Self-Regulatory Organizations; ISE Gemini, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Extend the Limit Up-Limit Down Obvious Error Pilot, 10175-10177 [2015-03822]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 37 / Wednesday, February 25, 2015 / Notices
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change
does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 13 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.14
The Exchange has asked the
Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay so that the proposal may
become operative immediately upon
filing. The Exchange stated that waiver
of this requirement will allow the
Exchange to compete with other
exchanges with similar provisions
without putting the Exchange at a
competitive disadvantage. For this
reason, the Commission believes that
the proposed rule change presents no
novel issues and that waiver of the 30day operative delay is consistent with
the protection of investors and the
public interest; and will allow the
Exchange to remain competitive with
other exchanges. Therefore, the
Commission designates the proposed
rule change to be operative upon
filing.15
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
13 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). As required under Rule
19b–4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the
Commission with written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and the text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the Commission.
15 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
14 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Feb 24, 2015
Jkt 235001
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
MIAX–2015–10 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MIAX–2015–10. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–MIAX–
2015–10 and should be submitted on or
before March 18, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74311; File No. SR–
ISEGemini–2015–05]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ISE
Gemini, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change to Extend the Limit UpLimit Down Obvious Error Pilot
February 19, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on February
19, 2015, ISE Gemini, LLC (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘ISE Gemini’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
ISE Gemini proposes to extend a pilot
program under Rule 703A(d) that
suspends Rule 720 regarding obvious
errors during Limit and Straddle States
in securities that underlie options
traded on the Exchange. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Internet Web site at https://
www.ise.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
[FR Doc. 2015–03810 Filed 2–24–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
1 15
16 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10175
2 17
E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
25FEN1
10176
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 37 / Wednesday, February 25, 2015 / Notices
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
Rule 703A(d), which was adopted as
part of the Exchange’s Form 1
application for registration as a national
securities exchange,3 is designed to
address certain issues related to the Plan
to Address Extraordinary Market
Volatility Pursuant to Rule 608 of
Regulation NMS under the Act (the
‘‘Limit Up-Limit Down Plan’’ or the
‘‘Plan’’).4 Specifically, pursuant to a
pilot program adopted under Rule
703A(d), the Exchange excludes
transactions executed during a Limit
State 5 or Straddle State 6 from the
obvious error provisions of Rule 720.
The purpose of this filing is to extend
the effectiveness of the pilot program to
coincide with the proposed extension of
the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan to
October 23, 2015.7
The Exchange believes the benefits to
market participants from this provision
should continue on a pilot basis. The
Exchange continues to believe that
adding certainty to the execution of
orders in Limit or Straddle States will
encourage market participants to
continue to provide liquidity to the
Exchange, and, thus, promote a fair and
orderly market during these periods.
Barring this provision, the obvious error
provisions of Rule 720 would likely
apply in many instances during Limit
and Straddle States. The Exchange
believes that continuing the pilot will
protect against any unanticipated
3 The Securities and Exchange Commission
granted the Exchange’s application for registration
as a national securities exchange on July 26, 2013.
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. Release
No. 70050 (July 26, 2013), 78 FR 46622 (Aug. 1,
2013).
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091
(May 31, 2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012) (the
‘‘Limit Up-Limit Down Release’’).
5 The term ‘‘Limit State’’ means the condition
when the national best bid or national best offer for
an underlying security equals an applicable price
band, as determined by the primary listing
exchange for the underlying security. See Rule
703A.
6 The term ‘‘Straddle State’’ means the condition
when the national best bid or national best offer for
an underlying security is non-executable, as
determined by the primary listing exchange for the
underlying security, but the security is not in a
Limit State. See Rule 703A.
7 See Exchange Act Release No. 74110 (January
21, 2015), 80 FR 4321 (January 27, 2015) (Eighth
Amendment to the Limit-Up Limit-Down Plan). The
Exchange notes that the current text of Rule 703A
mistakenly states a pilot period end date of April
8, 2014, which was the prior end date selected by
the options exchanges for this industry wide
initiative. The Exchange has maintained
compliance with Rule 703A, including by
submitting applicable pilot reports subsequent to
this date.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Feb 24, 2015
Jkt 235001
consequences in the options markets
during a Limit or Straddle State. Thus,
the Exchange believes that the
protections of current rule should
continue while the industry gains
further experience operating the Plan.
In connection with this proposed
extension, each month the Exchange
shall provide to the Commission, and
the public, a dataset containing the data
for each Straddle and Limit State in
optionable stocks that had at least one
trade on the Exchange. For each trade
on the Exchange, the Exchange will
provide (a) the stock symbol, option
symbol, time at the start of the Straddle
or Limit State, an indicator for whether
it is a Straddle or Limit State, and (b)
for the trades on the Exchange, the
executed volume, time-weighted quoted
bid-ask spread, time-weighted average
quoted depth at the bid, time-weighted
average quoted depth at the offer, high
execution price, low execution price,
number of trades for which a request for
review for error was received during
Straddle and Limit States, an indicator
variable for whether those options
outlined above have a price change
exceeding 30% during the underlying
stock’s Limit or Straddle State compared
to the last available option price as
reported by OPRA before the start of the
Limit or Straddle State (1 if observe
30% and 0 otherwise), and another
indicator variable for whether the
option price within five minutes of the
underlying stock leaving the Limit or
Straddle State (or halt if applicable) is
30% away from the price before the start
of the Limit or Straddle State.
In addition, the Exchange will
provide to the Commission, and the
public, no later than May 29, 2015,
assessments relating to the impact of the
operation of the obvious error rules
during Limit and Straddle States
including: (1) An evaluation of the
statistical and economic impact of Limit
and Straddle States on liquidity and
market quality in the options markets,
and (2) an assessment of whether the
lack of obvious error rules in effect
during the Straddle and Limit States are
problematic.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder that are
applicable to a national securities
exchange, and, in particular, with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.8
In particular, the proposal is consistent
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,9 because
8 15
9 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
it is designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest. Additionally, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 10 requirement that the rules of
an exchange not be designed to permit
unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
In particular, the Exchange further
believes that it is necessary and
appropriate in the interest of promoting
fair and orderly markets to exclude
transactions executed during a Limit or
Straddle State from certain aspects of
Rule 720. The Exchange believes the
application of the current rule will be
impracticable given the lack of a reliable
national best bid or offer in the options
market during Limit and Straddle
States, and that the resulting actions
(i.e., nullified trades or adjusted prices)
may not be appropriate given market
conditions. Extension of this pilot
would ensure that limit orders that are
filled during a Limit or Straddle State
would have certainty of execution in a
manner that promotes just and equitable
principles of trade, removes
impediments to, and perfects the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system. Thus, the
Exchange believes that the protections
of the pilot should continue while the
industry gains further experience
operating the Plan.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. Specifically,
the Exchange believes that, by extending
the expiration of the pilot, the proposed
rule change will allow for further
analysis of the pilot and a determination
of how the pilot shall be structured in
the future. In doing so, the proposed
rule change will also serve to promote
regulatory clarity and consistency,
thereby reducing burdens on the
marketplace and facilitating investor
protection.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
10 Id.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM
25FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 37 / Wednesday, February 25, 2015 / Notices
Exchange has not received any
unsolicited written comments from
members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change
does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 11 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder.12
The Exchange has asked the
Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay so that the proposal may
become operative immediately upon
filing. The Commission believes that
waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, as it
will allow the obvious error pilot
program to continue uninterrupted
while the industry gains further
experience operating under the Plan,
and avoid any investor confusion that
could result from a temporary
interruption in the pilot program. For
this reason, the Commission designates
the proposed rule change to be operative
upon filing.13
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
11 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). As required under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the
Commission with written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and the text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the Commission.
13 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
12 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Feb 24, 2015
Jkt 235001
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–ISEGemini–2015–05 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISEGemini–2015–05. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
ISEGemini–2015–05, and should be
submitted on or before March 18, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–03822 Filed 2–24–15; 8:45 am]
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74306; File No. SR–BOX–
2015–13]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX
Options Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
a Proposed Rule Change To Extend
the Pilot Program That Suspends
Certain Obvious Error Provisions
During Limit Up-Limit Down States in
Securities That Underlie Options
Traded on the Exchange
February 19, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on February
18, 2015, BOX Options Exchange LLC
(the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the self-regulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Interpretive Material 1 to Rule 7080 to
extend, through October 23, 2015, the
pilot program that suspends certain
obvious error provisions during limit
up-limit down states in securities that
underlie options traded on the
Exchange. The text of the proposed rule
change is available from the principal
office of the Exchange, at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room
and also on the Exchange’s Internet Web
site at https://boxexchange.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
1 15
14 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00134
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10177
2 17
E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
25FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 37 (Wednesday, February 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10175-10177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03822]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-74311; File No. SR-ISEGemini-2015-05]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ISE Gemini, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Extend the Limit
Up-Limit Down Obvious Error Pilot
February 19, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on February 19, 2015, ISE Gemini, LLC (the ``Exchange'' or ``ISE
Gemini'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
ISE Gemini proposes to extend a pilot program under Rule 703A(d)
that suspends Rule 720 regarding obvious errors during Limit and
Straddle States in securities that underlie options traded on the
Exchange. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's Internet Web site at https://www.ise.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries,
set forth in Sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects
of such statements.
[[Page 10176]]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Rule 703A(d), which was adopted as part of the Exchange's Form 1
application for registration as a national securities exchange,\3\ is
designed to address certain issues related to the Plan to Address
Extraordinary Market Volatility Pursuant to Rule 608 of Regulation NMS
under the Act (the ``Limit Up-Limit Down Plan'' or the ``Plan'').\4\
Specifically, pursuant to a pilot program adopted under Rule 703A(d),
the Exchange excludes transactions executed during a Limit State \5\ or
Straddle State \6\ from the obvious error provisions of Rule 720. The
purpose of this filing is to extend the effectiveness of the pilot
program to coincide with the proposed extension of the Limit Up-Limit
Down Plan to October 23, 2015.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Securities and Exchange Commission granted the
Exchange's application for registration as a national securities
exchange on July 26, 2013. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
Release No. 70050 (July 26, 2013), 78 FR 46622 (Aug. 1, 2013).
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091 (May 31,
2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012) (the ``Limit Up-Limit Down
Release'').
\5\ The term ``Limit State'' means the condition when the
national best bid or national best offer for an underlying security
equals an applicable price band, as determined by the primary
listing exchange for the underlying security. See Rule 703A.
\6\ The term ``Straddle State'' means the condition when the
national best bid or national best offer for an underlying security
is non-executable, as determined by the primary listing exchange for
the underlying security, but the security is not in a Limit State.
See Rule 703A.
\7\ See Exchange Act Release No. 74110 (January 21, 2015), 80 FR
4321 (January 27, 2015) (Eighth Amendment to the Limit-Up Limit-Down
Plan). The Exchange notes that the current text of Rule 703A
mistakenly states a pilot period end date of April 8, 2014, which
was the prior end date selected by the options exchanges for this
industry wide initiative. The Exchange has maintained compliance
with Rule 703A, including by submitting applicable pilot reports
subsequent to this date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the benefits to market participants from this
provision should continue on a pilot basis. The Exchange continues to
believe that adding certainty to the execution of orders in Limit or
Straddle States will encourage market participants to continue to
provide liquidity to the Exchange, and, thus, promote a fair and
orderly market during these periods. Barring this provision, the
obvious error provisions of Rule 720 would likely apply in many
instances during Limit and Straddle States. The Exchange believes that
continuing the pilot will protect against any unanticipated
consequences in the options markets during a Limit or Straddle State.
Thus, the Exchange believes that the protections of current rule should
continue while the industry gains further experience operating the
Plan.
In connection with this proposed extension, each month the Exchange
shall provide to the Commission, and the public, a dataset containing
the data for each Straddle and Limit State in optionable stocks that
had at least one trade on the Exchange. For each trade on the Exchange,
the Exchange will provide (a) the stock symbol, option symbol, time at
the start of the Straddle or Limit State, an indicator for whether it
is a Straddle or Limit State, and (b) for the trades on the Exchange,
the executed volume, time-weighted quoted bid-ask spread, time-weighted
average quoted depth at the bid, time-weighted average quoted depth at
the offer, high execution price, low execution price, number of trades
for which a request for review for error was received during Straddle
and Limit States, an indicator variable for whether those options
outlined above have a price change exceeding 30% during the underlying
stock's Limit or Straddle State compared to the last available option
price as reported by OPRA before the start of the Limit or Straddle
State (1 if observe 30% and 0 otherwise), and another indicator
variable for whether the option price within five minutes of the
underlying stock leaving the Limit or Straddle State (or halt if
applicable) is 30% away from the price before the start of the Limit or
Straddle State.
In addition, the Exchange will provide to the Commission, and the
public, no later than May 29, 2015, assessments relating to the impact
of the operation of the obvious error rules during Limit and Straddle
States including: (1) An evaluation of the statistical and economic
impact of Limit and Straddle States on liquidity and market quality in
the options markets, and (2) an assessment of whether the lack of
obvious error rules in effect during the Straddle and Limit States are
problematic.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that
are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular,
with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\8\ In particular, the
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\9\ because it
is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and
a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \10\ requirement that the
rules of an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination
between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the Exchange further believes that it is necessary
and appropriate in the interest of promoting fair and orderly markets
to exclude transactions executed during a Limit or Straddle State from
certain aspects of Rule 720. The Exchange believes the application of
the current rule will be impracticable given the lack of a reliable
national best bid or offer in the options market during Limit and
Straddle States, and that the resulting actions (i.e., nullified trades
or adjusted prices) may not be appropriate given market conditions.
Extension of this pilot would ensure that limit orders that are filled
during a Limit or Straddle State would have certainty of execution in a
manner that promotes just and equitable principles of trade, removes
impediments to, and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system. Thus, the Exchange believes that the
protections of the pilot should continue while the industry gains
further experience operating the Plan.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Specifically, the Exchange
believes that, by extending the expiration of the pilot, the proposed
rule change will allow for further analysis of the pilot and a
determination of how the pilot shall be structured in the future. In
doing so, the proposed rule change will also serve to promote
regulatory clarity and consistency, thereby reducing burdens on the
marketplace and facilitating investor protection.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The
[[Page 10177]]
Exchange has not received any unsolicited written comments from members
or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative
delay so that the proposal may become operative immediately upon
filing. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay
is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest,
as it will allow the obvious error pilot program to continue
uninterrupted while the industry gains further experience operating
under the Plan, and avoid any investor confusion that could result from
a temporary interruption in the pilot program. For this reason, the
Commission designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon
filing.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-ISEGemini-2015-05 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISEGemini-2015-05. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISEGemini-2015-05, and
should be submitted on or before March 18, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-03822 Filed 2-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P