Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2012-2013, 13332-13334 [2015-05828]

Download as PDF 13332 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 49 / Friday, March 13, 2015 / Notices clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they will also become a matter of public record. Dated: March 9, 2015. Marcie Lovett, Records Management Division Director, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2015–05781 Filed 3–12–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–16–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Ocean Exploration Advisory Board (OEAB); Notice of Public Meeting Office of Ocean Exploration and Research (OER), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce (DOC). ACTION: Notice of public meeting. AGENCY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of a forthcoming meeting of the Ocean Exploration Advisory Board (OEAB). OEAB members will discuss and provide advice on Federal ocean exploration programs, with a particular emphasis on National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Office of Ocean Exploration and Research (OER) activities, in the areas of: Strategic planning, current and future exploration priorities, the competitive grants process, citizen exploration, the next National Forum on Ocean Exploration, and other matters as described in the agenda found on the OEAB Web site at https://oeab/noaa.gov. Time and Dates: The announced meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, March 31, 2015, from 8:30 a.m.–4:30 p.m. PDT, and Wednesday, April 1, 2015, from 9:00 a.m.–3:00 p.m. PDT. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Seaside Forum, 8610 Kennel Way, La Jolla, CA 92037. Status: The meeting will be open to public participation with a 15-minute public comment period on Wednesday, April 1, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. PDT (please mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:27 Mar 12, 2015 Jkt 235001 check the agenda on the Web site to confirm the time). The OEAB expects that public statements at its meetings will not be repetitive of previously submitted verbal or written statements. In general, each individual or group making a verbal presentation will be limited to a total time of three minutes. The Designated Federal Officer should receive written comments by March 24, 2015, to provide sufficient time for OEAB review. Written comments received after March 24, 2015, will be distributed to the OEAB but may not be reviewed prior to the meeting date. Seats will be available on a first-come, first-served basis. Special Accomodations: These meetings are physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to David McKinnie, Designated Federal Officer, at (206) 526–6950 by March 16, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David McKinnie, Designated Federal Officer, Ocean Exploration Advisory Board, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 7600 Sand Point Way, NE., Seattle, WA 98115, (206) 526–6950. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NOAA established the OEAB under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) and legislation that gives the agency statutory authority to operate an ocean exploration program and to coordinate a national program of ocean exploration. The OEAB advises NOAA leaderships on strategic planning, exploration priorities, competitive ocean exploration grant programs and other matters as the NOAA Administrator requests. OEAB members represent government agencies involved in ocean exploration, the private sector, academic institutions, and not-for-profit institutions involved in all facets of ocean exploration—from advanced technology to citizen exploration. In addition to advising NOAA leadership, NOAA expects the OEAB to play a leadership role in helping to define and develop a national program of ocean exploration—a network of stakeholders and partnerships advancing national priorities for ocean exploration. Dated: March 6, 2015. Jason Donaldson, Chief Financial Officer, Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. [FR Doc. 2015–05775 Filed 3–12–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–KA–P PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–918] Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2012–2013 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On November 5, 2014, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published the Preliminary Results of the fifth administrative review of the antidumping duty order on steel wire garment hangers from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. Based on our analysis of the comments and information received, we have not made changes to the final margin calculations of Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shanghai Wells’’).2 Listed below in the ‘‘Final Results of the Administrative Review’’ section of this notice are the final dumping margins. The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is October 1, 2012, through September 31, 2013.3 DATES: Effective Date: March 13, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Josh Startup or Alexis Polovina, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5260 or (202) 482– 3927, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: 1 See Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012– 2013, 79 FR 65616 (November 5, 2014) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 2 The Department previously found that Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Wells Ltd. (‘‘HK Wells’’) and Hong Kong Wells Ltd. (USA) (‘‘Wells USA’’) are affiliated and that Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd. and HK Wells comprise a single entity (collectively, ‘‘Shanghai Wells’’). Because there were no changes in this review to the facts that supported that decision, we continue to find Shanghai Wells, HK Wells, and USA Wells are affiliated and that Shanghai Wells and HK Wells comprise a single entity. See Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Preliminary Rescission, in Part, of the First Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 68758, 68761 (November 9, 2010), unchanged in First Administrative Review of Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 27994, 27996 (May 13, 2011). 3 The deadline for the final results was March 5, 2015, however, due to inclement weather, the government was closed on March 5, 2015. Therefore, the deadline for the final results falls on the next business day, March 6, 2015. E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM 13MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 49 / Friday, March 13, 2015 / Notices Background The Department published the Preliminary Results on November 5, 2014. On December 5, 2014, M&B Metal Products Inc. (‘‘Petitioner’’), Fabriclean Supply Inc. (‘‘Fabriclean’’), a U.S. importer and wholesaler, and Ningbo Dasheng, a mandatory respondent, submitted case briefs in the administrative review. On December 10, 2014, Petitioner submitted a rebuttal brief. Scope of the Order The merchandise that is subject to the order is steel wire garment hangers. The products subject to the order are currently classified under U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings 7326.20.0020, 7323.99.9060, and 7323.99.9080. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise remains dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum,4 which is hereby adopted by this notice. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by interested parties in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues which parties raised is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file in the Central Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’), Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building, as well as electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and to all parties in the CRU. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at https://www. trade.gov/enforcement/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Determination of No Shipments In the Preliminary Results, the Department preliminarily determined that Hangzhou Yingqing Material Co., 4 See the Department’s Memorandum, titled ‘‘Steel Wire Garment Hangers from the People’s Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Fourth Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Review,’’ dated concurrently with this notice (‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’). VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:27 Mar 12, 2015 Jkt 235001 13333 Ltd. and Hangzhou Qingqing Mechanical Co., Ltd., did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR. We have not received any information to contradict this determination. Therefore, for these final results, the Department determines that Hangzhou Yingqing Material Co., Ltd. and Hangzhou Qingqing Mechanical Co., Ltd., did not have any reviewable entries of subject merchandise during the POR. Accordingly, consistent with the Department’s refinement to its assessment practice in non-market economy (‘‘NME’’) cases, the Department intends to issue appropriate instructions to Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) based on the final results of the review.5 Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review. Where the respondent reported reliable entered values, we calculated importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rates by aggregating the dumping margins calculated for all U.S. sales to each importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total entered value of the sales to each Final Results of the Administrative importer (or customer).8 Where the Review Department calculated a weightedRegarding the administrative review, average dumping margin by dividing the the following weighted-average total amount of dumping for reviewed dumping margins exist for the period October 1, 2012, through September 30, sales to that party by the total sales quantity associated with those 2013: transactions, the Department will direct CBP to assess importer-specific Weightedaverage assessment rates based on the resulting Exporter margin per-unit rates.9 Where an importer- (or (percent) customer-) specific ad valorem or perunit rate is greater than de minimis, the Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd.6 ....................................... 14.53 Department will instruct CBP to collect PRC-wide Entity 7 ..................... 187.25 the appropriate duties at the time of liquidation.10 Where an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem or perDisclosure unit rate is zero or de minimis, the We will disclose the calculations Department will instruct CBP to performed within five days of the date of publication of this notice to parties in liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.11 this proceeding in accordance with 19 The Department announced a CFR 351.224(b). refinement to its assessment practice in NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement 5 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 in practice, for entries that were not FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). reported in the U.S. sales databases 6 Shanghai Wells consists of Shanghai Wells submitted by companies individually Hanger Co., Ltd., and Hong Kong Wells Ltd. examined during this review, the 7 The PRC-wide entity includes all companies for which the Department initiated a review but did not Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide establish their eligibility for a separate rate: 1) Shaoxing Zhongbao Metal Manufactured Co., Ltd.; rate. Additionally, if the Department 2) Shaoxing Shunji Metal Clotheshorse Co., Ltd.; 3) determines that an exporter had no Shanghai Jianhai International Trade Co., Ltd.; 4) shipments of the subject merchandise, Feirongda Weaving Material Co. Ltd.; 5) Hongye (HK) Group Development Co. Ltd.; 6) Liaoning any suspended entries that entered Metals & Mineral Imp/Exp Corp.; 7) Ningbo under that exporter’s case number (i.e., Bingcheng Import & Export Co., Ltd.; 8) Ningbo at that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated Peacebird Import & Export Co., Ltd.; 9) Shang Zhou at the PRC-wide rate.12 Leather Shoes Plant; 10) Shanghai Ding Ying Printing & Dyeing Co. Ltd.; 11) Shanghai Guoxing Metal Products Co. Ltd.; 12) Shanghai Lian Development Co. Ltd.; 13) Shanghai Shuang Qiang Embroidery Factory; 14) Shaoxing Guochao Metallic Products Co., Ltd.; 15) Shaoxing Liangbao Metal Manufactured Co. Ltd.; 16) Shaoxing Meideli Hanger Co. Ltd.; 17) Shaoxing Shuren Tie Co., Ltd.; 18) Shaoxing Zhongdi Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.; 19) Tianjin Innovation International; 20) Tianjin Tailai Import and Export Co. Ltd.; 21) Wesken International (Kunshan) Co. Ltd.; 22) Zhejiang Hongfei Plastic Industry Co. Ltd.; 23) Zhejiang Jaguar Import and Export Co. Ltd.; 24) Shangyu Baoxiang; 25) Shaoxing Dingli; 26) Lucky Cloud; 27) the Shaoxing Entity; and 28) Ningbo Dasheng. PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this 8 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 9 Id. 10 Id. 11 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). 12 See E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM 13MRN1 13334 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 49 / Friday, March 13, 2015 / Notices review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above, the cash deposit rate will be established in the final results of these reviews (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 187.25 percent; and (4) for all nonPRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Dated: March 6, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Notification to Importers [S–3–2015] This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Approval of Subzone Status; Thyssenkrupp Presta Danville, LLC; Danville, Illinois mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. We request a timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing this administrative review and notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:27 Mar 12, 2015 Jkt 235001 Appendix—Issues and Decision Memorandum List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Application of Adverse Facts Available Comment 2: Selection of the Surrogate Country Comment 3: Selection of Financial Statements Comment 4: Whether the Department Should Revise the Surrogate Value for Brokerage and Handling (‘‘B&H’’) Comment 5: Whether the Thai AUV for Corrugated Paper Is Aberrational [FR Doc. 2015–05828 Filed 3–12–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board On January 14, 2015, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Economic Development Corporation of Decatur & Macon County, grantee of FTZ 245, requesting subzone status subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 245, on behalf of Thyssenkrupp Presta Danville, LLC, in Danville, Illinois. The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public comment (80 FR 2914, 1–21–2015). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 245C is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 245’s 1,822-acre activation limit. Dated: March 6, 2015. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–05856 Filed 3–12–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [S–165–2014) Approval of Expansion of Subzone 57C; DNP Imagingcomm America Corporation; Concord, North Carolina On December 10, 2014, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Charlotte Regional Partnership, Inc., grantee of FTZ 57, requesting the expansion of Subzone 57C subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 57, on behalf of DNP Imagingcomm America Corporation in Concord, North Carolina. The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public comment (79 FR 75125, 12–10–2014). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board’s Executive Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the application to expand Subzone 57C is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 57’s 2,000acre activation limit. Dated: March 9, 2015. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–05833 Filed 3–12–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648–XD819 Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice; scoping workshops. AGENCY: The Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council (Council) will hold scoping workshops for Coastal Migratory Species Amendments 26 & 28. SUMMARY: The scoping workshops will be held from Monday, March 30 through Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at nine locations throughout the Gulf of Mexico. The scoping workshops will begin at 6 p.m. and will conclude no later than 9 DATES: E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM 13MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 49 (Friday, March 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13332-13334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05828]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-918]


Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 2012-2013

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 5, 2014, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') published the Preliminary Results of the fifth 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on steel wire 
garment hangers from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'').\1\ We 
invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. Based on our 
analysis of the comments and information received, we have not made 
changes to the final margin calculations of Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., 
Ltd. (``Shanghai Wells'').\2\ Listed below in the ``Final Results of 
the Administrative Review'' section of this notice are the final 
dumping margins. The period of review (``POR'') is October 1, 2012, 
through September 31, 2013.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of 
China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 65616 (November 5, 2014) (``Preliminary 
Results'').
    \2\ The Department previously found that Shanghai Wells Hanger 
Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Wells Ltd. (``HK Wells'') and Hong Kong Wells 
Ltd. (USA) (``Wells USA'') are affiliated and that Shanghai Wells 
Hanger Co., Ltd. and HK Wells comprise a single entity 
(collectively, ``Shanghai Wells''). Because there were no changes in 
this review to the facts that supported that decision, we continue 
to find Shanghai Wells, HK Wells, and USA Wells are affiliated and 
that Shanghai Wells and HK Wells comprise a single entity. See Steel 
Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China: 
Preliminary Results and Preliminary Rescission, in Part, of the 
First Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 68758, 68761 
(November 9, 2010), unchanged in First Administrative Review of 
Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results and Final Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review, 76 FR 27994, 27996 (May 13, 2011).
    \3\ The deadline for the final results was March 5, 2015, 
however, due to inclement weather, the government was closed on 
March 5, 2015. Therefore, the deadline for the final results falls 
on the next business day, March 6, 2015.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: March 13, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Josh Startup or Alexis Polovina, AD/
CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
5260 or (202) 482-3927, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

[[Page 13333]]

Background

    The Department published the Preliminary Results on November 5, 
2014. On December 5, 2014, M&B Metal Products Inc. (``Petitioner''), 
Fabriclean Supply Inc. (``Fabriclean''), a U.S. importer and 
wholesaler, and Ningbo Dasheng, a mandatory respondent, submitted case 
briefs in the administrative review. On December 10, 2014, Petitioner 
submitted a rebuttal brief.

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise that is subject to the order is steel wire garment 
hangers. The products subject to the order are currently classified 
under U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule (``HTSUS'') subheadings 
7326.20.0020, 7323.99.9060, and 7323.99.9080. Although the HTSUS 
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the 
written description of the merchandise remains dispositive. A full 
description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum,\4\ which is hereby adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See the Department's Memorandum, titled ``Steel Wire Garment 
Hangers from the People's Republic of China: Issues and Decision 
Memorandum for the Final Results of the Fourth Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review and New Shipper Review,'' dated concurrently 
with this notice (``Issues and Decision Memorandum'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by interested 
parties in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum. A list of the issues which parties raised is attached to 
this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 
public document and is on file in the Central Records Unit (``CRU''), 
Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building, as well as 
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). 
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and 
to all parties in the CRU. In addition, a complete version of the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet 
at https://www.trade.gov/enforcement/. The signed Issues and Decision 
Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum are identical in content.

Final Determination of No Shipments

    In the Preliminary Results, the Department preliminarily determined 
that Hangzhou Yingqing Material Co., Ltd. and Hangzhou Qingqing 
Mechanical Co., Ltd., did not have any reviewable transactions during 
the POR. We have not received any information to contradict this 
determination. Therefore, for these final results, the Department 
determines that Hangzhou Yingqing Material Co., Ltd. and Hangzhou 
Qingqing Mechanical Co., Ltd., did not have any reviewable entries of 
subject merchandise during the POR. Accordingly, consistent with the 
Department's refinement to its assessment practice in non-market 
economy (``NME'') cases, the Department intends to issue appropriate 
instructions to Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') based on the 
final results of the review.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the Administrative Review

    Regarding the administrative review, the following weighted-average 
dumping margins exist for the period October 1, 2012, through  
September 30, 2013:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Shanghai Wells consists of Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd., 
and Hong Kong Wells Ltd.
    \7\ The PRC-wide entity includes all companies for which the 
Department initiated a review but did not establish their 
eligibility for a separate rate: 1) Shaoxing Zhongbao Metal 
Manufactured Co., Ltd.; 2) Shaoxing Shunji Metal Clotheshorse Co., 
Ltd.; 3) Shanghai Jianhai International Trade Co., Ltd.; 4) 
Feirongda Weaving Material Co. Ltd.; 5) Hongye (HK) Group 
Development Co. Ltd.; 6) Liaoning Metals & Mineral Imp/Exp Corp.; 7) 
Ningbo Bingcheng Import & Export Co., Ltd.; 8) Ningbo Peacebird 
Import & Export Co., Ltd.; 9) Shang Zhou Leather Shoes Plant; 10) 
Shanghai Ding Ying Printing & Dyeing Co. Ltd.; 11) Shanghai Guoxing 
Metal Products Co. Ltd.; 12) Shanghai Lian Development Co. Ltd.; 13) 
Shanghai Shuang Qiang Embroidery Factory; 14) Shaoxing Guochao 
Metallic Products Co., Ltd.; 15) Shaoxing Liangbao Metal 
Manufactured Co. Ltd.; 16) Shaoxing Meideli Hanger Co. Ltd.; 17) 
Shaoxing Shuren Tie Co., Ltd.; 18) Shaoxing Zhongdi Foreign Trade 
Co., Ltd.; 19) Tianjin Innovation International; 20) Tianjin Tailai 
Import and Export Co. Ltd.; 21) Wesken International (Kunshan) Co. 
Ltd.; 22) Zhejiang Hongfei Plastic Industry Co. Ltd.; 23) Zhejiang 
Jaguar Import and Export Co. Ltd.; 24) Shangyu Baoxiang; 25) 
Shaoxing Dingli; 26) Lucky Cloud; 27) the Shaoxing Entity; and 28) 
Ningbo Dasheng.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Weighted-
                                                               average
                          Exporter                              margin
                                                              (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd.\6\.........................        14.53
PRC-wide Entity \7\........................................       187.25
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We will disclose the calculations performed within five days of the 
date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), 
the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties 
on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with 
the final results of this review. The Department intends to issue 
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of 
these final results of review.
    Where the respondent reported reliable entered values, we 
calculated importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rates by 
aggregating the dumping margins calculated for all U.S. sales to each 
importer (or customer) and dividing this amount by the total entered 
value of the sales to each importer (or customer).\8\ Where the 
Department calculated a weighted-average dumping margin by dividing the 
total amount of dumping for reviewed sales to that party by the total 
sales quantity associated with those transactions, the Department will 
direct CBP to assess importer-specific assessment rates based on the 
resulting per-unit rates.\9\ Where an importer- (or customer-) specific 
ad valorem or per-unit rate is greater than de minimis, the Department 
will instruct CBP to collect the appropriate duties at the time of 
liquidation.\10\ Where an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem 
or per-unit rate is zero or de minimis, the Department will instruct 
CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping 
duties.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \9\ Id.
    \10\ Id.
    \11\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department announced a refinement to its assessment practice in 
NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that 
were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies 
individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct 
CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate. Additionally, if 
the Department determines that an exporter had no shipments of the 
subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that 
exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be 
liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of this

[[Page 13334]]

review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, 
or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the 
publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 
For the companies listed above, the cash deposit rate will be 
established in the final results of these reviews (except, if the rate 
is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required); (2) 
for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not 
listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this 
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-
specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all PRC 
exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be 
entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide 
rate of 187.25 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject 
merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit 
rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that 
non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the 
proceeding. We request a timely written notification of the return or 
destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective 
order. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a 
violation which is subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing this administrative review and notice 
in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: March 6, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix--Issues and Decision Memorandum

List of Topics Discussed in the Final Decision Memorandum

Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Application of Adverse Facts Available
    Comment 2: Selection of the Surrogate Country
    Comment 3: Selection of Financial Statements
    Comment 4: Whether the Department Should Revise the Surrogate 
Value for Brokerage and Handling (``B&H'')
    Comment 5: Whether the Thai AUV for Corrugated Paper Is 
Aberrational
[FR Doc. 2015-05828 Filed 3-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.