Certain 3G Mobile Handsets and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion of Complainants Interdigital Communications Corp. and Interdigital Technology Corp. To Substitute Parties, 9281-9282 [2015-03513]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 34 / Friday, February 20, 2015 / Notices TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES the [2007 Final Environmental Impact Statement] on a one billion barrel estimate of total economically recoverable oil was arbitrary and capricious.’’ The Ninth Circuit remanded the case to the District Court, which further remanded the matter to BOEM on April 24, 2014. BOEM has prepared a Final Second SEIS for Lease Sale 193 in accordance with the April 24, 2014, remand order of the District Court. The Final Second SEIS addresses the deficiencies identified in the Ninth Circuit opinion by analyzing the reasonably foreseeable environmental effects of the full range of likely production if oil production were to occur. The Final Second SEIS is available on BOEM’s Web site at https:// www.boem.gov/ak193/. In keeping with the Department of the Interior’s mission to protect natural resources and to limit costs, while ensuring availability of the document to the public, BOEM will primarily distribute digital copies of the Final Second SEIS on compact discs. BOEM has printed and will be distributing a limited number of paper copies. If requested, BOEM will provide a paper copy if copies are still available. You may request a paper copy by calling (907) 334–5200 or the toll free number at 800–764–2627. BOEM has distributed the Final Second SEIS for viewing at the following libraries in Alaska: Alaska Resources Library and Information Service (Anchorage); University of Alaska Anchorage, Consortium Library; Alaska Pacific University, Academic Support Center Library; University of Alaska Fairbanks, Institute of Arctic Biology; University of Alaska Fairbanks, Elmer E. Rasmuson Library; Nellie Weyiouanna Ilisaavik Library, Shishmaref; Katie Tokienna Memorial Library, Wales; Noel Wien Library, Fairbanks; Kaveolook School Library, Kaktovik; Koyuk City Library; Tikigaq Library, Point Hope; Trapper School Community Library, Nuiqsut; downtown Juneau Public Library; University of Alaska Southeast Library, Juneau; Alaska State Library, Juneau; and Kegoyah Kozga Public Library, Nome. Authority: This Notice of Availability of the Final Second SEIS is in compliance with NEPA, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4231 et seq.), and is published pursuant to 43 CFR 46.415. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Routhier, Program Analysis Officer and Project Manager, BOEM, Alaska OCS Region, 3801 Centerpoint Drive, Suite 500, Anchorage, Alaska 99503–5823 or by telephone at (907) 334–5200. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:07 Feb 19, 2015 Jkt 235001 Dated: February 6, 2015. Abigail Ross Hopper, Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. [FR Doc. 2015–03373 Filed 2–19–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–613 (Remand)] Certain 3G Mobile Handsets and Components Thereof; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion of Complainants Interdigital Communications Corp. and Interdigital Technology Corp. To Substitute Parties U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 53) granting a motion of complainants InterDigital Communications Corp. of King of Prussia, Pennsylvania and InterDigital Technology Corp. of Wilmington, Delaware (collectively, ‘‘InterDigital’’) to substitute parties. The Notice of Investigation is amended accordingly. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2301. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337– TA–613 on September 11, 2007, based on a complaint filed by InterDigital on August 7, 2007. 72 FR 51838 (Sept. 11, SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 9281 2007). The complaint, as amended, alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 1337) (‘‘section 337’’) in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain 3G mobile handsets and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,117,004; 7,190,966 (‘‘the ’966 patent’’); 7,286,847 (‘‘the ’847 patent’’); and 6,973,579. The Notice of Investigation named Nokia Corporation of Espoo, Finland and Nokia Inc. of Irving, Texas (collectively, ‘‘Nokia’’) as respondents. Id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations was named as a participating party. Id. On July 18, 2014, the Commission amended the Notice of Investigation (‘‘NOI’’) to add Microsoft Mobile OY (‘‘MMO’’) as a party. 79 FR 43068 (July 24, 2014). On August 14, 2009, the ALJ issued his final ID, finding no violation of section 337. On October 16, 2009, the Commission determined to review the final ID in part and terminated the investigation with a finding of no violation. 74 FR 55068 (Oct. 26, 2009). InterDigital timely appealed the Commission’s final determination of no violation of section 337 as to all of the asserted claims of the ’966 patent and claim 5 of the ’847 patent to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On August 1, 2012, the Federal Circuit reversed the Commission’s construction of two claim limitations found in the appealed patents-in-suit, reversed the Commission’s determination of noninfringement as to the asserted claims of those patents, and remanded to the Commission for further proceedings. InterDigital Commc’ns, LLC v. Int’l Trade Comm’n., 690 F.3d 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2012). On February 12, 2014, the Commission issued a Notice, Order, and Opinion deciding certain aspects of the investigation and remanding other aspects to the chief administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’). 79 FR 9277 (Feb. 18, 2014); see also Comm’n Op. Remanding Investigation (Feb. 12, 2014); Comm’n Order Remanding Investigation (Feb. 12, 2014). On February 24, 2014, Nokia petitioned for reconsideration of the Commission’s remand Order and Opinion. On March 24, 2014, the Commission granted in part the petition for reconsideration and issued a revised remand notice, order, and opinion. 79 FR 17571 (Mar. 28, 2014). On December 1, 2014, InterDigital filed a motion to substitute InterDigital Communications, Inc. for InterDigital Communications Corp. The motion stated that the Commission investigative E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM 20FEN1 9282 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 34 / Friday, February 20, 2015 / Notices attorney did not oppose the motion. On December 11, 2014, respondents Nokia, Inc. and MMO (collectively ‘‘Respondents’’) filed an opposition to the motion. On January 14, 2014, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting InterDigital’s motion. On January 22, 2015, Respondents filed a petition for review of the subject ID. On January 29, 2015, InterDigital and the IA each filed responses to the petition. On February 10, 2015, Respondents filed a motion for leave to reply to InterDigital’s response. On February 11, 2015, InterDigital filed an opposition to the motion. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The Commission has further determined to not grant Respondents’ motion for leave to file a reply. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: February 13, 2015. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2015–03513 Filed 2–19–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB Number 1121–0312] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Reinstatement, With Change, of a Previously Approved Collection for Which Approval Has Expired: 2014 Survey of State Criminal History Information Systems Bureau of Justice Statistics, Department of Justice. ACTION: 30-day notice. AGENCY: The Department of Justice, DOJ, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register at Volume 79, Number 244, page 75837, December 19, 2014, allowing for a 60 day comment period. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for an additional 30 days until March 23, 2015. TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:07 Feb 19, 2015 Jkt 235001 If you have additional comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Devon Adams, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 810 Seventh St. NW., Washington, DC 20531 (email: Devon.Adams@usdoj.gov; telephone: 202–514–9157). Written comments and/ or suggestions can also be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20530 or sent to OIRA_submissions@ omb.eop.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Evaluate whether and if so how the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected can be enhanced; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Overview of This Information Collection (1) Type of Information Collection: Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired. (2) Title of the Form/Collection: Survey of State Criminal History Information Systems. (3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department of Justice sponsoring the collection: There is no form number. The applicable component within the Department of Justice is the Bureau of Justice Statistics, in the Office of Justice Programs. PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 (4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: State Government. This information collection is a survey of State record repositories to estimate the percentage of total state records that are immediately available through the FBI’s Interstate Identification Index and the percentage of records that are complete and fingerprint-supported. (5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: It is estimated that 56 respondents will expend approximately 6.2 hours to complete the survey once every two years. (6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: There are an estimated 347 total annual burden hours associated with this collection. If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E.405B, Washington, DC 20530. Dated: February 17, 2015. Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice. [FR Doc. 2015–03528 Filed 2–19–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–18–P LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION Sunshine Act Meeting NOTICE: Cancellation. The Legal Services Corporation’s Board of Directors and Finance Committee meetings scheduled for February 19, 2015 at 4:00 p.m., EDT, have been canceled. These meetings were noticed in the Friday, February 13, 2015 issue of the Federal Register, 80 FR 8110. DATE AND TIME: CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Katherine Ward, Executive Assistant to the Vice President & General Counsel, at (202) 295–1500. Questions may be sent by electronic mail to FR_NOTICE_ QUESTIONS@lsc.gov. Dated: February 18, 2015. Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant General Counsel. [FR Doc. 2015–03547 Filed 2–18–15; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 7050–01–P E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM 20FEN1

Agencies

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 34 (Friday, February 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9281-9282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03513]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-613 (Remand)]


Certain 3G Mobile Handsets and Components Thereof; Commission 
Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion 
of Complainants Interdigital Communications Corp. and Interdigital 
Technology Corp. To Substitute Parties

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 53) 
granting a motion of complainants InterDigital Communications Corp. of 
King of Prussia, Pennsylvania and InterDigital Technology Corp. of 
Wilmington, Delaware (collectively, ``InterDigital'') to substitute 
parties. The Notice of Investigation is amended accordingly.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2301. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted Inv. No. 337-TA-
613 on September 11, 2007, based on a complaint filed by InterDigital 
on August 7, 2007. 72 FR 51838 (Sept. 11, 2007). The complaint, as 
amended, alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 
as amended, (19 U.S.C. 1337) (``section 337'') in the importation into 
the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the 
United States after importation of certain 3G mobile handsets and 
components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. 
Patent Nos. 7,117,004; 7,190,966 (``the '966 patent''); 7,286,847 
(``the '847 patent''); and 6,973,579. The Notice of Investigation named 
Nokia Corporation of Espoo, Finland and Nokia Inc. of Irving, Texas 
(collectively, ``Nokia'') as respondents. Id. The Office of Unfair 
Import Investigations was named as a participating party. Id. On July 
18, 2014, the Commission amended the Notice of Investigation (``NOI'') 
to add Microsoft Mobile OY (``MMO'') as a party. 79 FR 43068 (July 24, 
2014).
    On August 14, 2009, the ALJ issued his final ID, finding no 
violation of section 337. On October 16, 2009, the Commission 
determined to review the final ID in part and terminated the 
investigation with a finding of no violation. 74 FR 55068 (Oct. 26, 
2009).
    InterDigital timely appealed the Commission's final determination 
of no violation of section 337 as to all of the asserted claims of the 
'966 patent and claim 5 of the '847 patent to the U.S. Court of Appeals 
for the Federal Circuit. On August 1, 2012, the Federal Circuit 
reversed the Commission's construction of two claim limitations found 
in the appealed patents-in-suit, reversed the Commission's 
determination of non-infringement as to the asserted claims of those 
patents, and remanded to the Commission for further proceedings. 
InterDigital Commc'ns, LLC v. Int'l Trade Comm'n., 690 F.3d 1318 (Fed. 
Cir. 2012).
    On February 12, 2014, the Commission issued a Notice, Order, and 
Opinion deciding certain aspects of the investigation and remanding 
other aspects to the chief administrative law judge (``ALJ''). 79 FR 
9277 (Feb. 18, 2014); see also Comm'n Op. Remanding Investigation (Feb. 
12, 2014); Comm'n Order Remanding Investigation (Feb. 12, 2014). On 
February 24, 2014, Nokia petitioned for reconsideration of the 
Commission's remand Order and Opinion. On March 24, 2014, the 
Commission granted in part the petition for reconsideration and issued 
a revised remand notice, order, and opinion. 79 FR 17571 (Mar. 28, 
2014).
    On December 1, 2014, InterDigital filed a motion to substitute 
InterDigital Communications, Inc. for InterDigital Communications Corp. 
The motion stated that the Commission investigative

[[Page 9282]]

attorney did not oppose the motion. On December 11, 2014, respondents 
Nokia, Inc. and MMO (collectively ``Respondents'') filed an opposition 
to the motion.
    On January 14, 2014, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting 
InterDigital's motion. On January 22, 2015, Respondents filed a 
petition for review of the subject ID. On January 29, 2015, 
InterDigital and the IA each filed responses to the petition. On 
February 10, 2015, Respondents filed a motion for leave to reply to 
InterDigital's response. On February 11, 2015, InterDigital filed an 
opposition to the motion.
    The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The 
Commission has further determined to not grant Respondents' motion for 
leave to file a reply.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: February 13, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-03513 Filed 2-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.