Certain Non-Volatile Memory Devices and Products Containing Same; Commission Determination Not To Review Granting Motion Terminating the Investigation as to all Respondents; Termination of the Investigation, 12522-12523 [2015-05424]

Download as PDF 12522 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 45 / Monday, March 9, 2015 / Notices Wildlife, and a team of stakeholders, which included scientific experts, landowners and managers, agency representatives, and non-government organizations. Section 4(f) of the Act requires us to provide an opportunity for public review and comment prior to finalization of recovery plans. We made the draft of this recovery plan available for public comment from September 14, 2012, to November 13, 2012 (77 FR 56858). We considered all information we received during the public comment period and revised the recovery plan accordingly. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Recovery Plan Goals The purpose of a recovery plan is to provide a framework for the recovery of species so that protection under the Act is no longer necessary. A recovery plan includes scientific information about the species and provides criteria that enable us to gauge whether downlisting or delisting the species is warranted. Furthermore, recovery plans help guide our recovery efforts by describing actions we consider necessary for each species’ conservation and by estimating time and costs for implementing needed recovery measures. To achieve these goals, we have identified the following objectives in the recovery plan: (1) Each federally listed subspecies of island fox exhibits demographic characteristics consistent with long-term viability; and (2) Land managers are able to respond in a timely fashion to predation by nesting golden eagles or significant predation rates by transient golden eagles, to potential or incipient disease outbreaks and to other identified threats using the best available technology. Because some or all of the subspecies may meet their recovery criteria, we are initiating a status review of each subspecies. Why do we conduct a status review? Under the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), we maintain Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants (which we collectively refer to as the List) in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 17.11 (for animals) and 17.12 (for plants). Section 4(c)(2)(A) of the Act requires us to review each listed species’ status at least once every 5 years. Our regulations at 50 CFR 424.21 require that we publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing those species under active review. For additional information about status reviews, go to https://www.fws.gov/ endangered/what-we-do/recoveryoverview.html, scroll down to ‘‘Learn VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:04 Mar 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 More about 5-Year Reviews,’’ and click on our factsheet. hours at the offices where the comments are submitted. What information do we consider in our review? A status review considers all new information available at the time of the review. In conducting these reviews, we consider the best scientific and commercial data that have become available since the listing determination or most recent status review, such as: (A) Species biology, including but not limited to population trends, distribution, abundance, demographics, and genetics; (B) Habitat conditions, including but not limited to amount, distribution, and suitability; (C) Conservation measures that have been implemented that benefit the species; (D) Threat status and trends in relation to the five listing factors (as defined in section 4(a)(1) of the Act); and (E) Other new information, data, or corrections, including but not limited to taxonomic or nomenclatural changes, identification of erroneous information contained in the List, and improved analytical methods. Any new information will be considered during the review and will also be useful in evaluating the ongoing recovery programs for the species. Authority We developed our recovery plan and initiate these reviews under the authority of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Request for Information To ensure that a status review is complete and based on the best available scientific and commercial information, we request new information from all sources. See ‘‘What Information Do We Consider in Our Review?’’ for specific criteria. If you submit information, please support it with documentation such as maps, bibliographic references, methods used to gather and analyze the data, and/or copies of any pertinent publications, reports, or letters by knowledgeable sources. Public Availability of Submissions Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Comments and materials received will be available for public inspection, by appointment, during normal business PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Dated: February 27, 2015. Alexandra Pitts, Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region. [FR Doc. 2015–05029 Filed 3–6–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–55P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–909] Certain Non-Volatile Memory Devices and Products Containing Same; Commission Determination Not To Review Granting Motion Terminating the Investigation as to all Respondents; Termination of the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 23) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) terminating the above-captioned investigation as to all respondents based on a settlement agreement. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2310. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM 09MRN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 45 / Monday, March 9, 2015 / Notices on February 3, 2014, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Macronix International Co., Ltd. of Hsin-chu, Taiwan and Macronix America, Inc. of Milpitas, California. 79 FR 6227–28. The complaint, as amended, alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain non-volatile memory devices and products containing the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,552,360; 6,100,557; and 6,002,630. The complaint further alleges a domestic industry exists or is in the process of being established. The Commission’s notice of investigation, as amended, named the following respondents: Spansion, Inc., Spansion LLC, and Ruckus Wireless, Inc., all of Sunnyvale, California; Spansion (Thailand) Ltd. of Nonthaburi, Thailand; Tellabs Operations, Inc. and Tellabs North America, Inc., both of Naperville, Illinois (collectively, ‘‘the Tellabs respondents’’); Beats Electronics LLC of Santa Monica, California; Delphi Automotive PLC of Kent, United Kingdom; Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC of Troy, Michigan; Harman International Industries, Inc. of Stamford, Connecticut; Harman Becker Automotive Systems, Inc. of Farmington Hills, Michigan; and Harman Becker Automotive Systems GmbH of Karlsbad, Germany. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations participated in the investigation. On September 4, 2014, the Commission issued notice of its determination not to review the ALJ’s ID (Order No. 15) terminating the investigation as to original respondent Tellabs, Inc. of Naperville, Illinois, and amending the complaint and notice of investigation to substitute the Tellabs respondents for Tellabs, Inc. On January 29, 2015, complainants and all respondents jointly moved to terminate the investigation with respect to all respondents based on a settlement agreement. The Commission investigative attorney filed a response supporting the motion. On January 30, 2015, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 23) granting the joint motion for termination of the investigation as to all respondents. He found that the motion satisfies Commission rules 210.21(a)(2), (b)(1). No party petitioned for review of the ID. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID, and has terminated the investigation. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:04 Mar 06, 2015 Jkt 235001 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part 210. By order of the Commission. Issued: March 4, 2015. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of the Secretary Bureau of International Labor Affairs National Advisory Committee for Labor Provisions of U.S. Free Trade Agreements Bureau of International Labor Affairs, Department of Labor. ACTION: Notice of Charter Renewal. AGENCY: [FR Doc. 2015–05424 Filed 3–6–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), as amended (5 U.S.C. App. 2), the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (NAALC), and the Labor Chapters of U.S. Free Trade Agreements (FTAs), the Secretary of Labor has determined that the renewal of the charter of the National Advisory Committee for Labor Provisions of U.S. Free Trade Agreements (NAC) is necessary and in the public interest and will provide information that cannot be obtained from other sources. The committee shall provide its views to the Secretary of Labor through the Bureau of International Labor Affairs of the U.S. Department of Labor, which is the point of contact for the NAALC and the Labor Chapters of U.S. FTAs. The committee shall comprise twelve members, four representing the labor community, four representing the business community, and four representing the public. Purpose: In accordance with the provisions of the FACA, Article 17 of the NAALC, Article 17.4 of the United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement, Article 18.4 of the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement, Article 18.4 of the United States-Australia Free Trade Agreement, Article 16.4 of the United States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement, Article 16.4 of the Central AmericaDominican Republic-United States Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA–DR), Article 15.4 of the United States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement, Article 16.4 of the United States-Oman Free Trade Agreement, Article 17.5 of the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement, Article 17.5 of the United States-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement, Article 19.5 of the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement, and Article 16.5 of the United States-Panama Trade Promotion Agreement, the Secretary of Labor has determined that the renewal of the charter of the NAC is necessary and in the public interest and will provide information that cannot be obtained from other sources. The Bureau of International Labor Affairs of the U.S. Department of Labor serves as the U.S. point of contact under the FTAs listed above. The committee SUMMARY: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Bureau of Prisons Annual Determination of Average Cost of Incarceration Bureau of Prisons, Justice. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: The fee to cover the average cost of incarceration for Federal inmates in Fiscal Year 2014 was $30,619.85 ($83.89 per day). (Please note: There were 365 days in FY 2014.) The average annual cost to confine an inmate in a Residential Re-entry Center for Fiscal Year 2014 was $28,999.25 ($79.45 per day). SUMMARY: Effective Date: March 10, 2015. Office of General Counsel, Federal Bureau of Prisons, 320 First St. NW., Washington, DC 20534. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Qureshi, (202) 307–2105. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 28 CFR part 505 allows for assessment and collection of a fee to cover the average cost of incarceration for Federal inmates. We calculate this fee by dividing the number representing Bureau of Prisons facilities’ monetary obligation (excluding activation costs) by the number of inmate-days incurred for the preceding fiscal year, and then by multiplying the quotient by 365. Under § 505.2, the Director of the Bureau of Prisons determined that, based upon fiscal year 2014 data, the fee to cover the average cost of incarceration for Federal inmates in Fiscal Year 2014 was $30,619.85 ($83.89 per day). (Please note: There were 365 days in FY 2014.) The average annual cost to confine an inmate in a Residential Re-entry Center for Fiscal Year 2014 was $28,999.25 ($79.45 per day). DATES: ADDRESSES: Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director, Bureau of Prisons. [FR Doc. 2015–05437 Filed 3–6–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–05–P PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 12523 E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM 09MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 45 (Monday, March 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12522-12523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05424]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-909]


Certain Non-Volatile Memory Devices and Products Containing Same; 
Commission Determination Not To Review Granting Motion Terminating the 
Investigation as to all Respondents; Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 23) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') terminating the above-captioned investigation as to all 
respondents based on a settlement agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2310. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation

[[Page 12523]]

on February 3, 2014, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Macronix 
International Co., Ltd. of Hsin-chu, Taiwan and Macronix America, Inc. 
of Milpitas, California. 79 FR 6227-28. The complaint, as amended, 
alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the 
sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after 
importation of certain non-volatile memory devices and products 
containing the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. 
Patent Nos. 6,552,360; 6,100,557; and 6,002,630. The complaint further 
alleges a domestic industry exists or is in the process of being 
established. The Commission's notice of investigation, as amended, 
named the following respondents: Spansion, Inc., Spansion LLC, and 
Ruckus Wireless, Inc., all of Sunnyvale, California; Spansion 
(Thailand) Ltd. of Nonthaburi, Thailand; Tellabs Operations, Inc. and 
Tellabs North America, Inc., both of Naperville, Illinois 
(collectively, ``the Tellabs respondents''); Beats Electronics LLC of 
Santa Monica, California; Delphi Automotive PLC of Kent, United 
Kingdom; Delphi Automotive Systems, LLC of Troy, Michigan; Harman 
International Industries, Inc. of Stamford, Connecticut; Harman Becker 
Automotive Systems, Inc. of Farmington Hills, Michigan; and Harman 
Becker Automotive Systems GmbH of Karlsbad, Germany. The Office of 
Unfair Import Investigations participated in the investigation.
    On September 4, 2014, the Commission issued notice of its 
determination not to review the ALJ's ID (Order No. 15) terminating the 
investigation as to original respondent Tellabs, Inc. of Naperville, 
Illinois, and amending the complaint and notice of investigation to 
substitute the Tellabs respondents for Tellabs, Inc.
    On January 29, 2015, complainants and all respondents jointly moved 
to terminate the investigation with respect to all respondents based on 
a settlement agreement. The Commission investigative attorney filed a 
response supporting the motion.
    On January 30, 2015, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 23) 
granting the joint motion for termination of the investigation as to 
all respondents. He found that the motion satisfies Commission rules 
210.21(a)(2), (b)(1). No party petitioned for review of the ID.
    The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID, and has 
terminated the investigation.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 
part 210.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: March 4, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-05424 Filed 3-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.