Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 1518-1519 [2015-00228]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1518
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 7 / Monday, January 12, 2015 / Notices
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for the
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation,
via electronic mail at
OIRA_DOCKET@omb.eop.gov or by fax
to 202–395–6974.
The OMB submission (including the
collection of information, comments,
and supporting statement) will be
posted at https://www.pbgc.gov/prac/
laws-and-regulations/informationcollections-under-omb-review.html.
Copies of the collection of information
and comments may also be obtained
without charge by writing to the
Disclosure Division, Office of General
Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation, 1200 K Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20005–4026; visiting
the Disclosure Division; faxing a request
to 202–326–4042; or calling 202–326–
4040 during normal business hours.
(TTY/TDD users may call the Federal
relay service toll-free at 1–800–877–
8339 and ask to be connected to 202–
326–4040.) The premium payment
regulation and the premium instructions
(including illustrative forms) for 2014
are available at www.pbgc.gov .
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah C. Murphy, Deputy Assistant
General Counsel for Regulatory Affairs,
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation,
1200 K Street NW., Washington, DC
20005–4026; 202–326–4024. (TTY/TDD
users may call the Federal relay service
toll-free at 1–800–877–8339 and ask to
be connected to 202–326–4024.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
4007 of Title IV of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA) requires pension plans covered
under Title IV pension insurance
programs to pay premiums to PBGC. All
plans covered by Title IV pay a flat-rate
per-participant premium. An
underfunded single-employer plan also
pays a variable-rate premium based on
the value of the plan’s unfunded vested
benefits.
Pursuant to section 4007, PBGC has
issued its regulation on Payment of
Premiums (29 CFR part 4007). Under
§ 4007.3 of the premium payment
regulation, the plan administrator of
each pension plan covered by Title IV
of ERISA is required to file a premium
payment and information prescribed by
PBGC for each premium payment year.
Premium information must be filed
electronically using ‘‘My Plan
Administration Account’’ (‘‘My PAA’’)
through PBGC’s Web site except to the
extent PBGC grants an exemption for
good cause in appropriate
circumstances, in which case the
information must be filed using an
approved PBGC form. Under § 4007.10
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Jan 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
of the premium payment regulation,
plan administrators are required to
retain records about premiums and
information submitted in premium
filings.
Premium filings report (i) the flat-rate
premium and related data (all plans), (ii)
the variable-rate premium and related
data (single-employer plans), and (iii)
additional data such as identifying
information and miscellaneous planrelated or filing-related data (all plans).
PBGC needs this information to identify
the plans for which premiums are paid,
to verify whether the amounts paid are
correct, to help PBGC determine the
magnitude of its exposure in the event
of plan termination, to help track the
creation of new plans and transfer of
participants and plan assets and
liabilities among plans, and to keep
PBGC’s insured-plan inventory up to
date. That information and the retained
records are also needed for audit
purposes.
PBGC is revising the 2015 filing
procedures and instructions to require
after-the-fact reporting of certain risk
transfers through lump sum windows
and annuity purchases. Risk transfers
can substantially reduce the premiums
that plans otherwise would pay to
PBGC. Because PBGC premiums and the
investment income earned on them are
a major source of income for PBGC,
information about risk transfers is
critical to PBGC’s ability to assess its
future financial condition. There is
currently no available comprehensive,
detailed, and reliable source for
information on risk transfers.
PBGC is also changing certain
premium declaration certification
procedures, offering the option for a
plan to provide a telephone number
specifically for inclusion in PBGC’s
Search Plan List on PBGC’s Web site,
updating the premium rates (including
to reflect the Consolidated and Further
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015,
Pub. L. 113–235), and making
conforming, clarifying, and editorial
changes.
On September 23, 2014 (at 79 FR
56831), PBGC gave public notice that it
intended to submit the revised
procedures and instructions to OMB for
review. PBGC received nine comment
letters from representatives of
employers, pension practitioners,
annuity providers, and participants.1
The comments focused almost
exclusively on the new risk transfer
items. PBGC has made changes to the
new items (both the questions
1 The notice and comments are posted at https://
www.pbgc.gov/prac/pg/other/guidance/paperworknotices.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
themselves and the instructions) in
response to some of the comments. The
changes and other responses to the
comments are discussed in detail in the
supporting statement to the OMB
submission.
The collection of information under
the regulation has been approved
through April 30, 2017, by OMB under
control number 1212–0009. PBGC
intends to request that OMB approve the
revised collection of information for
three years. An agency may not conduct
or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
PBGC estimates that it will receive
25,700 premium filings per year from
25,700 plan administrators under this
collection of information. PBGC further
estimates that the average annual
burden of this collection of information
is approximately 8,000 hours and
$53,200,000.
Issued in Washington, DC, this 7th day of
January, 2015.
Judith Starr,
General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2015–00253 Filed 1–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709–02–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–2736.
Extension:
Rule 11a–3, SEC File No. 270–321, OMB
Control No. 3235–0358.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for
extension and approval.
Section 11(a) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (‘‘Act’’) (15 U.S.C.
80a–11(a)) provides that it is unlawful
for a registered open-end investment
company (‘‘fund’’) or its underwriter to
make an offer to the fund’s shareholders
or the shareholders of any other fund to
exchange the fund’s securities for
securities of the same or another fund
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 7 / Monday, January 12, 2015 / Notices
on any basis other than the relative net
asset values (‘‘NAVs’’) of the respective
securities to be exchanged, ‘‘unless the
terms of the offer have first been
submitted to and approved by the
Commission or are in accordance with
such rules and regulations as the
Commission may have prescribed in
respect of such offers.’’ Section 11(a)
was designed to prevent ‘‘switching,’’
the practice of inducing shareholders of
one fund to exchange their shares for
the shares of another fund for the
purpose of exacting additional sales
charges.
Rule 11a–3 (17 CFR 270.11a–3) under
the Act is an exemptive rule that
permits open-end investment
companies (‘‘funds’’), other than
insurance company separate accounts,
and funds’ principal underwriters, to
make certain exchange offers to fund
shareholders and shareholders of other
funds in the same group of investment
companies. The rule requires a fund,
among other things, (i) to disclose in its
prospectus and advertising literature the
amount of any administrative or
redemption fee imposed on an exchange
transaction, (ii) if the fund imposes an
administrative fee on exchange
transactions, other than a nominal one,
to maintain and preserve records with
respect to the actual costs incurred in
connection with exchanges for at least
six years, and (iii) give the fund’s
shareholders a sixty day notice of a
termination of an exchange offer or any
material amendment to the terms of an
exchange offer (unless the only material
effect of an amendment is to reduce or
eliminate an administrative fee, sales
load or redemption fee payable at the
time of an exchange).
The rule’s requirements are designed
to protect investors against abuses
associated with exchange offers, provide
fund shareholders with information
necessary to evaluate exchange offers
and certain material changes in the
terms of exchange offers, and enable the
Commission staff to monitor funds’ use
of administrative fees charged in
connection with exchange transactions.
The staff estimates that there are
approximately 1,633 active open-end
investment companies registered with
the Commission as of March 2014. The
staff estimates that 25 percent (or 408)
of these funds impose a non-nominal
administrative fee on exchange
transactions. The staff estimates that the
recordkeeping requirement of the rule
requires approximately 1 hour annually
of clerical time per fund, for a total of
408 hours for all funds.
The staff estimates that 5 percent of
these 1,633 funds (or 82) terminate an
exchange offer or make a material
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Jan 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
change to the terms of their exchange
offer each year, requiring the fund to
comply with the notice requirement of
the rule. The staff estimates that
complying with the notice requirement
of the rule requires approximately 1
hour of attorney time and 2 hours of
clerical time per fund, for a total of
approximately 246 hours for all funds to
comply with the notice requirement.1
The staff estimates that such notices
will be enclosed with other written
materials sent to shareholders, such as
annual shareholder reports or account
statements, and therefore any burdens
associated with mailing required notices
are accounted for in the burdens
associated with Form N–1A registration
statements for funds. The recordkeeping
and notice requirements together
therefore impose a total burden of 654
hours on all funds.2 The total number of
respondents is 490, each responding
once a year.3 The burdens associated
with the disclosure requirement of the
rule are accounted for in the burdens
associated with the Form N–1A
registration statement for funds.
The estimate of average burden hours
is made solely for the purposes of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, and is not
derived from a comprehensive or even
a representative survey or study of the
costs of Commission rules and forms.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Written comments are requested on:
(a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information has practical utility; (b) the
accuracy of the Commission’s estimate
of the burden(s) of the collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
1 This estimate is based on the following
calculations: (1,633 (funds) × 0.05% = 82 funds);
(82 × 1 (attorney hour) = 82 total attorney hours);
(82 (funds) × 2 (clerical hours) = 164 total clerical
hours); (82 (attorney hours) + 164 (clerical hours)
= 246 total hours).
2 This estimate is based on the following
calculations: (246 (notice hours) + 408
(recordkeeping hours) = 654 total hours).
3 This estimate is based on the following
calculation: (408 funds responding to recordkeeping
requirement + 82 funds responding to notice
requirement = 490 total respondents).
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1519
in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments
to Pamela Dyson, Acting Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, C/O Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549; or send an email
to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: January 6, 2015.
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–00228 Filed 1–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No.
31408; 812–14266]
Context Capital Advisers, LLC and
Context Capital Funds; Notice of
Application
January 6, 2015.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of an application under
section 6(c) of the Investment Company
Act of 1940 (‘‘Act’’) for an exemption
from section 15(a) of the Act and rule
18f–2 under the Act, as well as from
certain disclosure requirements.
AGENCY:
Applicants
request an order that would permit them
to enter into and materially amend
subadvisory agreements without
shareholder approval and would grant
relief from certain disclosure
requirements.
APPLICANTS: Context Capital Advisers,
LLC (‘‘Context Capital’’ or the
‘‘Adviser’’) and Context Capital Funds
(the ‘‘Trust’’ and collectively with
Context Capital, the ‘‘Applicants’’).
FILING DATES: The application was filed
January 14, 2014 and amended on May
21, 2014 and September 19, 2014.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An
order granting the application will be
issued unless the Commission orders a
hearing. Interested persons may request
a hearing by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary and serving
applicants with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on February 2, 2015 and
should be accompanied by proof of
service on the applicants, in the form of
an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate
of service. Pursuant to rule 0–5 under
the Act, hearing requests should state
the nature of the writer’s interest, any
facts bearing upon the desirability of a
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION:
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 7 (Monday, January 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1518-1519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00228]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-2736.
Extension:
Rule 11a-3, SEC File No. 270-321, OMB Control No. 3235-0358.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget (``OMB'') for extension and approval.
Section 11(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Act'') (15
U.S.C. 80a-11(a)) provides that it is unlawful for a registered open-
end investment company (``fund'') or its underwriter to make an offer
to the fund's shareholders or the shareholders of any other fund to
exchange the fund's securities for securities of the same or another
fund
[[Page 1519]]
on any basis other than the relative net asset values (``NAVs'') of the
respective securities to be exchanged, ``unless the terms of the offer
have first been submitted to and approved by the Commission or are in
accordance with such rules and regulations as the Commission may have
prescribed in respect of such offers.'' Section 11(a) was designed to
prevent ``switching,'' the practice of inducing shareholders of one
fund to exchange their shares for the shares of another fund for the
purpose of exacting additional sales charges.
Rule 11a-3 (17 CFR 270.11a-3) under the Act is an exemptive rule
that permits open-end investment companies (``funds''), other than
insurance company separate accounts, and funds' principal underwriters,
to make certain exchange offers to fund shareholders and shareholders
of other funds in the same group of investment companies. The rule
requires a fund, among other things, (i) to disclose in its prospectus
and advertising literature the amount of any administrative or
redemption fee imposed on an exchange transaction, (ii) if the fund
imposes an administrative fee on exchange transactions, other than a
nominal one, to maintain and preserve records with respect to the
actual costs incurred in connection with exchanges for at least six
years, and (iii) give the fund's shareholders a sixty day notice of a
termination of an exchange offer or any material amendment to the terms
of an exchange offer (unless the only material effect of an amendment
is to reduce or eliminate an administrative fee, sales load or
redemption fee payable at the time of an exchange).
The rule's requirements are designed to protect investors against
abuses associated with exchange offers, provide fund shareholders with
information necessary to evaluate exchange offers and certain material
changes in the terms of exchange offers, and enable the Commission
staff to monitor funds' use of administrative fees charged in
connection with exchange transactions.
The staff estimates that there are approximately 1,633 active open-
end investment companies registered with the Commission as of March
2014. The staff estimates that 25 percent (or 408) of these funds
impose a non-nominal administrative fee on exchange transactions. The
staff estimates that the recordkeeping requirement of the rule requires
approximately 1 hour annually of clerical time per fund, for a total of
408 hours for all funds.
The staff estimates that 5 percent of these 1,633 funds (or 82)
terminate an exchange offer or make a material change to the terms of
their exchange offer each year, requiring the fund to comply with the
notice requirement of the rule. The staff estimates that complying with
the notice requirement of the rule requires approximately 1 hour of
attorney time and 2 hours of clerical time per fund, for a total of
approximately 246 hours for all funds to comply with the notice
requirement.\1\ The staff estimates that such notices will be enclosed
with other written materials sent to shareholders, such as annual
shareholder reports or account statements, and therefore any burdens
associated with mailing required notices are accounted for in the
burdens associated with Form N-1A registration statements for funds.
The recordkeeping and notice requirements together therefore impose a
total burden of 654 hours on all funds.\2\ The total number of
respondents is 490, each responding once a year.\3\ The burdens
associated with the disclosure requirement of the rule are accounted
for in the burdens associated with the Form N-1A registration statement
for funds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This estimate is based on the following calculations: (1,633
(funds) x 0.05% = 82 funds); (82 x 1 (attorney hour) = 82 total
attorney hours); (82 (funds) x 2 (clerical hours) = 164 total
clerical hours); (82 (attorney hours) + 164 (clerical hours) = 246
total hours).
\2\ This estimate is based on the following calculations: (246
(notice hours) + 408 (recordkeeping hours) = 654 total hours).
\3\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: (408
funds responding to recordkeeping requirement + 82 funds responding
to notice requirement = 490 total respondents).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The estimate of average burden hours is made solely for the
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act, and is not derived from a
comprehensive or even a representative survey or study of the costs of
Commission rules and forms. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Written comments are requested on: (a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information has practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burden(s)
of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments to Pamela Dyson, Acting
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission,
C/O Remi Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549; or send
an email to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: January 6, 2015.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-00228 Filed 1-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P