Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act: Transmission of Documents and Information, 12917-12933 [2015-05103]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 48 / Thursday, March 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
the Administrator has determined that
prior notice and opportunity for public
comment are contrary to the public
interest and that there is good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553 for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
We will consider comments we
receive during the comment period for
this interim rule (see DATES above).
After the comment period closes, we
will publish another document in the
Federal Register. The document will
include a discussion of any comments
we receive and any amendments we are
making to the rule.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This interim rule is subject to
Executive Order 12866. However, for
this action, the Office of Management
and Budget has waived its review under
Executive Order 12866.
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, we have analyzed the
potential economic effects of this action
on small entities. The analysis is
summarized below. The full analysis
may be viewed on the Regulations.gov
Web site (see ADDRESSES above for
instructions for accessing
Regulations.gov) or obtained from the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
We are amending the gypsy moth
regulations by adding areas in
Minnesota, Virginia, West Virginia, and
Wisconsin to the list of generally
infested areas based on detected
infestations of gypsy moth. As a result
of this action, the interstate movement
of regulated articles from those areas is
restricted.
This interim rule will affect
businesses such as nurseries, Christmas
tree farms, and timber companies that
are located within the newly
quarantined areas and that transport
regulated articles interstate. Agricultural
entities in the newly quarantined areas
are predominantly, if not entirely, small
entities.
We do not anticipate any significant
economic impacts resulting from this
action. APHIS works closely with State
officials through quarantines and
regulatory programs to limit the
artificial spread of gypsy moth beyond
infested areas, and stakeholders support
these efforts. Many of the potentially
affected entities are already operating
under compliance agreements.
Businesses with compliance agreements
can self-inspect regulated articles
moved from quarantined areas.
Businesses without compliance
agreements can have inspection and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Mar 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
12917
certification services provided by State
or Federal officials at no cost.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
■
Executive Order 12372
Cook County. The entire county.
Lake County. The entire county.
*
*
*
*
*
This program/activity is listed in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
under No. 10.025 and is subject to
Executive Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials. (See 7 CFR part
3015, subpart V.)
d. Under the heading Wisconsin, by
adding an entry for Iowa County in
alphabetical order.
The additions read as follows:
§ 301.45–3
Generally infested areas.
(a) * * *
Minnesota
Virginia
*
*
*
*
*
Tazewell County. The entire county.
*
*
*
*
*
Executive Order 12988
West Virginia
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule: (1) Preempts all State
and local laws and regulations that are
inconsistent with this rule; (2) has no
retroactive effect; and (3) does not
require administrative proceedings
before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
*
Paperwork Reduction Act
Wisconsin
This rule contains no new
information collection or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
*
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301
■
Agricultural commodities, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation.
Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR
part 301 as follows:
Done in Washington, DC, this 6th day of
March 2015.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
PART 301—DOMESTIC QUARANTINE
NOTICES
1. The authority citation for part 301
continues to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
McDowell County. The entire county.
Mercer County. The entire county.
*
*
*
*
*
Raleigh County. The entire county.
*
*
*
*
*
Summers County. The entire county.
*
*
*
*
*
Wyoming County. The entire county.
*
*
*
*
Iowa County. The entire county.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 301.45–4
[Amended]
3. In § 301.45–4, paragraph (b) is
amended by removing the last sentence
of the paragraph.
[FR Doc. 2015–05661 Filed 3–11–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
■
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781–
7786; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Section 301.75–15 issued under Sec. 204,
Title II, Public Law 106–113, 113 Stat.
1501A–293; sections 301.75–15 and 301.75–
16 issued under Sec. 203, Title II, Public Law
106–224, 114 Stat. 400 (7 U.S.C. 1421 note).
Office of Workers’ Compensation
Programs
2. In § 301.45–3, paragraph (a) is
amended as follows:
■ a. By adding, in alphabetical order, an
entry for Minnesota.
■ b. Under the heading Virginia, by
adding an entry for Tazewell County in
alphabetical order.
■ c. Under the heading West Virginia,
by adding entries for McDowell County,
Mercer County, Raleigh County,
Summers County, and Wyoming County
in alphabetical order.
Longshore and Harbor Workers’
Compensation Act: Transmission of
Documents and Information
■
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20 CFR Parts 702 and 703
RIN 1240–AA09
Office of Workers’
Compensation Programs, Labor.
ACTION: Direct final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
Parties to claims arising under
the Longshore and Harbor Workers’
Compensation Act and its extensions
(LHWCA or Act) and entities required to
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
12918
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 48 / Thursday, March 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
have insurance pursuant to the Act
frequently correspond with the Office of
Workers’ Compensation Programs
(OWCP) and each other. The current
regulations require that some of these
communications be made in paper form
via a specific delivery mechanism such
as certified mail, U.S. mail or hand
delivery. As technologies improve, other
means of communication—including
electronic methods—may be more
efficient and cost-effective. Accordingly,
this rule broadens the acceptable
methods by which claimants,
employers, and insurers can
communicate with OWCP and each
other.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Antonio Rios, Director, Division of
Longshore and Harbor Workers’
Compensation, Office of Workers’
Compensation Programs, U.S.
Department of Labor, Suite C–4319, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20210. Telephone: (202) 693–0038
(this is not a toll-free number). TTY/
TDD callers may dial toll-free 1–877–
889–5627 for further information.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This direct final rule is effective
June 10, 2015 without further action
unless OWCP receives significant
adverse comment to this rule by
midnight Eastern Standard Time on
May 11, 2015. If OWCP receives
significant adverse comment, it will
publish a timely withdrawal of the final
rule in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written
comments, identified by RIN number
1240–AA09, by any of the following
methods.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions on the Web site for
submitting comments. To facilitate
receipt and processing of comments,
OWCP encourages interested parties to
submit their comments electronically.
• Fax: (202) 693–1380 (this is not a
toll-free number). Only comments of ten
or fewer pages, including a Fax cover
sheet and attachments, if any, will be
accepted by Fax.
• Regular Mail: Division of Longshore
and Harbor Workers’ Compensation,
Office of Workers’ Compensation
Programs, U.S. Department of Labor,
Suite C–4319, 200 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20210. The
Department’s receipt of U.S. mail may
be significantly delayed due to security
procedures. You must take this into
consideration when preparing to meet
the deadline for submitting comments.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Division of
Longshore and Harbor Workers’
Compensation, Office of Workers’
Compensation Programs, U.S.
Department of Labor, Suite C–4319, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20210.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and the
Regulatory Information Number (RIN)
for this rulemaking. All comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov including
any personal information provided.
I. Direct Final Rule Published
Concurrently With Companion
Proposed Rule
In direct final rulemaking, an agency
publishes a direct final rule in the
Federal Register with a statement that
the rule will go into effect unless the
agency receives significant adverse
comment within a specified period. The
agency concurrently publishes an
identical proposed rule. If the agency
receives no significant adverse comment
in response to the direct final rule, the
rule goes into effect. If the agency
receives significant adverse comment,
the agency withdraws the direct final
rule and treats such comment as
submissions on the proposed rule. An
agency typically uses direct final
rulemaking when it anticipates the rule
will be non-controversial.
OWCP has determined that this rule,
which modifies the existing regulations
to facilitate the exchange of documents
and information, is suitable for direct
final rulemaking. The rule expands the
methods by which employers,
claimants, insurers, and OWCP can
transmit documents and information to
each other; the rule does not eliminate
current methods. Thus, OWCP does not
expect to receive significant adverse
comment on this rule.
OWCP is also publishing a companion
notice of proposed rulemaking in the
‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of today’s
Federal Register to expedite notice-andcomment rulemaking in the event
OWCP receives significant adverse
comment and withdraws this direct
final rule. The proposed and direct final
rules are substantively identical, and
their respective comment periods run
concurrently. OWCP will treat
comments received on the companion
proposed rule as comments regarding
the direct final rule and vice versa.
Thus, if OWCP receives significant
adverse comment on either this direct
final rule or the companion proposed
rule, OWCP will publish a Federal
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Mar 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Register notice withdrawing this direct
final rule and will proceed with the
proposed rule. If no significant adverse
comment is received, this direct final
rule will become effective June 10, 2015.
For purposes of this direct final rule,
a significant adverse comment is one
that explains: (1) Why the rule is
inappropriate, including challenges to
the rule’s underlying premise or
approach; or (2) why the direct final
rule will be ineffective or unacceptable
without a change. In determining
whether a significant adverse comment
necessitates withdrawal of this direct
final rule, OWCP will consider whether
the comment raises an issue serious
enough to warrant a substantive
response had it been submitted in a
standard notice-and-comment process.
A comment recommending an addition
to the rule will not be considered
significant and adverse unless the
comment explains how this direct final
rule would be ineffective without the
addition.
OWCP requests comments on all
issues related to this rule, including
economic or other regulatory impacts of
this rule on the regulated community.
All interested parties should comment
at this time because OWCP will not
initiate an additional comment period
on the proposed rule even if it
withdraws the direct final rule.
II. Background of This Rulemaking
The LHWCA, 33 U.S.C. 901–950,
establishes a comprehensive federal
workers’ compensation system for an
employee’s disability or death arising in
the course of covered maritime
employment. Metropolitan Stevedore
Co. v. Rambo, 515 U.S. 291, 294 (1995).
The Act’s provisions have been
extended to: (1) Contractors working on
military bases or U.S. government
contracts outside the United States
(Defense Base Act, 42 U.S.C. 1651–54);
(2) employees of nonappropriated fund
instrumentalities (Nonappropriated
Fund Instrumentalities Act, 5 U.S.C.
8171–73); (3) employees engaged in
operations that extract natural resources
from the outer continental shelf (Outer
Continental Shelf Lands Act, 43 U.S.C.
1333(b)); and (4) private employees in
the District of Columbia injured prior to
July 26, 1982 (District of Columbia
Workers’ Compensation Act of May 17,
1928, Public Law 70–419 (formerly
codified at 36 D.C. Code 501 et seq.
(1973) (repealed 1979)). Consequently,
the Act and its extensions cover a broad
range of claims for injuries that occur
throughout the United States and
around the world.
The Department’s regulations
implementing the LHWCA and its
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 48 / Thursday, March 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
extensions (20 CFR parts 701–704)
currently contemplate that private
parties and OWCP file and exchange
documents only in paper form and, in
some instances, require transmission via
specific methods such as certified mail,
U.S. mail, or hand delivery. Because
many of these procedural rules were last
amended in 1985 and 1986, see 51 FR
4270 (February 3, 1986); 50 FR 384
(January 3, 1985), they do not address
whether the parties or OWCP may use
electronic communication methods
(e.g., facsimile, email, web portal) or
commercial delivery services (e.g.,
United Parcel Service, Federal Express).
These communication methods have
now become ubiquitous and are
routinely relied upon by individuals,
businesses, and government agencies
alike.
Recently, OWCP has been employing
electronic technology to improve the
program’s administration. In 2009,
OWCP began accepting reports of
insurance coverage electronically. See
Notice from Chief, Branch of Financial
Management, Insurance and
Assessments (December 2, 2009) https://
www.regulations.gov (docket folder for
RIN 1240–AA09); Industry Notice No.
138 (January 3, 2012) https://
www.dol.gov/owcp/dlhwc/
lsindustrynotices/
industrynotice138.htm. In 2013, OWCP
began creating electronic case files for
all new LHWCA cases. See LHWCA
Bulletin No. 14–03 (November 26,
2013), https://www.dol.gov/owcp/dlhwc/
LSBulletin14-03.pdf. And in 2014,
OWCP launched SEAPortal, a webbased electronic portal that parties may
use to submit case-specific documents
to OWCP. See Industry Notice No. 148
(October 31, 2014), https://www.dol.gov/
owcp/dlhwc/lsindustrynotices/
industrynotice148.pdf. These
advancements have enhanced claims
administration within OWCP and the
parties’ ability to submit documents to
OWCP. But they do not adequately
expand the methods employers,
claimants, insurers, and OWCP may use
to transmit documents and information
to each other.
Consistent with other workers’
compensation schemes, the LHWCA
provides ‘‘limited liability for
employers’’ and ‘‘certain, prompt
recovery for employees.’’ Roberts v.
Sea–Land Servs., Inc., l U.S. l, 132
S.Ct. 1350, 1354 (2012). These goals are
advanced through efficient and effective
communications between the private
parties and OWCP. This rule thus
revises the regulations to: (1) Remove
bars to using electronic and other
commonly used communication
methods wherever possible; (2) provide
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Mar 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
flexibility for OWCP to allow the use of
technological advances in the future;
and (3) ensure that all parties remain
adequately apprised of claim
proceedings.
Because the revisions are procedural
in nature, this rule applies to all matters
pending on the date the rule is effective
as well as those that arise thereafter.
This will not work a hardship on the
private parties or their representatives
since, as explained below, the revisions
either codify current practice or broaden
the methods by which documents and
information may be transmitted.
III. Legal Basis for the Rule
Section 39(a) of the LHWCA, 33
U.S.C. 939(a), authorizes the Secretary
of Labor to prescribe all rules and
regulations necessary for the
administration and enforcement of the
Act and its extensions. The LHWCA
also grants the Secretary authority to
determine by regulation how certain
statutory notice and filing requirements
are met. See 33 U.S.C. 907(j)(1) (the
Secretary is authorized to ‘‘make rules
and regulations and to establish
procedures’’ regarding debarment of
physicians and health care providers
under 33 U.S.C. 907(c)); 33 U.S.C. 912(c)
(employer must notify employees of the
official designated to receive notices of
injury ‘‘in a manner prescribed by the
Secretary in regulations’’); 33 U.S.C.
919(a) (claim for compensation may be
filed ‘‘in accordance with regulations
prescribed by the Secretary’’); 33 U.S.C.
919(b) (notice of claim to be made ‘‘in
accordance with regulations prescribed
by the Secretary’’); 33 U.S.C. 935 (‘‘the
Secretary shall by regulation provide for
the discharge, by the carrier,’’ of the
employer’s liabilities under the Act).
This rule falls well within these
statutory grants of authority.
In developing these rules, the
Department has also considered the
principles underlying two additional
statutes: The Government Paperwork
Elimination Act (GPEA), 44 U.S.C. 3504,
and the Electronic Signatures in Global
and National Commerce Act (E–SIGN),
15 U.S.C. 7001 et seq. GPEA requires
agencies, when practicable, to store
documents electronically and to allow
individuals and entities to communicate
with agencies electronically. It also
provides that electronic documents and
signatures will not be denied legal effect
merely because of their electronic form.
Similarly, E–SIGN generally provides
that electronic documents have the
same legal effect as their hard copy
counterparts and allows electronic
records to be used in place of hard copy
documents with appropriate safeguards.
15 U.S.C. 7001. Under E–SIGN, federal
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12919
agencies retain the authority to specify
the means by which they receive
documents, 15 U.S.C. 7004(a), and to
modify the disclosures required by
Section 101(c), 15 U.S.C. 7001(c), under
appropriate circumstances. These rules
are consistent with and further the
purposes of GPEA and E–SIGN.
IV. New and Revised Rules
A. General Provisions
This rule makes several general
revisions to advance the goals set forth
in Executive Order 13563 (January 18,
2011). That Order states that regulations
must be ‘‘accessible, consistent, written
in plain language, and easy to
understand.’’ 76 FR 3821; see also E.O.
12866, 58 FR 51735 (September 30,
1993) (‘‘Each agency shall draft its
regulations to be simple and easy to
understand, with the goal of minimizing
the potential for uncertainty and
litigation arising from such
uncertainty.’’). Accordingly, this rule
removes the imprecise term ‘‘shall’’
throughout those sections it amends and
substitutes ‘‘must,’’ ‘‘must not,’’ ‘‘will,’’
or other situation-appropriate terms.
These changes are designed to make the
regulations clearer and more userfriendly. See generally Federal Plain
Language Guidelines, https://
www.plainlanguage.gov/howto/
guidelines.
Executive Order 13563 also instructs
agencies to review ‘‘rules that may be
outmoded, ineffective, insufficient, or
excessively burdensome, and to modify,
streamline, expand, or repeal them.’’ As
a result, this rule ceases publication of
two rules that are obsolete or
unnecessary. These rules are set forth in
the Section-by-Section Explanation
below.
B. Section-by-Section Explanation
20 CFR 702.101 Exchange of
Documents and Information
This section is new. It sets out general
rules for transmitting documents and
information that apply except when
another rule or OWCP requires a
specific form of communication.
Paragraph (a) specifies the methods by
which documents and information must
be sent to OWCP. Paragraph (a)(1)
specifies that hard copy documents and
information must be submitted by postal
mail, commercial delivery service, or
delivered by hand. Paragraph (a)(2)
specifies that electronic documents and
information must be submitted through
an electronic system that has been
authorized by OWCP. OWCP’s
SEAPortal is an example of such a
system. Paragraph (a)(3) recognizes that
occasions may arise where transmission
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
12920
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 48 / Thursday, March 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
methods other than those enumerated
would be preferable and provides that
additional methods may be used when
allowed by OWCP.
Paragraph (b) specifies the methods
by which documents and information
must be sent from OWCP to parties and
their representatives or exchanged
between parties and party
representatives. Paragraph (b)(1)
specifies that hard copy documents
must be sent or exchanged by postal
mail, commercial delivery service, or
hand delivery. Paragraph (b)(2) specifies
that documents and information can be
sent or exchanged electronically, but
only if they are sent through a reliable
method and the receiving party agrees
in writing to accept electronic
transmission by the particular method
used. Requiring written confirmation
protects all parties and representatives
from misunderstandings about service
and ensures that the recipient has the
technology necessary to receive
documents by the selected method. The
Department does not intend that this
process be overly formalistic; a letter,
email or other writing memorializing
the receiving party’s agreement would
be sufficient to satisfy the regulatory
requirement. A party’s agreement to
receive documents or information
electronically, although required before
a sender can elect to use an electronic
transmission method, does not obligate
the sender to use an electronic
transmission method. Finally, paragraph
(b)(3) specifies that documents and
information can be sent or exchanged
through any OWCP-authorized
electronic system that allows for service
of documents. Although not currently
available, this provision is added for use
in the event OWCP adopts such a
system in the future.
Paragraph (c) provides a nonexhaustive list of reliable electronic
transmission methods.
Paragraph (d) specifies that parties or
representatives who agree to receive
documents electronically in accordance
with paragraph (b)(2) can revoke their
agreement by giving written notice to
the person or entity with whom they
initially agreed to receive documents
electronically. For example, if a
claimant’s legal representative no longer
wishes to receive documents
electronically from the employer’s
attorney, the representative can revoke
the agreement by simply notifying
opposing counsel in writing. Similarly,
if a pro se claimant initially agrees to
receive documents electronically from
OWCP, he or she may terminate that
agreement by sending a letter or some
other form of writing to OWCP. As with
the procedure for agreeing to electronic
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Mar 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
service, the Department does not intend
this procedure to be overly formalistic.
Paragraph (e) recognizes that the
Longshore regulations use various terms
to describe the process of exchanging
documents and information with OWCP
and between parties. It provides that
paragraphs (a) through (d) apply when
those terms are used.
Paragraph (f) clarifies that references
to documents include both electronic
and hard copy documents.
Paragraph (g) explains that a
requirement that something be in
writing, signed, certified, or executed
does not presuppose that the document
must be in hard copy.
Paragraph (h) states that an entity’s
address may include its electronic
address or Web portal.
Finally, paragraphs (i)(1) and (2)
clarify that when a document must be
sent to a particular district director’s
office or a district director must take an
action with respect to a document in his
or her office, the physical or electronic
address or file location provided for that
district director’s office by OWCP rather
than that district director’s physical
location controls. These provisions
accommodate the Department’s current
and anticipated future plans to have
most mail for district offices sent to a
central mail receipt location and
eventually to an electronic location and
to handle documents in an electronic
case file environment.
20 CFR 702.102 Establishment and
Modification of Compensation Districts,
Establishment of Suboffices and
Jurisdictional Areas
Current § 702.102(a) explains that the
Director has established compensation
districts as required under the Act and
specifies that the Director must notify
interested parties ‘‘by mail’’ of changes
to the compensation districts. Revised
§ 701.102(a) removes the phrase ‘‘by
mail’’ to broaden the methods by which
the Director may notify interested
parties of a change to the compensation
districts.
20 CFR 702.103 Effect of
Establishment of Suboffices and
Jurisdictional Areas
Current § 702.103 explains that the
Director may require claims-related
materials to be filed in suboffices.
Revised § 702.103 changes the phrase
‘‘at the suboffice’’ to ‘‘with the
suboffice’’ to reflect that documents
being filed with a suboffice will not
necessarily be filed at that suboffice per
se, but rather will be filed at the
physical or electronic address provided
by OWCP.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20 CFR 702.104
Case File
Transfer of Individual
Current § 702.104(b) provides that the
district director who is transferring a
case to a different district office may
give advice, comments, or suggestions to
the district director receiving the case.
The regulation also specifies that the
transfer must be made by registered or
certified mail. District directors now
have the capacity to transfer many cases
by secure electronic means, or may
prefer to use a commercial delivery
service such as Federal Express or the
United Parcel Service. Accordingly,
revised § 702.104 removes the
requirement that cases be transferred by
registered or certified mail to broaden
the methods by which district directors
may transfer cases between offices.
20 CFR 702.174 Exemptions;
Necessary Information
Current § 702.174(b)(1) provides that
in cases where the Director approves an
employer’s application for an exemption
from coverage under the Act, the
Director shall notify the employer of its
exemption by certified mail, return
receipt requested. This non-statutory
requirement limits the Director’s ability
to take advantage of other efficient
means of service that may be less costly.
Accordingly, revised § 702.174(b)(1)
removes the certified mail requirement
to broaden the methods by which the
Director may notify employers that their
application for exemption has been
approved. The revised rule also
includes a technical amendment to
§ 702.174(b)(2) to conform the language
regarding notification of a denial of
exempt status to the language in revised
subsection (b)(1).
20 CFR 702.203
How Given
Employer’s Report;
Current § 702.203 provides that
employers must submit their injury
reports by delivering or mailing an
original and one copy to the office of the
district director. The rule implements
the statutory directive to employers to
‘‘send to the Secretary a report’’ of
injury and ‘‘a copy of such report’’ to
the district director within ten days of
an employee’s injury or death. 33 U.S.C.
930(a), (b). Although not reflected in the
current regulation, the Act also provides
that ‘‘mailing’’ a report ‘‘in a stamped
envelope’’ within the ten-day time
period satisfies the statute’s
requirements. 33 U.S.C. 930(d).
Revised § 702.203 alters the current
rule in two ways. First, revised
paragraph (a) eliminates the
requirement that employers provide an
original and a copy of their injury
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 48 / Thursday, March 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
reports. OWCP has instituted a policy of
storing documents electronically; thus,
there is no continuing need to submit
multiple copies of the same document.
Instead, submission of one report to the
district director will satisfy the
employer’s statutory obligation to notify
both the Secretary and the district
director. Second, revised paragraph (b)
modifies the current regulation to
address what actions satisfy the ten-day
time period for filing the injury report.
Consistent with Section 30(d), revised
paragraph (b) specifies that when sent
by U.S. postal mail, an employer’s
report of injury will be deemed filed on
the date mailed. The rule extends this
same statutory concept—that an
employer meets the reporting obligation
when it sends the report, not when the
report is received by OWCP—to
commercial delivery services and
electronic filings. Thus, the rule
provides that the report will be
considered filed on the date given to a
commercial delivery service or, when
sent by permissible electronic means,
the date the employer completes all
steps necessary for electronic delivery.
20 CFR 702.215 Notice; How Given
Current § 702.215 provides that an
employee’s notice of injury or survivor’s
notice of death must be given to the
employer by hand delivery or by mail.
It further provides that notice of an
injury may be given to the district
director by hand delivery, mail, orally
in person, or by telephone. Revised
§ 702.215 modifies the current section to
allow the use of additional means of
providing notice to the employer and to
the district director.
For employer notice, the revised rule
allows an employee or survivor to
provide notice at the physical or
electronic address supplied by the
employer. Using the broader ‘‘physical’’
address term encompasses the current
hand and mail delivery, and expands it
to other methods such as a commercial
delivery service. And by allowing notice
to be delivered to an electronic address,
employers will be able to adopt
electronic systems (e.g., email, web
portal) that may speed the injury
reporting process. For district director
notice, the revised regulation provides
that the employee’s or survivor’s notice
of injury may be given to the district
director by submitting the correct form.
Using the word ‘‘submitting’’ brings this
document within the general
transmission rule set forth in 20 CFR
702.101(a), thus implementing the
statutory directive that notice be given
to the district director ‘‘by delivering it
to him or sending it by mail addressed
to his office.’’ 33 U.S.C. 912(c). The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Mar 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
revised rule retains the option of
reporting injuries to the district director
either in person or by telephone.
20 CFR 702.224 Claims; Notification of
Employer of Filing by Employee
Current § 702.224 requires the district
director to give the employer or
insurance carrier written notice of
claims for compensation served
‘‘personally or by mail.’’ This regulation
implements the statutory requirement
that the district director provide notice
of claims to interested parties, which
‘‘may be served personally upon the
employer or other person, or sent to
such employer or person by registered
mail.’’ 33 U.S.C. 919(b). Revised
§ 702.224 deletes the current rule’s
reference to specific service methods.
Using the phrase ‘‘give notice’’ brings
the notice within the general
transmission rule set forth in 20 CFR
702.101(a), which allows for methods of
service beyond mailing and what is
traditionally considered personal
service. Because the statute uses the
permissive term ‘‘may’’ in addressing
service methods for this notice and does
not mandate any particular method, the
revised rule is also consistent with the
statute.
20 CFR 702.234 Report by Employer
of Commencement and Suspension of
Payments
Current § 702.234 provides that the
employer shall immediately notify the
district director having jurisdiction over
the place where the injury or death
occurred when it makes its first
payment of compensation or suspends
payment of compensation. The
Department recognizes that cases are not
always adjudicated by the district
director who has jurisdiction over the
place where the injury or death
occurred. For example, cases may be
transferred to a district other than the
district where the injury occurred if a
worker moves his or her residence to a
different compensation district. 20 CFR
702.104. Thus, revised § 702.234
removes the reference to the district
director having jurisdiction over the
place where the injury or death
occurred and instead directs the
employer to notify the district director
who is administering the claim.
20 CFR 702.243 Settlement
Application; How Submitted, How
Approved, How Disapproved, Criteria
Current § 702.243(a) requires that
settlement applications be sent to the
adjudicator by certified mail, return
receipt requested, submitted in person,
or sent by any other delivery service
with proof of delivery to the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12921
adjudicator. The revised rule modifies
this subsection to explicitly allow
parties to submit settlement
applications via commercial delivery
service with tracking capability or
electronically through an OWCPauthorized system.
Current § 702.243(c) requires that
when the adjudicator disapproves a
settlement application, he or she must
serve a disapproval letter or order on the
parties by certified mail. This
requirement both limits the
adjudicator’s ability to take advantage of
more efficient means of service and
imposes an unnecessary expense.
Accordingly, the revised rule removes
the requirement that notice be sent by
certified mail in order to broaden the
methods by which adjudicators may
notify parties that their settlement
applications have been disapproved.
20 CFR 702.251 Employer’s
Controversion of the Right To
Compensation
Current § 702.251 requires that
employers notify the district director of
their election to controvert a claim by
sending the ‘‘original notice’’ of
controversion form to the district
director and a copy to the claimant. By
requiring the ‘‘original’’ form, the
regulation implies that the employer
must deliver a hard copy form bearing
its authorized signature in ink. There is
no statutory requirement that an
employer submit an original form in
that manner and requiring the employer
to do so by regulation unduly limits the
means by which the employer would
otherwise be permitted to submit the
form. For example, OWCP has instituted
a policy of accepting case-related
documents electronically through its
web portal. Further, OWCP now scans
and electronically stores the documents
it receives, so the ‘‘original’’ document
submitted by the employer would not be
retained in hard copy. For these reasons,
there is no need to require employers to
send an ‘‘original’’ document to the
district director. Thus, revised § 702.251
omits the requirement that an original
document be provided.
20 CFR 702.261 Claimant’s Contest of
Actions Taken by Employer or Carrier
With Respect to the Claim
Current § 702.261 provides that a
claimant who contests a reduction,
termination, or suspension of benefits
by the employer or carrier must notify
the office of the district director having
jurisdiction either in person or in
writing and explain the basis for his or
her complaint. New § 702.101 specifies
the methods by which the claimant can
provide documents or information to
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
12922
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 48 / Thursday, March 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
OWCP, and there is no statutory
requirement pertaining to claimants’
contests of employer or carrier action
that justifies treating transmission of
this type of information differently.
Accordingly, revised § 702.261
eliminates the requirement that notice
be given in person or in writing. In
addition, the revised rule substitutes the
phrase ‘‘the district director who is
administering the claim’’ for the phrase
‘‘the district director having
jurisdiction.’’ As noted, claims are not
always handled by the district director
for the district where the injury or death
occurred. See 20 CFR 702.104. To
clarify the regulation, revised § 702.234
directs the claimant to notify the district
director who is administering the claim
when he or she wishes to contest the
employer’s or carrier’s actions.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
20 CFR 702.272 Informal
Recommendation by District Director
Current § 702.272 concerns informal
recommendations by the district
director regarding claims of improper
discharge or discrimination against
employees who seek compensation
under the Act or testify in a
compensation claim under the Act.
Paragraph (a) provides that where the
employee and employer agree to the
district director’s recommendation, that
recommendation shall be incorporated
into an order and mailed to the parties.
The revised rule removes the reference
to service by mail and instead indicates
that service should be accomplished
under the same procedures that govern
service of compensation orders under
§ 702.349.
Current § 702.272(b) provides that
where the parties do not agree to the
district director’s recommendation, the
director must ‘‘mail’’ a memorandum to
the parties that summarizes the
disagreement. This requirement
precludes the Director from using other
methods of service. Accordingly, the
revised rule deletes the word ‘‘mail’’
and replaces it with the word ‘‘send’’ so
that delivery of the memorandum is
governed by the general rule in
§ 702.101.
20 CFR 702.281 Third Party Action
Current § 702.281(b) provides that in
order for an employee to settle a claim
with a third party for an amount less
than the employee would receive under
the Act, the employee must first receive
prior written approval from the
employer and the employer’s carrier.
That approval must be filed with the
district director with jurisdiction where
the injury occurred. As noted, claims
are not always handled by the district
director for the district where the injury
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Mar 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
or death occurred. See 20 CFR 702.104.
Thus, revised § 702.281(b) directs that
the approval be filed with the district
director who is administering the claim.
20 CFR 702.315 Conclusion of
Conference; Agreement on All Matters
With Respect to the Claim
Current § 702.315(a) provides that
when an informal conference results in
a formal compensation order, the order
must be ‘‘filed and mailed in accordance
with § 702.349.’’ This rule also provides
that when the problem considered is
resolved by telephone or by exchange of
written correspondence, the parties
shall be notified by the same method
through which agreement was reached,
and the district director will also issue
a memorandum or order setting forth
the agreed terms. Revised § 702.315(a)
modifies the rule in two ways. First, the
revised rule substitutes the phrase ‘‘filed
and served’’ for ‘‘filed and mailed’’ to
conform the language to the addition of
§ 702.349(b), which would allow parties
and their representatives to waive
registered and certified mail service of
compensation orders. Second, to allow
more flexibility, revised § 702.315(a)
eliminates the requirement that the
district director use the same method to
communicate the results of the
conference but preserves the authority
to communicate those results by
telephone.
20 CFR 702.317 Preparation and
Transfer of the Case for Hearing
Current § 702.317 provides rules for
transferring a case from the district
director’s office to the Office of
Administrative Law Judges (OALJ) for
hearing. When the district director
receives pre-hearing statement forms
from the parties and determines that no
further conferences will help resolve the
dispute, § 702.317(c) instructs the
district director to transmit the prehearing statements, a transmittal letter,
and certain other evidence to OALJ.
Paragraph (c) excepts from this
requirement materials ‘‘not suitable for
mailing.’’ To avoid any implication that
these documents must be mailed
between the district director and OALJ
rather than transmitted by some other
method (e.g., commercial delivery
service, electronically), the revised rule
substitutes the term ‘‘transmission’’ for
‘‘mailing’’ in paragraph (c).
20 CFR 702.319 Obtaining Documents
From the Administrative File for
Reintroduction at Formal Hearings
Current § 702.319 provides that upon
receipt of a request for a document from
the administrative file, the district
director shall give the original
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
document to the requester and retain a
copy in the file. OWCP has instituted a
policy of storing documents
electronically rendering it unable to
send requesters original documents. A
properly reproduced copy of the
electronically stored document can be
used in adjudicative proceedings. See
United States v. Hampton, 464 F.3d
687, 690 (7th Cir. 2006) (holding that
copies of documents are admissible to
the same extent as the original
documents unless there is an issue with
the authenticity of the original); United
States v. Georgalis, 631 F.2d 1199, 1205
(5th Cir. 1980) (‘‘A duplicate may be
admitted into evidence unless . . . there
is a genuine issue as to the authenticity
of the unintroduced original, or as to the
trustworthiness of the duplicate . . .’’).
Accordingly, revised § 702.319 specifies
that the district director will send a
copy of the requested document(s) to
the requester and retain a copy of the
record request and a statement of
whether it has been satisfied in the
administrative file.
20 CFR 702.321 Procedures for
Determining Applicability of Section
8(f) of the Act
Current § 702.321(a)(1) requires
employers or carriers who file
applications under Section 8(f) of the
Act to file those applications in
duplicate. As OWCP has instituted a
policy of storing documents
electronically, there is no continuing
need to file multiple copies of the same
document. Accordingly, the revised rule
deletes that requirement from
§ 702.321(a)(1). The Department has also
eliminated the mid-paragraph
numbering in this provision. This
technical change is made to conform to
the current formatting rules of the Office
of the Federal Register.
20 CFR 702.349 Formal Hearings;
Filing and Mailing of Compensation
Orders; Disposition of Transcripts
Current § 702.349 provides that at the
conclusion of the administrative
hearing, the administrative law judge
shall deliver the administrative record
‘‘by mail or otherwise’’ to the district
director that had original jurisdiction
over the case. As noted above, cases are
not always administered by the district
director who has ‘‘original’’ jurisdiction
over the controversy. For example, cases
may be transferred to a district other
than the district where the injury
occurred if a worker moves his or her
residence to a different compensation
district. See 20 CFR 702.104. Thus, the
revised rule removes the reference to the
district director that had original
jurisdiction and instead directs the
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 48 / Thursday, March 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
administrative law judge to forward the
record to the district director who
administered the case.
This rule contains two additional
revisions to the existing language
designed to accommodate transmission
of decisions and case records
electronically between OWCP and the
Office of Administrative Law Judges.
First, the revised rule eliminates the
language that the case record be sent to
the district director ‘‘together with’’ a
signed compensation order. Currently,
the Office of Administrative Law Judges
does not always transmit the full case
record at the same time as the
compensation order. Moreover, OWCP
also anticipates that, as an intermediate
step to transitioning to a full electronic
case file environment, a system may be
adopted for administrative law judge
decisions to be transmitted
electronically to OWCP for filing and
service. Second, the revised rule
eliminates reference to the ‘‘original’’
compensation order in anticipation of
future expansion of the electronic case
file system. The term ‘‘original’’ implies
that the district director must file a
paper copy of a compensation order.
This process may not be required in a
full electronic case file environment.
This rule is also revised to add a new
paragraph (b) that allows parties and
their representatives to receive
compensation orders by other service
methods in cases where they explicitly
waive service by registered or certified
mail. Under Section 19(e) of the Act, 33
U.S.C. 919(e), all parties have the right
to be served with a compensation order
via registered or certified mail (at
OWCP’s option). By practice, OWCP has
extended this service to the parties’
representatives. See 20 CFR 702.349.
Service via registered or certified mail
has many benefits, but unlike electronic
service, it cannot be accomplished
immediately. Several days will
generally elapse between the date that
an order is mailed by the district
director and the date the parties receive
it. Some parties and their
representatives have requested that the
Department begin serving compensation
orders immediately by electronic means.
The right to registered or certified
mail service of compensation orders is
a personal right that is conveyed by the
Act. But there is no indication in the
Act that the right to registered or
certified mail service cannot be waived,
contra 33 U.S.C. 915(b), 916, and it is
generally presumed that statutory rights
can be knowingly and voluntarily
waived. See New York v. Hill, 528 U.S.
110, 114 (2000). Accordingly,
§ 702.349(b) institutes a procedure
allowing parties and their
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Mar 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
representatives who are entitled to
registered or certified mail service to
waive their right to such service. The
waiver applies only to service of
compensation orders and does not
extend to other documents or
information transmitted by OWCP.
New § 702.349(b) provides that a
party or their representative can waive
registered or certified mail service of
compensation orders by filing the
appropriate form with the district
director that is administering the party’s
case. Waivers will only be accepted if
they are submitted on the proper form,
and a separate form must be submitted
for each party or representative.
Paragraph (b) emphasizes that
submission of a completed form
constitutes a knowing and voluntary
waiver of registered or certified mail
service.
New § 702.349(b)(1)–(b)(5) flesh out
important details related to the waiver
of service by registered or certified mail.
Paragraph (b)(1) provides that all parties
and representatives must provide a
valid electronic address on the waiver
form for the service waiver to be
effective.
Paragraph (b)(2) provides that parties
and their representatives must submit a
separate waiver form for each case in
which they intend to waive service.
Although it is common for certain
employers, carriers, and attorneys to
have an interest in several Longshore
Act cases pending at the same time, the
district director will not accept blanket
service waivers. This will ensure that
the party or representative has in fact
waived registered or certified mail
service in the particular case. Similarly,
paragraph (b)(3) prohibits a party’s
representative from signing the waiver
form on the party’s behalf. Instead, to
ensure that waivers are knowing and
voluntary, the parties themselves must
sign the waiver forms.
Paragraph (b)(4) provides that all
compensation orders issued after the
service waiver form is received will be
served in accordance with the
instructions on the form provided by the
party or representative. This includes
supplementary compensation orders
and orders on modification. This
paragraph also specifies that individuals
must submit another waiver form to
change their service address or to revoke
the waiver.
Finally, paragraph (b)(5) provides that
the district director will serve parties
and their representatives by certified
mail despite the existence of a waiver
form if there is some problem with the
service method selected. Thus, for
example, the district director will effect
service by certified or registered mail if
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12923
he or she receives an error message
when trying to serve a party or
representative via email.
20 CFR 702.372 Supplementary
Compensation Orders
Current § 702.372(b) requires that
supplementary compensation orders
declaring amounts of compensation in
default be served by certified mail on
the parties and their representatives.
This provision implements Section
18(a) of the Act, which requires that
supplementary orders ‘‘be filed in the
same manner as the compensation
order.’’ 33 U.S.C. 918(a). As discussed
above, Section 19(e) of the Act requires
that compensation orders be filed in the
office of the district director, and then
served by registered or certified mail. 33
U.S.C. 919(e). The revised rule
incorporates the filing provisions found
in § 702.349. This revision clarifies that
supplementary compensation orders
must be treated like any other
compensation order for purposes of
filing and service. In addition, by crossreferencing § 702.349, the Department
intends to extend the provisions
allowing voluntary waiver of registered
or certified mail service in § 702.349(b)
to supplementary compensation orders.
20 CFR 702.432 Debarment Process
Current § 702.432(b) provides that
when the Director determines that
debarment proceedings are appropriate
against a physician, health care provider
or claims representative, he or she will
notify the individual by certified mail,
return receipt requested. Similarly,
current § 702.432(e) requires that the
Director send a copy of his or her
decision regarding debarment to the
individual by certified mail, return
receipt requested. This method of
service is not required by the statute in
either instance. And requiring certified
mail service both limits the Director’s
ability to take advantage of electronic
means of service and imposes an
unnecessary expense. Accordingly, to
broaden the methods by which the
Director may notify individuals of
debarment proceedings and decisions
rendered in them, the revised rule
removes the requirement that notice be
sent by certified mail with return receipt
requested from paragraphs (b) and (e).
20 CFR 702.433 Requests for Hearing
Current § 702.433(b) requires that the
administrative law judge who will
conduct a hearing regarding debarment
serve a copy of a notice of hearing on
the individual who may be subject to
debarment via certified mail, return
receipt requested. This method of
service is not required by the statute,
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
12924
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 48 / Thursday, March 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
and it both limits the administrative law
judge’s ability to take advantage of
electronic service methods and imposes
an unnecessary expense. Accordingly,
revised § 702.433(b) eliminates the
certified mail requirement so as to
broaden the means by which the
administrative law judge may notify
individuals of hearings regarding
debarment.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
20 CFR 703.2 Forms
Current § 703.2(a) provides that
information sent by insurance carriers
and self-insured employers to OWCP
pursuant to Part 703 must be submitted
on Forms specified by the Director. In
order to facilitate the most efficient
processing of Part 703 information,
revised § 703.2(a) specifies that the
forms must be submitted to OWCP in
the manner it specifies.
20 CFR 703.113–703.120 and 703.502
Reporting Related to Insurance Coverage
This set of regulations governs how
matters related to insurance coverage
are reported to OWCP and the
consequences of those reports. In the
past, insurance companies reported
issuance of policies and endorsements
by filing a Form LS–570 (Carrier’s
Report of Issuance of Policy) in hard
copy with the district director in whose
compensation district the insured
employer operated. These hard copy
reports of insurance were retained in the
compensation district because that was
the district most likely to use the record.
OWCP now stores insurance
information electronically in a system
maintained by the Division of
Longshore and Harbor Workers’
Compensation (DLHWC) in OWCP’s
national office. This system is accessible
to the district offices. Thus, there is no
continuing need for carriers to report
insurance information to individual
district directors.
To facilitate reporting of insurance
information, OWCP began instituting an
electronic system for such reports in
2009. See Notice from Chief, Branch of
Financial Management, Insurance and
Assessments (December 2, 2009) https://
www.regulations.gov (docket folder for
RIN 1240–AA09); Industry Notice No.
138 (January 3, 2012) https://
www.dol.gov/owcp/dlhwc/
lsindustrynotices/
industrynotice138.htm. Many insurance
companies now report coverage,
including policy cancellations, to
industry data collection organizations
(e.g., New York Compensation Rating
Board, National Council on
Compensation Insurance, Inc.) that, in
turn, report the information to DLHWC
on the carriers’ behalf. DLHWC receives
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Mar 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
that information via a daily electronic
data interchange with the data
collection organizations and places it in
a centralized electronic repository that
the individual district directors can
access immediately. It is common
practice in the insurance industry to
provide this sort of information
electronically, and many carriers have
been voluntarily reporting coverage
under the Act and its extensions to
DLHWC electronically for several years
now. The system has proven to be
efficient and preferable for both OWCP
and the reporting carriers who use it.
Centralized reporting also reduces the
recordkeeping burden on the district
offices, thereby freeing up resources for
claims administration.
For these reasons, the revised rule
eliminates those provisions that require
insurance companies to report coverage
to individual district directors. In
addition, the revised rules are drafted
broadly to accommodate future methods
of electronic reporting that OWCP may
choose to adopt. Although OWCP
prefers receiving insurance information
electronically, the revised rules do not
require carriers to report electronically.
Carriers can still fulfill their reporting
obligations by submitting Form LS–570
to DLHWC.
Section 703.113 allows for a
longshoremen’s policy or endorsement
to specify the particular vessel(s) to
which it applies. It provides that the
carrier shall send the report of issuance
of a policy or endorsement that is
required by § 703.116 to the district
director for the compensation district
where the vessel(s)’ home port is
located. To conform this regulation to
the centralized reporting system, revised
§ 703.113 replaces references to the
district director with references to
DLHWC.
Section 703.114 provides that
cancellation of a contract or policy of
insurance will not be effective unless
done in compliance with Section 36(b)
of the Act, which requires that
insurance providers send a notice of
cancellation to the district director and
the employer 30 days prior to the date
that a policy termination is effective.
See 33 U.S.C. 936(b). The Act also
requires that the notice be in writing
and given to the district director ‘‘by
delivering it to him or sending it by mail
addressed to his office, and to the
employer by delivering it to him or by
sending it by mail addressed to him at
his last known place of business.’’ 33
U.S.C. 912(c); see also 33 U.S.C. 936(b).
The revised rule specifies the
methods an insurer can use to give
notice of cancellation. For notice to the
district director, the revised rule allows
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
insurers to report cancellations to
DLHWC either in a manner prescribed
under § 702.101(a) or in the same
manner as they report coverage under
§ 703.116 (including, where applicable,
through industry data collection
organizations). Reporting through these
established channels satisfies the
statutory requirement that notice be
delivered to the district director. For
notice to the employer, the revised rule
requires that the cancellation notice be
sent in accordance with the methods set
forth in § 702.101(b). Complying with
§ 702.101(b) satisfies the statutory
requirement that the cancellation notice
be delivered to the employer.
Importantly, an electronic report made
to DLHWC does not relieve the carrier
of its obligation to also provide written
notice of cancellation to the employer.
Moreover, the revised rule retains the
statutory requirement that notice to both
DLHWC and the employer must be
provided 30 days before the cancellation
is intended to be effective.
Section 703.116, as currently written,
requires insurance carriers to report all
policies and endorsements issued by
them to employers carrying on business
within a compensation district to that
particular district director. To conform
this regulation to the centralized
reporting system, revised § 703.116
replaces references to the district
director with references to DLHWC. In
addition, revised § 703.116 specifically
acknowledges that reports made through
an OWCP-authorized electronic system,
such as an industry data collection
organization, satisfy the carrier’s
reporting obligation. Instructions for
submitting coverage information to
DLHWC electronically will be posted on
OWCP’s Web site at https://www.dol.gov/
owcp/dlhwc/carrier.htm.
Section 703.117 specifies that the
report required by § 703.116 must be
sent by the insurance carrier’s home
office or authorized agent. The
regulation assumes that such reports
will be made to the district director in
the compensation district where the
employer is located, and requires the
carrier to tell the district director which
agency is authorized to issue reports on
its behalf. To conform this regulation to
the centralized reporting system, revised
§ 703.117 replaces references to the
district director with references to
DLHWC.
Section 703.118 provides that all
applicants for authority to write
insurance under the Act shall be
deemed to have agreed to accept full
liability for the insured’s obligations
under the Act. The current regulation
presumes that the district director for
the compensation district where an
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 48 / Thursday, March 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
insured employer carries on operations
will receive and accept the carrier’s
report of insurance. To conform this
regulation to the centralized reporting
system, revised § 703.118 replaces
references to the district director with
references to DLHWC.
Section 703.119 governs the situation
where an employer that is carrying on
operations covered by the Act in one
compensation district plans to begin
operations in a second. The regulation
provides that the carrier may submit the
report required by § 703.116 to the
district director in the new
compensation district before the
employer has an address in the new
district. Because carriers will no longer
be expected to provide notice regarding
insurance coverage to individual district
directors, there is no longer any need for
the procedure set forth in current
§ 703.119. Accordingly, the Department
has deleted this section.
Section 703.120 provides that a
separate report required by § 703.116
must be made for each employer that is
covered by a policy. DLHWC is able to
automatically extract employer-specific
coverage information from most
electronic reports that it receives, so this
requirement is often unnecessary when
coverage is reported electronically.
Accordingly, revised § 703.120 is
limited to reports made on Form LS–570
(Carrier’s Report of Issuance of Policy.)
The current regulation also presumes
that the district director for the
compensation district where an insured
employer carries on operations will
receive and accept the carrier’s report of
insurance. To conform this regulation to
the centralized reporting system, revised
§ 703.120 replaces references to the
district director with references to
DLHWC.
Section 703.502 provides that district
directors who receive a report of the
issuance of a policy that is authorized
by current § 703.119 shall file the report
until they receive an address for the
employer in the new compensation
district, at which point they shall issue
a certificate of compliance. The
Department has deleted current
§ 703.119 because carriers will no longer
be expected to provide notice regarding
insurance coverage to individual district
directors. Thus, there is no further need
for the special procedure laid out in
§ 703.502. Accordingly, the Department
has deleted this section.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Mar 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
V. Administrative Law Considerations
A. Information Collection Requirements
(Subject to the Paperwork Reduction
Act)
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., and its
attendant regulations, 5 CFR part 1320,
require that the Department consider the
impact of paperwork and other
information collection burdens imposed
on the public. A Federal agency
generally cannot conduct or sponsor a
collection of information, and the public
is generally not required to respond to
an information collection, unless it is
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the PRA and
displays a currently valid OMB Control
Number. In addition, notwithstanding
any other provisions of law, no person
shall generally be subject to penalty for
failing to comply with a collection of
information that does not display a
valid Control Number. See 5 CFR
1320.5(a) and 1320.6.
This rule allows parties to voluntarily
waive their statutory right to receive
compensation orders by registered or
certified mail and to instead receive
them by email. See 20 CFR 703.349. To
implement the waiver process, this rule
imposes two new collections of
information, OWCP Form LS–801,
Waiver of Service by Registered or
Certified Mail for Claimants and
Authorized Representatives, and OWCP
Form LS–802, Waiver of Service by
Registered or Certified Mail for
Employers and/or Insurance Carriers.
The Department has submitted an
Information Collection Request (ICR) for
both of these new forms under the
emergency procedures for review and
clearance contained in 5 CFR 1320.13.
This rule does not materially change
any other ICR with regard to the
information collected, but does change
the manner in which forms that collect
information may be submitted. Instead
of mandating the transmission of
information by postal mail, the rule
allows OWCP and private parties to use
electronic and other commonly used
communication methods. It also
provides flexibility for OWCP to allow
submission of information using future
technologies.
The collection of information
requirements are contained within ICRs
assigned OMB control numbers: 1240–
0003, 1240–0004, 1240–0005, 1240–
0014, 1240–0025, 1240–0026, 1240–
0029, 1240–0036, 1240–0040, 1240–
0041, 1240–0042 and 1240–0043. The
regulatory sections specifying the
submission procedures are found in
paragraphs: 20 CFR 702.111, 702.121,
702.162, 702.174, 702.175, 702.201,
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12925
702.202, 702.221, 702.234, 702.235,
702.236, 702.242, 702.251, 702.285,
702.317, 702.321, 702.407, 702.419,
703.116, 703.203, 703.204, 703.205,
703.209, 703.210, 703.212, 703.303 and
703.310.
Although the rule does not eliminate
any current methods of submission for
these collections, because its allowance
of electronic submission will result in
mailing cost savings (envelopes and
postage), OWCP anticipates some
savings for the public. Given the
response rate for each of the existing
collections, current combined mailing
costs are estimated at $113,977. The
Department anticipates a 13% rate of
electronic submission, an accompanying
reduction in postal mail submission,
and a resulting cost savings of $14,817.
In the future, as electronic transmission
submission options increase and are
used more frequently, this savings will
likely increase. The Department has
submitted a request for a nonsubstantive change for each existing ICR
cited above in order to obtain approval
for the changed cost estimate resulting
from the availability of electronic
submission methods.
The submitted ICRs for the two new
collections imposed by this rule will be
available for public inspection for at
least thirty days under the ‘‘Currently
Under Review’’ portion of the
Information Collection Review section
reginfo.gov Web site, available at:
https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. The Department will publish
a separate notice in the Federal Register
that will announce the result of the
OMB reviews. Currently approved
information collections are available for
public inspection under the ‘‘Current
Inventory’’ portion of the same Web site.
Request for Comments: As part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, the Department
conducts a pre-clearance consultation
program to provide the general public
and Federal agencies an opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information.
This program helps to ensure requested
data can be provided in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and
financial resources) is minimized,
collection instruments are clearly
understood, and the impact of collection
requirements can be properly assessed.
Comments on the information collection
requirements may be submitted to the
Department in the same manner as for
any other portion of this rule.
In addition to having an opportunity
to file comments with the agency, the
PRA provides that an interested party
may file comments on the information
collection requirements in a direct final
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
12926
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 48 / Thursday, March 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
rule directly with the Office of
Management and Budget, at Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attn: OMB Desk Officer for DOL–OWCP
Office of Management and Budget,
Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503; by Fax: 202–
395–5806 (this is not a toll-free
number); or by email: OIRA_
submission@omb.eop.gov. Commenters
are encouraged, but not required, to
send a courtesy copy of any comments
to the general addressee for this
rulemaking. The OMB will consider all
written comments that agency receives
within 30 days of publication of this
direct final rule in the Federal Register.
In order to help ensure appropriate
consideration, comments should
mention at least one of the control
numbers mentioned in this rule.
The OMB and the Department are
particularly interested in comments
that:
• Evaluate whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
The information collections in this
rule may be summarized as follows:
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
1. Title of Collection: Employer’s First
Report of Injury or Occupational
Disease, Employer’s Supplementary
Report of Accident or Occupational
Illness
OMB Control Number: 1240–0003.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 28,829.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden:
7,208 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs
Burden: $14,126.
2. Title of Collection: Exchange of
Documents and Information
OMB Control Number: 1240–0004.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 5,000.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden:
83 hours.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Mar 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs
Burden: $2,650.
3. Title of Collection: Securing Financial
Obligations Under the Longshore and
Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act and
Its Extensions
OMB Control Number: 1240–0005.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 668.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden:
454 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs
Burden: $344.
4. Title of Collection: Regulations
Governing the Administration of the
Longshore and Harbor Workers’
Compensation Act
OMB Control Number: 1240–0014.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 130,036.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden:
44,955 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs
Burden: $46,866.
5. Title of Collection: Request for
Earnings Information
OMB Control Number: 1240–0025.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 1,100.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden:
275 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs
Burden: $528.
6. Title of Collection: Application for
Continuation of Death Benefit for
Student
OMB Control Number: 1240–0026.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 20.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden:
10 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs
Burden: $10.
7. Title of Collection: Request for
Examination and/or Treatment
OMB Control Number: 1240–0029.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 96,000.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden:
52,000 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs
Burden: $2,088,960.
8. Title of Collection: Longshore and
Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act PreHearing Statement
OMB Control Number: 1240–0036.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 3,100.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden:
527 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs
Burden: $1,612.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
9. Title of Collection: Certification of
Funeral Expenses
OMB Control Number: 1240–0040.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 75.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden:
19 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs
Burden: $39.
10. Title of Collection: Notice of Final
Payment or Suspension of
Compensation Benefits
OMB Control Number: 1240–0041.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 21,000.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden:
5,250 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs
Burden: $16,590.
11. Title of Collection: Notice of
Controversion of Right to Compensation
OMB Control Number: 1240–0042.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 18,000.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden:
4,500 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs
Burden: $9,013.
12. Title of Collection: Payment of
Compensation Without Award
OMB Control Number: 1240–0043.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 16,800.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden:
4,200 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs
Burden: $8,736.
B. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
(Regulatory Planning and Review)
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. The
Department has considered this rule
with these principles in mind and has
concluded that the regulated
community will greatly benefit from this
regulation.
This rule’s greatest benefit is that it
provides the Longshore Program and the
affected public the flexibility to make
greater use of technology as it exists
today and as it may be developed in the
future. In some instances, the current
regulations restrict the means of
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 48 / Thursday, March 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
delivery or receipt when not required by
the statute’s terms. See, e.g., 20 CFR
702.215 (notice effected by ‘‘delivery by
hand or mail’’); 20 CFR 702.104(b) (case
transfers must be accomplished by
‘‘registered or certified mail’’).
Eliminating these restrictions where
appropriate and consistent with the
statute broadens available transmission
methods. From the Department’s view,
this rule allows easier and more
efficient transmission of critical
documents and information to OWCP,
and allows OWCP to take advantage of
more efficient means of delivery to
parties. And the regulated community,
which has asked the Department to
allow more modern transmission
methods to be used, can use electronic
technologies that they routinely employ
when communicating with other
entities.
All currently used methods of
submitting documents remain available
to OWCP, the parties, and the parties’
representatives. OWCP will continue to
accept documents delivered by hand or
routine mail and the parties may
communicate with each other in the
same way. Thus, a party or
representative may continue to send and
receive claim-related documents and
information in the same manner as it
currently does. But the rule in many
cases gives the parties additional
transmission options.
In addition, allowing parties and
representatives to waive their right to
registered or certified mail service of
compensation orders will expedite
compensation payments. This is an
important benefit to the rule: Faster
delivery of compensation orders via
electronic transmission will result in
more expeditious payment of benefits to
injured workers.
The Department has also considered
whether the parties will realize any
monetary benefits or incur any
additional costs in light of this rule. The
rule expands opportunities for parties
and their representatives to submit and
receive documents and does not require
deviation from current practice. So the
rule imposes no additional expense. To
the contrary, the Department anticipates
that the rule will provide some savings
because an electronically transmitted
document does not require postage or
reproduction of multiple hard copies.
Although difficult to quantify, the
Department estimates that initial usage
of electronic means of transmission will
be approximately 13%, with increased
usage possible in the future.
Finally, because this is not a
‘‘significant’’ rule within the meaning of
Executive Order 12866, the Office of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Mar 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
Management and Budget has not
reviewed it prior to publication.
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq., directs agencies to assess the
effects of Federal Regulatory Actions on
State, local, and tribal governments, and
the private sector, ‘‘other than to the
extent that such regulations incorporate
requirements specifically set forth in
law.’’ 2 U.S.C. 1531. For purposes of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, this
rule does not include any Federal
mandate that may result in increased
expenditures by State, local, tribal
governments, or increased expenditures
by the private sector of more than
$100,000,000.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act and
Executive Order 13272 (Proper
Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking)
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
(RFA), requires agencies to evaluate the
potential impacts of their proposed and
final rules on small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions and to prepare an analysis
(called a ‘‘regulatory flexibility
analysis’’) describing those impacts. See
5 U.S.C. 601, 603–604. But if the rule is
not expected to ‘‘have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities[,]’’ the RFA
allows an agency to so certify in lieu of
preparing the analysis. See 5 U.S.C. 605.
The Department has determined that
a regulatory flexibility analysis under
the RFA is not required for this
rulemaking. Many Longshore employers
and a handful of insurance carriers may
be considered small entities within the
meaning of the RFA. See generally 77
FR 19471–72 (March 30, 2012); 69 FR
12222–23 (March 15, 2004). But this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on these entities for
several reasons. First, the revisions do
not impose mandatory change on the
employers. Instead, employers may
choose to transmit documents and
related information in the same manner
as they do under the current rules.
Second, although the rules allow
insurance companies to report the
issuance of policies and endorsements
electronically, these companies—
virtually without exception—have been
voluntarily reporting coverage in the
manner the rule allows for several years.
No change in their conduct will be
required. Third, because the rule
provides more flexibility for employers
and insurers in transmitting documents
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12927
and information, the Department
anticipates that these entities could see
some economic savings by having the
freedom to choose the most costeffective transmission method for their
businesses.
Based on these facts, the Department
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Thus, a regulatory flexibility analysis is
not required. The Department invites
comments from members of the public
who believe the regulations will have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small Longshore
employers or insurers. The Department
has provided the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration with a copy of this
certification. See 5 U.S.C. 605.
E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
The Department has reviewed this
rule in accordance with Executive Order
13132 regarding federalism, and has
determined that it does not have
‘‘federalism implications.’’ E.O. 13132,
64 FR 43255 (August 4, 1999). The rule
will not ‘‘have substantial direct effects
on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’ Id.
F. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
This rule meets the applicable
standards in Sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
List of Subjects
20 CFR Part 702
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Health professions,
Insurance companies, Longshore and
harbor workers, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Workers’
compensation.
20 CFR Part 703
Insurance companies, Longshore and
harbor workers, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Workers’
compensation.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Department of Labor
amends 20 CFR parts 702 and 703 as
follows:
PART 702—ADMINISTRATION AND
PROCEDURE
1. The authority citation for part 702
is revised to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
12928
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 48 / Thursday, March 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, and 8171 et seq.;
33 U.S.C. 901 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 1651 et seq.;
43 U.S.C. 1333; Reorganization Plan No. 6 of
1950, 15 FR 3174, 64 Stat. 1263; Secretary’s
Order 10–2009, 74 FR 58834.
2. Add § 702.101 to subpart A to read
as follows:
■
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 702.101 Exchange of documents and
information.
(a) Except as otherwise required by
the regulations in this subchapter, all
documents and information sent to
OWCP under this subchapter must be
submitted—
(1) In hard copy by postal mail,
commercial delivery service (such as
Federal Express or United Parcel
Service), or hand delivery;
(2) Electronically through an OWCPauthorized system; or
(3) As otherwise allowed by OWCP.
(b) Except as otherwise required by
the regulations in this subchapter, all
documents and information sent under
this subchapter by OWCP to parties and
their representatives or from any party
or representative to another party or
representative must be sent—
(1) In hard copy by postal mail,
commercial delivery service (such as
Federal Express or United Parcel
Service), or hand delivery;
(2) Electronically by a reliable
electronic method if the receiving party
or representative agrees in writing to
receive documents and information by
that method; or
(3) Electronically through an OWCPauthorized system that provides service
of documents on the parties and their
representatives.
(c) Reliable electronic methods for
delivering documents include, but are
not limited to, email, facsimile and web
portal.
(d) Any party or representative may
revoke his or her agreement to receive
documents and information
electronically by giving written notice to
OWCP, the party, or the representative
with whom he or she had agreed to
receive documents and information
electronically, as appropriate.
(e) The provisions in paragraphs (a)
through (d) of this section apply when
parties are directed by the regulations in
this subchapter to: Advise; apply;
approve; authorize; demand; file;
forward; furnish; give; give notice;
inform; issue; make; notice, notify;
provide; publish; receive; recommend;
refer; release; report; request; respond;
return; send; serve; service; submit; or
transmit.
(f) Any reference in this subchapter to
an application, copy, filing, form, letter,
written notice, or written request
includes both hard-copy and electronic
documents.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Mar 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
(g) Any requirement in this
subchapter that a document or
information be submitted in writing, or
that it be signed, executed, or certified
does not preclude its submission or
exchange electronically.
(h) Any reference in this subchapter
to transmitting information to an
entity’s address may include that
entity’s electronic address or electronic
portal.
(i) Any requirement in this subchapter
that a document or information—
(1) Be sent to a specific district
director means that the document or
information should be sent to the
physical or electronic address provided
by OWCP for that district director; and
(2) Be filed by a district director in his
or her office means that the document
or information may be filed in a
physical or electronic location specified
by OWCP for that district director.
■ 3. Revise § 702.102 to read as follows:
§ 702.102 Establishment and modification
of compensation districts, establishment of
suboffices and jurisdictional areas.
(a) The Director has, pursuant to
section 39(b) of the Longshore and
Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33
U.S.C. 939(b), established compensation
districts as required for improved
administration or as otherwise
determined by the Director (see 51 FR
4282, Feb. 3, 1986). The boundaries of
the compensation districts may be
modified at any time, and the Director
will notify all interested parties directly
of the modifications.
(b) As administrative exigencies from
time to time may require, the Director
may, by administrative order, establish
special areas outside the continental
United States, Alaska, and Hawaii, or
change or modify any areas so
established, notwithstanding their
inclusion within an established
compensation district. Such areas will
be designated ‘‘jurisdictional areas.’’
The Director will also designate which
of his district directors will be in charge
thereof.
(c) To further aid in the efficient
administration of the OWCP, the
Director may from time to time establish
suboffices within compensation districts
or jurisdictional areas, and will
designate a person to be in charge
thereof.
■ 4. Revise § 702.103 to read as follows:
§ 702.103 Effect of establishment of
suboffices and jurisdictional areas.
Whenever the Director establishes a
suboffice or jurisdictional area, those
reports, records, or other documents
with respect to processing of claims that
are required to be filed with the district
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
director of the compensation district in
which the injury or death occurred, may
instead be required to be filed with the
suboffice, or office established for the
jurisdictional area.
■ 5. Revise § 702.104(b) to read as
follows:
§ 702.104
Transfer of individual case file.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The district director making the
transfer may by letter or memorandum
to the district director to whom the case
is transferred give advice, comments,
suggestions, or directions if appropriate
to the particular case. All interested
parties will be advised of the transfer.
■ 6. In § 702.174, revise the introductory
text of paragraph (a), paragraph (b), and
the introductory text of paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
§ 702.174 Exemptions; necessary
information.
(a) Application. Before any facility is
exempt from coverage under the Act,
the facility must apply for and receive
a certificate of exemption from the
Director or his/her designee. The
application must be made by the owner
of the facility; where the owner is a
partnership it must be made by a
partner and where a corporation by an
officer of the corporation or the manager
in charge of the facility for which an
exemption is sought. The information
submitted must include the following:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Action by the Director. The
Director or his/her designee must
review the application within thirty (30)
days of its receipt.
(1) Where the application is complete
and shows that all requirements under
§ 702.173 are met, the Director must
promptly notify the employer that
certification has been approved and will
be effective on the date specified. The
employer is required to post notice of
the exemption at a conspicuous
location.
(2) Where the application is
incomplete or does not substantiate that
all requirements of section 3(d) of the
Act, 33 U.S.C. 903(d), have been met, or
evidence shows the facility is not
eligible for exemption, the Director must
promptly notify the employer by issuing
a letter which details the reasons for the
deficiency or the rejection. The
employer/applicant may reapply for
certification, correcting deficiencies
and/or responding to the reasons for the
Director’s denial. The Director or his/
her designee must issue a new decision
within a reasonable time of
reapplication following denial. Such
action will be the final administrative
review and is not appealable to the
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 48 / Thursday, March 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Administrative Law Judge or the
Benefits Review Board.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Action by the employer.
Immediately upon receipt of the
certificate of exemption from coverage
under the Act the employer must post:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Revise § 702.203 to read as follows:
§ 702.203
Employer’s report; how given.
(a) The employer must file its report
of injury with the district director.
(b) If the employer sends its report of
injury by U.S. postal mail or commercial
delivery service, the report will be
considered filed on the date that the
employer mails the document or gives it
to the commercial delivery service. If
the employer sends its report of injury
by a permissible electronic method, the
report will be considered filed on the
date that the employer completes all
steps necessary for the transmission.
■ 8. Revise § 702.215 to read as follows:
§ 702.215
Notice; how given.
Notice must be effected by delivering
it to the individual designated to receive
such notices at the physical or
electronic address designated by the
employer. Notice may be given to the
district director by submitting a copy of
the form supplied by OWCP to the
district director, or orally in person or
by telephone.
■ 9. Revise § 702.224 to read as follows:
§ 702.224 Claims; notification of employer
of filing by employee.
Within 10 days after the filing of a
claim for compensation for injury or
death under the Act, the district director
must give written notice thereof to the
employer or carrier.
■ 10. Revise § 702.234 to read as
follows:
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 702.234 Report by employer of
commencement and suspension of
payments.
Immediately upon making the first
payment of compensation, and upon the
suspension of payments once begun, the
employer must notify the district
director who is administering the claim
of the commencement or suspension of
payments, as the case may be.
■ 11. In § 702.243, revise paragraphs (a)
and (b), the first two sentences of
paragraph (c), the introductory text of
paragraph (f), and paragraph (g) to read
as follows:
§ 702.243 Settlement application; how
submitted, how approved, how
disapproved, criteria.
(a) When the parties to a claim for
compensation, including survivor
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Mar 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
benefits and medical benefits, agree to a
settlement they must submit a complete
application to the adjudicator. The
application must contain all the
information outlined in § 702.242 and
must be sent by certified mail with
return receipt requested, commercial
delivery service with tracking capability
that provides reliable proof of delivery
to the adjudicator, or electronically
through an OWCP-authorized system.
Failure to submit a complete application
will toll the thirty day period mentioned
in section 8(i) of the Act, 33 U.S.C.
908(i), until a complete application is
received.
(b) The adjudicator must consider the
settlement application within thirty
days and either approve or disapprove
the application. The liability of an
employer/insurance carrier is not
discharged until the settlement is
specifically approved by a
compensation order issued by the
adjudicator. However, if the parties are
represented by counsel, the settlement
will be deemed approved unless
specifically disapproved within thirty
days after receipt of a complete
application. This thirty day period does
not begin until all the information
described in § 702.242 has been
submitted. The adjudicator will
examine the settlement application
within thirty days and must
immediately serve on all parties notice
of any deficiency. This notice must also
indicate that the thirty day period will
not commence until the deficiency is
corrected.
(c) If the adjudicator disapproves a
settlement application, the adjudicator
must serve on all parties a written
statement or order containing the
reasons for disapproval. This statement
must be served within thirty days of
receipt of a complete application (as
described in § 702.242) if the parties are
represented by counsel. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(f) When presented with a settlement,
the adjudicator must review the
application and determine whether,
considering all of the circumstances,
including, where appropriate, the
probability of success if the case were
formally litigated, the amount is
adequate. The criteria for determining
the adequacy of the settlement
application will include, but not be
limited to:
*
*
*
*
*
(g) In cases being paid pursuant to a
final compensation order, where no
substantive issues are in dispute, a
settlement amount which does not equal
the present value of future
compensation payments commuted,
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12929
computed at the discount rate specified
below, must be considered inadequate
unless the parties to the settlement
show that the amount is adequate. The
probability of the death of the
beneficiary before the expiration of the
period during which he or she is
entitled to compensation will be
determined according to the most
current United States Life Table, as
developed by the United States
Department of Health and Human
Services, which will be updated from
time to time. The discount rate will be
equal to the coupon issue yield
equivalent (as determined by the
Secretary of the Treasury) of the average
accepted auction price for the last
auction of 52 weeks U.S. Treasury Bills
settled immediately prior to the date of
the submission of the settlement
application.
■ 12. Revise § 702.251 to read as
follows:
§ 702.251 Employer’s controversion of the
right to compensation.
Where the employer controverts the
right to compensation after notice or
knowledge of the injury or death, or
after receipt of a written claim, he must
give notice thereof, stating the reasons
for controverting the right to
compensation, using the form
prescribed by the Director. Such notice,
or answer to the claim, must be filed
with the district director within 14 days
from the date the employer receives
notice or has knowledge of the injury or
death. A copy of the notice must also be
given to the claimant.
■ 13. Revise § 702.261 to read as
follows:
§ 702.261 Claimant’s contest of actions
taken by employer or carrier with respect to
the claim.
Where the claimant contests an action
by the employer or carrier reducing,
suspending, or terminating benefits,
including medical care, he should
immediately notify the office of the
district director who is administering
the claim and set forth the facts
pertinent to his complaint.
■ 14. In § 702.272, revise the last two
sentences of paragraph (a) and
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 702.272 Informal recommendation by
district director.
(a) * * * If the district director
determines that no violation occurred
he must notify the parties of his findings
and the reasons for recommending that
the complaint be denied. If the
employer and employee accept the
district director’s recommendation,
within 10 days it will be incorporated
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
12930
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 48 / Thursday, March 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
in an order, to be filed and served in
accordance with § 702.349.
(b) If the parties do not agree to the
recommendation, the district director
must, within 10 days after receipt of the
rejection, prepare a memorandum
summarizing the disagreement, send a
copy to all interested parties, and within
14 days thereafter, refer the case to the
Office of the Chief Administrative Law
Judge for hearing pursuant to § 702.317.
■ 15. In § 702.281, revise the
introductory text of paragraph (a) and
the last sentence of paragraph (b) to read
as follows:
§ 702.281
Third party action.
(a) Every person claiming benefits
under this Act (or the representative)
must promptly notify the employer and
the district director when:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * * The approval must be on a
form provided by OWCP and must be
filed, within thirty days after the
settlement is entered into, with the
district director who is administering
the claim.
■ 16. Revise § 702.315 to read as
follows:
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 702.315 Conclusion of conference;
agreement on all matters with respect to the
claim.
(a) Following an informal conference
at which agreement is reached on all
issues, the district director must (within
10 days after conclusion of the
conference), embody the agreement in a
memorandum or within 30 days issue a
formal compensation order, to be filed
and served in accordance with
§ 702.349. If either party requests that a
formal compensation order be issued,
the district director must, within 30
days of such request, prepare, file, and
serve such order in accordance with
§ 702.349. Where the problem was of
such nature that it was resolved by
telephone discussion or by exchange of
written correspondence, the district
director must prepare a memorandum or
order setting forth the terms agreed
upon and notify the parties either by
telephone or in writing, as appropriate.
In either instance, when the employer or
carrier has agreed to pay, reinstate or
increase monetary compensation
benefits, or to restore or appropriately
change medical care benefits, such
action must be commenced immediately
upon becoming aware of the agreement,
and without awaiting receipt of the
memorandum or the formal
compensation order.
(b) Where there are several
conferences or discussions, the
provisions of paragraph (a) of this
section do not apply until the last
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Mar 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
conference. The district director must,
however, prepare and place in his
administrative file a short, succinct
memorandum of each preceding
conference or discussion.
■ 17. Revise § 702.317 to read as
follows:
§ 702.317 Preparation and transfer of the
case for hearing.
A case is prepared for transfer in the
following manner:
(a) The district director will furnish
each of the parties or their
representatives with a copy of a
prehearing statement form.
(b) Each party must, within 21 days
after receipt of such form, complete it
and return it to the district director and
serve copies on all other parties.
Extensions of time for good cause may
be granted by the district director.
(c) Upon receipt of the completed
forms, the district director, after
checking them for completeness and
after any further conferences that, in his
or her opinion, are warranted, will
transmit them to the Office of the Chief
Administrative Law Judge by letter of
transmittal together with all available
evidence which the parties intend to
submit at the hearings (exclusive of Xrays, slides and other materials not
suitable for transmission which may be
offered into evidence at the time of the
hearing); the materials transmitted must
not include any recommendations
expressed or memoranda prepared by
the district director pursuant to
§ 702.316.
(d) If the completed pre-hearing
statement forms raise new or additional
issues not previously considered by the
district director or indicate that material
evidence will be submitted that could
reasonably have been made available to
the district director before he or she
prepared the last memorandum of
conference, the district director will
transfer the case to the Office of the
Chief Administrative Law Judge only
after having considered such issues or
evaluated such evidence or both and
having issued an additional
memorandum of conference in
conformance with § 702.316.
(e) If a party fails to complete or
return his or her pre-hearing statement
form within the time allowed, the
district director may, at his or her
discretion, transmit the case without
that party’s form. However, such
transmittal must include a statement
from the district director setting forth
the circumstances causing the failure to
include the form, and such party’s
failure to submit a pre-hearing statement
form may, subject to rebuttal at the
formal hearing, be considered by the
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
administrative law judge, to the extent
intransigence is relevant, in subsequent
rulings on motions which may be made
in the course of the formal hearing.
■ 18. Revise § 702.319 to read as
follows:
§ 702.319 Obtaining documents from the
administrative file for reintroduction at
formal hearings.
Whenever any party considers any
document in the administrative file
essential to any further proceedings
under the Act, it is the responsibility of
such party to obtain such document
from the district director and
reintroduce it for the record before the
administrative law judge. The type of
document that may be obtained will be
limited to documents previously
submitted to the district director,
including documents or forms with
respect to notices, claims,
controversions, contests, progress
reports, medical services or supplies,
etc. The work products of the district
director or his staff will not be subject
to retrieval. The procedure for obtaining
documents will be for the requesting
party to inform the district director in
writing of the documents he wishes to
obtain, specifying them with
particularity. Upon receipt, the district
director must promptly forward a copy
of the requested materials to the
requesting party. A copy of the letter of
request and a statement of whether it
has been satisfied must be kept in the
case file.
■ 19. In § 702.321, revise paragraphs
(a)(1), (b), and (c) to read as follows:
§ 702.321 Procedures for determining
applicability of section 8(f) of the Act.
(a) Application: filing, service,
contents. (1) An employer or insurance
carrier which seeks to invoke the
provisions of section 8(f) of the Act
must request limitation of its liability
and file a fully documented application
with the district director. A fully
documented application must contain a
specific description of the pre-existing
condition relied upon as constituting an
existing permanent partial disability
and the reasons for believing that the
claimant’s permanent disability after the
injury would be less were it not for the
pre-existing permanent partial disability
or that the death would not have ensued
but for that disability. These reasons
must be supported by medical evidence
as specified in this paragraph. The
application must also contain the basis
for the assertion that the pre-existing
condition relied upon was manifest in
the employer and documentary medical
evidence relied upon in support of the
request for section 8(f) relief. This
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 48 / Thursday, March 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
medical evidence must include, but not
be limited to, a current medical report
establishing the extent of all
impairments and the date of maximum
medical improvement. If the claimant
has already reached maximum medical
improvement, a report prepared at that
time will satisfy the requirement for a
current medical report. If the current
disability is total, the medical report
must explain why the disability is not
due solely to the second injury. If the
current disability is partial, the medical
report must explain why the disability
is not due solely to the second injury
and why the resulting disability is
materially and substantially greater than
that which would have resulted from
the subsequent injury alone. If the
injury is loss of hearing, the pre-existing
hearing loss must be documented by an
audiogram which complies with the
requirements of § 702.441. If the claim
is for survivor’s benefits, the medical
report must establish that the death was
not due solely to the second injury. Any
other evidence considered necessary for
consideration of the request for section
8(f) relief must be submitted when
requested by the district director or
Director.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Application: Time for filing. (1) A
request for section 8(f) relief should be
made as soon as the permanency of the
claimant’s condition becomes known or
is an issue in dispute. This could be
when benefits are first paid for
permanent disability, or at an informal
conference held to discuss the
permanency of the claimant’s condition.
Where the claim is for death benefits,
the request should be made as soon as
possible after the date of death. Along
with the request for section 8(f) relief,
the applicant must also submit all the
supporting documentation required by
this section, described in paragraph (a)
of this section. Where possible, this
documentation should accompany the
request, but may be submitted
separately, in which case the district
director must, at the time of the request,
fix a date for submission of the fully
documented application. The date must
be fixed as follows:
(i) Where notice is given to all parties
that permanency will be an issue at an
informal conference, the fully
documented application must be
submitted at or before the conference.
For these purposes, notice means when
the issue of permanency is noted on the
form LS–141, Notice of Informal
Conference. All parties are required to
list issues reasonably anticipated to be
discussed at the conference when the
initial request for a conference is made
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Mar 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
and to notify all parties of additional
issues which arise during the period
before the conference is actually held.
(ii) Where the issue of permanency is
first raised at the informal conference
and could not have reasonably been
anticipated by the parties prior to the
conference, the district director must
adjourn the conference and establish the
date by which the fully documented
application must be submitted and so
notify the employer/carrier. The date
will be set by the district director after
reviewing the circumstances of the case.
(2) At the request of the employer or
insurance carrier, and for good cause,
the district director, at his/her
discretion, may grant an extension of
the date for submission of the fully
documented application. In fixing the
date for submission of the application
under circumstances other than
described above or in considering any
request for an extension of the date for
submitting the application, the district
director must consider all the
circumstances of the case, including but
not limited to: Whether the claimant is
being paid compensation and the
hardship to the claimant of delaying
referral of the case to the Office of
Administrative Law Judges (OALJ); the
complexity of the issues and the
availability of medical and other
evidence to the employer; the length of
time the employer was or should have
been aware that permanency is an issue;
and, the reasons listed in support of the
request. If the employer/carrier
requested a specific date, the reasons for
selection of that date will also be
considered. Neither the date selected for
submission of the fully documented
application nor any extension therefrom
can go beyond the date the case is
referred to the OALJ for formal hearing.
(3) Where the claimant’s condition
has not reached maximum medical
improvement and no claim for
permanency is raised by the date the
case is referred to the OALJ, an
application need not be submitted to the
district director to preserve the
employer’s right to later seek relief
under section 8(f) of the Act. In all other
cases, failure to submit a fully
documented application by the date
established by the district director will
be an absolute defense to the liability of
the special fund. This defense is an
affirmative defense which must be
raised and pleaded by the Director. The
absolute defense will not be raised
where permanency was not an issue
before the district director. In all other
cases, where permanency has been
raised, the failure of an employer to
submit a timely and fully documented
application for section 8(f) relief will
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12931
not prevent the district director, at his/
her discretion, from considering the
claim for compensation and
transmitting the case for formal hearing.
The failure of an employer to present a
timely and fully documented
application for section 8(f) relief may be
excused only where the employer could
not have reasonably anticipated the
liability of the special fund prior to the
consideration of the claim by the district
director. Relief under section 8(f) is not
available to an employer who fails to
comply with section 32(a) of the Act, 33
U.S.C. 932(a).
(c) Application: Approval,
disapproval. If all the evidence required
by paragraph (a) of this section was
submitted with the application for
section 8(f) relief and the facts warrant
relief under this section, the district
director must award such relief after
concurrence by the Associate Director,
DLHWC, or his or her designee. If the
district director or the Associate
Director or his or her designee finds that
the facts do not warrant relief under
section 8(f) the district director must
advise the employer of the grounds for
the denial. The application for section
8(f) relief may then be considered by an
administrative law judge. When a case
is transmitted to the Office of
Administrative Law Judges the district
director must also attach a copy of the
application for section 8(f) relief
submitted by the employer, and
notwithstanding § 702.317(c), the
district director’s denial of the
application.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 20. Revise § 702.349 to read as
follows:
§ 702.349 Formal hearings; filing and
mailing of compensation orders; waiver of
service; disposition of transcripts.
(a) An administrative law judge must,
within 20 days after the official
termination of the hearing, deliver by
mail, or otherwise, to the district
director that administered the claim, the
transcript of the hearing, other
documents or pleadings filed with him
with respect to the claim, and his signed
compensation order. Upon receipt
thereof, the district director, being the
official custodian of all records with
respect to claims he administers, must
formally date and file the transcript,
pleadings, and compensation order in
his office. Such filing must be
accomplished by the close of business
on the next succeeding working day,
and the district director must, on the
same day as the filing was
accomplished, serve a copy of the
compensation order on the parties and
on the representatives of the parties, if
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
12932
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 48 / Thursday, March 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
any. Service on the parties and their
representatives must be made by
certified mail unless a party has
previously waived service by this
method under paragraph (b) of this
section.
(b) All parties and their
representatives are entitled to be served
with compensation orders via registered
or certified mail. Parties and their
representatives may waive this right and
elect to be served with compensation
orders electronically by filing the
appropriate waiver form with the
district director responsible for
administering the claim. To waive
service by registered or certified mail,
employers, insurance carriers, and their
representatives must file form LS–801
(Waiver of Service by Registered or
Certified Mail for Employers and/or
Insurance Carriers), and claimants and
their representatives must file form LS–
802 (Waiver of Service by Registered or
Certified Mail for Claimants and/or
Authorized Representatives). A
signature on a waiver form represents a
knowing and voluntary waiver of that
party’s or representative’s right to
receive compensation orders via
registered or certified mail.
(1) Waiving parties and
representatives must provide a valid
electronic address on the waiver form.
(2) Parties and representatives must
submit a separate waiver form for each
case in which they intend to waive the
right to certified or registered mail
service.
(3) A representative may not sign a
waiver form on a party’s behalf.
(4) All compensation orders issued in
a claim after receipt of the waiver form
will be sent to the electronic address
provided on the waiver form. Any
changes to the address must be made by
submitting another waiver form.
Individuals may revoke their service
waiver at any time by submitting a new
waiver form that specifies that the
service waiver is being revoked.
(5) If it appears that service in the
manner selected by the individual has
not been effective, the district director
will serve the individual by certified
mail.
■ 21. Revise § 702.372 to read as
follows:
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 702.372
orders.
Supplementary compensation
(a) In any case in which the employer
or insurance carrier is in default in the
payment of compensation due under
any award of compensation, for a period
of 30 days after the compensation is due
and payable, the person to whom such
compensation is payable may, within 1
year after such default, apply in writing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Mar 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
to the district director for a
supplementary compensation order
declaring the amount of the default.
Upon receipt of such application, the
district director will institute
proceedings with respect to such
application as if such application were
an original claim for compensation, and
the matter will be disposed of as
provided for in § 702.315, or if
agreement on the issue is not reached,
then as in §§ 702.316 through 702.319.
(b) If, after disposition of the
application as provided for in paragraph
(a) of this section, a supplementary
compensation order is entered declaring
the amount of the default, which
amount may be the whole of the award
notwithstanding that only one or more
installments is in default, a copy of such
supplementary order must be filed and
served in accordance with § 702.349.
Thereafter, the applicant may obtain
and file with the clerk of the Federal
district court for the judicial district
where the injury occurred or the district
in which the employer has his principal
place of business or maintains an office,
a certified copy of said order and may
seek enforcement thereof as provided
for by section 18 of the Act, 33 U.S.C.
918.
22. In § 702.432, revise the
introductory text of paragraph (b), and
paragraphs (b)(6) and (e) to read as
follows:
■
§ 702.432
Debarment process.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Pertaining to health care providers
and claims representatives. If after
appropriate investigation the Director
determines that proceedings should be
initiated, written notice thereof must be
provided to the physician, health care
provider or claims representative.
Notice must contain the following:
*
*
*
*
*
(6) The name and address of the
district director who will be responsible
for receiving the answer from the
physician, health care provider or
claims representative.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) The Director must issue a decision
in writing, and must send a copy of the
decision to the physician, health care
provider or claims representative. The
decision must advise the physician,
health care provider or claims
representative of the right to request,
within thirty (30) days of the date of an
adverse decision, a formal hearing
before an administrative law judge
under the procedures set forth herein.
The filing of such a request for hearing
within the time specified will operate to
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
stay the effectiveness of the decision to
debar.
■ 23. In § 702.433, revise paragraphs (a),
(b), (e) and (f) to read as follows:
§ 702.433
Requests for hearing.
(a) A request for hearing must be sent
to the district director and contain a
concise notice of the issues on which
the physician, health care provider or
claims representative desires to give
evidence at the hearing with
identification of witnesses and
documents to be submitted at the
hearing.
(b) If a request for hearing is timely
received by the district director, the
matter must be referred to the Chief
Administrative Law Judge who must
assign it for hearing with the assigned
administrative law judge issuing a
notice of hearing for the conduct of the
hearing. A copy of the hearing notice
must be served on the physician, health
care provider or claims representative.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) The administrative law judge will
issue a recommended decision after the
termination of the hearing. The
recommended decision must contain
appropriate findings, conclusions and a
recommended order and be forwarded,
together with the record of the hearing,
to the Administrative Review Board for
a final decision. The recommended
decision must be served upon all parties
to the proceeding.
(f) Based upon a review of the record
and the recommended decision of the
administrative law judge, the
Administrative Review Board will issue
a final decision.
PART 703—INSURANCE
REGULATIONS
24. The authority citation for part 703
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, and 8171 et seq.;
33 U.S.C. 901 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 1651 et seq.;
43 U.S.C. 1333; Reorganization Plan No. 6 of
1950, 15 FR 3174, 64 Stat. 1263; Secretary’s
Order 10–2009, 74 FR 58834.
25. In § 703.2, revise the introductory
text of paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 703.2
Forms.
(a) Any information required by the
regulations in this part to be submitted
to OWCP must be submitted on forms
the Director authorizes from time to
time for such purpose. Persons
submitting forms may not modify the
forms or use substitute forms without
OWCP’s approval. These forms must be
submitted, sent, or filed in the manner
prescribed by OWCP.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 48 / Thursday, March 12, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
26. Revise § 703.113 to read as
follows:
notifies DLHWC of the agencies so duly
authorized.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
§ 703.113
■
30. Revise § 703.118 to read as
follows:
Coast Guard
§ 703.118
report.
33 CFR Part 117
■
Marine insurance contracts.
A longshoremen’s policy, or the
longshoremen’s endorsement provided
for by § 703.109 for attachment to a
marine policy, may specify the
particular vessel or vessels in respect of
which the policy applies and the
address of the employer at the home
port thereof. The report of the issuance
of a policy or endorsement required by
§ 703.116 must be made to DLHWC and
must show the name and address of the
owner as well as the name or names of
such vessel or vessels.
■ 27. Revise § 703.114 to read as
follows:
§ 703.114
Notice of cancellation.
Cancellation of a contract or policy of
insurance issued under authority of the
Act will not become effective otherwise
than as provided by 33 U.S.C. 936(b); 30
days before such cancellation is
intended to be effective, notice of a
proposed cancellation must be given to
the district director and the employer in
accordance with the provisions of 33
U.S.C. 912(c). The notice requirements
of 33 U.S.C. 912(c) will be considered
met when:
(a) Notice to the district director is
given by a method specified in
§ 702.101(a) of this chapter or in the
same manner that reports of issuance of
policies and endorsements are reported
under § 703.116; and
(b) Notice to the employer is given by
a method specified in § 702.101(b) of
this chapter.
■ 28. Revise § 703.116 to read as
follows:
§ 703.116 Report by carrier of issuance of
policy or endorsement.
Each carrier must report to DLHWC
each policy and endorsement issued by
it to an employer whose employees are
engaging in work subject to the Act and
its extensions. Such reports must be
made in a manner prescribed by OWCP.
Reports made to an OWCP-authorized
intermediary, such as an industry data
collection organization, satisfy this
reporting requirement.
■ 29. Revise § 703.117 to read as
follows:
§ 703.117
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
12933
Report; by whom sent.
Agreement to be bound by
[Docket No. USCG–2015–0151]
Every applicant for the authority to
write insurance under the provisions of
this Act, will be deemed to have
included in its application an agreement
that the acceptance by DLHWC of a
report of insurance, as provided for by
§ 703.116, binds the carrier to full
liability for the obligations under this
Act of the employer named in said
report, and every certificate of authority
to write insurance under this Act will be
deemed to have been issued by the
Office upon consideration of the
carrier’s agreement to become so bound.
It will be no defense to this agreement
that the carrier failed or delayed to issue
the policy to the employer covered by
this report.
§ 703.119
■
[Removed and Reserved]
31. Remove and reserve § 703.119.
32. Revise § 703.120 to read as
follows:
■
§ 703.120 Name of one employer only in
each report.
For policies that are reported to
DLHWC on Form LS–570 (Carrier’s
Report of Issuance of Policy), a separate
report of the issuance of a policy and
endorsement, provided for by § 703.116,
must be made for each employer
covered by a policy. If a policy is issued
insuring more than one employer, a
separate form LS–570 for each employer
so covered must be sent to DLHWC in
the manner described in § 703.116, with
the name of only one employer on each
form.
§ 703.502
■
[Removed and Reserved]
33. Remove and reserve § 703.502.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of
February, 2015.
Leonard J. Howie III,
Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015–05103 Filed 3–11–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–CR–P
The report of issuance of a policy and
endorsement provided for in § 703.116
or notice of cancellation provided for in
§ 703.114 must be sent by the home
office of the carrier, except that any
carrier may authorize its agency or
agencies in any compensation district to
make such reports, provided the carrier
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:12 Mar 11, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Columbia River, Vancouver, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of deviation from
drawbridge regulations.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard has issued a
temporary deviation from the operating
schedule that governs the Burlington
Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway
Bridge across the Columbia River, mile
105.6, at Vancouver, WA. This deviation
is necessary to accommodate
maintenance to replace movable rail
joints. This deviation allows the bridge
to remain in the closed position during
maintenance activities.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
5 p.m. on April 27, 2015, until 9 a.m.
on April 28, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this
deviation, [USCG–2015–0151] is
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Type the docket number in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation. You may
also visit the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12–140 on the
ground floor of the Department of
Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
deviation, call or email Mr. Steven
Fischer, Bridge Administrator,
Thirteenth Coast Guard District;
telephone 206–220–7282, email d13-pfd13bridges@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Cheryl Collins, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: BNSF has
requested that the BNSF Swing Bridge
across the Columbia River, mile 105.6,
remain closed to vessel traffic to install
final components of a Washington State
DOT funded program for passenger
service. During this installation period,
the swing span of the BNSF Railway
Bridge across the Columbia River at
Vancouver, WA, will be in the closedto-navigation position, however, the
span may be opened for emergency
vessels responding to any calls. The
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12MRR1.SGM
12MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 48 (Thursday, March 12, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12917-12933]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05103]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
20 CFR Parts 702 and 703
RIN 1240-AA09
Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act: Transmission of
Documents and Information
AGENCY: Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Labor.
ACTION: Direct final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Parties to claims arising under the Longshore and Harbor
Workers' Compensation Act and its extensions (LHWCA or Act) and
entities required to
[[Page 12918]]
have insurance pursuant to the Act frequently correspond with the
Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (OWCP) and each other. The
current regulations require that some of these communications be made
in paper form via a specific delivery mechanism such as certified mail,
U.S. mail or hand delivery. As technologies improve, other means of
communication--including electronic methods--may be more efficient and
cost-effective. Accordingly, this rule broadens the acceptable methods
by which claimants, employers, and insurers can communicate with OWCP
and each other.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective June 10, 2015 without
further action unless OWCP receives significant adverse comment to this
rule by midnight Eastern Standard Time on May 11, 2015. If OWCP
receives significant adverse comment, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the final rule in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written comments, identified by RIN number
1240-AA09, by any of the following methods.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions on the Web site for submitting comments. To
facilitate receipt and processing of comments, OWCP encourages
interested parties to submit their comments electronically.
Fax: (202) 693-1380 (this is not a toll-free number). Only
comments of ten or fewer pages, including a Fax cover sheet and
attachments, if any, will be accepted by Fax.
Regular Mail: Division of Longshore and Harbor Workers'
Compensation, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department
of Labor, Suite C-4319, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC
20210. The Department's receipt of U.S. mail may be significantly
delayed due to security procedures. You must take this into
consideration when preparing to meet the deadline for submitting
comments.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Division of Longshore and Harbor
Workers' Compensation, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S.
Department of Labor, Suite C-4319, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and the Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this rulemaking. All
comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov including any personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Antonio Rios, Director, Division of
Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor, Suite C-4319, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. Telephone: (202) 693-
0038 (this is not a toll-free number). TTY/TDD callers may dial toll-
free 1-877-889-5627 for further information.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Direct Final Rule Published Concurrently With Companion Proposed
Rule
In direct final rulemaking, an agency publishes a direct final rule
in the Federal Register with a statement that the rule will go into
effect unless the agency receives significant adverse comment within a
specified period. The agency concurrently publishes an identical
proposed rule. If the agency receives no significant adverse comment in
response to the direct final rule, the rule goes into effect. If the
agency receives significant adverse comment, the agency withdraws the
direct final rule and treats such comment as submissions on the
proposed rule. An agency typically uses direct final rulemaking when it
anticipates the rule will be non-controversial.
OWCP has determined that this rule, which modifies the existing
regulations to facilitate the exchange of documents and information, is
suitable for direct final rulemaking. The rule expands the methods by
which employers, claimants, insurers, and OWCP can transmit documents
and information to each other; the rule does not eliminate current
methods. Thus, OWCP does not expect to receive significant adverse
comment on this rule.
OWCP is also publishing a companion notice of proposed rulemaking
in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal Register to
expedite notice-and-comment rulemaking in the event OWCP receives
significant adverse comment and withdraws this direct final rule. The
proposed and direct final rules are substantively identical, and their
respective comment periods run concurrently. OWCP will treat comments
received on the companion proposed rule as comments regarding the
direct final rule and vice versa. Thus, if OWCP receives significant
adverse comment on either this direct final rule or the companion
proposed rule, OWCP will publish a Federal Register notice withdrawing
this direct final rule and will proceed with the proposed rule. If no
significant adverse comment is received, this direct final rule will
become effective June 10, 2015.
For purposes of this direct final rule, a significant adverse
comment is one that explains: (1) Why the rule is inappropriate,
including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or approach; or
(2) why the direct final rule will be ineffective or unacceptable
without a change. In determining whether a significant adverse comment
necessitates withdrawal of this direct final rule, OWCP will consider
whether the comment raises an issue serious enough to warrant a
substantive response had it been submitted in a standard notice-and-
comment process. A comment recommending an addition to the rule will
not be considered significant and adverse unless the comment explains
how this direct final rule would be ineffective without the addition.
OWCP requests comments on all issues related to this rule,
including economic or other regulatory impacts of this rule on the
regulated community. All interested parties should comment at this time
because OWCP will not initiate an additional comment period on the
proposed rule even if it withdraws the direct final rule.
II. Background of This Rulemaking
The LHWCA, 33 U.S.C. 901-950, establishes a comprehensive federal
workers' compensation system for an employee's disability or death
arising in the course of covered maritime employment. Metropolitan
Stevedore Co. v. Rambo, 515 U.S. 291, 294 (1995). The Act's provisions
have been extended to: (1) Contractors working on military bases or
U.S. government contracts outside the United States (Defense Base Act,
42 U.S.C. 1651-54); (2) employees of nonappropriated fund
instrumentalities (Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentalities Act, 5 U.S.C.
8171-73); (3) employees engaged in operations that extract natural
resources from the outer continental shelf (Outer Continental Shelf
Lands Act, 43 U.S.C. 1333(b)); and (4) private employees in the
District of Columbia injured prior to July 26, 1982 (District of
Columbia Workers' Compensation Act of May 17, 1928, Public Law 70-419
(formerly codified at 36 D.C. Code 501 et seq. (1973) (repealed 1979)).
Consequently, the Act and its extensions cover a broad range of claims
for injuries that occur throughout the United States and around the
world.
The Department's regulations implementing the LHWCA and its
[[Page 12919]]
extensions (20 CFR parts 701-704) currently contemplate that private
parties and OWCP file and exchange documents only in paper form and, in
some instances, require transmission via specific methods such as
certified mail, U.S. mail, or hand delivery. Because many of these
procedural rules were last amended in 1985 and 1986, see 51 FR 4270
(February 3, 1986); 50 FR 384 (January 3, 1985), they do not address
whether the parties or OWCP may use electronic communication methods
(e.g., facsimile, email, web portal) or commercial delivery services
(e.g., United Parcel Service, Federal Express). These communication
methods have now become ubiquitous and are routinely relied upon by
individuals, businesses, and government agencies alike.
Recently, OWCP has been employing electronic technology to improve
the program's administration. In 2009, OWCP began accepting reports of
insurance coverage electronically. See Notice from Chief, Branch of
Financial Management, Insurance and Assessments (December 2, 2009)
https://www.regulations.gov (docket folder for RIN 1240-AA09); Industry
Notice No. 138 (January 3, 2012) https://www.dol.gov/owcp/dlhwc/lsindustrynotices/industrynotice138.htm. In 2013, OWCP began creating
electronic case files for all new LHWCA cases. See LHWCA Bulletin No.
14-03 (November 26, 2013), https://www.dol.gov/owcp/dlhwc/LSBulletin14-03.pdf. And in 2014, OWCP launched SEAPortal, a web-based electronic
portal that parties may use to submit case-specific documents to OWCP.
See Industry Notice No. 148 (October 31, 2014), https://www.dol.gov/owcp/dlhwc/lsindustrynotices/industrynotice148.pdf. These advancements
have enhanced claims administration within OWCP and the parties'
ability to submit documents to OWCP. But they do not adequately expand
the methods employers, claimants, insurers, and OWCP may use to
transmit documents and information to each other.
Consistent with other workers' compensation schemes, the LHWCA
provides ``limited liability for employers'' and ``certain, prompt
recovery for employees.'' Roberts v. Sea-Land Servs., Inc., _ U.S. _,
132 S.Ct. 1350, 1354 (2012). These goals are advanced through efficient
and effective communications between the private parties and OWCP. This
rule thus revises the regulations to: (1) Remove bars to using
electronic and other commonly used communication methods wherever
possible; (2) provide flexibility for OWCP to allow the use of
technological advances in the future; and (3) ensure that all parties
remain adequately apprised of claim proceedings.
Because the revisions are procedural in nature, this rule applies
to all matters pending on the date the rule is effective as well as
those that arise thereafter. This will not work a hardship on the
private parties or their representatives since, as explained below, the
revisions either codify current practice or broaden the methods by
which documents and information may be transmitted.
III. Legal Basis for the Rule
Section 39(a) of the LHWCA, 33 U.S.C. 939(a), authorizes the
Secretary of Labor to prescribe all rules and regulations necessary for
the administration and enforcement of the Act and its extensions. The
LHWCA also grants the Secretary authority to determine by regulation
how certain statutory notice and filing requirements are met. See 33
U.S.C. 907(j)(1) (the Secretary is authorized to ``make rules and
regulations and to establish procedures'' regarding debarment of
physicians and health care providers under 33 U.S.C. 907(c)); 33 U.S.C.
912(c) (employer must notify employees of the official designated to
receive notices of injury ``in a manner prescribed by the Secretary in
regulations''); 33 U.S.C. 919(a) (claim for compensation may be filed
``in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary''); 33
U.S.C. 919(b) (notice of claim to be made ``in accordance with
regulations prescribed by the Secretary''); 33 U.S.C. 935 (``the
Secretary shall by regulation provide for the discharge, by the
carrier,'' of the employer's liabilities under the Act). This rule
falls well within these statutory grants of authority.
In developing these rules, the Department has also considered the
principles underlying two additional statutes: The Government Paperwork
Elimination Act (GPEA), 44 U.S.C. 3504, and the Electronic Signatures
in Global and National Commerce Act (E-SIGN), 15 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
GPEA requires agencies, when practicable, to store documents
electronically and to allow individuals and entities to communicate
with agencies electronically. It also provides that electronic
documents and signatures will not be denied legal effect merely because
of their electronic form. Similarly, E-SIGN generally provides that
electronic documents have the same legal effect as their hard copy
counterparts and allows electronic records to be used in place of hard
copy documents with appropriate safeguards. 15 U.S.C. 7001. Under E-
SIGN, federal agencies retain the authority to specify the means by
which they receive documents, 15 U.S.C. 7004(a), and to modify the
disclosures required by Section 101(c), 15 U.S.C. 7001(c), under
appropriate circumstances. These rules are consistent with and further
the purposes of GPEA and E-SIGN.
IV. New and Revised Rules
A. General Provisions
This rule makes several general revisions to advance the goals set
forth in Executive Order 13563 (January 18, 2011). That Order states
that regulations must be ``accessible, consistent, written in plain
language, and easy to understand.'' 76 FR 3821; see also E.O. 12866, 58
FR 51735 (September 30, 1993) (``Each agency shall draft its
regulations to be simple and easy to understand, with the goal of
minimizing the potential for uncertainty and litigation arising from
such uncertainty.''). Accordingly, this rule removes the imprecise term
``shall'' throughout those sections it amends and substitutes ``must,''
``must not,'' ``will,'' or other situation-appropriate terms. These
changes are designed to make the regulations clearer and more user-
friendly. See generally Federal Plain Language Guidelines, https://www.plainlanguage.gov/howto/guidelines.
Executive Order 13563 also instructs agencies to review ``rules
that may be outmoded, ineffective, insufficient, or excessively
burdensome, and to modify, streamline, expand, or repeal them.'' As a
result, this rule ceases publication of two rules that are obsolete or
unnecessary. These rules are set forth in the Section-by-Section
Explanation below.
B. Section-by-Section Explanation
20 CFR 702.101 Exchange of Documents and Information
This section is new. It sets out general rules for transmitting
documents and information that apply except when another rule or OWCP
requires a specific form of communication.
Paragraph (a) specifies the methods by which documents and
information must be sent to OWCP. Paragraph (a)(1) specifies that hard
copy documents and information must be submitted by postal mail,
commercial delivery service, or delivered by hand. Paragraph (a)(2)
specifies that electronic documents and information must be submitted
through an electronic system that has been authorized by OWCP. OWCP's
SEAPortal is an example of such a system. Paragraph (a)(3) recognizes
that occasions may arise where transmission
[[Page 12920]]
methods other than those enumerated would be preferable and provides
that additional methods may be used when allowed by OWCP.
Paragraph (b) specifies the methods by which documents and
information must be sent from OWCP to parties and their representatives
or exchanged between parties and party representatives. Paragraph
(b)(1) specifies that hard copy documents must be sent or exchanged by
postal mail, commercial delivery service, or hand delivery. Paragraph
(b)(2) specifies that documents and information can be sent or
exchanged electronically, but only if they are sent through a reliable
method and the receiving party agrees in writing to accept electronic
transmission by the particular method used. Requiring written
confirmation protects all parties and representatives from
misunderstandings about service and ensures that the recipient has the
technology necessary to receive documents by the selected method. The
Department does not intend that this process be overly formalistic; a
letter, email or other writing memorializing the receiving party's
agreement would be sufficient to satisfy the regulatory requirement. A
party's agreement to receive documents or information electronically,
although required before a sender can elect to use an electronic
transmission method, does not obligate the sender to use an electronic
transmission method. Finally, paragraph (b)(3) specifies that documents
and information can be sent or exchanged through any OWCP-authorized
electronic system that allows for service of documents. Although not
currently available, this provision is added for use in the event OWCP
adopts such a system in the future.
Paragraph (c) provides a non-exhaustive list of reliable electronic
transmission methods.
Paragraph (d) specifies that parties or representatives who agree
to receive documents electronically in accordance with paragraph (b)(2)
can revoke their agreement by giving written notice to the person or
entity with whom they initially agreed to receive documents
electronically. For example, if a claimant's legal representative no
longer wishes to receive documents electronically from the employer's
attorney, the representative can revoke the agreement by simply
notifying opposing counsel in writing. Similarly, if a pro se claimant
initially agrees to receive documents electronically from OWCP, he or
she may terminate that agreement by sending a letter or some other form
of writing to OWCP. As with the procedure for agreeing to electronic
service, the Department does not intend this procedure to be overly
formalistic.
Paragraph (e) recognizes that the Longshore regulations use various
terms to describe the process of exchanging documents and information
with OWCP and between parties. It provides that paragraphs (a) through
(d) apply when those terms are used.
Paragraph (f) clarifies that references to documents include both
electronic and hard copy documents.
Paragraph (g) explains that a requirement that something be in
writing, signed, certified, or executed does not presuppose that the
document must be in hard copy.
Paragraph (h) states that an entity's address may include its
electronic address or Web portal.
Finally, paragraphs (i)(1) and (2) clarify that when a document
must be sent to a particular district director's office or a district
director must take an action with respect to a document in his or her
office, the physical or electronic address or file location provided
for that district director's office by OWCP rather than that district
director's physical location controls. These provisions accommodate the
Department's current and anticipated future plans to have most mail for
district offices sent to a central mail receipt location and eventually
to an electronic location and to handle documents in an electronic case
file environment.
20 CFR 702.102 Establishment and Modification of Compensation
Districts, Establishment of Suboffices and Jurisdictional Areas
Current Sec. 702.102(a) explains that the Director has established
compensation districts as required under the Act and specifies that the
Director must notify interested parties ``by mail'' of changes to the
compensation districts. Revised Sec. 701.102(a) removes the phrase
``by mail'' to broaden the methods by which the Director may notify
interested parties of a change to the compensation districts.
20 CFR 702.103 Effect of Establishment of Suboffices and Jurisdictional
Areas
Current Sec. 702.103 explains that the Director may require
claims-related materials to be filed in suboffices. Revised Sec.
702.103 changes the phrase ``at the suboffice'' to ``with the
suboffice'' to reflect that documents being filed with a suboffice will
not necessarily be filed at that suboffice per se, but rather will be
filed at the physical or electronic address provided by OWCP.
20 CFR 702.104 Transfer of Individual Case File
Current Sec. 702.104(b) provides that the district director who is
transferring a case to a different district office may give advice,
comments, or suggestions to the district director receiving the case.
The regulation also specifies that the transfer must be made by
registered or certified mail. District directors now have the capacity
to transfer many cases by secure electronic means, or may prefer to use
a commercial delivery service such as Federal Express or the United
Parcel Service. Accordingly, revised Sec. 702.104 removes the
requirement that cases be transferred by registered or certified mail
to broaden the methods by which district directors may transfer cases
between offices.
20 CFR 702.174 Exemptions; Necessary Information
Current Sec. 702.174(b)(1) provides that in cases where the
Director approves an employer's application for an exemption from
coverage under the Act, the Director shall notify the employer of its
exemption by certified mail, return receipt requested. This non-
statutory requirement limits the Director's ability to take advantage
of other efficient means of service that may be less costly.
Accordingly, revised Sec. 702.174(b)(1) removes the certified mail
requirement to broaden the methods by which the Director may notify
employers that their application for exemption has been approved. The
revised rule also includes a technical amendment to Sec. 702.174(b)(2)
to conform the language regarding notification of a denial of exempt
status to the language in revised subsection (b)(1).
20 CFR 702.203 Employer's Report; How Given
Current Sec. 702.203 provides that employers must submit their
injury reports by delivering or mailing an original and one copy to the
office of the district director. The rule implements the statutory
directive to employers to ``send to the Secretary a report'' of injury
and ``a copy of such report'' to the district director within ten days
of an employee's injury or death. 33 U.S.C. 930(a), (b). Although not
reflected in the current regulation, the Act also provides that
``mailing'' a report ``in a stamped envelope'' within the ten-day time
period satisfies the statute's requirements. 33 U.S.C. 930(d).
Revised Sec. 702.203 alters the current rule in two ways. First,
revised paragraph (a) eliminates the requirement that employers provide
an original and a copy of their injury
[[Page 12921]]
reports. OWCP has instituted a policy of storing documents
electronically; thus, there is no continuing need to submit multiple
copies of the same document. Instead, submission of one report to the
district director will satisfy the employer's statutory obligation to
notify both the Secretary and the district director. Second, revised
paragraph (b) modifies the current regulation to address what actions
satisfy the ten-day time period for filing the injury report.
Consistent with Section 30(d), revised paragraph (b) specifies that
when sent by U.S. postal mail, an employer's report of injury will be
deemed filed on the date mailed. The rule extends this same statutory
concept--that an employer meets the reporting obligation when it sends
the report, not when the report is received by OWCP--to commercial
delivery services and electronic filings. Thus, the rule provides that
the report will be considered filed on the date given to a commercial
delivery service or, when sent by permissible electronic means, the
date the employer completes all steps necessary for electronic
delivery.
20 CFR 702.215 Notice; How Given
Current Sec. 702.215 provides that an employee's notice of injury
or survivor's notice of death must be given to the employer by hand
delivery or by mail. It further provides that notice of an injury may
be given to the district director by hand delivery, mail, orally in
person, or by telephone. Revised Sec. 702.215 modifies the current
section to allow the use of additional means of providing notice to the
employer and to the district director.
For employer notice, the revised rule allows an employee or
survivor to provide notice at the physical or electronic address
supplied by the employer. Using the broader ``physical'' address term
encompasses the current hand and mail delivery, and expands it to other
methods such as a commercial delivery service. And by allowing notice
to be delivered to an electronic address, employers will be able to
adopt electronic systems (e.g., email, web portal) that may speed the
injury reporting process. For district director notice, the revised
regulation provides that the employee's or survivor's notice of injury
may be given to the district director by submitting the correct form.
Using the word ``submitting'' brings this document within the general
transmission rule set forth in 20 CFR 702.101(a), thus implementing the
statutory directive that notice be given to the district director ``by
delivering it to him or sending it by mail addressed to his office.''
33 U.S.C. 912(c). The revised rule retains the option of reporting
injuries to the district director either in person or by telephone.
20 CFR 702.224 Claims; Notification of Employer of Filing by Employee
Current Sec. 702.224 requires the district director to give the
employer or insurance carrier written notice of claims for compensation
served ``personally or by mail.'' This regulation implements the
statutory requirement that the district director provide notice of
claims to interested parties, which ``may be served personally upon the
employer or other person, or sent to such employer or person by
registered mail.'' 33 U.S.C. 919(b). Revised Sec. 702.224 deletes the
current rule's reference to specific service methods. Using the phrase
``give notice'' brings the notice within the general transmission rule
set forth in 20 CFR 702.101(a), which allows for methods of service
beyond mailing and what is traditionally considered personal service.
Because the statute uses the permissive term ``may'' in addressing
service methods for this notice and does not mandate any particular
method, the revised rule is also consistent with the statute.
20 CFR 702.234 Report by Employer of Commencement and Suspension of
Payments
Current Sec. 702.234 provides that the employer shall immediately
notify the district director having jurisdiction over the place where
the injury or death occurred when it makes its first payment of
compensation or suspends payment of compensation. The Department
recognizes that cases are not always adjudicated by the district
director who has jurisdiction over the place where the injury or death
occurred. For example, cases may be transferred to a district other
than the district where the injury occurred if a worker moves his or
her residence to a different compensation district. 20 CFR 702.104.
Thus, revised Sec. 702.234 removes the reference to the district
director having jurisdiction over the place where the injury or death
occurred and instead directs the employer to notify the district
director who is administering the claim.
20 CFR 702.243 Settlement Application; How Submitted, How Approved, How
Disapproved, Criteria
Current Sec. 702.243(a) requires that settlement applications be
sent to the adjudicator by certified mail, return receipt requested,
submitted in person, or sent by any other delivery service with proof
of delivery to the adjudicator. The revised rule modifies this
subsection to explicitly allow parties to submit settlement
applications via commercial delivery service with tracking capability
or electronically through an OWCP-authorized system.
Current Sec. 702.243(c) requires that when the adjudicator
disapproves a settlement application, he or she must serve a
disapproval letter or order on the parties by certified mail. This
requirement both limits the adjudicator's ability to take advantage of
more efficient means of service and imposes an unnecessary expense.
Accordingly, the revised rule removes the requirement that notice be
sent by certified mail in order to broaden the methods by which
adjudicators may notify parties that their settlement applications have
been disapproved.
20 CFR 702.251 Employer's Controversion of the Right To Compensation
Current Sec. 702.251 requires that employers notify the district
director of their election to controvert a claim by sending the
``original notice'' of controversion form to the district director and
a copy to the claimant. By requiring the ``original'' form, the
regulation implies that the employer must deliver a hard copy form
bearing its authorized signature in ink. There is no statutory
requirement that an employer submit an original form in that manner and
requiring the employer to do so by regulation unduly limits the means
by which the employer would otherwise be permitted to submit the form.
For example, OWCP has instituted a policy of accepting case-related
documents electronically through its web portal. Further, OWCP now
scans and electronically stores the documents it receives, so the
``original'' document submitted by the employer would not be retained
in hard copy. For these reasons, there is no need to require employers
to send an ``original'' document to the district director. Thus,
revised Sec. 702.251 omits the requirement that an original document
be provided.
20 CFR 702.261 Claimant's Contest of Actions Taken by Employer or
Carrier With Respect to the Claim
Current Sec. 702.261 provides that a claimant who contests a
reduction, termination, or suspension of benefits by the employer or
carrier must notify the office of the district director having
jurisdiction either in person or in writing and explain the basis for
his or her complaint. New Sec. 702.101 specifies the methods by which
the claimant can provide documents or information to
[[Page 12922]]
OWCP, and there is no statutory requirement pertaining to claimants'
contests of employer or carrier action that justifies treating
transmission of this type of information differently. Accordingly,
revised Sec. 702.261 eliminates the requirement that notice be given
in person or in writing. In addition, the revised rule substitutes the
phrase ``the district director who is administering the claim'' for the
phrase ``the district director having jurisdiction.'' As noted, claims
are not always handled by the district director for the district where
the injury or death occurred. See 20 CFR 702.104. To clarify the
regulation, revised Sec. 702.234 directs the claimant to notify the
district director who is administering the claim when he or she wishes
to contest the employer's or carrier's actions.
20 CFR 702.272 Informal Recommendation by District Director
Current Sec. 702.272 concerns informal recommendations by the
district director regarding claims of improper discharge or
discrimination against employees who seek compensation under the Act or
testify in a compensation claim under the Act. Paragraph (a) provides
that where the employee and employer agree to the district director's
recommendation, that recommendation shall be incorporated into an order
and mailed to the parties. The revised rule removes the reference to
service by mail and instead indicates that service should be
accomplished under the same procedures that govern service of
compensation orders under Sec. 702.349.
Current Sec. 702.272(b) provides that where the parties do not
agree to the district director's recommendation, the director must
``mail'' a memorandum to the parties that summarizes the disagreement.
This requirement precludes the Director from using other methods of
service. Accordingly, the revised rule deletes the word ``mail'' and
replaces it with the word ``send'' so that delivery of the memorandum
is governed by the general rule in Sec. 702.101.
20 CFR 702.281 Third Party Action
Current Sec. 702.281(b) provides that in order for an employee to
settle a claim with a third party for an amount less than the employee
would receive under the Act, the employee must first receive prior
written approval from the employer and the employer's carrier. That
approval must be filed with the district director with jurisdiction
where the injury occurred. As noted, claims are not always handled by
the district director for the district where the injury or death
occurred. See 20 CFR 702.104. Thus, revised Sec. 702.281(b) directs
that the approval be filed with the district director who is
administering the claim.
20 CFR 702.315 Conclusion of Conference; Agreement on All Matters With
Respect to the Claim
Current Sec. 702.315(a) provides that when an informal conference
results in a formal compensation order, the order must be ``filed and
mailed in accordance with Sec. 702.349.'' This rule also provides that
when the problem considered is resolved by telephone or by exchange of
written correspondence, the parties shall be notified by the same
method through which agreement was reached, and the district director
will also issue a memorandum or order setting forth the agreed terms.
Revised Sec. 702.315(a) modifies the rule in two ways. First, the
revised rule substitutes the phrase ``filed and served'' for ``filed
and mailed'' to conform the language to the addition of Sec.
702.349(b), which would allow parties and their representatives to
waive registered and certified mail service of compensation orders.
Second, to allow more flexibility, revised Sec. 702.315(a) eliminates
the requirement that the district director use the same method to
communicate the results of the conference but preserves the authority
to communicate those results by telephone.
20 CFR 702.317 Preparation and Transfer of the Case for Hearing
Current Sec. 702.317 provides rules for transferring a case from
the district director's office to the Office of Administrative Law
Judges (OALJ) for hearing. When the district director receives pre-
hearing statement forms from the parties and determines that no further
conferences will help resolve the dispute, Sec. 702.317(c) instructs
the district director to transmit the pre-hearing statements, a
transmittal letter, and certain other evidence to OALJ. Paragraph (c)
excepts from this requirement materials ``not suitable for mailing.''
To avoid any implication that these documents must be mailed between
the district director and OALJ rather than transmitted by some other
method (e.g., commercial delivery service, electronically), the revised
rule substitutes the term ``transmission'' for ``mailing'' in paragraph
(c).
20 CFR 702.319 Obtaining Documents From the Administrative File for
Reintroduction at Formal Hearings
Current Sec. 702.319 provides that upon receipt of a request for a
document from the administrative file, the district director shall give
the original document to the requester and retain a copy in the file.
OWCP has instituted a policy of storing documents electronically
rendering it unable to send requesters original documents. A properly
reproduced copy of the electronically stored document can be used in
adjudicative proceedings. See United States v. Hampton, 464 F.3d 687,
690 (7th Cir. 2006) (holding that copies of documents are admissible to
the same extent as the original documents unless there is an issue with
the authenticity of the original); United States v. Georgalis, 631 F.2d
1199, 1205 (5th Cir. 1980) (``A duplicate may be admitted into evidence
unless . . . there is a genuine issue as to the authenticity of the
unintroduced original, or as to the trustworthiness of the duplicate .
. .''). Accordingly, revised Sec. 702.319 specifies that the district
director will send a copy of the requested document(s) to the requester
and retain a copy of the record request and a statement of whether it
has been satisfied in the administrative file.
20 CFR 702.321 Procedures for Determining Applicability of Section 8(f)
of the Act
Current Sec. 702.321(a)(1) requires employers or carriers who file
applications under Section 8(f) of the Act to file those applications
in duplicate. As OWCP has instituted a policy of storing documents
electronically, there is no continuing need to file multiple copies of
the same document. Accordingly, the revised rule deletes that
requirement from Sec. 702.321(a)(1). The Department has also
eliminated the mid-paragraph numbering in this provision. This
technical change is made to conform to the current formatting rules of
the Office of the Federal Register.
20 CFR 702.349 Formal Hearings; Filing and Mailing of Compensation
Orders; Disposition of Transcripts
Current Sec. 702.349 provides that at the conclusion of the
administrative hearing, the administrative law judge shall deliver the
administrative record ``by mail or otherwise'' to the district director
that had original jurisdiction over the case. As noted above, cases are
not always administered by the district director who has ``original''
jurisdiction over the controversy. For example, cases may be
transferred to a district other than the district where the injury
occurred if a worker moves his or her residence to a different
compensation district. See 20 CFR 702.104. Thus, the revised rule
removes the reference to the district director that had original
jurisdiction and instead directs the
[[Page 12923]]
administrative law judge to forward the record to the district director
who administered the case.
This rule contains two additional revisions to the existing
language designed to accommodate transmission of decisions and case
records electronically between OWCP and the Office of Administrative
Law Judges. First, the revised rule eliminates the language that the
case record be sent to the district director ``together with'' a signed
compensation order. Currently, the Office of Administrative Law Judges
does not always transmit the full case record at the same time as the
compensation order. Moreover, OWCP also anticipates that, as an
intermediate step to transitioning to a full electronic case file
environment, a system may be adopted for administrative law judge
decisions to be transmitted electronically to OWCP for filing and
service. Second, the revised rule eliminates reference to the
``original'' compensation order in anticipation of future expansion of
the electronic case file system. The term ``original'' implies that the
district director must file a paper copy of a compensation order. This
process may not be required in a full electronic case file environment.
This rule is also revised to add a new paragraph (b) that allows
parties and their representatives to receive compensation orders by
other service methods in cases where they explicitly waive service by
registered or certified mail. Under Section 19(e) of the Act, 33 U.S.C.
919(e), all parties have the right to be served with a compensation
order via registered or certified mail (at OWCP's option). By practice,
OWCP has extended this service to the parties' representatives. See 20
CFR 702.349. Service via registered or certified mail has many
benefits, but unlike electronic service, it cannot be accomplished
immediately. Several days will generally elapse between the date that
an order is mailed by the district director and the date the parties
receive it. Some parties and their representatives have requested that
the Department begin serving compensation orders immediately by
electronic means.
The right to registered or certified mail service of compensation
orders is a personal right that is conveyed by the Act. But there is no
indication in the Act that the right to registered or certified mail
service cannot be waived, contra 33 U.S.C. 915(b), 916, and it is
generally presumed that statutory rights can be knowingly and
voluntarily waived. See New York v. Hill, 528 U.S. 110, 114 (2000).
Accordingly, Sec. 702.349(b) institutes a procedure allowing parties
and their representatives who are entitled to registered or certified
mail service to waive their right to such service. The waiver applies
only to service of compensation orders and does not extend to other
documents or information transmitted by OWCP.
New Sec. 702.349(b) provides that a party or their representative
can waive registered or certified mail service of compensation orders
by filing the appropriate form with the district director that is
administering the party's case. Waivers will only be accepted if they
are submitted on the proper form, and a separate form must be submitted
for each party or representative. Paragraph (b) emphasizes that
submission of a completed form constitutes a knowing and voluntary
waiver of registered or certified mail service.
New Sec. 702.349(b)(1)-(b)(5) flesh out important details related
to the waiver of service by registered or certified mail. Paragraph
(b)(1) provides that all parties and representatives must provide a
valid electronic address on the waiver form for the service waiver to
be effective.
Paragraph (b)(2) provides that parties and their representatives
must submit a separate waiver form for each case in which they intend
to waive service. Although it is common for certain employers,
carriers, and attorneys to have an interest in several Longshore Act
cases pending at the same time, the district director will not accept
blanket service waivers. This will ensure that the party or
representative has in fact waived registered or certified mail service
in the particular case. Similarly, paragraph (b)(3) prohibits a party's
representative from signing the waiver form on the party's behalf.
Instead, to ensure that waivers are knowing and voluntary, the parties
themselves must sign the waiver forms.
Paragraph (b)(4) provides that all compensation orders issued after
the service waiver form is received will be served in accordance with
the instructions on the form provided by the party or representative.
This includes supplementary compensation orders and orders on
modification. This paragraph also specifies that individuals must
submit another waiver form to change their service address or to revoke
the waiver.
Finally, paragraph (b)(5) provides that the district director will
serve parties and their representatives by certified mail despite the
existence of a waiver form if there is some problem with the service
method selected. Thus, for example, the district director will effect
service by certified or registered mail if he or she receives an error
message when trying to serve a party or representative via email.
20 CFR 702.372 Supplementary Compensation Orders
Current Sec. 702.372(b) requires that supplementary compensation
orders declaring amounts of compensation in default be served by
certified mail on the parties and their representatives. This provision
implements Section 18(a) of the Act, which requires that supplementary
orders ``be filed in the same manner as the compensation order.'' 33
U.S.C. 918(a). As discussed above, Section 19(e) of the Act requires
that compensation orders be filed in the office of the district
director, and then served by registered or certified mail. 33 U.S.C.
919(e). The revised rule incorporates the filing provisions found in
Sec. 702.349. This revision clarifies that supplementary compensation
orders must be treated like any other compensation order for purposes
of filing and service. In addition, by cross-referencing Sec. 702.349,
the Department intends to extend the provisions allowing voluntary
waiver of registered or certified mail service in Sec. 702.349(b) to
supplementary compensation orders.
20 CFR 702.432 Debarment Process
Current Sec. 702.432(b) provides that when the Director determines
that debarment proceedings are appropriate against a physician, health
care provider or claims representative, he or she will notify the
individual by certified mail, return receipt requested. Similarly,
current Sec. 702.432(e) requires that the Director send a copy of his
or her decision regarding debarment to the individual by certified
mail, return receipt requested. This method of service is not required
by the statute in either instance. And requiring certified mail service
both limits the Director's ability to take advantage of electronic
means of service and imposes an unnecessary expense. Accordingly, to
broaden the methods by which the Director may notify individuals of
debarment proceedings and decisions rendered in them, the revised rule
removes the requirement that notice be sent by certified mail with
return receipt requested from paragraphs (b) and (e).
20 CFR 702.433 Requests for Hearing
Current Sec. 702.433(b) requires that the administrative law judge
who will conduct a hearing regarding debarment serve a copy of a notice
of hearing on the individual who may be subject to debarment via
certified mail, return receipt requested. This method of service is not
required by the statute,
[[Page 12924]]
and it both limits the administrative law judge's ability to take
advantage of electronic service methods and imposes an unnecessary
expense. Accordingly, revised Sec. 702.433(b) eliminates the certified
mail requirement so as to broaden the means by which the administrative
law judge may notify individuals of hearings regarding debarment.
20 CFR 703.2 Forms
Current Sec. 703.2(a) provides that information sent by insurance
carriers and self-insured employers to OWCP pursuant to Part 703 must
be submitted on Forms specified by the Director. In order to facilitate
the most efficient processing of Part 703 information, revised Sec.
703.2(a) specifies that the forms must be submitted to OWCP in the
manner it specifies.
20 CFR 703.113-703.120 and 703.502 Reporting Related to Insurance
Coverage
This set of regulations governs how matters related to insurance
coverage are reported to OWCP and the consequences of those reports. In
the past, insurance companies reported issuance of policies and
endorsements by filing a Form LS-570 (Carrier's Report of Issuance of
Policy) in hard copy with the district director in whose compensation
district the insured employer operated. These hard copy reports of
insurance were retained in the compensation district because that was
the district most likely to use the record. OWCP now stores insurance
information electronically in a system maintained by the Division of
Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation (DLHWC) in OWCP's national
office. This system is accessible to the district offices. Thus, there
is no continuing need for carriers to report insurance information to
individual district directors.
To facilitate reporting of insurance information, OWCP began
instituting an electronic system for such reports in 2009. See Notice
from Chief, Branch of Financial Management, Insurance and Assessments
(December 2, 2009) https://www.regulations.gov (docket folder for RIN
1240-AA09); Industry Notice No. 138 (January 3, 2012) https://www.dol.gov/owcp/dlhwc/lsindustrynotices/industrynotice138.htm. Many
insurance companies now report coverage, including policy
cancellations, to industry data collection organizations (e.g., New
York Compensation Rating Board, National Council on Compensation
Insurance, Inc.) that, in turn, report the information to DLHWC on the
carriers' behalf. DLHWC receives that information via a daily
electronic data interchange with the data collection organizations and
places it in a centralized electronic repository that the individual
district directors can access immediately. It is common practice in the
insurance industry to provide this sort of information electronically,
and many carriers have been voluntarily reporting coverage under the
Act and its extensions to DLHWC electronically for several years now.
The system has proven to be efficient and preferable for both OWCP and
the reporting carriers who use it. Centralized reporting also reduces
the recordkeeping burden on the district offices, thereby freeing up
resources for claims administration.
For these reasons, the revised rule eliminates those provisions
that require insurance companies to report coverage to individual
district directors. In addition, the revised rules are drafted broadly
to accommodate future methods of electronic reporting that OWCP may
choose to adopt. Although OWCP prefers receiving insurance information
electronically, the revised rules do not require carriers to report
electronically. Carriers can still fulfill their reporting obligations
by submitting Form LS-570 to DLHWC.
Section 703.113 allows for a longshoremen's policy or endorsement
to specify the particular vessel(s) to which it applies. It provides
that the carrier shall send the report of issuance of a policy or
endorsement that is required by Sec. 703.116 to the district director
for the compensation district where the vessel(s)' home port is
located. To conform this regulation to the centralized reporting
system, revised Sec. 703.113 replaces references to the district
director with references to DLHWC.
Section 703.114 provides that cancellation of a contract or policy
of insurance will not be effective unless done in compliance with
Section 36(b) of the Act, which requires that insurance providers send
a notice of cancellation to the district director and the employer 30
days prior to the date that a policy termination is effective. See 33
U.S.C. 936(b). The Act also requires that the notice be in writing and
given to the district director ``by delivering it to him or sending it
by mail addressed to his office, and to the employer by delivering it
to him or by sending it by mail addressed to him at his last known
place of business.'' 33 U.S.C. 912(c); see also 33 U.S.C. 936(b).
The revised rule specifies the methods an insurer can use to give
notice of cancellation. For notice to the district director, the
revised rule allows insurers to report cancellations to DLHWC either in
a manner prescribed under Sec. 702.101(a) or in the same manner as
they report coverage under Sec. 703.116 (including, where applicable,
through industry data collection organizations). Reporting through
these established channels satisfies the statutory requirement that
notice be delivered to the district director. For notice to the
employer, the revised rule requires that the cancellation notice be
sent in accordance with the methods set forth in Sec. 702.101(b).
Complying with Sec. 702.101(b) satisfies the statutory requirement
that the cancellation notice be delivered to the employer. Importantly,
an electronic report made to DLHWC does not relieve the carrier of its
obligation to also provide written notice of cancellation to the
employer. Moreover, the revised rule retains the statutory requirement
that notice to both DLHWC and the employer must be provided 30 days
before the cancellation is intended to be effective.
Section 703.116, as currently written, requires insurance carriers
to report all policies and endorsements issued by them to employers
carrying on business within a compensation district to that particular
district director. To conform this regulation to the centralized
reporting system, revised Sec. 703.116 replaces references to the
district director with references to DLHWC. In addition, revised Sec.
703.116 specifically acknowledges that reports made through an OWCP-
authorized electronic system, such as an industry data collection
organization, satisfy the carrier's reporting obligation. Instructions
for submitting coverage information to DLHWC electronically will be
posted on OWCP's Web site at https://www.dol.gov/owcp/dlhwc/carrier.htm.
Section 703.117 specifies that the report required by Sec. 703.116
must be sent by the insurance carrier's home office or authorized
agent. The regulation assumes that such reports will be made to the
district director in the compensation district where the employer is
located, and requires the carrier to tell the district director which
agency is authorized to issue reports on its behalf. To conform this
regulation to the centralized reporting system, revised Sec. 703.117
replaces references to the district director with references to DLHWC.
Section 703.118 provides that all applicants for authority to write
insurance under the Act shall be deemed to have agreed to accept full
liability for the insured's obligations under the Act. The current
regulation presumes that the district director for the compensation
district where an
[[Page 12925]]
insured employer carries on operations will receive and accept the
carrier's report of insurance. To conform this regulation to the
centralized reporting system, revised Sec. 703.118 replaces references
to the district director with references to DLHWC.
Section 703.119 governs the situation where an employer that is
carrying on operations covered by the Act in one compensation district
plans to begin operations in a second. The regulation provides that the
carrier may submit the report required by Sec. 703.116 to the district
director in the new compensation district before the employer has an
address in the new district. Because carriers will no longer be
expected to provide notice regarding insurance coverage to individual
district directors, there is no longer any need for the procedure set
forth in current Sec. 703.119. Accordingly, the Department has deleted
this section.
Section 703.120 provides that a separate report required by Sec.
703.116 must be made for each employer that is covered by a policy.
DLHWC is able to automatically extract employer-specific coverage
information from most electronic reports that it receives, so this
requirement is often unnecessary when coverage is reported
electronically. Accordingly, revised Sec. 703.120 is limited to
reports made on Form LS-570 (Carrier's Report of Issuance of Policy.)
The current regulation also presumes that the district director for the
compensation district where an insured employer carries on operations
will receive and accept the carrier's report of insurance. To conform
this regulation to the centralized reporting system, revised Sec.
703.120 replaces references to the district director with references to
DLHWC.
Section 703.502 provides that district directors who receive a
report of the issuance of a policy that is authorized by current Sec.
703.119 shall file the report until they receive an address for the
employer in the new compensation district, at which point they shall
issue a certificate of compliance. The Department has deleted current
Sec. 703.119 because carriers will no longer be expected to provide
notice regarding insurance coverage to individual district directors.
Thus, there is no further need for the special procedure laid out in
Sec. 703.502. Accordingly, the Department has deleted this section.
V. Administrative Law Considerations
A. Information Collection Requirements (Subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act)
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.,
and its attendant regulations, 5 CFR part 1320, require that the
Department consider the impact of paperwork and other information
collection burdens imposed on the public. A Federal agency generally
cannot conduct or sponsor a collection of information, and the public
is generally not required to respond to an information collection,
unless it is approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the PRA and displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. In
addition, notwithstanding any other provisions of law, no person shall
generally be subject to penalty for failing to comply with a collection
of information that does not display a valid Control Number. See 5 CFR
1320.5(a) and 1320.6.
This rule allows parties to voluntarily waive their statutory right
to receive compensation orders by registered or certified mail and to
instead receive them by email. See 20 CFR 703.349. To implement the
waiver process, this rule imposes two new collections of information,
OWCP Form LS-801, Waiver of Service by Registered or Certified Mail for
Claimants and Authorized Representatives, and OWCP Form LS-802, Waiver
of Service by Registered or Certified Mail for Employers and/or
Insurance Carriers. The Department has submitted an Information
Collection Request (ICR) for both of these new forms under the
emergency procedures for review and clearance contained in 5 CFR
1320.13.
This rule does not materially change any other ICR with regard to
the information collected, but does change the manner in which forms
that collect information may be submitted. Instead of mandating the
transmission of information by postal mail, the rule allows OWCP and
private parties to use electronic and other commonly used communication
methods. It also provides flexibility for OWCP to allow submission of
information using future technologies.
The collection of information requirements are contained within
ICRs assigned OMB control numbers: 1240-0003, 1240-0004, 1240-0005,
1240-0014, 1240-0025, 1240-0026, 1240-0029, 1240-0036, 1240-0040, 1240-
0041, 1240-0042 and 1240-0043. The regulatory sections specifying the
submission procedures are found in paragraphs: 20 CFR 702.111, 702.121,
702.162, 702.174, 702.175, 702.201, 702.202, 702.221, 702.234, 702.235,
702.236, 702.242, 702.251, 702.285, 702.317, 702.321, 702.407, 702.419,
703.116, 703.203, 703.204, 703.205, 703.209, 703.210, 703.212, 703.303
and 703.310.
Although the rule does not eliminate any current methods of
submission for these collections, because its allowance of electronic
submission will result in mailing cost savings (envelopes and postage),
OWCP anticipates some savings for the public. Given the response rate
for each of the existing collections, current combined mailing costs
are estimated at $113,977. The Department anticipates a 13% rate of
electronic submission, an accompanying reduction in postal mail
submission, and a resulting cost savings of $14,817. In the future, as
electronic transmission submission options increase and are used more
frequently, this savings will likely increase. The Department has
submitted a request for a non-substantive change for each existing ICR
cited above in order to obtain approval for the changed cost estimate
resulting from the availability of electronic submission methods.
The submitted ICRs for the two new collections imposed by this rule
will be available for public inspection for at least thirty days under
the ``Currently Under Review'' portion of the Information Collection
Review section reginfo.gov Web site, available at: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. The Department will publish a
separate notice in the Federal Register that will announce the result
of the OMB reviews. Currently approved information collections are
available for public inspection under the ``Current Inventory'' portion
of the same Web site.
Request for Comments: As part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden, the Department conducts a pre-
clearance consultation program to provide the general public and
Federal agencies an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information. This program helps to ensure
requested data can be provided in the desired format, reporting burden
(time and financial resources) is minimized, collection instruments are
clearly understood, and the impact of collection requirements can be
properly assessed. Comments on the information collection requirements
may be submitted to the Department in the same manner as for any other
portion of this rule.
In addition to having an opportunity to file comments with the
agency, the PRA provides that an interested party may file comments on
the information collection requirements in a direct final
[[Page 12926]]
rule directly with the Office of Management and Budget, at Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for DOL-OWCP
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503; by Fax: 202-395-5806 (this is not a toll-free
number); or by email: OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov. Commenters are
encouraged, but not required, to send a courtesy copy of any comments
to the general addressee for this rulemaking. The OMB will consider all
written comments that agency receives within 30 days of publication of
this direct final rule in the Federal Register. In order to help ensure
appropriate consideration, comments should mention at least one of the
control numbers mentioned in this rule.
The OMB and the Department are particularly interested in comments
that:
Evaluate whether the collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
The information collections in this rule may be summarized as
follows:
1. Title of Collection: Employer's First Report of Injury or
Occupational Disease, Employer's Supplementary Report of Accident or
Occupational Illness
OMB Control Number: 1240-0003.
Total Estimated Number of Responses: 28,829.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden: 7,208 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs Burden: $14,126.
2. Title of Collection: Exchange of Documents and Information
OMB Control Number: 1240-0004.
Total Estimated Number of Responses: 5,000.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden: 83 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs Burden: $2,650.
3. Title of Collection: Securing Financial Obligations Under the
Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act and Its Extensions
OMB Control Number: 1240-0005.
Total Estimated Number of Responses: 668.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden: 454 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs Burden: $344.
4. Title of Collection: Regulations Governing the Administration of the
Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act
OMB Control Number: 1240-0014.
Total Estimated Number of Responses: 130,036.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden: 44,955 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs Burden: $46,866.
5. Title of Collection: Request for Earnings Information
OMB Control Number: 1240-0025.
Total Estimated Number of Responses: 1,100.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden: 275 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs Burden: $528.
6. Title of Collection: Application for Continuation of Death Benefit
for Student
OMB Control Number: 1240-0026.
Total Estimated Number of Responses: 20.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden: 10 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs Burden: $10.
7. Title of Collection: Request for Examination and/or Treatment
OMB Control Number: 1240-0029.
Total Estimated Number of Responses: 96,000.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden: 52,000 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs Burden: $2,088,960.
8. Title of Collection: Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act
Pre-Hearing Statement
OMB Control Number: 1240-0036.
Total Estimated Number of Responses: 3,100.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden: 527 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs Burden: $1,612.
9. Title of Collection: Certification of Funeral Expenses
OMB Control Number: 1240-0040.
Total Estimated Number of Responses: 75.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden: 19 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs Burden: $39.
10. Title of Collection: Notice of Final Payment or Suspension of
Compensation Benefits
OMB Control Number: 1240-0041.
Total Estimated Number of Responses: 21,000.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden: 5,250 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs Burden: $16,590.
11. Title of Collection: Notice of Controversion of Right to
Compensation
OMB Control Number: 1240-0042.
Total Estimated Number of Responses: 18,000.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden: 4,500 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs Burden: $9,013.
12. Title of Collection: Payment of Compensation Without Award
OMB Control Number: 1240-0043.
Total Estimated Number of Responses: 16,800.
Total Estimated Annual Time Burden: 4,200 hours.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs Burden: $8,736.
B. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 (Regulatory Planning and Review)
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. The Department has considered this rule with these
principles in mind and has concluded that the regulated community will
greatly benefit from this regulation.
This rule's greatest benefit is that it provides the Longshore
Program and the affected public the flexibility to make greater use of
technology as it exists today and as it may be developed in the future.
In some instances, the current regulations restrict the means of
[[Page 12927]]
delivery or receipt when not required by the statute's terms. See,
e.g., 20 CFR 702.215 (notice effected by ``delivery by hand or mail'');
20 CFR 702.104(b) (case transfers must be accomplished by ``registered
or certified mail''). Eliminating these restrictions where appropriate
and consistent with the statute broadens available transmission
methods. From the Department's view, this rule allows easier and more
efficient transmission of critical documents and information to OWCP,
and allows OWCP to take advantage of more efficient means of delivery
to parties. And the regulated community, which has asked the Department
to allow more modern transmission methods to be used, can use
electronic technologies that they routinely employ when communicating
with other entities.
All currently used methods of submitting documents remain available
to OWCP, the parties, and the parties' representatives. OWCP will
continue to accept documents delivered by hand or routine mail and the
parties may communicate with each other in the same way. Thus, a party
or representative may continue to send and receive claim-related
documents and information in the same manner as it currently does. But
the rule in many cases gives the parties additional transmission
options.
In addition, allowing parties and representatives to waive their
right to registered or certified mail service of compensation orders
will expedite compensation payments. This is an important benefit to
the rule: Faster delivery of compensation orders via electronic
transmission will result in more expeditious payment of benefits to
injured workers.
The Department has also considered whether the parties will realize
any monetary benefits or incur any additional costs in light of this
rule. The rule expands opportunities for parties and their
representatives to submit and receive documents and does not require
deviation from current practice. So the rule imposes no additional
expense. To the contrary, the Department anticipates that the rule will
provide some savings because an electronically transmitted document
does not require postage or reproduction of multiple hard copies.
Although difficult to quantify, the Department estimates that initial
usage of electronic means of transmission will be approximately 13%,
with increased usage possible in the future.
Finally, because this is not a ``significant'' rule within the
meaning of Executive Order 12866, the Office of Management and Budget
has not reviewed it prior to publication.
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531
et seq., directs agencies to assess the effects of Federal Regulatory
Actions on State, local, and tribal governments, and the private
sector, ``other than to the extent that such regulations incorporate
requirements specifically set forth in law.'' 2 U.S.C. 1531. For
purposes of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, this rule does not
include any Federal mandate that may result in increased expenditures
by State, local, tribal governments, or increased expenditures by the
private sector of more than $100,000,000.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act and Executive Order 13272 (Proper
Consideration of Small Entities in Agency Rulemaking)
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq. (RFA), requires agencies to evaluate the potential impacts of
their proposed and final rules on small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions and to prepare an
analysis (called a ``regulatory flexibility analysis'') describing
those impacts. See 5 U.S.C. 601, 603-604. But if the rule is not
expected to ``have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities[,]'' the RFA allows an agency to so certify in
lieu of preparing the analysis. See 5 U.S.C. 605.
The Department has determined that a regulatory flexibility
analysis under the RFA is not required for this rulemaking. Many
Longshore employers and a handful of insurance carriers may be
considered small entities within the meaning of the RFA. See generally
77 FR 19471-72 (March 30, 2012); 69 FR 12222-23 (March 15, 2004). But
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on these entities
for several reasons. First, the revisions do not impose mandatory
change on the employers. Instead, employers may choose to transmit
documents and related information in the same manner as they do under
the current rules. Second, although the rules allow insurance companies
to report the issuance of policies and endorsements electronically,
these companies--virtually without exception--have been voluntarily
reporting coverage in the manner the rule allows for several years. No
change in their conduct will be required. Third, because the rule
provides more flexibility for employers and insurers in transmitting
documents and information, the Department anticipates that these
entities could see some economic savings by having the freedom to
choose the most cost-effective transmission method for their
businesses.
Based on these facts, the Department certifies that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Thus, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required. The
Department invites comments from members of the public who believe the
regulations will have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small Longshore employers or insurers. The Department has
provided the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration with a copy of this certification. See 5 U.S.C. 605.
E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
The Department has reviewed this rule in accordance with Executive
Order 13132 regarding federalism, and has determined that it does not
have ``federalism implications.'' E.O. 13132, 64 FR 43255 (August 4,
1999). The rule will not ``have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.'' Id.
F. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This rule meets the applicable standards in Sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
List of Subjects
20 CFR Part 702
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Health professions,
Insurance companies, Longshore and harbor workers, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Workers' compensation.
20 CFR Part 703
Insurance companies, Longshore and harbor workers, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Workers' compensation.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department of Labor
amends 20 CFR parts 702 and 703 as follows:
PART 702--ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURE
0
1. The authority citation for part 702 is revised to read as follows:
[[Page 12928]]
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, and 8171 et seq.; 33 U.S.C. 901 et
seq.; 42 U.S.C. 1651 et seq.; 43 U.S.C. 1333; Reorganization Plan
No. 6 of 1950, 15 FR 3174, 64 Stat. 1263; Secretary's Order 10-2009,
74 FR 58834.
0
2. Add Sec. 702.101 to subpart A to read as follows:
Sec. 702.101 Exchange of documents and information.
(a) Except as otherwise required by the regulations in this
subchapter, all documents and information sent to OWCP under this
subchapter must be submitted--
(1) In hard copy by postal mail, commercial delivery service (such
as Federal Express or United Parcel Service), or hand delivery;
(2) Electronically through an OWCP-authorized system; or
(3) As otherwise allowed by OWCP.
(b) Except as otherwise required by the regulations in this
subchapter, all documents and information sent under this subchapter by
OWCP to parties and their representatives or from any party or
representative to another party or representative must be sent--
(1) In hard copy by postal mail, commercial delivery service (such
as Federal Express or United Parcel Service), or hand delivery;
(2) Electronically by a reliable electronic method if the receiving
party or representative agrees in writing to receive documents and
information by that method; or
(3) Electronically through an OWCP-authorized system that provides
service of documents on the parties and their representatives.
(c) Reliable electronic methods for delivering documents include,
but are not limited to, email, facsimile and web portal.
(d) Any party or representative may revoke his or her agreement to
receive documents and information electronically by giving written
notice to OWCP, the party, or the representative with whom he or she
had agreed to receive documents and information electronically, as
appropriate.
(e) The provisions in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section
apply when parties are directed by the regulations in this subchapter
to: Advise; apply; approve; authorize; demand; file; forward; furnish;
give; give notice; inform; issue; make; notice, notify; provide;
publish; receive; recommend; refer; release; report; request; respond;
return; send; serve; service; submit; or transmit.
(f) Any reference in this subchapter to an application, copy,
filing, form, letter, written notice, or written request includes both
hard-copy and electronic documents.
(g) Any requirement in this subchapter that a document or
information be submitted in writing, or that it be signed, executed, or
certified does not preclude its submission or exchange electronically.
(h) Any reference in this subchapter to transmitting information to
an entity's address may include that entity's electronic address or
electronic portal.
(i) Any requirement in this subchapter that a document or
information--
(1) Be sent to a specific district director means that the document
or information should be sent to the physical or electronic address
provided by OWCP for that district director; and
(2) Be filed by a district director in his or her office means that
the document or information may be filed in a physical or electronic
location specified by OWCP for that district director.
0
3. Revise Sec. 702.102 to read as follows:
Sec. 702.102 Establishment and modification of compensation
districts, establishment of suboffices and jurisdictional areas.
(a) The Director has, pursuant to section 39(b) of the Longshore
and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. 939(b), established
compensation districts as required for improved administration or as
otherwise determined by the Director (see 51 FR 4282, Feb. 3, 1986).
The boundaries of the compensation districts may be modified at any
time, and the Director will notify all interested parties directly of
the modifications.
(b) As administrative exigencies from time to time may require, the
Director may, by administrative order, establish special areas outside
the continental United States, Alaska, and Hawaii, or change or modify
any areas so established, notwithstanding their inclusion within an
established compensation district. Such areas will be designated
``jurisdictional areas.'' The Director will also designate which of his
district directors will be in charge thereof.
(c) To further aid in the efficient administration of the OWCP, the
Director may from time to time establish suboffices within compensation
districts or jurisdictional areas, and will designate a person to be in
charge thereof.
0
4. Revise Sec. 702.103 to read as follows:
Sec. 702.103 Effect of establishment of suboffices and jurisdictional
areas.
Whenever the Director establishes a suboffice or jurisdictional
area, those reports, records, or other documents with respect to
processing of claims that are required to be filed with the district
director of the compensation district in which the injury or death
occurred, may instead be required to be filed with the suboffice, or
office established for the jurisdictional area.
0
5. Revise Sec. 702.104(b) to read as follows:
Sec. 702.104 Transfer of individual case file.
* * * * *
(b) The district director making the transfer may by letter or
memorandum to the district director to whom the case is transferred
give advice, comments, suggestions, or directions if appropriate to the
particular case. All interested parties will be advised of the
transfer.
0
6. In Sec. 702.174, revise the introductory text of paragraph (a),
paragraph (b), and the introductory text of paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 702.174 Exemptions; necessary information.
(a) Application. Before any facility is exempt from coverage under
the Act, the facility must apply for and receive a certificate of
exemption from the Director or his/her designee. The application must
be made by the owner of the facility; where the owner is a partnership
it must be made by a partner and where a corporation by an officer of
the corporation or the manager in charge of the facility for which an
exemption is sought. The information submitted must include the
following:
* * * * *
(b) Action by the Director. The Director or his/her designee must
review the application within thirty (30) days of its receipt.
(1) Where the application is complete and shows that all
requirements under Sec. 702.173 are met, the Director must promptly
notify the employer that certification has been approved and will be
effective on the date specified. The employer is required to post
notice of the exemption at a conspicuous location.
(2) Where the application is incomplete or does not substantiate
that all requirements of section 3(d) of the Act, 33 U.S.C. 903(d),
have been met, or evidence shows the facility is not eligible for
exemption, the Director must promptly notify the employer by issuing a
letter which details the reasons for the deficiency or the rejection.
The employer/applicant may reapply for certification, correcting
deficiencies and/or responding to the reasons for the Director's
denial. The Director or his/her designee must issue a new decision
within a reasonable time of reapplication following denial. Such action
will be the final administrative review and is not appealable to the
[[Page 12929]]
Administrative Law Judge or the Benefits Review Board.
* * * * *
(d) Action by the employer. Immediately upon receipt of the
certificate of exemption from coverage under the Act the employer must
post:
* * * * *
0
7. Revise Sec. 702.203 to read as follows:
Sec. 702.203 Employer's report; how given.
(a) The employer must file its report of injury with the district
director.
(b) If the employer sends its report of injury by U.S. postal mail
or commercial delivery service, the report will be considered filed on
the date that the employer mails the document or gives it to the
commercial delivery service. If the employer sends its report of injury
by a permissible electronic method, the report will be considered filed
on the date that the employer completes all steps necessary for the
transmission.
0
8. Revise Sec. 702.215 to read as follows:
Sec. 702.215 Notice; how given.
Notice must be effected by delivering it to the individual
designated to receive such notices at the physical or electronic
address designated by the employer. Notice may be given to the district
director by submitting a copy of the form supplied by OWCP to the
district director, or orally in person or by telephone.
0
9. Revise Sec. 702.224 to read as follows:
Sec. 702.224 Claims; notification of employer of filing by employee.
Within 10 days after the filing of a claim for compensation for
injury or death under the Act, the district director must give written
notice thereof to the employer or carrier.
0
10. Revise Sec. 702.234 to read as follows:
Sec. 702.234 Report by employer of commencement and suspension of
payments.
Immediately upon making the first payment of compensation, and upon
the suspension of payments once begun, the employer must notify the
district director who is administering the claim of the commencement or
suspension of payments, as the case may be.
0
11. In Sec. 702.243, revise paragraphs (a) and (b), the first two
sentences of paragraph (c), the introductory text of paragraph (f), and
paragraph (g) to read as follows:
Sec. 702.243 Settlement application; how submitted, how approved, how
disapproved, criteria.
(a) When the parties to a claim for compensation, including
survivor benefits and medical benefits, agree to a settlement they must
submit a complete application to the adjudicator. The application must
contain all the information outlined in Sec. 702.242 and must be sent
by certified mail with return receipt requested, commercial delivery
service with tracking capability that provides reliable proof of
delivery to the adjudicator, or electronically through an OWCP-
authorized system. Failure to submit a complete application will toll
the thirty day period mentioned in section 8(i) of the Act, 33 U.S.C.
908(i), until a complete application is received.
(b) The adjudicator must consider the settlement application within
thirty days and either approve or disapprove the application. The
liability of an employer/insurance carrier is not discharged until the
settlement is specifically approved by a compensation order issued by
the adjudicator. However, if the parties are represented by counsel,
the settlement will be deemed approved unless specifically disapproved
within thirty days after receipt of a complete application. This thirty
day period does not begin until all the information described in Sec.
702.242 has been submitted. The adjudicator will examine the settlement
application within thirty days and must immediately serve on all
parties notice of any deficiency. This notice must also indicate that
the thirty day period will not commence until the deficiency is
corrected.
(c) If the adjudicator disapproves a settlement application, the
adjudicator must serve on all parties a written statement or order
containing the reasons for disapproval. This statement must be served
within thirty days of receipt of a complete application (as described
in Sec. 702.242) if the parties are represented by counsel. * * *
* * * * *
(f) When presented with a settlement, the adjudicator must review
the application and determine whether, considering all of the
circumstances, including, where appropriate, the probability of success
if the case were formally litigated, the amount is adequate. The
criteria for determining the adequacy of the settlement application
will include, but not be limited to:
* * * * *
(g) In cases being paid pursuant to a final compensation order,
where no substantive issues are in dispute, a settlement amount which
does not equal the present value of future compensation payments
commuted, computed at the discount rate specified below, must be
considered inadequate unless the parties to the settlement show that
the amount is adequate. The probability of the death of the beneficiary
before the expiration of the period during which he or she is entitled
to compensation will be determined according to the most current United
States Life Table, as developed by the United States Department of
Health and Human Services, which will be updated from time to time. The
discount rate will be equal to the coupon issue yield equivalent (as
determined by the Secretary of the Treasury) of the average accepted
auction price for the last auction of 52 weeks U.S. Treasury Bills
settled immediately prior to the date of the submission of the
settlement application.
0
12. Revise Sec. 702.251 to read as follows:
Sec. 702.251 Employer's controversion of the right to compensation.
Where the employer controverts the right to compensation after
notice or knowledge of the injury or death, or after receipt of a
written claim, he must give notice thereof, stating the reasons for
controverting the right to compensation, using the form prescribed by
the Director. Such notice, or answer to the claim, must be filed with
the district director within 14 days from the date the employer
receives notice or has knowledge of the injury or death. A copy of the
notice must also be given to the claimant.
0
13. Revise Sec. 702.261 to read as follows:
Sec. 702.261 Claimant's contest of actions taken by employer or
carrier with respect to the claim.
Where the claimant contests an action by the employer or carrier
reducing, suspending, or terminating benefits, including medical care,
he should immediately notify the office of the district director who is
administering the claim and set forth the facts pertinent to his
complaint.
0
14. In Sec. 702.272, revise the last two sentences of paragraph (a)
and paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 702.272 Informal recommendation by district director.
(a) * * * If the district director determines that no violation
occurred he must notify the parties of his findings and the reasons for
recommending that the complaint be denied. If the employer and employee
accept the district director's recommendation, within 10 days it will
be incorporated
[[Page 12930]]
in an order, to be filed and served in accordance with Sec. 702.349.
(b) If the parties do not agree to the recommendation, the district
director must, within 10 days after receipt of the rejection, prepare a
memorandum summarizing the disagreement, send a copy to all interested
parties, and within 14 days thereafter, refer the case to the Office of
the Chief Administrative Law Judge for hearing pursuant to Sec.
702.317.
0
15. In Sec. 702.281, revise the introductory text of paragraph (a) and
the last sentence of paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 702.281 Third party action.
(a) Every person claiming benefits under this Act (or the
representative) must promptly notify the employer and the district
director when:
* * * * *
(b) * * * The approval must be on a form provided by OWCP and must
be filed, within thirty days after the settlement is entered into, with
the district director who is administering the claim.
0
16. Revise Sec. 702.315 to read as follows:
Sec. 702.315 Conclusion of conference; agreement on all matters with
respect to the claim.
(a) Following an informal conference at which agreement is reached
on all issues, the district director must (within 10 days after
conclusion of the conference), embody the agreement in a memorandum or
within 30 days issue a formal compensation order, to be filed and
served in accordance with Sec. 702.349. If either party requests that
a formal compensation order be issued, the district director must,
within 30 days of such request, prepare, file, and serve such order in
accordance with Sec. 702.349. Where the problem was of such nature
that it was resolved by telephone discussion or by exchange of written
correspondence, the district director must prepare a memorandum or
order setting forth the terms agreed upon and notify the parties either
by telephone or in writing, as appropriate. In either instance, when
the employer or carrier has agreed to pay, reinstate or increase
monetary compensation benefits, or to restore or appropriately change
medical care benefits, such action must be commenced immediately upon
becoming aware of the agreement, and without awaiting receipt of the
memorandum or the formal compensation order.
(b) Where there are several conferences or discussions, the
provisions of paragraph (a) of this section do not apply until the last
conference. The district director must, however, prepare and place in
his administrative file a short, succinct memorandum of each preceding
conference or discussion.
0
17. Revise Sec. 702.317 to read as follows:
Sec. 702.317 Preparation and transfer of the case for hearing.
A case is prepared for transfer in the following manner:
(a) The district director will furnish each of the parties or their
representatives with a copy of a prehearing statement form.
(b) Each party must, within 21 days after receipt of such form,
complete it and return it to the district director and serve copies on
all other parties. Extensions of time for good cause may be granted by
the district director.
(c) Upon receipt of the completed forms, the district director,
after checking them for completeness and after any further conferences
that, in his or her opinion, are warranted, will transmit them to the
Office of the Chief Administrative Law Judge by letter of transmittal
together with all available evidence which the parties intend to submit
at the hearings (exclusive of X-rays, slides and other materials not
suitable for transmission which may be offered into evidence at the
time of the hearing); the materials transmitted must not include any
recommendations expressed or memoranda prepared by the district
director pursuant to Sec. 702.316.
(d) If the completed pre-hearing statement forms raise new or
additional issues not previously considered by the district director or
indicate that material evidence will be submitted that could reasonably
have been made available to the district director before he or she
prepared the last memorandum of conference, the district director will
transfer the case to the Office of the Chief Administrative Law Judge
only after having considered such issues or evaluated such evidence or
both and having issued an additional memorandum of conference in
conformance with Sec. 702.316.
(e) If a party fails to complete or return his or her pre-hearing
statement form within the time allowed, the district director may, at
his or her discretion, transmit the case without that party's form.
However, such transmittal must include a statement from the district
director setting forth the circumstances causing the failure to include
the form, and such party's failure to submit a pre-hearing statement
form may, subject to rebuttal at the formal hearing, be considered by
the administrative law judge, to the extent intransigence is relevant,
in subsequent rulings on motions which may be made in the course of the
formal hearing.
0
18. Revise Sec. 702.319 to read as follows:
Sec. 702.319 Obtaining documents from the administrative file for
reintroduction at formal hearings.
Whenever any party considers any document in the administrative
file essential to any further proceedings under the Act, it is the
responsibility of such party to obtain such document from the district
director and reintroduce it for the record before the administrative
law judge. The type of document that may be obtained will be limited to
documents previously submitted to the district director, including
documents or forms with respect to notices, claims, controversions,
contests, progress reports, medical services or supplies, etc. The work
products of the district director or his staff will not be subject to
retrieval. The procedure for obtaining documents will be for the
requesting party to inform the district director in writing of the
documents he wishes to obtain, specifying them with particularity. Upon
receipt, the district director must promptly forward a copy of the
requested materials to the requesting party. A copy of the letter of
request and a statement of whether it has been satisfied must be kept
in the case file.
0
19. In Sec. 702.321, revise paragraphs (a)(1), (b), and (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 702.321 Procedures for determining applicability of section 8(f)
of the Act.
(a) Application: filing, service, contents. (1) An employer or
insurance carrier which seeks to invoke the provisions of section 8(f)
of the Act must request limitation of its liability and file a fully
documented application with the district director. A fully documented
application must contain a specific description of the pre-existing
condition relied upon as constituting an existing permanent partial
disability and the reasons for believing that the claimant's permanent
disability after the injury would be less were it not for the pre-
existing permanent partial disability or that the death would not have
ensued but for that disability. These reasons must be supported by
medical evidence as specified in this paragraph. The application must
also contain the basis for the assertion that the pre-existing
condition relied upon was manifest in the employer and documentary
medical evidence relied upon in support of the request for section 8(f)
relief. This
[[Page 12931]]
medical evidence must include, but not be limited to, a current medical
report establishing the extent of all impairments and the date of
maximum medical improvement. If the claimant has already reached
maximum medical improvement, a report prepared at that time will
satisfy the requirement for a current medical report. If the current
disability is total, the medical report must explain why the disability
is not due solely to the second injury. If the current disability is
partial, the medical report must explain why the disability is not due
solely to the second injury and why the resulting disability is
materially and substantially greater than that which would have
resulted from the subsequent injury alone. If the injury is loss of
hearing, the pre-existing hearing loss must be documented by an
audiogram which complies with the requirements of Sec. 702.441. If the
claim is for survivor's benefits, the medical report must establish
that the death was not due solely to the second injury. Any other
evidence considered necessary for consideration of the request for
section 8(f) relief must be submitted when requested by the district
director or Director.
* * * * *
(b) Application: Time for filing. (1) A request for section 8(f)
relief should be made as soon as the permanency of the claimant's
condition becomes known or is an issue in dispute. This could be when
benefits are first paid for permanent disability, or at an informal
conference held to discuss the permanency of the claimant's condition.
Where the claim is for death benefits, the request should be made as
soon as possible after the date of death. Along with the request for
section 8(f) relief, the applicant must also submit all the supporting
documentation required by this section, described in paragraph (a) of
this section. Where possible, this documentation should accompany the
request, but may be submitted separately, in which case the district
director must, at the time of the request, fix a date for submission of
the fully documented application. The date must be fixed as follows:
(i) Where notice is given to all parties that permanency will be an
issue at an informal conference, the fully documented application must
be submitted at or before the conference. For these purposes, notice
means when the issue of permanency is noted on the form LS-141, Notice
of Informal Conference. All parties are required to list issues
reasonably anticipated to be discussed at the conference when the
initial request for a conference is made and to notify all parties of
additional issues which arise during the period before the conference
is actually held.
(ii) Where the issue of permanency is first raised at the informal
conference and could not have reasonably been anticipated by the
parties prior to the conference, the district director must adjourn the
conference and establish the date by which the fully documented
application must be submitted and so notify the employer/carrier. The
date will be set by the district director after reviewing the
circumstances of the case.
(2) At the request of the employer or insurance carrier, and for
good cause, the district director, at his/her discretion, may grant an
extension of the date for submission of the fully documented
application. In fixing the date for submission of the application under
circumstances other than described above or in considering any request
for an extension of the date for submitting the application, the
district director must consider all the circumstances of the case,
including but not limited to: Whether the claimant is being paid
compensation and the hardship to the claimant of delaying referral of
the case to the Office of Administrative Law Judges (OALJ); the
complexity of the issues and the availability of medical and other
evidence to the employer; the length of time the employer was or should
have been aware that permanency is an issue; and, the reasons listed in
support of the request. If the employer/carrier requested a specific
date, the reasons for selection of that date will also be considered.
Neither the date selected for submission of the fully documented
application nor any extension therefrom can go beyond the date the case
is referred to the OALJ for formal hearing.
(3) Where the claimant's condition has not reached maximum medical
improvement and no claim for permanency is raised by the date the case
is referred to the OALJ, an application need not be submitted to the
district director to preserve the employer's right to later seek relief
under section 8(f) of the Act. In all other cases, failure to submit a
fully documented application by the date established by the district
director will be an absolute defense to the liability of the special
fund. This defense is an affirmative defense which must be raised and
pleaded by the Director. The absolute defense will not be raised where
permanency was not an issue before the district director. In all other
cases, where permanency has been raised, the failure of an employer to
submit a timely and fully documented application for section 8(f)
relief will not prevent the district director, at his/her discretion,
from considering the claim for compensation and transmitting the case
for formal hearing. The failure of an employer to present a timely and
fully documented application for section 8(f) relief may be excused
only where the employer could not have reasonably anticipated the
liability of the special fund prior to the consideration of the claim
by the district director. Relief under section 8(f) is not available to
an employer who fails to comply with section 32(a) of the Act, 33
U.S.C. 932(a).
(c) Application: Approval, disapproval. If all the evidence
required by paragraph (a) of this section was submitted with the
application for section 8(f) relief and the facts warrant relief under
this section, the district director must award such relief after
concurrence by the Associate Director, DLHWC, or his or her designee.
If the district director or the Associate Director or his or her
designee finds that the facts do not warrant relief under section 8(f)
the district director must advise the employer of the grounds for the
denial. The application for section 8(f) relief may then be considered
by an administrative law judge. When a case is transmitted to the
Office of Administrative Law Judges the district director must also
attach a copy of the application for section 8(f) relief submitted by
the employer, and notwithstanding Sec. 702.317(c), the district
director's denial of the application.
* * * * *
0
20. Revise Sec. 702.349 to read as follows:
Sec. 702.349 Formal hearings; filing and mailing of compensation
orders; waiver of service; disposition of transcripts.
(a) An administrative law judge must, within 20 days after the
official termination of the hearing, deliver by mail, or otherwise, to
the district director that administered the claim, the transcript of
the hearing, other documents or pleadings filed with him with respect
to the claim, and his signed compensation order. Upon receipt thereof,
the district director, being the official custodian of all records with
respect to claims he administers, must formally date and file the
transcript, pleadings, and compensation order in his office. Such
filing must be accomplished by the close of business on the next
succeeding working day, and the district director must, on the same day
as the filing was accomplished, serve a copy of the compensation order
on the parties and on the representatives of the parties, if
[[Page 12932]]
any. Service on the parties and their representatives must be made by
certified mail unless a party has previously waived service by this
method under paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) All parties and their representatives are entitled to be served
with compensation orders via registered or certified mail. Parties and
their representatives may waive this right and elect to be served with
compensation orders electronically by filing the appropriate waiver
form with the district director responsible for administering the
claim. To waive service by registered or certified mail, employers,
insurance carriers, and their representatives must file form LS-801
(Waiver of Service by Registered or Certified Mail for Employers and/or
Insurance Carriers), and claimants and their representatives must file
form LS-802 (Waiver of Service by Registered or Certified Mail for
Claimants and/or Authorized Representatives). A signature on a waiver
form represents a knowing and voluntary waiver of that party's or
representative's right to receive compensation orders via registered or
certified mail.
(1) Waiving parties and representatives must provide a valid
electronic address on the waiver form.
(2) Parties and representatives must submit a separate waiver form
for each case in which they intend to waive the right to certified or
registered mail service.
(3) A representative may not sign a waiver form on a party's
behalf.
(4) All compensation orders issued in a claim after receipt of the
waiver form will be sent to the electronic address provided on the
waiver form. Any changes to the address must be made by submitting
another waiver form. Individuals may revoke their service waiver at any
time by submitting a new waiver form that specifies that the service
waiver is being revoked.
(5) If it appears that service in the manner selected by the
individual has not been effective, the district director will serve the
individual by certified mail.
0
21. Revise Sec. 702.372 to read as follows:
Sec. 702.372 Supplementary compensation orders.
(a) In any case in which the employer or insurance carrier is in
default in the payment of compensation due under any award of
compensation, for a period of 30 days after the compensation is due and
payable, the person to whom such compensation is payable may, within 1
year after such default, apply in writing to the district director for
a supplementary compensation order declaring the amount of the default.
Upon receipt of such application, the district director will institute
proceedings with respect to such application as if such application
were an original claim for compensation, and the matter will be
disposed of as provided for in Sec. 702.315, or if agreement on the
issue is not reached, then as in Sec. Sec. 702.316 through 702.319.
(b) If, after disposition of the application as provided for in
paragraph (a) of this section, a supplementary compensation order is
entered declaring the amount of the default, which amount may be the
whole of the award notwithstanding that only one or more installments
is in default, a copy of such supplementary order must be filed and
served in accordance with Sec. 702.349. Thereafter, the applicant may
obtain and file with the clerk of the Federal district court for the
judicial district where the injury occurred or the district in which
the employer has his principal place of business or maintains an
office, a certified copy of said order and may seek enforcement thereof
as provided for by section 18 of the Act, 33 U.S.C. 918.
0
22. In Sec. 702.432, revise the introductory text of paragraph (b),
and paragraphs (b)(6) and (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 702.432 Debarment process.
* * * * *
(b) Pertaining to health care providers and claims representatives.
If after appropriate investigation the Director determines that
proceedings should be initiated, written notice thereof must be
provided to the physician, health care provider or claims
representative. Notice must contain the following:
* * * * *
(6) The name and address of the district director who will be
responsible for receiving the answer from the physician, health care
provider or claims representative.
* * * * *
(e) The Director must issue a decision in writing, and must send a
copy of the decision to the physician, health care provider or claims
representative. The decision must advise the physician, health care
provider or claims representative of the right to request, within
thirty (30) days of the date of an adverse decision, a formal hearing
before an administrative law judge under the procedures set forth
herein. The filing of such a request for hearing within the time
specified will operate to stay the effectiveness of the decision to
debar.
0
23. In Sec. 702.433, revise paragraphs (a), (b), (e) and (f) to read
as follows:
Sec. 702.433 Requests for hearing.
(a) A request for hearing must be sent to the district director and
contain a concise notice of the issues on which the physician, health
care provider or claims representative desires to give evidence at the
hearing with identification of witnesses and documents to be submitted
at the hearing.
(b) If a request for hearing is timely received by the district
director, the matter must be referred to the Chief Administrative Law
Judge who must assign it for hearing with the assigned administrative
law judge issuing a notice of hearing for the conduct of the hearing. A
copy of the hearing notice must be served on the physician, health care
provider or claims representative.
* * * * *
(e) The administrative law judge will issue a recommended decision
after the termination of the hearing. The recommended decision must
contain appropriate findings, conclusions and a recommended order and
be forwarded, together with the record of the hearing, to the
Administrative Review Board for a final decision. The recommended
decision must be served upon all parties to the proceeding.
(f) Based upon a review of the record and the recommended decision
of the administrative law judge, the Administrative Review Board will
issue a final decision.
PART 703--INSURANCE REGULATIONS
0
24. The authority citation for part 703 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, and 8171 et seq.; 33 U.S.C. 901 et
seq.; 42 U.S.C. 1651 et seq.; 43 U.S.C. 1333; Reorganization Plan
No. 6 of 1950, 15 FR 3174, 64 Stat. 1263; Secretary's Order 10-2009,
74 FR 58834.
0
25. In Sec. 703.2, revise the introductory text of paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
Sec. 703.2 Forms.
(a) Any information required by the regulations in this part to be
submitted to OWCP must be submitted on forms the Director authorizes
from time to time for such purpose. Persons submitting forms may not
modify the forms or use substitute forms without OWCP's approval. These
forms must be submitted, sent, or filed in the manner prescribed by
OWCP.
* * * * *
[[Page 12933]]
0
26. Revise Sec. 703.113 to read as follows:
Sec. 703.113 Marine insurance contracts.
A longshoremen's policy, or the longshoremen's endorsement provided
for by Sec. 703.109 for attachment to a marine policy, may specify the
particular vessel or vessels in respect of which the policy applies and
the address of the employer at the home port thereof. The report of the
issuance of a policy or endorsement required by Sec. 703.116 must be
made to DLHWC and must show the name and address of the owner as well
as the name or names of such vessel or vessels.
0
27. Revise Sec. 703.114 to read as follows:
Sec. 703.114 Notice of cancellation.
Cancellation of a contract or policy of insurance issued under
authority of the Act will not become effective otherwise than as
provided by 33 U.S.C. 936(b); 30 days before such cancellation is
intended to be effective, notice of a proposed cancellation must be
given to the district director and the employer in accordance with the
provisions of 33 U.S.C. 912(c). The notice requirements of 33 U.S.C.
912(c) will be considered met when:
(a) Notice to the district director is given by a method specified
in Sec. 702.101(a) of this chapter or in the same manner that reports
of issuance of policies and endorsements are reported under Sec.
703.116; and
(b) Notice to the employer is given by a method specified in Sec.
702.101(b) of this chapter.
0
28. Revise Sec. 703.116 to read as follows:
Sec. 703.116 Report by carrier of issuance of policy or endorsement.
Each carrier must report to DLHWC each policy and endorsement
issued by it to an employer whose employees are engaging in work
subject to the Act and its extensions. Such reports must be made in a
manner prescribed by OWCP. Reports made to an OWCP-authorized
intermediary, such as an industry data collection organization, satisfy
this reporting requirement.
0
29. Revise Sec. 703.117 to read as follows:
Sec. 703.117 Report; by whom sent.
The report of issuance of a policy and endorsement provided for in
Sec. 703.116 or notice of cancellation provided for in Sec. 703.114
must be sent by the home office of the carrier, except that any carrier
may authorize its agency or agencies in any compensation district to
make such reports, provided the carrier notifies DLHWC of the agencies
so duly authorized.
0
30. Revise Sec. 703.118 to read as follows:
Sec. 703.118 Agreement to be bound by report.
Every applicant for the authority to write insurance under the
provisions of this Act, will be deemed to have included in its
application an agreement that the acceptance by DLHWC of a report of
insurance, as provided for by Sec. 703.116, binds the carrier to full
liability for the obligations under this Act of the employer named in
said report, and every certificate of authority to write insurance
under this Act will be deemed to have been issued by the Office upon
consideration of the carrier's agreement to become so bound. It will be
no defense to this agreement that the carrier failed or delayed to
issue the policy to the employer covered by this report.
Sec. 703.119 [Removed and Reserved]
0
31. Remove and reserve Sec. 703.119.
0
32. Revise Sec. 703.120 to read as follows:
Sec. 703.120 Name of one employer only in each report.
For policies that are reported to DLHWC on Form LS-570 (Carrier's
Report of Issuance of Policy), a separate report of the issuance of a
policy and endorsement, provided for by Sec. 703.116, must be made for
each employer covered by a policy. If a policy is issued insuring more
than one employer, a separate form LS-570 for each employer so covered
must be sent to DLHWC in the manner described in Sec. 703.116, with
the name of only one employer on each form.
Sec. 703.502 [Removed and Reserved]
0
33. Remove and reserve Sec. 703.502.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 25th day of February, 2015.
Leonard J. Howie III,
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015-05103 Filed 3-11-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-CR-P