Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Related to Enhancements to Its Risk Model for Credit Default Swaps, 6555-6558 [2015-02251]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 24 / Thursday, February 5, 2015 / Notices
of applicants and the acquiring fund, or
their affiliates.
Filing Date: The applications were
filed on December 22, 2014.
Applicants’ Address: 800 Nicollet
Mall, BC–MN–H04N, Minneapolis, MN
55402.
Minnesota Municipal Income Portfolio
Inc. [File No. 811–7680]
First American Minnesota Municipal
Income Fund II Inc. [File No. 811–
21193]
Summary: Each applicant, a closedend investment company, seeks an
order declaring that it has ceased to be
an investment company. Applicants
transferred their assets to Nuveen
Minnesota Municipal Income Fund, and
on October 22, 2014, made distributions
to their shareholders based on net asset
value. Expenses of $259,711 and
$88,537, respectively, incurred in
connection with the reorganizations
were paid by the investment advisers of
applicants and the acquiring fund, or
their affiliates.
Filing Date: The applications were
filed on December 22, 2014.
Applicants’ Address: 800 Nicollet
Mall, BC–MN–H04N, Minneapolis, MN
55402.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BlackRock Fixed Income Value
Opportunities [File No. 811–22252]
Summary: Applicant, a closed-end
investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an
investment company. On December 17,
2014, applicant made a liquidating
distribution to its shareholders, based
on net asset value. Applicant has
retained $58,600 in cash in a liquidating
trust to pay contingent liabilities, and
any remaining assets will be distributed
to shareholders. Expenses of
approximately $30,500 incurred in
connection with the liquidation were
paid by applicant.
Filing Date: The application was filed
on December 22, 2014.
Applicant’s Address: 100 Bellevue
Pkwy., Wilmington, DE 19809.
Williams Capital Management Trust
[File No. 811–21186]
Summary: Applicant seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an
investment company. On September 22,
2014, applicant made a liquidating
distribution to its shareholders, based
on net asset value. Expenses of $30,000
incurred in connection with the
liquidation were paid by applicant.
Filing Dates: The application was
filed on November 25, 2014, and
amended on December 22, 2014.
Applicant’s Address: 650 Fifth Ave.,
9th Floor, New York, NY 10019.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:46 Feb 04, 2015
Jkt 235001
Pacific Corporate Group Private Equity
Fund [File No. 811–8637]
Summary: Applicant, a closed-end
investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an
investment company. On December 30,
2014, applicant made a liquidating
distribution to its shareholders, based
on net asset value. Applicant has
retained $188,657 to pay its outstanding
expenses. Additional expenses of
$109,555 incurred in connection with
reorganization were previously paid by
applicant.
Filing Date: The application was filed
on January 16, 2015.
Applicant’s Address: 1015 Ocean
Blvd., Coronado, CA 92118.
Salient MLP & Energy Infrastructure
Fund [File No. 811–22530]
Summary: Applicant, a closed-end
investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an
investment company. Applicant
transferred its assets to Salient
Midstream & MLP Fund, and on
November 17, 2014, made distributions
to its shareholders based on net asset
value. Expenses of $89,525 incurred in
connection with the reorganization were
paid by applicant and the acquiring
fund.
Filing Date: The application was filed
on December 15, 2014.
Applicant’s Address: 4265 San Felipe,
8th Floor, Houston, TX 77027.
Nomura Partners Funds, Inc. [File No.
811–1090]
Summary: Applicant seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an
investment company. Applicant
transferred the assets of its remaining
series to Nomura High Yield Fund, a
series of The Advisors’ Inner Circle
Fund III, and on December 8, 2014,
made distributions to its shareholders
based on net asset value. Applicant did
not incur any expenses in connection
with the reorganization.
Filing Date: The application was filed
on December 16, 2014.
Applicant’s Address: 4 Copley Place,
5th Floor, CPH–0326, Boston, MA
02116.
American Fidelity Dual Strategy Fund,
Inc. [File No. 811–8873]
Summary: Applicant seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an
investment company. On December 2,
2014, applicant made a liquidating
distribution to its shareholders, based
on net asset value. Expenses $18,530
incurred in connection with the
liquidation were paid by American
Fidelity Assurance Company,
applicant’s investment adviser.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6555
Filing Dates: The application was
filed on December 1, 2014, and
amended on January 8, 2015.
Applicant’s Address: 2000 N Classen
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73106.
Clipper Fund, Inc. [File No. 811–3931]
Summary: Applicant seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an
investment company. Applicant
transferred its assets to Clipper Fund, a
series of Clipper Funds Trust, and on
December 17, 2014, made distributions
to shareholders based on net asset value.
Expenses of approximately $361,841
incurred in connection with the
reorganization were paid by applicant
and Davis Selected Advisors, L.P.,
applicant’s investment adviser.
Filing Date: The application was filed
on December 29, 2014.
Applicant’s Address: c/o Davis
Advisors—Legal Department, 2949 E.
Elvira Rd., Ste. 101, Tucson, AZ 85756.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, pursuant to
delegated authority.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–02303 Filed 2–4–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74179; File No. SR–CME–
2015–002]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change Related to Enhancements to
Its Risk Model for Credit Default Swaps
January 30, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’
or ‘‘Exchange Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that
on January 21, 2015, Chicago Mercantile
Exchange Inc. (‘‘CME’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change described in Items I, II and III
below, which Items have been prepared
primarily by CME. CME filed the
proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act,3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(4)(ii) 4
thereunder, so that the proposal was
effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(4)(ii).
2 17
E:\FR\FM\05FEN1.SGM
05FEN1
6556
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 24 / Thursday, February 5, 2015 / Notices
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
CME is proposing to add a new CDS
Guaranty Fund charge to CDS Clearing
Members that clear CDS Products that
reference themselves or their affiliates
and delete the current threshold-based
approach. Specifically, CME proposes to
add a new risk component to its CDS
Stress Test Methodology to capture selfreferencing risk arising from contracts
that include component transactions for
which the reference entity is a clearing
member or one of its affiliates. In
addition, CME proposes to add a new
stress exposure calculation to size the
self-referencing risk.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
CME included statements concerning
the purpose and basis for the proposed
rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. CME has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
CME is proposing to add a new CDS
Guaranty Fund charge to CDS Clearing
Members that clear CDS Products that
reference themselves or their affiliates
and delete the current threshold-based
approach. Specifically, CME proposes to
add a new risk component to its CDS
Stress Test Methodology to capture selfreferencing risk arising from contracts
that include component transactions for
which the reference entity is a Clearing
Member or one of its affiliates. In
addition, CME proposes to add a new
stress exposure calculation to size the
anticipated maximum self-referencing
risk.
Although CME does not permit a CDS
Clearing Member or a customer to enter
into or maintain a single-name CDS
position referencing the clearing
member or an affiliate, a self-referencing
CDS position may arise where the CDS
Clearing Member or its affiliate is the
Reference Entity in respect of a
component transaction within the index
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:46 Feb 04, 2015
Jkt 235001
referenced in a CDS position. For
example, such a situation may arise in
the context of index CDS contracts
which reference CDS Clearing Members
or their affiliates. In such cases, the CDS
Clearing Member (a ‘‘CDS SR Clearing
Member’’), either through its own
account or that of a customer, has
exposure to a CDS Product that
references itself or its affiliate (each, an
‘‘SR Transaction’’). CME proposes to
address this potential exposure to selfreferencing risk by allocating an
additional ‘‘jump-to-default’’ (‘‘JTD’’)
risk for each CDS SR Clearing Member
under its Stress Test Methodology. CME
considers a CDS Clearing Member
default to be an extreme tail risk event
which is subject to the CDS financial
safeguards, including mutualization
across all other CDS Clearing Members
via the CDS Guaranty Fund.
Currently, CDS SR Clearing Members
that clear self-referencing indices for
themselves or their customers are
required to collateralize the selfreferencing exposure in an amount
specified in the CME Rules. CME is now
proposing to adopt a risk-based
approach without reference to any
preset threshold to capture this selfreferencing risk. The additional risk
associated with CDS SR Clearing
Members will be added to the stress
scenarios used to size the CDS Guaranty
Fund and CME will require each CDS
SR Clearing Member to make an
additional CDS Guaranty Fund Deposit
to address this risk (such additional
deposit, the ‘‘CDS SR Deposit’’). The
aggregate amount of CDS SR Deposits
will be sized to cover the net selfreferencing exposure of the two CDS SR
Clearing Members whose combined
default would create the largest possible
loss to CME in extreme but plausible
market conditions 5 using the stress
testing methodology and will be
allocated proportionately to each CDS
SR Clearing Member. The required CDS
SR Deposit will be allocated to each
CDS SR Clearing Member in proportion
to each such CDS SR Clearing Member’s
net self-referencing exposure.6
5 For purposes of determining the largest
potential residual losses, the self-referencing
exposure of a CDS SR Clearing Member will be
aggregated with that of any affiliated CDS SR
Clearing Member.
6 CME received a notice of non-objection to the
proposed rule change contained herein from the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (‘‘CFTC’’).
See Letter from Phyllis Dietz, Acting Director,
CFTC, to Jason Silverstein, Executive Director and
Associate General Counsel, CME (December 22,
2014). The CFTC imposed conditions in the notice
of non-objection. In accordance with the CFTC
conditions, CME will monitor the self-referencing
risk brought by CDS SR Clearing Members on a
daily basis. In the event the self-referencing
potential residual loss of three or more CDS SR
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A new CME Rule 8H06 (CDS SR
Deposit) has been added to reflect
accurately these proposed changes to
the CDS Guaranty Fund in the CME
Rules, and CME Rule 8H802.B
(Satisfaction of Clearing House
Obligations) has been amended to
reflect the introduction of the CDS SR
Deposit. In addition, provisions in CME
Rule 80104.A (Clearing Through
Clearing Member’s House (or
Proprietary) Account) and CME Rule
80104.B (Clearing Through Clearing
Members Customer Account) that relate
to the requirement by clearing members
that clear self-referencing indices for
themselves or their customers to
collateralize the self-referencing
exposure in an amount specified in the
CME Rules have been deleted.
2. Statutory Basis
CME believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the
requirements of the Exchange Act,
including Section 17A of the Exchange
Act 7 and the applicable regulations
thereunder. The proposed rule change is
designed to promote the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions and, to the extent
applicable, derivatives agreements,
contracts, and transactions, to assure the
safeguarding of securities and funds
which are in the custody or control of
the clearing agency or for which it is
responsible, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest
consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of
the Exchange Act.8
The proposed rule change
accomplishes these objectives because it
is intended to capture more accurately
the risk associated with CDS Clearing
Members that clear CDS Products that
references themselves or their affiliates.
A CDS Clearing Member default may
result in contagion among financial
institutions, widening spreads and
exposing portfolios consisting of index
CDS that reference financial entities to
potential wrong-way risk. For example,
the default of a CDS Clearing Member
based in the United States, which is not
referenced in an index referencing
European names, could lead to overall
widening of the credit spreads among
financial institutions worldwide,
leading to widening of spreads in nonUS indices. This may lead to variations
in correlations between such non-US
indices and other North American
Clearing Members exceeds the equivalent of 50
million Euros each, CME will require additional
initial margin from each such CDS SR Clearing
Member to cover the incremental portion of the selfreferencing risk it brings above 50 million Euros.
7 15 U.S.C. 78q–1.
8 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
E:\FR\FM\05FEN1.SGM
05FEN1
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 24 / Thursday, February 5, 2015 / Notices
indices, potentially adversely impacting
certain portfolios which are sensitive to
such correlations. This increase in
potential exposure caused by contagion
is addressed in the Proposed CDS Risk
Model and Stress Test Methodology via
incorporation of stressed correlation
scenarios.
CME will also promote the efficient
use of margin for the clearinghouse and
its Clearing Members and their
customers, by enabling CME to provide
appropriate portfolio margining
treatment between index and singlename CDS positions and as such
contribute to the safeguarding of
securities and funds in CME’s custody
or control or for which CME is
responsible and the protection of
investors.9
CME also believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the
requirements of Rule 17Ad–22 of the
Exchange Act.10 In particular, in terms
of financial resources, CME believes that
the proposed rule change will continue
to ensure sufficient margin to cover its
credit exposure to its clearing members,
consistent with the requirements of Rule
17Ad–22(b)(2) 11 and Rule 17Ad–
22(d)(14),12 and that the CDS Guaranty
Fund contributions and required margin
will provide sufficient financial
resources to withstand a default by the
two participant families to which it has
the largest exposures in extreme but
plausible market conditions consistent
with the requirements of Rule 17Ad–
22(b)(3).13 CME is adding a CDS
Guaranty Fund deposit using this
approach to address self-referencing
risk, which has historically not been a
material risk in relation to the CDS
products cleared by CME to date. In
anticipation of clearing additional
products, CME proposes to replace the
existing threshold-based margin
requirement with a risk-based
additional CDS Guaranty Fund charge.
In addition, CME believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
CME’s requirement to limit its
exposures to potential losses from
defaults by its participants under
normal market conditions pursuant to
17Ad–22(b)(1).14 CME also believes that
the proposed rule change will continue
to allow for it to take timely action to
contain losses and liquidity pressures
and to continue meeting its obligations
in the event of clearing member
9 Id.
10 17
CFR 240.17Ad–22.
CFR 240.17Ad–22(b)(2).
12 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(d)(14).
13 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(b)(3).
14 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(b)(1).
insolvencies or defaults, in accordance
with Rule 17Ad–22(d)(11).15
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
CME does not believe that the
proposed rule change will have any
impact, or impose any burden, on
competition. The proposed rule change
reflects enhancements to CME’s CDS
Risk Model. Consequently, CME does
not believe that the proposed rule
change would significantly affect the
ability of Clearing Members or other
market participants to continue to clear
CDS, consistent with the risk
management requirements of CME, or
otherwise limit market participants’
choices for selecting clearing services.
For the foregoing reasons, the Proposed
CDS Risk Model does not, in CME’s
view, impose any unnecessary or
inappropriate burden on competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments relating to the
Proposed CDS Risk Model have not
been solicited or received. CME will
notify the Commission of any written
comments received by CME.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 16 of the Act and Rule 19b–
4(f)(4)(ii) 17 thereunder.
CME asserts that this proposal
constitutes a change in an existing
service of CME that (a) primarily affects
the clearing operations of CME with
respect to products that are not
securities, including futures that are not
security futures, and swaps that are not
security-based swaps or mixed swaps,
and forwards that are not security
forwards; and (b) does not significantly
affect any securities clearing operations
of CME or any rights or obligations of
CME with respect to securities clearing
or persons using such securities-clearing
service, which renders the proposed
change effective upon filing. CME
believes that the proposal does not
significantly affect any securities
clearing operations of CME because
CME recently filed a proposed rule
change that clarified that CME has
decided not to clear security-based
swaps, except in a very limited set of
11 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:46 Feb 04, 2015
15 17
CFR 240.17Ad–22(d)(11).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
17 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(4)(ii).
16 15
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6557
circumstances.18 The rule filing
reflecting CME’s decision not to clear
security-based swaps removed any
ambiguity concerning CME’s ability or
intent to perform the functions of a
clearing agency with respect to securitybased swaps. Therefore, this proposal
will not have an effect on any securities
clearing operations of CME.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml), or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File No. SR–
CME–2015–002 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CME–2015–002. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
18 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–
73615 (Nov. 17, 2014), 79 FR 69545 (Nov. 21, 2014)
(SR–CME–2014–49). The only exception is with
regards to Restructuring European Single Name
CDS Contracts created following the occurrence of
a Restructuring Credit Event in respect of an iTraxx
Component Transaction. The clearing of
Restructuring European Single Name CDS Contracts
will be a necessary byproduct after such time that
CME begins clearing iTraxx Europe index CDS.
E:\FR\FM\05FEN1.SGM
05FEN1
6558
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 24 / Thursday, February 5, 2015 / Notices
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours or
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of CME and on CME’s Web site at
https://www.cmegroup.com/marketregulation/rule-filings.html.
All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CME–2015–002 and should
be submitted on or before February 26,
2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–02251 Filed 2–4–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74184; File No. SR–NYSE–
2014–65]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Designation of Longer Period for
Commission Action on Proposed Rule
Change Amending Its Continued
Listing Requirements in Relation to the
Late Filing of a Company’s Annual
Report With the Securities and
Exchange Commission as Set Forth in
Section 802.01E of the Exchange’s
Listed Company Manual
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
January 30, 2015.
On December 4, 2014, New York
Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
amend its continued listing
requirements in relation to the late filing
of a company’s annual report with the
Commission as set forth in Section
802.01E of the Exchange’s Listed
Company Manual (‘‘Late Filer Rule’’).
The proposed rule change was
19 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:46 Feb 04, 2015
Jkt 235001
published for comment in the Federal
Register on December 17, 2014.3 The
Commission received no comment
letters regarding the proposed rule
change.
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 4 provides
that within 45 days of the publication of
notice of the filing of a proposed rule
change, or within such longer period up
to 90 days as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the
self-regulatory organization consents,
the Commission shall either approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether these
proposed rule changes should be
disapproved. The 45th day for this filing
is January 31, 2015.
The Commission is extending the 45day time period for Commission action
on the proposed rule change. The
Commission finds that it is appropriate
to designate a longer period within
which to take action on the proposed
rule change so that it has sufficient time
to consider the proposed rule change.
Accordingly, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act 5 and for the reasons
stated above, the Commission
designates March 17, 2015, as the date
by which the Commission should either
approve or disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–02267 Filed 2–4–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74178; File No. SR–BOX–
2015–06]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX
Options Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Its Rules for the Listing and
Trading on the Exchange of Options
Settling to the RealVolTM SPY Index
(‘‘Index’’)
January 30, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73821
(December 11, 2014), 79 FR 75217 (‘‘Notice’’).
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
6 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(31).
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January
21, 2015, BOX Options Exchange LLC
(the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the self-regulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rules 6010, 6040, 6090, and 10120 to
allow for the listing and trading on the
Exchange of options settling to the
RealVolTM SPY Index (‘‘Index’’). The
text of the proposed rule change is
available from the principal office of the
Exchange, at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room and also on the
Exchange’s Internet Web site at https://
boxexchange.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
rules to provide for the listing and
trading on the Exchange of options
settling to the RealVolTM SPY Index
(‘‘Index’’). The Index measures the
realized volatility of the SPDR® S&P
500® Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) (this
security is known by its symbol ‘‘SPY’’).
At settlement, the Index is based on the
daily closing values of SPY, over the
previous 21 trading days, as calculated
by the RealVol Daily Formula, and
promulgated by The VolX Group
Corporation (‘‘VolX®’’). Options on the
Index (proposed symbol ‘‘VOLS’’) will
be P.M. cash-settled and will have
1 15
2 17
E:\FR\FM\05FEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
05FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6555-6558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02251]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-74179; File No. SR-CME-2015-002]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Related to Enhancements to Its Risk Model for Credit Default Swaps
January 30, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'' or ``Exchange Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice
is hereby given that on January 21, 2015, Chicago Mercantile Exchange
Inc. (``CME'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change described in Items I, II and
III below, which Items have been prepared primarily by CME. CME filed
the proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act,\3\ and Rule
19b-4(f)(4)(ii) \4\ thereunder, so that the proposal was effective upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit
[[Page 6556]]
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(4)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
CME is proposing to add a new CDS Guaranty Fund charge to CDS
Clearing Members that clear CDS Products that reference themselves or
their affiliates and delete the current threshold-based approach.
Specifically, CME proposes to add a new risk component to its CDS
Stress Test Methodology to capture self-referencing risk arising from
contracts that include component transactions for which the reference
entity is a clearing member or one of its affiliates. In addition, CME
proposes to add a new stress exposure calculation to size the self-
referencing risk.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, CME included statements
concerning the purpose and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. CME has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
CME is proposing to add a new CDS Guaranty Fund charge to CDS
Clearing Members that clear CDS Products that reference themselves or
their affiliates and delete the current threshold-based approach.
Specifically, CME proposes to add a new risk component to its CDS
Stress Test Methodology to capture self-referencing risk arising from
contracts that include component transactions for which the reference
entity is a Clearing Member or one of its affiliates. In addition, CME
proposes to add a new stress exposure calculation to size the
anticipated maximum self-referencing risk.
Although CME does not permit a CDS Clearing Member or a customer to
enter into or maintain a single-name CDS position referencing the
clearing member or an affiliate, a self-referencing CDS position may
arise where the CDS Clearing Member or its affiliate is the Reference
Entity in respect of a component transaction within the index
referenced in a CDS position. For example, such a situation may arise
in the context of index CDS contracts which reference CDS Clearing
Members or their affiliates. In such cases, the CDS Clearing Member (a
``CDS SR Clearing Member''), either through its own account or that of
a customer, has exposure to a CDS Product that references itself or its
affiliate (each, an ``SR Transaction''). CME proposes to address this
potential exposure to self-referencing risk by allocating an additional
``jump-to-default'' (``JTD'') risk for each CDS SR Clearing Member
under its Stress Test Methodology. CME considers a CDS Clearing Member
default to be an extreme tail risk event which is subject to the CDS
financial safeguards, including mutualization across all other CDS
Clearing Members via the CDS Guaranty Fund.
Currently, CDS SR Clearing Members that clear self-referencing
indices for themselves or their customers are required to collateralize
the self-referencing exposure in an amount specified in the CME Rules.
CME is now proposing to adopt a risk-based approach without reference
to any preset threshold to capture this self-referencing risk. The
additional risk associated with CDS SR Clearing Members will be added
to the stress scenarios used to size the CDS Guaranty Fund and CME will
require each CDS SR Clearing Member to make an additional CDS Guaranty
Fund Deposit to address this risk (such additional deposit, the ``CDS
SR Deposit''). The aggregate amount of CDS SR Deposits will be sized to
cover the net self-referencing exposure of the two CDS SR Clearing
Members whose combined default would create the largest possible loss
to CME in extreme but plausible market conditions \5\ using the stress
testing methodology and will be allocated proportionately to each CDS
SR Clearing Member. The required CDS SR Deposit will be allocated to
each CDS SR Clearing Member in proportion to each such CDS SR Clearing
Member's net self-referencing exposure.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ For purposes of determining the largest potential residual
losses, the self-referencing exposure of a CDS SR Clearing Member
will be aggregated with that of any affiliated CDS SR Clearing
Member.
\6\ CME received a notice of non-objection to the proposed rule
change contained herein from the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (``CFTC''). See Letter from Phyllis Dietz, Acting
Director, CFTC, to Jason Silverstein, Executive Director and
Associate General Counsel, CME (December 22, 2014). The CFTC imposed
conditions in the notice of non-objection. In accordance with the
CFTC conditions, CME will monitor the self-referencing risk brought
by CDS SR Clearing Members on a daily basis. In the event the self-
referencing potential residual loss of three or more CDS SR Clearing
Members exceeds the equivalent of 50 million Euros each, CME will
require additional initial margin from each such CDS SR Clearing
Member to cover the incremental portion of the self-referencing risk
it brings above 50 million Euros.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A new CME Rule 8H06 (CDS SR Deposit) has been added to reflect
accurately these proposed changes to the CDS Guaranty Fund in the CME
Rules, and CME Rule 8H802.B (Satisfaction of Clearing House
Obligations) has been amended to reflect the introduction of the CDS SR
Deposit. In addition, provisions in CME Rule 80104.A (Clearing Through
Clearing Member's House (or Proprietary) Account) and CME Rule 80104.B
(Clearing Through Clearing Members Customer Account) that relate to the
requirement by clearing members that clear self-referencing indices for
themselves or their customers to collateralize the self-referencing
exposure in an amount specified in the CME Rules have been deleted.
2. Statutory Basis
CME believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Exchange Act, including Section 17A of the Exchange
Act \7\ and the applicable regulations thereunder. The proposed rule
change is designed to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions and, to the extent applicable,
derivatives agreements, contracts, and transactions, to assure the
safeguarding of securities and funds which are in the custody or
control of the clearing agency or for which it is responsible, and, in
general, to protect investors and the public interest consistent with
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Exchange Act.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change accomplishes these objectives because it
is intended to capture more accurately the risk associated with CDS
Clearing Members that clear CDS Products that references themselves or
their affiliates. A CDS Clearing Member default may result in contagion
among financial institutions, widening spreads and exposing portfolios
consisting of index CDS that reference financial entities to potential
wrong-way risk. For example, the default of a CDS Clearing Member based
in the United States, which is not referenced in an index referencing
European names, could lead to overall widening of the credit spreads
among financial institutions worldwide, leading to widening of spreads
in non-US indices. This may lead to variations in correlations between
such non-US indices and other North American
[[Page 6557]]
indices, potentially adversely impacting certain portfolios which are
sensitive to such correlations. This increase in potential exposure
caused by contagion is addressed in the Proposed CDS Risk Model and
Stress Test Methodology via incorporation of stressed correlation
scenarios.
CME will also promote the efficient use of margin for the
clearinghouse and its Clearing Members and their customers, by enabling
CME to provide appropriate portfolio margining treatment between index
and single-name CDS positions and as such contribute to the
safeguarding of securities and funds in CME's custody or control or for
which CME is responsible and the protection of investors.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CME also believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of Rule 17Ad-22 of the Exchange Act.\10\ In particular, in
terms of financial resources, CME believes that the proposed rule
change will continue to ensure sufficient margin to cover its credit
exposure to its clearing members, consistent with the requirements of
Rule 17Ad-22(b)(2) \11\ and Rule 17Ad-22(d)(14),\12\ and that the CDS
Guaranty Fund contributions and required margin will provide sufficient
financial resources to withstand a default by the two participant
families to which it has the largest exposures in extreme but plausible
market conditions consistent with the requirements of Rule 17Ad-
22(b)(3).\13\ CME is adding a CDS Guaranty Fund deposit using this
approach to address self-referencing risk, which has historically not
been a material risk in relation to the CDS products cleared by CME to
date. In anticipation of clearing additional products, CME proposes to
replace the existing threshold-based margin requirement with a risk-
based additional CDS Guaranty Fund charge. In addition, CME believes
that the proposed rule change is consistent with CME's requirement to
limit its exposures to potential losses from defaults by its
participants under normal market conditions pursuant to 17Ad-
22(b)(1).\14\ CME also believes that the proposed rule change will
continue to allow for it to take timely action to contain losses and
liquidity pressures and to continue meeting its obligations in the
event of clearing member insolvencies or defaults, in accordance with
Rule 17Ad-22(d)(11).\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22.
\11\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(b)(2).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(d)(14).
\13\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(b)(3).
\14\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(b)(1).
\15\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(d)(11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
CME does not believe that the proposed rule change will have any
impact, or impose any burden, on competition. The proposed rule change
reflects enhancements to CME's CDS Risk Model. Consequently, CME does
not believe that the proposed rule change would significantly affect
the ability of Clearing Members or other market participants to
continue to clear CDS, consistent with the risk management requirements
of CME, or otherwise limit market participants' choices for selecting
clearing services. For the foregoing reasons, the Proposed CDS Risk
Model does not, in CME's view, impose any unnecessary or inappropriate
burden on competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments relating to the Proposed CDS Risk Model have not
been solicited or received. CME will notify the Commission of any
written comments received by CME.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective upon filing pursuant
to Section 19(b)(3)(A) \16\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(4)(ii) \17\
thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(4)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CME asserts that this proposal constitutes a change in an existing
service of CME that (a) primarily affects the clearing operations of
CME with respect to products that are not securities, including futures
that are not security futures, and swaps that are not security-based
swaps or mixed swaps, and forwards that are not security forwards; and
(b) does not significantly affect any securities clearing operations of
CME or any rights or obligations of CME with respect to securities
clearing or persons using such securities-clearing service, which
renders the proposed change effective upon filing. CME believes that
the proposal does not significantly affect any securities clearing
operations of CME because CME recently filed a proposed rule change
that clarified that CME has decided not to clear security-based swaps,
except in a very limited set of circumstances.\18\ The rule filing
reflecting CME's decision not to clear security-based swaps removed any
ambiguity concerning CME's ability or intent to perform the functions
of a clearing agency with respect to security-based swaps. Therefore,
this proposal will not have an effect on any securities clearing
operations of CME.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-73615 (Nov. 17,
2014), 79 FR 69545 (Nov. 21, 2014) (SR-CME-2014-49). The only
exception is with regards to Restructuring European Single Name CDS
Contracts created following the occurrence of a Restructuring Credit
Event in respect of an iTraxx Component Transaction. The clearing of
Restructuring European Single Name CDS Contracts will be a necessary
byproduct after such time that CME begins clearing iTraxx Europe
index CDS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed change,
the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml), or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File No. SR-CME-2015-002 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CME-2015-002. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the
[[Page 6558]]
public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours or 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of
such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of CME and on CME's Web site at https://www.cmegroup.com/market-regulation/rule-filings.html.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CME-2015-002 and
should be submitted on or before February 26, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-02251 Filed 2-4-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P