Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014, 75791-75792 [2014-29780]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 2014 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
is contained in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.1
International Trade Administration
Preliminary Determination of No
Reviewable Entries
We received timely submissions of
letters from Hyosung Corporation
(Hyosung), Samsung C&T Corporation
(Samsung), and TCC Steel Corporation
(TCC) reporting to the Department that
they had no exports, sales or entries of
subject merchandise to the United
States during the POR.2 Based on record
evidence, we preliminarily determine
that Hyosung, Samsung, and TCC had
no reviewable entries during the POR.
For additional information on our
preliminary determination of no
reviewable entries, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.
[A–580–836]
Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality
Steel Plate Products From the
Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2013–2014
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain cutto-length carbon-quality steel plate
products (CTL plate) from the Republic
of Korea (Korea). The period of review
(POR) is February 1, 2013, through
January 31, 2014. The Department
preliminarily determines that the
producers/exporters subject to this
review made sales of subject
merchandise at less than normal value
or had no shipments of subject
merchandise. We invite interested
parties to comment on these preliminary
results.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Effective Date: December 19,
2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yang Jin Chun, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202)
482–5760.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the
antidumping duty order are certain CTL
plate. Imports of CTL plate are currently
classified in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
under subheadings 7208.40.3030,
7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030,
7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060,
7208.52.0000, 7208.53.0000,
7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000,
7210.90.9000, 7211.13.0000,
7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045,
7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000,
7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000,
7225.40.3050, 7225.40.7000,
7225.50.6000, 7225.99.0090,
7226.91.5000, 7226.91.7000,
7226.91.8000, and 7226.99.0000. While
the HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description is dispositive. A
full description of the scope of the order
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:37 Dec 18, 2014
Jkt 235001
Methodology
We selected one company for
individual examination in this
administrative review, Dongkuk Steel
Mill Co., Ltd. (DSM). The Department
conducted this review in accordance
with section 751 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed
export price is calculated in accordance
with section 772 of the Act. Normal
value is calculated in accordance with
section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is made available
to the public via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).3
ACCESS is available to registered users
1 See the memorandum from Associate Deputy
Assistant Secretary Gary Taverman to Assistant
Secretary Paul Piquado entitled, ‘‘Preliminary
Decision Memorandum for the Administrative
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain
Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products
from the Republic of Korea’’ dated concurrently
with this notice and hereby adopted by this notice
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
2 See the no shipment letters from Hyosung and
Samsung dated May 30, 2014, and TCC dated May
14, 2014. See also the correction letter from
Samsung dated June 5, 2014. Hyosung reported that
the correct name of Hyosung International in
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation
in Part, 79 FR 18262, 18264 (April 1, 2014), is
Hyosung Corporation. See Hyosung’s no shipment
letter dated May 30, 2014.
3 On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and
Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and
Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic
Service System (IA ACCESS) to AD and CVD
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
The Web site location was changed from http://
iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The
Final Rule changing the references to the
Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046
(November 20, 2014).
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75791
at http://access.trade.gov, and is
available to all parties in the
Department’s Central Records Unit,
located at Room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be found at http://enforcement.trade.
gov/frn/index.html.
Preliminary Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we
preliminarily determine that the
following weighted-average dumping
margins exist for the respondents for the
period February 1, 2013, through
January 31, 2014. The rate for the
companies not selected for individual
examination is equal to the weightedaverage dumping margin for the selected
respondent, DSM.
Manufacturer/exporter
Bookuk Steel Co., Ltd. .............
Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. .....
SM Solution Co. Ltd. ................
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
0.56
0.56
0.56
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed for these preliminary results
to the parties within five days of the
date of publication of this notice in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c),
interested parties may submit case briefs
not later than 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice. Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in the
case briefs, may be filed not later than
five days after the date for filing case
briefs.4 Parties who submit case briefs or
rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are
encouraged to submit with each
argument: (1) A statement of the issue,
(2) a brief summary of the argument,
and (3) a table of authorities.5
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing, or to participate if one is
requested, must submit a written
request to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, filed
electronically via ACCESS. An
electronically filed document must be
received successfully in its entirety by
the Department’s electronic records
system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern
Time within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice.6 Requests
should contain: (1) The party’s name,
address and telephone number; (2) the
4 See
19 CFR 351.309(d).
19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
6 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
5 See
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
75792
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 244 / Friday, December 19, 2014 / Notices
number of participants; and (3) a list of
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in
the hearing will be limited to those
raised in the respective case briefs. The
Department will issue the final results
of this administrative review, including
the results of its analysis of the issues
raised in any written briefs, not later
than 120 days after the date of
publication of this notice, pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Bookuk Steel Co., Ltd., and SM Solution
Co. Ltd., we will instruct CBP to apply
the rates listed above to all entries of
subject merchandise produced and/or
exported by those firms.
We intend to issue liquidation
instructions to CBP 15 days after
publication of the final results of this
review.
Assessment Rates
If DSM’s weighted-average dumping
margin continues to be above de
minimis in the final results of this
review, we will calculate an importerspecific assessment rate on the basis of
the ratio of the total amount of
antidumping duties calculated for the
importer’s examined sales and the total
entered value of the sales in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).7 If DSM’s
weighted-average dumping margin is
zero or de minimis in the final results
of review, we will instruct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) not to
assess duties on any of its entries in
accordance with the Final Modification
for Reviews.8
For entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by DSM, for
which it did not know its merchandise
was destined for the United States, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate
if there is no rate for the intermediate
company(ies) involved in the
transaction.9
Consistent with the May 2003
Clarification, in the final results of this
review, if we continue to find that
Hyosung, Samsung, and TCC had no
reviewable transactions of subject
merchandise, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate any existing entries of
merchandise produced by Hyosung,
Samsung, or TCC but exported by other
companies at the all-others rate.10
For the companies which were not
selected for individual examination,
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
notice of final results of administrative
review for all shipments of CTL plate
from Korea entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the date of publication as provided by
section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit rate for companies subject to
this review will be the rate established
in the final results of this administrative
review; (2) for merchandise exported by
manufacturers or exporters not covered
in this review but covered in a prior
segment of the proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original investigation but
the manufacturer is, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate established for the
most recent period for the manufacturer
of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters will continue to be 0.98
percent,11 the all-others rate established
in the less-than-fair-value investigation,
adjusted for the export-subsidy rate in
the companion countervailing duty
investigation. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
7 In
these preliminary results, the Department
applied the assessment rate calculation method
adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation
of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
Reviews).
8 See Final Modification for Reviews, 77 FR at
8102.
9 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (May 2003 Clarification),
for a full discussion of this clarification.
10 See, e.g., Magnesium Metal From the Russian
Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 26922, 26923
(May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal
From the Russian Federation: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR
56989 (September 17, 2010).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:37 Dec 18, 2014
Jkt 235001
Cash Deposit Requirements
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Department’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
The Department is issuing and
publishing these results in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
11 See, e.g., Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality
Steel Plate Products From the Republic of Korea:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 54264, 54265 (September
11, 2014).
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Preliminary Determination of No Reviewable
Entries
Rates for Respondents Not Selected for
Individual Examination
Comparisons to Normal Value
Determination of Comparison Method
Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
Product Comparisons
Date of Sale
Level of Trade/CEP Offset
Export Price
Constructed Export Price
Normal Value
1. Overrun Sales
2. Selection of Comparison Market
3. Affiliated Parties
4. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm’sLength Test
5. Cost of Production
6. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
Comparison Market Prices
Currency Conversion
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2014–29780 Filed 12–18–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XD664
Pacific Fishery Management Council;
Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of online Webinar.
AGENCY:
Notification to Importers
PO 00000
Dated: December 15, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
The Pacific Fishery
Management Council’s (Pacific
Council’s) Scientific and Statistical
Committee (SSC) will hold an online
Webinar to review new methodologies
proposed for 2015 west coast groundfish
stock assessments. The online SSC
Webinar is open to the public.
DATES: The SSC Webinar will
commence at 1 p.m. PT, Tuesday,
January 6, 2015 and continue until 3
p.m. or as necessary to complete
business for the day.
ADDRESSES: To attend the SSC Webinar,
please join online at http://
www.gotomeeting.com/online/webinar/
join-webinar and enter the Webinar ID:
156–698–723, as well as your name and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19DEN1.SGM
19DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 244 (Friday, December 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75791-75792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29780]
[[Page 75791]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-580-836]
Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products From
the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2013-2014
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain cut-to-
length carbon-quality steel plate products (CTL plate) from the
Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of review (POR) is February 1,
2013, through January 31, 2014. The Department preliminarily determines
that the producers/exporters subject to this review made sales of
subject merchandise at less than normal value or had no shipments of
subject merchandise. We invite interested parties to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: December 19, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yang Jin Chun, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-
5760.
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the antidumping duty order are certain CTL
plate. Imports of CTL plate are currently classified in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings
7208.40.3030, 7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030, 7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060,
7208.52.0000, 7208.53.0000, 7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000, 7210.90.9000,
7211.13.0000, 7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045, 7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000,
7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, 7225.40.3050, 7225.40.7000, 7225.50.6000,
7225.99.0090, 7226.91.5000, 7226.91.7000, 7226.91.8000, and
7226.99.0000. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written description is dispositive. A full
description of the scope of the order is contained in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See the memorandum from Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary
Gary Taverman to Assistant Secretary Paul Piquado entitled,
``Preliminary Decision Memorandum for the Administrative Review of
the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality
Steel Plate Products from the Republic of Korea'' dated concurrently
with this notice and hereby adopted by this notice (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Determination of No Reviewable Entries
We received timely submissions of letters from Hyosung Corporation
(Hyosung), Samsung C&T Corporation (Samsung), and TCC Steel Corporation
(TCC) reporting to the Department that they had no exports, sales or
entries of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.\2\
Based on record evidence, we preliminarily determine that Hyosung,
Samsung, and TCC had no reviewable entries during the POR. For
additional information on our preliminary determination of no
reviewable entries, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See the no shipment letters from Hyosung and Samsung dated
May 30, 2014, and TCC dated May 14, 2014. See also the correction
letter from Samsung dated June 5, 2014. Hyosung reported that the
correct name of Hyosung International in Initiation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for
Revocation in Part, 79 FR 18262, 18264 (April 1, 2014), is Hyosung
Corporation. See Hyosung's no shipment letter dated May 30, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
We selected one company for individual examination in this
administrative review, Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. (DSM). The
Department conducted this review in accordance with section 751 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed export price is
calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is
calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the
public via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).\3\ ACCESS is
available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and is
available to all parties in the Department's Central Records Unit,
located at Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be found at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and Compliance changed the
name of Enforcement and Compliance's AD and CVD Centralized
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS) to AD and CVD Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS). The Web site location was
changed from http://iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov.
The Final Rule changing the references to the Regulations can be
found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of the Review
As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that the
following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the respondents
for the period February 1, 2013, through January 31, 2014. The rate for
the companies not selected for individual examination is equal to the
weighted-average dumping margin for the selected respondent, DSM.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Manufacturer/exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bookuk Steel Co., Ltd...................................... 0.56
Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd................................ 0.56
SM Solution Co. Ltd........................................ 0.56
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these
preliminary results to the parties within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case
briefs not later than 30 days after the date of publication of this
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs,
may be filed not later than five days after the date for filing case
briefs.\4\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement
of the issue, (2) a brief summary of the argument, and (3) a table of
authorities.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. An electronically filed
document must be received successfully in its entirety by the
Department's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern
Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\6\
Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone
number; (2) the
[[Page 75792]]
number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed.
Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the
respective case briefs. The Department will issue the final results of
this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of
the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after
the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
If DSM's weighted-average dumping margin continues to be above de
minimis in the final results of this review, we will calculate an
importer-specific assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the
total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the importer's
examined sales and the total entered value of the sales in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\7\ If DSM's weighted-average dumping margin
is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, we will instruct
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) not to assess duties on any of
its entries in accordance with the Final Modification for Reviews.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ In these preliminary results, the Department applied the
assessment rate calculation method adopted in Antidumping
Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final
Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for
Reviews).
\8\ See Final Modification for Reviews, 77 FR at 8102.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by DSM,
for which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United
States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the
all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies)
involved in the transaction.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (May
2003 Clarification), for a full discussion of this clarification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with the May 2003 Clarification, in the final results of
this review, if we continue to find that Hyosung, Samsung, and TCC had
no reviewable transactions of subject merchandise, we will instruct CBP
to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by Hyosung,
Samsung, or TCC but exported by other companies at the all-others
rate.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See, e.g., Magnesium Metal From the Russian Federation:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR
26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in Magnesium Metal From the
Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the companies which were not selected for individual
examination, Bookuk Steel Co., Ltd., and SM Solution Co. Ltd., we will
instruct CBP to apply the rates listed above to all entries of subject
merchandise produced and/or exported by those firms.
We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after
publication of the final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for
all shipments of CTL plate from Korea entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication as
provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for
companies subject to this review will be the rate established in the
final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise
exported by manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but
covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most
recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for
the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; (4) the
cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will
continue to be 0.98 percent,\11\ the all-others rate established in the
less-than-fair-value investigation, adjusted for the export-subsidy
rate in the companion countervailing duty investigation. These cash
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See, e.g., Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate
Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 54264, 54265 (September
11, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
The Department is issuing and publishing these results in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: December 15, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Preliminary Determination of No Reviewable Entries
Rates for Respondents Not Selected for Individual Examination
Comparisons to Normal Value
Determination of Comparison Method
Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis
Product Comparisons
Date of Sale
Level of Trade/CEP Offset
Export Price
Constructed Export Price
Normal Value
1. Overrun Sales
2. Selection of Comparison Market
3. Affiliated Parties
4. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm's-Length Test
5. Cost of Production
6. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices
Currency Conversion
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2014-29780 Filed 12-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
