Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From the Russian Federation and Ukraine; Final Results of the Expedited Third Sunset Reviews of the Suspension Agreements, 6052-6053 [2015-02201]

Download as PDF 6052 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Notices cross-section where such cross-section is achieved subsequent to the rolling process (i.e., products which have been ‘‘worked after rolling’’)—for example, products which have been beveled or rounded at the edges. Excluded from the order is grade X–70 plate. Also excluded from the order is certain carbon cut-tolength steel plate with a maximum thickness of 80 mm in steel grades BS 7191, 355 EM, and 355 EMZ, as amended by Sable Offshore Energy Project specification XB MOO Y 15 0001, types 1 and 2. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received A complete discussion of all issues raised in this sunset review is provided in the accompanying I&D Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this notice.3 The issues discussed in the I&D Memorandum include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail if the order is revoked. The I&D Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).4 ACCESS is available in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the I&D Memorandum can be accessed at https:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed I&D Memorandum and the electronic version of the I&D Memorandum are identical in content. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Pursuant to section 752(c)(3) of the Act, the Department determines that revocation of the Order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at weighted average margins up to 128.59 percent. 3 See ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Third Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from the People’s Republic of China,’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice (‘‘I&D Memorandum’’). 4 On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). The Web site location was changed from https:// iaaccess.trade.gov to https://access.trade.gov. The Final Rule changing the references to the Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014). 18:18 Feb 03, 2015 Jkt 235001 This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: January 28, 2015. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2015–02202 Filed 2–3–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–821–808; A–823–808] Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From the Russian Federation and Ukraine; Final Results of the Expedited Third Sunset Reviews of the Suspension Agreements Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) finds that termination of the suspension agreements on certain cut-to-length carbon steel plate (‘‘CTL plate’’) from the Russian Federation (‘‘Russia’’) and Ukraine would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. The magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail are indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Reviews’’ section of this notice. SUMMARY: Final Results of Sunset Review VerDate Sep<11>2014 Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders DATES: Effective Date: February 4, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sally C. Gannon or Judith Wey Rudman, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–0162 or (202) 482–0192. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 History of the Suspension Agreements On December 3, 1996, the Department initiated antidumping duty investigations under section 732 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) on certain CTL plate from Russia and Ukraine.1 The Department suspended the antidumping duty investigations on October 24, 1997, on the basis of agreements by the Russian and Ukrainian governments, respectively, to restrict the volume of direct and indirect exports of CTL plate to the United States in order to prevent the suppression or undercutting of price levels of U.S. domestic like products.2 Thereafter, the Department continued its investigations and published in the Federal Register its final determinations of sales at less than fair value. In the final determination for Russia, the Department calculated a weightedaverage dumping margin of 53.81 percent for JSC Severstal, and 185.00 percent for ‘‘all other’’ Russian manufacturers, producers, and exporters of the subject merchandise.3 In the final determination for Ukraine, the Department calculated weighted-average dumping margins of 81.43 percent for JSC Azovstal Iron & Steel Works, 155.00 percent for JSC Ilyich Iron & Steel Works, and 237.91 percent for ‘‘all other’’ Ukrainian manufacturers, producers, and exporters of the subject merchandise.4 Suspension agreements remain in effect for signatory exporters of CTL plate from Russia and Ukraine.5 1 See Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigations: Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon Steel Plate from the People’s Republic of China, Ukraine, the Russian Federation, and the Republic of South Africa, 61 FR 64051 (December 3, 1996). 2 See Suspension of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From the Russian Federation, 62 FR 61780 (November 19, 1997); Suspension of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From Ukraine, 62 FR 61766 (November 19, 1997). 3 See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From the Russian Federation, 62 FR 61787, 61794 (November 19, 1997) (‘‘Final Russia Determination’’). 4 See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From Ukraine, 62 FR 61754, 61766 (November 19, 1997) (‘‘Final Ukraine Determination’’). 5 On December 20, 2002, and September 29, 2008, respectively, revised suspension agreements were signed by representatives of Russian and Ukrainian CTL plate producers pursuant to section 734(b) of the Act. These agreements became effective January 23, 2003, and November 1, 2008, respectively, and replaced the previous non-market economy agreements that had been in effect since 1997. See Suspension of Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from the Russian Federation, 68 FR 3859 (January 27, 2003); Suspension of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from Ukraine, 73 FR 57602 (October 3, 2008). E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM 04FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 23 / Wednesday, February 4, 2015 / Notices Background On October 1, 2014, the Department published the notice of initiation of sunset reviews of the suspension agreements on CTL plate from Russia and Ukraine, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act.6 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i), the Department received timely and complete notices of intent to participate in these sunset reviews from SSAB Enterprises LLC (‘‘SSAB’’) on October 9, 2014, from ArcelorMittal USA LLC (‘‘ArcelorMittal’’) on October 15, 2014, and from Evraz Oregon Steel and Evraz Claymont Steel (collectively, ‘‘Evraz’’), and Nucor Corporation (‘‘Nucor’’), on October 16, 2014. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3), on October 31, 2014, ArcelorMittal, Nucor, and SSAB (collectively, ‘‘domestic interested parties’’) jointly filed, and Evraz separately filed, timely, complete and adequate substantive responses in these sunset reviews.7 The Department did not receive substantive responses from any respondent interested party. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 51.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted expedited sunset reviews of these suspension agreements. nonmetallic substances, 4.75 mm or more in thickness and of a width which exceeds 150 mm and measures at least twice the thickness. Included as subject merchandise in the Suspension Agreements are flat-rolled products of nonrectangular cross-section where such cross-section is achieved subsequent to the rolling process (i.e., products which have been ‘‘worked after rolling’’) for example, products which have been beveled or rounded at the edges. This merchandise is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS) under item numbers 7208.40.3030, 7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000, 7208.53.0000, 7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000, 7210.90.9000, 7211.13.0000, 7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045, 7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, and 7212.50.0000. Although the HTS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the Agreements is dispositive. Specifically excluded from subject merchandise within the scope of these Agreements is grade X–70 steel plate. Scope of Reviews The products covered by these suspension agreements include hotrolled iron and non-alloy steel universal mill plates (i.e., flat-rolled products rolled on four faces or in a closed box pass, of a width exceeding 150 mm but not exceeding 1250 mm and of a thickness of not less than 4 mm, not in coils and without patterns in relief), of rectangular shape, neither clad, plated nor coated with metal, whether or not painted, varnished, or coated with plastics or other nonmetallic substances; and certain iron and non-alloy steel flatrolled products not in coils, of rectangular shape, hot-rolled, neither clad, plated, nor coated with metal, whether or not painted, varnished, or coated with plastics or other A complete discussion of all issues raised in these sunset reviews is provided in the accompanying issues and decision memoranda.8 The issues discussed in the I&D memoranda include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail if the suspension agreements are terminated. The I&D memoranda are public documents and are on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov and is available in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 6 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 79 FR 59216 (October 1, 2014) (Sunset Initiation). 7 See ‘‘Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from Russia: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation’’ from ArcelorMittal USA, Nucor Corporation, and SSAB Enterprises (‘‘domestic interested parties’ response’’) dated October 31, 2014; ‘‘Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from Ukraine: Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation’’ from ArcelorMittal USA, Nucor Corporation, and SSAB Enterprises (‘‘domestic interested parties’ response’’) dated October 31, 2014; ‘‘Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from the People’s Republic of China, the Russian Federation, and Ukraine: Substantive Response from Domestic Producers’’ from Evraz Oregon Steel and Evraz Claymont Steel (‘‘Evraz response’’) dated October 31, 2014. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:18 Feb 03, 2015 Jkt 235001 Analysis of Comments Received 8 See ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Third Sunset Review of the Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from the Russian Federation,’’ from Lynn Fischer Fox, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice; ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Third Sunset Review of the Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from Ukraine,’’ from Lynn Fischer Fox, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (collectively, ‘‘I&D memoranda’’). PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 6053 main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the I&D memoranda can be accessed directly on the Web at https:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn. The signed I&D memoranda and the electronic versions of the I&D memoranda are identical in content. Final Results of Reviews Pursuant to section 752(c) of the Act, the Department determines that termination of the suspension agreements on CTL plate from Russia and Ukraine would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at weighted-average margins up to 185.00 percent for Russia and up to 237.91 percent for Ukraine.9 Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218. Dated: January 29, 2015. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2015–02201 Filed 2–3–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648–XD712 Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska; Central Gulf of Alaska Rockfish Program National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notification of standard prices and fee percentage. AGENCY: 9 See Final Russia Determination and Final Ukraine Determination. E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM 04FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 4, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6052-6053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02201]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-821-808; A-823-808]


Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From the Russian 
Federation and Ukraine; Final Results of the Expedited Third Sunset 
Reviews of the Suspension Agreements

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department of 
Commerce (``the Department'') finds that termination of the suspension 
agreements on certain cut-to-length carbon steel plate (``CTL plate'') 
from the Russian Federation (``Russia'') and Ukraine would be likely to 
lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. The magnitude of the 
dumping margins likely to prevail are indicated in the ``Final Results 
of Reviews'' section of this notice.

DATES: Effective Date: February 4, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sally C. Gannon or Judith Wey Rudman, 
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-0162 or (202) 482-0192.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History of the Suspension Agreements

    On December 3, 1996, the Department initiated antidumping duty 
investigations under section 732 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act'') on certain CTL plate from Russia and Ukraine.\1\ The Department 
suspended the antidumping duty investigations on October 24, 1997, on 
the basis of agreements by the Russian and Ukrainian governments, 
respectively, to restrict the volume of direct and indirect exports of 
CTL plate to the United States in order to prevent the suppression or 
undercutting of price levels of U.S. domestic like products.\2\ 
Thereafter, the Department continued its investigations and published 
in the Federal Register its final determinations of sales at less than 
fair value. In the final determination for Russia, the Department 
calculated a weighted-average dumping margin of 53.81 percent for JSC 
Severstal, and 185.00 percent for ``all other'' Russian manufacturers, 
producers, and exporters of the subject merchandise.\3\ In the final 
determination for Ukraine, the Department calculated weighted-average 
dumping margins of 81.43 percent for JSC Azovstal Iron & Steel Works, 
155.00 percent for JSC Ilyich Iron & Steel Works, and 237.91 percent 
for ``all other'' Ukrainian manufacturers, producers, and exporters of 
the subject merchandise.\4\ Suspension agreements remain in effect for 
signatory exporters of CTL plate from Russia and Ukraine.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigations: Certain 
Cut-To-Length Carbon Steel Plate from the People's Republic of 
China, Ukraine, the Russian Federation, and the Republic of South 
Africa, 61 FR 64051 (December 3, 1996).
    \2\ See Suspension of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Certain 
Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From the Russian Federation, 62 FR 
61780 (November 19, 1997); Suspension of Antidumping Duty 
Investigation: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From 
Ukraine, 62 FR 61766 (November 19, 1997).
    \3\ See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
Value: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From the Russian 
Federation, 62 FR 61787, 61794 (November 19, 1997) (``Final Russia 
Determination'').
    \4\ See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 
Value: Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From Ukraine, 62 FR 
61754, 61766 (November 19, 1997) (``Final Ukraine Determination'').
    \5\ On December 20, 2002, and September 29, 2008, respectively, 
revised suspension agreements were signed by representatives of 
Russian and Ukrainian CTL plate producers pursuant to section 734(b) 
of the Act. These agreements became effective January 23, 2003, and 
November 1, 2008, respectively, and replaced the previous non-market 
economy agreements that had been in effect since 1997. See 
Suspension of Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Cut-to-
Length Carbon Steel Plate from the Russian Federation, 68 FR 3859 
(January 27, 2003); Suspension of Antidumping Duty Investigation: 
Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from Ukraine, 73 FR 57602 
(October 3, 2008).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 6053]]

Background

    On October 1, 2014, the Department published the notice of 
initiation of sunset reviews of the suspension agreements on CTL plate 
from Russia and Ukraine, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act.\6\ 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i), the Department received timely and 
complete notices of intent to participate in these sunset reviews from 
SSAB Enterprises LLC (``SSAB'') on October 9, 2014, from ArcelorMittal 
USA LLC (``ArcelorMittal'') on October 15, 2014, and from Evraz Oregon 
Steel and Evraz Claymont Steel (collectively, ``Evraz''), and Nucor 
Corporation (``Nucor''), on October 16, 2014. Pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.218(d)(3), on October 31, 2014, ArcelorMittal, Nucor, and SSAB 
(collectively, ``domestic interested parties'') jointly filed, and 
Evraz separately filed, timely, complete and adequate substantive 
responses in these sunset reviews.\7\ The Department did not receive 
substantive responses from any respondent interested party. As a 
result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 
51.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted expedited sunset 
reviews of these suspension agreements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 79 FR 59216 
(October 1, 2014) (Sunset Initiation).
    \7\ See ``Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from Russia: 
Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation'' from ArcelorMittal 
USA, Nucor Corporation, and SSAB Enterprises (``domestic interested 
parties' response'') dated October 31, 2014; ``Certain Cut-to-Length 
Carbon Steel Plate from Ukraine: Substantive Response to Notice of 
Initiation'' from ArcelorMittal USA, Nucor Corporation, and SSAB 
Enterprises (``domestic interested parties' response'') dated 
October 31, 2014; ``Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from 
the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation, and Ukraine: 
Substantive Response from Domestic Producers'' from Evraz Oregon 
Steel and Evraz Claymont Steel (``Evraz response'') dated October 
31, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of Reviews

    The products covered by these suspension agreements include hot-
rolled iron and non-alloy steel universal mill plates (i.e., flat-
rolled products rolled on four faces or in a closed box pass, of a 
width exceeding 150 mm but not exceeding 1250 mm and of a thickness of 
not less than 4 mm, not in coils and without patterns in relief), of 
rectangular shape, neither clad, plated nor coated with metal, whether 
or not painted, varnished, or coated with plastics or other nonmetallic 
substances; and certain iron and non-alloy steel flat-rolled products 
not in coils, of rectangular shape, hot-rolled, neither clad, plated, 
nor coated with metal, whether or not painted, varnished, or coated 
with plastics or other nonmetallic substances, 4.75 mm or more in 
thickness and of a width which exceeds 150 mm and measures at least 
twice the thickness. Included as subject merchandise in the Suspension 
Agreements are flat-rolled products of nonrectangular cross-section 
where such cross-section is achieved subsequent to the rolling process 
(i.e., products which have been ``worked after rolling'') for example, 
products which have been beveled or rounded at the edges. This 
merchandise is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 
of the United States (HTS) under item numbers 7208.40.3030, 
7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000, 
7208.53.0000, 7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000, 7210.90.9000, 7211.13.0000, 
7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045, 7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 
and 7212.50.0000. Although the HTS subheadings are provided for 
convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope 
of the Agreements is dispositive. Specifically excluded from subject 
merchandise within the scope of these Agreements is grade X-70 steel 
plate.

Analysis of Comments Received

    A complete discussion of all issues raised in these sunset reviews 
is provided in the accompanying issues and decision memoranda.\8\ The 
issues discussed in the I&D memoranda include the likelihood of 
continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the dumping 
margins likely to prevail if the suspension agreements are terminated. 
The I&D memoranda are public documents and are on file electronically 
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available 
to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and is available in the 
Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce 
building. In addition, a complete version of the I&D memoranda can be 
accessed directly on the Web at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn. The 
signed I&D memoranda and the electronic versions of the I&D memoranda 
are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Expedited Third 
Sunset Review of the Agreement Suspending the Antidumping Duty 
Investigation of Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from the 
Russian Federation,'' from Lynn Fischer Fox, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with 
and hereby adopted by this notice; ``Issues and Decision Memorandum 
for the Expedited Third Sunset Review of the Agreement Suspending 
the Antidumping Duty Investigation of Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon 
Steel Plate from Ukraine,'' from Lynn Fischer Fox, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant 
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with 
and hereby adopted by this notice (collectively, ``I&D memoranda'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Reviews

    Pursuant to section 752(c) of the Act, the Department determines 
that termination of the suspension agreements on CTL plate from Russia 
and Ukraine would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping 
at weighted-average margins up to 185.00 percent for Russia and up to 
237.91 percent for Ukraine.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Final Russia Determination and Final Ukraine 
Determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective orders is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which 
is subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in 
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 
19 CFR 351.218.

     Dated: January 29, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-02201 Filed 2-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.