Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Rule 6.76A by Revising the Order Allocation Methodology for Certain Orders of Five Contracts or Fewer, 78928-78930 [2014-30589]
Download as PDF
78928
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NSCC–2014–13 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NSCC–2014–13. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of NSCC and on DTCC’s Web site
at https://dtcc.com/legal/sec-rulefilings.aspx. All comments received will
be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–NSCC–
2014–13 and should be submitted on or
before January 21, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.9
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–30591 Filed 12–30–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–73928; File No. SR–
NYSEARCA–2014–145]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Amending Rule 6.76A by
Revising the Order Allocation
Methodology for Certain Orders of Five
Contracts or Fewer
December 23, 2014.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on December
22, 2014, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 6.76A by revising the order
allocation methodology for certain
orders of five contracts or fewer. The
text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s Web site at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rules 6.76A by revising the order
1 15
9 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
2 17
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00150
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
allocation methodology for certain
orders of five (5) contracts or fewer. As
proposed, for all incoming orders of five
contracts or fewer the Lead Market
Maker (‘‘LMM’’) would be allocated the
full contract size up to the size of the
LMM’s quote, provided the LMM is
quoting at the NBBO and there is no
Customer interest at the same price
ranked ahead of the LMM.
Rule 6.76A sets forth the priority for
the allocation of incoming orders
against bids and offers in the Display
Order Process at a particular price in the
NYSE Arca System (‘‘System’’).
Specifically, pursuant to Rule
6.76A(a)(1)(A), if there is an LMM
quoting at the NBBO, and there is no
Customer interest ranked ahead of the
LMM, nor is the incoming order a
Directed Order, the incoming order will
be matched against the quote of the
LMM for either: (a) An amount equal to
40% of the incoming order up to the
LMM’s disseminated quote size; or (b)
the LMM’s share in the order of ranking,
whichever is greater. Generally
speaking, this means an LMM receives
a guaranteed 40% trade allocation on
any incoming order provided the LMM
is quoting at the NBBO, and there is no
Customer interest ranked ahead of the
LMM.
The Exchange is proposing to revise
the order allocation methodology to
provide that if the LMM is entitled to an
allocation pursuant to Rule
6.76A(a)(1)(A) and the entire contract
size of the incoming order is five (5)
contracts or fewer, the LMM would be
allocated the full contract size up to the
size of the LMM’s quote. As proposed,
Rule 6.76A(1)(B) would state, ‘‘If the
LMM is entitled to an allocation
pursuant to (a)(1)(A) above, for all
incoming orders of five (5) contracts or
fewer, the LMM will be allocated the
full contract size up to the size of the
LMM’s quote.’’ This proposed change
would affect only those incoming orders
of five contacts or fewer. The Exchange
notes that the proposed rule is only
available if the LMM is entitled to an
allocation, which means that if there is
Customer interest at the same price
ranked ahead of the LMM, such
Customer interest would continue to
have priority, even for executions of five
contracts or fewer. In addition, an LMM
must be quoting at the NBBO to be
entitled to trade with orders of five
contracts or fewer.3 The Exchange is not
proposing any changes to the order
3 If the LMM is not quoting at the NBBO, or the
LMM is quoting at the NBBO but for less size than
the incoming order of five contracts or fewer, any
remaining balance of the incoming order will be
matched against orders and quotes in the Display
Order Process in the order of their ranking.
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
allocation methodology for executions
greater than five contracts.
The allocation of orders of five
contracts or fewer to a specific type of
market maker (i.e. LMM) is consistent
with similar methodology for allocating
small size orders on other options
exchanges. For example, the Chicago
Board Options Exchange (‘‘CBOE’’) may
allocate all orders of five contracts or
fewer to an LMM or Designated Primary
Market Maker (‘‘DPM’’),4 NYSE Amex
Options allocates orders of five
contracts or fewer to the Primary
Specialist,5 and the International
Securities Exchange (‘‘ISE’’) allocates all
orders of five contracts or fewer to the
Primary Market Maker (‘‘PMM’’).6 The
Exchange’s proposal would provide its
LMMs the same guaranteed allocation of
orders of five contracts or fewer as these
exchanges provide to their DPMs,
Specialist, or PMMs. Specifically, the
Exchange, like NYSE Amex Options,
and the ISE, would condition this
guaranteed allocation on there being no
Customer orders ranked ahead of the
LMM, the LMM quoting at the NBBO,
and the trade allocation not exceeding
the number of contracts than the LMM
is quoting.
The Exchange believes that the
allocation of order of five contracts or
fewer will not result in a significant
portion of the Exchange’s volume being
executed by the LMM. Nevertheless, the
Exchange would monitor the sizes of all
orders received, and, on a quarterly
basis, evaluate the percentage of volume
constituted by orders of five contracts or
fewer that were allocated to an LMM. If
the percentage of the volume executed
on the Exchange comprised of orders for
five (5) contracts or fewer executed by
an LMM is over forty percent (40%), the
Exchange will reduce the size of the
orders guaranteed to the LMM in this
provision. Conducting a quarterly
review of Exchange volume and
analyzing the percentage of orders of
five contracts or fewer is consistent with
review processes at other exchanges
with comparable allocation
methodology for small size orders.7 The
Exchange proposes to include the
evaluation process in new Commentary
.02 to Rule 6.76A.
The proposed allocation methodology
described above is part of NYSE Arca’s
careful balancing of the rewards and
obligations that pertain to each of the
Exchange’s classes of memberships.
4 See
CBOE Rule 6.45B(a)(iii)(1).
NYSE MKT Rule 964NY(b)(2)(C)(iv).
6 See ISE Rule 713 Supplementary Material .01(c).
7 See NYSE MKT Rule 964NY Commentary .01,
ISE Rule 713 Supplementary Material .01(c), and
CBOE Rule 6.45B(a)(iii)(1)(A).
5 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
This balancing is part of the overall
market structure that is designed to
encourage vigorous price competition
among Market Makers, as well as to
maximize the benefits of price
competition resulting from the entry of
Customer and non-Customer orders,
while encouraging participants to
provide market depth. The Exchange
believes by offering LMMs a greater
allocation on executions of five
contracts or fewer, similar to what their
counterparts on other exchanges
receive, the proposed change, which
guarantees participation rights for
LMMs only when quoting at the best
price, strikes the appropriate balance
between the obligations of LMMs to
provide meaningful depth and liquidity,
and the rewards they receive for doing
so. Furthermore, the Exchange believes
that the revised trade allocation process,
which is competitive with those offered
on other exchanges,8 will help to ensure
that NYSE Arca is able to continue to
attract quality LMMs willing to provide
deep meaningful markets to the
investing public.
The Exchange is also proposing minor
non-substantive changes to the
numbering convention of Rule 6.76A to
accommodate the rule change described
above.
The Exchange will issue a notice
announcing the implementation date of
the proposed rule change no later than
30 days after the effective date of this
filing.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that this
proposed rule change is consistent with
section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 9, in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act 10 in particular, in that it is
designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices,
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. In
particular, and as described above, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is part of the balancing of NYSE
Arca’s overall market structure, which is
designed to encourage vigorous price
competition between Market Makers. In
addition, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change furthers the
objectives of the Act because it is also
designed to help ensure that NYSE Arca
is able to attract quality LMMs willing
nn. 4, 5, and 6.
U.S.C. 78f(b).
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
to provide deep meaningful markets to
the investing public. Increasing quote
competition should lead to narrower
spreads and more liquid markets and
thus benefit investors. Narrower spreads
and more liquid markets can serve as a
catalyst to attracting additional order
flow to the Exchange, enhancing price
discovery and generally benefiting all
participants on the Exchange.
The Exchange further believes that the
proposed rule change would be not be
unfairly discriminatory in allocating
orders of five contracts or fewer to the
LMM. To help ensure that one class of
Market Maker is not unduly enriched by
this proposal, the Exchange would
monitor the sizes of all orders received,
and by using objective criteria, if it
determines that the proposed allocation
process could be seen as discriminatory
because of an unfair share of trade
allocations going to the LMM, would
reduce the eligible size for orders
included in this provision.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. In fact, the
Exchange feels that the proposed change
will increase competition amongst
Market Makers seeking appointments as
LMMs which should result in narrower
spreads and more liquid markets for
investors. In addition, by offering an
allocation methodology similar to those
offered at other exchanges, NYSE Arca
will be in a better position to compete
with those exchanges in attracting well
capitalized Market Makers willing to
make deep liquid markets while acting
as an LMM.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed
rule change pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 11 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.12 Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
8 Supra
9 15
PO 00000
Frm 00151
Fmt 4703
11 15
12 17
Sfmt 4703
78929
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
31DEN1
78930
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices
competition; and (iii) become operative
prior to 30 days from the date on which
it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, it has
become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 13 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) thereunder.14
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of NYSE Arca. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEARCA–2014–145 and should be
submitted on or before January 21, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–30589 Filed 12–30–14; 8:45 am]
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEARCA–2014–145.
This file number should be included on
the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review
your comments more efficiently, please
use only one method. The Commission
will post all comments on the
Commission’s Internet Web site (https://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of
the submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEARCA–2014–145 on the subject
line.
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Extending the
Operation of Its New Market Model
Pilot, Until the Earlier of Securities and
Exchange Commission Approval To
Make Such Pilot Permanent or July 31,
2015
13 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to
give the Commission written notice of its intent to
file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing
of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time
as designated by the Commission. The Exchange
has satisfied this requirement.
14 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:02 Dec 30, 2014
Jkt 235001
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–73919; File No. SR–NYSE–
2014–71]
December 23, 2014
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on December
18, 2014, New York Stock Exchange
LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
15 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00152
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to extend the
operation of its New Market Model
Pilot, currently scheduled to expire on
December 31, 2014, until the earlier of
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) approval to make such
pilot permanent or July 31, 2015. The
text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s Web site at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to extend the
operation of its New Market Model Pilot
(‘‘NMM Pilot’’),4 currently scheduled to
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58845
(October 24, 2008), 73 FR 64379 (October 29, 2008)
(SR–NYSE–2008–46). See also Securities Exchange
Act Release Nos. 60756 (October 1, 2009), 74 FR
51628 (October 7, 2009) (SR–NYSE–2009–100)
(extending Pilot to November 30, 2009); 61031
(November 19, 2009), 74 FR 62368 (November 27,
2009) (SR–NYSE–2009–113) (extending Pilot to
March 30, 2010); 61724 (March 17, 2010), 75 FR
14221 (March 24, 2010) (SR–NYSE–2010–25)
(extending Pilot to September 30, 2010); 62819
(September 1, 2010), 75 FR 54937 (September 9,
2010) (SR–NYSE–2010–61) (extending Pilot to
January 31, 2011); 63616 (December 29, 2010), 76
FR 612 (January 5, 2011) (SR–NYSE–2010–86)
(extending Pilot to August 1, 2011); 64761 (June 28,
2011), 76 FR 39147 (July 5, 2011) (SR–NYSE–2011–
29) (extending Pilot to January 31, 2012); 66046
(December 23, 2011), 76 FR 82340 (December 30,
2011) (SR–NYSE–2011–65) (extending Pilot to July
31, 2012); 67494 (July 25, 2012), 77 FR 45408 (July
31, 2012) (SR–NYSE–2012–26) (extending Pilot to
January 31, 2013); 68558 (January 2, 2013), 78 FR
1288 (January 8, 2013) (SR–NYSE–2012–75)
(extending Pilot to July 31, 2013); 69813 (June 20,
2013), 78 FR 38753 (June 27, 2013) (SR–NYSE–
2013–43) (extending Pilot to January 31, 2014);
71345 (January 17, 2014), 79 FR 4221 (January 24,
2014) (SR–NYSE–2014–01) (extending Pilot to July
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78928-78930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30589]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-73928; File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2014-145]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Rule 6.76A
by Revising the Order Allocation Methodology for Certain Orders of Five
Contracts or Fewer
December 23, 2014.
Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 22, 2014, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``NYSE
Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.76A by revising the order
allocation methodology for certain orders of five contracts or fewer.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Rules 6.76A by revising the order
allocation methodology for certain orders of five (5) contracts or
fewer. As proposed, for all incoming orders of five contracts or fewer
the Lead Market Maker (``LMM'') would be allocated the full contract
size up to the size of the LMM's quote, provided the LMM is quoting at
the NBBO and there is no Customer interest at the same price ranked
ahead of the LMM.
Rule 6.76A sets forth the priority for the allocation of incoming
orders against bids and offers in the Display Order Process at a
particular price in the NYSE Arca System (``System''). Specifically,
pursuant to Rule 6.76A(a)(1)(A), if there is an LMM quoting at the
NBBO, and there is no Customer interest ranked ahead of the LMM, nor is
the incoming order a Directed Order, the incoming order will be matched
against the quote of the LMM for either: (a) An amount equal to 40% of
the incoming order up to the LMM's disseminated quote size; or (b) the
LMM's share in the order of ranking, whichever is greater. Generally
speaking, this means an LMM receives a guaranteed 40% trade allocation
on any incoming order provided the LMM is quoting at the NBBO, and
there is no Customer interest ranked ahead of the LMM.
The Exchange is proposing to revise the order allocation
methodology to provide that if the LMM is entitled to an allocation
pursuant to Rule 6.76A(a)(1)(A) and the entire contract size of the
incoming order is five (5) contracts or fewer, the LMM would be
allocated the full contract size up to the size of the LMM's quote. As
proposed, Rule 6.76A(1)(B) would state, ``If the LMM is entitled to an
allocation pursuant to (a)(1)(A) above, for all incoming orders of five
(5) contracts or fewer, the LMM will be allocated the full contract
size up to the size of the LMM's quote.'' This proposed change would
affect only those incoming orders of five contacts or fewer. The
Exchange notes that the proposed rule is only available if the LMM is
entitled to an allocation, which means that if there is Customer
interest at the same price ranked ahead of the LMM, such Customer
interest would continue to have priority, even for executions of five
contracts or fewer. In addition, an LMM must be quoting at the NBBO to
be entitled to trade with orders of five contracts or fewer.\3\ The
Exchange is not proposing any changes to the order
[[Page 78929]]
allocation methodology for executions greater than five contracts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ If the LMM is not quoting at the NBBO, or the LMM is quoting
at the NBBO but for less size than the incoming order of five
contracts or fewer, any remaining balance of the incoming order will
be matched against orders and quotes in the Display Order Process in
the order of their ranking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The allocation of orders of five contracts or fewer to a specific
type of market maker (i.e. LMM) is consistent with similar methodology
for allocating small size orders on other options exchanges. For
example, the Chicago Board Options Exchange (``CBOE'') may allocate all
orders of five contracts or fewer to an LMM or Designated Primary
Market Maker (``DPM''),\4\ NYSE Amex Options allocates orders of five
contracts or fewer to the Primary Specialist,\5\ and the International
Securities Exchange (``ISE'') allocates all orders of five contracts or
fewer to the Primary Market Maker (``PMM'').\6\ The Exchange's proposal
would provide its LMMs the same guaranteed allocation of orders of five
contracts or fewer as these exchanges provide to their DPMs,
Specialist, or PMMs. Specifically, the Exchange, like NYSE Amex
Options, and the ISE, would condition this guaranteed allocation on
there being no Customer orders ranked ahead of the LMM, the LMM quoting
at the NBBO, and the trade allocation not exceeding the number of
contracts than the LMM is quoting.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See CBOE Rule 6.45B(a)(iii)(1).
\5\ See NYSE MKT Rule 964NY(b)(2)(C)(iv).
\6\ See ISE Rule 713 Supplementary Material .01(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the allocation of order of five
contracts or fewer will not result in a significant portion of the
Exchange's volume being executed by the LMM. Nevertheless, the Exchange
would monitor the sizes of all orders received, and, on a quarterly
basis, evaluate the percentage of volume constituted by orders of five
contracts or fewer that were allocated to an LMM. If the percentage of
the volume executed on the Exchange comprised of orders for five (5)
contracts or fewer executed by an LMM is over forty percent (40%), the
Exchange will reduce the size of the orders guaranteed to the LMM in
this provision. Conducting a quarterly review of Exchange volume and
analyzing the percentage of orders of five contracts or fewer is
consistent with review processes at other exchanges with comparable
allocation methodology for small size orders.\7\ The Exchange proposes
to include the evaluation process in new Commentary .02 to Rule 6.76A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See NYSE MKT Rule 964NY Commentary .01, ISE Rule 713
Supplementary Material .01(c), and CBOE Rule 6.45B(a)(iii)(1)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed allocation methodology described above is part of NYSE
Arca's careful balancing of the rewards and obligations that pertain to
each of the Exchange's classes of memberships. This balancing is part
of the overall market structure that is designed to encourage vigorous
price competition among Market Makers, as well as to maximize the
benefits of price competition resulting from the entry of Customer and
non-Customer orders, while encouraging participants to provide market
depth. The Exchange believes by offering LMMs a greater allocation on
executions of five contracts or fewer, similar to what their
counterparts on other exchanges receive, the proposed change, which
guarantees participation rights for LMMs only when quoting at the best
price, strikes the appropriate balance between the obligations of LMMs
to provide meaningful depth and liquidity, and the rewards they receive
for doing so. Furthermore, the Exchange believes that the revised trade
allocation process, which is competitive with those offered on other
exchanges,\8\ will help to ensure that NYSE Arca is able to continue to
attract quality LMMs willing to provide deep meaningful markets to the
investing public.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Supra nn. 4, 5, and 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange is also proposing minor non-substantive changes to the
numbering convention of Rule 6.76A to accommodate the rule change
described above.
The Exchange will issue a notice announcing the implementation date
of the proposed rule change no later than 30 days after the effective
date of this filing.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that this proposed rule change is consistent
with section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \9\,
in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act
\10\ in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, promote just and equitable principles
of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. In particular, and as described
above, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is part of the
balancing of NYSE Arca's overall market structure, which is designed to
encourage vigorous price competition between Market Makers. In
addition, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change furthers the
objectives of the Act because it is also designed to help ensure that
NYSE Arca is able to attract quality LMMs willing to provide deep
meaningful markets to the investing public. Increasing quote
competition should lead to narrower spreads and more liquid markets and
thus benefit investors. Narrower spreads and more liquid markets can
serve as a catalyst to attracting additional order flow to the
Exchange, enhancing price discovery and generally benefiting all
participants on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange further believes that the proposed rule change would
be not be unfairly discriminatory in allocating orders of five
contracts or fewer to the LMM. To help ensure that one class of Market
Maker is not unduly enriched by this proposal, the Exchange would
monitor the sizes of all orders received, and by using objective
criteria, if it determines that the proposed allocation process could
be seen as discriminatory because of an unfair share of trade
allocations going to the LMM, would reduce the eligible size for orders
included in this provision.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In fact, the Exchange feels
that the proposed change will increase competition amongst Market
Makers seeking appointments as LMMs which should result in narrower
spreads and more liquid markets for investors. In addition, by offering
an allocation methodology similar to those offered at other exchanges,
NYSE Arca will be in a better position to compete with those exchanges
in attracting well capitalized Market Makers willing to make deep
liquid markets while acting as an LMM.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\12\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on
[[Page 78930]]
competition; and (iii) become operative prior to 30 days from the date
on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may
designate, if consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest, it has become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \13\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2014-145 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2014-145. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of NYSE Arca. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2014-145 and should
be submitted on or before January 21, 2015.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-30589 Filed 12-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P