Sugar From Mexico: Suspension of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 78044-78051 [2014-30392]
Download as PDF
78044
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 248 / Monday, December 29, 2014 / Notices
procedures, including but not limited
to, the calculation methodologies
described in Appendix II of this
Agreement.
B. By entering into the Agreement, the
Signatories do not admit that exports of
Sugar from Mexico are having or have
had an injurious effect on Sugar
producers in the United States, have
caused the suppression or undercutting
of prices, or have been sold at less than
fair value.
C. As of the Effective Date, the
Department shall instruct CBP to refund
any cash deposits collected as a result
of the antidumping duty investigation
on sugar from Mexico. The Department
shall instruct CBP to terminate the
suspension of liquidation consistent
with section 734(f)(2)(B) of the Act.
llllllllllllllllll
l
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
llllllllllllllllll
l
Date
The following parties hereby certify
that the producers and exporters of
Sugar from Mexico that are members of
their organization, and which have
authorized the undersigned to sign this
Agreement on their behalf, agree to
abide by all terms of the Agreement:
llllllllllllllllll
l
Juan Cortina Gallardo,
President,
´
Camara Nacional de Las Industrias
Azucarera y Alcoholera.
llllllllllllllllll
l
Date
llllllllllllllllll
l
Humberto Jasso Torres,
Director General,
´
Camara Nacional de Las Industrias
Azucarera y Alcoholera.
llllllllllllllllll
l
Date
Appendix II—Suspension of
Antidumping Investigation—Sugar
From Mexico—Analysis of Prices at
Less Than Fair Value
A. Normal Value
The cost or price information reported to
the Department that will form the basis of the
normal value (NV) calculations for purposes
of the Agreement must be comprehensive in
nature and based on a reliable accounting
system (e.g., a system based on wellestablished standards and can be tied either
to the audited financial statements or to the
tax return filed with the Mexican
government).
1. Based on Sales Prices in the Comparison
Market
When the Department bases normal value
on sales prices, such prices will be the prices
at which the foreign like product is first sold
for consumption in the comparison market in
the usual commercial quantities and in the
ordinary course of trade. Also, to the extent
practicable, the comparison shall be made at
the same level of trade as the export price
(EP) or constructed export price (CEP).
Calculation of NV:
Gross Unit Price
¥ Billing Adjustments
¥ Movement Expenses
¥ Discounts and Rebates
¥ Direct Selling Expenses
¥ Commissions
¥H ome Market Packing Expenses
= Normal Value (NV)
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Appendix I—Suspension of
Antidumping Investigation—Sugar
From Mexico—Reference Prices
2. Constructed Value
When normal value is based on
constructed value, the Department will
compute constructed values (CVs), as
appropriate, based on the sum of each
respondent’s costs, plus amounts for selling,
general and administrative expenses (SG&A),
U.S. packing costs, and profit. The
Department will collect this cost data in
order to determine the accurate per-unit CV.
Calculation of CV:
+ Direct Materials
+ Direct Labor
+ Factory overhead
= Cost of Manufacturing
+ Home Market SG&A*
= Cost of Production
+ U.S. Packing
+ Profit*
= Constructed Value (CV)
* SG&A and profit are based on homemarket sales of the foreign like product made
in the ordinary course of trade. SG&A
includes financing but not movement
expenses.
Consistent with the requirements of section
734(c) of the Act, to eliminate completely the
injurious effect of exports to the United
States and to prevent the suppression or
undercutting of price levels of domestic
sugar, the Reference Prices are as follows:
The FOB plant Reference Price for Refined
Sugar is $0.2600 per pound by dry weight
commercial value.
The FOB plant Reference Price for all
Other Sugar is $0.2225 per pound by dry
weight commercial value.
B. Export Price and Constructed Export Price
EP and CEP refer to the two types of
calculated prices for merchandise imported
into the United States. Both EP and CEP are
based on the price at which the subject
merchandise is first sold to a person not
affiliated with the foreign producer or
exporter.
Calculation of EP:
Gross Unit Price
¥ Movement Expenses
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:09 Dec 24, 2014
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
¥ Discounts and Rebates
+/¥ Billing Adjustments
+ Packing Expenses
+ Rebated Import Duties
= Export Price (EP)
Calculation of CEP:
Gross Unit Price
¥ Movement Expenses
¥ Discounts and Rebates
+/¥ Billing Adjustments
¥ Direct Selling Expenses
¥ Indirect Selling Expenses that relate to
commercial activity in the United States
¥ The cost of any further manufacture or
assembly incurred in the United States
¥ CEP Profit
+ Rebated Import Duties
¥ Commissions
= Constructed Export Price (CEP)
C. Fair Comparisons
To ensure that a fair comparison with EP
or CEP is made, the Department will make
adjustments to normal value. The
Department will adjust for physical
differences between the merchandise sold in
the United States and the merchandise sold
in the home market. For EP sales, the
Department will add in U.S. direct selling
expenses, U.S. commissions 2 and packing
expenses. For CEP sales, the Department will
subtract the amount of the CEP offset, if
warranted, and add in U.S. packing expenses.
[FR Doc. 2014–30396 Filed 12–24–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–201–846]
Sugar From Mexico: Suspension of
Countervailing Duty Investigation
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: December 19,
2014.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) has suspended the
countervailing duty investigation on
sugar from Mexico. The basis for this
action is an agreement between the
Department and the Government of
Mexico (‘‘GOM’’), wherein the GOM has
agreed not to provide any new or
additional export or import substitution
subsidies on the subject merchandise
and has agreed to restrict the volume of
direct or indirect exports to the United
States of sugar from all Mexican
producers/exporters in order to
eliminate completely the injurious
effects of exports of this merchandise to
the United States.
AGENCY:
2 If there are not commissions in both markets,
then the Department will apply a commission
offset.
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 248 / Monday, December 29, 2014 / Notices
Agreement Suspending the
Countervailing Duty Investigation on
Sugar from Mexico,’’ dated October 27,
2014. On October 30, 2104, the
Department issued a memorandum
titled ‘‘Proposed Scope Clarification’’
and requested comments from
interested parties. On November 7,
2014, we extended the deadline to
submit comments on the draft
suspension agreement and the proposed
Background
scope clarification until November 18,
2014. See memorandum titled ‘‘Sugar
On April 17, 2014, the Department
from Mexico: Notice of Extension of
initiated a countervailing duty
Deadline to Submit Comments on Draft
investigation under section 702 of the
Suspension Agreements and Scope
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Clarification,’’ dated November 7, 2014.
Act’’), to determine whether
We received comments from numerous
manufacturers, producers, or exporters
parties by the November 18, 2014,
of sugar from Mexico receive subsidies.
deadline.
See Sugar from Mexico: Initiation of
The Department and the GOM signed
Countervailing Duty Investigation, 79 FR
the suspension agreement on December
22790 (April 24, 2014). On August 25,
19, 2014. See Agreement Suspending
2014, the Department preliminarily
the Countervailing Duty Investigation on
determined that countervailable
Sugar from Mexico, signed on December
subsidies are being provided to
19, 2014 (‘‘Suspension Agreement’’),
producers and exporters of sugar from
attached hereto. Based on the scope
Mexico and aligned the final
comments received in this investigation,
countervailing duty determination with
the Department has revised the scope of
the final antidumping duty
this investigation, as provided in the
determination. See Sugar from Mexico:
scope of the Suspension Agreement.
Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing
Scope of Agreement
Determination and Alignment of Final
Countervailing Duty Determination With
See Section I, Product Coverage, of
Final Antidumping Duty Determination, the Suspension Agreement.
79 FR 51956 (September 2, 2014)
Suspension of Investigation
(‘‘Preliminary Determination’’).
On October 27, 2014, the Department
The Department consulted with the
and the GOM initialed a proposed
parties to the proceeding and has
agreement to suspend the countervailing considered the comments submitted by
duty investigation on sugar from
interested parties with respect to the
Mexico. After initialing the proposed
proposal to suspend the countervailing
agreement, consistent with 704(e)(1) of
duty investigation. In accordance with
the Act, the Department notified and
section 704(c) of the Act, we have
consulted with the petitioners (i.e., the
determined that extraordinary
American Sugar Coalition and its
circumstances are present in this case,
individual members: American Sugar
as defined by section 704(c)(4) of the
Cane League, American Sugar Refining,
Act. See the memorandum titled
Inc., American Sugarbeet Growers
‘‘Agreement Suspending the
Association, Florida Sugar Cane League, Countervailing Duty Investigation on
Hawaiian Commercial and Sugar
Sugar from Mexico: Existence of
Company, Rio Grande Valley Sugar
Extraordinary Circumstances, Public
Growers, Inc., Sugar Cane Growers
Interest, and Effective Monitoring
Cooperative of Florida, and United
Assessments’’ from Lynn Fischer Fox,
States Beet Sugar Association)
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy
concerning its intention to suspend the
and Negotiations, to Paul Piquado,
antidumping investigation on sugar
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
from Mexico. The Department also
Compliance, dated December 19, 2014
notified the other parties to the
(‘‘statutory requirements
investigation and the International
memorandum’’).
The Suspension Agreement provides
Trade Commission (‘‘ITC’’) of the
that: (1) The GOM will not provide any
proposed agreement, consistent with
704(e)(1) of the Act. Also on October 27, new or additional export or import
substitution subsidies on the subject
2014, we invited interested parties to
merchandise; and (2) the GOM will
provide written comments on the
restrict the volume of direct or indirect
proposed suspension agreement by no
exports to the United States of subject
later than the close of business on
November 10, 2014. See ‘‘Memorandum merchandise from all Mexican
producers/exporters.
to All Interested Parties’’ and ‘‘Draft
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Judith Wey Rudman or Sally Craig
Gannon at (202) 482–0192 or (202) 482–
0162, respectively; Bilateral Agreements
Unit, Office of Policy, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC, 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:09 Dec 24, 2014
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78045
Following consultations under section
704(a)(2)(C) of the Act, we have also
determined that the Suspension
Agreement is in the public interest and
can be monitored effectively, as
required under section 704(d) of the
Act. See statutory requirements
memorandum.
For the reasons outlined above, we
find that the Suspension Agreement
meets the criteria of section 704(c) and
(d) of the Act.
The terms and conditions of this
Suspension Agreement, signed
December 19, 2014, are set forth in the
Suspension Agreement, which is
attached to this notice.
International Trade Commission
In accordance with section 704(f) of
the Act, the Department has notified the
ITC of the Suspension Agreement.
Suspension of Liquidation
The suspension of liquidation ordered
in the Preliminary Determination, shall
continue to be in effect, subject to
section 704(h)(3) of the Act. Section
704(f)(2)(B) of the Act provides that the
Department may adjust the security
required to reflect the effect of the
Suspension Agreement. The Department
has found that the Suspension
Agreement eliminates completely the
injurious effects of imports and, thus,
the Department is adjusting the security
required to zero. If there is no request
for review of suspension under section
704(h) of the Act, or if the ITC conducts
a review and finds that the injurious
effect of imports of the subject
merchandise is eliminated completely
by the Suspension Agreement, the
Department will terminate the
suspension of liquidation of all entries
of sugar from Mexico and refund any
cash deposits collected on entries of
sugar from Mexico consistent with
section 704(h)(3) of the Act.
Notwithstanding the Suspension
Agreement, the Department will
continue the investigation if it receives
such a request within 20 days after the
date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register, in accordance with
section 704(g) of the Act. Pursuant to
Section XI of the Suspension
Agreement, the Department will
terminate the Suspension Agreement in
the event that the GOM requests
continuation of this investigation, or
signatories accounting for a significant
proportion of exports of sugar from
Mexico request continuation of the
antidumping investigation of sugar from
Mexico, and will resume the
investigation.
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
78046
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 248 / Monday, December 29, 2014 / Notices
Administrative Protective Order Access
The Administrative Protective Order
(‘‘APO’’) the Department granted in the
investigation segment of this proceeding
remains in place. While the
investigation is suspended, parties
subject to the APO may retain, but may
not use, information received under that
APO. All parties wishing access to
business proprietary information
submitted during the administration of
the Suspension Agreement must submit
new APO applications in accordance
with the Department’s regulations
currently in effect. See section 777(c)(1)
of the Act; 19 CFR 351.103, 351.304,
351.305, and 351.306. An APO for the
administration of the Suspension
Agreement will be placed on the record
within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with section
704(f)(1)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.208(g)(2).
Dated: December 19, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Attachment
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGREEMENT SUSPENDING THE
COUNTERVAILING DUTY
INVESTIGATION ON SUGAR FROM
MEXICO
Pursuant to the requirements of
section 704(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act) (19 U.S.C.
1671c(c)) and 19 CFR 351.208, and in
satisfaction of the requirements of those
provisions, the U.S. Department of
Commerce (the Department) and the
Government of Mexico (GOM), through
the Secretaria de Economia, enter into
this agreement suspending the
countervailing duty investigation of
Sugar from Mexico (Agreement), as
follows:
I. Product Coverage
The product covered by this
Agreement is raw and refined sugar of
all polarimeter readings derived from
sugar cane or sugar beets. The chemical
sucrose gives sugar its essential
character. Sucrose is a nonreducing
disaccharide composed of glucose and
fructose linked by a glycosidic bond via
their anomeric carbons. The molecular
formula for sucrose is C12H22O11; the
International Union of Pure and
Applied Chemistry (IUPAC)
International Chemical Identifier (InChl)
for sucrose is 1S/C12H22O11/c13-l-4–
6(16)8(18)9(19)11(21–4)23–12(3–
15)10(20)7(17)5(2–14)22–12/h4–11,13–
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:09 Dec 24, 2014
Jkt 235001
20H,1–3H2/t4-,5-,6-,7-,8+,9-,10+,11-,
12+/m1/s1; the InChl Key for sucrose is
CZMRCDWAGMRECN–
UGDNZRGBSA–N; the U.S. National
Institutes of Health PubChem
Compound Identifier (CID) for sucrose is
5988; and the Chemical Abstracts
Service (CAS) Number of sucrose is 57–
50–1.
Sugar described in the previous
paragraph includes products of all
polarimeter readings described in
various forms, such as raw sugar,
estandar or standard sugar, high polarity
or semi-refined sugar, special white
sugar, refined sugar, brown sugar, edible
molasses, desugaring molasses, organic
raw sugar, and organic refined sugar.
Other sugar products, such as powdered
sugar, colored sugar, flavored sugar, and
liquids and syrups that contain 95
percent or more sugar by dry weight are
also within the scope of this Agreement.
The scope of the Agreement does not
include (1) sugar imported under the
Refined Sugar Re-Export Programs of
the U.S. Department of Agriculture; 1 (2)
sugar products produced in Mexico that
contain 95 percent or more sugar by dry
weight that originated outside of
Mexico; (3) inedible molasses (other
than inedible desugaring molasses noted
above); (4) beverages; (5) candy; (6)
certain specialty sugars; and (7)
processed food products that contain
sugar (e.g., cereals). Specialty sugars
excluded from the scope of this
Agreement are limited to the following:
caramelized slab sugar candy, pearl
sugar, rock candy, dragees for cooking
and baking, fondant, golden syrup, and
sugar decorations.
Merchandise covered by this
Agreement is typically imported under
the following headings of the HTSUS:
1701.12.1000, 1701.12.5000,
1701.13.1000, 1701.13.5000,
1701.14.1000, 1701.14.5000,
1701.91.1000, 1701.91.3000,
1701.99.1010, 1701.99.1025,
1701.99.1050, 1701.99.5010,
1701.99.5025, 1701.99.5050, and
1702.90.4000. The tariff classification is
provided for convenience and customs
purposes; however, the written
description of the scope of this
Agreement is dispositive.
II. Definitions
For purposes of the Agreement, the
following definitions apply:
A. ‘‘Anniversary Month’’ means the
month in which the Agreement becomes
effective.
1 This exclusion applies to sugar imported under
the Refined Sugar Re-Export Program, the SugarContaining Products Re-Export Program, and the
Polyhydric Alcohol Program administered by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
B. ‘‘Base Export Limit’’ means the
amount of Sugar allocated to producers
and exporters of Sugar in Mexico at the
beginning of each Export Limit Period.
C. ‘‘Date of Export’’ means the date on
which the product is exported from
Mexico to the United States.
D. ‘‘Effective Date’’ means the date on
which the Department and the GOM
sign the Agreement.
E. ‘‘Export License’’ means the
document issued by the GOM’s export
license issuing authority, pursuant to
Section VI of the Agreement.
F. ‘‘Export Limit’’ means the quantity
of Mexican Sugar permitted to be
exported, based on the Date of Export,
during a given Export Limit Period.
G. ‘‘Export Limit Period’’ means one
of the following periods:
1. ‘‘Initial Export Limit Period’’ covers
entries of Sugar entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse for consumption,
between the Effective Date and
September 30, 2015.
2. ‘‘Subsequent Export Limit Period’’
covers entries of Sugar entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse for
consumption, in each subsequent period
from October 1 through September 30.
H. ‘‘Interested Party’’ means any
person or entity that meets the
definitions in section 771(9) of the Act.
I. ‘‘Indirect Exports’’ means exports of
Sugar from Mexico to the United States
through one or more Third Countries,
whether or not such exports are further
processed, provided that the further
processing does not result in a
substantial transformation or a change
in the country of origin, as determined
by the Department.
J. ‘‘Mexico’’ means the customs
territory of the United Mexican States
and foreign trade zones located within
the territory of Mexico.
K. ‘‘Other Sugar’’ means Sugar that
does not meet the definition of Refined
Sugar under this Agreement.
L. ‘‘Refined Sugar’’ means Sugar with
a polarity of 99.5 and above.
M. ‘‘Sugar’’ means the product
described under Section I, ‘‘Product
Coverage,’’ of the Agreement.
N. ‘‘Target Quantity of U.S. Needs’’
means 100 percent of U.S. Needs, as
defined below.
O. ‘‘Third Country’’ or ‘‘Third
Countries’’ mean any country other than
the United States or Mexico, including
any customs territory or free trade zone
administered, governed, or controlled
by such country.
P. ‘‘United States’’ means the customs
territory of the United States of America
(the 50 States, the District of Columbia
and Puerto Rico) and foreign trade zones
located within the territory of the
United States.
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 248 / Monday, December 29, 2014 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Q. ‘‘USDA’’ means the United States
Department of Agriculture.
R. ‘‘U.S. Needs’’ is calculated based
on information in the WASDE
published by USDA and means:
(Total Use * 1.135) ¥ Beginning Stocks
¥ Production ¥ TRQ Imports ¥
Other Program Imports ¥ (Footnote
5 for ‘‘other high tier’’ + ‘‘other’’)
S. ‘‘Violation’’ means noncompliance
with the terms of the Agreement,
whether through an act or omission,
except for noncompliance that is
inconsequential or inadvertent, and
does not materially frustrate the
purposes of the Agreement.
T. ‘‘WASDE’’ means the ‘‘World
Agriculture Supply and Demand
Estimates’’ published by the USDA.
Any term or phrase not defined by
this section shall be defined using either
a definition provided in the Act for that
term or phrase, or the plain meaning of
that term, as appropriate.
Agreement is not working as intended
in this regard, the Department will
explore all appropriate measures,
including renegotiation of the terms of
the Agreement to resolve the problem or
measures under Section 751(d)(1) of the
Act.
V. Export Limits
No Sugar covered by the Agreement,
whether exported directly or indirectly
from Mexico, shall be entered into the
United States unless, when cumulated
with all prior entries of Sugar exported
from Mexico during the Export Limit
Period in which the Sugar was exported,
it does not exceed the applicable Export
Limit set forth below. All exports of
Sugar from Mexico that enter the United
States will be counted against the
Export Limit established for the
applicable Export Limit Period.
A. The Export Limit for the Initial
Export Limit Period shall be calculated
using the formula provided in Section
III. Suspension of Investigation
V.B, beginning with the December
As of the Effective Date, in accordance allocation in Section V.B.2. The
with section 704(c)(1) and (3) of the Act restriction in Section V.C.2 below shall
apply, and the March allocation in
and 19 CFR 351.208, the Department
Section V.B.3 applies.
will suspend its countervailing duty
B. The Export Limit for each
investigation on Sugar from Mexico
Subsequent Export Limit Period will be
initiated on April 17, 2014. See Sugar
seventy (70) percent of the Target
from Mexico: Initiation of
Countervailing Duty Investigation, 79 FR Quantity of U.S. Needs as calculated
based on the July WASDE preceding the
22,790 (Apr. 24, 2014).
beginning of the Export Limit Period.
IV. Statutory Conditions for the
The Export Limit will be effective
Agreement
October 1. The Export Limit may be
increased in the following manner:
In accordance with section 704(c)(1)
1. In September of each Subsequent
and (4) of the Act, the Department has
Export Limit Period, the Department
determined that extraordinary
will determine if there is a need for
circumstances are present in this
additional Sugar in the U.S. market
investigation because the suspension of
the investigation will be more beneficial beyond the Export Limit calculated in
July. The Department will calculate the
to the domestic industry than the
Target Quantity of U.S. Needs based on
continuation of the investigation and
information in the September WASDE.
the investigation is complex.
Effective October 1, the Export Limit
In accordance with section 704(d)(1)
shall be revised to equal seventy (70)
of the Act, the Department has
percent of the Target Quantity of U.S.
determined that the suspension of the
Needs, unless that amount is less than
investigation is in the public interest
or equal to the Export Limit announced
and that effective monitoring of the
in July, in which case the Export Limit
Agreement by the United States is
shall not change.
practicable. Section 704(a)(2)(B) of the
2. In December of each Subsequent
Act provides that the public interest
Export Limit Period, the Department
includes the availability of supplies of
the merchandise and the relative impact will determine if there is a need for
additional Sugar in the U.S. market
on the competitiveness of the domestic
beyond the Export Limit calculated in
industry producing the like
September. The Department will
merchandise, including any such
calculate the Target Quantity of U.S.
impact on employment and investment
Needs based on information in the
in that industry. Accordingly, if a
December WASDE. Effective January 1,
domestic producer requests an
the Export Limit shall be revised to
administrative review of the status of,
equal eighty (80) percent of the Target
and compliance with, the Agreement,
Quantity of U.S. Needs, unless that
the Department will take these factors
amount is less than or equal to the
into account in conducting that review.
Export Limit announced in September,
If the Department finds that the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:09 Dec 24, 2014
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78047
in which case the Export Limit shall not
change.
3. In March of each Subsequent
Export Limit Period, the Department
will determine if there is a need for
additional Sugar in the U.S. market
beyond the Export Limit calculated in
December. The Department will
calculate the Target Quantity of U.S.
Needs based on information in the
March WASDE. Effective April 1, the
Export Limit shall be revised to equal
100 percent of the Target Quantity of
U.S. Needs, unless the amount is less
than or equal to the Export Limit
announced in December, in which case
the Export Limit shall not change.
4. Prior to April 1 of any Export Limit
Period, the Department may increase the
Export Limit to address potential
shortages in the U.S. market that are
identified by USDA, in writing. After
April 1, if USDA informs the
Department, in writing, of any
additional need for Sugar from Mexico,
the Department may increase the Export
Limit based upon USDA’s request.
C. The following restrictions on
shipping patterns for exports of Sugar
from Mexico to the United States shall
also apply.
1. No more than 30 percent of U.S.
Needs calculated in each July and
effective October 1 may be exported to
the United States during the period
October 1 through December 31.
2. No more than 55 percent of U.S.
Needs calculated in each December and
effective January 1 may be exported to
the United States during the period
October 1 through March 31.
3. Refined Sugar may account for no
more than 53 percent of the exports
during any given Export Limit Period.
D. If any Sugar from Mexico is entered
into the United States in excess of the
Export Limit established for the relevant
Export Limit Period or without a valid
Export License, the Department shall
consult with the GOM and request that
the GOM reduce the export allocation
for the producer/exporter involved by
twice the volume of the entry. If the
export allocation has been reached for
the producer/exporter for the relevant
Export Limit Period, twice the volume
of the entry will be subtracted from the
producer/exporter’s allocation in the
next Export Limit Period. If the entry
cannot be tied to a specific producer/
exporter, the Department may reduce
the Export Limit that is effective April
1 by twice the volume of the entry.
E. Subsequent to the publication of
the March WASDE but prior to March
31 of each Export Limit Period, the
GOM will inform the Department if
there is any amount of U.S. Needs that
exporters of Sugar from Mexico will be
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
78048
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 248 / Monday, December 29, 2014 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
unable to supply during the second half
of the Export Limit Period. The
Department will adjust the Export Limit
downward by any amount that Mexico
cannot supply. Mexico agrees that, if it
cannot satisfy Mexico’s needs using
Mexican production, it will not supply
those needs with imports from a Third
Country or Countries for the purpose of
filling the Export Limit with Sugar from
Mexico. If the Department receives
information that Mexico may have
imported Sugar from a Third Country or
Countries for this purpose during any
Export Limit Period, the Department
will hold consultations with the GOM
in determining appropriate action, as
warranted.
F. The GOM and the Department shall
hold consultations regarding the GOM’s
compliance with the provisions of this
section consistent with Section VIII.D.2
of the Agreement.
VI. Implementation
A. On and after 60 days from the
Effective Date, presentation of a
shipment-specific Export License is
required as a condition for entry of
Sugar from Mexico into the United
States. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.208(i),
the Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
prohibit the entry of any Sugar from
Mexico not accompanied by an Export
License.
B. Export Licenses will be shipmentspecific and must contain the
information identified in Appendix I.
Additional information may be included
on the Export License or, if necessary,
a separate page attached to the Export
License. If the bills of lading for each
shipment establish that the actual
imports into the United States under
that license were less than the total
volume listed on the license, the GOM
shall notify the Department in writing
that the GOM intends to issue a new
Export License in the same Export Limit
Period authorizing additional exports
equal in volume to the volume of the
undershipment.
C. The GOM will ensure compliance
with all of the provisions of the
Agreement. To ensure such compliance,
the GOM will take the following
measures:
1. Ensure that no Sugar is exported
from Mexico for entry into the United
States during any Export Limit Period
that exceeds the Export Limit for that
Export Limit Period.
2. Establish an Export Limit licensing
and enforcement program for all direct
and indirect exports of Sugar from
Mexico to the United States no later
than 60 days after the Effective Date.
Export Licenses shall contain all
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:09 Dec 24, 2014
Jkt 235001
information described in Appendix I of
the Agreement.
3. Require that applications for Export
Licenses contain all of the information
listed in Appendix I of the Agreement.
4. Refuse to issue an Export License
to any applicant that does not permit
full verification and reporting under the
Agreement of all of the information in
the application.
5. Issue Export Licenses sequentially,
charged against the Export Limit for the
relevant Export Limit Period, and
reference any notice of the Export Limit
allocation for the relevant Export Limit
Period. Export Licenses shall remain
valid for entry into the United States for
90 days. The Department and the GOM
may agree to an extension of the validity
of the Export License in extraordinary
circumstances.
6. Permit full verification of all
information related to the
administration of the Agreement on an
annual basis or more frequently, as
deemed necessary.
7. Ensure compliance with all
procedures established to effectuate the
Agreement by any official Mexican
institution, chamber, or other
authorized Mexican company, and any
Mexican producer, exporter, broker, and
trader of Sugar.
8. Impose strict measures, such as
prohibition from participation in the
Export Limit allocation allowed by the
Agreement, in the event that any
Mexican company does not comply in
full with the requirements established
by the GOM pursuant to the Agreement.
D. The GOM and the Department shall
hold consultations regarding the GOM’s
compliance with the provisions of this
section consistent with Section VIII.D.1
of the Agreement.
VII. Anti-Circumvention
A. The GOM will take all necessary
measures to prevent circumvention of
the Agreement. These measures shall
include requiring that all Mexican
exporters of Sugar agree, as a condition
of receiving any Export License under
the Agreement, not to export directly or
indirectly to the United States Sugar
that is not accompanied by an Export
License issued pursuant to the
Agreement and that each such Mexican
exporter provide the GOM with a
certification that it has required all of its
customers to agree, as part of the terms
of sale, not to engage in any
circumvention activities specified by
this Agreement. Circumvention
activities may include exporting Sugar
from Mexico: (1) in excess of the Export
Limit in any given Export Limit Period;
(2) without an Export License; and (3)
in a manner that requires Mexico to
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
satisfy its needs with imports of sugar
from a Third Country or Countries.
Circumvention activities may also
include, but are not limited to, any
bundling arrangement, swap or other
exchange where such arrangement is
designed to circumvent the basis of the
Agreement.
1. If the GOM receives an allegation
that circumvention has occurred,
including an allegation from the
Department, the GOM shall promptly
initiate an inquiry, normally complete
the inquiry within 45 days and notify
the Department of the results of the
inquiry within 15 days after the
conclusion of the inquiry.
2. If the GOM determines that a
Mexican company has participated in a
transaction circumventing the
Agreement, the GOM shall impose
penalties upon such company
including, but not limited to, denial of
access to an Export License for Sugar
under the Agreement.
3. If the GOM determines that a
Mexican company has participated in
the circumvention of the Agreement, the
GOM shall count against the Export
Limit for the Export Limit Period in
which the circumvention took place an
amount of Sugar equivalent to the
amount involved in such circumvention
and shall immediately notify the
Department of the amount deducted. If
a sufficient amount is not available in
the current Export Limit Period, then
the remaining amount shall be deducted
from the subsequent Export Limit
Period or Periods.
B. The Department will investigate
any allegations of circumvention which
are brought to its attention both by
asking the GOM to investigate such
allegations and by itself gathering
relevant information. The GOM will
respond to requests from the
Department for information relating to
such allegations. In distinguishing
normal arrangements from those which
would result in the circumvention of a
given Export Limit established by the
Agreement, the Department will take the
following factors into account, as
deemed appropriate:
1. Existence of any verbal or written
agreement leading to circumvention of
the Agreement;
2. Existence and function of any
subsidiaries or affiliates of the parties
involved;
3. Existence and function of any
historical and traditional patterns of
production and trade among the parties
involved, and any deviation from such
patterns;
4. Existence of any payments
unaccounted for by previous or
subsequent deliveries, or any payments
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 248 / Monday, December 29, 2014 / Notices
to one party for Sugar delivered or
swapped by another party;
5. Sequence and timing of the
arrangements; and
6. Any other information relevant to
the transaction or circumstances.
C. The GOM and the Department shall
hold consultations regarding anticircumvention consistent with Section
VIII.D.3 of the Agreement.
VIII. Monitoring of the Agreement
A. Import Monitoring
1. The Department will monitor
entries of Sugar from Mexico to ensure
compliance with Section V of the
Agreement.
2. The Department will review
publicly available data and other official
import data, including, as appropriate,
records maintained by CBP, to
determine whether there have been
imports that are inconsistent with the
provisions of the Agreement. The
Department also intends to consult with
USDA regarding monthly information
submitted by processors, refiners, and
importers of Sugar from Mexico.
3. The Department will review, as
appropriate, data it receives through any
data exchange program between U.S.
and Mexican government agencies, to
determine whether there have been
imports that are inconsistent with the
provisions of the Agreement.
4. The Department agrees to discuss
with CBP additional mechanisms that
may be established and administered by
CBP to monitor entries of Sugar.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
B. Compliance Monitoring
1. The GOM will collect and provide
to the Department such information as
is necessary and appropriate to monitor
the implementation of, and compliance
with, the Agreement, including the
following:
a. Within 30 days following the date
that the GOM allocates the Export Limit
for any Export Limit Period, the GOM
shall notify the Department of each
allocation recipient and the volume
granted to each recipient. The GOM also
shall inform the Department of any
changes in the volume allocated to
individual recipients within 30 days of
the date on which such changes become
effective.
b. The GOM shall collect and provide
to the Department information on
exports to the United States in the
format in Appendix II to the Agreement
and, if requested, on the aggregate
quantity and value of exports of Sugar
to Third Countries. This information
will be provided on a monthly basis as
specified in Appendix II, and will be
provided no later than 60 days
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:09 Dec 24, 2014
Jkt 235001
following the end of each month,
beginning on February 1, 2015 (for the
period from the Effective Date through
December 31, 2015). If the Department
has concerns with the shipments of a
particular exporter, upon request, the
GOM will provide information related
to that exporter on an expedited basis.
c. The GOM and the Department
recognize that the effective monitoring
of the Agreement may require the GOM
to provide information in addition to
that identified in the Agreement.
Accordingly, after consulting with the
GOM, the Department may request
additional reporting requirements
consistent with U.S. law and regulations
during the course of the Agreement. The
GOM shall also collect and provide to
the Department, generally within 60
days of the request, any such additional
information requested by the
Department.
2. The Department has the authority
to verify all information related to the
administration of the Agreement,
including all information relating to
potential circumvention of the
Agreement, annually or more frequently
as deemed necessary. The Department
will conduct verifications at locations
and times it deems appropriate to
ensure compliance with the terms of the
Agreement.
3. The Department may initiate
administrative reviews under section
751(a) of the Act in the month
immediately following the Anniversary
Month, upon request, or upon its own
initiative, to ensure that exports of
Sugar from Mexico satisfy the
requirements of section 704(c)(1) and (3)
of the Act. The Department may
conduct administrative reviews under
sections 751(b) and (c), and 781 of the
Act, as appropriate. The Department
may perform verifications pursuant to
administrative reviews conducted under
section 751 of the Act.
C. Rejection of Submissions
The Department may reject: (1) any
information submitted after the
deadlines set forth in the Agreement; (2)
any submission that does not comply
with the filing, format, translation,
service, and certification of documents
requirements under 19 CFR 351.303; (3)
submissions that do not comply with
the procedures for establishing business
proprietary treatment under 19 CFR
351.304; and (4) submissions that do not
comply with any other applicable
regulations, as appropriate. If
information is not submitted in a
complete and timely fashion or is not
fully verifiable, the Department may use
facts otherwise available for the basis of
its decision, as it determines
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78049
appropriate, consistent with section 776
of the Act.
D. Consultations
1. Implementation Consultations
a. If the GOM notifies the Department
in writing, or the Department otherwise
determines, that the GOM for any reason
has not satisfied the implementation
obligations in Section VI of the
Agreement, the Department will consult
with the GOM for a period of up to 60
days to ensure that the GOM complies
with those obligations within those 60
days.
b. If the Department is not satisfied at
the conclusion of the consultation
period that exports of Sugar from
Mexico are entering the United States in
amounts consistent with the Agreement,
or entered with a valid Export License,
the Department may evaluate under
section 351.209 of its regulations, or
section 751 of the Act, whether the
Agreement is being violated, as defined
in Section IX of the Agreement.
2. Compliance Consultations
a. When the Department identifies,
through import or compliance
monitoring or otherwise, that exports of
Sugar from Mexico may have entered
the United States in volumes
inconsistent with Section V of the
Agreement, or without an Export
License, the Department will notify the
GOM. The Department will consult with
the GOM for a period of up to 60 days
to establish a factual basis regarding
exports that may be inconsistent with
Section V of the Agreement.
b. During the consultation period, the
Department will examine any
information that it develops or which is
submitted, including information
requested by the Department, under any
provision of the Agreement.
c. If the Department is not satisfied at
the conclusion of the consultation
period that exports of Sugar from
Mexico are entering the United States in
amounts consistent with the Agreement,
or entered with a valid Export License,
the Department may evaluate under
section 351.209 of its regulations, or
section 751 of the Act whether the
Agreement is being violated, as defined
in Section IX of the Agreement.
3. Anti-Circumvention Consultations
a. If the GOM determines that a
company from a Third Country has
circumvented the Agreement and the
Department and the GOM agree that no
Mexican company participated in or
had knowledge of such activities, then
the Department and the GOM shall hold
consultations for the purpose of sharing
information regarding such
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
78050
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 248 / Monday, December 29, 2014 / Notices
IX. Violations of the Agreement
4. Operations Consultations
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
circumvention and reaching mutual
agreement on the appropriate measures
to be taken to eliminate such
circumvention. If the Department and
the GOM are unable to reach mutual
agreement within 45 days, then the
Department may take appropriate
measures, such as deducting the amount
of Sugar involved in such
circumvention from the Export Limit for
the current Export Limit Period or a
subsequent Export Limit Period. Before
taking such measures, the Department
will notify the GOM of the facts and
reasons constituting the basis for the
Department’s intended action and will
afford the GOM 15 days in which to
comment. Alternatively, the Department
may evaluate under section 351.209 of
its regulations, or section 751 of the Act
whether the Agreement is being
violated, as defined in Section IX of the
Agreement.
b. In the event that the Department
determines that a Mexican company has
participated in a transaction
circumventing the Agreement, the
Department and the GOM shall hold
consultations for the purpose of sharing
evidence regarding such circumvention
and reaching mutual agreement on an
appropriate resolution of the problem. If
the Department and the GOM are unable
to reach mutual agreement within 60
days, the Department may take
appropriate measures, such as
deducting the amount of Sugar involved
in such circumvention from the Export
Limit for the current Export Limit
Period (or, if necessary, the subsequent
Export Limit Period) or instructing U.S.
Customs and Border Protection to deny
entry to any Mexican Sugar sold by the
company found to be circumventing the
Agreement. Before taking such
measures, the Department will notify
the GOM of the basis for the
Department’s intended action and the
GOM will comment within 30 days. The
Department will enter its
determinations regarding circumvention
into the record of the Agreement.
Alternatively, the Department may
evaluate under section 351.209 of its
regulations or section 751 of the Act
whether the Agreement is being
violated, as defined in Section IX of the
Agreement.
XI. Duration of the Agreement
The Department will consult with the
GOM regarding the operation of the
Agreement. The Department or the GOM
may request such consultations at any
time, including consultations to revise
the formula to establish the Export
Limit.
A. The Agreement has no scheduled
termination date. Termination of the
suspended investigation shall be
considered in accordance with the fiveyear review provisions of section 751(c)
of the Act, and section 351.218 of the
Department’s regulations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:09 Dec 24, 2014
Jkt 235001
A. If the Department determines that
there has been a violation of the
Agreement or that the Agreement no
longer meets the requirements of section
704(c) or (d) of the Act, the Department
shall take action it determines
appropriate under section 704(i) of the
Act and the Department’s regulations.
B. The following activities shall be
considered violations of the Agreement:
1. Exports of Sugar from Mexico in
amounts greater than the Export Limit
established in the relevant Export Limit
Period.
2. A significant amount (i.e., 5 percent
or more of the Export Limit for the
relevant Export Limit Period) of Sugar
from Mexico exported to the United
States without an Export License that is
not reported by the GOM to the
Department.
3. Any other material violation or
breach, as determined by the
Department.
X. Disclosure and Comment
This section provides the terms for
disclosure and comment following
consultations or during segments of the
proceeding not involving a review
under section 751 of the Act.
A. The Department may make
available to representatives of each
Interested Party, pursuant to and
consistent with 19 CFR 351.304–
351.306, business proprietary
information submitted to and/or
collected by the Department pursuant to
the Agreement, as well as the results of
the Department’s analysis of that
information.
B. Under this section, the GOM and
any other Interested Party shall file all
communications and other submissions
via the Department’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS),
which is available to registered users at
https://access.trade.gov and to all parties
at the following address:
U.S. Department of Commerce
Central Records Unit, Room 7046
1401 Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20230
Such communications and
submissions shall be filed consistent
with the requirements provided in 19
CFR 351.303.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
B. The GOM or the Department may
terminate the Agreement at any time.
Termination of the Agreement shall be
effective no later than 60 days after the
date written notice of termination is
provided to the Department or the GOM,
respectively.
C. Upon termination, the Department
shall follow the procedures outlined in
section 704(i)(1) of the Act.
D. The Department will terminate the
Agreement in the event that the GOM
requests continuation of the
countervailing duty investigation of
Sugar from Mexico, or Signatories
accounting for a significant proportion
of exports of Sugar from Mexico request
continuation of the antidumping
investigation of Sugar from Mexico.
XII. Other Provisions
A. By entering into the Agreement,
the GOM does not admit that exports of
Sugar from Mexico are having or have
had an injurious effect on Sugar
producers in the United States or that
the GOM has provided countervailable
subsidies to sugar producers and
exporters in Mexico. The GOM agrees
that it will not provide any new or
additional export or import substitution
subsidies on Sugar.
B. As of the Effective Date, the
Department shall instruct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection to refund any
cash deposits collected as a result of the
countervailing duty investigation on
Sugar from Mexico. The Department
shall instruct CBP to terminate the
suspension of liquidation consistent
with section 704(f)(2)(B) of the Act.
llllllllllllllllll
l
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, U.S.
Department of Commerce
llllllllllllllllll
l
Date
llllllllllllllllll
l
Francisco de Rosenzweig Mendialdua,
Undersecretary for Foreign Trade,
Ministry of Economy, Government of
Mexico
llllllllllllllllll
l
Date
Appendix I—Information To Be
Contained in Export Licenses
The GOM will issue shipment-specific
Export Licenses to Mexican entities that shall
contain the following fields:
1. Export License Number: Indicate the
Export License number for the shipment.
2. Name of the Licensee: Indicate the name
of the Licensee, and the name of the mill, if
different from the Licensee.
3. Name of the Exporter: Indicate the name
of the broker/trader or mill, as applicable.
4. Complete Description of Merchandise:
Include the applicable Harmonized Tariff
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 248 / Monday, December 29, 2014 / Notices
Schedule category and the polarity of the
product.
5. Processing: Indicate ‘‘YES’’ if the Sugar
is being imported for further processing in
the United States by a USDA-recognized cane
refiner and ‘‘NO’’ if it is not.
6. Quantity: Indicate in metric tons raw
value and short tons raw value.
7. Date of Export License: Date that the
Export License is issued.
8. Date of Expiration of the Export License:
Indicate the date that the Export License
expires.
9. Port of Export: Indicate the port of
export.
10. Allocation to Mill: Indicate the total
amount of the Export Limit allocated to the
individual mill during the relevant Export
Limit Period.
11. Allocation Remaining: Indicate the
remaining amount available under the
allocation to the individual mill during the
relevant Export Limit Period.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Appendix II—Information on Exports
of Sugar From Mexico
In accordance with the established format,
the GOM’s license issuing authority shall
collect and provide to the Department all
information necessary to ensure compliance
with the Agreement. This information will be
provided to the Department on monthly
basis. The GOM’s license issuing authority
will collect and maintain data on exports to
the United States on a continuous basis. Data
for exports to countries other than the United
States will be reported upon request. The
GOM’s license issuing authority may provide
a narrative explanation to substantiate all
data collected in accordance with the
following formats.
The GOM’s license issuing authority will
provide a report or summary regarding all
Export Licenses issued to entities, which
shall contain the following information
unless the information is unknown to the
licensing authority and the licensee. Upon
request, the GOM will provide copies of any
Export License to the Department.
1. Export License Number: Indicate the
Export License number for the shipment.
2. Name of the Licensee: Indicate the name
of the Licensee, and the name of the mill, if
different from the Licensee.
3. Name of the Exporter: Indicate the name
of the broker/trader or mill, as applicable.
4. Complete Description of Merchandise:
Include the applicable Harmonized Tariff
Schedule category and the polarity of the
product.
5. Processing: Indicate ‘‘YES’’ if the Sugar
is being imported for further processing in
the United States by a USDA-recognized cane
refiner and ‘‘NO’’ if it is not.
6. Quantity: Indicate in metric tons raw
value and short tons raw value.
7. Date of Export License: Date that the
Export License is issued.
8. Date of Expiration of the Export License:
Indicate the date that the Export License
expires.
9. Port of Export: Indicate the port of
export.
10. Allocation to Mill: Indicate the total
amount of the Export Limit allocated to the
individual mill during the relevant Export
Limit Period.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:09 Dec 24, 2014
Jkt 235001
11. Allocation Remaining: Indicate the
remaining amount available under the
allocation to the individual mill during the
relevant Export Limit Period.
[FR Doc. 2014–30392 Filed 12–24–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–874]
Certain Steel Nails From the Republic
of Korea: Affirmative Preliminary
Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value and Postponement of Final
Determination
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) preliminarily
determines that certain steel nails
(‘‘nails’’) from the Republic of Korea
(‘‘Korea’’) are being, or are likely to be,
sold in the United States at less than fair
value (‘‘LTFV’’), as provided in section
733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the ‘‘Act’’). The period of
investigation is April 1, 2013, through
March 31, 2014. The estimated
weighted-average dumping margins are
shown in the ‘‘Preliminary
Determination’’ section of this notice.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on this preliminary
determination. We intend to issue the
final determination 135 days after
publication of this preliminary
determination in the Federal Register.
DATES: Effective Date: December 29,
2014.
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jamie Blair-Walker or Drew Jackson,
AD/CVD Operations, Office IV,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–2615 or (202) 482–4406,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department published the notice
of initiation of this investigation on June
25, 2014.1 Pursuant to section
733(c)(1)(A) of the Act, the Department
postponed this preliminary LTFV
1 See Certain Steel Nails From India, the Republic
of Korea, Malaysia, the Sultanate of Oman, Taiwan,
the Republic of Turkey, and the Socialist Republic
of Vietnam: Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value
Investigations, 79 FR 36019 (June 25, 2014)
(‘‘Initiation Notice’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78051
determination by 42 days until
December 17, 2014.2
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this
investigation is certain steel nails from
Korea. For a full description of the
scope of the investigation, see Appendix
I to this notice.3
Scope Comments
Several interested parties (i.e., IKEA
Supply AG and IKEA Distributions
Services Inc. (collectively ‘‘IKEA’’),
Target Corporation, and The Home
Depot) submitted comments to the
Department on the scope of the
investigation as it appeared in the
Initiation Notice, and Mid Continent
Steel & Wire, Inc. (‘‘Petitioner’’)
submitted rebuttal comments. For
discussion of those comments and
rebuttal comments, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.4
Methodology
The Department conducted this
investigation in accordance with section
731 of the Act. Export price (‘‘EP’’) and
constructed export price (‘‘CEP’’) have
been calculated in accordance with
section 772 of the Act. Normal value
(‘‘NV’’) has been calculated in
accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is made available
to the public via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).5
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov, and is
2 See Certain Steel Nails from the Republic of
Korea, Malaysia, Taiwan, the Sultanate of Oman,
Taiwan, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Postponement of Preliminary Determination of
Antidumping Duty Investigations, 79 FR 63082
(October 22, 2014).
3 The scope language has not changed from that
in the Initiation Notice.
4 See memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen,
‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary
Determination in the Antidumping Duty
Investigation of Certain Steel Nails from the
Republic of Korea,’’ (‘‘Preliminary Decision
Memorandum’’) dated concurrently with and
hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the topics
discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum appears in Appendix II, below.
5 On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and
Compliance changed the name of the Import
Administration AD and CVD Centralized Electronic
Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD
Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).
The Web site location was changed from https://
iaaccess.trade.gov to https://access.trade.gov. See
Enforcement and Compliance; Change of Electronic
Filing System Name, 79 FR 69046 (November 20,
2014).
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 248 (Monday, December 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78044-78051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30392]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-201-846]
Sugar From Mexico: Suspension of Countervailing Duty
Investigation
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: December 19, 2014.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') has suspended
the countervailing duty investigation on sugar from Mexico. The basis
for this action is an agreement between the Department and the
Government of Mexico (``GOM''), wherein the GOM has agreed not to
provide any new or additional export or import substitution subsidies
on the subject merchandise and has agreed to restrict the volume of
direct or indirect exports to the United States of sugar from all
Mexican producers/exporters in order to eliminate completely the
injurious effects of exports of this merchandise to the United States.
[[Page 78045]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judith Wey Rudman or Sally Craig
Gannon at (202) 482-0192 or (202) 482-0162, respectively; Bilateral
Agreements Unit, Office of Policy, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street & Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC, 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 17, 2014, the Department initiated a countervailing duty
investigation under section 702 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(``the Act''), to determine whether manufacturers, producers, or
exporters of sugar from Mexico receive subsidies. See Sugar from
Mexico: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 79 FR 22790
(April 24, 2014). On August 25, 2014, the Department preliminarily
determined that countervailable subsidies are being provided to
producers and exporters of sugar from Mexico and aligned the final
countervailing duty determination with the final antidumping duty
determination. See Sugar from Mexico: Preliminary Affirmative
Countervailing Determination and Alignment of Final Countervailing Duty
Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination, 79 FR 51956
(September 2, 2014) (``Preliminary Determination'').
On October 27, 2014, the Department and the GOM initialed a
proposed agreement to suspend the countervailing duty investigation on
sugar from Mexico. After initialing the proposed agreement, consistent
with 704(e)(1) of the Act, the Department notified and consulted with
the petitioners (i.e., the American Sugar Coalition and its individual
members: American Sugar Cane League, American Sugar Refining, Inc.,
American Sugarbeet Growers Association, Florida Sugar Cane League,
Hawaiian Commercial and Sugar Company, Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers,
Inc., Sugar Cane Growers Cooperative of Florida, and United States Beet
Sugar Association) concerning its intention to suspend the antidumping
investigation on sugar from Mexico. The Department also notified the
other parties to the investigation and the International Trade
Commission (``ITC'') of the proposed agreement, consistent with
704(e)(1) of the Act. Also on October 27, 2014, we invited interested
parties to provide written comments on the proposed suspension
agreement by no later than the close of business on November 10, 2014.
See ``Memorandum to All Interested Parties'' and ``Draft Agreement
Suspending the Countervailing Duty Investigation on Sugar from
Mexico,'' dated October 27, 2014. On October 30, 2104, the Department
issued a memorandum titled ``Proposed Scope Clarification'' and
requested comments from interested parties. On November 7, 2014, we
extended the deadline to submit comments on the draft suspension
agreement and the proposed scope clarification until November 18, 2014.
See memorandum titled ``Sugar from Mexico: Notice of Extension of
Deadline to Submit Comments on Draft Suspension Agreements and Scope
Clarification,'' dated November 7, 2014. We received comments from
numerous parties by the November 18, 2014, deadline.
The Department and the GOM signed the suspension agreement on
December 19, 2014. See Agreement Suspending the Countervailing Duty
Investigation on Sugar from Mexico, signed on December 19, 2014
(``Suspension Agreement''), attached hereto. Based on the scope
comments received in this investigation, the Department has revised the
scope of this investigation, as provided in the scope of the Suspension
Agreement.
Scope of Agreement
See Section I, Product Coverage, of the Suspension Agreement.
Suspension of Investigation
The Department consulted with the parties to the proceeding and has
considered the comments submitted by interested parties with respect to
the proposal to suspend the countervailing duty investigation. In
accordance with section 704(c) of the Act, we have determined that
extraordinary circumstances are present in this case, as defined by
section 704(c)(4) of the Act. See the memorandum titled ``Agreement
Suspending the Countervailing Duty Investigation on Sugar from Mexico:
Existence of Extraordinary Circumstances, Public Interest, and
Effective Monitoring Assessments'' from Lynn Fischer Fox, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated December 19,
2014 (``statutory requirements memorandum'').
The Suspension Agreement provides that: (1) The GOM will not
provide any new or additional export or import substitution subsidies
on the subject merchandise; and (2) the GOM will restrict the volume of
direct or indirect exports to the United States of subject merchandise
from all Mexican producers/exporters.
Following consultations under section 704(a)(2)(C) of the Act, we
have also determined that the Suspension Agreement is in the public
interest and can be monitored effectively, as required under section
704(d) of the Act. See statutory requirements memorandum.
For the reasons outlined above, we find that the Suspension
Agreement meets the criteria of section 704(c) and (d) of the Act.
The terms and conditions of this Suspension Agreement, signed
December 19, 2014, are set forth in the Suspension Agreement, which is
attached to this notice.
International Trade Commission
In accordance with section 704(f) of the Act, the Department has
notified the ITC of the Suspension Agreement.
Suspension of Liquidation
The suspension of liquidation ordered in the Preliminary
Determination, shall continue to be in effect, subject to section
704(h)(3) of the Act. Section 704(f)(2)(B) of the Act provides that the
Department may adjust the security required to reflect the effect of
the Suspension Agreement. The Department has found that the Suspension
Agreement eliminates completely the injurious effects of imports and,
thus, the Department is adjusting the security required to zero. If
there is no request for review of suspension under section 704(h) of
the Act, or if the ITC conducts a review and finds that the injurious
effect of imports of the subject merchandise is eliminated completely
by the Suspension Agreement, the Department will terminate the
suspension of liquidation of all entries of sugar from Mexico and
refund any cash deposits collected on entries of sugar from Mexico
consistent with section 704(h)(3) of the Act.
Notwithstanding the Suspension Agreement, the Department will
continue the investigation if it receives such a request within 20 days
after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register,
in accordance with section 704(g) of the Act. Pursuant to Section XI of
the Suspension Agreement, the Department will terminate the Suspension
Agreement in the event that the GOM requests continuation of this
investigation, or signatories accounting for a significant proportion
of exports of sugar from Mexico request continuation of the antidumping
investigation of sugar from Mexico, and will resume the investigation.
[[Page 78046]]
Administrative Protective Order Access
The Administrative Protective Order (``APO'') the Department
granted in the investigation segment of this proceeding remains in
place. While the investigation is suspended, parties subject to the APO
may retain, but may not use, information received under that APO. All
parties wishing access to business proprietary information submitted
during the administration of the Suspension Agreement must submit new
APO applications in accordance with the Department's regulations
currently in effect. See section 777(c)(1) of the Act; 19 CFR 351.103,
351.304, 351.305, and 351.306. An APO for the administration of the
Suspension Agreement will be placed on the record within five days of
the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
section 704(f)(1)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.208(g)(2).
Dated: December 19, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Attachment
AGREEMENT SUSPENDING THE COUNTERVAILING DUTY INVESTIGATION ON SUGAR
FROM MEXICO
Pursuant to the requirements of section 704(c) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act) (19 U.S.C. 1671c(c)) and 19 CFR 351.208, and
in satisfaction of the requirements of those provisions, the U.S.
Department of Commerce (the Department) and the Government of Mexico
(GOM), through the Secretaria de Economia, enter into this agreement
suspending the countervailing duty investigation of Sugar from Mexico
(Agreement), as follows:
I. Product Coverage
The product covered by this Agreement is raw and refined sugar of
all polarimeter readings derived from sugar cane or sugar beets. The
chemical sucrose gives sugar its essential character. Sucrose is a
nonreducing disaccharide composed of glucose and fructose linked by a
glycosidic bond via their anomeric carbons. The molecular formula for
sucrose is C12H22O11; the
International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) International
Chemical Identifier (InChl) for sucrose is 1S/C12H22O11/c13-l-4-
6(16)8(18)9(19)11(21-4)23-12(3-15)10(20)7(17)5(2-14)22-12/h4-11,13-
20H,1-3H2/t4-,5-,6-,7-,8+,9-,10+,11-, 12+/m1/s1; the InChl Key for
sucrose is CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N; the U.S. National Institutes of
Health PubChem Compound Identifier (CID) for sucrose is 5988; and the
Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Number of sucrose is 57-50-1.
Sugar described in the previous paragraph includes products of all
polarimeter readings described in various forms, such as raw sugar,
estandar or standard sugar, high polarity or semi-refined sugar,
special white sugar, refined sugar, brown sugar, edible molasses,
desugaring molasses, organic raw sugar, and organic refined sugar.
Other sugar products, such as powdered sugar, colored sugar, flavored
sugar, and liquids and syrups that contain 95 percent or more sugar by
dry weight are also within the scope of this Agreement.
The scope of the Agreement does not include (1) sugar imported
under the Refined Sugar Re-Export Programs of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture; \1\ (2) sugar products produced in Mexico that contain 95
percent or more sugar by dry weight that originated outside of Mexico;
(3) inedible molasses (other than inedible desugaring molasses noted
above); (4) beverages; (5) candy; (6) certain specialty sugars; and (7)
processed food products that contain sugar (e.g., cereals). Specialty
sugars excluded from the scope of this Agreement are limited to the
following: caramelized slab sugar candy, pearl sugar, rock candy,
dragees for cooking and baking, fondant, golden syrup, and sugar
decorations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This exclusion applies to sugar imported under the Refined
Sugar Re-Export Program, the Sugar-Containing Products Re-Export
Program, and the Polyhydric Alcohol Program administered by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merchandise covered by this Agreement is typically imported under
the following headings of the HTSUS: 1701.12.1000, 1701.12.5000,
1701.13.1000, 1701.13.5000, 1701.14.1000, 1701.14.5000, 1701.91.1000,
1701.91.3000, 1701.99.1010, 1701.99.1025, 1701.99.1050, 1701.99.5010,
1701.99.5025, 1701.99.5050, and 1702.90.4000. The tariff classification
is provided for convenience and customs purposes; however, the written
description of the scope of this Agreement is dispositive.
II. Definitions
For purposes of the Agreement, the following definitions apply:
A. ``Anniversary Month'' means the month in which the Agreement
becomes effective.
B. ``Base Export Limit'' means the amount of Sugar allocated to
producers and exporters of Sugar in Mexico at the beginning of each
Export Limit Period.
C. ``Date of Export'' means the date on which the product is
exported from Mexico to the United States.
D. ``Effective Date'' means the date on which the Department and
the GOM sign the Agreement.
E. ``Export License'' means the document issued by the GOM's export
license issuing authority, pursuant to Section VI of the Agreement.
F. ``Export Limit'' means the quantity of Mexican Sugar permitted
to be exported, based on the Date of Export, during a given Export
Limit Period.
G. ``Export Limit Period'' means one of the following periods:
1. ``Initial Export Limit Period'' covers entries of Sugar entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, between the Effective Date
and September 30, 2015.
2. ``Subsequent Export Limit Period'' covers entries of Sugar
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, in each
subsequent period from October 1 through September 30.
H. ``Interested Party'' means any person or entity that meets the
definitions in section 771(9) of the Act.
I. ``Indirect Exports'' means exports of Sugar from Mexico to the
United States through one or more Third Countries, whether or not such
exports are further processed, provided that the further processing
does not result in a substantial transformation or a change in the
country of origin, as determined by the Department.
J. ``Mexico'' means the customs territory of the United Mexican
States and foreign trade zones located within the territory of Mexico.
K. ``Other Sugar'' means Sugar that does not meet the definition of
Refined Sugar under this Agreement.
L. ``Refined Sugar'' means Sugar with a polarity of 99.5 and above.
M. ``Sugar'' means the product described under Section I, ``Product
Coverage,'' of the Agreement.
N. ``Target Quantity of U.S. Needs'' means 100 percent of U.S.
Needs, as defined below.
O. ``Third Country'' or ``Third Countries'' mean any country other
than the United States or Mexico, including any customs territory or
free trade zone administered, governed, or controlled by such country.
P. ``United States'' means the customs territory of the United
States of America (the 50 States, the District of Columbia and Puerto
Rico) and foreign trade zones located within the territory of the
United States.
[[Page 78047]]
Q. ``USDA'' means the United States Department of Agriculture.
R. ``U.S. Needs'' is calculated based on information in the WASDE
published by USDA and means:
(Total Use * 1.135) - Beginning Stocks - Production - TRQ Imports -
Other Program Imports - (Footnote 5 for ``other high tier'' +
``other'')
S. ``Violation'' means noncompliance with the terms of the
Agreement, whether through an act or omission, except for noncompliance
that is inconsequential or inadvertent, and does not materially
frustrate the purposes of the Agreement.
T. ``WASDE'' means the ``World Agriculture Supply and Demand
Estimates'' published by the USDA.
Any term or phrase not defined by this section shall be defined
using either a definition provided in the Act for that term or phrase,
or the plain meaning of that term, as appropriate.
III. Suspension of Investigation
As of the Effective Date, in accordance with section 704(c)(1) and
(3) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.208, the Department will suspend its
countervailing duty investigation on Sugar from Mexico initiated on
April 17, 2014. See Sugar from Mexico: Initiation of Countervailing
Duty Investigation, 79 FR 22,790 (Apr. 24, 2014).
IV. Statutory Conditions for the Agreement
In accordance with section 704(c)(1) and (4) of the Act, the
Department has determined that extraordinary circumstances are present
in this investigation because the suspension of the investigation will
be more beneficial to the domestic industry than the continuation of
the investigation and the investigation is complex.
In accordance with section 704(d)(1) of the Act, the Department has
determined that the suspension of the investigation is in the public
interest and that effective monitoring of the Agreement by the United
States is practicable. Section 704(a)(2)(B) of the Act provides that
the public interest includes the availability of supplies of the
merchandise and the relative impact on the competitiveness of the
domestic industry producing the like merchandise, including any such
impact on employment and investment in that industry. Accordingly, if a
domestic producer requests an administrative review of the status of,
and compliance with, the Agreement, the Department will take these
factors into account in conducting that review. If the Department finds
that the Agreement is not working as intended in this regard, the
Department will explore all appropriate measures, including
renegotiation of the terms of the Agreement to resolve the problem or
measures under Section 751(d)(1) of the Act.
V. Export Limits
No Sugar covered by the Agreement, whether exported directly or
indirectly from Mexico, shall be entered into the United States unless,
when cumulated with all prior entries of Sugar exported from Mexico
during the Export Limit Period in which the Sugar was exported, it does
not exceed the applicable Export Limit set forth below. All exports of
Sugar from Mexico that enter the United States will be counted against
the Export Limit established for the applicable Export Limit Period.
A. The Export Limit for the Initial Export Limit Period shall be
calculated using the formula provided in Section V.B, beginning with
the December allocation in Section V.B.2. The restriction in Section
V.C.2 below shall apply, and the March allocation in Section V.B.3
applies.
B. The Export Limit for each Subsequent Export Limit Period will be
seventy (70) percent of the Target Quantity of U.S. Needs as calculated
based on the July WASDE preceding the beginning of the Export Limit
Period. The Export Limit will be effective October 1. The Export Limit
may be increased in the following manner:
1. In September of each Subsequent Export Limit Period, the
Department will determine if there is a need for additional Sugar in
the U.S. market beyond the Export Limit calculated in July. The
Department will calculate the Target Quantity of U.S. Needs based on
information in the September WASDE. Effective October 1, the Export
Limit shall be revised to equal seventy (70) percent of the Target
Quantity of U.S. Needs, unless that amount is less than or equal to the
Export Limit announced in July, in which case the Export Limit shall
not change.
2. In December of each Subsequent Export Limit Period, the
Department will determine if there is a need for additional Sugar in
the U.S. market beyond the Export Limit calculated in September. The
Department will calculate the Target Quantity of U.S. Needs based on
information in the December WASDE. Effective January 1, the Export
Limit shall be revised to equal eighty (80) percent of the Target
Quantity of U.S. Needs, unless that amount is less than or equal to the
Export Limit announced in September, in which case the Export Limit
shall not change.
3. In March of each Subsequent Export Limit Period, the Department
will determine if there is a need for additional Sugar in the U.S.
market beyond the Export Limit calculated in December. The Department
will calculate the Target Quantity of U.S. Needs based on information
in the March WASDE. Effective April 1, the Export Limit shall be
revised to equal 100 percent of the Target Quantity of U.S. Needs,
unless the amount is less than or equal to the Export Limit announced
in December, in which case the Export Limit shall not change.
4. Prior to April 1 of any Export Limit Period, the Department may
increase the Export Limit to address potential shortages in the U.S.
market that are identified by USDA, in writing. After April 1, if USDA
informs the Department, in writing, of any additional need for Sugar
from Mexico, the Department may increase the Export Limit based upon
USDA's request.
C. The following restrictions on shipping patterns for exports of
Sugar from Mexico to the United States shall also apply.
1. No more than 30 percent of U.S. Needs calculated in each July
and effective October 1 may be exported to the United States during the
period October 1 through December 31.
2. No more than 55 percent of U.S. Needs calculated in each
December and effective January 1 may be exported to the United States
during the period October 1 through March 31.
3. Refined Sugar may account for no more than 53 percent of the
exports during any given Export Limit Period.
D. If any Sugar from Mexico is entered into the United States in
excess of the Export Limit established for the relevant Export Limit
Period or without a valid Export License, the Department shall consult
with the GOM and request that the GOM reduce the export allocation for
the producer/exporter involved by twice the volume of the entry. If the
export allocation has been reached for the producer/exporter for the
relevant Export Limit Period, twice the volume of the entry will be
subtracted from the producer/exporter's allocation in the next Export
Limit Period. If the entry cannot be tied to a specific producer/
exporter, the Department may reduce the Export Limit that is effective
April 1 by twice the volume of the entry.
E. Subsequent to the publication of the March WASDE but prior to
March 31 of each Export Limit Period, the GOM will inform the
Department if there is any amount of U.S. Needs that exporters of Sugar
from Mexico will be
[[Page 78048]]
unable to supply during the second half of the Export Limit Period. The
Department will adjust the Export Limit downward by any amount that
Mexico cannot supply. Mexico agrees that, if it cannot satisfy Mexico's
needs using Mexican production, it will not supply those needs with
imports from a Third Country or Countries for the purpose of filling
the Export Limit with Sugar from Mexico. If the Department receives
information that Mexico may have imported Sugar from a Third Country or
Countries for this purpose during any Export Limit Period, the
Department will hold consultations with the GOM in determining
appropriate action, as warranted.
F. The GOM and the Department shall hold consultations regarding
the GOM's compliance with the provisions of this section consistent
with Section VIII.D.2 of the Agreement.
VI. Implementation
A. On and after 60 days from the Effective Date, presentation of a
shipment-specific Export License is required as a condition for entry
of Sugar from Mexico into the United States. Pursuant to 19 CFR
351.208(i), the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to prohibit the entry of any Sugar from Mexico not
accompanied by an Export License.
B. Export Licenses will be shipment-specific and must contain the
information identified in Appendix I. Additional information may be
included on the Export License or, if necessary, a separate page
attached to the Export License. If the bills of lading for each
shipment establish that the actual imports into the United States under
that license were less than the total volume listed on the license, the
GOM shall notify the Department in writing that the GOM intends to
issue a new Export License in the same Export Limit Period authorizing
additional exports equal in volume to the volume of the undershipment.
C. The GOM will ensure compliance with all of the provisions of the
Agreement. To ensure such compliance, the GOM will take the following
measures:
1. Ensure that no Sugar is exported from Mexico for entry into the
United States during any Export Limit Period that exceeds the Export
Limit for that Export Limit Period.
2. Establish an Export Limit licensing and enforcement program for
all direct and indirect exports of Sugar from Mexico to the United
States no later than 60 days after the Effective Date. Export Licenses
shall contain all information described in Appendix I of the Agreement.
3. Require that applications for Export Licenses contain all of the
information listed in Appendix I of the Agreement.
4. Refuse to issue an Export License to any applicant that does not
permit full verification and reporting under the Agreement of all of
the information in the application.
5. Issue Export Licenses sequentially, charged against the Export
Limit for the relevant Export Limit Period, and reference any notice of
the Export Limit allocation for the relevant Export Limit Period.
Export Licenses shall remain valid for entry into the United States for
90 days. The Department and the GOM may agree to an extension of the
validity of the Export License in extraordinary circumstances.
6. Permit full verification of all information related to the
administration of the Agreement on an annual basis or more frequently,
as deemed necessary.
7. Ensure compliance with all procedures established to effectuate
the Agreement by any official Mexican institution, chamber, or other
authorized Mexican company, and any Mexican producer, exporter, broker,
and trader of Sugar.
8. Impose strict measures, such as prohibition from participation
in the Export Limit allocation allowed by the Agreement, in the event
that any Mexican company does not comply in full with the requirements
established by the GOM pursuant to the Agreement.
D. The GOM and the Department shall hold consultations regarding
the GOM's compliance with the provisions of this section consistent
with Section VIII.D.1 of the Agreement.
VII. Anti-Circumvention
A. The GOM will take all necessary measures to prevent
circumvention of the Agreement. These measures shall include requiring
that all Mexican exporters of Sugar agree, as a condition of receiving
any Export License under the Agreement, not to export directly or
indirectly to the United States Sugar that is not accompanied by an
Export License issued pursuant to the Agreement and that each such
Mexican exporter provide the GOM with a certification that it has
required all of its customers to agree, as part of the terms of sale,
not to engage in any circumvention activities specified by this
Agreement. Circumvention activities may include exporting Sugar from
Mexico: (1) in excess of the Export Limit in any given Export Limit
Period; (2) without an Export License; and (3) in a manner that
requires Mexico to satisfy its needs with imports of sugar from a Third
Country or Countries. Circumvention activities may also include, but
are not limited to, any bundling arrangement, swap or other exchange
where such arrangement is designed to circumvent the basis of the
Agreement.
1. If the GOM receives an allegation that circumvention has
occurred, including an allegation from the Department, the GOM shall
promptly initiate an inquiry, normally complete the inquiry within 45
days and notify the Department of the results of the inquiry within 15
days after the conclusion of the inquiry.
2. If the GOM determines that a Mexican company has participated in
a transaction circumventing the Agreement, the GOM shall impose
penalties upon such company including, but not limited to, denial of
access to an Export License for Sugar under the Agreement.
3. If the GOM determines that a Mexican company has participated in
the circumvention of the Agreement, the GOM shall count against the
Export Limit for the Export Limit Period in which the circumvention
took place an amount of Sugar equivalent to the amount involved in such
circumvention and shall immediately notify the Department of the amount
deducted. If a sufficient amount is not available in the current Export
Limit Period, then the remaining amount shall be deducted from the
subsequent Export Limit Period or Periods.
B. The Department will investigate any allegations of circumvention
which are brought to its attention both by asking the GOM to
investigate such allegations and by itself gathering relevant
information. The GOM will respond to requests from the Department for
information relating to such allegations. In distinguishing normal
arrangements from those which would result in the circumvention of a
given Export Limit established by the Agreement, the Department will
take the following factors into account, as deemed appropriate:
1. Existence of any verbal or written agreement leading to
circumvention of the Agreement;
2. Existence and function of any subsidiaries or affiliates of the
parties involved;
3. Existence and function of any historical and traditional
patterns of production and trade among the parties involved, and any
deviation from such patterns;
4. Existence of any payments unaccounted for by previous or
subsequent deliveries, or any payments
[[Page 78049]]
to one party for Sugar delivered or swapped by another party;
5. Sequence and timing of the arrangements; and
6. Any other information relevant to the transaction or
circumstances.
C. The GOM and the Department shall hold consultations regarding
anti-circumvention consistent with Section VIII.D.3 of the Agreement.
VIII. Monitoring of the Agreement
A. Import Monitoring
1. The Department will monitor entries of Sugar from Mexico to
ensure compliance with Section V of the Agreement.
2. The Department will review publicly available data and other
official import data, including, as appropriate, records maintained by
CBP, to determine whether there have been imports that are inconsistent
with the provisions of the Agreement. The Department also intends to
consult with USDA regarding monthly information submitted by
processors, refiners, and importers of Sugar from Mexico.
3. The Department will review, as appropriate, data it receives
through any data exchange program between U.S. and Mexican government
agencies, to determine whether there have been imports that are
inconsistent with the provisions of the Agreement.
4. The Department agrees to discuss with CBP additional mechanisms
that may be established and administered by CBP to monitor entries of
Sugar.
B. Compliance Monitoring
1. The GOM will collect and provide to the Department such
information as is necessary and appropriate to monitor the
implementation of, and compliance with, the Agreement, including the
following:
a. Within 30 days following the date that the GOM allocates the
Export Limit for any Export Limit Period, the GOM shall notify the
Department of each allocation recipient and the volume granted to each
recipient. The GOM also shall inform the Department of any changes in
the volume allocated to individual recipients within 30 days of the
date on which such changes become effective.
b. The GOM shall collect and provide to the Department information
on exports to the United States in the format in Appendix II to the
Agreement and, if requested, on the aggregate quantity and value of
exports of Sugar to Third Countries. This information will be provided
on a monthly basis as specified in Appendix II, and will be provided no
later than 60 days following the end of each month, beginning on
February 1, 2015 (for the period from the Effective Date through
December 31, 2015). If the Department has concerns with the shipments
of a particular exporter, upon request, the GOM will provide
information related to that exporter on an expedited basis.
c. The GOM and the Department recognize that the effective
monitoring of the Agreement may require the GOM to provide information
in addition to that identified in the Agreement. Accordingly, after
consulting with the GOM, the Department may request additional
reporting requirements consistent with U.S. law and regulations during
the course of the Agreement. The GOM shall also collect and provide to
the Department, generally within 60 days of the request, any such
additional information requested by the Department.
2. The Department has the authority to verify all information
related to the administration of the Agreement, including all
information relating to potential circumvention of the Agreement,
annually or more frequently as deemed necessary. The Department will
conduct verifications at locations and times it deems appropriate to
ensure compliance with the terms of the Agreement.
3. The Department may initiate administrative reviews under section
751(a) of the Act in the month immediately following the Anniversary
Month, upon request, or upon its own initiative, to ensure that exports
of Sugar from Mexico satisfy the requirements of section 704(c)(1) and
(3) of the Act. The Department may conduct administrative reviews under
sections 751(b) and (c), and 781 of the Act, as appropriate. The
Department may perform verifications pursuant to administrative reviews
conducted under section 751 of the Act.
C. Rejection of Submissions
The Department may reject: (1) any information submitted after the
deadlines set forth in the Agreement; (2) any submission that does not
comply with the filing, format, translation, service, and certification
of documents requirements under 19 CFR 351.303; (3) submissions that do
not comply with the procedures for establishing business proprietary
treatment under 19 CFR 351.304; and (4) submissions that do not comply
with any other applicable regulations, as appropriate. If information
is not submitted in a complete and timely fashion or is not fully
verifiable, the Department may use facts otherwise available for the
basis of its decision, as it determines appropriate, consistent with
section 776 of the Act.
D. Consultations
1. Implementation Consultations
a. If the GOM notifies the Department in writing, or the Department
otherwise determines, that the GOM for any reason has not satisfied the
implementation obligations in Section VI of the Agreement, the
Department will consult with the GOM for a period of up to 60 days to
ensure that the GOM complies with those obligations within those 60
days.
b. If the Department is not satisfied at the conclusion of the
consultation period that exports of Sugar from Mexico are entering the
United States in amounts consistent with the Agreement, or entered with
a valid Export License, the Department may evaluate under section
351.209 of its regulations, or section 751 of the Act, whether the
Agreement is being violated, as defined in Section IX of the Agreement.
2. Compliance Consultations
a. When the Department identifies, through import or compliance
monitoring or otherwise, that exports of Sugar from Mexico may have
entered the United States in volumes inconsistent with Section V of the
Agreement, or without an Export License, the Department will notify the
GOM. The Department will consult with the GOM for a period of up to 60
days to establish a factual basis regarding exports that may be
inconsistent with Section V of the Agreement.
b. During the consultation period, the Department will examine any
information that it develops or which is submitted, including
information requested by the Department, under any provision of the
Agreement.
c. If the Department is not satisfied at the conclusion of the
consultation period that exports of Sugar from Mexico are entering the
United States in amounts consistent with the Agreement, or entered with
a valid Export License, the Department may evaluate under section
351.209 of its regulations, or section 751 of the Act whether the
Agreement is being violated, as defined in Section IX of the Agreement.
3. Anti-Circumvention Consultations
a. If the GOM determines that a company from a Third Country has
circumvented the Agreement and the Department and the GOM agree that no
Mexican company participated in or had knowledge of such activities,
then the Department and the GOM shall hold consultations for the
purpose of sharing information regarding such
[[Page 78050]]
circumvention and reaching mutual agreement on the appropriate measures
to be taken to eliminate such circumvention. If the Department and the
GOM are unable to reach mutual agreement within 45 days, then the
Department may take appropriate measures, such as deducting the amount
of Sugar involved in such circumvention from the Export Limit for the
current Export Limit Period or a subsequent Export Limit Period. Before
taking such measures, the Department will notify the GOM of the facts
and reasons constituting the basis for the Department's intended action
and will afford the GOM 15 days in which to comment. Alternatively, the
Department may evaluate under section 351.209 of its regulations, or
section 751 of the Act whether the Agreement is being violated, as
defined in Section IX of the Agreement.
b. In the event that the Department determines that a Mexican
company has participated in a transaction circumventing the Agreement,
the Department and the GOM shall hold consultations for the purpose of
sharing evidence regarding such circumvention and reaching mutual
agreement on an appropriate resolution of the problem. If the
Department and the GOM are unable to reach mutual agreement within 60
days, the Department may take appropriate measures, such as deducting
the amount of Sugar involved in such circumvention from the Export
Limit for the current Export Limit Period (or, if necessary, the
subsequent Export Limit Period) or instructing U.S. Customs and Border
Protection to deny entry to any Mexican Sugar sold by the company found
to be circumventing the Agreement. Before taking such measures, the
Department will notify the GOM of the basis for the Department's
intended action and the GOM will comment within 30 days. The Department
will enter its determinations regarding circumvention into the record
of the Agreement. Alternatively, the Department may evaluate under
section 351.209 of its regulations or section 751 of the Act whether
the Agreement is being violated, as defined in Section IX of the
Agreement.
4. Operations Consultations
The Department will consult with the GOM regarding the operation of
the Agreement. The Department or the GOM may request such consultations
at any time, including consultations to revise the formula to establish
the Export Limit.
IX. Violations of the Agreement
A. If the Department determines that there has been a violation of
the Agreement or that the Agreement no longer meets the requirements of
section 704(c) or (d) of the Act, the Department shall take action it
determines appropriate under section 704(i) of the Act and the
Department's regulations.
B. The following activities shall be considered violations of the
Agreement:
1. Exports of Sugar from Mexico in amounts greater than the Export
Limit established in the relevant Export Limit Period.
2. A significant amount (i.e., 5 percent or more of the Export
Limit for the relevant Export Limit Period) of Sugar from Mexico
exported to the United States without an Export License that is not
reported by the GOM to the Department.
3. Any other material violation or breach, as determined by the
Department.
X. Disclosure and Comment
This section provides the terms for disclosure and comment
following consultations or during segments of the proceeding not
involving a review under section 751 of the Act.
A. The Department may make available to representatives of each
Interested Party, pursuant to and consistent with 19 CFR 351.304-
351.306, business proprietary information submitted to and/or collected
by the Department pursuant to the Agreement, as well as the results of
the Department's analysis of that information.
B. Under this section, the GOM and any other Interested Party shall
file all communications and other submissions via the Department's
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS), which is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and to all parties at the following address:
U.S. Department of Commerce
Central Records Unit, Room 7046
1401 Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20230
Such communications and submissions shall be filed consistent with
the requirements provided in 19 CFR 351.303.
XI. Duration of the Agreement
A. The Agreement has no scheduled termination date. Termination of
the suspended investigation shall be considered in accordance with the
five-year review provisions of section 751(c) of the Act, and section
351.218 of the Department's regulations.
B. The GOM or the Department may terminate the Agreement at any
time. Termination of the Agreement shall be effective no later than 60
days after the date written notice of termination is provided to the
Department or the GOM, respectively.
C. Upon termination, the Department shall follow the procedures
outlined in section 704(i)(1) of the Act.
D. The Department will terminate the Agreement in the event that
the GOM requests continuation of the countervailing duty investigation
of Sugar from Mexico, or Signatories accounting for a significant
proportion of exports of Sugar from Mexico request continuation of the
antidumping investigation of Sugar from Mexico.
XII. Other Provisions
A. By entering into the Agreement, the GOM does not admit that
exports of Sugar from Mexico are having or have had an injurious effect
on Sugar producers in the United States or that the GOM has provided
countervailable subsidies to sugar producers and exporters in Mexico.
The GOM agrees that it will not provide any new or additional export or
import substitution subsidies on Sugar.
B. As of the Effective Date, the Department shall instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection to refund any cash deposits collected as
a result of the countervailing duty investigation on Sugar from Mexico.
The Department shall instruct CBP to terminate the suspension of
liquidation consistent with section 704(f)(2)(B) of the Act.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, U.S.
Department of Commerce
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Francisco de Rosenzweig Mendialdua, Undersecretary for Foreign Trade,
Ministry of Economy, Government of Mexico
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date
Appendix I--Information To Be Contained in Export Licenses
The GOM will issue shipment-specific Export Licenses to Mexican
entities that shall contain the following fields:
1. Export License Number: Indicate the Export License number for
the shipment.
2. Name of the Licensee: Indicate the name of the Licensee, and
the name of the mill, if different from the Licensee.
3. Name of the Exporter: Indicate the name of the broker/trader
or mill, as applicable.
4. Complete Description of Merchandise: Include the applicable
Harmonized Tariff
[[Page 78051]]
Schedule category and the polarity of the product.
5. Processing: Indicate ``YES'' if the Sugar is being imported
for further processing in the United States by a USDA-recognized
cane refiner and ``NO'' if it is not.
6. Quantity: Indicate in metric tons raw value and short tons
raw value.
7. Date of Export License: Date that the Export License is
issued.
8. Date of Expiration of the Export License: Indicate the date
that the Export License expires.
9. Port of Export: Indicate the port of export.
10. Allocation to Mill: Indicate the total amount of the Export
Limit allocated to the individual mill during the relevant Export
Limit Period.
11. Allocation Remaining: Indicate the remaining amount
available under the allocation to the individual mill during the
relevant Export Limit Period.
Appendix II--Information on Exports of Sugar From Mexico
In accordance with the established format, the GOM's license
issuing authority shall collect and provide to the Department all
information necessary to ensure compliance with the Agreement. This
information will be provided to the Department on monthly basis. The
GOM's license issuing authority will collect and maintain data on
exports to the United States on a continuous basis. Data for exports
to countries other than the United States will be reported upon
request. The GOM's license issuing authority may provide a narrative
explanation to substantiate all data collected in accordance with
the following formats.
The GOM's license issuing authority will provide a report or
summary regarding all Export Licenses issued to entities, which
shall contain the following information unless the information is
unknown to the licensing authority and the licensee. Upon request,
the GOM will provide copies of any Export License to the Department.
1. Export License Number: Indicate the Export License number for
the shipment.
2. Name of the Licensee: Indicate the name of the Licensee, and
the name of the mill, if different from the Licensee.
3. Name of the Exporter: Indicate the name of the broker/trader
or mill, as applicable.
4. Complete Description of Merchandise: Include the applicable
Harmonized Tariff Schedule category and the polarity of the product.
5. Processing: Indicate ``YES'' if the Sugar is being imported
for further processing in the United States by a USDA-recognized
cane refiner and ``NO'' if it is not.
6. Quantity: Indicate in metric tons raw value and short tons
raw value.
7. Date of Export License: Date that the Export License is
issued.
8. Date of Expiration of the Export License: Indicate the date
that the Export License expires.
9. Port of Export: Indicate the port of export.
10. Allocation to Mill: Indicate the total amount of the Export
Limit allocated to the individual mill during the relevant Export
Limit Period.
11. Allocation Remaining: Indicate the remaining amount
available under the allocation to the individual mill during the
relevant Export Limit Period.
[FR Doc. 2014-30392 Filed 12-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P