Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From China; Determination To Conduct a Full Five-Year Review and Scheduling of the Review, 5136-5137 [2015-01783]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
5136
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 20 / Friday, January 30, 2015 / Notices
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Comments: Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the PRA requires each agency to ‘‘* * *
provide 60-day notice in the Federal
Register * * * and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information * * *.’’
Agencies must specifically solicit
comments to: (a) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the agency to perform its
duties, including whether the
information is useful; (b) evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information; (c) enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
minimize the burden on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
To comply with the public
consultation process, we published a
notice in the Federal Register on May
28, 2014 (79 FR 30651), announcing that
we would submit this ICR to OMB for
approval. The notice provided the
required 60-day comment period. We
received no comments in response to
the notice.
If you wish to comment in response
to this notice, you may send your
comments to the offices listed under the
ADDRESSES section of this notice. OMB
has up to 60 days to approve or
disapprove the information collection
but may respond after 30 days.
Therefore, to ensure maximum
consideration, OMB should receive
public comment by March 2, 2015.
Public Comment Policy: ONRR will
post all comments, including names and
addresses of respondents at https://
www.regulations.gov. Before including
Personally Identifiable Information (PII),
such as your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
information in your comment(s), you
should be aware that your entire
comment (including PII) may be made
available to the public at any time.
While you may ask us, in your
comment, to withhold PII from public
view, we cannot guarantee that we will
be able to do so.
Dated: January 28, 2015.
Gregory J. Gould,
Director, Office of Natural Resources
Revenue.
[FR Doc. 2015–01886 Filed 1–29–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4335–30–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:50 Jan 29, 2015
Jkt 235001
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1092 (Review)]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
From China; Determination To
Conduct a Full Five-Year Review and
Scheduling of the Review
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice that it will proceed with a full
review pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c))
(the Act) to determine whether
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on diamond sawblades and parts
thereof from China would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury within a reasonably
foreseeable time. The Commission also
gives notice of the scheduling of the full
review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(5)). For further information
concerning the conduct of this review
and rules of general application, consult
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
DATES: Effective Date: January 22, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Szustakowski (202) 205–3169,
Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.
Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On December 2, 2013,
the Commission instituted a five-year
review on the antidumping duty order
on imports of diamond sawblades and
parts thereof from China (78 FR 72116,
December 2, 2013). The U.S.
Department of Commerce initiated its
five-year review of the order on the
same day (78 FR 72061, December 2,
2013). The Diamond Sawblades
Manufacturers’ Coalition (DSMC), an
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
association of domestic producers of
diamond sawblades, filed an action in
the U.S. Court of International Trade
(CIT) to declare that the five-year
reviews that Commerce initiated and the
Commission instituted were ultra vires
because they began prematurely. On
September 23, 2014, the CIT directed
the Commission to cease further work
on the five-year review it previously
instituted, and to instead institute a
review on November 4, 2014. Prior to
terminating proceedings, the
Commission had voted to conduct a full
review.
Effective November 4, 2014, the
Commission rescinded the previously
instituted five-year review and
instituted the current review (79 FR
65420, November 4, 2014). The
institution notice for the current review
gave notification that the Commission
reserved the right to waive its
regulations concerning filing of
comments on whether to conduct an
expedited review. The Commission
stated in the notice that both domestic
and respondent interested parties
responded to the notice of institution it
published on December 2, 2013, and
that in light of these responses the
Commission determined that
conducting a full review was
appropriate.
In its November 4, 2014 notice, the
Commission did not require those
interested parties that submitted
adequate responses to the December 2,
2013 institution notice to submit full
responses. Instead, the Commission
stated that each such party could submit
a response no later than December 4,
2014 indicating that: (1) It incorporated
the contents of its response to the
December 2, 2013 institution notice and
(2) that it was willing to participate in
this review by providing information
requested to the Commission. Any such
party was also allowed to provide
additional information of the nature
specified in the notice. Parties that did
not submit an adequate response to the
December 2, 2013 institution notice
were also allowed to provide additional
information of the nature specified in
the notice no later than December 4,
2014.
The notice also stated that should
those parties that submitted adequate
responses to the December 2, 2013
institution notice indicate their desire to
participate in this review, the
Commission intended to issue a notice
stating that it will conduct a full review.
In light of this, the Commission reserved
the right to waive the process specified
in 19 CFR 207.62(b) for submitting
comments to the Commission on
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 20 / Friday, January 30, 2015 / Notices
whether to conduct an expedited
review.
Three sets of parties provided
adequate responses to the previously
instituted reviews: (1) DSMC and its
individual members (U.S. producers of
the domestic like product), (2)
Husqvarna Construction Products North
American, Inc. (U.S. producer of the
domestic like product and importer of
subject merchandise) and Husqvarna
(Hebei) Co., Ltd. (foreign producer of the
subject merchandise), and (3) SaintGobain Abrasives-North America
(importer of the subject merchandise)
and Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai)
Co. Ltd. (foreign producer of the subject
merchandise).
These same parties provided
responses to the current notice of
institution. As requested by the notice,
all parties incorporated the contents of
their responses to the December 2, 2013
notice and stated their willingness to
participate in this review by providing
information requested by the
Commission. No new party submitted a
response to the current notice of
institution.
The requirements listed in the
Commission’s November 4, 2014 notice
have been fulfilled. Accordingly, the
Commission waives the process
specified in 19 CFR 207.62(b) for
submitting comments to the
Commission on whether to conduct an
expedited review, and determines that a
full review pursuant to section 751(c)(5)
of the Act should proceed.
Participation in the review and public
service list.—Persons, including
industrial users of the subject
merchandise and, if the merchandise is
sold at the retail level, representative
consumer organizations, wishing to
participate in this review as parties
must file an entry of appearance with
the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11 of the
Commission’s rules, by 45 days after
publication of this notice. A party that
filed a notice of appearance following
publication of the Commission’s notice
of institution of the review need not file
an additional notice of appearance. The
Secretary will maintain a public service
list containing the names and addresses
of all persons, or their representatives,
who are parties to the review.
Limited disclosure of business
proprietary information (BPI) under an
administrative protective order (APO)
and BPI service list.—Pursuant to
section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s
rules, the Secretary will make BPI
gathered in this review available to
authorized applicants under the APO
issued in the review, provided that the
application is made by 45 days after
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:50 Jan 29, 2015
Jkt 235001
publication of this notice. Authorized
applicants must represent interested
parties, as defined by 19 U.S.C. 1677(9),
who are parties to the review. A party
granted access to BPI following
publication of the Commission’s notice
of institution of the review need not
reapply for such access. A separate
service list will be maintained by the
Secretary for those parties authorized to
receive BPI under the APO.
Staff report.—The prehearing staff
report in the review will be placed in
the nonpublic record on Friday, June 3,
2015, and a public version will be
issued thereafter, pursuant to section
207.64 of the Commission’s rules.
Hearing.—The Commission will hold
a hearing in connection with the review
beginning at 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday, June
23, 2015, at the U.S. International Trade
Commission Building. Requests to
appear at the hearing should be filed in
writing with the Secretary to the
Commission on or before Thursday,
June 18, 2015. A nonparty who has
testimony that may aid the
Commission’s deliberations may request
permission to present a short statement
at the hearing. All parties and
nonparties desiring to appear at the
hearing and make oral presentations
should attend a prehearing conference
to be held at 9:30 a.m. on Monday, June
22, 2015, at the U.S. International Trade
Commission Building. Oral testimony
and written materials to be submitted at
the public hearing are governed by
sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24,
and 207.66 of the Commission’s rules.
Parties must submit any request to
present a portion of their hearing
testimony in camera no later than 7
business days prior to the date of the
hearing.
Written submissions.—Each party to
the review may submit a prehearing
brief to the Commission. Prehearing
briefs must conform with the provisions
of section 207.65 of the Commission’s
rules; the deadline for filing is Friday,
June 12, 2015. Parties may also file
written testimony in connection with
their presentation at the hearing, as
provided in section 207.24 of the
Commission’s rules, and posthearing
briefs, which must conform with the
provisions of section 207.67 of the
Commission’s rules. The deadline for
filing posthearing briefs is Thursday,
July 2, 2015. In addition, any person
who has not entered an appearance as
a party to the review may submit a
written statement of information
pertinent to the subject of the review on
or before Thursday, July 2, 2015. On
Thursday, July 30, 2015, the
Commission will make available to
parties all information on which they
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5137
have not had an opportunity to
comment. Parties may submit final
comments on this information on or
before Monday, August 3, 2015, but
such final comments must not contain
new factual information and must
otherwise comply with section 207.68 of
the Commission’s rules. All written
submissions must conform with the
provisions of section 201.8 of the
Commission’s rules; any submissions
that contain BPI must also conform with
the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s Handbook on
E-Filing, available on the Commission’s
Web site at https://edis.usitc.gov,
elaborates upon the Commission’s rules
with respect to electronic filing.
Additional written submissions to the
Commission, including requests
pursuant to section 201.12 of the
Commission’s rules, shall not be
accepted unless good cause is shown for
accepting such submissions, or unless
the submission is pursuant to a specific
request by a Commissioner or
Commission staff.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules,
each document filed by a party to the
review must be served on all other
parties to the review (as identified by
either the public or BPI service list), and
a certificate of service must be timely
filed. The Secretary will not accept a
document for filing without a certificate
of service.
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 26, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–01783 Filed 1–29–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1117–0012]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection,
eComments Requested; Extension
Without Change of a Previously
Approved Collection; Application for
Registration, Application for
Registration Renewal, Affidavit for
Chain Renewal (DEA Forms 225, 225a
and 225b)
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: 60-day notice.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 20 (Friday, January 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5136-5137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01783]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731-TA-1092 (Review)]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From China; Determination To
Conduct a Full Five-Year Review and Scheduling of the Review
AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with a
full review pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19
U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the
antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades and parts thereof from
China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material
injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission also gives
notice of the scheduling of the full review pursuant to section
751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)). For further
information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general
application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure,
part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: January 22, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Szustakowski (202) 205-3169,
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this
review may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at
https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.--On December 2, 2013, the Commission instituted a five-
year review on the antidumping duty order on imports of diamond
sawblades and parts thereof from China (78 FR 72116, December 2, 2013).
The U.S. Department of Commerce initiated its five-year review of the
order on the same day (78 FR 72061, December 2, 2013). The Diamond
Sawblades Manufacturers' Coalition (DSMC), an association of domestic
producers of diamond sawblades, filed an action in the U.S. Court of
International Trade (CIT) to declare that the five-year reviews that
Commerce initiated and the Commission instituted were ultra vires
because they began prematurely. On September 23, 2014, the CIT directed
the Commission to cease further work on the five-year review it
previously instituted, and to instead institute a review on November 4,
2014. Prior to terminating proceedings, the Commission had voted to
conduct a full review.
Effective November 4, 2014, the Commission rescinded the previously
instituted five-year review and instituted the current review (79 FR
65420, November 4, 2014). The institution notice for the current review
gave notification that the Commission reserved the right to waive its
regulations concerning filing of comments on whether to conduct an
expedited review. The Commission stated in the notice that both
domestic and respondent interested parties responded to the notice of
institution it published on December 2, 2013, and that in light of
these responses the Commission determined that conducting a full review
was appropriate.
In its November 4, 2014 notice, the Commission did not require
those interested parties that submitted adequate responses to the
December 2, 2013 institution notice to submit full responses. Instead,
the Commission stated that each such party could submit a response no
later than December 4, 2014 indicating that: (1) It incorporated the
contents of its response to the December 2, 2013 institution notice and
(2) that it was willing to participate in this review by providing
information requested to the Commission. Any such party was also
allowed to provide additional information of the nature specified in
the notice. Parties that did not submit an adequate response to the
December 2, 2013 institution notice were also allowed to provide
additional information of the nature specified in the notice no later
than December 4, 2014.
The notice also stated that should those parties that submitted
adequate responses to the December 2, 2013 institution notice indicate
their desire to participate in this review, the Commission intended to
issue a notice stating that it will conduct a full review. In light of
this, the Commission reserved the right to waive the process specified
in 19 CFR 207.62(b) for submitting comments to the Commission on
[[Page 5137]]
whether to conduct an expedited review.
Three sets of parties provided adequate responses to the previously
instituted reviews: (1) DSMC and its individual members (U.S. producers
of the domestic like product), (2) Husqvarna Construction Products
North American, Inc. (U.S. producer of the domestic like product and
importer of subject merchandise) and Husqvarna (Hebei) Co., Ltd.
(foreign producer of the subject merchandise), and (3) Saint-Gobain
Abrasives-North America (importer of the subject merchandise) and
Saint-Gobain Abrasives (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. (foreign producer of the
subject merchandise).
These same parties provided responses to the current notice of
institution. As requested by the notice, all parties incorporated the
contents of their responses to the December 2, 2013 notice and stated
their willingness to participate in this review by providing
information requested by the Commission. No new party submitted a
response to the current notice of institution.
The requirements listed in the Commission's November 4, 2014 notice
have been fulfilled. Accordingly, the Commission waives the process
specified in 19 CFR 207.62(b) for submitting comments to the Commission
on whether to conduct an expedited review, and determines that a full
review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Act should proceed.
Participation in the review and public service list.--Persons,
including industrial users of the subject merchandise and, if the
merchandise is sold at the retail level, representative consumer
organizations, wishing to participate in this review as parties must
file an entry of appearance with the Secretary to the Commission, as
provided in section 201.11 of the Commission's rules, by 45 days after
publication of this notice. A party that filed a notice of appearance
following publication of the Commission's notice of institution of the
review need not file an additional notice of appearance. The Secretary
will maintain a public service list containing the names and addresses
of all persons, or their representatives, who are parties to the
review.
Limited disclosure of business proprietary information (BPI) under
an administrative protective order (APO) and BPI service list.--
Pursuant to section 207.7(a) of the Commission's rules, the Secretary
will make BPI gathered in this review available to authorized
applicants under the APO issued in the review, provided that the
application is made by 45 days after publication of this notice.
Authorized applicants must represent interested parties, as defined by
19 U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the review. A party granted
access to BPI following publication of the Commission's notice of
institution of the review need not reapply for such access. A separate
service list will be maintained by the Secretary for those parties
authorized to receive BPI under the APO.
Staff report.--The prehearing staff report in the review will be
placed in the nonpublic record on Friday, June 3, 2015, and a public
version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.64 of the
Commission's rules.
Hearing.--The Commission will hold a hearing in connection with the
review beginning at 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday, June 23, 2015, at the U.S.
International Trade Commission Building. Requests to appear at the
hearing should be filed in writing with the Secretary to the Commission
on or before Thursday, June 18, 2015. A nonparty who has testimony that
may aid the Commission's deliberations may request permission to
present a short statement at the hearing. All parties and nonparties
desiring to appear at the hearing and make oral presentations should
attend a prehearing conference to be held at 9:30 a.m. on Monday, June
22, 2015, at the U.S. International Trade Commission Building. Oral
testimony and written materials to be submitted at the public hearing
are governed by sections 201.6(b)(2), 201.13(f), 207.24, and 207.66 of
the Commission's rules. Parties must submit any request to present a
portion of their hearing testimony in camera no later than 7 business
days prior to the date of the hearing.
Written submissions.--Each party to the review may submit a
prehearing brief to the Commission. Prehearing briefs must conform with
the provisions of section 207.65 of the Commission's rules; the
deadline for filing is Friday, June 12, 2015. Parties may also file
written testimony in connection with their presentation at the hearing,
as provided in section 207.24 of the Commission's rules, and
posthearing briefs, which must conform with the provisions of section
207.67 of the Commission's rules. The deadline for filing posthearing
briefs is Thursday, July 2, 2015. In addition, any person who has not
entered an appearance as a party to the review may submit a written
statement of information pertinent to the subject of the review on or
before Thursday, July 2, 2015. On Thursday, July 30, 2015, the
Commission will make available to parties all information on which they
have not had an opportunity to comment. Parties may submit final
comments on this information on or before Monday, August 3, 2015, but
such final comments must not contain new factual information and must
otherwise comply with section 207.68 of the Commission's rules. All
written submissions must conform with the provisions of section 201.8
of the Commission's rules; any submissions that contain BPI must also
conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of
the Commission's rules. The Commission's Handbook on E-Filing,
available on the Commission's Web site at https://edis.usitc.gov,
elaborates upon the Commission's rules with respect to electronic
filing.
Additional written submissions to the Commission, including
requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission's rules, shall
not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such
submissions, or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request
by a Commissioner or Commission staff.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission's
rules, each document filed by a party to the review must be served on
all other parties to the review (as identified by either the public or
BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed.
The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a
certificate of service.
Authority: This review is being conducted under authority of
title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 26, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-01783 Filed 1-29-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P