Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From India, 71384-71385 [2014-28417]
Download as PDF
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
71384
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 231 / Tuesday, December 2, 2014 / Notices
explanation of the attempts it made to
locate the producer or exporter at the
same time it files its request for review,
in order for the Secretary to determine
if the interested party’s attempts were
reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.303(f)(3)(ii).
As explained in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and NonMarket Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011) the Department
clarified its practice with respect to the
collection of final antidumping duties
on imports of merchandise where
intermediate firms are involved. The
public should be aware of this
clarification in determining whether to
request an administrative review of
merchandise subject to antidumping
findings and orders.2
Further, as explained in Antidumping
Proceedings: Announcement of Change
in Department Practice for Respondent
Selection in Antidumping Duty
Proceedings and Conditional Review of
the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME
Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR
65963 (November 4, 2013), the
Department clarified its practice with
regard to the conditional review of the
non-market economy (NME) entity in
administrative reviews of antidumping
duty orders. The Department will no
longer consider the NME entity as an
exporter conditionally subject to
administrative reviews. Accordingly,
the NME entity will not be under review
unless the Department specifically
receives a request for, or self-initiates, a
review of the NME entity.3 In
administrative reviews of antidumping
duty orders on merchandise from NME
countries where a review of the NME
entity has not been initiated, but where
an individual exporter for which a
review was initiated does not qualify for
a separate rate, the Department will
issue a final decision indicating that the
company in question is part of the NME
entity. However, in that situation,
because no review of the NME entity
was conducted, the NME entity’s entries
were not subject to the review and the
rate for the NME entity is not subject to
change as a result of that review
(although the rate for the individual
exporter may change as a function of the
finding that the exporter is part of the
NME entity).
Following initiation of an
antidumping administrative review
when there is no review requested of the
NME entity, the Department will
instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all
exporters not named in the initiation
notice, including those that were
suspended at the NME entity rate.
All requests must be filed
electronically in Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (‘‘IA
ACCESS’’) on the IA ACCESS Web site
at https://iaaccess.trade.gov.4 Further, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i),
a copy of each request must be served
on the petitioner and each exporter or
producer specified in the request.
The Department will publish in the
Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation
of Administrative Review of
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation’’ for requests received by
the last day of December 2014. If the
Department does not receive, by the last
day of December 2014, a request for
review of entries covered by an order,
finding, or suspended investigation
listed in this notice and for the period
identified above, the Department will
instruct CBP to assess antidumping or
countervailing duties on those entries at
a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or
bond for) estimated antidumping or
countervailing duties required on those
entries at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption and to continue to collect
the cash deposit previously ordered.
For the first administrative review of
any order, there will be no assessment
of antidumping or countervailing duties
on entries of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption during the relevant
provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of
the order, if such a gap period is
applicable to the period of review.
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
Dated: November 19, 2014.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014–28413 Filed 12–1–14; 8:45 am]
2 See
also the Enforcement and Compliance Web
site at https://trade.gov/enforcement/.
3 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties
should specify that they are requesting a review of
entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to
the extent possible, include the names of such
exporters in their request.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:30 Dec 01, 2014
Jkt 235001
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
4 See
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR
39263 (July 6, 2011).
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–840]
Notice of Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Changed Circumstances Review:
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
From India
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 10, 2014, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) initiated a changed
circumstances review and published a
notice of preliminary results of changed
circumstances review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
frozen warmwater shrimp (shrimp) from
India.1 In that notice, we preliminarily
determined that Premier Marine
Products Private Limited (PPL) is the
successor-in-interest to Premier Marine
Products (PMP) for purposes of
determining antidumping duty cash
deposits and liabilities. No interested
party submitted comments on, or
requested a public hearing to discuss,
the Initiation and Preliminary Results.
For these final results, the Department
continues to find that PPL is the
successor-in-interest to PMP.
DATES: Effective Date: December 2, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Blaine Wiltse or Stephen Banea, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone (202) 482–6345 or (202) 482–
0656, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On August 22, 2014, PPL requested
that the Department conduct an
expedited changed circumstances
review under 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(iii)
to confirm that PPL is the successor-ininterest to PMP for purposes of
determining antidumping duty cash
deposits and liabilities.
On October 10, 2014, the Department
initiated this changed circumstances
review and published the notice of
preliminary results, determining that
PPL is the successor-in-interest to PMP.
See Initiation and Preliminary Results,
79 FR at 61290. In the Initiation and
Preliminary Results, we provided all
1 See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from
India: Initiation and Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review,
79 FR 61290 (October 10, 2014) (Initiation and
Preliminary Results).
E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM
02DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 231 / Tuesday, December 2, 2014 / Notices
interested parties with an opportunity to
comment or request a public hearing
regarding our preliminary finding that
PPL is the successor-in-interest to PMP.
We received no comments or requests
for a public hearing from interested
parties within the time period set forth
in the Initiation and Preliminary
Results.
Dated: November 21, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Scope of the Order
International Trade Administration
The merchandise subject to the order
is certain frozen warmwater shrimp.2
The product is currently classified
under the following Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
item numbers: 0306.17.0003,
0306.17.0006, 0306.17.0009,
0306.17.0012, 0306.17.0015,
0306.17.0018, 0306.17.0021,
0306.17.0024, 0306.17.0027,
0306.17.0040, 1605.21.1030, and
1605.29.1010. Although the HTSUS
numbers are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
product description remains dispositive.
rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Final Results of Changed
Circumstances Review
For the reasons stated in the Initiation
and Preliminary Results, and because
we received no comments from
interested parties to the contrary, the
Department continues to find that PPL
is the successor-in-interest to PMP. As
a result of this determination, we find
that PPL should receive the cash deposit
rate previously assigned to PMP, as a
part of the Liberty Group of companies,
in the most recently completed review
of the antidumping duty order on
shrimp from India.3 Consequently, the
Department will instruct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection to suspend
liquidation of all shipments of subject
merchandise produced and/or exported
by PPL and entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the publication date of this notice in the
Federal Register at 2.49 percent, which
is the current antidumping duty cash
deposit rate for PMP, as a part of the
Liberty Group.4 This cash deposit
requirement shall remain in effect until
further notice.
We are issuing this determination and
publishing these final results and notice
in accordance with sections 751(b)(1)
and 777(i)(1) and (2) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.216
and 351.221(c)(3).
2 For a complete description of the scope of the
order, see Initiation and Preliminary Results.
3 See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From
India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 51309
(August 28, 2014).
4 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:30 Dec 01, 2014
Jkt 235001
[FR Doc. 2014–28417 Filed 12–1–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[A–570–933]
Frontseating Service Valves From the
People’s Republic of China; Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2012–2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On May 27, 2014, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published the preliminary
results of the administrative review of
the antidumping duty on frontseating
service valves from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 The period
of review (‘‘POR’’) is April 1, 2012,
through March 31, 2013. The review
covers two exporters of subject
merchandise, Zhejiang DunAn Hetian
Metal Co., Ltd. (‘‘DunAn’’) and Zhejiang
Sanhua Co., Ltd. (‘‘Sanhua’’). The
Department continues to find that
DunAn did not have reviewable entries
during the POR. Additionally, we find
that Sanhua made no sales in the United
States at prices below normal value
(‘‘NV’’). Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we made changes to
our margin calculations for Sanhua. The
final weighted-average dumping margin
for this review is listed below in the
section entitled ‘‘Final Results of the
Review.’’
DATES: Effective Date: December 2, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurel LaCivita, AD/CVD Operations,
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–4243.
AGENCY:
Background
On May 27, 2014, the Department
published the preliminary results of the
subject administrative review of the
order.2 At that time, we invited
1 See Frontseating Service Valves From the
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; Review;
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2012–
2013, 79 FR 30081 (May 27, 2014) (‘‘Preliminary
Results’’).
2 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71385
interested parties to comment on our
preliminary results.
Subsequent to the Preliminary
Results, the following events occurred.
On June 2, 2014, Sanhua provided
comments on new factual information
contained in the Preliminary Results.3
On June 25, 2014, Sanhua requested a
hearing.4 On June 26, 2014, Sanhua
filed a case brief.5
On October 14, 2014, we rejected
Sanhua’s post-preliminary submissions
referenced above.6 On the same date,
the Department placed additional
Bulgarian surrogate value (‘‘SV’’) data
on the record, and set the briefing and
hearing schedule for the case.7 On
October 25, 2014, Sanhua filed its case
brief.8 Sanhua was the only party to file
a case or rebuttal brief in this segment
of the proceeding. Sanhua withdrew its
hearing request on October 28, 2014.9
On August 13, 2014, we extended the
deadline for completing the final results
until November 24, 2014, in accordance
with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’).10
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this
order is frontseating service valves,
assembled or unassembled, complete or
incomplete, and certain parts thereof.
Frontseating service valves are classified
under subheading 8481.80.1095, and
also have been classified under
subheading 8415.90.80.85, of the
3 See letter from Sanhua, ‘‘Frontseating Service
Valves from the People’s Republic of China; A–570–
933; Rebuttal, Clarification or Correction of Factual
Information by Zhejiang Sanhua Co., Ltd.,’’ dated
June 2, 2014.
4 See letter from Sanhua, ‘‘Frontseating Service
Valves from the People’s Republic of China; A–570–
933; Request for a Hearing by Zhejiang Sanhua Co.,
Ltd.,’’ dated June 25, 2014.
5 See letter from Sanhua, ‘‘Frontseating Service
Valves from the People’s Republic of China; A–570–
933; Case Brief by Zhejiang Sanhua Co., Ltd.,’’
dated June 26, 2014.
6 See letter to Sanhua, ‘‘Frontseating Service
Valves from the People’s Republic of China:
Rejection of Zhejiang Sanhua Co., Ltd. (‘‘Sanhua’’)’s
Submissions of June 2, 2014, and June 26, 2014,’’
dated October 14, 2014.
7 See Memorandum to the File, ‘‘2012–2013
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Frontseating Service Valves from the
People’s Republic of China: Placing Additional
Surrogate Value Information on the Record After
the Preliminary Results,’’ dated October 14, 2014.
8 See letter from Sanhua, ‘‘Frontseating Service
Valves from the People’s Republic of China; A–570–
933; Case Brief of Zhejiang Sanhua Co., Ltd.,’’ dated
October 25, 2014.
9 See letter from Sanhua, ‘‘Frontseating Service
Valves from the People’s Republic of China; A–570–
933; Withdrawal of Hearing Request,’’ dated
October 28, 2014.
10 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh,
‘‘Frontseating Service Valves from the People’s
Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review,’’ dated August 13, 2014.
E:\FR\FM\02DEN1.SGM
02DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 231 (Tuesday, December 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71384-71385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28417]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-840]
Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances
Review: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From India
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On October 10, 2014, the Department of Commerce (the
Department) initiated a changed circumstances review and published a
notice of preliminary results of changed circumstances review of the
antidumping duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp (shrimp) from
India.\1\ In that notice, we preliminarily determined that Premier
Marine Products Private Limited (PPL) is the successor-in-interest to
Premier Marine Products (PMP) for purposes of determining antidumping
duty cash deposits and liabilities. No interested party submitted
comments on, or requested a public hearing to discuss, the Initiation
and Preliminary Results. For these final results, the Department
continues to find that PPL is the successor-in-interest to PMP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from India: Initiation
and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances
Review, 79 FR 61290 (October 10, 2014) (Initiation and Preliminary
Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: December 2, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Blaine Wiltse or Stephen Banea, AD/CVD
Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-6345
or (202) 482-0656, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 22, 2014, PPL requested that the Department conduct an
expedited changed circumstances review under 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(iii)
to confirm that PPL is the successor-in-interest to PMP for purposes of
determining antidumping duty cash deposits and liabilities.
On October 10, 2014, the Department initiated this changed
circumstances review and published the notice of preliminary results,
determining that PPL is the successor-in-interest to PMP. See
Initiation and Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 61290. In the Initiation
and Preliminary Results, we provided all
[[Page 71385]]
interested parties with an opportunity to comment or request a public
hearing regarding our preliminary finding that PPL is the successor-in-
interest to PMP. We received no comments or requests for a public
hearing from interested parties within the time period set forth in the
Initiation and Preliminary Results.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is certain frozen warmwater
shrimp.\2\ The product is currently classified under the following
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item numbers:
0306.17.0003, 0306.17.0006, 0306.17.0009, 0306.17.0012, 0306.17.0015,
0306.17.0018, 0306.17.0021, 0306.17.0024, 0306.17.0027, 0306.17.0040,
1605.21.1030, and 1605.29.1010. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided
for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description
remains dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see
Initiation and Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review
For the reasons stated in the Initiation and Preliminary Results,
and because we received no comments from interested parties to the
contrary, the Department continues to find that PPL is the successor-
in-interest to PMP. As a result of this determination, we find that PPL
should receive the cash deposit rate previously assigned to PMP, as a
part of the Liberty Group of companies, in the most recently completed
review of the antidumping duty order on shrimp from India.\3\
Consequently, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border
Protection to suspend liquidation of all shipments of subject
merchandise produced and/or exported by PPL and entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of
this notice in the Federal Register at 2.49 percent, which is the
current antidumping duty cash deposit rate for PMP, as a part of the
Liberty Group.\4\ This cash deposit requirement shall remain in effect
until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From India: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR
51309 (August 28, 2014).
\4\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We are issuing this determination and publishing these final
results and notice in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1)
and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.216 and
351.221(c)(3).
Dated: November 21, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-28417 Filed 12-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P