Barium Carbonate From the People's Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order, 8286-8287 [2015-03197]
Download as PDF
8286
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 31 / Tuesday, February 17, 2015 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the Department is initiating a CCR of the
antidumping duty order on LEU from
France with respect to AREVA. Based
on the information and documentation
AREVA submitted in its November 10,
2014 letter, we find that we have
received sufficient information to
warrant initiation of a review to
determine if changed circumstances
exist to support the extension of time to
re-export the specified entry of LEU.
Section 351.221 (c)(3)(ii) of the
Department’s regulations permits the
Department to combine the notice of
initiation of a changed circumstances
review and the notice of preliminary
results if the Department concludes that
expedited action is warranted. In this
instance, because we have on the record
the information necessary to make a
preliminary finding, we find that
expedited action is warranted, and have
combined the notice of initiation and
the notice of preliminary results.
Preliminary Results of Expedited
Changed Circumstances Review
Based on the Department’s analysis of
the information provided by AREVA in
its request for a CCR, in accordance with
19 CFR 351.216, we preliminarily
determine that changed circumstances
to extend the time period for reexportation a third time do not exist,
and that AREVA should not be granted
an additional extension of time to reexport this one entry of subject
merchandise.
In its Third CCR Request, AREVA
explained that the Japanese end-user
remained unable to take delivery of the
subject LEU due to conditions caused by
the March 11, 2011 earthquake and
tsunami in Japan, that the Japanese enduser was working to comply with
‘‘detailed and lengthy’’ regulatory
requirements of Japan’s Nuclear
Regulatory Authority, and that AREVA
and the Japanese end-user were unable
to confirm when re-export of the subject
entry of LEU would be possible.9
In the Final Results of Second
Changed Circumstances Review, the
Department stated that ‘‘. . . if the
Japanese end-user is unable to take
delivery by the November 1, 2015
deadline, AREVA, the U.S. importer as
well as the French exporter, will be
required to re-export this sole entry to
France or pay antidumping duties on
the entry at the applicable rate.’’ 10
Given that the situation where the
Japanese end-user would be unable to
take delivery was anticipated in the
previous CCR, we do not consider this
9 See
id. at 3–4.
10 See Final Results of Second Changed
Circumstances Review, 78 FR at 66899.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Feb 13, 2015
Jkt 235001
situation to be ‘‘changed
circumstances.’’
The Department stated in the Final
Results of Second Changed
Circumstances Review,11 that this
would be the final extension, and
further stated in the accompanying
decision memorandum that to allow the
re-export deadline to be extended
indefinitely would mean ‘‘ignoring this
aspect of the scope.’’12
The Department preliminarily
determines that changed circumstances
do not exist beyond the changed
circumstances already recognized in the
two previous changed circumstances
reviews, and that AREVA will not be
granted a further extension to re-export
the specified entry of LEU.
Public Comment
Case briefs from interested parties
may be submitted not later than 30 days
after the date of publication of this
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to the
issues raised in the case briefs, may be
filed no later than 5 days after the
submission of case briefs. All written
comments shall be submitted in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.303. All
submissions are to be filed
electronically using Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS),
and must also be served on interested
parties.13 ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov, and it is available to
all parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room 7046 of the main Department of
Commerce building. An electronically
filed document must be received
successfully in its entirety by the
Department’s electronic records system,
ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the
deadline.14
Any interested party may request a
hearing within 30 days of publication of
this notice. Any hearing, if requested,
will be held no later than 37 days after
the date of publication of this notice, or
the first business day thereafter. Persons
interested in attending the hearing, if
one is requested, should contact the
Department for the date and time of the
hearing.
Notifications to Interested Parties
Consistent with 19 CFR 351.216(e),
we will issue the final results of this
changed circumstances review no later
11 See
id.
Memorandum to Paul Piquado, ‘‘Decision
Memorandum for Final Results of Changed
Circumstances Review of Low Enriched Uranium
from France,’’ October 31, 2013.
13 See 19 CFR 351.303(f).
14 See 19 CFR 351.303(b).
12 See
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
than 270 days after the date on which
this review is initiated, or within 45
days after the date on which this review
is initiated if all parties agree to our
preliminary finding. The final results
will include the Department’s analysis
of issues raised in any written
comments.
We are issuing and publishing these
preliminary results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and
777(i)(1) and (2) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.216.
Dated: February 9, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–03194 Filed 2–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–880]
Barium Carbonate From the People’s
Republic of China: Continuation of
Antidumping Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the
determinations by the Department of
Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) and the
International Trade Commission (the
‘‘ITC’’) that revocation of the
antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) order on
barium carbonate from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) would likely
lead to a continuation or recurrence of
dumping and material injury to an
industry in the United States, the
Department is publishing a notice of
continuation of the antidumping duty
order.
DATES: Effective Date: February 17,
2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–6905.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On August 6, 2003, the Department
published the final determination in the
AD investigation of barium carbonate
from the PRC.1 On October 1, 2003, the
1 See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value: Barium Carbonate From the
People’s Republic of China, 68 FR 46577 (August
6, 2003) (‘‘Final Determination’’).
E:\FR\FM\17FEN1.SGM
17FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 31 / Tuesday, February 17, 2015 / Notices
Department issued the AD order on
barium carbonate from the PRC.2 There
have been no administrative reviews
since issuance of the Order. There have
been no related findings or rulings (e.g.,
changed circumstances review, scope
ruling, duty absorption review) since
issuance of the Order. On January 9,
2009, the Department published the
final results of the expedited first sunset
review of this Order.3 On March 17,
2009, the Department published the
continuation of the Order.4
On February 3, 2014, the Department
initiated the second five-year (‘‘sunset’’)
review of the AD order on barium
carbonate from the PRC pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the ‘‘Act’’).5 As a result of
its review, the Department determined
that revocation of the antidumping duty
order on barium carbonate from the PRC
would likely lead to a continuation or
recurrence of dumping and, therefore,
notified the ITC of the magnitude of the
margins likely to prevail should the
order be revoked.6 On February 6, 2015,
the ITC published its determination,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act,
that revocation of the antidumping duty
order on barium carbonate from the PRC
would likely lead to a continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.7
Scope of the Order
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2 See Antidumping Duty Order: Barium Carbonate
From the People’s Republic of China, 68 FR 56619
(October 1, 2003) (‘‘Order’’).
3 See Barium Carbonate From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited
Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 74
FR 882 (January 9, 2009).
4 See Barium Carbonate From the People’s
Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping
Duty Order, 74 FR 11348 (March 17, 2009).
5 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 79
FR 6163 (February 3, 2014).
6 See Barium Carbonate From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited
Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order, 79 FR 32221 (June 4, 2014) and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.
7 See Barium Carbonate From China:
Determination, 80 FR 6766 (February 6, 2015); see
also Barium Carbonate from China (Inv. No. 731–
TA–1020 (Second Review), USITC Publication
4518, February 2015).
16:51 Feb 13, 2015
Dated: February 9, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–03197 Filed 2–13–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
The merchandise covered by this
order is barium carbonate, regardless of
form or grade. The product is currently
classifiable under subheading
2836.60.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS
subheading is provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
description of the scope of this
proceeding is dispositive.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Continuation of the Order
As a result of the determinations by
the Department and the ITC that
revocation of the AD order would likely
lead to a continuation or recurrence of
dumping and material injury to an
industry in the United States, pursuant
to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, the
Department hereby orders the
continuation of the AD order on barium
carbonate from the PRC. U.S. Customs
and Border Protection will continue to
collect AD cash deposits at the rates in
effect at the time of entry for all imports
of subject merchandise. The effective
date of the continuation of the order
will be the date of publication in the
Federal Register of this notice of
continuation. Pursuant to section
751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department
intends to initiate the next five-year
review of the order not later than 30
days prior to the fifth anniversary of the
effective date of continuation.
This five-year (‘‘sunset’’) review and
this notice are in accordance with
section 751(c) of the Act and published
pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Jkt 235001
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Title: Southeast Region Vessel and
Gear Identification Requirements.
OMB Control Number: 0648–0358.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Request: Regular (revision
and extension of a currently approved
information collection).
Number of Respondents: 7,825.
Average Hours per Response: Vessel
marking, 75 minutes; gear marking
varies from 10 seconds for cultured live
rocks, to 20 minutes for mackerel gillnet
buoys.
Burden Hours: 50,575.
Needs and Uses: This request is for a
regular submission (revision and
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8287
extension of a currently approved
information collection). With this
request, OMB Control No. 0648–0359,
Southeast Region Gear Identification
Requirements is being merged into OMB
Control No. 0648–0358, Southeast
Region Vessel Identification
Requirements.
The National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) Southeast Region manages the
U.S. fisheries in the exclusive economic
zone (EEZ) of the South Atlantic,
Caribbean, and Gulf of Mexico regions
under various Fishery Management
Plans (FMPs). The Regional Fishery
Management Councils prepared the
FMPs pursuant to the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act. The regulations
implementing the FMPs are located at
50 CFR part 622.
The recordkeeping and reporting
requirements at 50 CFR part 622 form
the basis for this collection of
information. NMFS Southeast Region
requires that all permitted fishing
vessels must mark their vessel with the
official identification number or some
form of identification. A vessel’s official
number, under most regulations, is
required to be displayed on the port and
starboard sides of the deckhouse or hull,
and weather deck. The official number
and color code identifies each vessel
and should be visible at distances from
the sea and in the air. These markings
provide law enforcement personnel
with a means to monitor fishing, at-sea
processing, and other related activities,
to ascertain whether the vessel’s
observed activities are in accordance
with those authorized for that vessel.
The identifying number is used by
NMFS, the United States Coast Guard
(USCG) and other marine agencies in
issuing violations, prosecutions, and
other enforcement actions. Vessels that
qualify for particular fisheries are
readily identified, gear violations are
more readily prosecuted, and this
allows for more cost-effective
enforcement.
Requirements, also at 50 CFR part
622, that fishing gear be marked, are
also essential to facilitate enforcement.
The ability to link fishing gear to the
vessel owner is crucial to enforcement
of regulations issued under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
The marking of fishing gear is also
valuable in actions concerning damage,
loss, and civil proceedings. The
requirements imposed in the Southeast
Region are for coral aquacultured live
rock; golden crab traps; mackerel gillnet
floats; spiny lobster traps; black sea bass
pots; and buoy gear.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
E:\FR\FM\17FEN1.SGM
17FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8286-8287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03197]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-880]
Barium Carbonate From the People's Republic of China:
Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of
Commerce (the ``Department'') and the International Trade Commission
(the ``ITC'') that revocation of the antidumping duty (``AD'') order on
barium carbonate from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') would
likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material
injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is
publishing a notice of continuation of the antidumping duty order.
DATES: Effective Date: February 17, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
6905.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 6, 2003, the Department published the final determination
in the AD investigation of barium carbonate from the PRC.\1\ On October
1, 2003, the
[[Page 8287]]
Department issued the AD order on barium carbonate from the PRC.\2\
There have been no administrative reviews since issuance of the Order.
There have been no related findings or rulings (e.g., changed
circumstances review, scope ruling, duty absorption review) since
issuance of the Order. On January 9, 2009, the Department published the
final results of the expedited first sunset review of this Order.\3\ On
March 17, 2009, the Department published the continuation of the
Order.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value: Barium Carbonate From the People's Republic of China, 68 FR
46577 (August 6, 2003) (``Final Determination'').
\2\ See Antidumping Duty Order: Barium Carbonate From the
People's Republic of China, 68 FR 56619 (October 1, 2003)
(``Order'').
\3\ See Barium Carbonate From the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order, 74 FR 882 (January 9, 2009).
\4\ See Barium Carbonate From the People's Republic of China:
Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order, 74 FR 11348 (March 17,
2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On February 3, 2014, the Department initiated the second five-year
(``sunset'') review of the AD order on barium carbonate from the PRC
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
``Act'').\5\ As a result of its review, the Department determined that
revocation of the antidumping duty order on barium carbonate from the
PRC would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and,
therefore, notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins likely to
prevail should the order be revoked.\6\ On February 6, 2015, the ITC
published its determination, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act,
that revocation of the antidumping duty order on barium carbonate from
the PRC would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably
foreseeable time.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 79 FR 6163
(February 3, 2014).
\6\ See Barium Carbonate From the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of Expedited Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order, 79 FR 32221 (June 4, 2014) and accompanying Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
\7\ See Barium Carbonate From China: Determination, 80 FR 6766
(February 6, 2015); see also Barium Carbonate from China (Inv. No.
731-TA-1020 (Second Review), USITC Publication 4518, February 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this order is barium carbonate,
regardless of form or grade. The product is currently classifiable
under subheading 2836.60.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (``HTSUS''). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided
for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the
scope of this proceeding is dispositive.
Continuation of the Order
As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC
that revocation of the AD order would likely lead to a continuation or
recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United
States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department hereby
orders the continuation of the AD order on barium carbonate from the
PRC. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD
cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all
imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation
of the order will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of
this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act,
the Department intends to initiate the next five-year review of the
order not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the
effective date of continuation.
This five-year (``sunset'') review and this notice are in
accordance with section 751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to
section 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: February 9, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-03197 Filed 2-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P