Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change To Revise ICC End-of-Day Price Discovery Policies and Procedures, 8729-8730 [2015-03230]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 18, 2015 / Notices
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2015–010 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2015–010. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
offices of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2015–010, and should be
submitted on or before March 11, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–03232 Filed 2–17–15; 8:45 am]
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74257; File No. SR–ICC–
2014–23]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE
Clear Credit LLC; Order Granting
Approval of Proposed Rule Change To
Revise ICC End-of-Day Price Discovery
Policies and Procedures
February 11, 2015.
I. Introduction
On December 18, 2014, ICE Clear
Credit LLC (‘‘ICC’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change SR–ICC–2014–23 pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder.2 The proposed rule
change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on January 5,
2015.3 The Commission received no
comment letters regarding the proposed
change. For the reasons discussed
below, the Commission is granting
approval of the proposed rule change.
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
ICC is proposing this change to revise
the ICC End-of-Day Price Discovery
Policies and Procedures to remove the
ability for Clearing Participants to
submit end-of-day submissions for
Single Name instruments in terms of
spread and associated recovery rate.
This revision does not require any
changes to the ICC Clearing Rules.
ICC requires all Clearing Participants
to provide end-of-day submissions for
specific instruments related to their
cleared open interest. ICC states that it
uses these submissions as inputs to its
price discovery algorithm, which
determines end-of-day levels.
According to ICC, it computes margin
and guaranty fund requirements, and all
other money movements, in price terms,
but currently supports Clearing
Participant submissions in terms of
price (or the equivalent points upfront),
or spread and associated recovery rate.
As a result, according to ICC, the first
step in the price discovery algorithm for
Single Name instruments is to convert
any submissions in terms of spread and
associated recovery rate to the
equivalent submission in price terms
using the ISDA standard model.
ICC therefore proposes to revise its
End-of-Day Price Discovery Policies and
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–73951
(Dec. 29, 2014), 80 FR 269 (Jan. 5, 2015) (SR–ICC–
2014–23).
Procedures to remove the ability for
Clearing Participants to provide end-ofday submissions for Single Name
instruments in terms of spread and
associated recovery rate. Rather, ICC
will require price (or the equivalent
points upfront) submissions for all
Single Name instruments. According to
ICC, this change will result in the
elimination of the use of the ISDA
standard model to determine end-of-day
prices for Single Name instruments.
Furthermore, ICC also proposes to add
clarifying language regarding its
determination of implied recovery rates.
III. Discussion and Commission
Findings
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act 4 directs
the Commission to approve a proposed
rule change of a self-regulatory
organization if the Commission finds
that such proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to such selfregulatory organization. Section
17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 5 requires, among
other things, that the rules of a clearing
agency are designed to promote the
prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions
and, to the extent applicable, derivative
agreements, contracts, and transactions,
to assure the safeguarding of securities
and funds which are in the custody or
control of the clearing agency or for
which it is responsible and, in general,
to protect investors and the public
interest.
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 17A of the Act 6 and the rules
thereunder applicable to ICC. The
revised ICC End-of-Day Price Discovery
Policies and Procedures will ensure ICC
uses data that reflect its Clearing
Participants’ view of the price of a given
Single Name instrument, without the
use of a model to imply a given price,
resulting in an end-of-day price that is
not subject to any potential model
limitations or assumptions. As such, the
Commission believes that the proposed
rule change will promote the prompt
and accurate settlement of securities
and derivatives transactions, and
therefore is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to
ICC, in particular, Section 17A(b)(3)(F).7
1 15
2 17
12 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Feb 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00141
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8729
4 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
6 15 U.S.C. 78q–1.
7 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
5 15
E:\FR\FM\18FEN1.SGM
18FEN1
8730
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 32 / Wednesday, February 18, 2015 / Notices
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission finds that the proposal is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and in particular with the
requirements of Section 17A of the Act 8
and the rules and regulations
thereunder.
It Is Therefore Ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,9 that the
proposed rule change (File No. SR–ICC–
2014–23) be, and hereby is, approved.10
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–03230 Filed 2–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74256; File No. SR–ICC–
2014–21]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE
Clear Credit LLC; Order Approving
Proposed Rule Change To Provide for
the Clearance of Additional Standard
Western European Sovereign Single
Names
February 11, 2015.
I. Introduction
On December 16, 2014, ICE Clear
Credit LLC (‘‘ICC’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change SR–ICC–2014–21 pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder.2 The proposed rule
change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on January 2,
2015.3 The Commission received one
comment.4 For the reasons discussed
below, the Commission is approving the
proposed rule change.
8 15
U.S.C. 78q–1.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
10 In approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposal’s impact on
efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–73941
(Dec. 24, 2014), 80 FR 75 (Jan. 2, 2015) (File No.
SR–ICC–2014–21).
4 See Comment from Anonymous, dated January
23, 2015, available at https://www.sec.gov/
comments/sr-icc-2014-21/icc201421-1.htm (stating
‘‘Good Idea’’).
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
9 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:32 Feb 17, 2015
Jkt 235001
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
ICC proposes to adopt rules that will
provide the basis for ICC to clear
additional credit default swap (‘‘CDS’’)
contracts. Specifically, ICC is proposing
to amend Section 26I of its Rules to
provide for the clearance of additional
Standard Western European Sovereign
CDS contracts (collectively, ‘‘SWES
Contracts’’). ICC has been approved to
clear four SWES Contracts: the Republic
of Ireland, the Italian Republic, the
Portuguese Republic, and the Kingdom
of Spain.5 The proposed changes to the
ICC Rules would provide for the
clearance of additional SWES Contracts,
specifically the Kingdom of Belgium
and the Republic of Austria (the
‘‘Additional SWES Contracts’’).
ICC states that these Additional SWES
Contracts will be offered on the 2003
and 2014 ISDA Credit Derivatives
Definitions. ICC believes that the
addition of these SWES Contracts will
benefit the market for credit default
swaps on Western European sovereigns
by providing market participants the
benefits of clearing, including reduction
in counterparty risk and safeguarding of
margin assets pursuant to clearing house
rules. According to ICC, the clearing of
the additional SWES Contracts will not
require any changes in ICC’s risk
management framework (including
relevant policies) or margin model. ICC
represents that the Additional SWES
Contracts have terms consistent with the
other SWES Contracts which ICC has
been approved to clear and which will
be governed by Subchapter 26I of the
ICC rules, namely the Republic of
Ireland, the Italian Republic, the
Portuguese Republic, and the Kingdom
of Spain.
ICC proposes minor revisions to
Subchapter 26I (Standard Western
European Sovereign (‘‘SWES’’) Single
Name) to provide for clearing the
additional SWES Contracts. Rule 26I–
102 will be modified to include the
Kingdom of Belgium and the Republic
of Austria in the list of specific Eligible
SWES Reference Entities to be cleared
by ICC. Additionally, in ICC Rule 26D–
102 (Definitions), the definition of
‘‘Eligible SES Reference Entity’’ will be
modified to correct a typographical error
and correctly identify the reference
entity for a cleared product as Hungary
(as opposed to the Republic of
Hungary).
5 See Exchange Act Release No. 34–72941(Nov. 5,
2014), 79 FR 67213 (Nov. 12, 2014) (File No. SR–
ICC–2014–14) (order approving rule change to clear
other Western European sovereign CDS contracts)
(the ‘‘Prior WES Order’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00142
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
III. Comments
The Commission received one
comment supporting approval of the
proposed rule change. In this
anonymous comment, the author
expressed general support for the
proposal but did not opine on any
particular aspects of the proposal or
offer any specific comment beyond a
statement of general support.
IV. Discussion and Commission
Findings
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act 6 directs
the Commission to approve a proposed
rule change of a self-regulatory
organization if the Commission finds
that such proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to such selfregulatory organization. Section
17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 7 requires, among
other things, that the rules of a clearing
agency are designed to promote the
prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions
and, to the extent applicable, derivative
agreements, contracts, and transactions,
to assure the safeguarding of securities
and funds which are in the custody or
control of the clearing agency or for
which it is responsible and, in general,
to protect investors and the public
interest.
The Commission finds that clearing of
the Additional SWES Contracts is
consistent with the requirements of
Section 17A of the Act 8 and regulations
thereunder applicable to it, including
the standards under Rule 17Ad–22.9
The proposed change will provide for
clearing of Additional SWES Contracts
in the same manner as other SWES
Contracts. Specifically, the new
contracts will be cleared, and the risk
associated with clearing the new
contracts will be appropriately
managed, pursuant to ICC’s existing
margin and guaranty fund methodology,
operational and managerial procedures,
settlement procedures and default
management policies. The Commission
believes that the proposal is therefore
designed to promote the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions and derivative
agreements, contracts and transactions
cleared by ICC, to assure the
safeguarding of securities and funds in
the custody or control of ICC, and to
protect investors and the public interest,
within the meaning of is designed to
promote the prompt and accurate
6 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
8 15 U.S.C. 78q–1.
9 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22.
7 15
E:\FR\FM\18FEN1.SGM
18FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 32 (Wednesday, February 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8729-8730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03230]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-74257; File No. SR-ICC-2014-23]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Order
Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change To Revise ICC End-of-Day
Price Discovery Policies and Procedures
February 11, 2015.
I. Introduction
On December 18, 2014, ICE Clear Credit LLC (``ICC'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change SR-ICC-2014-23 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\2\ The
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register
on January 5, 2015.\3\ The Commission received no comment letters
regarding the proposed change. For the reasons discussed below, the
Commission is granting approval of the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-73951 (Dec. 29,
2014), 80 FR 269 (Jan. 5, 2015) (SR-ICC-2014-23).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
ICC is proposing this change to revise the ICC End-of-Day Price
Discovery Policies and Procedures to remove the ability for Clearing
Participants to submit end-of-day submissions for Single Name
instruments in terms of spread and associated recovery rate. This
revision does not require any changes to the ICC Clearing Rules.
ICC requires all Clearing Participants to provide end-of-day
submissions for specific instruments related to their cleared open
interest. ICC states that it uses these submissions as inputs to its
price discovery algorithm, which determines end-of-day levels.
According to ICC, it computes margin and guaranty fund
requirements, and all other money movements, in price terms, but
currently supports Clearing Participant submissions in terms of price
(or the equivalent points upfront), or spread and associated recovery
rate. As a result, according to ICC, the first step in the price
discovery algorithm for Single Name instruments is to convert any
submissions in terms of spread and associated recovery rate to the
equivalent submission in price terms using the ISDA standard model.
ICC therefore proposes to revise its End-of-Day Price Discovery
Policies and Procedures to remove the ability for Clearing Participants
to provide end-of-day submissions for Single Name instruments in terms
of spread and associated recovery rate. Rather, ICC will require price
(or the equivalent points upfront) submissions for all Single Name
instruments. According to ICC, this change will result in the
elimination of the use of the ISDA standard model to determine end-of-
day prices for Single Name instruments. Furthermore, ICC also proposes
to add clarifying language regarding its determination of implied
recovery rates.
III. Discussion and Commission Findings
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act \4\ directs the Commission to
approve a proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if the
Commission finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to such self-regulatory organization. Section 17A(b)(3)(F)
of the Act \5\ requires, among other things, that the rules of a
clearing agency are designed to promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities transactions and, to the extent
applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and transactions, to
assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the
custody or control of the clearing agency or for which it is
responsible and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 17A of the Act \6\ and the rules thereunder applicable to
ICC. The revised ICC End-of-Day Price Discovery Policies and Procedures
will ensure ICC uses data that reflect its Clearing Participants' view
of the price of a given Single Name instrument, without the use of a
model to imply a given price, resulting in an end-of-day price that is
not subject to any potential model limitations or assumptions. As such,
the Commission believes that the proposed rule change will promote the
prompt and accurate settlement of securities and derivatives
transactions, and therefore is consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to ICC, in
particular, Section 17A(b)(3)(F).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 8730]]
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act and in
particular with the requirements of Section 17A of the Act \8\ and the
rules and regulations thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It Is Therefore Ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\9\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-ICC-2014-23) be, and
hereby is, approved.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\10\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-03230 Filed 2-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P