Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of Countervailing Duty Order: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From India, 12804-12805 [2015-05560]
Download as PDF
12804
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 47 / Wednesday, March 11, 2015 / Notices
Company
the results of our analysis of the issues
raised by the parties in their comments,
within 120 days after issuance of these
34.77
preliminary results.
Subsidy rate
(percent)
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Daewoo Electronics Corporation ........................................
81.91
Disclosure and Public Comment
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The Department intends to disclose to
interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with this
preliminary determination within five
days of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register.5 Interested parties
may submit case and rebuttal briefs, as
well as request a hearing.6 Interested
parties may submit written comments
(case briefs) within 30 days of
publication of the preliminary results
and rebuttal comments (rebuttal briefs)
within five days after the time limit for
filing case briefs.7 Rebuttal briefs must
be limited to issues raised in the case
briefs.8 Parties who submit case or
rebuttal briefs are requested to submit
with the argument: (1) A statement of
the issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and (3) a table of authorities.9
Interested parties who wish to request
a hearing, or to participate if one is
requested, must do so within 30 days of
publication of these preliminary results
by submitting a written request to the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, using Enforcement and
Compliance’s ACCESS system.10
Requests should contain the party’s
name, address, and telephone number,
the number of participants, and a list of
the issues to be discussed. If a request
for a hearing is made, we will inform
parties of the scheduled date for the
hearing which will be held at the U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230, at a time and
location to be determined.11 Parties
should confirm by telephone the date,
time, and location of the hearing. Issues
addressed at the hearing will be limited
to those raised in the briefs.12 All briefs
and hearing requests must be filed
electronically and received successfully
in their entirety through ACCESS by
5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date.
Unless the deadline is extended
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Act, we intend to issue the final results
of this administrative review, including
5 See
19 CFR 351.224(b).
6 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)–(d), 19 CFR 351.310(c).
7 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(l)(ii) and 351.309(d)(l).
8 See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(2).
9 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
10 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
11 See 19 CFR 351.310.
12 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:27 Mar 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
Assessment Rates and Cash Deposit
Requirement
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(b)(4)(i), we assigned a subsidy
rate for each producer/exporter subject
to this administrative review. Upon
issuance of the final results, the
Department shall determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, CVDs on all appropriate
entries covered by this review. We
intend to issue instructions to CBP 15
days after publication of the final results
of review.
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act, the Department also intends to
instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of
estimated CVDs, in the amounts shown
above for each of the respective
companies shown above, on shipments
of subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review. For all non-reviewed firms, we
will instruct CBP to continue to collect
cash deposits at the most-recent
company-specific or all-others rate
applicable to the company, as
appropriate. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
These preliminary results are issued
and published in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: March 2, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and
Adverse Inferences
V. Analysis of Programs
VI. Conclusion
[FR Doc. 2015–05562 Filed 3–10–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
PO 00000
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–533–829]
Final Results of Expedited Sunset
Review of Countervailing Duty Order:
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire
Strand From India
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset
review, the Department of Commerce
(the ‘‘Department’’) finds that revocation
of the countervailing duty (‘‘CVD’’)
order on prestressed concrete steel wire
strand (‘‘PC Strand’’) from India would
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of a countervailable subsidy
at the level indicated in the ‘‘Final
Results of Review’’ section of this
notice.
DATES: Effective Date: March 11, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mandy Mallott, AD/CVD Operations,
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6430.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On November 3, 2014, the Department
initiated the second sunset review of the
Order 1 pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
‘‘Act’’).2 On November 17, 2014, the
Department received a timely
notification of intent to participate from
Insteel Wire Products Company and
Sumiden Wire Products Corporation
(collectively, ‘‘domestic parties’’ or
‘‘Petitioners’’), filed in accordance with
19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). On December 3,
2014, the Department received a
substantive response from Petitioners,
timely filed in accordance with 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i).
Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) and section
751(c)(3)(B) of the Act, when there are
inadequate responses from respondent
interested parties, the Department will
conduct an expedited sunset review
and, not later than 120 days after the
date of publication in the Federal
Register of the notice of initiation, issue
final results of review based on the facts
available. The Department did not
receive a substantive response from the
1 See Countervailing Duty Order: Prestressed
Concrete Steel Wire Strand From India, 69 FR 5319
(February 4, 2004) (‘‘Order’’)
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 79
FR 65186 (November 3, 2014).
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM
11MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 47 / Wednesday, March 11, 2015 / Notices
Government of India or any Indian
producers or exporters. Accordingly, we
conducted an expedited (120-day)
sunset review of the Order.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to this order
is prestressed concrete steel wire (‘‘PC
strand’’), which is steel strand produced
from wire of non-stainless, nongalvanized steel, which is suitable for
use in prestressed concrete (both pretensioned and post-tensioned)
applications. The product definition
encompasses covered and uncovered
strand and all types, grades, and
diameters of PC strand.
The merchandise under this order is
currently classifiable under subheadings
7312.10.3010 and 7312.10.3012 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
under investigation is dispositive.
Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are
addressed in the accompanying Issues
and Decision Memorandum (‘‘IDM’’),
which is hereby adopted by this notice.3
The issues discussed in the IDM include
the likelihood of continuation or
recurrence of a countervailable subsidy
and the net countervailable subsidy
likely to prevail if the Order were
revoked. Parties can find a complete
discussion of all issues raised in this
expedited sunset review and the
corresponding recommendations in this
public memorandum which is on file
electronically via the Enforcement and
Compliance Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).4
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and in the
Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the
main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete
version of the IDM can be accessed
3 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, entitled ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited
First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty
Order on Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand
from the India,’’ dated concurrently with this
notice.
4 On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and
Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and
Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic
Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD
Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).
The web location was changed from https://
iaaccess.trade.gov to https://access.trade.gov. The
Final Rule changing the references to the
Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046
(November 20, 2014).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:41 Mar 10, 2015
Jkt 235001
directly on the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed IDM and the electronic
versions of the IDM are identical in
content.
Final Results of Review
Pursuant to sections 752(b)(1) and (3)
of the Act, the Department determines
that revocation of the Order would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of a countervailable subsidy
for all producers/manufacturers/
exporters at a net countervailable
subsidy rate of 62.92 percent.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’)
of their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Timely notification of return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing the
results and notice in accordance with
sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the
Act.
Dated: March 2, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–05560 Filed 3–10–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–351–825]
Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2013–2014
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 19, 2014, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on stainless
steel bar (SSB) from Brazil.1 The period
of review (POR) is February 1, 2013,
through January 31, 2014. The review
covers one producer/exporter of the
AGENCY:
1 See Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2013–2014, 79 FR 75789 (December 19,
2014) (Preliminary Results).
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12805
subject merchandise, Villares Metals
S.A. (Villares). We invited parties to
comment on the Preliminarily Results.
None were received. Accordingly, for
the final results, we continue to find
that Villares did not make sales of
subject merchandise at less than normal
value.
DATES: Effective Date: March 11, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Catherine Cartsos or Minoo Hatten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1757, and (202)
482–1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 19, 2014, the
Department published the Preliminary
Results of the administrative review.
The Department gave interested parties
an opportunity to comment on the
Preliminary Results. None were
received. The Department conducted
this review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is SSB. The term SSB with respect to the
order means articles of stainless steel in
straight lengths that have been either
hot-rolled, forged, turned, cold-drawn,
cold-rolled or otherwise cold-finished,
or ground, having a uniform solid cross
section along their whole length in the
shape of circles, segments of circles,
ovals, rectangles (including squares),
triangles, hexagons, octagons or other
convex polygons. SSB includes coldfinished SSBs that are turned or ground
in straight lengths, whether produced
from hot-rolled bar or from straightened
and cut rod or wire, and reinforcing bars
that have indentations, ribs, grooves, or
other deformations produced during the
rolling process. Except as specified
above, the term does not include
stainless steel semi-finished products,
cut-length flat-rolled products (i.e., cutlength rolled products which if less than
4.75 mm in thickness have a width
measuring at least 10 times the
thickness, or if 4.75 mm or more in
thickness having a width which exceeds
150 mm and measures at least twice the
thickness), wire (i.e., cold-formed
products in coils, of any uniform solid
cross section along their whole length,
which do not conform to the definition
of flat-rolled products), and angles,
shapes and sections. The SSB subject to
the order is currently classifiable under
E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM
11MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 47 (Wednesday, March 11, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12804-12805]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05560]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-533-829]
Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of Countervailing Duty
Order: Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From India
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset review, the Department of Commerce
(the ``Department'') finds that revocation of the countervailing duty
(``CVD'') order on prestressed concrete steel wire strand (``PC
Strand'') from India would be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of a countervailable subsidy at the level indicated in the
``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice.
DATES: Effective Date: March 11, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mandy Mallott, AD/CVD Operations,
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6430.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 3, 2014, the Department initiated the second sunset
review of the Order \1\ pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the ``Act'').\2\ On November 17, 2014, the
Department received a timely notification of intent to participate from
Insteel Wire Products Company and Sumiden Wire Products Corporation
(collectively, ``domestic parties'' or ``Petitioners''), filed in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). On December 3, 2014, the
Department received a substantive response from Petitioners, timely
filed in accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Countervailing Duty Order: Prestressed Concrete Steel
Wire Strand From India, 69 FR 5319 (February 4, 2004) (``Order'')
\2\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 79 FR 65186
(November 3, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) and section 751(c)(3)(B)
of the Act, when there are inadequate responses from respondent
interested parties, the Department will conduct an expedited sunset
review and, not later than 120 days after the date of publication in
the Federal Register of the notice of initiation, issue final results
of review based on the facts available. The Department did not receive
a substantive response from the
[[Page 12805]]
Government of India or any Indian producers or exporters. Accordingly,
we conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of the Order.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to this order is prestressed concrete steel
wire (``PC strand''), which is steel strand produced from wire of non-
stainless, non-galvanized steel, which is suitable for use in
prestressed concrete (both pre-tensioned and post-tensioned)
applications. The product definition encompasses covered and uncovered
strand and all types, grades, and diameters of PC strand.
The merchandise under this order is currently classifiable under
subheadings 7312.10.3010 and 7312.10.3012 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise under investigation is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are addressed in the accompanying
Issues and Decision Memorandum (``IDM''), which is hereby adopted by
this notice.\3\ The issues discussed in the IDM include the likelihood
of continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy and the net
countervailable subsidy likely to prevail if the Order were revoked.
Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in this
expedited sunset review and the corresponding recommendations in this
public memorandum which is on file electronically via the Enforcement
and Compliance Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (``ACCESS'').\4\ ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records
Unit, Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the IDM can be accessed directly on the
Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed IDM
and the electronic versions of the IDM are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance,
entitled ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of
the Expedited First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order
on Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from the India,'' dated
concurrently with this notice.
\4\ On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and Compliance changed the
name of Enforcement and Compliance's AD and CVD Centralized
Electronic Service System (``IA ACCESS'') to AD and CVD Centralized
Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). The web location was changed
from https://iaaccess.trade.gov to https://access.trade.gov. The Final
Rule changing the references to the Regulations can be found at 79
FR 69046 (November 20, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
Pursuant to sections 752(b)(1) and (3) of the Act, the Department
determines that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy for all
producers/manufacturers/exporters at a net countervailable subsidy rate
of 62.92 percent.
Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order
This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely
notification of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with
the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance
with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: March 2, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-05560 Filed 3-10-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P