Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements, 3010-3011 [2015-00807]

Download as PDF asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 3010 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 13 / Wednesday, January 21, 2015 / Notices who are either riding unrestrained in vehicles, improperly placed in a CRS, or prematurely graduated to an adult vehicle seat belt system. A NHTSA survey, the National Child Restraint Use Special Study, conducted in 2011, observed and interviewed a nationally representative sample of drivers with child passengers (NHTSA, 2012). The most prevalent installation errors identified in this survey were: Incorrect harness routing slot used, improper harness clip position, loose CRS installation, loose harness straps, and improper lap belt placement. Other potential installation errors may include: Improper routing of the vehicle’s seat belt system or lower LATCH straps, and twisting of the seat belt or LATCH. While these errors can be classified as improper installation and/or securement errors, researchers have also identified errors related to caregivers selecting the correct CRS for the children’s ages, heights, and weights. Evaluating the causes of the various selection and installation errors can be challenging. That is, one or more factors may contribute to any one type of installation error. There are numerous CRS makes and models marketed to the consumer, each with its own installation procedures/manual. In addition, vehicle manufacturers design vehicle restraint systems and vehicle seats that are incompatible with various CRSs. New vehicles are continually introduced to the fleet, and CRSs continue to evolve each year. Finally, there is a never-ending flow of new parents/caregivers who need to be educated on child passenger safety. Despite their inexperience, new parents may overestimate their own accuracy in selecting and securely installing a CRS to the vehicle and securing the child in the CRS. While it might be hard to control for some factors, such as the continuing flow of new parents, and the number and variety of vehicles and CRSs, others might be more easily examined. For example, among the large variety of CRS designs, CRS and vehicle labeling, vehicle seating attachments, and manual designs and instructions, there may be ways to better convey information to the caregivers. In addition, specific features or designs that minimize installation errors could improve the ease of use for CRS for the parent or caregiver. In an effort to reduce the number of errors, NHTSA is undertaking a study to gain some insight into the causes of errors related to selecting and installing CRSs. To accomplish this, NHTSA will evaluate installation performance and caregiver confidence in both VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:50 Jan 20, 2015 Jkt 235001 experienced and novice CRS users and determine which factors contribute to both installation and securement errors and to determine what factors related to the CRS, vehicle, and user confidence contribute to errors. Identifying these causal factors that contribute to errors related to selecting and installing CRSs, as well as those factors that contribute to accurately selecting and properly installing CRSs for both novice and experienced users, will be the first step in increasing the safety of child passengers in moving vehicles. In addition, overall findings can be made available to CRS manufacturers and vehicle manufacturers related to improvements to specific CRS and vehicle design features that may foster a better fit in the vehicles and securement for children. Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number, and Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information)—Under this proposed effort, a total of 150 individuals evenly distributed among experienced and novice CRS users. ‘‘Experienced’’ users will be defined as individuals who regularly care for a child under the age of 4 years, transport the child in a vehicle at least twice a week, and also have installed any CRS a minimum of five times in the past 6 months. ‘‘Novice’’ users are defined as individuals who do not regularly transport children and have not installed a CRS in the past 6 months. NHTSA estimates that each session will last 120 minutes. Each participant will complete four installations, resulting in 600 total installations distributed across vehicle type, CRS type, and child’s age, weight, and height. Each CRS installation will be video recorded. Prior to installing the CRS’s, participants will complete a set of questionnaires including a risk appraisal assessment tool specific to motor vehicle crash and injury risks, an invincibility beliefs index, and demographics. Throughout the project, the privacy of all participants will be protected. Personally-identifiable information (names, telephone numbers, email addresses, etc.) will be kept separate from the data collected, and will be stored in restricted folders on secure password protected servers that are only accessible to study staff who have need to access such information. In addition, all data collected from participants will be reported in aggregate, and participant names will not be used in any reports resulting from this project. Rigorous deidentification procedures will be used during summary and feedback stages to PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 ensure no officers will be identified through reconstructive means. Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Record Keeping Burden Resulting from the Collection of Information—NHTSA estimates that the total time for each respondent to participate in the data collection effort will likely not be more than 2 hours. Staff estimates that the travel time for participants will not be more than 30 minutes one-way. Therefore, a maximum of 3 hours of burden will be placed on any one participant. The duration of the study for each participant will be 3 hours, or a total of 450 hours for the 150 participants. The participants will not incur any reporting cost from the information collection. The participants also will not incur any record keeping burden or record keeping cost from the information collection. Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) Dated: January 15, 2015. Jeff Michael, Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development. [FR Doc. 2015–00810 Filed 1–20–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–59–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration [U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2014–0127] Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT. ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed collection of information. AGENCY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit public comment on proposed collections of information, including extensions and reinstatements of previously approved collections. This document describes the collection of information for which NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval. DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 23, 2015. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT Docket ID Number NHTSA–2014–0127 using any of the following methods: SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM 21JAN1 asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 13 / Wednesday, January 21, 2015 / Notices Electronic submissions: Go to https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. Mail: Docket Management Facility, M–30, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590. Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Fax: 1– (202) 493–2251. Instructions: Each submission must include the Agency name and the Docket number for this Notice. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov including any personal information provided. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. J. Stephen Higgins, Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative, Office of Behavioral Safety Research (NTI–132), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W46–474, Washington, DC 20590. Dr. Higgins’ phone number is (202) 366–3976 and his email address is james.higgins@dot.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB for approval, it must publish a document in the Federal Register providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must be included in such a document. Under OMB’s regulations (at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following: (i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (ii) The accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (iii) How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (iv) How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. In compliance with these requirements, VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:50 Jan 20, 2015 Jkt 235001 NHTSA asks public comment on the following proposed collection of information: Characterizing Ambulance Driver Training in EMS Systems Type of Request—New information collection requirement. OMB Clearance Number—None. Form Number—NHTSA 1186. Requested Expiration Date of Approval—3 years from date of approval. Summary of the Collection of Information—In order to characterize ambulance driver training across the United States, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposes to collect information from EMS agencies providing ambulance services and State offices responsible for overseeing training, licensing, and regulation of EMS agencies and their drivers. NHTSA is interested in learning about what types of driver training are required, when the training is required (new drivers, continuing education, etc.), how driving incidents (crashes, moving violations, etc.) impact driving privileges, initial qualification standards (age, number of years with license, driving record, etc.), and other related topics. Participation in the study will be voluntary and will only include State level agency representatives and representatives from EMS agencies that offer ambulance services. Data collection will be in the form of semistructured interviews in-person or over the phone of contacts at State offices and an Internet-based survey of EMS agencies providing ambulance services. EMS agencies will be contacted via email, mail, or phone with a link to the Internet survey. State offices will be contacted via email or phone to participate in the semi-structured interviews. Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the Information— NHTSA has the responsibility for making driving safer by ensuring that drivers commit the fewest errors possible and by attempting to render the residual errors that are committed benign. Not all drivers, however, face the same level of risk on the road or the same task demands. Emergency vehicle operators must deal with critical time demands, large vehicles, and numerous potential and unavoidable distractions inherent in the response to emergencies. Operator training is one method that human factors professionals have used in virtually all domains to reduce human error and thereby increase the safety of operations. Although emergency vehicle training for PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 3011 ambulance drivers has been repeatedly identified as an important step in the safety system, the current situation with respect to ambulance driver training in the United States is not well characterized. This project will document the types of driver training offered, when this training is required, how driving incidents impact driving privileges, initial qualification standards, and other related topics discovered throughout the course of the study. The results of this project will assist NHTSA in determining the current state of ambulance driver training which will help the Agency determine if additional research and development on the topic are warranted. Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number, and Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information)—The participant groups being sought include representatives from up to 21,283 EMS agencies across the United States and representatives from State offices for the 50 States and Washington DC Participants from EMS agencies will be recruited via email to respond to an Internet-based survey. The survey will be completed a single time by one representative from the solicited agencies. Approximately 153 semistructured interviews (up to 3 per State and Washington DC since multiple offices may be responsible for various aspects of ambulance driver training and regulation) will be conducted via telephone with personnel from State offices. The total sample size has the potential to be 21,436 participants. Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Record Keeping Burden Resulting from the Collection of Information—The 153 conversations with State personnel will average approximately 60 minutes in length including introduction, demographics, ambulance driver training/licensing requirements, training course description and content review, and conclusion. The estimated completion time for the Internet-based survey of EMS agency representatives is 30 minutes per agency. The total estimated annual burden if all solicited participants respond is 10,794.50 hours. Participants will incur no costs and no record keeping burden from the information collection. Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A). Dated: January 14, 2015. Jeff Michael, Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development. [FR Doc. 2015–00807 Filed 1–20–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–59–P E:\FR\FM\21JAN1.SGM 21JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3010-3011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00807]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2014-0127]


Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed collection of 
information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from 
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit 
public comment on proposed collections of information, including 
extensions and reinstatements of previously approved collections.
    This document describes the collection of information for which 
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 23, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT Docket ID Number 
NHTSA-2014-0127 using any of the following methods:

[[Page 3011]]

    Electronic submissions: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow 
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
    Mail: Docket Management Facility, M-30, U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, 
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
    Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, except Federal holidays. Fax: 1-(202) 493-2251.
    Instructions: Each submission must include the Agency name and the 
Docket number for this Notice. Note that all comments received will be 
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov including any 
personal information provided.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. J. Stephen Higgins, Contracting 
Officer's Technical Representative, Office of Behavioral Safety 
Research (NTI-132), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W46-474, Washington, DC 20590. Dr. Higgins' 
phone number is (202) 366-3976 and his email address is 
james.higgins@dot.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB 
for approval, it must publish a document in the Federal Register 
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of 
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of 
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must 
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulations (at 5 CFR 
1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following: (i) 
Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the 
proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether 
the information will have practical utility; (ii) The accuracy of the 
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of 
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions 
used; (iii) How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and (iv) How to minimize the burden of the 
collection of information on those who are to respond, including the 
use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other 
technological collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. In 
compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks public comment on the 
following proposed collection of information:

Characterizing Ambulance Driver Training in EMS Systems

    Type of Request--New information collection requirement.
    OMB Clearance Number--None.
    Form Number--NHTSA 1186.
    Requested Expiration Date of Approval--3 years from date of 
approval.
    Summary of the Collection of Information--In order to characterize 
ambulance driver training across the United States, the National 
Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposes to collect 
information from EMS agencies providing ambulance services and State 
offices responsible for overseeing training, licensing, and regulation 
of EMS agencies and their drivers. NHTSA is interested in learning 
about what types of driver training are required, when the training is 
required (new drivers, continuing education, etc.), how driving 
incidents (crashes, moving violations, etc.) impact driving privileges, 
initial qualification standards (age, number of years with license, 
driving record, etc.), and other related topics. Participation in the 
study will be voluntary and will only include State level agency 
representatives and representatives from EMS agencies that offer 
ambulance services. Data collection will be in the form of semi-
structured interviews in-person or over the phone of contacts at State 
offices and an Internet-based survey of EMS agencies providing 
ambulance services. EMS agencies will be contacted via email, mail, or 
phone with a link to the Internet survey. State offices will be 
contacted via email or phone to participate in the semi-structured 
interviews.
    Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the 
Information-- NHTSA has the responsibility for making driving safer by 
ensuring that drivers commit the fewest errors possible and by 
attempting to render the residual errors that are committed benign. Not 
all drivers, however, face the same level of risk on the road or the 
same task demands. Emergency vehicle operators must deal with critical 
time demands, large vehicles, and numerous potential and unavoidable 
distractions inherent in the response to emergencies.
    Operator training is one method that human factors professionals 
have used in virtually all domains to reduce human error and thereby 
increase the safety of operations. Although emergency vehicle training 
for ambulance drivers has been repeatedly identified as an important 
step in the safety system, the current situation with respect to 
ambulance driver training in the United States is not well 
characterized. This project will document the types of driver training 
offered, when this training is required, how driving incidents impact 
driving privileges, initial qualification standards, and other related 
topics discovered throughout the course of the study. The results of 
this project will assist NHTSA in determining the current state of 
ambulance driver training which will help the Agency determine if 
additional research and development on the topic are warranted.
    Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number, 
and Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information)--
The participant groups being sought include representatives from up to 
21,283 EMS agencies across the United States and representatives from 
State offices for the 50 States and Washington DC Participants from EMS 
agencies will be recruited via email to respond to an Internet-based 
survey. The survey will be completed a single time by one 
representative from the solicited agencies. Approximately 153 semi-
structured interviews (up to 3 per State and Washington DC since 
multiple offices may be responsible for various aspects of ambulance 
driver training and regulation) will be conducted via telephone with 
personnel from State offices. The total sample size has the potential 
to be 21,436 participants.
    Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Record Keeping Burden 
Resulting from the Collection of Information--The 153 conversations 
with State personnel will average approximately 60 minutes in length 
including introduction, demographics, ambulance driver training/
licensing requirements, training course description and content review, 
and conclusion. The estimated completion time for the Internet-based 
survey of EMS agency representatives is 30 minutes per agency. The 
total estimated annual burden if all solicited participants respond is 
10,794.50 hours. Participants will incur no costs and no record keeping 
burden from the information collection.

    Authority:  44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A).

    Dated: January 14, 2015.
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2015-00807 Filed 1-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.