Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 75791-75792 [2014-29780]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 2014 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE is contained in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.1 International Trade Administration Preliminary Determination of No Reviewable Entries We received timely submissions of letters from Hyosung Corporation (Hyosung), Samsung C&T Corporation (Samsung), and TCC Steel Corporation (TCC) reporting to the Department that they had no exports, sales or entries of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.2 Based on record evidence, we preliminarily determine that Hyosung, Samsung, and TCC had no reviewable entries during the POR. For additional information on our preliminary determination of no reviewable entries, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. [A–580–836] Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013–2014 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain cutto-length carbon-quality steel plate products (CTL plate) from the Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of review (POR) is February 1, 2013, through January 31, 2014. The Department preliminarily determines that the producers/exporters subject to this review made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value or had no shipments of subject merchandise. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. AGENCY: DATES: Effective Date: December 19, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–5760. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Scope of the Order The products covered by the antidumping duty order are certain CTL plate. Imports of CTL plate are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 7208.40.3030, 7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060, 7208.52.0000, 7208.53.0000, 7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000, 7210.90.9000, 7211.13.0000, 7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045, 7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, 7225.40.3050, 7225.40.7000, 7225.50.6000, 7225.99.0090, 7226.91.5000, 7226.91.7000, 7226.91.8000, and 7226.99.0000. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:37 Dec 18, 2014 Jkt 235001 Methodology We selected one company for individual examination in this administrative review, Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. (DSM). The Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the public via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).3 ACCESS is available to registered users 1 See the memorandum from Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary Gary Taverman to Assistant Secretary Paul Piquado entitled, ‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum for the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products from the Republic of Korea’’ dated concurrently with this notice and hereby adopted by this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 2 See the no shipment letters from Hyosung and Samsung dated May 30, 2014, and TCC dated May 14, 2014. See also the correction letter from Samsung dated June 5, 2014. Hyosung reported that the correct name of Hyosung International in Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 18262, 18264 (April 1, 2014), is Hyosung Corporation. See Hyosung’s no shipment letter dated May 30, 2014. 3 On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS) to AD and CVD Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). The Web site location was changed from http:// iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The Final Rule changing the references to the Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014). PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 75791 at http://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Department’s Central Records Unit, located at Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be found at http://enforcement.trade. gov/frn/index.html. Preliminary Results of the Review As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the respondents for the period February 1, 2013, through January 31, 2014. The rate for the companies not selected for individual examination is equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin for the selected respondent, DSM. Manufacturer/exporter Bookuk Steel Co., Ltd. ............. Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. ..... SM Solution Co. Ltd. ................ Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) 0.56 0.56 0.56 Disclosure and Public Comment We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these preliminary results to the parties within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.4 Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue, (2) a brief summary of the argument, and (3) a table of authorities.5 Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. An electronically filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department’s electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.6 Requests should contain: (1) The party’s name, address and telephone number; (2) the 4 See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 6 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 5 See E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM 19DEN1 75792 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 2014 / Notices number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. The Department will issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Bookuk Steel Co., Ltd., and SM Solution Co. Ltd., we will instruct CBP to apply the rates listed above to all entries of subject merchandise produced and/or exported by those firms. We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Assessment Rates If DSM’s weighted-average dumping margin continues to be above de minimis in the final results of this review, we will calculate an importerspecific assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the importer’s examined sales and the total entered value of the sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).7 If DSM’s weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) not to assess duties on any of its entries in accordance with the Final Modification for Reviews.8 For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by DSM, for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.9 Consistent with the May 2003 Clarification, in the final results of this review, if we continue to find that Hyosung, Samsung, and TCC had no reviewable transactions of subject merchandise, we will instruct CBP to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by Hyosung, Samsung, or TCC but exported by other companies at the all-others rate.10 For the companies which were not selected for individual examination, The following deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of CTL plate from Korea entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for companies subject to this review will be the rate established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 0.98 percent,11 the all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-value investigation, adjusted for the export-subsidy rate in the companion countervailing duty investigation. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 7 In these preliminary results, the Department applied the assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). 8 See Final Modification for Reviews, 77 FR at 8102. 9 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (May 2003 Clarification), for a full discussion of this clarification. 10 See, e.g., Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:37 Dec 18, 2014 Jkt 235001 Cash Deposit Requirements This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. The Department is issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 11 See, e.g., Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 54264, 54265 (September 11, 2014). Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order Preliminary Determination of No Reviewable Entries Rates for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination Comparisons to Normal Value Determination of Comparison Method Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis Product Comparisons Date of Sale Level of Trade/CEP Offset Export Price Constructed Export Price Normal Value 1. Overrun Sales 2. Selection of Comparison Market 3. Affiliated Parties 4. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm’sLength Test 5. Cost of Production 6. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices Currency Conversion Recommendation [FR Doc. 2014–29780 Filed 12–18–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648–XD664 Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice of online Webinar. AGENCY: Notification to Importers PO 00000 Dated: December 15, 2014. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. The Pacific Fishery Management Council’s (Pacific Council’s) Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) will hold an online Webinar to review new methodologies proposed for 2015 west coast groundfish stock assessments. The online SSC Webinar is open to the public. DATES: The SSC Webinar will commence at 1 p.m. PT, Tuesday, January 6, 2015 and continue until 3 p.m. or as necessary to complete business for the day. ADDRESSES: To attend the SSC Webinar, please join online at http:// www.gotomeeting.com/online/webinar/ join-webinar and enter the Webinar ID: 156–698–723, as well as your name and SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM 19DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 244 (Friday, December 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75791-75792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29780]



[[Page 75791]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-580-836]


Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products From 
the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; 2013-2014

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain cut-to-
length carbon-quality steel plate products (CTL plate) from the 
Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of review (POR) is February 1, 
2013, through January 31, 2014. The Department preliminarily determines 
that the producers/exporters subject to this review made sales of 
subject merchandise at less than normal value or had no shipments of 
subject merchandise. We invite interested parties to comment on these 
preliminary results.

DATES: Effective Date: December 19, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-
5760.

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by the antidumping duty order are certain CTL 
plate. Imports of CTL plate are currently classified in the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 
7208.40.3030, 7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060, 
7208.52.0000, 7208.53.0000, 7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000, 7210.90.9000, 
7211.13.0000, 7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045, 7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 
7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, 7225.40.3050, 7225.40.7000, 7225.50.6000, 
7225.99.0090, 7226.91.5000, 7226.91.7000, 7226.91.8000, and 
7226.99.0000. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience 
and customs purposes, the written description is dispositive. A full 
description of the scope of the order is contained in the Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See the memorandum from Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary 
Gary Taverman to Assistant Secretary Paul Piquado entitled, 
``Preliminary Decision Memorandum for the Administrative Review of 
the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality 
Steel Plate Products from the Republic of Korea'' dated concurrently 
with this notice and hereby adopted by this notice (Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Determination of No Reviewable Entries

    We received timely submissions of letters from Hyosung Corporation 
(Hyosung), Samsung C&T Corporation (Samsung), and TCC Steel Corporation 
(TCC) reporting to the Department that they had no exports, sales or 
entries of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.\2\ 
Based on record evidence, we preliminarily determine that Hyosung, 
Samsung, and TCC had no reviewable entries during the POR. For 
additional information on our preliminary determination of no 
reviewable entries, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See the no shipment letters from Hyosung and Samsung dated 
May 30, 2014, and TCC dated May 14, 2014. See also the correction 
letter from Samsung dated June 5, 2014. Hyosung reported that the 
correct name of Hyosung International in Initiation of Antidumping 
and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for 
Revocation in Part, 79 FR 18262, 18264 (April 1, 2014), is Hyosung 
Corporation. See Hyosung's no shipment letter dated May 30, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    We selected one company for individual examination in this 
administrative review, Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. (DSM). The 
Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed export price is 
calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is 
calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act.
    For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the 
public via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).\3\ ACCESS is 
available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and is 
available to all parties in the Department's Central Records Unit, 
located at Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In 
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can 
be found at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and Compliance changed the 
name of Enforcement and Compliance's AD and CVD Centralized 
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS) to AD and CVD Centralized 
Electronic Service System (ACCESS). The Web site location was 
changed from http://iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. 
The Final Rule changing the references to the Regulations can be 
found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Results of the Review

    As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that the 
following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the respondents 
for the period February 1, 2013, through January 31, 2014. The rate for 
the companies not selected for individual examination is equal to the 
weighted-average dumping margin for the selected respondent, DSM.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Weighted-
                                                               average
                   Manufacturer/exporter                       dumping
                                                                margin
                                                              (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bookuk Steel Co., Ltd......................................         0.56
Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd................................         0.56
SM Solution Co. Ltd........................................         0.56
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these 
preliminary results to the parties within five days of the date of 
publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case 
briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this 
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, 
may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case 
briefs.\4\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 
proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement 
of the issue, (2) a brief summary of the argument, and (3) a table of 
authorities.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
    \5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to 
request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a 
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 
Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. An electronically filed 
document must be received successfully in its entirety by the 
Department's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern 
Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\6\ 
Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone 
number; (2) the

[[Page 75792]]

number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. 
Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the 
respective case briefs. The Department will issue the final results of 
this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of 
the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after 
the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    If DSM's weighted-average dumping margin continues to be above de 
minimis in the final results of this review, we will calculate an 
importer-specific assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the 
total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the importer's 
examined sales and the total entered value of the sales in accordance 
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\7\ If DSM's weighted-average dumping margin 
is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, we will instruct 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) not to assess duties on any of 
its entries in accordance with the Final Modification for Reviews.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ In these preliminary results, the Department applied the 
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping 
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final 
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for 
Reviews).
    \8\ See Final Modification for Reviews, 77 FR at 8102.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by DSM, 
for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United 
States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the 
all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) 
involved in the transaction.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (May 
2003 Clarification), for a full discussion of this clarification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with the May 2003 Clarification, in the final results of 
this review, if we continue to find that Hyosung, Samsung, and TCC had 
no reviewable transactions of subject merchandise, we will instruct CBP 
to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by Hyosung, 
Samsung, or TCC but exported by other companies at the all-others 
rate.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See, e.g., Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 
26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal From the 
Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the companies which were not selected for individual 
examination, Bookuk Steel Co., Ltd., and SM Solution Co. Ltd., we will 
instruct CBP to apply the rates listed above to all entries of subject 
merchandise produced and/or exported by those firms.
    We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after 
publication of the final results of this review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for 
all shipments of CTL plate from Korea entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication as 
provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for 
companies subject to this review will be the rate established in the 
final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise 
exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but 
covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate 
will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most 
recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this 
review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the 
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for 
the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; (4) the 
cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will 
continue to be 0.98 percent,\11\ the all-others rate established in the 
less-than-fair-value investigation, adjusted for the export-subsidy 
rate in the companion countervailing duty investigation. These cash 
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See, e.g., Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate 
Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 54264, 54265 (September 
11, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    The Department is issuing and publishing these results in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: December 15, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum

Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Preliminary Determination of No Reviewable Entries
Rates for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination
Comparisons to Normal Value
Determination of Comparison Method
Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
Product Comparisons
Date of Sale
Level of Trade/CEP Offset
Export Price
Constructed Export Price
Normal Value
    1. Overrun Sales
    2. Selection of Comparison Market
    3. Affiliated Parties
    4. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm's-Length Test
    5. Cost of Production
    6. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices
Currency Conversion
Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2014-29780 Filed 12-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P