Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Amend Rules 11.6, 11.8, 11.9, 11.10 and 11.11 of EDGA Exchange, Inc., 12655-12660 [2015-05482]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 46 / Tuesday, March 10, 2015 / Notices III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will: (A) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– OCC–2015–03 on the subject line. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–OCC–2015–03. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:53 Mar 09, 2015 Jkt 235001 inspection and copying at the principal office of OCC and on OCC’s Web site at https://www.theocc.com/components/ docs/legal/rules_and_bylaws/sr_occ_15_ 03.pdf. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–OCC–2015–03 and should be submitted on or before March 31, 2015. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.11 Brent J. Fields, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–05479 Filed 3–9–15; 08:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–74435; File No. SR–EDGA– 2015–10] Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Amend Rules 11.6, 11.8, 11.9, 11.10 and 11.11 of EDGA Exchange, Inc. March 4, 2015. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on February 20, 2015, EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGA’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. On February 27, 2015, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposal.3 The Commission is publishing this notice, as modified by Amendment No. 1, to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of the Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange filed a proposal to amend Rules 11.6, 11.8, 11.9, 11.10 and 11.11 to clarify and to include additional specificity regarding the current functionality of the Exchange’s 11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 3 Amendment No. 1 replaces SR–EDGA–2015–10 and supersedes such filing in its entirety. 1 15 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 12655 System,4 including the operation of its order types and order instructions, as further described below. The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange’s Web site at www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose On June 5, 2014, Chair Mary Jo White asked all national securities exchanges to conduct a comprehensive review of each order type offered to members and how it operates.5 The Exchange notes that a comprehensive rule filing clarifying and updating Exchange rules was recently approved.6 However, based on the request from Chair White, the Exchange did indeed conduct further review of each order types and its operation. The proposals set forth below are based on this comprehensive review and are intended to clarify and to include additional specificity regarding the current functionality of the Exchange’s System, including the operation of its order types and order instructions. The proposals set forth below are intended to supplement the recently approved filing based on further review conducted by the Exchange and are intended to clarify and enhance the understandability of 4 The term ‘‘System’’ is defined as ‘‘the electronic communications and trading facility designated by the Board through which securities orders of Users are consolidated for ranking, execution and, when applicable, routing away.’’ See Exchange Rule 1.5(cc). 5 See Mary Jo White, Chair, Commission, Speech at the Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P. Global Exchange and Brokerage Conference, (June 5, 2014) (available at https://www.sec.gov/News/Speech/ Detail/Speech/1370542004312#.VD2HW610w6Y). 6 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73592 (November 13, 2014), 79 FR 68937 (November 19, 2014) (SR–EDGA–2014–20). E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM 10MRN1 12656 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 46 / Tuesday, March 10, 2015 / Notices the Exchange’s rules related to the ranking and execution of orders. The proposal is also intended to add additional detail with respect to the handling of orders with a Discretionary Range 7 instruction. The Exchange is not proposing any substantive modifications to the System. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Orders With a Discretionary Range Pursuant to current Rule 11.6(d), the Exchange defines a Discretionary Range as an instruction the User 8 may attach to an order to buy (sell) a stated amount of a security at a specified, displayed price with discretion to execute up (down) to a specified, non-displayed price. For purposes of this proposal, the Exchange will use the term ‘‘Discretionary Range’’ to describe the amount between the displayed price to and including the highest price at which a buyer is willing to buy or lowest price at which a seller is willing to sell. The Exchange proposes to make clear that although an order with a Discretionary Range instruction may be accompanied by a Displayed 9 instruction, an order with a Discretionary Range instruction may also be accompanied by a NonDisplayed instruction, and if so, will have a non-displayed ranked price as well as a discretionary price. The Exchange further proposes to specifically state that resting orders with a Discretionary Range instruction will be executed at a price that uses the minimum amount of discretion necessary to execute the order against an incoming order. In addition, the Exchange proposes to make clear certain circumstances where the Discretionary Range of an order is temporarily reduced due to contra-side interest resting on the EDGA Book.10 The Exchange also proposes to specify certain situations where the Discretionary Range of an order could be temporarily reduced based on contraside interest resting on the Exchange. The Exchange notes that an order with a Post Only instruction 11 will, in all cases, remove contra-side liquidity from the EDGA Book because under its current taker-maker pricing structure, the remover of liquidity is provided a rebate while the provider of liquidity is charged a fee. Therefore, in all cases, the value of the execution to remove 7 See Exchange Rule 11.6(d). term ‘‘User’’ is defined as ‘‘any Member or Sponsored Participant who is authorized to obtain access to the System pursuant to Rule 11.3.’’ See Exchange Rule 1.5(ee). 9 See Exchange Rule 11.6(e)(1). 10 The term ‘‘EDGA Book’’ is defined as ‘‘the System’s electronic file of orders.’’ See Exchange Rule 1.5(d). 11 See Exchange Rule 11.6(n)(4). 8 The VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:53 Mar 09, 2015 Jkt 235001 liquidity will equal or exceed the value of such execution once posted to the EDGA Book, including the applicable fees charged or rebates received. However, the Exchange proposes to adopt language to reflect the operation of the System in the event the Exchange’s fee structure is modified and an order with a Post Only instruction is able to be posted to the EDGA Book without removing liquidity. The Exchange notes that if this were the case, it would be possible for an order with a Discretionary Range instruction to have its Discretionary Range temporarily reduced based on contraside interest resting on the Exchange because an incoming order with a Post Only instruction would be posted to the EDGA Book rather than executing against the Discretionary Range of a resting order. With respect to displayed contra-side liquidity, the Exchange proposes to make clear that if an order posted to the EDGA Book has a Discretionary Range and there is a contra-side order that is displayed by the System on the EDGA Book within such Discretionary Range, the order with a Discretionary Range will not be permitted to execute at the price of or at a price more aggressive than such contra-side displayed order unless and until there is no contra-side displayed order on the EDGA Book within the Discretionary Range. In such case, the order with a Discretionary Range will have discretion to one Minimum Price Variation 12 below (above) the contra-side offer (bid) that is displayed by the System on the EDGA Book. With respect to non-displayed contraside liquidity, the Exchange proposes to make clear that if an order posted to the EDGA Book has a Discretionary Range and there is a contra-side order with a Non-Displayed instruction,13 the order with a Discretionary Range will not be permitted to execute at a price more aggressive than the ranked price of such contra-side order unless and until there is no contra-side order on the EDGA Book within the Discretionary Range. In such case, the order with a Discretionary Range will have discretion to the ranked price of the contra-side offer (bid) with a Non-Displayed instruction that is maintained by the System on the EDGA Book. The Exchange notes that the language proposed with respect to the temporary reduction of the Discretionary Range of an order is consistent with the Exchange’s recently amended rules.14 Specifically, the Exchange suspends the discretion of an order subject to the Displayed Price Sliding 15 instruction for so long as a contra-side order that equals the Locking Price 16 is displayed by the System on the EDGA Book. The Exchange suspends this discretion to avoid an apparent priority issue. In particular, in such a situation the Exchange believes a User representing an order that is displayed on the Exchange might believe that an incoming order was received by the Exchange and then bypassed such displayed order, removing some other non-displayed liquidity on the same side of the market as such displayed order. For the same reason, the Exchange believes it is appropriate to prevent an order with a Discretionary Range instruction to execute at the same price or at a price more aggressive than a contra-side order that is displayed on the EDGA Book. Similarly, although the Exchange believes it is appropriate to permit an order with a Discretionary Range instruction to execute at the same price as a contra-side order with a NonDisplayed instruction, the Exchange suspends such discretion at any more aggressive prices in order to avoid trading through orders that have been ranked on and are resting on the EDGA Book. Below are examples of the operation of orders with a Discretionary Range. Example No. 1: Modification and Reinstatement of Discretionary Range With a Displayed Contra-Side Order Assume the NBBO is $10.00 by $10.10, that the best-priced order to buy in the System is a displayed bid at $9.99, and that the best-priced order to sell in the System is a displayed offer at $10.11. Also assume that orders with a Post Only instruction do not remove liquidity from the EDGA Book because the value of an execution would not equal or exceed the value of an execution if posted at its limit price, including the applicable fees charged or rebates provided under proposed Rule 11.6(n)(4).17 A Limit Order 18 to buy 100 shares at $10.00 with a Discretionary Range of $0.05 is entered into the System. The order will be displayed on the EDGA Book at $10.00 with discretion to execute up to $10.05. If a 14 See supra note 6. Exchange Rule 11.6(l)(1)(B). 16 See Exchange Rule 11.6(f). 17 As described elsewhere in the proposal, under the Exchange’s current pricing structure a Limit Order with a Post Only instruction will remove contra-side liquidity in all cases. 18 See Exchange Rule 11.8(b). 15 See 12 See Exchange Rule 11.6(i). Exchange notes that the reference to orders with a Non-Displayed instruction is intended to apply to all orders that are not displayed on the Exchange, such as MidPoint Peg Orders as defined in Rule 11.8(d). 13 The PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM 10MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 46 / Tuesday, March 10, 2015 / Notices mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.05 with a Displayed instruction and a Post Only instruction 19 is entered into the System such order will be posted and displayed by the System on the EDGA Book as an order to sell 100 shares at $10.05. The buy order with the Discretionary Range instruction will have its discretion to execute at $10.05 temporarily suspended but such order will continue to have discretion to execute up to $10.04. The following examples demonstrate various potential outcomes following the temporary suspension of the buy order’s discretion to execute at $10.05. • If a non-routable Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.05 is entered into the System, depending on applicable User instructions, such order will either be posted and displayed by the System on the EDGA Book as an order to sell 100 shares (i.e., with priority behind the order to sell that is already displayed on the EDGA Book at $10.05) or will be cancelled back to the entering User. • If, instead, a Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.04 is entered into the System, such order will execute at $10.04 against the resting buy order with a Discretionary Range instruction. • If, instead, a Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.02 is entered into the System, such order will execute at $10.02 against the resting buy order with a Discretionary Range instruction. • If, instead, a Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.00 or lower or a Market Order to sell 100 shares is entered into the System, such order will execute at $10.00 against the resting buy order with a Discretionary Range instruction. • If, instead, the sell order at $10.05 with a Post Only instruction is then canceled, the buy order with a Discretionary Range instruction with have its discretion to execute up to $10.05 reinstated. • If, instead, a Limit Order to buy 100 shares at $10.05 or higher or a Market Order to buy 100 shares is then entered into the System, such order will execute at $10.05 against the displayed order to sell with a Post Only instruction and the buy order with a Discretionary Range instruction will have its discretion to execute up to $10.05 reinstated. Example No. 2: Modification and Reinstatement of Discretionary Range With a Non-Displayed Contra-Side Order Assume the NBBO is $10.00 by $10.10, that the best-priced order to buy in the System is a displayed bid at $9.99, and that the best-priced order to sell in the System is a displayed offer at 19 See Exchange Rule 11.6(n)(4). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:53 Mar 09, 2015 Jkt 235001 $10.11. Also assume that orders with a Post Only instruction do not remove liquidity from the EDGA Book because the value of an execution would not equal or exceed the value of an execution if posted at its limit price, including the applicable fees charged or rebates provided under proposed Rule 11.6(n)(4).20 A Limit Order with to buy 100 shares at $10.00 with a Discretionary Range of $0.07 is entered into the System. The order will be ranked and displayed on the EDGA Book at $10.00 with discretion to execute up to $10.07. If a Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.06 with a NonDisplayed instruction and a Post Only instruction is entered into the System such order will be posted by the System on the EDGA Book as an order to sell 100 shares at $10.06. The buy order’s discretion to execute at $10.07 will be temporarily suspended but such order will continue to have discretion to execute up to $10.06. The following examples demonstrate various potential outcomes following the temporary suspension of the buy order’s discretion to execute at $10.07. • If a non-routable Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.07 with a Displayed instruction is entered into the System, depending on applicable User instructions, such order will be posted and displayed by the System on the EDGA Book as an order to sell 100 shares at $10.07 or will be cancelled back to the entering User. • If, instead, a Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.06 is entered into the System, such order will execute at $10.06 against the resting buy order with a Discretionary Range instruction. • If, instead, a Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.02 is entered into the System, such order will execute at $10.02 against the resting buy order with a Discretionary Range instruction. • If, instead, a Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.00 or lower or a Market Order to sell 100 shares is entered into the System, such order will execute at $10.00 against the resting buy order with a Discretionary Range instruction. • If, instead, the sell order with a Non-Displayed instruction of 100 shares that is ranked at $10.06 is then canceled, the buy order with a Discretionary Range instruction will have its discretion to execute up to $10.07 reinstated. The Exchange’s handling of orders with a Discretionary Range instruction is intended to reflect the relatively 20 As described elsewhere in the proposal, under the Exchange’s current pricing structure a Limit Order with a Post Only instruction will remove contra-side liquidity in all cases. PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 12657 passive nature of orders with a Discretionary Range. In all cases, although the Users submitting such orders have indicated a willingness to execute at a more aggressive price, such orders are ranked at a lower price to buy or a higher price to sell. In turn, if an order is executed at its ranked price, rather than at a price within the Discretionary Range, then the User that submitted the order receives a better result in each case (i.e., buys for less or sells for more). With this background, the Exchange believes it is reasonable that an order with a Discretionary Range instruction might temporarily become not executable at certain prices because such prices are more aggressive than their ranked price (i.e., higher prices for orders to buy or lower prices for orders to sell). Further, to the extent a User would prefer an execution at more aggressive price levels, such User could simply choose other order type instructions that would increase the likelihood of execution at these prices (e.g., a routable order rather than a nonroutable order or an order that is ranked at its full price rather than an order ranked at a less aggressive price with a Discretionary Range). In addition to the changes described above, the Exchange proposes to relocate within Rule 11.8(b) and re-word the statement regarding the inclusion of a Discretionary Range on a Limit Order. Current Rule 11.8(b)(8) currently states that a ‘‘User may include a Discretionary Range instruction.’’ This ability to include a Discretionary Range instruction on a Limit Order is currently grouped with other functionality that can be elected for Limit Orders that also include a Post Only or Book Only instruction as well as specified time-inforce instructions for orders that can be entered into the System and post to the EDGA Book. However, the System does not allow the combination of a Discretionary Range and a Post Only instruction. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to re-locate the reference to the Discretionary Range instruction within Rule 11.8(b) so that it is no longer grouped with other orders that can be combined with a Post Only instruction. The Exchange also proposes to state in Rule 11.8(b) that: (i) A Limit Order with a Discretionary Range instruction may also include a Book Only instruction; and (ii) a Limit Order with a Discretionary Range instruction and a Post Only instruction will be rejected. Further, the Exchange proposes to refer to the ability of a Limit Order to include a Discretionary Range instruction, rather than a ‘‘User’’ that may include a Discretionary Range instruction. E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM 10MRN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 12658 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 46 / Tuesday, March 10, 2015 / Notices Priority and Execution Algorithm With respect to the Exchange’s priority and execution algorithm, the Exchange is proposing various minor and structural to changes that are intended to emphasize the processes by which orders are accepted, priced, ranked, displayed and executed, as well as a new provision related to the ability of orders to rest at locking prices that is consistent with the changes to provisions related to the operation of orders with a Discretionary Range instruction described above. First, the Exchange has proposed modifications to Rule 11.9, Priority of Orders, to make clear that the ranking of orders described in such rule is in turn dependent on Exchange rules related to the execution of orders, primarily Rule 11.10. The Exchange believes that this has always been the case under Exchange rules but there was not previously a description of the crossreference to Rule 11.10 within such rules. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to add reference to the execution process in addition to the numeric cross-reference to Rule 11.10. The Exchange also proposes to change certain references within Rule 11.9 to refer to ranking rather than executing equally priced trading interest, as the Rule as a whole is intended to describe the manner in which resting orders are ranked and maintained, specifically in price and time priority, while awaiting execution against incoming orders. The Exchange does not believe that the proposed modifications substantively modify the operation of the rules but the Exchange believes that it is important to make clear that the ranking of orders is a separate process from the execution of orders. The Exchange also proposes changes to Rule 11.9(a)(4) and (a)(5) to specify that orders retain and lose ‘‘time’’ priority under certain circumstances as opposed to priority generally because retaining or losing price priority does not require the same descriptions, as price priority will always be retained unless the price of an order changes. Next, the Exchange proposes to move language contained within subparagraph (a)(2) of Rule 11.10 to the main paragraph, paragraph (a), such that the language is more generally applicable to the rules. Although subparagraph (a)(2) contains information relevant to executability, in that it describes orders that are executable in compliance with Regulation NMS or otherwise do not trade through quotations of other markets, there are other provisions set forth in paragraph (a) that relate to executability. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:53 Mar 09, 2015 Jkt 235001 Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to relocate language stating that any order falling within the parameters of this paragraph shall be referred to as ‘‘executable’’ and that an order will be cancelled back to the User, if based on market conditions, User instructions, applicable Exchange Rules and/or the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, such order is not executable, cannot be routed to another Trading Center pursuant to Rule 11.11 or cannot be posted to the EDGA Book. The Exchange proposes to adopt paragraph (C) of Rule 11.10(a)(4) to provide further clarity regarding the situations where orders are not executable, which although covered in other existing rules, would focus on the incoming order on the same side of an order displayed on the EDGA Book rather than the resting order that is rendered not executable because it is opposite such order displayed on the EDGA Book. Proposed paragraph (C) would further state that if an incoming order is on the same side of the market as an order displayed on the EDGA Book and upon entry would execute against contra-side interest at the same price as such displayed order, such incoming order will be cancelled or posted to the EDGA Book and ranked in accordance with Rule 11.9. As described above, the Exchange suspends the ability of an order subject to the Displayed Price Sliding instruction to execute at the Locking Price for so long as a contra-side order that equals the Locking Price is displayed by the System on the EDGA Book. Similarly, as proposed to be added to EDGA Rules, the Exchange temporarily suspends the ability of an order to execute at the same price as a contra-side displayed order for any order with a Discretionary Range instruction. The Exchange temporarily suspends this discretion to avoid an apparent priority issue where a User representing an order that is displayed on the Exchange either believes such order has time priority among displayed orders at that price or that the displayed order is the only order at such price level and then sees an execution published by the Exchange at that price. To demonstrate the functionality in place on the Exchange described above, assume the NBBO is $10.00 by $10.01. Also assume that orders with a Post Only instruction do not remove liquidity from the EDGA Book because the value of an execution would not equal or exceed the value of an execution if posted at its limit price, including the applicable fees charged or rebates provided under proposed Rule PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 11.6(n)(4).21 A non-routable Limit Order to buy 100 shares at $10.01 with a Displayed Price Sliding instruction is entered into the System. The order will be displayed on the EDGA Book at $10.00 and ranked at $10.01. If a Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.01 with a Displayed instruction and a Post Only instruction is entered into the System such order will be posted and displayed by the System on the EDGA Book as an order to sell 100 shares at $10.01. The buy order with the Displayed Price Sliding instruction will no longer be executable at $10.01 but will continue to be displayed and executable at $10.00. The following examples demonstrate various potential outcomes following the temporary suspension of the buy order’s ability to execute at $10.01. • If a non-routable Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.01 is entered into the System, depending on applicable User instructions, such order will either be posted and displayed by the System on the EDGA Book as an order to sell 100 shares (i.e., with priority behind the order to sell that is already displayed on the EDGA Book at $10.01) or will be cancelled back to the entering User. • If, instead, a Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.00 is entered into the System, such order will execute at $10.00 against the resting buy order with a Displayed Price Sliding instruction. • If, instead, a Limit Order to buy 100 shares at $10.01 or higher or a Market Order to buy 100 shares is entered into the System,22 such order will execute at $10.01 against the resting sell order displayed on the EDGA Book, as such 21 As described elsewhere in the proposal, under the Exchange’s current pricing structure a Limit Order with a Post Only instruction will remove contra-side liquidity in all cases. 22 The Exchange notes that an incoming order for purposes of comparison to a resting order can be any incoming order unless the terms of that incoming order itself preclude execution. In this example, a Limit Order to buy 100 shares at $10.01 that executes against the order to sell displayed at $10.01 on the EDGA Book could be a Limit Order with a Displayed instruction, a Limit Order with a Non-Displayed instruction, a Limit Order with a Displayed Price Sliding instruction, a Limit Order with a Price Adjust instruction, a routable Limit Order, a non-routable Limit Order, an order with a Limit Price of $10.00 and a Discretionary Range of $0.01, or any other type of incoming Limit Order to buy that is executable at $10.01. Thus, this example demonstrates that on entry the incoming order is compared to contra-side orders on the EDGA Book regardless of the modifiers that will determine how it will be displayed, ranked or otherwise handled by the System and that unless the ability of an order to execute has been suspended based on the Exchange’s rules, the resting contra-side order with priority at that price will be executed against the incoming order. E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM 10MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 46 / Tuesday, March 10, 2015 / Notices resting order is fully executable and displayed as an offer on the EDGA Book. The Exchange notes that it is proposing to add descriptive titles to paragraphs (A) and (B) of Rule 11.10(a)(4), which describe the process by which executable orders are matched within the System. Specifically, so long as it is otherwise executable, an incoming order to buy will be automatically executed to the extent that it is priced at an amount that equals or exceeds any order to sell in the EDGA Book and an incoming order to sell will be automatically executed to the extent that it is priced at an amount that equals or is less than any other order to buy in the EDGA Book. These rules further state that an order to buy shall be executed at the price(s) of the lowest order(s) to sell having priority in the EDGA Book and an order to sell shall be executed at the price(s) of the highest order(s) to buy having priority in the EDGA Book. The Exchange emphasizes these current rules only insofar as to highlight the interconnected nature of the priority rule. The Exchange also proposes to modify paragraph (h) of Rule 11.11 to clarify the Exchange’s rule regarding the priority of routed orders. Paragraph (h) currently sets forth the proposition that a routed order does not retain priority on the Exchange while it is being routed to other markets. The Exchange believes that its proposed clarification to paragraph (h) is appropriate because it more clearly states that a routed order is not ranked and maintained in the EDGA Book pursuant to Rule 11.9(a), and therefore is not available to execute against incoming orders pursuant to Rule 11.10. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that the proposed rule changes are consistent with Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) 23 and further the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 24 because they are designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The proposed rule changes are also designed to support the principles of Section 11A(a)(1) 25 of the Act in that they seek to assure fair 23 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 25 15 U.S.C. 78k–1(a)(1). 24 15 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:53 Mar 09, 2015 Jkt 235001 competition among brokers and dealers and among exchange markets. Specifically, the Exchange also believes that the changes to provide additional clarity and specificity regarding the functionality of the System with respect to an order with a Discretionary Range instruction would promote just and equitable principles of trade and remove impediments to a free and open market by providing greater transparency concerning the operation of the System. The Exchange also believes that the proposed amendments to clarify and re-structure the Exchange’s priority, execution and routing rules will contribute to the protection of investors and the public interest by making the Exchange’s rules easier to understand. As described above, the Exchange has proposed to adopt rules that describe functionality in the System that will only be implicated to the extent an order with a Post Only instruction does not remove liquidity on entry and is posted to the EDGA Book. As also described above, under the Exchange’s current pricing structure, an order with a Post Only instruction will, in all cases, remove contra-side liquidity from the EDGA Book. However, the Exchange proposes to adopt language to reflect the operation of the System in the event the Exchange’s fee structure is modified and an order with a Post Only instruction is able to be posted to the EDGA Book without removing liquidity. The Exchange believes that it is consistent with the Act to temporarily reduce the Discretionary Range of an order that has been posted to the EDGA Book for so long as there is contra-side liquidity on the EDGA Book because this functionality prevents an apparent priority issue on the EDGA Book as described above as well as the ability of an order to execute at a price that trades through the ranked price of an order resting on the EDGA Book. The Exchange reiterates that such behavior, as described above, is temporary in nature; an order’s full Discretionary Range will be returned as soon as the contra-side liquidity that caused the reduction in the first place is no longer maintained on the EDGA Book. The Exchange believes that its overall handling of orders, including the temporary suspension of the ability of an order with a Discretionary Range to execute at one or more prices is consistent with the Act because it removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system by reflecting the relatively passive nature of an order with a Discretionary Range instruction while honoring the PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 12659 instructions of a User submitting a contra-side order that does not remove liquidity on entry. As explained above, the Exchange’s handling of orders with a Discretionary Range instruction is intended to reflect the relatively passive nature of orders with a Discretionary Range. The Exchange believes it is reasonable that an order with a Discretionary Range instruction might temporarily become not executable at certain prices because such prices are more aggressive than their ranked price (i.e., higher prices for orders to buy or lower prices for orders to sell). Further, to the extent a User would prefer an execution at more aggressive price levels, such User could simply choose other order type instructions that would increase the likelihood of execution at these prices. Finally, the Exchange believes that its proposal to re-locate and re-word the Discretionary Range instruction reference within Rule 11.8(b), related to Limit Orders, is consistent with the Act because the change will correct an error within the Exchange’s rules and prevent potential confusion regarding the ability to combine a Discretionary Range instruction with a Post Only instruction. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule changes are not designed to address any competitive issue but rather to add specificity and clarity to Exchange rules, thus providing greater transparency regarding the operation of the System. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on the proposed rule changes. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the Exchange consents, the Commission will: (a) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM 10MRN1 12660 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 46 / Tuesday, March 10, 2015 / Notices to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– EDGA–2015–10 on the subject line. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–EDGA–2015–10. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–EDGA– 2015–10 and should be submitted on or before March 31, 2015. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:53 Mar 09, 2015 Jkt 235001 For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.26 Brent J. Fields, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–05482 Filed 3–9–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–74431; File No. SR–EDGX– 2015–05] Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fee Schedule To Increase the Fee for Orders Yielding Fee Code K March 4, 2015. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that, on January 28, 2015, EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as one establishing or changing a member due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,4 which renders the proposed rule change effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange filed a proposal to amend its fees and rebates applicable to Members 5 of the Exchange pursuant to EDGX Rule 15.1(a) and (c) (‘‘Fee Schedule’’) to increase the fee for orders yielding fee code K, which routes to NASDAQ OMX PSX (‘‘PSX’’) using ROUC or ROUE routing strategy. The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange’s Web site 26 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 5 The term ‘‘Member’’ is defined as ‘‘any registered broker or dealer, or any person associated with a registered broker or dealer, that has been admitted to membership in the Exchange. A Member will have the status of a ‘‘member’’ of the Exchange as that term is defined in Section 3(a)(3) of the Act.’’ See Exchange Rule 1.5(n). 1 15 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 at www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to increase the fee for orders yielding fee code K, which routes to PSX using ROUC or ROUE routing strategy. In securities priced at or above $1.00, the Exchange currently assesses a fee of $0.0024 per share for Members’ orders that yield fee code K. The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule to increase this fee to $0.0026 per share. The proposed change represents a pass through of the rate that BATS Trading, Inc. (‘‘BATS Trading’’), the Exchange’s affiliated routing broker-dealer, is charged for routing orders to PSX when it does not qualify for a volume tiered reduced fee. The proposed change is in response to PSX’s February 2015 fee change where PSX increased the fee to remove liquidity via routable order types it charges its customers, from a fee of $0.0024 per share to a fee of $0.0025 per share for Tape A securities and $0.0026 per share for Tapes B and C securities.6 When BATS Trading routes to PSX, it will now be charged a standard rate of $0.0025 per share for Tape A securities and $0.0026 per share for Tapes B and C securities.7 BATS Trading will pass through this rate to the Exchange and the Exchange, in turn, will pass through of a rate of $0.0026 per share to its Members. The proposed increase to the 6 See PSX, Equity Trader Alert 2014–95, Updates to PSX and BX Pricing for November 2014, dated October 27, 2014 [sic], available at https:// www.nasdaqtrader.com/ MicroNews.aspx?id=ETA2014-95. 7 The Exchange notes that to the extent BATS Trading does or does not achieve any volume tiered reduced fee on PSX, its rate for fee code K will not change. E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM 10MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 46 (Tuesday, March 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12655-12660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05482]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-74435; File No. SR-EDGA-2015-10]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To 
Amend Rules 11.6, 11.8, 11.9, 11.10 and 11.11 of EDGA Exchange, Inc.

March 4, 2015.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on February 20, 2015, EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or 
``EDGA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II 
and III below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. On February 27, 2015, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 
to the proposal.\3\ The Commission is publishing this notice, as 
modified by Amendment No. 1, to solicit comments on the proposed rule 
change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Amendment No. 1 replaces SR-EDGA-2015-10 and supersedes such 
filing in its entirety.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the 
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange filed a proposal to amend Rules 11.6, 11.8, 11.9, 
11.10 and 11.11 to clarify and to include additional specificity 
regarding the current functionality of the Exchange's System,\4\ 
including the operation of its order types and order instructions, as 
further described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The term ``System'' is defined as ``the electronic 
communications and trading facility designated by the Board through 
which securities orders of Users are consolidated for ranking, 
execution and, when applicable, routing away.'' See Exchange Rule 
1.5(cc).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's 
Web site at www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the 
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
Sections A, B and C below, of the most significant parts of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    On June 5, 2014, Chair Mary Jo White asked all national securities 
exchanges to conduct a comprehensive review of each order type offered 
to members and how it operates.\5\ The Exchange notes that a 
comprehensive rule filing clarifying and updating Exchange rules was 
recently approved.\6\ However, based on the request from Chair White, 
the Exchange did indeed conduct further review of each order types and 
its operation. The proposals set forth below are based on this 
comprehensive review and are intended to clarify and to include 
additional specificity regarding the current functionality of the 
Exchange's System, including the operation of its order types and order 
instructions. The proposals set forth below are intended to supplement 
the recently approved filing based on further review conducted by the 
Exchange and are intended to clarify and enhance the understandability 
of

[[Page 12656]]

the Exchange's rules related to the ranking and execution of orders. 
The proposal is also intended to add additional detail with respect to 
the handling of orders with a Discretionary Range \7\ instruction. The 
Exchange is not proposing any substantive modifications to the System.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Mary Jo White, Chair, Commission, Speech at the Sandler 
O'Neill & Partners, L.P. Global Exchange and Brokerage Conference, 
(June 5, 2014) (available at https://www.sec.gov/News/Speech/Detail/Speech/1370542004312#.VD2HW610w6Y).
    \6\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73592 (November 13, 
2014), 79 FR 68937 (November 19, 2014) (SR-EDGA-2014-20).
    \7\ See Exchange Rule 11.6(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Orders With a Discretionary Range
    Pursuant to current Rule 11.6(d), the Exchange defines a 
Discretionary Range as an instruction the User \8\ may attach to an 
order to buy (sell) a stated amount of a security at a specified, 
displayed price with discretion to execute up (down) to a specified, 
non-displayed price. For purposes of this proposal, the Exchange will 
use the term ``Discretionary Range'' to describe the amount between the 
displayed price to and including the highest price at which a buyer is 
willing to buy or lowest price at which a seller is willing to sell. 
The Exchange proposes to make clear that although an order with a 
Discretionary Range instruction may be accompanied by a Displayed \9\ 
instruction, an order with a Discretionary Range instruction may also 
be accompanied by a Non-Displayed instruction, and if so, will have a 
non-displayed ranked price as well as a discretionary price. The 
Exchange further proposes to specifically state that resting orders 
with a Discretionary Range instruction will be executed at a price that 
uses the minimum amount of discretion necessary to execute the order 
against an incoming order. In addition, the Exchange proposes to make 
clear certain circumstances where the Discretionary Range of an order 
is temporarily reduced due to contra-side interest resting on the EDGA 
Book.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The term ``User'' is defined as ``any Member or Sponsored 
Participant who is authorized to obtain access to the System 
pursuant to Rule 11.3.'' See Exchange Rule 1.5(ee).
    \9\ See Exchange Rule 11.6(e)(1).
    \10\ The term ``EDGA Book'' is defined as ``the System's 
electronic file of orders.'' See Exchange Rule 1.5(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to specify certain situations where the 
Discretionary Range of an order could be temporarily reduced based on 
contra-side interest resting on the Exchange. The Exchange notes that 
an order with a Post Only instruction \11\ will, in all cases, remove 
contra-side liquidity from the EDGA Book because under its current 
taker-maker pricing structure, the remover of liquidity is provided a 
rebate while the provider of liquidity is charged a fee. Therefore, in 
all cases, the value of the execution to remove liquidity will equal or 
exceed the value of such execution once posted to the EDGA Book, 
including the applicable fees charged or rebates received. However, the 
Exchange proposes to adopt language to reflect the operation of the 
System in the event the Exchange's fee structure is modified and an 
order with a Post Only instruction is able to be posted to the EDGA 
Book without removing liquidity. The Exchange notes that if this were 
the case, it would be possible for an order with a Discretionary Range 
instruction to have its Discretionary Range temporarily reduced based 
on contra-side interest resting on the Exchange because an incoming 
order with a Post Only instruction would be posted to the EDGA Book 
rather than executing against the Discretionary Range of a resting 
order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Exchange Rule 11.6(n)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to displayed contra-side liquidity, the Exchange 
proposes to make clear that if an order posted to the EDGA Book has a 
Discretionary Range and there is a contra-side order that is displayed 
by the System on the EDGA Book within such Discretionary Range, the 
order with a Discretionary Range will not be permitted to execute at 
the price of or at a price more aggressive than such contra-side 
displayed order unless and until there is no contra-side displayed 
order on the EDGA Book within the Discretionary Range. In such case, 
the order with a Discretionary Range will have discretion to one 
Minimum Price Variation \12\ below (above) the contra-side offer (bid) 
that is displayed by the System on the EDGA Book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Exchange Rule 11.6(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to non-displayed contra-side liquidity, the Exchange 
proposes to make clear that if an order posted to the EDGA Book has a 
Discretionary Range and there is a contra-side order with a Non-
Displayed instruction,\13\ the order with a Discretionary Range will 
not be permitted to execute at a price more aggressive than the ranked 
price of such contra-side order unless and until there is no contra-
side order on the EDGA Book within the Discretionary Range. In such 
case, the order with a Discretionary Range will have discretion to the 
ranked price of the contra-side offer (bid) with a Non-Displayed 
instruction that is maintained by the System on the EDGA Book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ The Exchange notes that the reference to orders with a Non-
Displayed instruction is intended to apply to all orders that are 
not displayed on the Exchange, such as MidPoint Peg Orders as 
defined in Rule 11.8(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that the language proposed with respect to the 
temporary reduction of the Discretionary Range of an order is 
consistent with the Exchange's recently amended rules.\14\ 
Specifically, the Exchange suspends the discretion of an order subject 
to the Displayed Price Sliding \15\ instruction for so long as a 
contra-side order that equals the Locking Price \16\ is displayed by 
the System on the EDGA Book. The Exchange suspends this discretion to 
avoid an apparent priority issue. In particular, in such a situation 
the Exchange believes a User representing an order that is displayed on 
the Exchange might believe that an incoming order was received by the 
Exchange and then bypassed such displayed order, removing some other 
non-displayed liquidity on the same side of the market as such 
displayed order. For the same reason, the Exchange believes it is 
appropriate to prevent an order with a Discretionary Range instruction 
to execute at the same price or at a price more aggressive than a 
contra-side order that is displayed on the EDGA Book. Similarly, 
although the Exchange believes it is appropriate to permit an order 
with a Discretionary Range instruction to execute at the same price as 
a contra-side order with a Non-Displayed instruction, the Exchange 
suspends such discretion at any more aggressive prices in order to 
avoid trading through orders that have been ranked on and are resting 
on the EDGA Book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See supra note 6.
    \15\ See Exchange Rule 11.6(l)(1)(B).
    \16\ See Exchange Rule 11.6(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Below are examples of the operation of orders with a Discretionary 
Range.
Example No. 1: Modification and Reinstatement of Discretionary Range 
With a Displayed Contra-Side Order
    Assume the NBBO is $10.00 by $10.10, that the best-priced order to 
buy in the System is a displayed bid at $9.99, and that the best-priced 
order to sell in the System is a displayed offer at $10.11. Also assume 
that orders with a Post Only instruction do not remove liquidity from 
the EDGA Book because the value of an execution would not equal or 
exceed the value of an execution if posted at its limit price, 
including the applicable fees charged or rebates provided under 
proposed Rule 11.6(n)(4).\17\ A Limit Order \18\ to buy 100 shares at 
$10.00 with a Discretionary Range of $0.05 is entered into the System. 
The order will be displayed on the EDGA Book at $10.00 with discretion 
to execute up to $10.05. If a

[[Page 12657]]

Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.05 with a Displayed instruction 
and a Post Only instruction \19\ is entered into the System such order 
will be posted and displayed by the System on the EDGA Book as an order 
to sell 100 shares at $10.05. The buy order with the Discretionary 
Range instruction will have its discretion to execute at $10.05 
temporarily suspended but such order will continue to have discretion 
to execute up to $10.04. The following examples demonstrate various 
potential outcomes following the temporary suspension of the buy 
order's discretion to execute at $10.05.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ As described elsewhere in the proposal, under the 
Exchange's current pricing structure a Limit Order with a Post Only 
instruction will remove contra-side liquidity in all cases.
    \18\ See Exchange Rule 11.8(b).
    \19\ See Exchange Rule 11.6(n)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     If a non-routable Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.05 
is entered into the System, depending on applicable User instructions, 
such order will either be posted and displayed by the System on the 
EDGA Book as an order to sell 100 shares (i.e., with priority behind 
the order to sell that is already displayed on the EDGA Book at $10.05) 
or will be cancelled back to the entering User.
     If, instead, a Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.04 is 
entered into the System, such order will execute at $10.04 against the 
resting buy order with a Discretionary Range instruction.
     If, instead, a Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.02 is 
entered into the System, such order will execute at $10.02 against the 
resting buy order with a Discretionary Range instruction.
     If, instead, a Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.00 or 
lower or a Market Order to sell 100 shares is entered into the System, 
such order will execute at $10.00 against the resting buy order with a 
Discretionary Range instruction.
     If, instead, the sell order at $10.05 with a Post Only 
instruction is then canceled, the buy order with a Discretionary Range 
instruction with have its discretion to execute up to $10.05 
reinstated.
     If, instead, a Limit Order to buy 100 shares at $10.05 or 
higher or a Market Order to buy 100 shares is then entered into the 
System, such order will execute at $10.05 against the displayed order 
to sell with a Post Only instruction and the buy order with a 
Discretionary Range instruction will have its discretion to execute up 
to $10.05 reinstated.
Example No. 2: Modification and Reinstatement of Discretionary Range 
With a Non-Displayed Contra-Side Order
    Assume the NBBO is $10.00 by $10.10, that the best-priced order to 
buy in the System is a displayed bid at $9.99, and that the best-priced 
order to sell in the System is a displayed offer at $10.11. Also assume 
that orders with a Post Only instruction do not remove liquidity from 
the EDGA Book because the value of an execution would not equal or 
exceed the value of an execution if posted at its limit price, 
including the applicable fees charged or rebates provided under 
proposed Rule 11.6(n)(4).\20\ A Limit Order with to buy 100 shares at 
$10.00 with a Discretionary Range of $0.07 is entered into the System. 
The order will be ranked and displayed on the EDGA Book at $10.00 with 
discretion to execute up to $10.07. If a Limit Order to sell 100 shares 
at $10.06 with a Non-Displayed instruction and a Post Only instruction 
is entered into the System such order will be posted by the System on 
the EDGA Book as an order to sell 100 shares at $10.06. The buy order's 
discretion to execute at $10.07 will be temporarily suspended but such 
order will continue to have discretion to execute up to $10.06. The 
following examples demonstrate various potential outcomes following the 
temporary suspension of the buy order's discretion to execute at 
$10.07.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ As described elsewhere in the proposal, under the 
Exchange's current pricing structure a Limit Order with a Post Only 
instruction will remove contra-side liquidity in all cases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     If a non-routable Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.07 
with a Displayed instruction is entered into the System, depending on 
applicable User instructions, such order will be posted and displayed 
by the System on the EDGA Book as an order to sell 100 shares at $10.07 
or will be cancelled back to the entering User.
     If, instead, a Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.06 is 
entered into the System, such order will execute at $10.06 against the 
resting buy order with a Discretionary Range instruction.
     If, instead, a Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.02 is 
entered into the System, such order will execute at $10.02 against the 
resting buy order with a Discretionary Range instruction.
     If, instead, a Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.00 or 
lower or a Market Order to sell 100 shares is entered into the System, 
such order will execute at $10.00 against the resting buy order with a 
Discretionary Range instruction.
     If, instead, the sell order with a Non-Displayed 
instruction of 100 shares that is ranked at $10.06 is then canceled, 
the buy order with a Discretionary Range instruction will have its 
discretion to execute up to $10.07 reinstated.
    The Exchange's handling of orders with a Discretionary Range 
instruction is intended to reflect the relatively passive nature of 
orders with a Discretionary Range. In all cases, although the Users 
submitting such orders have indicated a willingness to execute at a 
more aggressive price, such orders are ranked at a lower price to buy 
or a higher price to sell. In turn, if an order is executed at its 
ranked price, rather than at a price within the Discretionary Range, 
then the User that submitted the order receives a better result in each 
case (i.e., buys for less or sells for more). With this background, the 
Exchange believes it is reasonable that an order with a Discretionary 
Range instruction might temporarily become not executable at certain 
prices because such prices are more aggressive than their ranked price 
(i.e., higher prices for orders to buy or lower prices for orders to 
sell). Further, to the extent a User would prefer an execution at more 
aggressive price levels, such User could simply choose other order type 
instructions that would increase the likelihood of execution at these 
prices (e.g., a routable order rather than a non-routable order or an 
order that is ranked at its full price rather than an order ranked at a 
less aggressive price with a Discretionary Range).
    In addition to the changes described above, the Exchange proposes 
to re-locate within Rule 11.8(b) and re-word the statement regarding 
the inclusion of a Discretionary Range on a Limit Order. Current Rule 
11.8(b)(8) currently states that a ``User may include a Discretionary 
Range instruction.'' This ability to include a Discretionary Range 
instruction on a Limit Order is currently grouped with other 
functionality that can be elected for Limit Orders that also include a 
Post Only or Book Only instruction as well as specified time-in-force 
instructions for orders that can be entered into the System and post to 
the EDGA Book. However, the System does not allow the combination of a 
Discretionary Range and a Post Only instruction. Accordingly, the 
Exchange proposes to re-locate the reference to the Discretionary Range 
instruction within Rule 11.8(b) so that it is no longer grouped with 
other orders that can be combined with a Post Only instruction. The 
Exchange also proposes to state in Rule 11.8(b) that: (i) A Limit Order 
with a Discretionary Range instruction may also include a Book Only 
instruction; and (ii) a Limit Order with a Discretionary Range 
instruction and a Post Only instruction will be rejected. Further, the 
Exchange proposes to refer to the ability of a Limit Order to include a 
Discretionary Range instruction, rather than a ``User'' that may 
include a Discretionary Range instruction.

[[Page 12658]]

Priority and Execution Algorithm
    With respect to the Exchange's priority and execution algorithm, 
the Exchange is proposing various minor and structural to changes that 
are intended to emphasize the processes by which orders are accepted, 
priced, ranked, displayed and executed, as well as a new provision 
related to the ability of orders to rest at locking prices that is 
consistent with the changes to provisions related to the operation of 
orders with a Discretionary Range instruction described above. First, 
the Exchange has proposed modifications to Rule 11.9, Priority of 
Orders, to make clear that the ranking of orders described in such rule 
is in turn dependent on Exchange rules related to the execution of 
orders, primarily Rule 11.10. The Exchange believes that this has 
always been the case under Exchange rules but there was not previously 
a description of the cross-reference to Rule 11.10 within such rules. 
Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to add reference to the execution 
process in addition to the numeric cross-reference to Rule 11.10. The 
Exchange also proposes to change certain references within Rule 11.9 to 
refer to ranking rather than executing equally priced trading interest, 
as the Rule as a whole is intended to describe the manner in which 
resting orders are ranked and maintained, specifically in price and 
time priority, while awaiting execution against incoming orders. The 
Exchange does not believe that the proposed modifications substantively 
modify the operation of the rules but the Exchange believes that it is 
important to make clear that the ranking of orders is a separate 
process from the execution of orders. The Exchange also proposes 
changes to Rule 11.9(a)(4) and (a)(5) to specify that orders retain and 
lose ``time'' priority under certain circumstances as opposed to 
priority generally because retaining or losing price priority does not 
require the same descriptions, as price priority will always be 
retained unless the price of an order changes.
    Next, the Exchange proposes to move language contained within sub-
paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 11.10 to the main paragraph, paragraph (a), 
such that the language is more generally applicable to the rules. 
Although sub-paragraph (a)(2) contains information relevant to 
executability, in that it describes orders that are executable in 
compliance with Regulation NMS or otherwise do not trade through 
quotations of other markets, there are other provisions set forth in 
paragraph (a) that relate to executability. Accordingly, the Exchange 
proposes to relocate language stating that any order falling within the 
parameters of this paragraph shall be referred to as ``executable'' and 
that an order will be cancelled back to the User, if based on market 
conditions, User instructions, applicable Exchange Rules and/or the Act 
and the rules and regulations thereunder, such order is not executable, 
cannot be routed to another Trading Center pursuant to Rule 11.11 or 
cannot be posted to the EDGA Book.
    The Exchange proposes to adopt paragraph (C) of Rule 11.10(a)(4) to 
provide further clarity regarding the situations where orders are not 
executable, which although covered in other existing rules, would focus 
on the incoming order on the same side of an order displayed on the 
EDGA Book rather than the resting order that is rendered not executable 
because it is opposite such order displayed on the EDGA Book. Proposed 
paragraph (C) would further state that if an incoming order is on the 
same side of the market as an order displayed on the EDGA Book and upon 
entry would execute against contra-side interest at the same price as 
such displayed order, such incoming order will be cancelled or posted 
to the EDGA Book and ranked in accordance with Rule 11.9. As described 
above, the Exchange suspends the ability of an order subject to the 
Displayed Price Sliding instruction to execute at the Locking Price for 
so long as a contra-side order that equals the Locking Price is 
displayed by the System on the EDGA Book. Similarly, as proposed to be 
added to EDGA Rules, the Exchange temporarily suspends the ability of 
an order to execute at the same price as a contra-side displayed order 
for any order with a Discretionary Range instruction. The Exchange 
temporarily suspends this discretion to avoid an apparent priority 
issue where a User representing an order that is displayed on the 
Exchange either believes such order has time priority among displayed 
orders at that price or that the displayed order is the only order at 
such price level and then sees an execution published by the Exchange 
at that price.
    To demonstrate the functionality in place on the Exchange described 
above, assume the NBBO is $10.00 by $10.01. Also assume that orders 
with a Post Only instruction do not remove liquidity from the EDGA Book 
because the value of an execution would not equal or exceed the value 
of an execution if posted at its limit price, including the applicable 
fees charged or rebates provided under proposed Rule 11.6(n)(4).\21\ A 
non-routable Limit Order to buy 100 shares at $10.01 with a Displayed 
Price Sliding instruction is entered into the System. The order will be 
displayed on the EDGA Book at $10.00 and ranked at $10.01. If a Limit 
Order to sell 100 shares at $10.01 with a Displayed instruction and a 
Post Only instruction is entered into the System such order will be 
posted and displayed by the System on the EDGA Book as an order to sell 
100 shares at $10.01. The buy order with the Displayed Price Sliding 
instruction will no longer be executable at $10.01 but will continue to 
be displayed and executable at $10.00. The following examples 
demonstrate various potential outcomes following the temporary 
suspension of the buy order's ability to execute at $10.01.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ As described elsewhere in the proposal, under the 
Exchange's current pricing structure a Limit Order with a Post Only 
instruction will remove contra-side liquidity in all cases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     If a non-routable Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.01 
is entered into the System, depending on applicable User instructions, 
such order will either be posted and displayed by the System on the 
EDGA Book as an order to sell 100 shares (i.e., with priority behind 
the order to sell that is already displayed on the EDGA Book at $10.01) 
or will be cancelled back to the entering User.
     If, instead, a Limit Order to sell 100 shares at $10.00 is 
entered into the System, such order will execute at $10.00 against the 
resting buy order with a Displayed Price Sliding instruction.
     If, instead, a Limit Order to buy 100 shares at $10.01 or 
higher or a Market Order to buy 100 shares is entered into the 
System,\22\ such order will execute at $10.01 against the resting sell 
order displayed on the EDGA Book, as such

[[Page 12659]]

resting order is fully executable and displayed as an offer on the EDGA 
Book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ The Exchange notes that an incoming order for purposes of 
comparison to a resting order can be any incoming order unless the 
terms of that incoming order itself preclude execution. In this 
example, a Limit Order to buy 100 shares at $10.01 that executes 
against the order to sell displayed at $10.01 on the EDGA Book could 
be a Limit Order with a Displayed instruction, a Limit Order with a 
Non-Displayed instruction, a Limit Order with a Displayed Price 
Sliding instruction, a Limit Order with a Price Adjust instruction, 
a routable Limit Order, a non-routable Limit Order, an order with a 
Limit Price of $10.00 and a Discretionary Range of $0.01, or any 
other type of incoming Limit Order to buy that is executable at 
$10.01. Thus, this example demonstrates that on entry the incoming 
order is compared to contra-side orders on the EDGA Book regardless 
of the modifiers that will determine how it will be displayed, 
ranked or otherwise handled by the System and that unless the 
ability of an order to execute has been suspended based on the 
Exchange's rules, the resting contra-side order with priority at 
that price will be executed against the incoming order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that it is proposing to add descriptive titles 
to paragraphs (A) and (B) of Rule 11.10(a)(4), which describe the 
process by which executable orders are matched within the System. 
Specifically, so long as it is otherwise executable, an incoming order 
to buy will be automatically executed to the extent that it is priced 
at an amount that equals or exceeds any order to sell in the EDGA Book 
and an incoming order to sell will be automatically executed to the 
extent that it is priced at an amount that equals or is less than any 
other order to buy in the EDGA Book. These rules further state that an 
order to buy shall be executed at the price(s) of the lowest order(s) 
to sell having priority in the EDGA Book and an order to sell shall be 
executed at the price(s) of the highest order(s) to buy having priority 
in the EDGA Book. The Exchange emphasizes these current rules only 
insofar as to highlight the interconnected nature of the priority rule.
    The Exchange also proposes to modify paragraph (h) of Rule 11.11 to 
clarify the Exchange's rule regarding the priority of routed orders. 
Paragraph (h) currently sets forth the proposition that a routed order 
does not retain priority on the Exchange while it is being routed to 
other markets. The Exchange believes that its proposed clarification to 
paragraph (h) is appropriate because it more clearly states that a 
routed order is not ranked and maintained in the EDGA Book pursuant to 
Rule 11.9(a), and therefore is not available to execute against 
incoming orders pursuant to Rule 11.10.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule changes are consistent 
with Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') 
\23\ and further the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \24\ 
because they are designed to promote just and equitable principles of 
trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and 
open market and a national market system, to foster cooperation and 
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in 
securities, and, in general, to protect investors and the public 
interest. The proposed rule changes are also designed to support the 
principles of Section 11A(a)(1) \25\ of the Act in that they seek to 
assure fair competition among brokers and dealers and among exchange 
markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \25\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, the Exchange also believes that the changes to 
provide additional clarity and specificity regarding the functionality 
of the System with respect to an order with a Discretionary Range 
instruction would promote just and equitable principles of trade and 
remove impediments to a free and open market by providing greater 
transparency concerning the operation of the System. The Exchange also 
believes that the proposed amendments to clarify and re-structure the 
Exchange's priority, execution and routing rules will contribute to the 
protection of investors and the public interest by making the 
Exchange's rules easier to understand. As described above, the Exchange 
has proposed to adopt rules that describe functionality in the System 
that will only be implicated to the extent an order with a Post Only 
instruction does not remove liquidity on entry and is posted to the 
EDGA Book. As also described above, under the Exchange's current 
pricing structure, an order with a Post Only instruction will, in all 
cases, remove contra-side liquidity from the EDGA Book. However, the 
Exchange proposes to adopt language to reflect the operation of the 
System in the event the Exchange's fee structure is modified and an 
order with a Post Only instruction is able to be posted to the EDGA 
Book without removing liquidity.
    The Exchange believes that it is consistent with the Act to 
temporarily reduce the Discretionary Range of an order that has been 
posted to the EDGA Book for so long as there is contra-side liquidity 
on the EDGA Book because this functionality prevents an apparent 
priority issue on the EDGA Book as described above as well as the 
ability of an order to execute at a price that trades through the 
ranked price of an order resting on the EDGA Book. The Exchange 
reiterates that such behavior, as described above, is temporary in 
nature; an order's full Discretionary Range will be returned as soon as 
the contra-side liquidity that caused the reduction in the first place 
is no longer maintained on the EDGA Book. The Exchange believes that 
its overall handling of orders, including the temporary suspension of 
the ability of an order with a Discretionary Range to execute at one or 
more prices is consistent with the Act because it removes impediments 
to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market and a national 
market system by reflecting the relatively passive nature of an order 
with a Discretionary Range instruction while honoring the instructions 
of a User submitting a contra-side order that does not remove liquidity 
on entry. As explained above, the Exchange's handling of orders with a 
Discretionary Range instruction is intended to reflect the relatively 
passive nature of orders with a Discretionary Range. The Exchange 
believes it is reasonable that an order with a Discretionary Range 
instruction might temporarily become not executable at certain prices 
because such prices are more aggressive than their ranked price (i.e., 
higher prices for orders to buy or lower prices for orders to sell). 
Further, to the extent a User would prefer an execution at more 
aggressive price levels, such User could simply choose other order type 
instructions that would increase the likelihood of execution at these 
prices. Finally, the Exchange believes that its proposal to re-locate 
and re-word the Discretionary Range instruction reference within Rule 
11.8(b), related to Limit Orders, is consistent with the Act because 
the change will correct an error within the Exchange's rules and 
prevent potential confusion regarding the ability to combine a 
Discretionary Range instruction with a Post Only instruction.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will 
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed 
rule changes are not designed to address any competitive issue but 
rather to add specificity and clarity to Exchange rules, thus providing 
greater transparency regarding the operation of the System.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on 
the proposed rule changes.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will: (a) By order approve 
or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings

[[Page 12660]]

to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, is consistent with the Act. 
Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please 
include File Number SR-EDGA-2015-10 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGA-2015-10. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for 
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGA-2015-10 and should be 
submitted on or before March 31, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-05482 Filed 3-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.