Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 10051-10053 [2015-03897]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 37 / Wednesday, February 25, 2015 / Notices the start of the program, are U.S. citizens, and are interested in scientific research. Students selected for this competitive volunteer program will participate in cutting-edge research at NIST, and will work closely with NIST staff scientists and engineers on a specific research problem. The first round of the application process is completed via an on-line application through the Student Information System which collects basic biographical information about the student. This information is reviewed and finalists are invited to submit secondary materials via email to ship@ nist.gov. These secondary materials include a resume, transcript, letters of recommendation, personal statement, and parental consent and commitment form. Affected Public: Individuals or households; local government (public schools). Frequency: Once a year. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. This information collection request may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections currently under review by OMB. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to OIRA_Submission@ omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806. Dated: February 20, 2015. Glenna Mickelson, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. estimated response time is expected to be less than 30 minutes. Burden Hours: 15,000. Needs and Uses: NIST conducts surveys, focus groups, and other customer satisfaction/service data collections. The collected information is needed and will be used to determine the kind and the quality of products, services, and information our key customers want and expect, as well as their satisfaction with and awareness or existing products, services, and information. Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations, individuals or households, not-for-profit institutions. Frequency: On occasion. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary, providing the requested information is necessary to obtain accurate information regarding customer satisfaction with NIST products, services and information. This information collection request may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections currently under review by OMB. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to OIRA_Submission@ omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806. Dated: February 19, 2015. Glenna Mickelson, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2015–03824 Filed 2–24–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–13–P [FR Doc. 2015–03870 Filed 2–24–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE [B–76–2014] The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Agency: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Title: NIST Three-Year Generic Request for Customer Service—Related Data Collections. OMB Control Number: 0693–0031. Form Number(s): None. Type of Request: Regular submission. Number of Respondents: 90,000. Average Hours Per Response: Less than 2 minutes for a response card; 2 hours for focus group participation. The VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Feb 24, 2015 Jkt 235001 Foreign-Trade Zone 45—Portland, Oregon; Revision to Production Authority; Epson Portland, Inc., Subzone 45F; (Inkjet Cartridges and Bulk Ink); Hillsboro, Oregon On October 20, 2014, Epson Portland, Inc. (EPI) submitted a notification of proposed revision to existing production authority to the ForeignTrade Zones (FTZ) Board for EPI’s facility in Hillsboro, Oregon, within Subzone 45F. The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal Register inviting public comment (79 FR 64168–64169, 10–28–2014). The FTZ Board has determined that no further review of the PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 10051 proposed revision to the scope of production authority is warranted at this time. The proposed revision described in the notification is authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.14. Dated: February 19, 2015. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–03895 Filed 2–24–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–583–837] Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On August 21, 2014, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published its preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET film) from Taiwan.1 Based upon our analysis of the comments received, we have made no changes to the margin calculations for these final results and continue to determine that Nan Ya Plastics Corporation (‘‘Nan Ya’’) made sales of subject merchandise to the United States at below normal value. The final dumping margin is listed below in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATED: Effective Date: February 25, 2015.2 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Milton Koch or Toni Page at (202) 482– 2584, or (202) 482–1398, respectively; AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. AGENCY: 1 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012– 2013, 79 FR 49496 (August 21, 2014) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 2 Due to the closure of the Federal Government in Washington, DC on February 17, 2015, the Department reached this determination on the next business day (i.e., February 18, 2015). See Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM 25FEN1 10052 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 37 / Wednesday, February 25, 2015 / Notices SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On August 21, 2014, the Department published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review. The administrative review covers one producer and exporter of the subject merchandise to the United States, Nan Ya. On January 8, 2014, the Department published a notice rescinding the review with respect to Shinkong Materials Technology Corporation.3 The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013. We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. Nan Ya timely filed a case brief on September 29, 2014; however, the Department rejected the case brief for containing new factual information. Nan Ya resubmitted its case brief on October 14, 2014. Petitioners timely filed a rebuttal brief on October 21, 2014. Scope of the Order The products covered by the antidumping duty order are all gauges of raw, pretreated, or primed polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip, whether extruded or coextruded. Excluded are metalized films and other finished films that have had at least one of their surfaces modified by the application of a performance-enhancing resinous or inorganic layer of more than 0.00001 inches thick. Imports of polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip are currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) under item number 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. The written description of the scope of the antidumping duty order is dispositive. asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Analysis of Comments Received The sole issue raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties regarding differential pricing methodology is addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is dated concurrently with these final results and incorporated herein by reference.4 The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file in the Central Records Unit (‘‘CRU’’), Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building, as well as 3 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film From Taiwan: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 1362 (January 8, 2014). 4 See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from Taiwan; 2012–2013,’’ dated February 18, 2015 (Issues and Decision Memorandum). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Feb 24, 2015 Jkt 235001 electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the CRU. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at https://www.trade.gov/enforcement. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made no adjustments to the margin calculations for Nan Ya. Final Results of Review We determine that Nan Ya’s weighted-average dumping margin is 1.56 percent for entries of subject merchandise that were produced and/or exported by Nan Ya and that entered, or were withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the period July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013. Assessment Rates The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review. For any individually examined respondents whose weightedaverage dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.5 percent) in the final results, we will calculate importerspecific ad valorem duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer’s examined sales to the total entered value of those sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is above de minimis. Where either the respondent’s weighted average dumping margin is zero or below de minimis or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or below de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. The Department clarified its ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on May 6, 2003.5 5 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (‘‘Assessment Policy Notice’’). PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 This clarification will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by each respondent for which they did not know that their merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.6 Cash Deposit Requirements The following deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of PET film from Taiwan entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’): (1) The cash deposit rate for Nan Ya will be the rate established in the final results of this review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the lessthan-fair-value investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and, (4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any previous review, the cash deposit rate will be the all others rate for this proceeding, 2.40 percent, as established in the less-thanfair-value investigation.7 These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Disclosure We will disclose the calculations performed within five days of the date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice is the only reminder to parties subject to the administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 6 For a full discussion of this clarification, see Assessment Policy Notice. 7 See Notice of Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) From Taiwan, 67 FR 44174 (July 1, 2002), as corrected in Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) from Taiwan, 67 FR 46566 (July 15, 2002). E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM 25FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 37 / Wednesday, February 25, 2015 / Notices disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. These final results of administrative review and notice are published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: February 18, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2015–03897 Filed 2–24–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [Application No. 99–8A005] Export Trade Certificate of Review Notice of Application to Amend the Export Trade Certificate of Review Issued to California Almond Export Association, LLC (‘‘CAEA’’), Application No. (99–8A005). ACTION: The Office of Trade and Economic Analysis (‘‘OTEA’’) of the International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, has received an application to amend an Export Trade Certificate of Review (‘‘Certificate’’). This notice summarizes the proposed amendment and requests comments relevant to whether the amended Certificate should be issued. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Flynn, Director, Office of Trade and Economic Analysis, International Trade Administration, (202) 482–5131 (this is not a toll-free number) or email at etca@trade.gov. asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:05 Feb 24, 2015 Jkt 235001 Title III of the Export Trading Company Act of 1982 (15 U.S.C. Sections 4001–21) (‘‘the Act’’) authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to issue Export Trade Certificates of Review. An Export Trade Certificate of Review protects the holder and the members identified in the Certificate from State and Federal government antitrust actions and from private treble damage antitrust actions for the export conduct specified in the Certificate and carried out in compliance with its terms and conditions. The regulations implementing Title III are found at 15 CFR part 325 (2014). Section 302(b)(1) of the Export Trade Company Act of 1982 and 15 CFR 325.6(a) require the Secretary to publish a notice in the Federal Register identifying the applicant and summarizing its application. Under 15 CFR 325.6(a), interested parties may, within twenty days after the date of this notice, submit written comments to the Secretary on the application. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Request for Public Comments Interested parties may submit written comments relevant to the determination whether an amended Certificate should be issued. If the comments include any privileged or confidential business information, it must be clearly marked and a nonconfidential version of the comments (identified as such) should be included. Any comments not marked as privileged or confidential business information will be deemed to be nonconfidential. An original and five (5) copies, plus two (2) copies of the nonconfidential version, should be submitted no later than 20 days after the date of this notice to: Export Trading Company Affairs, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 21028, Washington, DC 20230. Information submitted by any person is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). However, nonconfidential versions of the comments will be made available to the applicant if necessary for determining whether or not to issue the amended Certificate. Comments should refer to this application as ‘‘Export Trade Certificate of Review, application number 99–8A005.’’ Summary of the Application Applicant: California Almond Export Association, LLC (‘‘CAEA’’), 4800 Sisk Road Modesto, CA 95356. Contact: Bill Morecraft, Chairman, Telephone: (916) 446–8537. Application No.: 99–8A005. PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 10053 Date Deemed Submitted: February 6, 2014. Proposed Amendment: CAEA seeks to amend its Certificate to delete the following company as a Member of CAEA’s Certificate: Minturn Nut Company, Inc., Le Grand, CA. CAEA’s proposed amendment of its Export Trade Certificate of Review would result in the following companies as Members under the Certificate: Almonds California Pride, Inc., Caruthers, CA, Baldwin-Minkler Farms, Orland, CA, Blue Diamond Growers, Sacramento, CA, Campos Brothers, Caruthers, CA, Chico Nut Company, Chico, CA, Del Rio Nut Company, Inc., Livingston, CA, Fair Trade Corner, Inc., Chico, CA, Fisher Nut Company, Modesto, CA, Hilltop Ranch, Inc., Ballico, CA, Hughson Nut, Inc., Hughson, CA, Mariani Nut Company, Winters, CA, Nutco, LLC d.b.a. Spycher Brothers, Turlock, CA, Paramount Farms, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, P–R Farms, Inc., Clovis, CA, Roche Brothers International Family Nut Co., Escalon, CA, South Valley Almond Company, LLC, Wasco, CA, Sunny Gem, LLC, Wasco, CA, Western Nut Company, Chico, CA. Dated: February 19, 2015. Joseph Flynn, Director, Office of Trade and Economic Analysis, International Trade Administration. [FR Doc. 2015–03784 Filed 2–24–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Trade Mission to South Africa, Kenya and Mozambique International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Replacement of Trade Mission Statement. AGENCY: The United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration is replacing a notice published June 14, 2014, at 79 FR 36290, for the Trade Mission to South Africa and Mozambique, With an Optional Stop in Kenya; February 23– 27, 2015. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Replacement of Trade Mission Statement. SUMMARY: Background The United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration is replacing its Trade Mission to South Africa and E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM 25FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 37 (Wednesday, February 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10051-10053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03897]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-583-837]


Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From Taiwan: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On August 21, 2014, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') published its preliminary results of the administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene terephthalate 
film, sheet, and strip (PET film) from Taiwan.\1\ Based upon our 
analysis of the comments received, we have made no changes to the 
margin calculations for these final results and continue to determine 
that Nan Ya Plastics Corporation (``Nan Ya'') made sales of subject 
merchandise to the United States at below normal value. The final 
dumping margin is listed below in the ``Final Results of Review'' 
section of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From 
Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 49496 (August 21, 2014) (``Preliminary 
Results'').

DATED: Effective Date: February 25, 2015.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Due to the closure of the Federal Government in Washington, 
DC on February 17, 2015, the Department reached this determination 
on the next business day (i.e., February 18, 2015). See Notice of 
Clarification: Application of ``Next Business Day'' Rule for 
Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 
1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Milton Koch or Toni Page at (202) 482-
2584, or (202) 482-1398, respectively; AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, 
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230.

[[Page 10052]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    On August 21, 2014, the Department published the Preliminary 
Results of this administrative review. The administrative review covers 
one producer and exporter of the subject merchandise to the United 
States, Nan Ya. On January 8, 2014, the Department published a notice 
rescinding the review with respect to Shinkong Materials Technology 
Corporation.\3\ The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2012, through 
June 30, 2013. We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary 
Results. Nan Ya timely filed a case brief on September 29, 2014; 
however, the Department rejected the case brief for containing new 
factual information. Nan Ya resubmitted its case brief on October 14, 
2014. Petitioners timely filed a rebuttal brief on October 21, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film From Taiwan: Partial 
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 
FR 1362 (January 8, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the antidumping duty order are all gauges 
of raw, pretreated, or primed polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, 
and strip, whether extruded or coextruded. Excluded are metalized films 
and other finished films that have had at least one of their surfaces 
modified by the application of a performance-enhancing resinous or 
inorganic layer of more than 0.00001 inches thick. Imports of 
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip are currently 
classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
(``HTSUS'') under item number 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are 
provided for convenience and customs purposes. The written description 
of the scope of the antidumping duty order is dispositive.

Analysis of Comments Received

    The sole issue raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties 
regarding differential pricing methodology is addressed in the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum, which is dated concurrently with these final 
results and incorporated herein by reference.\4\ The Issues and 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file in the Central 
Records Unit (``CRU''), Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce 
building, as well as electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and in the CRU. In addition, a complete version of the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet 
at https://www.trade.gov/enforcement. The signed Issues and Decision 
Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, ``Decision Memorandum for Final Results 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Polyethylene 
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from Taiwan; 2012-2013,'' dated 
February 18, 2015 (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our analysis of the comments received, we have made no 
adjustments to the margin calculations for Nan Ya.

Final Results of Review

    We determine that Nan Ya's weighted-average dumping margin is 1.56 
percent for entries of subject merchandise that were produced and/or 
exported by Nan Ya and that entered, or were withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption during the period July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013.

Assessment Rates

    The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all 
appropriate entries. The Department intends to issue assessment 
instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final 
results of this review. For any individually examined respondents whose 
weighted-average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.5 percent) 
in the final results, we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem 
duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping 
calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value 
of those sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). We will 
instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries 
covered by this review when the importer-specific assessment rate 
calculated in the final results of this review is above de minimis. 
Where either the respondent's weighted average dumping margin is zero 
or below de minimis or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or 
below de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 
entries without regard to antidumping duties. The Department clarified 
its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on May 6, 2003.\5\ This 
clarification will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the 
POR produced by each respondent for which they did not know that their 
merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances, we 
will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others 
rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in 
the transaction.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) 
(``Assessment Policy Notice'').
    \6\ For a full discussion of this clarification, see Assessment 
Policy Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of PET film from Taiwan entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 
for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final 
results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''): (1) 
The cash deposit rate for Nan Ya will be the rate established in the 
final results of this review; (2) for previously reviewed or 
investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will 
continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent 
period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a 
prior review, or the less-than-fair-value investigation, but the 
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for 
the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and, 
(4) if neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in 
this or any previous review, the cash deposit rate will be the all 
others rate for this proceeding, 2.40 percent, as established in the 
less-than-fair-value investigation.\7\ These deposit requirements, when 
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Notice of Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination 
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: 
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) From 
Taiwan, 67 FR 44174 (July 1, 2002), as corrected in Notice of 
Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 
Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and 
Strip (PET Film) from Taiwan, 67 FR 46566 (July 15, 2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We will disclose the calculations performed within five days of the 
date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice is the only reminder to parties subject to the 
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information

[[Page 10053]]

disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or 
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order 
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the 
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    These final results of administrative review and notice are 
published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 
Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).

    Dated: February 18, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-03897 Filed 2-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.