Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 78784-78788 [2014-30662]

Download as PDF 78784 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices Affected Public: Applicants for temporary jobs in office and field positions. Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory to apply for temporary positions. Legal Authority: Title 13, United States Code, Section 23 a and c. This information collection request may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov .Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections currently under review by OMB. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to OIRA_Submission@ omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806. Dated: December 24, 2014. Glenna Mickelson, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2014–30627 Filed 12–30–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–07–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [S–132–2014] mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Approval of Subzone Status, 5.11, Inc., Modesto and Lathrop, California On November 6, 2014, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Port of Stockton, California, grantee of FTZ 231, requesting subzone status subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 231, on behalf of 5.11, Inc., in Modesto and Lathrop, California. The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public comment (79 FR 67413, 11/13/2014). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 231B is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 231’s 2,000-acre activation limit. Dated: December 23, 2014. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. 2014–30719 Filed 12–30–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:02 Dec 30, 2014 Jkt 235001 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–967] Aluminum Extrusions From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on aluminum extrusions from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is May 1, 2012, through April 30, 2013. These final results cover 52 companies for which an administrative review was initiated, and for which this administrative review was not rescinded in the Preliminary Results.1 For these final results, the Department examined two mandatory respondents and one voluntary respondent for which this review was initiated. The first mandatory respondent is Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd. and Jangho Curtain Wall Hong Kong Ltd. (collectively ‘‘Jangho’’); the second mandatory respondent is a single entity that the Department continues to find is comprised of Guang Ya Aluminum Industrial Co., Ltd. (‘‘Guang Ya’’), Foshan Guangcheng Aluminum Co., Ltd. (‘‘Guangcheng’’), Kong Ah International Co., Ltd. (‘‘Kong Ah’’), and Guang Ya Aluminum Industries (Hong Kong) Ltd. (‘‘Guang Ya HK’’) (collectively ‘‘Guang Ya Group’’), Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd. (‘‘Zhongya’’), Zhongya Shaped Aluminum (HK) Holding Ltd. (‘‘Shaped Aluminum’’), and Karlton Aluminum Co., Ltd. (‘‘Karlton’’) (collectively ‘‘Zhongya’’), and Foshan Nanhai Xinya Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd. (‘‘Xinya’’) (collectively ‘‘Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya’’). The Department finds for these final results that Jangho and the Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya entity failed to demonstrate that they were eligible for separate rates and thus are part of the PRC-wide entity. For Kromet International, Inc. (‘‘Kromet’’), a voluntary respondent in this review, the AGENCY: 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 38924 (June 28, 2013) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’); see also Aluminum Extrusions From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission, in Part; 2012/2013, 79 FR 36003 (June 25, 2014) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Department finds that Kromet did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the POR. Furthermore, the Department finds that 19 of the companies under review (including Kromet) have established their eligibility for a separate rate. Additionally, we determine that four companies, Hong Kong Gree Electric Appliances Sales Limited (‘‘Gree’’), Jiuyuan Co., Ltd. (‘‘Jiuyuan’’), Shenzhen Hudson Technology Development Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shenzhen Hudson’’), and Skyline Exhibit Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (‘‘Skyline’’) had no shipments. The Department finds that the remaining companies under review either failed to establish their eligibility for a separate rate or were not responsive, and, therefore, these companies are part of the PRC-wide entity. DATES: Effective Date: December 31, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Terpstra or Paul Stolz, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3965 or (202) 482– 4474, respectively. Background On June 25, 2014, the Department published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review. At that time, we invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results.2 We granted parties an extension of time to submit case and rebuttal briefs.3 On August 8, 2014 we received case briefs from the Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee (‘‘Petitioner’’); 4 Zhongya; Skyline; Jangho; tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (‘‘tenKsolar’’); Permasteelisa South China Factory and Permasteelisa Hong Kong Ltd. (collectively, ‘‘Permasteelisa’’); Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co. Ltd., and Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn. Bhd. (collectively ‘‘Kam Kiu’’). On 2 See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 36006. ‘‘Second Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Granting an Extension of Time for Parties to Provide Case Briefs and Rebuttal Case Briefs,’’ dated July 7, 2014 and ‘‘Second Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Granting an Extension of Time for Parties to Provide Rebuttal Briefs,’’ dated August 12, 2014. 4 The individual members of the Committee are Aerolite Extrusion Company; Alexandria Extrusion Company; Benada Aluminum of Florida, Inc.; William L. Bonnell Company, Inc.; Frontier Aluminum Corporation; Futural Industries Corporation; Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc.; Kaiser Aluminum Corporation; Profile Extrusion Company; Sapa Extrusions, Inc.; and Western Extrusions Corporation. 3 See E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM 31DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices August 20, 2014, we received rebuttal briefs from the Petitioner, Kromet, and Jangho. On September 5, 2014, the Department extended the deadline for the final results until December 22, 2014.5 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the Order 6 is aluminum extrusions which are shapes and forms, produced by an extrusion process, made from aluminum alloys having metallic elements corresponding to the alloy series designations published by The Aluminum Association commencing with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or proprietary equivalents or other certifying body equivalents).7 Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under the following categories of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTS’’): 7610.10.00, 7610.90.00, 7615.10.30, 7615.10.71, 7615.10.91, 7615.19.10, 7615.19.30, 7615.19.50, 7615.19.70, 7615.19.90, 7615.20.00, 7616.99.10, 7616.99.50, 8479.89.98, 8479.90.94, 8513.90.20, 9403.10.00, 9403.20.00, 7604.21.00.00, 7604.29.10.00, 7604.29.30.10, 7604.29.30.50, 7604.29.50.30, 7604.29.50.60, 7608.20.00.30, 7608.20.00.90, 7609.00.00.00, 8302.10.30.00, 8302.10.60.30, 8302.10.60.60, 8302.10.60.90, 8302.20.00.00, 8302.30.30.10, 8302.30.30.60, 8302.41.30.00, 8302.41.60.15, 8302.41.60.45, 8302.41.60.50, 8302.41.60.80, 8302.42.30.10, 8302.42.30.15, 8302.42.30.65, 8302.49.60.35, 8302.49.60.45, 8302.49.60.55, 8302.49.60.85, 8302.50.00.00, 8302.60.90.00, 8305.10.00.50, 8306.30.00.00, 8414.59.60.90, 8415.90.80.45, 8418.99.80.05, 8418.99.80.50, 8418.99.80.60, 8419.90.10.00, 8422.90.06.40, 8473.30.20.00, 8473.30.51.00, 8479.90.85.00, 8486.90.00.00, 8487.90.00.80, 8503.00.95.20, 8508.70.00.00, 5 See ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated September 5, 2014. 6 See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 30650 (May 26, 2011) (‘‘Order’’). 7 See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, titled ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China,’’ which is dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’) for a complete description of the scope of the Order. VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:02 Dec 30, 2014 Jkt 235001 8516.90.50.00, 8516.90.80.50, 8517.70.00.00, 8529.90.73.00, 8529.90.97.60, 8538.10.00.00, 8543.90.88.80, 8708.29.50.60, 8708.80.65.90, 8803.30.00.60, 9013.90.50.00, 9013.90.90.00, 9401.90.50.81, 9403.90.10.40, 9403.90.10.50, 9403.90.10.85, 9403.90.25.40, 9403.90.25.80, 9403.90.40.05, 9403.90.40.10, 9403.90.40.60, 9403.90.50.05, 9403.90.50.10, 9403.90.50.80, 9403.90.60.05, 9403.90.60.10, 9403.90.60.80, 9403.90.70.05, 9403.90.70.10, 9403.90.70.80, 9403.90.80.10, 9403.90.80.15, 9403.90.80.20, 9403.90.80.41, 9403.90.80.51, 9403.90.80.61, 9506.11.40.80, 9506.51.40.00, 9506.51.60.00, 9506.59.40.40, 9506.70.20.90, 9506.91.00.10, 9506.91.00.20, 9506.91.00.30, 9506.99.05.10, 9506.99.05.20, 9506.99.05.30, 9506.99.15.00, 9506.99.20.00, 9506.99.25.80, 9506.99.28.00, 9506.99.55.00, 9506.99.60.80, 9507.30.20.00, 9507.30.40.00, 9507.30.60.00, 9507.90.60.00, and 9603.90.80.50. The subject merchandise entered as parts of other aluminum products may be classifiable under the following additional Chapter 76 subheadings: 7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and 7616.99 as well as under other HTS chapters. In addition, fin evaporator coils may be classifiable under HTS numbers: 8418.99.80.50 and 8418.99.80.60. While HTS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this Order is dispositive. 78785 registered users at http:// access.trade.gov, and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http:// www.trade.gov/enforcement/frn/ index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on an analysis of the comments received from interested parties and a review of the record, the Department made the following changes for these final results of review: • We corrected a calculation error for the final adjusted margin to be applied to the separate rate companies.9 • We adjusted the PRC-wide entity margin for both export subsidies and domestic subsidy pass-through.10 • We determined that Skyline did not have shipments of subject merchandise during the POR.11 • We made a correction to the spelling of Kam Kiu’s name.12 • For Kromet’s preliminary margin calculation, we neglected to convert the variables ‘‘Magnesium Ingots’’ and ‘‘Aluminum Titanium Boron Wire’’ using Thai exchange rates. We corrected this error, and it did not change Kromet’s margin.13 Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is incorporated herein by reference. A list of the issues which parties raised, and to which we respond in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, follows as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).8 ACCESS is available to Companies Eligible for a Separate Rate In our Preliminary Results, we determined that 18 companies, plus Kromet, are eligible for a separate rate.14 We received no information since the issuance of the Preliminary Results that provides a basis for reconsideration of this determination. Therefore, the Department continues to find that these 19 companies are eligible for a separate rate. Rate for Non-Examined Companies Which Are Eligible for a Separate Rate The Department assigned to nonexamined, separate rate companies the 8 On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). The Web site location was changed from http:// iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The Final Rule changing the reference to the Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014). PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 9 See Attachment to the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. 10 Id.; see also Comment 3 of the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. 11 See Comment 7 of the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. 12 See Comment 8 of the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. 13 See Memorandum to the File titled ‘‘Second Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Analysis of the Final Results Margin Calculation for Kromet International,’’ dated concurrently with this notice. 14 See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 36006. E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM 31DEN1 78786 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices weighted-average dumping margin assigned to non-examined, separate rate companies in the final determination of the antidumping investigation and for the final results of the first administrative review of the Order. Neither the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’) nor the Department’s regulations address the establishment of the rate applied to individual companies not selected for examination where the Department limited its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. The Department’s practice in cases involving limited selection based on exporters accounting for the largest volumes of trade has been to look to section 735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in an investigation. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act instructs the Department to avoid calculating an all-others rate using any rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available in investigations. Section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act provides that, where all rates are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts available, the Department may use ‘‘any reasonable method’’ for assigning an all-others rate. We determine that the application of the rate from the investigation to the non-examined separate rate respondents is consistent with precedent and an appropriate method to determine the separate rate in the instant review. Pursuant to this method, we are assigning the rate of 32.79 percent, the most recent rate (from the less than fair value investigation) calculated for the non-examined separate rate respondents, to the non-examined separate rate respondents in the instant review.15 Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of the Act Pursuant to section 777A(f) of the Act, the Department has made an adjustment for countervailable domestic subsidies which have been found to have impacted the U.S. prices. We made no changes (since the Preliminary Results) to the adjustments made for these final results to Kromet’s adjustment or the separate rate companies’ adjustment (though we corrected a calculation error for the final adjusted margin to include only the passed-through portion of the domestic subsidy for the separate rate companies).16 Pursuant to section 777A(f) of the Act, for these final results, we also made an adjustment to the PRC-wide entity’s rate to account for countervailable domestic subsidies. PRC-Wide Entity In the Preliminary Results, the Department determined that the mandatory respondents Jangho and Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya were not eligible for a separate rate, and, accordingly, were found to be part of the PRC-wide entity. The Department received no information since the issuance of the Preliminary Results that provides a basis for reconsideration of this determination. Therefore, the Department continues to find that Jangho and Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/ Xinya 17 are not eligible for a separate rate and are part of the PRC-wide entity. In the Preliminary Results, the Department also found 21 companies to be part of the PRC-wide entity. For one of those companies, Skyline, the Department received information since the Preliminary Results sufficient to change its determination. For the remaining 20 companies, the Department received no information since the issuance of the Preliminary Results that provides a basis for reconsideration of its determination. Therefore, the Department continues to find that these 20 companies are not eligible for a separate rate and are part of the PRC-wide entity.18 Adverse Facts Available Rate for the PRC-Wide Entity For the PRC-wide entity, the Department in the Preliminary Results preliminarily determined that the PRCwide entity had not acted to the best of its ability in providing necessary information to the Department, and assigned the rate of 33.28 percent, the only rate ever determined for the PRCwide entity in this proceeding, as adverse facts available pursuant to sections 776(a) and 776(b) of the Act. The rate of 33.28 percent has probative value because it was in the range of the individual dumping margins which we calculated for Kromet. Accordingly, we find that the rate of 33.28 percent is corroborated within the meaning of section 776(c) of the Act, and that it is appropriate to continue to apply this rate of 33.28 percent to the PRC-wide entity.19 Final Results of Review As a result of this review, we determine that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the period May 1, 2012, through April 30, 2013: Margin adjusted for liquidation and cash deposit purposes (%) Kromet International, Inc ............................................................................................................................. Allied Maker Limited .................................................................................................................................... Changzhou Changzheng Evaporator Co., Ltd ............................................................................................ Classic & Contemporary Inc ........................................................................................................................ Dynabright Int’l Group (HK) Limited ............................................................................................................ Hanyung Metal (Suzhou) Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................... Global Point Technology (Far East) Limited 21 ........................................................................................... Jiangsu Changfa Refrigeration Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................... Jiaxing Jackson Travel Products Co., Ltd ................................................................................................... mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Exporter Weightedaverage dumping margin 20 .............................. 32.79 32.79 32.79 32.79 32.79 32.79 32.79 32.79 0.00 22.28 32.69 22.28 22.28 22.28 22.28 27.22 27.22 15 See Comment 4 of the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum for further discussion. 16 See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 36005–36006 and the Attachment to the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. 17 See Comments 2, 5, and 6 of the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum for further discussion. See also Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 36003–36005 and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 14–15. VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:02 Dec 30, 2014 Jkt 235001 18 These companies are: (1) Alnan Aluminium Co., Ltd.; (2) Chiping One Stop Industrial & Trade Co., Ltd.; (3) Cixi Handsome Pool Appliance Co., Ltd.; (4) DongChuan Swimming Pool Equipments Co., Ltd.; (5) Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd.; (6) Foshan Shunde Aoneng Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.; (7) Guang Dong Xin Wei Aluminum Products Co., Ltd.; (8) Guangdong Whirlpool Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.; (9) Guangzhou Mingcan Die-Casting Hardware Products, Co. Ltd.; (10) Hanyung Alcobis Co., Ltd.; (11) Henan New Kelong Electrical Appliances Cp., PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Ltd.; (12) Idex Dinglee Technology (Tianjin Co., Ltd.); (13) Nidec Sankyo (Zhejiang) Corporation; (14) Ningbo Splash Pool Appliance Co., Ltd.; (15) Samuel, Son & Co., Ltd.; (16) Shenyang Yuanda Aluminum Industry Engineering Co., Ltd.; (17) Taizhou Lifeng Manufacturing Corporation; (18) Tiazhou Lifeng Manufacturing Corporation; (19) Wenzhou Shengbo Decoration & Hardware; and (20) Whirlpool (Guangdong). 19 See Comment 3 of the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum for further discussion. E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM 31DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices 78787 Weightedaverage dumping margin 20 Margin adjusted for liquidation and cash deposit purposes (%) 32.79 32.79 32.79 32.79 32.79 32.79 32.79 32.79 32.79 32.79 33.28 27.22 22.28 27.22 27.22 22.28 27.22 27.22 22.28 27.22 27.22 33.18 Exporter Justhere Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................... Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn. Bhd 22 .................................................................................................. Metaltek Group Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................. Midea International Trading Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................... Permasteelisa Hong Kong Limited 23 .......................................................................................................... Shanghai Tongtai Precise Aluminum Alloy ................................................................................................. Sincere Profit Limited .................................................................................................................................. tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................... Tianjin Jinmao Import & Export Corp., Ltd .................................................................................................. Union Industry (Asia) Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................... PRC-wide Entity ........................................................................................................................................... Disclosure We will disclose the calculations performed within five days of the date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rates mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b).24 The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of review. For Kromet, we will instruct CBP to liquidate all appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties because Kromet’s weighted-average dumping margin is zero percent. For the 18 nonexamined, separate rate companies, we will instruct CBP to liquidate all appropriate entries at a rate based on 32.79 percent and adjusted for both export and domestic subsidies as described above. For the PRC-wide entity, we will instruct CBP to liquidate all appropriate entries at a rate equal to 33.18 percent, which is adjusted for 20 As explained in the Preliminary Results, for the Separate Rate Companies (i.e., all companies other than Kromet), the Department intends to adjust the weighted-average dumping margin, for both cash deposit and liquidation purposes. See Attachment to the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum for calculations showing the export subsidy, domestic subsidy, pass-through rate, and net adjustments. 21 Hoff Associates Mfg Reps Inc. (dba Global Point Technology, Inc.) is the U.S. importer. 22 Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusions Co., Ltd. is the producer. 23 Permasteelisa South China Factory (Permasteelisa China) is the producer. 24 See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103 (February 14, 2012) (‘‘NME Antidumping Proceedings’’). VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:02 Dec 30, 2014 Jkt 235001 export and domestic subsidies, as appropriate.25 The Department recently announced a refinement to its assessment practice in non-market economy (‘‘NME’’) cases. Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the NME-wide rate. In addition, if the Department determines that an exporter under review had no shipments of subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under that exporter’s case number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the NME-wide rate. For a full discussion of this practice, see NME Antidumping Proceedings, supra. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters listed above, the cash deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin identified in ‘‘Final Results of the Review,’’ and adjusted for applicable export and domestic subsidies; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters that are not under review in this segment of the proceeding but that received a separate rate in a previous segment, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the 25 For the PRC-wide entity, which received an AFA rate, as an extension of the adverse inference found necessary pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act, the Department has adjusted the PRC-wide entity’s AD assessment rate by the lowest export subsidy rate and the lowest estimated domestic subsidy pass-through determined for any party in the companion CVD proceeding. PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 33.18 percent, which is adjusted for export and domestic subsidies, as appropriate; 26 and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC exporter. The cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of the antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties In accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), this notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under the APO. Timely written notification of the return or 26 For the PRC-wide entity, which received an AFA rate, as an extension of the adverse inference found necessary pursuant to section 776(b) of the Act, the Department has adjusted the PRC-wide entity’s AD cash deposit rate by the lowest export subsidy rate and the lowest estimated domestic subsidy pass-through determined for any party in the companion CVD proceeding. See Attachment to accompanying Issues and Decision memorandum. E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM 31DEN1 78788 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. These final results of review and notice are published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: December 22, 2014. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix—Issues and Decision Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order Discussion of the Issues Comment 1A: Selection of the Primary Surrogate Country Comment 1B: Selection of Financial Statements To Derive Financial Ratios Comment 1C: Selection of Surrogate Value for Primary Aluminum Input Comment 1D: Selection of Surrogate Value for Labor Comment 2: Whether To Continue To Collapse Zhongya, Guang Ya, and Xinya Comment 3: Whether To Recalculate the PRC-Wide Rate Comment 4: Whether To Recalculate the Separate-Rate for Non-Examined Exporters Comment 5: Whether the Department Has the Authority To Assess Antidumping Duties on Imports of Merchandise Prior to the Initiation of a Scope Inquiry Comment 6: Whether the Department Should Make a Scope Ruling on Jangho’s Curtain Wall Units and Window Wall Units in This Review Comment 7: Status of Skyline’s Separate Rate Comment 8: Whether To Correct the Spelling of Company Names in the Final Results and CBP Instructions Recommendation Attachment [FR Doc. 2014–30662 Filed 12–30–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES [C–570–968] Aluminum Extrusions From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2012 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) completed its administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:02 Dec 30, 2014 Jkt 235001 aluminum extrusions from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) for the January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2012, period of review (POR). We determine that the Alnan Companies 1 and Jiangsu Changfa Refrigeration Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu Changfa) received countervailable subsidies during the POR. The final net subsidy rates are listed below in ‘‘Final Results of the Review.’’ DATES: Effective Date: December 31, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristen Johnson and Joy Zhang, AD/ CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–4793 and (202) 482–1168, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 25, 2014, the Department published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review.2 On August 26, 2014, the Department extended the final results of this administrative review until December 22, 2014.3 The Department invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results, received case and rebuttal briefs from several parties, and held a public hearing on October 17, 2014.4 Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the Order 5 is aluminum extrusions which are shapes and forms, produced by an extrusion process, made from aluminum alloys having metallic elements corresponding to the alloy series 1 The Alnan Companies are Alnan Aluminum Co., Ltd. (Alnan Aluminum), Alnan Aluminum Foil Co., Ltd. (Alnan Foil), Alnan (Shanglin) Industry Co., Ltd. (Shanglin Industry), and Shanglin Alnan Aluminum Comprehensive Utilization Power Co., Ltd. (Shanglin Power). Kromet International Inc., one of the selected mandatory respondents in this administrative review, reported that it is a Canadabased company that sold subject merchandise produced by the Alnan Companies to the United States during the review period. 2 See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2012, 79 FR 36009 (June 25, 2014) (Preliminary Results). 3 See Department Memorandum regarding ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review’’ (August 26, 2014). 4 For additional case history for this administrative review, see accompanying Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China, dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 5 See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 76 FR 30653 (May 26, 2011) (Order). PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 designations published by The Aluminum Association commencing with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or proprietary equivalents or other certifying body equivalents).6 Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under the following categories of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS): 7610.10.00, 7610.90.00, 7615.10.30, 7615.10.71, 7615.10.91, 7615.19.10, 7615.19.30, 7615.19.50, 7615.19.70, 7615.19.90, 7615.20.00, 7616.99.10, 7616.99.50, 8479.89.98, 8479.90.94, 8513.90.20, 9403.10.00, 9403.20.00, 7604.21.00.00, 7604.29.10.00, 7604.29.30.10, 7604.29.30.50, 7604.29.50.30, 7604.29.50.60, 7608.20.00.30, 7608.20.00.90, 8302.10.30.00, 8302.10.60.30, 8302.10.60.60, 8302.10.60.90, 8302.20.00.00, 8302.30.30.10, 8302.30.30.60, 8302.41.30.00, 8302.41.60.15, 8302.41.60.45, 8302.41.60.50, 8302.41.60.80, 8302.42.30.10, 8302.42.30.15, 8302.42.30.65, 8302.49.60.35, 8302.49.60.45, 8302.49.60.55, 8302.49.60.85, 8302.50.00.00, 8302.60.90.00, 8305.10.00.50, 8306.30.00.00, 8414.59.60.90, 8415.90.80.45, 8418.99.80.05, 8418.99.80.50, 8418.99.80.60, 8419.90.10.00, 8422.90.06.40, 8473.30.20.00, 8473.30.51.00, 8479.90.85.00, 8486.90.00.00, 8487.90.00.80, 8503.00.95.20, 8508.70.00.00, 8516.90.50.00, 8516.90.80.50, 8517.70.00.00, 8529.90.73.00, 8529.90.97.60, 8538.10.00.00, 8543.90.88.80, 8708.29.50.60, 8708.80.65.90, 8803.30.00.60, 9013.90.50.00, 9013.90.90.00, 9401.90.50.81, 9403.90.10.40, 9403.90.10.50, 9403.90.10.85, 9403.90.25.40, 9403.90.25.80, 9403.90.40.05, 9403.90.40.10, 9403.90.40.60, 9403.90.50.05, 9403.90.50.10, 9403.90.50.80, 9403.90.60.05, 9403.90.60.10, 9403.90.60.80, 9403.90.70.05, 9403.90.70.10, 9403.90.70.80, 9403.90.80.10, 9403.90.80.15, 9403.90.80.20, 9403.90.80.41, 9403.90.80.51, 9403.90.80.61, 9506.11.40.80, 9506.51.40.00, 9506.51.60.00, 9506.59.40.40, 9506.70.20.90, 9506.91.00.10, 9506.91.00.20, 9506.91.00.30, 9506.99.05.10, 9506.99.05.20, 9506.99.05.30, 9506.99.15.00, 9506.99.20.00, 9506.99.25.80, 9506.99.28.00, 9506.99.55.00, 9506.99.60.80, 9507.30.20.00, 9507.30.40.00, 6 For a complete description of the scope of the Order, see Issues and Decision Memorandum. E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM 31DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78784-78788]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30662]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-967]


Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``Department'') is conducting an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on aluminum 
extrusions from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''). The period of 
review (``POR'') is May 1, 2012, through April 30, 2013. These final 
results cover 52 companies for which an administrative review was 
initiated, and for which this administrative review was not rescinded 
in the Preliminary Results.\1\ For these final results, the Department 
examined two mandatory respondents and one voluntary respondent for 
which this review was initiated. The first mandatory respondent is 
Guangzhou Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering Co., Ltd. and Jangho 
Curtain Wall Hong Kong Ltd. (collectively ``Jangho''); the second 
mandatory respondent is a single entity that the Department continues 
to find is comprised of Guang Ya Aluminum Industrial Co., Ltd. (``Guang 
Ya''), Foshan Guangcheng Aluminum Co., Ltd. (``Guangcheng''), Kong Ah 
International Co., Ltd. (``Kong Ah''), and Guang Ya Aluminum Industries 
(Hong Kong) Ltd. (``Guang Ya HK'') (collectively ``Guang Ya Group''), 
Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd. (``Zhongya''), Zhongya Shaped 
Aluminum (HK) Holding Ltd. (``Shaped Aluminum''), and Karlton Aluminum 
Co., Ltd. (``Karlton'') (collectively ``Zhongya''), and Foshan Nanhai 
Xinya Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd. (``Xinya'') 
(collectively ``Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 
38924 (June 28, 2013) (``Initiation Notice''); see also Aluminum 
Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results 
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission, in Part; 
2012/2013, 79 FR 36003 (June 25, 2014) (``Preliminary Results'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department finds for these final results that Jangho and the 
Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya entity failed to demonstrate that they 
were eligible for separate rates and thus are part of the PRC-wide 
entity. For Kromet International, Inc. (``Kromet''), a voluntary 
respondent in this review, the Department finds that Kromet did not 
make sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the 
POR.
    Furthermore, the Department finds that 19 of the companies under 
review (including Kromet) have established their eligibility for a 
separate rate. Additionally, we determine that four companies, Hong 
Kong Gree Electric Appliances Sales Limited (``Gree''), Jiuyuan Co., 
Ltd. (``Jiuyuan''), Shenzhen Hudson Technology Development Co., Ltd. 
(``Shenzhen Hudson''), and Skyline Exhibit Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 
(``Skyline'') had no shipments. The Department finds that the remaining 
companies under review either failed to establish their eligibility for 
a separate rate or were not responsive, and, therefore, these companies 
are part of the PRC-wide entity.

DATES: Effective Date: December 31, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Terpstra or Paul Stolz, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20230; telephone: (202) 482-3965 or (202) 482-4474, respectively.

Background

    On June 25, 2014, the Department published the Preliminary Results 
of this administrative review. At that time, we invited interested 
parties to comment on the Preliminary Results.\2\ We granted parties an 
extension of time to submit case and rebuttal briefs.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 36006.
    \3\ See ``Second Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 
Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: 
Granting an Extension of Time for Parties to Provide Case Briefs and 
Rebuttal Case Briefs,'' dated July 7, 2014 and ``Second 
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Aluminum 
Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: Granting an 
Extension of Time for Parties to Provide Rebuttal Briefs,'' dated 
August 12, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 8, 2014 we received case briefs from the Aluminum 
Extrusions Fair Trade Committee (``Petitioner''); \4\ Zhongya; Skyline; 
Jangho; tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (``tenKsolar''); Permasteelisa 
South China Factory and Permasteelisa Hong Kong Ltd. (collectively, 
``Permasteelisa''); Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co. Ltd., 
and Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn. Bhd. (collectively ``Kam Kiu''). On

[[Page 78785]]

August 20, 2014, we received rebuttal briefs from the Petitioner, 
Kromet, and Jangho.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The individual members of the Committee are Aerolite 
Extrusion Company; Alexandria Extrusion Company; Benada Aluminum of 
Florida, Inc.; William L. Bonnell Company, Inc.; Frontier Aluminum 
Corporation; Futural Industries Corporation; Hydro Aluminum North 
America, Inc.; Kaiser Aluminum Corporation; Profile Extrusion 
Company; Sapa Extrusions, Inc.; and Western Extrusions Corporation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On September 5, 2014, the Department extended the deadline for the 
final results until December 22, 2014.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See ``Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of 
China: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review,'' dated September 5, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by the Order \6\ is aluminum extrusions 
which are shapes and forms, produced by an extrusion process, made from 
aluminum alloys having metallic elements corresponding to the alloy 
series designations published by The Aluminum Association commencing 
with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or proprietary equivalents or other 
certifying body equivalents).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Aluminum Extrusions from the People's Republic of China: 
Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 30650 (May 26, 2011) (``Order'').
    \7\ See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, titled 
``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Aluminum Extrusions from the 
People's Republic of China,'' which is dated concurrently with and 
hereby adopted by this notice (``Issues and Decision Memorandum'') 
for a complete description of the scope of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Imports of the subject merchandise are provided for under the 
following categories of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 
States (``HTS''): 7610.10.00, 7610.90.00, 7615.10.30, 7615.10.71, 
7615.10.91, 7615.19.10, 7615.19.30, 7615.19.50, 7615.19.70, 7615.19.90, 
7615.20.00, 7616.99.10, 7616.99.50, 8479.89.98, 8479.90.94, 8513.90.20, 
9403.10.00, 9403.20.00, 7604.21.00.00, 7604.29.10.00, 7604.29.30.10, 
7604.29.30.50, 7604.29.50.30, 7604.29.50.60, 7608.20.00.30, 
7608.20.00.90, 7609.00.00.00, 8302.10.30.00, 8302.10.60.30, 
8302.10.60.60, 8302.10.60.90, 8302.20.00.00, 8302.30.30.10, 
8302.30.30.60, 8302.41.30.00, 8302.41.60.15, 8302.41.60.45, 
8302.41.60.50, 8302.41.60.80, 8302.42.30.10, 8302.42.30.15, 
8302.42.30.65, 8302.49.60.35, 8302.49.60.45, 8302.49.60.55, 
8302.49.60.85, 8302.50.00.00, 8302.60.90.00, 8305.10.00.50, 
8306.30.00.00, 8414.59.60.90, 8415.90.80.45, 8418.99.80.05, 
8418.99.80.50, 8418.99.80.60, 8419.90.10.00, 8422.90.06.40, 
8473.30.20.00, 8473.30.51.00, 8479.90.85.00, 8486.90.00.00, 
8487.90.00.80, 8503.00.95.20, 8508.70.00.00, 8516.90.50.00, 
8516.90.80.50, 8517.70.00.00, 8529.90.73.00, 8529.90.97.60, 
8538.10.00.00, 8543.90.88.80, 8708.29.50.60, 8708.80.65.90, 
8803.30.00.60, 9013.90.50.00, 9013.90.90.00, 9401.90.50.81, 
9403.90.10.40, 9403.90.10.50, 9403.90.10.85, 9403.90.25.40, 
9403.90.25.80, 9403.90.40.05, 9403.90.40.10, 9403.90.40.60, 
9403.90.50.05, 9403.90.50.10, 9403.90.50.80, 9403.90.60.05, 
9403.90.60.10, 9403.90.60.80, 9403.90.70.05, 9403.90.70.10, 
9403.90.70.80, 9403.90.80.10, 9403.90.80.15, 9403.90.80.20, 
9403.90.80.41, 9403.90.80.51, 9403.90.80.61, 9506.11.40.80, 
9506.51.40.00, 9506.51.60.00, 9506.59.40.40, 9506.70.20.90, 
9506.91.00.10, 9506.91.00.20, 9506.91.00.30, 9506.99.05.10, 
9506.99.05.20, 9506.99.05.30, 9506.99.15.00, 9506.99.20.00, 
9506.99.25.80, 9506.99.28.00, 9506.99.55.00, 9506.99.60.80, 
9507.30.20.00, 9507.30.40.00, 9507.30.60.00, 9507.90.60.00, and 
9603.90.80.50.
    The subject merchandise entered as parts of other aluminum products 
may be classifiable under the following additional Chapter 76 
subheadings: 7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and 7616.99 as well as 
under other HTS chapters. In addition, fin evaporator coils may be 
classifiable under HTS numbers: 8418.99.80.50 and 8418.99.80.60. While 
HTS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the 
written description of the scope of this Order is dispositive.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by parties 
in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, 
which is incorporated herein by reference. A list of the issues which 
parties raised, and to which we respond in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum, follows as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically 
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS'').\8\ ACCESS is 
available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and it is 
available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the 
main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version 
of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the 
internet at http://www.trade.gov/enforcement/frn/index.html. The signed 
Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues 
and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and Compliance changed the 
name of Enforcement and Compliance's AD and CVD Centralized 
Electronic Service System (``IA ACCESS'') to AD and CVD Centralized 
Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). The Web site location was 
changed from http://iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. 
The Final Rule changing the reference to the Regulations can be 
found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on an analysis of the comments received from interested 
parties and a review of the record, the Department made the following 
changes for these final results of review:
     We corrected a calculation error for the final adjusted 
margin to be applied to the separate rate companies.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Attachment to the accompanying Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     We adjusted the PRC-wide entity margin for both export 
subsidies and domestic subsidy pass-through.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Id.; see also Comment 3 of the accompanying Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     We determined that Skyline did not have shipments of 
subject merchandise during the POR.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Comment 7 of the accompanying Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     We made a correction to the spelling of Kam Kiu's 
name.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Comment 8 of the accompanying Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     For Kromet's preliminary margin calculation, we neglected 
to convert the variables ``Magnesium Ingots'' and ``Aluminum Titanium 
Boron Wire'' using Thai exchange rates. We corrected this error, and it 
did not change Kromet's margin.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Memorandum to the File titled ``Second Administrative 
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the 
People's Republic of China: Analysis of the Final Results Margin 
Calculation for Kromet International,'' dated concurrently with this 
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Companies Eligible for a Separate Rate

    In our Preliminary Results, we determined that 18 companies, plus 
Kromet, are eligible for a separate rate.\14\ We received no 
information since the issuance of the Preliminary Results that provides 
a basis for reconsideration of this determination. Therefore, the 
Department continues to find that these 19 companies are eligible for a 
separate rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 36006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rate for Non-Examined Companies Which Are Eligible for a Separate Rate

    The Department assigned to non-examined, separate rate companies 
the

[[Page 78786]]

weighted-average dumping margin assigned to non-examined, separate rate 
companies in the final determination of the antidumping investigation 
and for the final results of the first administrative review of the 
Order. Neither the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'') nor the 
Department's regulations address the establishment of the rate applied 
to individual companies not selected for examination where the 
Department limited its examination in an administrative review pursuant 
to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. The Department's practice in cases 
involving limited selection based on exporters accounting for the 
largest volumes of trade has been to look to section 735(c)(5) of the 
Act for guidance, which provides instructions for calculating the all-
others rate in an investigation. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act 
instructs the Department to avoid calculating an all-others rate using 
any rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts 
available in investigations. Section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act provides 
that, where all rates are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on facts 
available, the Department may use ``any reasonable method'' for 
assigning an all-others rate.
    We determine that the application of the rate from the 
investigation to the non-examined separate rate respondents is 
consistent with precedent and an appropriate method to determine the 
separate rate in the instant review. Pursuant to this method, we are 
assigning the rate of 32.79 percent, the most recent rate (from the 
less than fair value investigation) calculated for the non-examined 
separate rate respondents, to the non-examined separate rate 
respondents in the instant review.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Comment 4 of the accompanying Issues and Decision 
Memorandum for further discussion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of the Act

    Pursuant to section 777A(f) of the Act, the Department has made an 
adjustment for countervailable domestic subsidies which have been found 
to have impacted the U.S. prices. We made no changes (since the 
Preliminary Results) to the adjustments made for these final results to 
Kromet's adjustment or the separate rate companies' adjustment (though 
we corrected a calculation error for the final adjusted margin to 
include only the passed-through portion of the domestic subsidy for the 
separate rate companies).\16\ Pursuant to section 777A(f) of the Act, 
for these final results, we also made an adjustment to the PRC-wide 
entity's rate to account for countervailable domestic subsidies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 36005-36006 and the 
Attachment to the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

PRC-Wide Entity

    In the Preliminary Results, the Department determined that the 
mandatory respondents Jangho and Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya were not 
eligible for a separate rate, and, accordingly, were found to be part 
of the PRC-wide entity. The Department received no information since 
the issuance of the Preliminary Results that provides a basis for 
reconsideration of this determination. Therefore, the Department 
continues to find that Jangho and Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya \17\ are 
not eligible for a separate rate and are part of the PRC-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Comments 2, 5, and 6 of the accompanying Issues and 
Decision Memorandum for further discussion. See also Preliminary 
Results, 79 FR at 36003-36005 and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum at 14-15.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the Preliminary Results, the Department also found 21 companies 
to be part of the PRC-wide entity. For one of those companies, Skyline, 
the Department received information since the Preliminary Results 
sufficient to change its determination. For the remaining 20 companies, 
the Department received no information since the issuance of the 
Preliminary Results that provides a basis for reconsideration of its 
determination. Therefore, the Department continues to find that these 
20 companies are not eligible for a separate rate and are part of the 
PRC-wide entity.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ These companies are: (1) Alnan Aluminium Co., Ltd.; (2) 
Chiping One Stop Industrial & Trade Co., Ltd.; (3) Cixi Handsome 
Pool Appliance Co., Ltd.; (4) DongChuan Swimming Pool Equipments 
Co., Ltd.; (5) Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd.; 
(6) Foshan Shunde Aoneng Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.; (7) Guang 
Dong Xin Wei Aluminum Products Co., Ltd.; (8) Guangdong Whirlpool 
Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.; (9) Guangzhou Mingcan Die-Casting 
Hardware Products, Co. Ltd.; (10) Hanyung Alcobis Co., Ltd.; (11) 
Henan New Kelong Electrical Appliances Cp., Ltd.; (12) Idex Dinglee 
Technology (Tianjin Co., Ltd.); (13) Nidec Sankyo (Zhejiang) 
Corporation; (14) Ningbo Splash Pool Appliance Co., Ltd.; (15) 
Samuel, Son & Co., Ltd.; (16) Shenyang Yuanda Aluminum Industry 
Engineering Co., Ltd.; (17) Taizhou Lifeng Manufacturing 
Corporation; (18) Tiazhou Lifeng Manufacturing Corporation; (19) 
Wenzhou Shengbo Decoration & Hardware; and (20) Whirlpool 
(Guangdong).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adverse Facts Available Rate for the PRC-Wide Entity

    For the PRC-wide entity, the Department in the Preliminary Results 
preliminarily determined that the PRC-wide entity had not acted to the 
best of its ability in providing necessary information to the 
Department, and assigned the rate of 33.28 percent, the only rate ever 
determined for the PRC-wide entity in this proceeding, as adverse facts 
available pursuant to sections 776(a) and 776(b) of the Act. The rate 
of 33.28 percent has probative value because it was in the range of the 
individual dumping margins which we calculated for Kromet. Accordingly, 
we find that the rate of 33.28 percent is corroborated within the 
meaning of section 776(c) of the Act, and that it is appropriate to 
continue to apply this rate of 33.28 percent to the PRC-wide 
entity.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See Comment 3 of the accompanying Issues and Decision 
Memorandum for further discussion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of Review

    As a result of this review, we determine that the following 
weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period May 1, 2012, 
through April 30, 2013:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Margin adjusted
                                    Weighted- average   for liquidation
             Exporter                 dumping margin    and cash deposit
                                           \20\           purposes (%)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kromet International, Inc.........  .................               0.00
Allied Maker Limited..............              32.79              22.28
Changzhou Changzheng Evaporator                 32.79              32.69
 Co., Ltd.........................
Classic & Contemporary Inc........              32.79              22.28
Dynabright Int'l Group (HK)                     32.79              22.28
 Limited..........................
Hanyung Metal (Suzhou) Co., Ltd...              32.79              22.28
Global Point Technology (Far East)              32.79              22.28
 Limited \21\.....................
Jiangsu Changfa Refrigeration Co.,              32.79              27.22
 Ltd..............................
Jiaxing Jackson Travel Products                 32.79              27.22
 Co., Ltd.........................

[[Page 78787]]

 
Justhere Co., Ltd.................              32.79              27.22
Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn.                 32.79              22.28
 Bhd \22\.........................
Metaltek Group Co., Ltd...........              32.79              27.22
Midea International Trading Co.,                32.79              27.22
 Ltd..............................
Permasteelisa Hong Kong Limited                 32.79              22.28
 \23\.............................
Shanghai Tongtai Precise Aluminum               32.79              27.22
 Alloy............................
Sincere Profit Limited............              32.79              27.22
tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.....              32.79              22.28
Tianjin Jinmao Import & Export                  32.79              27.22
 Corp., Ltd.......................
Union Industry (Asia) Co., Ltd....              32.79              27.22
PRC-wide Entity...................              33.28              33.18
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We will disclose the calculations performed within five days of the 
date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ As explained in the Preliminary Results, for the Separate 
Rate Companies (i.e., all companies other than Kromet), the 
Department intends to adjust the weighted-average dumping margin, 
for both cash deposit and liquidation purposes. See Attachment to 
the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum for calculations 
showing the export subsidy, domestic subsidy, pass-through rate, and 
net adjustments.
    \21\ Hoff Associates Mfg Reps Inc. (dba Global Point Technology, 
Inc.) is the U.S. importer.
    \22\ Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusions Co., Ltd. is the 
producer.
    \23\ Permasteelisa South China Factory (Permasteelisa China) is 
the producer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    The Department shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all 
appropriate entries covered by this review pursuant to section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b).\24\ The Department 
intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date 
of publication of these final results of review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103 (February 14, 2012) 
(``NME Antidumping Proceedings'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For Kromet, we will instruct CBP to liquidate all appropriate 
entries without regard to antidumping duties because Kromet's weighted-
average dumping margin is zero percent. For the 18 non-examined, 
separate rate companies, we will instruct CBP to liquidate all 
appropriate entries at a rate based on 32.79 percent and adjusted for 
both export and domestic subsidies as described above. For the PRC-wide 
entity, we will instruct CBP to liquidate all appropriate entries at a 
rate equal to 33.18 percent, which is adjusted for export and domestic 
subsidies, as appropriate.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ For the PRC-wide entity, which received an AFA rate, as an 
extension of the adverse inference found necessary pursuant to 
section 776(b) of the Act, the Department has adjusted the PRC-wide 
entity's AD assessment rate by the lowest export subsidy rate and 
the lowest estimated domestic subsidy pass-through determined for 
any party in the companion CVD proceeding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department recently announced a refinement to its assessment 
practice in non-market economy (``NME'') cases. Pursuant to this 
refinement in practice, for entries that were not reported in the U.S. 
sales databases submitted by companies individually examined during 
this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries 
at the NME-wide rate. In addition, if the Department determines that an 
exporter under review had no shipments of subject merchandise, any 
suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., 
at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the NME-wide rate. For a 
full discussion of this practice, see NME Antidumping Proceedings, 
supra.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the 
final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the exporters listed above, the cash 
deposit rate will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin 
identified in ``Final Results of the Review,'' and adjusted for 
applicable export and domestic subsidies; (2) for previously 
investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters that are not under 
review in this segment of the proceeding but that received a separate 
rate in a previous segment, the cash deposit rate will continue to be 
the exporter-specific rate published for the most recently completed 
segment of this proceeding; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject 
merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a separate 
rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 33.18 percent, 
which is adjusted for export and domestic subsidies, as appropriate; 
\26\ and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which 
have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 
rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC 
exporter. The cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in 
effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ For the PRC-wide entity, which received an AFA rate, as an 
extension of the adverse inference found necessary pursuant to 
section 776(b) of the Act, the Department has adjusted the PRC-wide 
entity's AD cash deposit rate by the lowest export subsidy rate and 
the lowest estimated domestic subsidy pass-through determined for 
any party in the companion CVD proceeding. See Attachment to 
accompanying Issues and Decision memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties 
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. 
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's 
presumption that reimbursement of the antidumping and/or countervailing 
duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping 
duties.

Notification to Interested Parties

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), this notice serves as a 
reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order 
(``APO'') of their responsibility concerning the disposition of 
proprietary information disclosed under the APO. Timely written 
notification of the return or

[[Page 78788]]

destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective 
order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and 
terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
    These final results of review and notice are published in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: December 22, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix--Issues and Decision Memorandum

Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Discussion of the Issues

    Comment 1A: Selection of the Primary Surrogate Country
    Comment 1B: Selection of Financial Statements To Derive 
Financial Ratios
    Comment 1C: Selection of Surrogate Value for Primary Aluminum 
Input
    Comment 1D: Selection of Surrogate Value for Labor
    Comment 2: Whether To Continue To Collapse Zhongya, Guang Ya, 
and Xinya
    Comment 3: Whether To Recalculate the PRC-Wide Rate
    Comment 4: Whether To Recalculate the Separate-Rate for Non-
Examined Exporters
    Comment 5: Whether the Department Has the Authority To Assess 
Antidumping Duties on Imports of Merchandise Prior to the Initiation 
of a Scope Inquiry
    Comment 6: Whether the Department Should Make a Scope Ruling on 
Jangho's Curtain Wall Units and Window Wall Units in This Review
    Comment 7: Status of Skyline's Separate Rate
    Comment 8: Whether To Correct the Spelling of Company Names in 
the Final Results and CBP Instructions

Recommendation
Attachment

[FR Doc. 2014-30662 Filed 12-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P