Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Related to Fees for Use of BATS Exchange, Inc., 10735-10738 [2015-04068]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Notices
NASD Rule 3170 (Mandatory Electronic
Filing Requirements), NASD Rule 1150
(Executive Representative), and NASD
Rule 1160 (Contact Information
Requirements) into the Consolidated
FINRA rulebook as FINRA Rule 4517
(Member Filing and Contact Information
Requirements) without any substantive
changes, to update cross-references
accordingly and reflect current
nomenclature, and to thereby clarify
FINRA’s rules, and because the rulebook
consolidation process is designed to
provide additional clarity and
regulatory efficiency to members, the
Commission believes that a waiver of
the requirement is appropriate so that
the rule change may become operative
immediately. Therefore, the
Commission hereby waives the 30-day
operative delay and designates the
proposal effective upon filing.14
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
FINRA–2015–004 on the subject line.
please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on
the Commission’s Internet Web site
(https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of FINRA. All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–FINRA–
2015–004, and should be submitted on
or before March 20, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–04084 Filed 2–26–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74352; File No. SR–BATS–
2015–13]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change Related to Fees for Use
of BATS Exchange, Inc.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Paper Comments
February 23, 2015.
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–FINRA–2015–004. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used.
To help the Commission process and
review your comments more efficiently,
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on February
10, 2015, BATS Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BATS’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
14 For purposes of waiving the 30-day operative
delay, the Commission has considered the proposed
rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Feb 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
15 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10735
Exchange has designated the proposed
rule change as one establishing or
changing a member due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange under
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 3 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,4 which
renders the proposed rule change
effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange filed a proposal to
amend the fee schedule applicable to
Members 5 and non-members of the
Exchange pursuant to BATS Rules
15.1(a) and (c). Changes to the fee
schedule pursuant to this proposal are
effective upon filing.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at the Exchange’s Web site
at www.batstrading.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to modify its
fee schedule in order to: (1) remove the
reference to ROLF from fee code BO; (2)
make certain changes to Cross-Asset
Step-Up Tier 3; and (3) make certain
non-substantive clean-up changes to the
fee schedule.
Deleting Reference to ROLF
The Exchange proposes to amend its
fee schedule to remove the reference to
3 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
5 The term ‘‘Member’’ is defined as ‘‘any
registered broker or dealer that has been admitted
to membership in the Exchange.’’ See Exchange
Rule 1.5(n).
4 17
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
10736
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Notices
ROLF from fee code BO. Fee code BO
currently provides that the Exchange
will charge $0.0030 per share for any
order routed using ROLF or Destination
Specific routing strategy unless
otherwise specified. Under the ROLF
routing strategy, an order will check the
Exchange for available shares and then
will be sent to LavaFlow ECN
(‘‘LavaFlow’’). This change is being
proposed in response to LavaFlow’s
announcement that it will cease market
operations and its last day of trading
will be Friday, January 30, 2015. As
such, beginning on February 2, 2015,
the Exchange will no longer route orders
to LavaFlow. As proposed, the Exchange
would continue to charge $0.0030 per
share for orders routed using a
Destination Specific routing strategy.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Step-Up Add TCV Definition
The Exchange is also proposing to
make a non-substantive change to the
definition of ‘‘Step-Up Add TCV’’ in its
fee schedule. Currently, Step-Up Add
TCV means ADAV 6 as a percentage of
TCV 7 in January 2014 subtracted from
current ADAV as a percentage of TCV.
In order to add an additional month to
use as a baseline for calculating Step-Up
Add TCV, as further described below,
the Exchange is proposing to amend the
fee schedule such that Step-Up Add
TCV means ADAV as a percentage of
TCV in the relevant baseline month
subtracted from current ADAV as a
percentage of TCV. The Exchange is also
proposing to make a corresponding nonsubstantive change to footnote 2, titled
‘‘Step-Up Tiers,’’ such that the criteria
to qualify for the tiers is described as the
‘‘Member’s Step-Up TCV from January
2014 is equal to or greater than’’ instead
of ‘‘Member’s Step-Up TCV is equal to
or greater than.’’ This change is nonsubstantive because the Exchange is not
proposing to amend any fees, rebates, or
the calculation thereof, but rather
making the requisite change in order for
the rebate and the criteria associated
with meeting the tiers to remain the
same in conjunction with the proposed
changes to the definition of Step-Up
Add TCV outlined above.
to make two changes: to base the tier
calculation on a Member’s Step-Up Add
TCV from December 2014; and to lower
the threshold required to meet Tier 3
from 0.20% to 0.15%. Currently, in
order to meet Tier 3 of the Cross-Asset
Step-Up Tier and receive a $0.0032
rebate per share that adds liquidity: (i)
a Member’s ADAV as a percentage of
TCV must be equal to or greater than
0.20%; and (ii) the Member’s Options
Step-Up Add TCV 8 must be equal to or
greater than 0.60%. The Exchange is not
proposing to amend requirement (ii).
The Exchange is proposing to amend
requirement (i) such that a Member
must have a Step-Up Add TCV from
December 2014 of at least 0.15% instead
of an ADAV as a percentage of TCV of
at least 0.20%, which will encourage
increased participation on the Exchange
by requiring that a Member increases its
participation on the Exchange as
compared to December 2014, rather than
maintaining a static ADAV as a
percentage of TCV.
The Exchange proposes to implement
the amendments to its fee schedule
effective February 10, 2015.
Cross-Asset Step-Up Tiers
The Exchange is also proposing to
amend the criteria for meeting Tier 3 in
the Cross-Asset Step-Up Tiers.
Specifically, the Exchange is proposing
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder that
are applicable to a national securities
exchange, and, in particular, with the
requirements of Section 6 of the Act.9
Specifically, the Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change is consistent
with Sections 6(b)(4) of the Act and
6(b)(5) of the Act,10 in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among
members and other persons using any
facility or system which the Exchange
operates or controls. The Exchange
notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market
participants can readily direct order
flow to competing venues if they deem
fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive.
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to eliminate ROLF from fee
code BO represents an equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among Members and other
persons using its facilities. The
proposed change is in response to
LavaFlow’s announcement that it will
6 ‘‘ADAV’’ means average daily volume calculated
as the number of shares added per day on a
monthly basis.
7 ‘‘TCV’’ means total consolidated volume
calculated as the volume reported by all exchanges
and trade reporting facilities to a consolidated
transaction reporting plan for the month for which
the fees apply.
8 ‘‘Options Step-Up Add TCV’’ means ADAV as
a percentage of TCV in January 2014 subtracted
from current ADAV as a percentage of TCV, using
the definitions of ADAV and TCV as provided
under the Exchange’s fee schedule for BATS
Options.
9 15 U.S.C. 78f.
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Feb 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
cease market operations and its last day
of trading will be Friday, January 30,
2015. The Exchange notes that the
proposed change is not designed to
amend any fee or rebate, nor alter the
manner in which the Exchange assesses
fees and rebates. As of February 2, 2015,
the Exchange will no longer route orders
to LavaFlow and, therefore, proposes to
remove ROLF from the fee schedule,
which will make the fee schedule
clearer and less confusing for investors
as well as help to eliminate potential
investor confusion, thereby removing
impediments to and perfecting the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, protecting investors and the
public interest.
The Exchange also believes that the
proposed non-substantive change to the
definition of Step-Up Add TCV and the
corresponding non-substantive change
to the Step-Up Tiers are reasonable, fair,
and equitable because they are designed
to make the fee schedule easier to
comprehend in light of the decision to
add an additional baseline month, as
described above. The Exchange notes
that neither of the proposed changes are
designed to amend any fee or rebate, nor
alter the manner in which the Exchange
assesses fees and rebates. These nonsubstantive changes to the fee schedule
are intended to make the fee schedule
clearer and less confusing for investors
and eliminate potential investor
confusion, thereby removing
impediments to and perfecting the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, protecting investors and the
public interest.
The Exchange also believes that the
proposed change to measure the
Member’s Step-Up Add TCV from
December 2014 instead of ADAV as a
percentage of TCV is reasonable, fair,
and equitable because it will incentive
Members to increase their participation
on the Exchange as compared to
December 2014, rather than maintaining
a static ADAV as a percentage of TCV.
The Exchange further believes that the
proposal is reasonable, fair, and
equitable because the increased
liquidity from incentivizing Members to
increase their participation on the
Exchange will benefit all investors by
deepening the liquidity pool on the
Exchange, supporting the quality of
price discovery, promoting market
transparency, and improving investor
protection. The Exchange also believes
that lowering the threshold to meet the
requirement from 0.20% to 0.15% is
reasonable, fair, and equitable because
the measurement is changing from a
measure of total added volume (ADAV
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
as a percentage of TCV) into a measure
of the increase of added volume as
compared to December 2014 (Step-Up
Add TCV from December 2014) and the
reduction will make it easier for
Members to achieve Cross-Asset StepUp Tier 3. The Exchange believes that
step-up pricing programs such as that
proposed herein reward a Member’s
growth pattern and that such increased
volume increases the potential revenue
to the Exchange, which will allow the
Exchange to continue to provide and
potentially expand the incentive
programs operated by the Exchange.
Such pricing programs are also fair and
equitable in that they are available to all
Members. Further, volume-based rebates
and fees such as the ones maintained by
the Exchange, including those
amendments proposed herein, have
been widely adopted by equities and
options exchanges and are equitable
because they are open to all Members on
an equal basis and provide additional
benefits or discounts that are reasonably
related to the value to an exchange’s
market quality associated with higher
levels of market activity, such as higher
levels of liquidity provision and/or
growth patterns, and introduction of
higher volumes of orders into the price
and volume discovery processes.
Further, the Exchange believes that the
Cross-Asset Step-Up Tiers will provide
such enhancements in market quality on
the Exchange by incentivizing increased
participation by Members attempting to
meet Tier 3. Accordingly, the Exchange
believes that the proposed amendments
to the Cross-Asset Step-Up Tiers and the
incentives associated therewith are not
unfairly discriminatory because they
will apply uniformly to all Members
and are consistent with the overall goals
of enhancing market quality on the
Exchange.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
To the contrary, the Exchange believes
that the proposed changes to the CrossAsset Step-Up Tiers will allow the
Exchange to compete more ably with
other execution venues by drawing
additional volume to the Exchange,
thereby making it a more desirable
destination venue for its customers.
Further, the Exchange does not believe
that these proposed changes represent a
significant departure from previous
pricing offered by the Exchange or
pricing offered by the Exchange’s
competitors. Additionally, Members
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Feb 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
may opt to disfavor the Exchange’s
pricing if they believe that alternatives
offer them better value. Accordingly, the
Exchange does not believe that the
proposed change will impair the ability
of Members or competing venues to
maintain their competitive standing in
the financial markets.
The Exchange also believes that its
proposal to remove ROLF from fee code
BO would not affect intermarket nor
intramarket competition because the
change is not designed to amend any fee
or rebate or to alter the manner in which
the Exchange assesses fees or calculates
rebates. It is simply proposed in
response to LavaFlow’s announcement
that it will cease market operations
following the close of business on
Friday, January 30, 2015.
The Exchange believes that the nonsubstantive and organizational changes
to the fee schedule would not affect
intermarket nor intramarket competition
because none of the proposed changes
are designed to amend any fee or rebate
or to alter the manner in which the
Exchange asses fees or rebates. The
changes are intended to make the fee
schedule as clear and concise as
possible.
As stated above, the Exchange notes
that it operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can
readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee structures to be
unreasonable or excessive.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any written
comments from members or other
interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 11 and paragraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b–4 thereunder.12 At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
11 15
12 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10737
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
BATS–2015–13 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BATS–2015–13. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–BATS–
2015–13 and should be submitted on or
before March 20, 2015.
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
10738
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 39 / Friday, February 27, 2015 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–04068 Filed 2–26–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74351; File No. SR–CBOE–
2015–021]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Chicago
Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated’s Order Handling System
and Order Management Terminal
February 23, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that, on February
19, 2015, Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of
the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.4 The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is proposing to adopt a
rule that further describes its existing
order handling system (also referred to
below as ‘‘OHS’’) and order
management terminal (also referred to
below as ‘‘OMT’’) operations, and to
make corresponding amendments to its
opening, automatic execution and
complex order processing rules. The
text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s Web site
(https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/
CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at
the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary,
13 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Feb 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange is proposing to adopt
new Rule 6.12 to further describe its
existing OHS and OMT operations, and
to make corresponding amendments to
its opening, automatic execution and
complex order processing rules (Rules
6.2B, 6.13, and 6.53C, respectively). The
Exchange notes that these OHS and
OMT operations are currently in use
and referenced in the Exchange Rules.
The purpose of this rule change is
simply to codify further details of the
existing operations within the Exchange
Rules.
Background
The CBOE Hybrid System 5 is a
trading platform that allows automatic
executions to occur electronically and
open outcry trades to occur on the floor
of the Exchange. To operate in this
‘‘hybrid’’ environment, the Exchange
has made available to Trading Permit
Holders (‘‘TPHs’’) a dynamic order
handling system, also referred herein as
OHS, that has the capability to route
orders to the Hybrid System for
automatic execution and book entry, to
PAR workstations located in the trading
5 The CBOE ‘‘Hybrid System’’ or ‘‘Hybrid Trading
System’’ refers to the Exchange’s trading platform
that allows Market-Makers to submit electronic
quotes in their appointed classes. The ‘‘Hybrid 3.0
Platform’’ is an electronic trading platform on the
Hybrid Trading System that allows one or more
quoters to submit electronic quotes which represent
the aggregate Market-Maker quoting interest in a
series for the trading crowd. Classes authorized by
the Exchange for trading on the Hybrid Trading
System shall be referred to as Hybrid classes.
Classes authorized by the Exchange for trading on
the Hybrid 3.0 Platform shall be referred to as
Hybrid 3.0 classes. References to ‘‘Hybrid,’’ ‘‘Hybrid
System,’’ or ‘‘Hybrid Trading System’’ in the
Exchange’s Rules shall include all platforms unless
otherwise provided by rule. See, e.g., Rule 1.1(aaa).
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
crowds for open outcry and other
manual handling by TPHs and Exchange
PAR Officials, and/or to other order
management terminals generally located
in booths on the trading floor for
manual handling. Where an order is
routed for processing by the Exchange
order handling system depends on
various parameters configured by the
Exchange and the order entry firm itself.
Thus, the OHS provides TPHs with
some flexibility to determine how to
process their orders in the CBOE Hybrid
System.
The Exchange believes these routing
parameters assist with the maintenance
of a fair and orderly market and help to
mitigate potential risks associated with
orders executing at potentially
erroneous prices or inconsistent with a
particular investment strategy by
routing certain orders to a PAR
workstation or a booth order
management terminal for manual
handling based on parameters
determined by the Exchange under Rule
6.2B, 6.13 or 6.53C, by routing certain
orders to an order management terminal
based on parameters prescribed by the
Exchange, by routing certain orders to
an order management terminal or a PAR
workstation or for electronic process,
based on parameters prescribed by the
order entry firm itself, and by routing
certain orders to an order management
terminal in the event of certain
Exchange system disruptions or
malfunctions. The order handling
system also permits orders to be routed
from a PAR workstation to an order
management terminal (and vice versa)
and from a PAR workstation or an order
management terminal to the Hybrid
System for automatic execution or book
entry. The Exchange also views the
order handling system as an important
tool to assist order entry firms in their
ability to efficiently manage, process
and execute orders in a ‘‘hybrid’’ trading
environment. The Exchange believes
this, again, promotes fair and orderly
markets, as well as assists the Exchange
in its ability to effectively attract order
flow and liquidity to its market, and
ultimately benefits all CBOE TPHs and
all investors.
Regarding booth routing parameters in
particular, an order may route to an
order management terminal generally
located in a booth depending on various
circumstances. One such set of
circumstances pertains to automatic
execution/book ‘‘kick-outs.’’ In that
regard, the electronic processes under
Rules 6.2B (pertaining to opening
transactions), 6.13 (pertaining to simple
orders) and 6.53C (pertaining to
complex orders), provide that an order
that is not eligible for automatic
E:\FR\FM\27FEN1.SGM
27FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10735-10738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04068]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-74352; File No. SR-BATS-2015-13]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Related to
Fees for Use of BATS Exchange, Inc.
February 23, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on February 10, 2015, BATS Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BATS'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as one establishing or
changing a member due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange
under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)
thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposed rule change effective upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange filed a proposal to amend the fee schedule applicable
to Members \5\ and non-members of the Exchange pursuant to BATS Rules
15.1(a) and (c). Changes to the fee schedule pursuant to this proposal
are effective upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The term ``Member'' is defined as ``any registered broker or
dealer that has been admitted to membership in the Exchange.'' See
Exchange Rule 1.5(n).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
Web site at www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to modify its fee schedule in order to: (1)
remove the reference to ROLF from fee code BO; (2) make certain changes
to Cross-Asset Step-Up Tier 3; and (3) make certain non-substantive
clean-up changes to the fee schedule.
Deleting Reference to ROLF
The Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule to remove the
reference to
[[Page 10736]]
ROLF from fee code BO. Fee code BO currently provides that the Exchange
will charge $0.0030 per share for any order routed using ROLF or
Destination Specific routing strategy unless otherwise specified. Under
the ROLF routing strategy, an order will check the Exchange for
available shares and then will be sent to LavaFlow ECN (``LavaFlow'').
This change is being proposed in response to LavaFlow's announcement
that it will cease market operations and its last day of trading will
be Friday, January 30, 2015. As such, beginning on February 2, 2015,
the Exchange will no longer route orders to LavaFlow. As proposed, the
Exchange would continue to charge $0.0030 per share for orders routed
using a Destination Specific routing strategy.
Step-Up Add TCV Definition
The Exchange is also proposing to make a non-substantive change to
the definition of ``Step-Up Add TCV'' in its fee schedule. Currently,
Step-Up Add TCV means ADAV \6\ as a percentage of TCV \7\ in January
2014 subtracted from current ADAV as a percentage of TCV. In order to
add an additional month to use as a baseline for calculating Step-Up
Add TCV, as further described below, the Exchange is proposing to amend
the fee schedule such that Step-Up Add TCV means ADAV as a percentage
of TCV in the relevant baseline month subtracted from current ADAV as a
percentage of TCV. The Exchange is also proposing to make a
corresponding non-substantive change to footnote 2, titled ``Step-Up
Tiers,'' such that the criteria to qualify for the tiers is described
as the ``Member's Step-Up TCV from January 2014 is equal to or greater
than'' instead of ``Member's Step-Up TCV is equal to or greater than.''
This change is non-substantive because the Exchange is not proposing to
amend any fees, rebates, or the calculation thereof, but rather making
the requisite change in order for the rebate and the criteria
associated with meeting the tiers to remain the same in conjunction
with the proposed changes to the definition of Step-Up Add TCV outlined
above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ ``ADAV'' means average daily volume calculated as the number
of shares added per day on a monthly basis.
\7\ ``TCV'' means total consolidated volume calculated as the
volume reported by all exchanges and trade reporting facilities to a
consolidated transaction reporting plan for the month for which the
fees apply.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross-Asset Step-Up Tiers
The Exchange is also proposing to amend the criteria for meeting
Tier 3 in the Cross-Asset Step-Up Tiers. Specifically, the Exchange is
proposing to make two changes: to base the tier calculation on a
Member's Step-Up Add TCV from December 2014; and to lower the threshold
required to meet Tier 3 from 0.20% to 0.15%. Currently, in order to
meet Tier 3 of the Cross-Asset Step-Up Tier and receive a $0.0032
rebate per share that adds liquidity: (i) a Member's ADAV as a
percentage of TCV must be equal to or greater than 0.20%; and (ii) the
Member's Options Step-Up Add TCV \8\ must be equal to or greater than
0.60%. The Exchange is not proposing to amend requirement (ii). The
Exchange is proposing to amend requirement (i) such that a Member must
have a Step-Up Add TCV from December 2014 of at least 0.15% instead of
an ADAV as a percentage of TCV of at least 0.20%, which will encourage
increased participation on the Exchange by requiring that a Member
increases its participation on the Exchange as compared to December
2014, rather than maintaining a static ADAV as a percentage of TCV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ ``Options Step-Up Add TCV'' means ADAV as a percentage of
TCV in January 2014 subtracted from current ADAV as a percentage of
TCV, using the definitions of ADAV and TCV as provided under the
Exchange's fee schedule for BATS Options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to implement the amendments to its fee
schedule effective February 10, 2015.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and,
in particular, with the requirements of Section 6 of the Act.\9\
Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Sections 6(b)(4) of the Act and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\
in that it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among members and other persons using any
facility or system which the Exchange operates or controls. The
Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily direct order flow to competing venues
if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that its proposal to eliminate ROLF from fee
code BO represents an equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees,
and other charges among Members and other persons using its facilities.
The proposed change is in response to LavaFlow's announcement that it
will cease market operations and its last day of trading will be
Friday, January 30, 2015. The Exchange notes that the proposed change
is not designed to amend any fee or rebate, nor alter the manner in
which the Exchange assesses fees and rebates. As of February 2, 2015,
the Exchange will no longer route orders to LavaFlow and, therefore,
proposes to remove ROLF from the fee schedule, which will make the fee
schedule clearer and less confusing for investors as well as help to
eliminate potential investor confusion, thereby removing impediments to
and perfecting the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, protecting investors and the public
interest.
The Exchange also believes that the proposed non-substantive change
to the definition of Step-Up Add TCV and the corresponding non-
substantive change to the Step-Up Tiers are reasonable, fair, and
equitable because they are designed to make the fee schedule easier to
comprehend in light of the decision to add an additional baseline
month, as described above. The Exchange notes that neither of the
proposed changes are designed to amend any fee or rebate, nor alter the
manner in which the Exchange assesses fees and rebates. These non-
substantive changes to the fee schedule are intended to make the fee
schedule clearer and less confusing for investors and eliminate
potential investor confusion, thereby removing impediments to and
perfecting the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, protecting investors and the public
interest.
The Exchange also believes that the proposed change to measure the
Member's Step-Up Add TCV from December 2014 instead of ADAV as a
percentage of TCV is reasonable, fair, and equitable because it will
incentive Members to increase their participation on the Exchange as
compared to December 2014, rather than maintaining a static ADAV as a
percentage of TCV. The Exchange further believes that the proposal is
reasonable, fair, and equitable because the increased liquidity from
incentivizing Members to increase their participation on the Exchange
will benefit all investors by deepening the liquidity pool on the
Exchange, supporting the quality of price discovery, promoting market
transparency, and improving investor protection. The Exchange also
believes that lowering the threshold to meet the requirement from 0.20%
to 0.15% is reasonable, fair, and equitable because the measurement is
changing from a measure of total added volume (ADAV
[[Page 10737]]
as a percentage of TCV) into a measure of the increase of added volume
as compared to December 2014 (Step-Up Add TCV from December 2014) and
the reduction will make it easier for Members to achieve Cross-Asset
Step-Up Tier 3. The Exchange believes that step-up pricing programs
such as that proposed herein reward a Member's growth pattern and that
such increased volume increases the potential revenue to the Exchange,
which will allow the Exchange to continue to provide and potentially
expand the incentive programs operated by the Exchange. Such pricing
programs are also fair and equitable in that they are available to all
Members. Further, volume-based rebates and fees such as the ones
maintained by the Exchange, including those amendments proposed herein,
have been widely adopted by equities and options exchanges and are
equitable because they are open to all Members on an equal basis and
provide additional benefits or discounts that are reasonably related to
the value to an exchange's market quality associated with higher levels
of market activity, such as higher levels of liquidity provision and/or
growth patterns, and introduction of higher volumes of orders into the
price and volume discovery processes. Further, the Exchange believes
that the Cross-Asset Step-Up Tiers will provide such enhancements in
market quality on the Exchange by incentivizing increased participation
by Members attempting to meet Tier 3. Accordingly, the Exchange
believes that the proposed amendments to the Cross-Asset Step-Up Tiers
and the incentives associated therewith are not unfairly discriminatory
because they will apply uniformly to all Members and are consistent
with the overall goals of enhancing market quality on the Exchange.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. To
the contrary, the Exchange believes that the proposed changes to the
Cross-Asset Step-Up Tiers will allow the Exchange to compete more ably
with other execution venues by drawing additional volume to the
Exchange, thereby making it a more desirable destination venue for its
customers. Further, the Exchange does not believe that these proposed
changes represent a significant departure from previous pricing offered
by the Exchange or pricing offered by the Exchange's competitors.
Additionally, Members may opt to disfavor the Exchange's pricing if
they believe that alternatives offer them better value. Accordingly,
the Exchange does not believe that the proposed change will impair the
ability of Members or competing venues to maintain their competitive
standing in the financial markets.
The Exchange also believes that its proposal to remove ROLF from
fee code BO would not affect intermarket nor intramarket competition
because the change is not designed to amend any fee or rebate or to
alter the manner in which the Exchange assesses fees or calculates
rebates. It is simply proposed in response to LavaFlow's announcement
that it will cease market operations following the close of business on
Friday, January 30, 2015.
The Exchange believes that the non-substantive and organizational
changes to the fee schedule would not affect intermarket nor
intramarket competition because none of the proposed changes are
designed to amend any fee or rebate or to alter the manner in which the
Exchange asses fees or rebates. The changes are intended to make the
fee schedule as clear and concise as possible.
As stated above, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily direct
order flow to competing venues if they deem fee structures to be
unreasonable or excessive.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any written comments from members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\12\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If
the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute
proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved
or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BATS-2015-13 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BATS-2015-13. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BATS-2015-13 and should be
submitted on or before March 20, 2015.
[[Page 10738]]
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-04068 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P