Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe From India, Oman, the United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam, 72699-72700 [2014-28679]

Download as PDF mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 235 / Monday, December 8, 2014 / Notices Survey of Farmed Lands by Underwood Engineering Inc., signed September 16, 2013, and shown as Parcel B and is described as follow: BEGINNING at the northerly corner of PARCEL B. Said point of beginning hereinafter referred as ‘‘Corner No. 1 of Parcel B’’ for this description. From said point of beginning of Parcel B the center one quarter (1⁄4) section corner bears N. 2°21′17″ E., a distance of 364.11 feet. THENCE, S. 2°21′17″ W., a distance of 449.78 feet to corner No. 2 of Parcel B; THENCE, S. 81°51′43″ W., a distance of 122.42 feet to corner No. 3 of Parcel B; THENCE, N. 16°39′35″ E., a distance of 487.18 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL B containing 0.62 acres of land. The area described (Parcels A and B) in aggregate is 4.12 acres. The applicable regulation at 43 CFR 2920.5–4(b) provides that, ‘‘land use authorizations may be offered on a negotiated, non-competitive basis, when, in the judgment of the authorized officer equities, such as prior use of the lands, exist, no competitive interest exists or where competitive bidding would represent unfair competitive and economic disadvantage to the originator of the unique land use concept.’’ Based on past use of the subject parcels for the establishment of pecan trees owned by Winder Farm, it is the authorized officer’s decision to offer the proposed agricultural lease to Winder Farm on a non-competitive basis because competitive bidding would represent an unfair competitive and economic disadvantage to Winder Farm. As noted above, Winder Farms’ use of the parcels constituted an inadvertent trespass that they discovered and subsequently reported to the BLM. Winder Farms has since worked with the BLM to resolve the trespass. Subsequent to the BLM’s receipt of an application for leasing by Winder Farm that complies with all applicable requirements set forth at 43 CFR 2920.5, processing of the proposed lease will take place in accordance with 43 CFR 2920.6, and other applicable regulations. Information and documentation regarding processing of the lease application is available as described in ADDRESSES, above, and reference should be made to National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis, to be conducted under DOI– BLM–NM–L000–2014–0168–EA. No final decision on the lease will be made until all required analyses are completed. If authorized, the lease would be subject to provisions of FLPMA and all applicable regulations of the Secretary of the Interior, including, VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:19 Dec 05, 2014 Jkt 235001 but not limited to, 43 CFR part 2920, and to valid existing rights. Public comments regarding the proposed lease may be submitted in writing—see ADDRESSES above—on or before January 22, 2015. Comments received in electronic form, such as email or fax, will not be considered. Any adverse comments regarding the proposed lease will be reviewed by the BLM State Director or another authorized official of the Department of the Interior, who may sustain, vacate, or modify this realty action in whole or in part. In the absence of timely filed objections, this realty action will become the final determination of the Department of the Interior. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. (Authority: 43 CFR 2920.4) Michael H. Tupper, Deputy State Director, Lands and Minerals. [FR Doc. 2014–28687 Filed 12–5–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4310–FB–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 701–TA–482–484 and 731–TA–1191–1194 (Final) (Remand)] Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe From India, Oman, the United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of remand proceedings. AGENCY: The U.S. International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) hereby gives notice of the court-ordered remand of its final determinations in the countervailing duty investigations of circular welded carbon-quality steel pipe (‘‘CWP’’) from India, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates (‘‘UAE’’) and the antidumping duty investigations of CWP from India, Oman, the UAE, and Vietnam. For further information concerning the conduct of these remand proceedings and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subpart A (19 CFR part 207). SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DATES: 72699 Effective Dates: December 8, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Corkran (202–205–3057), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (http:// www.usitc.gov). The public record of Investigation Nos. 701–TA–482–484 and 731–TA–1191–1194 (Final) may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: In November 2012, the Commission determined by a vote of four to two that an industry in the United States was not materially injured or threatened with material injury by reason of imports of CWP from India, Oman, the UAE, and Vietnam that were sold in the United States at less than fair value and that were subsidized by the Governments of India, Oman, and the UAE. Petitioners and domestic producers contested the Commission’s determinations before the U.S. Court of International Trade (‘‘CIT’’). The CIT remanded certain issues to the Commission and affirmed all other aspects of the Commission’s determinations. JMC Steel Group v. United States, Slip. Op. 14–120 (Ct. Int’l Trade Oct. 15, 2014). Participation in the proceeding: Only those persons who were interested parties that participated in the investigations (i.e., persons listed on the Commission Secretary’s service list) and also parties to the appeal may participate in the remand proceedings. Such persons need not make any additional filings with the Commission to participate in the remand proceedings, unless they are adding new individuals to the list of persons entitled to receive business proprietary information (‘‘BPI’’) under administrative protective order. BPI referred to during the remand proceedings will be governed, as appropriate, by the administrative protective order issued in the investigations. The Secretary will maintain a service list containing the names and addresses of all persons or their representatives who are parties to the remand proceedings, and the E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM 08DEN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 72700 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 235 / Monday, December 8, 2014 / Notices Secretary will maintain a separate list of those authorized to receive BPI under the administrative protective order during the remand proceedings. Written Submissions: The Commission is not reopening the record and will not accept the submission of new factual information for the record. The Commission will permit the parties to file comments concerning how the Commission could best comply with the Court’s remand instructions. The comments must be based solely on the information in the Commission’s record. The Commission will reject submissions containing additional factual information or arguments pertaining to issues other than those on which the Court has remanded this matter. The deadline for filing comments is December 24, 2014. Comments shall be limited to no more than twenty (20) double-spaced and single-sided pages of textual material. Parties are advised to consult with the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subpart A (19 CFR part 207) for provisions of general applicability concerning written submissions to the Commission. All written submissions, including those that contain BPI, must conform to the Commission’s rules. Please be aware that the Commission’s rules with respect to electronic filing have been amended. The amendments took effect on November 7, 2011. See 76 FR 61937 (Oct. 6, 2011) and the newly revised Commission Handbook on EFiling, available on the Commission’s Web site at http://edis.usitc.gov. Additional written submissions to the Commission, including requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission’s rules, shall not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such submissions or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request by a Commissioner or Commission staff. In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission’s rules, each document filed by a party to the investigation must be served on all other parties to the investigation (as identified by either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for filing without a certificate of service. By order of the Commission. Issued: December 3, 2014. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2014–28679 Filed 12–5–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:19 Dec 05, 2014 Jkt 235001 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–895] Certain Multiple Mode Outdoor Grills and Parts Thereof; Commission’s Determination To Review-In-Part a Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Schedule for Filing Written Submissions on the Issues Under Review and on Remedy, the Public Interest and Bonding U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to reviewin-part the final initial determination (‘‘ID’’) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on September 26, 2014, finding a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in this investigation. SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2392. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on September 26, 2013, based on a complaint filed on behalf of A&J Manufacturing, LLC of St. Simons, Georgia and A&J Manufacturing, Inc. of Green Cove Springs, Florida (collectively, ‘‘A&J’’ or ‘‘Complainants’’). 78 FR 59373 (Sept. 26, 2013). The complaint alleged violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the sale for importation, importation, or sale within the United States after importation of certain multiple mode outdoor grills and parts PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,381,712, U.S. Patent No. D660,646, and U.S. Patent No. D662,773 patent. The Commission’s notice of investigation, as amended, named numerous respondents including: The Brinkmann Corporation (‘‘Brinkmann’’); Academy Ltd., d/b/a Academy Sports + Outdoors (‘‘Academy’’); Ningbo Huige Outdoor Products Co. (‘‘Huige’’); CharBroil, LLC (‘‘Char-Broil’’); Zhejiang Fudeer Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. (‘‘Fudeer’’); Outdoor Leisure Products, Incorporated (‘‘OLP’’); Dongguan Kingsun Enterprises Co., Ltd. (‘‘Kingsun’’); and Keesung Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (‘‘Keesung’’) (collectively ‘‘the Respondents’’). The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (OUII) is also a party to this investigation. On June 24, 2014, the Commission affirmed-in-part and vacated-in-part an initial determination granting-in-part a motion for summary determination of non-infringement filed by Char-Broil, Fudeer, OLP, Kingsun, Tractor Supply Co. (‘‘TSC’’), and Chant Kitchen Equipment (HK) Ltd. (‘‘Chant’’). The Commission found that Complainants admit that the following redesigned grills do not infringe the ’712 patent: (1) Chant/Tractor Supply’s New Model 1046761; (2) Rankam’s Member’s Mark Grill, Model No. GR2071001–MM (Ver. 2) and (3) Rankam’s Smoke Canyon Grill, Model No. GR2034205–SC (Ver. 2). Comm’n Op. at 1 (Jun. 24, 2014). The Commission found the other redesigned products at issue were within the scope of the investigation. Id. The Commission adopted the ALJ’s construction of the ‘‘openable [] cover’’ limitations of claims 1 and 17 on modified grounds. Id. The Commission affirmed the ALJ’s finding of non-infringement of claims 1 and 17 for the Char-Broil Oklahoma Joe Longhorn Model 12210767 Grill and adopted the ALJ’s findings that the redesigned grills do not infringe claims 1 and 17 on modified grounds. Id. The Commission also found that the ‘‘openable [] cover means’’ limitations of claim 10 are means-plus-function limitations and directed the ALJ to make findings consistent with its means-plusfunction interpretation. Id. at 2. On September 26, 2014, the ALJ issued the final ID, finding a violation of section 337 as to Respondents Brinkmann, OLP, Kingsun, Academy, and Huige based upon his determinations: (i) That certain, but not all, accused products infringe at least one claim of the ’712 patent; (ii) that the domestic industry requirement has been satisfied with respect to the ’712 patent; and (iii) that the asserted claims of the E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM 08DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 72699-72700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28679]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-482-484 and 731-TA-1191-1194 (Final) 
(Remand)]


Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe From India, Oman, the 
United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice of remand proceedings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. International Trade Commission (``Commission'') 
hereby gives notice of the court-ordered remand of its final 
determinations in the countervailing duty investigations of circular 
welded carbon-quality steel pipe (``CWP'') from India, Oman, and the 
United Arab Emirates (``UAE'') and the antidumping duty investigations 
of CWP from India, Oman, the UAE, and Vietnam. For further information 
concerning the conduct of these remand proceedings and rules of general 
application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 
part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subpart 
A (19 CFR part 207).

DATES:  Effective Dates: December 8, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Corkran (202-205-3057), Office of 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information 
on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special 
assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the 
Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning 
the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server 
(http://www.usitc.gov). The public record of Investigation Nos. 701-TA-
482-484 and 731-TA-1191-1194 (Final) may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Background: In November 2012, the Commission determined by a vote 
of four to two that an industry in the United States was not materially 
injured or threatened with material injury by reason of imports of CWP 
from India, Oman, the UAE, and Vietnam that were sold in the United 
States at less than fair value and that were subsidized by the 
Governments of India, Oman, and the UAE. Petitioners and domestic 
producers contested the Commission's determinations before the U.S. 
Court of International Trade (``CIT''). The CIT remanded certain issues 
to the Commission and affirmed all other aspects of the Commission's 
determinations. JMC Steel Group v. United States, Slip. Op. 14-120 (Ct. 
Int'l Trade Oct. 15, 2014).
    Participation in the proceeding: Only those persons who were 
interested parties that participated in the investigations (i.e., 
persons listed on the Commission Secretary's service list) and also 
parties to the appeal may participate in the remand proceedings. Such 
persons need not make any additional filings with the Commission to 
participate in the remand proceedings, unless they are adding new 
individuals to the list of persons entitled to receive business 
proprietary information (``BPI'') under administrative protective 
order. BPI referred to during the remand proceedings will be governed, 
as appropriate, by the administrative protective order issued in the 
investigations. The Secretary will maintain a service list containing 
the names and addresses of all persons or their representatives who are 
parties to the remand proceedings, and the

[[Page 72700]]

Secretary will maintain a separate list of those authorized to receive 
BPI under the administrative protective order during the remand 
proceedings.
    Written Submissions: The Commission is not reopening the record and 
will not accept the submission of new factual information for the 
record. The Commission will permit the parties to file comments 
concerning how the Commission could best comply with the Court's remand 
instructions.
    The comments must be based solely on the information in the 
Commission's record. The Commission will reject submissions containing 
additional factual information or arguments pertaining to issues other 
than those on which the Court has remanded this matter. The deadline 
for filing comments is December 24, 2014. Comments shall be limited to 
no more than twenty (20) double-spaced and single-sided pages of 
textual material.
    Parties are advised to consult with the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 
201), and part 207, subpart A (19 CFR part 207) for provisions of 
general applicability concerning written submissions to the Commission. 
All written submissions, including those that contain BPI, must conform 
to the Commission's rules. Please be aware that the Commission's rules 
with respect to electronic filing have been amended. The amendments 
took effect on November 7, 2011. See 76 FR 61937 (Oct. 6, 2011) and the 
newly revised Commission Handbook on E-Filing, available on the 
Commission's Web site at http://edis.usitc.gov.
    Additional written submissions to the Commission, including 
requests pursuant to section 201.12 of the Commission's rules, shall 
not be accepted unless good cause is shown for accepting such 
submissions or unless the submission is pursuant to a specific request 
by a Commissioner or Commission staff.
    In accordance with sections 201.16(c) and 207.3 of the Commission's 
rules, each document filed by a party to the investigation must be 
served on all other parties to the investigation (as identified by 
either the public or BPI service list), and a certificate of service 
must be timely filed. The Secretary will not accept a document for 
filing without a certificate of service.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: December 3, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-28679 Filed 12-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P