangdao
In the Preliminary Results, we determined that because Zhengzhou
Shangdao did not respond to the questionnaire and did not provide
separate rate information, it did not establish its eligibility for
separate rate status and is part of the PRC-wide entity.\4\ The
Department then preliminarily determined that it had to rely on facts
otherwise available to assign a dumping margin to the PRC-wide entity
in accordance with sections 776(a)(1), 776(a)(2)(A), and 776(a)(2)(C)
of the Act, because necessary information was not on the record, the
PRC-wide entity (Zhengzhou Shangdao) had withheld information that was
requested of it, and, by not providing requested information, the
entity had significantly impeded the proceeding. We further
preliminarily found that Zhengzhou Shangdao's failure to provide the
requested information constituted circumstances under which the company
and, hence, the PRC-wide entity, had not acted to the best of its
ability to comply with the Department's request for information. We
therefore preliminarily determined, pursuant to section 776(b) of the
Act, that the PRC-wide entity failed to cooperate by not acting to the
best of its ability and that, accordingly, when selecting from among
the facts otherwise available, an adverse inference was warranted with
respect to the PRC-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Preliminary Results, and accompanying Decision
Memorandum, at 3-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Therefore, for these final results, the Department finds that
Zhengzhou Shangdao is part of the PRC-wide entity and that the use of
adverse facts available is warranted with respect to the PRC-wide
entity.
Final Results of Review
The Department determines that the following weighted-average
dumping margin exists for the period November 1, 2012, through October
31, 2013:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PRC-wide entity \5\..................................... 128.59
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The PRC-wide entity includes Zhengzhou Shangdao Iron & Steel
Co.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment
The Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\6\ The
Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of these final results of review. The
Department intends to instruct CBP to liquidate entries of subject
merchandise from Zhengzhou Shangdao at the PRC-wide rate of 128.59
percent. Additionally, consistent with the Department's assessment
practice refinement in NME cases, because the Department determined
that Hunan Valin had no reviewable transactions of subject merchandise
during the POR, any suspended entries that entered under Hunan Valin's
antidumping duty case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be
liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
\7\ See Assessment Practice Refinement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 13524]]
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Hunan Valin, which
claimed no shipments, the cash deposit rate will remain unchanged from
the rate assigned to this company in the most recently completed review
of the company; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and
non-PRC exporters which are not under review in this segment of the
proceeding but which have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent
period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not
been found to be entitled to a separate rate, including Zhengzhou
Shangdao, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 128.59
percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which
have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the
rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC
exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in
effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties has occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to the
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely notification of the
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing these results and this notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: March 9, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-05959 Filed 3-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P