Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Reviews, 11171-11172 [2015-04278]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the POR. asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Administrative Protective Orders and Letters of Appearance Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under administrative protective orders in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On January 22, 2008, the Department published Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Documents Submission Procedures; APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January 22, 2008). Those procedures apply to administrative reviews included in this notice of initiation. Parties wishing to participate in any of these administrative reviews should ensure that they meet the requirements of these procedures (e.g., the filing of separate letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 351.103(d)). Revised Factual Information Requirements On April 10, 2013, the Department published Definition of Factual Information and Time Limits for Submission of Factual Information: Final Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April 10, 2013), which modified two regulations related to antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings: The definition of factual information (19 CFR 351.102(b)(21)), and the time limits for the submission of factual information (19 CFR 351.301). The final rule identifies five categories of factual information in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21), which are summarized as follows: (i) Evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on the record by the Department; and (v) evidence other than factual information described in (i)–(iv). The final rule requires any party, when submitting factual information, to specify under which subsection of 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) the information is being submitted and, if the information is submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct factual information already on the record, to provide an explanation identifying the information already on the record that the factual information seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The final rule also modified 19 CFR 351.301 so that, rather than providing general time limits, there are specific time limits VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:55 Feb 27, 2015 Jkt 235001 based on the type of factual information being submitted. These modifications are effective for all segments initiated on or after May 10, 2013. Please review the final rule, available at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/ 1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to submitting factual information in this segment. Any party submitting factual information in an antidumping duty or countervailing duty proceeding must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.9 Parties are hereby reminded that revised certification requirements are in effect for company/ government officials as well as their representatives. All segments of any antidumping duty or countervailing duty proceedings initiated on or after August 16, 2013, should use the formats for the revised certifications provided at the end of the Final Rule.10 The Department intends to reject factual submissions in any proceeding segments if the submitting party does not comply with applicable revised certification requirements. Revised Extension of Time Limits Regulation On September 20, 2013, the Department modified its regulation concerning the extension of time limits for submissions in antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings: Final Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013). The modification clarifies that parties may request an extension of time limits before a time limit established under Part 351 expires, or as otherwise specified by the Secretary. In general, an extension request will be considered untimely if it is filed after the time limit established under Part 351 expires. For submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously, an extension request will be considered untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on the due date. Examples include, but are not limited to: (1) Case and rebuttal briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; (2) factual information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure the adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, clarification and correction filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) comments concerning the selection of a surrogate country and surrogate values 9 See section 782(b) of the Act. Certification of Factual Information To Import Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (‘‘Final Rule’’); see also the frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_ info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. 10 See PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 11171 and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning U.S. Customs and Border Protection data; and (5) quantity and value questionnaires. Under certain circumstances, the Department may elect to specify a different time limit by which extension requests will be considered untimely for submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such a case, the Department will inform parties in the letter or memorandum setting forth the deadline (including a specified time) by which extension requests must be filed to be considered timely. This modification also requires that an extension request must be made in a separate, stand-alone submission, and clarifies the circumstances under which the Department will grant untimelyfiled requests for the extension of time limits. These modifications are effective for all segments initiated on or after October 21, 2013. Please review the final rule, available at http:// www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/ html/2013-22853.htm, prior to submitting factual information in these segments. These initiations and this notice are in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). Dated: February 24, 2015. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2015–04346 Filed 2–27–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Reviews Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: Background Every five years, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the International Trade Commission automatically initiate and conduct a review to determine whether revocation of a countervailing or antidumping duty order or termination of an investigation suspended under section 704 or 734 of the Act would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a countervailable subsidy (as the case may be) and of material injury. E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM 02MRN1 11172 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices Upcoming Sunset Reviews for April 2015 The following Sunset Reviews are scheduled for initiation in April 2015 and will appear in that month’s Notice of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Review (‘‘Sunset Review’’). With respect to the orders on Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from China, Malaysia and Thailand, we have advanced the initiation date of these Sunset Reviews upon determining that initiation of the Sunset Reviews for all of the Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags orders on the same date would promote administrative efficiency. Department contact Antidumping Duty Proceedings Chloropicrin from China (A–570–002) (4th Review) .................................................................................. Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from China (A–570–892) (2nd Review) ...................................................... Crepe Paper from China (A–570–895) (2nd Review) ................................................................................ Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from China (A–570–886) (1st Review) ................................................. Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India (A–533–838) (2nd Review) ........................................................ Polyethylene Polyethylene Polyethylene Polyethylene Retail Retail Retail Retail Carrier Carrier Carrier Carrier Bags Bags Bags Bags from from from from Indonesia (A–560–822) (1st Review) ........................................... Malaysia (A–557–813) (1st Review) ............................................ Taiwan (A–583–843) (1st Review) ............................................... Thailand (A–549–821) (1st Review) ............................................. Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Vietnam (A–552–806) (1st Review) ............................................. Countervailing Duty Proceedings Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India (C–533–839) (2nd Review) ........................................................ Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Vietnam, (C–552–805) (1st Review) ............................................ Charles Riggle, (202) 482–0650. Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482– 5255. Charles Riggle, (202) 482–0650. David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136. Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482– 5255. David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136. David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136. David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136. David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136. David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136. Jacqueline 5255. Arrowsmith, (202) 482– Jacqueline 5255. Arrowsmith, (202) 482– asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Suspended Investigations No Sunset Review of suspended investigations is scheduled for initiation in April 2015. The Department’s procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth in 19 CFR 351.218. The Notice of Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews provides further information regarding what is required of all parties to participate in Sunset Reviews. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the Department will maintain and make available a service list for these proceedings. To facilitate the timely preparation of the service list(s), it is requested that those seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding contact the Department in writing within 10 days of the publication of the Notice of Initiation. Please note that if the Department receives a Notice of Intent to Participate from a member of the domestic industry within 15 days of the date of initiation, the review will continue. Thereafter, any interested party wishing to participate in the Sunset Review must provide substantive comments in response to the notice of initiation no later than 30 days after the date of initiation. This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: February 23, 2015. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2015–04278 Filed 2–27–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:55 Feb 27, 2015 Jkt 235001 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–475–819] Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2012 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Department) conducted an administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain pasta from Italy. On August 25, 2014, we published the Preliminary Results for this administrative review.1 The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012. We find that DeMatteis Agroalimentare S.p.A. (also known as, De Matteis Agroalimentare SpA) (DeMatteis) received countervailable subsidies during the POR, and that Fratelli DeCecco di Filippo Fara San Martino S.p.A. (also known as, F.lli De Cecco di Filippo Fara San Martino S.p.A.) (DeCecco) received de minimis countervailable subsidies during the POR. As such, we are applying DeMatteis’ rate to the other firms subject AGENCY: 1 See Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2012, 79 FR 50618 (August 25, 2014) (Preliminary Results). PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 to this review that were not individually examined. DATES: Effective Date: March 2, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sergio Balbontin or Joshua Morris, AD/ CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6478 or (202) 482– 1779, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background In the Preliminary Results, we deferred our analysis of certain programs to a post-preliminary analysis. On October 30, 2014, we issued a postpreliminary analysis memorandum.2 We invited interested parties to file case briefs and rebuttal briefs following the release of the post-preliminary analysis memorandum. Only the Government of Italy (the GOI) filed a case brief. Scope of the Order The scope of the Order consists of certain pasta from Italy.3 The merchandise subject to the order is 2 See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘PostPreliminary Analysis of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Certain Pasta from Italy’’ (October 30, 2014). 3 See Notice of Countervailing Duty Order and Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination: Certain Pasta (‘‘Pasta’’) From Italy, 61 FR 38544 (July 24, 1996) (Order). E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM 02MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 40 (Monday, March 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11171-11172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04278]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended 
Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Reviews

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

Background

    Every five years, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended (``the Act''), the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') and the International Trade Commission automatically 
initiate and conduct a review to determine whether revocation of a 
countervailing or antidumping duty order or termination of an 
investigation suspended under section 704 or 734 of the Act would be 
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a 
countervailable subsidy (as the case may be) and of material injury.

[[Page 11172]]

Upcoming Sunset Reviews for April 2015

    The following Sunset Reviews are scheduled for initiation in April 
2015 and will appear in that month's Notice of Initiation of Five-Year 
Sunset Review (``Sunset Review''). With respect to the orders on 
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from China, Malaysia and Thailand, we 
have advanced the initiation date of these Sunset Reviews upon 
determining that initiation of the Sunset Reviews for all of the 
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags orders on the same date would promote 
administrative efficiency.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                          Department contact
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Antidumping Duty Proceedings
 
Chloropicrin from China (A-570-002) (4th Review)...  Charles Riggle, (202) 482-0650.
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from China (A-570-892)   Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482-5255.
 (2nd Review).
Crepe Paper from China (A-570-895) (2nd Review)....  Charles Riggle, (202) 482-0650.
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from China (A-570-  David Goldberger, (202) 482-4136.
 886) (1st Review).
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India (A-533-838)   Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482-5255.
 (2nd Review).
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Indonesia (A-  David Goldberger, (202) 482-4136.
 560-822) (1st Review).
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Malaysia (A-   David Goldberger, (202) 482-4136.
 557-813) (1st Review).
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Taiwan (A-583- David Goldberger, (202) 482-4136.
 843) (1st Review).
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Thailand (A-   David Goldberger, (202) 482-4136.
 549-821) (1st Review).
 
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Vietnam (A-    David Goldberger, (202) 482-4136.
 552-806) (1st Review).
 
          Countervailing Duty Proceedings
 
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India (C-533-839)   Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482-5255.
 (2nd Review).
 
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Vietnam, (C-   Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482-5255.
 552-805) (1st Review).
              Suspended Investigations
 
No Sunset Review of suspended investigations is
 scheduled for initiation in April 2015.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department's procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are 
set forth in 19 CFR 351.218. The Notice of Initiation of Five-Year 
(``Sunset'') Reviews provides further information regarding what is 
required of all parties to participate in Sunset Reviews.
    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the Department will maintain and 
make available a service list for these proceedings. To facilitate the 
timely preparation of the service list(s), it is requested that those 
seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding contact the 
Department in writing within 10 days of the publication of the Notice 
of Initiation.
    Please note that if the Department receives a Notice of Intent to 
Participate from a member of the domestic industry within 15 days of 
the date of initiation, the review will continue. Thereafter, any 
interested party wishing to participate in the Sunset Review must 
provide substantive comments in response to the notice of initiation no 
later than 30 days after the date of initiation.
    This notice is not required by statute but is published as a 
service to the international trading community.

    Dated: February 23, 2015.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2015-04278 Filed 2-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P