Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Provide for the Clearance of Additional Standard Western European Sovereign Single Names, 75-77 [2014-30700]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 1 / Friday, January 2, 2015 / Notices
fees are only one factor in a total
platform analysis. Some competitors
have lower transactions fees and higher
data fees, and others are vice versa. The
market for this proprietary information
is highly competitive and continually
evolves as products develop and
change.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 12 and
paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4
thereunder.13 At any time within 60
days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
MIAX–2014–66 on the subject line.
Paper Comments:
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–MIAX–2014–66. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of MIAX. All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–MIAX–
2014–66 and should be submitted on or
before January 23, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–30701 Filed 12–31–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–73941; File No. SR–ICC–
2014–21]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE
Clear Credit LLC; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change To Provide for
the Clearance of Additional Standard
Western European Sovereign Single
Names
December 24, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder 2
notice is hereby given that on December
16, 2014, ICE Clear Credit LLC (‘‘ICC’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared primarily by ICC.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
14 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
12 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
13 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 Dec 31, 2014
1 15
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to adopt rules that will
provide the basis for ICC to clear
additional credit default swap (‘‘CDS’’)
contracts. Specifically, ICC is proposing
to amend Section 26I of its Rules to
provide for the clearance of additional
Standard Western European Sovereign
CDS contracts (collectively, ‘‘SWES
Contracts’’). ICC has been approved to
clear four SWES Contracts: The
Republic of Ireland, the Italian
Republic, the Portuguese Republic, and
the Kingdom of Spain.3 The proposed
changes to the ICC Rules would provide
for the clearance of additional SWES
Contracts, specifically the Kingdom of
Belgium and the Republic of Austria.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, ICC
included statements concerning the
purpose of and basis for the proposed
rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. ICC has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of these statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to adopt rules that will
provide the basis for ICC to clear
additional credit default swap contracts.
ICC has been approved to clear four
SWES Contracts: The Republic of
Ireland, the Italian Republic, the
Portuguese Republic, and the Kingdom
of Spain.4 ICC proposes amending
Subchapter 26I of its Rules to provide
for the clearance of two additional
SWES Contracts, specifically the
Kingdom of Belgium and the Republic
of Austria. These two additional SWES
Contracts will be offered on the 2003
and 2014 ISDA Credit Derivatives
Definitions. The addition of these SWES
Contracts will benefit the market for
credit default swaps on Western
European by providing market
3 See Exchange Act Release No. 34–72941 (Nov.
5, 2014), 79 FR 67213 (Nov. 12, 2014) (File No. SR–
ICC–2014–14) (order approving rule change to clear
other Western European sovereign CDS contracts)
(the ‘‘Prior WES Order’’).
4 Id.
E:\FR\FM\02JAN1.SGM
02JAN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
76
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 1 / Friday, January 2, 2015 / Notices
participants the benefits of clearing,
including reduction in counterparty risk
and safeguarding of margin assets
pursuant to clearing house rules.
Clearing of the additional SWES
Contracts will not require any changes
in ICC’s risk management framework
(including relevant policies) or margin
model.
These additional SWES Contracts
have terms consistent with the other
SWES Contracts which ICC has been
approved to clear and which will be
governed by Subchapter 26I of the ICC
rules, namely the Republic of Ireland,
the Italian Republic, the Portuguese
Republic, and the Kingdom of Spain.
Minor revisions to Subchapter 26I
(Standard Western European Sovereign
(‘‘SWES’’) Single Name) are made to
provide for clearing the additional
SWES Contracts and described as
follows.
Rule 26I–102 is modified to include
the Kingdom of Belgium and the
Republic of Austria in the list of specific
Eligible SWES Reference Entities to be
cleared by ICC.
Additionally, in ICC Rule 26D–102
(Definitions), the definition of ‘‘Eligible
SES Reference Entity’’ is modified to
correct a typographical error and
correctly identify the reference entity for
a cleared product as Hungary (as
opposed to the Republic of Hungary).
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 5
requires, among other things, that the
rules of a clearing agency be designed to
promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities
transactions and, to the extent
applicable, derivative agreements,
contracts, and transactions. The
clearance of additional SWES Contracts
will allow market participants an
increased ability to manage risk. ICC
believes that acceptance of these new
contracts, on the terms and conditions
set out in the ICC Rules, is consistent
with the prompt and accurate clearance
of and settlement of securities
transactions and derivative agreements,
contracts and transactions cleared by
ICC, the safeguarding of securities and
funds in the custody or control of ICC,
and the protection of investors and the
public interest, within the meaning of
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.6
Clearing of the additional SWES
Contracts will also satisfy the
requirements of Rule 17Ad–22.7 In
particular, in terms of financial
resources, ICC will apply its existing
margin methodology to the additional
SWES Contracts. ICC believes that this
model will provide sufficient margin to
cover its credit exposure to its clearing
members from clearing such contracts,
consistent with the requirements of Rule
17Ad–22(b)(2).8 In addition, ICC
believes its Guaranty Fund, under its
existing methodology, will, together
with the required margin, provide
sufficient financial resources to support
the clearing of the new contracts
consistent with the requirements of Rule
17Ad–22(b)(3).9 ICC also believes that
its existing operational and managerial
resources will be sufficient for clearing
of the additional SWES Contracts,
consistent with the requirements of Rule
17Ad–22(d)(4),10 as the new contracts
are similar from an operational
perspective to existing SWES Contracts.
Similarly, ICC will use its existing
settlement procedures and account
structures for the new contracts,
consistent with the requirements of Rule
17Ad–22(d)(5), (12) and (15) 11 as to the
finality and accuracy of its daily
settlement process and avoidance of the
risk to ICC of settlement failures.
Finally, ICC will apply its existing
default management policies and
procedures for the new contracts. ICC
believes that these procedures allow for
it to take timely action to contain losses
and liquidity pressures and to continue
meeting its obligations in the event of
clearing member insolvencies or
defaults in respect of the additional
SWES Contracts, in accordance with
Rule 17Ad–22(d)(11).12
As discussed in further detail in the
Prior WES Order, although the margin
model applicable to SWES Contracts,
including the additional SWES
Contracts, may result in Clearing
Participants being subject to different
margin charges based on their domicile
and correlation with the underlying
sovereign, ICC believes that the margin
model properly aligns the margin
requirements to the risks presented by
particular Clearing Participants.
Moreover, the model operates without
the need for ICC (or its management,
Board or Risk Committee) to exercise
discretion concerning particular
Clearing Participants or the margin
levels applicable to them. As a result, in
ICC’s view, the clearing of such
contracts does not result in unfair
discrimination among Clearing
Participants within the meaning of
8 17
CFR 240.17Ad–22(b)(2).
CFR 240.17Ad–22(b)(3).
10 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(d)(4).
11 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(d)(5), (12) and (15).
12 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(d)(11).
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act and Rule
17Ad–22(d)(8).13
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The additional SWES Contracts will
be available to all ICC Participants for
clearing. The clearing of these
additional SWES Contracts by ICC does
not preclude the offering of the
additional SWES Contracts for clearing
by other market participants.
Although clearance of additional
SWES Contracts may result in higher
margin requirements for some Clearing
Participants as a result of the general
wrong way risk component of the
margin model, ICC believes that the
model properly aligns margin
requirements to the risks presented by
such clearing members with respect to
the additional SWES Contracts. As a
result, ICC is of the view that these
changes are necessary and appropriate
in furtherance of the purpose of the Act
and the Commission’s regulations
thereunder, including the financial
resources and risk management
requirements of Rule 17Ad–22.14
Furthermore, ICC does not believe that
any such increase in margin
requirements would significantly affect
the ability of Clearing Participants or
other market participants to continue to
clear CDS, consistent with the risk
management requirements of the
clearing house, or otherwise limit
market participants’ choices for
selecting clearing services. Accordingly,
ICC does not believe that clearance of
the additional SWES Contracts will
impose any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
Written comments relating to the
proposed rule change have not been
solicited or received. ICC will notify the
Commission of any written comments
received by ICC.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period
up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which
9 17
5 15
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
6 Id.
7 17
CFR 240.17Ad–22.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 Dec 31, 2014
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F); 17 CFR 240.17Ad–
22(d)(8).
14 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22.
E:\FR\FM\02JAN1.SGM
02JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 1 / Friday, January 2, 2015 / Notices
the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove
the proposed rule change or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
ICC–2014–21 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to
Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ICC–2014–21. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filings will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of ICE Clear Credit and on ICE
Clear Credit’s Web site at https://
www.theice.com/clear-credit/regulation.
All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You
should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:50 Dec 31, 2014
Jkt 235001
Number SR–ICC–2014–21 and should
be submitted on or before January 23,
2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–30700 Filed 12–31–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–73937; File No. SR–CME–
2014–18]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change Regarding Certain Contractual
Arrangements That Apply to its Overthe-Counter Credit Default Swap
Clearing Offering
December 24, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Exchange Act’’ or ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby
given that on December 15, 2014,
Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc.
(‘‘CME’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change described in Items I, II and III,
below, which Items have been primarily
prepared by CME. CME filed the
proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act,3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(4)(ii)
thereunder,4 so that the proposal was
effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
CME is proposing to make certain
revenue sharing and governance
changes related to certain contractual
arrangements that apply to its over-thecounter credit default swap (‘‘OTC
CDS’’) clearing offering. CME entered
into this arrangement (the ‘‘Agreement’’)
with a group of clearing members on
June 30, 2012 and the proposed rule
15 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(4)(ii).
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
77
change has been implemented by CME
since June 30, 2012.5
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
CME included statements concerning
the purpose and basis for the proposed
rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. CME has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
CME is registered as a derivatives
clearing organization with the
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (‘‘CFTC’’) and operates a
substantial business clearing futures and
swaps contracts subject to the
jurisdiction of the CFTC. CME is filing
this proposed rule change with respect
to the Agreement made with various
third-party financial institutions
(‘‘DFMs’’) relating to its OTC CDS
clearing business. The Agreement
incentivized the DFMs to support CME’s
initial development of its OTC CDS
clearing infrastructure and is designed
to ensure that the DFMs continue their
demonstrated commitment to CME’s
ongoing CDS clearing efforts. The
existing DFMs were selected based on
their support in CME’s development of
its clearing initiative, ability to provide
liquidity, their client clearing and risk
management expertise, as well as their
willingness to test and generally support
centralized clearing in CDS Contracts on
an on-going basis. CME may invite other
firms to join the Agreement in the future
so long as such firms are among the top
CDS clearing members by notional
amount of CDS Contracts submitted to
the Clearing House during any sixmonth period through June 2015 or are
approved by a majority of the thenexisting DFMs.
In summary, under the Agreement,
the DFMs that satisfy their obligations
under the Agreement will receive a
portion of the clearing revenues and
market data revenues generated in
connection with CME’s clearing of
certain specified CDS Contracts, will be
5 Pursuant to a teleconference with CME’s
counsel on December 19, 2014, staff in the Division
of Trading and Markets has modified this sentence
to insert references to the Agreement’s execution
and implementation date.
E:\FR\FM\02JAN1.SGM
02JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 1 (Friday, January 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75-77]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30700]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-73941; File No. SR-ICC-2014-21]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Provide for the Clearance of
Additional Standard Western European Sovereign Single Names
December 24, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder \2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 16, 2014, ICE Clear Credit LLC (``ICC'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have
been prepared primarily by ICC. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to adopt rules that will
provide the basis for ICC to clear additional credit default swap
(``CDS'') contracts. Specifically, ICC is proposing to amend Section
26I of its Rules to provide for the clearance of additional Standard
Western European Sovereign CDS contracts (collectively, ``SWES
Contracts''). ICC has been approved to clear four SWES Contracts: The
Republic of Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Portuguese Republic, and
the Kingdom of Spain.\3\ The proposed changes to the ICC Rules would
provide for the clearance of additional SWES Contracts, specifically
the Kingdom of Belgium and the Republic of Austria.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Exchange Act Release No. 34-72941 (Nov. 5, 2014), 79 FR
67213 (Nov. 12, 2014) (File No. SR-ICC-2014-14) (order approving
rule change to clear other Western European sovereign CDS contracts)
(the ``Prior WES Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, ICC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. ICC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of these statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to adopt rules that will
provide the basis for ICC to clear additional credit default swap
contracts. ICC has been approved to clear four SWES Contracts: The
Republic of Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Portuguese Republic, and
the Kingdom of Spain.\4\ ICC proposes amending Subchapter 26I of its
Rules to provide for the clearance of two additional SWES Contracts,
specifically the Kingdom of Belgium and the Republic of Austria. These
two additional SWES Contracts will be offered on the 2003 and 2014 ISDA
Credit Derivatives Definitions. The addition of these SWES Contracts
will benefit the market for credit default swaps on Western European by
providing market
[[Page 76]]
participants the benefits of clearing, including reduction in
counterparty risk and safeguarding of margin assets pursuant to
clearing house rules. Clearing of the additional SWES Contracts will
not require any changes in ICC's risk management framework (including
relevant policies) or margin model.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These additional SWES Contracts have terms consistent with the
other SWES Contracts which ICC has been approved to clear and which
will be governed by Subchapter 26I of the ICC rules, namely the
Republic of Ireland, the Italian Republic, the Portuguese Republic, and
the Kingdom of Spain. Minor revisions to Subchapter 26I (Standard
Western European Sovereign (``SWES'') Single Name) are made to provide
for clearing the additional SWES Contracts and described as follows.
Rule 26I-102 is modified to include the Kingdom of Belgium and the
Republic of Austria in the list of specific Eligible SWES Reference
Entities to be cleared by ICC.
Additionally, in ICC Rule 26D-102 (Definitions), the definition of
``Eligible SES Reference Entity'' is modified to correct a
typographical error and correctly identify the reference entity for a
cleared product as Hungary (as opposed to the Republic of Hungary).
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \5\ requires, among other things,
that the rules of a clearing agency be designed to promote the prompt
and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and,
to the extent applicable, derivative agreements, contracts, and
transactions. The clearance of additional SWES Contracts will allow
market participants an increased ability to manage risk. ICC believes
that acceptance of these new contracts, on the terms and conditions set
out in the ICC Rules, is consistent with the prompt and accurate
clearance of and settlement of securities transactions and derivative
agreements, contracts and transactions cleared by ICC, the safeguarding
of securities and funds in the custody or control of ICC, and the
protection of investors and the public interest, within the meaning of
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
\6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearing of the additional SWES Contracts will also satisfy the
requirements of Rule 17Ad-22.\7\ In particular, in terms of financial
resources, ICC will apply its existing margin methodology to the
additional SWES Contracts. ICC believes that this model will provide
sufficient margin to cover its credit exposure to its clearing members
from clearing such contracts, consistent with the requirements of Rule
17Ad-22(b)(2).\8\ In addition, ICC believes its Guaranty Fund, under
its existing methodology, will, together with the required margin,
provide sufficient financial resources to support the clearing of the
new contracts consistent with the requirements of Rule 17Ad-
22(b)(3).\9\ ICC also believes that its existing operational and
managerial resources will be sufficient for clearing of the additional
SWES Contracts, consistent with the requirements of Rule 17Ad-
22(d)(4),\10\ as the new contracts are similar from an operational
perspective to existing SWES Contracts. Similarly, ICC will use its
existing settlement procedures and account structures for the new
contracts, consistent with the requirements of Rule 17Ad-22(d)(5), (12)
and (15) \11\ as to the finality and accuracy of its daily settlement
process and avoidance of the risk to ICC of settlement failures.
Finally, ICC will apply its existing default management policies and
procedures for the new contracts. ICC believes that these procedures
allow for it to take timely action to contain losses and liquidity
pressures and to continue meeting its obligations in the event of
clearing member insolvencies or defaults in respect of the additional
SWES Contracts, in accordance with Rule 17Ad-22(d)(11).\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22.
\8\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(b)(2).
\9\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(b)(3).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(d)(4).
\11\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(d)(5), (12) and (15).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(d)(11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in further detail in the Prior WES Order, although the
margin model applicable to SWES Contracts, including the additional
SWES Contracts, may result in Clearing Participants being subject to
different margin charges based on their domicile and correlation with
the underlying sovereign, ICC believes that the margin model properly
aligns the margin requirements to the risks presented by particular
Clearing Participants. Moreover, the model operates without the need
for ICC (or its management, Board or Risk Committee) to exercise
discretion concerning particular Clearing Participants or the margin
levels applicable to them. As a result, in ICC's view, the clearing of
such contracts does not result in unfair discrimination among Clearing
Participants within the meaning of Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act and
Rule 17Ad-22(d)(8).\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F); 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(d)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The additional SWES Contracts will be available to all ICC
Participants for clearing. The clearing of these additional SWES
Contracts by ICC does not preclude the offering of the additional SWES
Contracts for clearing by other market participants.
Although clearance of additional SWES Contracts may result in
higher margin requirements for some Clearing Participants as a result
of the general wrong way risk component of the margin model, ICC
believes that the model properly aligns margin requirements to the
risks presented by such clearing members with respect to the additional
SWES Contracts. As a result, ICC is of the view that these changes are
necessary and appropriate in furtherance of the purpose of the Act and
the Commission's regulations thereunder, including the financial
resources and risk management requirements of Rule 17Ad-22.\14\
Furthermore, ICC does not believe that any such increase in margin
requirements would significantly affect the ability of Clearing
Participants or other market participants to continue to clear CDS,
consistent with the risk management requirements of the clearing house,
or otherwise limit market participants' choices for selecting clearing
services. Accordingly, ICC does not believe that clearance of the
additional SWES Contracts will impose any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
Written comments relating to the proposed rule change have not been
solicited or received. ICC will notify the Commission of any written
comments received by ICC.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which
[[Page 77]]
the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change or
(B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-ICC-2014-21 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ICC-2014-21. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filings will also be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of ICE Clear Credit
and on ICE Clear Credit's Web site at https://www.theice.com/clear-credit/regulation.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ICC-2014-21
and should be submitted on or before January 23, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-30700 Filed 12-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P