Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements, 70275-70276 [2014-27922]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 25, 2014 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2014–2127–
0008]
Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S.
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Request for public comment on
proposed collection of information.
AGENCY:
Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public
comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and
reinstatement of previously approved
collections.
This document describes one
collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 26, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by the docket number in the
heading of this document, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
on the electronic docket site by clicking
on ‘‘Help’’ or ‘‘FAQ.’’
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Regardless of how you submit
comments, you should mention the
docket number of this document.
You may call the Docket Management
Facility at 202–366–9826.
Instructions: For detailed instructions
on submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the Public Participation heading of
the Supplementary Information section
of this document. Note that all
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:41 Nov 24, 2014
Jkt 235001
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78) or you may visit https://
www.dot.gov/privacy.html.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, or the street
address listed above. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Randy Reid, Office of Defects
Investigation (NVS–210), National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Ave SE., W48–311,
Washington, DC 20590. Randy Reid’s
phone number is 202–366–4383 and his
email address is randy.reid@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for
approval, it must first publish a
document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and
otherwise consult with members of the
public and affected agencies concerning
each proposed collection of information.
The OMB has promulgated regulations
describing what must be included in
such a document. Under OMB’s
regulation (at 5 CFR 1320.8(d), an
agency must ask for public comment on
the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected;
(iv) how to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g. permitting
electronic submission of responses.
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following proposed
collection of information for which the
agency is seeking approval from OMB:
Title: Consumer Complaint
Information.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Abstract: Chapter 301 of title 49 of the
United States Code, the Secretary of
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70275
Transportation is authorized to require
manufacturers of motor vehicles and
motor vehicle equipment to conduct
owner notification and remedy, i.e., a
recall campaign, when it has been
determined that a safety defect exists in
the performance, construction,
components, or materials in motor
vehicles and motor vehicle equipment.
To make this determination, the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) solicits
information from vehicle owners which
is used to identify and evaluate possible
safety-related defects and provide the
necessary evidence of the existence of
such a defect. Under the Authority of
chapter 301 of Title 49 of the United
States Code, the Secretary of
Transportation is authorized to require
manufacturers of motor vehicle and
motor vehicle equipment which do not
comply with the applicable Federal
motor vehicle safety standards or
contains a defect that relates to motor
vehicle safety to notify each owner that
their vehicle contains a safety defect or
noncompliance. Also, the manufacturer
of motor vehicle replacement equipment
presented for remedy pursuant to such
notification shall cause such defect or
noncompliance to be remedied without
charge. In the case of a motor vehicle
presented for remedy pursuant to such
notification, the manufacturer shall
cause the vehicle remedied by
whichever of the following means he
elects: (1) By repairing such vehicle; (2)
by replacing such motor vehicle without
charge; or (3) by refunding the purchase
price less depreciation. To ensure these
objectives are being met, NHTSA audits
recalls conducted by manufacturer.
These audits are performed on a
randomly selected number of vehicle
owners for verification and validation
purposes.
Affected Public: Individuals and
households.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 11,814.
Number of Respondents: 47,256.
Comments are invited on: Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Department’s estimate of the burden
of the proposed information collection;
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
E:\FR\FM\25NON1.SGM
25NON1
70276
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 25, 2014 / Notices
Issued on: November 20, 2014.
Randy Reid,
Chief, Correspondence Research Division,
Office of Defects Investigation.
[FR Doc. 2014–27922 Filed 11–24–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
Petition for Exemption From the
Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard; Ford Motor Company
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption.
AGENCY:
This document grants in full
the Ford Motor Company’s (Ford)
petition for an exemption of the MKX
vehicle line in accordance with 49 CFR
part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard. This petition is
granted because the agency has
determined that the antitheft device to
be placed on the line as standard
equipment is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the 49 CFR
part 541, Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard (Theft Prevention
Standard). Ford also requested
confidential treatment for specific
information in its petition. The agency
will address Ford’s request for
confidential treatment by separate letter.
DATES: The exemption granted by this
notice is effective beginning with the
2016 model year (MY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Deborah Mazyck, Office of International
Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer
Programs, NHTSA, W43–443, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590. Ms. Mazyck’s phone number is
(202) 366–4139. Her fax number is (202)
493–2990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
petition dated August 18, 2014, Ford
requested an exemption from the partsmarking requirements of the Theft
Prevention Standard for the Lincoln
MKX vehicle line beginning with MY
2016. The petition requested exemption
from parts-marking pursuant to 49 CFR
part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard, based on the
installation of an antitheft device as
standard equipment for the entire
vehicle line.
Under 49 CFR 543.5(a), a
manufacturer may petition NHTSA to
grant an exemption for one vehicle line
wreier-aviles on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:41 Nov 24, 2014
Jkt 235001
per model year. In its petition, Ford
provided a detailed description and
diagram of the identity, design, and
location of the components of the
antitheft device for the Lincoln MKX
vehicle line. Ford stated that the Model
Year (MY) 2016 Lincoln MKX will be
installed with its Intelligent Access with
Push button Start (IAwPB) passive,
electronic immobilizer device using
encrypted transponder technology as
standard equipment on the entire
vehicle line. Key components of the
IAwPB device will include an electronic
key fob, remote function actuator (RFA),
body control module (BCM), powertrain
control module (PCM) and a passive
immobilizer. Ford further stated that its
Lincoln MKX vehicle line will be
offered with a perimeter alarm system as
standard equipment. The perimeter
alarm system activates a visible and
audible alarm if unauthorized access is
attempted. Ford’s submission is
considered a complete petition as
required by 49 CFR 543.7, in that it
meets the general requirements
contained in § 543.5 and the specific
content requirements of § 543.6.
Ford stated that the device’s
integration of the transponder into the
normal operation of the ignition key
assures activation of the system. Ford
stated that the start sequence is initiated
when the ‘StartStop’ button is pressed.
Specifically, the transceiver module
sends a signal to the keyfob through the
RF antenna. The keyfob responds with
a High Frequency (UHF) over the air
signal that includes the keycode, back to
the transceiver module. Once the key is
validated, starting of the engine is
authorized by sending a separate
encrypted message to the BCM/RFA and
then the powertrain control module
PCM. Ford stated that the powertrain
will function only if the keycode
matches the unique identification
keycode previously programmed into
the BCM/RFA. If the codes do not
match, the vehicle will be inoperable.
Ford stated that an electronic key will
be programmed into the vehicle during
system initialization performed at the
manufacturing plant. Ford further stated
that if the programmed key is not
present in the vehicle, the engine will
not start. Ford also pointed out that in
addition to the programmed key, there
are two modules that must be matched
together in order to start the vehicle,
adding an additional level of security to
both systems. Ford stated that the BCM
and the PCM share security data that,
during vehicle assembly, form matched
modules that must be together in order
to start the vehicle. Ford further stated
that no owner/operator actions are
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
required to deactivate the device
because it functions automatically each
time an engine start sequence occurs.
In addressing the specific content
requirements of 543.6, Ford provided
information on the reliability and
durability of its proposed device. To
ensure reliability and durability of the
device, Ford conducted tests based on
its own specified standards. Ford
provided a detailed list of the tests
conducted and believes that the device
is reliable and durable since the device
complied with its own specified
requirements for each test.
Ford stated that it’s MY 2016 Lincoln
MKX vehicle line will also be equipped
with several other standard antitheft
features common to Ford vehicles, (i.e.,
hood release located inside the vehicle,
counterfeit resistant VIN labels and
secondary VINs, cabin accessibility only
with the use of a valid key fob).
Ford compared the device proposed
for its vehicle line with other devices
which NHTSA has determined to be as
effective in reducing and deterring
motor vehicle theft as would
compliance with the parts-marking
requirements. Ford stated that it
believes that the standard installation of
the IAwPB device would be an effective
deterrent against vehicle theft.
Ford stated that its antitheft device
was installed on all MY 1996 Ford
Mustang GT and Cobra models and
other selected models. Ford stated that
in the 1997 model, its antitheft device
was extended to the complete Ford
Mustang vehicle line as standard
equipment. Ford also stated that
according to the National Insurance
Crime Bureau (NICB) theft statistics, MY
1997 Mustangs installed with the
SecuriLock device showed a 70%
reduction in theft rate compared to the
MY 1995 Mustangs.
Ford stated that starting with MY
2013, the IAwPB was offered as
standard equipment on the Lincoln
MKZ. Ford also reported that beginning
with MY 2010, the its antitheft device
was installed as standard equipment on
all of its North American Ford, Lincoln
and Mercury vehicles but was offered as
optional equipment on its 2010 F-series
Super Duty pickups, Econoline and
Transit Connect vehicles. Ford further
stated that beginning with MY 2010, the
IAwPB was standard equipment on the
Lincoln MKT vehicles; starting with MY
2011, the device was offered as standard
equipment on the Lincoln MKX and
optionally on the Lincoln MKS, Taurus,
Edge, Explorer and the Focus vehicles
and beginning with MY 2013, the device
was offered as optional equipment on
the Ford Fusion, C-Max and Escape
vehicles.
E:\FR\FM\25NON1.SGM
25NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70275-70276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27922]
[[Page 70275]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2014-2127-0008]
Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S.
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed collection of
information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatement of previously approved collections.
This document describes one collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 26, 2015.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by the docket number in
the heading of this document, by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments on
the electronic docket site by clicking on ``Help'' or ``FAQ.''
Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Regardless of how you submit comments, you should mention the
docket number of this document.
You may call the Docket Management Facility at 202-366-9826.
Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the Public
Participation heading of the Supplementary Information section of this
document. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit https://www.dot.gov/privacy.html.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov, or the street
address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Reid, Office of Defects
Investigation (NVS-210), National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave SE., W48-311, Washington, DC 20590.
Randy Reid's phone number is 202-366-4383 and his email address is
randy.reid@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must first publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulation (at 5 CFR
1320.8(d), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected;
(iv) how to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic
submission of responses.
In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following proposed collection of information for which
the agency is seeking approval from OMB:
Title: Consumer Complaint Information.
Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Abstract: Chapter 301 of title 49 of the United States Code, the
Secretary of Transportation is authorized to require manufacturers of
motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment to conduct owner
notification and remedy, i.e., a recall campaign, when it has been
determined that a safety defect exists in the performance,
construction, components, or materials in motor vehicles and motor
vehicle equipment. To make this determination, the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) solicits information from vehicle
owners which is used to identify and evaluate possible safety-related
defects and provide the necessary evidence of the existence of such a
defect. Under the Authority of chapter 301 of Title 49 of the United
States Code, the Secretary of Transportation is authorized to require
manufacturers of motor vehicle and motor vehicle equipment which do not
comply with the applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards or
contains a defect that relates to motor vehicle safety to notify each
owner that their vehicle contains a safety defect or noncompliance.
Also, the manufacturer of motor vehicle replacement equipment presented
for remedy pursuant to such notification shall cause such defect or
noncompliance to be remedied without charge. In the case of a motor
vehicle presented for remedy pursuant to such notification, the
manufacturer shall cause the vehicle remedied by whichever of the
following means he elects: (1) By repairing such vehicle; (2) by
replacing such motor vehicle without charge; or (3) by refunding the
purchase price less depreciation. To ensure these objectives are being
met, NHTSA audits recalls conducted by manufacturer. These audits are
performed on a randomly selected number of vehicle owners for
verification and validation purposes.
Affected Public: Individuals and households.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 11,814.
Number of Respondents: 47,256.
Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
[[Page 70276]]
Issued on: November 20, 2014.
Randy Reid,
Chief, Correspondence Research Division, Office of Defects
Investigation.
[FR Doc. 2014-27922 Filed 11-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P