Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube From Mexico: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 73028-73029 [2014-28827]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
73028
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 236 / Tuesday, December 9, 2014 / Notices
HTSUS subheadings 7407.10.1500,
7419.99.5050, 8415.90.8065, and
8415.90.8085. The HTSUS subheadings
are provided for convenience and
customs purposes only; the written
product description of the scope of the
order is dispositive.3
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–201–838]
Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and
Tube From Mexico: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2012–2013
Methodology
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on seamless
refined copper pipe and tube from
Mexico.1 The review covers two
producers/exporters of the subject
merchandise, GD Affiliates S. de R.L. de
C.V. (Golden Dragon) 2 and Nacional de
Cobre, S.A. de C.V. (Nacobre). The
period of review (POR) is November 1,
2012, through October 31, 2013. We
have preliminarily found that sales of
subject merchandise have been made at
prices below normal value. Interested
parties are invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: December 9, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Eastwood or Dennis McClure,
AD/CVD Operations, Office II,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–3874 or (202) 482–5973,
respectively.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The merchandise subject to the order
is seamless refined copper pipe and
tube. The product is currently classified
under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (HTSUS)
subheadings 7411.10.1030 and
7411.10.1090, and also may enter under
1 See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube
From Mexico and the People’s Republic of China:
Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
From Mexico, 75 FR 71070 (November 22, 2010)
(Order).
2 The Department has previously treated GD
Affiliates S. de R.L. de C.V. as part of a single entity
including: (1) GD Copper Cooperatief U.A.; (2) Hong
Kong GD Trading Co. Ltd.; (3) Golden Dragon
Holding (Hong Kong) International, Ltd.; (4) GD
Copper U.S.A. Inc.; (5) GD Affiliates Servicios S. de
R.L. de C.V.; and (6) GD Affiliates S. de R.L. de C.V.,
which is collectively referred to as Golden Dragon.
See, e.g., Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube
From Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
New Shipper Review, 77 FR 59178 (September 26,
2012), and accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:48 Dec 08, 2014
Jkt 235001
The Department is conducting this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). Constructed export
price is calculated in accordance with
section 772 of the Act. Normal value is
calculated in accordance with section
773 of the Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum, dated
concurrently with these results and
hereby adopted by this notice. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).4
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov and it is
available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed Preliminary Decision
Memorandum and the electronic
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Preliminary Results of Review
The Department preliminarily
determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist:
3 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, entitled ‘‘Seamless Refined Copper
Pipe and Tube from Mexico: Decision
Memorandum for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
2013’’ (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated
concurrent with and adopted by this notice, for a
complete description of the Scope of the Order.
4 On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and
Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and
Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic
Service System (IA ACCESS) to AD and CVD
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
The Web site location was changed from https://
iaaccess.trade.gov to https://access.trade.gov. The
Final Rule changing the references to the
Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046
(November 20, 2014).
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Producer/exporter
Weightedaverage dumping
margin
(percent)
GD Affiliates S. de R.L.
de C.V .........................
Nacional de Cobre, S.A.
de C.V .........................
1.23
0.00
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department intends to disclose to
interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with these
preliminary results within five days
after the date of publication of this
notice.5 Interested parties may submit
case briefs to the Department no later
than seven days after the date of the
final verification report issued in this
proceeding. Rebuttal briefs, limited to
issues raised in the case briefs, may be
filed no later than five days after the
time limit for filing case briefs.6 Parties
who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs
in this proceeding are encouraged to
submit with each argument: (1) A
statement of the issue; (2) a brief
summary of the argument; and (3) a
table of authorities.7 Case and rebuttal
briefs should be filed using ACCESS.8
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing, or to participate if one is
requested, must submit a written
request to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, filed
electronically via ACCESS. An
electronically-filed document must be
received successfully in its entirety by
ACCESS by 5 p.m. Eastern Standard
Time within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice.9 Hearing
requests should contain: (1) The party’s
name, address, and telephone number;
(2) the number of participants; and (3)
a list of issues to be discussed. Issues
raised in the hearing will be limited to
issues raised in the briefs. If a request
for a hearing is made, parties will be
notified of the time and date for the
hearing to be held at the U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street
and Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20230.10
The Department intends to issue the
final results of this administrative
review, including the results of its
analysis of the issues raised in any
written briefs, no later than 120 days
after the date of publication of this
notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A)
5 See
19 CFR 351.224(b).
19 CFR 351.309(d).
7 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
8 See 19 CFR 351.303.
9 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
10 Id.
6 See
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 236 / Tuesday, December 9, 2014 / Notices
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h),
unless this deadline is extended.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, the
Department shall determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review.11 Golden Dragon and Nacobre
reported the names of the importers of
record and the entered value for all of
their sales to the United States during
the POR. If Golden Dragon’s and
Nacobre’s weighted-average dumping
margins are not zero or de minimis (i.e.,
less than 0.50 percent) in the final
results of this review, we will calculate
importer-specific assessment rates on
the basis of the ratio of the total amount
of dumping calculated for the importer’s
examined sales and the total entered
value of those sales in accordance with
19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), and we will
instruct CBP to assess antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered
by this review. Where either the
respondent’s weighted-average dumping
margin is zero or de minimis, or an
importer-specific assessment rate is zero
or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by Golden
Dragon and Nacobre for which they did
not know their merchandise was
destined for the United States. In such
instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction. For a full discussion of
this clarification, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
We intend to issue instructions to
CBP 41 days after the publication date
of the final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
notice of final results of administrative
review for all shipments of seamless
refined copper pipe and tube from
Mexico entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the date of publication as provided by
section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit rates for Golden Dragon and
Nacobre will be equal to the weightedaverage dumping margins established in
11 See
the final results of this administrative
review; (2) for merchandise exported by
manufacturers or exporters not covered
in this review but covered in a prior
segment of the proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently-completed segment; (3) if
the exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original
investigation but the manufacturer is,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recentlycompleted segment for the manufacturer
of the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters will continue to be 26.03
percent, the all-others rate established
in the Order. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h) and 351.221(b)(4).
Dated: December 2, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Discussion of the Methodology
i. Normal Value Comparisons
ii. Determination of Comparison Method
iii. Product Comparisons
iv. Date of Sale
v. Constructed Export Price
vi. Normal Value
vii. Currency Conversion
[FR Doc. 2014–28827 Filed 12–8–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
19 CFR 351.212(b).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:48 Dec 08, 2014
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
73029
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–942]
Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving
and Racks From the People’s Republic
of China: Final Results of Expedited
Sunset Review of the Countervailing
Duty Order
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) finds that revocation
of the countervailing duty order (CVD)
order on certain kitchen appliance
shelving and racks (kitchen racks) from
the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of a countervailable
subsidy at the levels indicated in the
Final Results of Review section of this
notice.
DATES: Effective Date: December 9, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Kolberg, Office I, AD/CVD
Operations, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1785.
AGENCY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Background
On August 1, 2014, the Department
initiated a sunset review of the CVD
Order 1 on kitchen racks from the PRC
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 On
August 18, 2014, the Department
received a notice of intent to participate
in the review on behalf of Nashville
Wire Products, Inc. (Nashville Wire) and
SSW Holding Company, Inc. (SSW)
(collectively, the domestic industry)
within the deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(1)(i). Each of these
companies claimed interested party
status under section 771(9)(C) of the
Act, as domestic producers of the
domestic like product.
The Department received adequate
substantive responses collectively from
the domestic industry within the 30-day
deadline specified in 19 CFR
351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department did
not receive a substantive response from
the Government of the PRC or any
respondent interested party to the
1 See Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving and
Racks From the People’s Republic of China:
Countervailing Duty Order, 74 FR 46973 (September
14, 2009) (CVD Order).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 79
FR 44743 (August 1, 2014).
E:\FR\FM\09DEN1.SGM
09DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 236 (Tuesday, December 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73028-73029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28827]
[[Page 73028]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-201-838]
Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube From Mexico: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on seamless refined
copper pipe and tube from Mexico.\1\ The review covers two producers/
exporters of the subject merchandise, GD Affiliates S. de R.L. de C.V.
(Golden Dragon) \2\ and Nacional de Cobre, S.A. de C.V. (Nacobre). The
period of review (POR) is November 1, 2012, through October 31, 2013.
We have preliminarily found that sales of subject merchandise have been
made at prices below normal value. Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube From Mexico and
the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Orders and Amended
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value From Mexico, 75
FR 71070 (November 22, 2010) (Order).
\2\ The Department has previously treated GD Affiliates S. de
R.L. de C.V. as part of a single entity including: (1) GD Copper
Cooperatief U.A.; (2) Hong Kong GD Trading Co. Ltd.; (3) Golden
Dragon Holding (Hong Kong) International, Ltd.; (4) GD Copper U.S.A.
Inc.; (5) GD Affiliates Servicios S. de R.L. de C.V.; and (6) GD
Affiliates S. de R.L. de C.V., which is collectively referred to as
Golden Dragon. See, e.g., Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube From
Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 77 FR
59178 (September 26, 2012), and accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: December 9, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Eastwood or Dennis McClure,
AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
3874 or (202) 482-5973, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is seamless refined copper
pipe and tube. The product is currently classified under the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 7411.10.1030
and 7411.10.1090, and also may enter under HTSUS subheadings
7407.10.1500, 7419.99.5050, 8415.90.8065, and 8415.90.8085. The HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the
written product description of the scope of the order is
dispositive.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance,
entitled ``Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and Tube from Mexico:
Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2012-2013'' (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum), dated concurrent with and adopted by this notice, for a
complete description of the Scope of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed
export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act.
Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, dated
concurrently with these results and hereby adopted by this notice. The
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file
electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).\4\
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov and
it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046
of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary
Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and Compliance changed the
name of Enforcement and Compliance's AD and CVD Centralized
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS) to AD and CVD Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS). The Web site location was
changed from https://iaaccess.trade.gov to https://access.trade.gov.
The Final Rule changing the references to the Regulations can be
found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of Review
The Department preliminarily determines that the following
weighted-average dumping margins exist:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted- average
Producer/exporter dumping margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GD Affiliates S. de R.L. de C.V...................... 1.23
Nacional de Cobre, S.A. de C.V....................... 0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
The Department intends to disclose to interested parties the
calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results
within five days after the date of publication of this notice.\5\
Interested parties may submit case briefs to the Department no later
than seven days after the date of the final verification report issued
in this proceeding. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the
case briefs, may be filed no later than five days after the time limit
for filing case briefs.\6\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal
briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument:
(1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and
(3) a table of authorities.\7\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed
using ACCESS.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
\6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2).
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.303.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS. An electronically-filed
document must be received successfully in its entirety by ACCESS by 5
p.m. Eastern Standard Time within 30 days after the date of publication
of this notice.\9\ Hearing requests should contain: (1) The party's
name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants;
and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing
will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a
hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the
hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
\10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department intends to issue the final results of this
administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the
issues raised in any written briefs, no later than 120 days after the
date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A)
[[Page 73029]]
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h), unless this deadline is extended.
Assessment Rates
Upon issuance of the final results, the Department shall determine,
and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\11\ Golden
Dragon and Nacobre reported the names of the importers of record and
the entered value for all of their sales to the United States during
the POR. If Golden Dragon's and Nacobre's weighted-average dumping
margins are not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent) in
the final results of this review, we will calculate importer-specific
assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of
dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales and the total
entered value of those sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
and we will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this review. Where either the
respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or
an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced by Golden Dragon and Nacobre for
which they did not know their merchandise was destined for the United
States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed
entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate
company(ies) involved in the transaction. For a full discussion of this
clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
We intend to issue instructions to CBP 41 days after the
publication date of the final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for
all shipments of seamless refined copper pipe and tube from Mexico
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the
date of publication as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rates for Golden Dragon and Nacobre will be equal to
the weighted-average dumping margins established in the final results
of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by
manufacturers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a
prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to
be the company-specific rate published for the most recently-completed
segment; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a
prior review, or the original investigation but the manufacturer is,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most
recently-completed segment for the manufacturer of the merchandise; (4)
the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will
continue to be 26.03 percent, the all-others rate established in the
Order. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in
effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h) and
351.221(b)(4).
Dated: December 2, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4. Discussion of the Methodology
i. Normal Value Comparisons
ii. Determination of Comparison Method
iii. Product Comparisons
iv. Date of Sale
v. Constructed Export Price
vi. Normal Value
vii. Currency Conversion
[FR Doc. 2014-28827 Filed 12-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
