Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Rule 123C To Specify That Exchange Systems May Close One or More Securities Electronically, 1567-1570 [2015-00222]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 7 / Monday, January 12, 2015 / Notices
execution of complex order strategies,
such as Box Spreads and Condors,
which consist of four legs. The proposed
rule change is designed to protect
investors and the public interest in that
the proposal amends a current rule to
ensure that complex orders with three
or four option legs where all legs are
buying or all legs are selling only trade
against other complex orders in the
complex order book. The Exchange
notes that prior to the Legging Filing
and before the Non-Standard Strategies
were codified into the Exchange’s rules,
the complex order strategies affected by
this proposal were permitted to trade
and leg into the regular market.
Therefore, this proposed rule change
simply adjusts Exchange rules to once
again permit the execution such
complex order strategies. The proposed
rule change will also benefit investors
and the general public because multilegged strategies will have a greater
chance of execution when they are
allowed to leg into the regular market
and thereby increase the execution rate
for these orders thus, providing market
participants with an increased
opportunity to execute these orders on
ISE rather than on a competing
exchange.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The proposed rule change does not
impose any burden on competition. The
proposed change to amend the
restriction against complex order
strategies, such as Box Spreads and
Condors, from legging into the regular
market will allow a greater number of
complex orders to be executed on the
Exchange without adversely impacting
risk to market makers that are quoting
in the regular market.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any
unsolicited written comments from
members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Jan 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
1567
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–ISE–
2014–56 and should be submitted on or
before February 2, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–00221 Filed 1–9–15; 8:45 am]
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an Email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File No. SR–ISE–
2014–56 on the subject line.
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Amending Rule
123C To Specify That Exchange
Systems May Close One or More
Securities Electronically
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2014–56. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the ISE. All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
January 6, 2015.
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 74006; File No. SR–NYSE–
2014–73]
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that December 23,
2014, New York Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 123C to specify that Exchange
systems may close one or more
securities electronically if a Designated
Market Maker (‘‘DMM’’) registered in a
security or securities cannot facilitate
the close of trading as required by
Exchange rules. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com,
at the principal office of the Exchange,
on the Commission’s Web site at
www.sec.gov, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
13 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
1568
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 7 / Monday, January 12, 2015 / Notices
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 123C to specify that Exchange
systems may close one or more
securities electronically if a Designated
Market Maker registered in a security or
securities cannot facilitate the close of
trading as required by Exchange rules.
Rule 123C specifies the procedures to
be followed at the close of trading on
the Exchange, including procedures for
the execution of closing interest,4 which
interest is guaranteed to participate in
the closing transaction,5 and the
determination of the closing print(s) to
be reported to the Consolidated Tape for
each security. Supplementary Material
.10 to Rule 123C (‘‘Rule 123C.10’’)
currently provides that closings may be
effectuated manually or electronically.
However, the current rule contemplates
that closings would be facilitated by the
DMM, as provided for in Rule 104(a)(3).
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 123C.10 to provide that, if a DMM
cannot facilitate the close of trading for
one or more securities for which the
DMM is registered, the Exchange would
close those securities electronically.6
Unlike DMMs, who have the obligation
to trade for their own account to supply
liquidity as needed to facilitate the
4 See Rule 123C(7) (Order of Execution at the
Close). Rule 123C(7)(a) specifies the type of interest
that must be executed in whole or in part in the
closing transaction, and the allocation order of such
interest.
5 See Rule 123C(8).
6 The proposed amendment contemplates that a
DMM’s inability to close securities either manually
or electronically would be related to business
continuity disruptions such as the physical closing
of the Exchange Trading Floor or equipment and
connectivity breakdowns that prevent the DMM
from closing a security either manually or
electronically. When a DMM is unable to close
securities manually or electronically, the DMM’s
affirmative obligations under Rule 104 would not
apply.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Jan 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
close,7 the Exchange would not supply
any liquidity when effectuating an
electronic close. Without the addition of
liquidity to offset an imbalance, the
closing price may not be reasonably
related to the last sale. To avoid closing
at a price too far away from the last sale,
the Exchange proposes to establish
numerical guidelines to provide
parameters regarding the price a
security may close when the Exchange
closes such security.
As proposed, the closing price of a
security closed by the Exchange would
not be greater than or less than the last
sale price on the Exchange (the
‘‘Reference Price’’) by an amount within
the Closing Numerical Guidelines set
forth below:
Further, in performing a close under the
proposed rule, the Exchange would
consider all interest eligible to trade in
the close consistent with Rule 123C(7) 10
and 123C(8)(a).11 Under no
circumstances, however, would the
Exchange close a security if the closing
price would be greater than or less than
the Reference Price by an amount
outside the Closing Numerical
Guidelines. Accordingly, interest
specified in Rule 123C(7)(a) would not
participate in a closing trade if such
interest would cause a closing price to
be outside the Closing Numerical
Guidelines.
The proposed rule would also specify
that the provisions of Rule 123C(9)(a)(1)
and 123C(9)(b) would be suspended if
the Exchange closes a security
electronically. Rule 123C(9)(a)(1)
Closing
numerical
permits the Exchange, on a security-byguideline
security basis, to temporarily suspend
Reference price
(closing price
the hours of operation under Rule 52 so
% difference
that offsetting interest may be solicited
from the reference price)
from both on-Floor and off-Floor
participants and entered after 4:00 p.m.
Greater than $0.00 up to and
ET to reduce the size of the imbalance.
including $25.00 ................
10 Rule 123C(9)(b) specifies that only the
Greater than $25.00 up to
DMM may request the temporary
and including $50.00 .........
5
Greater than $50.00 .............
3 suspensions available under Rule
123C(9)(a). As proposed, if the Exchange
closes a security electronically, the
The proposed numerical guidelines
assigned DMM would not have the
are the same as those currently utilized
authority to invoke Rule 123C(9)(a)(1).
in determining whether an execution
Similarly, the proposed rule would
qualifies as clearly erroneous under
specify that only the Exchange would be
Rule 128.8 The Exchange believes that
able to invoke Rule 123C(9)(a)(2) if the
using the same guidelines when the
Exchange closes a security
Exchange closes a security
electronically. Rule 123C(9)(a)(2)
electronically is appropriate because it
permits temporary suspensions of the
would reduce the potential for the
prohibition on the cancellation or
closing price on the Exchange to be
reduction of a Market on Close
considered erroneous.
(‘‘MOC’’)/Limit on Close (‘‘LOC’’) order
Further, the Exchange proposes to
after 3:58 p.m. where there is a
amend Rule 123C.10 to specify the
legitimate error in such an order and
eligible interest to be considered in an
execution of the order would cause
Exchange electronic close. Specifically,
significant price dislocation at the close.
as proposed, no manually-entered Floor
Only the assigned DMM can request
interest would participate in an
relief under Rule 123C(9)(a)(2). Under
Exchange electronic close, and if
the proposed rule, in an electronic close
9
previously entered, would be ignored.
by the Exchange, Rule 123C(9)(a)(2)
would be in effect but the assigned
7 See Rule 104(a)(3) and 104(f)(iii).
DMM would not have authority to
8 Rule 128 defines a clearly erroneous execution
temporarily suspend cancellation; only
as an execution with an obvious error in any term,
such as price, number of shares or other unit of
trading, or identification of the security. Under the
numerical guidelines set forth in Rule 128, an
execution may be found to be clearly erroneous
only if the price of the transaction to buy is greater,
or less in the case of a sale, than the reference price
by an amount that equals or exceeds the numerical
guidelines for a particular transaction category. In
determining whether an execution is clearly
erroneous, the Exchange generally utilizes the
consolidated last sale as the Reference Price.
9 Manually-entered Floor interest includes
interest entered by the DMM on behalf of a Floor
broker and the DMM interest entered manually. The
Exchange notes that, under regular trading
conditions, if manually-entered Floor interest has
been entered into Exchange systems, Exchange
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
systems will not permit a DMM to close a stock
electronically and the DMM would instead be
required to close the security manually. The
Exchange proposes to make this explicit in the text
of Supplementary Material .10.
10 Rule 123C(7)(a) sets forth the interest that must
be executed or cancelled as part of the closing
transaction as well as the order of execution. Rule
123C(7)(b) sets forth the interest that may be used
to offset a closing imbalance and the order of
execution (i.e., interest that is not guaranteed to
participate in the closing transaction).
11 Rule 123C(8) governs printing of the closing
transaction where there is an order imbalance (Rule
123C(8)(a)) and where there is no order imbalance
(Rule 123C(8)(b)).
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 7 / Monday, January 12, 2015 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
the Exchange would be able to invoke
a temporary suspension under the rule.
Because of the technology changes
associated with the proposed rule
change, the Exchange proposes to
announce the implementation date via
Trader Update.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,12 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act,13 in particular, because it is
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices,
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and protect investors and the
public interest. The Exchange believes
that permitting the Exchange to
automatically close trading would
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system by
ensuring an orderly close if the
registered DMM cannot manually or
electronically facilitate the close of
trading as required by Exchange rules.
Similarly, the proposal promotes just
and equitable principles of trade and
removes impediments to and perfects
the mechanism of a free and open
market by providing customers and the
investing public with the certainty of a
close in circumstances where business
continuity disruptions or other
emergencies would prevent the assigned
DMMs from closing a security. For the
same reasons, the proposal is also
designed to protect investors as well as
the public interest.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed amendment to Rule 123C.10
to provide that closings effectuated by
the Exchange would be within a
proposed numerical guideline would
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
because having such guidelines
provides transparency regarding the
range of potential prices that a security
may close in such scenario. The
Exchange further believes that the
proposed numerical guidelines, which
are based on existing guidelines for
clearly erroneous executions, would
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a fair and orderly market
because in the absence of a DMM
supplying liquidity, the proposed
guidelines would reduce the possibility
for closing prices to not [sic] be
executed at potentially erroneous prices,
thereby protecting investors and the
public. Similarly, the Exchange believes
that excluding interest eligible for the
close that would cause an execution to
occur outside the proposed numerical
guidelines, even if such interest would
otherwise be required to be included in
a close effectuated by a DMM, and
permitting the Exchange to cancel or
reduce an MOC/LOC order after 3:58
p.m. where there is a legitimate error
and execution of the order would cause
significant price dislocation at the close,
would remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a fair and
orderly market because it would assure
that the Exchange could effectuate the
close within the proposed specified
price ranges. The proposed rule
therefore promotes just and equitable
principles of trade because it provides
transparency to entering firms of
whether interest would be eligible to
participate in a closing transaction
effectuated by the Exchange.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change is not intended to
address competitive issues but rather
enable the Exchange to close trading
where circumstances would prevent a
DMM from facilitating a close.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 14 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.15 Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
prior to 30 days from the date on which
it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder.
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 16 normally does not
become operative prior to 30 days after
the date of the filing. However, pursuant
to Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii),17 the
Commission may designate a shorter
time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 18 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSE–2014–73 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2014–73. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
16 17
12 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
13 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Jan 09, 2015
14 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
15 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1569
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
18 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
17 17
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
1570
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 7 / Monday, January 12, 2015 / Notices
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–NYSE–
2014–73 and should be submitted on or
before February 2, 2015.
(‘‘Pricing Schedule’’). Specifically, the
Exchange proposes to amend the Port
Fees in Section VII of the Pricing
Schedule in order to increase the Order
Entry Port Fee, establish a CTI Port Fee,
and delete the Real-Time Risk
Management Fee.
While the changes proposed herein
are effective upon filing, the Exchange
has designated that the amendments be
operative on January 2, 2015.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s Web site
at https://
nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
[FR Doc. 2015–00222 Filed 1–9–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–74000; File No. SR–Phlx–
2014–83]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Port Fees
January 6, 2015.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on December
24, 2014, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to modify
Section VII entitled ‘‘Other Member
Fees’’ of the Phlx Pricing Schedule
19 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 09, 2015
Jkt 235001
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
orders to the Exchange via an external
order entry port. Phlx members access
the Exchange’s network through order
entry ports. A Phlx member may have
more than one order entry port. Today,
the Exchange assesses members an
Order Entry Port Fee of $550 per month,
per mnemonic.4 The current practice
will continue whereby the Order Entry
Port Fee will be waived for mnemonics
that are used exclusively for Complex
Orders 5 where one of the components
of the Complex Order is the underlying
security. Member organizations will
continue not being assessed an Order
Entry Port Fee for additional ports
acquired for only ten business days for
the purpose of transitioning
technology.6
The Exchange proposes to increase
the Order Entry Port Fee of $550 per
month, per mnemonic to $600 per
month, per mnemonic, as described
below. This is exactly the same as a rule
change filed by NASDAQ Options
Market (‘‘NOM’’) proposing to assess
$600 for Order Entry Port Fees as of
January 2, 2015.7
Real-Time Risk Management Fee
The Exchange is eliminating the Realtime Risk Management Fee from
subsection B of Section VII of the
Pricing Schedule, entitled ‘‘Port Fees.’’
The proposal to delete the Real-Time
Risk Management Fee results in a price
reduction to member organizations and
members (clearing firms,8 Specialists,9
and Market Makers 10),
1. Purpose
The purpose of this filing is to amend
the Port Fees in Section VII of the
Pricing Schedule in order to increase
the Order Entry Port Fee, establish a CTI
Port Fee, and remove the Real-Time
Risk Management Fee.3
Today, all Port Fees on the Exchange
are located in subsection B of Section
VII of the Pricing Schedule. These Port
Fees include Order Entry Port Fees,
Real-time Risk Management Fees, and
Active SQF Port Fees, which are not
amended by this proposal. Each of the
amended fees is discussed below.
Order Entry Port Fee
The Order Entry Port Fee is a
connectivity fee related to routing
3 The Real-Time Risk Management Fee was
adopted well over a decade ago for members
receiving option trading information on-line (i.e.,
electronically) from the Exchange. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 43719 (December 13,
2000), 65 FR 80975 (December 22, 2000) (SR–Phlx–
00–97) (notice of filing and immediate
effectiveness). This fee is, as discussed, being
deleted as the CTI Port Fee, which is also used on
other exchanges, is added.
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4 Mnemonics are codes that identify member
organization order entry ports.
5 A Complex Order is any order involving the
simultaneous purchase and/or sale of two or more
different options series in the same underlying
security, priced at a net debit or credit based on the
relative prices of the individual components, for the
same account, for the purpose of executing a
particular investment strategy. Furthermore, a
Complex Order can also be a stock-option order,
which is an order to buy or sell a stated number
of units of an underlying stock or exchange-traded
fund (‘‘ETF’’) coupled with the purchase or sale of
options contract(s). See Exchange Rule 1080,
Commentary .08(a)(i).
6 Similarly, member organizations will continue
to be required to provide the Exchange with written
notification of the transition and all additional ports
which were provided at no cost will be removed at
the end of the ten business days.
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73843
(December 16, 2014) (SR–NASDAQ–2014–122) (not
yet published).
8 A ‘‘clearing firm’’ is a member organization that
meets the requirements of Rule 165(c).
9 A ‘‘Specialist’’ is an Exchange member who is
registered as an options specialist pursuant to Rule
1020(a).
10 A ‘‘Market Maker’’ includes Registered Options
Traders (Rule 1014(b)(i) and (ii)), which includes
Streaming Quote Traders (Rule 1014(b)(ii)(A)) and
Remote Streaming Quote Traders (Rule
1014(b)(ii)(B)).
E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM
12JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 7 (Monday, January 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1567-1570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00222]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 74006; File No. SR-NYSE-2014-73]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Amending Rule 123C To Specify That Exchange Systems May Close One or
More Securities Electronically
January 6, 2015.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that December 23, 2014, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 123C to specify that Exchange
systems may close one or more securities electronically if a Designated
Market Maker (``DMM'') registered in a security or securities cannot
facilitate the close of trading as required by Exchange rules. The text
of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, on the
Commission's Web site at www.sec.gov, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
[[Page 1568]]
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 123C to specify that Exchange
systems may close one or more securities electronically if a Designated
Market Maker registered in a security or securities cannot facilitate
the close of trading as required by Exchange rules.
Rule 123C specifies the procedures to be followed at the close of
trading on the Exchange, including procedures for the execution of
closing interest,\4\ which interest is guaranteed to participate in the
closing transaction,\5\ and the determination of the closing print(s)
to be reported to the Consolidated Tape for each security.
Supplementary Material .10 to Rule 123C (``Rule 123C.10'') currently
provides that closings may be effectuated manually or electronically.
However, the current rule contemplates that closings would be
facilitated by the DMM, as provided for in Rule 104(a)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Rule 123C(7) (Order of Execution at the Close). Rule
123C(7)(a) specifies the type of interest that must be executed in
whole or in part in the closing transaction, and the allocation
order of such interest.
\5\ See Rule 123C(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 123C.10 to provide that, if a
DMM cannot facilitate the close of trading for one or more securities
for which the DMM is registered, the Exchange would close those
securities electronically.\6\ Unlike DMMs, who have the obligation to
trade for their own account to supply liquidity as needed to facilitate
the close,\7\ the Exchange would not supply any liquidity when
effectuating an electronic close. Without the addition of liquidity to
offset an imbalance, the closing price may not be reasonably related to
the last sale. To avoid closing at a price too far away from the last
sale, the Exchange proposes to establish numerical guidelines to
provide parameters regarding the price a security may close when the
Exchange closes such security.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The proposed amendment contemplates that a DMM's inability
to close securities either manually or electronically would be
related to business continuity disruptions such as the physical
closing of the Exchange Trading Floor or equipment and connectivity
breakdowns that prevent the DMM from closing a security either
manually or electronically. When a DMM is unable to close securities
manually or electronically, the DMM's affirmative obligations under
Rule 104 would not apply.
\7\ See Rule 104(a)(3) and 104(f)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As proposed, the closing price of a security closed by the Exchange
would not be greater than or less than the last sale price on the
Exchange (the ``Reference Price'') by an amount within the Closing
Numerical Guidelines set forth below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Closing
numerical
guideline
(closing price
Reference price % difference
from the
reference
price)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greater than $0.00 up to and including $25.00........... 10
Greater than $25.00 up to and including $50.00.......... 5
Greater than $50.00..................................... 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed numerical guidelines are the same as those currently
utilized in determining whether an execution qualifies as clearly
erroneous under Rule 128.\8\ The Exchange believes that using the same
guidelines when the Exchange closes a security electronically is
appropriate because it would reduce the potential for the closing price
on the Exchange to be considered erroneous.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Rule 128 defines a clearly erroneous execution as an
execution with an obvious error in any term, such as price, number
of shares or other unit of trading, or identification of the
security. Under the numerical guidelines set forth in Rule 128, an
execution may be found to be clearly erroneous only if the price of
the transaction to buy is greater, or less in the case of a sale,
than the reference price by an amount that equals or exceeds the
numerical guidelines for a particular transaction category. In
determining whether an execution is clearly erroneous, the Exchange
generally utilizes the consolidated last sale as the Reference
Price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 123C.10 to specify the
eligible interest to be considered in an Exchange electronic close.
Specifically, as proposed, no manually-entered Floor interest would
participate in an Exchange electronic close, and if previously entered,
would be ignored.\9\ Further, in performing a close under the proposed
rule, the Exchange would consider all interest eligible to trade in the
close consistent with Rule 123C(7) \10\ and 123C(8)(a).\11\ Under no
circumstances, however, would the Exchange close a security if the
closing price would be greater than or less than the Reference Price by
an amount outside the Closing Numerical Guidelines. Accordingly,
interest specified in Rule 123C(7)(a) would not participate in a
closing trade if such interest would cause a closing price to be
outside the Closing Numerical Guidelines.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Manually-entered Floor interest includes interest entered by
the DMM on behalf of a Floor broker and the DMM interest entered
manually. The Exchange notes that, under regular trading conditions,
if manually-entered Floor interest has been entered into Exchange
systems, Exchange systems will not permit a DMM to close a stock
electronically and the DMM would instead be required to close the
security manually. The Exchange proposes to make this explicit in
the text of Supplementary Material .10.
\10\ Rule 123C(7)(a) sets forth the interest that must be
executed or cancelled as part of the closing transaction as well as
the order of execution. Rule 123C(7)(b) sets forth the interest that
may be used to offset a closing imbalance and the order of execution
(i.e., interest that is not guaranteed to participate in the closing
transaction).
\11\ Rule 123C(8) governs printing of the closing transaction
where there is an order imbalance (Rule 123C(8)(a)) and where there
is no order imbalance (Rule 123C(8)(b)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule would also specify that the provisions of Rule
123C(9)(a)(1) and 123C(9)(b) would be suspended if the Exchange closes
a security electronically. Rule 123C(9)(a)(1) permits the Exchange, on
a security-by-security basis, to temporarily suspend the hours of
operation under Rule 52 so that offsetting interest may be solicited
from both on-Floor and off-Floor participants and entered after 4:00
p.m. ET to reduce the size of the imbalance. Rule 123C(9)(b) specifies
that only the DMM may request the temporary suspensions available under
Rule 123C(9)(a). As proposed, if the Exchange closes a security
electronically, the assigned DMM would not have the authority to invoke
Rule 123C(9)(a)(1).
Similarly, the proposed rule would specify that only the Exchange
would be able to invoke Rule 123C(9)(a)(2) if the Exchange closes a
security electronically. Rule 123C(9)(a)(2) permits temporary
suspensions of the prohibition on the cancellation or reduction of a
Market on Close (``MOC'')/Limit on Close (``LOC'') order after 3:58
p.m. where there is a legitimate error in such an order and execution
of the order would cause significant price dislocation at the close.
Only the assigned DMM can request relief under Rule 123C(9)(a)(2).
Under the proposed rule, in an electronic close by the Exchange, Rule
123C(9)(a)(2) would be in effect but the assigned DMM would not have
authority to temporarily suspend cancellation; only
[[Page 1569]]
the Exchange would be able to invoke a temporary suspension under the
rule.
Because of the technology changes associated with the proposed rule
change, the Exchange proposes to announce the implementation date via
Trader Update.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\12\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\13\ in particular, because it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and protect investors and the public interest. The
Exchange believes that permitting the Exchange to automatically close
trading would remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free
and open market and a national market system by ensuring an orderly
close if the registered DMM cannot manually or electronically
facilitate the close of trading as required by Exchange rules.
Similarly, the proposal promotes just and equitable principles of trade
and removes impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and
open market by providing customers and the investing public with the
certainty of a close in circumstances where business continuity
disruptions or other emergencies would prevent the assigned DMMs from
closing a security. For the same reasons, the proposal is also designed
to protect investors as well as the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed amendment to Rule 123C.10
to provide that closings effectuated by the Exchange would be within a
proposed numerical guideline would remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market because having such guidelines
provides transparency regarding the range of potential prices that a
security may close in such scenario. The Exchange further believes that
the proposed numerical guidelines, which are based on existing
guidelines for clearly erroneous executions, would remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a fair and orderly market because in
the absence of a DMM supplying liquidity, the proposed guidelines would
reduce the possibility for closing prices to not [sic] be executed at
potentially erroneous prices, thereby protecting investors and the
public. Similarly, the Exchange believes that excluding interest
eligible for the close that would cause an execution to occur outside
the proposed numerical guidelines, even if such interest would
otherwise be required to be included in a close effectuated by a DMM,
and permitting the Exchange to cancel or reduce an MOC/LOC order after
3:58 p.m. where there is a legitimate error and execution of the order
would cause significant price dislocation at the close, would remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a fair and orderly market
because it would assure that the Exchange could effectuate the close
within the proposed specified price ranges. The proposed rule therefore
promotes just and equitable principles of trade because it provides
transparency to entering firms of whether interest would be eligible to
participate in a closing transaction effectuated by the Exchange.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is
not intended to address competitive issues but rather enable the
Exchange to close trading where circumstances would prevent a DMM from
facilitating a close.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \14\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\15\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \16\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\17\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \18\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2014-73 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2014-73. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the
[[Page 1570]]
proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2014-73 and should be
submitted on or before February 2, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-00222 Filed 1-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P