Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From Brazil, the People's Republic of China, and the United Arab Emirates: Continuation and Revocation of Antidumping Duty Orders, 6689-6690 [2015-02456]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2015 / Notices
ESTIMATES OF THE POPULATION OF
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
VOTING AGE FOR EACH STATE AND
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA: JULY 1, International Trade Administration
2014—Continued
[A–351–841, A–520–803, A–570–924]
Area
Arizona ..................................
Arkansas ...............................
California ...............................
Colorado ...............................
Connecticut ...........................
Delaware ...............................
District of Columbia ..............
Florida ...................................
Georgia .................................
Hawaii ...................................
Idaho .....................................
Illinois ....................................
Indiana ..................................
Iowa ......................................
Kansas ..................................
Kentucky ...............................
Louisiana ..............................
Maine ....................................
Maryland ...............................
Massachusetts ......................
Michigan ...............................
Minnesota .............................
Mississippi ............................
Missouri ................................
Montana ................................
Nebraska ..............................
Nevada .................................
New Hampshire ....................
New Jersey ...........................
New Mexico ..........................
New York ..............................
North Carolina ......................
North Dakota ........................
Ohio ......................................
Oklahoma .............................
Oregon ..................................
Pennsylvania ........................
Rhode Island ........................
South Carolina ......................
South Dakota ........................
Tennessee ............................
Texas ....................................
Utah ......................................
Vermont ................................
Virginia ..................................
Washington ...........................
West Virginia ........................
Wisconsin .............................
Wyoming ...............................
Population 18
and over
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip From Brazil, the
5,109,792 People’s Republic of China, and the
2,259,350 United Arab Emirates: Continuation
29,649,348 and Revocation of Antidumping Duty
4,109,494 Orders
2,821,247
731,367
543,588
15,839,713
7,604,061
1,111,117
1,203,384
9,892,106
5,014,928
2,381,172
2,181,355
3,400,843
3,536,183
1,071,112
4,625,863
5,354,940
7,686,087
4,175,347
2,262,810
4,670,966
798,555
1,414,894
2,175,874
1,059,672
6,926,094
1,583,623
15,517,321
7,656,415
570,955
8,955,859
2,925,352
3,112,217
10,086,316
842,321
3,747,734
642,768
5,054,826
19,841,344
2,038,787
504,976
6,457,174
5,458,809
1,470,179
4,457,375
445,830
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, Vintage 2014 Population Estimates.
I have certified these estimates for the
Federal Election Commission.
Dated: January 29, 2015.
Penny Pritzker,
Secretary of Commerce.
[FR Doc. 2015–02473 Filed 2–5–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Feb 05, 2015
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the
determinations by the Department of
Commerce (the Department) and the
International Trade Commission (the
ITC) in their five year (sunset) reviews
that revocation of the antidumping duty
(AD) order on polyethylene
terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET
Film) from the People’s Republic of
China (PRC) and the United Arab
Emirates (UAE) would likely lead to a
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and material injury to an industry in the
United States, the Department is
publishing a notice of continuation for
these antidumping duty orders. As a
result of the ITC’s determination that
revocation of the AD order on PET Film
from Brazil is not likely to lead to the
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States, the Department is revoking this
AD order.
DATES: Effective Date: AD Brazil
Revocation: November 10, 2013; AD
PRC and UAE Continuation: February 6,
2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jacqueline Arrowsmith, Office VII, AD/
CVD Operations, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–5255.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On October 1, 2013, the Department
initiated the sunset reviews on the AD
orders on PET film from Brazil, the PRC,
and the UAE pursuant to section 751(c)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act).1 As a result of the reviews, the
Department found that revocation of the
AD orders on PET Film from Brazil, the
PRC, and the UAE would likely to lead
to continuation or recurrence of
dumping, and notified the ITC of the
1 See Initiation of Five year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 78
FR 60253 (October 1, 2013).
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6689
margins of dumping likely to prevail
should the order be revoked.2
On January 23, 2015, the ITC
published its determination, pursuant to
section 751(c)(1) and section 752(a) of
the Act, that revocation of the AD order
on PET Film the PRC and the UAE
would be likely to lead to the
continuation or recurrence of material
injury within a reasonably foreseeable
time, but that revocation of the AD order
on PET Film from Brazil would not be
likely to do so.3
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order
are all gauges of raw, pre-treated, or
primed PET film, whether extruded or
co-extruded. Excluded are metallized
films and other finished films that have
had at least one of their surfaces
modified by the application of a
performance-enhancing resinous or
inorganic layer more than 0.00001
inches thick. Also excluded is roller
transport cleaning film which has at
least one of its surfaces modified by
application of 0.5 micrometers of SBR
latex. Tracing and drafting film is also
excluded. PET film is classifiable under
subheading 3920.62.0090 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). While HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, our
written description of the scope of the
order is dispositive.
Scope Determinations on PET Film
From the PRC
Since these orders were published,
there was one scope determination for
PET film from the PRC, with notice of
the decision published on July 1, 2010.
In this determination, requested by
Coated Fabrics Company, the
Department determined that
Amorphous PET (‘‘APET’’), Glycolmodified PET (‘‘PETG’’), and
coextruded APET with PETG on its
outer surfaces (‘‘GAG Sheet’’), are
within the scope of the antidumping
duty order of PET Film from the PRC.4
2 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and
Strip From Brazil, the People’s Republic of China,
and the United Arab Emirates: Final Results of the
Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty
Orders, 79 FR 10095, (February 24, 2014).
3 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and
Strip from Brazil, China, and the United Arab
Emirates, 80 FR 3623 (January 23, 2015). On the
same day, the ITC also determined that revocation
of the antidumping orders of PET Film from the
PRC and the UAE would lead to a continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
4 See Notice of Scope Rulings, 75 FR 38081 (July
1, 2010).
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
6690
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2015 / Notices
Continuation of the Order on PET Film
From the PRC and the UAE
As a result of the determinations by
the Department and the ITC that
revocation of these antidumping duty
orders would likely lead to a
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and material injury to an industry in the
United States, pursuant to sections
751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act, the
Department hereby orders the
continuation of the AD order on PET
Film from the PRC and the UAE. U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
will continue to collect antidumping
duty cash deposits at the rates in effect
at the time of entry for all imports of
subject merchandise.
The effective date of the continuation
of this order will be the date of
publication in the Federal Register of
this notice of continuation. Pursuant to
section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the
Department intends to initiate the next
five-year review of this order not later
than 30 days prior to the fifth
anniversary of the effective date of
continuation.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Revocation of the Order on PET Film
From Brazil
As a result of the determination by the
ITC that revocation of this AD order is
not likely to lead to the continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States, the
Department is revoking the AD order on
PET Film from Brazil. Pursuant to
section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.222(i)(2)(i), the effective date of
revocation is November 10, 2013 (i.e.,
the fifth anniversary of the date of
publication in the Federal Register of
the order 5).
Cash Deposit and Assessment of Duties
on PET Film From Brazil
The Department will notify U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP),
15 days after the publication of this
notice, to terminate the suspension of
liquidation and to discontinue the
collection of cash deposits on entries of
PET Film from Brazil, entered or
withdrawn from warehouse, on or after
November 10, 2013. The Department
will further instruct CBP to refund with
interest all cash deposits on entries
made on or after November 10, 2013.
Entries of subject merchandise prior to
the effective date of revocation will
continue to be subject to suspension of
liquidation and AD deposit
5 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and
Strip From Brazil, the People’s Republic of China
and the United Arab Emirates: Antidumping Duty
Orders and Amended Final Determination of Sales
at Less Than Fair Value for United Arab Emirates,
73 FR 66595 (November 10, 2008).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Feb 05, 2015
Jkt 235001
requirements and assessments. The
Department will complete any pending
or requested administrative reviews of
the order on PET Film from Brazil
covering entries prior to November 10,
2013.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return/destruction or conversion to
judicial protective order of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3).
Failure to comply is a violation of the
APO which, may be subject to
sanctions.
This five-year (sunset) review and
notice are in accordance with sections
751(c) and 751(d)(2), and 777(i) of the
Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4).
Dated: January 30, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015–02456 Filed 2–5–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–890]
Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the
People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Changed
Circumstances Review, and Intent To
Revoke Antidumping Duty Order in
Part
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 2, 2014, the
Department of Commerce (the
‘‘Department’’) received a request for
revocation, in part, of the antidumping
duty (‘‘AD’’) order on wooden bedroom
furniture from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’) 1 with respect to certain
shoe cabinets. We preliminarily
determine that the producers accounting
for substantially all of the production of
the domestic like product to which the
Order pertains lack interest in the relief
provided by the Order with respect to
certain shoe cabinets described below.
Accordingly, we intend to revoke, in
part, the Order as to imports of certain
shoe cabinets. The Department invites
AGENCY:
1 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping
Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the
People’s Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4,
2005) (‘‘Order’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
interested parties to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: February 6, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Martin or Howard Smith, AD/
CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–3936 or (202) 482–
5193, respectively.
Background
On January 4, 2005, the Department
published the Order in the Federal
Register. On June 2, 2014, the
Department received a request on behalf
of Elements International Group LLC
(‘‘Elements’’) for a changed
circumstances review to revoke, in part,
the Order with respect to certain shoe
cabinets.2 In its request, Elements stated
that the American Furniture
Manufacturing Committee for Legal
Trade and Vaughan-Basset Furniture
Company, Inc. (‘‘Petitioners’’) discussed
the scope exclusion described below
and are in agreement with the
revocation, in part. On June 3, 2014, the
Department received a letter from the
Petitioners in which they stated they
were in agreement with the proposed
scope exclusion language in Elements’
June 2, 2014, changed circumstances
review request.3
On July 15, 2014, we published the
Initiation Notice in the Federal
Register.4 Because the statement
submitted by Petitioners in support of
Elements’ Request did not indicate
whether Petitioners account for
substantially all of the domestic wooden
bedroom furniture production, in the
Initiation Notice, we invited interested
parties to submit comments concerning
industry support, as well as comments
and/or factual information regarding the
changed circumstances review.5 We
received no comments concerning
industry support.
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the order is
wooden bedroom furniture. Wooden
2 See Submission from Elements, ‘‘Wooden
Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of
China: Request for a Changed Circumstance Review
Regarding Shoe Cabinets,’’ dated June 2, 2014
(‘‘Elements’ Request’’).
3 See Submission from Petitioners, ‘‘Wooden
Bedroom Furniture From The People’s Republic of
China/Petitioners’ Response to Elements’ Letter of
June 2, 2014,’’ dated June 3, 2014.
4 See Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the
People’s Republic of China: Notice of Initiation of
Changed Circumstances Review, and Consideration
of Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Order in
Part, 79 FR 41260 (July 15, 2014) (‘‘Initiation
Notice’’)
5 Id. at 41262.
E:\FR\FM\06FEN1.SGM
06FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6689-6690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02456]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-351-841, A-520-803, A-570-924]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From Brazil,
the People's Republic of China, and the United Arab Emirates:
Continuation and Revocation of Antidumping Duty Orders
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of
Commerce (the Department) and the International Trade Commission (the
ITC) in their five year (sunset) reviews that revocation of the
antidumping duty (AD) order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet,
and strip (PET Film) from the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the
United Arab Emirates (UAE) would likely lead to a continuation or
recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United
States, the Department is publishing a notice of continuation for these
antidumping duty orders. As a result of the ITC's determination that
revocation of the AD order on PET Film from Brazil is not likely to
lead to the continuation or recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States, the Department is revoking this AD
order.
DATES: Effective Date: AD Brazil Revocation: November 10, 2013; AD PRC
and UAE Continuation: February 6, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith, Office VII, AD/
CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
5255.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 1, 2013, the Department initiated the sunset reviews on
the AD orders on PET film from Brazil, the PRC, and the UAE pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\1\ As a
result of the reviews, the Department found that revocation of the AD
orders on PET Film from Brazil, the PRC, and the UAE would likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and notified the ITC of
the margins of dumping likely to prevail should the order be
revoked.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Five year (``Sunset'') Review, 78 FR 60253
(October 1, 2013).
\2\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip From
Brazil, the People's Republic of China, and the United Arab
Emirates: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders, 79 FR 10095, (February 24, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 23, 2015, the ITC published its determination, pursuant
to section 751(c)(1) and section 752(a) of the Act, that revocation of
the AD order on PET Film the PRC and the UAE would be likely to lead to
the continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably
foreseeable time, but that revocation of the AD order on PET Film from
Brazil would not be likely to do so.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from
Brazil, China, and the United Arab Emirates, 80 FR 3623 (January 23,
2015). On the same day, the ITC also determined that revocation of
the antidumping orders of PET Film from the PRC and the UAE would
lead to a continuation or recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by this order are all gauges of raw, pre-
treated, or primed PET film, whether extruded or co-extruded. Excluded
are metallized films and other finished films that have had at least
one of their surfaces modified by the application of a performance-
enhancing resinous or inorganic layer more than 0.00001 inches thick.
Also excluded is roller transport cleaning film which has at least one
of its surfaces modified by application of 0.5 micrometers of SBR
latex. Tracing and drafting film is also excluded. PET film is
classifiable under subheading 3920.62.0090 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). While HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description
of the scope of the order is dispositive.
Scope Determinations on PET Film From the PRC
Since these orders were published, there was one scope
determination for PET film from the PRC, with notice of the decision
published on July 1, 2010. In this determination, requested by Coated
Fabrics Company, the Department determined that Amorphous PET
(``APET''), Glycol-modified PET (``PETG''), and coextruded APET with
PETG on its outer surfaces (``GAG Sheet''), are within the scope of the
antidumping duty order of PET Film from the PRC.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Notice of Scope Rulings, 75 FR 38081 (July 1, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 6690]]
Continuation of the Order on PET Film From the PRC and the UAE
As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC
that revocation of these antidumping duty orders would likely lead to a
continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an
industry in the United States, pursuant to sections 751(c) and
751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department hereby orders the continuation of
the AD order on PET Film from the PRC and the UAE. U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) will continue to collect antidumping duty cash
deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of
subject merchandise.
The effective date of the continuation of this order will be the
date of publication in the Federal Register of this notice of
continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department
intends to initiate the next five-year review of this order not later
than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of
continuation.
Revocation of the Order on PET Film From Brazil
As a result of the determination by the ITC that revocation of this
AD order is not likely to lead to the continuation or recurrence of
material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is
revoking the AD order on PET Film from Brazil. Pursuant to section
751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the effective date of
revocation is November 10, 2013 (i.e., the fifth anniversary of the
date of publication in the Federal Register of the order \5\).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From
Brazil, the People's Republic of China and the United Arab Emirates:
Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final Determination of Sales at
Less Than Fair Value for United Arab Emirates, 73 FR 66595 (November
10, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit and Assessment of Duties on PET Film From Brazil
The Department will notify U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP), 15 days after the publication of this notice, to terminate the
suspension of liquidation and to discontinue the collection of cash
deposits on entries of PET Film from Brazil, entered or withdrawn from
warehouse, on or after November 10, 2013. The Department will further
instruct CBP to refund with interest all cash deposits on entries made
on or after November 10, 2013. Entries of subject merchandise prior to
the effective date of revocation will continue to be subject to
suspension of liquidation and AD deposit requirements and assessments.
The Department will complete any pending or requested administrative
reviews of the order on PET Film from Brazil covering entries prior to
November 10, 2013.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return/destruction or conversion to judicial protective
order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with
19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO
which, may be subject to sanctions.
This five-year (sunset) review and notice are in accordance with
sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2), and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.218(f)(4).
Dated: January 30, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-02456 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P