Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements, 3008-3010 [2015-00810]
Download as PDF
3008
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 13 / Wednesday, January 21, 2015 / Notices
SCUBA diving and fishing. Most trips
will be within 35 miles of safe harbor.’’
Geographic Region: ‘‘North Carolina.’’
The complete application is given in
DOT docket MARAD–2015–0004 at
https://www.regulations.gov. Interested
parties may comment on the effect this
action may have on U.S. vessel builders
or businesses in the U.S. that use U.S.flag vessels. If MARAD determines, in
accordance with 46 U.S.C. 12121 and
MARAD’s regulations at 46 CFR part
388, that the issuance of the waiver will
have an unduly adverse effect on a U.S.vessel builder or a business that uses
U.S.-flag vessels in that business, a
waiver will not be granted. Comments
should refer to the docket number of
this notice and the vessel name in order
for MARAD to properly consider the
comments. Comments should also state
the commenter’s interest in the waiver
application, and address the waiver
criteria given in § 388.4 of MARAD’s
regulations at 46 CFR part 388.
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Dated: January 5, 2015.
Julie P. Agarwal,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015–00898 Filed 1–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
[Docket No. MARAD–2015–0002]
Requested Administrative Waiver of
the Coastwise Trade Laws: Vessel
JOSIAHS REACH; Invitation for Public
Comments
Maritime Administration,
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
As authorized by 46 U.S.C.
12121, the Secretary of Transportation,
as represented by the Maritime
Administration (MARAD), is authorized
to grant waivers of the U.S.-build
requirement of the coastwise laws under
certain circumstances. A request for
such a waiver has been received by
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 Jan 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
MARAD. The vessel, and a brief
description of the proposed service, is
listed below.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
February 20, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
docket number MARAD–2015–0002.
Written comments may be submitted by
hand or by mail to the Docket Clerk,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. You may also
send comments electronically via the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
All comments will become part of this
docket and will be available for
inspection and copying at the above
address between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
E.T., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. An electronic version
of this document and all documents
entered into this docket is available on
the World Wide Web at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda Williams, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Maritime
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W23–453,
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone 202–
366–0903, Email Linda.Williams@
dot.gov.
As
described by the applicant the intended
service of the vessel JOSIAHS REACH
is:
Intended Commercial Use of Vessel:
Nautical tourism on the Puerto Rico
Island. The service we want to develop
is a Sailing Charter with crew
(Catamaran Leopard 43) for day trips as
well as overnight.
Geographic Region: ‘‘Puerto Rico.’’
The complete application is given in
DOT docket MARAD–2015–0002 at
https://www.regulations.gov. Interested
parties may comment on the effect this
action may have on U.S. vessel builders
or businesses in the U.S. that use U.S.flag vessels. If MARAD determines, in
accordance with 46 U.S.C. 12121 and
MARAD’s regulations at 46 CFR part
388, that the issuance of the waiver will
have an unduly adverse effect on a U.S.vessel builder or a business that uses
U.S.-flag vessels in that business, a
waiver will not be granted. Comments
should refer to the docket number of
this notice and the vessel name in order
for MARAD to properly consider the
comments. Comments should also state
the commenter’s interest in the waiver
application, and address the waiver
criteria given in § 388.4 of MARAD’s
regulations at 46 CFR part 388.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Dated: January 5, 2015.
Julie P. Agarwal,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015–00897 Filed 1–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2014–0126]
Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on
proposed collection of information.
AGENCY:
Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public
comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and
reinstatements of previously approved
collections.
This document describes one
collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 23, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA–[docket number] using any of
the following methods:
Electronic submissions: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility,
M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
21JAN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 13 / Wednesday, January 21, 2015 / Notices
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
Instructions: Each submission must
include the Agency name and the
Docket number for this Notice. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Amanda M. Kelley, Contracting Officer’s
Representative, Office of Behavioral
Safety Research (NTI–132), National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W46–495,
Washington, DC 20590. Dr. Kelley’s
phone number is 202–366–7394 and her
email address is Amanda.Kelley@
dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for
approval, it must publish a document in
the Federal Register providing a 60-day
comment period and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing
what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB’s regulations (at
5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask
for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) how to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(iv) how to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks public
comment on the following proposed
collection of information:
Title: Evaluation of Correct Child
Restraint System Installations.
Type of Request: New information
collection requirement.
OMB Clearance Number: None.
Form Number: NHTSA Forms 1265,
1266, 1267.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval: 3 years from date of approval.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 Jan 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
Summary of the Collection of
Information—The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
proposes to conduct individual data
collection session with 150 participants.
Each session will require participants to
complete a set of questionnaires
including: A risk appraisal assessment
tool specific to motor vehicle crash and
injury risks; a measure of invincibility
beliefs; and a demographics
questionnaire. Then each participant
will be instructed to install a CRS (rearfacing, forward facing, high-back
booster, no-back booster) for each of the
four child-size dummies (16-month-old,
3-year-old, 6-year-old, and 8-year-old)
into one of the four vehicle types (SUV,
compact SUV, mini-van, sedan)
provided. By providing the participant
with the age, height, and weight of the
child, and asking the participant to
select the appropriate CRS to install,
NHTSA will immediately address
whether the parent has selected the best
restraint type for each child’s age and
physical dimensions. No verbal
instructions on how to use the CRS
features or vehicle features will be
provided. Participants will be instructed
to complete each installation by
securing a child-size doll in the CRS.
Participants will complete a total of 4
installations.
The order of installations for a given
participant will be randomized with
respect to CRS type, vehicle type, and
child’s age/weight/height in order to
preclude any effects of sequence and
control for any learning or fatigue that
might take place. In addition, the CRS
within each CRS type (easier, more
challenging) and the vehicle type will
vary across participants.
After each installation, various types
of objective and subjective measures
will be collected. Together, these
measures will describe how the
participant used the CRS system, what
problems were encountered, errors
identified, how acceptable the system
was to the user, and the degree of
confidence each participant exhibited
with correctly installing the CRS to the
vehicle and securing the child in the
CRS. Participants will convey this
information by responding to a series of
ratings and open-ended questions
regarding the ease of installation and
challenges related to usability of the
CRS system, the CRS manual, and the
vehicle features and vehicle manual.
Each CRS installation will be videotaped using electronic equipment. Any
and all personally identifiable
information will be separated from data
collected. Also, all identifying
information collected during initial
scheduling will be separated from
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3009
collected information, kept on a secure
server in password protected files, and
discarded when no longer needed.
Access to this information will be
limited. All information collected
during the sessions will be summarized
using generic categories and summary
statistics.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use of the
Information—The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
was established by the Highway Safety
Act of 1970 (23 U.S.C. 101) to carry out
a Congressional mandate to reduce the
mounting number of deaths, injuries,
and economic losses resulting from
motor vehicle crashes on the Nation’s
highways. As part of this statutory
mandate, NHTSA is authorized to
conduct research as a foundation for the
development of motor vehicle standards
and traffic safety programs.
Motor vehicle crashes are a leading
cause of death to children in the United
States. In 2012 a total of 952 children
younger than 13 years died in motor
vehicle traffic crashes, and two-thirds of
these fatalities occurred among children
riding in passenger vehicles. The
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA), recommends
that all children ages 12 and under be
properly buckled in an age- and sizeappropriate car seat, booster seat, or seat
belt in the rear seat. Currently, there are
four types of child restraint systems
designed for children: Infant,
convertible, combination, and beltpositioning booster seats. Each system is
designed to protect a child within a
given height and weight category in the
event of a crash. Child safety seat (CSS)
use reduces the risk for death to infants
(aged <1 year) by 71%; and to toddlers
(aged 1–4 years) by 54% in passenger
vehicles. Booster seat use reduces the
risk for serious injury by 45% for
children aged 4–8 years when compared
with seat belt use alone. Infant,
convertible, and combination seats are
secured to the vehicle seat using the
vehicle’s seat belt system or the
vehicle’s LATCH system, and the child
is secured to the seat using the CRS’s
harness system. Conversely,
combination and booster seats provide a
transition from the child safety seat with
its internal harness to the vehicle lap/
shoulder belt by repositioning the child
so that the vehicle’s seat belt system
holds both the child and the booster in
place.
While child restraint use has
increased over the years, many children
are still fatally injured as a result of
motor vehicles crashes. One possible
explanation for this occurrence could be
the large number of child passengers
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
21JAN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
3010
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 13 / Wednesday, January 21, 2015 / Notices
who are either riding unrestrained in
vehicles, improperly placed in a CRS, or
prematurely graduated to an adult
vehicle seat belt system. A NHTSA
survey, the National Child Restraint Use
Special Study, conducted in 2011,
observed and interviewed a nationally
representative sample of drivers with
child passengers (NHTSA, 2012). The
most prevalent installation errors
identified in this survey were: Incorrect
harness routing slot used, improper
harness clip position, loose CRS
installation, loose harness straps, and
improper lap belt placement. Other
potential installation errors may
include: Improper routing of the
vehicle’s seat belt system or lower
LATCH straps, and twisting of the seat
belt or LATCH. While these errors can
be classified as improper installation
and/or securement errors, researchers
have also identified errors related to
caregivers selecting the correct CRS for
the children’s ages, heights, and
weights.
Evaluating the causes of the various
selection and installation errors can be
challenging. That is, one or more factors
may contribute to any one type of
installation error. There are numerous
CRS makes and models marketed to the
consumer, each with its own
installation procedures/manual. In
addition, vehicle manufacturers design
vehicle restraint systems and vehicle
seats that are incompatible with various
CRSs. New vehicles are continually
introduced to the fleet, and CRSs
continue to evolve each year. Finally,
there is a never-ending flow of new
parents/caregivers who need to be
educated on child passenger safety.
Despite their inexperience, new parents
may overestimate their own accuracy in
selecting and securely installing a CRS
to the vehicle and securing the child in
the CRS.
While it might be hard to control for
some factors, such as the continuing
flow of new parents, and the number
and variety of vehicles and CRSs, others
might be more easily examined. For
example, among the large variety of CRS
designs, CRS and vehicle labeling,
vehicle seating attachments, and manual
designs and instructions, there may be
ways to better convey information to the
caregivers. In addition, specific features
or designs that minimize installation
errors could improve the ease of use for
CRS for the parent or caregiver. In an
effort to reduce the number of errors,
NHTSA is undertaking a study to gain
some insight into the causes of errors
related to selecting and installing CRSs.
To accomplish this, NHTSA will
evaluate installation performance and
caregiver confidence in both
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 Jan 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
experienced and novice CRS users and
determine which factors contribute to
both installation and securement errors
and to determine what factors related to
the CRS, vehicle, and user confidence
contribute to errors. Identifying these
causal factors that contribute to errors
related to selecting and installing CRSs,
as well as those factors that contribute
to accurately selecting and properly
installing CRSs for both novice and
experienced users, will be the first step
in increasing the safety of child
passengers in moving vehicles. In
addition, overall findings can be made
available to CRS manufacturers and
vehicle manufacturers related to
improvements to specific CRS and
vehicle design features that may foster
a better fit in the vehicles and
securement for children.
Description of the Likely Respondents
(Including Estimated Number, and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the
Collection of Information)—Under this
proposed effort, a total of 150
individuals evenly distributed among
experienced and novice CRS users.
‘‘Experienced’’ users will be defined as
individuals who regularly care for a
child under the age of 4 years, transport
the child in a vehicle at least twice a
week, and also have installed any CRS
a minimum of five times in the past 6
months. ‘‘Novice’’ users are defined as
individuals who do not regularly
transport children and have not
installed a CRS in the past 6 months.
NHTSA estimates that each session
will last 120 minutes. Each participant
will complete four installations,
resulting in 600 total installations
distributed across vehicle type, CRS
type, and child’s age, weight, and
height. Each CRS installation will be
video recorded. Prior to installing the
CRS’s, participants will complete a set
of questionnaires including a risk
appraisal assessment tool specific to
motor vehicle crash and injury risks, an
invincibility beliefs index, and
demographics.
Throughout the project, the privacy of
all participants will be protected.
Personally-identifiable information
(names, telephone numbers, email
addresses, etc.) will be kept separate
from the data collected, and will be
stored in restricted folders on secure
password protected servers that are only
accessible to study staff who have need
to access such information. In addition,
all data collected from participants will
be reported in aggregate, and participant
names will not be used in any reports
resulting from this project. Rigorous deidentification procedures will be used
during summary and feedback stages to
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ensure no officers will be identified
through reconstructive means.
Estimate of the Total Annual
Reporting and Record Keeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of
Information—NHTSA estimates that the
total time for each respondent to
participate in the data collection effort
will likely not be more than 2 hours.
Staff estimates that the travel time for
participants will not be more than 30
minutes one-way. Therefore, a
maximum of 3 hours of burden will be
placed on any one participant. The
duration of the study for each
participant will be 3 hours, or a total of
450 hours for the 150 participants. The
participants will not incur any reporting
cost from the information collection.
The participants also will not incur any
record keeping burden or record
keeping cost from the information
collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A)
Dated: January 15, 2015.
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2015–00810 Filed 1–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2014–0127]
Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on
proposed collection of information.
AGENCY:
Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public
comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and
reinstatements of previously approved
collections.
This document describes the
collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 23, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA–2014–0127 using any of the
following methods:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
21JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3008-3010]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00810]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2014-0126]
Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed collection of
information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatements of previously approved collections.
This document describes one collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 23, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA-[docket number] using any of the following methods:
Electronic submissions: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, M-30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
[[Page 3009]]
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Instructions: Each submission must include the Agency name and the
Docket number for this Notice. Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Amanda M. Kelley, Contracting
Officer's Representative, Office of Behavioral Safety Research (NTI-
132), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., W46-495, Washington, DC 20590. Dr. Kelley's phone number is
202-366-7394 and her email address is Amanda.Kelley@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulations (at 5 CFR
1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) how to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(iv) how to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks public comment on
the following proposed collection of information:
Title: Evaluation of Correct Child Restraint System Installations.
Type of Request: New information collection requirement.
OMB Clearance Number: None.
Form Number: NHTSA Forms 1265, 1266, 1267.
Requested Expiration Date of Approval: 3 years from date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of Information--The National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposes to conduct individual
data collection session with 150 participants. Each session will
require participants to complete a set of questionnaires including: A
risk appraisal assessment tool specific to motor vehicle crash and
injury risks; a measure of invincibility beliefs; and a demographics
questionnaire. Then each participant will be instructed to install a
CRS (rear-facing, forward facing, high-back booster, no-back booster)
for each of the four child-size dummies (16-month-old, 3-year-old, 6-
year-old, and 8-year-old) into one of the four vehicle types (SUV,
compact SUV, mini-van, sedan) provided. By providing the participant
with the age, height, and weight of the child, and asking the
participant to select the appropriate CRS to install, NHTSA will
immediately address whether the parent has selected the best restraint
type for each child's age and physical dimensions. No verbal
instructions on how to use the CRS features or vehicle features will be
provided. Participants will be instructed to complete each installation
by securing a child-size doll in the CRS. Participants will complete a
total of 4 installations.
The order of installations for a given participant will be
randomized with respect to CRS type, vehicle type, and child's age/
weight/height in order to preclude any effects of sequence and control
for any learning or fatigue that might take place. In addition, the CRS
within each CRS type (easier, more challenging) and the vehicle type
will vary across participants.
After each installation, various types of objective and subjective
measures will be collected. Together, these measures will describe how
the participant used the CRS system, what problems were encountered,
errors identified, how acceptable the system was to the user, and the
degree of confidence each participant exhibited with correctly
installing the CRS to the vehicle and securing the child in the CRS.
Participants will convey this information by responding to a series of
ratings and open-ended questions regarding the ease of installation and
challenges related to usability of the CRS system, the CRS manual, and
the vehicle features and vehicle manual.
Each CRS installation will be video-taped using electronic
equipment. Any and all personally identifiable information will be
separated from data collected. Also, all identifying information
collected during initial scheduling will be separated from collected
information, kept on a secure server in password protected files, and
discarded when no longer needed. Access to this information will be
limited. All information collected during the sessions will be
summarized using generic categories and summary statistics.
Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the
Information--The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
was established by the Highway Safety Act of 1970 (23 U.S.C. 101) to
carry out a Congressional mandate to reduce the mounting number of
deaths, injuries, and economic losses resulting from motor vehicle
crashes on the Nation's highways. As part of this statutory mandate,
NHTSA is authorized to conduct research as a foundation for the
development of motor vehicle standards and traffic safety programs.
Motor vehicle crashes are a leading cause of death to children in
the United States. In 2012 a total of 952 children younger than 13
years died in motor vehicle traffic crashes, and two-thirds of these
fatalities occurred among children riding in passenger vehicles. The
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), recommends that
all children ages 12 and under be properly buckled in an age- and size-
appropriate car seat, booster seat, or seat belt in the rear seat.
Currently, there are four types of child restraint systems designed for
children: Infant, convertible, combination, and belt-positioning
booster seats. Each system is designed to protect a child within a
given height and weight category in the event of a crash. Child safety
seat (CSS) use reduces the risk for death to infants (aged <1 year) by
71%; and to toddlers (aged 1-4 years) by 54% in passenger vehicles.
Booster seat use reduces the risk for serious injury by 45% for
children aged 4-8 years when compared with seat belt use alone. Infant,
convertible, and combination seats are secured to the vehicle seat
using the vehicle's seat belt system or the vehicle's LATCH system, and
the child is secured to the seat using the CRS's harness system.
Conversely, combination and booster seats provide a transition from the
child safety seat with its internal harness to the vehicle lap/shoulder
belt by repositioning the child so that the vehicle's seat belt system
holds both the child and the booster in place.
While child restraint use has increased over the years, many
children are still fatally injured as a result of motor vehicles
crashes. One possible explanation for this occurrence could be the
large number of child passengers
[[Page 3010]]
who are either riding unrestrained in vehicles, improperly placed in a
CRS, or prematurely graduated to an adult vehicle seat belt system. A
NHTSA survey, the National Child Restraint Use Special Study, conducted
in 2011, observed and interviewed a nationally representative sample of
drivers with child passengers (NHTSA, 2012). The most prevalent
installation errors identified in this survey were: Incorrect harness
routing slot used, improper harness clip position, loose CRS
installation, loose harness straps, and improper lap belt placement.
Other potential installation errors may include: Improper routing of
the vehicle's seat belt system or lower LATCH straps, and twisting of
the seat belt or LATCH. While these errors can be classified as
improper installation and/or securement errors, researchers have also
identified errors related to caregivers selecting the correct CRS for
the children's ages, heights, and weights.
Evaluating the causes of the various selection and installation
errors can be challenging. That is, one or more factors may contribute
to any one type of installation error. There are numerous CRS makes and
models marketed to the consumer, each with its own installation
procedures/manual. In addition, vehicle manufacturers design vehicle
restraint systems and vehicle seats that are incompatible with various
CRSs. New vehicles are continually introduced to the fleet, and CRSs
continue to evolve each year. Finally, there is a never-ending flow of
new parents/caregivers who need to be educated on child passenger
safety. Despite their inexperience, new parents may overestimate their
own accuracy in selecting and securely installing a CRS to the vehicle
and securing the child in the CRS.
While it might be hard to control for some factors, such as the
continuing flow of new parents, and the number and variety of vehicles
and CRSs, others might be more easily examined. For example, among the
large variety of CRS designs, CRS and vehicle labeling, vehicle seating
attachments, and manual designs and instructions, there may be ways to
better convey information to the caregivers. In addition, specific
features or designs that minimize installation errors could improve the
ease of use for CRS for the parent or caregiver. In an effort to reduce
the number of errors, NHTSA is undertaking a study to gain some insight
into the causes of errors related to selecting and installing CRSs. To
accomplish this, NHTSA will evaluate installation performance and
caregiver confidence in both experienced and novice CRS users and
determine which factors contribute to both installation and securement
errors and to determine what factors related to the CRS, vehicle, and
user confidence contribute to errors. Identifying these causal factors
that contribute to errors related to selecting and installing CRSs, as
well as those factors that contribute to accurately selecting and
properly installing CRSs for both novice and experienced users, will be
the first step in increasing the safety of child passengers in moving
vehicles. In addition, overall findings can be made available to CRS
manufacturers and vehicle manufacturers related to improvements to
specific CRS and vehicle design features that may foster a better fit
in the vehicles and securement for children.
Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number,
and Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information)--
Under this proposed effort, a total of 150 individuals evenly
distributed among experienced and novice CRS users. ``Experienced''
users will be defined as individuals who regularly care for a child
under the age of 4 years, transport the child in a vehicle at least
twice a week, and also have installed any CRS a minimum of five times
in the past 6 months. ``Novice'' users are defined as individuals who
do not regularly transport children and have not installed a CRS in the
past 6 months.
NHTSA estimates that each session will last 120 minutes. Each
participant will complete four installations, resulting in 600 total
installations distributed across vehicle type, CRS type, and child's
age, weight, and height. Each CRS installation will be video recorded.
Prior to installing the CRS's, participants will complete a set of
questionnaires including a risk appraisal assessment tool specific to
motor vehicle crash and injury risks, an invincibility beliefs index,
and demographics.
Throughout the project, the privacy of all participants will be
protected. Personally-identifiable information (names, telephone
numbers, email addresses, etc.) will be kept separate from the data
collected, and will be stored in restricted folders on secure password
protected servers that are only accessible to study staff who have need
to access such information. In addition, all data collected from
participants will be reported in aggregate, and participant names will
not be used in any reports resulting from this project. Rigorous de-
identification procedures will be used during summary and feedback
stages to ensure no officers will be identified through reconstructive
means.
Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Record Keeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of Information--NHTSA estimates that the
total time for each respondent to participate in the data collection
effort will likely not be more than 2 hours. Staff estimates that the
travel time for participants will not be more than 30 minutes one-way.
Therefore, a maximum of 3 hours of burden will be placed on any one
participant. The duration of the study for each participant will be 3
hours, or a total of 450 hours for the 150 participants. The
participants will not incur any reporting cost from the information
collection. The participants also will not incur any record keeping
burden or record keeping cost from the information collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A)
Dated: January 15, 2015.
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2015-00810 Filed 1-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P