Certain Multiple Mode Outdoor Grills and Parts Thereof; Commission's Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation, 7033-7034 [2015-02516]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 26 / Monday, February 9, 2015 / Notices
page: https://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/info/
rac/dac.html. The following must
accompany the form for all
nominations:
• Letters of reference from
represented interests or organizations.
• A completed background
information nomination form.
• Any other information that
addresses the nominee’s qualifications.
Nominees unable to download the
nomination form may contact the BLM
California Desert District External
Affairs staff at (951) 697–5217 to request
a copy. Advisory Council members are
appointed by the Secretary of the
Interior. The Obama Administration
prohibits individuals who are currently
federally registered lobbyists to serve on
all FACA and non-FACA boards,
committees or councils.
Authority: 43 CFR 1784.4–1.
Teresa A. Raml,
California Desert District Manager.
[FR Doc. 2015–02550 Filed 2–6–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–40–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–895]
Certain Multiple Mode Outdoor Grills
and Parts Thereof; Commission’s Final
Determination Finding a Violation of
Section 337; Issuance of a Limited
Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist
Orders; Termination of the
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has found a violation of
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the
unlawful importation, sale for
importation, and sale after importation
by respondents The Brinkmann
Corporation (‘‘Brinkmann’’) of Dallas,
Texas; Outdoor Leisure Products, Inc.
(‘‘OLP’’) of Neosho, Missouri; Dongguan
Kingsun Enterprises Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Kingsun’’) of Dongguan City, China;
Academy, Ltd. (‘‘Academy’’) of Katy,
Texas; and Ningbo Huige Outdoor
Products Co., Ltd. (‘‘Huige’’) of Zhejiang
Province, China, of certain multiple
mode outdoor grills and parts thereof by
reason of infringement of one or more
claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,381,712
(‘‘the ’712 patent’’). The Commission
also found defaulted respondent
Keesung Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Keesung’’) of Guangzhou, China in
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:39 Feb 06, 2015
Jkt 235001
violation pursuant to Section 337(g)(1).
The Commission’s determination is
final, and the investigation is
terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–2392. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on September 26, 2013, based on a
complaint filed on behalf of A&J
Manufacturing, LLC of St. Simons,
Georgia and A&J Manufacturing, Inc. of
Green Cove Springs, Florida
(collectively, ‘‘A&J’’ or
‘‘Complainants’’). 78 Fed. Reg. 59373
(Sept. 26, 2013). The complaint alleged
violations of Section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, in the sale for importation,
importation, or sale within the United
States after importation of certain
multiple mode outdoor grills and parts
thereof by reason of infringement of
certain claims of the ’712 patent, the
claim of U.S. Patent No. D660,646, and
the claim of U.S. Patent No. D662,773.
The Commission’s notice of
investigation, as amended, named
numerous respondents including
Brinkmann, OLP, Kingsun, Academy,
Huige, Char-Broil, LLC (‘‘Char-Broil’’),
and Fudeer Electric Appliance Co., Ltd.
(‘‘Fudeer’’). The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is also a party to
this investigation.
On January 9, 2014, the Commission
determined not to review an initial
determination finding respondent
Keesung in default. Order No. 16 (Dec.
20, 2013).
On June 24, 2014, the Commission
affirmed-in-part and vacated-in-part an
initial determination granting-in-part a
motion for summary determination of
non-infringement filed by Char-Broil,
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7033
Fudeer, OLP, Kingsun, Tractor Supply
Co., and Chant Kitchen Equipment (HK)
Ltd. The Commission found that
Complainants admit that the following
redesigned grills do not infringe the ’712
patent: (1) Chant/Tractor Supply’s New
Model 1046761; (2) Rankam’s Member’s
Mark Grill, Model No. GR2071001–MM
(Ver. 2) and (3) Rankam’s Smoke
Canyon Grill, Model No. GR2034205–SC
(Ver. 2). Comm’n Op. at 1 (Jun. 24,
2014). The Commission found the other
redesigned products at issue were
within the scope of the investigation. Id.
The Commission adopted the ALJ’s
construction of the ‘‘openable [] cover’’
limitations of claims 1 and 17 on
modified grounds. Id. The Commission
affirmed the ALJ’s finding of noninfringement of claims 1 and 17 for the
Char-Broil Oklahoma Joe Longhorn
Model 12210767 Grill and adopted the
ALJ’s findings that the redesigned grills
do not infringe claims 1 and 17 on
modified grounds. Id. The Commission
also found that the ‘‘openable [] cover
means’’ limitations of claim 10 are
means-plus-function limitations and
directed the ALJ to make findings
consistent with its means-plus-function
interpretation. Id. at 2.
On July 31, 2014, the Commission
determined not to review an initial
determination granting a motion for
partial termination of the investigation
based on withdrawal of allegations in
the complaint concerning the two
asserted design patents. See Order No.
50 (Jul. 14, 2014).
On September 26, 2014, the ALJ
issued the final Initial Determination
(‘‘ID’’), finding a violation of section 337
as to respondents Brinkmann, OLP,
Kingsun, Academy, and Huige based
upon his determinations: (i) That
certain, but not all, accused products
infringe at least one claim of the ’712
patent; (ii) that the domestic industry
requirement has been satisfied with
respect to the ’712 patent; and (iii) that
the asserted claims of the ’712 patent
have not been shown by clear and
convincing evidence to be invalid. On
October 9, 2014, the ALJ issued his
Recommended Determination on
remedy and bonding.
On October 14, 2014, A&J filed a
petition for review of certain aspects of
the final ID’s findings concerning claim
construction and infringement. On the
same day, Brinkmann, OLP, and
Academy together sought review of
certain aspects of the final ID’s findings
regarding validity. OLP separately
challenged certain aspects of the final
ID’s findings regarding claim
construction and infringement.
Academy and Huige petitioned for
review of the ID’s determination (Order
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
7034
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 26 / Monday, February 9, 2015 / Notices
No. 47) to exclude evidence and
testimony concerning their redesigns,
and the ALJ’s refusal to make a
determination as to whether those
redesigns infringe the asserted claims of
the ’712 patent. Responses to the
petitions were filed on October 22,
2014.
On December 2, 2014, the
Commission determined to review the
final ID in part and requested briefing
on issues it determined to review, and
on remedy, the public interest, and
bonding. 79 Fed. Reg. 72700–02 (Dec. 8,
2014). Specifically, with respect to the
’712 patent, the Commission determined
to review: (1) The ID’s construction of
the ‘‘exhaust’’ and ‘‘exhaust means’’
limitations in claims 10 and 16, and
related findings regarding infringement
of claims 10–16; (2) the ID’s findings
regarding infringement of claims 1, 4,
and 6–8 by the accused Dyna-Glo grills
imported by respondent GHP Group,
Incorporated; (3) the ID’s findings
regarding infringement of claims 1, 2, 4–
8, 10, 11, and 13–15 by the accused
Char-Broil Model No. 463724512 grill;
and (4) the ID’s finding that the ’712
patent was not shown to be invalid.
On December 12, 2014, A&J and OUII
each filed initial written submissions
regarding issues on review, remedy, the
public interest, and bonding. On the
same day, the respondents jointly filed
their initial written submission
regarding issues on review, remedy, the
public interest, and bonding. Responses
to the initial written submissions were
filed on December 19, 2014.
Having examined the record of this
investigation, including the parties’
submissions and responses thereto, the
Commission has determined that 35
U.S.C. 112, ¶ 6 applies to the ‘‘exhaust
means’’ and ‘‘exhaust’’ limitations in
claims 10 and 16. Based on the
Commission’s interpretation of claims
10–16, the Commission has determined
(i) that the accused Brinkmann 810–
3821 grill infringes claims 10, 11, 13, 15,
and 16; (ii) that the accused Academy/
Huige grills infringe claims 10–13, 15,
and 16; and (iii) that the other accused
Brinkmann grills, the OLP/Kingsun
redesigned grills, the OLP/Kingsun
original grills, and the Char-Broil/
Fudeer grills do not infringe any of
claims 10–16 of the ’712 patent. The
Commission vacates the ID’s finding
that the DGB730SNB–D grill does not
infringe claims 1, 4, and 6–8 of the ’712
patent. The Commission also reverses
the ID’s finding that the DGJ810CSB–D
grill does not infringe claims 1, 4, and
6–8 of the ’712 patent. With respect to
the accused Char-Broil/Fudeer grill,
Model No. 463724512, the Commission
has determined to affirm, with modified
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:39 Feb 06, 2015
Jkt 235001
reasoning, the ID’s finding that the grill
does not infringe any asserted claims of
the ’712 patent. The Commission has
further determined to affirm, with
modified reasoning, the ID’s finding that
the asserted claims of the ’712 patent
have not been proven invalid as
obvious. Accordingly, the Commission
has found a violation of section 337 as
to respondents Brinkmann, OLP,
Kingsun, Academy, and Huige, and
defaulted respondent Keesung.
The Commission has determined that
the appropriate form of relief is a
limited exclusion order prohibiting the
unlicensed entry of covered multiple
mode outdoor grills and parts thereof
manufactured by, for, or on behalf of
Brinkmann, OLP, Kingsun, Academy,
Huige, and Keesung, or any of their
affiliated companies, parents,
subsidiaries, licensees, or other related
business entities, or their successors or
assigns. The Commission has also
determined to issue cease and desist
orders prohibiting Brinkmann, OLP, and
Academy from further importing,
selling, and distributing articles that
infringe certain claims of the ’712 patent
in the United States. The orders include
the following exemptions: (1) Conduct
licensed or authorized by the owner of
the ’712 patent; (2) conduct related to
covered products imported by or for the
United States; and (3) the importation,
distribution, and sale of parts for use in
the maintenance, service, or repair of
covered products purchased prior to the
effective date of the orders. The
Commission has carefully considered
the submissions of the parties and has
determined that the public interest
factors enumerated in section 337(d)(1),
(f)(1), and (g)(1) do not preclude
issuance of its orders.
Finally, the Commission has
determined that excluded multiple
mode outdoor grills and parts thereof
may be imported and sold in the United
States during the period of Presidential
review (19 U.S.C. 1337(j)) with the
posting of a bond of 100 percent of the
entered value for all covered articles
manufactured by, for, or on behalf of
Keesung, and the posting of a bond of
zero percent for all covered articles
manufactured by, for, or on behalf of
Brinkmann, OLP, Kingsun, Academy,
and Huige. The Commission’s Orders
and Opinion were delivered to the
President and to the United States Trade
Representative on the day of their
issuance.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
Issued: February 3, 2015.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–02516 Filed 2–6–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1122–0006]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested; Semi-Annual
Progress Report for Grantees From the
Grants to Encourage Arrest Policies
and Enforcement of Protection Orders
Program; Extension of a Currently
Approved Collection
Office on Violence Against
Women, Department of Justice.
ACTION: 60-day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice,
Office on Violence Against Women
(OVW) will be submitting the following
information collection request to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for 60 days until April
10, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have additional comments
especially on the estimated public
burden or associated response time,
suggestions, or need a copy of the
proposed information collection
instrument with instructions or
additional information, please contact
Cathy Poston, Office on Violence
Against Women, at 202–514–5430 or
Catherine.poston@usdoj.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 26 (Monday, February 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7033-7034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02516]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-895]
Certain Multiple Mode Outdoor Grills and Parts Thereof;
Commission's Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337;
Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders;
Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has found a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the unlawful importation, sale
for importation, and sale after importation by respondents The
Brinkmann Corporation (``Brinkmann'') of Dallas, Texas; Outdoor Leisure
Products, Inc. (``OLP'') of Neosho, Missouri; Dongguan Kingsun
Enterprises Co., Ltd. (``Kingsun'') of Dongguan City, China; Academy,
Ltd. (``Academy'') of Katy, Texas; and Ningbo Huige Outdoor Products
Co., Ltd. (``Huige'') of Zhejiang Province, China, of certain multiple
mode outdoor grills and parts thereof by reason of infringement of one
or more claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,381,712 (``the '712 patent''). The
Commission also found defaulted respondent Keesung Manufacturing Co.,
Ltd. (``Keesung'') of Guangzhou, China in violation pursuant to Section
337(g)(1). The Commission's determination is final, and the
investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2392. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on September 26, 2013, based on a complaint filed on behalf of A&J
Manufacturing, LLC of St. Simons, Georgia and A&J Manufacturing, Inc.
of Green Cove Springs, Florida (collectively, ``A&J'' or
``Complainants''). 78 Fed. Reg. 59373 (Sept. 26, 2013). The complaint
alleged violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the sale for importation, importation, or
sale within the United States after importation of certain multiple
mode outdoor grills and parts thereof by reason of infringement of
certain claims of the '712 patent, the claim of U.S. Patent No.
D660,646, and the claim of U.S. Patent No. D662,773. The Commission's
notice of investigation, as amended, named numerous respondents
including Brinkmann, OLP, Kingsun, Academy, Huige, Char-Broil, LLC
(``Char-Broil''), and Fudeer Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. (``Fudeer'').
The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (``OUII'') is also a party
to this investigation.
On January 9, 2014, the Commission determined not to review an
initial determination finding respondent Keesung in default. Order No.
16 (Dec. 20, 2013).
On June 24, 2014, the Commission affirmed-in-part and vacated-in-
part an initial determination granting-in-part a motion for summary
determination of non-infringement filed by Char-Broil, Fudeer, OLP,
Kingsun, Tractor Supply Co., and Chant Kitchen Equipment (HK) Ltd. The
Commission found that Complainants admit that the following redesigned
grills do not infringe the '712 patent: (1) Chant/Tractor Supply's New
Model 1046761; (2) Rankam's Member's Mark Grill, Model No. GR2071001-MM
(Ver. 2) and (3) Rankam's Smoke Canyon Grill, Model No. GR2034205-SC
(Ver. 2). Comm'n Op. at 1 (Jun. 24, 2014). The Commission found the
other redesigned products at issue were within the scope of the
investigation. Id. The Commission adopted the ALJ's construction of the
``openable [] cover'' limitations of claims 1 and 17 on modified
grounds. Id. The Commission affirmed the ALJ's finding of non-
infringement of claims 1 and 17 for the Char-Broil Oklahoma Joe
Longhorn Model 12210767 Grill and adopted the ALJ's findings that the
redesigned grills do not infringe claims 1 and 17 on modified grounds.
Id. The Commission also found that the ``openable [] cover means''
limitations of claim 10 are means-plus-function limitations and
directed the ALJ to make findings consistent with its means-plus-
function interpretation. Id. at 2.
On July 31, 2014, the Commission determined not to review an
initial determination granting a motion for partial termination of the
investigation based on withdrawal of allegations in the complaint
concerning the two asserted design patents. See Order No. 50 (Jul. 14,
2014).
On September 26, 2014, the ALJ issued the final Initial
Determination (``ID''), finding a violation of section 337 as to
respondents Brinkmann, OLP, Kingsun, Academy, and Huige based upon his
determinations: (i) That certain, but not all, accused products
infringe at least one claim of the '712 patent; (ii) that the domestic
industry requirement has been satisfied with respect to the '712
patent; and (iii) that the asserted claims of the '712 patent have not
been shown by clear and convincing evidence to be invalid. On October
9, 2014, the ALJ issued his Recommended Determination on remedy and
bonding.
On October 14, 2014, A&J filed a petition for review of certain
aspects of the final ID's findings concerning claim construction and
infringement. On the same day, Brinkmann, OLP, and Academy together
sought review of certain aspects of the final ID's findings regarding
validity. OLP separately challenged certain aspects of the final ID's
findings regarding claim construction and infringement. Academy and
Huige petitioned for review of the ID's determination (Order
[[Page 7034]]
No. 47) to exclude evidence and testimony concerning their redesigns,
and the ALJ's refusal to make a determination as to whether those
redesigns infringe the asserted claims of the '712 patent. Responses to
the petitions were filed on October 22, 2014.
On December 2, 2014, the Commission determined to review the final
ID in part and requested briefing on issues it determined to review,
and on remedy, the public interest, and bonding. 79 Fed. Reg. 72700-02
(Dec. 8, 2014). Specifically, with respect to the '712 patent, the
Commission determined to review: (1) The ID's construction of the
``exhaust'' and ``exhaust means'' limitations in claims 10 and 16, and
related findings regarding infringement of claims 10-16; (2) the ID's
findings regarding infringement of claims 1, 4, and 6-8 by the accused
Dyna-Glo grills imported by respondent GHP Group, Incorporated; (3) the
ID's findings regarding infringement of claims 1, 2, 4-8, 10, 11, and
13-15 by the accused Char-Broil Model No. 463724512 grill; and (4) the
ID's finding that the '712 patent was not shown to be invalid.
On December 12, 2014, A&J and OUII each filed initial written
submissions regarding issues on review, remedy, the public interest,
and bonding. On the same day, the respondents jointly filed their
initial written submission regarding issues on review, remedy, the
public interest, and bonding. Responses to the initial written
submissions were filed on December 19, 2014.
Having examined the record of this investigation, including the
parties' submissions and responses thereto, the Commission has
determined that 35 U.S.C. 112, ] 6 applies to the ``exhaust means'' and
``exhaust'' limitations in claims 10 and 16. Based on the Commission's
interpretation of claims 10-16, the Commission has determined (i) that
the accused Brinkmann 810-3821 grill infringes claims 10, 11, 13, 15,
and 16; (ii) that the accused Academy/Huige grills infringe claims 10-
13, 15, and 16; and (iii) that the other accused Brinkmann grills, the
OLP/Kingsun redesigned grills, the OLP/Kingsun original grills, and the
Char-Broil/Fudeer grills do not infringe any of claims 10-16 of the
'712 patent. The Commission vacates the ID's finding that the
DGB730SNB-D grill does not infringe claims 1, 4, and 6-8 of the '712
patent. The Commission also reverses the ID's finding that the
DGJ810CSB-D grill does not infringe claims 1, 4, and 6-8 of the '712
patent. With respect to the accused Char-Broil/Fudeer grill, Model No.
463724512, the Commission has determined to affirm, with modified
reasoning, the ID's finding that the grill does not infringe any
asserted claims of the '712 patent. The Commission has further
determined to affirm, with modified reasoning, the ID's finding that
the asserted claims of the '712 patent have not been proven invalid as
obvious. Accordingly, the Commission has found a violation of section
337 as to respondents Brinkmann, OLP, Kingsun, Academy, and Huige, and
defaulted respondent Keesung.
The Commission has determined that the appropriate form of relief
is a limited exclusion order prohibiting the unlicensed entry of
covered multiple mode outdoor grills and parts thereof manufactured by,
for, or on behalf of Brinkmann, OLP, Kingsun, Academy, Huige, and
Keesung, or any of their affiliated companies, parents, subsidiaries,
licensees, or other related business entities, or their successors or
assigns. The Commission has also determined to issue cease and desist
orders prohibiting Brinkmann, OLP, and Academy from further importing,
selling, and distributing articles that infringe certain claims of the
'712 patent in the United States. The orders include the following
exemptions: (1) Conduct licensed or authorized by the owner of the '712
patent; (2) conduct related to covered products imported by or for the
United States; and (3) the importation, distribution, and sale of parts
for use in the maintenance, service, or repair of covered products
purchased prior to the effective date of the orders. The Commission has
carefully considered the submissions of the parties and has determined
that the public interest factors enumerated in section 337(d)(1),
(f)(1), and (g)(1) do not preclude issuance of its orders.
Finally, the Commission has determined that excluded multiple mode
outdoor grills and parts thereof may be imported and sold in the United
States during the period of Presidential review (19 U.S.C. 1337(j))
with the posting of a bond of 100 percent of the entered value for all
covered articles manufactured by, for, or on behalf of Keesung, and the
posting of a bond of zero percent for all covered articles manufactured
by, for, or on behalf of Brinkmann, OLP, Kingsun, Academy, and Huige.
The Commission's Orders and Opinion were delivered to the President and
to the United States Trade Representative on the day of their issuance.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
Issued: February 3, 2015.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-02516 Filed 2-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P