Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Reviews, 11171-11172 [2015-04278]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices
on entries of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption during the relevant
provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of
the order, if such a gap period is
applicable to the POR.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Administrative Protective Orders and
Letters of Appearance
Interested parties must submit
applications for disclosure under
administrative protective orders in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On
January 22, 2008, the Department
published Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Documents Submission Procedures;
APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January
22, 2008). Those procedures apply to
administrative reviews included in this
notice of initiation. Parties wishing to
participate in any of these
administrative reviews should ensure
that they meet the requirements of these
procedures (e.g., the filing of separate
letters of appearance as discussed at 19
CFR 351.103(d)).
Revised Factual Information
Requirements
On April 10, 2013, the Department
published Definition of Factual
Information and Time Limits for
Submission of Factual Information:
Final Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April 10,
2013), which modified two regulations
related to antidumping and
countervailing duty proceedings: The
definition of factual information (19
CFR 351.102(b)(21)), and the time limits
for the submission of factual
information (19 CFR 351.301). The final
rule identifies five categories of factual
information in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21),
which are summarized as follows: (i)
Evidence submitted in response to
questionnaires; (ii) evidence submitted
in support of allegations; (iii) publicly
available information to value factors
under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure
the adequacy of remuneration under 19
CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed
on the record by the Department; and (v)
evidence other than factual information
described in (i)–(iv). The final rule
requires any party, when submitting
factual information, to specify under
which subsection of 19 CFR
351.102(b)(21) the information is being
submitted and, if the information is
submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct
factual information already on the
record, to provide an explanation
identifying the information already on
the record that the factual information
seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The
final rule also modified 19 CFR 351.301
so that, rather than providing general
time limits, there are specific time limits
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Feb 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
based on the type of factual information
being submitted. These modifications
are effective for all segments initiated on
or after May 10, 2013. Please review the
final rule, available at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/
1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to
submitting factual information in this
segment.
Any party submitting factual
information in an antidumping duty or
countervailing duty proceeding must
certify to the accuracy and completeness
of that information.9 Parties are hereby
reminded that revised certification
requirements are in effect for company/
government officials as well as their
representatives. All segments of any
antidumping duty or countervailing
duty proceedings initiated on or after
August 16, 2013, should use the formats
for the revised certifications provided at
the end of the Final Rule.10 The
Department intends to reject factual
submissions in any proceeding
segments if the submitting party does
not comply with applicable revised
certification requirements.
Revised Extension of Time Limits
Regulation
On September 20, 2013, the
Department modified its regulation
concerning the extension of time limits
for submissions in antidumping and
countervailing duty proceedings: Final
Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013).
The modification clarifies that parties
may request an extension of time limits
before a time limit established under
Part 351 expires, or as otherwise
specified by the Secretary. In general, an
extension request will be considered
untimely if it is filed after the time limit
established under Part 351 expires. For
submissions which are due from
multiple parties simultaneously, an
extension request will be considered
untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on
the due date. Examples include, but are
not limited to: (1) Case and rebuttal
briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309;
(2) factual information to value factors
under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure
the adequacy of remuneration under 19
CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19
CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal,
clarification and correction filed
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3)
comments concerning the selection of a
surrogate country and surrogate values
9 See
section 782(b) of the Act.
Certification of Factual Information To
Import Administration During Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July
17, 2013) (‘‘Final Rule’’); see also the frequently
asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_
info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf.
10 See
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11171
and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
data; and (5) quantity and value
questionnaires. Under certain
circumstances, the Department may
elect to specify a different time limit by
which extension requests will be
considered untimely for submissions
which are due from multiple parties
simultaneously. In such a case, the
Department will inform parties in the
letter or memorandum setting forth the
deadline (including a specified time) by
which extension requests must be filed
to be considered timely. This
modification also requires that an
extension request must be made in a
separate, stand-alone submission, and
clarifies the circumstances under which
the Department will grant untimelyfiled requests for the extension of time
limits. These modifications are effective
for all segments initiated on or after
October 21, 2013. Please review the
final rule, available at https://
www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/
html/2013-22853.htm, prior to
submitting factual information in these
segments.
These initiations and this notice are
in accordance with section 751(a) of the
Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i).
Dated: February 24, 2015.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2015–04346 Filed 2–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Advance Notification of
Sunset Reviews
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
Background
Every five years, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the
International Trade Commission
automatically initiate and conduct a
review to determine whether revocation
of a countervailing or antidumping duty
order or termination of an investigation
suspended under section 704 or 734 of
the Act would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
or a countervailable subsidy (as the case
may be) and of material injury.
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
11172
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 40 / Monday, March 2, 2015 / Notices
Upcoming Sunset Reviews for April
2015
The following Sunset Reviews are
scheduled for initiation in April 2015
and will appear in that month’s Notice
of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Review
(‘‘Sunset Review’’). With respect to the
orders on Polyethylene Retail Carrier
Bags from China, Malaysia and
Thailand, we have advanced the
initiation date of these Sunset Reviews
upon determining that initiation of the
Sunset Reviews for all of the
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags orders
on the same date would promote
administrative efficiency.
Department contact
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
Chloropicrin from China (A–570–002) (4th Review) ..................................................................................
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from China (A–570–892) (2nd Review) ......................................................
Crepe Paper from China (A–570–895) (2nd Review) ................................................................................
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from China (A–570–886) (1st Review) .................................................
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India (A–533–838) (2nd Review) ........................................................
Polyethylene
Polyethylene
Polyethylene
Polyethylene
Retail
Retail
Retail
Retail
Carrier
Carrier
Carrier
Carrier
Bags
Bags
Bags
Bags
from
from
from
from
Indonesia (A–560–822) (1st Review) ...........................................
Malaysia (A–557–813) (1st Review) ............................................
Taiwan (A–583–843) (1st Review) ...............................................
Thailand (A–549–821) (1st Review) .............................................
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Vietnam (A–552–806) (1st Review) .............................................
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India (C–533–839) (2nd Review) ........................................................
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Vietnam, (C–552–805) (1st Review) ............................................
Charles Riggle, (202) 482–0650.
Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–
5255.
Charles Riggle, (202) 482–0650.
David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136.
Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482–
5255.
David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136.
David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136.
David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136.
David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136.
David Goldberger, (202) 482–4136.
Jacqueline
5255.
Arrowsmith,
(202)
482–
Jacqueline
5255.
Arrowsmith,
(202)
482–
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Suspended Investigations
No Sunset Review of suspended investigations is scheduled for initiation in April 2015.
The Department’s procedures for the
conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth
in 19 CFR 351.218. The Notice of
Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’)
Reviews provides further information
regarding what is required of all parties
to participate in Sunset Reviews.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the
Department will maintain and make
available a service list for these
proceedings. To facilitate the timely
preparation of the service list(s), it is
requested that those seeking recognition
as interested parties to a proceeding
contact the Department in writing
within 10 days of the publication of the
Notice of Initiation.
Please note that if the Department
receives a Notice of Intent to Participate
from a member of the domestic industry
within 15 days of the date of initiation,
the review will continue. Thereafter,
any interested party wishing to
participate in the Sunset Review must
provide substantive comments in
response to the notice of initiation no
later than 30 days after the date of
initiation.
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
Dated: February 23, 2015.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2015–04278 Filed 2–27–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:55 Feb 27, 2015
Jkt 235001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–475–819]
Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results
of Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review; 2012
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Department) conducted an
administrative review of the
countervailing duty (CVD) order on
certain pasta from Italy. On August 25,
2014, we published the Preliminary
Results for this administrative review.1
The period of review (POR) is January
1, 2012 through December 31, 2012. We
find that DeMatteis Agroalimentare
S.p.A. (also known as, De Matteis
Agroalimentare SpA) (DeMatteis)
received countervailable subsidies
during the POR, and that Fratelli
DeCecco di Filippo Fara San Martino
S.p.A. (also known as, F.lli De Cecco di
Filippo Fara San Martino S.p.A.)
(DeCecco) received de minimis
countervailable subsidies during the
POR. As such, we are applying
DeMatteis’ rate to the other firms subject
AGENCY:
1 See Certain Pasta From Italy: Preliminary
Results and Partial Rescission of the Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review; 2012, 79 FR 50618
(August 25, 2014) (Preliminary Results).
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to this review that were not individually
examined.
DATES: Effective Date: March 2, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sergio Balbontin or Joshua Morris, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
and Compliance, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–6478 or (202) 482–
1779, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In the Preliminary Results, we
deferred our analysis of certain
programs to a post-preliminary analysis.
On October 30, 2014, we issued a postpreliminary analysis memorandum.2 We
invited interested parties to file case
briefs and rebuttal briefs following the
release of the post-preliminary analysis
memorandum. Only the Government of
Italy (the GOI) filed a case brief.
Scope of the Order
The scope of the Order consists of
certain pasta from Italy.3 The
merchandise subject to the order is
2 See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘PostPreliminary Analysis of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review: Certain Pasta from Italy’’
(October 30, 2014).
3 See Notice of Countervailing Duty Order and
Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination: Certain Pasta (‘‘Pasta’’) From Italy,
61 FR 38544 (July 24, 1996) (Order).
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 40 (Monday, March 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11171-11172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04278]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Reviews
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
Background
Every five years, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (``the Act''), the Department of Commerce (``the
Department'') and the International Trade Commission automatically
initiate and conduct a review to determine whether revocation of a
countervailing or antidumping duty order or termination of an
investigation suspended under section 704 or 734 of the Act would be
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a
countervailable subsidy (as the case may be) and of material injury.
[[Page 11172]]
Upcoming Sunset Reviews for April 2015
The following Sunset Reviews are scheduled for initiation in April
2015 and will appear in that month's Notice of Initiation of Five-Year
Sunset Review (``Sunset Review''). With respect to the orders on
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from China, Malaysia and Thailand, we
have advanced the initiation date of these Sunset Reviews upon
determining that initiation of the Sunset Reviews for all of the
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags orders on the same date would promote
administrative efficiency.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Department contact
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
Chloropicrin from China (A-570-002) (4th Review)... Charles Riggle, (202) 482-0650.
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from China (A-570-892) Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482-5255.
(2nd Review).
Crepe Paper from China (A-570-895) (2nd Review).... Charles Riggle, (202) 482-0650.
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from China (A-570- David Goldberger, (202) 482-4136.
886) (1st Review).
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India (A-533-838) Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482-5255.
(2nd Review).
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Indonesia (A- David Goldberger, (202) 482-4136.
560-822) (1st Review).
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Malaysia (A- David Goldberger, (202) 482-4136.
557-813) (1st Review).
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Taiwan (A-583- David Goldberger, (202) 482-4136.
843) (1st Review).
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Thailand (A- David Goldberger, (202) 482-4136.
549-821) (1st Review).
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Vietnam (A- David Goldberger, (202) 482-4136.
552-806) (1st Review).
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from India (C-533-839) Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482-5255.
(2nd Review).
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Vietnam, (C- Jacqueline Arrowsmith, (202) 482-5255.
552-805) (1st Review).
Suspended Investigations
No Sunset Review of suspended investigations is
scheduled for initiation in April 2015.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department's procedures for the conduct of Sunset Reviews are
set forth in 19 CFR 351.218. The Notice of Initiation of Five-Year
(``Sunset'') Reviews provides further information regarding what is
required of all parties to participate in Sunset Reviews.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(c), the Department will maintain and
make available a service list for these proceedings. To facilitate the
timely preparation of the service list(s), it is requested that those
seeking recognition as interested parties to a proceeding contact the
Department in writing within 10 days of the publication of the Notice
of Initiation.
Please note that if the Department receives a Notice of Intent to
Participate from a member of the domestic industry within 15 days of
the date of initiation, the review will continue. Thereafter, any
interested party wishing to participate in the Sunset Review must
provide substantive comments in response to the notice of initiation no
later than 30 days after the date of initiation.
This notice is not required by statute but is published as a
service to the international trading community.
Dated: February 23, 2015.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2015-04278 Filed 2-27-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
