Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements, 3010-3011 [2015-00807]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
3010
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 13 / Wednesday, January 21, 2015 / Notices
who are either riding unrestrained in
vehicles, improperly placed in a CRS, or
prematurely graduated to an adult
vehicle seat belt system. A NHTSA
survey, the National Child Restraint Use
Special Study, conducted in 2011,
observed and interviewed a nationally
representative sample of drivers with
child passengers (NHTSA, 2012). The
most prevalent installation errors
identified in this survey were: Incorrect
harness routing slot used, improper
harness clip position, loose CRS
installation, loose harness straps, and
improper lap belt placement. Other
potential installation errors may
include: Improper routing of the
vehicle’s seat belt system or lower
LATCH straps, and twisting of the seat
belt or LATCH. While these errors can
be classified as improper installation
and/or securement errors, researchers
have also identified errors related to
caregivers selecting the correct CRS for
the children’s ages, heights, and
weights.
Evaluating the causes of the various
selection and installation errors can be
challenging. That is, one or more factors
may contribute to any one type of
installation error. There are numerous
CRS makes and models marketed to the
consumer, each with its own
installation procedures/manual. In
addition, vehicle manufacturers design
vehicle restraint systems and vehicle
seats that are incompatible with various
CRSs. New vehicles are continually
introduced to the fleet, and CRSs
continue to evolve each year. Finally,
there is a never-ending flow of new
parents/caregivers who need to be
educated on child passenger safety.
Despite their inexperience, new parents
may overestimate their own accuracy in
selecting and securely installing a CRS
to the vehicle and securing the child in
the CRS.
While it might be hard to control for
some factors, such as the continuing
flow of new parents, and the number
and variety of vehicles and CRSs, others
might be more easily examined. For
example, among the large variety of CRS
designs, CRS and vehicle labeling,
vehicle seating attachments, and manual
designs and instructions, there may be
ways to better convey information to the
caregivers. In addition, specific features
or designs that minimize installation
errors could improve the ease of use for
CRS for the parent or caregiver. In an
effort to reduce the number of errors,
NHTSA is undertaking a study to gain
some insight into the causes of errors
related to selecting and installing CRSs.
To accomplish this, NHTSA will
evaluate installation performance and
caregiver confidence in both
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 Jan 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
experienced and novice CRS users and
determine which factors contribute to
both installation and securement errors
and to determine what factors related to
the CRS, vehicle, and user confidence
contribute to errors. Identifying these
causal factors that contribute to errors
related to selecting and installing CRSs,
as well as those factors that contribute
to accurately selecting and properly
installing CRSs for both novice and
experienced users, will be the first step
in increasing the safety of child
passengers in moving vehicles. In
addition, overall findings can be made
available to CRS manufacturers and
vehicle manufacturers related to
improvements to specific CRS and
vehicle design features that may foster
a better fit in the vehicles and
securement for children.
Description of the Likely Respondents
(Including Estimated Number, and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the
Collection of Information)—Under this
proposed effort, a total of 150
individuals evenly distributed among
experienced and novice CRS users.
‘‘Experienced’’ users will be defined as
individuals who regularly care for a
child under the age of 4 years, transport
the child in a vehicle at least twice a
week, and also have installed any CRS
a minimum of five times in the past 6
months. ‘‘Novice’’ users are defined as
individuals who do not regularly
transport children and have not
installed a CRS in the past 6 months.
NHTSA estimates that each session
will last 120 minutes. Each participant
will complete four installations,
resulting in 600 total installations
distributed across vehicle type, CRS
type, and child’s age, weight, and
height. Each CRS installation will be
video recorded. Prior to installing the
CRS’s, participants will complete a set
of questionnaires including a risk
appraisal assessment tool specific to
motor vehicle crash and injury risks, an
invincibility beliefs index, and
demographics.
Throughout the project, the privacy of
all participants will be protected.
Personally-identifiable information
(names, telephone numbers, email
addresses, etc.) will be kept separate
from the data collected, and will be
stored in restricted folders on secure
password protected servers that are only
accessible to study staff who have need
to access such information. In addition,
all data collected from participants will
be reported in aggregate, and participant
names will not be used in any reports
resulting from this project. Rigorous deidentification procedures will be used
during summary and feedback stages to
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ensure no officers will be identified
through reconstructive means.
Estimate of the Total Annual
Reporting and Record Keeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of
Information—NHTSA estimates that the
total time for each respondent to
participate in the data collection effort
will likely not be more than 2 hours.
Staff estimates that the travel time for
participants will not be more than 30
minutes one-way. Therefore, a
maximum of 3 hours of burden will be
placed on any one participant. The
duration of the study for each
participant will be 3 hours, or a total of
450 hours for the 150 participants. The
participants will not incur any reporting
cost from the information collection.
The participants also will not incur any
record keeping burden or record
keeping cost from the information
collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A)
Dated: January 15, 2015.
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2015–00810 Filed 1–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2014–0127]
Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on
proposed collection of information.
AGENCY:
Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public
comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and
reinstatements of previously approved
collections.
This document describes the
collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 23, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA–2014–0127 using any of the
following methods:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
21JAN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 13 / Wednesday, January 21, 2015 / Notices
Electronic submissions: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility,
M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. Fax: 1–
(202) 493–2251.
Instructions: Each submission must
include the Agency name and the
Docket number for this Notice. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
J. Stephen Higgins, Contracting Officer’s
Technical Representative, Office of
Behavioral Safety Research (NTI–132),
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., W46–474, Washington, DC
20590. Dr. Higgins’ phone number is
(202) 366–3976 and his email address is
james.higgins@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for
approval, it must publish a document in
the Federal Register providing a 60-day
comment period and otherwise consult
with members of the public and affected
agencies concerning each proposed
collection of information. The OMB has
promulgated regulations describing
what must be included in such a
document. Under OMB’s regulations (at
5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask
for public comment on the following: (i)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (iii) How to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv)
How to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses. In
compliance with these requirements,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 Jan 20, 2015
Jkt 235001
NHTSA asks public comment on the
following proposed collection of
information:
Characterizing Ambulance Driver
Training in EMS Systems
Type of Request—New information
collection requirement.
OMB Clearance Number—None.
Form Number—NHTSA 1186.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval—3 years from date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of
Information—In order to characterize
ambulance driver training across the
United States, the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
proposes to collect information from
EMS agencies providing ambulance
services and State offices responsible for
overseeing training, licensing, and
regulation of EMS agencies and their
drivers. NHTSA is interested in learning
about what types of driver training are
required, when the training is required
(new drivers, continuing education,
etc.), how driving incidents (crashes,
moving violations, etc.) impact driving
privileges, initial qualification standards
(age, number of years with license,
driving record, etc.), and other related
topics. Participation in the study will be
voluntary and will only include State
level agency representatives and
representatives from EMS agencies that
offer ambulance services. Data
collection will be in the form of semistructured interviews in-person or over
the phone of contacts at State offices
and an Internet-based survey of EMS
agencies providing ambulance services.
EMS agencies will be contacted via
email, mail, or phone with a link to the
Internet survey. State offices will be
contacted via email or phone to
participate in the semi-structured
interviews.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use of the
Information— NHTSA has the
responsibility for making driving safer
by ensuring that drivers commit the
fewest errors possible and by attempting
to render the residual errors that are
committed benign. Not all drivers,
however, face the same level of risk on
the road or the same task demands.
Emergency vehicle operators must deal
with critical time demands, large
vehicles, and numerous potential and
unavoidable distractions inherent in the
response to emergencies.
Operator training is one method that
human factors professionals have used
in virtually all domains to reduce
human error and thereby increase the
safety of operations. Although
emergency vehicle training for
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
3011
ambulance drivers has been repeatedly
identified as an important step in the
safety system, the current situation with
respect to ambulance driver training in
the United States is not well
characterized. This project will
document the types of driver training
offered, when this training is required,
how driving incidents impact driving
privileges, initial qualification
standards, and other related topics
discovered throughout the course of the
study. The results of this project will
assist NHTSA in determining the
current state of ambulance driver
training which will help the Agency
determine if additional research and
development on the topic are warranted.
Description of the Likely Respondents
(Including Estimated Number, and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the
Collection of Information)—The
participant groups being sought include
representatives from up to 21,283 EMS
agencies across the United States and
representatives from State offices for the
50 States and Washington DC
Participants from EMS agencies will be
recruited via email to respond to an
Internet-based survey. The survey will
be completed a single time by one
representative from the solicited
agencies. Approximately 153 semistructured interviews (up to 3 per State
and Washington DC since multiple
offices may be responsible for various
aspects of ambulance driver training
and regulation) will be conducted via
telephone with personnel from State
offices. The total sample size has the
potential to be 21,436 participants.
Estimate of the Total Annual
Reporting and Record Keeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of
Information—The 153 conversations
with State personnel will average
approximately 60 minutes in length
including introduction, demographics,
ambulance driver training/licensing
requirements, training course
description and content review, and
conclusion. The estimated completion
time for the Internet-based survey of
EMS agency representatives is 30
minutes per agency. The total estimated
annual burden if all solicited
participants respond is 10,794.50 hours.
Participants will incur no costs and no
record keeping burden from the
information collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A).
Dated: January 14, 2015.
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2015–00807 Filed 1–20–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM
21JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3010-3011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00807]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2014-0127]
Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed collection of
information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatements of previously approved collections.
This document describes the collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 23, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA-2014-0127 using any of the following methods:
[[Page 3011]]
Electronic submissions: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, M-30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays. Fax: 1-(202) 493-2251.
Instructions: Each submission must include the Agency name and the
Docket number for this Notice. Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. J. Stephen Higgins, Contracting
Officer's Technical Representative, Office of Behavioral Safety
Research (NTI-132), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W46-474, Washington, DC 20590. Dr. Higgins'
phone number is (202) 366-3976 and his email address is
james.higgins@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulations (at 5 CFR
1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following: (i)
Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether
the information will have practical utility; (ii) The accuracy of the
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (iii) How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv) How to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including the
use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. In
compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks public comment on the
following proposed collection of information:
Characterizing Ambulance Driver Training in EMS Systems
Type of Request--New information collection requirement.
OMB Clearance Number--None.
Form Number--NHTSA 1186.
Requested Expiration Date of Approval--3 years from date of
approval.
Summary of the Collection of Information--In order to characterize
ambulance driver training across the United States, the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposes to collect
information from EMS agencies providing ambulance services and State
offices responsible for overseeing training, licensing, and regulation
of EMS agencies and their drivers. NHTSA is interested in learning
about what types of driver training are required, when the training is
required (new drivers, continuing education, etc.), how driving
incidents (crashes, moving violations, etc.) impact driving privileges,
initial qualification standards (age, number of years with license,
driving record, etc.), and other related topics. Participation in the
study will be voluntary and will only include State level agency
representatives and representatives from EMS agencies that offer
ambulance services. Data collection will be in the form of semi-
structured interviews in-person or over the phone of contacts at State
offices and an Internet-based survey of EMS agencies providing
ambulance services. EMS agencies will be contacted via email, mail, or
phone with a link to the Internet survey. State offices will be
contacted via email or phone to participate in the semi-structured
interviews.
Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the
Information-- NHTSA has the responsibility for making driving safer by
ensuring that drivers commit the fewest errors possible and by
attempting to render the residual errors that are committed benign. Not
all drivers, however, face the same level of risk on the road or the
same task demands. Emergency vehicle operators must deal with critical
time demands, large vehicles, and numerous potential and unavoidable
distractions inherent in the response to emergencies.
Operator training is one method that human factors professionals
have used in virtually all domains to reduce human error and thereby
increase the safety of operations. Although emergency vehicle training
for ambulance drivers has been repeatedly identified as an important
step in the safety system, the current situation with respect to
ambulance driver training in the United States is not well
characterized. This project will document the types of driver training
offered, when this training is required, how driving incidents impact
driving privileges, initial qualification standards, and other related
topics discovered throughout the course of the study. The results of
this project will assist NHTSA in determining the current state of
ambulance driver training which will help the Agency determine if
additional research and development on the topic are warranted.
Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number,
and Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information)--
The participant groups being sought include representatives from up to
21,283 EMS agencies across the United States and representatives from
State offices for the 50 States and Washington DC Participants from EMS
agencies will be recruited via email to respond to an Internet-based
survey. The survey will be completed a single time by one
representative from the solicited agencies. Approximately 153 semi-
structured interviews (up to 3 per State and Washington DC since
multiple offices may be responsible for various aspects of ambulance
driver training and regulation) will be conducted via telephone with
personnel from State offices. The total sample size has the potential
to be 21,436 participants.
Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Record Keeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of Information--The 153 conversations
with State personnel will average approximately 60 minutes in length
including introduction, demographics, ambulance driver training/
licensing requirements, training course description and content review,
and conclusion. The estimated completion time for the Internet-based
survey of EMS agency representatives is 30 minutes per agency. The
total estimated annual burden if all solicited participants respond is
10,794.50 hours. Participants will incur no costs and no record keeping
burden from the information collection.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A).
Dated: January 14, 2015.
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2015-00807 Filed 1-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P